20191137 Ver 1_JD_Packet_20190823

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
Long Creek Stream Restoration
✔
The project study area for this JD request includes county owned parcels and county owned easements along Long Creek and Dixon
Branch. The County proposes to restore Long Creek and construction the Long Creek Greenway. The proposed stream restoration
project is a part of the Mecklenburg County LUESA's initiative to improve water quality within the county through improvement of
degraded streams. The project will serve as a centerpiece demonstration of LUESA’s vision for water quality in the county.
Mecklenburg County LUESA - David Woodie
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc / Amber Coleman
None existing
35.344670, -80.860321; Multiple parcels; Southwest and southeast of the intersection of Reames
Road and Perimeter Parkway
Multiple parcels, see attached
Mecklenburg
Charlotte
Long Creek
Catawba / 03050103
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELDOFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Propertyowner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Multiple parcels,See attached
Charlotte, NC
Mecklenburg
See attached parcel owner table.
Brian Sikes - Mecklenburg Stormwater
2145 Suttle Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28208
980-314-3227
[e-mail]
Requestor is a Mecklenburg County
employee and project manager for this project
Mecklenburg County and others
See attached
Charlotte, NC
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION','
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the pwWse of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination. pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the livers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, airs either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ® Owner ❑ Authorized Agent
5-r 2,V . rf
Date �,J�
Signature
E. REASON FUR JD REQUEST. (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all agLiatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid al (.jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑V I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the title.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/d.oes not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel,
❑I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. --
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part I-.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s .Must provide agent authorization fornt/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
76.8
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
ƒNorth Arrow
ƒGraphical Scale
ƒBoundary of Review Area
ƒDate
ƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.344670
-80.860321
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your request to determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with theDepartmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJD cannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See attached
Amber Coleman, 801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27606
NC Mecklenburg Charlotte
35.34467 -80.860321
NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
Long Creek/Dixon Branch
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the termsand
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or toprovideanofficial
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map: _--
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S_ Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
0 USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24,000 ` Derlta, NC
© Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County 1977
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name; Mecklenburg 100k Quads -
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FPMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: ,(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs; ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NCONEMAP 2095
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter: T_
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified bythe Corps and should not be relied upon.for-later later
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
I Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finallxing an action.

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Restoration
Site Number Latitude Longitude
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Type of Aquatic Resource
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be" subject
(ie. Section 404 or Section
10/404)
STREAMS
Long Creek 35.341681 -80.850753 6,418 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
Dixon Branch 35.349074 -80.862318 1,296 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
Stream 1 35.341460 -80.851043 594 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
Stream 2 35.341460 -80.851289 83 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
Stream 3 35.343235 -80.856217 322 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
Stream 4 35.343710 -80.866492 294 linear feet Non-Wetland Section 404
WETLANDS
WA 35.34910500 -80.86161700 0.49 acres Wetland Section 404
WB 35.34934300 -80.86188000 0.01 acres Wetland Section 404
WC 35.34878200 -80.86131300 0.32 acres Wetland Section 404
WE 35.34596500 -80.86264600 0.44 acres Wetland Section 404
WF 35.34513700 -80.85886100 0.69 acres Wetland Section 404
WI 35.34353500 -80.85670500 0.71 acres Wetland Section 404
WJ 35.34336600 -80.85700800 0.27 acres Wetland Section 404
WK 35.34265100 -80.85428700 0.79 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 35.34406900 -80.85689500 0.02 acres Wetland Section 404
WM 35.34418200 -80.85747900 0.02 acres Wetland Section 404
WO 35.34170200 -80.85007300 <0.01 acres Wetland Section 404
WP 35.34023000 -80.86819600 1.46 acres Wetland Section 404
WQ 35.34423800 -80.86500200 1.56 acres Wetland Section 404
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions

ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):

Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM

1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:

2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial

3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:

4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:

5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:

6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:

7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:

8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:

9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:

10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:

11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:

12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:

Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404

Regulatory Action Type:

Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required

Revised 20150602
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
8/28/2018 Long Creek/Stream 2 35.342176
Melissa Ruiz Mecklenburg -80.851178
32.50 ✔
19.0
7.5
6.00
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
8/28/2018 Long Creek/Stream 3 35.343079
Melissa Ruiz Mecklenburg -80.856217
43.00 ✔
20.0
11.5
11.50
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes x X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Long Creek Charlotte/Mecklenburg
WP - Wet
8/29/18
Mecklenburg County NC
No
Section, Township, Range:N/AAmber Coleman/Melissa Ruiz
0NoneFlat
Datum:NAD83-80.86805635.345242LRR P, MLRA 136
PFO1ANWI classification:Monocan Soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:X
1.
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.WP - Wet
Tree Stratum 30' x 30')
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Acer rubrum 60 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Liriodendron tulipifera
7 (B)
30 Yes FACU 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:85.7%
Prevalence Index worksheet:90 =Total Cover
OBL species
45 18
FACU species
Acer negundo
(A)
Total % Cover of:
15 Yes FAC
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =
UPL species
FAC species15Yes
Asimina triloba 10 Yes FAC
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
30 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
FACW
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Ulmus americana
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
10 Yes FAC
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
30' x 30')
Acer rubrum
10 4
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Saururus cernuus 30 Yes OBL
20 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
=Total Cover
15 6
)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30' x 30')
30' x 30')
30
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
15 6
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
10YR 6/8
Loc2
PL
80
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
90 C
Color (moist)
PL
Matrix
C10YR 5/2
10YR 4/3
95
7.5YR 5/8
10YR 5/1 5
7.5YR 5/82-6
0-2
16-20
WP - WetSOIL
6-16 10YR 5/1
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
98
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
C
10YR 6/8
%
Sandy Loam
Sandy Clay Loam
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
PL20
Loam
Texture
Loamy/Clayey
Loam
10 M
C2
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Long Creek Charlotte/Mecklenburg
WP - Up
8/29/18
Mecklenburg County NC
No
Section, Township, Range:N/APam Ferral/Melissa Ruiz
0NoneFlat
Datum:NAD83-80.86834435.395293LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Monocan Soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:X
1.
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.WP - Up
Tree Stratum 30' x 30')
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Acer rubrum 60 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
8 (B)
8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:60 =Total Cover
OBL species
30 12
FACU species
Acer negundo
(A)
Total % Cover of:
30 Yes FAC
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =
UPL species
FAC species30Yes
Acer negundo 40 Yes FAC
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
60 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
FAC
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Acer rubrum
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
10 Yes FAC
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
30' x 30')
Lindera benzoin
25 10
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Saururus cernuus 30 Yes OBL
50 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
15 6
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
30 =Total Cover
15 6
Toxicodendron radicans 20 Yes FAC
)
Smilax rotundifolia 10
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30' x 30')
30' x 30')
30' x 30'
30
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
30 12
Yes FAC
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
10YR 5/3
Loc2
PL
85
10YR 5/3 85
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
M
Matrix
10YR 5/8
C10YR 4/4
10YR 4/4
15
7.5YR 5/84-7
10-20
0-4
C15
WP - UpSOIL
7-10 10YR 4/4
M
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
70
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
C
7.5YR 5/8
%
Loam
Loam
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
PL15
Loam
Texture
Loam
C15
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
0
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Long Creek Charlotte/Mecklenburg
WQ - Wet
8/29/18
Mecklenburg County NC
No
Section, Township, Range:N/APam Ferral/Melissa Ruiz
0NoneFlat
Datum:NAD83-80.86435635.343476LRR P, MLRA 136
PFO1ANWI classification:Monocan Soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
0
0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:X
1.
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.WQ - Wet
Tree Stratum 30' x 30')
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Acer negundo 50 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Ulmus americana
8 (B)
30 Yes FACW 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:80 =Total Cover
OBL species
40 16
FACU species
Ulmus americana
(A)
Total % Cover of:
10 Yes FACW
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =
UPL species
FAC species
Acer negundo 15 Yes FAC
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
10 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
30' x 30')
8 3
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Impatiens capensis 30 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
polygonum pensylvanicum 20 Yes FACW
20 8
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
40 =Total Cover
25 10
Toxicodendron radicans 30 Yes FAC
)
Smilax rotundifolia 10
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30' x 30')
30' x 30')
30' x 30'
50
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
5 2
Yes FAC
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
98
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
95 C
Color (moist)
Matrix
C10YR 5/2
10YR 5/2 10YR 4/6
10YR 4/68-18
0-8
WQ - WetSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
PL2
Silty Loam
Texture
Clay
5 PL
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Long Creek Charlotte/Mecklenburg
WQ - Up
8/29/18
Mecklenburg County NC
No
Section, Township, Range:N/APam Ferral
0NoneFlat
Datum:NAD83-80.86424835.3439220LRR P, MLRA 136
N/ANWI classification:Monocan Soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:X
1.
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.WQ - Up
Tree Stratum 30' x 30')
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Ulmus americana 60 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7 (B)
5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:71.4%
Prevalence Index worksheet:60 =Total Cover
OBL species
30 12
FACU species
Acer negundo
(A)
Total % Cover of:
10 Yes FAC
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =
UPL species
FAC species
Maclura pomifera 30 Yes UPL
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
10 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
30' x 30')
15 6
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum 40 Yes FAC
30 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Impatiens capensis 20 Yes FACW
8 3
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
15 =Total Cover
30 12
Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FAC
)
Lonicera japonica 5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
30' x 30')
30' x 30')
30' x 30'
60
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
5 2
Yes FACU
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/30-18
WQ - UpSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
Clay Loam
Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
V:\1726\active\172610010\03_data_design\04_gis\mxd\JD_Fg1_Vicinity.mxd Revised: 2019-05-07 By: jusahn1
172610010
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Long Creek Restoration
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared by JPA on 2019-04-29
TR by MMR on 2019-04-29
IR Review by ALC on 2019-04-29
Vicinity Map
Disclaimer: This document has been prepared based on information provided by others as cited in the Notes section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and/or completeness of this information and shall not be responsible for any
errors or omissions which may be incorporated herein as a result. Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format, and the recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the
data.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Base Imagery: USGS 24k Topographic Quadrangle, Derita, NC
Figure No.
Title
Project Location
Client/Project
Legend
Project Study Area (At original document size of 8.5x11)
1:48,000 ($$¯0 2,000 4,000
Feet
§¨¦77
¬«24
Charlotte
L o n d o n shireDr
N o r t h l a k e M a llD rN
e
t
t
l
e

D
r
CoventryRidge
CtPicker
i
ngGroveLnLongCreekFairw a y D r
H a r r i s O a k s B v
Newfield StI-485 Ra
C o r e y Com
monAvTreyburn DrWoodsedgeDrBuckhornSt
A m b le sid e D rSecretari
a
t

D
r
AmesHollow
R
d
V a lc o u r t Rd
Pond
Vist
a
Ct
P re s tb u r y B v
Ai
nswor
th
St
Cantle
Dr Center Lake DrP
e
ri
m
eter
W
oods
DrNorthlakeWestDr HarrisCornersP y
LongCreekClubDr
Westhop
e
St
Sh e n in g to n P lB
a
y
v
i
e
w

P
yKimm
e
l

L
n
P erim e t e r PyNorthlakeCentrePy Pe rimeterStationDrRo u n d sto n e
W y
N
orthla k e CommonsBvSmith Corners BvLongC reek
Club DrSidneyC rCinna b ayDrReames RdÂÂ24
ÂÂ24
§¨¦77
§¨¦485
1443567
1443567
1446847
1446847
1450128
1450128583988 583988587269587269National Wetland Inventory Map
4
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Long Creek Stream Restoration
Notes
1.
2.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Base features produced from NCONEMAP.com 2015 aerial orthoimagery layer
0 400 800Feet
Legend
Project Study Area
NWI Wetlands
V:\1726\active\172610010\03_data_design\04_gis\mxd\JD_Fg4_NWI_Map.mxd Revised: 2019-05-07 By: jusahn($$¯
1:7,200 (At original document size of 11x17)
172610010
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data.
Project Location
Client/Project
Figure No.
Title
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared by JPA on 2019-04-29
Technical Review by MMR on 2019-04-29
Independent Review by TT on 2019-04-29
§¨¦77
¬«24
Charlotte
1
2
3
1443567
1443567587269 587269Potential Jurisdictional Features Map
5-1
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Long Creek Stream Restoration
Notes
1.
2.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Base features produced from NCONEMAP.com 2015 aerial orthoimagery layer
0 200 400
Feet
Legend
Culverts
Jurisdictional Streams
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Project Study Area
Project Study Area (delineated by Carolina Wetland Services 2019)
GF Wetland Data Point
GF Upland Data Point
V:\1726\active\172610010\03_data_design\04_gis\mxd\JD_Fg5_Jurisdictional_Features_update20190314.mxd Revised: 2019-06-20 By: jusahn($$¯
1:2,400 (At original document size of 11x17)
172610010
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data.
Page 1 of 3
Project Location
Client/Project
Figure No.
Title
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared by JPA on 2018-11-12
Technical Review by MMR on 2019-04-26
Independent Review by TT on 2019-04-26
Stream Lengths
Long Creek: 6,418 Linear Feet
Dixon Branch: 1,296 Linear Feet
Stream 1: 594 Linear Feet
Stream 2: 83 Linear Feet
Stream 3: 322 Linear Feet
Stream 4: 294 Linear Feet
§¨¦77
¬«24
Charlotte
1
2
3
1443567
1443567
Potential Jurisdictional Features Map
5-2
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Long Creek Stream Restoration
Notes
1.
2.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Base features produced from NCONEMAP.com 2015 aerial orthoimagery layer
0 200 400
Feet
Legend
Culverts
Jurisdictional Streams
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Project Study Area
Project Study Area (delineated by Carolina Wetland Services 2019)
GF Wetland Data Point
GF Upland Data Point
V:\1726\active\172610010\03_data_design\04_gis\mxd\JD_Fg5_Jurisdictional_Features_update20190314.mxd Revised: 2019-06-20 By: jusahn($$¯
1:2,400 (At original document size of 11x17)
172610010
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data.
Page 2 of 3
Project Location
Client/Project
Figure No.
Title
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared by JPA on 2018-11-12
Technical Review by MMR on 2019-04-26
Independent Review by TT on 2019-04-26
Stream Lengths
Long Creek: 6,418 Linear Feet
Dixon Branch: 1,296 Linear Feet
Stream 1: 594 Linear Feet
Stream 2: 83 Linear Feet
Stream 3: 322 Linear Feet
Stream 4: 294 Linear Feet
§¨¦77
¬«24
Charlotte
1
2
3
1446847
1446847 583988 583988Potential Jurisdictional Features Map
5-3
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Long Creek Stream Restoration
Notes
1.
2.
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Base features produced from NCONEMAP.com 2015 aerial orthoimagery layer
0 200 400
Feet
Legend
Culverts
Jurisdictional Streams
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Project Study Area
Project Study Area (delineated by Carolina Wetland Services 2019)
GF Wetland Data Point
GF Upland Data Point
V:\1726\active\172610010\03_data_design\04_gis\mxd\JD_Fg5_Jurisdictional_Features_update20190314.mxd Revised: 2019-06-20 By: jusahn($$¯
1:2,400 (At original document size of 11x17)
172610010
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data.
Page 3 of 3
Project Location
Client/Project
Figure No.
Title
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared by JPA on 2018-11-12
Technical Review by MMR on 2019-04-26
Independent Review by TT on 2019-04-26
Stream Lengths
Long Creek: 6,418 Linear Feet
Dixon Branch: 1,296 Linear Feet
Stream 1: 594 Linear Feet
Stream 2: 83 Linear Feet
Stream 3: 322 Linear Feet
Stream 4: 294 Linear Feet