Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG130084_Compliance Report_20190904Ploy COOPER, Governor MICHAEL S. PEGAN Secretary S. D NIEL SMITH Director Covanta Environmental Solutions 2503 North Fayetteville Street Asheboro, NC 27203 NORTH CAROI INA Environmental Quality September 4, 2019 Subject : Compliance Inspection Report: Permit No. NCG 130084 Covanta Environmental Solutions - Asheboro Randolph County Dear Permit Holder: On August 30, 2019, Brandon Wise, inspector with the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) — Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources, and other inspectors with NCDEQ, met with site contacts at the facility located at 2503 North Fayetteville Street in Asheboro. The purpose of this visit was to conduct a compliance inspection per a request to inspect facilities that could have contact with compounds deemed high priority by NCDEQ. The inspection consisted of review of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and each of its components, review of the facility outfalls, as well as the review of the overall site conditions. Permit: This facility has General Stormwater Permit NCG130084 to discharge stormwater from industrial activity associated with Non -Metal Waste Recycling Industry [SIC 5093] under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This version of the permit was issued on June 1, 2018 and the permit will expire on May 31, 2023. Records/Reports: This facility is required to develop and maintain a SWPPP in accordance with Part Il, Section A of the permit. All qualitative and analytical monitoring records are required to be maintained with the SWPPP for a minimum of five (5) years. Under this permit, analytical monitoring is not required under current operating procedures. The facility records are kept up to date and kept with the SWPPP in the main office. The facility previously had a permit under NCGO80000 and this permit did require analytical monitoring, these records were kept with the new updated SWPPP. The SWPPP for this facility had been put together and implemented prior to the inspection. The SWPPP was well put together and a new SWPPP for the 2019 calendar year had been created and was there for review. Please note on the site maps, that a universal naming system should be used for tanks on site. The lack of a universal naming system made it hard for even site contacts to be able to inform NCDEQ which tanks were which. The SPCC was also reviewed and a new version of it had been created as well. The facility is required to amend and update the SWPPP at a minimum of annually in accordance with Part II, Section A, Item 8 of the permit. Please note that as long as changes were not made to the permit it can be signed off that the SWPPP was reviewed with no changes and a whole new SWPPP does not have to be created each year. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Energy. Mineral and Land Resources E 1 Winston-Salem Regional Office ( 450 Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103 Department of Envimnmentaf Quality 336,776.9800 Facility Site Review: This facility operates as an environmental recycling facility. The facility receives products that cannot go to landfills or need to be modified prior to going to landfills. The facility is graded in a way that stormwater in the east (front) portion of the facility all drains to a single stormwater pipe that discharged in the front of the facility near the road. The western (rear) portion of the facility either drains overland or drains to outlets that then discharge to a pond in the northwestern corner of the facility. This pond was full and appeared to be working during the inspection, however some issues were observed with the pond. The pond had evidence of overtopping the banks on both sides of the designed outfall. While some overtopping can be attributed to an "emergency spillway" of sorts, the evidence during the inspection was that water would typically discharge over the banks prior to or during discharging to the designed outfall. This should be fixed by building up the banks otherwise these areas of discharge could be considered extra outfalls. The outfall from this pond was not observed as it was overgrown and difficult to reach, please ensure that the qualitative monitoring is being performed at the location where stormwater leaves the pond and not the pond itself. The pond should be inspected during facility inspections however the stormwater outfall is the location the water leaves the facility not the pond. The overall housekeeping of the facility was good however some areas could use clean-up. The middle section of the facility where sawdust was stored to be mixed with waste should be cleaned up. The area had deposits of sawdust and while it appeared to be primarily clean sawdust that had not yet been used in the actual recycling process, the potential exists for impacts from the waste mixing to be present. There was also an area to the south of the waste mixing area where trucks could pull through in order to be loaded with waste product. This area needs to be clean and should be an area of regular inspection. Due to the location of this area there is high potential for waste impacts to make it to this area as the shredder where waste is shredded and added to the mixing pit is in this area and trucks pulling through could carry impacted sawdust into this area. There were two locations that needed spill kits, one being the attached building where the shredder was located and another being the rear storage area. This was pointed out during the inspection and before the inspection was over the site contacts were working on ordering more spill kits. Some secondary containment around the tank farm north of the office building showed some evidence of cracking, however it did not appear as though these cracks went through the secondary, this should be monitored to ensure the secondary containment works as designed. At this facility almost all industrial activity is performed under cover or is performed inside of an enclosed building. The primary risk for contamination comes from the mixing area as discussed previously, however the mixing area is graded so any liquid from that location should flow towards the mixing pit. Throughout the inspection spill kits were observed in many locations to help address any issues that could arise during the waste mixing process. Effluent Receiving Waters: Effluent from this facility drains into an unnamed tributary of Haskett Creek, class "C" waters of the Cape Fear River Basin. Please note that this area is part of the Cape Fear River Basin so the potential exists for future changes to the class of waters or additional nutrient testing requirements. Self -Monitoring Program: This facility is required to provide qualitative monitoring twice annually. The outfalls where stormwater is discharged from the facility are expected to be properly maintained and monitored. At the time of the inspection monitoring was being done, however there was no obvious maintained access to the western outfall. Please ensure that regular maintenance is being performed to keep the outfall clear and maintained. Monthly inspections of the facility are required to ensure the facility is meeting the housekeeping requirements in the permit. At the time of the inspection these regular inspections were being completed as required. There are no additional comments or changes to the currently operating permit. Please continue to keep up the facility and monitor stormwater discharges. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Brandon Wise at (336) 776-9660 or Brandon.wise@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Brandon Wise Stormwater Specialist Land Quality Section Winston-Salem Regional Office Enclosures: Inspection Report cc: NCDEQ — DEMLR (WSRO) w/o enclosure NCDEQ — Air Quality (WSRO) w/o enclosure O ' _._ ,,� .:,