HomeMy WebLinkAbout20161268 Ver 2_U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request_20190829Carpenter, Kristi
From:
Herndon, T. Mason
Sent:
Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:03 AM
To:
Shaver, Brad ; Steenhuis, Joanne
Subject:
U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request
Attachments:
U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request_signed.pdf
Attached is the PJD request that BB and Hal Owens Consulting provided for Corbett Pit #2. Please let me know how we
need to proceed since this one has EPA interest. Thanks
Mason Herndon
Environmental Program Supervisor
Division 3
NCDOT- Division of Highways
910-341-2036 office
910-604-0050 mobile
tmherndon@ncdot.gov
5501 Barbados Blvd
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mason Herndon, 5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne NC 28429
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover city: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.318634 Long.:-77.834547
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Island Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT
TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
Number
(decimal
(decimal
amount of
resources (i.e.,
to which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
aquatic resources
wetland vs.
resource "may be"
in review area
non -wetland
subject (i.e., Section
(acreage and
waters)
404 or Section 10/404)
linear feet, if
applicable
1
34.321597
-77.83757
3690 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
2
34.321181
-77.835977
5790 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
3
34.31532
-77.839659
3290 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
4
34.323801
-77.832674
5640 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
5
34.319769
-77.833059
1620 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
6
34.317458
-77.82894
1470 linear ft
non -wetland
404
waters
E
34.319317
-77.827711
0.5 ac
wetland
404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Quad: Scott's Hill 2016 1:240000
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: websoil survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Mason Herndon
Date: 2019.08.29 08:55:18-04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
■
■
■
■
I
I �
I �
I
✓r♦♦♦ I
1 ♦♦♦ I ii/ii/ \o���\
�o w
• — � I S ii r iii `�\ \`��� �
PRI VA TE
•ROAD
• ni�,ii� `` � ,_'_; ;_ � iii � `��� "`
rr r �a
1 n' m
1 iii iii
1
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
s�
EXISTING PRIVA TE
RGAD;�
I
I
i
■
PROPOSED CROSSING
I-
•
• PROPOSED
4% PROPOSE
D
HAUL ROAD
JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH
u
/ , a
d ,
SAFETY
SILT &
FENCE ■
ALONG PERIMETER ■
Vewatering Basin 7p ,
nth surface skimmer Outlet .-•-• •
\ POND
SF — CRY------------' s /SF ---�\ ■
1 \ 4 / -� SF SF
\
I � 1
Dewaterin \
70 sin
X 140' �a1
I •
with \ ■
1 ♦ surface �
\ , skimmer Outl�{
SF , SF N SF � SF
\ WETLAND \
\ \ , BOUNDARY
w\
Sp
\ \\ ■ i
POND
o 'A\ UN POND
_
r4
\" \ \\ w1
VROPOS ED �� a
FESILT &
FENCE
LVN PERIMETER
";;;� \\ -
\ ♦ �' v,
PROPOSED
\
CROSSING
ROPOSED \ YAI
UL ROAD
g v,
M
■
r
ir �1 �
ti .r ■
1
■ - J I - - - ■ ■ 1 \ -
J -
■
4-
Fi gure 1. Map o f candidate site provided by H alfour H eatty
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXI"NG RRIVATE
ROAD
1
rr!
I
i
I�
I•
,INC pRIVArE
I
ROAD \
i
i
SKAGGS
CURSErr
INDDSiRIES INC
AflEA II_8
4] ACRES
r
ji
lNUU57I
I;f� *,'
EXISTING PRIVATE
ROAp \
! !
\\A
eoeaerr
INnusr>71Fs INC
AREq IC
r3 Aa¢e
. rhr L
PROP.
II PROPOSED •
HAUL ROAp
.-\
—ram �1uL ROAp
JURfSDIC71pIyAL �'t�• �''•
OITCH `
!� � PROPOSEp
CROSSIND
-..-
SKAGGS SKAGGS
JJRISLIICTI AL•
DIrcR
CORBErr iICTIgNAL INpU1NC
AREEAA 11p-A
5a Aces
50' O/S
.... �SKAGGS
�_�, creoss ryc
J°R
INOUORRRSETrI^} y •_'1`1
AREA 82' 0/5
II ACRES
PROPOSED �.
CR05gryU
.-- PROPOSES `•
AUL ROAD
`OOr
R/W
SR 1409 (MILITARY CUTOFF
ROAR EXTENSION) FROM SR
1409 TO U5 17 IN WILMINGTON
TIP PROJECT U-4751 CONTRACT
C203980
. CAMERON "g•.
1
1�
NAUI-
� -uoT R/W
NCDOT R/W
CORBETT II TRACTS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
430 Eastwood Road SRL mgw, NC 29403
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 2. USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Quadrangle: Scotts Hill, NC 2016
—� 1� yi ter-,, r - ,e I, / I c i -
SCALD 1:24 000
1 0.5 0 KILOMETER5 1 2
f000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
1 0-5 0 1
hULES
1000 a lo00 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 70M 8000 9000 1000a
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF1988
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
Figure 3. NRCS Sol Survey Map
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
rVScab:i:15,Wfp*fEdcnA�wd (Ifzss')4vNC
N 6 M 41D EM 131�
Fit
C 500 1L00 2000 3C00
14ap pig: Web Mauer Corns' mudrubas: YdGS84 Edge bim UTM Zone 1M r—%4
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
_ e
Baymeade fine sand. 1 to ,6
percent slopes
C:
Johnston sails
-
Leon sand
Mti
Murville fine sand
5e
Seagate fine sand
This product is generated from the USDA-NRGS certified data as
of the version dates) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger_
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 21, 2018—Now
28, 2018
Soil Sciet.ce Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 4. Jurisdictional wetlands and ditches
Not a survey
'INC PRIVATE
Rn-
U," I Dataform #1
Jurisdictional Ditches . "
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydralogy significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PrimaEy Indicators minimum of one is requiredcheck all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (s$)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Mass Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
----Lateral Effect Program Summary ----
Application of Skaggs Method
Copyright 2006-2014. Brian D Phillips, R Wayne Skaggs, G M Chescheir
North Carolina State University Dept of Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Version: 2.8.1.0
Project Run Date and Time: 7/29/2019 1:58:11 PM
********************************************************************************
Project Information
Project : Corbett II
User: Dail Reed
Company / Agency: Balfour Beatty
Project Location: New Hanover County
Soil ID: Mu
Site Parameters
State: North Carolina
County / Parish: New -Hanover
Surface Storage: 2_inch_(5.0_cm)
Ditch Depth or Depth to Water Surface: 2 ft
Depth to Restrictive Layer: 15 ft
Drainable Porosity: 0.04
Hydroperiod: 14 days
User defined T25 or Default T25: DEFAULT
T25 value: 3.2 days
User Conductivity or Soil Survey Conductivity: SOIL SURVEY
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity: 11.1185 in/hr
Hydraulic Conductivity Data by Layer for Soil: Mu Murville_undrained
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity Calculated Using: Average K Values
Bottom Depth in Low K in/hr
Layer 1
8.00
5.95
Layer 2
45.00
1.98
Layer 3
180.00
5.95
Layer 4
0.00
0.00
Layer 5
0.00
0.00
Layer 6
0.00
0.00
Layer 7
0.00
0.00
Layer 8
0.00
0.00
Lateral Effect: 180.7 ft
High K in/hr Average K in/hr
19.98
12.968478
5.95
3.968496
19.98
12.968478
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
file:///Cl/Users/dreed/Documents/00%20MILCUTOFF/REC%20PLANS/CORBETT%20I1/Mu%2015%20Lateral_Effect Summary.txt[7/31/2019 11:58:56 AM]