19930100 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19930711

Lakes will filter
1ty Stnrri'
G-'k
the 'C'am
rair,
watt
exist ?C cC?
Foi
residt
trend `Y""" G? ? , N l
rencl ? /,I /c ef (N'
polluti ftr(Cs?e
contra, ?S
Deve r\q?? funded 1
o
had to
Now t ?? --,,tired the filtering
techniqu r anent that failed.
"A policy that was not working well and was
causing problems has been replaced," said Lou
Yates, assistant city manager for planning and
development. "We had a policy that required people.
to build facilities that may not have been needed."
In their place, Raleigh plans to rely on three
approaches city officials hope will be more cost-
effective:

t
' -Sylvia Hatchell takes the podium, actually tl
x;
a.
Hatchell, La
s'
p`
r' BY NOAH BARTOLUCCI
C?
STAFF WRITER
t, r have
CHAPEL HILL - Here's more
' basket
eV Bence that women
s basketball
ig gaining in popularity and steal- peop
Ing; some of the spotlight from
Ha
an in this roundball mecca:
A
' girls' basketball camp under
vVay at the University of North
I39rolina at Chapel Hill is having
itis? most successful summer, with more room.
W record attendance of about "I have about
$e,600. and playing bask
And enrollment at the boys' at one time," thf
basketball camp? Less than 2,000. some people this
To be fair, the programs are it's music."
s?xuctured differently, and each In March, the
xatned away applicants because won their first N;
LAKES
t CO IUED FROM PAGE I B
¦ Teaching homeowners not to
over-fertilize their yards or let
household chemicals or motor oil
be washed into storm drains.
¦ Investigating and punishing
illicit industrial waste clumping.
Instead of trying to remove pollut-
ants from storm water, it makes
more sense to keep the water
clean in the first place, city
officials say.
¦ Persuading the owners of
Raleigh's 250 private lakes and
ponds to preserve them. The
bigger the lake, the better it
filters rainwater. Raleigh's pri-
vate ponds average only a few
acres, but some are much larger.
To encourage private landown-
ers to go along, the city may help
pay for dam repairs, dredge the
lakes and ponds or even buy them.
Raleigh may even have to build
a few large lakes in valleys that
don't have them, officials say.
Besides filtering water, lakes re-
duce storm flooding.
Raleigh is paying consultants to
study the city's 20-odd drainage
basins. The city will use those
results and its general storm
water management plan to tailor
water-protection policies for dif-
ferent parts of Raleigh.
"It's going to depend on the
peculiar situation in every case,"
Yates said. "There's a lot that
nobody knows about storm water
quality management."
The federal government has
ordered Raleigh and other cities
to develop storm water manage-
ment plans, but it hasn't said how.
Raleigh's new approach is more
conservative than that of some
cities that have instituted blanket
policies that don't vary for differ-
ent streams and valleys.
A recent study of northeast
Raleigh's Perry Creek basin
found that the storm water pollu-
tion wasn't as bad as officials
thought and wasn't likely to get
much worse as long as the exist-
ing lakes remain.
City officials concluded they
had overreacted when they re-
quired the expensive filtering pits
and trenches, which turned out to
be a hazard for children, often
became overgrown and eventual-
ly got so clogged with mud that
they weren't doing much good
anyway.
The city's new approach is
lower-tech, simpler and cheaper
than the prospect of continuing
the old policy for all new develop-
ment. And now new homeowners
in growing areas - mainly North
Raleigh - won't have to pay for
more ineffective rain-catching de-
vices.
But the city may still have to
spend millions on lake improve-
ments and construction - proba-
bly paid for through citywide
charges, perhaps via a new storlu
water utility that would work
Homeowners pay price for bad policy
BY MATTHEw EISLEY
STAR WRITER
RALEIGH - When Irv Paull
says be thinks Raleigh's old
storm water management poli-
cy was the pits, he's doubly
right, city officials agree.
Five runoff-catching pits and
rock-filled trenches in Paull's
Durant Trails neighborhood -
fixtures which the city once
routinely required in new subdi-
visions - didn't work and
weren't even needed, the city
now concedes.
Raleigh hopes in the future to
protect water quality by elimi-
nating pollution sources and
relying on larger lakes as fil-
ters.
Paull and his thousand-plus
neighbors never wanted the
trenches in the first place, but
they had to pay for them as a
component of their home pur-
chases,
Now they'll have to come up
with another $50,000 - about
$100 a household - to fill the
largest one, a gaping hole near
the subdivision's recreation cen-
ter, said Paull, a concert pho-
tographer and former president
of the Durant Trails Homeown-
ers Association.
"They're like bomb craters,"
he said. "We paid for them to be
built, we paid for the upkeep of
them and now we have to pay to
get rid of them. They're disgust-
ing, and they don't work.
"They're an accident waiting
to happen. We were waiting for
a kid to fall in one of them."
The association plans to build
volleyball courts and a play-
ground over the largest pit,
abandon one and hide another
with landscaping. The subdivi-
sion's developer will fill the two
others, Paull said.
"It's a big pain in the neck,"
he said.
Paull, who complained to the
City Council earlier this year
about the city's old policy of
requiring such pits, said lie may
go back and ask the council to
help pay for the improvements.
"1 can make life a little
miserable for them," he said.
much like existing water and
sewer agencies.
City officials say Raleigh's new
approach should also improve
downstream water quality. Rain
falling around Raleigh ultimately
flows down the Neuse River,
through Smithfield, Goldsboro,
Kinston and New Bern to the
Pamlico Sound.
"The water quality in a lot of
areas is not as bad as some people
would have you believe," said
Danny Bowden, the city's storm
water services manager.
"Overall, we're not in very bad
shape," he said. "We just need to
be careful and make improve-
ments where we can. If we don't
protect our water, it won't be
there for our kids."
Raleigh's new approach relies
heavily on preserving existing
lakes and ponds, especially big
ones such as the 35-acre Gresh-
am's Lake off Capital Boulevard,
next to the path of the planned
Outer Loop.
Of the dozen lakes and ponds in
the Perry Creek basin, Gresham's
is the biggest. City officials con-
sider two more at Durant Nature
Park critical for water quality in
the area.
The city's success will depend
on the cooperation of private land
holders such as Gresham's Lake
owner Bennett Rowland.
Rowland said he plans to keep
his lake. He has suggested to city
officials that Raleigh periodically
dredge it and charge property
owners upstream for the cost.
"Fifteen years ago I proposed
this to the city, and they told me I
was crazy." he said.
Mary Watson Nooe, an at-large
City Council member, said the
storm water program will have to
be funded through the city's gen-
eral fund, by assessing individual
property owners in specific creek
basins or by establishing a new
utility that charges citywide fees.
She favors the latter.
"It's a problem for all of us,
whether we live at the top of the
hill or the bottom of the hill,"
Nooe said. "Rain falls on the just
and the unjust."
-- erfieldg etc.
What you need to get cook-n'
13 Oz. Acrylic
FROSTY
MUG -?
Irv Paull of Durant Trails says his neighborhood will have to come
up with at least $50,000 to solve problems with nuisance
drainage pits.
STAFF PHOTO BY LANCE POWELL
Raleigh's new approach relies heavily on preserving existing lakes,
such as the 35-acre Gresham's Lake off Capital Boulevard.
STAFF PHOTO BY SARAH I. GLOVER
-I--"- ?J %71111111
feral Home.
Powellsville
DANNY O. BARNES SR., 48, Suf-
folk, Va., formerly of Powells-
ville, July 7. Arrangements by
Garrett Funeral Home, Ahos-
kie.
Rockingham
MINNIE T. REYNOLDS, 91, July
7. Arrangements by Watson-
King Funeral Home.
Sanford
ANNIE K. LAND, 78, July 7. Ar-
rangements by Miller Funeral
Home.
Snow Hill
LMA J. TILGHMAN, 79, July 7.
Arrangements by Taylor-Ed-
wards Funeral Home.
Tarboro
ETHA WHITE, 75, July 6. Ar-
rangements by Baker Funeral
Home.
Taylorsville
AUL J. PARSON, 78, July 7.
Arrangements by Adams Fu-
neral Home.
Trenton
ULIA P. HARRIETT, 79, July 8.
Arrangements by Howard-Cart-
er & Stroud Funeral Home,
Kinston.
Whispering Pines
OBERT E. LEMKER, 74, July 8.
Arrangements by Powell Fu-
neral Home, Southern Pines.
Williamston
ETTIE C. JONES, 85, July 8.
Arrangements by Biggs Funer-
al Home.
Winston-Salem
M. OVERTON, 83, June 29.
ed' star
Mr. Sargent played Darrin
Stephens on 'Bewitched'.
and "A Touch of. Mink,"
ng Cary Grant.
television, Mr. Sargent av-
American cancer Soc e?
Family will be at the home of
Frank Berry Skinner, Berry Downs,
Holt Lake.
LENWOOD MARTIN VANIER
CLAYTON - Lenwood Martin Va-
nier, 73, died Wednesday. Funeral
service 11 a.m. today at McLaurin
Funeral Home Chapel, Clayton with
Rev. Danny Poyner and Rev. Ron
Byrd officiating. Burial at Pinecrest
Memorial Gardens, Clayton.
Survivors: wife, Addle C. Vanier of
Clayton; daughter, Betty Vanier of
Kenly; son, Tommy Vanier of Clay-
ton; sisters, Lillie Ollis of Morgan•
ton, Zadie Ollis of Roxboro, Eliza-
beth CarnelI of Garner; three grand-
children; one great grandchild.
KENNETH W. NEAL SR.
PITTSBORO-Mr. Kenneth Wade
"00" Neal Sr., 61, of 3139 Lower
Moncure Road, Sanford, died Thurs-
day, July 7th in UNC Hospitals in
Chapel Hill. He was a native of
Washington, D.C. and was owner-op-
erator of Hydrolic Cylinder Repair.
A memorial service will be held 3
p.m. Sunday in the Griffin Funeral
Home chapel.
Surviving: daughters, Cynthia A.
Crabtree of Cameron and Kathy
Marks of Pittsboro; stepdaughter,
Deanna Glosson of Pittsboro; sons,
Kenneth W. Neal Jr, of Hawaii, Karl
D Neal of Apex and Joel B. Neal of
Pittsboro; sister, Barbara Jean
Newton of Wilmington; seven grand-
children.
Family will receive friends from
5-8 p.m. Saturday at the family
home.
Arrangements by Griffin Funeral
Home.
LEROY ALLEN
SMITHFIELD -Leroy Allen, 66,
of 215 Underwood Ave., died Friday,
July 8, 1994. Funeral 2 p.m. Sunday,
Minshew Funeral Home chapel,
Four Oaks. Burial, Faith Free Will
Baptist Church cemetery.
Surviving: wife, Wilma Massengill
Allen; brother, Guy Cleveland Allen
of High Point.
Family will be at Mrs. Mary Mos-
sengill home, 601 Webb Mill Road,
Four Oaks.
Family at Minshew Funeral Home
from 7-9 p.m. today.
E. CARL JARVIS
RALEIGH - A memorial service
will be held for E. Carl Jarvis 3 p.m.
Saturday at Brown-Wynne Funeral
Home chapel, St. Mary's Street.
In lieu of flowers, memorials may
be made to American Heart Associa-
tion, l Heart Circle, Chapel Hill, N.C.
27514.
0. LEE DOVE .
GARN ER - Garland Lee Dove, 65,
of 708 Wakeland Drive, a retired
engineer, died Thursday. Funeral 11
a.m. Monday at Bryan-Lee Funeral
Chapel. Burial, Montlawn Memorial
Park.
Surviving: wife, Rachel M. Dove;
daughter, Teresa L. Jagneaux of
Willow Spring; sons, Michael Lee
Dove, Mark Alan Dove and Christo-
pher Robert Dove, all of Garner;
grandsons, Keith Wilkins and Jona-
than Jagneaux, both of Willow
Spring; a godson, Scott Kopuschan-
sky of Temple Hills, Md.
Visitation 7-9 p.m. Sunday, Bryan-
Lee Funeral Home, Garner.
In lieu of flowers, the family re-
quests That contributions be made to
the American Cancer Society, the
American Heart Assoc., the Ameri-
can Kidney Fund, or to Hospice of
Wake County.
ALAN WEBB BREWER
RALEIGH - Alan Webb Brewer,
17 _ rncri luly S lOOA ,n 01,k -A
wood Cemetery on Sunday, July 10 at
2 p.m.
Please forget that she died and
smile while remembering that she
lived.
Sue W. Noell and Lou W. Mitchell.
CARL M. BAKER
BUNN - Carl M. Baker, 50, died
July 6. Funeral service Saturday 2
P.m. at Gethsemane Baptist Church.
Burial Church Cemetery.
Survivors: son, Carl Epps of Hen-
derson; mother, Lessie Baker of
Bunn; sisters, Lonnie Yarborough of
Franklinton, Edna Patterson, Bren-
da Baker of Louisburg, Joyce Cru-
dup, Sharon Anderson of Bunn, Anti-
onette Baker of Jacksonville, Col-
leen Holden of Raleigh; brothers
Clovis Baker Jr., Frederick Baker of
Raleigh, Douglas Baker of Bunn,
Leslie Baker, Oliver Baker of Louis-
burg, Lynn Baker of Boston, Mass.
Service by William Toney's Funer-
al Home, Spring Hope.
SANDY R. PENDERGRAFT
RALEIGH - Sandy Ray Pender-
graft, 54, died Friday. Funeral ser-
vice will be held at 2 P.m. Sunday,
Ephesus Baptist Church, 6767 Hills-
borough Street, Raleigh. Burial in
Restlawn Memorial Gardens, Ra-
leigh.
Surviving: wife, Rachel S. Pender-
graft of the home; daughters, Kim
Pendergraft and Cindy Pendergraft,
both of Apex; son, Tim Pendergraft
of Cary; stepson, Jeff McQuillen of
Raleigh; stepdaughters, Angie Jow-
ers of Louisburg, Dina Simpson of
Garner and Kristie Tyler of Raleigh;
sisters, Dixie Gray of Raleigh and
Ann Parks of Graham; brothers,
Charles Pendergraft of Cary and
Billy Pendergraft of Raleigh; four
step-grandchildren.
The family will receive friends 7-9
P.m. Saturday at Brown-Wynne Fu-
neral Home in Cary.
HAROLD ERIKSEN
ZEBULON - Harold Eriksen, 50,
of 10833 Debnom Road, died Thurs-
day at Wake Medical Center. Memo-
rial service will be held at 7 p.m.
Monday, July 11, 1994 at the King-
dom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses,
Hwy. 64 Alternate, Spring Hope.
Surviving is his wife, Margie B.
Eriksen; sons, Harold Allen Eriksen
and Ted Lee Eriksen, both of Zebu-
Ion; Parents, Trygve and Marie
Stange of New Jersey; brothers, Al-
fred Eriksen of Tampa, Fla., Ken-
neth Eriksen of Long Island, N.Y.,
Roy Stange and Trygve Stange Jr.,
both of New Jersey;. sisters, Karen
Marie Morgan of New Jersey and
Eva Madsen of Norway; grandchil-
dren, Crystal Leigh Eriksen and
Mikala Celine Eriksen, both of Zebu-
Ion.
Memorial contributions may be
made to the Kingdom Hall of Jeho-
vah's Witnesses, c/o Mr. Ira Dough-
ty, 752 Whitley Way, Wendell, N.C.
27591.
Arrangements by Brown-Wynne
Funeral Home, Zebulon.
LESTER L. WHITLEY
WENDELL- Lester Lee Whitley,
55, of 156 Hollybrook Road, died
Friday, July 8, 1994 at Rex Hospital.
Lester was a retired auto mechanic
and formerly was co-owner of Whit-
ley's Auto Center in Wendell.
Funeral 3 p.m. Sunday at Clydes
Chapel Baptist Church. Burial,
church cemetery.
Surviving: wife, Celia Pollard
Whitley; son, Andy Whitley and wife,
Kathy of Wendell; daughters, Shar-
on W. Hinton and husband, Jamie of
Zebulon, Pamela W. Hocutt and hus-
band, Phil of Zebulon; grandchil-
dren, Leslie Renee Hinton, Katie
9=1i7nhofh I.linfnn Cnrn 1(ri,41., uw-
we will be able to see y ur pre-
cious smile and be togeth r again.
You'll always be our ecloys
Gary. We love you and miss you.
Mother, Daddy, Bill, Beverly,
Sharon and Faith.
DORIS C. SMITH
GREENVILLE Doris Carpenter
Smith, 76, formerly of New Bern,
died Thursday. Graveside service
will be 11 a.m. Saturday, July 9 at
Greenleaf Memorial Park. Rev.
Keith Hamilton, officiating. Burial
will be in Greenleaf Memorial Park.
Surviving: stepson, Carl Ray
Smith of Atlanta, Ga.; daughter,
Nancy S. Duncan of. Greenville; step-
daughters, Ethel Hamilton of Beau-
fort, Barbara Ellington of Golds-
boro; sister, Etna Mason of Beau-
fort; eight grandchildren; four
great-grandchildren.
Funeral arrangements are being
handled by Cotten Funeral Home,
New Bern.
RICHARD E. GASPERSON
JACKSONVILLE - Richard Earl
Gasperson died Friday. Funeral ser-
vice will be held 3 p,m. Sunday at the
Sayland Funeral Home, Maysville.
Burial, Dogwood Memorial Ceme-
tery.
The family will receive friends
from 7:30-9 p.m. today at the funeral
home.
OLA ESTHER MORRIS OVERTON
WINSTON-SALEM - Ola Esther
Morris Overton, 83, wife of Dr.
James H. Overton, formerly of Eton
College and Raleigh, died Wednes.
day, June 29, 1994 at Triad United
Methodist Home, Winston-Salem.
Mrs. Overton was born November
21, 1910 in Washington, N.C., the
daughter of Coolidge Greene Morris
and Sophia Jane O'Brien Morris. She
attended Louisburg College and
graduated from East Carolina Uni.
versity, Greenville. She began her
teaching career as an eighth grade
teacher and basketball coach in Au.
rora and continued teaching until her
retirement from the Alamance
County School System in 1975.
Surviving are her husband of 55
Years, Dr. James H. Overton of
Winston-Salem; two daughters, and
a son-in-law, Nancy J. Overton of
Jacksonville, Fla., Sarah Overton
Johnston Hunter and Robert E.
Hunter of Winston-Salem; four
grandchildren; sister, Mrs. E.W.
McGahey of Washington, N.C.
A memorial service was held Fri-
day, July 1 in Winston-Salem and
graveside service was held in Wash-
ington, N.C., Saturday, July 2.
Memorials may be made to Elan
College Development Office, Elon
College, N.C. 27244; or Louisburg
College Development Office, Louis-
burg, N.C. 27549..
MARGARET L. "JOSIE" MCLEAN
WENDELL - Margaret "Josie"
Lane McLean, 79, of Hillhaven,
Wade Ave., died Thursday after-
noon. She was the widow of C.S.
McLean and the daughter of the late
Walter Scott and Kitty Ray Lane.
Mrs. McLean was a dedicated wife
and mother, who courageously en-
dured sickness for almost 30 years.
Her spirit and sense of humor will be
greatly missed.
Funeral service 3 p.m. today,
Strickland Funeral Home chapel,
with Rev. Lovell Allis officiating.
She is survived by a daughter, Jean
Hocutt of Wendel I; sons, Joe McLean
of Raleigh, Scott McLean of New
Orleans, La.; grandchildren, Tina
McLean, Natalie McLean, Becky
Reeder, Tim McLean, Nathan Ho-
cutt, Ben Hocutt, Nicholas McLean
and Sara McLean; one great-grand-
Wesley D. Webster
1042 Washington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
[phone]
June 30, 1994
Mr. Steve Levitas
Deputy Secretary
NC Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Steve:
6 i,
a
This letter is written to thank you and your staff for the assistance
offered to Mr. Bennett Rowland and me in our meeting on Thursday, June 23.
Preston Howard and John Dorney were understanding of Mr. Rowland's concerns
about his pending permit and have kindly offered to meet with Mr. Rowland
and me on his site to look further at the situation. I am sure that Mr.
Rowland appreciates their concern and kindness and feels much better having
talked with them personally. We look forward to meeting with your staff
people at the site in order to try to resolve this matter.
Again, many thanks to you, Preston and John for your assistance.
Sincerely,

Wesley D. Webster
WDW/mld
bc: John Dorney
MEMO
June 30, 1994
TO: Preston Howard f
FROM: John Dornee-?
. ^ 111
THROUGH: Steve Tedder -?
Greg Thorpe 01ft?r?a
Boyd DeVane''?"` `
FILE COPY
RE: Update on Bennett Rowlands' proposal to fill portion of
Gresham's Lake
After our meeting with Mr. Rowlands' consultants on 23 June,
you asked me to investigate two issues with respect to Mr.
Rowland's plans to fill about 11 additional acres of Gresham's
Lake. These are listed below.
1. Status of DOT discussions with Mr. Rowland regarding
land transfer
As you will recall, we worked with DOT to facilitate a
transfer of land to Mr. Rowland from DOT. This land transfer
would allow Mr. Rowland to develop an industrial park without
fill of Gresham's Lake. According to Carl Parker (DOT in
Durham), DOT met with Ed Dunn (Mr. Rowland's consultant on April
26, 1994 to explain DOT policy, etc. Mr. Dunn was told that DOT
needs a written request for early acquisition from Mr. Rowland
(see copy of 4/28/94 letter). DOT has not received a response to
date and have been unsuccessful in having Mr. Dunn return their
phone calls. Therefore until Mr. Rowland requests advance
acquisition, DOT cannot proceed. You will notice that DOT did
not copy Mr. Rowland on their letter to Ed Dunn.
2. Corps of Engineers approach to additional fill request.
As you will recall, Mr. Dunn stated that the Corps said that
there would be no problem with approving additional fill.
According to Eric Alsmeyer with the COE, he talked to Mr. Dunn
and told him that an individual permit would be needed, an
alternative site and design analysis would be needed as well as a
mitigation plan. He tried to discourage Mr. Rowland from
applying but did not tell him that it would not be approved since
he had not seen an application. As far as I can tell, this is in
line with what you and I told Mr. Dunn were his chances for a 404
permit on the site.
Please advise whether you :need any more information.
grsham.mem
OP
l?
_.___1UN-28-'y4 TUL U8:42 1D:NCD0T-kW DURHHI.1 ILL NU:1-y1y-5613-?2U4
i
d?Q
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAAUN R. tIUN r. JP_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
331 West Main Street-Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
[phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMTTTAL ('OVER SHF7.T
DATE:
gubu Hui
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
Ylease deliver t1,e following page3 te:
NAMR: C 6.e/.1
6
COMPANY:
ADDRESS OR ROOM NUMBER:
This fax is beinq sent by-
NAME: PHONE NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) _L J
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PACES CLEARLY, CALL RACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
our Fax Number is 919-560-3207
REMARKS:
??'? ? .gyp ??',?-t 7 ? {?•? .?- ? .???' ???5 ?? ? ??
Y ?c
r `r
JUH-2d-'y4 TUE U8:4::' ID:NUDUT-kW DUkHHH TEL NU:1-919-560-3204 4060 P02
i
!?°siro
SlATL OF, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF' TRANSPORTATION
JANAIl 1t I ZUNI lit. DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS SAM HUNT
1,??1'i IiNC?It SI CRI 1ARY
331 West Main Strout-Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27101
PHONE: [phone]
FAX; 919--560-3204
April 28, 19Y4
Mr. Edward K. Duun, Jr.
136 Mine Lake Court
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Ed:
Subject: Advance Acquisition for Bennett A. Rowland
Per our conversatioi, last Pur_vday, phase I,rc,vide t(_) 1110 your request for
advance right of way acquisit:lun of thco purtiun of Mr. Ruwland'9 property
effrrc.ti+d by the Northern Wake Expressway. Please state your reason for the
request and the hardship imposed ors Mr. Rowland as a result of this project.
Also, please stator any proposal you may have in regard to exchanging NC
lldpartment of Teari9porttit ion remnantti (already ac-quired) for Mr. Rowland's
right of way.
1 will forward yc,ur Ill Lvrmation, alony with my survey mep to the Central
Office in Raleigh for Approval. Once approved or nc,t approved, I will contact
you concerning the statue of your request.
If you havK any questions, please do nut hesitate to contact me.
S, rc 4('
Bt ad LRight of Way Agent
BL:tsg

_ I (??1 ? ? ? )pct
. ?Aj
_ ?z?_ ? 193
jtkeA
C?l
ke-
GAIL
S '4?4' vie 4 u?,IIQ, ? t
q??laQ.'b?.$ , ??Jko b T mz-?
J417, , JZ-f - .'OLk ur
f&?.',? ems. ?;
t{/1??gY? w..w a /? ?.. r. ?..n LL ? ,?w a
? 7? -'?°t aRK 's
Yw?
Irv

T
YY'W

Co 'u, cc,? tnea-?*>
w ('? ?.I L £A r ek-7
co
low I 4k

?? Ca_uae CD

/.he r V)Z-O- ra CX9 PI 16?7- YVap // ?b
-Crp 14
JfYT)
? a
qT6D. - Wek IP f? 0 uJ
cZAa
NM.
Q

rod 17?f-?-Om -,)Iyvs -trD
v? ?p x?yo
(AM
17
Uvo -rwl"
rill Q?
<t-- 410 cyp CY)o
Hero -n6V
loas
Q-Yono
Qj ? rd° --?? Nnv
'I'eJ °a9
w

mfr ;? ohm 40
YD
4
rAOOI?
aglow
C4
z
z
Q
x
Q
w
W
d
U
H
z
d
W
a
d
N
N
Z
J
a
U
x
0
z
T
Cpl
z
z
Q
C)
0
a,
w
00
00
a,
June 30, 1994
MEMO
TO: Preston Howard
FROM : John Dorne???
THROUGH: Steve Tedder-1
Greg Thorpe
Boyd DeVane
RE: Update on Bennett Rowlands' proposal to fill portion of
Gresham's Lake
After our meeting with Mr. Rowlands' consultants on 23 June,
you asked me to investigate two issues with respect to Mr.
Rowland's plans to fill about 11 additional acres of Gresham's
Lake. These are listed below.
1. Status of DOT discussions with Mr. Rowland regarding
land transfer
As you will recall, we worked with DOT to facilitate a
transfer of land to Mr. Rowland from DOT. This land transfer
would allow Mr. Rowland to develop an industrial park without
fill of Gresham's Lake. According to Carl Parker (DOT in
Durham), DOT met with Ed Dunn (Mr. Rowland's consultant on April
26, 1994 to explain DOT policy, etc. Mr. Dunn was told that DOT
needs a written request for early acquisition from Mr. Rowland
(see copy of 4/28/94 letter). DOT has not received a response to
date and have been unsuccessful in having Mr. Dunn return their
phone calls. Therefore until Mr. Rowland requests advance
acquisition, DOT cannot proceed. You will notice that DOT did
not copy Mr. Rowland on their letter to Ed Dunn.
2. Corps of Engineers approach to additional fill request.
As you will recall, Mr. Dunn stated that the Corps said that
there would be no problem with approving additional fill.
According to Eric Alsmeyer with the COE, he talked to Mr. Dunn
and told him that an individual permit would be needed, an
alternative site and design analysis would be needed as well as a
mitigation plan. He tried to discourage Mr. Rowland from
applying but did not tell him that it would not be approved since
he had not seen an application. As far as I can tell, this is in
line with what you and I told Mr. Dunn were his chances for a 404
permit on the site.
Please advise whether you need any more information.
grsham.mem
.? z.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
)AAU. ft. thn.r. Ik. DIVISION OF HIGI IWAYS
GON F rtNOR
331 West Main Street-Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
[phone]
FAC6IMILE TRANSI-aTTAL COVER SHMr.?
DATE:
SAM HUNT
SFCkF.TAkY
YleaSe deliver the following pages to:
NAME: ?iG e??e /16
COMPANY:
AUDKOSS OR ROOM NUMBER:
This fax is beinq sent by:
NAME: 4:1_? 1 / :D h
PHONE NUMBER: -.S-4,0 - G R)e
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) ILI"
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES CLEARLY CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Our Fax Number is 919-560-3209
REMARKS:
.? .- ,per
cc. y
-ZS
P? pl?.G G T ?J d sv'n-6-c - ?.C >??r`?
0
s.rr ?
y V- J?
Sl'Al'E or- Nofm-i CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IA1111` R. I-IIINr 11L DIVISION Of HIGHWAYS
Gr»'1 kwok
331 W©st Main Street-suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: 9:19-560-3204
April 28, 1994
Mr.. Edward K. Dunn, Jr.
136 Mine Lake Court
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Ed:
Subject: Advance Acquisition for Bennett A. Rowland
SAM IIUNI
FILM IAkY
Per our conversation lazt Tuesday, please provide to me your request for
advance right of way acquisition of the portion of Mr. Rowland'u property
nffr.ctc+d by the Northern Wake Expressway. Please state your reason for the
request and the hardship imposed on Mr.. Rowland as a resu]r of this project.
Alsu, please state any proposal you may have in regard to exchanging NC
Department of Transportation remnants (already acquired) for Mr. Rowland's
right of way.
I will forward your ill f.-irmatioy,, along with my survey map tc, the celltlal
Office in Raleigh for approval. Once approved or not approved, I will contact
you concerning the status of your request.
If you haves any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
S' c ely
"Brad Lo) p
Right of Way Ager,t
B1.: tsg

26 Cam, ?iLC_ ? C G
dlu?
,4?a

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • o
Division of Environmental Management
WOO&
James B. Hunt, ,Secreta ED E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 16, 1994
Mr. Ed Dunn
Dunn-Sargeant Associates
136 Mine Lake Court
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
Dear Mr. Dunn:
Through discussions with the Army Corps of Engineers, we
have learned that Mr. Bennett Rowland is planning to submit
another application for wetland/water fill near Lake Gresham to
develop an industrial site. As you are aware from our
Certification review for lake fill in 1993, DOT has identified
extra upland right-of-way adjacent to the Northern Wake
Expressway and Mr. Rowland's property that could be obtained by
Mr. Rowland. DOT has contacted Mr. Rowland to inform him that
this property is available and a settlement may be made if Mr.
Rowland submits a hardship letter. DOT has not received such a
letter.
As we discussed in 1993, DEM believes that this land trade
with DOT provides Mr. Rowland with an alternative to filling
wetland/waters. Therefore, an application for additional fill is
unlikely to be approved.
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Eric
Galamb or me at 733-1786.
Sincerely,
qvE n R. Dorney
ir onment
al l Super isor
cc: Mr. Carl Parker, DOT
Mr. Ken Jolly, Raleigh Field Office COE
greshnot.ltr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
December 16, 1993
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
p((( 1 r ! ? I f f' .
Action ID. 199201527 and Nationwide Permit Numbe `6 (Headwaters and
Isolated Waters)
Mr. JVPfttt,A. Rowlanod
6700 Valley Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Reference our letters dated March 10, 1993 and August 23, 1993, concerning
nationwide general permit authorization for your proposed discharge of fill
material within waters of the United States, within Gresham Lake, above the
headwaters of Perry Creek, to create high ground for commercial development,
west of U.S. 1, northeast of Raleigh,`e County, North Carolina. Reference
also the September 21, 1993 letter from the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources which confirms water quality
certification for an additional 0.75 acre of fill on the northeastern edge of
the lake, for a total of 9.0 acres of fill.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits (NWP).
Authorization was provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
for discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters
provided:
a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters
of the United States;
b. The permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one acre in
accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in
special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include
a delineation of affected specific aquatic sites, including wetlands; and
c. The discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project.
Your work, causing the loss of 9.0 acres of waters of the United States,
is authorized by this NWP provided it is accomplished in strict accordance
-2-
with the conditions enclosed in our letter of March 10, 1993. This NWP does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local
approvals.
This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the NWP authorization is reissued without modification or the activity
complies with any subsequent modification of the NWP authorization. If during
the 2 years, the NWP authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is
modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the NWP, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under
construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the NWP will
remain authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the
date of the NWP's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary
authority has been exercised on a case-by-case base to modify, suspend or
revoke the authorization.
Please note that this authorization is valid for the work described above
only, and impacts of subsequent projects on this property would have to be
considered cumulatively with these impacts, regardless of future subdivision
or ownership of the property. Questions or comments may be addressed to
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of my Raleigh Field Office regulatory staff, at telephone
[phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr. Mrs,-`John Dorney
Post Office Box 18051 Water Quality Section
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619 Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Mr. Mike Coughlin Environment, Health and
Environmental Engineer Natural Resources
Wake County Community Post Office Box 29535
Development Services Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199201527
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Dear Mr. Rowland:
August 23, 1993
Reference is made to our letter dated March 10, 1993, confirming
authorization by nationwide general permit of your proposed discharge of fill
material causing the cumulative loss of 9.9 acres of open water within Gresham
Lake, above the headwaters of Perry Creek, to create high ground for
commercial development, west of U.S. 1, northeast of Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina. By copy of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources letter to you of July 23, 1993, we have learned that
State 401 Water Quality Certification has been confirmed for only a portion
(0.87 acre) of your proposed fill, and the additional approximately 1.7 acres
are not authorized.
As stated in our letter, your work is authorized by the nationwide permit
only provided you receive Section 401 water quality certification from the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management for the work. Therefore,
the 1.7 acres of proposed fill that did not receive certification are not
authorized under the nationwide general permit.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, at telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch

-2-
Copies Furnished:
John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr.
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Mr. Mike Coughlin
Environmental Engineer
Wake County Community
Development Services
Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
City of Raleigh
Inspections Department
Attn.: Mr. Mike Johnson
Post Office Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources _
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE., Director
Mr. Bennett Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, N.C. 27612
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Subject: Proposed fill
Gresham Lake
Wake County
DEM Project #
September 21, 1993
DEHNR
in Wetlands or Waters
shoreline fill
93100
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.75 acres of wetlands or waters which are
tributary to Perry Creek for shoreline stabilization and landscaping
located at existing fill along the northeastern edge of Gresham Lake
in Wake County as described in your submittal dated 14 September 1993,
we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by General
Water Quality Certification No. 2671. A copy of the General
Certification is attached. This Certification may be used in
qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit
No. 26. This Certification completes DEM action on this project.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right
to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in
the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
1786.
Sincerely,
r.-,A . Preston Howard, Jr. P . E .
93100.1tr
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Fred Davis
Ed Dunn
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 23, 1993
Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, N.C. 27612
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Subject: Proposed fill
Gresham Lake
Wake County
DEM Project #
AT." F
5"'A
C) FE F=1
in Wetlands or Waters
edge fill
93100
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.87 acres of wetlands or waters which are
tributary to Gresham Lake for evening out the edge of existing fill
located at Gresham Lake Road and US 1 in Wake County as described in
your submittal dated 1 July 1993, we have determined that the proposed
fill can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2671
issued January 21, 1992. A copy of the General Certification is
attached. This Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage
under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No.26. An additional
proposed fill (appx. 1.7 acres) to the west of the existing fill is
not allowed by this Certification.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right
to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in
the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-
1786. This letter replaces a letter I sent on 12 July 1993.
erely,
,.teston `Howard, ?r . P . E .
93100.1tr
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Fred Davis
Edward Dunn, Jr.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
TELECOPY TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:__
_r
rrrL
PHONE:-13 3 - 11166
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET:
b
t4 r-e d ?av I
R f
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
September 14, 1993
Mr. John R. Dorney, Wetlands and Technical Review Group
State of North Carolina
Division of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
219 East North Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601

REF: FILLING A PORTION OF LAKE GRESHAM, RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Dear Mr. Dorney,
on behalf of my client, Mr. Bennett Rowland, I am writing to request that
he be allowed to continue to fill a small portion of the lake from station 14200
to station 14500, thence SSW along a line to the existing shore line as shown on
the enclosed map showing same colored in green, and containing approximately
0.75 acre.
The existing shore line in this area was surveyed January 18, 1993 and
again on September 02, 1993, and found to be approximately the same.
This request, if granted, would allow Mr. Rowland to dress up and smooth
out the existing shore line.
If further information is needed, please advise me.
°^6n?e0oa o c o us rc,cr;
K CARof
8
000 o
SE AL ( o
g° 3333
? ?f 0000 °° `-'?uv.
F oOp °O ?` ?
15eV?o
o??Ree D DAY
JFD, JR./db
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Ed Dunn
Sincerely,
J. FRED DAVID, JR. INC.
J/` Fi ed Davis, Jr. ,
rofes onal Engineer #k 333
i
V %50
i
N\ ???
1
AF:^
VAW
/
1 oo/ oOV/ / l
/ Q
C+J
10
/10
006Q16 0065/ / O
i
N
H / / / 1R Q
/ s
/ N
0o
00 _ p b?
at N 8 t ?
?j l lINNYI'11.,1
pit
avq .
op-
00
t ry,a ?? ?i? A !7
?u ?k
I
MEMO
TO:
DATE: (ti0 G
SUBJECT:
?an?. ?.cc? sad /?-f 7c7 mod' '^rJ
Z -7
Yo-
07

? .1

C12"" 7?(/
.IV I/
fn/.?
Ito
A?
IT
STATE 6(?ina rpaftent 0 North Ca of Environment
„r , Health, and Natural Resources
Printed on Recycled Paper
?? awM ??1

TRAHSHISSION REPORT

t JUL 23 193 03 : 19P1°1
%k %k?l:%k:k:::};:.}?;k ?>Fi;f?:k: h;;i: ??:f::? ?}:;+: %k%+? h:>k ik4::k ?F:;f:>k>k>k W;k:k:%Y:4:;k%k-??Fi;k';f"f<%k;k:f; ;k:k>k>Y;f•:* Ek:?K?.f:?>k%k'k.:F:>k %k;k %F:>k %k?k %k?l:>k>k:f:>k>k:f:;k:f: %k%k>k>k>k>k>Y%k>k>k>k>k>k
?k Nc

+ DATE STHRT REMOTE TERMINAL 1'1ODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEFT. FILE ?
TIME IDENTIFIC:ATIOH PAGES CODE NO.

} JUL E3 03: 18PM 919 876 5823 G3 ST L11 ' l38" CiK SS

k

MEW)RANDUM MAR 1 6 1%3 tR I1J7' 1fA TC` : <<,hn )c?rn ETLfrNDS fR R U LIT
WETLAND S'TAFF' REPORT A._
MENL!A T I ON S
***EACH :i:'I'EM MUST }.E
PERMIT YR: PERMIT NO: C;OC?(?10t1 ('1'11INTY: WAKE,
APPLICANT NAME: BENNETT ROWLAND!GR-G ',_TAM LAKE
PROJECT 'I".LPE : c C>N??IER(.-' I AL FILL IDF;r.?p,I T ;, hY ?,} MAT')
COE #:
RCD FRC)M C"DI[ : APP DAVE PR.M ('C}A : U'/1 r', ,' 93
I?E(: OFFICE: I?I?U T?IVET?--_AND SUE T A. ITI #:
in NFuo-e O ab4 4 43
STREAM ___t:'LA.S -'.TRINL>EX _ N(): -7 2 5 _
L
WL, -_IMPAC'T'? : 0/N
WL,R_EoTTESTED : G. ?7 at"z
WL_--SCORE (# ! . -7o,5
HYDRO-i"NECT'? : (q/N
MITICATION_-TYPE:7W-a- Pitof?eaep(
W1, 1"I"E': -or Lps
0
1a1h'i ER IMPAC"Tf?T> f, r' _1 1,? : ?I iJ ?aa
Z X7
MITI("A'1'IC>NT? : Yiv
MT7'I!;A'I_ ONIZP: ???tc?teQnG?
.IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: (9 N
Ste'IM
P.EC'OMM.ENDATION (C_isc e One): I = .TIJ;,i? UNI. DENY -`et-,-e rrt w
COMMENT, : l Alw (? `?'?tlztn?C?1 G?? ? ?: ?ji ??t ?-i ? L t `tir!__ r?•<.? ;'rsG1^ ? C?YI??
n Goa ? 1'1/ 4" ?.C2
????t??t.rb?DC7( l??i-Y?i C?n.r2 ?` c??.??-Gn lrvt'Cr?=-l?vth'.ihxn ???2??!ti„°t' _7? ?r?.!??i'?Zot?svr?JFr3.L(`a
f /
'C- ?f l Cs/ %1 G? 1.t7a ee< e
??G-.?! -f?JU) ?-___?/•`??! C/1,.2__??:%!-??lrLl_.%?1?..5?!a??,--(i?-??l -i?'??1?.._1.??'..-L!.?.. _ ???- 1rL? l{.tRi"'LLCr"?1.?`.1/.??
cc: R.egi?--mol C`ffi_re
C'. ant,-,_31 F'i-l e
??Cal?'U,(!.V. ?v:^,?fl.:? ??,.u?IC?? ,'%ir?! /„'ll`C,? ,G(/?n-f?.t?? ? ? ?'?r?ti('-/?--C.., `1i(i•-[,i? r+?"T7?+
fig:t ( ?;?.z?1
?"
??
IMPVKIA
To -- ---' V' - --r
Date
M WH LEY WERE OUT
?) ?;?x of o'. _ak-' -
Phone - '? J>n. l q q
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message?k'' -- -----
_-- S' ned- -- -
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
?? Printed on Recycled Paper
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, NC 27619
[phone]
TO: Mr. John Dorney
NC Div. E, H, & N_R.
?19 No h St t
Raleigh, NC
we are sending you:
Shop Drawings
Copy of Letter
X Other
Copies Date
Description

1 06-05-80 Soil erosion plan for sites 1 & 2
24 x36 B/L Gresham Lake fill area

0'/-Ul-93 e er re: i area

These are transmited as checked below:
For Approval
X For Your Use
As Requested
X For Review & Comment
Corrected Prints
Approved as Submitted Return
Approved as Noted Submit
Return for Corrections
Other
Prints Returned After Loan to Us
Copies for Distribution Resubmit Copies for Approval
Remarks:
Copy To: File signed:
/0--
LJQ.L.LrAM Vr li[lilvJP1111,1L,
Date 07-02-93 Job No.
Att: Mr. John Dorney
Re: Gresham Lake
Raleigh, NC
D
F r ;,
X Attached Under Separate Cover
X Prints Plans Samples
Change Order Specifications
MEMO
TO

?s ??3
SATE:
1
SUBJECT: Z'-1MS
560-

ti; L?56T
45 z uo
From:
North Carolina Department of
?t Health, and Natural Resources
ask WnrA vNp.
Environment,
* Printed on Recycled Paper
EJ` v/ U (`
State of. Noz ?-. Carollia
Dcpa.rlrmnt of Enviro,:un-In.t, Health, and Natural ResourCCs
Division of Envzxonmenta) ?.ana.?elr,c n.t
P.O. Pox 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
VVATER QUALITY SEC! 10N
FAX "# 919/733-13)°
-IELECOPY T0: f eCJ ( y-LS
FAX N7UI\/lBER-. 83 ? ? `?l 8) . _
E??O rTo?,'?
'O. Ol- PAGES, i C.UDING C0'MR SE ET:
StATE
??:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
March 9, 1993
The News and Observer
Post Office Box 191
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
ATTN: Legal Ad Department
Dear Sir:
Subject: Public Notice
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Please publish the attached Public Notice one time in the
section set aside for Legal Advertisements in your newspaper.
The publication should be run at the earliest possible date.
Please send the invoice for publication and three copies of the
affidavit of publication to the address given below. Payment
cannot be processed without the affidavit of publication.
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this matter, please call
me at 919/733-1786.
Since ely,
John D e
Wetla ds nd Technical view Group
JRD/kls
N&O.ltr/Vol.7
cc: John Dorney
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
P.O. Box 27687, Raleiugh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax .# [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative A-don Employer
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE is hereby given that Mr. Bennett Rowland near
Raleigh, North Carolina has applied to the Division of
Environmental Management for a Water Quality Certification
pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act and
Environmental Management Commission rules in 15A NCAC 2H .0500
and 15A NCAC 2B .0109. The activity for which the certification
is sought is to fill 2.47 additional areas of Gresham Lake
adjacent to Perry Creek in Wake County. A total of 7.43 acres of
the lake were previously filled under previous permits.
The public is invited to comment on the above mentioned
application to the Division of Environmental Management.
Comments shall be in writing and shall be received by the
Division no later than March 25, 1993. Comments should be sent
to N.C. Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality
Section, Planning Branch, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0535, Attention: John Dorney. A copy of the application
is on file at the Division's Raleigh Regional Office (3800
Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina, 919-571-4700) during
normal business hours and may be inspected by the public.
A. Presto oward, Jr. P.E., Director
North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management
DATE: March 9, 1993
IMPORTANT
To ?O
30
Date 625 Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
_
of
Phone
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
? ('
Message
d
w" 6'y"
Signed
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
osll

MEMO
DATE:
TO:
SUBJECT:
luzo 'A
CQ
COD I&
ttA,
Q
From:
ow -VT7yTa--
?a?wSTAT(q'
?? ?? , North Carolina DeRartment of Environment
U^ril+k P%V%A Kill-L.. r%
a
_ 617 A Ito-,
-- -- 14-1 (O-
7 t. .
;F
i
, WTI?li'
f\I
L
f
1 `1
iA
TO:

DATE:
SUBJECT:
t ? \
i
From:

?r??.r??srnrt ???
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Printed on Recycled Paper
?'?sV Wnrn Ntf??
w \ ti
M
• /
r `? M
o ,
tt "r
1? \ 4 b • U o
M

STATE OF NORTf i CAROLI NA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IAMIS l?. HUNT I R. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVT RNOR
331 West Main Street-Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27701
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
August 4, 1993
Project: 4.49009 (8.U401712)
I. D. No.: R-2000 E
County: Wake
Description: Raleigh Outer Loop at US 1 q
MEMORANDUM TO: Phillip Humphries
e%?00
FROM: C. D. Parker
SUBJECT: Claim of UCB - Parcel No. 902
6199?
WETLANDS GROUT'
fER QUALITY SECTION
S,A0.A I IUN I
SIB N IARY
We purchased the above property in its entirety on December 4, 1992.
Subsequently, it appears from the project design plan that there will be
a residue lying outside the actual area needed for the project.
In the meanwhile, it also appears we will need right of way from the
adjoining owner, Bennett Rowland.
I am enclosing a property survey showing the metes and bounds areas of
these properties, with the request that you review same and provide us data as
to their value.
We propose to make a trade with Mr. Rowland, acquiring the needed right
of way in exchange for the residue of UCB property.
If we can be of further assistance, please advise.
CDP:tsg
enclosures
CC; Eric Galamb
Cecil McLamb
R. G. Gregory
Cathy Lassiter (Roadway Design)

J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
July 01, 1993
Mr. John R. Dorney, Wetlands and Technical Review Group
State of North Carolina
Division of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
219 East North Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
REF: FILLING A PORTION OF LAKE GRESHAM, RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Dear Mr. Dorney,
On behalf of my client, Mr. Bennett Rowland, I am writing to request that
he be allowed to continue to fill a small portion of the lake between station
13+00 and station 14+20 as shown on the map entitled, "PROPOSED FILL AREA FOR
LAKE GRESHAM", dated 06-05-80 and last revised 01-18-93 (copy of same
enclosed). This fill section would enable Mr. Rowland to "dress up and
straighten" the shoreline along the south side of the lake as proposed and
shown on the enclosed map between the two previously mentioned stations as
measured along the existing flow line (center line of main channel) and
designated as the "right bank of the design channel". This area is a small
sliver of the proposed fill containing approximately 0.87 acres.
Mr. Rowland is anticipating a substantial amount of topsoil being
transported to his site in the near future and would like to use this material
to stabilize the shoreline as above described. After this fill is placed and
the banks stabilized with rip-rap, he will fertilize, seed and mulch the shore
line to improve the appearance and protect water quality.
I appreciate you and Mr. Ron Ferrell having met with Mr. Rowland and
myself 04-13-93 on site and discussing the prior fill operation.
I hope that I have submitted enough data from our ongoing files concerning
Lake Gresham that began around 1981. My files are open to you for inspection
if you desire to do so.
Should you permit Mr. Rowland to place the above described sliver of fill,
I will be glad to furnish you a revised map of Lake Gresham showing the
location of the completed right bank of the design channel.
Sincerely,
J. IS, ., INC.
? i
m m ?•
J Fred D is, r.
Q,'I Pt f s, n 1 En ' veer ;k 3 3
JFD, JR. /db •°???` n r; ?'
Enclosure
IMPORTANT
Date Time
ICI CI YOU
M WARE OUT
< i? l?y)
of /
Phone
AREA CODE //NUMBER EXT SION
TELEPHONED 5F CALL
L
E
CALLED TO SEE YOU CALL AGAIN
t
I
WANTS TO SEE YOU NT
U
I
GI
RETURN ED YOUR CALL
Message
se
s
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health. and N tural spurces
1? PrinlnA n FPNfIPA P204f
State of North Carolina
Department of Envirnnmc n+
Health and Naturc
Division of Environmer
James B, Hunt, Jr., Gc
Jonathan B. Howes, S
A. Preston Howard, A
S?M-5 Ls-t?, i--v /3 t

E.
? ?SSG.?? i i lS
C---
Bennett A. Rowland L/l<<s ? ?" ? G? ?
6700 Valley Lake Dril c
Raleigh, N.C. 276122 C-C
Dear Mr. Rowland: /-_
Subject: Proposed f - wit ?? yu_3- ?p2z<x ?4. 7
Gresham LE
Wake County
DEM Project # 93100
-:Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification
to (remove ill material in 0.87 acres of wetlands or waters which are
tribZt-d-t to Gresham Lake for evening out the edge of existing fill
located at Gresham Lake Road and US 1 in Wake County as described in
your submittal dated 1 July 1993, we have determined that the proposed
fill can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2671
issued January 21, 1992. A copy of the General Certification is
attached. This Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage
under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No.26. An additional
proposed fill (appx. 1.7 acres) to the west of the existing fill is
not allowed by this Certification.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right
to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in
the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-
1786.
Si cerr ely,
1,4
eston Howa/ Jr. P . E .
93100.1tr_
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Fred Davis
Edward Dunn, Jr.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
TELECOPY TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:

NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET:
PHONE: J 7 ??
DUNN • SARGEANT ASSOCIATES
136 MINE LAKE COURT
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
[phone] FAX [phone]
April 27, 1993
Mr. John R. Dorney
State of North Carolina
Division of Environment, Health an(
219 East North St.
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Project #93100,COE #19921527
Dear Mr. Dorney:
IT
s
1 F , l n
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland has asked that we respond on his
behalf to your letter dated April 14, 1993. You requested
that additional information supporting his project be
forwarded to your office. As you are aware, this project
was previously approved for 9.9 acres and has only 2.5 acres
remaining to complete the originally sanctioned work.
I have asked Mr. Rowland to dictate to me all the facts in
their proper chronology so as to paint the history of
approvals for this project. He will further co-sign this
document as to its accuracy.
The first portion of this response will be a brief narrative
history of the ownership of the property. The second
portion will outline the detailed correspondence of all
approvals to date under the current ownership. Thirdly,
this portion will deal with the current changing face of the
entire surrounding area due to new City of Raleigh
standards, the new North Wake Expressway, land
condemnations, etc. at our property.
HISTORY OF OWNERSHIP
In the early 1940's, the owner of this farm area was an
individual whose last name was Gresham. This area was well

north of Raleigh and south of Wake Forest and enjoyed no
zoning regulations from those governments. All of the land
lay to the east of the north/south Seaboard Coastline
Railroad and was basically a valley falling in elevation
toward the now Capital Boulevard. Mr. Gresham owned some 93
acres and decided to dam up the valley so as to have a
private pond. As stated he owned all the land and
therefore, when he built the dam, he owned the shoreline
property as well as the pond floor as a private citizen.
The pond was never a publicly owned entity and Mr. Gresham
controlled all rights to it.
In the early 1970's , he tired of the ongoing liabilities
associated with owning the lake. Some of these were illegal
garbage dumping, night parties, drownings, shootings,
unauthorized entries, and a multitude of other happenings.
Furthermore, properties to the west (up-gradient) of the
Seaboard Coastline Railroad were beginning to be
industrially developed and fear of underground leakage into
his pond (now called Gresham Lake) from Halliburton and
others caused him to wish to sell his property. ;Some of
these have been since placed in your Super-Fund for clean-
up.)
Around 1974, Mr. Bennett A. Rowland bought the entire
private 93 acres from Mr. Gresham with the thought of
cleaning up the existing structures and continuing the
businesses that were operating. The service road presently
there was at that time the main US #1 Highway. In the early
19801s, the NCDOT shifted US #1 to the east and retained the
service road rights of way. When Mr. Rowland removed some
of the older structures in front of the dam, he discovered
that the City of Raleigh had then territorial jurisdiction
of zoning and that he did not have enough land depth to re-
construct his businesses due to zoning set backs under the
City's zoning. It was at this time that he was made aware
of the future more restrictive zonings by the City as well
as the City wanting to take more of his land for a future
outer belt loop to be built in the 2000's.
Acting upon advice from environmental consultants,
professional engineers, hydrological engineers, geologists,
lawyers, architects, transportation officials, Mr. Rowland
was advised to apply for the proper permits allowing
structural fill of 30 acres from the dam generally to the
south and west. (See attached approved map by J. Fred
Davis, P.E. called Bennett Rowland, Gresham Lake Site
8/11/86).
NCDOT in preparing their ramps up to the large bridge over
US #1 and the bridge over Seaboard Coastline Railroad.
APPROVAL HISTORY OF PERMITS
Attached to this document is the File Index prepared by J.
Fred Davis, P. E. regarding all correspondence related to
the entire approval process to date. We are attaching
selective copies for your files and avail ourselves and our
files for your perusal at any time. These files are huge
and therefore quite difficult to transmit easily.
Please examine the attached exhibits showing that Mr.
Rowland has complied in all regards with the permits issued.
As part of the approval process, Dr. Michael Amein, Ph.D.,
certified that the water levels as well as the dam were in
compliance and that reduction of the water area by 30 acres
would not be adverse and therefore was satisfactory to all
agencies.
We must reiterate that the lake is privately owned and is
not a recreational lake to the public. Fishing and swimming
is not permitted. The Raleigh Ski Club currently leases the
lake in exchange for carrying liability insurance and a
guarantee to clean floating debris. In addition, during our
approvals it was proved that the lake was not in the
headwaters and was not considered as a tributary for
spawning of fishes, etc. Therefore, we feel that for the
above reasons that you should not consider us as "excellent
fishing opportunities" as stated in Mr. Hamilton's letter of
3/22/93 (NC Wildlife Resources).
MAJOR CHANGES NOW HAPPENING
Please refer to the color aerial showing the NCDOT rights of
way to the south and east of the lake. It should be noted
that the areas nearest these roads are going to need slope
easements as well as become the collection area of
pollutants, silt, oil and gasoline grime, etc. We do not
ever see this lake as recreational. Furthermore, the super
Overlay Highway District zoning to be placed along the
Rights of Way of the North Wake Expressway will cause a
reduction in usable land due to these required zoning
buffers. Our 2.5 acre completion will simply help replace
this space as well as provide solid buffer between the cause
(NW Expressway) and its eventual recipient (the lake). We
continue to receive reports of water samples up-gradient
(above the lake) of higher lead concentrations entering then
what we sample in the lake. We are concerned of the
liability of bad fish, etc. being eaten and being sued.
Once the lake fill project is complete, we intend to
terminate our lease with the Ski Club and work with the
4% vo
00,
` •? \ d
v! / ? x
00
C \
i
i
~ / % r LL
oo?si open
«
.,?
Y
?i tGj ?
?_
??
,:?,
,;?
?'
;;
,x;
`?.
a?-
..,.N"

4Y r -ft
a
r

April 15, 1993 Bennett Rowland
Gresham Lake Fill
01-12-81 Corp. to C.O.R. (Baker) : Re-align spillway - 404 may be needed
05-06-81 Corp to JFD : No permits required - re-align spillway
07-15-81 C.O.R. to Rowland : Approved flood hazard boundary ammendments
10-02-85 JFD to Corp : Request re-delineation to pass 100 yr.
storm
10-28-85 Corp to C.O.R. (Bowden) : Backwater input data - removing flasher
and driveway boards
06-12-86 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorn-O'Mara) : Copy of HE-2 output sent
05-08-86 FEMA to Rowland : Review costs
08-27-86 Rowland to Lindsey : Documents for submittal
07-10-86 FEMA to Rowland : Req. for map revision - floodway
11-06-86 FEMA to Rowland : Req. for more data
01-06-87 FEMA to Rowland : Fee request
01-08-87 Amein to FEMA (Matticks) : Rev. to submittal
01-09-87 Rowland to FEMA (Matticks) : Req. to continue & send money
02-12-87 JFD to FEMA (Matticks) : Send new printouts (L.O.T)
03-17-87 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorn -O'Mara) : Send printouts
04-30-87 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorn e-O'Mara) : Send new printouts
06-04-87 FEMA to Rowland : Send $1,600 to complete review
06-16-87 FEMA to C.O.R. (Mayor) : Conditional letter of map rev.
11-25-87 Corp to Rowland : Stop fill work
12-10-87 JFD to Corp : Rebuttal to 11-25-87 - copies of all
letters
12-10-87 Dept of Justice to Rowland : Stop fill - contact Corp
12-11-87 JFD to Corp : Filling of small pond, etc.
01-13-88 Corp to Rowland : Permit now required - applic. pkg. sent
03-03-88 Rowland to Corp : Permit 26 applied for
04-04-88 Rowland to Corp : Water quality cert. applic.
03-04-88 MRCP to Rowland : Certif. to fill (#2176)
03-29-88 Corp to Rowland : Authorized for permit 26
02-07-90 JFD to Jolly (Corp) : Soil erosion plans & correspondence
02-07-90 JFD to Jolly (Corp) : Amended fill area & req. time ext.
03-08-90 Corp to Rowland : Renewed Permit 26
09-12-91 Bunn, Hatch, Little : overfill?
04-06-92 Corp to B. H. & L. : not overfilled
03-25-92 JFD to Corp (Jolly) : Soil erosion plans, etc.
10-22-92 JFD to Rowland : Yardage left to fill
(1)

FILE INDEX
02-08-93 JFD to Corp (Alsmeyer)
02-09-93 JFD to DEM (Dorney)
April 15, 1993
03-05-93 JFD to NCDR (Schaffer)
03-05-93 NC Cul. Resources to JFD
03-10-93 Corp to Rowland
04-14-93 DEH & NR (Dorney) to JFD
(N.C. Wildlife) to Dorney
Bennett Rowland
Gresham Lake Fill
: Req. for Nationwide permit, letters
: Req. for Nationwide permit, remaining
fill
: SAW 26 & Gen. Corp. 404
: Review 404, Permit, No comment
: Permit 26, Authorization to proceed
: Moving to denial - req. additional
data
: Comments on 404 Certification
(2)

, , r
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):
26
JOINT FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
Telephone (919) 733-
17
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Bennett A. Rowland
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: 6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME):
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
[phone]
(WORK) :
[phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: N/A
5. LOCATION OF WORK (MUST ATTACH MAP). COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Raleigh, N.C.
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): located on
Capitol Blvd. (US Hwy #1 North at Lake Gresham) said lake located approx.
8 miles north of the center of Raleigh, N.C. '
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER:
Perry Creek
7. RIVER BASIN: Neuse
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES ( ) NO (X)
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES (X) NO ( )
IF YES, EXPLAIN. necessary for previous Nationwide permit to be valid.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 49.2 ac.
7/8/92
7 . 1

-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS, IMPACTED BY
THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 9.9 acres (7.43 acres completed)
DRAINED:
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED:
12. DESC(2IPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): filling 9.9 acres of a
49.2 ** acre lake as shown delineated on attached map.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: fill 9.9 acres of Lake Gresham for commercial
use. Lake size is approx. 65 acres.
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Commercial property close to residential subdivisions, major highways,
and railroads with municipal water and sewer adjacent to site is needed by
the public for their convenience. This minimizes ravel, saves fuel, and
reduces pollutants to the atmosphere.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES (X) NO ( ) See copy of letters
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. attached.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [X] NO ( See copy of letters
attached.
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY. Remaining fill to be placed in lake as shown on attached plat.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT. Not available
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. N/A
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY. N/A
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Primarily Industrial Use.
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Citv of Raleiah Public Seweraae Svstem
0 ER'S SIGNATURE DATE
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
October 22, 1992
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
REF: PROPOSED FILL IN LAKE GRESHAM, RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
Dear Mr. Rowland,
You obtained a "Land Disturbing Activity" permit (4794LD) from the City of
Raleigh on 07-29-87 at a cost of $2,525.00, for disturbing 29.7 acres. You also
obtained a water quality certification to place fill in Gresham Lake;
Certification No. 2176 was issued 11-04-87 from the State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development. You received a
Nationwide Permit (33CFR 330 J (a) (26) from the Corps of Engineers on
03-29-88, authorizing the fill of 9.9 acres of Gresham Lake land.
Since the acquisition of the above permits and the payment of fees, you
have filled the greater portion of the 9.9 acres allowed.
As you requested, I have calculated the approximate volume of fill
available in the remaining 19.8 acres authorized by the Land Disturbing
Activity Permit to be approximately 600,000 cubic yards.
In order to proceed filling any of the remaining 19.8 acres, other permits
will have to be obtained from the State Dept. of Natural Resources and
Community Development and the Corps of Engineers.
If you desire, I will be glad to assist you in,obtaining the required
permits.
Sincerely,
:.?0 c
' r
?ofessivml S, JR. INC
d.Davis, Jr
°, °"'?'•' j ° Engineer #3333
, V
?IIiYYt,Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
April 6, 1992
Action ID. 199201527 and Nationwide Permit 26
Ms. S. Michelle Bradshaw
Hatch, Little and Bunn
Attorneys at Law
Post Office Box 527
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Ms. Bradshaw:
Reference is made to your letter of September 12, 1991, concerning
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland's placement of fill into Gresham Lake adjacent to U.S.
Highway 1, in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. In that letter, you
expressed concerns that Mr. Rowland had exceeded the 9.9 acre limit of fill
authorized by Department of the Army nationwide permit (33 CFR 330.5(a)(26).
During a telephone conversation with Mr. Ken Jolly of my staff on October 30,
1991, you were advised that Mr. Jolly had inspected the worksite and requested
a survey of the present fill limits.
A field survey of the site dated March 11, 1992, revealed that all fill
was landward of and within the authorized fill limits as of that date.
Mr. Rowland was notified that we were in concurrence with the findings of that
survey, and cautioned that he not exceed the permitted limits. Mr. Rowland
has assured my staff that he is aware of the project limits and will do all he
can to ensure that these limits are not exceeded.
We appreciate your concern in this matter. Should you have further
questions, please contact Mr. Jolly at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office,
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Bennett A Rowland Mr. Mike Coughlin
6700 Valley Lake Drive Wake County Developmental Services
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Mr. Fred Davis, Jr.
st Office Box 18051
aleigh, North Carolina 27619

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA-28402.1890
March 8, (990
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
SUBJECT: CESAW-C090-D-092 and Nationwide Permit 26
Mr. B. A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
?.` 3n? r 9o,.J
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Reference is made to my letter to you of March 29, 1988 concerning your
proposed placement of fill material into 9.9 acres of G am Lake to allow
for commercial development of your property in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. In that letter, you were notified that your proposed fill
activities were authorized by Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26).
Reference is also made to Mr. J. Fred Davis' letter of February 7, 1990,
requesting a time extension for completion of the authorized project.
Department of the Army permit authorization pursuant to Nationwide Permit
33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) is hereby renewed for your proposed placement of fill
material into 9.9 acres of Gresham Lake, located above the headwaters of Perry
Creek, provided the work is accomplished in strict accordance with the
enclosed conditions. This verification will be valid until the nationwide
permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits ar
r99 scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to January 13, 21 It
is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the nationwidd", prmits.
We will issue a public notice announcing changes when they occur.
Furthermore, if you commence, or are under contract to commence, this activity
before the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have
twelve months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the
activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
This authorization is valid for a period of two years from the date of this
letter.
If you have questions, please contact Mr. Ken Jolly, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
ne Wr tht
ARegulatory Branch
Enclosure
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr.
Consulting Engineers
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of
Health, Environment and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. William Mills
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Health,
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify
the critical habitat of such species.
C. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water).
d. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure or fill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer.
g. An individual state water quality certification must be obtained or
waived. Conditions of certification will be considered to be special
conditions of the Federal nationwide permit. Please contact Mr. William
Mills, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, telephone (919)
733-5083.
h. The following management practices will be followed to the maximum
extent practicable:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States will be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
avoided.
(2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
(3) Discharges will not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound water).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetland areas will be avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands will be placed on mats.
c z e•
?• r
• ??
s
N
J 4
r ` ?
?
??`?113Xd? '
ro
I"v. :s •?
w o
A I?
cd
b N U
?x
ca cd 4
3 a u
\ ?o 0 z°
?>

z
0 -?
F- N
Z N
cr. _j Q
Q
= 3 w O U)
H•UZ$Q
0:5 z
LL
1
O m z x x
w ?
m
Z W O S3 0
O JQ
W w m
z U
? z CL IL LL.
Q Z 0
U
O

W Z

O
3

cli

N

r z??n
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
March 4, 1988
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: Proposed Fill in
Headwaters or Isolated
Wetlands
Bennett A. Rowland -
Lake Gresham
Wake County
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Upon review of your request for Water Quality
Certification to place fill material in Lake Gresham, we
have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by
General Water Quality Certification No. 2176 issued November
4, 1987. A copy of the General Certification is attached.
This Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage
under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact Bill Mills at
919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
. Paul Wilms
RPW/dkb
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regional Office
t /Fred Davis, Jr., Inc. i.
Pnllutinn Prrvrntiun Paps
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
A- r.,.-1 rk ... , e14;.........,_ e.+..,... F.....I,......
x ,N
GENERAL CERTIFICATION
THIS GENERAL CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with
the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and
95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management Regulations in
15NCAC2H, Section .0500 for the discharge of fill material
to navigable waters or adjacent wetlands areas which are
above the headwaters or to wetland areas that are not a part
of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or
navigable waters of the United States (i.e. isolated
wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) of the Corps
of Engineers' regulations. The category of activities shall
include any fill activity in these headwaters and isolated
wetlands areas where the activity does not result in the
loss or substantial modification of 10 acres or more of
waters of the United States, including wetlands.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the
specified category of activity will not violate Sections
301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and
95-217 if conducted in accordance with the conditions
hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of 1 to
10 acres of such waters, including wetlands,
requires a written concurrence from the Division
of Environmental Management. Activities involving
less than one acre do not require written
concurrence.
2. Excluded from this General Certification are
discharges of fill in waters classified WS I, II,
or III (public water supplies) and SA (shellfish
waters). This exclusion also applies to fill in
wetlands adjacent to these waters. Discharge
proposed for these waters or wetlands must be
considered for certification on a case-by-case
basis;
• .?
- 2 -
3. That the discharge will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants in other than
trace quantities;
4. That established erosion control practices are
utilized to prevent excessive increases in
turbidity and settleable solids concentrations in
the water body as a result of the discharge;
5. That the discharge of fill material shall be in
accordance with the conditions and management
practices specified by the Corps of Engineers in
33 CFR 330.5 and 330.6 for nationwide permit
number 26.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions
herein set forth by a specific fill project shall result in
revocation of this Certification for the project.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management may require submission of a formal
application for certification for any project in this
category of activity, if it is determined that the project
is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water
quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses are
precluded.
Public Hearings may be held for specific applications
or group of applications prior to Certification if deemed in
the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
st
This the ?r day of ?(fw..Lr ??"?
DIVISION 'q ENVIR*
?ENT MANAGEMENT
?// it
R. Paul Wilms, Director
,. NCY MAN
V
d ?
?'yy o ' o b
JW 1 Is off

Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
The Honorable Avery C. Upchurch
Mayor, City of Raleigh
P.O. Box 590
222 W. Hargett Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mayor Upchurch:
Community No.: 370243
Case No.: 86-04-04R
City of Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina
This is in response to a letter dated April 2, 1986, from Mr. Danny Bowden,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) regarding the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the City of
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. With his letter, Mr. Bowden submitted
a report entitled, 'Floodway Determination for Perry Creek in Gresham Lake,`
dated March 1986 and prepared by Dr. Michael Amein for J. Fred Davis Jr.,
Inc. With a letter dated June 12, 1986, Dr. Amein submitted a revised
report, dated June 1986, that revised the orientation of cross sections used
in the hydraulic analysis for the March 1986 report. In addition, the
hydraulic analysis for the June 1986 report contains updated cross-section
data for the Chessie System bridge and for the bridge removed at Rock Quarry
Road. The June 1986 report outlines a proposed plan to partially fill the
southern portion of Gresham Lake without increasing the base flood elevations
(BFEs ) of Perry Creek.
In a letter dated July 10, 1986, to Mr. Bennett A. Rowland, developer for the
proposed project, we requested that a floodway analysis be performed for the
proposed project. In a letter dated November 6, 1986, to Mr. Rowland, we
detailed the procedure needed to generate a floodway analysis for Perry Creek
with Dr. Amein's hydraulic analysis. With a letter dated April 30, 1987, Dr.
Amein submitted a revised floodway analysis for Perry Creek.
We have reviewed the PIS with respect to the information submitted. If fill
is placed in Gresham Lake as proposed, we believe that flood waters entering
Gresham Lake will be adequately conveyed by the improved channel as outlined
in the report. The placement of fill will not change the BFEs through
Gresham Lake, but the floodway will be narrowed an average of 400 feet. As a
result of the updated cross-section data used in the hydraulic analysis, the
BFEs will increase about one foot just upstream of the Chessie System bridge,
and will decrease about seven feet at the site where the bridge was removed
at Rock Quarry Road.
Upon completion of the project and receipt of community approval and 'as-
built' plans certified by a registered professional engineer, FEMA will make
a determination on revising the PIS. However, before FEMA can make a
determination concerning a revision to the floodway, we will need a written
statement from the City of Raleigh approving the revised f loodway and stating
that it will enforce the revised floodway.
•
The basis of this Conditional Letter of Map Revision is a proposed channel
modification project. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulation 44
CFR 60.3 (b) (7) requires that communities 'assure that the flood-carrying
capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is
maintained.' This provision is incorporated into your community's existing
floodplain management regulation. Consequently, upon completion of the
project your community will be responsible for maintaining the channel.
In addition, this Conditional Letter of Map Revision is based on minimum
floodplain management criteria established under the NFIP. State and
community officials may set higher standards for construction in floodplain
areas. If the State of North Carolina or the City of Raleigh has adopted
more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these
criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP requirements.
If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact the Chief, Natural and Technological Hazards Division of
F 714A, in Atlanta, Georgia, at [phone] or Mr. Daniel cotter of our
Central Office staff in Washington, D.C., at [phone].
Sincerely,
1"'Q
J h L. Matticks
f, Risk Studies Division
Federal Insurance Administration
cc: Mr. Mark T. Senior
City of Raleigh
Mr. Danny Bowden
City of Raleigh
Dr. Michael Amein, P.E.
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr.
J. Fred Davis Jr., Inc.
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
Mr. W.W. Carroll

T
Received of
Address
No. M' 439373
.
d' Y'VIXT d'%M1 " A T T'TlITT WTI-% 1MVT l A - -I
PAID Ll-
1;lTY OF RAIEICH
?PI K-",,U
lY s9{? BY
DIV[RWKD OUSN SS FORMS. GRT. NC 27511 1919) 469.2335 10.131646E Collector.
-1..

DEPAKTMtN T Ul- INbFt:L; I IVNS Lel?l
DATE/TIME 07/29/87 09:14 CITY OF RALEIGH PERMIT 4794 L
TRAN NO. 850 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
PERMIT FOR LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY
ADDRESS 6935 NORTH BLVD
PROJECT TYPE
SUBDIVISION BLK LOT PRIG 7194
PROPERTY OWNER. BENNETT ROWLANO CITY LIMITS OUT
ADDRESS .?--' 69]5 NORTH-_r3LVD. ° -- ti_ TRACT SIZE 540.0
PLANS PREPARED BYJ".-FRED DAVIS ZONING 1 50
ADDRESS .G +r .. r?`.? Y05 GEORGrTQWH°'10,.•-,.
CDNTRACT,31,NAME j'CENN? ?'T
?? t ?,9 ?,brrr sta.,; .?, '•? x r. `,
, R
ADDRESSrx7c;-r N*TMa-+
J
TEk '#
AC7IVITx2` GRADING FILLR>„$AMS LAKE
tff ct !f", S7ssfS ii' r 1("tt 11riT^ t E i ,.ti y sr t
r 1
11 I? ,ow R, ?R A 9.7 ACRES ??kY # 2 ;' 23000
yv ...,:?
1?*L .k 1:vi ,:i`?_' .?/.7.,: •?,?a? ?'.tf 'iis. Y ! .7 ?'...?•,}ti ,"".
?S _ ? '? ,. ?, '? ?..?i+ +, r ?'?•r.«??Zv. y,,flttv... ?,.:,? r r?? f ; :tbt? ? r. ...i? ? iFi' 4..
4,, '? 1 -'? t,. ? ? ' rte." ??.: ?.. '?3 i ? .:J is"+(r%;iJti•??
31 sdl /
> :w
`9, ??e9r?. ?? ??? '? °". 7,.if. e•. ?[ ,}st .'? I' ;i. t. a?i? i! ,r' ,
Itt?. •"I.?Yt !1.Lf r ?1,y •' ? [11i11* 1'?' `!?`?? ?'? ?r ?.? s -' }
DATE: 07/29/87 -CASrKXgft; ASS,. ``'I.NITIAL.t OUNT rDL,LA TED; $29525.00
t d yy 1?i+ !' ? , 'R?? X11 w., I. r. «.,...._._.....,.- ?.n. w .-a vt ?' .:: aKRIM, 4794 L
. -i..?t?fi ..?- t3?.F3:k?G y' ',1 di •nf-?a1J??dit,,yyfy ?'1-??r, r{
`?ai?i, .vf''fit . V? „th?(??? •' c? ,ttitl?'''?""T.4'r]V ,??'`i'+[? ;1t '
It ?tip' G(t , ti Jf :7flj ,
wit
???t qtr;; tJ<? > f Y l? 'r??{??
-Ir

PLEASE REFER TO CRITICAL NOTES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THIS SHEET'
222 W. HARGETT STREET • P.O. BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
DATE/TIME 07/29/87 09:14
TRAM N0. BSa .
PERMIT
CITY OF RALEIGH
INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
FOR FLOOOPLAIN REGULATION
PERMIT 8:
PURPOSES
ADDRESS 6935 NORTH BLVD PROJECT TYPE
7
4795
SUBDIVISION BLK• LOT PRID A
PROPERTY OWNER ?.•" BENNETT ROWLAND CITY LIMITS
ADDRESS "691'5 NORTT-- BLVD TRACT SIZE
lic
PLANS PREPARED BY FRED DAVI,S-? ZONING 1 50
ADDRESS 705, 6EORGET4i/N-RDW-
R A L E lGjK NG
CONTRAGiDR NAME,' s SEyN?Yi Ra.44NO h CONT . NQI'
AODRES4 Sp t6915- NDR•Mrt• l?tr /.? 4? ?
«Y ! 7';,_'-.t Y _ ???, ?W l +.. •??ii ?, `'t` ?,. ?'.?/}1 ?'?l{ TELL F 4 A
ACTIVITY: FLOIOOP4AIN FILL 6RESMAMS LAXE
Y
tFjr4 'P. 'ELEVATION a2, Z.0 -`FEET r'#':,'
TUI
COMMENTS
???'. •w` L? t• tliv ?.. ' aft '1.nf jY i??l? .,' ^?it i,i? 7.,+.?^• r i?' ?.• 4'?' e, lr` ? r. :.../ / ,! j }
ice-. ! r e•; ,.i W' ?,:.t J' /r r.. .Y `,Y j , ??cyT
?tr,? ?•, '4tj1 .•:?I. '1? ,..,? I ??? y _,yN+.? ...._.. ., ???.. ?_R. "rfrSr ?.r?. ,? 1-'. 1/ .. T' ,
.?!_,t i .,i''+l.:r , s wT
719'
OUT
540.
DATE: 07/29/87 GASOTElt4, ,,ABS iA?MALS.... r AMOUNT] COLLECTED: $25.0
,.,p :fi?t?A??4113. ?" h `?';. ; ? "?rr...a....+.+......•.•."_s -cil', .?T. L? ••'r'-"' ? ? :,,? ti21r•?ttii't:.1 ? "r'
PERMIT 0: 4795
541114 r ?fllt~?A.''?_ 51F-111.,?.
flGt:4 .FL7KQ }f i4'.'Cr « '}1 /'?'"t.. .00 bsL,v l1 )pstiw,ol4( etv
.?'y
q ss
1ti. .. Ix,a1 ?L /?`VL(iy?f a+?,. ri _?•"1.e#^' 1' :??,?
4/
t
fit ° • e1 {i ?'r w`i
N
PLEASE REFER TO CRITICAL NOTES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
222 W. HARGETT STREET • P.O. BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Personal Account Information Redacted
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
December 10, 1987
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch (CESAW-Co-EE)
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Mike Smith
Re: Your letter dated 11/25/87 regarding
alleged unauthorized filling activity at
Gresham Lake, Raleigh, N.C., and subsequent
phone conversations requesting information.
Dear Mr. Smith,
Relative to information requested by you regarding filling
in Gresham Lake the following is submitted.
1. Copy of letter dated 1/12/81, to Mr. E. Wayne Baker,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, N.C., from
K.B. Old, Jr., Acting Chief, Flood Plain Management
Services Branch.
2. Copy of letter dated 5/6/81 from the Department of
the Army, Regulatory Functions Branch, eliminating
need for individual permit.
3. Copy of letter dated 7/15/81 from E. Wayne Baker, Jr.,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh.
4. Copy of letter dated 10-2-85 from this office to
Colonel Wayne Hanson, District Engineer, Wilmington,
North Carolina.
5. Copy of letter dated 10-28-85 to Mr. Danny Bowden,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, from
K.B. Old, Jr.
6. Copy of land disturbing permit from City of Raleigh.
7. Copy of flood plain permit from City of Raleigh.
8. Copy of check and receipt for permits.
9. Copy of map by this office entitled " Property of
Bennett Rowland, Gresham Lake Site"- Channel Design,
dated August 11, 1986, and revised 7/02/87.
s-
Mr. Mike Smith
December 10, 1987
Page Two
The estimated area of the lake that has been filled since
7/29/87 is 0.75 acres.
I believe the above items are as you requested. My files
are open to you if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
_ i
G- ?
r d Davis, Jr. j
E 3333
JFD/dcb
Encls. (9)
306 Electra Drive
Cary, N.C. 27511
June 12,1986
Mr. Lyle Fisher
Greenhorne and O'Mara
9001 Edmonston Road
Greenbelt, Md.,20770
Dear Mr. Fisher:
A copy of the revised report on Perry Creek in Gresham Lake
and a HEC-2 output with the proposed new channel in the lake
is enclosed. In this revision, the added cross-sections
have been redrawn so that the stationing is from left-to-
right looking downstream. The GR cards were revised to
reflect the change.
As I mentioned it over the telephone, I discussed the matter
of the effect of storage loss in the lake on the outflow
hydrograph with Mr. W. Ray Batchelor of the Corps of
Engineers. This question is dealt with in 'Section III.
Design Floods' of the report.
The Corps of Engineers has prepared a floodway analysis for
the city of Raleigh. If the design floods and the water
surface elevations above and below the lake remain
essentially unchanged, there may be no need to run new
analyses.
Mr. J. Fred Davis will obtain a copy of the city of
Raleigh's approval of the proposed plan and will submit it
to you.
Sincerol
Michael Amein
Professor of Civil Engineering
N.C. State University,
Personal Account Information Redacted
3 31: 56Pr9

P.2
_ E'E'Norffi Carolina Wildlife Resources Comadssion §,r _
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Execucive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney, Water Quality Planning
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: Richard B. Hamilton, Assistant Director
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: March 22, 1993
SUBJECT: DEM #93140, 401 Certification Application for Gresham
Lake, Wake County, North Carolina.
Biologists from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject permit application
and an onsite visit was conducted on March"9, 1993 for the
purpose of further assessing project impacts on fish and wildlife
resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat.
401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Clean Water Act
of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.).
Lake Gresham, an impoundment of Perry Creek, provides
excellent fishing opportunities for largemouth bass, crappie,
sunfish species and channel catfish. The applicant is currently
completing the filling of 7.5 acres of the 49 acre impoundment
and is seeking a permit to fill an addit' nal 2.4 acres of the
lake for commercial use.
The fill already completed has resulted in a decrease in the
impoundments surface area of approximately 15k. Additional fill
will negate another 5 to 85'k of the impoundment. The ongoing
activity has increased turbidity levels in the lake. At the time
of inspection no erosion control measures were noted on the site
previously filled, or on the site where work was progressing.
Increased turbidity will have negative impacts to fisheries
resources in the lake. It will also decrease buffering capacity
and retention time of water in the lake and result in increased
nutrient and sediment loading downstream.
?R 13 193 01:57PM P.3
Memo Page 2 March 22, 1993
The applicant has not demonstrated that the development of
commercial property at this location is wetland dependant.
Based upon the information provided in the permit application,
the results of our onsite investigation, and our knowledge of the
fishery and wetland benefits of Lake Gresham, NCWRC recommends
that 401 Water Quality Certification be denied.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
application. If we may provide additional information, or if you
should have questions, please contact our Habitat Conservation
Program Manager, Dennis Stewart at [phone].
WJ/sp
CC: The Honorable Eugene Price
Wayne Jones ,
Mike Scruggs
Steve Pozzanghera
a-
s
L-Li
2
. (17
L?
w
t?
4.,
Z r
d,
0
U
Ljj
u
w
LL-1
0 `?-
o 0
7
0
oooz-?
u
z

u

ti ~

LU

e,li:l ,a-
?r

5
71
w 0,
,c IL
i
ICI?
Lt7G E7 6
i1 'I-1I53C l.yffluD, 107 W033 ;,:?
CAPITAL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR PLAN
;EGTION
'H KZEF:-
GT101?!
J?
EG"f t v "(
INC)
LEGEND
?1 STUDY AREA
VISUAL RESOURCES STUDY AREA

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 01
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney, Water Quality Planning
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
°`?I?
FROM: Richard B. Hamilton, Assistant Director
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: March 22, 1993
SUBJECT: DEM #93100, 401 Certification Application for Gresham
Lake, Wake County, North Carolina.
Biologists from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject permit application
and an onsite visit was conducted on March'9, 1993 for the
purpose of further assessing project impacts on fish and wildlife
resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat.
401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Clean Water Act
of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.).
Lake Gresham, an impoundment of Perry Creek, provides
excellent fishing opportunities for largemouth bass, crappie,
sunfish species and channel catfish. The applicant is currently
completing the filling of 7.5 acres of the 49 acre impoundment
and is seeking a permit to fill an additional 2.4 acres of the
lake for commercial use.
The fill already completed has resulted in a decrease in the
impoundments surface area of approximately 15%. Additional fill
will negate another 5 to 8% of the impoundment. The ongoing
activity has increased turbidity levels in the lake. At the time
of inspection no erosion control measures were noted on the site
previously filled, or on the site where work was progressing.
Increased turbidity will have negative impacts to fisheries
resources in the lake. It will also decrease buffering capacity
and retention time of water in the lake and result in increased
nutrient and sediment loading downstream.
Memo Page 2 March 22, 1993
The applicant has not demonstrated that the development of
commercial property at this location is wetland dependant.
Based upon the information provided in the permit application,
the results of our onsite investigation, and our knowledge of the
fishery and wetland benefits of Lake Gresham, NCWRC recommends
that 401 Water Quality Certification be denied.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
application. If we may provide additional information, or if you
should have questions, please contact our Habitat Conservation
Program Manager, Dennis Stewart at [phone].
WJ/sp
cc: The Honorable Eugene Price
Wayne Jones
Mike Scruggs
Steve Pozzanghera
1
1
1
Y'2 6 4
WETLANDS GP Report
WATER QUALITY e -
FLOODWAY DETERMINATION FOR PERRY CREEK IN GRESHAM LAKE
FLOODWAY DETERMINATION
FOR PERRY CREEK
IN GRESHAM LAKE
by
Michael Amein, Ph.D.,P.E.
306 Electra Dr., Cary,N.C. 27511
Prepared for
J. Fred Davis Jr. Inc.
Consulting Engineers
March 1986
Revised June 1986

r

C'

1. Introduction
This report is concerned with the computation of water
surface elevations and water surface profiles in Perry
Creek, Raleigh, N.C. through Gresham Lake and its vicinity
(a) under existing conditions, and (b) with a proposed
floodway channel through the lake. At the present time,
Perry Creek enters Gresham lake below the Seaboard Coastline
Railroad Bridge and leaves the lake through a box culvert
under the U.S. Highway No. 1. Under a proposed plan for the
development of the Gresham Lake area, the lake would be
partially filled. The purpose of the proposed floodway is
to maintain and preserve adequate passage for Perry Creek
through the lake. The main objective of this study is to
determine the effect of the proposed development on the
water surface elevations upstream of the site.
II.Procedure

The procedure for determination of the water surface
elevations through Perry Creek consists of the following
steps:
(1) Determination of the channel cross sections through
Perry Creek
(2) Selection of the design floods
(3) Computation of the flow profiles
In January 1981, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, determind the water surface profiles
through Perry Creek beginning at U.S.No. 1 Bypass and
extending through Gresham Lake and ending at the bridge at
Litchford Road. For this purpose the Corps had prepared
cross section data from airphoto maps, topographic maps and
other sources. The profiles were determined by the HEC2
model for design floods with recurrence intervals of
10,50,100 and 500 years. The same data have been used as the
primary source in the present study. The data, however,
have been rechecked with the topographical maps, and
supplemented by additional surveys and measurements.
To determine the profiles under the proposed plan of
development, additional sections were introduced in the lake
site, and the new floodway was delineated on these cross
sections.
The design floods for the computation of the water surface
profiles selected for this study are identical to thos.e
determined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for sections
along Perry Creek.
In this study the calcualtions were performed by using the
latest version of HEC2 (1976 version updated March 1984)
adapted for the IBM-PC RT. The output files were edited for
the purpose of this report and the summary tables were
compiled using LOTUS software.
2

L

t

'J

CONTENTS
Item Pages
I. Introduction 2
II. Procedure 2
III. Design Floods 3
IV. Cross Section Date 4
V. Water Surface Profiles and Elevations 5
VI. Conclusions 22
LIST OF TABLES
No. Description Pages
1 Design Floods on Perry Creek, N.C. 3
2 Cross Section Data for Perry Creek in Gresham Lake,
Raleigh, N.C. 4
3 Summary Printout 18-20
LIST OF FIGURES
No. Title Pages
1 Cross sections 12890, 14800, 15000 and 15600 7
2 Cross section 14300 8
3 Cross sections 14550 9
4 Profile for stream 10 year natural
under existing conditions 10
5 Profile for stream 50 year natural
under existing conditions 11
6 Profile for stream 100 year natural
under existing conditions 12
7 Profile for stream 500 year natural
under existing conditions 13
8 Profile for stream 10 year natural
in the proposed lake channel 14
9 Profile for stream 50 year natural
in the proposed lake channel 15
10 Profile for stream 100 year natural
in the proposed lake channel 16
11 Profile for stream 500 year natural
in the proposed lake channel 17
12 Site Map 21
1 11

As with the Corps study, the calculations were performed for
the reach of Perry Creek extending from the U.S. Highway No.
1 through Litchford Road Bridge. Due to the significant
slope of Perry Creek between Litchford Road and the Seaboard
railroad bridge, it is not expected that the backwater
effects from the developments in Gresham Lake would extend
' beyond Litchford Road, and therefore there is no need to
extend these computations beyond Litchford Road bridge.
The location of the cross sections and the alignment of the
' proposed channel are shown on the site map, Fig. 12.
III. Design Floods
The design floods, as determined by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District and used in this study are
given in Table 1.
' TABLE 1
Design Fl oods on Perry Cree k, Raleigh, N.C.

Location Section Recurrence Magni tude
interval
' Litchford Rd 20364 10 yr 920 ofs
50 yr 1600 of s
100 yr 1900 cf s
500 yr 3350 of s
Below Rook Quarry 18000 10 yr 980 cfs
50 yr 1620 of s
' 100 yr 1920 cfs
500 yr 3520 cfs
Seaboard RR 16400 10 yr 1000 cfa
50 yr 1700 cfs
100 yr 2000 cfs
500 yr 3720 cf s
Above Dam at 12890 10 yr 1050 ofs
Gresham lake 50 yr 1790 ofs
' 100 yr 2200 of s
500 yr 4080 of s
US Highway No. 1 12700 10 yr 1100 ofs
50 yr 1800 cfs
100 yr 2250 ofs
' 500 yr 4150 of s

3

r
' The design floods used in this study, as well as in the
study by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, neglect any
reduction in peak flow due to storage in Gresham Lake.
' Under the proposed plan of modifications to the lake, a
rtial
t
d
portion of o pa
ue
the available storage will be lost
filling of the lake. However, according to Mr. W. Ray
Batchelor of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
' District, the storage in the lake under the present
conditions , even after the removal of the flashboards from
the dam, is not taken into consideration because this
' storage is insignificant compared to the volume of runoff
over the watershed. When flood hydrographs were routed
through the lake, no significant reduction in peak flow was
' obtained.
' IV. Cross section data
Each cross section is identified by a number. For
' convenience , the identifying number chosen is the same as
the distance in feet from a downstream reference point. The
cross sections start at Section 12700 at U.S. Highway No. 1
' and terminate at Section 20400 above Litchford Road bridge.
The cross sectional data are given as a sequence of pairs of
numbers, the pair being elevation and station. Stations are
' measured as horizontal distances across the channel
initiated at some reference point on the left overbank
looking downstream.
' In this study the original data used by the US Army Corps of
rofiles
f
ti
t
p
on o
a
Engineers were used as the basis for compu
under existing conditions. The following modifications and
' additions were made to the original data.
The data on a number of cross sections were incomplete.
Additional points were taken from topo maps to delineate the
hannel below the maximum expected water elevations.
c
According to information provided by J. Fred Davis Jr..Ino.,
Consulting Engineers, the bridge at Rock Quarry Road is no
longer in place. Therefore, this bridge was removed from
e
n brid
ti
g
on o
the computations. More detailed informa
openings at U.S. Highway No. 1, at Seaboard Coastline
Railroad Bridge and at Litchford Road were also provided by
new measurements by J. Fred Davis Jr. Inc, Consulting
Engineers. It is to be noted that the railroad bridge is a
concrete arch with a rise of 13 ft and a base of 23 ft.
For the computation of profiles under proposed development,
the four natural sections in Gresham Lake were modified to
represent future conditions. It is anticipated that the
orted by a riprapped
b
e supp
fill area in the lake will
e of 3ht1v. The embankment forms the
a slo
t
k
' p
on
men
emban
channel side for the proposed floodway through Gresham lake.

i
' The existing and proposed channel cross sections lying in
the present lake are shown on Figs 1-3. The data for these
sections, consisting of the values of stations and
' elevations, are presented in Table 2.

V. Water surface profiles and elevations

t
Using the existing and the proposed channel cross sectional
data, two sets of profiles were obtained for design floods
with recurrence intervals of 10,50,100 and 500 years. The
first sets of profiles are under existing conditions and are
shown on Figs-3-7. The second set depicts the conditions
under the proposed plan of development for Gresham lake, and
are shown on figs 8-11.
Summary tables presenting the water surface elevations,
energy line elevations and water depth, both under existing
conditions and under proposed development, are presented in
Table 3.
5

r
' TABLE 2
CROSS SECTION DATA FOR PERRY CREEK I N BRESNAN LAKE, RALEIBN, N.C.
14
ti
S 300
Sections 12890914800,15000 ad 15600 on
ec
' Proposed Exis ting Proposed Esistinq
oily station eley station Illy station elev station
' 264.30 1062.00 264.30 1062.00 264.30 1062.00 244.30 1062.00
262.20 1100.00 262.20 1100.00 262.20 1100.00 262.20 1100.04
258.90 1200.00 256.90 1200.00 258.90 1200.00 256.90 1200.00
255.00 1250.00 255.00 1250.00 251.70 1300.00 251.70 1300.00
251.70 1300.00 251.70 1300.00 247.40 1419.00 247.40 1419.00
247.40 1419.00 247.40 1419.00 235.00 1600.00 235.00 1600.00
241.90 1432.00 241.90 1432.00 232.00 1700.00 232.00 1700.00
' 241.50 1436.00 241.50 1436.00 255.00 1769.00 225.00 1769.00
241.00 1438.00 241.00 1438.00 255.00 2018.00 220.90 2018.00
240.50 1450.00 240.50 1450.00 255.00 2300.00 234.20 2300.00
' 247.30 1474.00 247.30 1474.00 255.00 2500.00 250.00 2500.00
247.60 1485.00 247.60 1485.00
245.00 1500.00 245.00 1500.00
236.10 1600.00 236.10 1600.00
' 232.30 1700.00 232.30 1700.00
255.00 1777.00 230.10 1777.00
255.00 1800.00 229.50 1800.00
' 255.00 1832.00 228.70 1832.00
255.00 2000.00 224.00 2000.00
255.00 2012.00 22340 2012.00
' 255.00 2015.00 223.10 2015.00
255.00 2018.00 220.90 2018.00
255.00 2021.00 222.90 2021.00
255.00 2025.00 224.00 2025.00
' 255.00 2100.00 227.60 2100.00
255.00 2200.00 230.10 2200.00
255.00 2300.00 234.20 2300.00
' 255.00 2500.00 250.00 2500.00

6ection 14550
Proposed Existing
elev station Illy station
265.00 1600.00 265.10 1600.00
255.00 1625.00 255.00 1625.00
250.00 1650.00 250.00 1650.00
229.50 1600.00 229.50 1800.00
226.70 1832.00 226.70 1832.00
226.20 1900.00 228.20 1900.00
229.00 1976.00 229.00 1978.00
224.00 2000.00 224.00 2000.00
223.60 2012.00 223.60 2012.00
223.10 2015.00 223.10 2015.00
220.90 2018.00 220.90 2018.00
222.90 2021.00 222.90 2021.00
224.00 2025.00 224.00 2025.00
227.80 2100.00 227.60 2100.00
230.10 2185.00 230.00 2185.00
230.10 2200.00 230.10 2200.00
255.00 2260.00 232.30 2260.00
255.00 2300.00 234.20 2300.00
255.00 2500.00 250.10 2500.00

0
0
Q
LO
w
0
m0
W
0
w Q
o w'!
/TS r
00 C
? v
r
0
W
0
r

4
400 U! Uol. 0A& 13
N
N
N
N a
?- a
C C
V- O-
h4p
20
Oc
s
r
C
4-
'? N
• X
r ?
N
0
N
0 to in In ? ?' M m N
N N N N N N N N N
a
i
i
0
0
c
V
V
N

4061 u! UC]40Ao 13
It
N
N
N
N
N p
CL
4- G.
rte,
HA
CR G
?C
H?
s° c
r

N
T
T
C
N
t0 t0 to in It M M N N
N N N N N N Cl N N N

0
nn?
r W
V ?
1' l
LL.
40N U.1 U0140A613
It
N
'a
N H
N ?
G.
?- L
N w-.
'a
=C
a'-
N
OC
C-4 .C fa
00?
41-
N
X
O
r
r
O
N

N N N N N N N N N

F16. 4. PROFILE FOR STREAM 10 YEAR NATURAL UNDER EXISTING CNNiITIONS
PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORITY) -E-EWAYj "TER SMACE91-INVERTtC-CRITICAL N.S.,L-LEFT MWIR-RIGHT YANK
ELEVATION 220. 225. 230. 235. 240. 243. 250. 255. 260. 265.
SECNO CUNDIS
12700.00 0. . . I V. E
12720.00 150. C . I N E
12770.00 300. C . I . H E
12120.00 450. C . I . Y E
12640.00 600. C . I . N E
12140.00 750. C I R. L E
12545.00 400. C I R. l E
12900.00 1050. C I R. L E
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E
14000.00 1350. C .I R L. E
1500. C I R L. E
14300.00 14%. C I A L. E
14550.00 1100. C I L R E
1950. C I R L. E
14100.00 2100. C I R L. E .
15000.00 2250. C I R L. E
2400. C I R L. E
M. C I R L. E
2700. C 1 R L. E .
15600.00 2550. C I R 1. E
3000. C 1 R L E
3150. C .I R . L E
3300. C I R. L E
16190.00 3450. C . I L E
16240.00 3600. C I . NE
16365.00 3750. C : i L N E
16400.00 3900. C .I R IN E .
4050. C I . R LNE .
16400.00 4200. C I . R LN E
4350. C I. R 1. N E
4500. C 1. R L. NE
4650. C .I R L. NE
4600. C . I L . NE . .
17690.00 4950. C I I.R. E .
5100. C I LA NE .
18000.00 5250. C I L K.
5400. C I . L E. .
5550. C 1. Rl E
5700. C 1 RL E .
18463.00 5850. C I RL E .
18520.00 6000. I NE .
16560.00 6150. . I . N E .
11610.00 6300. C . I AL . E
19000.00 6450. C I L . E
6600. C I L. E
19500.00 6750. C I .l NE .
6900. C 1. L K.
7050. C I L K
7200. C . I NE .
20000.00 7350. C . I .NE
7500. C . 1 . WE
20290.00 7650. C . I . RUE
20340.00 1600. C . 1 . N E .
20364.00 7950. C . I . LN E . .
20400.00 1100. C 1 . ILE . .
t F16.5. PROFILE FOR STREAM PERRY CREEK 50 YR NATURAL UNDER EIISTIN6 CONDITIONS
PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORITY) -E-ENERSYjV-MATER SURFACE,I-INWTjC-CRITICAL N.S.,L-LEFT DANKOR-RIGHT BANK
' ELEVATION 220. 225. 236. 235. 240. 245. 250. 255. 260. 265.
SECNO CINNIS
12700.00 0. . . I . N E . .
' 12720.00 150. C . I M E
12770.00 300. C I M E
12120.00 450. C . I M E
' 12640.00 600. C . I M E
12190.00 750. C i R. .L E
12195.00 900. C 1 R. .L E
' 12900.00 1050. C I R. .l . E
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E
14001.00 1350. C .I R . L. E
1500. C I R . L. E
' 14300.00 1650. C I R . L . E
14550.00 1600. C I L R .E
'
14000.00 1950.
2100. C
C I
I R
it L.
.
L . .E
. E
15000.00 2250. C I R . L . E
2400. C I R . L . E
2550. C I R . L . E
2700. C I R . L. . E
15600.00 2150. C I R . L . E
3000. C I R L . E
' 3150. C .I R . L ME
3300. C I R. L ME
' 16190.00
16240.00 3450.
3600. C
C . I
I L ME
ME
16365.00 3750. C I L M. E
16400.00 3900. C .1 R L . ME
4050. C I . R L . NE
16900.00 4200. C I . R L. M E
4350. C i. R L. M E
4500. C 1. R L. M E .
M. C .I R L. ME.
4800. C . I L . E.
17690.00 4950. C I LR. E
5100. C I LR E
11000.00 5250. C I L .BE
5400. C I . L . E
M. C I. RL . E
' 5700. C I RL . E
18465.00 5150. C I RL . VE
18520.00 6000. C I . VE
' 18560.00 6150. . . I . ME
18610.00 6300. C . I AL . E
14000.00 6450. C I L . E .
' 6600. C I L. E .
19500.00 6750. C I L E
6900. C 1. L ME
7050. C I L M E
' 7200. C . 1 L M E
20000.00 7350. C . I LV E
7500. C . I . L N E .
' 20290.00 7650. C I . RL VE .
20340.00 7800. . 1 . L M E
20364.00 7950. . I . L C M E
' 20400.00 1100. C 1 . RL .ME

LIB

F1G.6. PROFILE FOR STREAM PERRY CREEK 100 YR WIDER EIISTINB MITIONS
PLOTTED POINTS MY PRINITY1-E-EIERSV9"TER SINIFACEol-1NYERTlC-CNITICAL N.S.gL-tff1 BAKjR-RIGHT UK
ELEVATION 220. 225. 230. 235. 240. 245. 250. 255. 260. 263.
SECND CINIDIS
12700.00 0. . .I . N E
12720.00 150. C . I N E •
12770.00 300. . I . C N E
12120.00 450. C . I N E
12140.00 600. C . 1 N E
121".00 750. C 1 R. . L . E
12195.00 "0. C 1 R. l . E
12"0.00 1050. C I R. .L . E •
12905.00 1200. C I R. .L . E
14000.00 13". C .I R . L. . E
1500. C I R L. . E
14300.00 1650. C I R L. . E
14550.00 1100. C I L R . E
19". C I R L. . E
14800.00 2100. C I R . 1. . E
15000.00 2250. C I R . L. . E
2400. C I R . L. . E
2550. C I R . L. . E
2700. C I R . L. . E
15600.00 2850. C I R . L. . E
3000. C I R . L . E
3150. C .1 R . L . E
3300. C I R. L . E
16190.00 3450. C . I L . E
16240.00 3600. C 1 .N E
16365.00 3750. C 1 l N. E
1"00.00 3900. C .I R L . N E
4050. C . I . R L . NE
16900.00 4200. C I. R L. N E.
4350. C I . R L. N E.
4500. C I. R L. N E
4650. C .1 R L. NE
4100. C . I L . NE
17690.00 4950. C 1 LR. .NE
5100. C I LR . E
11000.00 5250. C I L . E
5400. C I . L . NE
M. C I. RL . E
5700. C 1 RL . NE
18465.00 5850. C I RL E
11520.00 6000. C I . NE
18560.00 6150. C . I . N E .
18610.00 6300. C . I AL . E .
1"00.00 6450. C I L . ME.
6600. C I L. E. .
19500.00 6750. C I L NE
6900. C 1. L NE
7050. C I L . N E
7200. . C . I L N E .
20000.00 7350. . . I LCN E . .
7500. C . I . L N E.
20290.00 7650. C . i . RL NE.
20340.00 7800. . . I . L N . E
203".00 7950. . . 1 . L C 1. E
20400.00 6101. C 1 . AL . NE

FILL PROFILE FOR STREAM PERRY CREEK 500 YR MR EXISTING CONDITIONS
' PLOTTED POINTS 100 PRIORI TY)-E-ENERGY,N-NATER SURFACE,)-
ELEVATION 220. 225. 231. 235. 240. 10OT,C-CRITICAL N.S.,L-LEFT MNK,R-RISMT 9ANK
245. 250. 255. 240. 965.
SEGO M IS
' 12700.00 O. . I N E
12720.00 150. C . 1 N E
12770.00 300. C . 1
.
WE
12020.00 450. C I NE .
' 12040.00 W. C . 1 NE . .
12090.10 750. C 1 R. L E .
t 12095.00
12900.00 900.
1050. C I
C 1 R.
2. L
L E .
E .
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E . .
14010.00 1350. C .I R L. E .

'
1500.
C
l
R
L.
E . .
.
14300.00 1650. C I R L. E. .
14550.00 1000. C 1 l R E. .
1951. C 1 R L. E . .
14000.00 2100. C I R . L. E. .
15000.00 2250. C I R L. E. .
' 2400.
2550. C
C I
I R
R L.
L. E.
E. .
2700. C 1 R L. E. .
15600.00 2050. C t R L. E.

'
3000.
C
I
R
L
E. .
3150. C .I R . L E .
3300. C I R. L E .

16190.00
3450.
C
. 1
L
E . .
.
16240.00 3600. C I N E .
16365.00 3750. I L N E .

' 16400.00 3900.
4050. C
C .i
l R
R L
L NF.
IE .

16900.00

4200.

C .

I .

R L. .
.
NE

.
4350. C I . R L. NE .
' 4500. C 1. R L. NE
4650. C .I R L. NE
4000. C 1 L . E
17690.00 4950.
5100. C
C I LR.
I LA NE
. E .
10000.00 5250. C 1 .L . E
5400. C 1 . L E
' SSSO. C 1. RL .
. NE .
5700. C I RL E
10465.00 3050. C I RL E
' 10520.00 6000. C I E
10560.00 6150. C . ! E
10610.00 6300. C I AL . E
19000.00 6450. C I L . E
' 6600. C I L. . NE
19500.00 6750. C I .l NE

' 6900.
7050. C
C 1.
I L WE
L N
E.
7200s . C . I L N E
20000.00 73%. i .l N .E
' 7500. C 1 . L N E
20290.00 7650. C 1 . RL . N E
20340.00 7000. . . I L . N E
' 20364.01 7950. C . 1 L . 8 E
FI6.6. PROFILE FOR STREAM 10 YEAR NATURAL IN THE PROPOSED LAKE CWAEL
' PLOTTED POINTS MY PRIORITY) -E-EIER6Yj11-UTER SINIFACE,I-IWERToC-MITICAL N.S.,L-LEFT VA91-RIONT Sm
ELEVATION 220. Z25. 230. 235. 240. M. 250. 255. 260. 265.
SECNO CUNDIS
12700.00 0. . . I N. E
12720.00 150. C . I .N E
12770.00 300. C . I . N E
12620.00 450. C 1 . N E
' 12610.00 610. C . I . N E
12690.00 750. C i R. .l E
' 12695.00
12900.00 W.
1050. C
C I
I R.
R. L
L E
E
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E
14001.00 1350. C .I R L. E
' 1500. C . I R E L
14300.00 1650. C I R E L.
14550.00 1600. C I R E 1.
1950. C I R E L.
' 11600.00 2100. C I R E L.
15000.00 2250. C I R E L.
' 2400.
25%. C
C I R
1 R E
E L.
L.
2700. C 1 R E 1.
15600.00 2650. C I R E L.
' 3000. C I R . E L.
3150. C 1 R . E L.
3300. C . 1 R. L. E
16190.00 3450. C . I L E
16210.00 3600. C I . ME
16365.00 3750. C I L N E . .
' 16400.00 3900.
4050. C
C .I
. I R LM E .
. R LIE . .
.
16900.00 4200. C I . R LN E .
4350. C 1 . R L.N E .
4500. C 1. R L. ME .
1650. C .1 R L. NE .
1600. C . 1 L . NE . .
17640.00 4950. C I Lt. E . .
' 5100. C 1 LA iE . .
16000.00 5250. C 1 L NE. .
3400. C I . L E. .
' 5550. C 1. RL E .
3700. C I RL .E .
16165.00 5650. C I RL E .
' 16520.00 6000. 1 NE .
16360.00 6150. . 1 . M E .
16610.00 6300. C I RL . E
19000000 6450. C I L . E
' 6600. C I L. E
19500.00 6750. C I L NE .
6900. C I. L NE.
' 7050. C I L NE
7200. C . I ME
20000.00 7350. C . i NE
' 7500. C . 1 .1E .
20240.00 7630. C . 1 . RLME
20340.00 1600. C . 1 . N E
20364.00 7950. C I . Ll E
' 20100.00 6100. C 1 . NLE

' F16.9. PROFILE FOR STREAM PERRY CREEK 50 YR NATURAL IN THE PROPOSED LAKE CHANNEL
PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORITY)-E-ENERSY,N-NATER SMACEll-INVERT,C-MTICAL N.S.gL-LEFT lAlKgR-RISHT DANK
ELEVATION 220. 225. 230. 235. 240. 243. 250. 255. 260. 265.
SECNO CUNDIS

I

12700.00 0. . . I . M E . .
12720.00 150. C I v E
12770.00 300. C . 1 V E.
12820.00 450. C I N E.
12840.00 600. C . I N E.
12890.00 750. C I R. l E
12895.00 900. C I R. L E
12900.00 1050. C I R. L E
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E
14000.00 13%. C .1 R L. E
1500. C . I R E L
14300.00 1650. C I R E L.
14550.00 1800. C 1 R E 1.
1950. C I R E L.
14800.00 2100. C I R E L.
15000.00 2250. C I R E L.
2400. C I R E L.
2550. C I R E L.
2700. C I R E L.
15600.00 2850. C I R E L.
3000. C 1 R E L.
3150. C 1 R . LE
3300. C I R. L. E
16190.00 3450. C . I L E
16240.00 3600. C 1 NE
16365.00 3750. C I L N. E
16400.00 3900. C .1 R L .N E
4050. C 1 . R L. M E
16900.00 4200. C I R L. N E
4350. C I. R L. N E
4500. C 1. R L. M E .
4650. C .I R L. K .
4800. C I L . E.
17690.00 4950. C I Lit. E
5100. C I LR E
18000.00 5250. C I L .ME
5400. C I . L . E
55%. C 1. RL E
5700. C 1 RL E
18465.00 5850. C I Rl NE
18520.00 6000. C I NE
18560.00 6150. . 1 HE
18610.00 6300. C I RL . E
19000.00 6450. C I L . E .
6600. C 1 L. E .
19500.00 6750. C I L E
6900. C 1. L BE
7050. C I L .N E
7200. C I - L M E
20000.10 7350. C . I LM E
7500. C I . L N E
20290.00 7650. C I . RL NE .
20340.00 7800. 1 L 0 E
20364.00 7950. 1 L C N E
20400.00 8100. C I RL .NE

F16. 10. PROFILE FOR STREAN PERRY CREEK 100 YR IN THE PROPOSES LAKE CHANNEL
' PLOTTED POINTS MY PRIORITY )-E-ENMY, "TER SMACE91- INMT,C-CRITICAL M.S.jL-LEFT YAMKIR-R IGHT DANK
ELEVATION 220. 225. 230. 235. 240. 245. 250. 255. 260. 265.
6ECNO CINIDIS

12700.00 0. . 1 M E ,
12720.00 150. C I M E
12770.00 300. 1 C M E
' 12820.00 450. C I M E
12840.00 600. C . 1 N E
12890.00 750. C I R. L . E
12895.00 900. C i R. L . E
12980.00 1050. C I R. l . E
12905.00 1200. C I R. L . E
14000.00 1350. C .1 R L. . E
' 1500. C . I R . E L
14300.00 1650. C I R . E L.
' 14550.00 1800.
1950. C
C 1
I R
R . E
. E 1.
L.
14800.00 2100. C I R . E L.
15000.00 2250. C 1 R . E L.
t 2400. C 1 R . E L.
2550. C 1 R . E L.
2700. C I R . E L.
!5600.00 2850. C I R . E L.
' 3000. C I R E L.
3150. C I R . L. E
3300. C . I R. L. . E
' 16190.00 3450. C . I L . E
16240.00 3600. C I M E
16365.00 3750. C I L 9. E
1000.00 3900. C .1 R L M E
' 4050. C 1 . R L NE
16900.00 4200. C 1 R L. N E.
4350. C I . R L. N E.
' 4500. C I. R L. N E
4650. C .I R L. ME
4800. C I L . NE
17690.00 49%. C I I.R. NE
' 5100. C I Lit . E
18000.00 5250. C 1 L E
' 5400.
5550. C
C 1 . L NE
1. RL E
5700. C I RL NE
1S465.00 MO. C I Rl E
' I8520.00 6000. C I NE
18560.00 6150. C . I M E .
10610.00 6300. C . I RL . E .
14000.00 050. C 1 L . NE.
' 6600. C 1 L. E.
19500.00 6750. C I L NE
6900. C I. L .NE
' 7050. C I L. N E
7200. . C . 1 l M E .
20000.00 7350. . . I LCM E .
7500. C I . L N E.
20290.00 7650. C I . RL NE.
20340.00 7800. . I . L M . E
2030.00 79%. . I . L C M. E
' 20400.00 8100. C I . RL . WE

FIB. 11. PROFILE FOR STREAM
PLOTTED POINTS (BY PRIORI " PERRY CREEK 500 YR IN THE PROPOSED LAKE CHANNEL
I-E-EIERBYq#-HATER SNRFACE,I-INYERT,C-CRITICAL N.B.oL-LEF
T D Mo
t-R16NT MW
ELEVATION 220. 225. 230. 235. 240. 245. 250. 255. 260. 265.
BECNO CNMDI S
t 12700.00 0. . 1 N E
12720.00 150. C I N E
12770.00
121".00 300.
450. C
C I
. I HE .
NE .
12840.00 600. C . I NE .
120".00 750. C I R. L E .
12895.00 900. C I R. L E .
12900.00 1050. C I R. L E .
12905.00 1200. C I R. L E .
14000.00 1350. C I R L. E .
' 1500. C . I R L E.
14300.00 14". C I R E. L.
14550.00 1800. C 1 R E. L.
' 1950. C I R E. L.
14100.00 2100. C I R E. L.
15000.00 2250. C I R E. L.
2400. C I R E. L.
' 2550. C 1 R E. L.
2700. C I R E. L.
15600.00 2850. C I R E. 1.
' 3000. C 1 R E .
3150. C I R . L. E .
3300. C . l R. L. E .
16190.00 3450. C . I L E .
16240.00 3600. C I N E
16365.00 3750. 1 L N E
' 1"00.00 3400.
4050. C
C .1
I A
. R L
L . NE.
M.
16900.00 4200. C I R L. NE
4350. C I . R L. NE
4500. C 1. R L. NE
46%. C .1 R L. NE
4800. C I L . . E
17690.00 4950. C 1 U. NE
' 5100. C I LR . E .
11000.00 5250. C I L . E
5400. C 1 . L . E
' 5550. C 1. RL . WE
5700. C I RL E .
18465.00 M. C I RL E
18520.00 6000. C I E
' 18560.00 6150. C . I E
11610.00 6300. C . 1 RL . . E
19000.00 6450. C I L . E
' 6600. C I L. NE
19500.00 6750. C I L NE .
6900. C 1. L NE .
7050. C I L N E.
' 7200. . . C . I L N E
20000.00 7350. . . 1 L N E
'
20290.00 7500.
7650. C
C .
. I . L
I . RL N E
. N E
20340.00 7100. C . I L . N E
20364.00 7950. C . I L K .
' 20100.00 8100. C I RL NE .

1
TABLE 3
ARY PRINTOUT
S
UMM
SECTION 911CNARBE FLOOD HATER ENERGY BOTTON DEPTH
NUMBER TYPE SURF ELEV ELEVATION ELEVATION
EIISTIN6 PROPOSED EIISTIN6 PROPOSED EIISTIN6 PROPOSED E1ISTIN6 PROPOSED
ICFS) (FT) (FT) (FT) IFT) (FT) (FT) (FT) IFT)
t
12700.00 1100.00 10 YR 244.70 244.70 246.67 246.67 240.80 240.80 3.90 3.90
12700.00 1800.00 50 YR 246.22 246.22 248.94 248.94 240.80 240.80 5.42 5.42
12700.00 2250.00 100 YR 241.09 247.09 250.24 250.24 240.60 240.10 6.29 6.29
' 12700.00 4150.00 500 YR 251.90 251.90 253.69 253.69 240.80 240.80 11.10 11.10

' 12720.00
12720.00 1100.00
1600.00 10 YR
50 YR 245.71
248.67 245.71
247.90 246.95
249.96 246.95
249.48 240.80
240.80 240.10
240.80 4.91
7.87 4.91
7.10
12720.00 2250.00 100 YR 247.29 247.29 250.24 250.24 240.80 240.80 6.49 6.49
12720.00 4150.00 500 YR 252.05 252.05 253.69 253.69 240.60 240.10 11.25 11.25
'
12770.00 1100.00 10 YR 245.83 245.83 247.01 247.01 240.80 240.80 5.03 5.03
12770.00 1800.00 50 YR 248.73 247.97 249.99 249.52 240.80 240.10 7.93 7.17

1 12110.00
12770
00 2250.00
00
4150 100 YR
500 YR 248.09
253
26 248.09
253
26 250.43
253
91 250.43
91
253 240.80
240
80 240.80
240
10 7.29
46
12 7.29
12
46
. . . . . . . . . .
12820.00 1100.00 10 YR 245.93 245.93 247.06 247.06 240.80 240.10 5.13 5.13
' 12820.00 IBOO.00 50 YR 248.76 248.06 250.02 249.57 240.80 240.80 7.96 7.26
12820.00 2250.00 100 YR 248.31 248.31 250.51 250.51 240.80 240.80 7.51 7.51
12820.00 4150.00 500 YR 253.28 253.28 253.92 253.92 240.10 240.80 12.48 12.48
' 12840.00 1100.00 10 YR 245.95 245.95 247.06 247.08 240.80 240.80 5.15 5.15
12840.00 1600.00 50 YR 248.78 248.08 250.03 249.58 24030 240.80 1.98 7.28
12840.00 2250.00 100 YR 241.35 241.35 250.54 250.54 240.80 240.80 7.55 7.55
' 12110.00 4150.00 500 YR 253.29 253.29 253.92 253.92 240.80 240.80 12.49 12.49
12690.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.30 247.31 247.31 221.40 221.40 25.91 25.90
12090.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.28 249.88 250.28 249.86 221.40 221.10 21.88 26.48
' 12890.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 250.97 250.97 250.97 221.40 221.40 29.57 29.57
12890.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.04 254.05 254.05 221.40 221.40 32.65 32.64
' 12895.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.30 247.31 247.31 221.40 221.40 25.91 25.90
12895.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.28 249.86 250.28 249.88 221.40 221.40 28.88 28.48
12895.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 250.97 250.97 250.97 221.40 221.40 29.57 29.57
12895.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.04 254.05 254.05 221.40 221.40 32.65 32.64
12900.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.30 247.31 247.31 221.40 221.40 25.91 25.90

t 12900.00
12900.00 1790.00
2200.00 50 YR
100 YR 250.28
250.97 249.68
250.97 250.28
250.97 249.86
250.97 221.40
221.40 221.40
221.40 28.88
29.57 28.48
29.57
12900.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.04 254.05 254.05 221.40 221.40 32.65 32.64
' 12905.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.30 247.31 247.31 221.40 221.40 25.91 25.90
12905.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.28 249.18 250.28 249.86 221.40 221.40 - 26.88 28.48
12905.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 250.97 250.97 250.97 221.40 221.40 29.57 29.57
' 12905.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.04 254.05 254.05 221.40 221.40 32.65 32.64
14000.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.31 247.31 247.32 225.40 225.40 21.91 21.91
14000.00 1190.00 50 YR 250.28 249.19 250.28 249.90 225.40 225.40 24.88 24.49
' 14000.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 250.98 250.97 250.99 225.40 225.40 25.57 25.58
14000.00 4080.00 500 VA 254.05 254.06 254.05 _ 254.08 225.40 225.40 - _ ,. 28.65 _ __28.66._
i

7

r

r

TABLE 3 ICONT'D1
SECTION DISDIARK FLOOD NA ENEMY DOTTON DEPTH
Nmu TYPE SURF ELEVATION ELEVATION
EXISTING EIISTIN6 PROPOSED EIISTIN6 PA14M UISTINB PROPOSED
14550.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.33 247.31 247.34 224.90 224.90 22.41 22.43
14550.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.28 249.91 250.28 249.92 224.90 224.90 25.38 25.01
14550.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 251.00 250.97 251.01 224.90 234.90 26.07 26.10
14550.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.09 254.05 254.10 224.90 224.90 29.15 29.19
14800.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.34 247.31 247.34 224.90 237.00 22.41 10.34
14800.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.28 249.92 250.28 249.92 224.90 237.00 25.38 12.92
14800.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 251.01 250.97 251.02 224.90 237.00 26.07 14.01
14800.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.11 254.05 254.11 224.90 237.00 29.15 17.11
15600.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.31 247.34 247.31 247.35 224.90 237.00 22.41 10.34
15600.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.2S 249.92 250.28 249.93 224.90 237.00 25.38 12.92
15600.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.97 251.01 250.97 251.02 224.90 237.00 26.07 14.01
15600.00 4080.00 500 YR 254.05 254.11 254.05 254.13 224.90 237.00 29.15 17.11
16190.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.25 247.36 247.34 247.37 236.00 236.00 11.25 11.36
16190.00 1790.00 50 YR 250.22 249.94 250.32 249.95 236.00 236.00 14.22 13.94
16190.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.90 251.04 251.02 251.05 236.00 236.00 14.90 15.04
16190.00 4080.00 500 YR 253.% 254.14 254.12 254.16 236.00 236.00 17.96 18.14
16240.00 1050.00 10 YR 247.09 247.43 247.46 247.67 236.30 236.30 10.79 11.13
16240.00 1140.00 50 YR 249.89 250.02 250.56 250.40 236.30 236.30 13.59 13.72
16240.00 2200.00 100 YR 250.42 251.11 251.36 251.58 236.30 236.30 14.12 14.81
16240.00 1080.00 500 YR 252.62 254.24 255.04 255.31 236.30 236.30 16.32 17.94
16365.00 1050.00 10 YR 246.34 246.69 248.02 244.15 240.00 240.00 6.34 6.69
16365.00 1790.00 50 YR 249.12 248.89 251.14 251.02 240.00 240.00 9.12 8.89
16365.00 2200.00 too YR 249.28 249.64 252.22 252.36 240.00 240.00 9.26 9.64
16365.00 4080.00 500 YR 251.53 251.53 258.20 258.20 240.00 210.00 11.53 11.53
16400.00 1000.00 10 YR 247.71 247.80 248.37 248.44 240.50 240.50 7.21 7.30
16400.00 1700.00 50 YR 250.93 250.51 251.52 251.43 240.50 240.50 10.43 10.31
IM00.00 2000.00 100 YR 252.22 252.33 252.80 252.89 240.50 240.50 11.72 11.83
16400.00 3720.00 500 YR 259.04 259.04 259.52 239.52 240.50 210.50 18.54 18.54
16900.00 1000.00 10 YR 250.02 250.02 250.75 250.75 243.00 243.00 7.02 7.02
16900.00 1700.00 50 YR 252.11 252.05 253.02 252.98 243.00 243.00 9.11 9.05
16900.00 2000.00 100 YR 253.14 253.21 254.04 254.09 243.00 243.00 10.14 10.21
16900.00 3720.00 500 YR 259.36 259.36 260.07 260.07 243.00 243.00 16.36 16.36
17690.00 1000.00 10 YR 253.26 253.26 253.45 253.45 247.30 247.30 5.96 5.96
17690.00 1700.00 50 YR 255.00 254.99 255.21 255.20 247.30 247.30 7.70 7.69
17690.00 2000.00 100 YR 255.74 255.76 255.95 255.% 247.30 247.30 8.44 8.46
17690.00 3720.00 500 YR 260.74 260.74 260.88 260.88 247.30 247.30 13.44 13.44
18000.00 980.00 to YR 254.06 254.06 254.30 254.30 248.50 248.50 5.56 5.56
18000.00 1620.00 50 YR 255.63 255.63 255.88 255.88 248.50 248.50, 7.13 7.13
18000.00 1920.00 100 YR 256.30 256.31 256.55 256.56 248.50 218.50 7.80 7.81
18000.00 3520.00 500 YR 260.95 260.95 261.11 261.11 241.50 248.50 12.45 12.45

ECTION 11801AME FLOOD
NUNIER TYPE
18465.00 980.00 10 YR
18465.00 1620.00 50 YR
18465.00 1920.00 100 YR
18465.00 3520.00 500 YR
18520.00 980.00 10 YR
18520.00
' 18520.00 1620.00
1920.00 50 YR
100 YR
18520.00 3520.00 500 YR
18560.00 980.00 10 YR
18560.00 1620.00 50 YR
18560.00 1920.00 100 YR
' 18560.00 3520.00 500 YR
18610.00 980.00 10 YR
18610.00 1620.00 50 YR
16610.00 1920.00 100 YR
18610.00 3520.00 500 YR
19000.00 980.00 10 YR
' 19000.00 1620.00 50 YR
19000.00 1920.00 100 YR
' 19000.00
19500.00 3520.00
920.00 500 YR
10 YR
19500.00 1600.00 50 YR
19500.00 1900.00 f00 YR
' 19500.00 3350.00 500 YR

' 20000.00
20000.00 920.00
1600.00 10 YR
50 YR
20000.00 1900.00 100 YR
20000.00 3350.00 500 YR
' 20290.00 920.00 10 YR
20290.00 1600.00 50 YR

' 20290.00
20290
00 1900.00
3350
00 100 YR
500 YR
. .
20340.00 920.00 10 YR
' 20340.00 1600.00 50 YR
20340.00 1900.00 100 YR
20340.00 3350.00 500 YR

' 20364.00 920.00 10 YR
20364.00 1600.00 50 YR
20364400 1900.00 100 YR
' 20364.00 3350.00 500 YR
20400.00 920.00 10 YR
20400.00 1600.00 50 YR
20400.00 1900.00 100 YR
20400.00 3350.00 500 YR
TAKE 3 1CONT'D1
MATER ENERGY
MOW ELEV ELEVATION
EIISTINB PROPOSED EIISTINS PROPOSED
255.33 255.33 255.41 255.41
256.68 256.68 256.77 256.77
257.27 257.28 251.36 257.37
261.37 261.37 261.44 261.44
255.29 255.29 256.06 256.06
256.56 256.56 257.07 257.07
257.19 257.20 257.61 257.61
261.35 261.35 261.52 261.52
256.02 256.02 256.86 256.86
256.85 256.85 257.71 257.71
257.13 257.13 258.03 258.03
261.37 261.37 261.59 261.59
257.11 257.11 257.20 257.20
257.94 257.94 251.07 258.07
258.25 258.25 258.40 258.40
261.55 261.55 261.67 261.67
257.83 257.83 257.19 257.89
258.79 258.79 258.88 258.88
259.16 259.16 259.27 259.27
262.01 262.01 262.13 262.13
251.72 258.72 258.81 258.11
259.77 259.77 259.90 259.90
260.18 260.18 260.32 260.32
262.65 262.65 262.80 262.80
260.24 260.24 260.93 260.93
261.23 261.23 262.47 262.47
261.56 261.56 263.05 263.05
263.32 263.32 265.25 265.25
261.86 261.86 262.33 262.33
263.44 263.44 264.10 264.10
264.04 264.04 264.72 264.72
266.11 266.11 266.81 266.81
261.61 261.61 262.86 262.86
262.59 262.59 265.08 265.08
263.11 263.11 266.02 266.02
265.78 265.95 270.02 267.16
261.95 261.95 263.02 263.02
263.73 263.73 265.42 265.42
264.51 264.51 266.40 266.40
266.02 268.56 270.02 268.85
262.68 262.68 263.35 263.35
265.28 265.28 265.83 265.83
266.43 266.43 266.84 266.14
270.71 268.53 270.85 268.94
IOTTON
ELEVATION
EIISTINB PROPOSED
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
250.20 250.20
251.00 251.00
251.00 251.00
251.00 251.00
251.00 251.00
252.20 252.20
252.20 252.20
252.20 252.20
252.20 252.20
252.50 252.50
252.50 252.50
252.50 252.50
252.50 252.50
254.00 254.00
254.00 254.00
254.00 254.00
254.00 254.00
256.00 256.00
256.00 256.10
256.00 256.00
256.00 256.00
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
256.90 256.90
251.40 258.40
256.40 258.40
258.40 258.40
258.40 258.40
DEPTH
EXISTING PROPOSED
5.13 5.13
6.48 6.48
7.07 7.08
11.17 11.17
5.09 5.09
6.36 6.36
6.99 7.00
11.15 11.15
5.02 5.02
5.85 5.85
6.13 6.13
10.37 10.37
4.91 4.91
5.74 5.74
6.05 6.05
9.35 9.35
5.33 5.33
6.29 6.29
6.66 6.66
9.51 9.51
4.72 4.72
5.77 5.77
6.18 6.18
8.65 8.65
4.24 4.24
5.23 5.23
5.56 5.56
7.32 7.32
4.96 4.96
6.54 6.54
7.14 7.14
9.21 9.21
4.71 4.71
5.69 5.69
6.21 6.21
8.86 9.05
5.05 5.05
6.83 6.83
7.61 7.61
9.12 11.66
4.28 4.21
6.88 6.81
8.03 8.03
12.31 10.13
1
m m m m m s m mm m m m m m m m s m

I
r \ ? 1 ` J 71
IWO PL
10
--
41
/ ooss?
_ i
? I
M • tiv n ? l? ?, I
I • ?0Oto,
.
1
I A \ w
y 1
015 ( r
I 0060
a ot" O
1 CIS II
N M
11
1, Y ° i
11
OOSVI oil 92
1
M a , J I
O , 00`r, 0, I I1
r-
Q i
q%S
I< try ?' ? -?- J
2 d1
°0`E, o,S
it M
N t 00'0\4 0 ~
i?
00 eq.
• F Y \' •i YY# 0014\ 1 I\\ _
1
,

1
9I. Conclusions
An examination of the profiles shown on Figs 4-11 and a
' study of the summary tables clearly indicate that partial
filling of Gresham lake will have negligible effect on the
water surface elevations upstream of the lake. The water
surface elevations in the proposed channel are slightly
lower than for the existing channel at some locations and at
some discharges, and are slightly higher than for the
' existing channel at some other locations and discharges .
These differences are within the tolerance limits of the
numerical accuracy of the HEC2 model. The reason why the
proposed fill in the lake will not cause any significant
' backwater is that the proposed floodway is more than
adequate to carry the flow of Perry Creek, and the
velocities will be very low in the lake site. Actually, as
' can be seen from the results of the computations. the
channel constrictions outside of the lake, and especially at
the culverts and bridges, are the major causes of
significant backwater.
l
7

C
u

1
1
22
1
IMPORTANT
Date ) Time
WHIL9 YOU WERE OUT l
M ?--,!
Phone_
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
!e"),
?v v? Printed on Recycled Paper
VU Printed on Recycled Paper
v l
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
, ate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Water Quality Section
April 30, 1993
Memorandum
To: L. E. Stegall - DOT
Carl Parker - DOT
Cecil McLamb - DOT
Kathy Lassiter - DOT
Glenda Gibson - DOT
David Foster - DEHNR
John Dorney - DEM
From: Eric Galamb - DEM
XFX.;VA
AMPA
ID F= F1
Subject: Northern Wake Expressway Near Gresham Lake Meeting
The Division of Environmental Management (DEM) is responsible for issuing 401
Water Quality Certifications (certification) for projects that impact waters and wetlands. DEM
issued a certification to Mr. Bennett A. Rowland around 1988 allowing him to fill 9.9 acres of
Gresham Lake. Mr. Rowland filled 7.43 acres prior to his certification expiring in January
1992. Mr. Rowland has requested another certification for the remaining 2.5 acres of fill
originally approved stating that this fill is required to make his project economically viable.
DEM, with DOT's assistance, would like to be able to present Mr. Rowland with an alternative
that avoids further fill.
You are requested to attend a meeting at DOT's Century Complex in Kathy Lassiter's
Roadway Design Conference room at 2 p.m. on May 17, 1993. This meeting will try to
determine:
a) does DOT owns the peninsula (a portion of the Lincoln S&L property),
b) can DOT consider all or part of the peninsula surplus, and
c) if surplus, can DOT offer the property to Mr. Rowland if the original owner does not
wish to re-purchase the property.
If the answers to the above questions are yes, then an amiable solution may have been
found. DOT "wins" because they release surplus property, DEM "wins" because the water
quality of Gresham Lake is not degraded, and Mr. Rowland "wins" because he has a viable
alternative to continued filling of the lake.
Should you wish further background information, please contact me at 733-1786.
gresham.met
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
04/13/1993 14:47 FROM LOT ROPEWhY DESIGN TO
awn o
ST?JF.OF NOR:TI-i CkROLINA
DEI)AkTMENT OF TPZr%NSPORTATION
„r tsD-i1?•r.JR C1ibICICiN(.>I HIGNwA.YS
?7011 5201
GirvtK?pK r:0 1.0X2530;. tl. N C
FAX TRANSMITTAL (:uVRR SHEET

PLEASE DELIVER 'THR ?OLLOW?[?G FACES T0:
NAME.
vr.t
?_U. o E.Y?Vr/ON.
FAX # 2S3- 133
THIS FAX IS BEING SENT BY:
ail KL1/,Kr
(9191 ?50 ?0?
PHONE NUMBER:
- AC CLEARLY PLEASE CALL t3AC K. AS SOON AS
IF YOU UO NOT RECEIVE ALL
p?SSiBLE.
PLEASE COUNT PkGE5 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
REMARKS o

wHQNE (919 250-4015
97331336 P.01
Sr'A
f? i uf?CC' LC ``
4
?_. ' •', ? ?:?' !??• ; • - Sri i
r ` 1'.? •{ ? `` 111 ? •, :M -?. m'/? J. i'} ?
r ? n / \
w'
? t? it ` ? ii'11 i ';' . r ` ``?" L` ? - . ?P / /
V ? ? A
1 ? ? ITf M? ?
r's
''? /1• Y ??? ?r? ' S i ?? \. \ 1 1 ? ??•??qr " 0 0 ?'9? io 7?f
rf0 ? / Pik-? \.• / ? V4y rY r Y7
A SA
"? I? y ? ? f ? 1 r'D? O ?•..
y r / P, i abp? Ld Z14 : ?J
co c
cf-
??'? R5 UT('•f, n1 Nq-IS3(J ),HMUU'I1 Jog 10033 LV:V z66Ti2-T/t7n

cJ`.

TOTAL P.132

M
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
TELECOPY TO: C" l 12?1C1
FAX NUMBER:- -? ?; o - ?C' 3 (%
_Ir ' < "
..A/Lc <> - /
FROM:- t s?? r PHONE:
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET: J-7) e
o 1A 16?
I,rCbLIfOi' L6??k r??s/?,??? a? K-
T ?iroc '> r o c?c1 e t? ??
C L1 1 -
f air, rc), f
?oi,.) ?r???r 1
-J )
5to - ? bpi 7 (,)I? ,? ??? 6,
Q% r
m
0
x o S 2 !_
rt. ' 1 I
40
i m /6300
n+ m 2 / ?\\
n1 N 9 r ,
ob m
o\
/5 oo
z
z
p
14 0 p r
FILL LIMIT LINE
m \
l O OOH x
177
14 00 C3
r'° / . ///992
' / .f Z~ 111
?? 1I
I oo ? ? I I
LQ 1
x
+ x / y
A
'o
-? / '• I?100 ?? ?/i U N
77) 0
v
"i O / /3900 O p
. (i 13900
/
? • ? ' ' ,?g? i '? '• ? a ° r to
Cl%
?1 \ ?\ ro \'?' \ n -? rr
00 z
a
of O G ?1 v j "Xy?,?/" yEt
o n?? °
s-
11 ov
15, CL =r
n m cn c I?VDO 310o 11
?°
O ?
900 '
s a /? ??•
cn tn?.. Y ?, ' 1 c?i
r1l
7
L1 \ \ 'myD / e90

TRHHSMISSIOH REPORT

( APR 16 193 12=49PH
+::;+: +• h + h:+: +. +• + + + + + + + + + + + + + L + + + + + + *4 + +:+:: +• +• +• + + .+:+ +• +: k +:::+• + h• +::+:+: +• +•+. + + + + + +.'+-+ + + + + + '+• +:h,:+:.+:'k F. F.h•-k-+;+:.+:h h:N h %+: h, h„y;+:h:
H- L + h:
DHTE STI FRT REM( TE TEPHIH I'll- TIME RESULTS TiITHL DEPT. FILE +
TINE IDDATIFICHTIOH PHGES LODE NO.
HF'F' 16 1 4-PH 919 35+ 4+136 G:3E ST U 'Eau" OI< u3
}
+:: +.+;+ +:::+'::+ +.+• };h,;+ + + # # + + .+ $::h:::+ +:A 4 + I + } +'.;+:3+ + +:::+ 4 1 + 1 + + + :}..+,+.,+:;+.;+: +. + V:+ +: + + +. :+::;+:+•%f • Y +.+ +•h:h•V::::}::,+ + +:$: Fih• +::+,++'+; F F h•;+c Y + F::V
/ rr-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P,E., Director
Water Quality Section
Memorandum
To: L. E. Stegall -- DOT
Carl Parker - DOT
Cecil McLamb - DOT
Kathy Lassiter - DOT
Glenda Gibson - DOT
David Foster - DEHNR
John Dorney - DEM
From: Eric Galamb - DEM P6
April 30, 1993
Subject: Northern Wake Expressway Near Gresham Lake Meeting
r v,'
i i
The Division of Environmental Management (DEM) is responsible for issuing 401
Water Quality Certifications (certification) for projects that impact waters and wetlands. DEM
issued a certification to Mr. Bennett A. Rowland around 1988 allowing him to fill 9.9 acres of
Gresham Lake. Mr. Rowland filled 7.43 acres prior to his certification expiring in January
1992. Mr. Rowland has requested another certification for the remaining 2.5 acres of fill
originally approved stating that this fill is required to make his project economically viable.
DEM, with DOT's assistance, would like to be able to present Mr. Rowland with an alternative
that avoids further fill.
C) If surplus, can DOT offer the property to Mr. Rowland if the original owner does not
wish to re-purchase the property.
If the answers to the above questions are yes, then an amiable solution may have been
found. DOT "wins" because they release surplus property, DEM "wins" because the water
quality of Gresham Lake is not degraded, and Mr. Rowland "wins" because he has a viable
alternative to continued filling of the lake.
You are requested to attend a meeting at DOT's Century Complex in Kathy Lassiter's
Roadway Design Conference room at 2 p.m. on May 17, 1993. This meeting will try to
determine:
a) does DOT owns the peninsula (a portion of the Lincoln S&L property),
b) can DOT consider all or part of the peninsula surplus, and
Should you wish further background information, please contact me at 733-1786.
gresham.met
"Affl:.KWA
"" r4
[DE"NR
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
?'IIDaT sI%?/S3
c65u/^-e-
rfQA
Aec? ?v?:katiQo? oa ?i oss?L?e W?n•G
V
3or pj?e9 ? UcB
? ? •,? `I? DoT

TOT 0,-c-6 6'A4
7`n
O'T -/V e9
4%r a
rQ? ? "O,o 5 G?J ?p .cxull' ?•v Coic Sffy/
DUNT • SARGEANT ASSOCIATES
136 MINE LAKE COURT
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
[phone] FAX [phone]
April 27, 1993
APR 29 1993
WATER Q A TY
SECTIO
.' 9 1?3
CONSULTING, BROKERAGE,
LEASING, DEVELOPMENT,
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
MAY 1 1993
Mr. John R. Dorney
State of North Carolina
Division of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
219 East North St.
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Project #93100,COE #19921527
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland has asked that we respond on his
behalf to your letter dated April 14, 1993. You requested
that additional information supporting his project be
forwarded to your office. As you are aware, this project
was previously approved for 9.9 acres and has only 2.5 acres
remaining to complete the originally sanctioned work.
I have asked Mr. Rowland to dictate to me all the facts in
their proper chronology so as to paint the history of
approvals for this project. He will further co-sign this
document as to its accuracy.
The first portion of this response will be a brief narrative
history of the ownership of the property. The second
portion will outline the detailed correspondence of all
approvals to date under the current ownership. Thirdly,
this portion will deal with the current changing face of the
entire surrounding area due to new City of Raleigh
standards, the new North Wake Expressway, land
condemnations, etc. at our property.
HISTORY OF OWNERSHIP
In the early 1940's, the owner of this farm area was an
individual whose last name was Gresham. This area was well
«,
CRJ V g 11?421
'APR 29 1993
DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMNT.
p??j? DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
north of Raleigh and south of Wake Forest and enjoyed no
zoning regulations from those governments. All of the land
lay to the east of the north/south Seaboard Coastline
Railroad and was basically a valley falling in elevation
toward the now Capital Boulevard. Mr. Gresham owned some 93
acres and decided to dam up the valley so as to have a
private pond. As stated he owned all the land and
therefore, when he built the dam, he owned the shoreline
property as well as the pond floor as a private citizen.
The pond was never a publicly owned entity and Mr. Gresham
controlled all rights to it.
In the early 1970's , he tired of the ongoing liabilities
associated with owning the lake. Some of these were illegal
garbage dumping, night parties, drownings, shootings,
unauthorized entries, and a multitude of other happenings.
Furthermore, properties to the west (up-gradient) of the
Seaboard Coastline Railroad were beginning to be
industrially developed and fear of underground leakage into
his pond (now called Gresham Lake) from Halliburton and
others caused him to wish to sell his property. (Some of
these have been since placed in your Super-Fund for clean-
up.)
Around 1974, Mr. Bennett A. Rowland bought the entire
private 93 acres from Mr. Gresham with the thought of
cleaning up the existing structures and continuing the
businesses that were operating. The service road presently
there was at that time the main US #1 Highway. In the early
1980's, the NCDOT shifted US #1 to the east and retained the
service road rights of way. When Mr. Rowland removed some
of the older structures in front of the dam, he discovered
that the City of Raleigh had then territorial jurisdiction
of zoning and that he did not have enough land depth to re-
construct his businesses due to zoning set backs under the
City's zoning. It was at this time that he'was made aware
of the future more restrictive zonings by the City as well
as the City wanting to take more of his land for a future
outer belt loop to be built in the 2000's.
Acting upon advice from environmental consultants,
professional engineers, hydrological engineers, geologists,
lawyers, architects, transportation officials, Mr. Rowland
was advised to apply for the proper permits allowing
structural fill of 30 acres from the dam generally to the
south and west. (See attached approved map by J. Fred
Davis, P.E. called Bennett Rowland, Gresham Lake Site
8/11/86).
APPROVAL HISTORY OF PERMITS
Attached to this document is the File Index prepared by J.
Fred Davis, P. E. regarding all correspondence related to
the entire approval process to date. We are attaching
selective copies for your files and avail ourselves and our
files for your perusal at any time. These files are huge
and therefore quite difficult to transmit easily.
Please examine the attached exhibits showing that Mr.
Rowland has complied in all regards with the permits issued.
As part of the approval process, Dr. Michael Amein, Ph.D.,
certified that the water levels as well as the dam were in
compliance and that reduction of the water area by 30 acres
would not be adverse and therefore was satisfactory to all
agencies.
We must reiterate that the lake is privately owned and is
not a recreational lake to the public. Fishing and swimming
is not permitted. The Raleigh Ski Club currently leases the
lake in exchange for carrying liability insurance and a
guarantee to clean floating debris. In addition, during our
approvals it was proved that the lake was not in the
headwaters and was not considered as a tributary for
spawning of fishes, etc. Therefore, we feel that for the
above reasons that you should not consider us as "excellent
fishing opportunities" as stated in Mr. Hamilton's letter of
3/22/93 (NC Wildlife Resources).
MAJOR CHANGES NOW HAPPENING
Please refer to the color aerial showing the NCDOT rights of
way to the south and east of the lake. It should be noted
that the areas nearest these roads are going to need slope
easements as well as become the collection area of
pollutants, silt, oil and gasoline grime, etc. We do not
ever see this lake as recreational. Furthermore, the super
Overlay Highway District zoning to be placed along the
Rights of Way of the North Wake Expressway will cause a
reduction in usable land due to these required zoning
buffers. Our 2.5 acre completion will simply help replace
this space as well as provide solid buffer between the cause
(NW Expressway) and its eventual recipient (the lake). We
continue to receive reports of water samples up-gradient
(above the lake) of higher lead concentrations entering then
what we sample in the lake. We are concerned of the
liability of bad fish, etc. being eaten and being sued.
Once the lake fill project is complete, we intend to
terminate our lease with the Ski Club and work with the
NCDOT in preparing their ramps up to the large bridge over
US #1 and the bridge over Seaboard Coastline Railroad.
Additionally, when Wilbur Smith Associates on behalf of the
State of North Carolina located the pathway of the
Expressway, it was selected because of two factors. One was
to preserve the 2 recreational lakes at Camp Durant to the
north (original alignment) and shift it to south of Gresham
Lake because of its low impact (non-recreational).
Secondly, the cost of road underbed had been done previously
in the 1980's US #1 project as well as the structural fill
we had performed was an effective savings to the State of
North Carolina.
Please release us to complete our 2.5 acre p
Corps, and others have completed their work!
department has been dealing with this matter
weeks plus. We have no secret agenda. Your
seemingly do not understand that this is not
lake.
roject. The
Your
for some four
people
a recreational
Therefore, we request that you approve our permit so that we
can complete what we have already been previously permitted
to do and ask you not to delay our project any more. We
request that you respect all of the history, facts and
professional work done since 1981 and not deny us what we
feel is rightfully ours.
We would appreciate you issuing our approval in the next two
weeks.
With kind regards,
ennett A. Rowland

Edward K. Dunn, Jr.
President
cc: eorge T. Everett, NCDEM
J. Fred Davis, Jr. P.E. #3333
Charles F. Blanchard, Attorney-at-Law
Benjamin B. Taylor, Envirotek, Architects/Engineers
vii . _ a \
e • glitz \ it
aS ?, ? l
? 1 oor ?v / ,? ? ;•
1-0
ry ? Doer eoerr / ?
" / 1<1
11 ? I1
Z
000, r / FFF
d LL.
z

April 15, 1993 Bennett Rowland
Gresham Lake Fill
01-12-81 Corp. to C.O.R. (Baker) : Re-align spillway - 404 may be needed
05-06-81 Corp to JFD : No permits required - re-align spillway
07-15-81 C.O.R. to Rowland : Approved flood hazard boundary ammendments
10-02-85 JFD to Corp : Request re-delineation to pass 100 yr.
storm
10-28-85 Corp to C.O.R. (Bowden) : Backwater input data - removing flasher
and driveway boards
06-12-86 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorne-O'Mara) : Copy of HE-2 output sent
05-08-86 FEMA to Rowland : Review costs
08-27-86 Rowland to Lindsey : Documents for submittal
07-10-86 FEMA to Rowland : Req. for map revision - floodway
11-06-86 FEMA to Rowland : Req. for more data
01-06-87 FEMA to Rowland : Fee request
01-08-87 Amein to FEMA (Matticks) : Rev. to submittal
01-09-87 Rowland to FEMA (Matticks) : Req. to continue & send money
02-12-87 JFD to FEMA (Matticks) : Send new printouts (L.O.T)
03-17-87 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorn-O'Mara) : Send printouts
04-30-87 Amein to Fisher (Greenhorne-O'Mara) : Send new printouts
06-04-87 FEMA to Rowland : Send $1,600 to complete review
06-16-87 FEMA to C.O.R. (Mayor) : Conditional letter of map rev.
11-25-87 Corp to Rowland : Stop fill work
12-10-87 JFD to Corp : Rebuttal to 11-25-87 - copies of all
letters
12-10-87 Dept of Justice to Rowland : Stop fill - contact Corp
12-11-87 JFD to Corp : Filling of small pond, etc.
01-13-88 Corp to Rowland : Permit now required - applic. pkg. sent
03-03-88 Rowland to Corp : Permit 26 applied for
04-04-88 Rowland to Corp : Water quality cert. applic.
03-04-88 NRCP to Rowland : Certif. to fill (#2176)
03-29-88 Corp to Rowland : Authorized for permit 26
02-07-90 JFD to Jolly (Corp) : Soil erosion plans & correspondence
02-07-90 JFD to Jolly (Corp) : Amended fill area & req. time ext.
03-08-90 Corp to Rowland : Renewed Permit 26
09-12-91 Bunn, Hatch, Little : overfill?
04-06-92 Corp to B. H. & L. : not overfilled
03-25-92 JFD to Corp (Jolly) : Soil erosion plans, etc.
10-22-92 JFD to Rowland : Yardage left to fill
(1)
.
April 15, 1993
02-08-93 JFD to Corp (Alsmeyer)
02-09-93 JFD to DEM (Dorney)
03-05-93 JFD to NCDR (Schaffer)
03-05-93 NC Cul. Resources to JFD
03-10-93 Corp to Rowland
04-14-93 DEH & NR (Dorney) to JFD
(N.C. Wildlife) to Dorney
Bennett Rowland
Gresham Lake Fill
: Req. for Nationwide permit, letters
: Req. for Nationwide permit, remaining
fill
: SAW 26 & Gen. Corp. 404
: Review 404, Permit, No comment
: Permit 26, Authorization to proceed
: Moving to denial - req. additional
data
: Comments on 404 Certification
(2)

DEM ID: ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT f):
26
JOINT FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]"
17'66
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Bennett A. Rowland
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: 6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME): [phone] (WORK):
[phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: N/A
5. LOCATION OF WORK (MUST ATTACH MAP). COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Raleigh, N.C.
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): located on
Capitol Blvd. (US Hwy #1 North at Lake Gresham) said lake located approx.
8 miles north of the center of Raleigh, N.C.
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER:
Perry Creek
7. RIVER BASIN: Neuse
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES [ ] NO (X)
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [X] NO [ )
IF YES, EXPLAIN. necessary for previous Nationwide permit to be valid.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 49.2 ac.
7/8/92
f . 1

-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS, IMPACTED BY
THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 9.9 acres (7.43 acres completed)
DRAINED:
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED:
12. DESC{2IPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): filling 9.9 acres of a
49.2 ** acre lake as shown delineated on attached map.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: fill 9.9 acres of Lake Gresham for commercial
use. Lake size is aonrox. 65 acres.
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Commercial property close to residential subdivisions, major highways,
and railroads with municipal water and sewer adjacent to site is needed by
the public for their convenience. This minimizes travel, saves fuel, and
reduces pollutants to the atmosphere.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [X] NO [ ] See copy of letters
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. attached.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [X] NO ( ] See copy of letters
attached.
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY. Remaining fill to be placed in lake as shown on attached plat.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT. Not available
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. N/A
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY. N/A
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Primarily Industrial Use.
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Citv of Raleiah Public Seweraae Svstem ?,
R'S SIGNATURE DATE
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
October 22, 1992
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
REF: PROPOSED FILL IN LAKE GRESHAM, RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
Dear Mr. Rowland,
You obtained a "Land Disturbing Activity" permit (4794LD) from the City of
Raleigh on 07-29-87 at a cost of $2,525.00, for disturbing 29.7 acres. You also
obtained a water quality certification to place fill in Gresham Lake;
Certification No. 2176 was issued 11-04-87 from the State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development. You received a
Nationwide Permit (33CFR 330 J (a) (26) from the Corps of Engineers on
03-29-88, authorizing the fill of 9.9 acres of Gresham Lake land.
Since the acquisition of the above permits and the payment of fees, you
have filled the greater portion of the 9.9 acres allowed.
As you requested, I have calculated the approximate volume of fill
available in the remaining 19.8 acres authorized by the Land Disturbing
Activity Permit to be approximately 600,000 cubic yards.
In order to proceed filling any of the remaining 19.8 acres, other permits
will have to be obtained from the State Dept. of Natural Resources and
Community Development and the Corps of Engineers.
If you desire, I will be glad to assist you in,obtaining the required
permits.
v
Y Or•
Sincerely,
J. FRFD-DAV,15, JR.
C
r
J Fred.Davis, JrJ,
ofessi'enal Engineer #3333
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
April 6, 1992
Action ID. 199201527 and Nationwide Permit 26
Ms. S. Michelle Bradshaw
Hatch, Little and Bunn
Attorneys at Law
Post Office Box 527
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Ms. Bradshaw:
Reference is made to your letter of September 12, 1991, concerning
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland's placement of fill into Gresham Lake adjacent to U.S.
Highway 1, in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. In that letter, you
expressed concerns that Mr. Rowland had exceeded the 9.9 acre limit of fill
authorized by Department of the Army nationwide permit (33 CFR 330.5(a)(26).
During a telephone conversation with Mr. Ken Jolly of my staff on October 30,
1991, you were advised that Mr. Jolly had inspected the worksite and requested
a survey of the present fill limits.
A field survey of the site dated March 11, 1992, revealed that all fill
was landward of and within the authorized fill limits as of that date.
Mr. Rowland was notified that we were in concurrence with the findings of that
survey, and cautioned that he not exceed the permitted limits. Mr. Rowland
has assured my staff that he is aware of the project limits and will do all he
can to ensure that these limits are not exceeded.
We appreciate your concern in this matter. Should you have further
questions, please contact Mr. Jolly at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office,
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Bennett A Rowland Mr. Mike Coughlin
6700 Valley Lake Drive Wake County Developmental Services
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Mr. Fred Davis, Jr.
st Office Box 18051
sleigh, North Carolina 27619
IN REPLY REFER TO
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
March 8, 1990
Regulatory Branch
SUBJECT: CESAW-C090-D-092 and Nationwide Permit 26
Mr. B. A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Dear Mr. Rowland:

Reference is made to my letter to you of March 29, 1988, concerning your
proposed placement of fill material into 9.9 acres of Gresham Lake to allow
for commercial development of your property in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. In that letter, you were notified that your proposed fill
activities were authorized by Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26).
Reference is also made to Mr. J. Fred Davis' letter of February 7, 1990,
requesting a time extension for completion of the authorized project.
Department of the Army permit authorization pursuant to Nationwide Permit
33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) is hereby renewed for your proposed placement of fill
material into 9.9 acres of Gresham Lake, located above the headwaters of Perry
Creek, provided the work is accomplished in strict accordance with the
enclosed conditions. This verification will be valid until the-nat-i--apwide
permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits are
scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to January 13, 1992. It
is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to--the__nati9nwide permits.
We will issue a public notice announcing changes when they occur.
Furthermore, if you commence, or are under contract to commence, this activity
before the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have
twelve months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the
activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
This authorization is valid for a period of two years from the date of this
letter.
If you have questions, please contact Mr. Ken Jolly, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Enclosure
ne Wr ht
ARegulatory Branch
I IL
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr.
Consulting Engineers
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of
Health, Environment and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. William Mills
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Health,
Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify
the critical habitat of such species.
C. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water).
d. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure or fill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer.
g. An individual state water quality certification must be obtained or
waived. Conditions of certification will be considered to be special
conditions of the Federal nationwide permit. Please contact Mr. William
Mills, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, telephone (919)
733-5083.
h. The following management practices will be followed to the maximum
extent practicable:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States will be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
(2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
avoided.
(3) Discharges will not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound water).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetland areas will be avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands will be placed on mats.
i
v

r
i
r
i
c ze,

?a

$4 o
A I-?
cd
"d d U
G 14
R1 co 4
3 a K

> 00
°?
°
• o
r
i

z
O
-'?
H N
0 O
co
2 Z
cc ?

cn Z
Q
z
3
w O
U w
F-
Z?iQ
°
° z
LL ¢ (ry
r
U j
O?zx=
W m
Z W O .0 Q
W W y z
CL
e
c U

u
;
c
?(D .
O
U
d
z
W
0 a

N

e S Art
V
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
March 4, 1988
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: Proposed Fill in
Headwaters or Isolated
Wetlands
Bennett A. Rowland -
Lake Gresham
Wake County
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Upon review of your request for Water Quality
Certification to place fill material in Lake Gresham, we
have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by
General Water Quality Certification No. 2176 issued November
4, 1987. A copy of the General Certification is attached.
This Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage
under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact Bill Mills -at
919/733-5083.
Since-rely,
Paul Wilms
RPW/dkb
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regional Office
,T/Fred Davis, Jr., Inc. i.
Pollution Prevrntiun Paw
P.U. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal CDaorwnzty Affirmative Action Fmolovrr
GENERAL CERTIFICATION
THIS GENERAL CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with
the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and
95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management Regulations in
15NCAC2H, Section .0500 for the discharge of fill material
to navigable waters or adjacent wetlands areas which are
above the headwaters or to wetland areas that are not a part
of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or
navigable waters of the United States (i.e. isolated
wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) of the Corps
of Engineers' regulations. The category of activities shall
include any fill activity in these headwaters and isolated
wetlands areas where the activity does not result in the
loss or substantial modification of 10 acres or more of
waters of the United States, including wetlands.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the
specified category of activity will not violate Sections
301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and
95-217 if conducted in accordance with the conditions
hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of 1 to
10 acres of such waters, including wetlands,
requires a written concurrence from the Division
of Environmental Management. Activities involving
less than one acre do not require written
concurrence.
2. Excluded from this General Certification are
discharges of fill in waters classified WS I, II,
or III (public water supplies) and SA (shellfish
waters). This exclusion also applies to fill in
wetlands adjacent to these waters. Discharge
proposed for these waters or wetlands must be
considered for certification on a case-by-case
basis;
- 2 -
3. That the discharge will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants in other than
trace quantities;
4. That established erosion control practices are
utilized to prevent excessive increases in
turbidity and settleable solids concentrations in
the water body as a result of the discharge;
5. That the discharge of fill material shall be in
accordance with the conditions and management
practices specified by the Corps of Engineers in
33 CFR 330.5 and 330.6 for nationwide permit
number 26.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions
herein set forth by a specific fill project shall result in
revocation of this Certification for the project.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management may require submission of a formal
application for certification for any project in this
category of activity, if it is determined that the project
is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water
quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses are
precluded.
Public Hearings may be held for specific applications
or group of applications prior to Certification if deemed in
the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
This the S? day of ?{/sfs..,L« ??? .
? A
DIVISION 'CSb? ENVIR?N 7.4 MANAGEMENT
'PEN
By ?,?-- sue... ,o......
•
R. Paul Wilms, Director
?y M^ i
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
yQ or
Community No.: 370243
Case No.: 86-04-04R
The Honorable Avery C. Upchurch
Mayor, City of Raleigh
P.O. Box 590
222 W. Hargett Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
City of Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina
Dear Mayor Upchurch:
This is in response to a letter dated April 2, 1986, from Mr. Danny Bowden,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) regarding tae Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the City of
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. With his letter, Mr. Bowden submitted
a report entitled, 'Floodway Determination for Perry Creek in Gresham Lake,'
dated March 1986 and prepared by Dr. Michael Amein for J. Fred Davis Jr.,
Inc. With a letter dated June 12, 1986, Dr. Amein submitted a revised
report, dated June 1986, that revised the orientation of cross sections used
in the hydraulic analysis for the March 1986 report. In addition, the
hydraulic analysis for the June 1986 report contains updated cross-section
data for the Chessie System bridge and for the bridge removed at Rock Quarry
Road. The June 1986 report outlines a proposed plan to partially fill the
southern portion of Gresham Lake without increasing the base flood elevations
(BFEs) of Perry Creek.
In a letter dated July 10, 1986, to Mr. Bennett A. Rowland, developer for the
proposed project, we requested that a floodway analysis be performed for the
proposed project. In a letter dated November 6, 1986, to Mr. Rowland, we
detailed the procedure needed to generate a floodway analysis for Perry Creek
with Dr. Amein's hydraulic analysis. With a letter dated April 30, 1987, Dr.
Amein submitted a revised floodway analysis for Perry Creek.
We have reviewed the FIS with respect to the information submitted. If fill
is placed in Gresham Lake as proposed, we believe that flood waters entering
Gresham Lake will be adequately conveyed by the improved channel as outlined
in the report. The placement of fill will not change the BFEs through
Gresham Lake, but the floodway will be narrowed an average of 400 feet. As a
result of the updated cross-section data used in the hydraulic analysis, the
BFEs will increase about one foot just upstream of the Chessie System bridge,
and will decrease about seven feet at the site where the bridge was removed
at Rock Quarry Road.
Upon completion of the project and receipt of community approval and 'as-
built' plans certified by a registered professional engineer, FEMA will make
a determination on revising the FIS. However, before FEMA can make a
determination concerning a revision to the floodway, we will need a written
statement from the City of Raleigh approving the revised f loodway and stating
that it will enforce the revised floodway.
A
The basis of this Conditional Letter of Map Revision is a proposed channel
modification project. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulation 44
CFR 60.3 (b) (7) requires that communities 'assure that the flood-carrying
capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is
maintained.' This provision is incorporated into your community's existing
floodplain management regulation. Consequently, upon completion of the
project your community will be responsible for maintaining the channel.
In addition, this Conditional Letter of Map Revision is based on minimum
floodplain management criteria established under the NFIP. State and
community officials may set higher standards for construction to floodplain
areas. If the State of North Carolina or the City of Raleigh has adopted
more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these
criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP requirements.
If there are any f urther questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact the Chief, Natural and Technological Hazards Division of
FEMA, in Atlanta, Georgia, at [phone] or Mr. Daniel Cotter of our
Central Office staff in Washington, D.C., at [phone].
Sincerely,
'"'Q
J h L. Matticks
f, Risk Studies Division
Federal Insurance Administration
cc: Mr. Mark T. Senior
City of Raleigh
Mr. Danny Bowden
City of Raleigh
Dr. Michael Amein, P.E.
Mr. J. Fred Davis, Jr.
J. Fred Davis Jr., Inc.
Mr. Bennett A. Rowland
Mr. W.W. Carroll
T
Received of
Address
No. M' 439373
-vr
PAID
CITY OP RALEIGH `
OIVERSRI[O BUS"SFORMS. f?RV. HC 27111 (9191 /69-233! 1e331eas Collector.
.y

DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
DATE/TIME 07/29/87 09:14 CITY OF RALEIGH PERMIT 4794 L
TRAM NO. 854 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
PERMIT FOR LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY
ADDRESS 6935 NORTH BLVD PROJECT TYPE
SUBDIVISION BLK LOT PRID A 71941
PROPERTY OWNER }T; ,•:r' BENMETT ROWLAND CITY LIMITS OUT
ADDRESS , - "6915 NORTH._13LVD.-"- - TRACT SIZE 540.0
PLANS PREPAREO By, ? J: ,FRED DAVIS ZONING 1 50
ADDRESS
74 5 r1r EORGIETOWIV°•RU'.•-•-... .,
CONTR CT,n'I4AMEJ 1 4i ?aENAt+.7'T t,RQlt,>~.ANA
AODRES4jfjt;?i(,
1.1,. t It.wtt? . i f .'?4G•?!'. 1!}Ci'lu?;:_,'' -,, •J,'-1 :?d'?? .5.. ,? l 4? '1 _ ..?
ys;: ce..:;r?tt3,+f'1; J r r .. n s ti46 f11`....6+. .3gf nt 'j;LI TEL
ACTIVITXS' GRADE NG DILL `k6RESOAMS LAKE
C91:
I S 2
11 REA 9.7 '`'ACRES o25.00
'.W-A1. I 1j.#0
t D '
t : ?IA
DATE:
0 ?? 3 u`, '•.. ?? ?: • t :_ -'d.,................,.. c" ,+? ?' . : ;t?,ERN?`?t? : 4794 L
`?i Difr>tr1 ..y1. inh?UQi;? •`.? +t?L+j4.'~"2+??? .(tl 'yet . ? ? '
??i?L'Or :?W1'ittw+;j?;xv P„• "`('t r.,•.aa. i)-?C(6 ,>r*i::,4J,f..?it::.•.+t .:75.)
aril •?i,", h...?%"'? J ,t:
4w lto-o?,
:4: ? "t}.^f" t ? 1 •t li . 1. ?. ?F+• ;1'` t ?.l `? i %aJ :: l ?a? ,? t* '?i:, 1 j !` a." ?'?t? ? ,'!'
?t ;?_ f, } ,! '? \,h? ` r ,. ^?..tV y(1rly: Y?3 ?'.ly, ,f .::?t r. t Ot
3i 8,^I Y . ?;, t ?, v .ilafa ``d.,- ,`.•r'.' ?. )' at. do"
.gl 'Al 10,Z3p I1
07/29/87 ?s C-A3Aj". ABS?a~`."It4ITIAL,?j?j? f HAUNT W,ILECTED: t29525.00
' PLEASE REFER TO CRITICAL NOTES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
222 W. HARGETT STREET • P.O. BOX 590 • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS 7
DATE/TIME 07/29/87 09:14 CITY OF RALEIGH PERMIT $: 4795
TRAM NO. 850 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
PERMIT FOR FLOOOPLAIN REGULATION PURPOSES
ADDRESS 6935 NORTH BLVD PROJECT TYPE
SUBDIVISION BLK' LOT PRID $ 719
PROPERTY OWNER BENNETT ROWLAND CITY LIMITS OUT
ADDRESS ""'6425 NORTT•- BLVD TRACT SIZE 540.
PLANS PREPAREGY BY FRED DAVI$- ZONING 1 50
ADDRESS ., but- , ",765 . 6 E11 R6E7t?NNRD: 2
if ?RALETGK NG ":,, , yF 3
CONTRACTOR, NAMEr 'r$EIyNTT ROWLAND ~?•`? ,• t aCONT . No'
ADDRESS _? = fn ;iktt
4t 4;6915 NORT7 RL Q;, ,? ,
r t / 'f13? X13 i ,.. ??c •r '? t TEL 10 J
ACTIVITY: FLOODPhAIN ? FILL GRESHAMS LAKE
:!'.,,.t1? t7 r ? , I +?. 1_f'?'i1,.r7i ?4'.: •.>: ? , .i,'..i( 1 E : ''::? .a
R
`.P. 'ti:L> YATIQN ?2 Z.0 _FEET # :?' `? r r! #
FLUO
GOMMPN3?5 ?...? ? ?1. 't#?•?^ ?1- ?'. ,, ?; , "1,,; .. , ,?,., ? r, 1' .?,,, ?` ., ? `"
'(;. ',. •? ?'? t, itirv ?, `\j timi, .t,a` ,i r ;' ?' `?? ?' •.?, ,-. i . .r
y ... ?;l ... - , 1 ... ?(i `? ,4 i.t" ? ??t• .tr1A ?M??' ,'i? _ ? ,? .?sJ f.. +j ?` 1 .1 .'?,,,,,jpi`'7'?`:tjf?') tt ?l. ?`?"? .? \;,r,tJ' - _•..... "' ,(;idt, Z?..?? ? i'? ty .,Y`r 'lrt ?..:
DATE: 07/29/87 GASOIIEU .•ABS 14 T2 AL-Z, AMOUNT, COLLECTED: $25.0
" ?' ?,? ^+i?lW"JJI) ?"1', ti!$;:, t ••w..,.........r i',i? Lti :' °,td ,''?y'14•.l?i y" +•
00KKfJ'e?7 PERMIT $: 4795
`ft11? ?R,±j, <• }`-?1t•^•?C, i in ?p`HCy? °.:, ?',t• , l'' - `?' /Zti
'ji?;fln:w..}1?1f'4?.?':•,:J 3i ,. "}} .. ("'"'l.. ? ? ??5. ?1?.-`.1,? oi:/??"!+l"'aR%. }?'.t :?t?
•? .i 44V1+,TSa)
4. 1 `,fit` 4
04
* PLEASE REFER TO CRITICAL NOTES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
222 W. HARGETT STREET • P.O. BOX 590 9 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602

0 0

}
IAJ

. ... •..
l
C) co

--.W?jj
imc,
10
cc C2.

306 Electra Drive
Cary, N.C. 27511
June 12,1986
Mr. Lyle Fisher
Greenhorne and O'Mara
9001 Edmonston Road
Greenbelt, Md.,20770
Dear Mr. Fisher:
A copy of the revised report on Perry Creek in Gresham Lake
and a HEC-2 output with the proposed new channel in the lake
is enclosed. In this revision, the added cross-sections
have been redrawn so that the stationing is from left-to-
right looking downstream. The GR cards were revised to
reflect the change.
As I mentioned it over the telephone, I discussed the matter
of the effect of storage loss in the lake on the outflow
hydrograph with Mr. W. Ray Batchelor of the Corps of
Engineers. This question is dealt with in 'Section III.
Design Floods' of the report.
The Corps of Engineers has prepared a floodway analysis for
the city of Raleigh. If the design floods and the water
surface elevations above and below the lake remain
essentially unchanged, there may be no need to run new
analyses.
Mr. J. Fred Davis will obtain a copy of the city of
Raleigh's approval of the proposed plan and will submit it
to you.
Sincerel /
Michael Amei
n
Professor of Civil Engineering
N.C. State Universityt
Personal Account Information Redacted

01:5hPM
P.2
_. ' North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission _ pc.
_
512 N. Salisbury Street, Ralciah, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney, Water Quality Planning
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: Richard B. Hamilton, Assistant Director ?tl?t'J•l?Cv.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: March 22, 1993
SUBJECT: DEM #93100, 401 Certification Application for Gresham
Lake, Wake County, North Carolina.
Biologists from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject permit application
and an onsite visit was conducted on March'9, 1993 for the
purpose of further assessing project impacts on fish and wildlife
resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat.
401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Clean Water Act
of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.).
Lake Gresham, an impoundment of Perry Creek, provides
excellent fishing opportunities for largemouth bass, crappie,
sunfish species and channel catfish. The applicant is currently
completing the falling of 7.5 acres of the 49 acre impoundment
and is seeking a permit to fill an addit' nal 2.4 acres of the
lake for commercial use.
The fill already completed has resulted in a decrease in the
impoundments surface area of approximately 151k. Additional fill
will negate another 5 to 8sk of the impoundment. The ongoing
activity has increased turbidity levels in the lake. At the time
of inspection no erosion control measures were noted on the site
previously filled, or on the site where work was progressing.
Increased turbidity will have negative impacts to fisheries
resources in the lake. It will also decrease buffering capacity
and retention time of water in the lake and result in increased
nutrient and sediment loading downstream.
PR 13 133 01:57PM
. .
Memo
P.3
Page 2 March 22, 1993
The applicant has not demonstrated that the development of
commercial property at this location is wetland dependant.
Based upon the information provided in the permit application,
the results of our onsite investigation, and our knowledge of the
fishery and wetland benefits of Lake Gresham, NCWRC recommends
that 401 Water Quality Certification be denied.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
application. if we may provide additional information, or if you
should have questions, please contact our Habitat Conservation
Program Manager, Dennis Stewart at [phone].
WJ/sp
cc: The Honorable Eugene Price
Wayne Jones
Mike Scruggs
Steve Pozzanghera
J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
• Comilting Engineers
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Telephone [phone]
December 10, 1987
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch (CESAW-Co-EE)
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Mike Smith
Re: Your letter dated 11/25/87 regarding
alleged unauthorized filling activity at
Gresham Lake, Raleigh, N.C., and subsequent
phone conversations requesting information.
Dear Mr. Smith,
Relative to information requested by you regarding filling
in Gresham Lake the following is submitted.
1. Copy of letter dated 1/12/81, to Mr. E. Wayne Baker,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, N.C., from
K.B. Old, Jr., Acting Chief, Flood Plain Management
Services Branch.
2. Copy of letter dated 5/6/81 from the Department of
the Army, Regulatory Functions Branch, eliminating
need for individual permit.
3. Copy of letter dated 7/15/81 from E. Wayne Baker, Jr.,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh.
4. Copy of letter dated 10-2-85 from this office to
Colonel Wayne Hanson, District Engineer, Wilmington,
North Carolina.
5. Copy of letter dated 10-28-85 to Mr. Danny Bowden,
Conservation Engineer, City of Raleigh, from
K.B. Old, Jr.
6. Copy of land disturbing permit from City of Raleigh.
7. Copy of flood plain permit from City of Raleigh.
8. Copy of check and receipt for permits.
9. Copy of map by this office entitled " Property of
Bennett Rowland, Gresham Lake Site"- Channel Design,
dated August 11, 1986, and revised 7/02/87.
-• r
Mr. Mike Smith
December 10, 1987
Page Two
The estimated area of the lake that has been filled since
7/29/87 is 0.75 acres.
I believe the above items are as you requested. My files
are open to you if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
JFD/dcb
Encls. (9)
0002-?
a-
.1:
s
O
W
u
Cr)
W
n
CD
f•
d,
l
U-i
u
w
{y
l r-
1
O

?21Ah. A.
- %"
0.r
.11 1 t rl
'?r.Er? '" ?( 3y ?I
Qn 'a
iL
I
I
? VN W
C
'• ~
I h ? J
Q `
jn• iti 4^.? ?
°' r1 WI
r J .
a
1

y
l j m d
? y, s2 1

O O ?
?
1 I
f
{
r? '"1
?
I I
j 1
I
N I 1
=
s
La
y 0
U
v ~-n

r oc
_
tc ; - ? x t t ? tZ
, ?c d
0 an
c
w

M
1
?
V

ry
" J
C?
.n
ti
R
C
3 .~^.
u
LLi a
Yv
.31
h
i
? }
[
I.!.
?L N 1

go 0

I
S V I li

o
.to
0
ni
I
q r; I
o
? vl I
id K I
z
?
s i eI
r
uj ':I`-
4{?,
M
P
m ? j
3
+
M 1
,1 t?ln
.'. ? Q ,
lr- Y5N ?I
I N 0
,
x { { rl

? Ul .4
4
O I
I •'

? I -,
i C 4 I u
<
r iw? IV
x IW {
c? a

1

y=
?j3a
?
?? v NI
o?nl0.
R
sI 4 M ar t o^-

I
n 7, a
}
?
? i
I

I
`,
?
I
.J G I i ? i
I
l
?I
•? 7 ZI P
I ?
:
w ^ n
p
1 C d am: '' ly H U
V? ? ? C4 W " x

6W
W
I a z

4
W
a
4
8 6

4
u
In
`J `

_
1
W wii
-? i
- i

a
d
a C] r•
N - F
l
[I j lrl c3Q 1,4 91H]'J -0 10?H S V ; L .rSi '1 .1::1j
CAPITAL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR PLAN
SEC .0N
` Hkl9F-
5E CcnoN
:NiE
`rA10
LEGEND
STUDY AREA
VISUAL RESOURCES STUDY AREA
.le,

A^'

c'

o•
11 t„ e
f
a
+
y
v{•r
A 'y
;4
f; T
?. r
4
t?
cam, ? ,

MON .o.n u
f ( p // ? r r _ g
4
O I r/
J
Ids[
? ? i rlU'p ? n
IMPORTANT
Date Time v
1-- E YOU WERE OUT
M ?Y vc S
of
Phone -776 - --
AREA COD NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
s ge ev G
57, / I ?4Q
'PO !1/17
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health. and Natural Resources
1v ? Printed on Recycled Paper
STAIZ
State of North Carolina
Department of Envirorunent, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.R.
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Director
April 14, 1993
Bennett A. Rowland
6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, N.C. 27612
Project # 93100, COE # 19921527
Dear Mr. Rowland:
The Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section has
reviewed your plans for wetland fill for 2.5 acres of water at Gresham Lake in Wake
County for commercial fill. Based on this review, we have identified significant uses
which would be removed by this project. These are aquatic life, water storage,
pollutant removal and swimming. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is present in our
files to conclude that your project must be built as planned. Therefore, we are moving
toward denial of your 401 Certification. Until we receive this information, we are
requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your
project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that your project
must be constructed in wetlands. Specifically can you construct your commercial
development on nearby upland or prior filled lake bed? Any documentation such as
maps and narrative which you can supply to address upland alternatives may be
helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please respond within two weeks of the
date of this letter.
RL010\AI. OPPICPS
A,I-illc F?pcuc?illc \lovc di R;kigh \Vaxh':gL
704/251 6208 919/4801541 7111/hb:-1099 919/571.47(10 914/9=6 f.181
wilminp \V inston SaIc
919/395-39(1(1 919/8967007
Pnllulinn Prc-,11 n P:nc
1' 0 Ito_? .9535 Rnlcilh Nonh C arolinz 27(,26-05,±5 lilcph,nl< S.. 733 7(115
An Lyu:J 0pp.m.um1r A(fumeti- A-,, hn,pl„pu
0*
If you have any questions, please call me at 919/733-1786.
incerely,
O-ne)yg Jp n R.
93100
cc: Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office COE
Wilmington Office COE
Central Files
Fred Davis,,#
Dennis Stewart, WRC
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
?gS
TELECOPY TO:
FAX NUMBER:
11? ?? -,
FROM:
PHONE:- I -?) I l?1
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET:. __
,?/? Clj?^? 5 JAM
TRAHSMISSIOH REPORT
+:;#:;k #?*;k;?;+:;+:;k>k'X•>k;k;k::k>k;l<>I:>Y;K?F::F:>k*:+:?F:h:;k;k
( APR 13 '93 01: 58Ph1 )
:}?;**N:* ?i *h?* *,t<;k *:* ?F:>f:%k* * ***;k*** *.W * **-t<* ** *:+::F? ?+:* * ** W.?F::*;tt* * ** h:h::k-+: * *%k: *?f:: *;k*;+: %k **?k>k;*>f:>k* %k*>k:k ik>kh:*;?;t:;*>k*>k*;k?k-?;>k
>k *
DATE '-TART REMOTE TERMINAL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. FILE
TIME IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE 1.10.
?J3
APR 13 01: 56P1.1 9198324781 CS ST 01' 53" U- K
* *
* *
* *
*
* *
h: *
* *
* *
*
* *
*
* *
* *
*
t:;t<**;k%k%+::k*;K;f;*?f;;?;%h:+:;+:*?k* **>k:+:;+?:k?kh:X*%t;;+:;t:;t:::y,;t:;?::k:;i?;k:;+:%k?kK:>k:k:t::k:k;k>k%+;***%I<%+;%F:;t:;t:;k%k;k;#?*-k:t<,kiF:,k*%t<;{c:f;**:k*;k***:k;?;kh;*>k%k***

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
TELECOPY TO:

FAX NUMBER:

FROM:__ r L ? PHONE: ??'?? 1 C
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET:

TRAHSMISSIOH REPORT

APR 14 '93 11:33-HI-1 )
? -: ?h:::k,+:>k %k:Y;k,+ ,+.;+` k h::+' f' t ,k:;k:? ;ft;+.,k ?k,f: ?k h.:F:>k;k;k;?>Y• h:;kh?'4' +: Y< k'k:;+ .k h<;k Y<;k,Y;t ;k %+: k;K%F? *;k ?;kh? ?k k h<;k:f:,k?k,k,k;k ;#?;k>k>k>k>k h; %kX h: *,k,k;k:k h;;k;k>k;K>k h;%k-+?

DATE START REMOTE TERHIHHL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. FILE h
TIME IDEHTIFICATIOI'J PAGES CODE HO.

APR 14 11:31H11 919,3 4T=i G3 ST 01'4=1" OI< 03 +

h:

W
h? 'y

k h:

k

? k.

:+:kh;h„+:,+,kY<kh•h:;+:;+:;k-f,h::+:h::h;h.,kh`-+:;t:h. F:kh:h;h;h,h?h -+:;+:;+.,+;+; h;;+;:F:?+. +;.t•?k::kh;h;h;-+';+::?,t.:t +:;k:+::>+;h..F? +:;+: +:;+:k h';k,+;h;?h;?+„+:h?h'>k:kh:h.h;;+:,fi:?<%Y.Xk: h•h.h;k:kh:
z ?? J
k

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890

NC
epl 0/
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
March 10, 1993
Action ID. 199201527 and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
Ini
y l
Mr. Bennett r -1-iwland 71993
6700 Valley "e
Raleigh, Nr 27612
WETLANDS GROUP
Dear Mr.
Ref
author
water
wate-
gro,
Coy
• To
?. byp ry 8, 1993, for Department of the Army
Oar\G\ ORTgtiT hin an additional 2.5 acres of
ve loss of 9.9 acres of open
'grry Creek, to create high
?V 'gast of Raleigh, Wake
F
?' yOU h,F T'?
R
l ?) I F 001
? mac' n i C4111 lb
uNFQ \
gNTS F TO 8,6
0(I p1Fq XTe
'1?e RFTUR OO W/11 SF Cyl(
SSdBe OFD Y bhp C,gll
OUR C111 GF?T q G q/N
Regulatory Program,
published in the
permits (NWP).
the Clean Water Act,
aters and isolated waters
ire than 10 acres of waters
-neer if the discharge would
,reater than one acre in
.dition. For discharges in
e notification must also include
ites, including wetlands; and
lant features, both temporary and
:e project.
provided it is accomplished in strict
This NWP does not relieve you of the
State or local approval. You should
Carolina Division of Environmental
ag a State Water Quality Certification.
rJl ? J ?

t
Y ?dM i f'
1: PC
-2-
This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the NWP authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also, this
verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period, the NWP
authorization is reissued without modification or the activity complies with
any subsequent modification of the NWP authorization. If during the 2 years,
the NWP authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such
that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the
NWP, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are
under contract to commence in reliance upon the NWP will remain authorized
provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of the NWP's
expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the
authorization.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh
Regulatory Field office, at telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Mike Coughlin
Environmental Engineer
Wake County Community
Development Services
Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
ar. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27687
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
J. Fred Davis,
P.O. Box 18051
Raleigh, North
Jr., Inc.
Carolina 27619
MEMO
DATE:
TO
CIS III

N Uj ?-" ??'
SUBJECT:
4,
S _
??751

? cl w?P
From:
pl
?h ?Sk Wnra v?tAP
North Carolina Department of
Health, and Natural Resources
Environment,
?4 Printed on Recycled Paper
OA
X13/C?C?
y ? DEM ID: ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT 26
JOINT FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
l DIVISION OF ENVIRONPM
ANC DEPARTMENT OF E
' AND NATURAL RE
0.0. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626
ATTNs MR. JOHN DO PN
)Telephone (919) 73 ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SE
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME:
Bennett A. Rowland
E@r, HAA#H W
199 3
W29
'lilt; SUUi{??
ION OF
..... 199u
OWNERS ADDRESS: 6700 Valley Lake Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME):
[phone]
(WORK) :
[phone]
4. IF APPLICABLEs AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: N/A
5. LOCATION OF WORK (MUST ATTACH MAP). COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Raleigh, N.C.
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): located on
Capitol Blvd. (US Hwy #1 North at Lake Gresham) said lake located approx.
8 miles north of the center of Raleigh, N.C.
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: Perry Creek

7. RIVER BASIN: Neuse
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES ( ) NO (X)
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES (X) NO ( )
IF YES, EXPLAIN. necessary for previous Nationwide permit to be valid.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 49.2 ac.
7/8/92
?,r SiATg o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
March 4, 1993
The News and Observer
Post Office Box 191
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
ATTN: Legal Ad Department
Dear Sir:
Subject: Public Notice
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Please publish the attached Public Notice one time in the
section set aside for Legal Advertisements in your newspaper.
The publication should run on or before March 8, 1993. Please
send the invoice for publication and three copies of the
affidavit of publication to the address given below. Payment
cannot be processed without the affidavit of publication.
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this matter, please call
me at 919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
Joh R. Dorney
Wetlands and Techni 1 Review Group
JRD/kls
N&O.ltr/Vol.7
cc: John Dorney
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax ,# 919-733-0513
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
• ? ? Wiz- ?
xe ?? GI
173
TELECOPY
FAX NUMBS
FROM:
NO. OF PAGE ('ec
COMMENTS:
??L? ?G frq

cN d
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
March 9, 1993
The News and Observer
Post Office Box 191
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
ATTN: Legal Ad Department
Dear Sir:
Subject: Public Notice
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Please publish the attached Public Notice one time in the
section set aside for Legal Advertisements in your newspaper.
The publication should be run at the earliest possible date.
Please send the invoice for publication and three copies of the
affidavit of publication to the address given below. Payment
cannot be processed without the affidavit of publication.
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this matter, please call
me at 919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
John rds e
Wetla nd echnical /view Group
JRD/kls
N&O.ltr/Vol.7
cc: John Dorney
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax i 919.733-0513
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE is hereby given that Mr. Bennett Rowland near
Raleigh, North Carolina has applied to the Division of
Environmental Management for a Water Quality Certification
pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act and
Environmental Management Commission rules in 15A NCAC 2H .0500
and 15A NCAC 2B .0109. The activity for which the certification
is sought is to fill 2.47 additional areas of Gresham Lake
adjacent to Perry Creek in Wake County. A total of 7.43 acres of
the lake were previously filled under previous permits.
The public is invited to comment on the above mentioned
application to the Division of Environmental Management.
Comments shall be in writing and shall be received by the
Division no later than March 25, 1993. Comments should be sent
to N.C. Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality
Section, Planning Branch, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0535, Attention: John Dorney. A copy of the application
is on file at the Division's Raleigh Regional Office (3800
Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina, 919-571-4700) during
normal business hours and may be inspected by the public.
A. Presto oward, Jr. P.E., Director
North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management
DATE: March 9, 1993
-. Filbat Oil r_% \
? New LJe ?
( I- damp
\1t Vern h 439 \
735. ( r'
4-5
454 ??\\? ? t /r - 1 • ' `? ? //\ \'?```..
?! ?•? 345 03 C.
?., 'f) •? 281`
•
82
i
' 45'g
• , .. ??
-- ;
. . . I X34
Course
?,.
411,
- i - - 327 O ` A S •
- - 316 ??.
Garry r
Gre.shams Lake
Perri
- - - - -- -
l. - - i16 117 2120000 f FEI 18 35' Hnl.trc rus.641;nv. (R
FILL AR- A SI
Jited, and published by the Geological Survev
'GS, NOS NOAH, and Nort',' Carolina Geode'ic Surve, * - 1 1 1-- - -
1000 0 1000 2000
hoto -rnmetric methoc? ron: aerial pli--')giaph? ,
1
Field c-cked 1967 5
-_?-
jection 10.000-foot gw_: ticks haseri o Ct1NTOU(
Stem. l?ii-!1?efer Univ-Zs i irrlnsvers ?.=?satc'' %s" NATIONAL GELD
7, shov, iur'. 927 '':rrrth An,,,ricim L; ;'
he prey (i North American Datum 1983
1 lines :- >>eters south arc 23 meters wes
Dashed"-'net ticks r?'. ro 1'787 .; ?c r:06-
' Jr, A'. LA N'! f- MA, ; IHIS MAP COMPLIES Wit
ied Ilne? at? seiectec *2nr.e and ficres v?he - FOR SALE BY
ble on photof;raphs. This irforniah Is uocl-c-,_.,.,I DENVER, COLORADO
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC
W11 in p, . t? l:rr' -r'rlnlyd
North ag?ncies fro'" penal phntogra,:- taken
er sour( .- his intormati,..` .',ot 1r_I,.. herk?-c
38
Wetland area r--ern M flitfil/0-4 --acre
Nearest road -U S --
Wetland width
Wetland type (select one) o Other - /ikc--W 47? ER
• o Swamp forest o Shoreline "
o Bottomland hardwood forest o Stream channel ;
• c Carolina bay o Salt marsh •
' o Pocosin o Brackish marsh •
o Pine savannah o Freshwater marsh ;
• o Wet flat o Bog/Fen •
o Perched o Vernal pool ;
sum

Water storage -::
......> ::... >: ,
Bank/Shoreline stabilization ?- < s`;''"»>
x 4.40 -
>:: > ?<><
Pollutant removal <::»<>::>! •
.. .................... .

Sensitive watershed -S

Dispersal corridor

;.;
: x 1.50 = >r+.
Wetland score.
.
_,,.,;,
,
_ ............... ''

Special ecological attributes . •
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = + . > :: •
Aquatic life value - >;

ti
n
R
/Ed
ti '
uca
o
ecrea
on :; x0
25-
- ' '
Economic value ... . , •
.............................................................

c Hydrologically connected o Hydrologically Isolated

I / I? ?j l?llil, l_o?l el
-7 7Z,
7`,
A411 '4A)
G?
( '?l?l? ? ,/'. <.2o.C2?l -?tl'- Tiffin
.v
i
1
iii •?? ? __.?
DEM ID: 931a ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT fl :
26
JOINT FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone (919) 73f.?-?_
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SE ?fb.
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. ISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT. ""' 21
1. OWNERS NAME: Bennett A. RoWland
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: 6700 Valley Lake Drive ?`" =`-t??N
--?....
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME):
[phone]
(WORK) :
[phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: N/A
5. LOCATION OF WORK (MUST ATTACH MAP). COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Raleigh,.N.C.
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): located on
Capitol Blvd. (US Hwv #1 North at Lake Gresham) said lake located approx.

6. NAME OF CLOSET m emns.*v /n T.mr..
7. RIVER BASIN:
8. IS THIS PROJEC f
WS I, OR WS II?
9. HAVE ANY SECTI
PROPERTY?
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
Perry Creek
) CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
FIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
...v...--ul LVL Liu VIVU.7 Nationwide permit to be valid.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 49.2 ac.
7/8/92
-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS, IMPACTED BY?
THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 9.9 acres (7.43 acres completed) 1•
DRAINED: dtl7
FLOODED :
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED:
12. DESCtRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): filling 9.9 acres of a
49.2 acre lake as shown delineated on attached map.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: fill 9.9 acres of Lake Gresham for commercial
use. Lake size is approx. 65 acres.
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Commercial property close to residential subdivisions, major highways,
dllU Ld11L-OaC7a W.I. LEI lllunlcl?al water anQ sewer aalacp_nr r_n a, ra , s neeaea ny
the public for the' convenience. This min?mizes travel, saves _fuel, and
reduces pollutants to the atmosphere.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES (X) NO ( ) See copy of letters
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. attached.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT? See copy of letters
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES (X) NO ( J attached.
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY. Remaining fill to be placed in lake as shown on attached plat.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT. Not available
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. N/A
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY. N/A
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Primarily Industrial Use.
City of Raleigh Public Sewerage System
4-f'-
O ER'S SIGNATURE DATE

I t .s ?
e
t?ic-lll?

„r
or ? ? ti
r
? A J? *' ` Arlry
I

y
? 43

' JO a
c? <:::J
l3 E'%`? AU
q' ro

0

r A ,
f ? } ??a•
N J? ?N`
=fll ?
\ A
fAu c
/ i b '?. fA
fA
PAU
V.`+0? t y?yi
_ ? ? MO Y!% ip J
LOCATION MAP
BENNETT A. ROWLAND PROPERTY
LAKE GRESHAM FILL SITE
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY ; N. C.

BOO
vP _ i

M1?/
?5
^ti
I ?
I
bL
imp
r..j
Tow".
440
4 JL440
�*-
Ll
kh,

J. FRED DAVIS, JR., INC.
705 Georgetown Road
Post Office Box 18051
Raleigh, NC 27619
[phone]
TO. D.E.M. water quality planning
NC Dept EHNR
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
we are sending you: X Attached
Shop Drawings Prints
Copy of Letter Change Order
X Other
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date 02-09-93 Job No.
Att: Mr. John Dornev
Re: Gresham Lake, Ral., NC
Bennett Rowland
Under

A
Plans Sample `` x,10 r
S 1-Ei ia W ,<<
VI?Ai I1 U!;r?l l f 1'`;?i;?I'?1i1
Copies Date Description -'
sets 02-08-93 -Nationwide permit rgquest form (426)
remainina fill area
These are transmited as checked below:
For Approval
For Your Use
X As Requested
For Review & Comment
Corrected Prints
Copies for Distribution
Approved as Submitted Return
Approved as Noted Submit
Return for Corrections
Other
Prints Returned After Loan to Us
Resubmit Copies for Approval
Remarks:
Copy To: File Signed: