790002_Inspection_20181228

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® - ® Division of Soil and Water Conservation f
0 Other Agency 11
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 `Denied Access y� fi
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: (1, Departure Time: •- v7/ fix County: IC,O�ymcgion: kNS 1�-O
Farm Name: ,zAra sQ{\I Cyax- r--o y s Owner Email: CAh1a- 1 . Cal1h
Owner Name: C--/cyf(kVJ A O r(���/'um 'l nP,,hone:
Mailing Address: 2 d �/I .�rxSS U— V iY—G1• / (Ad 4 SOY)
Physical Address: J/
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
i
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: ��hh � ff
Location of Farm: Latitude: Je> �� � 5 Longitude:
f
u5 a'�'(J 7 �G51- QVLrD ��� •�ti��� I� wY�(�5'��1 �8`2Q�'���G�� f
I
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity .Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. ':.Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I JLayer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capaci Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets 113eefl3roodCow I I '..
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
I
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 7�
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: C - , Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ZC Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? Qj�,k WW Vl ,. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): � �h
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Y'e{No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�fl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 1,24
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
U 12. Crop Type(s): of 7� b
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA T�! NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No (� NA ❑l NE
acres determination? T
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes P'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�pe pi=tien Lo]Weekly Freeboard E3'-s` ^ 1, 's �ss n�4�taskeTr�ncfrc
Rainfall Q-Staelttrtg. rop ie _ [Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections �s ey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: I q - Date of inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No '0 NA ❑ NE f
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No r�71 NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the M Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes PM No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Co"tiimgats(Ye#er to gaestioq#a$ x I i nyyXES;dnswers and/pr any addiho> ) 'gdatlons of,:0y other egipm tits a ivy r %r F
[Z a drawings af.fael td b'',et(ereslilh disitpatib s„base„a'ildit}onal�phges 00)tegessgly),a ,.;xta= .
�'Cby�A t&fY..1j.,'1,( 4S' 0 V O e
{ S YIUIh Cl9i
&vOC}t�tiV�GU Rrts �l �� C� /� Z 1 E\ i �
i' � I �(ti/�� ��>1��f'� ->(,V\f" '1'e COON-) -
t ire �¢Ioo {d ✓e�ordS �leP ki .� % yksl A-IIcwlL Jew.
Xa • ' b h�.q� er, vnsvre ;s�
i11 ��� otil cnYl A� _
Mc�kc J��e anat s;5 .
GL VA, e V�L�1 F �( 10 VU �-U�6a Ir, c 1�C ���c�o r rA
Llv�
ct oY CiUlvt at1�+ Vump MmAC
�OA
129G�1�`;r -�vv\k v1 �v � in Cam^
Reviewer/InspectorName: 6 1 Q Q\ Q Phone: 2 _C
Reviewer/Inspector Sign re: Date: \4
1
Page 3 of 3 21412015