20191188 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190903

i�
t�
i1
lT O W E R
ENGINEERING
PROFESSIONALS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC DWQ- WBSCP Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Joint Application for Nationwide Permit, Section 401 Certification, and NC Stream Buffer Authorization
American Towers LLC Site: Finch Mill, NC (306379)
5259 Mamie Rd
Wilson, NC 27893
(Wilson County)
To Whom It May Concern,
August 30, 2018
Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) has been contracted by American Towers LLC to provide environmental services for the
improvement of an existing access road associated with an existing guyed communications tower located on a portion of an approximately
59.27 -acre parcel identified as PIN #2782 98 7069 000 by the Wilson County, NC Tax Assessors Office. The proposed project will involve
the replacement of two (2) culverts within a stream crossing and the replacement of two (2) culverts with a pipe arch along the
aforementioned access road in order to minimize impacts to stream flow and minimize erosion of improvement features into adjacent water
courses.
On behalf of our client, American Towers LLC, we hereby submit an application for Department of the Army Nationwide Permit
18, Section 401 Certification, and NC Stream Buffer Authorization for the proposed project.
During preliminary research of the site, TEP personnel confirmed that the aforementioned portion of Shepard Branch is mapped as a
"blueline" stream on the USGS 7.5 -minute Lucama, NC topographic quadrangle. In addition, at the time of inspection, TEP delineated a
potential perennial stream from 0 to 50 -ft up and down -stream of an existing stream crossing approximately 750 -ft south-southwest of the
existing tower. Additionally, TEP delineated three (3) potential forested wetland areas in the immediate vicinity of the aforementioned
stream, and three (3) potential herbaceous wetland areas in the vicinity of the southwestern and southeastern guy anchor alleys.
American Towers LLC (ATC) proposes the replacement of two (2) culverts within a stream crossing and the replacement of two (2)
culverts with a pipe arch along an existing access road associated with an existing guyed communications tower. The existing access &
utility easement proceeds generally north -northwesterly from a portion of Mamie Rd through a forested area and cleared area for
approximately 1,100 -ft, crossing an approximately 8 -ft wide portion of Shepard Branch, before reaching the existing tower compound.
American Towers LLC is proposing the repair of a stretch of access road, the replacement of two (2) existing 12 -inch diameter corrugated
metal pipe (CMP) culverts with 20 linear feet of 18 -inch diameter High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe, and the removal of two (2)
existing 24 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts to be replaced with a 49 -in x 33 -in x 20 -in pipe arch. The proposed
aforementioned improvements are anticipated to result in 0.001 -acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.001 -acres of temporary wetland
impacts, impacts to 30 linear feet of an portion of Shepard Branch including 142-ft2/0.2-y3 soil removed below OHWM and 3.0-y3
temporary stream fill, and a total of 1,705.0-ft2 of impacts to Zone 1 Buffers and 395.0-ft2 of impacts to Zone 2 Buffers.
TEP is submitting a request for authorization of the use of NWP 18 for the aforementioned access road and stream crossing improvements
in order tower in order to minimize impacts to stream flow and minimize erosion of improvement features into adjacent water courses. The
approximate latitude and longitude of the project area is N 35.74786111° W -0.780201°.
Please don't hesitate to contact me if there are any questions or concerns related to the site or the information attached herein.
Sincerely,
Toler Eng' eering Professionals, Inc.
Ryan Malek
Environmental Division Manager
326 Tryon Road, Raleigh, NC 27603 C) 919.661.6351 F) 919.661.6350
rmalekgtepgroup.net

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191188
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Finch Mill, NC
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ryan Malek
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
9/3/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Shepard Branch
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS -IV; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.74786111
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wilson
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.0201
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
18 - Minor Discharges
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
fJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r- Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F- Owner FT Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
William McKinley Finch and Shirley Jean Finch
2b. Deed book and page no.:
1121/46
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
5264 Mamie Rd
Address Line 2
City
Wilson
Postal / Zip Cade
27893
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
29. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
American Tower Corporation
State / Rwince / Pagion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
ryes r No

3b. Business Name:
3c.Address
Street Address
10 Presidential Way
Address Lim 2
City
Woburn
Fbstal / Zip Code
01801
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropmte)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Wilson
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2782987069000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
5259 Mamie Rd
Address Lim 2
City
Wilson
Postal / Zip (ode
27893
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Shepard Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS -IV; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202030401
4. Project Description and History
State / Frmince / Region
MA
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
59.27
State / Rrmince / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Cleared land, forested land, and an wasting guyed communications tower with associated access road.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No F Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
FinchMillTopoMap.pdf 1.44MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey.pdf 381.75KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

The assessed area includes the existing 50 -ft x 50 -ft fenced communications tower compound, -12-
ft x 1,100 -ft access drive, three (3) -20-ft x -200 -ft guy anchor alleys, a 30 -ft buffer surrounding the
aforementioned areas, and an assessment 50 -ft up and down -stream of an existing stream
crossing. Within this assessed areas, and an assessment 50 -ft up and down -stream of an existing
stream crossing. Within this assessed area, three (3) potential forested wetland areas were
delineated in the immediate vicinity of the stream (described in 3c), and three (3) potential forested
wetland areas were delineated in the vicinity of the southwestern and southeastern guy anchor
alleys. Within the assessed area, these delineated wetland features total approximately 0.55 acres.
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Within the assessed area, a potential perennial stream was delineated from 0 to 50 -ft up and down-
stream of an wasting stream crossing approximately 750 -ft south-southwest of the wasting tower.
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is the improvement of two (2) culverts and the replacement of (2) within a stream crossing along an existing access road associated with an
existing guyed communications tower in order to minimize impacts to stream flow and minimize erosion of improvement features into adjacent water courses.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Phase 1: Beginning of road work and bulk grading. The contractor will blade the existing road to match cross slope. Capture and reuse of existing stone will occur where feasible. A
stretch of access road is to be repaired, two (2) existing 12 -inch CMP culverts are to be replaced with 20LF of 18 -inch HDPE, and two (2) existing 24 -inch RCP culverts are to be
removed and replaced with a 49 -in x 33 -in x 20 -in pipe arch. Banks around the proposed culvert removal will be stabilized with rip rap and a temporary pump line and sandbags will be
employed to allow for continuity of stream flow.
Phase 2: Construction of the access road. Install surface course to match depth and cross slopes. Apply shortcrete on slopes of new road. Compaction shall be with sheepsfoot rollers
weighing at least eight (8) tons for base course and smooth drum vibrator rollers for the surface coarse/finish grade.
Phase 3: Permanent seeding and stabilizing of all disturbed areas.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
STAMPED PDF.OPS @ 306379 FINCH MILL, NC (12601314).AE(CD).REV0.pdf 8.96MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Mitchell Wimberley
Agency/Consultant Company: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Wetland Map.pdf
933.44KB
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4point11.pdf
1.02MB
UP1 data form.pdf
1.12MB
WP1 data form.pdf
1.12MB
WP2 data form.pdf
IAMB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory -
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
P Wetlands p Streams -tributaries W Buffers
F- Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

WA
2a1 Reason(?)
Access road
improvement
2b. Impact type * (?)
P
2c. Type of W. *
Unknown
2d. W. name *
Unknown
2e. Forested *2f.
Yes
Type of
Jurisdi,ltion*(?)
Both
2g. Impact
area*
0.001
(acres)
tYA
Access road
improvement
T
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.001
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.002
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.001
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
30 30
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
60
3j. Comments:
Impacts are confined to 30 total linear feet of stream (not the calculated 60). Actions S1 and S2 are occurring within the same 30 -ft.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
C1 -k all that apply.
9 Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba ❑ Randleman
r- Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *1
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S7
]
Access road im rovement
P
Permanent
Excavation
J
Unnamed tributa of
rY
Perennial
Both
8
30
Shepard Branch
Average (feet)
(linear fed)
82
Access road improvement
Temporary
Fill
Unnamed tributary of
Perennial
Both
8
30
Shepard Branch
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
30 30
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
60
3j. Comments:
Impacts are confined to 30 total linear feet of stream (not the calculated 60). Actions S1 and S2 are occurring within the same 30 -ft.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
C1 -k all that apply.
9 Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba ❑ Randleman
r- Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Access road improvement activities
P
Unnamed tributary of Shepard
Branch
No
1,705
395
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 1,705.00
395.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 1,705.00
395.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
STAMPED PDF.OPS @ 306379 FINCH MILL, NC (12601314).AE(CD).REVO.pdf 8.96MB
Wetland Map.pdf 933.441<13

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed action was designed to include sufficient improvements to the existing access road and stream crossing while minimizing impacts to
surface water features as much as possible. BMPs have been included in the design processes and are described in detail in section D1 b.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
During culvert removal, a sandbag and pump system will be employed to minimize impacts to stream flow. For access road repair, geosynthetic fabric
will be used during access road improvement to minimize runoff. For culvert installation in flat areas, cut and fill slopes shall be stabilized immediately
upon completion of roadway grading. These areas shall be blanketed wherever they are located within 50 -ft of a surface water feature or where a
suitable vegetative area does not epst. Roadside ditches shall be provided with adequate protective lining or rip -rap wherever runoff cannot sheet
flow away from the roadway. Adequately sized culverts or other suitable cross drains shall be provided at seeps, springs, and drainage courses. For
rip -rap outlet protection, geosynthetic fabric will be placed after topsoil removal and prior to placing stone. Rip -rap will be extended on the backside of
culvert aprons to at least 1/2 depth of pipe on both sides to prevent scour around the pipe.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Under mitigation threshold.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The proposed action consists of repairs to an wasting culverted crossing. The majority of the buffer zone impacts are located within previously disturbed/non-vegetated areas including
the eAsting gravel access road and epsting culverted crossing as well as, within the stream bed itself. In vegetated areas, cut and fill slopes shall be stabilized immediately upon
completion of roadway grading. These areas shall be blanketed wherever they are located within 50 -ft of a surface water feature or where a suitable vegetated area does not exist.
When construction activities are completed, all disturbed areas will be permanently seeded and stabilized. Impacts to vegetated buffer areas will be minimal.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
Does not exceed disturbance threshold and consists of improvements to epsting impervious surfaces.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 28.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The purpose of the proposed project is the improvement of an wasting access road associated with a guyed communications tower.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)

4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR forth is project?*
r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
What Federal Agency is involved?
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPac) preliminary species list for Wilson County, NC and an informal biological assessment
completed by TEP.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location.pdf 2.33MB
Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS].pdf 220.01 KB
Species Table.pdf 67.14KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPac) preliminary species list for Wilson County, NC and an informal biological assessment
completed by TEP.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
This proposed project occurs in a previously disturbed area.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO map.pdf 305.92KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Firm panel 3720279200K date April 16, 2013
Miscellaneous
Comments
Additional attachments include a PDF copy of the PCN form, a Cover Letter, Vicinity Map, Parcel Information, applicable FIRM panel, and the USFWS NWI map.

Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Finch Mill Permitting - Transmittal Letter.pdf
111.63KB
PCN-Forrrr0_3 Dec 2008.pdf
238.48KB
Finch Mill Vicinity Map.pdf
999.19KB
Wilson County Tax Record Application - Parcel Ref No - 2782987069.pdf
154.26KB
FIRMETTE_6c2b8570-7621-11e8-9bdc-001b21b31e35.pdf
222.99KB
nwi map.pdf
321.7KB
Signature
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
. I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Ryan Malek
Signature
"#
Date
9/3/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 2782987069.000
STREET ADDRESS: 5259 Mamie Road, Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Please print:
PropertyOwner: William McKinley Finch & Shirley Taylor Finch — Property Owners
Property Owner: American Towers, LLC — Tower Owner and Leasee
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
George T. Swearingen, 111, of Tower Engineering Professionals
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Mr. & Mrs. Finch - 5265 Mamie Road, Wilson, North Carolina 27893
American Towers LLC — Attn: Shawn Lanier Vice President — Legal — 10 Presidential Way, Woburn,
Massachusetts, 01801
Telephone:
Mr. & Mrs. Finch — 252-243-5071
Ms. Duclos (American Towers, LLC) — 781-926-7157
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate t e best of
our knowledge.
-f
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature q
Date: 8-12-1 Date:
Mr. & Mrs. Finch — Property Owner Mr. Shawn Lanier —American Towers, LLC Vice
President — Legal — Tower Owner and Leasee

264
SANDFORD RD - Fi hs
FARMWOOD l.00➢ /so �Mildp�ond
4inchs
y
y �� -" Millpond
imp—
Lamm RASE GH
_ ROAKW
CLpUp
,E Ro WILSON
- I S
7Finc.lk\
� I _
Ali
264 0—
m
I No ✓ON�SFYRp
- o
0
` 00 MAMIE RD
a -
\) o
64 0
- WILSON
A
i m
,h,
o v_` 0
INTERNAiIONAI
i h
uc c
RA<f/Gy RD
_ L
— n,,.
'lllll�i - o OCDRACE/GyR
I
- S „'-
-
4L -
Project
Project Site
E� Fillmore
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Finch Mill

a Soil Map—Wilson County, North Carolina
N
769M 76MM 769.390 768480 766530
35o 41T 56'N
"r
•
264
F
Soil Mah may not Ue valid �t this sole.
35° 44' 37N 769M 76M 76M 769530
3
Map Scale: 1:2,810 iP printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11'� sheet.
Meters
N
0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Coma coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
usoA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
3
35o 44 56'N
0
35o 44 37N
769670
3
R
6/13/2018
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
■
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
f
Landfill
r'
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
�i
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Wilson County, North Carolina
Spoil Area
w Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wilson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Oct 3, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2015—Feb
25, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Wilson County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
2.1
40.4%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
1.9
38.2%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
1.1
21.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.1
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

A' -
Side i- 10pf-_
81
=d4' I_ - Izi45
P�5
Wejo a�c�
G �8 Pis
TJ° 7pIi--,
` 7 pts
,ISTING GUY ANCHOR (TYP)
XISTING 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYP)
EXISTING GUY WIRE (TYP)
4 a�
15 t,7 � o
h W
EXISTING NEXTEL LEASE AREA � t 4 tr
EXIST. GENERATOR
PAD X
SEE AS -BUILT SITE DETAIL
�
X x
EXISTING 8' EL = X
CHAIN LINK FENCE -EXISTING STOOP
EXISTING CABLE TREXISTING EQUIPMENT BUILDING
AY
EXISTING AC UNITS dOr'
EXISTING ELECTRIC PANEL
� r,✓c-Nmn d
415TING TRANSFORMER
XISTING 15` GRAVEL DRIVE WOODED
2.1' GRAVEL DRIVE ENCROACHMENTb \y-WOODED
EXISTING 20' ACCESS
AND UTILITY EASEMENT
EXISTING 2C` AC'vESS & UTILITY EASEMENT
l
AS -BUILT SITE D ETA � w/LHEADWAL v
NO SCALE
NOW DR FORMERLY 5IS
LEGES TEJAUIJ F C/L CREEK
CONTROL POINT
X
y
X
EL=X
`'------�-car�RaL POINT
S5Y47'41 "W EL = X
177.85' r--
I "Z
ass`f
TOWER I.
LATITUDE:
LONGITUE"414
%_1q
GROUND
DP;?x � STRUCTUI
LA
NOW OR FORMERLY (TOP OF
WILLIAM McKINLEY AND TOWER H
}� SHIRLEY JEAN FINCH
f l D.B. 1121 PG. 46-47 TOP OF .
L16 1 AREA: 64.63 ACRES BOTTOM
L17 tt� X10 TOP OF
L18 j �/E� C NOW DR FORME
J.H. LAMM, JR. I
lJ t, D.B. M PG.
t
AREAD < <F, fx, c LC
L20 y r
-AwLUTHER B. FIN
1 L ! P.B. 25 PG. c
GRAVEI
L22
�s
v
1
EXIST, 15'—
GRAVEL DRIVE
t
ur���hl
L24
L2
r ­T i nrn I -ti r�
- 500'.34'56"E
180.55'
NOW OR FORMEF
WILLIAM MCKINLEY I
—D_B. 801 PG. II
MAMMAE
IA . HILL
LINE SURVEYED
AND HUSE�ND
GLENN W. FILL
1 A
EXIST. 24"
R
•
LINE NOT SURVEYED
IRON PIN SET
D,B. 1552 PG. 945
4
a
IRON PIN FOUND
D�1.
Z
UTILITY POLE
1
0
EXIST. CONC. MONUMENT
NOW DR FORMERLY
�
GUY WIRE
WILLIAM VcKINLEY
AND WIFE
i
DHE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
SHIRLEY JEAN FINCH
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
D.B. 1649 PG, 71)4—�-
CALCULATED POINT
I
winrr.
MOW ROAD �S. R,
— e --
1 j 56) .,
CONTROL POINT
X
y
X
EL=X
`'------�-car�RaL POINT
S5Y47'41 "W EL = X
177.85' r--
I "Z
ass`f
TOWER I.
LATITUDE:
LONGITUE"414
%_1q
GROUND
DP;?x � STRUCTUI
LA
NOW OR FORMERLY (TOP OF
WILLIAM McKINLEY AND TOWER H
}� SHIRLEY JEAN FINCH
f l D.B. 1121 PG. 46-47 TOP OF .
L16 1 AREA: 64.63 ACRES BOTTOM
L17 tt� X10 TOP OF
L18 j �/E� C NOW DR FORME
J.H. LAMM, JR. I
lJ t, D.B. M PG.
t
AREAD < <F, fx, c LC
L20 y r
-AwLUTHER B. FIN
1 L ! P.B. 25 PG. c
GRAVEI
L22
�s
v
1
EXIST, 15'—
GRAVEL DRIVE
t
ur���hl
L24
L2
r ­T i nrn I -ti r�
- 500'.34'56"E
180.55'
NOW OR FORMEF
WILLIAM MCKINLEY I
—D_B. 801 PG. II
MAMMAE

I
DeLorme Street Atlas USAV 2013
Fg.1
127 Wi nst �d, � r ssroa{Is
Ih#'oDd
127 " r
* � r
� r
� r
}� r
{
SR 1941 r r 5-$
/ r
581
f
Y 1
r 1 I [dew; Field
_- f I:ountr r ^Iut long
Bailer Y \
OA
ecC
r Sh r ' 6d'F r t
b J
34LUMS fiew on Park
XJ� Y
P, Xmli
xL—..
r A rte. 1�1
of 3�A
CO
r I1 Its., F.s�
r 3 38E. , r�r
31; E 1 1 h ,Ih1i hint
I-
CP
M1
42
I I I nior-e
LIT=
38A'110
8A
119
119 f 38B
-/1 38B
0
Haw rzi Eluca Ma 'Ilk
I � l
Data use subject to license.
I ' DeLorme. DeLorme StreetAtlas U A , 2013_
\ ev.delorme.com NIN (9.0¢
d+ r T I i cI�. 1711e•Fafill
d
Brentwood Forest
Edges°gid Y�,
{ ���aIier P�Irk 4
F+ r �4
st Hi1I""r+
E . r4
Pi n ewo d Estat a rr4n H i I Is
�r �keLrl riilg -�
h�llillbrook r �I H'oniin
r _ Piga in
;� Qu -ail oll—
uil Ridgy '
WL
ff F
i
42
r
f %V ggins Mill
43C
3A,
r
43B
ti Bxa.114IIIe r'43�.
i _5
n r r ti ��C71,k1
r
r
MI
0 12 1 1Y2 2 2Y2
Data Zoom 11-G
€n
�
1
11�
�
Rock Ridge �
1113
Contentnea
M1
42
I I I nior-e
LIT=
38A'110
8A
119
119 f 38B
-/1 38B
0
Haw rzi Eluca Ma 'Ilk
I � l
Data use subject to license.
I ' DeLorme. DeLorme StreetAtlas U A , 2013_
\ ev.delorme.com NIN (9.0¢
d+ r T I i cI�. 1711e•Fafill
d
Brentwood Forest
Edges°gid Y�,
{ ���aIier P�Irk 4
F+ r �4
st Hi1I""r+
E . r4
Pi n ewo d Estat a rr4n H i I Is
�r �keLrl riilg -�
h�llillbrook r �I H'oniin
r _ Piga in
;� Qu -ail oll—
uil Ridgy '
WL
ff F
i
42
r
f %V ggins Mill
43C
3A,
r
43B
ti Bxa.114IIIe r'43�.
i _5
n r r ti ��C71,k1
r
r
MI
0 12 1 1Y2 2 2Y2
Data Zoom 11-G

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/19/2018
Project/Site: Finch Mill
Latitude: N 35 44 44.5
Evaluator: M. Wimberle & R. Ward
County: Wilson
Longitude: W 78 0112.5
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30" 43.5
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name: LUcama
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Zs )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
12O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
O .2D
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5 1 1 .5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es =-Z)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 they =
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 1. furthest downstream significant modification
maintains
lawn); 11.
determined
40-M. of topographir. quadrangle
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: Finch Mill (306379) CitylCounty: WilsonlWilson County Sampling Date: 6/19/2018
Applicant/owner: American Towers, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: UP1
Investgator(s): Ryan Ward and Mitchell WimberleySection, Township, Range: NIA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc_): stream terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat. N 35 44 45.3 Long: W 78 01 12.9 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Series NWI classification: Forested Wetland
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is located --40-ft east of closest portion of stream
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
1❑f
LJ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
^❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Q1 Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
1.1 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UP1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 -ft
}
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1- Quercus bicolor
20
x
FACW
8
That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Acer rubrum
15
x
FAC
3• Quercus alba
10
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
8
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Oxydendrum arboreum
10
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (ASB)
6-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
55
= Total Cover
QBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover: 27.2
20% of total cover:
11
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -ft }
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
1 Quercus bicolor
15
x
FACW
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
2 Ligustrum sinense
5
x
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 155 (A) 450 (B)
3-
4.
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.90
5-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6-
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
8•
x 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
20
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 -ft
}
'Indicators
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Athyrium asplenioides
15
x
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Arundinaria gigantea
5
x
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3-
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4-
more in diameter at breast height (13611), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7-
than 3 in- DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8-
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height_
12.
20
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover:
4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 }
1 Vitis rotundifolia
20
x
FAC
2 Smilax rotundifolia
35
x
FAC
3 Lonicera japonica
5
FACU
4-
5-
Hydrophytic
60
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover:
12
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Calor (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 613 100
sand moderate fine roots
3-4 7.5YR 413 100
sand moderate fine roots
4-6 7.5YR 6/4 100
sand sparse fine roots
6-9 7.5YR 313 95 5YR 415 5 C PL
sand sparse fine roots
9-11 1 OYR 413 100
fine sandy loam sparse fine roots
11-14 1 OYR 2/3 100
fine sandy barn sparse fine roots
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0
Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
HHistic
Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T1
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
TLJ�
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F24)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
ID
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑
1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
E]
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
0
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
JLJ
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
0
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: Finch Mill (306379) CitylCounty: WilsonlWilson County Sampling Date: 6/19/2018
Applicant/owner: American Towers, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: WP1
Investgator(s): Ryan Ward and Mitchell Wimberley Section, Township, Range: NIA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc_): stream terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat. N 35 44 44.4 Long: W 78 01 12.7 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Bibb Series NWI classification: Forested Wetland
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is located —5 -ft south of perennial stream
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
1❑�f
LJ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Q Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
^❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q1 Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
1.1 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑1 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
1.1 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 11.5"
Saturation Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 8"
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WP1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 -ft
}
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Quercus bicolor
30
x
FACW
6
That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: {A}
2 Liriodendron tulipifera
25
x
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
20
FAC
Species Species Across All Strata: {B}
4 Acer rubrum
15
FAC
Ilex o
5. pap
10
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
67% �0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6 Pinus taeda
5
FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
105
OBL species 60 x 1 = 60
50% of total cover: 52.5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
21
FACW species 95 x 2 = 190
15 -ft
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
Sapling/Shrub Stratum {Plot size:
}
1 Ilex opaca
10
x
FAC
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
2 Quercus bicolor
10
x
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3 Vaccinium corymbosum
5
x
FACW
Column Totals: 275 (A) 640 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.33
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
8
x 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
25
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
50% of total cover: 12.5
20% of total cover:
5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 -ft
}
'Indicators
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Arundinaria gigantica
50
x
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Woodwardia areolata
35
x
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Saururus cemuus
25
OBL
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4 Athyrium esplenioides
20
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (13611), regardless of
$
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft {1 m} tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height_
12.
130
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 65
20% of total cover:
26
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 }
1 Smilax rotundifolia
10
x
FAC
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
x
FACU
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
15
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
or con
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Calor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-4 10YR 313
4-8 10YR 312 75 7.5YR 415 25 C PL
8-14 10YR 512 95 7.5YR 515 5 C PL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
0 Histosol (All
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
H5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: WP1
ce
Texture
Remarks
loam
moderate fine roots
loam
some fine and medium roots
silty loam
sparse fine roots
2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) {LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
T1 Reduced Vertic (F18) [outside MLRA 150A,B]
TLJ� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
T❑ -I
u Very Shallow dark Surface (TF1 2)
Other {Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: Finch Mill (306379) CitylCounty: WilsonlWilson County
Applicant/Owner: American Towers, LLC State: NC
Investigator(s): Ryan Ward and Mitchell WimbedeySection, Township, Range: NIA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc_): stream terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lot N 35 44 50.4 Long: W 78 01 14.1
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Series
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Sampling Date: 6/19/2018
Sampling Point: WP2
Slope (%): 0-3%
Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: none
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The surrounding area has been significantly disturbed through land clearing activities associated
with logging, which appears to have compacted the soil and blocked the natural flow of water
through debris piles and berms.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
1❑f
LJ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
^❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
11=--lI Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
1.1 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WP2
150 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 75 20% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: }
1.
2.
3-
4-
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 -ft }
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2
-
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% (AIB)
6-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 105 x 1 = 105
= Total Cover
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -ft }
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
5 x FAC
FACU species 45 x 4 = 180
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
2
Column Totals: 155 (A) 300 (B)
3-
4•
Prevalence Index = BIA = 1.94
5-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6-
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
8•
x 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
5 = Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 -ft }
'Indicators
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Juncus effusus
40 x DBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Erigeron canadensis
30 x FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Carex comosa
25 x OBL
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4 Eleocharis palustris
20 OBL
more in diameter at breast height (13611), regardless of
5 Juncus elliottii
20 DBL
height.
6 Eupatorium capillifolium
15 FACU
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7-
than 3 in- DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8-
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height_
12.
150 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 75 20% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: }
1.
2.
3-
4-
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: WP2
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Calor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 512 90 2.5YR 514 10 C PL silty loam moderate fine roots
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
0 Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
H5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR Q, S)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix {S4}
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix {S6}
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hardpan hit at —8" BLS.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
T1 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B]
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) E]
TPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix {F3}
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface {F6}
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
T❑ -I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Mad (F14) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochdc (F11 ) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR Q, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric {F17} (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.4

SHPO Map
W SH
@
. 2 @
#
mur riiiR
9©
\ Waw W¥ieHouse
!% @
.R
. *, : \
.. \
w L21 w Ha_ - -za _16 /
# . 135®9__. «.
+ gym, WL2DO2 House
—Raleigh Road �," .
!
& / $
\
® a PC eC Area
� , � •
WI SON
�
� .
■ ■ � �_,
� r
f J
®
[ Ww- WaonFe
3 INd � Im_
I ~� �
fe
k � ■
■ �
■ , �
@ :
ww@B CDntentneaPrimitive
Baptist c e� ,9M
� -s
June 25, 2018
]:39,]77
0 0.33 0.65 1.3 mi
NR min
❑
Boundary yDestroyed/Re makNRLUng
0 0.5 1 2 k
® NRIndividual Listing
SL Kin
® NRListing, Gone
0
SL Individual GR
NRHD Center Kw
A
SL and
State a _,c as ma ,,mR _m«wmu� Rm&
as
NR Boundaries
stAList Entry, Gone
❑ National Register kc6w

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
35°45'2.58"N
FEMA Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard -.4.e x
Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storrs Sewer
STRUCTURES uuulllllll Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
V Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
117.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
ny Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
❑ Digital Data Available AN
Q No Digital Data Available II
CVS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
SPECIAL FLOOD
Nth BFE or Depth
HAZARD AREAS
Regulatory Floodway zone AE, AD, AH, VE, AR
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
ITHER AREAS OF
Levee. See Notes. zone x
FLOOD HAZARD
Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard -.4.e x
Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storrs Sewer
STRUCTURES uuulllllll Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
V Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
117.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
ny Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps If It Is not void as described below.
The base map shown complies with FEMA's base map
accuracy standards
The flood hazard Information Is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 6/22/2018 at 9:37.40 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective Information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map Image Is void If the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear base map Imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community Identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map Images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
❑ Digital Data Available AN
Q No Digital Data Available II
CVS
MAP PANELS
®Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps If It Is not void as described below.
The base map shown complies with FEMA's base map
accuracy standards
The flood hazard Information Is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 6/22/2018 at 9:37.40 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective Information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map Image Is void If the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear base map Imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community Identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map Images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

ti �nlw'i
WildlifeU.S. Fish and
�" National Wetlands Inventor NWI Map
shy
Janna 17, 2� 1$ This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
Wetlands base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland F] Other
Q Estuarine and Marine Wetland 0 Freshwater Pond F] Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

6/22/2018 Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS]
Home- Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS]
Details I Basemap
. 95`
About Content Legend +
r Ur
Legend E
Final Linear Features
Final Polygon Features y swam ��� Pa p�cK
COrffr
4Yilgn
'i�' MNlsti Ciel rySR}e }fid Mu n.c opal
Proposed Linear Features a pu
a
Sims � c
Proposed Polygon Featuresto
xai a
nSheVacd erahcp �f p�`sW �
d
0 �-
a ,
y�
� 7 (]fq Halergh t}
4Ch = -
o
o �v
7
� w W
w
L iftfe Sw'JmA
Esri.com Help Terms of Use Privacy. Contact Esri. Report Abuse. Contact Us
https://fws.maps.aregis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4feO9893cf75b8dbfb77 1/1

Species Name
Federal Species Status
Species Habitat Requirement
Species Effect
Rationale
Red-cockaded
Federal Endangered
Prefers to nest in mature pine stands with low understory
1 - No Effect
Lack of suitable habitat
woodpecker (Picoides
vegetation and prefers to forage in mixed pine and hardwood
borealis)
stands greater than 30 years of age and consisting of trees
with an average diameter greater than 10-inches dbh
Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Federal Endangered
Occurs in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic
1 - No Effect
Lack of suitable habitat (forested areas
michauxii)
soils; survives best when some form of disturbance provides
consistently had a closed canopy) and
openings in the forested areas
lack of observances
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus
MBTA
Found near rivers and large lakes and nests in tall trees or on
1 - No Effect
Lack of suitable habitat and observances
leucoce halus)
cliffs near water