20150088 Ver 2_Final Respnse to DWR 8.30.19_20190830

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 2
20150088
Is this project a public transportation project?* O Yes
IS No
Reviewer List:* Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Select Reviewing Office:* Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
Application Attachments
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are ansvwred.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
t= More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: R. Clement Riddle
Who is sutxrritting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20150088 2
20170001 (no dashes)
Project Name: Asheville Airport Apron Expansion
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
w: No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Buncombe
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Oick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Final Respnse to DWR 8.30.19.pdf 4.98MB
Only pdf or lT z files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:

Response to DWR Add -Info letter from August 16, 2019
W By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in autonatically.

CLearWater
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
August 30, 2019
Karen Higgins
NC DEQ, Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Asheville Regional Airport Apron Expansion Project
DWR # 20250088 Ver 2
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Ms. Higgins,
Please reference the letter dated August 16, 2019 sent by the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) in response to the permit application submitted by C1earWater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC), on behalf of Mr. Lew Bleiweis of the Asheville
Regional Airport Authority. The permit application requested written authorization for
the impacts associated with the Apron Expansion in a location that facilitates use of
existing infrastructure. The comments provided by the DWR are listed and discussed
below.
NC Division of Water Resources comments:
The Division appreciates the additional information that has been provided regarding
avoidance and minimization for the impacts associated with the proposed Apron
Expansion. Please update the on-site alternatives analysis and avoidance and
minimization analysis with the new information. Specifically provide updated clear
and concise siting criteria with explanations. And ensure that all previously noted
discrepancies have been removed, clarified, or resolved. In addition, if the
alternatives analysis references constraints related to future projects please provide
an airport master plan in support of this criteria. [I SA NCAC 02H. 05060 and (g)j
Please refer to the attached revised Alternative Analysis sections 6.1 and 6.2
(Attachment A). This revision clarifies the siting criteria and alternative descriptions.
Attached is a copy of the Master Plan Layout Drawing (Attachment B). This
drawing may also be downloaded here: https:llflyavl.copVvwp-
content/uploads/2015/08/3-Airport-Layout-Drawing.'pg The current master plan
documents can be found on the Asheville Airport's website here:
h s://fl avl.com/about-the-ai ort/ lannin-develo ment/master- lan-documents
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel

DWR # 20150088 Ver 2
August 30, 2019
Page 2 of 4
2. You have indicated that parking spaces lost by the current project will be replaced by
an associated paving and parking expansion project shown on Exhibit C as Lot B.
You indicate that there will be no wetland or stream impacts for the Lot B expansion.
Exhibit C indicates there are additional parking lot expansion areas under
consideration, please clarffy if any of these parking lot expansion areas include
jurisdictional impacts. [15A NCAC 02H. 0506(b)(4)]
Please find the attached Figure 7 (Attachment C) which overlays the Parking Area
Site Plan with the Jurisdictional Waters delineated by Clearwater Environmental.
This figure indicates that these future proposed parking areas will not impact
jurisdictional waters.
3. In order to ensure downstream water quality protection will be provided, it is
necessary for the Division to consult with the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources stormwater unit upon their review of the project's stormwater permit
application. [15A NCAC 02H. 0502(b)]
The Stormwater Plan was submitted to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources (DEMLR) on July 15, 2019. Please coordinate with DEMLR to review the
proposed plans.
Thank you for reviewing the responses to agency comments above. Should you have any
questions or comments concerning this project please do not hesitate to contact me at
828-698-9800.
Sincerely,
nna Priest, P.W.S.
Project Manager
R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S
Principal
Attachments:
Attachment A — Revised Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the Individual Permit
Attachment B — Master Plan Layout Drawing
Attachment C — Figure 7 Remote Parking Alternatives
Copy Furnished:
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville Regional Office — Kevin Mitchell
NC Division of Water Resources, Winston-Salem Office — Sue Homewood

Attachment A
Revised Section 6.1 and 6.2
Asheville Airport Apron Expansion

6.1 Avoidance
The applicant was willing to consider sites other than the proposed project site for
development of the proposed facilities at the airport. A set of criteria was developed to aid
in the search for a site and ultimate selection of a site.
6.1.1 Site Criteria
A. Project Area Size
Two to three aircraft must be able to occupy the apron concurrently. Each
aircraft could be up to 118 feet wingspan and 124 feet in length.
Additionally, the apron must be able to accommodate one to three boarding
bridges.
B. Site Availability and Land Use Compatibility
The apron expansion must be sited on existing airport property in a location
that does not hinder existing airport functions or future expansion. If
existing infrastructure exists, the existing infrastructure must not be
essential to current airport operations.
C. Site Accessibility
In order to meet the stated project purpose, the apron expansion needs to be
adjacent to the existing terminals. The proposed apron will not just be used
for Remain Overnight (RON) parking, but also will be used for the proposed
terminal expansion project which is projected to occur in approximately two
to three years. Additionally, RON is typically adjacent to an existing
terminal. The necessary jet fuel to taxi further is inefficient, costly, and a
deterrent for existing and prospective airline companies.
6.1.2 Proiect Alternatives
The project as proposed, along with seven alternatives, were considered when
determining the most practical alternative. A map which includes alternative
locations within existing airport property is included for review (Figure 6).
A. Areas North of Existing Apron
The area identified as "A" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
this project. The area immediately north of the existing apron is adjacent to
the terminals, however, an existing building for airport operations was
recently built in that area (Criteria B). Due to the new building and area
immediately north of building being used as an apron for general aviation,
and site of future ARFF/ DPS building site location. Area "A" does not
meet the site criteria and was eliminated as a suitable location for this
proj ect.
B. Area East of Existing Apron
The area identified as "B" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
this project. Area "B" is the location of the Asheville Regional Airport
terminals, parking, and operational facilities (Criteria B). Area "B" does

not meet the site criteria and was eliminated as a suitable location for this
proj ect.
C. Area Immediately North West of Existing Runway
The area identified as "C" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
this project. Area "C" is on property owned by the Airport and by the City
of Asheville. Area "C" is not adjacent to the existing terminal, requiring
additional infrastructure, access, and security needed for RON parking
(Criteria Q. This site is proposed for future corporate general aviation and
or aircraft manufacturing/maintenance or air industrial use in the Airport
Master Plan (Criteria B). Area "C" does not meet the site criteria and was
eliminated as a suitable location for this project.
D. Area Immediately North of General Aviation Area
The area identified as "D" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
the project. Area "D" is not adjacent to the existing terminal, requiring
additional infrastructure, access, and security needed for RON parking
(Criteria Q. This area is proposed for future general aviation use in the
Airport Master Plan. Area "D" does not meet the site criteria and was
eliminated as a suitable location for this project.
E. Area North of Existing Runway
The area identified as "E" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
the project. Plane access would present significant challenges as there is no
existing taxiway to this location and area E is approximately 50 feet lower
in elevation and would require significant fill and grading to bring to a
useable elevation. Area "E" is not adjacent to the existing terminal (Criteria
Q. Location "E" does not meet the site criteria and was eliminated as a
suitable location for this project.
F. Area Immediately South West of Existing Runway
The area identified as "F" on Figure 6 was evaluated for consideration for
the project. Area "F" is not adjacent to the existing terminal, requiring
additional infrastructure, access, and security needed for RON aircraft
parking (Criteria Q. This area is proposed for future air cargo development
in the Airport Master Plan. Location "F" does not meet the site criteria and
was eliminated as a suitable location for this project.
G. No -Build
The proposed Asheville Airport Apron Expansion will provide the
necessary improvements to accommodate the growing demand for aircraft
parking space at the terminal. The project as proposed cannot be completed
without the stream and wetland impacts applied for in this application. If
the project is not completed, the demands for aircraft overnight parking will
not be met.

H. Project As Proposed
The project as proposed meets the stated project purpose and is within the
project selection criteria listed above. The proposed project site area is the
appropriate size, does not have essential existing infrastructure, and is
adjacent to the existing terminal allowing for RON aircraft parking.
Construction within the proposed project area will not hinder existing
airport activities and is not in a critical or safety area. Wetlands and stream
impacts have been reduced to the minimum amount necessary to complete
the project. The project as proposed is the most feasible and least damaging
practical alternative.
6.2 Minimization and Justification of Impacts
Wetlands and stream impacts have been reduced to the minimum amount necessary to
complete the project while being able to accommodate two to three aircraft on the apron
concurrently. Each aircraft could be up to 118 feet wingspan and 124 feet in length.
Additionally, the apron must be able to accommodate one to three boarding bridges. The
space needed for this project is approximately 2.79 acres (13,500 square yards) of apron
pavement, 130,000 square yards of earthwork, construction of a retaining wall, and
relocation of the existing fence. The proposed layout has been designed to meet FAA
design criteria.
The purpose of this project is to meet the economic development needs of the Asheville,
Buncombe County and Western North Carolina regions by providing RON aircraft
parking. The proposed Asheville Airport Apron Expansion will provide the necessary
improvements to accommodate the growing RON aircraft parking demand for the WNC
region. AVL is the only FAA air traffic control towered airport in WNC, as well as, the
only FAA part 139 certificated airport and the only airport equipped to adequately serve
this market. AVL is an essential part of the economic development of the area and air
transportation is a growing component for the airport and region.
The Asheville Regional Airport has a need to expand in order to meet the needs of the
regional aviation industry. Airport property is linear in nature and limited by the existing
boundaries of the French Broad River, Interstate 26, and NC Highway 280. Due to the
limited real estate available for aviation use with access to taxiways, runway systems, and
public roadways, the proposed development area is the airport's best alternative and most
feasible development parcel to accommodate the proposed apron expansion.

Attachment B
Asheville Airport Master Plan Layout

L
rl
^1
J
L �
_ �---y�i� LOW LEVEL '`�j' p ED TERMINAL /
� w rr-
,J HENDERSON GOUNTY
Qj sir /f `����,� �,.�y WINDSHEAR ALERT
tJ p �4/i �` J —� ' BUNCOMBE COUNTY / �� i SYSTEM (LLWAS) I Am APRON TS
Rte\ o rr� / O}� a BUNCOMBE COUNTY rIII] ,�-,-
// ` r . r f MAGNETIC
AD k[Lr0 CJ 1. r -O f! PROPOSED A COMME��IAL--I w ? 7 i�t RUNWAY 34 END
NEW ROCK
Vv OD RO O /. y r
�1 „ r - PFR OSED-TEk��iA1 s° 17' w 1212011
LAT: 35° 25' 33.12" N DECLINATION
�1 LON' 82'32'13.85"W )
d s r _`
'10�-�--- ; /� ►I ♦ O �hAME IAL PROPOSE .TERMINAL 1_`"'- ' _� �'."-_'-1$APRO'VEMENTS &e
♦ - HENDERSON COUNTY ELEV: 2,110.8 LOW POINT
�� r LTI E I -� PRC)POSEDPARKING D�EK,�QI_T� �. �����
� PROPOSED AIR TRA NTR � �<rj, N .. �„ �S .- _' �,�UIL�71_N-�f'.- _ 4 WI YR
a � 0
_.;__ 7 _ TOWER (ATCT) AND CRITIC ,', / [ - -- - v r -� �r�:
[IIIA ---J u _ PROPOSE�TaX1
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND �%• a : �rj/ _ r� ,� ; -- REHABILITATION.
NON -AERONAUTICAL MULTI -USE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL �-�`
�► w t IMPROVEMENTS
'. -
VEHICLE NE
1 �1��� ^- ,� _.-,-7 ■ ..• `�e'.�` _� 1/E E[IjA ��RKING I ` [It�
III
Y
—-- _. A
�ENERAL r-, � —'-._' Lr:T� iia 1-1 Cc—' CK
AVIATION DEVELOPMEN i
(ALT 1) �I •>�'"r PROPOSED RUNWAY 35 END
LAT. 35 25'32.87" N
�� - 1 ` ti r °
_,}
i �w /I [II]4C t
•' • � - � 15B '' fi ; _ � LON: 82° 32'14.70" W
.teFANDE�;_
r �.� / % �. POSED OMMERCIALr ND / `,I
HIDDEN CREEK ROAD----FUE-L FARM OH
d / >,. ELEV: 2,110.8
�1� '�9TI.y [III] �' :y.-� _ ,', MU
At
,(�E [1TICAL LT %
308 s L (1 �X i d
I, ROUTE 280 _ J ,
_ / ,� ,� .,.• __� �• .-_ -_ ,- � � � PROPOSED RUNWAY 35
F -r _ - \_- L._�,.. I' ''-y_ �`I I ►. `" �� - `.i ---- 21 i 1.4
,yam
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE
RUNWAY 16 PRO O ZONE - u r_ ri 1 `' /
N.�" 67 1s8 zz o o rvf,. \ ; �, / 5161LITY 314 LE,
VIS.l81L1T /4 MILE (11,000 X1,750'x2,500)
it (1,000 x 1,750' x 2,500') I}A; cti "s ,
� d zed 20 0 • ,� ;
1 ', 240 , 31 : fl ' (`----------_ ___'_- -- •� � � ./�` /
20
PROPOSED RUNWAY 17 END
- ' 35° 6' 3" N z 4 �, - I, so ; ► J 134
' 11 LAT. 2 47.1 �• ,�,,.� ', i �
.. ..:,
°
r LON: 82 32'48.04"W .! r, rte, 311 �x
.. . • � 136 69 , , ,- ..': O . ,_.., , „. ._ _ t_ -ti
6
'^cty'd• J —�
E " > MIDDLE APRdi'u
ELEV: 2,164.4 �..�;_,_ �- ` �x } .. ,el A.PRI SOUTH API�:Ge.
n off' Cry
/'
PROPOSED RUNWAY 17 - �� _ L � , ; 1 �� �` �� o SOS
� � PRIMARY K -' '� -�-'=� -� -
_ '._- . �.'-_ 3 35�. I 312 .
pp
RUNWAY 16 END . l�
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE a -�-� �'• -
j LAT: 35'25'47.39 " N -- j ♦' ; I -s - ._� = 1-
VISIBILITY 314 MILE _ ti
LON: 82° 32' 41.19" W ✓% ?. TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA ' ' TOFA TOFA TOF , TOFA TOFA
(1,000'x 1,750'x 2,506 ��� ELEV: 2,164.4 HIGH POINT'-__-- - - —
[I] � �j ,j; ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA 74.5' ROFA
n]
_ — _ - _--_—
lus - .. .. � .] F 58898:S:K54ttt.....-;........... .
RSA
A .,' A6 OFZ AS Z A4
—OFZ
L _,.
O L -- - --- 3 --
S'Lh 'L OFZ
---_ WINDSOCK
A2 Al
A m 0 1 t
— —
�� NfALSR V�� ";;t. ':r ••'••. •••`•'' ':� _ — �
rROPOSEDRUE BEARING S20° 05' 33"E RUNWAY 17-35 8 '
' x —
/ VS
�OOFZ RSA . A OFZ g RSA 1
AIRPORT /ul_z
\ IRS
SERVICE - - - - Tom" - TcA
TOFR O� TOFA TOFA TOFA
RUNWAY 34 �- - - - /
o i'
-t
LOCALIZER s-- -- ------------------- -.------- -
-.,
^� �c •= a„ L,,,<�_i - - -_--- -- __---------------__---- . _ - P U ACE 4 ----- ---=-- - --
�y��.
� i J: ---- .-__
TEM14 RARY — J� 1
, r
;r-50�.�' i 25-x! \ 25' 25' 25' � �t _ ._� f' lr I-RUhWAY34 i
TAXIWAY 4 GLIDE, I J,r /r` R \ �-
RP L r r
- _ H° PRIMARY SURFACE / 4 i e i LID '
ONNECTOR CRITICAL AREA =r--ter----'-7777--,'77,- - a ---7 r ^ ---- [
r V
E
ik L
PROPOSED RELOCATEDARP
�'"�-,., i-- _
r uu_
ti K ' 'i - !•
RUNWAY16
34 ti �� ,
LAT: 35°26'10"I"J
- = (
�.►. ! ✓,r' y° , ' "9; .:- �'r I .. `.. `::' .' ::' ' 1 5a ' ' / ! f1 '' � .34
(7N; 82` 32'30.50" --- ---_'-{`�
qCT tOLIV LEVEL DSHEAR _-,$APROPOSED r ' `RUNUVAI' 1 a
GLIDESLOPE ' �' ' r-
,I
w
�r;,J � RUNWAY 34 PROTECTIG � � �'�, , , 1 ' • �
.r"
ZONE VISIBILITY <3/4 MILE
► �� j ){ (1,000 x 1,750'x 2,500')
If ��
,. �'�-� �� r GOLF COURSE
MALSR
S:LSt-,SS:R1S4t,..
- U
a,
iv xiY.eY'SYi�i•SE:G Wy1 S Illll '`
•r j1 i � r
RUN AY 16
LIZEF2 l I LOC IZER ,'r,
PROPOSED GLIDESLOPE-
\ y CRITICAL AREA I
p ! )zc +,, , _ RELOCATE Y1; _ r R .If RUNWAY 34 PART 77
J ALERT SYS EM (LLWAS} 'rf r I GLIDE SLOP',- r^ti rr �, ( - J t.
„ CRITICAL AREA];, PROPOSES Alf ;r
{ aPROPOSED APPROACH SURFACE
°�! k- 1 - Z LOW LEVEL WINDSHEAR (i r ,
GLEN m ) ,-' LPAR �� zti O PN {.�.EEOGATEQRSO i t
-- BRIp >" iir I !,', -.- r I' ,-I .. .. . _I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I:v % LAT: 35° 26' 09.99 9r C'• F h I �.L PRECISION INSTR=UMENT
GE ROADS z � f _1 [ 1 s� : ,. �,�, �=y �=y ��� � _y �_� �=y �=y �_� � _y � _y �=y _ ALERT SYSTEM ( LLWAS) ` d4 0 ��� fI? ;A � PROPOSED f AND CRITI,�AL A A; s
E ----------------------------T�- II O�} �'�' ` ,
< LON. 82 32 31.34 31 RELOCATE ti 50:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000 )
iF'4" VASI4 COMMERCIAL AND `�
h
-� � 40:1 APPROACH OUTER (40,000'}
RUNWAY 16 PART 77 ' '3 `;']t I I rr7�
�` ISS �' I T �;. I NON -AERONAUTICAL l " VISIBILITY <3/4 MILE
APPROACH SURFACE <>_ J ) ,-� lr ` 4 = r '�, j! IST/j,� �� "' �` MULTI USE i •, ( )
�+ r s- f G i 1,000 x 1fi,000' x 50,000'
PRECISION INSTRUMENT l Er A1��Z73 �`off
rl - '/� [ ] ` -
5 :1 APPROACH INNER (10,000') �� a! i y - < I /
r (6 �� > , PROPOSED TE1;711P r
_ M
40:1 PROACH OUTER (40,400') ¢ `„r RUNWAYI FUTURE WEST SIDE r� - // - t BUNCOA+�i3c COUNTY
VISIBILITY <3/4 MILE •�� ���`-4.-Iw �. `.,; `.v„ , ';' � II , _ 1, /,, � � PARALLELTA;d4Y
(1,000 X 16,000' X 50,000')
t
-
_s ■ ., -� � _ � _M �� . z r `� r � � r ir -.. � I r'• �i` �. t • ' r 'r ' ; r. r % , ./-1- --, , � I --, ..
. A r f, / [
! 11r1B > c' 1.+ rR "' ,� j _ rr . /r�QC'J ��
PROPOSED AIR CARGO
vHENDERSON COUNTY
�. to y -l'' / ,r tc ., nm� , 1N��r ` { , I ¢� C
DEVELOPMENT AREA
PROPOSED RUNWAY 17©
Nl
PO O_
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE 1 -� `} S� ti S f ¢ l `! `' /r /!f` J�mfi 41 -/, �
��
PRECISION INSTRUMENTS ` ^ ' �'- % /' m'�m� `�. �' �. S TRAFFIC CIRCLEn Z
� {1 ; NCDOT PROJECTF� `-
50:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000') ti` \ U PROPOSED ,,` � � }
40:1 APPROACH OUTER (40,000 ' �r� 4 COMMERCIAL AND f�C- f; II` �CUl r;% fn: �m� 1 4 • r r f m
) �,
VISIBILITY < 314 MILE C NON-COMMERCIAL - �?�'
(1,000'x 16,000'x 50,000') M
1 VERVI W DRIm
----------------------------
r' FRENCH BROAD RIVER
BUNCOMBECOUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
LEGEND
RUNWAY DATA TABLE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
RUNWAY 16134
RUNWAY 17135
DESCRIPTION
— • — • — • —
SAME
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR (ASR) CRITICAL AREA
EXISTI NG
PROPOSED
RUNWAY END COORDINATES (NAD 83)
RUNWAY CENTERLINE
L
82' 32' 31.34" W
(16) 35° 26' 47.39" N
(17) 35° 26' 47.13" N
LATITUDE
• •
SAME
PAVEMENT
(34) 35° 25' 33.12" N
(35) 35° 25' 32.87" N
-------------------
(16) 82° 32' 47.19" W
(17) 82° 32' 48.04" W
LONGITUDE
BRL
SAME
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA)
(34) 82° 32' 13.85" W
(35) 82° 32' 14.70" W
SAME
(16) < 314 MILE
(17) < 3/4 MILE
APPROACH MINIMUMS
SAME
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ)
RPZ
(34) <3/4 MILE
(35) < 3!4 MILE
PART 77 CATEGORY
OTHER THAN UTILITY
SAME
SAME
(16) 50:1
(17) 50:1
APPROACH SURFACE SLOPE
SAME
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA (TSA)
FSA
(34) 50:1
(35) 50:1
RUNWAY WIDTH
150'
SAME
RUNWAY LENGTH
8,001'
SAME
DISPLACED THRESHOLD
NONE
NONE
SURFACE TYPE
ASPHALT -GROOVED
SAME
PAVEMENT STRENGTH (LBS)
NA
GROUND ELEVATION CONTOURS
SINGLE WHEEL
120,000
SAME
DUAL WHEEL
160,000
SAME
DUAL TANDEM
260,000
SAME
RUNWAY LIGHTING
HIRL
SAME
RUNWAY MARKING
PRECISION
SAME
EFFECTIVE GRADIENT (%)
0.67
SAME
MAXIMUM GRADE (%)
41.0
SAME
LINE OF SIGHT VIOLATIONS
NO
NO
UNUSABLE PAVEMENT
IFR: (16 KNOTS) 99.91%
SAME
WIND COVERAGE (%)
VFR: (16 KNOTS) 99,51%
SAME
NA
ALL WEATHER: (16 KNOTS) 99.56%
SAME
0
(16) MALSR, REILS, PAR (P4L),
(17) MALSR, REILS, PAR (P4L),
WIND CONEANINDSOCK
CENTERLINE LIGHTING
CENTERLINE LIGHTING
VISUAL APPROACH AIDS
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ARP)
-
40
(34) MALSR, REILS, VASI (V4L),
(35) MALSR, REILS, VASI (V4L),
O
TDZ & CENTERLINE LIGHTING
TDZ & CENTERLINE LIGHTING
MEDIUM INTENSITY APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH
RUNWAY ALIGNMENT INDICATOR LIGHTS (MALSR)
(16) ILS, GPS
(17) ILS, GPS
INSTRUMENT APPROACH AIDS
PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)
40
(34) ILS, GPS
(35) ILS, GPS
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)
C - III
C -IV
DESIGN AIRCRAFT
BOEING 737-700
BOEING 757
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA) DIM.
500' x 10,001'
SAME
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA) DIM.
800' x 10,001'
SAME
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) DIM.
400'x 8,401'
SAME
PRECISION OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (POFZ)
DIM. 200'x 800'
SAME
(16) 2,164.4
(17) 2,164.4
RUNWAY END ELEVATIONS (MSL)
T-HANGAR#1 (T -HANGAR ROW)
(34) 2,110.8
(35) 2,110.8
MAX. ELEVATION (MSL)
2,164.4
SAME
(16) 2,164.4
(17) 2,164.4
TDZ ELEVATION (MSL)
(TERMINAL DRIVE)
(34) 2,140.0
(35) 2,140.0
r' FRENCH BROAD RIVER
BUNCOMBECOUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
LEGEND
DESCRIPTION
EXISTING
PROPOSED
ULTIMATE
AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
- -
— • — • — • —
SAME
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR (ASR) CRITICAL AREA
s. re sr. se rr. rs rr.-a rr, r� r. ,r
.............................
SAME
SAME
RUNWAY CENTERLINE
L
82' 32' 31.34" W
SAME
PART 77 SURFACE
• • •
• •
SAME
PAVEMENT
HANGAR
*
-------------------
TERMINAL EXPANSION [III]
BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL)
BRL
BRL
SAME
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA)
RSA
RAA
SAME
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA)
ROFA
ROFA
SAME
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ)
RPZ
RPZ
SAME
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ)
OFZ
OFZ
SAME
TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (TOFA)
rUFA
TOFA
SAME
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA (TSA)
FSA
TSA
SAME
PRECISION OBJECT FREE ZONE (POFZ)
PpFZ
±
SAME
FENCE
*
F
SAME
x x x x
FLOODWAY (100 -YEAR)
*
NA
NA
GROUND ELEVATION CONTOURS
--- - ------------�
NA
NA
TREE LINE
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [U]
NA
NA
NON -AERONAUTICAL DEVELOPMENT
*
H
SAME
GLIDESLOPE CRITICAL AREA."•.:a""°
": """"'
- — — — -
SAME
LOCALIZER CRITICAL AREA�rr�r'rrr
rfrr+rr�r r r rfsr?r�r'rrT r r�r
- - - - - - - - - -
SAME
AIRPORT BUILDINGS
®
PARKING, COMMERCIAL NON -AERONAUTICAL
-------_- ----
UNUSABLE PAVEMENT
NA
NA
WETLANDS
y +w
NA
NA
ROTATING BEACON
0
CO M M ER C IALM O N -AER O NAUT I CALMULTI-USE
SAME
WIND CONEANINDSOCK
G /
_
%
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ARP)
-
40
NA
AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEMS (ASOS)
O
SAME
SAME
MEDIUM INTENSITY APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH
RUNWAY ALIGNMENT INDICATOR LIGHTS (MALSR)
® /
® J ;°
SAME
PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)
40
NA
VISUAL APPROACH SLOPE INDICATOR (VASI)
8
SAME
SAME
LOW LEVEL WINDSHEAR ALERT SYSTEM (LLWAS)
CARGO BUILDING (TERMINALDPIVE)
SAME
SAME
FACILITIES TABLE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL)
TOP
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (NAD 83)
TOE
REF
FACILITY NAME
35' 26' 10.30" N
REF
FACILITY NAME
L
82' 32' 31.34" W
MEAN MAX. TEMPERATURE HOTTEST
MONTH
ELEV
SAME
AIRPORT TERMINAL AREA NAVRIDS
(EST.)
3
HANGAR
*
A
TERMINAL EXPANSION [III]
AIR CARRIER
15
MAINTENANCE OFFICE AND BUILDING
*
B
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (ATCT) [III]
MITL
SAME
(AVIATION WAY)
ENHANCED
SAME
15A
MAINTENANCE VEHICLE STORAGE
*
C
BOX HAN GAR S [I I I
- ±
15H
MAINTENANCE STORAGE
*
D
CONVENTIONAL HANGARS [111
-- -
20
HANGAR WITH OFFICE (LINDBERGH LANE)
*
E
AIR CARGO DEVELOPMENT [U]
±
20
T-HANGAR#3 (20 -UNIT) (T -HANGAR ROW)
*
F
G EN ER AL AV IAT IO N DEVELOPMENT [I111
21
OFFICE BUILDING (AVIATION WAY)
*
G
COMMERCIAUN0N-AERONAUTICAL
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [U]
-
30
BULK HANGAR (LINDBERGH LANE)
*
H
COMMERCIAUNON AERONAUTICAL
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [1111
-
31
CONVENTIONAL HANGAR (AVIATION WAY)
*
1
PARKING, COMMERCIAL NON -AERONAUTICAL
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [U]
35
HANGAR WITH OFFICE (AVIATION WAY)
*
CO M M ER C IALM O N -AER O NAUT I CALMULTI-USE
DEVELOPMENT [U]
-
40
FRO OFFICE BUILDING AND HANGAR
*
K
FUEL FARM [III]
'
(T -HANGAR ROW)
40
T-HAN GAR #2 (17-U N IT) (T-HAN GAR R OW)
41
CARGO BUILDING (TERMINALDPIVE)
2,165
43
DPS BU ILD ING (TER M INAL DR IVE)
2,178
45
HANGAR (AVIATION WAY)
50
T-HANGAR#1 (T -HANGAR ROW)
61
TERMINAL BU ILD ING (ATCT EL 2.226)
2'20$
(TERMINAL DRIVE)
RENTAL CAR MAINTENANCE FACILITY
65
(RENTAL CAR DRIVE)
67
UTILITY BUILDING (TERMINAL DRIVE)
AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT
69
(TERMINAL DRIVE)
70
PARKING TOLL PLAZA (TERMINAL DRIVE)
87
RENTAL CAR MAINTENANCE FACILITY
(RENTAL CAR DRIVE)
PORTABLE OFFICE BUILDING
91
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
99
RENTAL CAR READY r
RETURN SERVICE BOOTH
104
HANGAR#1 AND#2
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
120
HANGAR WITH OFFICE
2'187
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
122
HANGAR (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
2,186
134
OFFICE BUILDING
2,183
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIRE FIGHTING FACILITY
136
(APFF) (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
140
CONVENTIONAL HANGAR #1
2,198
168
BULK HANGAR (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
220
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR
240
FBO OFFICE BUILDING AND HANGAR
311
FUEL FARM
31.2
RENTAL CAR FUEL FARM
* ELEVATIONS NOT AVAILABLE
PROPOSED RUNWAY 35
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE
PRECISION INSTRUMENT
50:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000')
40:1 APPROACH OUTER (40,000')
VISIBILITY < 314 MILE
(1,000'x 16,000'x 50,000')
[I]
MODIFICATIONS OF DESIGN STANDARDS
NO. STANDARD MODIFIED FAA STANDARDS EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED ACTION DATE APPROVED AERONAUTICAL STUDY
1 RUNWAY LONGITUDINAL GRADE <0.5% 1 ST QUARTER >0.5% 1 ST QUARTER RELOCATE RUNWAY AUGUST 16, 1978 ATL -603: 7268: 8-07-78
2 RUNWAY TO TAXIWAY SEPARATION 400' 325' RELOCATE RUNWAY AUGUST 16, 1978 ATL -603: 7268: 8-07-78
NONSTANDARD CONDITIONS
NO.NON-STANDARD CONDITION EXISTING CONDITION FAA STANDARD
1 RUNWAY LONG GRADE 1.0% 1ST QUARTER (RW 34) 1 <0.8% 1ST QUARTER
RUNWAY TO TAXIWAY
2 325' 400'
SEPARATION
NOTES
1. FAA's APPROVAL OF THIS AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP) REPRESENTS
ACCEPTANCE OF THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE FUTURE FACILITIES
DEPICTED. DURING THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE, THE AIRPORT OWNER IS
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FORAPPROVAL THE FINAL LOCATIONS, HEIGHTS AND
EXTERIOR FINISHES OF STRUCTURES. FAA'S CONCERNS ARE OBSTRUCTIONS,
IMPACT ON ELECTRONIC AIDS AND ADVERSE EFFECT ON CONTROLLER VIEW
OF AIRCRAFT APPROACHES AND GROUND MOVEMENTS, WHICH COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SAFETY, EFFICIENCY OR UTILITY OF THE AIRPORT.
2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL).
3. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY
STANDARDS. SPOT ELEVATIONS AND GROUND CONTOURS ARE DERIVED FROM
AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMERTY AND ARE APPROXIMATE. GROUND SURVEYS ARE
RECOMMENDED TO VERIFY ACCURACY.
4. ALL LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES ARE NAD 83.
5. TOPOGRAPHY AND PLANIMETRICS FROM AERIAL SURVEYS OBTAINED FROM
WOOLPERT, INC., SURVEY DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 2011.
6. WETLANDS FROM ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT. RUNWAY RECONSTRUCTION
AND NEW PARALLEL TAXIWAY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT, THE LPA
GROUP AVIATION CONSULTANTS, MAY 2011.
7. THERE ARE NO KNOWN OFZ OBJECT PENETRATIONS.
8. THERE ARE NO KNOWN THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE (TSS) PENETRATIONS.
9. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST MEET THE FULL DESIGN STANDARDS LISTED
IN FAA AC 15015300-13.
10. THE BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL) SHOULD BE LOCATED ON AN AIRPORT
LAYOUT PLAN TO IDENTIFY SUITABLE LOCATIONS FOR BUILDING AREAS ON
AIRPORT PROPERTY. THE BRL IS DEPICTED BASED ON FAR PART 77 SURFACE
FOR A GIVEN DISTANCE FROM THE RUNWAY CENTERLINE. SPECIFIC SITE
DEVELOPMENT MUST BE FURTHER EVALUATED BASED ON TOP ELEVATION OF
PROPOSED STRUCTURE. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BRL ENCOMPASS
THE RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONES, THE RUNWAY VISIBILITY ZONE, AND AREAS
REQUIRED FOR AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER CLEAR LINES OF SIGHT.
11. LEGEND ELEMENTS REPRESENT DEPICTIONS ON DRAWING, BUT MAY VARY IN
SIZE DUE TO SCALING ON DRAWING.
12. GEOMETRICS DEVELOPED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE PUBLICATION OF
ADVISORY CIRCULAR 150!5300-13A.
AIRPORT DATA TABLE
AIRPORT DATA
EXISTING
PROPOSED
AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL)
2,165'
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (NAD 83)
[ U ]
DATE
LATITUDE
35' 26' 10.30" N
35' 26' 09.99" N
LONGITUDE
82' 32'30.50" W
82' 32' 31.34" W
MEAN MAX. TEMPERATURE HOTTEST
MONTH
83.2° F
SAME
AIRPORT TERMINAL AREA NAVRIDS
ROTATING BEACON, SEGMENTED CIRCLE,
LOCALIZER, GLIDE SLOPE
SAME
NPIAS SERVICE LEVEL
PRIMARY- SMALL -HUB
COMMERCIAL SERVICE
SAME
STATE SERVICE LEVEL
AIR CARRIER
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)
C -III
SAME
TAXIWAY LIGHTING
MITL
SAME
TAXIWAY MARKING
ENHANCED
SAME
NO. REVISIONS BY APP. DATE
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PHASE I DEVELOPMENT
PHASE II DEVELOPMENT
[ II ]
PHASE III DEVELOPMENT
[III ]
ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT
[ U ]
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
APPROVED DATE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF AVIATION
APPROVED
DATE
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
APPROVED
DATE
500 0 500 1000
SCALE: 1 "=500' FEET
AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
MeadSHEET
3
DELTA AIRPORT I lunt
CoAffulTAII n INC.
OF
DRAWN BY: RWW SCALE: 1 " = 500' 21
CHECKED BY: RGL DATE: MARCH 2013

Attachment C
Figure 7
Remote Parking Alternatives

v ,
Ink.
Igo.
•
11
}
r
'
ua�tfr i � A
, �� �. ��. , �'•. � m1ll�ag Y9�ia.! �4 �N t�YilgdrW {N1l�t{Ni1dk WY1�31� .��. _ ��, �.,;� '�R+lY�i
'+a '• � utrol f�H;Nir3i6i�ti1 A ##�1�! v8'R i■ q� _
�■■ltrj�!�rnrti.�w�aa�u'+inwL�Mcr�rAWp7ikM1A pop I-
- r
NONN
.1[ 11 s► 9 � � r ,.r. A l 5 . � h.
a
10
s
• r. •_�! ?f. Y� BCW ! °r
0
N
\W\
L
■ O
W
■
O
i
C/)
shevill
4/10/2019
EXHIBIT C