20191153 Ver 1_HA 16-08-0003 (NSR)_20190829

Project Tracking No. (fntertial Use)
16-08-0003
�t HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
T, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROTECT INFORMATION
Project No:
U-5789
County:
Onslow
WBS No.:
44361.1.1
Document
Type:
MCC
Fed. Aid No:
NIA
Funding:
E State El Federal
Federal
Permits :
El Yes 1Z No
Permit
T e s :
NIA
Project Description:
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on August 4, 2016. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or
SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is defined on the following maps. As this is
a state funded project with no federal actions, it is subject to GS 121-12(a), which requires
consideration of only National Register listed properties in the APE. There are no NR Iisted
properties in the APE, therefore the project needs no architectural survey. Should the project
acquire federal funding, permits, or other involvement, or if its scope changes in any way, it will
require additional review. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties and no
survey is required. If design plans change, additional review will be required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the
Onslow County survey, Onslow County GISITax information, and Google Maps are considered
valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There
are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
ap(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Histo r7,Xid Landscap -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED V�/ 1 za
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Lrnrdscapes NO SURVEY REQUIREDform forMinor D-ansportation Projects as Qrnhfued nr the 20071'rogrammaric Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

HPO GIS, APE Defined in red. No NR listed properties within the APE.
Nisroric Archireclure aird l,andscapea NO SURV Y REQUIRE,!) form for Minor 7ransporroliort Projects as Qualifrerl is ilit' 1007 Prograrumaric Agreerrrenr.
Page 2 of 2

From: Husband, Katherine L
To: Adrienne Rogers
Subject: RE: U-5789 - NC 53 at Gateway Drive North Intersection Improvements
Date: Friday, December 2, 2016 11:34:30 AM
Attachments: imaae002.ona
imaae003.pnna
Thank you Adrienne,
I just reviewed the change of the Scope and discussed with Mary Pope Furr. The revised Study
Area/Area of Potential Effects contains no structures over fifty years of age and is characterized by
modern commercial development similar to the original Study Area. No additional survey is required
for Historic Architecture, and you do not need to resubmit this project as this email confirms that
the additional study area was reviewed and a determination was made that no additional survey
work is needed. Please let me know if you need any additional information or have any questions.
Thank you,
Kate
Kate Husband
Architectural Historian
Human Environment Section
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919 707 6075 office
[e-mail]
1020 Birch Ridge Drive, Building B
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, INC 27699-1598
�" 'Nothing Compares_ -
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Adrienne Rogers [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 12:00 PM
To: Husband, Katherine L
Cc: Westphal, Anneliese
Subject: U-5789 - INC 53 at Gateway Drive North Intersection Improvements
Good morning Kate,
I hope this finds you well. I requested a Historic Cultural Resources Screening in July 2016, and
received the attached document from your office. The initial project limits for the area in question
have been extended approximately 650-feet northwest (see attached map). I'm preparing to submit

a State Minimum Criteria Checklist document to Division 3, and need to know if I should re -submit
for the Historic Cultural Resources Screening through ETRACS based on the new footprint.
I appreciate your time and attention to this matter.
v/r,
Adrienne Rogers Environmental Scientist
DAVENPORT
3722-E Shipyard Blvd Wilmington, NC 28403
t [phone] ext: 203 c [phone] f [phone]
website
man I email
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.