20191149 Ver 1_401 Application_20190828

-0- WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success,
August 27, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Stephens Tract Subdivision & Offsite Sewer - NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Holly Springs, Wake County
USACE AID: SAW -2011-01171
WR Project #0270951.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Clayton Properties Group, Inc., we are requesting authorization from the USACE to
use NWP 29 for 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.101 acres of temporary wetland
impacts, 210 If of permanent stream impacts and 30 If of temporary stream impacts necessary to
construct the proposed residential townhome subdivision project and offsite sewer. We are also
requesting an NCDWR 401 WQC for the above referenced impacts, as well as a Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Authorization for the proposed 25,937 sf of permanent buffer impacts and 8,653
sf of temporary buffer impacts.
The project is ±58.45 acres in size (Subdivision: 56.53 ac; Offsite Sewer: ±1.92 ac) and is located
at 1720, 1729, 1740 & 1825 Ralph Stephens Road in Holly Springs, Wake County (Latitude:
35.636962°N; Longitude: -78.841131°W). The project is located on seven parcels, and the offsite
sewer is located on three parcels, as shown in the Parcel/Owner Exhibit provided as an Appendix
The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Basal Creek [(Bass
Lake,(Mills Pond))]. The Water Quality Classification for Basal Creek [(Bass Lake,(Mills Pond))] is
B;NSW, and the Stream Index Number is: 27-43-15-3. The cataloging unit for the site is
03020201.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential townhome development to meet
the existing demand for housing in Holly Springs. The proposed project consists of construction
of 292 townhome units, parking, internal access roads, a greenway trail and associated
infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwater management, etc), as well as required improvements to
Ralph Stephens Road.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
219 Station Road, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Stephens Tract Subdivision & Offsite Sewer, Holly Springs, Wake Co. :: Withers Rave n e l
Dur People. Your Success.
Proiect Histo
PIN: 0648765713 - USACE AJD issued 8/10/17 (AID: SAW -2011-01171), which has been
provided as an Appendix.
PINs: 0648771259, 0648767101, 0648769202 & 0648769067 - USACE email, dated 7/25/18,
verifying delineation has been provided as an Appendix.
PIN: 0648668224 - USACE email, dated 10/9/18, verifying that site visit was not needed for
issuance of PJD (10/8/19) has been provided as an Appendix.
Offsite Sewer Alignment - WR completed a wetland delineation for the offsite sewer alignment
in June 2019. A PJD Request in support of the delineation specific to the offsite sewer alignment
has been provided as an Appendix. Please note we are not requesting issuance of a PJD in
conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
Subdivision - NCDWR issued a formal buffer determination for the entire Stephens Tract
Subdivision project area (RRO#18-373) on 10/25/18, which has been provided as an Appendix.
Offsite Sewer - WR has requested a site meeting with NCDWR to verify the stream stop/re-start
points for Stream 1 within the offsite sewer alignment to confirm that there is no stream within
the offsite sewer alignment.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of:
Impacts from Subdivision Construction
• 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts
• 0.011 acres of temporary wetland impacts
• 210 If of permanent stream impacts (187 If with Functional Loss; 23 If with No Functional
Loss)
• 10 If of temporary stream impacts
• 18,937 sf of permanent buffer impacts (Z1: 12,333 sf; Z2: 6,604 sf)
• 4,586 sf of temporary buffer impacts (Z1: 2,259 sf; Z2: 2,327 sf)
Impacts from Sewer Construction
• 0.09 ac of temporary wetland impacts
• 20 If of temporary stream impacts
• 7,000 sf of permanent buffer impacts (Z1: 3,776 sf; Z2: 3,224 sf)
• 4,067 sf of temporary buffer impacts (Z1: 1,833 sf; Z2: 2,234 sf)
All proposed permanent wetland and stream impacts are necessary for road construction.
Impacts 3, 4 & 5 are necessary for the extension of the existing 48" culvert beneath Ralph
Stephenson Road to accommodate the required widening of the road. The widening of Ralph
Stephens Road will result in 0.009 ac of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 4), 0.011 ac of
temporary wetland impacts (Impact 3) and 55 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact 5).
Improvements also include installation of a 42" culvert to provide high flow bypass, which will not
require impacts to jurisdictional features. Improvements to Ralph Stephens Road will also result
in 2,862 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts and 1,676 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts (Allowable).
Page 2 of 5

Stephens Tract Subdivision & Offsite Sewer, Holly Springs, Wake Co. :: Withers Rave n e l
Dur People. Your 5mcess.
The construction of internal road R007 to access Lots 255-292 will result in 0.132 acres of
permanent wetland impacts (Impact 12), 132 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact 13) for
installation of the culvert, 23 If of permanent stream impacts for installation of the rip -rap
dissipater (Impact 11) and 10 If of temporary stream impacts for installation of the culvert (Impact
14). The rip -rap dissipater is required to reduce flow velocity and prevent erosion of the stream
and undercutting of the culvert. The rip -rap will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the
top of the rip -rap matches the pre -construction contours of the natural stream bed, allowing for
the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of this section of stream channel. The
construction of road R007 will also result in 8,902 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts and 4,928 sf
of permanent Zone 2 impacts (Impact 9A), as well as 943 sf of temporary Zone 1 impacts, which
are "Allowable".
The construction of road R008 is required to connect to the existing Cline Falls Drive to the west
in order to meet the Town of Holly Springs interconnectivity requirements. The construction of
road R008 will result in 0.028 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 15).
The construction of the internal and offsite sewer system will result in 0.09 acres of temporary
wetland impacts, 20 If of temporary stream impacts, 3,776 sf of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts,
3,224 sf of permanent Zone 2 buffer impacts, 1,833 sf of temporary Zone 1 impacts and 2,234 sf
of temporary Zone 2 impacts. All wetland/stream crossings have been designed as perpendicular
crossings, except at Impact #9, where the sewer must turn east to cross under Castaway Ct.
All buffer crossings have been designed as perpendicular buffer crossings, except Impact 6A,
where the sewer must turn east to cross under Castaway Ct. Impact 6A is considered a non -
perpendicular impact within Zone 2, which is classified as "Allowable".
The project will result in 0.048 acres of permanent wetland conversion impacts as a result of the
perpetual mowing/maintenance of the entire 20 -ft permanent sewer easement. The wetlands
within the 10 -ft temporary construction easement will be restored to natural grade and
temporarily stabilized with a wetland seed mix, and allowed to return to forested wetlands. The
permanent wetland conversion impacts are documented in the table below:
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts for construction of the subdivision and infrastructure have been
minimized to only those necessary for construction of road crossings to access developable
uplands within the site. There are no impacts proposed for construction of lots. The internal road
Page 3 of 5
Permanent Conversion Impact Table
Map
Impact # Wetland #
Acreage
A
1 Wetland C
0.013 ac
A
6 Wetland C
0.018 ac
B
9 Wetland A
0.017 ac
Total Wetland Conversion Impacts
0.048 ac
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts for construction of the subdivision and infrastructure have been
minimized to only those necessary for construction of road crossings to access developable
uplands within the site. There are no impacts proposed for construction of lots. The internal road
Page 3 of 5

Stephens Tract Subdivision & Offsite Sewer, Holly Springs, Wake Co. %0 WithersRavenel
lipOw People. Your Success.
crossing for road R007 has been designed to cross wetlands at the narrowest points and cross
streams perpendicularly. Wetland impacts for the construction of road R008 to connect to the
existing Cline Falls Drive could not be avoided due to the fixed tie-in point, as well as minimum
curve radii allowed. Permanent impacts for road construction have been minimized by utilizing
3:1 backslopes to transition road fill to natural grade. Headwalls have been designed
The proposed sewer line/easement has been designed to minimize temporary wetland impacts by
crossing the wetlands at the most narrow practical point. Temporary wetland, stream and buffer
impacts have been minimized by crossing these features at perpendicular angles. The sewer
crossing of at Pond 3 in the southwestern portion of the proposed subdivision will be installed via
jack and bore to avoid impacts and prevent the need to drain Pond 3.
Upon completion of installation of the proposed sewer line, the disturbed wetland areas will be
restored to natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix to restore wetland vegetation. The
20 -ft permanent utility easement will be regularly mowed, and the remainder of the disturbed
wetlands within the 10 -ft temporary construction easement will be left alone to allow vegetation
to re -grow and return to forested wetlands.
Temporary buffer impacts for needed temporary construction access will be restored to natural
grade and seeded with a riparian seed mix to stabilize the area until natural recruitment permanent
restores the vegetation within these areas.
Construction techniques used to avoid or minimize impacts include installation of erosion &
sediment control devices prior to construction of the utility line. Matting will be used where
necessary to minimize the extent of impacts within the sewer construction corridor.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 210 If of permanent stream impacts, of which 187 If will result
in a functional loss as depicted in the table below:
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 187 If of functional loss at a 2:1 mitigation ratio,
resulting in the provision of 374 If of stream mitigation. WithersRavenel contacted mitigation
banks within the Neuse 03020201 basin, and there was no stream mitigation available. Therefore,
the applicant proposes to provide the 374 If of stream mitigation through the NCDMS. The letter
of acceptance from NCDMS has been provided as an Appendix.
Wetland Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, which the applicant
proposes to mitigate at a 2:1 ratio, resulting in the purchase of 0.4 acres of riparian wetland
Page 4 of 5
Stream Impact Mitigation Table
Impact #
Reason for Impact
Functional Loss No Functional Loss
5
Culver Extension
55 If
11
Rip -Rap Dissipator
23 If
13
Culvert/Road Crossing
132 If
Total
187 If 23 If
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 187 If of functional loss at a 2:1 mitigation ratio,
resulting in the provision of 374 If of stream mitigation. WithersRavenel contacted mitigation
banks within the Neuse 03020201 basin, and there was no stream mitigation available. Therefore,
the applicant proposes to provide the 374 If of stream mitigation through the NCDMS. The letter
of acceptance from NCDMS has been provided as an Appendix.
Wetland Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, which the applicant
proposes to mitigate at a 2:1 ratio, resulting in the purchase of 0.4 acres of riparian wetland
Page 4 of 5

Stephens Tract Subdivision & Offsite Sewer, Holly Springs, Wake Co. %0 WithersRavenel
lipOw People. Your Success.
mitigation. The applicant proposed to provide the 0.4 acres of riparian wetland mitigation through
the purchase of credits from Wildlands Holdings III, LLC within the Falling Creek Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Bank: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site. A copy of the Statement of
Availability from Wildlands has been provided as an appendix.
Buffer Mitigation
All proposed impacts to riparian buffers are classified as "Exempt" or "Allowable" in the Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules' Table of Uses. Therefore, buffer mitigation is not required.
The current request is for 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.101 acres of temporary
wetland impacts, 210 If of permanent stream impacts, 30 If of temporary stream impacts, 25,937
sf of permanent buffer impacts and 8,653 sf of temporary buffer impacts. (see the attached maps
and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Wetland/Stream/Buffer Location Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Wake County Soil Survey
• USACE AJD for PIN: 0648765713 (AID: SAW -2011-01171)
• USACE Concurrence Email for PINs: 0648771259, 0648767101 & 0648769067
• USACE Concurrence Email for PIN: 0648668224 (AID: SAW -2011-01171)
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter for Stephens Tract Subdivision Project Area
• PJD Request for Offsite Sewer Alignment
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• NCDMS ILF Letter of Acceptance
• Wildlands Holdings III, LLC Statement of Availability
• Stormwater Management Plan - Drainage Area Exhibit (For locations of SCMs)
• Impact Exhibits
Page 5 of 5

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FEI Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Stephens Tract Subdivision and Offsite Sewer
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Holly Springs
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
Page 1 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Owner Information
Stephens Tract Townhome Project Area
Clayton Properties Group, Inc. — PINs: 0648771259, 0648765713, 0648769202,
0648769067 and 0648668224
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Offsite Sewer Project Area
Regina Barrow — PIN: 0648751814
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel — PIN: 0648757407
Lightbridge Partners LLC. — PIN: 0648850369
017406; 0278 - PIN:0648771259
017373; 00930 - PIN:0648765713
017406; 02690 - PIN:0648769202
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
017388; 01134 - PIN:0648769067
017448; 01634 - PIN:0648668224
007036; 00621 - PIN:0648751814
017183; 00121 - PIN:0648757407
017437; 02494 - PIN:0648850369
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Stephens Tract Townhome Project Area
Clayton Properties Group, Inc. — 5000 Clayton Road
3d. Street address:
Offsite Sewer Project Area
Regina Barrow — 511 Montgomery Loop
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel — 1910 W Sunset Blvd; Suite 200
Lightbridge Partners LLC. — 5210 Driftwood Lane
Stephens Tract Townhome Project Area
Clayton Properties Group, Inc. — Maryville, TN 37804
3e. City, state, zip:
Offsite Sewer Project Area
Regina Barrow — Hampstead, NC 28443
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel — Los Angeles, CA 90026
Lightbridge Partners LLC. — Morehead City, NC 28557
Stephens Tract Townhome Project Area
Clayton Properties Group, Inc. — 919.390.5299 (Chris Simmering — VP)
3f. Telephone no.:
Offsite Sewer Project Area
Regina Barrow — 919.818.7439
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel — 919.946.2135 (Todd Davis — Pastor)
Lightbridge Partners LLC. — N/A
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
Stephens Tract Townhome Project Area
Clayton Properties Group, Inc. — [e-mail]
3h. Email address:
Offsite Sewer Project Area
Regina Barrow — [e-mail]
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel — [e-mail]
Lightbridge Partners LLC. — N/A
Page 2 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner/Developer — Local Office
4b.
Name:
Chris Simmering — VP of Land Acquisitions & Development
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Clayton Properties Group, Inc
4d. Street address:
2521 Schieffelin Rd; Suite 116
4e. City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27502
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-390-5299
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
csimmering(cDmungo.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
WithersRavenel
5c.
Street address:
219 Station Road, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28405
5e.
Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no..-
o.:5g.
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley(@withersravenel.com
Page 3 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
Subdivision: 0648771259; 0648765713; 0648769202;
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0648769067;0648668224
Offsite Sewer: 0648751814; 0648757407; 0648850369
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.636962 Longitude: - 78.841131
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
Subdivision - ±56.53 acres
1 c.
Property size:
Offsite Sewer — 1.92 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Basal Creek [(Bass Lake,(Mills Pond))]
proposed project:
Stream Index: 27-43-15-3
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class B; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse - 03020201
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of a mixture of undeveloped woodlands, agricultural fields, and existing residential
houses. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists of a mixture of residential and commercial land use.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Subdivision - ±6.27 acres
Offsite Sewer - ±0.11 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±1,144 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential townhome subdivision to meet the existing demand for
this type of housing in Holly Springs.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of construction of 292 townhome units, parking, internal access roads, a greenway trail and
associated infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwater management, etc), as well as required improvements to Ralph
Stephens Road.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques.
Page 4 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Lyle Phillips
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PIN: 0648765713 — USACE AJD issued 8/10/17 (AID: SAW -2011-01171), which has been provided as an Appendix.
PINs: 0648771259, 0648767101, 0648769202 & 0648769067 — USACE email, dated 7/25/18, verifying delineation has
been provided as an Appendix.
PIN: 0648668224 — USACE email, dated 10/9/18, verifying that site visit was not needed for issuance of PJD (10/8/19)
has been provided as an Appendix.
Offsite Sewer Alignment — WR completed a wetland delineation for the offsite sewer alignment in June 2019. A PJD
Request in support of the delineation specific to the offsite sewer alignment has been provided as an Appendix. Please
note we are not requesting issuance of a PJD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
Subdivision - NCDWR issued a formal buffer determination for the entire Stephens Tract Subdivision project area
(RRO#18-373) on 10/25/18, which has been provided as an Appendix.
Offsite Sewer - WR has requested a site meeting with NCDWR to verify the stream stop/re-start points for Stream 1
within the offsite sewer alignment to confirm that there is no stream within the offsite sewer alignment.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 6 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number—
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Permanent Impacts
Impact 4
®Yes
® Corps
(Wetland C)
Road Crossing
Headwater Forest
[I No
®DWQ
0.009
®P❑T
Impact 12
®Yes
® Corps
(Wetland A)
Road Crossing
Headwater Forest
El No
®DWQ
0.132
®P❑T
Impact 15
®Yes
® Corps
(Wetland A)
Road Crossing
Headwater Forest
El No
®DWQ
0.028
®P❑T
Total Permanent Impacts
0.169
Temporary
Impacts
Impact 1
Sewer — Temp
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland C)
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
®DWQ
0.013
L]P ® T
Access
Impact 2
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland C)
Sewer Crossing
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.013
❑P®T
Impact 3
Road Crossing —
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland C)
Temp Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.011
❑ P ® T
Access
Impact 6
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland D)
Sewer Crossing
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.018
❑P®T
Impact 8
Sewer — Temp
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland D)
Construction
Headwater Forest
El No
®DWQ
0.018
[_1P ® T
Access
Impact 9
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland A)
Sewer Crossing
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.017
❑P®T
Impact 10
Sewer — Temp
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland A)
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.011
❑ P ® T
Access
Total Temporary Wetland Impacts
0.101
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.270
2h. Comments:
Page 7 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 8 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Permanent Impacts (Functional Loss)
Impact 5
❑ PER
® Corps
(Stream 1)
Road Crossing
UT to Basal Creek
®INT
®DWQ
5
55
®P❑T
Impact 13
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 2)
Road Crossing
Basal Creek
El INT
®DWQ
10
132
®P❑T
Total Permanent Impacts (Function Loss)
187
Permanent Impacts (No Functional Loss)
Impact 11
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 2)
Rip -Rap Dissipator
Basal Creek
E] INT
®DWQ
10
23
®P❑T
Total Permanent Impacts (No Function Loss)
23
Temporary Impacts
Impact 7
❑ PER
® Corps
(Stream 1)
Sewer Crossing
UT to Basal Creek
®INT
®DWQ
5
20
❑P®T
Impact 14
Road — Temp
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 2)
Construction
Basal Creek
El INT
®DWQ
10
10
L]P ® T
Access
Total Temporary Impacts
30
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
240
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 8 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 9 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
Permanent Impacts
Impact 2A
Perp Sewer
El Yes
®P [_1 T
Crossing
UT to Basal Creek
®No
0
59
(Allowable)
Impact 3A
Road Crossing
UT to Basal Creek
❑ Yes
2862
1676
® P ❑ T
(Allowable)
® No
Impact 4A
Road Crossing
UT to Basal Creek
ElYes
569
0
® P [_1T
(Allowable)
® No
Impact 5A
Perp Sewer
❑ Yes
® P ❑ T
Crossing
Basal Creek
® No
940
973
(Allowable)
Impact 6A
Non -Perp Sewer
❑ Yes
® P ❑ T
Crossing
Basal Creek
® No
0
491
(Allowable)
Impact 7A
Perp Sewer
❑ Yes
®P El T
Crossing
Basal Creek
No
1612
840
(Allowable)
Impact 8A
Perp Sewer
L1 Yes
®P El T
Crossing
Basal Creek
No
1224
861
(Allowable)
Impact 9A
Road Crossing
Basal Creek
ElYes
8902
4928
® P [_1T
(Allowable)
® No
Total Permanent Impacts
16,109
9,828
Temporary Impacts
Impact 1 B
Existing Structure
El Yes
E:1 P ®T
Demo
UT to Basal Creek
No
497
2,015
(Exempt)
Sewer — Temp
Impact 2B
Construction
UT to Basal Creek
ElYes
0
383
E:1P ® T
Access
® No
(Exempt)
Road Crossing —
Impact 4B
Temp Construction
UT to Basal Creek
El Yes
819
312
❑ P ® T
Access
(Exempt)
Sewer — Temp
Impact 5B
Construction
Basal Creek
LlYes
331
597
[_1P ® T
Access
® No
(Exempt)
Sewer — Temp
Impact 6B
Construction
Basal Creek
ElYes
51
391
E:1P ® T
Access
® No
(Exempt)
Page 10 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 11 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Sewer — Temp
Impact 7B
Construction
Basal Creek
ElYes
838
433
❑ P ® T
Access
® No
(Exempt)
Sewer — Temp
Impact 8B
Construction
Basal Creek
ElYes
613
430
[_1P ® T
Access
® No
(Exempt)
Road Crossing —
Impact 9B
Temp Construction
Basal Creek
®Nos
943
0
E]P ® T
Access
(Exempt)
Total Temporary Impacts
4,092
4,561
6h. Total buffer impacts
20,201
14,389
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts for construction of the subdivision and infrastructure have been minimized to only those
necessary for construction of road crossings to access developable uplands within the site. There are no impacts proposed for
construction of lots. The internal road crossing for road R007 has been designed to cross wetlands at the narrowest points
and cross streams perpendicularly. Wetland impacts for the construction of road R008 to connect to the existing Cline Falls
Drive could not be avoided due to the fixed tie-in point, as well as minimum curve radii allowed. Permanent impacts for road
construction have been minimized by utilizing 3:1 backslopes to transition road fill to natural grade. Headwalls have been
designed
The proposed sewer line/easement has been designed to minimize temporary wetland impacts by crossing the wetlands at
the most narrow practical point. Temporary wetland, stream and buffer impacts have been minimized by crossing these
features at perpendicular angles. The sewer crossing of at Pond 3 in the southwestern portion of the proposed subdivision will
be installed via jack and bore to avoid impacts and prevent the need to drain Pond 3.
Upon completion of installation of the proposed sewer line, the disturbed wetland areas will be restored to natural grade and
seeded with a wetland seed mix to restore wetland vegetation. The 20 -ft permanent utility easement will be regularly mowed,
and the remainder of the disturbed wetlands within the 10 -ft temporary construction easement will be left alone to allow
vegetation to re -grow and return to forested wetlands.
Temporary buffer impacts for needed temporary construction access will be restored to natural grade and seeded with a
riparian seed mix to stabilize the area until natural recruitment permanent restores the vegetation within these areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques used to avoid or minimize impacts include installation of erosion & sediment control devices prior to
construction of the utility line. Matting will be used where necessary to minimize the extent of impacts within the sewer
construction corridor.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 11 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Wetland
Quantity 0.4 acres
3c. Comments: The proposed project will result in 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, which the applicant proposes to
mitigate at a 2:1 ratio, resulting in the purchase of 0.4 acres of riparian wetland mitigation. The applicant proposed to provide
the 0.4 acres of riparian wetland mitigation through the purchase of credits from Wildlands Holdings III, LLC within the Falling
Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site. A copy of the Statement of Availability from
Wildlands has been provided as an appendix.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
374 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.40 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 187 If of functional loss at a 2:1 mitigation ratio, resulting in the provision of 374 If of
stream mitigation. WithersRavenel contacted mitigation banks within the Neuse 03020201 basin, and there was no stream
mitigation available. Therefore, the applicant proposes to provide the 374 If of stream mitigation through the NCDMS. The
letter of acceptance from NCDMS has been provided as an Appendix.
The proposed project will result in 0.169 acres of permanent wetland impacts, which the applicant proposes to mitigate at a
2:1 ratio, resulting in the purchase of 0.4 acres of riparian wetland mitigation. The applicant proposed to provide the 0.4 acres
of riparian wetland mitigation through the purchase of credits from Wildlands Holdings III, LLC within the Falling Creek Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Bank: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site. A copy of the Statement of Availability from Wildlands has
been provided as an appendix.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 12 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 13 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The stormwater management plan consists of 4 stormwater wetland
❑ Yes ® No
SCMs which do not require diffuse flow. The stormwater management plan will be
reviewed and approved by the Town of Holly Springs as the certified municipality.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
38%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan consists of 4 stormwater wetland SCMs. The stormwater management plan will be
reviewed and approved by the Town of Holly Springs as the certified municipality.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Holly Springs
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ 0 R
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 14 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located within a heavily developed area of Holly Springs, and will not be a catalyst
for future
development. Additionally, there are no future phases proposed or anticipated for this project.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Holly Springs Sanitary Sewer
Page 15 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
F-1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home, as well as
NCNHP GIS data to identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project.
The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species
or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter.
Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for bald eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker or Michaux's sumac.
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin, and therefore is not located within the known range of the Cape Fear
Shiner or Tar River spinymussel.
The project site is within the known range of the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance
and dwarf wedgemussel. Stream 1 is an intermittent stream, and therefore was not considered potential habitat for
Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance and dwarf wedgemussel
Stream 2 is perennial (Basal Creek), but does not have the excellent water quality and high oxygen levels necessary to
be considered potential habitat for Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance and dwarf
wedgemussel. Additionally, the proposed project is located in the extreme upper reach of Basal Creek, and is located
upstream of four separate dammed impoundments, including Bass Lake and Sunset Lake, prior to the confluence of
Basal Creek and Middle Creek, which would prevent migration of these species to sustain viable populations. Therefore,
the onsite intermittent streams were not considered potential habitat for the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog,
Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance and dwarf wedgemussel.
Therefore, the proposed project will have No Effect on federally listed species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at:
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html. There are now waters classified as EFH in Wake
County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
Page 16 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel
l
Authorized Agent
8/27/19
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 17 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1/ WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

■■ WithersRavenel
'. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, Clayton Properties Group, Inc (Client) does hereby
appoint WithersRavenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the
appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local
municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite
jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and
submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the Stephens Tract
Subdivision (±56 acres), located on Ralph Stephens Road in Holly Springs, Wake County,
consisting of the following parcels:
• Wake Co PIN: 0648771259 - ±23.51 ac - 1720 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648668224 - ±7.57 ac - 1740 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648765713 - ±19.01 ac - 1729 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648767101 - ±3.68 ac - 1825 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648769202 - ±1.90 ac - No Address
• Wake Co PIN: 0648769067 - ±0.34 ac - No Address
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date:
Signature of Client:
Na e- Pr t) (Title)
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone:
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PARCEL/OWNER INFORMATION

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
PIN: 0648771259 - 1720 RALPH STEPHENS RD
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017406; PAGE: 0278
STEPHENS TRACT --
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
PIN: 0648668224 - 1740 RALPH STEPHENS RD
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017448; PAGE: 01634
STEPHENS TRACT
I*
PIN:0648751814
REGINA BARROW
511 MONTGOMERY LOOP
HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443
BOOK: 007036; PAGE: 00621
OFFSITE SEWER
PARCEL/OWNER EXHIBIT
PIN: 0648765713 - 1729 RALPH STEPHENS RD
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017373; PAGE: 00930
PIN:0648769202
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017406; PAGE: 02690
PIN:0648769067
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017388; PAGE: 01134
PIN: 0648767101 - 1825 RALPH STEPHENS RD
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.
5000 CLAYTON RD
MARYVILLE, TN 37804
BOOK: 017388; PAGE: 01134
PIN:0648757407
INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE
FOURSQUARE GOSPEL
1910 W SUNSET BLVD; SUITE 200
LOS ANGELES, CA 90026
BOOK: 017183; PAGE: 00121
—PIN:0648850369
LIGHTBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC
5210 DRIFTWOOD LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
BOOK: 017437: PAGE: 02494
;!
WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WETLAND/STREAM/BUFFER
LOCATION EXHIBIT

NOTES:
GRAPHIC SCALE0 1) DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS ON 06/27/2019.
2) JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (SAW -2011-01171) FOR PIN#: 0648765713 ISSUED BY
0 250 500 a o d JAMES LASTINGER OF USACE ON 08/10/2017. FOR THE REMAINING PARCELS, THE
d 4 DELINEATION AND JURISDICTIONAL STATUS WAS FIELD VERIFIED BY JAMES
LASTINGER OF THE USACE ON 07/10/2018.
1 inch = 500 ft. SOP° 0 3) BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER (RRO #18-373) ISSUED BY NCDWR ON 10.25.2018.
e° 4) BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER (RRO #15-170) ISSUED BY NCDWR ON 04.28.2015.
v e; ��a =rrt} 5) WETLAND/STREAM/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS LOCATION,
WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
o , � ' � �/✓ � � Y' � 40 0 1 0
�q O O/1
0 o e
8 e \\ 0 I e Q
N n °
E , d 0
pr
a •off,
- o
g STEPHENS TRACT WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
[HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000 r{1��{
_�It y
3157 3 4
r I k
I
a1
1 inch = 2000 ft. ' Fr�
IF
I•
J
O f
• 5 i -^�/�t�v, it I
�t
� r5
I F
REAS
r
f lrl*� �y5k \�1 ii �I! � Y�r l/•✓� ' �' �
�I ! f L
�r'
\l ) I
�v� =�
I
ti Y_�afJlfl� � II �
�k{� '�. x•� 4
�rT�-- i i�j �,,
a r��. ��J
+
I I ;nl,s?
Q pBRp
(' t+f
;
TpR PAM Pt v
+
Q,,Vfy ����
A 4
(400
�� 450
450
HIGH POCKET DR
\� J
�'
450 B•4?T—BQSgl
/
0
C{• / y
`z
i HONE 'CUTT RD
45b
STEPHENS TRACT
USGS QUAD (2013) - APEX, FUQUAY-VARINA,
NEW HILL, & COKESBURY
WithersRavenel
1P Engineers I PLanners I Surveyors
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
o zso soo
1 inch = 500 ft.
STEPHENS TRACT
ECT
NI
OFFSITESEWER
do
USGS QUAD (2013) - APEX,FUQUAY-VARINA,
NEW HILL, & COKESB RY
STNS RA
NO WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
Go
1 inch = 500 ft.
1
��, FaB2 FaC2.
FaB2 `
tt
1 N �
A 62 NoB
i y
Ag
B2
i OrB
CeF 1
1 �� �, '
,
• NoB2
�_
NoB2
eC2
FaC2
`.
NoB
Or62
NoA W
s _
e
FaB _� Ra
OrB2
E O rC a
N .
oB2
`
ku
NoB
STEPHENS TRACT
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970)
- SHEET 90
10 WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
j HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE AJ D FOR PIN: 0648765713
(AID: SAW -2011-01171)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 201101171 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: Fuguay-Varina
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Amec Foster Wheeler
Address: Attn: Josh Witherspoon
4021 Stirrup Creek Dr., suite 100
Durham, NC 27703
Telephone No.: 919-381-9900
Property description:
Size (acres) 18 Nearest Town Holly Springs
Nearest Waterway Basal Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates N 35.6367 W -78.8400
Location description The property is located adiacent to Piney Grove Wilbon Rd., near Holly Springs, Wake
Countv. North Carolina. The property consists of existing farm fields and contains one non-iurisdictional pond
constructed entirely within uplands.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

Action ID:
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James LastinEer at 919-554-4884 ext 32.
C. Basis For Determination
Please see attached approved jurisdictional determination form.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Jean Gibby, Field Office Chief,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by September 5, 2011.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date August 10, 2017
Expiration Date August 10, 2022
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://re ug latory.usacesurvey.com/ to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
Page 2 of 2

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-
8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): August 10, 2017
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-R, Stephens Property, SAW -2011-01171
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The property is located adjacent to Piney Grove
Wilbon Rd., near Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina. The property consists of existing farm fields and
contains one non jurisdictional pond.
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Holly S�2 rings
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.6367° ■, Long. -78.8400° �.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Basal Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Cape Fear
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030004
'Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
'Office (Desk) Determination. Date: August 10, 2017
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
Therer� "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There _ "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
❑' TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Pick List
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

0 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not
jurisdictional. Explain: One pond was observed on the property and is not a Water of the U.S. pursuant to the preamble
to the Corps 1986 regulations (33 CFR Parts 320-330). The area immediately adjacent to Pond 1 consists of uplands..
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through � tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.

Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that Uply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: --
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: -
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: -
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Wk List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick A. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: _. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM .7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: W Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: �. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Fick Lid river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Fick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wk List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an�
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IIID:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IIID:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
0 Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Q Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA -STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
0 which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
'Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above): One pond was observed on the property and is not a Water of the U.S. pursuant to the
preamble to the Corps 1986 regulations (33 CFR Parts 320-330). The area immediately adjacent to Pond 1 consists of uplands.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
® Lakes/ponds:0.5acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
0 Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
. Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Amec Foster Wheeler.
Eq Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
EJ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: Simsuite data set.
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Apex Quad.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County 1970.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Simsuite data set.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date): site photos.
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW -2011-01171 dated July 5, 2011.
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:.

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE CONCURRENCE EMAIL FOR PINs:
0648771259,0648767101 & 0648769067
(AID: SAW -2011-01171)

From: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
To: Phillips, Lyle
Subject: RE: Request for Preliminary JD - Stephens Tract Townhomes (WR#02170951.00)
Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 10:38:33 AM
Lyle,
Thanks for the email. Based on our site visit the delineation is accurate and may be relied upon for planning and
permitting purposes. The AID for the project is SAW -2011-01171.
James Lastinger
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x32
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Phillips, Lyle[mailto:lphillips&withersravenel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 3:11 PM
To: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Preliminary JD - Stephens Tract Townhomes (WR#02170951.00)
James,
This email is in follow-up to our site meeting on 07/10/2018 to verify the delineation for the Stephens Tract
Townhomes project, located at 1720 & 1825 Ralph Stephens Road in Holly Springs. During the site review, you
field verified that the delineation as delineated, with no changes to flags or jurisdictional status, as depicted in the
attached Approved Delineation Exhibits attached.
We understand that due to your current workload, the JD will be issued during permitting. Will you please respond
to this email concurring with the results of the site meeting so that we have documentation for upcoming submittals.
Thanks again for your help with this project.
Lyle Phillips
From: Phillips, Lyle
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 8:51 AM
To: 'Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US)' <[e-mail]>

Subject: Request for Preliminary JD - Stephens Tract Townhomes (WR#02170951.00)
Good Morning James,
I've attached a request for Preliminary JD for the Stephens Tract Townhomes site, located at 1720 & 1825 Ralph
Stephens Road in Holly Springs, NC.
The overall project site is t 47.25 acres and our review area is 29.65 acres. Approximately 17.6 acres of the project
has been reviewed by the USACE and an approved JD has been issued (AID: SAW -201101171). I have attached the
AID as an appendix.
The review area is comprised of undeveloped woods, agricultural land and 3 small homesteads.
During the site review WithersRavenel identified 2 Streams, 3 wetlands and 1 pond.
Please take a look at the attached request and let me know your availability for a site visit. The site visit should take
about 2.0 hours.
Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any additional information.
Lyle Phillips
<Blockedhttp://www.withersravenel.com/>
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
Office: 919.469.3340 1 Direct: 919.535.5165
[e-mail]<mailto:lphillips&withersravenel.com>
<Blockedhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/1040027?
trk=tyah&trklnfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityld%3A 1040027%2Cidx%3A21-
3%2Ctarld%3A1439227492366%2Ctas%3Awithersravenel> <Blockedhttps://www.facebook.com/withersravenel?
ref'--bookmarks><Blockedhttps://twitter.com/WithersRavenel>
<Blockedhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UClY4TLZTX7cTZxW zKAXz Q>
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE <Blockedhttp://withersravenel.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/09/Confidentiality.png>

_47m , �,� I I -f - I _
.
GRAPHIC SCALE �:. ', eR� -;�'��
` 4
0 200 400 �•� • r f r * ',?� �a • +� ��
1 inch 400 ft.
0w0_j
16 1
.. n4 � r OO _ I Y� �1�4 k •;
}" • + - - -
1
n} R � j ••
Af
s 7_ ate.
• .•
NOTES:r
1) DELINEATION AND JURISDICTIONAL STATUS FIELD APPROVED BY JAMES
LASTINGER OF USACE ON 07/10/2018. �_ Y
2) WETLAND/STREAM LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS LOCATION, s
WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
STEPHENS TRACT TOWNHOMES APPROVED WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT ;� WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE CONCURRENCE EMAIL FOR PIN:
0648668224 (AID: SAW -2011-01171)

From: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
To: Phillips, Lyle
Subject: RE: Kesselring Property - Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 7:38:32 AM
Lyle,
I see no need to make a site visit for this one, and concur with the delineation as submitted.
James Lastinger
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x32
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Phillips, Lyle[mailto:lphillips&withersravenel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 3:44 PM
To: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Kesselring Property - Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Hey James,
I've attached a request for Preliminary JD for Kesselring Property, located at 1740 Penny Road in Holly Springs,
NC.
This site is f 7.57 review area comprised of undeveloped woodlands, and a homestead.
During the site review WithersRavenel identified 1 Stream and 2 wetlands and 1 pond. The wetlands were located
along the toe of slop and the delineation was very straight forward. This parcel was a last minute addition to our
Stephens Tract Townhomes Project (SAW -2011-01171).
Please take a look at the attached request and let me know your availability for a site visit. The site visit should take
less than an hour.
Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any additional information.
Lyle Phillips

<Blockedhttp://www.withersravenel.com/>
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
Office: 919.469.3340 1 Direct: 919.535.5165
[e-mail] <mailto:lphillips(!�withcrsravcncl.com>
<Blockedhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/1040027?
trk=tyah&trklnfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityld%3A1040027%2Cidx%3A21-
3%2Ctarld%3A1439227492366%2Ctas%3Awithersravenel> <Blockedhttps://www.facebook.com/withersravenel?
ref�—bookmarks> <Blockedhttps://twitter.com/WithersRavenel>
<Blockedhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/JCIY4TLZTX7cTZxW ZKAXz Q>
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE <Blockedhttp://withersravenel.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/09/Confidentiality.png>

GRAPHIC SCALE ...........
n0 75 150
�.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •
.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.••
.. it
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . • �'
• • WETLAND DELINEATION AND "
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS FIELD APPROVED
BY JAMES LASTINGER (SAW -2011-01171). POTENTAIALNON-WESAL TLA
WATERS OF US ,
BERM
5EyIEW AREA ---
Y DP1 &2
y v.
FLAG A-5
WETLAND A�
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF US
All
WETLAND B
� r � OTENTIAL WETLAN
r ' WATERS OF US
f 1 PON
e {�• POTENTIAL NON -WET. A
y WATERS OF U3
PROPERTYKESSELRING
COUNTYVA 0 Engineers I Planners I SurveyorsHOLLY SPRINGS WAKE

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCDWR BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER FOR
STEPHENS TRACT SUBDIVISION PROJECT AREA

01 -
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
October 25, 2418
Agnes H. Smith Trust
The Trust Company of NC
100 West Chatham Street
Cary, NC 27511
ROY COOPER
Go> err:at•
MICHAEL S. REGAN
5ec+•ercr+ t
LINDA CULPEPPER
Inierion 0irecror
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #18-373
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Start@EDWR
❑ Tar -Pamlico 05A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
USGS
To o
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
DWR Flag
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
Tract Townhomes
1825, 1729, 1740, & 1720 Ralph Stephens Road, Holly Springs
Basal Creek and UTs
Determination Date: 10/23/2018
Staff: Jeremiah Dow
Stream
Feature
VIM(11
Not I�1
Subject
Subject
Start@EDWR
@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
IIP
X
DWR Flag
lagA
etland
X
A-1
X
DWR Flag
Off Property
X
B
UP
X
DWR Flag
Off Property
X
X
Pond l
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
Pond 2
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
Pond 5
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
Pond 3
Not Subject according to Buffer Determination #15-170 (expires in 2020)
Pond 4
C
( 1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Wake County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
' Nothing Compares - --
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality , Water Resources I Ralei8h Regional Office
1628 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919 791-4200

Stephens Tract Townhomes
Wake County
10/25/2018
Page 2 of 2
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present, Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B,
and may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service. c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mai! Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding thi etermin .'on, please feel free to contact Jeremiah Dow at [phone].
Si erel ,
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Lyle Phillips, Withers Ravenel, via email at: [e-mail]
David Tollefson, 1326 Young Road, Angier, NC 27501
Stephens Cousins LLC, 502 North Ennis Street, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
William & Kathleen Kesselring, 1740 Ralph Stephens Road, Holly Springs, NC 27540

Ralph Stephens Road Properties, Holly Springs (Wake)
Stream Determination #18-373
Feature C
Nor Subject according to
NBRRUP 15-170 (expires in 2020)
aB2
Nor Suhjecr accorrfing to i Pond 5 - Not Subject
;1.'iir•"'� 1 - 1? -176 (expires in 2020)
Pond I - i Subject
O r
Feature B - Subject
Start at DWR FlayFa 13.2
r. FeatureA- Subject
dOL ,3: 4,. Start at DWR Flag
Stop at DWR Flag
•� s . (Feature loses bed $c bank in wetland)
y.
Ik
O
Legend
Pond 2 •Sub ect Feature A-1 - Subject
P
1825 Ralph Stephens Road 1 } Start at DWR Flag y
(Restart of Feature A)
1729 Ralph Stephens Road
z
1740 Ralph Stephens Road
1720 Ralph Stephens Road
P P �
�o-
�. Map provided by NCDEQ Division
N _ of Water Resources
Locations are approximate and are
0 250 500 1,000.*,, provided for reference only
Feet

Ralph Stephens Road Properties, Holly Springs (Wake)
Stream Determination #18-373
Feature C
Not Subject according to
NBRRO# 15-170 (expires in 2020) i1
Pond 3
Not Subject according to
NBRRO# 15-170 (expires in 2020) �t
J �
Feature B
Start at D)
Legend
® 1825 Ralph Stephens Road
1729 Ralph Stephens Road
1740 Ralph Stephens Road
1720 Ralph Stephens Road
s
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Pond 4
Not Subject according to
NBRRO# 15-170 (expires in 2020)
Pond 5 - Not Subject �.9�'f
Pond 1 - Not Subject
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation
Dataset, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and
National Transportation dataset; U -S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line; HERE
Road Data. Data Refreshed July, 2017,
Map provided by NCDEQ Division
of Water Resources
Locations are approximate and are
provided for reference only ::

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PJD REQUEST FOR OFFSITE
SEWER ALIGNMENT

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1828 Ralph Stephens Road
City, State:
Holly Springs, NC
County: Wake County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0648757407, 0648850369 & 0648751814
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Lvle Phillips - WithersRavenel
Mailing Address: 115 MacKenan Drive
Telephone Number:
Cary, NC 27511
919-353-0219
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
ZI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
F1Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: See property owner information
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Lyle Phillips - WithersRavenel
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agent'
08.24.2019
Date L—�
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOVUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 • 92 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.633634
-78.839578
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
ul Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug lato!3 -Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
✓0 USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorL/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.g.M.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lyle Phillips — WithersRavenel; 115 MacKenan Drive,
Cary, NC 27511
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1828 Ralph Stephens Road
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Holly Springs
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.633634°N Long.: -78.839578°W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Basal Creek (27-43-15-3)
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount
of aquatic
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude
Longitude
resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic
Site Number
(decimal
(decimal
resource "may be" subject
degrees)
degrees)
review area
wetland vs. non-
(i.e., Section 404 or
(acreage and linear
wetland waters)
Section 10/404)
feet, if applicable
Wetland A
35.633186
-78.839196
0.11
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.634205
-78.841119
0.02
Wetland
Section 404
Outside Review
Stream 1
35.633313
-78.8309079
Area
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream 2
35.633260
-78.840342
Outside Review
Non -wetland
Section 404
Area

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fords that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester: Lyle
Phillips - WithersRavenel
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS Quad — Apex; 1:24K
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co. Soil Survey — Sheet 90
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Aerial — 2017
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determination-_
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
/ 08.24.2019
Lyle Phillips — WithersRavenel
Authorized Agent
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

■■ WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
Stephens Tract Offsite Sewer
WR Proiect No. 02170951.00
Jurisdictional Determination Request Information
Applicant - Clayton Properties Group, Inc.
Chris Simmering - VP of Land Acquisitions & Development
2521 Schieffelin Rd; Suite 116
Apex, NC 27502
919-390-5299
csimmering@mun og com
Property Owner -
Physical Address -
Written Authorization:
Nearest Municipality -
See Property Owner Information
1828 Ralph Stephens Road
See attached Agent Authorization form
Holly Springs
County - Wake County
PIN - Wake Co PIN#: 0648757407, 0648850369 & 0648751814
Drainage Basin - Cape Fear River Basin
HUC Code: 03030004
Receiving Waters -
Stream Index:
Classification:
Decidegrees -
USGS Quad Map -
Soils Map -
Total Area -
Basal Creek {Bass Lake, (Mills Pond))]
27-43-15-3
B; NSW
35.633634°N; -78.839578°W
Apex Quadrangle
Wake County Soil Survey - Sheet 90
1.92 acres
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

-4■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
Stephens Tract Offsite Sewer
WR Proiect No. 02170951.00
Property Owner Information
Wake Co. PIN - 0648751814
Property Owner - Regina Barrow
Mail Address - 511 Montgomery Loop
Hampstead, NC 28443
Email - [e-mail]
Phone - 919.818.7439
Wake Co. PIN - 0648757407
Property Owner - International Church of the Foursquare Gospel
Mail Address - 1910 W Sunset Blvd; Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90028
Email - [e-mail]
Phone - 919.946.2135
Wake Co. PIN - 0648850369
Property Owner - Lightbridge Partners LLC.
Mail Address - 5210 Driftwood Lane
Morehead City, NC 28557
Email - N/A
Phone - N/A
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

■■ WithersRavenel
'. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, Clayton Properties Group, Inc (Client) does hereby
appoint WithersRavenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the
appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local
municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite
jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and
submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the Stephens Tract
Subdivision (±56 acres), located on Ralph Stephens Road in Holly Springs, Wake County,
consisting of the following parcels:
• Wake Co PIN: 0648771259 - ±23.51 ac - 1720 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648668224 - ±7.57 ac - 1740 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648765713 - ±19.01 ac - 1729 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648767101 - ±3.68 ac - 1825 Ralph Stephens Road
• Wake Co PIN: 0648769202 - ±1.90 ac - No Address
• Wake Co PIN: 0648769067 - ±0.34 ac - No Address
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date:
Signature of Client:
Na e- Pr t) (Title)
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone:
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

40 WithersRavenel
Q�J Our People. Your Success.
The undersigned owners) International ChUrch of The Foursouare Gomel, doles) hereby authorize
WithersRavenel, Inc. to access the (T8.29 acre parcel/Wake Co PIN: 0648757.4071Located
at 1828 Ralph Stephens Road in Holly Springs, NO for the purpose of environmental regulatory agency
review (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management,
US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities, etc.) and approvals (i.e. wetland delineation, stream/buffer
determination, environmental permitting, etc.) at the request of Mungo Homes of NC, or the developers)
of the Stephens Tract project.
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc,
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the improvement(s) for the subject
property.
Date: (P ho
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info: Signature of Owner(s):
WithersRavenel, Inc- -Fc- DD Dc,ViS GxecOV,`e—'Pc`SN""
Name - Print I Title
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 ignature
TeL [phone]PQ 3 Q>x ( 2 3 L{
Mailing Address
)1611 sa-ln5 AJ c, _x 7 5 v
L4
City State Zip
Phone: 1 L 1^ �1 Co a o75-
Email: +nclpoLs,%S Ckor-8^ nC. cc) ,,%�
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919,469.3340 I f; 919,467.6008 1 www,withersravenel.com I License No, C-OS32
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Our People, Your Success.
AuTHOIRIZATION FqR PROPERTY ACCE_ss
The undersigned owner(s), Re , do(es) hereby authorize WithersRavenel, Inc. to access the
tZ.Sfs acre reel Wakeo P p 5 i rin NC for
the purpose of environmental regulatory agency review (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities, etc.) and
approvals (i.e. wetland delineation, stream/buffer determination, environmental permitting, etc,j at the
request of Mungo Homes of NC, or the developer(s) of the Stephens Tract project.
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc.
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the improvement(s) for the subject
property.
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
ovo V" t d, t�
1. 6�
T"
Date: (Q � 14 • L
Signature of Owner(s):
Vej Print Title
(j -
Mailing ddress
_ KV_ a �_
City State Zip
Phone: (lIq 2a -1(k5Q
i�.VhG�u 1-�YN-2S �l' NL
J
Fw
L -J
s�

Real Estate ID: 0003765
Township: Holly Springs
PIN: 0648751814
Owner: BARROW, REGINA D
PIN Ext: 000
Mail Address 1: 511 MONTGOMERY LOOP
Land Value: $89,100
Mail Address 2: HAMPSTEAD NC 28443-8114
Building Value: $0
Mail Address 3:
Total Value: $89,100
Deed Book: 007036
Deed Acres: 1.56
Deed Page: 00621
Sale Price: $0
Deed Date: 6/21/1996
Sale Date:
Land Class: Vacant
Year Built:
Map Name: 0648 11
Heated Area:
Biling Class: Individual
Use Type:
Description: BRASWELL CRK LD
Design Style:
Site Address: 704 CASTAWAY CT
City:
Street Name: CASTAWAY CT
Planning Jursidiction: HS
Old Parcel Number: 140-00000-0002
A
105 210
1 inch = 200 feet
420 ft
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

Real Estate ID: 0204665
PIN:0648757407
PIN Ext: 000
Land Value: $325,700
Building Value: $180,669
Total Value: $506,369
Deed Acres: 8.29
Sale Price: $1,000,000
Sale Date: 7/12/2018
Year Built: 1995
Heated Area: 2088
Use Type: SINGLFAM
Design Style: Conventional
City:
Planning Jursidiction: HS
Township: Holly Springs
Owner: INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE
FOURSQUARE GOSPEL
Mail Address 1: 1910 W SUNSET BLVD STE 200
Mail Address 2: LOS ANGELES CA 90026-3295
Mail Address 3:
Deed Book: 017183
Deed Page: 00121
Deed Date: 7/12/2018
Land Class: Residential Less Than 10 Acres
Map Name: 0648 12
Biling Class: Business
Description: TRPT 2 PROP DAVID & EUGENE
BARROW (BM2014-1486) BM1994-00767
Site Address: 1828 RALPH STEPHENS RD
A
0 105 210
1 inch = 200 feet
420 ft
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

Real Estate ID: 0056751
Township: Holly Springs
PIN: 0648850369
Owner: LIGHTBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC
PIN Ext: 000
Mail Address 1: 5210 DRIFTWOOD LN
Land Value: $138,938
Mail Address 2: MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557 -
Building Value: $0
2576
Total Value: $138,938
Mail Address 3:
Deed Acres: 2.43
Deed Book: 017437
Sale Price: $0
Deed Page: 02494
Sale Date:
Deed Date: 5/10/2019
Year Built:
Land Class: Vacant
Heated Area:
Map Name: 0648 12
Use Type:
Biling Class: Business
Design Style:
Description: SOUTHERN CROSSROADS
City: HOLLY SPRINGS
BM2018 -00095
Planning Jursidiction: HS
Site Address: 1840 RALPH STEPHENS RD
N
0 105 210
1 inch = 200 feet
420 ft
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250
1 inch = 250 ft.
PIN:0648751814 X
REGINA BARROW
511 MONTGOMERY LOOP
HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443
BOOK: 007036; PAGE: 00621
OFFSITE SEWER
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SEWER
PROPERTY OWNER EXHIBIT
STEPHENS TRACT
PROJECT AREA
PIN:0648757407
INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOURSQUARE GOSPEL
1910 W SUNSET BLVD; SUITE 200
LOS ANGELES, CA 90026
BOOK: 017183; PAGE: 00121
--- PIN:0648850369
LIGHTBRIDGE PARTNERS LLC
5210 DRIFTWOOD LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
BOOK: 017437; PAGE: 02494
;!
WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

iGRAPHIC SCALE IN0 125 250
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SEWER AERIAL - 2017 ;0- WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE-�
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft. 9
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS ON 06/27/2019.
2) STEPHENS TRACT SUBDIVISION PROJECT AREA WAS FIELD VERIFIED BY JAMES
LASTINGER OF THE USACE ON 07/10/2018.
3) WETLAND/STREAM/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS LOCATION,
WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
0
_ e—j
,o
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SE�O WithersRavenel
WER WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CARONA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors
LI

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000 r{1��{
_�It y
3157 3 5
r I k
I
a1
1 inch = 2000 ft. ' Fr�
IF
J I• -
F + +
• 5 i�-^—� �t j � i I I � r I
�
4 r5
� � F i l I
TEPHENS TRAt',
/';
r l r ��, � _ J . , �
-
� %• PROJ CT-AR-EA
IN
J
��,
I
.`ter
g
�v� I =�
�
% I
5 Y_�afJlfl� �rT�-- i i�j �,,
II �
�k{� '�. x•� 4
4
a r��. ��J
+
pBRp
; Q
TpR PARK
-�MBP —Q,fy
i
J� iLy r
(400
450
450
HIGH POCKET DR
5r
\� J
450 B•4?T
�—BQSql C�• / y
IiONEYCUTT RD
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SEWER
USGS QUAD (2013) - APEX
1P PAPEngineers I Planners I Surveyors
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
STEPHENS TRACT
PROJECT AREA
w
ar
OFFSITE SEWER
WOO
i
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SEWER USGS QUAD (2013) - APEXaWithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
•
1 inch = 200 ft.
R
a
>r _
a '
0 •
s
E
3
STEPHENS TRACT OFFSITE SEWER WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) -SHEET 90 ;! WgthersRavenel
I Planners I Surveyors
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Stephens Tract Offsite Sewer City/County: Holly Springs/Wake Sampling Date: 06/27/2019
Applicant/Owner: Mungo Homes State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): L.Phillips & A. Ricci - WithersRavene Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.633186 Long: -78.839196 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ra - Rains fine sandy loam NWI classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The data form was taken within Wetland A, near Flag WA -29, at the Lat/Long specified above. This data form aslo applies to Wetland B as conditions
were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 85 (A) 265 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.12
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Pinus taeda
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
30
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius-)
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1.
Woodwardia areolata
5
Yes
FACW
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
5
Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 85 (A) 265 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.12
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 3/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present at this sampling point
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Stephens Tract Offsite Sewer City/County: Holly Springs/Wake Sampling Date: 06/27/2019
Applicant/Owner: Mungo Homes State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): L.Phillips & A. Ricci - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.633186 Long: -78.839196 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: AgC2 - Appling gravelly sandy loadm, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: Uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
The data form was taken within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, near Flag WA -29, at the Lat/Long specified above. This data form aslo applies
touplands adjacent to Wetland B as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 No FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia 35 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the dominance test.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Hosoiuie
uommam
maicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3•
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1% (A/B)
20
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Quercus alba
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
3. Fagus grandifolia
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 290 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.22
25
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Quercus alba
5
Yes
FACU
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 No FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia 35 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point based on the dominance test.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14
10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCNHP PROJECT REVIEW LETTER

\`I'I ♦ 1t 11 1�1`I ♦ t1r111 ♦ \7 11 ♦ ♦ 1 t1-► ♦ 11 ♦t1 1 ♦ ♦ 11rd'7 111
♦1 t111'I 1t 1 11rd7 ♦ 1 \'I ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ \7 r"1 ♦ 1 \7 111 1'I \'I \-► ♦ 1 11 11 \'7 ♦ ♦ 1I 1 \'I 11'/t ♦ \'/ 11 11 111'1 11
1�l1��1 1111�11��11,! II 11 N�lQ� Il 1.1 hll 1,!,111 1I 111p1�1 0II011�IN 111111111,!,11 11111111 Lol1,ll51 1r,511.11.11,li►11.1111,151 II II 1II II II I,i5 1111111,11 1lI�11l11,�11�1 111/11/111 1!!1111 11111,!1111,1'114,1��1111111FI�11,l�1111.1�i�1 1.1N 11
11111111111111►;�1 /� 111111�11111111!11!li'l 11
11 li, ill li i1 iii 11 I,i.` 5 111111 11 111;5111
►1/� ►1 ►1►1111�1/i ►s;1►:1►11
11111111111111111111111
►:1►;11►1 1� ►1►11 .. ►1 ►:11111. ►1►:1►1►;1►:11111►:1 ►1►1.1►111. ►\,i1 ►;�1 ►;11►;1►1 ►1 ►1►111 ►111►;1►1►1►;11►0„ ►11,1, IZ1111111iI
11��111.11
11111111111111 ►;11 1111 II1 /�►/►11/�11;�I14111�1►Z�►1 , /' ►.111 ►1 ►1 ►1►; ►1►1 , 11111111
11.1 1111 ►:111 1111.111.1NO 11.111.11111111 111'.1.111111111 I EI` 11►; 11 1111.11/11111 /�: ►1,
11 1111 1111 Pljj!�
11114►:1111IF"11111ti1115Ill11011hJ►1,IF' 12111►:1:101:101:111►:IF' 121►;�I,p;�Ip; V; 5111:II►:1,1P �IIF, U:IV:1SIU:1►;11:11IMI, 11V:1IF, 1►:1111P,�11 Il1,,,1Ill 111111
►1 11111111111111 /1,1111►;I 1111►.111 111111�1►.1►;�I ►41 1;11►111 /� ►1►111 ►;1.1►;1►1/1111►:0„ ►11; ►, ►1►; ►1 ►t1/� ►1;11 ►1 21 ►1
11.1 1111.111►1►1►I 11►1: ►I
PIP, ►1►1 11 11.1 /1 111111
111111 ►11;1411►1 E11111►/ 11111►/ /�►; ►:1►1►1 PI 10, ►1►/ 111111 ►Z� 1"ll 14'MI1I 11111"ll ►'/ 11111►/ /
111111 11111141 II ►;111 /111111111111►;1 II II II 111 II II II11111111 11111111111 111111 111114�1111114 111111111111111
��� 111, V 4 V 1 U1 I � 0 U I � 111 I I
111111.11 .111111.111111..1111.111111..111111 ..1111 Ir 4 11 1111 111111 111111 .,1 11 ►11111111111
VIN112 1111;y111l1ll11111 ,111 �1p1,!��II 11 �1r1Pl1l '11111111111►IPIiI
111111 111111 111. PIM IFMI 11111►11111111
111111 11111111'.4„ IIl I►;1111i�1111111111 11
1:11:11:1 1.11; 111.4;11 111;1.11 l 11111.1111110
1:11:111 111;! 11:4;11 II 1;111 I; 1111:1111111:1
II II Irl 1111111/11 11011I"ll 14111111111111111111111111111
111111 ►1►;1►111►.� ►;111►„ ►111111 ►1/�
1.11;111 1:11111 11 1111.111.111111.11:1 110 1111
1:111.1111.1; 11 1;111:11111 01'.1111.1;
11.1 1.11111.11/.11;1111011.111111111;1.1
11.1111111.1;11 11 11111//1 11 111111.1
11111111.1
11.111.1 11111.11111.111.1;
F1 11.111.1 11.111.1111
1:11111.1
1.11.111;
11.1 /1 111111;;111111
11.1 11 1111111► 11 111111:1; 11.1 111111 11
11.1111111.11',f' 12 11111111.1;11.1 1111.111
Il ►1►1►111;�1►1/1►1►:1 ►1 111111
1:11:11.111111',1;11 111:1111:1;11.1 1:11:111
11.111.1111'.11',11; 1111111:1;111 1111111
11111111111 1 1111
Fl 271 11.1 1111.1 ►1
11.111111.1;
11.111.111111;11 1 11111111.1;11.1 11.111.111
.,, .,, ♦1111x,♦♦♦....,:,r 1111..... 1x,1♦♦11.1♦1.1♦1:.,...,,....,,........,,.,,.....,,.ui,... ,.....1m♦.. ..,:, .,,.1...
11,111.pi 111,.1111„1111111111111111,,111 M.1 H.111111..111 E,,1 N.1111111111..111 N.11111 E:11,,,11 1.11;11,111.1 L11.1,1,111.11.11.11.,1.11,1,� 11.11,11 ,1.11.1 L11.,111.11,!,I I .N 1,111,!. x,1.11,1., L11„,I 11.1 1.1 1.1 , 1,!,I 11.11,111.11„,111.11,111.1
♦�r �♦ ♦.1 r♦ Rr.♦r.♦ 1111♦ ♦♦ ♦� �r♦.♦ ♦ �r♦♦♦ ♦�r ♦�r ♦♦ ♦�r �..♦♦♦
�U�►�1��1�1 �1 �1i1i►1�1y!��I �1��1�1��1 �1 �I,E��D��I� �1 �1y!��I �1�1��1��1 �1 �1y!��1 �1 �l1��1�1 �1 �1 �1 �1 �I��1 �1��1 �1 ►i1� �1►� �1 �1 ►�1�►�►i �1 �1 �1 �1 �1 �1
III:I:I@IP,1511g 121►1:15I

NCNHDE-10095: Stephens Tract Subdivision
_ I•.::. e. L F�i�.: Wooer .
V �p
tV L r• Rye _ _� � ^��� 0, � An,�y � y ' '
gyp•. c
7,
�' R O.eN F4i1 W
4 0 ��er• y.� e. fir .
4ryrc Akapoey �•, �'� NAS• e•Pww crw r
A
3 N
rrn�
• � gJ �4� �r � l ...r SJ•ms W k.���, ..i rj .
4=1 �p - 9f
Y
M k0
HqA Peeper Dr
'v.0 B�yN Gam!
W\i; IbeY•I W v _
L
S
August 25, 2019
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
J Managed Area (MAREA)
00,11@1roIi"""IP NI:15�
1:25,989
0 0.225 0.45 0.9 mi
0 0.35 0-7 1.4 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmn, Imernnap, in-nl P Corp., GE6CO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Gea9ase. IG N, ]Cadas[er NL, Onfnance Survey. Esri ,Japan.
MErE. >=yr China [Hong Kong1. jp] OpenD eeWap ppnhtu[prs, and rhe GIS
user co n numty

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCDMS ILF LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
(STREAM MITIGATION)

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Chris Simmering
Clayton Properties Group, Inc
2521 Schieffelin Rd, Suite 116
Apex, NC 27502
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 23, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/23/2020
Project: Stephens Tract Subdivision County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8 -digit HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Neuse
03020201
Warm Stream
187
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Troy Beasley, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
e:,�e
NORTH CAROLINAD_E QI
Uepartmem of Enrlronmemal Uual�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WILDLANDS HOLDING III, LLC
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY
(WETLAND MITIGATION)

HWILDLANDSoi�
Statement of Availability
August 26, 2019
Clayton Properties Group, Inc.
2521 Schieffelin Road
Suite 116
Apex, NC 27502
RE: Availability of Riparian Wetland Credits for the Stephens Tract Townhomes and Offsite
Sewer project
Bank Name: Falling Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Bank Site: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings, III, LLC
USACE Action ID: 2017-00549
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 0.4 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 6.08 acres
Neuse 03020201 River Basin
Dear Mr. Simmering:
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC has the above mentioned Riparian Wetland credits from the Falling
Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site to satisfy the
mitigation requirements related to the above mentioned project. The project is located within
the service area (HUC 03020201) of the Bank.
Credits may be reserved for a period of 12 months upon the receipt of a non-refundable
deposit of 10% of the purchase price. Should credits not be reserved, they will be sold on a first
come, first serve basis. Credit prices will be guaranteed for a period of 6 months from the date
of this letter and are then subject to change.
An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will reserve the credits
and price for a period of 30 days from invoice. This letter is a Statement of Availability as of the
date provided — it is not a reservation of credits nor a guarantee of price. Credits will be sold on
a first come, first serve basis.
Final transfer of credits will occur upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer
Wildlands Holding III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

HOLDINGSO
Form within the 404 permit.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact
me at 704-719-2100 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any
additional information.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Bugg
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Director: Land Acquisition
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ex. 105
M: [phone]
cc: Lyle Phillips, Withers Ravenel
Wildlands Holding III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN -
DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT

K11T17-09s%1709s1SYepM1am Treq TpxnM1PmeplWbReaV54�m19WM%BASE-DA& LaM Ilee Maps.tlw9 Fbey, July 19, 20199:37:28 AM -PERRY, RO55
LEGEND II I I I
Drainage Area I _
--Ow __qW ___W ___W __1W TC Sheet Flow \I I \I \I I \
TC Shallow Flow
TC Channel Flow I \ \ \ / GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
Notes:
1. 2ft Contours Displayed Consist of 2013 LiDAR and Field Survey 1 \ \ \\ \ \ \\ 11
\ \ 1 inch= 300 Ft.
P)T\\��I1111�1(�I
\X\\\
\ J Onsite Sub -Drainage Area to
\ = = Bypass at POA #1
/ — �• Onsite Sub -Drainage Area
Total Area: 14.97 Acres / / J — — — Bypass to Existing Crossing (POA #1A)
Cumulative CN: 81 _
�= Time of Concentration: 0.36 Hrs POA #1A --- — Total Area: 4.24 Acres
_ Cumulative CN: 83
�� I I Time of Concentration: 0.53 Hrs
i SUBJECT SITE / SCM #1\ r \
±56.52 Acres
/ rfr~ rr J
/ // ( / ::::. ' •i ' , �• , ; ; ' ' `' ' ; ; ' ' y' , • — l ^ .... ; 111 Sub -Drainage Area SCM #1
• :r � i----_.� � � Total Area: 3.73 Acres
\:\: a \• • • ::::: :: ,/ • • • `,• :� Cumulative CN: 88
�� : �; • • Time of Concentration: 0.083 Hrs
IJ ' 111
Sub -Drainage Area to SCM #2
Total Area: 13.86 Acres
r \ } Cumulative CN: 88
Time of Concentration: 0.083 Hrs
/ I �� 1
SCM #4
Sub -Drainage Area to SCM #3 —
I Total Area: 8.44 Acres
Cumulative n88 ( \
Time of Concentration: 0.083 Hrs
SCM #3
/ / / 11 ///�� \` � 1 \, �_ -�-'• •' / 1
Onsite Sub -Drainage Area to
SCM #2 Bypass at POA #2 / \
Total Area: 9.14 Acres \ 1
Cumulative CN: 83
Time of Concentration. 0.82 Hrs \ \ \
PDA #2
%y
<
'
< I
i//ii'� / 1 III I I ll l�1 IIII i 1 \ \\��_// // I / ✓/ J _�\\\ ///
�/, � ,IIII II � ► I I � \ �- �/ �/ i \ / / J \ � 1� / / �
No. Revision Date 3v Designer Scale 10 WithersRavenel
WR AS NOTE PROPOSED sM1ePlNo
Drawn y at STEPH ENS TRACT Engineers l Planners l SurveyorsWRP A
7/19/19 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 /1
Checked y o D. DRAINAGE AREA MAP t:919.469.33401 license#:C-08321www.withersravenel.com
02170951. Town of Holl Springs North Carolina
I
Sub -Drainage Area to SCM #4Existing
�iii
Northern SID System
�/
Tri QAL;
SCM #4
Sub -Drainage Area to SCM #3 —
I Total Area: 8.44 Acres
Cumulative n88 ( \
Time of Concentration: 0.083 Hrs
SCM #3
/ / / 11 ///�� \` � 1 \, �_ -�-'• •' / 1
Onsite Sub -Drainage Area to
SCM #2 Bypass at POA #2 / \
Total Area: 9.14 Acres \ 1
Cumulative CN: 83
Time of Concentration. 0.82 Hrs \ \ \
PDA #2
%y
<
'
< I
i//ii'� / 1 III I I ll l�1 IIII i 1 \ \\��_// // I / ✓/ J _�\\\ ///
�/, � ,IIII II � ► I I � \ �- �/ �/ i \ / / J \ � 1� / / �
No. Revision Date 3v Designer Scale 10 WithersRavenel
WR AS NOTE PROPOSED sM1ePlNo
Drawn y at STEPH ENS TRACT Engineers l Planners l SurveyorsWRP A
7/19/19 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 /1
Checked y o D. DRAINAGE AREA MAP t:919.469.33401 license#:C-08321www.withersravenel.com
02170951. Town of Holl Springs North Carolina

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
IMPACTS EXHIBITS

POND 1
LT-<
\ 1
1 \ \ J
I r�i
i
1`
.
SHEET ��� �� / �Q� 4'
c �^L
IMPACTS 1 - 8
8 8 7 17 7 \ PROpV / = q
If �D -
7 11 1 BO N
Ln
-- R00 POND 2 V \ 2 N ,`��
NON -JURISDICTIONAL PER F3B �\ L �"
,7 7 7 7 94 s5 96� USACE (SAW - 2011- 01171) 2
pp ��14q
9 9 9
99 p p _ TO'`U k 'Yl� 'O � rn
@ T X71/\ \ ♦ ``
I 03 02 01 80
,, a
57 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 �P !�f`
O 82 63 C fi5 fib 67 . I ��
1 1 1 1 ham, .... �K ___ I \•'• •.• .O
SHEET D -_--_
IMPACT 15
23 3 3
SHEET C
I M PACTS 11 -14
K•'
-.tnPOg ✓-
POND 3
J
7 7
T
V \
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 100 250 Soo
/ 1 inch= 2S0 Ft.
o
\ S AYCOU
ISHEET BI
I M PACTS 9 - 10
of
w
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
WETLAND & STREAM
WETLANDS - GREEN
co
Em
DISSIPATOR
TEMPORARY
STREAM - RED
®
WETLANDS - PURPLE
EXISTING ROAD
CROSSING
Ed
PERANENT
a
STREAM - MAGENTA
STREAM -RED
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
El
TEMPORARY
IMPACT SPECI FI CATION
STREAM -BLUE
WETLAND -ORANGE
NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS
( )
a
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM WETLANDS
(LF)
(S F)
(S F)
(AC)
(LF)
(S F)
(S F)
(AC)
(LF) (SF) (SF) (AC)
1
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
553
0.013
2
SEWER CROSSING
550
0.013
3
ROAD GRADING
445
0.011
4
ROAD GRADING
-
-
-
-
365
0.009
A
5
ROAD CROSSING
-
-
55
231
-
-
6
SEWER CROSSING
775
0.018
-
-
7
SEWER CROSSING
20
111
-
-
8
SEWER CROSSING
-
-
771
0.018
9
SEWER CROSSING
707
0.017
B
10
SEWER CROSSING
465
0.011
11
RIP RAPDISSIPATOR
-
-
-
23 167
12
ROAD CROSSING
-
-
5,745
0.132
- -
C
13
ROAD CROSSING
132
1,454
-
-
14
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
10
107
-
D
15
ROAD GRADING
1,197
0.028
-
TOTAL
30
218
4,266
0.101[187
1,685
7,307
0.169
23 167
i
1`
.
SHEET ��� �� / �Q� 4'
c �^L
IMPACTS 1 - 8
8 8 7 17 7 \ PROpV / = q
If �D -
7 11 1 BO N
Ln
-- R00 POND 2 V \ 2 N ,`��
NON -JURISDICTIONAL PER F3B �\ L �"
,7 7 7 7 94 s5 96� USACE (SAW - 2011- 01171) 2
pp ��14q
9 9 9
99 p p _ TO'`U k 'Yl� 'O � rn
@ T X71/\ \ ♦ ``
I 03 02 01 80
,, a
57 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 �P !�f`
O 82 63 C fi5 fib 67 . I ��
1 1 1 1 ham, .... �K ___ I \•'• •.• .O
SHEET D -_--_
IMPACT 15
23 3 3
SHEET C
I M PACTS 11 -14
K•'
-.tnPOg ✓-
POND 3
J
7 7
T
V \
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 100 250 Soo
/ 1 inch= 2S0 Ft.
o
\ S AYCOU
ISHEET BI
I M PACTS 9 - 10
06
0 u
Z V
�a
W
3�
J LQ
Lu N
0
a
z
o
c
U
Q
o
Ln
Z
Lu z
z
a�
Lu O=
Ln z
0
WETLAND & STREAM
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
WETLANDS - GREEN
(NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
Em
DISSIPATOR
TEMPORARY
STREAM - RED
®
WETLANDS - PURPLE
EXISTING ROAD
CROSSING
Ed
PERMANENT
STREAM - MAGENTA
STREAM -RED
PERMANENT
El
TEMPORARY
(NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
STREAM -BLUE
WETLAND -ORANGE
06
0 u
Z V
�a
W
3�
J LQ
Lu N
0
a
z
o
c
U
Q
o
Ln
Z
Lu z
z
a�
Lu O=
Ln z
0

OEM—
I10' PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
:USE RIVER 50' BUFFER _ W 1
�_ \I CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP INC. —
a
D.B. 17388 PG. 1134 - _ _ n
P.I.N. 0648-76-9067
IMPACT #2
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) X02- - - - - - - �� ✓E3%S-L--�F�R
SEWER CROSSING
O� aA 0.013 AC. - (550 SF.) S0-
\� \ 0
,CE'RIVER 50
STREAM '1' STOP PER
(SAW-2011-01171) %
WETLAND'C' PER _
(SAW - 2011 - 01171) CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP INC —�
D.B. 17388 PG. 1134 �` m
B.M. 2009 PG. 1062
SS P.I.N. 0648-76-71\01
PROPOSED 20' PUBL C
UTILITY EASEMENT LIA
IMPACT #1
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) ass,N/ ,
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
0.013 AC. - (553 SF.) \ /
SCM #2 0
CONSTRUCTED'
\ WETLAND
440 (UP STREAM) 440 440
FGCL
EGCL
435 435
RCP
430 W 430
M
0
n
0+00 0+50
r
--7 z,\ L
PROPO_SE—D 20—' PU�BLIC
IMPACT#3 UTILITY EASEMENT
(TEMPORARY WETLAND)
PROPOSED
20'PU
UTILITY EASEMENT
ROAD GRADING
Cn
--
-
I �� /----_-
�l 0.011 AC. - (445 SF.) %�� Jz / / \�� Co
II t- 1 L� /
I� II I IMPACT #4 -
II /III (PERMANENT WETLAND)/ E�oo gUFFE� — �� -435
I ROAD GRADING /ZONE3 gPSS�
\�I I 0.009 AC. - (365 SF.) - - -
I/ / �"- -
�II / IMPACT #5 1
(PERMANENT STREAM)
/ ROAD CROSSING / FFER I I IMPACT #7
/f USE RIVER 5�� \ I M PACT #6
55 LF. - (231 SF.) ZONE 2 �E_ I _ I (TEMPORARY STREAM)
(TEMPORARY WETLAND) , — I PERPENDICULAR
1i l I
42° RCP -141.79 LF @ 1.41°/0 SEWER CROSSING I SEWER CROSSING
v
0.018 AC. - (775 SF.) 20 LF. - (111 SF.)
/ 48" RCP - 54.95 LF @ 0.56%
PERMANENT DRAINAGE / / //'' (� \ \/ / Z _ \ JL-- — ,
/ EASEMENT —
i B.M. 2014 PG. 1486 / % EXISTING 48" RCP - 80.39 LF @ 0.561%, \
£ STREAM'1'
RESTART PER /\\N� \)---\
(SAW - 2011 - 01171)\ r
TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS // �� / / /, / / ��N 2 NEU E /VER \ I M PACT #8
D.B. 15760 PG. 1656 / /�� PROPOSED , 50 BUF�R I (TEMPORARY WETLAND)
P.I.N. 0648-75-7826 / / //// //r o - 100 YR FLOODLINE \ \ _ \ - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
PER WR STUDY
'D� \ \ \ \ 0.018 AC. - (771 SF.)
BAS LAKE 100 BUFFER
(DOWN STREAM)
440
0+00 0+50
/ INT NATIONAL CHURCH OF
PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL DETAIL THE YRSQUAREGOSPEL I �(
GRADE HEADWALL/ Ms D.B.1183 PG. 0121 Co V \ J
RETAINING WALL B.M. 1994PG. 767
EXISTING RIP RAP APRON p.I.N. 0648.115-7407
PIPE GRADE (SEE DETAIL)
RIP RAP 'RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS SHALL BE PROPOSED
INSTALLED AT OR BELOW EXISTING GRADE. 20'PUBLIC UTILITY
RIP RAP APRON DETAIL EASEMENT
TOP OF BANK
n
0 50' 100'
TOP OF RIP RAP TO MATCH
PRE -CONSTRUCTION RIP RAP
50 ft.
STREAM CONTOUR 1 inch =
C
E
a
z
o
U
Q
0� o
Z
Wz
_z
d
F
Ln z
0
SCALE:
1"= 50' HORIZ.
EGCL
1"=SWERT.
435
435
EXISTING
48"
RCP
W
0
Co
430
W
430
r—
CP
M
0+00 0+50
/ INT NATIONAL CHURCH OF
PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL DETAIL THE YRSQUAREGOSPEL I �(
GRADE HEADWALL/ Ms D.B.1183 PG. 0121 Co V \ J
RETAINING WALL B.M. 1994PG. 767
EXISTING RIP RAP APRON p.I.N. 0648.115-7407
PIPE GRADE (SEE DETAIL)
RIP RAP 'RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS SHALL BE PROPOSED
INSTALLED AT OR BELOW EXISTING GRADE. 20'PUBLIC UTILITY
RIP RAP APRON DETAIL EASEMENT
TOP OF BANK
n
0 50' 100'
TOP OF RIP RAP TO MATCH
PRE -CONSTRUCTION RIP RAP
50 ft.
STREAM CONTOUR 1 inch =
C
E
a
z
o
U
Q
0� o
Z
Wz
_z
d
F
Ln z
0

3
—\ -
C)
G—
G
_
-7 /� /\ MSG
AF
OF
JANICE J. STEPHENS /� ✓
D.B. 11857 PG. 2713
B.M. 1988, PG. 1014
P.I.N. 0648.11-76-1028 / o / ? ��\�� �� \ \ J _\ F0°W
Z _ c
/— _ \ \ \ F
° 1
EKE 100' BUFFER / o � = � _ � _ � �� � \ °
uj
\ — \ —�ro W
a.
Iss 0
NO IMPACT 06_ _ y _ r
EASE ,V FW BUFFER S �, I SEWER INSTALLED BY — / T \ T _�
NE/
I I BORE AND JACK — �� \ T T���
RY
� �
_ >\ \
/� / / / / \I✓ �� J� >1 / / Tom, \ \ \ \ \`
>\
REGINA D. BARROW
D.B. 7036 PG. 621 —�
U
— a
�1 / POND 3 B.M.1994 PG.767 a
i — _— — — _
P.I.N. 0648.11-75-1814 �1 IMPACT #9 c
jop OFBANK (TEMPORARY WETLAND)
_ _ ! -�` I �Ln
� SEWER CROSSING _ — _ _ _ Z
0.017AC. -(707SF) — — _
�.o
-� ------ I �'� Q_ \ IMPACT#10Ln
o
_ zoNE2NF-- QE
5o-Fer- I ` _ (TEMPORARY WETLAND) /\i — — — — — — — —
ss i 01
m — — CONSTRUCTION ACCESS /
o�
_-------- —1\I -- 0.011AC. -(465SF.)
-LAKE-100- \ — \ — — —
i
SCM #40 50' 10
\ CONSTRUCTED
WETLAND

W N/A r #-- rs�AL 1111frem'' I
3
wo
IMPACT#13\\
_ — — —�— (PERMANENT STREAM)
ROAD CROSSING ss_
ZONEi S�BL1(—�R 50's F�' — — 132 LF. - (1,454 SF.) —
IMPACT #14
\ — (TEMPORARY STREAM)
J \— Ln o
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
10 LF. - (107 SF.) �-
STREAM '2' PER \\\ / TOP OF BANK
(SAW - 2011 - 01171)
WETLAND'N PER o I
(SAW - 2011 _Q1171)
IMPACT #12
(PERMANENT WETLANDS)
\ \\ ROAD CROSSING
— " � — 0.132 AC. - (5,745 SF.)
ZONE BSS -LAKE 100' BUFFER
45�
- — 255
256
257 —
_ _ 258
-
261 260
262
263
264
=C� OEM
lk
�' WWIROOM
CROSS SECTION
445 DOWN STREAM 445
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00
CROSS SECTION
445 (UP STREAM)
FGCL
440
435
430
-0+50
445
SCALE:
1" = 50' HORIZ.
1" = 5' VERT.
440
54" RCP
EGCL
54" RCP
Lu
Lu
0
0 w
C7 U)
z
0 -
Lo
0
w a
M 1-:
�
v
0+00
0+50
435
430
1+00
PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL DETAIL
GRADE HEADWALL/ NQS TOP OF BANK NTS
RETAINING WALL
EXISTING RIPRAPAPRON
PIPE GRADE Z (SEE DETAIL)
RIP RAPTOP OF RIP RAP TO MATCH RIP RAP
'RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS SHALL BE PRE -CONSTRUCTION
INSTALLED AT OR BELOW EXISTING GRADE. STREAM CONTOUR
E
Q
Lu
H
un V
06 Q
z
J
3
a
Z
H�
U
Q=
0�0
Ln
z�
Lu u
Z
2
Lud
o
Ln o
4__
FGCL
440
435
430
EGCL
w
0
�
o
a
a
440
435
54"
RCP
54" RCP
430
o
�
w
��
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00
CROSS SECTION
445 (UP STREAM)
FGCL
440
435
430
-0+50
445
SCALE:
1" = 50' HORIZ.
1" = 5' VERT.
440
54" RCP
EGCL
54" RCP
Lu
Lu
0
0 w
C7 U)
z
0 -
Lo
0
w a
M 1-:
�
v
0+00
0+50
435
430
1+00
PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL DETAIL
GRADE HEADWALL/ NQS TOP OF BANK NTS
RETAINING WALL
EXISTING RIPRAPAPRON
PIPE GRADE Z (SEE DETAIL)
RIP RAPTOP OF RIP RAP TO MATCH RIP RAP
'RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS SHALL BE PRE -CONSTRUCTION
INSTALLED AT OR BELOW EXISTING GRADE. STREAM CONTOUR
E
Q
Lu
H
un V
06 Q
z
J
3
a
Z
H�
U
Q=
0�0
Ln
z�
Lu u
Z
2
Lud
o
Ln o

-21_-
1I 1 \ LL m \ 1 \ 267 O 273 \ 460
ol
I 1� ~ � ~ ,{
I I /� I \ � 268
cn I I / STREAM '2' PER I \ \ �N I—
/ h (SAW - 2011 - 01 171) \ \ 271 �tss — — J` — 1 — _ — I _
4,01
2 �I / 270
�A,' 4(�� ��
10'PERIMETER — \
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
PROPOSED
\I \ \ 100 YR FLOODLINE 450
N�� �- \ \, PER WR STUDY
\ 3 BASS LAKE 100' gVF \71
20' STORM DRAINAGE
71
EASEMENT , ' 450
\ �I WETLAND'A' PER
\ \ (SAW - 2011 - 01171) j —
-21 -,, \ -� -;1 4: "1 "1
\ �► /
�
445-
4� \\ � � A �
71 20' STORM DRAINAGE I I
/ 71 71 \ �a EASEMENT 71 � ' \ I I I
71 I
-71\\ -21:r-21 - IMPACT #1571
�I -71\ \, (PERMANENT WETLANDS)
— �— �— —�\ / \ I71 71 ROAD GRADING
-�►--�—�- —4--�—--�--�— _ I 0.028 AC. -(1,197SF.) /
77 77
_�—
PROPERTY BOUNDARY � �
30' PERIMETER
RQy/ YARD
10' PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
1201 AVENT FERRY LLC
D.B. 17000 PG. 1225
B.M. 2008 PG. 0627
P.I.N. 0648.11-66-1838
/0 50' 100
C
E
a
z
o
U
Q=
0� o
Ln
Z
Wz
_z
d
F o
L
0

1 ,\>SHEET A
V IMPACTS I
1 --
Boom-
�l�,
HE D
r�rrr r
-- ----
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 100 250 500
1 inch = 250 ft.
W.
E
Lu
LL
LN
m
V
is
<Lu�
0
a
z
�0
V
Q
o
Ln
z�
Wz
_z
d
F0
Lo
BUFFER ZONE
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT IMPACTS
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 50' BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
i
L
ZONE
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
R30
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 50' BUFFER
EXISTING POND
NON - JURISDICTIONAL
PER USACE (SAW -2011-01171)
1 ,\>SHEET A
V IMPACTS I
1 --
Boom-
�l�,
HE D
r�rrr r
-- ----
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 100 250 500
1 inch = 250 ft.
W.
E
Lu
LL
LN
m
V
is
<Lu�
0
a
z
�0
V
Q
o
Ln
z�
Wz
_z
d
F0
Lo

0
0
0
c
°1 _3
3
o L V N
v v
L vYv
M
`` a
/,
H
2
H
a
z
o
C
c
o
l/1
W
W0
0
0
0 Z
aJ
�
ID
oP
0
0
Z�
3 3a
m
0
0
c
0
z
w BUFFER IMPACT
m
m TEMPORARY PERMANENT
a z
IMPACT SPECIFICATION
30' ZONE 1 50' ZONE 2 30' ZONE 1 50' ZONE 2
a
� (SF) (AC) (LF) (S F) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) (LF)
16 EXISTING STRUCTURE DEMO 497 0.012 - 2,015 0.047 - - - - - - -
2A PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING - - - - - - - - - 59 0.002 -
2B PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING - - - 383 0.009 - - - - - - -
A
3A ROAD GRADING - - - - - - 2,862 0.066 - 1,676 0.039 -
4A STORM HIGH FLOW BYPASS - - - - - - 569 0.014 - - - V
-
4B STORM HIGH FLOW BYPASS 819 0.019 - 312 0.008 - - - - - - U
-
5A PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING - - - - - - 940 0.022 - 973 0.023 -
B
5B PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING 331 0.008 - 597 0.014 - - - - - - -
6A PARALLEL SEWER - - - - - - - - - 491 0.012 -
6B PARALLEL SEWER 51 0.002 - 391 0.009 - - - - - - -
C
7A PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING - - - - - - 1,612 0.038 840 0.020
7B PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING 838 0.020 - 433 0.010 - - - - - - -
8A PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING - - - - - - 1,224 0.029 - 861 0.020 Va
-
8B PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING 613 0.015 - 430 0.010 - - - - - - Q
-
D
9A ROAD CROSSING - - - - - - 8,902 0.205 - 4,928 0.114 -
96 ROAD CROSSING 943 0.022 ZIL
- -
-
- -
-
- -
- -
TOTAL
4,092
0.098
- 4,561
0.107
- 16,109
0.374
- 9,828
0.230 -

CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP INC.
�\ \ 10' PERIMETER D.B. 17388 PG. 1134
ZONE3 BASS LAKE 100' UFFER_ \I I-�\ \ \ LANDSCAPE BUFFER P.I.N. 0648-76-9067
PRO ERTY BOUNDARY
�� �� ��� ` v / / 00 —�� 0 t
IT o�
\ — — IMPACT #2A \ y i / - — /— — — — — — — —
/ CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROU INC I / / / ' 6� / /// �- ro
/ / (PERMANENT) / / _
D.B. 17406 PG. 2690 SS
PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING \ � \ / / / l1 � l 111 � I � ,
_ _ N you
B.M. 2009 PG. 1062—-------------------�-- ��_
----\--- ZONE2=59 SF. 0.002 AC. �� �� I � � ��I l � /--------- aj
\ — P.LN. 0648-76-9202 / / lII �� / //� / Q ^ /
ZONA
_USE RIVER 50' B FFER — — — / L Y
r\� _ � � =I l• � I �� ' � l 11/�l�l � � _
/ //
— — — -ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFEER
7/---- — — ------ —
BASS LAKE-1
-440-(SAW AFAIF
STREA2011-011171)II II
--_-- ---- —� �_---_ � _ --_ — —__— —
—7-
""'T
OF BANK_ — —5p'B � r
\ — \ �\ — — — T\ �� \ \ \ \ WETLAND'C' PER GFcF \ \ /z� S I�I l / / �ll l / ✓ = j IMPACT #4B S N
\ SAW - 2011 - 01171) \ r 2—/-- (TEMPORARY)
\ 1 ( / / / NEUSE RIVER / / STORM HIGH FLOW BYPASS _ U
`\� \ — \ ` �' \ / tioN� o F l 11 ' l lI ZONE 1 = 819 SF. - 0.019 AC. a
\ ��tiF? ONE
EINE IVER �\ \ \ \ \ �\ \ / / / ? J /IIL /I�' I l / ZONE 2 = 312 SF. - 0.008 AC.
C TON PROPERTIES GROUP INC FU RSV \ 1� ER G� \ \) /I� 1 / / / /' \ / / \Lu
D.B. 17388 PG. 1134 E0' BUFF R ZONE 2 USE RIV(PERMANENT) Z
STORM HIGH FLOW BYPASS /
B.M. 2009 PG. 1062 \
P N. 064�-76-7101\ \ _ \ \ 1'��\`�- L / // /// // / ZONE 1 = 569 SF. - 0.014 AC.
b 11 /l / \✓�� ��— / Lu
LL
STREAM'1' STOP PER \ \ '� //// / �/ LL
(SAW - 2011 - 01171) \ \ / �0� o / \ /—/ — / — D
STREAM'.'
RESTART PER
(SAW - 2011 - 01171)
Q g
\ IMPACT #1B / / // \ \ \ �� \ �� / / / / IMPACT #3A \ \ � o
\ 72 \ (PERMANENT) \ \
\ 7 (TEMPORARY) / IMPACT #2B '1' �j ROAD GRADING \
EXISTING STRUCTURE DEMO \ / \\ \
/ (TEMPORARY) 69 / 1 / \ ZONE 1 = 2,862 SF. 0.066 AC. \ Z
ZONE 1 = 497 SF. 0.012 AC. PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING SS/ / / Zo ��U Z
% a ZONE 2 = 1,676 SF. - 0.039 AC. N \ W
ZONE 2 = 2,015 SF. - 0.047 AC. ZONE 2 = 383 SF. - 0.009 AC. srpo kF // // / �_ \� NESE RIVE 30' B = N
\ \ \ \ TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS / / / / \ ZONE? \ �\ \ W o
D.B. 15760 PG. 1656 yVE�jSE
\ \ / — / RIVER 50' BUFFER Z
/ PROPOSED 20' PUBLIC \ o P.I.N. 0648-75-7826 /// // r o / \ \ \ \
UTILITY EASEMENT
/ \ ✓ \ ASS LAKE 10QI FFER \ ^ 3 T3
,may 1, \
/ \ \ SCM #2 / / / / / �// \
CONSTRUCTEDIS
WETLAND
0 50' 100'
1 inch = 50 ft.
Z iLw

PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER Cw\
OUTFALL'A'
\ PROPOSED 20' PUBLIC ' PROPOSED 30' PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT / / UTILITY EASEMENT
I
rho
77, /—�--— i —��
/
-- (35
---- Ss--- S/ / \ )s �ss ss S��\I I \\
PROPOSED 20' PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT , / / / / / AF,
1 > --- — — — — — /I <
co
J / y �-7
Lu
LU H ONE 3 s.Ass -435 t' L _ — — \ / / / / /
—0Co¢ l — — — -I —I, --- _— J
Lu
rzo�lv
NE2
/ E4 50
BUFFER — I----��_ 43p- i-- �//�\��' \✓/ �= //_�
_i
IMPACT #5A
(PERMANENT)�-
30' B� PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING
\ � ZONE 1 = 940 SF. - 0.022 AC.—
\ ZONE 2 = 973 SF. - 0.023 AC.
. . ........
I /
I
/C —
-,-ro �
0' B� I
;UPPER IMPACT #56
\ \ (TEMPORARY)
PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING
ZONE 1 = 331 SF. - 0.008 AC.
\ \ \ \ \ I I \ ZONE 2 = 597 SF. - 0.014 AC.
` �J
j �<
\ /
/ Cl)
HOF
iPEL100010C,MP , I
7 \ okz I 'l/ A
0 50' 100'
finch =50 ft.
N
H
U
a
Lu
Z
O
DC
Lu
LL
LL
D
m
a
z
o
U
Q=
0L 0
LnZ
Z
Lu z
H
L o

INTERNATIONAL CHURCH 6F
T E FOURSO ARE GOSP�L
D.B. 1718 PG. 0121
I B.M. 1994 PG. 767
/ / P.I.N. 06481.12-75-7407 i PROPOSED
/o
20' PUBLIC UTILITY /
/ I I / / / EASEMENT
1A
\ \\\\� Ill I/ -�
DUKE ENERGY
PROGRESS EASEMENT
B.M. 2014 PG. 1486 / / / SS / I/\ > N
BUFFER o
O PROPOSED �- a ="
F = G _ / — \ / / \ \ G 4 y / SANITARY SEWER / ��/ i �� / S� R�� R / l i
AFM G ' ' —� \ �� E \\ J/ / �I /t / OUTFALL'B' M / pN�2N�j
Z�\ �� �! tib-- I ���R3 / "M
_�I I �FM�-� G��� \\�\\ / S /� 'moi, / R > // / j� ``
Fm
Lu o/ , / / Fo ' P
Lu
/' �W s� / /pFSPN%i
z w ��-\iii . _ % PROPOSED / /-��Ell l\ F��\ / /'�
w -; 20' PUBLIC UTILITY / / / ow
Co Q y1% > EASEMENT _/ _ / J \ \\ �� �GFM \ �� \ � �lFo °w
� Lu — / �/ 3 s (A� — � \�� �O� ?_ FO `FO ow
O f / lCF\ \ Fo \ / /­77
G ow
—7 � — \ 1 $�-` _ =� FAQ F1Ai� sFoll,
SS
-77
Lu
-� IMPACT#7A T - >�10 - - - N
/ 33
(PERMANENT) - - _ _ _ / _�� r " W
o - PERPENDICULAR SEWER T r \_\� �-��—__ �� LU
LL.
50'j BUF m cn ZONESING 612 SF. 0.038 AC. _ZONE 2-��� 5% FFE/� `\ \ \ = ti _ r \ 5����
LL
ZONE 2 = 840 SF. - 0.020 AC. NEUSE� ER t - - W 7S�P� m
�� / f"� --- _ /
/O � / \ T T
a ZONE I NEUSE V IMPACT #6A o
(PERMANENT) a
REGINA D D. ARROW SOP OF BPNK PARALLEL SEWER % - - - - - - - - / Q
/ �_ ZONE 2 = 491 SF. - 0.012 AC. - - _ - - - o
B.M.1994 PG.767
(STING I P.I.N. 0648.11-75-1814 ,pP / Ll
-
OND 3 �2 E SSE RIVER 30' BUFFER / / - - - - - - - - - Z
IMPACT#6B / / / Lu z
/ \ ` (TEMPORARY)
IMPACT #7B e PARALLEL SEWER/_ ` - -
(TEMPORARY) / ZONE 1 = 51 SF. - 0.002 AC. W
- - L
_ PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING / ZONE 2 = 391 SF. - 0.009 AC. / �� - - - - _ ` V) Z
ZONE 1=838 SF.-0.020 AC.�'------
ZONE 2 = 433 SF. - 0.010 AC. / / / / / - - _ \ \
o .11
R1V=50'BUFFE� Z o
Im
Lu
\ \ a� ZONE 3 BASS-LAKE-
p0 100' BUFFER
FFE R _
\ 30' PERIMETER YARD /�/ ' / / / / / - -
101
(%lop
0 50' 100'
0
/ ///// X / \/ / ' — /
/ � / �\ finch =50 ft. 11LILLLUI

1 _ - ` E� 252_ ! - E TIMOTHY LYNN
JJ
239 OGLESBY
- E - - ti s, Y� 4g _ - \ D.B. 11857 PG. 2713 \ �� 450
240 - qc� - 253 - -
P.I.N. 0648-76-0374
242
JANICE J. STEPHENS �� �� \ N
243 254 -_ C N t
450 D. B. 11857 PG. 2713
'� - ♦ _ B.M. 1988, PG. 1014\ >
- _ - - - - _ ♦ _ _ / q/ P.I.N. 0648.11-76-1028
IMPACT #9B N
- - - - �(TEMPORARY) IMPACT #8A y U
ROAD CROSSING j _ - - �� I^ /r
(PERMANENT) 3 w M
- _i ZONE 1 = 943 SF. - 0.022 AC. PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING ``
? NNE�3 BASS LAK 100' BUFFERAFN
ZONE 1 = 1,224 SF. - 0.029 AC.
ZONE 2 = 861 SF. - 0.020 AC. /
----------- `�5 - gg 7-
--- /� /SSL
-71
�- - RIV R 50' BUFFER -
ZONE 2 �IEUSE�� i / SONE 2 'NE -
-7,-�V �FFER� II li /� \ pROpeO ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER. 50 BUFF ^ ~
�--- -� U
BUFFER /
- - ZONE 1 NEUSE RIS 3 I �/ /ZONE 1 NEUSE RIV512 30'\ \\ \ I `'C♦� y Co
-
_ _ BUFFER
_� / / ^ — T�\\�� - WETLAND'B' PER Tr Z W
3
(SAW - 2011 - 01171) - .0 Z z
STREAM'2' PER ll�ON TOP OF B. NK / \ N
\ � i - - - �F BANK- \, // / J- =� �� Q� DC
'AW - 2011 - 01171)\_ %�
j-���OFBANK �/
f r � STOP OF BANK IWi
WETLAND'A'PER - - LOP OF BANK EXISTING �� Co
POND3 m
(SAW-2011-01171)\\-_1
r STREAM'2' PER _ -
o ONE 11_NEUS EIVER.30' BUFF / (SAW - 2011 - 01171) \ \ _ a
'�•` R�VFR 30' BUFFER - v n `� v - -
SFRIV�- -� ZONE' SE R� /� �� _� - U
\ ER 5 ' BUFFER WETLAND 'A' PER - - - - - - - - 50'BUF I - - - z-� \ - Q u
_ (SAW - 2011 - 01171) - IMPACT #813 '� \�fY 0
Z
\ - - (TEMPORARY)
4 PERPENDICULAR SEWER CROSSING / �-{Ln
445- IMPACT #9A ' 1 - -=��E�IVER
ZONE 1 = 613 SF. 0.015 AC. / - - S 50'
ZONE 8 S ROADECROSS NG 1 - - ZONE 2 = 430 SF. - 0.010 AC. / /moo, / \ \` \ \ \ BUFF\R \ \ / \ / I =
S LAKE BUFFER ZONE 1 = 8,902 SF. - 0.205 AC. 4 BASSLAKE 100' BUFFER —� �- PROPOSED 20' PUBLIC
100' ZONE 2 = 4,928 SF. - 0.114 AC. q45 / / �, / d
1 UTILITY EASEMENT W
F Z
-- 255 s - �' - ° s
256 \ 1 gzyo
s v3T3
261 260
262 450 45 _ss ,i o SCM #4 o
263 \\b \ CONSTRUCTED I m
264 - _ S/ WETLAND
0 50' 100'
292
S 5 - - / \ 291 \ yrs j \ - - 1 inch = 50 ft.
\ \ 290 z