19940727 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19940812

Pfi-11 1q:+ 4 F19:-11 FF7-h1 F-41P FFi-i i-FFi1-,F Ti-1 G;NLWT T!FiPHF`, F.l_17
i
r?(TJT ..
'r! I?bh
4 oI1' •//
Caroh"a VesouTces
Sate og Igo e thl and star
ter
t of Env?v lenC? 1?Ser°ent pgei N' puwtor
D e?, nen p;NVIWIIDo 11 Ret1nna' p{ ice
j7aSX12S ?. ???t, fir" ('j?7vCi?(YT
so B. kiow• cecary 3uly 28, 1994
L MDR
TO: Mr_ A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
S13WCT: CAMAIDREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
Project Uwation: Mouth of Futch Creek from the north end of Bald Eagle Lane to the south side
Scotts Hill Loop Road.
Proposed Project: Dredging of both sides of Futch Creek with the intent of aiding in the flushing of t
upper reaches of the creek.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
August 18. 1994. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Tere Barr
at extension 246. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached commen
SIGNED DATE _
127 Cardigan Ikive E>G? VYikningWa. N.G. 24105-3945 • Tek how 919494 39{70 • Fax [phone]
A& equal Opj.x, !w',v .41C u! 3titr Aiun0 AMPIO}"er
hJ -r 1'+=ate r 1:: :F, 1-1r1 (-NrJp 1i ,; -FFi,-F rC! !-,AL -1F FIFPIIFl `r' P. i±-,
DPO SION OF COA.S"TAL MANAGEMWr
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APpIJCANT'S NAME: Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Mouth of Futch Creek Ram gender end of Md Eagle Zane in County.
New Hanover County to the south side of Scotts Hill Loo 234, Pend1 & 18-k,1
Photo index - 1M: 174-19, gr.14-t,u & 11-t,u 1?' g ,
State Plane Coordinates - R: 2380000-2380800 Y: 202700-203200
3. POTSTIGATION TYPE: CAM.A[D&F
4 INVF,S'TIGA1TVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 6117/94, 7/13/94
Was Applicant Present - No
PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Applicat3ou Received - cc: 7/21/94
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIP'T'ION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - New Hanover
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(R) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public

(E) N/A
Wastewater Treatment: Existing -
Ptumed - N/A
(Fj Type of Structures: Eadsting - None
Planned - None
(G) F-oirnate.d Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7.
HABITAT DFSCRUMON:
[AREA]
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: This is an experimental project funded in pant by the Rural Clean Water
Demonstration Project. The pmposed activity is the dredging of both sides of Futch Creek with the
intent of aiding in the flushing of the upper reaches of the creek.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2.9 acres
(p primary Nursery Area: Partial
(n Water Classification: SA, Part ORW Open: No
I .I i ' 1 ;z'F=,-, FF T -F ? "i F . t ,Y74
Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
Page 2
9. MQILg'p-
7/25/94
This project is part of a Rural Clean Water Demonstration Project funded in part (up to
75%) by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. The applicant is the Northeast New
Hanover Conservancy. The project area is
tthe mouth of Futch he south side of Stiotts?H.illf from
Road in gender
Bald Eagle Lane in New Hanover County
County.
Recent studies by professors and graduate students at the University of North Carolina
at Wilmington have shown that the concentration of feel coliform levels, being a valid indicator
of other pollutants'., is greatly reduced by tidal flushing and high salinity. The hope is that by
removing the shoals restricting tidal interchange, flushing will be increased and the concentration
of pollutant-, will be diminished, providing for a more functional estuarine system.
There are several other similar projects awaiting the results of this one.
The part of this project that extends inside the mouth of Futch Creek is within that area
designated as Primary Nursery. The waters are classified Sa by the Division of Environmental
Aianagement. Once again, part of the project - that outside of the mouth of the creek - is also
classified as ORW. The area is closed to shellfishing. The New Hanover County Land Use
plan classifies the project area as Conservation.
Futch Creek is approximately 1000' across at the mouth, with an average mean low water
depth of -.5'. The proposal is to excavate a channel approximately 300' in length from the south
side of the creek, and 700' in length from the north side o the creek oese6 ch=els would
substrate, is to have a top cut of 50' and a bottom cut of The Pth
accomplishing a finished depth of -6.5' mlw. The project would require the removal of
approximately 10,000 cubic yards of sandy material. These are the most shoaled areas along
the sides of Futch Creek. Aerial photography shows that the greatest percentage of the shoaling
AIWW irtt AMW. The
has occurred over the past 10 years. The north 5' wchannel est of the would
portion
south channel would terminate approximately
of the project area has been previously dredged while the majority is new dredging,
The excavation is proposed to be accomplished by clam bucket to barge. The spoil will
be unloaded on an existing spoil island across from the mouth of F'utch Creek. The applicant
bolds title to this island, which is partly within the right-of-way of the US Army Corps of
Engineers. A letter is on file from Robert J. Sperberg indicating a consent agreement will be
reached after all permits are obtained.
The spoil area to be used is approximately 500' x 150' in size, with existing dike walls
of approximately 8' in height. The stilling basin is 4' in height, but will not be used since the
project is not to be accomplished hydraulically. The applicant has stated that the stilling basin
will be sealed during this project.
The applicant expects to access the spoil site by utilizing an unvegetated, sandy area.
The spoil area as proposed will hold approximately 22,000 cubic yards of materW.
IJF --1' _, -1=4: - Fr'aP,I F?P1F I•I' I,* F'Fi-, riF=Fr E Ti r:NLHf1F; T,FIPF, P.1Fi

10. ANnCPA_UZJWAM,
The nature of tidal creeks is that the upper reaches WIC more influenced by stormwater
than by flow tides, a trend which reverses gradually toward the mouth. Wave action dissipates
inland, encouraging the settling of solids. supporting more wetland vegetation, and creating a
shallower system. This shallower, less active system appears to allow for the ooncentration of
pollutants.
The hope of the sponsors of this application is that by removing the shoaling at the
mouths of the creeks, a greater volume of saline water will move at an increased rate further
inland, thereby maintaining a more open system, and one wherein the fresh, and somewhat more
stagnant water is diluted on a regular basis with salt water. I'hc overall effect would be to push
the influence of the coastal waters further upstream.
One may expect that, given the proximity to the AIWW, these areas will shoal in again.
A secondary benefit of this project would be at least a temporary ease of navigability.
The project will cause temporary turbidity increases during excavation. Approximately
50,000 square feet of bottom area will be disturbed, with approximately 10,000 cubic yards of
material removed from the system. Spoil placement will cause the disturbance of approximately
75,000 square feet of high ground previously used as a spoil area,
Submitted by: T. Barrett Date: 07/26/94 office: Wilmington
L I l t-al F'_ IC)
- _F7 -7' , :I I F"F [" '-IF IF`F P. l'1
i'cr John .bornev
Planning Branch
DIVI510N OF ENN RONMEM AL W%2 AGEWEN'T
_CA1k1A '1_A jQR PERT t1T AFPLICAUQQN._R_E_VIE_VV
RE(>IC)tiAI, OF'FI( E_5T.A> .R ORT :I? R S;DAZI L' WAIJ N
RF.VTE'VN'F,R: GREGSON- %,
WQ.9 PRR'%1SOR: ADKiNS
DATE: Augtst 22, 1994
WETLAND TYFQRMATK)N FQR (FSMAT?nFCF, TRArKFN
PERMIT VR: 94 PER.MJT NO.: (
94727 COI.1'NTY: New Hanover
PROJECT NAMR: Northeast Ne%v Hanover Conservancy
PROJECT TYPE: Dredging PERM T TYPE: CANNA
COE #: N/A DOT#: NIA
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: Job, 29, 1994
REG OFFICE: A 'iRO RIVER AND $U$ RASLti#: 030624
*STREAM OR ADJACFN'T WATF.,R BODY: Futch Creek / AMI%N'
CLASS: SA / SA ORW STREAM INDEX #: 18-87-19 / 1"7-(1.'.;)
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed
WL IMPACT: N/A A'I'L TYPE: N/A
UT R1F.Q1TF.1;"TFD: N/A WL AC'R FST: N/A
WI, SCORE: N/A
MITit:ATION: N/A I<fMGATION TYPE: N/A
MTTI('.ATION SIZE: N/A RATING SHEET A'I'I'ACk1ED'.': NiA
RF.COMTbTF.NDATION., I95LTE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D:
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJE(' r DESCRIPTION The applicunt proposes to dredge mo 6annels through the shoal at the
111outh of Futch Creek. The purpose of the proposed projee:t is to increase tidal :lushi,ug in the lower
pant of the c.reck
. _CE.It:I ,_La9b
WATER. QUALUX
CERT. REQ'D: No
IF YTS, TYPE:
_WWAGF UIS
TYPF, O DISPOSAI. PROPOSED- N/A
TO BF PERM171'FD BY: N/A
iF BY T)FM, IS SITF AVAII..ABI..E AND I'ER.%9T1'ISSUANi`E PROBABLE: N/A
WA,1cERJW)?`TLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WAT'F.R: N/A WETLAND: N/A
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGYNIFICANT USF? N/A
PNITW 9
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY F:XPF(7M_D TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? No
is spon. DISPOSAL ADEQ11ATELY ADDRESSED? Yes
a?
_o
Y
r
O
CL

U47; '.:iug
A

MARINA
AR.F TNF. FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY AD0RFScTD'?
CFR'.A(iF DISPOSAL: N/A MARINA SFRVICES: WA
OXYGEN IN BASIN: NIA Cl_OS'URF OF SHELLI`ISHING NKA'ZERS N.'A
(ATI ACH A MARINA t ISF. A7"CAINABILC1'Y F%W.. )
RF,C0N,ZV ?NDEr CQN, t`I N n _PE?. "+, Zit: RE. W LIQt ; 'I?at the prc'Je t tx
d011P in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate C-Onstnictiott area to
c-xcmd 25 N'lli
cc CentM1 files
Wilmington Regional Office File
LLCM-Tern Barrett
John 1'Zr};rr
JUL G 9 1y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division og Coastal Management
Wilmington Regional Offloe
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Roger N. Scbecw
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Director
July 28, 1994
,, ?oRAr?trlvi:
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
App3iamt:
Project Location:
Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
John R. Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
Mouth of Futch Creek from the north end of Bald Eagle Lane to the south side of
Scotts Hill Loop Road.
Proposed Project: Dredging of both sides of Futch Creek with the intent of aiding in the flushing of the
upper reaches of the creek.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
August 18, 1994. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Tere Barret
at extension 246. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: X ',phis agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
-- This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
)DATE Z /0
N.C. 28405.3845 ? Ueyboee 919.395-3900 + Rut 919-354.2004
p-ectuaity Affu m five AWm Employer
i
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Mouth of Futch Creek from the north end of Bald Eagle Lane in
New Hanover County to the south side of Scott's Hill Loop Rd. in Pender County.
Photo Index - 19$2: 174-19, gr.14-t,u & 11-t,u : 18-234, gr.20-k,1 & 18-k,1
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2380000-2380800 Y: 202700-203200
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 6/17/94, 7/13/94
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: 7/21/94
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - New Hanover
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - None
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
Shallow Bottom ?Q,000 sf
(C) Other
High Ground Spoil Area 75,000 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2.9 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: Partial
(F) Water Classification: SA, Part ORW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: This is an experimental project funded in part by the Rural Clean Water
Demonstration Project. The proposed activity is the dredging of both sides of Futch Creek with the
intent of aiding in the flushing of the upper reaches of the creek.
Northeast New Hanover Conservancy
Page 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7/25/94
This project is part of a Rural Clean Water Demonstration Project funded in part (up to
75%) by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. The applicant is the Northeast New
Hanover Conservancy. The project area is the mouth of Futch Creek, from the north end of
Bald Eagle Lane in New Hanover County to the south side of Scotts Hill Loop Road in Pender
County.
Recent studies by professors and graduate students at the University of North Carolina
at Wilmington have shown that the concentration of fecal coliform levels, being a valid indicator
of other pollutants, is greatly reduced by tidal flushing and high salinity. The hope is that by
removing the shoals restricting tidal interchange, flushing will be increased and the concentration
of pollutants will be diminished, providing for a more functional estuarine system.
There are several other similar projects awaiting the results of this one.
The part of this project that extends inside the mouth of Futch Creek is within that area
designated as Primary Nursery. The waters are classified Sa by the Division of Environmental
Management. Once again, part of the project - that outside of the mouth of the creek - is also
classified as ORW. The area is closed to shellfishing. The New Hanover County Land Use
Plan classifies the project area as Conservation.
Futch Creek is approximately 1000' across at the mouth, with an average mean low water
depth of -.5'. The proposal is to excavate a channel approximately 300' in length from the south
side of the creek, and 700' in length from the north side of the creek. These channels would
have a top cut of 50' and a bottom cut of 40'. The plan is to remove 6' of substrate,
accomplishing a finished depth of -6.5' mlw. The project would require the removal of
approximately 10,000 cubic yards of sandy material. These are the most shoaled areas along
the sides of Futch Creek. Aerial photography shows that the greatest percentage of the shoaling
has occurred over the past 10 years. The north channel would connect to the AIWW. The
south channel would terminate approximately 350' west of the AIWW in -1.5' mlw. A portion
of the project area has been previously dredged while the majority is new dredging.
The excavation is proposed to be accomplished by clam bucket to barge. The spoil will
be unloaded on an existing spoil island across from the mouth of Futch Creek. The applicant
holds title to this island, which is partly within the right-of-way of the US Army Corps of
Engineers. A letter is on file from Robert J. Sperberg indicating a consent agreement will be
reached after all permits are obtained.
The spoil area to be used is approximately 500' x 150' in size, with existing dike walls
of approximately 8' in height. The stilling basin is 4' in height, but will not be used since the
project is not to be accomplished hydraulically. The applicant has stated that the stilling basin
will be sealed during this project.
The applicant expects to access the spoil site by utilizing an unvegetated, sandy area.
The spoil area as proposed will hold approximately 22,000 cubic yards of material.
10. ANTICIPATED POPACTS
The nature of tidal creeks is that the upper reaches are more influenced by stormwater
than by flow tides, a trend which reverses gradually toward the mouth. Wave action dissipates
inland, encouraging the settling of solids, supporting more wetland vegetation, and creating a
shallower system. This shallower, less active system appears to allow for the concentration of
pollutants.
The hope of the sponsors of this application is that by removing the shoaling at the
mouths of the creeks, a greater volume of saline water will move at an increased rate further
inland, thereby maintaining a more open system, and one wherein the fresh, and somewhat more
stagnant water is diluted on a regular basis with salt water. The overall effect would be to push
the influence of the coastal waters further upstream.
One may expect that, given the proximity to the AIWW, these areas will shoal in again.
A secondary benefit of this project would be at least a temporary ease of navigability.
The project will cause temporary turbidity increases during excavation. Approximately
50,000 square feet of bottom area will be disturbed, with approximately 10,000 cubic yards of
material removed from the system. Spoil placement will cause the disturbance of approximately
75,000 square feet of high ground previously used as a spoil area.
Submitted by: T. Barrett Date: 07/26/94 Office: Wilmington

Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
a. Name RCi'VASr NFw ? OVM C0ASrCgAAr_-1
Address 116 gWN CoAo SOOT14
City AN o'MIA(mN , State N C
Zip29,40-_Dayphone 91b. 8G-d3,02
FAA SID - G- 199
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) MoUTt4 mr- FoTc'I1 CQi ,;K
SAA DA t_ 1REA 0 t AL
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
NMW
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
q?
commercial use?
_YUSLIC USG MML-1
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
OBI NC 5 TI A L
LVSH1AG ACrlflA1 7b INC9- ASC
SALT M ITq O;: L.oIN 12 %r-TI ON S
epr POT-C11 CR FK.
4 LAND AND WATER
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
CHARACTERISTICS
ze of entire tract NA
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
OElevati
- ,y N6-04
of individual lot(s) N A
ct above mean sea level or
tic Vertical Datum
PROJECT
pe(s) and texture(s) of tract
\
? WA R 5 AN D aTTnM So
a. Street address or secondary road number "_N F OF YOE 5610 OF 6 ALD U-AG'Ct L4 is _ Vegetation on tract N. C, MC-
b. City, town, community, or landmark
_M130TH of F%1TC4I G2t=r_Y_
c. County -,dad km o0Gp J PPN DF2
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction?_ *J0
e. Name of body of water nearest project
A-MAATIC w1,24 cwa TAL WA-rMWAY
V
f. Man-made features now on tract N o N G:
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
? Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OFPROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier)._DeFDCu iC C ANNCLS ON goT14
<1 ??S OF LA 24'1= YPas?p 51,IOALC
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
C . o .'D.
i. How are adjace waters classified?
C?. %R. W.
S A
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? If so, by whom?
N ,4
3/91

5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.

a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed
b. Number of lots or parcels
c. Density (Give the number of. residential units-and the
units per acre.)
d. Size of area.to be?graded or disturbed
e. If the proposed project will disturb,more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources'must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
m. Water supply source
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accessways or provide new access.
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? ' ' .. .
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, Access channel
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces. (MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management?
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval? Upland fill
areas
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
AT -T012 Ot- cOT
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards 10,000± Gv, VD S
c. Type of material (- A%,p SAIU r . Sorb r- s wr
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down").
1 2
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps„or other wetlands?
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
NoN e
3/91

Length Width* Depth
f. _Dimensinne of snoiLdisnosaLatea c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
iS?1=?rT(R,) GGOFFFT,Sc6 ORA01t-IG M4Vr_' feet
g. Location of sn ' sal area OQbOG; S90,t. d. Type of bulkhead material
15LAr105' 0P?6SrTF: GV;gtg ModrH
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? %41;S mean high water
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner. f. Type of fill material
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?- UNOFR FASFMG,.Ir 'To
Ifso,where?_ Cog? of yNcuaCCP_s
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
I,J o
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water? _ N o
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 1 O, o 00'x' co 05,
in. Type of fill material. 4 AQ S/aN Q r S oM? C l C?
n. Source of fill material CIP4 CIC. 13 o
o.
P.
S.
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
the project.
Will fill material be placed on marsh or other.

An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
wetlands?
f-4 6
" sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
Dimensions of the wetland to be filled 1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commissi?#R
l
7J
0203 f
d
il
d d
i
i
u
e
.
or a
eta
e
escr
pt
on.)
<
How will excavated or fill material be kept o s
r
and
i
ll
d? v
°?
°` Ple a to that original drawings are preferred and
e
os
on contro
e
------
o u. U JILL r Pur FTwt?C'N -r,}.1 on}t h quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
i t FR©N -M 0 Ln pit?or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
WLtL Ma al copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the

W ?J-? Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
hat type of construction equipment wil d of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
(for example, dragline, hackh4e?or hydraulic
dredge). or
?
?/?eG'& W I TN .plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
A
,
AM ?t-1FtrC ?j guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment the like.
to project site? M o If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts. A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
SpoIC. I SIAM D /ACC >RS S IS 14A? -0 ma
have been devel
d i
lt
i
i
h
h
y
ope
n consu
at
on w
t
t
e
g n " S Frz DgAW I /gC T'tapF Di
i
i
f E
i
, v
s
on o
nv
ronmental Management.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
that opportunity.
3/91
Name VIC -ANSLV*Y
Address 22 24 500TH P=AD
CANToKD . NC 2 3?,a
(Pr.-ioc¢ coasAn-1 S t o F)
Name
Address MIM 12o802T RaeK+ 39
8142 2)AI_fl l ac ts LANF
Wklm It4cTON, N C 2>3¢OS
Nnm& (N FW NAM6 IM CWMT-4 51 Di)
A4dfess
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
N. A
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION ANDPERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND .
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that tQ the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity coinplies.wilh the State of, North Carolina's ap-
pioved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project. e-?..?
R?Sat3Mrrrcn July IS t994 ?l
Thisisthe 1- dayof JV"I;: , 19°34
-I WAuthorized agent
PA4l T-osT: a, P2>rsI Orr.tr, Ki Nww IAMOICe
CONSCgNIANC-t, SF? NAQ?"T?J'F ?o? ExQLAN-
A-rt o U
3/91
Name Y i C A N S L5-'
Address 2 2 2 4 500TH F,.0,4 D
sn.NTrot?p , NC T 33 c:)

Name (Pr??? Q coor?-r-+ s ? o F?
Address MSS. QoBC1zT RaeK_, 3,g
81A2 6ALfl G64 LI9 t_A,,tF

NAMa- Wt LM INCToN ,
( N FW NAM69te N C 28¢05
_-WNT-1 S1 pl
A-d& ss
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment , Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of ?North Carolina's ap-
p,oved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the L day of JVU l9 ?4
Authorized agent
PAVL FOST: R, 92Grt OWT, tAi Nww NAr4oore-
CoNSC(Z.I/A-4C-t SFF NAV F ?o? EX FL AIL
A -r % o tl
y
i i ? I
turn,.

G?
O?JC ?PNP Y,`?,
GOPS??
3/91
A?_gciX M N W ?i
_ ELrc V..0,b
Cl o SS s FCri o N
?_RZ_--TN-C-__1A"EX OF THE SPOP\L. AT
10' I4C)(ZIZOi:4TAL-
l = 4' VERTICAL

/I NN vY

?
°'zz,, J
O?
C-,
VOQ
Njr- NEW NANOVE:Q CONSZ-K:VAttC'?/
NlO?Tu e? 1`?TC?1 ?R?F? , sNc'l? R6UtaVut?
JUP* t 99 4 , P. FOSIFR SHEET WC- OF THREE,
vONIN /MAP
,, f' + I 1+ r ? 71
d / 1 S N 00 0
00 r gyp
n
.O h
1 _ _ rl p b
f d? o I J.
NAS No Pce,,? T 3 A C
b1 O In ?>I
Cl)
y? I -1 I ,
fJ
Vin
I °
r ,1r C,
fit
1 a ?? O
oy 3
I r I ?! ELF! / ? f x ?
y3 _o ? ??
Oo PEST P?? a r on
r w Z.. G
IBM"-
-4 Z:
m n T D o ;4 --1
I %A
2 >. r %n-- r 'n o
o
A Jl z S'• m p (4 M 7
rn
rri
o 3. a o
Z
I r S r i n o -'? 0Z o ?
L) n
EA (>
CA -41
'I' I `? A

?
S
\
S
r
r
v F-

z
C
m

A
?O

--c7
m
a
0
N
0
0
L -, a

o,

c
rr7
x
Z
C!l
.Q
rn
?r
?m
?z =
o '
,
x
13.1
O
O
,l