19951190 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19951109

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
X77MA
4W
ID F= F1
December 18, 1995
Cumberland County
DEM Project # 951190
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Barry Andrews
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
701 South Walton Blvd.
Bentonville, Arkansas 72716
Dear Mr. Andrews:
tlLt COPY
You have our approval to place fill material in 1.6 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
constructing a Wal-Mart facility at Skibo Road and Yadkin Road, as you described in your application dated 3
November 1995. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use `nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is
issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Additional written approval must be
obtained from DEM for a stormwater plan (including a wet detention basin) before construction begins. A deed
restriction shall be placed on remaining wetlands on the site to prevent future fill. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding
unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental !Management under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-734786.
Si ely
ton oward, Jr. P.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
William Granger; Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
951190.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
MEMORANDUM ` PRINT NAMES:
Reviewer:
J tJ '?
a'-:--
TO: JOHN DORNEY WQ SUPV.: (II
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH DATE: SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
;;**EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) ***
PERMIT YR: 95 PERMIT NO: 0007-190 COUNTY: CUMBERLAND
APPLICANT NAME: WALMART STORES, INC - FAYETTEVILLE
PROJECT _TYPE: COMMERCIAL FILL PERMIT-TYPE: NW26
COE_#: DOT J:
RCD FROM_CDA: APP DATE_FRM_CDA: 11/06/95
REG OFFICE: FRO
RIVER_AND_SUB_BASIN_# : fi3j ,)& 5_ STR_INDEX_N0:
STREAM CLASS:
?yw
WL_IMPACT? : 6YN WL_TYPE:
2 ?WL_REQUESTED: A ?- WL_ACR_EST?: Y? ?tiy
WL_SCORE M : WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: Y?
MITIGATION?: VN MITIGATION _TYPE:
?7/?
MITIGATION-SIZE: ^J//} DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: Y/,
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?:(Y/i'N 1
HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: Y/N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ?SSUETOND ENY
COMMENTS. 6??? ?1?,??fo? ?r?' r/i???s. s,?;,,??? i? ?f/<•,,? ?G?? ??;r_ •,_
? ?-- ? ? ? 1 ??+,.3 i ? 1(! SjFJ[ ,l DES ,?R? ?'..?r i/rla'.? Ty f?C?-a'D Si,?rE < TT[.t .y?, l >'. ?l.:c?,-?i J't.
Cur?P??
y/,,G I. C' ?f J` ',f N /rl'l?"'t }^IJ?t2ce '-/ ,? r?.?' jferr-P a. ?.tcl- - ? ?N- ?`e /.F,vs? dsr /S /f a"I Le,s / C-f?`+l) ./R'-i,,;J/ ,,a-a',.i.y?i?? n'! ,i,/ .?/; <a:../ .s,+••_`• -r?° v.`?' zt n ?i'4f S j` t /z? l?.=? ?./,e IR?F',-_ /7? Li art / [eY- h /?i7,dp2 y .
t 'V
-? y d???t/;' ?t?c ? 0[? ?- i.-?/? Cam/ ?G' ? a : ls? , ? / ?¢ 5 ?r< <'ov ?? ???-» .• ? /y ? t ?? ??x-u??
?lfZ?dPdP? ¢ tilP /??1? d? ?4 i7QM 1?c TIC//L?7'b'?'" tie-
CC, Regional Office
f ??`o??ME,? Central Files
,04 7''
41C t.0 'i
r? c .i/ ??/('flnJ sf/U?Lf] //llJl. s7Ueln) WA
Project name ' Nearest road RVI 15ti - rte'
County W tla area .9 7 acres Wetland width 78? eet
Name of evaluator Date
t tz .
Wet1and`IoCation ;'. Adjacent land use }
z> =
mile .ups dam, ` upsloe _
Y. aa3FR , i??54 + FarR
or radius) ,.-
"
`?Eortpnd-or-lake ,:
;_; ? orz perennial stream '
[] forested/na'tura{ vegetarian
,[] ©n in#e?mittant stream
?a ricuiture°urban?suburn
? an= ` %tt>snJ terstream divide ? 9 .
es' ? impervious "surface
Dominant: vegetations
i
JQjl
2) W-1
?prdorSinanlly organic - humus, ??3*
muck, or.peat" ?t ! 3)
? predominantly mineral ?- n0i-sandy",, s
r 71 k `F
tl' lood" and wetness `
predo'minan"y savoy g
?Osemipermanently toy permanently
flooded or inundated ,
Hydraulic factors ??_seasgnally flooded or inundated
F? j
?
st'ee to o ra h intermittantfy flooded ormporary
itched or, channelized surfaces water ,
RIP o evidence of -floadin. or surface
?] ta$df wetland width > 3 00 fleet i r 9
water,;;,;,;:,,;,;
Wetland type (select one)*
40ottomlancl ha-dwood (ores ? Pine savanna
-Headwater forest ??•w??.+rl? ? g?/fen ter marsh
E3 Swamp forest
? Wet flat ? Ephemera! wetland
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
? Bog forest ? Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
G weight S
Water storage x 4.00 ?_7
Wetland Score
Bank/Shoreline stabilisation ,4'-_AX x 4.00 ;
Pollutant removal x 5.00 = Cy;?y a
Wildlife ; abitat x 2.00
s „r+o?v? ?7 Aquatic life value 1 x 4.00 '
10
Recreation/Education ? x 1.00
* Add 1 point if in sensitive wa-ershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upsiope, or radius
57
V.
ERIN
ETLAND RAT
ING WORKS
i a
Project name Nearest road
County Wetl nd area acres Wetland widh feet
Name of evaluator Date y
VetXaii'd location : Adjacent -land use; - r
(within-.1/2 mile ? upst i pi e
0 °p d,orlake or radius) t` '4'.• - p'.' is .: Ct '?l'" 'Y. 1'xi t` ;ti: ..,
?;o perezinlaistream VV ,?L
P ? forested/hatural,ve etatlon
? inermxtfant sQeam
?nthin ntersreamiv7de- a agriculture, urban/sububan-%'
a l
the,?y ? ?ylmpser vlous 'r>tace fl ?,
t
177
_N1 'IV V
Dominant vegetation's
, F
Soil series <r ?r?
rz
? predominantiy organic humus'°
mu ..
ck, or peaty
? p`redofilnantty mineral - non sandy , V
'redominartly sandy klooding ands ?v?tness `?"*;
1 ?'semiperrnanently, to' permanently
Hydrau)IC ;factors ?s. flooded 4or, inundated ter
f: ?`seasonally' JI oc 9d or. inundated
L1 steeto o ra h ? "Intermlttantly flooded or .temporary
pE? g , p
difchecl` or channel?zed surfa
66111* ce` water
? wetland 3wldth ' 100 feet ? 'no evlderice of :flooding or, surface
water: .:?
Wetland type (select one)*
i;
` ? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanr=
C
;2"eadwater forest ? Freshwater -narsh
E3 Swamp forest El Bog/fen
El Wet flat El Ephemeral \,,etland
L1 Pocosin El Carolina Ba:
? Bog forest El Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or seam channels
low weight
11? Water storage x 4.00 = r-s a 'y
Wetland Score
Q Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00
Pollutant removal x 5.00
T
*--,
ildlife habitat x 2.00 = ?`'
W
Aquatic life value x 4.00 =.b '±
Recreation/Education x 1.00
Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile .,pstream, upslope, or radius
:.............J....J.l.....J.............J...//.,.,.,..,,.,......J/.....ll...J...l......../,,./../..,.....,.-J..JJJ//,////!/JJ//,///J/////„///,
57
VE.
?F
3n;,;'7
D RATING WORKSHEET, ' fFourtiFi? uecs on
l
Project name 1, )zny, Nearest road
County Netlan red ?Z? acres Wetland width x JZ? feet
Name of evaluamrL hate ,lz
.r n . 3
b
y
?x FMS J-
47-1
Wetlaid?` location Adjacent'-landuse x? a??, ' (with r? X12 °mile upstream, upslopei
Q on{paido r lake : or rad3usj?
Q raper nnial stream
sti' Q foresT edlnatural-'vegetatlan.:, -%
an earn
'a Q on 1ne>"xn1t1
rY' a= ? Q agncult-re, urban/suburban- ? o
Q within:°znter`strearn divide
?; "r 'tlZrer Q impervious suriace
W Dominant vegetation
Soil series
? predori?inantfy organic '= humus,
`:v r muck, Ear; peat' {3) Grp ;.
? p dominantly mineral - non-sandy; .
Flooding and wetness
predornlnanty' sandy t
d0 ?sernlpermanently' to permanently
.
fioade'd':br Jr;undared
Hydraulic factors
t Q?seasonally flood'ed or mundateds
Q lnterrrllttantly flooded o? mporary
? steep topography
r ditched , or, ehannelized surface. water' T
.,
Q or surface
no evidence of ;flooding
t otal wetland width >100 eet .
, . 15
"".. tixa.....: titer,i
iViYi//!/////!l?liii//!//!r!///.ri
Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland ha-dwood forest ? Pine savanna
t ? Freshwater marsh
eadwater forest
u ? Swamp forest El Boa/fen
Mll?
? Wet flat ? Ephemera! wetland
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
? Bog forest ? Other
*The rating system carmot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
U Water storage x 4.00
We tland Score
Ak_ Bank/Shoreline stabilisation s? x 4.00
Pollutant removal 1;_4* x 5.00 =
Wildlife i abitat x 2.00
Aquatic life value x 4.00 = ' g `<
Recreation/Ed.:cation x 1.00 =
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mi!e upstream, upslope, or radius
S CC
57
ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
?! ROUP, INC.
9 D) 1?0
Environmental Consultants
November 3. 1995
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
Department of the .-army
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington. North Carolina 24802-1890
Attn: CESAW-CO-E
Re: Pre-Discharge Notification
Proposed Wal-Mart Store
Fayetteville, North Carolina
6 1995
I;Dear Sir:

'AIL;
Please find enclosed one copy of a Pre-Discharge Notification (PDN) and Joint Application Form for
Nationwide Permits for the proposed Wal-Mart Store in Fayetteville, North Carolina, prepared by the
Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG). Mr. Matt Flint of your staff has reviewed the
delineation conducted by WEG and requested that we provide a metes and bounds survey of the wetlands
prior to confirmation of the delineation. A copy of the survey is included within the document. Based
upon this sun-ey, the subject property contains 2.34 acres of nonbdal, headwater wetlands.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. proposes to construct a Wal-Mart shopping center on the subject property. As a
result of the need for expansion in the vicinity of Fayetteville, various sites and land plans have been
considered. The impacts to Aetlands on the selected alternative site have been reduced from 2.1 acres to
1.60 acres through avoidanc,- and minimization of till in wetlands.
On behalf of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., WEG respectfully requests that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) provide a confirmation of our delineation and process the enclosed PDN. By copy of this letter,
wEG requests the North Carolina Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to review and
process the Joint Permit Application as well.
Please feel free to call me or Mr. David Ramsey at your convenience if you have any questions or
comments. I look forward to %our response.
Sincerely,
/William J. Gran g2 y
Ecologist/Project Manager
enclosure
cc: Mr. John Dorney - N. C. DEHIVR - DE'VI
Mr. Scott Stannard - Freeland, Clinkscales and Kauffman, Inc.
516-B South HenrY Street Williamsburg, VirlSinia 23185 [phone] FAX [phone]

' Proposed Wal-Mart Store
Pre-Discharge Notification
' Fayetteville, North Carolina

prepared for:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
701 South Walton Boulevard
Bentonville. Arkansas 72716

t prepared by:
' Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
516-B South Henry Street
Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
1
November 1995
t
n

0 PRE-DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION - - REQUIRED INFORMATION
1 1. General Permittee: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Barry Andrews
701 South Walton Boulevard, Mitchell Building
1 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
1 Agent: Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Attention: Mr. William J. Granger/Project Manager
516-B South Henry Street
1 Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
1 2. The proposed development is located in Cumberland County, North Carolina (see Vicinity
Map). More specifically, the site lies in the northern portion of the intersection of Skibo Road
(Route 401 Bypass) and Yadkin Road (SR 1415) (see Location Map).
3. The proposed 33.5-acre development involves the construction of an entrance road, parking
areas, a retail store and stormwater management ponds. the 2.34 acres of wetlands on the
' property are associated with several depressions and drainage swales within a fallow pasture and
forested areas. The forested wetlands in the northwest portion of the site are relatively
undisturbed and are associated with intermittent surface drainage. These wetlands drain
1 northwest into Beaver Creek, a tributary of Little Rockfish Creek. Little Rockfish Creek drains
to Rockfish Creek and eventually the Cape Fear River.
Considerable effort has been spent preparing the plan of development to avoid impacts to the
1 wetlands on the site to the greatest extent practicable. Two feasible alternative development
plans were considered. Alternative 1 (Map A) includes a 199,026 square foot Wal-Mart Super
Center facing toward the south and two developable outparcels, with two stormwater ponds
1 placed in the forested wetlands along the western property line. As a result, the construction of
this retail facility would unavoidably impact 2.10 acres of Section 404 jurisdictional wetland
areas, including the hi;h value wetlands in the northwest corner of the site. The selected
1 alternative (Map B) presents the land plan which was prepared with consideration of avoidance
and minimization of wetland impacts. The selected alternative includes rotation of the building
to face the east. with a 200,089 square foot store and only one developable outparcel. In
addition, this layout reduces the wetland impacts by 0.5 acre to 1.60 acres through avoidance of
1 the high value forested wetlands in the northwestern portion of the site. The impacts to
jurisdictional areas are outlined on the grading plan (Map B). Additional impacts to the
environment will be minimized through the implementation of strict erosion and sedimentation
1 control plans. This project will not impact any public water supply, shellfish harvesting area,
spawning grounds, or waterfowl habitat; nor jeopardize any threatened or endangered species of
which we are aware; nor disrupt the movement of aquatic life.
1 The impacts associated with this development meet the conditions of the Corps' Nationwide #26
permit. This Pre-Discharge Notification (PDN? is submitted in accordance with General
Condition # 13 of Appendix A of 33 CFR Part 330 for the 1.60 acres of nonddal headwater
wetland impacts associated with the construction of this project. The following table describes
the wetland impacts associated with the development of the proposed 33.5-acre retail facility as
shown on the grading plan (Map B).
i
2
1

?I

Total Impact
Area Type Area (Acre) Area (acre)
PFOIA 0.97 0.87
11 PFOIA 1.00 0.36
III PFOI/SS1A 0.34 0.34
IV PFOIA 0 03 0.03
Total 2.34 1.60
The nontidal headwater and isolated wetlands to be impacted are associated with a fallow field
and adjacent forest. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has made attempts to avoid and minimize impacts to
wetlands to the greatest extent practicable. The proposed impacts are to those wetlands which
have been historically manipulated through ditching or other disturbance. The wetlands to be
preserved in the northern and northwestern portions of the property exhibit no historic
disturbance and are associated directly with the surface flow to Beaver Creek. Due to the
limited space onsite and the low relative value of the wetlands to be impacted versus those to be
preserved, no onsite mitigation area is available. The Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
(WEG) has conducted a pre-application telephone conversation with Mr. Matt Flint of the
Wilmington District Corps. The Corps indicated that the project may be permitted without
compensation, provided avoidance and minimization of impacts are demonstrated and the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) issues a 401 Certification and requires
no such mitigation. Appendix A includes a Joint Permit Application for Nationwide Permit #26.
Wal-titart Stores, Inc. and WEG conducted an analysis of alternative site plans in an effort to
avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands to the greatest extent practicable (see appendix B).
A jurisdictional wetland delineation was performed by WEG in March, 199-5. This delineation
was verbally confirmed by Mr. Matt Flint of the Corps, pending a metes and bounds survey of
the flagging. The data sheets used in the delineation are enclosed in Appendix C. Map C
depicts the wetlands map which was submitted to the Corps for confirmation. As a result of the
field visit by Mr. Matt Flint of the Corps, two small areas labeled as Area I on the submitted
map, were determined to be non-jurisdictional. Map D presents a metes and bounds survey of
the wetland flagging per the Corps' request. The areas determined to be non-jurisdictional by
the Corps are labeled "Wetland H" and "Wetland U'
As required by the Corps, WEG has contacted the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service and the State Historic Preservation Office regarding the presence of
any Federally listed (or proposed for listing) endangered or threatened species and/or the
presence of any historic properties in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed
project. At the time of the correspondence with these agencies, the full extent of the impacts as
a result of stormwater management facilities was not known. The impacts, therefore, are listed
as 1.498 acres in the letters as opposed to 1.60 acres, which includes all impacts to wetlands
under the current plan. Please refer to the letters-in Appendix D for details regarding this
correspondence.
As required by the DEM, the stormwater management plan is included in Appendix E.

I

- -------------------- -
- - - ---------
/ ?^ .. ice/ / \ 1
f \ 42

,, ? ? ? ? ? ? . - _. •./, Jam,, t" ?
1 71v

1^

J

a
:77 N
?? ?>?/. - .. -. ? .%? ??' __. V' - . `•yi_? v , ? ? 'rte
7"m=
i o 2 4"Lf5
SCAL_, V - 2-4 MILF5
PROJECT tiICINITY MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
YADIMf .0-D SKMO ROADS
FAYFrnN LI.E, YC I MAY 1995

ILLItA-IiSB TIM. G
SCURS NCR-,'H CAROI:N: ?S + G.,Z ^? :?-II?ONMEiV''3i
C_LCRrE MAP°NG ?ROUP, Lei C.

I

1

F1

r_
L

11 a i? `?! e' ?z:-- 1 (Par,' 11 i ?,` •"lk?r ??/ `• ??'// `. ??? ;? ???• f b?_
mill \ . .?% ?-? ? c ??..?: ?? .. .,•?? \ ,??' ?' ?. ? .,?•??.??, f ?"'?
Y ? ti.. ,' it ?_ !.. •??? ^???''? ? \?? ? '•?•
? ?; ?(? `-?', -?i1 J o9n?? D ors ?f'SSio ? .? ? ? • ,. rr `
-.?. ?- ?. r r ?1?; `: ?' ., ,' ???- ra,a
;,q ?• ?'? ham; ?i j'• ?\ I?n a\
%? ?• \ \?
::`\ r•, ?.,\• ....???(?'C' ?.;`%=r'3' I ',??o. ?1?- % ?1.? t?? •1?1E?` 1l••`V.•, ,,?? •`4T?.?• v ?? _\?
IMP
17
{ fir I. w 1 .1.? ? .:\ / '?: .ta. ? Y ? r ? .\>?.y,? ? V I. ?,•\
i I `l+? ? ???,'-Ir?`•' ?? ?/ •\ ? -'???"' as ?c.?'? J `_?`? \\? 'fir=-=? j ????? . ?. ;•;'
?. _ ?; , _'•\,. •? ? -; `sue
rl O-E-Ci I Ll-i'\in
//I
_ t Ili l; 1 ` ?` I
/• =;?/ ;1 ,`` ? .: \ ` ' \ y?? a{ '1?' ?a' • 11?,
. I ?r1f71D G'btTT;C?. ,`. ! .? ? ? •Y1?C r '? ?a?? ' .??+• `? I n ??
5GU'RCEI U5G5 75 MNU T TOPOGRAP111C 5ER.f5.
FArf7l =z YTLL E. NCRTI~ CAROLINA QU.ZRANGL= Wn T T liSB
LA I I DE' 35' 04' 50•
LONG i UDEr 78' 57' 25'
7%==
2000• 1000• o• 2coo'
SCALE, 1' - 2000•
iII20Y, L R G
ENTAL
ROLP, LNC.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
Y.QHINN AND SKIBO ROADS
FkY?IT$YII,I,E, NC I MAY 1995
?i
U

L

1

1

1

APPENDIX A
JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
?7,
I
I
I
I
F1

DEM ID: ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT APPLIED FOR (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) 26
JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]

V

LJ
u
u

WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone: [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Wal-Mart Stores, InC A` n• M Barr, Ant-ews
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: -
7C' o r Walron Bo lpvard
Be---nvi'ie -kansas 7 716-00 5
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME) : (WORK) : (30"_) 273-4940
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: Mr. W i'am Grang- Rrojerr Manager
W; .. i amst rg Env; "nr a> Grolo, InC
516-7? S -'n N - S- - a
Wi l ' i amstu-- 7' rg ' a 23135
5. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK (ATTACH MAP). COUNTY: 'umber-end
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Fav r--v-11_
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): The project
ssi*a is 1 .^a d in h no -'i rn port; cn of h intersection o= S'<" o Road
(R_ o' e 4Q! byLass) and Yadk;n Road (SR 1415), behind the Dix'e Pawl hop. See
r A T ; V; i- , a
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: °eaver Cree
7. RIVER BASIN: Cace Fear
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES [ ] NO [ X ]
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [ X ]
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 2.401 Acres (see a--ached w land
d '. i n -anon man and survey map)
3/30/92

J
U

t

F

L

11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS, IMPACTED BY
THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 1.600
DRAINED:
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED: 1,600
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): See attached alternatives
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: See attached alternatives analysis.
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. See attached alternatives analysis.

r?
i
?J
U

15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ X ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
see attached correspondence
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ X ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
see attached correspondence
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY.
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Commercial/Resideintial
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
City Sewer
1
A9
OWNER'S Si NATURE DATE

r

II
LJ

U

U

11

APPENDIX B
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS

F7
u

n
U

1.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
I The proposed Wal-Mart Store site was selected based upon its location relative to the existing commercial
areas in Fayetteville, North Carolina, the unavailability of 30+ acre sites in the corridor, and site
' limitations such as topography, wetlands and existing roads. The construction of this 200,089 square foot
store will serve to provide a new location for the existing Wal-Mart Store located approximately 1/4 mile
south on Skibo road in the Cross Creek Shopping Center. The existing store is currently the national
store of the year based upon volume of sales, however sufficient space is not available in the structure to
warehouse the volume of goods moving through the facility. As a result, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. elected to
create a larger facility which is capable of handling the volume of a national store of the year.
1.1 ALTERNATIVE SITES

As a result of the need for expansion, Wal-Mart Stores determined that only two possible locations for the
new facility were available. The existing Wal-Mart was determined to be unsuitable based upon physical
site constraints. The selected site rates very high in the siting criteria used by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. based
upon its lack of engineering :onstraints and location relative to commercial centers within the corridor.
The existing Wal-Mart location was considered for expansion. Site constraints, including the existing
commercial infrastructure in the vicinity and existing traffic congestion indicated that the present store
location may not be suitable for expansion. Additionally, the area to the rear of the existing store would
require extensive quantities of fill material for expansion of the facility, thereby creating an engineering
and economic constraint for the expansion potential of the store.
The presence of additional ?0+ acre parcels was investigated for the construction of a new shopping center
along the Skibo Road corridor, in the vicinity of the existing store. Only one site was located which met
the size requirements for the larger facility. This is the selected site, located at the intersection of Skibo
and Yadkin Roads, approximately 1/4 mile north of the existing store. The characteristics of this site,
including the location with respect to other commercial centers in the area, the traffic management
capabilities and the physical condition of the site provides for one of the highest rated potential Wal-Mart
Store sites, based upon Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. siting criteria.

'7 1
I__ J

1.2 ALTERNATIVE LAND PLANS
The selected property encompasses approximately 33.5 acres of forest and fallow pasture, with 2.34 acres
of jurisdictional wetlands. The majority of the wedands onsite have been historically disturbed through
ditching and land clearing. Within the northwest corner of the site, an undisturbed area of nontidal,
forested wetlands drains to the north into Beaver Creek. The remaining wetlands onsite are associated
with ditched areas or drain into storm sewer pipes.
Several land plans were developed for an approximate 200,000 square foot shopping center. Two basic
configurations were considered. One configuration is depicted in Alternative 1 (Map A), with the store
located in the northern portion of the site facing south. The alternative configuration included placing the
store in the western portion of the site facing east, as shown on Map B. Based upon these two possible
configurations, parking, traffic and stormwater management facilities were then designed to minimize
impacts to wetlands onsite, particularly the undisturbed wetlands in the northwest portion of the site, to
the greatest extent practicable.
1 .2.1 Alternative 1
Alternative 1, shown in Nlap A, provides a 199,026 square foot Wal-Mart store in the northern portion of
the site, facing to the south. This configuration allows for one out parcel in the southwest portion of the
site, where the existing NAPA store is located, and another across the Wal-Mart entrance road. The two
out parcels would be the future location of fast food or smaller retail facilities. Under this plan, two
stormwater management ponds are located along the western portion of the site. The southern most pond
is located mostly in uplands, with impacts to approximately 0.34 acre of wetlands that currently drain into
storm pipes. The northern most pond is situated in the high value wetlands at the northwestern portion of
the site, and impacts approximately 0.65 acre of this wetland. The impacts from stormwater management
and the building total 2.1 acre under this alternative.
As a result of the impacts to wetlands required by this plan, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. attempted to move the
northern most pond from the high value wetlands and into the narrow, north-central portion of the site.
This move would result in less impact to wetlands. The configuration of the building, however, does not
' allow for the creation of a pond at the rear of the store due to its proximity to the property line. Alternative
1 was determined to be non-practicable due to the impacts tp high value wetlands resulting from the
stormwater pond.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1 1.2.2 Selected Alternative
The selected alternative is shown in Map B. This alternative was developed in an effort to allow for
stormwater management facilities in the narrow, northern portion of the site. This alternative provides for
a 200,089 square foot store in the western portion of the site, facing east toward Skibo Road. Two
stormwater management ponds are included in the plan, as with Alternative 1. The southern most pond is
located along the intersection of Yadkin and Skibo Roads, in the approximate location of the out parcels
' shown in Alternative 1. As a result of the rotation of the store, the northern most pond is sited in the
narrow strip of land in the northern portion of the site, thereby allowing for preservation of the majority of
the undisturbed wetlands in the northwestern portion of the site. Under the selected alternative, the store
has been rotated, one out parcel has been eliminated and the wetlands impacts are reduced by 0.5 acre, to
a total of 1.60 acres of low value wetlands, through avoidance and minimization of the fill required in the
high value wetlands. The remaining 0.74 acre of high value wetlands on the site will be preserved.

n
L

li
u

E

1

11

F

APPENDIX C
WETLAND DELINEATION DATA SHEETS

I

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMENATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner.. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigation: B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 1
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGF.TATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Liriodendron tulipifera Subcan. FAC
Acer rubrum Subcan. FAC
Symplocos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Acer rubrwn Shrub FAC
Smilax laurifolia Herb FACW+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 1: inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Community ID:
TransectID:
Plot ID: 1
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): VANCLUSE LOAMY SAND

Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICPALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist)
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR31 IOYR416 10% SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic :Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleved or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Laycr ?n Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET. LLj
WEILAiNL) UhI!•;F-M NATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS IN DRAW ADJACENT TO ADAIR ROAD;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE .NET.

E

C

WEG DATA FORM
ROL'PINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigation: B. GRANGER. D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 2
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VF.GF.TAT ON
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Cano v FAC
Li uidambar styraciRua CL- FAC+
Cornus Jlorida Subcan. FACU
Pinus taeda Subean. I FAC
Svm locos tinctoria Subcan. FAC
Ilex coriacea Shrub I FACW
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Symplocos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Smilax rotundifolia Shrub FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 89
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYn R 0 .01- V
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.

u

J

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 2
I SOILS

1

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Hori zon unsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A 2SY514 SANDY LOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epioedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed a Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Suffice Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils last
Listed on National Hydric Soi s List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARA.btETER IS NOT MET.
wC,1 LA NU L)t 1'hF_M.LN ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS ACROSS LINE FROM :3 ON ABRUPT TOPOGRAPHIC RISE;
SOIL AND HYDROLOGY PARAMETERS ARE NOT MET.

J

I

i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLANID DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Dellneatlon Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner.. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigation: B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 3
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION;
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC Smilax rotundi olia Herb FAC
Li uidambar s raci ua Canopy FAC+
Liquidambar styraciflua Subcan. FAC+
Magnolia vir iniana Subcan. FACW+
Magnolia vir iniana Shrub FACW+
Vaccinium corvmbosum Shrub FACW
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Symplocos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Ilex coriacea Shrub FACW
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

I
r

L

s

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 3
S011 -S
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC P.ALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon unsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR3'I SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface [aver in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (aplain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
VV Z I L A.r U Ut!, I LKAMN ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS IN LARGER DRAW BYADAIR ROAD;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

n

L

s
i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAYD DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot M: 4
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VFC.F.TATTON
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Cano v FAC
Pinus taeda Subcan. FAC
Quercus ni ra Shrub FAC
uercus rubra Shrub FACU
Svrn locos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Ilex coriacea Shrub FACW
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Rex opaea Shrub FAC-
Smilax rotundifolia Herb FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 78
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: d (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

17,
t

t
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 4
St7ii.C
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRdM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A 2JY514 SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol

Hisuc Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils Lst
Listed on National Hydric Soils Ls.
Other (Explain, in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
VVrALA'NU UL:"IERVIINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS JUST ACROSS LINE FROM 1t5;
SOIL PARAMETER IS NOT MET.

t
1

I,,

I

1

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 5
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
Acer rubrum Subcan. FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera Subcan. FAC
Acer rubrum Shrub FAC
Li uidambar s raci ua Shrub FAC+
Ilex o aca Shrub FAC-
Vaccinium corymbosum Shrub FACW
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW
Smilax rotundi olio Herb FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 89
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOCW
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

F
1

Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: S
Soil 4
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A IOYR311 SILTY SAND
3-18 B IOYR512 IOYR416 10g) SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
SulRdic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Sneaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
WETLAND DETEP_Mr?ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WIDE WETLANDS NORTH ON PROPERTY;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
e
i
i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLA\'D DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETT'EVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner.. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 6
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Myrica cerifera Shrub FAC+
Smilax rotundi olia Herb FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
Prunus caroliniana (NI) IS ALSO A DOMINANT SPECIES.
HYnRni.nnV
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURF,4CE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
X Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SPHAGNUM MOSS; PARAMETER IS MET.

F7
L

I
1

1

Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 6
Cnii A
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR411 SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or tow-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
vv r, I LA1V U UM I L' KM IN A I ION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: JUST INSIDE WETLANDS LINE ACROSS FROM #7;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

F-11
L

i?

i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAN,
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 7
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
uercus alcata Cano FACU-
Pinus taeda Cann FAC
Clethra alnifolia Shrub FACW
uercus ni ra Shrub FAC
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW
Smilax rotundi olia Herb FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 83
Remarks: GREATER THAN 509'o FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
Prunus caroliniana (NI) IS ALSO A DOMINANT SPECIES.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or mote required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

L

F

Community ID:
1 Transect ID:
Plot ID: 7

SOFIA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A JOYR412 SANDY LOAM
4-18 B 2.SY514 SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
WE1 LAND DE'FERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: JUST OUTSIDE WETLANDS LINE ACROSS FROM tt6;
SOIL PARAMETER IS NOT MET.

II
L?

u

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner.. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 8
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
N ssa lvatica Canopy FAC
uercus ni ra Shrub FAC
Pinurtaeda Shrub FAC
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW
Smilax rotundi olia Her FAC
.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

LJ

Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 8
1 SnII4

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-18 A IOYR311 SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streating in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: CONNECTION BETWEEN WETLANDS DRAW AND MAN-MADE DITCH BELOW;
LINE WAS ESTABLISHED AT TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS CHANGES; ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET;
DITCH IS NON-JURISDICTIONAL BEYOND HYDRIC SOIL LIMITS.

I I

i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETI'EVIL E Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 9
(If needed, explain in remarks.
VEGF.TATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus raeda Shrub FAC
Lonicera ' onica Herb FAC-
Andro 0 on vir inicus Herb FAC-
Salix ni ra Herb OBL

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 50
Remarks: LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER 1S NOT MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-3 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

LI

J

Community ID:
I Transect ID:
Plot ID: 9
SOILS

L

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENIC PALEUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A 2.5Y614 SILTY SAND
12-18 B IOYR611 IOYR416 20137 SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: MAN-MADE DITCH THROUGH UPLANDS DRAINING WETLANDS; FLAGGED AS WATERS OF THE U.S.;
VEGETATION AND SOIL PARAMETERS ARE NOT MET.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
H
I
I

I
I
I
i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner.. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 10
If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Canopy FAC
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
Li uidambar styraciflua Subcan. FAC+
Acer rubrum Subcan. FAC
Magnolia vir iniana Shrub FACW+
Li uidambar st raci ua Shrub FA C+
Acer rubrum Shrub FAC
Smilax rotundi olia Herb FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

i

Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 10
SOU -S

1

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): WAGRAM - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: ARENICPALEUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A IOYR211 SANDY LOAM
6-18 B IOYR512 IOYR416 10% SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic,Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chrama Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Myer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
W>J I LAND UK TERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS EAST ON PROPERTY; LINE ESTABLISHED AT TOPOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND LIMITS OF
SATURATION AND HYDRIC SOILS; ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

1

e

i
WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator: B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 11
If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Canopy FAC
uercus ni ra Canopy FAC
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
Rex o aca Canopy FAC-
Pol ovum convolvulus Shrub FACU
Magnolia vir iniana Shrub FACW+
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 75
Remarks: GREATER THAN 5091o FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE. (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

n

f
1

F,

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 11
I SOILS

t

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICHAPLUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-18 A IOYR411 SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol

Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors

Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils Lin
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
WtA LAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS LINE ESTABLISHED AT LIMITS OF HYDRIC SOILS;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

t

1

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 12
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
uercus alcata Canopy FACU-
Sym locos tinctoria Subcan. FAC
S m locos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Clethra alni olia Shrub FACW
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that ate OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 83
Remarks: GREATER THAN 5096 FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
ff"ROLOGV
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marts
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more requited):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.

F-I

L

1

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 12
SOILS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPIC HAPLUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 2.5Y414 SANDYLOAM
6-18 B 2.5Y514 SANDY LOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy So"
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lst
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
W b 1 LAINL UL-1 LKMLN ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS JUST ACROSS LINE FROM #11;
SOIL AND HYDROLOGY PARAMETERS ARE NOT MET.

1

t

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
FAYETTEVILLE
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
Date: 3121195
County: CUMBERGAN
State: N. CAROLINA
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 13
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
uercus ni ra Canopy FAC
Magnolia vir iniana Subcan. FACW+
S m locos linctoria Shrub FAC
Vaccinium co mbosum Shrub FACW
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW
Smilax Lauri olia Herb FACW+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 509x' FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
Prunus caroliniana (NI) IS ALSO A DOMINANT SPECIES.
HVDROI.O(;V
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more requited):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

I

J

III

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 13
SOIIS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICHAPLUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR411 SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Faplain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
W r, I LAND Uh I EF-MIN ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS LINE ESTABLISHED AT TOE-OF-SLOPE AND LIMITS OF HYDRIC SOILS;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

Fl?

7
Li

U

11

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLJNA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 14
If needed, explain in remarks.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Cann FAC
Acer rubrum Canopy FAC
Prunus serotina Canopy FACU
S m locos tincloria Shrub FAC
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 80
Remarks: GREATER THAN 509b FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
HVnR0T.0GV
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 14
SOLI-1;
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICHAPLUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-4 A 2.SY414 SANDY LOAM
4-18 B 2.SY514 SANDY LOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface [aver in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed at Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
W E ILAN U Ul!:"FUKMN ATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS JUST ACROSS LINE FROM #13;
SOIL AND HYDROLOGY PARAMETERS ARE NOT MET.

Pi

C'

WEG DATA FORM
ROL'PINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
FAYETTEVILI.E
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
Date: 3121195
County: CUMBERLAND
State: N. CAROLINA
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 15
VlP.V.V rATTnN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Canopy FAC
Magnolia vir iniana Subcan. FACW+
Magnolia vir iniana Shrub FACW+
S m locos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Arundinaria i antea Herb FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100
Remarks: GREATER THAN 5035 FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS MET.
H"ROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.

1

f1
U

P

Community ID:
I Transect ID:
Plot ID: 15
SOIIS

Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPIC HAPLUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist unsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-18 A IOYR211 SILTY SAND

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Myer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
WV,ILAND VEMK.V1INATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS ALONG CHANNEL, WEST ON PROPERTY,
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

n
?u

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE
Applicant/Owner.
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X
Daze: 3121195
County: CUMBERLAND
State: N. CAROLINA
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 16
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Canopy FAC
Prunus serotina Canopy FACU
Cornus florida Subcan. FACU
Prunus serotina Subcan. FACU
S m locos tinctoria Shrub FAC
Smilax rotundi olia Herb FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 50
Remarks: LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
Carya tomentosa (NI) IS ALSO A DOMINANT SPECIES.
K"ROI.WW
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Fit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >I8 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
I
I
I
n
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sons
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPIC HAPLUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR514 SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chrana Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed an Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
? V G I LHl1 L 1/L' 1 C.K/Y1lPl A l lull
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS JUST ACROSS LINE FROM #15;
NO PARAMETERS ARE MET.
I

n

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:
FAYE7TEVILLE
Date: 3121195
County: CUMBERLAND
State: N. CAROLINA
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 17
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VFhF.TATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Shrub FAC
M rica ceri era Shrub FAC+
Juni erus vir iniana Shrub FACU-
Lonicera ' onica Herb FAC-

F

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 50
Remarks: LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER 1S NOT MET.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER 1S NOT MET.

E

C

Community ID:
' Transect ID:
Plot ID: 17
i
Snii 4
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICHAPLUDULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A IOYR411 IOYR416 1091 SANDYLOAM

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor

Aquic.Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chratna Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking '
in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
?• G s &"Ai. u uG i t a4Ya uv A 11uIV
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: UPLANDS JUST OUTSIDE LINE OF MAN-MADE DITCH; VEGETATION AND HYDROLOGY PARAMETERS
ARE NOT MET; MAN-MADE DITCH BELOW WAS FLAGGED AS WATERS OF THE U.S.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER. D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 18
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0-1 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: SURFACE (in.)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MEP.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or mote required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)

1

11

D

Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: 18
SOIIS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPIC HAPLUD ULTS No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon unsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structureetc
0.61 1 A 2SY412 I I SAND
i B I 2-5Y210 I I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroms Colors
Remarks: PARAMETER IS MET.
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed an Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
r1'a.' 1LANU UbFERM[NATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? X Yes No
Remarks: WETLANDS LINE ESTABLISHED AT UPLAND EDGE OF SOIL AND HYDROLOGY CHANGE;
ALL PARAMETERS ARE MET.

n

r

WEG DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: FAYETTEVILLE Date: 3121195
Applicant/Owner. County: CUMBERLAND
Investigator. B. GRANGER, D. DEBERRY State: N. CAROLINA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No X Plot ID: 19
f needed, explain in remarks.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum Shrub FAC
Lonicera onica Herb FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 50
Remarks: LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 50% FAC OR WETTER; PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
Ligustrum vulgare (NI) IS ALSO A DOMINANT SPECIES.
HYDR011-M' V
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits

Depth of Surface Water: 0-2 (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in
) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
. Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: WATER FLOWING IN CHANNEL; PARAMETER IS MET.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

Community ID:
l ransect ID:
Plot ID:
19
cnrr c
Map I snit Name
(Series and Phase): FACEVILLE - URBAN LAND COMPLEX

Taxonomy Subgroup: TYPICHAPLUDULTS Drainage Class:
Confirm Mapped Type?
X Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
ORAGANICS/SEDIMENT

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Hlstosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Ayuic lMoisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chrotna Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Renurks)
Remarks: PARAMETER IS NOT MET.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present'? X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present'? Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Weiland'.' Yes X No
Remarks: POTENTWLLYMAN-MADE DITCHAREAS SOUTH ON PROPERTY, WATERS OF THE U.S.;
VEGETATION AND SOIL PARAMETERS ARE NOT .NET.

n

C
F

APPENDIX D
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE
USFWS, NMFS AND THE SHPO

r

L

1
J

V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
_N ROUP, INC.
October 19, 1995 Environmental Consultants
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Re: Proposed Commercial Development, Cumberland County, North Carolina
' Dear Sir/Mam:
The Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is requesting information regarding the presence of
' any threatened and endangered species in the permit area for the above referenced project in Fayetteville,
North Carolina. This request is submitted in accordance with the Notification Procedures (General
Condition #13) outlined in the Nationwide Permit Program Regulations (33CFR Part 330, Appendix A).
' The project parcel is located in the northern portion of the intersection of Skibo Road (Route 401 Bypass)
and Yadkin Road (SR 1415) (see attached vicinity and location maps). The proposed development will
include the construction of roads, parking and a commercial shopping facility. As a result, 1.498 acres of
' nontidal headwater and isolated wetlands will be unavoidably impacted. The construction of this
development has been designed to avoid the high value wetlands on the property. A Pre-Discharge
Notification and Joint Application Form will be submitted shortly to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
' and the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management for a Nationwide Permit #26 verification
and Water Quality Certification.
Please provide a copy of your response to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers at the following address:
' Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
' Department of the Army
P. 0. Box 1890
Attn: CESAW-CO-E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
If you have any questions concerning this parcel, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Thank
you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
William J. Granjr
1
Ecologist/Project Manager
' Attachments

516-B South Henry Street Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 [phone] FAX [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L?
I
I
I
I

\`n...... °il ? M?Oyf?'!^/ ,?r •-???/???- .`_ ?`,\..._••rr) i 1r' 2;0 i"?n? ?\
POOL
\7
j G G ( / _ r l l"-4 T_ Y? ?1 f E

T BRAG(,
y!f' l O, i ?
I

V

I I ?

IfY11!• ?

°g ?? ?-=%? - - Y„ ?_.t- f ate, 4
Ile,
SGT LOGATIOIy:_
i= 7 74
?,??4??'?...a.? ? /1/ ;? '?-• -?_?...`?±?_, i,N, ';•ii--_ ? `.r?`' _" ice; Y\`c'+^rs??,•
71.

SOURCE: NORTH CAROLINA ATLAS + GAZE I I __.
DeLCRME MAPPING COMPANY.
1 O 2 4 MLES
SCALE= 1' - 2.4 MILES (:APPROX.-)
LL
.au a ao.v ^
?,-II,1 no

TIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
PROJECT VICINI'T'Y MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
YADKIN AND SKIBO ROADS
FAYFM7VII , NC I MAY 1995

7

rl,

t
ill,;'
A kw
/fir 4-?
'?' .`:'?•I ???..!? j ??) r??P•, -. ° ?l\-cam ?;y `?1_ .,Y. - I'.%\?• ,/??,I.
\ ; ,? .\ `/I I?1 ,. ' ??I. I IJ.• Cave-n Q? ?? t - ,?. ]]]? ??
01
Tnesce
{? ;'\?
?. r I / ,? ? ". s .Y? r
L17. -
;i'\ ` ?'?. )'\`?/7 ^ ??' ? ? ??,. ,.\- i ,I-?1?? \??`? ?'/;r ' ': 'ma"r" r • • , i?
; C..i% PROJcGT LCGAiION
??'?' ? ???.?. ?, - ? ? ? ? `\ ?-? - i' it ° ? % _ •.??\ .?? ? ,?? 1 I' Rai
i%, ;1L?r?'??GFbund ` ' •. ? ? ? ; ,r , III, • ?_? `,.,? • ' ? ?; ?? I \
?:: ?1t ??? ??? r ? ^/ ?? 11f ??vr:?.--tea \ r ?, ••••,J ?`y fir' 5,.1.r
'tit
A% x,
5CURGE, U5G5 75 MINUTE TCPCGRAPMIC SErF'55.
FArEl IC.\A F. NORTH CAROLINA QUAL'RANGLE n SBURG
ONMENTAL
LATITUDE, 35' 04' 50' ?ROUP, INC.
LONGITUDE, 78' 57' 25'
7%== PROJECT LOCATION MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
2000' 1000' 0' 2000• YADKEN AND SE BO ROADS
SCALE- 1' - ZOCO'
FAYETTUM, NC MAY 1995

J

r

r

I

V V ILLIAMSBURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
' ?*-N ROUP, INC.
' October 19, 1995 Environmental Consultants
' U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P. 0. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-4520
' Re: Proposed Commercial Development, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Mam:
The Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is requesting information regarding the presence of
' any threatened and endangered species in the permit area for the above referenced project in Fayetteville,
North Carolina. This request is submitted in accordance with the Notification Procedures (General
Condition 413) outlined in the Nationwide Permit Program Regulations (33CFR Part 330, Appendix A).
H

1

The project parcel is located in the northern portion of the intersection of Skibo Road (Route 401 Bypass)
and Yadkin Road (SR 1415) (see attached vicinity and location maps). The proposed development will
include the construction of roads, parking and a commercial shopping facility. As a result, 1.498 acres of
nontidal headwater and isolated wetlands will be unavoidably impacted. The construction of this
development has been designed to avoid the high value wetlands on the property. A Pre-Discharge
Notification and Joint Application Form will be submitted shortly to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management for a Nationwide Permit #26 verification
and Water Quality Certification.
Please provide a copy of your response to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers at the following address:
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
P. 0. Box 1890
Attn: CESAW-CO-E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
If you have any questions concerning this parcel, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Thank
you for your assistance.
Sincerely, ,
William J. Grange
Ecologist/Project Manager
' Attachments
516-B South Henry Street lVilliamsburg, Virginia 23185 [phone] FAX [phone]

r

Ittt` Ala
^I'?alt
''??? > `? •?_ )1 '3 l..:'''::.. ;?? ;?\.•Pa,(<- /? 290 `"/,?•1.
17
17
;,k:.t (:? h •??? , 11 ?'; ? ? :\,• ??;:- _;?= `#` :.,?; \ ?? ,? ? ?.`?( ; . ? ?Y? a
\t 'fir ^`???? yl?? ? ? tu.? • .\ . j , ;•?\ i;r ?II ,?railor?? 11\??f ?'`"""?a ?-
?:?:'? ^, I ,•' ?`?i ?;? ) ' •;!?`'? I -Park /?•? ., / ,-
•?;,\ ? ;,?,\, ??"??,? ,?`'1'... \??/? ?.i 1 aOrive•in ? .ti, •i•;??? ?L \:\J. -.., i \,linyr ?.? r"?+'???i?i
j eat ?, •`'I• ??•? .?
2 3
` c1. :/!mil' 'r r ???'a_? w +? 11/?\ / / ?.-
?;;?, i•?, : •u / /?'//?/ ?, (? Lam- •..: alloark?/`..+E' •,i• ?/ ,.
TA
U\,
?y?;': ;?% Al PROJECT LOGA ilON
•/' 'i ?I ' \' ??C? '2:2\ \JI i , ?\`??- \? 111' r '? •.? ' `.?.. ?• 11irt..:"Caini GFU\riid;n r, 4 %ti`rYi'L?p ,,?? ?-,•?+ ^ ?`\i\
I;A
' `i;4??? -, ?t5 t??\?.?I? ?..•?, ?`r•?`h.?' ...iii
??K`f; '\ ? '' r'. ? t? Q ? . J``, ," l? i . ?.??\• ?4.??'? ? ?, ? ?j .mss
' I: `r c "\ ?' _ l.. ? ilia S '? ;? ? -i ?•--:_ ? ,('
?li?_,': '1? t /?1' i•I?? ?, ` I s-?.??-•`' 4 .??: •I?`/1 ?'`v.?? // A •'?qr?,.,. •:•" i / ,?
cz,
SOURCE' U5G5 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPMIC SVUE5.
FATE TTE\41 I F. NORTH CAROL?NA QUADRANGLE ILLIAMSBT3RG
0 MENTAL
LATITUDE, 35' 04' 50' ?ROUP, INC.
LONGITUDE, 78' 57' 25•
7%== PROJECT LOCATION MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
2000' 1000• o' 2000' YADKEN AND SE BO ROADS
SCALE, 1' - 2000'
FAYLTI'L9=, NC MAY 1996

L

? 11

?J
t

1

'??l tl ?RF CG r? f ? I ? `'•? tR"'\ /`! ,? ? ?? „F'\ t`?.7
\rl? ?T'? - IrMfJ
?? `?.? ? !' ? / I _ \ X ??Il`? \1? yi`.w` Y, $?I? J i? r`?.-ti• je`I?
aim ' 'S :fa si • / ', 11. , , \ ./,? _ ' . -? \,..,
_.1 ?r >? ?' to 6n(j; aid \ I•I I
t v??./-+rf. f? ?\-`'.•< •.d ' h,}•r?t I CgRT BRAG
(iJ'
t A G _G \7 • 7^? (' °j t _ r? Y? ?? ??`? EtR?? q?!? I o: v. ;• •a/ i \\ F,K
_ J/n .i?`? r? ` /__ Y ????•? ilKSpecl>r ?? ?1C ?i•I `t 2 + ?. nr \•\ *u ??
., tio- n ?i/??,.R?a,r,ro i•., m.- - i'C• r I .al ' n f ? ?, ,.
•-`s
DIY ', ?/ ? ? \_,`` I ??_^?? t ?;- _ _'?_r`i'`. ?C•.. L... ? ??
?. ? ,l L.i .? err / •?
41.
HLmo"'t-
,,\ F,'? -l..?.,T LOCATION
?"? .? Via. ?„'/.T l ? •?.`„ ,_r ? °'.s. - ? ??r +? J-!',i;??j `?? .--!J'''I fi
L
Iv?

\ ?- ._ - ? ,.' _`^ .o• ---?.__.= ?` x '?r•FepeMilir .,? .y ?,`r?ino
•-•••?' ``? "J•. ' . ^"Sw/ ?'?• i 1:c`? / ? ? ? it ? -' ? ? + "Y •? 1`„ 95
??;• './•/ -.\`?w?,`4 _ -ter /` _•7; _ /
5CURCEr NORTH CAROUNA A i LAS + GaZ= I __.
DeLORME MAP°NG COMPANY. 1C,?3
rILLIAMSBURG
TIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC. m%mm=
1 O 2 4 MIL S
SCALD 1' - 2.4 MLES CAPPROXJ
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
YADKIN AND SKIM ROADS
FAYSITSYM, NC MAY 1995
J
1

I

I Y YILLIAMSBURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
?*"N ROUP, INC.
October 19, 1995 Environmental Consultants
' State Historic Preservation Office
N. C. Division of Archives and History
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Re: Proposed Commercial Development, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Mam:
The Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is requesting information regarding the presence of
any historic properties in the permit area for the above referenced project in Fayetteville, North Carolina.
This request is submitted in accordance with the Notification Procedures (General Condition #13)
outlined in the Nationwide Permit Program Regulations (33CFR Part 330, Appendix A).
The project parcel is located in the northern portion of the intersection of Skibo Road (Route 401 Bypass)
and Yadkin Road (SR 1415) (see attached vicinity and location maps). The proposed development will
include the construction of roads, parking and a commercial shopping facility. As a result, 1.498 acres of
nontidal headwater and isolated wetlands will be unavoidably impacted. The construction of this
development has been designed to avoid the high value wetlands on the property. A Pre-Discharge
Notification and Joint Application Form will be submitted shortly to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management for a Nationwide Permit 7#26 verification
and Water Quality Certification.
Please provide a copy of your response to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers at the following address:
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers v
Department of the Army
P. O. Box 1890
Attn: CESAW-CO-E
' Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
If you have any questions concerning this parcel, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Thank
you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
60c????,
' William J. Granger
Ecologist/Project Manager
Attachments

516-B South Henry Street Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 [phone] FAX [phone]

1

,` 1 ) rad
y :,? \?? 'I \1 .ice. •.?, Fear 'e\\ 1? : .•`?? ;?- v.?,?..J '' ??\. ??
'C. Ili ` `• ??? ? o ni, Dgorte,3Cssio?
\ a' / L•: J. 1? ,> . ?r 1{agno?ia 1 , ?, ?\ y
- j 1
-Ch
t r ??>v ?, ?1 :- ,\• Pail ?\ ???T ,? ?'
:??,1• (•' i ?? ?? , .,?'• ?}, I -Park / ,
•?? r ?l Illi± \{?.r/• ? •. 1 ?t\ ,rp •al * \``J(/?J("`??\?l ???:• \ ( \ -'??•1,/?^?1,\ ;?, Vic..
17
1I/ '`• ?? ?`:. 1 \\` ?-?. tom-- = ; / .rte - , °r ?
'?. ? 1 ;: ° _,?')/fit; 1./ ,: ?" = ``?>.-^?; \I\•?? J ;f ? ??. '?.,`?"•?. rV^--•.,\I -
»'?' I?,r `i rl" f 1 `.\'?. Il .?,? ? ? = ? r!."?J?,/(? ??. / w` r ?` ?n? ./6`t•' ; "may,:'
( .v?T\? ??-, •_-. J! ? .. /, ` ire r t, ?
FRCJLGT LOGA ICN
;???? z,? ?? ? 1 ? ?, ` ?- lug ? ? ? ,.? %`\• , ( n-,.
-am r;
.? .y..??1 ? r 1, (' •--..t?„?' I ? / ` / _ 1???•? ? o,? "•' ???.l?r i?
• `? { - ,\ _ ?/ -' urn. 'f . \?-?: ' 1 ` ?•. ??'--??:?_'--?
SOU'RCE' USG5 7.5 MMUi? TOPOGRAPMIC SER=S.
FAY=r-'A! F, NCRTM CAROUNA QUAZRANG{ F y i,T' TSB
LATMUDE, 35' 04' S0•
LONGITUDE, 78. 57' 25'
2000' 1000• O' 2000'
SCALE, 1' - 2000•
URG
7MONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
PROTECT LOCATION MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
YADKIN AND SKIBO ROADS
FAYETrEVILLE, NC MAY 1995

I

1

F-i
Li
I
L

t

t OAR ? - `' ' ?. ,
-ki
) J ROPL
Alit PCRCh' JAS / A
l_A.G G`7 RY-E,
/'1f:ndA Yoh., ii11, + ar?.n
?-jrlJ ?•V ?.n?d442aVUht
?C r I' ib e f \•'? l
.l
\- ! 0.1 i?il yir
I rA• ?, Oi urtu N.w ? mil' f • I : y ?_ J.?
FOR i BRAGt"'? 1 ?P``, - ` 4 IV \I l ?
T;70 N
nr + ?. r t.V i. ???.•.a T ?
V?l
'n,-e??? .'"mo"o I ?-- / ? ? ? ?..•r f' J?
Fa ye^ev711e C k--
Ear LOCATION
' /? _ ; %' \??- ?\? /_Y `.? ? -?\ /-?` ••-?.??? r ?`ic-tom -y?%? ?L.
?V(
I? \
Y
-_
i.
V,i
vvvGGG??^ ??a
=LM S B UR G
SOURCE= NCRTH CAROUNA ATLAS + GAZE I I a_. 1 OtiTIVENTAL
DeLORME MAP°iVG COMPANY. 1993 7'N ROLP, INC.
PROJECT yICINITY MAP
33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
1 0 2 4MLr5 YADIO AND SE BO ROADS
SCALEI 1• - 2.4 ML.E5 CAPPROXJ
FAYETTEVM, NC MAY 1995

[I
Ir-7
LJ?

E

in
?J

t

I

APPENDIX E
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

u

r

1

STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
REPORT
WAL-MART STORE # 1238
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C.
FREELAND-CLINKSCALES &
KAUFFMAN. INC.
209 WEST STONE AVENUE,
GREENVILLE, S.C. 29609

J

1

' Wal-Mart Store # 1238
Fayetteville, N.C.
' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
The following is the stormwater management report for the new Wal-Mart store to be
built at the intersection of Yadkin Road and Skibo Road. The site will be developed to
contain a +/- 200,000 sT Wal-Mart store and accompanying parking and landscape areas.
The stormwater system will be an underground system using catch basins and pipes which
' will convey runoff to one of two on-site ponds. These ponds are sized to handle the 2 year
and 10 year storm events and will have staged outlets to manage each storm. All release
' will be restricted to pre-developed rates. No runoff will enter the existing stormwater
systems belonging to the Department of Transpiration. All runoff will be directed to the
low areas that currently pick up runoff from this site.
' The site is being divided into two sections with a pond to serve each section. These
stormwater calculations are also setup to present the runoff values and release rates for
' each pond. The ponds are referred to in this report as Pond #1, the north pond, and Pond
# 2, the south pond.
' The runoff calculations shown in this report are based on the Soil Conservation Service
method TR-55 with plotted hydrographs included.
' Eaistine Conditions:
The site currently is comprised of large fields (grassy areas) that contain a few small
' residential structures. These structures will be removed to accommodate Wal-Mart's
construction. The remainder of the site is comprised of wooded areas that contain small
pockets of wetlands per the environmental report by the Williamsburg Environmental
' Group (WEG). The permits for filling these wetlands is being obtained by WEG. The
runoff currently follows two tracts. The northern portion of the site flows to a small ditch
' in the middle of the site which traverses north across the site to a large draw that carries
the water to an existing creek to the west of the site. This draw also picks up
approximately 14.18 acres of off-site runoff as per the USGS map. This off-site runoff will
' continue to flow to this draw when construction is complete and is accounted for in the
design. The southern portion of the site flows west to two ditches along the western
property line. These ditches feed two 18" pipes that carry the water under a mini
' warehouse development and eventually to the same creek that catches the northern
portion of the site. The closest body of water to the site is a branch of Beaver Creek and
the site does not lie within the 100 year flood plain. This site also lies outside of the
' watershed area.

r

I
POINT "A", POND # 1
Existing Conditions:
The areas draining to Point `A' are comprised of the follow; The soils are made up of
three classifications, type A, type B, and type C hydrologic soils groups. These soils can
be found in bands as one goes from east to west across the site. This area is comprised of
wooded areas which should be classified as good condition, and a small portion of pasture
land or grassland which is somewhat sandy and in fair condition. The drainage basin can
be broken down into small sub-areas which eventually flow together at point A. These sub
areas are shown on the drainage map included in the drawings and are as follows:
Area 1 - Off-site runoff - 14.18 acres, wooded
Area 2 - On-site - 3.26 acres, wooded
Area 3 - On-site - 8.18 acres, wooded
Area 4 - On-site - 3.06 acres, wooded, grassland
' From the drainage area map it can be seen that area 3 drains to area 4 and the two
combined drain to area 2. These three areas combine with area 1 for the total, pre-
developed discharge at point `A'.
' Runoff Curve Number:
' The runoff curve number for each area is based on soil group and type of existing
vegetation, paving, etc.. The runoff curve for each area is as shown on the included TR-55
printouts and are as follows.
Area # 1 Off-bite Area # Z Area # 3 Area #4
CN=71 CN=59 --+CN CN=76
' Time of Concentration:

The time of concentration for each area will be calculated using three types of flow. Sheet
flow for the first 300 feet, Shallow Concentrated flow for any sheet flow after 300 feet,
and Open channel flow for any flow through pipes or ditches. The time of concentration is
a function of slope, the roughness coefficient of the surface the water is flowing over, and
in the case of open channel flow, the velocity. This number is used in determining the
runoff from the site over time and subsequently to develop the hydrograph. Tc is as
follows for each area:
Area # I Off-Site I Area # 2 1 Area # 3
Area # 4
Tc = .40 hrs.
Tc = 1.41 hrs
Tc = 1.17 hrs
Tc = 1.08 hrs

I
I

' From the Tc and the Runoff Curve Number the total runoff for each area can be
determined.
' Runoff Calculations - Tabular Hvdrograph Method
Per the TR-55 program the runoff will be calculated for each area and a hydrograph will
' be generated for each area. This will be done for the 2 year, 10 year, and 100 year storm
events. After each hydrograph is generated the areas will be combined to provide the final
hydrograph of the entire drainage basin. Refer to the calculations for these runoff numbers
' and hydrographs. Since Area #1, Off-Site, will not be disturbed, it will be combined with
the on-site after all runoff has been calculated to the point at which it joins the off-site
runoff path. Hydrographs 2, 3, and 4 are joined together (hydrographs # 6 and # 7), and
' then the resulting hydrograph is joined with hydrograph #1 to get the total runoff to point
`A'. The results are as follows:

Pre-Developed ff Rates
Storm Event Area #1 Areas #2,3,&4 Total to Point A
2 year 3.66 cfs 2.87 cfs 5.89 cfs
10 year 9.87 cfs 8.68 cfs 17.14 cfs
Develoned Condition to Point `A'
Next the developed condition will be evaluated for the drainage area to Pond # 1 and
ultimately to Point `A'. As stated before, the off-site area is not impacted by the
development so this runoff number will be the same as in the pre-developed condition. The
off-site runoff does not flow through the stormwater pond so to obtain the total to point
`A', the off-site hydrograph will be combined with the stormwater pond routing
hydrograph and this total can not exceed the pre-developed total runoff.
Runoff Curve Number
The developed condition will consist of parking areas and a portion of the roof area. This
water will sheet across the parking lot to catch basins and be conveyed via pipes to Pond
#1. Pond # 1 will also be sized to accommodate an outparcel in its developed state. The
configuration of the site allows for a 4.82 acre outparcel on the north end at Skibo Road.
This outparcel will be assumed to have a total runoff number of 86. The runoff curve
numbers are as follows:
Runoff Curve Numbers Post Developed Condition On-Site
Open Space CN = 61, 0.71 acres
Impervious Area CN = 98, 10.7 acres
Newly Graded Area CN = 86, 4.82 acres Out Parcel
Total Runoff Curve Number CN = 93

7

J

Time of Concentration
The time of concentration for the developed condition will be comprised of sheet flow for
the first 300, shallow concentrated flow for 70, and open channel flow for 475 feet.
Tc = 0.07 hrs.
Graahical Peak Discharge
The developed condition for runoff is calculated using the TR-55 method and a'
hydrograph is developed from these calculations. The calculations are performed for the 2,
10, 25 and 100 year storm events and the results will be taken through Pond # 1 to
develop a Reservoir Routing Hydrograph. These hydrographs will be combined with the
off-site hydrograph to get the total runoff to Point 'A'. The results are as follows:
Post Develo e&Runoffto Pond # 1
Storm Event Runoff cfs
2 year 42.59 cfs
10 year 71.27 cfs
100 year 107.60 cfs
These numbers will be used to develop hydrographs through the pond.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
psi
.17
(? ? / rv..?';}; :??`: _?? ? Trader ??? ``\ /?} -
..•?: •.??,?:?,• ?• ??I ? :P'-.:J,: ?? •^?'"•? '• \ - Park
d\ ;. ,• Drive in OaL
loark
i? `i--•?_,'?a. ,. ?OAMOR v 4?\J `?.'.?L`tiJi '1'•?`.?• TA
^^ ?' - 200 ?:' `a ???J \ \ ?% • ?. ??
-.\? ?f?. ?? ? ? l?'?? i °r fir ^'---?\•'??
PROJECT
LOCATION :?,;' ' °, •
C?m rO ound ??? . \ y <<r is ;.?:. •, „\
A,
1 "1.11: e?,, • .'•?1u._. \--? (?! \l:•?'•• `\: •'?•• ?\ ??`?\?'':,• t?oa :-\_a_o;, ?.,,,•• •i:
1 `?1
50URCEs U5G5 7-5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPMIC 5ER1E5.
FATETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE ILLLAMSBURG
' O NMENTAL
LATITUDE' 35' 04' 50• ?ROUP, INC.
LONGITUDE' 78. 57' 25•
' PROJE
CT LOCATION MAP
' 33.5 ACRE PARCEL AT
2000. 1000• o• 2000' YADKIN AND SKIBO ROADS
5CALE' 1' - 2000'
FAYETTSVII.I.E, NC MAY 1995
1

RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
roject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT
A
u
O barea : _
AREA1
-------- ---------------------------------- -------------------
Hydrologic ---
Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D

-- Acres (CN)
----------------------------------------
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS ------------------- -----------------
¦ ods good - 1.20(55) 9 .0(70) 3.98(77)
total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 1.2 9 3.98
1------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREA: AREA1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 14.18 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 71
1------------------------------------------------ ______-_______------

1

RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty :
t CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
f barea . AREA2
------- ---------------------------------- -------------------
Hydrologic -----------------
Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
-----------------------------------------
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS -------------
- -------------
rods good
-
- 2.45(55) .81(70)
total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 2.45 .81
t-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREA: AREA2 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 3.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 59
1------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I
I
I
I
L?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L?
I
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
roject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
ubarea .
-------- AREA3
----------------------------------
-------------------
-----------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
--------
OTHER AGR ----------------------------------
ICULTURAL LANDS ------------------- -----------------
I oods good - 2.7(55) 5.48 (70) -
lotal Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 2.7 5.48
1------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREA: AREA3 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 8.18 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 65
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1

I

1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
t oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
f barea . AREA4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres
1---------------------------------------------------------- -------------
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS
ro s ture, grassland or range fair - 2.05(79) ods good - - 1.01(70) -
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 3.06
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AREA: AREA4 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 3.06 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 76
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7

L

TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
roject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
ubtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
---------------- --------- - Subarea #1 - AREA1 --------- --
- ---------- ------
low Type 2 year Length Slope S urface n Area P
W Velocity Time
rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)
---------------- -------- --------- ------ --------------- ---- ---------- ------
heet 3.7 300 .0065 H 1,257
Shallow Concent'd 500 .0181 U 0.064
allow Concent'd 500 .0280 U 0.051
en Channel 270 2 0.038
Time of Concentration = 1.41*

--------------------- -------- - Subarea #2..- AREA2 --------- ---- ----------- -----
ow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
?
rain
--------------------- (ft)
-------- (ft/ft)
--------- code
-- (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)

eet 3.7
300
.0083 ----
H --------------- ----- ---------- -----
1.139
allow Concent'd 290 .031 U 0.028
Time of Concentration = 1.17*

------------------------------ Subarea #3 - AREAS -----------------------------
ow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp velocity Time

----- rain
---------------- (ft)
------- (ft/ft)
---------- code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)

eet
3.7
300 -
.0117 ----------
H -------- ----------------- -----
0.993
all ow Concent'd 110 .0318 U 0.011
all ow Concent'd 370 .0108 U 0.061
Open Channel 100 2 0.014
Time of Concentration = 1 .08*
Subarea #4 - AREA4
-------------
-----
ow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time

? rain
--------
----- (ft)
-
---- (ft/ft)
--
--- code
-E-------- (sq/ft)
-------- (ft) (ft/sec)
----------------- (hr)
eet 3.7 300 .0167 0 393
Shall ow Concent'd 60 .033 U 0.006
' Time of Concentration = 0 .40*

A --- Sheet Flo
Smooth Surface w Surface Codes --
F Grass -
Dense
--- Sha
llow Concentrated
---
B Fallow (No Res. ) ,
G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 g Res. H Woods, Light P Paved
D Cultivated > 20 Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved
E Grass-Range, Sh ort J Range, Natural
i - Generated for use by TABULAR method

l
u

r
1

r

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
roject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
ubtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
total watershed are a: 0.0 45 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 2 years
------ ------- ------- ------ Subareas ------ ---
-----------------
AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
rea(sq mi) 0.02* 0.01* 0.01* 0.00*
ainfall(in) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
Curve number 71* 59* 65* 76*
noff(in) 1.19 0.58 0.86 1.51
tc (hrs) 1.41* 1.17* 1.08* 0.40*
(Used) 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.40
eToOutlet 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UP 0.22 0.38 0.29 0.17
Time Total - ------ ------ Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
Ir r) Flow AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
9.0 0 0 OP 0 0
.3 0 0 0 0 0
.6 0 0 0 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0
10.0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 0 1
.2 1 0 0 0 1
10.3 3 1 0 0 2P
4 3 1 0 0 2
0.5 4 1 0 1P 2
6 4 2 0 1 1
.7 4 2 0 1 1
8 4 2 0 1 1
11.0 5P 3P 0 1 1
2 5
1- 3 0 1 1
4 4 3 0 1 0
6 4 3 0 1 0
.8 4 3 0 1 0
0 3 2 .0 1 0
.3 3 2 0 1 0
.6 3 2 0 1 0
0 3 2 0 1 0
13.5 2 1 0 1 0
0 2 1 0 1 0
14.5 2 1 0 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
.5 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
17.0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1
1 1 0 0 0
.0 1 1 0 0 0
24.0 1 1 0 0 0
t Peak Flow * - value(s) pro vided from TR-55 system routines

L'

1 TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVEL OPED POINT A
tt
l
h d
waters
a e
are a: 0.0 45 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 10 years
------ ------- ------- ------ Subareas ------ --------------------

ea(sq mi)
t AREA1
0.02* AREA2
0.01* AREA3
0.01* AREA4
0.00*
infall(in) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8
Curve number 71* 59* 65* 76*
t noff(in) 2.74 1.71 2.21 3.21
(hrs) 1.41* 1.17* 1.08* 0.40*
(Used) 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.40
meToOutlet 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UP 0.14 0.24 0.19 0.11
'me Total - ------ ------ Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
tr) Flow AREA1 AREA2 AREAS AREA4
9.0 1 1 0 0 0
3 1
9. 1 0 0 0
6 2 1 0 0 1
9.9 3 1 0 1 1
0 3 1 0 1 1
.1 5 2 0 1 2
.2 7 2 0 1 4
.3 8 2 0 1 5P
.4 10 3 0 2 5
10.5 11 4 0 3 4
6 13 5 1P 4 3
.7 13 6 1 4 2
10.8 15P 7 1 5P 2
.0 15 8 1 5 1
.2 15 9P 1 4 1
.4 13 8 1 3 1
6 12
1. 7 1 3 1
8 11 7 1 2 1
12.0 10 6 .1 2 1
.3 9 5 1 2 1
.6 8 4 1 2 1
1 .0 8 4 1 2 1
5 5 3 0 1 1
.0 5 3 0 1 1
14.5 3 2 0' 1 0
0 3 2 0 1 0
.5 3 2 0 1 0
16.0 3 2 0 1 0
] 0 3 2 0 1 0
.0 3 2 0 1 0
.0 3 2 0 1 0
24.0 2 1 0 1 0
J *
- Peak Flow - value(s) pro vided from TR-55 system routines

n

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
roject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
lotal watershed area: 0.045 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
ea(sq mi) 0.02* 0.01* 0.01* 0.00*
kinfall(in) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
Curve number 71* 59* 65* 76*
not f (in) 3.64 2.44 3.03 4.17
(hrs) 1.41* 1.17* 1.08* 0.40*
(Used) 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.40
imeToOutlet 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
?a/P 0.12 0.20 0.16 0.09
(Used) 0.12 0.20 0.16 0.10
'me Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
r) Flow AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
0 1 1 0 0 0
.3 3 1 0 1 1
9.6 3 1 0 1 1
.9 4 2 0 1 1
.0 5 2 0 1 2
.1 6 2 0 1 3
10.2 10 3 0 2 5
F.3 12 4 0 2 6P
10.4 15 5 1 3 6
5 16 6 1 4 5
.6 17 7 1 5 4
10.7 19 9 1 6 3
.8 21 10 2P 7P 2
.0 23P 12 2 7 2
2 21 13P 2 5 1
11.4 19 12 2 4 1
1.6 16 10 1 4 1
11.8 14 9 1 3 1
0 13 8 1 3 1
.3 11 7 1 2 1
.6 10 6 1 2 1
.0 9 5 1 2 1
.5 8 4 1 2 1
.0 8 4 1 2 1
5 6 3 1 1 1
.0 5 3 0 1 1
15.5 5 3 0 1 1
0 4 2 0 1 1
.0 4 2 0 1 1
0 3 2 0 1 0
20.0 3 2 0 1 0
1.0 2 1 0 1 0
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines
1

L

r

i?

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED POINT A
ttal watershed area: 0.045 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 100 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREAl AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
ea(sq mi) 0.02* 0.01* 0.01* 0.00*
linfall(in) 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
Curve number 71* 59* 65* 76*
I noff(in) 5.02 3.60 4.30 5.61
(hrs) 1.41* 1.17* 1.08* 0.40*
(Used) 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.40
meToOutlet 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
/P 0.10 0.16 0.13 0.07
(Used) 0.10 0.16 0.13 0.10
me Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
r) Flow AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 AREA4
0 3 1 0 1 1
.3
9 4 2 0 1 1
9.6 4 2 0 1 1
.9 7 3 0 2 2
.0
0 8 3 0 2 3
1 10 4 0 2 4
10.2 15 4 1 3 7
1.3 18 5 1 4 8P
10.4 21 7 1 5 8
.5 23 8 1 7 7
.6 25 10 2 8 5
7 28 12 2 lop 4
.8 30 14 3P 10 3
.0 32P 17 3 10 2
. 2 31 18P 3 8 2
11.4 27 16 2 7 2
i.6 23 14 2 5 2
11.8 21 12 2 5 2
.0 18 11 2 4 1
.3 15 9 1 4 1
6 13 8 1 3 1
13.0 12 7 1 3 1
5
1. 10 6 1 2 1
0 9 5 1 2 1
5 8
.0 8
1 .5 8
0 7
.0 7
1 .0 6
20.0 5
1 0 3
P - Peak Flow

4 1 2 1
4 1 2 1
4 1 2 1
3 1 2 1
3 1 2 1
3 1 1 1
3 0 1 1
2 0 1 0
* - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

C

C

H

R- P E- L? ?P- .o A;EA # FF - hrrs
Q(ofs) S.C.S. RUNOFF
5.0 Hydrograph No.1
4 5 - Outfle
4.0-
3.5- Qp = 3.66
3.0-
2.5-
2.0-
1.6-
1.0-
0.5-
0.0 0 153 306 459 613 766 919 1073 1226 1379 1533
Time (min)
?.?. ?.? .• ? ?? ?w r {? V ! ?V •YIRi - 1 • 1V6. {14r? Y
[Space] Clear
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2 ?-- D r-LL-o v R Z
Q (Cfs) S.C.S. RUNOFF
1.0 Hydrograph No. 2
- Outflow
0.9-
0.8-
0.7-
0.6-
0.5-
0.4-
0.3- 24
0.2 ?Qp = .
0.0 /
0 129 258 387 516 645 774 903 1032 1161 1290
Time (min)
Return Period = 2 yrs, Volume = 8.157 acft
[Space] Clear

l
E
C

G yR ?" ??V EVE I-
Q (Cfs)
1.4
.2
1.2-
0.9
0.9-
0.8
0.8-
0.7
0.7-
0.5
0.5-
0.4-
0.4
0.2
0.2-
0.1
0.1-
0.0
0.0-
I r-- P, Aa-l -a
I
S.C.S. RUNOFF
0 150 300 450 600 750 900 1050 1200 1350 1500
Time (min)

[Space] Clear
C

z y F-- F2 a. ? PEVc.?.op c..o 41Ir2-5 4
Q(CfS) S.C.S. RU ,OFF
OFF
Qp = 2.1
2.2 Hydrograph No. 4
19 ' - Outfle
1.7-
1.5-
1.3-
1.1 0.8-
0.6-
0.4-
0.2-
0.0 0 145 291 436 582 727 873 1018 1164 1309 1455
Time (min)
•.????.. ?v. ?vr r a??V/ ?V ?YlR. - V.J?V YYl U
[Space] Clear

I

Q(Cfs) COMBINED
2.9- Hydrograph No. 6
2.6- WP ° 2.81 - Outflow
2.3 -- Ir1 t[: ?;
2.0
1.8
1.5-
1.2-
0.9-
0.6-
0.34
0.0
0 149 298 447 696 745 894 1043 1192 1341 1490
Time (min)
turn Period = 2 yrs, Volume = 8.962 acft [Space] Clear
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
L

l

r

A19 2 t i-?i o Go.-? g,,., E,o
£ 4 B. ?? - ??- D Z
Q (CfS) COMBINED
2.9- Hydrograph No. 7
Up= - Outflow
2.3- In.
2.0-
1.8-
.5 'S
1.2-
0.9-
0.6-
0.3
0 150 300 450 600 750 900 1050 1200 1350 1500
Time (min)
-?v?w ?• -v-?vY Y _VA -I -V.- - -- Y\&6
[Space] Clear

J

u
n

r
i
fly p ?' ? P,/D :;' 7
IoTAL oWTPAw To ?a?T yR-
Q (cfS) COMBINED
6.9 Hydrograph No. 8
6.2- - Outfle
Qp= 5.89
4.8-
4.1-
3.5-
2.8-
2.0-
0.7-
0.0 __-
-_---r-..._..__-r----- r...? -
0 153 306 459 613 766 919 1073 1226 1379 1533
Time (min)
.._ -- .. . a.. . - y. -A . - F. . J 9 V 4..a

[Space] Clear

7

0
Q (Cfs)
11.0-
9.9
8.8-
7.6-
6.5-
5.5-
4.4-
3.3-
2.2-
0. 0 0 154 309 463 618 772 927 1081 1236 1390 1545
Time (min)
Return Period = 10 grs, Uolune = 3.355 weft [Space] Clear
/ ?'?E ???/ P` R-" f- I OAF - h -r
S.C.S. RUNOFF

1?
r
C

l 0 2 - DE,?/. ? ?
0(Cfs) S.C.S. RUNOFF
1.3 Hydrograph No. 2
11 - Outflow
1.0-
0.9-
0.7-
0.6-
0.5-
0.3-
0.2-
0.1-

0.0
0 148 297 446 596 744 892 1041 1190 1339 1488
Time (min)

[Space] Clear

7

n

L

b P D Ev , ARF:t 1'- S
Q(cfS) S.C.S. RUNOFF
5.9 Hydrograph No. 3
5.3 -Outflow
4.7 Qp = 5.04
4.1-
3.5-
3.0-
2.4-
1.8-
1.2- ------
0.6-
0.0-
0 150 301 451 602 753 903 1054 1204 1355 1505
Time (min)

[Space] Clear

L

io \/ P- F;-fi - PLV, A 9-,r-A*4
Q(cfS) S.C.S. RUNOFF
5.9 Hydrograph No. 4
5.3- -Outflow
4.7 Qp = 5.04
4.1-
3.5-
3.0-
2.4-
1.8-
1.2-
0.6-
0.0
0 146 292 439 685 732 878 1024 1171 1317 1464
Time (min)
Return Period = 10 yrs, Volume = 8.798 acft [Space] Clear

11

L
7
11

L

Q (C
9.0
8.1
7.2
6.3
5.4
4.5
3.6
2.6
1.8
0.9
0.0
0 150 301 451 602 753 903 1054 1204 1355 1505
Time (min)
Return Period = 10 grs, Volume = 2.302 acft
[Space] Clear
°G, 1: 3 E 4 Goi?td, .,?r , P94 - pr.vr,
t,? ?.o 0
fS) COMBINED
Hydrograph No. 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L?
I
I
I
I

r y v 1?yv U Cro h?l P?? r4 E ,.P
i'¢E- V 6y .
Q(ofS) COMBINED
10 Hydrograph No. 7
9 - Outflow
Qp = 8.68 iir ;f1::..;.:
8-
7-
6-
5-
4-
3-
2-
... ` 1 0 ----- .?.,.._ _. -- ._._............ _ .... _ _
------
F r. ?..
0 151 303 454 606 757 909 1060 1212 1363 1515
Time (min)
Return Period = 10 yrs, Uolume = 2.763 acft [Space] Clear

LJ

n

Fil

1

i
PYD 6'- 1- G,?? ?e? CEO
i A o ??? o Fa, ,-IT
COMBINED
20 Hydrograph No. 8
18 - Outflow
Qp= 17.14
16-
14
12
10
2?
-----r-----r--
0 154 309 463 618 772 927 1081 1236 1390 15,45
Time (min)

DFF-s,T?- -•1- o,j --, ,TF
[Space] Clear

I

L

L
WREELAND - CLINKSCALES & KAUFFMAN
Engineers • Landscape Architects
f r 09 West Stone Avenue
eenvilleI South Carolina 29609
Job
Job No. Date
03) 233-5497
Computed By
Checked By Date

EFERENCE
Calculation For: Amp. o , _
Discipline:

I??YEI"D CoNC>,TIOI?
?vIJoFF ? K.?g ?o Po ?,1 D ; ? I ?_?.Io RT+?51,0?- Of ??°L• ??AR•'?
IT A'e- -oo F:

oFf - 51T?- - ?. 001 Ii GL,
o,-7+ 64-4x

?4 Soo 0, P
SL?o PE = 25%
S t'4 c. t_ I-o l,?l Go ? ?-+ i ,e o, i f P - ? D ? I. E ?iav ??

O(G•r q?S (,F V = S o ??,

FA L 1 i?J 75 ?I l l-L i3E G? L??IL i ?. p iJ S, ?J S G 5
T? - 5S
' Sheet of

r_

C

5

L

I RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
t oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-23-95
unty : CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT A
barea : DEVP
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
---------Acres (CN)
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
en space (Lawns,parks etc.)
Good condition; grass cover > 75% - .74(61) - -
pervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 10.7(98) - -
t VELOPING URBAN AREA (No vegetation) - -
wly graded area (pervious only) - 4.82(86)
total Area
(by Hydrologic Soil Group) 16.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BAREA: DEVP TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 16.26 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 93*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Generated for use by GRAPHIC method

I

t

t

C

C?

1
u

I TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-23-95
unty : CUMBERLAND
t State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT A
------------------------ ----------- --------- -------------------------- -----
ow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)

---
---
----
----
--------
-
--------------------------
-
e et 3.7 300 - 025 A 0.041
Shallow Concent'd 70 .025 P 0.006
en Channel 475 5.0 0.026
? Time of Concentration = 0 .07*
' --- Sheet Flow Surfa ce Codes -- -
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved
D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved
E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural

- Generated for use by GRA PHIC method

u

r

r

GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD
9 oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS
unty : CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked:
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT A
' Data: Drainage Area 16.26 * Acres
Runoff Curve Number 93 *
Time of Concentration: 0.07 * Hours
' Rainfall Type I
Pond and Swamp Area NONE
- -------------------------
Storm Number I 1 1 2 I 3 I 4
Frequency (yrs) 2 10 25 100
(
24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3.7 5.8 6.9 8.5
IIa/P Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02
Used 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
(Runoff (in) 2.93 4.99 6.07 7.66
Unit Peak Discharge 0.864 0.864 0.864 0.864
(cfs/acre/in)
Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ponds
Used
0_0-
-
-
--
-- ---
Peak Discharge (cfs)
------- ------
41
------- ------
70
------- ------
85
------- ------
108
-------
Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines
Version 2.00
Date: 08-23-95
Date:
- -- - -
r
t

5

7

i
2 OST (? ?1„D f? -hi Tv ?o -+ i A
Q(Cfs) S.C.S. RUNOFF
49.0 Hydrograph No. 9
44.1 - Outflow
Qp = 42.59
39.2
34.2
29.3
24.5
19.6
14.7
9.8
4.9
0.0
0 146 292 438 584 730 876 1022 1168 1314 1460
Time (min)
Return Period = 2 yrs, Volume = 4.464 acft
[Space] Clear

t

r.

Q (Cf
81.9-
73.7-
65.5-
57.4-
49.2-
41.0-
32.7-7
24.5-
16.3-
8.1-
0.0-
0 146 292 438 584 730 876 1022 1168 1314 1460
Time (min)
Return Period = 10yrs, Uclume = 7.599 acft
[Space] Clear
?/R- Porgy' pEv cp ?p o u 5 ITi - I f
S) S.C.S. RUNOFF
Hydrograph No. 9

I

J

I

r

POND # 1 SIZING AND ROUTING
Pond # 1, as can be seen on the grading plan, will be a surface pond with a bottom
' elevation of 222.0 and a top elevation of 230. This gives a total volume of 190631 cf.
Stage / Discharge and Stage / Storage charts are included in this report. Once the pond
volume is known an outlet structure must be designed to limit outflow from the pond to a
' pre determined amount. The outlet structure is designed to limit flow in stages, limiting
the 2 year storm event to pre-developed 2 year rate, the 10 year storm event to 10 year
' pre-developed rates, etc.. The outlet structure will consist of a box with an orifice at the
outlet elevation to control the 2 yr., a weir at the 2 yr. storage elevation to control the 10
yr. and an emergency spillway to release the 100 year event. The outlets will be sized as
' follows;
Orifice Equation - Q= 0.6 x A x (f2gh) x 1
Weir Equation - Q = 3.0 x (L) x (H^1.5)
' From these equations it is determined that a 6" orifice at elevation 222.0 will control the 2
yr. storm and a 4.5' weir at elevation 228.0 will control the 10 yr storm. Refer to the
hydrographs for reservoir routing. The results are as follows:

Pt?ND # 1 _,
Storm Stage Volume Release
2 226.78 106048 cf 1.95 cfs
10 yr 228.55 151024 cf 7.79 cfs
These runoff hydrographs are now combined with the off-site hydrograph (hydrograph #1)
to get the total runoff. This number is compared to the pre-developed rate to insure that
runoff is equal to or less than the pre-developed number.

Combined Post Developed Runoff Pre-Developed Runoff
2 yr - 5.3 cfs 5.89 cfs .'. ok
10 yr - 17.17 cfs 17.14 cfs .-. ok

L

1 HYDROLOGIC REPORT
_
STAGE / STORAGE / DISCHARGE

RESERVOIR NUMBER = 1

RESERVOIR NAME = NORTH POND.. (* Controlled by Culv Structure A)
STORAGE VALUES WERE INPUT MANUALLY
DISCHARGE VALUES: CULVERT STRUCT A. Q = .6 *A*[2gh/k]^.5 * 1
* CULVERT STRUCT B. Q = .6 *A*[2gh/k]^.5 * 1
' * WEIR STRUCT A.
WEIR STRUCT B. , Q
Q = 3 * 4.5 *
= 3 * 0 * H H ^ 1.5
^ 1.5

' ELEVATION DISCHARGE (cfs)

--------- CULVERT A
---------------- CULVERT B
------------- WEIR A
------------ WEIR B
----------
221.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
222.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
223.00 7.37 0.79 0.00 0.00
224.00 24.35 1.21 0.00 0.00
225.00 41.68 1.52 0.00 0.00
226.00 53.81 1.78 0.00 0.00
227.00 63.67 2.01 0.00 0.00
228.00 72.19 2.21 0.00 0.00
229.00 79.81 2.23 13.50 0.00
230.00 86.76 2.18 38.18 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

STAGE ELEVATION INC STOR TOT STOR OUTFLOW
'
---------- -
-------------- -cu-ft-- ------ cu-ft------ -----cfs--
' 0.00
0.50 221.50
222.00 0
4587 0
4587 0.00
0.00
1.50 223.00 18927 23514 0.79
2.50 224.00 20113 43627 1.21
' 3.50 225.00 21325 64952 1.52
4.50 226.00 22562 87514 1.78
5.50 227.00 23824 111338 2.01
6.50 228.00 25110 136448 2.21
' 7.50 229.00 26423 162871 15.73
8.50 230.00 27760 190631 40.36
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00
'
-
* Tailwater elevation none

J
u
1

I

1

I

0
J

I

I`okl-Q -t?- 1
Stage(ft) Stage I Storage
8.5 NORTH POND..
7.6
6.7
5.9
5.0 '
4.2 /
3.4 /
2.5 /
1.7
0.8 /
0.0
0 38126 76252 114378 152504 190631
Vol (cuft)
J

n

u

L

Q (Cf
49.0-
44.1-
39.2-
34.2-
29.3-
24.5-
19.6-
14.7-
9.8-
4.9-
0.0-
0 297 594 891 1188 1485 1782 2079 2376 2673 2970
Time (min)
Max. Elevation = 226.78 f t, Max. Storage = 106MO tuf t [Space] Clear
'I ?+ i ?l Ll? Ga P? N i rr+-l N-? R n 6 a P? # 1 To ?-r
I oTLyl. ?u????F? PosT fJF ?LoP? ? To poi ti ? /?
yam 2? -l C, Ems , ZZZ
1oy? "41;- ?, ZZS.o
O'JTLL?? ?(o'' Pe--,
2 yfL P-?r1 QC-, To Po,,-,- A , Pao ? ?
S) RESERVOIR ROUTE
Hydrograph No. 10

C
L
F

7

I

7-,49-
Q (Cf S) / I,O i 1til OFF "ro Po
COMBINED
5.9 Hydrograph No. 11
- iJutfle
5.3 Qp = 5.3
4.7
4.1
3.5
3.0 ?
2.4
1.8 .....__..._......
1.2-
0.6-
0.0
0 297 594 891 1188 1485 1782 2079 2376 2673 2970
Time (min)
Return Period = 2 yrs, Volume = 5.767 acft

[Space] Clear
C?

i

.? ., w
1 0 ?D,..;T, -f ?-kKL; K'a tiJ C? ' I
Q(CfS) RESERVOIR ROUTE
819 Hydrograph No. 10
73 7 - Outflo
65.5
57.4
49.2
41.0
32.7
24.5
16.3
. p
8.1 Q = 7.79
0 330 661 991 1322 1652 1983 2313 2644 2974 3305
Time (min)
Max. Eleuation = 228.55 ft, Max. Storage = 151824 cuft [Space] Clear
THIS ,?i LI. (.3E Go?? SI ?FifJ ,Ti-1
- ? I-I,?P?oes,?APr # I Cif. sr??
2 61 t
09, F,Gg- @ EL 22Z
??'? avTl?? I

I

?I

1
F

o1J-S?TE?t ePF 5r-ff--
1-7
67- AK T• K-- v ?-" yr r
Q (Cfs)
20-
18-
16-
14-
12 10
8
6
4
2
0
0
10 A
COMBINED
Hvdroaraph No. 11
v Iv
- autflc
330 661 991 1322 1652 1983 2313 2644 2974 3305
Time (min)

I -7 . I /,7 1-7, 14- O?-
1-4 r,2F-oU7R o,PI?S Ip Goy per; .ate
[Space] Clear
On= 1717

L

L'

s
i
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
The emergency spillway will be sized to release the 100 year storm event in the post
developed condition. The spillway will take into account the amount of flow released from
the outlet structure and the difference from this amount and the amount of the 100 year
runoff is the basis for the size of the spillway. From the stormwater calculations the 100
year rainfall event produces 107.6 cfs.
Q,oo= 107.6 cfs
QE = Emergency spill way release QS = Structure release
QE = 107.6 cfs - 15.73 cfs = 91.87 cfs
Size emergency spillway for 91.87, i.e. 92.0 c6 release. From the weir equation this would
require a 30.6 foot weir with one foot of head. The spillway elevation is 229.0 and the top
of the dike is 230. To add a factor of safety into the design make the spillway 40 feet
wide. This gives a head elevation of 0.8 feet.

C

r

I

I FREELAND - CLINKSCALES & KAUFFMAN
Engineers • Landscape Architects
323 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
[phone]
/1
REFERENCE

Computed By
Checked By Date
Calculation For: Po G1D I Discipline:

-Tat???..,
?7L'f t.•1? tJ _ ?.1. N x _ G, ohs TI+ ?o v ? N -C1-t ?. P? I t`,. _c', p L l?- _ G> u'?t._. ?T
??c ,?Rf? _ A??>7 TIE. _Loo yf? f7re-V

C - = L o-7 Co
Gds = _? S • 73
..
I ? l "? I-1 I Fa o a 14 E, A f? ? ZI S f? _ . W Fl IZ Ems? t)Ai io ?-1
?F?_ Lw?jTN .
G?? __? o_C)..CN3?2) ?- I D

?i.???=?.?C?-)CI) __ ? = ?o. ? FEET
tJS L- = 4n' I-4 -- o 0
f? P- ?° P` S I-I_ 1 ?1 a y P9,6-' bfz-;A IL l µ 6,5
Sheet of

1

s
00 F- Poy EU ??- o F?P R v LJoFF To Po,-i q #
Q(cfS) S.C.S. RUNOFF
124.0 Hydrograph No. 9
111.6 - Outflo
Qp = 107.6
99.2
86.8
74.4
i
62.0
49.5
37.1
24.7
12.3
0.0 ---
0 146 292 438 684 730 876 1022 1168 1314 1460
Time (min)
V-/ -.Y - 11.V(J QL.a &
[Space] Clear

r

I I
I

k
i
eservo
r No. 1 STAGE / STORAGE / DISCHARGE
torage values were input manually
ischarge values: Culvert struct A. Q = .6 * A * [2gh/k]^.5 * 1
Culvert struct B. Q = .6 * A * [2gh/k]^.5 * 1
Weir struct A. Q = 3 * 4.5 * H ^ 1.5
1 Weir struct B. Q = 3 * 0 * H ^ 1.5
' ELEVATION
CULVERT A
Yjz 229.00 79.81
229.10 80.53
229.20 81.25
229.30 81.96
229.40 82.66
229.50 83.36
229.60 84.05
229.70 84.74
' 229.80 85.42
229.90 86.09
230.00 86.76
DISCHARGE (cfs)
CULVERT B WEIR A WEIR B
IC 2.23 IC 13.50
IC 2.23 IC 15.57
IC 2.23 IC 17.75
IC 2.23 IC 20.01
IC 2.22 IC 22.36
IC 2.21 IC 24.80
IC 2.21 IC 27.32
IC 2.21 'IC 29.92
IC 2.20 IC 32.60
IC 2.19 IC 35.36
IC 2.18 IC 38.18
t-----------------------------------------------------------
[-J] to cont [PgUp] t [PgDn] 1
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NORTH POND..
TOTAL
15.73
17.81
19.97
22.24
24.58
27.02
29.53
32.13
34.80
37.55
40.36
----------------
[Esc] to exit
FTf}??j? IJ?JI?I(31E.u? THE- ToTAI- ?L.Dl.c?l TH2i! THE. otlT?-E:'i S7RLIGT?1RE
A-S p-I_ . ?-Z? • p I S • 73 c.Fs
V gT?AGT? T+?is Fa o ??l T++? 100 y(2- Ri irIpF:C-
Q
? Qi oo Q5 = ?a7. !o - 15.3
1 ?I ?,- f-: t -I r-- . ?-, To APR
R-y 9I4-7c,?? ?f, I.o of p?,?p
I- ) H
1`7)l 06?FS o L ?c I L
N = a . g4?

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

RUNOFF TO POINT B, POND #2
Existing Conditions
The area draining to Point `B' is comprised entirely of grasslands and type B and C soils.
The total area is 5.82 acres. There is another areas next to Yadkin Road that drains
towards the road but since it does not contribute to the runoff at Point B it will not be
considered. Point B is an 18" rcp that is located at the west side of the site and currently
drains under a mini warehouse complex to an open ditch that leads to a branch of Beaver
Creek. The 5.82 acres drains from east to west by mainly sheet flow at low to moderate
slopes.
Runoff Curve Number:
The runoff curve number for the existing condition will be based on the total acreage for
each type of use and soil type. Of the 5.82 acres, 2.18 acres are considered type B soils
and 3.64 acres are considered type C soils.

t

Soil Type B Soil Type C
2.18 ac. CN=61 3.64 ac. CN=74
Weighted CN = 69
Time of Concentration:
The time of concentration for the existing condition will be based on two sections of flow.
r The first section is 300 feet of sheet flow and the second section is 580 feet of shallow
concentrated flow.
i Tc = .46 hrs.
Tabular Hydrograph Method:
The runoff calculations will be run for the 2 yr, 10 yr, 25 yr, and 100 yr storm events to
obtain the pre-developed release rates. A pond will then be designed to handle the 2 yr,
l Oyr and 100 yr storm events. The runoff rates are as follows:
Storm Event
2 Storm 2.19 cfs
10 Storm 6.25 cfs
100 yr Storm 12.0 cfs .

`1
11

I

RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDIT IONS POINT B
barea : AREA6
------- --------------------- ------------- ------------------------------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
Acres (CN)
------------------------------
HER AGRICULTURAL LANDS ------------- ------------------------------------
¦ sture, grassland or range good - 2.18(61) 3.64(74) -
tal Area (b
H
l
i
il
d
S Gr
) 2
18 3
64
y
ro
y
og
c
o oup .
.
--------- --------------------- ------------- ------------------------------------
SUBAREA: AREA6 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 5.82 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 69
------- --------------------- ------------- ------------------------------------

C

1

TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS POINT B
t--------------------------- - Subarea #1 - AREA6 -----------------------------
Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Su rface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft)
--------
------
----
f (ft/ft)
--
--- code
-
-------- (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr)
-------------------------
eet
3.7
300 .0167 E 0.393
Shallow Concent'd 580 .0241 U 0.064
Time of Concentration = 0_46*
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes -- -
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated - - -
B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Burmuda --- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 t Res.
D Cultivated > 20 $ Res. H Woods,
I Woods, Light
Dense P Paved
U Unpaved
E Grass-Range, Short J Range, Natural

- Generated for use by TABULAR method

11

I

1

I

I

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
roject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
ounty : CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS POINT B
total watershed area: 0.009 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 2 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREA6
ea(sq mi) 0.01*
tinfall(in) 3.7
Curve number 69*
I L noff(in) 1.08
(hrs) 0.46*
(Used) 0.50
UP eToOutlet 0.00
0.24
me
?ir)
9.0 0
3 0
.6 0
9.9 0
.0 0
.1 0
.2 1
0.3 2P
.4 2
10.5 2
6 2
.7 2
10.8 1
.0 1
.2 1
.4 1
6 1
8 1
12.0 1
.3 1
.6 1
.0 0
5 0
0 0
14.5 0
0 0
.5 0
X6.0 0
.0 0
.0 0
.0 0
24.0 0
1
- Peak Flow
Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
Flow AREA6
0
0
0
0
0
1
2P
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

I
J
11

IF

1

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS POINT B
total watershed area: 0.009 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 10 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREA6
ea(sq mi) 0.01*
tinfall(in) 5.8
Curve number 69*
noff (in) 2.56
(hrs) 0.46*
(Used) 0.50
t meToOutlet 0.00
/P 0.15
me Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
fr) Flow AREA6
9.0 0
3 0
.6 1
9.9 1
.0 1
.1 2
.2 3
10.3
V 5
6P
10.5 6
6 5
.7 4
10.8 3
.0 2
.2 2
.4 2
6 1
.8 1
12.0 1
.3 1
.6 1
.0 1
1 .5 1
0 1
14.5 1
0 1
.5 1
16.0 1
0 1
.0 1
.0 1
24.0 0
i - Peak Flow
0
0
1
1
2
3
5
6P
6
4
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
* - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

1

1 TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS POINT B
ttal watershed area: 0.009 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 25 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREA6
ea(sq mi) 0.01*
linfall(in) 6.9
Curve number 69*
not f (in) 3.43 _
(hrs) 0.46*
(Used) 0.50
meToOutlet 0.00
/P 0.13
'me Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
r) Flow AREA6
9.0 1
3 1
.6 1
9.9 1
0 2
1 3
.2 5
10.3 7
1.4 8P
10.5 8
.6 7
.7 6
.8 5
.0 3
.2 3
.4 2
6 2
.8 2
12.0 2
.3 2
.6 2
.0 1
13.5 1
1.0 1
14.5 1
.0 1
.5
1 1
1 .0 1
0 1
.0 1
0 1
24.0 0
J
- Peak Flow
1
1
1
1
2
3
5
7
8P
8
7
6
5
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
* - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

1

LJ

1

1

LJ
71
n
1

TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Version 2.00
oject WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-14-95
unty CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS POINT B
ttal watershed area: 0.009 sq mi Rainfall type: I Frequency: 100 years
-------------------------- Subareas --------------------------
AREA6
ea(sq mi) 0.01*
linfall(in) 8.5
Curve number 69*
noff (in) 4.78
(hrs) 0.46*
(Used) 0.50
meToOutlet 0.00
/P 0.11
e
Fr )
9.0 1
3 1
.6 2
9.9 2
.0 3
.1 5
2 7
3 11
4 12P
10.5 12
6 10
.7 8
10.8 7
.0 5
.2 4
.4 3
6 3
.8 3
12.0 2
.3 2
.6 2
1 .0 2
4 5 2
.0 2
14.5 1
0 1
.5 1
16.0 1
.0 1
.0 1
.0 1
24.0 1
J
- Peak Flow
Total ------------- Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs) ------------
Flow AREA6
1
1
2
2
3
5
7
11
12P
12
10
8
7
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
* - value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines

F

1

i
L ? p-L- vr.V o &0 AP- F.,A G
Q (CfS) S. .SQFM, OFF
2.2 Hydrograph No. 5
19 - Outflo
1.7-
1.5
1.3-
1.1
0.8-
0.6-
0.4-
0.2-
0.0 0 147 295 442 590 737 885 1032 1180 1327 1475
Time (min)

[Space] Clear

I

n
1

6.9-
6.2-
6.5-
4.8-
4.1---
3.5-
2.8-
2.0-
1.4-
0.7-
0.0-
0 148 296 444 692 740 888 1036 1184 1332 1480
Time (min)
Return Period = 10 yrs, Volume = 1.279 acft [Space] Clear
°ytz Pip- P f.?./ ,t-,, p AR-.-A :: ? G
fS) S.C.S. RUNOFF

1

F

1

' Developed Conditions:
In the developed condition Point B will receive a portion of the parking lot and a large
' portion of the building area. These areas will be piped via pipes and catch basins to Pond
#2 located near Yadkin Road.

Runoff Curve Number:
The runoff curve number for the developed condition is made up almost entirely of paved
roof and other impervious area. Pond #2 will also be sized to accommodate an outparcel
or outparcels that are estimated to be 2.16 acres. These outparcels will be assumed to
have 85% impervious coverage.
Runrf'Curve
Cover Description Area and Curve Number
Impervious Area 11.0 ac. CN = 98
Outparcel 2.16 ac. CN = 86
Time of Concentration:
The time of concentration in the developed condition will be set by sheet flow across the
parking lot, some small areas of shallow concentrated flow, and then open channel flow
through the storm water pipes.
Tc = 0.10 hrs.
Graphical Peak Discharge:
The developed condition for runoff is calculated using the TR-55 method and a
hydrograph is developed from these calculations. The calculations are performed for the 2,
10, 25 and 100 year storm events and the results will be taken through Pond # 2 to
develop a Reservoir Routing Hydrograph. The results are as follows:

Storm Event Runoff cfs
2 year 33.64 cfs
10 year 59.75 cfs
100 year 80.44 cfs
These numbers will be used to develop hydrographs through the pond.

n

J

u

J

IFREELAND - CLINKSCALES & KAUFFMAN
Engineers • Landscape Architects
M209 West Stone Avenue
reenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date _
[phone]
Computed By
Checked By ?S Date
REFERENCE Calculation For: __ 4t,-ESA To PD -?' Discipline:
i
Sheet of

1

t
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
?oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-23-95
unty : CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT B
barea : DEVP
----
-----------------
-------------------------- --------------- ---------------
Hydrologic Soil Group
COVER DESCRIPTION A B C D
' Acres
---- (CN)
-----------------
----------------------------
LILLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS ---------------
(Veg Estab.) -------------
-
pervious Areas

Paved parking lots, roofs,
driveways
- 11.0(98) - -
LVELOPING URBAN AREA (No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious only) - 2.16(86) - -
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group) 13.1
-----------FBAREA:-DEVP TOTAL-DRAINAGE-AREA:-13.16-Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 96*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method

E

L

1

I TIME OF CONCENTRATION AND TRAVEL TIME Version 2.00
oject : WAL-MART CENTER User: SKS Date: 08-23-95
unty : CUMBERLAND State: NC Checked: Date:
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT B
I-------------------------- ----------- --------- -------------------------- -----
Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity Time
rain (ft)
--------------------- (ft/ft)
----------- code
--------- (sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
--------------------?------ (hr)
-----
eet 3 7 300 .O1 A 0.060
allow Concent'd 80 .010 P 0.011
en Channel 520 5.0 0.029
Time of Concentration = 0 .10*
'
--- Sheet Flow Surface Codes -- -
A Smooth Surface F Grass, Dense --- Shallow Concentrated ---
B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, Bermuda --- Surface Codes ---
C Cultivated < 20 % Res. H Woods, Light P Paved
D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved
E Grass-Range Short J Range Natural
* - Generated for use by GRAPHIC method

1

n

I GRAPHICAL PEAK DISCHARGE METHOD
oject : WAL-MART CENTER
unty : CUMBERLAND State: NC
Subtitle: POST DEVELOPED TO POINT B
t Data: Drainage Area 13.16 * Acres
Runoff Curve Number 96 *
' Time of Concentration: 0.10 * Hours
Rainfall Type I
Pond and Swamp Area NONE
User: SKS
Checked:

Storm Number 1 2 3 4
----------------------
Frequency (yrs) ------
2 ------
10 ------
25 ------
100
24-Hr Rainfall (in) 3.7 5.8 6.9 8.5
Ia/P Ratio 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
Used 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Runoff (in) 3.24 5.33 6.42 8.02
Unit Peak Discharge 0.787 0.787 0.787 0.787
(cfs/acre/in)
Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.0% Ponds Used
---------------------
Peak Discharge (cfs) ------
34 ------
55 ------
67 ------
83
-_----- _________=------------- =____________
* - Value(s) provided from TR-55 system routines
i

0

Version 2.00
Date: 08-23-95
Date:

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Q (CfS) S.C.S. RUNOFF
39 0 Hydrograph No. 12
35.0 - Outflow
Qp = 33.64
31.1-
27.2-
23.3-
19.5-
15.6-
11.7-
7.8-
3.9-
?--
0.0-
0
146 292 439 585 732 878 1024 1171 1317 1464
Time (min)
- :3"-' _....._... ......_.........
[Space] Clear

L

I o V- X05 To ?oI I -r E
Q (cfs) S.C.S. RUNOFF
69.0 Hydrograph No. 12
62.1 - Outflo
Qp = 59.75
55.2-
48.3-
41.4-
34.5-
27.6-
20.7-
13.8-
r?
0.0
0 146 292 438 584 730 876 1022 1168 1314 1460
Time (min)

[Space] Clear

J

u
n

L

r

J
I
POND # 2 SIZING AND ROUTING
Pond # 2, as can be seen on the grading plan, will be a surface pond with a bottom
' elevation of 222.0 and a top elevation of 229.0. This gives a total volume of 209878 cf..
Stage / Discharge and Stage / Storage charts are included in this report. Once the pond
volume is known an outlet structure must be designed to limit outflow from the pond to a
pre determined amount. The outlet structure is designed to limit flow in stages, limiting
the 2 year storm event to pre-developed 2 year rate, the 10 year storm event to 10 year
' pre-developed rates, etc.. The outlet structure will consist of a box with an orifice at the
outlet elevation to control the 2 yr., a weir at the 2 yr. storage elevation to control the 10
yr. and an emergency spillway to release the 100 year event. The outlets will be sized as
' follows;
Orifice Equation - Q= 0.6 x A x (.r2gh) x 1
Weir Equation - Q = 3.0 x (L) x (H^1.5)

1
From these equations it is determined that a T' orifice at elevation 222.0 will control the 2
yr. storm and a 1.6' weir at elevation 225.8 will control the 10 yr storm. Refer to the
hydrographs for reservoir routing. The results are as follows:

Storm Stage Volume Release
2 225.51 79067 cf 2.17 cfs
10 yr 226.66 118562 cf 6.20 cfs
These runoff hydrographs are now combined with the off-site hydrograph (hydrograph #1)
to get the total runoff. This number is compared to the pre-developed rate to insure that
runoff is equal to or less than the pre-developed number.
c
Actual Release Rate Allowable Release Rate
2 yr - 2.17 cfs 2.19 cfs .-. ok
10 yr - 6.20 cfs 6.25 cfs, .-. ok

n

L

1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
?'? , p -Z Z
HYDROLOGIC REPORT_
STAGE / STORAGE / DISCHARGE
RESERVOIR NUMBER = 2
RESERVOIR NAME = SOUTH POND.. (* Controlled by Culv Structure A)
STORAGE VALUES WERE INPUT MANUALLY
DISCHARGE VALUES: CULVERT STRUCT A. Q = .6 *A*[2gh/k]^ .5 * 1
* CULVERT STRUCT B. Q = .6 *A*[2gh/k]^ .5 * 1
* WEIR STRUCT A. Q = 3 * 1.6 * H ^ 1.5
WEIR STRUCT B. Q = 3 * 0 * H ^ 1. 5
ELEVATION DISCHARGE (cfs)

---------- CULVERT A
--------------- CULVERT B
---------------- WEIR A W
-------------- EIR B
-----
222.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
223.00 4.30 0.98 0.00 0.00
224.00 9.51 1.55 0.00 0.00
225.00 12.76 1.98 0.00 0.00
226.00 15.34 2.33 0.43 0.00
227.00 17.54 2.37 6.31 0.00
228.00 19.49 1.60 15.66 0.00
229.00 20.88 0.00 27.48 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
STAGE ELEVATION INC STOR TOT STOR OUTFLOW

--------
-------------- cu ft
------------- cu ft
-------------- cfs
-----------
0.00 222.00 0 0 0.00
1.00 223.00 9303 9303 0.98
2.00 224.00 22444 31747 1.55
3.00 225.00 30483 62230 1.98
4.00 226.00 33009 95239 2.76
5.00 227.00 35580 130819 8.68
6.00 228.00 38198 169017 17.27
7.00 229.00 40861 209878 20.88
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00
* Tailwater elevation = none

n

1

n

Po,.?r,2 it Z
Stage(ft) Stage I Discharge
6.9- SOUTH POND..
6.2
l
5.5
4.8
4.1
3.6
2.8
2.0
1.4
0.7
0.0-
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Q (cfS)

1

r

L
I

i
ro,10 i? 2
Stage(ft) Stage I Storage
6.9 SOUTH POND..
6.2-
6.5-
4.8-
4.1-
3.5-
2.8-
2.0-
1.4-
0.7 0.0-
0 41976 83951 125926 167902 209878
Vol (tuft)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Z U J r o") P tr- Z
Q(cfS) RESERVOIR ROUTE
39.0 Hydrograph No. 13
35.0 - Qutflo
31.1-
27.2-
23.3-
19.6-
15.6-
11.7-
7.8-
3.9
`
0.0
I-- --r-----j-----1-
0 223 446 669 892 1116 1339 1662 1785 2008 2231
Time (min)
Max. E leuat ion = ?25.51 ft, Max. Storage =
2.1-7,-- 2-1`7 - , ak
Z y - ?? OfL IF I F- I- 222
1 D yP-- - I - (1' Wi;-4 225, S
12)" ge-F ouTLE?:- P P?
79667 tuft [Space] Clear
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ?
I
I
I
I
i
1 0 y R-- ILoJTi -r, Z-u Paw D 0 2-
Q (Cf S) RESERVOIR ROUTE
62.0 Hydrograph No. 13
- Outflow
65.8-
49.6-
43.4-
37.2-
31.0-
24.7-
18.5-
12.3-
6.1- y?- -,,•' gyp= 6.2 - ?-
0.0 1
0 247 494 741 988 1236 1483 1730 1977 2224 2471
Time (min)
Max. Elevation = MM.66 ft, Max. Stowage =
Ca•2 L &,2S b K

C' Y fL ' I . G' r..1 Fes, ?- FJ, 225. g

ism cuf t [Space] clear

n

L

r

' Emergency Spillway Design:
Pond #2 feeds an existing 18:' pipe at the mini warehouse next door. Because this pond
' does not feed an open drainage way the pond will be designed to manage the 100 year
storm event in lieu of an emergency spillway. The release rate will subsequently be much
lower than the release from an emergency spillway and thus will protect the adjoining
' property owner during the 100 year storm.
The post developed runoff for the 100 year storm event is 80.44 cfs. When routed through
the pond the resulting reservoir hydrograph is as follows:

J

I
.... .: _
_.. •. '. ,,jpgg??,?? d 3
IN UM
Maximum Storage Elevation
iu:hh I ?° ptle?9tl5hs. ?.,
. 3E ,.. °. ?.?..:
227.92
Maximum Volume 165874 cf
Release Rate 16.51 cfs
Freeboard 1.08 ft.

1

n

J

V (L 1'O'. K-%j 140 F? r I o i ot? ? L
Q (efS) S.C.S. RQNOFF
Hydrograph No. 12
91.9
82.7 --?`Q?fflo
Qp = 80.44
73.5-
64.4-
55.2-
46.0-
36.7-
27.5-
18.3-
9.1-
0.0
0 146 292 439 585 732 878 1024 1171 1317 1464
Time (min)

[Space] Clear

n

L

E

Oo
Q (Cfs)
91.9-
82.7-
73.6-
64.4-
56.2-
46.0-
36.7-
27.5-
18.3-
9.1-
0.01
0 265
rIW-, i HR-J Ka"y1w 2
RESERVOIR ROUTE
HYdroaraph No. 13
- Outflo
-- In -.:
Qp = 16.51
-r----- T----- r----- -r---..-I
611 766 1022 1278 1633 1789 2044 2300 2556
Time (min)
Max. Elevation = ZZ7.92 ft, Max. Storage = 165M tuft [Space] Clear
Q ors f-,4.-,t . 5,ToF-6,G f-- F-1-F-,/ - ZZ7. 9 Z , L,4-4\1I aL
I Foar aF Fpe-E(So A•r2-P

r

1

?l
L

I

MAP A

1

1

0

st*-x2g r! aor Gbbl M7f#171d75 w
W-71.ig
'Ad
' L SOON O®IS + Fpl u
??: ld 13??Jd 3?1?V 5'ff Q Lei U? E o• p
i# 3?I1VNb31lV LL
W
\?\ar
\ `'SSG b ?;`.._'---'-- -- ----- -- - -------- j?'-?
}
try !ot \i \ \ ,/ d? I ?'?• !•' .
11

I

1

1

ICII
?i

?I

I MAP B
L]

r-i 11

1

u

na M-3 ,na.muo.?.y
7Oa9 1Y1NIANOaW17 'JameNYrt
YNn0HV3 HJAON '37MUL:.i0A
9£Zi # gums laYN-Til
aALLVNZlSl'Id G913a S
NraNC sYvanoe
IN aaennN ear
vUa?/e Suva
.
?- -
0

`d#
tY m K ?', 0 $
o 0 0 0 _ spy
!?
F 9

os?o
?
i 9Y
rY
00m0

_ 7,t l?
F.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

MAP C

u

a]]os
nurllncvo0 1?7uamuo?inu3 SGV0TT2??i.77 O r??r9DIISSf (INV NDInUk .00[ _ .T ry7Y?Tj7?1r37HYd(?2180.f
..]Y??T9*00 11t, 'ONI'dnOH3lyLN3ANON1AN3 D8fIRSKYMIAA d- N0LL.7VRNIr11711 S(INY 1 RA Sbbt l.VW W a ^
VNI' [E7::
3 tttYJJJ a
u ? u
a
/ ? V
OA.
6
I
I' LL-1
L1L ??E\
Q W # v
pro # *r n .
W / # # $ 40
n> to # ??
o _ .y # #
/ ? # Q 0000 0
LLI
W W W W W
` OC K pub OC OC
#? O?y QQQ Q Q
000" N
W
aaaa
Q C, 1?
CJ W ? ? r- N
U 3 3
p
0

F

J

1

MAP D

r

J

III _ T "{IrF l? PI
!

aF.e ' !I'! F` t
?
Y t6
k t
ti

"
la Y
`
!-- 9
?` o
?
R
tL? ? ??
?!"
?
='
l ?
16
laftDr
r

C! e
ji
t
li
la?4l31? at

4?'s}!I t
f t lll'!s} ilt tti!! (!!4!?
Ct t?ri ? t C P!}Ell
}?1?
l?l `t t
t f ??i3 L
i
w Z?Z
' b?q??f it, t y,ti:}?i:iiFif;
F' rlr -t}jti If ? ft t ft3lFiiFC
d
L
F ?Sf RS
t :?t } s t}x ?v:;i:? !};ts'
e i? del
t ? °

„-?
I
?
O
F
t:.
.Yt:r: P
t'E?:?:.:.^.r": - S YS'
t
SFF:
yl
`
. .
t a
P
k. .•, rx
,B (

,[
§ r
k t ?"A)
[
°
}cell
tS ;
?
I? ?

?

I
??i ?.
ke` a Al _ S !
! Pe l!P
t.
t , ^_
6 _ f
_ < y
!T
?^- ! ` 1 lllic?, .f•z ????. E 4 'C ..
! l: t8fa R °? R, rt • _
?t
R t ?
a R
? E ?
R h
;i t. 1.°E^ t :k5 k t ,? k I ! 3 8? R4 x.. SR tt _' ' II

/X° t ?
tf !
€
" .l CiCgCCCC t etCtC-
t s ! f
Cf RsrltrC [
}it}? {
I
:::
III
?F'.S !¢aalB } ! 'Clti?I tr !il{f6Eliti[1;f41i!!!!I't!P!ll:?i,;l _ !!!!b?!g!1!! e!3 xt;3t !!`kt !!!!llEibP!! let le
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
E^? tF)E€'? ? -.? t 1;.! t. t }}fiFf}t;; ifii}ii:F jFSFIF tttt}t rtii ;tf t?Fi S tag }tF t fFejtrF:}F tSF tltie6
?• Dk
_!.? R-?e?! T- _ `( 'StT 8 RY:?"%•^:5::"F:^ _ ^T8`°e K. t `R+Y47. ,7,^$ tk .: yHR?A.?-,•_a
G:Y !se_} i A D •,L IAP !l! e!!?!!P!P l PII?l}!!!!P!D klIIP P? eeae€ > k PIIP }ADIIA?P a?IIIIDP DlDP -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
` 12 k8! 66.}{.. ? 'r t ?r;°o Got:f.4 G xR ^._. E-i'^:'t O Y Q\ Al,! -_Y.. ., CeB«?%=. ' °9
t t -t 9. Fa.^BR?^? Ra: ?. : vaR?-?-GJ WW ? ?6°y S 8 k6 (a A S
Ctj[`?8k Y o±e T : R t G _€ 7 .PRE 3 M.N.°,a SN jb R ...z z z z.. t.l ^ O O ° t'1 T r ?'8 l!
gt tt g.., d ?; ?r _ CC- tC E ([ litlfC?C;jCeij ICg.tt}[ity`jlggtkEtiiCCCCtg° ? `? ? E ? ??? CCCC- tt[fCftCCCcC[tCgtCC }
I ??2 fi 1., t..a,t -,_: f .: ... g ,-??. ._ 2 ee. • ..............o „ t 8 aF -t::_ _._..__
m
vt .r°?' - eC
to m
<? a
]m 3 °qi? ? ilt: ?
?I
r \Y
r PTW Z8ft''ft'R' _:t'a'Afafafe DD..
I
III i '?I?
clz srT,.?cs:"x f :?a
I ?
Rfs "I? +Li

t
r:
t
?e
ey k
=? 9
cTw
y " to
yll .i 1•. e ? so:?
i? I D 9 . y rc
pt.p
fyYYl q'
7. 1
.f

3 R T"
S
' y yff; ;
I
• -......c
y_y II i I I
<O r''''_?ll1a111 s ?:°'4 °....•'• ^:ajKl:f
• ?Ifl
?
?r
`? ^EHCIa
al Ya. ?

tea'
3
£?
.
" .i .
l
"' I I I ?
., •I"?.y.,
I II ..
ao
o ? L_-
u
cctrTfa T!EI --_-?-- r:c!R's.'f:` ':fc`a3?: -'xia ':Cii: risfefRP.fa=fa:c --_ :?: :aC;irsraL^^' ':?xYfa6dTF.:C.:Gibi:fEfRP.fm _ _ _ s: RF
:i, 'xl• l:L:.2:C' ?R "4 I R. I_I:I:2^I.. _-. I ? 'r.E,::.J ::? - ttlG?M:l6' ?E_ S t Rl.fe:E?ISR41RIRl S.aa J1.7°1
^IAI rT 11
ICI ryY I I? ? I,,,... ?.i.•.,....... ? I I .:...1. I I^ i I ? I • I I ? I I I_I I
I$;'-Woyi 'Ix..x,z; s ^'^ x, t .t t ?t r, f r fs ?tk Esat.l>;aaC:zaN r s.-' fRf< ,.,,??fa•?F"r' .. •.-1 ,!I_J{l .
?!?h?..u YIE: '? ' P'^?(rf- f z?- r' fRfT.P :?
J F I iiz
C_SIRI I g a a?? 'I e: * AH
- ; I I ? ? • ?I ? I ?•:I .I.,I..;,, I , „ I ; , I ,? ?•? • , .I(.I I ..,., f.,w,; ^'".v^•'Y ax?R -_?..zsa R.R'TI t r?x .Y' '^ S^'S': _-`H'•"_. 1_.I a'sIY1=?.i"-' - __ _IW_li I4:.:Ekf` C RNg2.,x'C!t ?'L?
=Pn
g?
I

r