20191125 Ver 1_00_Marvin_Roadway_Complete_PCN_NoPlans-_20190822

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Intersection Improvements at NC16 (Providence Road) and New Town
2. Work Type: ✓❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Publix North Carolina, LP, as required by the Village of Marvin and in coordination with NCDOT, proposes to conduct intersection
improvements at Providence Road South (NC16) and New Town Road in order to enhance traffic flow and traffic safety. In an effort to
improve driver safety and add capacity to enhance the flow of thoroughfare traffic, the project will add capacity by widening for
additional turn lanes, lengthening turn lanes, reconfigure lane striping, and adjusted signal timing. (Figure 1).
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: NA
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The subject property is located at the intersection of New Town Road and Providence Road South in the Town
of Waxhaw, Union County (Figure 1). Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): 34.989084 N,-80.772582 W.
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: NA
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Union County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Waxhaw
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: West Fork — Twelve Mile Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Lower Catwaba (HUC 03050103)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑✓ Nationwide Permit #14
FRegional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley»>Horn
August 5, 2019
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Pre -Construction Notification (NWP 14) &
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Intersection Improvements at NC16 (Providence Road) and New Town Road
Waxhaw, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Publix North Carolina, LP, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed joint
Section 404/401 Pre -Construction Notification for the above -referenced project for your review
pursuant to Nationwide Permit 14 and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 4135 as well
as a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (JD) request package. Authorization is requested to
improve New Town Road and Providence Road South (NC 16). The subject property is the roadway
right-of-way, extending from the intersection of New Town Road and Providence Road South, in
Waxhaw, Mecklenburg County. Three potential non -wetland waters of the US (WoUS) (SA, SB, and
SC) were identified within the project boundary. The project area is located at 34.989084°N, -
80.772582°W. The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
Project Summary Sheet
Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
■ Figure 1—Vicinity
■ Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Catawba NE Quadrangle)
■ Figure 3—SSURGO Soils and NWI (2019 ESRI Aerial)
■ Figure 4 — PJD Field Sketch (2019 Union. Co. Aerial)
■ Figure 5 — PJD Field Sketch (Union County LiDAR)
■ Figure 6 — Proposed Conditions (2019 ESRI Aerial)
• Marvin Gardens Improvement Plans
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Stream Identification Forms
■ North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NCSAM)

Kimley>>)Horn Paget
■ NCDWR Stream Identification Form
Project Site Photographs
Agency Correspondence
Stormwater Report
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The purpose of the project is to provide intersection improvements at Providence Road South (NC16)
and New Town Road to enhance traffic flow and traffic safety caused by a rapid increase in the
population of residents in the Weddington/Waxhaw/Marvin area in recent years. The project is
funded by a private entity; however, the improvements are required by the Village of Marvin, in
coordination with NCDOT, under the anticipation of NCDOT's forthcoming NC16 widening project and
incorporates improvements anticipated by the widening project. The recent increases in traffic and
congestion in the area have caused intersection improvements at NC16 and New Town Road to be
expedited. To improve driver safety and add capacity to enhance the flow of thoroughfare traffic, the
project will widen the existing roadway for additional turn lanes, lengthen turn lanes, reconfigure lane
striping, and adjust signal timing.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Current N.C. Division of Water Resources' (NCDWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11 as well as the USACE's methodology for
identifying the lateral extents of non -tidal streams, i.e., Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM), were
utilized to identify the presence of streams on the subject property. The USACE defines OHWM as
"that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical
characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character
of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate
means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas." (33 CFR 328.3e). The results of
the field investigations reflect conditions observed on October 15, 2018, and July 10, 2019, are
outlined in the sections below.
Stream A -Intermittent (SA)
Stream A -Intermittent (-921f) originates from an off -site wetland seep, that is present on the edge of
a powerline easement and a maintained residential property. SA enters the subject property at the
northwestern boundary of the site, flowing from west to east, and through an existing 30-inch RCP
culvert under NC16. It appears that hydrology is influenced predominately by surface runoff as well
as seasonal fluctuations of the water table and is not indicative of year-round flow. At the time of
the site visit, baseflow was weak throughout the entirety of the on -site stream segment. The entire
length of SA demonstrates limited value for biological habitat based on NCSAM and scored a 23 out
of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Identification Form, indicating an intermittent flow
regime. A relevant and consistent OHWM including the establishment of a bankfull bench and
substrate sorting within the bed of the stream was observed. Based on these observed OHWM
indicators, it is likely that SA is a non -wetland WoUS.

Kimley»>Horn
Stream B-Intermittent (SB)
Page 3
Stream B-Intermittent (-731f) originates off -site. The upper reach of SB was not observed and
appears to be culverted under NC16 from off -site commercial development, where it enters the site
on the northwestern boundary, south of SA. It appears that hydrology is influenced predominately
by surface runoff and stormwater drainage from the surrounding commercial development and may
also be influenced by seasonal fluctuations of the water table. Hydrology of SB is not indicative of
year-round flow. At the time of the site visit, baseflow was weak throughout the entirety of the on -
site stream segment. The upper reach of SB is actively eroding and heavily incised, likely a result of
a developed and impervious drainage area. The entire length of SB demonstrates limited value for
biological habitat based on NCSAM and scored a 24 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR
Stream Identification Form, indicating an intermittent flow regime. A relevant and consistent
OHWM including the establishment of a bankfull bench and substrate sorting within the bed of the
stream was observed. Based on these observed OHWM indicators, it is likely that SB is a non -
wetland WoUS.
Stream C-Perennial (SC)
Stream C-Perennial (-741f) originates offsite near the eastern project boundary, flowing north to
south, through a maintained power -line easement and under Newtown Road through a 48-inch RCP
culvert. At the time of the site visit, baseflow was strong throughout the stream segment. The lower
reach of SC is actively eroding, and incised, likely a result of a highly developed and impervious
drainage area. The entire length of SC demonstrates limited value for biological habitat based on
NCSAM and scored a 31.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Identification Form,
indicating a perennial flow regime. A relevant and consistent OHWM including the establishment of
a bankfull bench, substrate sorting within the bed of the stream as well as a presence of litter and
debris were observed throughout the segment. Based on these observed OHWM indicators, it is
likely that SC is a non -wetland WoUS.
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The overall project includes the improvement of the existing roads, New Town Road and NC16,
within the project boundary. To facilitate the road improvements and associated shoulders, the
existing piped stream crossings at Streams A, B, and C must be extended. The existing 66 linear feet
of 30-inch RCP at Stream A will be extended to 92 linear feet of 30-inch RCP, resulting in 26 linear
feet of permanent impacts to potential non -wetland WoUS. The existing 45 linear feet of 24-inch
RCP at Stream B will be extended to 73 linear feet of 24-inch RCP, resulting in 28 linear feet of
permanent impacts to potential non -wetland WoUS. The existing 40 linear feet of 48-inch RCP at
Stream C will be extended to 74 linear feet of 48-inch RCP with a rip -rap apron added to the outfall
(south of New Town Road), resulting in 44 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non -
wetland WoUS.
The proposed project will result in 98 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non -wetland
WoUS. 45 linear feet of temporary impacts to potential non -wetland WoUS are necessary in order
to install impervious dikes and a pumped diversion to allow for work in dry conditions.

Kimley»>Horn
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Page 4
Culvert extensions have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable by implementing taller
headwalls and maximizing side slopes in order to minimize stream impacts and will be installed in
such a manner that the original stream profiles will not be altered. Culverts will be installed below
the elevation of the stream bed by 20% of the culvert diameter to allow low flow passage of water
and aquatic life. Rip -rap outlet dissipation will be placed in a manner that the finished top elevation
of the riprap will not exceed that of the original stream bed in order to prevent destabilization of the
stream bed or banks downstream of the impact area and to allow for aquatic life passage.
Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable in orderto meet the needs
of the project and do not pose adverse alterations to the existing channel bed. Erosion control
measures implemented during construction of the culvert extensions will be removed immediately
following the activity and any disturbance will be returned to pre -construction conditions.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) in -lieu fee program. 98 If of stream impacts will be mitigated through the purchase
of stream mitigation credits. Based on NCSAM assessment quality rating of LOW for intermittent
Streams A and B, mitigation is proposed at a 1:1 ratio. The assessment of perennial Stream C also
resulted in a LOW -quality rating; therefore, mitigation is proposed at 1.5:1. Since the project is
located within the Lower Catawba watershed (HUC 03050103), credits will be purchased at a 2:1 ratio
for Streams A and B, and 3:1 for Stream C.
Therefore, 240 SMUs will be purchased from NCDMS for impacts associated with the roadway
improvements.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments

Kimley>>> Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Intersection Improvements at NC16 (Providence Road) and New Town Road
Applicant Name and Address: Publix North Carolina LP
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway
Lakeland, FL 33811
Telephone Number:863-688-1188
Type of Request: ® Nationwide PCN (NWP # 14) ❑ Individual Permit Application
❑ Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments: ® Project Plans ® USGS Map ® NRCS Soil Survey
® Agent Authorization ❑ Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet) ® NCDWR Stream Forms ❑ USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation ® Aerial Photo ❑ Site Photos
® Agency Correspondence ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Union Nearest City/Town: Waxhaw
Waterway: West Fork- Twelve Mile Creek River Basin: Catawba
H.U.C.: 03050103 USGS Quad Name: Catawba NE
Property Size (acres): 6.57 acres Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.01 ac
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 34.989084 °N-80.772582 °W
Project Location: The project area is located at the intersection of Providence Road South (NC 16) and New Town Road
in Waxhaw, Union County, North Carolina.
Site Description: The project area is currently located in the right-of-way for Providence Road South (NC 16) and New
Town Road. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes, residential neighborhoods, commercial development,
and undeveloped forested/maintained properties.
Impact Summary (if applicable): The proposed road improvement will result in permanent impacts to 98 linear feet from
the extension of three culverted stream crossings and a rip -rap apron. 45 linear feet of temporary stream impacts are
necessary to perform work in dry conditions.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Tem
Perm.
Tem
Perm.
if
ac
if
ac
if
ac
if
Ac
39
j
30
0.003
54
0.006
15
0.0017
44
0.005
Total
30
0.003
54
0.006
15
0.0017
44
0.005
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S.
98 if (0.010 ac)
Total Temporary Impact to Waters of the U.S.
45 if (0.008 ac)
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenbergga,kimley-horn.com

o��Fy\N- AT��F
o �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
7E] Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Intersection Improvements at NC16 (Providence Road) and New Town Road
2b. County:
Union
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Village of Marvin
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NCDOT — Right -of -Entry Agreement
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Publix North Carolina, LP
4b.
Name:
Publix North Carolina, LP (POC: William W. Rayburn, IV)
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway
4e.
City, state, zip:
Lakeland, FL 33811
4f.
Telephone no.:
863-688-1188
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.989084 Longitude: - 80.772582
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
6.57 acres (Project Boundary)
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
West Fork — Twelve Mile Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
West Fork — Twelve Mile Creek - Class "C"
2c.
River basin:
Catawba; HUC 03050103
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is located in the right of way for Providence Road South (NC 16) and New Town Road. Existing land
use in the vicinity of the project includes residential neighborhoods, commercial development, and undeveloped
forested/maintained properties.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The total length of all on -site streams is approximately 239 linear feet.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide intersection improvements at Providence Road South (NC16) and New Town
Road to enhance traffic flow and traffic safety caused by a rapid increase in the population of residents in the
Weddington/Waxhaw/Marvin area in recent years. The project is funded by a private entity; however, the improvements
are required by the Village of Marvin, in coordination with NCDOT, under anticipation of NCDOT's forthcoming NC16
widening project and incorporates improvements anticipated by the widening project. The recent increases in traffic and
congestion in the area have caused intersection improvements at NC16 and New Town Road to be expedited. To
improve driver safety and add capacity to enhance the flow of thoroughfare traffic, the project will widen the existing
roadway for additional turn lanes, lengthen turn lanes, reconfigure lane striping, and adjust signal timing.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project seeks to improve the Providence Road South (NC 16) and New Town Road to accommodate for the increase
of traffic flow near the intersection.
The overall project includes the improvement of the existing roads, New Town Road and NC16, within the project
boundary. To facilitate the road improvements and associated shoulders, the existing piped stream crossings at Streams
A, B, and C must be extended. The existing 66 linear feet of 30-inch RCP at Stream A will be extended to 92 linear feet
of 30-inch RCP, resulting in 26 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non -wetland waters of the US. The existing
45 linear feet of 24-inch RCP at Stream B will extended to 73 linear feet of 24-inch RCP, resulting in 28 linear feet of
permanent impacts to potential non -wetland waters of the US. The existing 40 linear feet of 48-inch RCP at Stream C will
be extended to 74 linear feet of 48-inch RCP with a rip -rap apron added to the outfall (south of New Town Road),
resulting in 44 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non -wetland waters of the US.
General construction equipment, such as; bulldozers, back hoes, front end loaders, etc. will be used for constructions
purposes.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
El Yes ®No El Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
or Temporary
T
W ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P)
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
or Temporary
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
(T)
SA —Impact 1
UT to West Fork -
El PER
®Corps
®P ❑ T
Culvert extension
Twelve Mile
®INT
®DWQ
5
26
Creek
SA —Impact 2
Impervious Dike and
UT to West Fork -
Twelve Mile
❑PER
®Corps
5
15
❑ P ® T
Pumped Diversion
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
SB —Impact 3
UT to West Fork-
El PER
® Corps
®P ❑ T
Culvert extension
Twelve Mile
®INT
®DWQ
5
28
Creek
SB —Impact 4
Impervious Dike and
UT to West Fork -
Twelve Mile
❑PER
®Corps
5
15
❑ P ® T
Pumped Diversion
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
SC —Impact 5
Culvert extensions and
UT to West Fork -
Twelve Mile
®PER
®Corps
5
44
® P El
rip -rap apron
Creek
[_1 INT
® DWQ
SC —Impact 6
Impervious Dike and
UT to West Fork -
Twelve Mile
®PER
®Corps
5
15
❑ P ® T
Pumped Diversion
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
143
3i. Comments: The proposed development will result in permanent impacts to 98 linear feet due to culvert extensions and a
rip -rap apron. 45 linear feet of temporary stream impacts are necessary to perform work in dry conditions.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com lete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Culvert extensions have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable by implementing taller headwalls and maximizing
side slopes in order to minimize stream impacts and will be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles will not
be altered. Culverts will be installed below the elevation of the stream bed by 20% of the culvert diameter to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Rip -rap outlet dissipation will be placed in a manner that the finished top elevation of the
riprap will not exceed that of the original stream bed in order to prevent de -stabilization of the stream bed or banks
downstream of the impact area and to allow for aquatic life passage.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable in order to meet the needs of the project and do
not pose adverse alterations to the existing channel bed. Erosion control measures implemented during construction of the
culvert extensions will be removed immediately following the activity and any disturbance will be returned to preconstruction
conditions.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
98 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
80%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Linear public transportation projects are
required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance with the practices described in the
NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. Diffuse flow will be implemented to provide proper drainage and water
treatment.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on March 8, 2019 did not indicate known
occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database on March 8,
2019 did not indicate any cultural or historic resources within the project boundary. (See attached NCNHP Report)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panels 4465 and 4475
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
��%_
8/5/2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

MtHolly _
elmo �,
h
r
eville
Figure 1
k V Hill
_ ha
e Rd
- - � Hatt,av+aY L) dr'rIt z
- J � 0*t0
t44
li N01
r
Cottonttetd Cn
Ilan Trail
°
S'rP?Ingham Way n c/aye*
r Ro.
y 'Ohell rt
m
" I
'el? , Fin
rs
��ctortd �ry
ftd� 6
O
Tov+^ Rd a° W cstRro7
{
c
Y
_ o
sionehaven Or o
3
I
�
N
4
o
a
?�
h,
°Oarnont Dr x
o`
3 U
_
�
m
ryyA°nn(n�y`o9a�6
n�
coo
Montane Run Ct y
—1
r r �?
Orin'-
Pvant;Dt
Ro
D yster
0
9
o G^
Z
a
G
y
A
04n
_
3
p`
Penrnan Springs
Of
ccc°
°
h a
Gn°ccnE`
Acacia tCD
Ryan Ln
Gto e
$°^ds
`clay Ot
o 13risbin Dr
�a `z bW aY
Figure 1 - Vicinity
(2019 ESRI Street Map)
Legend:
Project Boundary
Kim
Iey/,>>Horn
o �50
I I
�,500
N
Feet

r
vlW
• J
WOODLE
16
• o
o
- C— STONEHAVEN' (0m co
m
b 50 1,\ r^ o
• •� ROCF�AND
it 4—
co
l
00 J r ¢ fk a
'1�
Figure 2 - USGS Topo (Catawba NE) Legend: [=I Project Boundary
��[[ f1
0 500 1,000
KimleY ��rr ! HQrn I Feet N

SA - 92 If
Intermittent Stream
a�
SB - 73 If
Intermittent Stream
_f_
SC-74/f
Perennial Stream
I
0
z
m
m
z
WOODMONT �O
N
- m
0
z
Figure 5 - PJD Field Sketch (LiDAR)
�/ �J
0 250 500 a
Kimleyr >) Ho� Feet T
ROCKLAND
Legend:
Project Boundary
—Stream (Potential Non -Wetland Water)

0.1.
O � - 5 � x � ^ •� � I, - atiltIT-
• c ,\. ( I ''!'Ira - �T
t
p LENGTHEN 30" RCP BY 8'r.■
L
. — - - - Stream e - Impact 1 �'. S ` - , :+ Ji• 1 �rt
Permanent - 26 LF � .. �P � �..+ d �• ' , �' . -u �fi . �Y'i� �, r'• '� ,` � 'i't -y'• i
Culvert Extension Stream C - Impact 5 Permanent - 44 LF
Stream A - Impact 2 �LENGTHEN 30" RCP BY IB' i ~' , i Culvert Extension and rip -rap apron TOWN ROAD
Temporary - 15 LF ,� '1 _ - NEW
Impervious Dike and Pumped Diversion.. Stream C - Impact 6
p P y .1 Temporary - 15 LF
_ ' '�1►i�t 1 f1` di y� ,tq Impervious Dike and Pumped Diversion
/ a
" ' LENGTHEN 24RCP BY 28
LENGTHEN 48" RCP BY 18' -
Stream B - Impact 3
_ r _ Permanent - 28 LF
Culvert Extension
Stream B - Impact 4
Temporary - 15 LF
Impervious Dike and Pumped Diversion
LENGTHEN 48" RCP BY 16'
v k
~ � J .v
00,
.r
b _
+I
a
l
."i►E �a �r _ 8 �
LEGEND +'
w S
® CONCRETE ISLANDS
O
- ASPHALT WIDENING
ASPHALT RESURFACING k
I u
-�--'F- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS _ Z !'• -
•••••••••• EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY ,
- III •:; ,.?`'��
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
1
w-
.N'
G
?1 ",f76 WWI\
Kimley>>> Horn &
THIS DOCUMENT. TacflrvEN WITH THE OONCEPTS AND DESIGNS 'RESENTED HERERN. AS AN INSTRUMENT
MARVIN GARDENS
OFFSITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
4LEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO NIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
DATE: 02-25-2019
0 100, 200' 300'
GRAPHIC SCALE

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Intersection Improvements
Date: 7/10/2019
Project/Site: at NC16/ New Town Road -
Latitude: 34.989959
SA
Evaluator: Addie Lasitter, WPIT
County: Union
Longitude:-80.773175
Total Points: 23
Stream Dete circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name: NE Catawaba
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. GeomorphologyGeolmorphology Subtotal = 10.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes
Stream flowing from offsite from the west, under Providence Rd.
Weak baseflow present, pooling throughout channel
Incised channels, influenced by road runoff
Originating from hillside wetland on NW side of Providence Rd.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Intersection Improvements
Date: 7/10/2019
Project/Site: at NC16/ New Town Road -
Latitude: 34.989959
SIB
Evaluator: Addie Lasitter, WPIT
County: Union
Longitude:-80.773312
Total Points: 24
Stream Det circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: NE Catawaba
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. GeomorphologyGeolmorphology Subtotal = 10
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes
Stream flowing from offsite from the west, under Providence Road South.
Moderate baseflow present; not continuous througout reach
, incised urban channels, influenced by road runoff

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Intersection Improvements
Date: 7/10/2019
Project/Site: at Nc16/ New Town Road -
Latitude: 34.989959
Sc
Evaluator: Addie Lasitter, WPIT
County: Union
Longitude:-80.769225
Total Points: 31.5
Stream Determination .
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: NE Catawaba
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. GeomorphologyGeolmorphology Subtotal = 16.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes
Stream flowing from offsite from the north, under New Town Road.
Strong baseflow present,
Likely influenced by urban development to the north

Accompanies User Manual Version 2
t.aicuiator version c
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Intersection Improvements NC16/New Town 2. Date of evaluation: July 10, 2019
3. Applicant/owner name: Publix NC, LP (POC:William W. Rayburn, IV) 4. Assessor name/organization: C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horn
5. County: Union 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: West Fork - Twelve Mile Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.988239,-80.768858
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -40'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3' F Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? [ Yes (- No
14. Feature type: (- Perennial flow Intermittent flow ( Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: (- Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) ( Inner Coastal Plain (1) (- Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for ( a -��� ( b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip (* Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) (' Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`) (' Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) (' Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ( Yes (- No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( (- I r II r III r IV r V)
F Essential Fish Habitat F Primary Nursery Area F High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect F Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish F 303(d) List F CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
F Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ( Yes (- No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(' A Water throughout assessment reach.
(*' B No flow, water in pools only.
(' C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
(- A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(*' A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
(' B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
( B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
(' A < 10% of channel unstable
(*' B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(' C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
(- A (- A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction

0- B ft B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
[- C i C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no flood plain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
Ff B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
r F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
f H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
r I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
[- A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[- B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
f Yes f*' No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types -assessment reach metric
10a. [- Yes [- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) H m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent $ in r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation L o r I Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) z Co r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
Fe E Little or no habitat
*""—'**"********************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS********************* ******
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. f Yes f*' No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
Fe C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach -whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but <_ 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
f*' f f f f Bedrock/saprolite
f*' f f f f Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
f*' f f f f Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
f*' f f f f Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
f*' f f f f Detritus
f*' f f f f Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. [- Yes [- No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. f*' Yes f No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. f No Water f Other:

12b. [— Yes [- No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r F Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r F Beetles (including water pennies)
F r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r F Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r F Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
F_ F Dipterans (true flies)
F F Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r r Midges/mosquito larvae
r r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
r F Other fish
r F Salamanders/tadpoles
r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
F F Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
[- A i' A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- B i' B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- C f C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
f A f A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
f B f B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
f C f C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
[ Y C' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
f+ N ft N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
F B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
r D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
r E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
F C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above
18. Shading —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
f A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
f*' B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
f C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded

LB
RB
LB RB
(- A
(- A
(- A (- A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
f+ B
(t B
(- B (- B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
(- C
(- C
(- C (- C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
(- D
(- D
f+ D (t D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
[ E
(- E
[ E (- E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
(' A
(' A
Mature forest
B
B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
(7 C
(*' C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
(' D
(' D
Maintained shrubs
(' E
(' E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
( A (- A ( A (- A ( A (- A Row crops
( B (- B ( B (- B ( B (- B Maintained turf
(` C (' C (` C (' C (` C (' C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
( D (- D ( D (- D ( D (- D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
(' A (' A Medium to high stem density
(' B (*' B Low stem density
(7 C (' C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
(- A (- A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
(- B f+ B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
(7 C (- C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
(' A (' A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
(' B (' B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
(7 C (*' C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity- assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. (" Yes (: No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. (- No Water (- Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(' A <46 (- B 46 to < 67 (- C 67 to < 79 (- D 79 to < 230 (' E >! 230
The assessed reach includes maintained areas on the west side of Providence Rd and relatively new -growth forest on the east side of Providence
Road.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name Intersection Improvements NC16/New Town
Stream Category Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation July 10, 2019
Assessor Name/Organization C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horr
YES
NO
YES
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NO
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Accompanies User Manual Version 2
t.aicuiator version c
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Intersection Improvements NC16/New Town 2. Date of evaluation: July 10, 2019
3. Applicant/owner name: Publix NC, LP (POC:William W. Rayburn, IV) 4. Assessor name/organization: C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horn
5. County: Union 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: West Fork - Twelve Mile Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.988239,-80.768858
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -30'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3' F Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? [ Yes (- No
14. Feature type: (- Perennial flow Intermittent flow ( Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: (- Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) ( Inner Coastal Plain (1) (- Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for ( a -��� ( b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip (* Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) (' Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`) (' Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) (' Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ( Yes (- No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( (- I r II r III r IV r V)
F Essential Fish Habitat F Primary Nursery Area F High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect F Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish F 303(d) List F CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
F Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ( Yes (- No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(' A Water throughout assessment reach.
(*' B No flow, water in pools only.
(' C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
(- A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(*' A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
(' B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
( B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
(' A < 10% of channel unstable
(*' B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(' C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
(- A (- A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction

0- B ft B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
[- C i C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no flood plain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
Ff B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
r F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
f H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
r I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
[- A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[- B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
f Yes f*' No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types -assessment reach metric
10a. [- Yes [- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) H m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent $ in r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation L o r I Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) z Co r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
Fe E Little or no habitat
*""—'**"********************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS********************* ******
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. f Yes f*' No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
Fe C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach -whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but <_ 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
f*' f f f f Bedrock/saprolite
f*' f f f f Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
f*' f f f f Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
f*' f f f f Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
f*' f f f f Detritus
f*' f f f f Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. [- Yes [- No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. f*' Yes f No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. f No Water f Other:

12b. [— Yes [- No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r F Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r F Beetles (including water pennies)
F r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r F Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r F Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
F_ F Dipterans (true flies)
F F Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r r Midges/mosquito larvae
r r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
r F Other fish
r F Salamanders/tadpoles
r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
F F Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
[- A i' A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- B i' B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- C f C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
f A f A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
f B f B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
f C f C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
[ Y C' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
f+ N ft N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
F B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
r D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
r E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
R C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above
18. Shading —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
f A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
f*' B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
f C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded

LB
RB
LB RB
(- A
(- A
(- A (- A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
f+ B
(t B
(- B (- B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
(- C
(- C
(- C (- C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
(- D
(- D
f+ D (t D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
[ E
(- E
[ E (- E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
(' A
(' A
Mature forest
B
B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
(7 C
(*' C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
(' D
(' D
Maintained shrubs
(' E
(' E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
( A (- A ( A (- A ( A (- A Row crops
( B (- B ( B (- B ( B (- B Maintained turf
(` C (' C (` C (' C (` C (' C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
( D (- D ( D (- D ( D (- D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
(' A (' A Medium to high stem density
(' B (*' B Low stem density
(7 C (' C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
(- A (- A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
(- B f+ B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
(7 C (- C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
(' A (' A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
(' B (' B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
(7 C (*' C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity- assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. (" Yes (: No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. (- No Water (- Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(' A <46 (- B 46 to < 67 (- C 67 to < 79 (- D 79 to < 230 (' E >! 230
The assessed reach includes maintained areas on the west side of Providence Rd and relatively new -growth forest on the east side of Providence
Road.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name Intersection Improvements NC16/New Town
Stream Category Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation July 10, 2019
Assessor Name/Organization C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horr
YES
NO
YES
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NO
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Accompanies User Manual Version 2
t.aicuiator version c
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Marvin Gardens Retail Development 2. Date of evaluation: July 10, 2019
3. Applicant/owner name: Publix NC, LP (POC:William W. Rayburn, IV) 4. Assessor name/organization: C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horn
5. County: Union 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: West Fork - Twelve Mile Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.989719,-80.769383
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream C 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -75'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3' F Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? [ Yes (- No
14. Feature type: (t Perennial flow (- Intermittent flow ( Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: (- Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) ( Inner Coastal Plain (1) (- Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for ( a -��� ( b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip (' Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) (* Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`) (' Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) (' Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ( Yes (- No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( (- I r II r III r IV r V)
F Essential Fish Habitat F Primary Nursery Area F High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect F Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish F 303(d) List F CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
F Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ( Yes (- No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(*' A Water throughout assessment reach.
(' B No flow, water in pools only.
(' C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
(- A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(*' A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
(' B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
(- A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
(' A < 10% of channel unstable
(' B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(*' C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
(- A (- A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction

[- B i' B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
[ C ft C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no flood plain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
r F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
f H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
r 1 Other: Trash/Debris Input (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
[- A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[- B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
[ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
f Yes f*' No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types -assessment reach metric
10a. [-- Yes [- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) H m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent $ in r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation L o r I Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) z Co r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
Fe E Little or no habitat
***""—'**"********************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS***************
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. f Yes f*' No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
Fe C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach -whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but <_ 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
f*' f f f f Bedrock/saprolite
f*' f f f f Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
f f f*' f f Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
f f f*' f f Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
f f f*' f f Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
f*' f f f f Detritus
f*' f f f f Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. [- Yes [- No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. f*' Yes f No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. f No Water f Other:

12b. [— Yes [- No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
r F Aquatic reptiles
r F Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F f Beetles (including water pennies)
r F Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r F Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
f F Dipterans (true flies)
r F Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r r Midges/mosquito larvae
r r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
F r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
r F Other fish
r F Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
F F Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
[- A i' A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- B i' B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[- C f C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
f A f A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
f B f B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
f C f C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
[ Y C' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
f+ N ft N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F_ Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
177 D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F, E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r_ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors —assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
F A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
F_ C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
r E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F F None of the above
18. Shading —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
f A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
f B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
f*' C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded

LB
RB
LB RB
(- A
(- A
(- A (- A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
f+ B
(t B
(- B (- B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
(- C
(- C
(- C (- C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
(- D
(- D
(- D (- D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
[ E
(- E
f+ E (t E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
(' A
(' A
Mature forest
B
B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
(7 C
(*' C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
(' D
(' D
Maintained shrubs
(' E
(' E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
( A (- A ( A (- A ( A (- A Row crops
( B (- B ( B (- B ( B (- B Maintained turf
(` C (' C (` C (' C (` C (' C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
( D (- D ( D (- D ( D (- D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
(' A (' A Medium to high stem density
(' B (' B Low stem density
(7 C (*' C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
(- A (- A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
(- B (- B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
(7 C ( C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
(' A (' A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
(' B (' B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
(7 C (*' C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity- assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. (" Yes (: No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. (- No Water (- Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(' A <46 (- B 46 to < 67 (- C 67 to < 79 (- D 79 to < 230 (' E >! 230
The upstream section of the assessment reach (north of Newtown Road) is within a maintained powerline easement.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name Marvin Gardens Retail Development
Stream Category Pb2
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation July 10, 2019
Assessor Name/Organization C. Tinklenberg/Kimley-Horr
YES
NO
YES
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM
(3) Substrate LOW
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Arrny Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington Dstrict
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Intersection of Providence Road South (NC 16) and New Town Road
City, State:
County:
Waxhaw, North Carolina
Union County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): NA
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Mailing Address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: NCDOT
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
02/26/2019
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 6.57 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
34.989084 N
-80.772582 W
❑� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re _ug latory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
✓❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re_ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App_A_Prelim _JD_Form _fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Chris Tinklenberg, 200 S. Tryon St., Ste 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Union City: WaXhaw
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.989084 N Long.:-80.772582 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: West Fork — Twelve Mile Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
34.990114
-80.773175
92 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404
SIB
34.989720
-80.773312
73 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404
SC
34.989959
-80.769225
74 If
non -wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24K -Catawba NE
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRcs soil survey (Union county, 1996)
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI digital data
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 2017 Union County Aerial
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Site photographs (Oct 5, 2018 & July 10, 2019) .
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Intersection Improvements at NC16 (Providence Road) and New Town Road
t=
b
�t
7
lQ
al4c� p
P
r
U"(31S$ IJ'n:xnawn
4
s
e
n
�r
r
UN019D Ae>rDn wey°
Log H€>use {GCn 1 S83 s%
�r
_ a
SUN 10
JWD192 Miles Howay is
dust i
. 2r" k L7o !ate.
_1 Dr
I
y R°c&4And TFI
n
r I �
r
s
J
13
GJ
March 15, 2019
NR Points NR Boundaries
0 NR Individual Listing ❑ National Register Boundary
NR Listing, Gone ❑ Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
SL Points
NRHD Center Point
SL Individual Entry
i SL and DOE entry
` a colnkco C1
1:11,918
0 0.07 0.15 0.3 mi
I I I
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 km
Union County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin,
INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS

■ MEN Ray Cooper. Governor
®, : NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton. Secretary
Mumum NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 ONE Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water stewardship
NCNHDE-8419
March 8. 2019
Addie Lasitter
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: NC16 / New Town Rd - Intersection Improvements
Dear Addie Lasitter:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates
that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOff ices. cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATUPAL AND CULTUPA2 _ 3 E1._,()LJPC:FS
�ALE1 ,H,N(: 01651 MAR
t: ,7: FAX

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
NC16 / New Town Rd - Intersection Improvements
March 8, 2019
NCNHDE-8419
Element Occurrences
Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
axonomic
EO ID Scientific Name ° Common Name Last Element Accuracy
Federal
State Global
State
roup
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status Rank
Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant
27576 Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower 2003-12 X? 2-High
Endangered
Endangered G3
S3
Vascular Plant
15141 Rhus michauxii Michaux's Sumac 1794-07-21 H 5-Very
Endangered
Endangered G2G3
S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/content/help. Data query generated on March 8,.2019; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

N
W+G
S
NCNHDE-8419: NC16 / New Town Rd - Intersection Improvements
e�nool
March 8, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Page 3 of 3
1:23,580
0 0.2 0A 0.8 mi
0 U 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO. USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community

Stormwater Design Report
NC 16 (Providence Road)
State Route 1315 (New Town Road)
Intersection Improvements
Union County, North Carolina
NC 16 (Providence Road)
State Route 1315 (New Town Road)
Prepared for:
NCDOT
©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., 2019
Date: 4/11 /2019
Kim ley Horn

This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is
intended only for the purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this
document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without
liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT OVERVIEW
2. CHAPTER NARRATIVE
2.1. Existing Conditions
2.2. Proposed Conditions
2.3. Methodology/Design Criteria
2.4. Pre vs Post Summary
3. REFERENCES
4. APPENDIX
4.1.
APPENDIX A
— Vicinity Map
4.2.
APPENDIX B
— Soil Map, FEMA FIRMette, and Wetland Display
4.3.
APPENDIX C
— NCDOT Rainfall Intensity
4.4.
APPENDIX D
— Existing Drainage Map
4.5.
APPENDIX E — Existing Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)
4.6.
APPENDIX F —
Proposed Drainage Map
4.7.
APPENDIX G
— Proposed Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)

1. OVERVIEW
This report has been prepared to support the build -out conditions for the proposed intersection improvement
project in Union County, NC. See Figure 1 "Vicinity Map" for a map that defines the proposed project areas.
The proposed facility improvements include:
NC 16 (Providence Road) & State Route 1315 (New Town Road)
• Installation of a southbound right -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) with approximately 220 feet
of storage and appropriate tapers.
• Extension of the existing southbound left -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) 140 feet for a total of
300 feet of storage.
• Installation of an eastbound right -turn lane on State Route 1315 (New Town Road) with approximately
220 feet of storage and appropriate tapers, which includes a raised concrete island. It is assumed that
the widening for this improvement will occur to the north of 1315 (New Town Road).
• Extension of the existing eastbound left -turn lane on 1315 (New Town Road) to the first driveway west
of NC 16 (Providence Road).
Extension of the existing westbound left -turn lane on 1315 (New Town Road) resulting in
approximately 275 feet of storage and appropriate tapers.
NC 16 (Providence Road) & Driveway #1
• Installation of a westbound right -turn lane on Driveway #1 with approximately 125 feet of storage and
appropriate tapers.
• Re -striping of the southbound left -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) to provide 325 feet of
storage.
• Re -striping of the northbound right -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) to provide 175 feet of
storage.
• Provide a three lane driveway connection to NC 16 (Providence Road) to approximately the right-of-
way limits.
NC 16 (Providence Road) & Driveway #2
• Installation of a concrete median along NC 16 (Providence Road) to make the access right-in/right-out
only.
• Provide a two-lane driveway connection to NC 16 (Providence Road) to approximately the right-of-way
limits.
NC 16 (Providence Road) & Driveway #3
• Installation of a westbound left -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) with approximately 150 feet of
storage and appropriate tapers.
• Installation of an eastbound right -turn slip lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) into the site.
• Installation of a concrete median along 1315 (New Town Road) to restrict the left -out movement from
the site.
• Provide a two-lane driveway connection to 1315 (New Town Road) to approximately the right-of-way
limits.
NC 16 (Providence Road) & Driveway #4
• Installation of a westbound left -turn lane on NC 16 (Providence Road) with approximately 150 feet of
storage and appropriate tapers.
• Provide a three -lane driveway connection to 1315 (New Town Road) to approximately the right-of-way
limits.

This report contains the approach and results of the stormwater analysis including closed drainage analysis,
spread analysis, and pre vs post conditions analysis.
The overall goal of the stormwater analysis was to analyze the drainage system within the project limits with
respect to current NCDOT 2016 "Guidelines for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design" and design to those
standards.

2. CHAPTER NARRATIVE
This report contains the approach and results of the storm water analysis/design conducted for the intersection
improvements at NC 16 (Providence Road) and State Route 1315 (New Town Road) in Union County, NC.
2.1 Existing Conditions
The intersection consists of 4 approaches. The SB approach is NC 16 (Providence Road). The NB approach is
NC 16 (Providence Road). The EB approach is State Route 1315 (New Town Road). The WB approach is
State Route 1315 (New Town Road). Each road is mainly shoulder sections with a small curb and gutter
section along the west side of the SB approach of NC 16 (Providence Road) and the south side of the EB
approach of State Route 1315 (New Town Road). There is a closed drainage system fed by inlets in the
developments along the EB approach of State Route 1315 (New Town Road) that drains to the Northeast
quadrant of the intersection. All other drainage is conveyed by driveway pipes and culverts the eventually drain
to the south side of the end of the project along State Route 1315 (New Town Road).
The existing storm system was investigated through a visit to the site and with the survey that was provided.
Survey was primarily used to catch basin and manhole locations, rim and invert elevations. Some elevations
could not be obtained due to the debris in the catch basins and the buried junction boxes.
Research was done into FEMA, wetlands and soils (See Appendix B) and was found that there we no major
environmental concerns within the project limits.
2.2 Proposed Conditions
The proposed roadway improvements include the resurfacing of each road as well as geometry changes such as
widening, turn radius improvements, curb and gutter additions, and median improvements. The roads replace
the open drainage system with and closed drainage system that will keep the outfall of the existing system the
same.
The intent of this design is to replace the existing open system with a closed system but to keep the outfalls of
the existing system intact. The widening along NC 16 (Providence Road) will add 12 new catch basins, all
tying onto existing culvert crossing. The widening along State Route 1315 (New Town Road) will add 32 new
catch basins and 2 drop inlets, all tying onto existing culvert crossing.
2.3 Methodology/Design Criteria
Topographic survey information for the site was provided by RB Pharr. This data, in addition to GIS
topographic information and field observations conducted on the project site, was used to identify the
contributing drainage areas, and historic drainage patterns.
Drainage areas were calculated using GIS contours in areas where the limits extended beyond surveyed data.
Peak discharges were calculated using the Rational Method. Recurrence intervals were applied to the 10, 25,
50, and 100-year storm events. The 10 year storm was used to calculate the spread of the runoff to check for
adequacy. Composite `C' values were calculated using existing and proposed ground cover. Time of

concentration (T.) was calculated using the velocity method in the NRCS TR-55 manual (with a minimum Tc of
5 minutes).
2.4 Pre vs Post Summary
The modeling of the proposed inlet and pipes was an iterative process. Changing locations of inlets to capture
spread and changing pipe slope to accommodate capacity. Both the inlets and pipes were designed to handle the
10 year peak discharge per the NCDOT 2016 "Guidelines for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design". The
new pipes meet the requirements based on the additional flow to the system by the additional impervious area
created by the widening project. For all calculations see Appendix D through Appendix G.
OEP 48" RCP
SYSTEM
Existing System
Proposed System
% increase
OUTLET
CFS
Flow/Max Flow
CFS
Flow/Max Flow
10 yr
92.094
0.449
98.492
0.480
6.95%

3. REFERENCES
`Bentley GEOPAK V8i (SELECTseries 2) 08.11.07.427", by Bentley Systems, Inc, 2009
"Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 22, Third Edition URBAN DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL", by U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
"NCDOT Instruction Manual for GEOPAK Drainage" March 12, 2009
"NCDOT 2016 Guidelines for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design" November 21, 2016
"National Wetlands Inventory" Available at: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mgoer.htn-1
"USDA Web Soil Survey" Available at: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvgy.aVx October,
2016
"FEMA Issued Flood Maps (FIRMS) and Flood Insurance Studies (FIS)" Available at:
http://msc.fema.gov/portal/advanceSearch#searchresultsanchor October, 2016
4. APPENDIX
Appendix A
— Vicinity Map
Appendix B —
Soil Map, FEMA FIRMette, and Wetland Display
Appendix C
— NCDOT Rainfall Intensity
Appendix D
— Existing Drainage Map
Appendix E —
Existing Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)
Appendix F —
Proposed Drainage Map
Appendix G
— Proposed Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)

APPENDIX A
Vicinity Map

!917A
�IR
REA RD
aAo•I �� � •�, * . .
I
II'ti r - A q t
�I I
14
1 3 f '7 s`,' . tea= • y='r'—'' u
411
a Pip s
_ � �C!
O
�� • �;O
jf
7
- 7 �iWp d_` • E, _ 'T � �.. � Vea4_,, ,'''F � 4' �'�
or�/ AI
i r -
,
14 la
'
1 t•
41
.� �_ j
T 4111& ,; '-
r L..
Vp
ask
r - -
e,Alli
• � - ors+; : � � �
,
fir^ A'
Ap
r
07
:A
1 -t -low—Va. -
IF,L. N P .
r wd
z
Lzo� AL
z
1 $ t
If � ~ 1 �, � •� � r� . ��i �,'' P� Y�„ ter, ,"�`�t • '�'�
19
lion
In
'd.:*' +' Wyk - . __'�• i &La, 1
L'' _,- �"� .•'ILL- �. 1: •;, �w !� .#�:- r � ,�
I
_ M WA ' his' • ar � ii+�•.� ��;•
441
r#
- _ dlfihw
f
_J
4p
Ham
Fare
a�
Quo
1000, 1500'
HIC SCALE
r- J
O�
Stonehaven
Is
�" •�z_� 'tee.' r1 �
■ NC License #F-0102
421 FAYETTEVILLE S-F, STE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
Kim e >>> PHONE [phone] ©2019
VICINITY MAP
DATE: 04-11-2019
0 1000, 2000' 3000'
GRAPHIC SCALE
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

APPENDIX B
Soil Map, FEMA FIRMette, and Wetland Display

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Union County,
North Carolina
April 11, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface.................................................................................................................... 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Union County, North Carolina.........................................................................
14
ApB—Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes.......................................14
CeB2—Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded................................................................................15
CeC2—Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded................................................................................16
ChA—Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ..........
17
CmB—Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes..................................18
Gf132—Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................19
HeB—Helena fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes.................................20
IrA—Iredell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes ......................................................
22
TaB—Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes..................................23
TaC—Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes ...............................
24
Tb132—Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded................................................................................25
W—Water....................................................................................................
26
WyB—Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes ....................................
26
References............................................................................................................
28
2

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
0

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
0

lilt
AUMP
fn
CeB2 CeB2 F, _ CeC2'�TaC'
CeB2 HeB CeC2
t � ti,k�
�.: CeC2 CeB2 IrA fi y Ce"C�2W Ce�rB2 r � TbB2
k< " Ap B
CeC2 NeBgpg
°�A
HeBx
Le S� f
.r s GfB2S rt :f4
CeB2 GhA
.rCe�B2 r W TbB2 CeC2
CeC2," qpB 9a
ti,Y y
W *,fit v• CeB2 '
CeC2 ApB
" CeB2 'r `ChA ..IrA '•� '
V11 'GfB2
CmB
t
k
•_'., � ,. 1 n .a-.. C ,;\: .�r� , _ ��.. � '`+ ram- .._,_.

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
-, *
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
tjo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
l:
Closed Depression
'
Gravel Pit
„
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
A
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
++
Mine or Quarry
0
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
}
Sandy Spot
4D
Severely Eroded Spot
0
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at
1:24,000.
,^jj
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Wet Spot
Other
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
.-
Special Line Features
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Transportation
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
*-I-+
Rails
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
e �+
Interstate Highways
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
US Routes
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
Major Roads
of the version date(s) listed below.
Local Roads
Soil Survey Area: Union County, North Carolina
Background
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 10, 2018
Aerial Photography
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Nov
25, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8
64.1
6.4%
percent slopes
CeB2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam,
324.0
32.3%
2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CeC2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam,
83.0
8.3%
8 to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
ChA
Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2
43.9
4.4%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
CmB
Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5
9.3
0.9%
percent slopes
GfB2
Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to
82.3
8.2%
8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
HeB
Helena fine sandy loam, 2 to 8
168.9
16.8%
percent slopes
IrA
Iredell loam, 0 to 3 percent
26.7
2.7%
slopes
TaB
Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8
22.8
2.3%
percent slopes
TaC
Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15
99.8
10.0%
percent slopes
TbB2
Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2
59.6
5.9%
to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
W
Water
10.9
1.1 %
WyB
Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8
7.3
0.7%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
1,002.5
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into Iandforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Union County, North Carolina
ApB—Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wOb
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Appling and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 7 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Appling
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
E - 6 to 9 inches: sandy loam
BE - 9 to 12 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 12 to 48 inches: clay
BC - 48 to 53 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 53 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Vance
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Helena
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, footslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
CeB2—Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx87
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cecil, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Bt - 6 to 40 inches: clay
BC - 40 to 55 inches: clay loam
C - 55 to 80 inches: sandy loam
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
CeC2—Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx89
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cecil, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Bt - 6 to 40 inches: clay
BC - 40 to 55 inches: clay loam
C - 55 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
ChA—Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wOp
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Chewacla and similar soils: 87 percent
Minor components: 13 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Chewacla
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: silt loam
Bwl - 4 to 26 inches: silty clay loam
Bw2 - 26 to 38 inches: loam
Bw3 - 38 to 60 inches: clay loam
C - 60 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Congaree
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wehadkee, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CmB—Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wOq
Elevation: 200 to 650 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cid and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cid
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material. Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or residuum
weathered from argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: channery silt loam
Bt - 9 to 22 inches: silty clay loam
BC - 22 to 27 inches: channery silty clay
Cr - 27 to 32 inches: weathered bedrock
R - 32 to 80 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 20 to 40 inches
to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):
high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Very low to moderately
W132—Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx7q
Elevation: 270 to 950 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Georgeville, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 4 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Georgeville, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: silty clay loam
Bt - 7 to 60 inches: clay
C - 60 to 80 inches: silty clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tarrus, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
HeB—Helena fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wl4
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Helena and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 4 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Helena
Setting
Landform: Ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, footslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 45 inches: clay
BC - 45 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Worsham, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Depressions
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wehadkee, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
IrA—Iredell loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wl5
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Iredell and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Iredell
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Btss - 6 to 25 inches: clay
BC - 25 to 28 inches: clay loam
C - 28 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Cr - 72 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 60 to 80 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 2 percent
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Armenia, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Drainageways on interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
TaB—Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx8j
Elevation: 200 to 650 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tarrus and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarrus
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly silt loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay
BC - 32 to 40 inches: silty clay loam
C - 40 to 54 inches: silt loam
Cr - 54 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
TaC—Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx8k
Elevation: 200 to 650 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Tarrus and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarrus
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly silt loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay
BC - 32 to 40 inches: silty clay loam
C - 40 to 54 inches: silt loam
Cr - 54 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
TbB2—Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mx8q
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tarrus, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarrus, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from schist and/or other metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly silty clay loam
Bt - 6 to 45 inches: silty clay
Cr - 45 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
WyB—Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mdlm
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wynott and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wynott
Setting
Landform: I nterfl uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: gravelly loam
Bt - 8 to 23 inches: clay
BC - 23 to 30 inches: gravelly clay
Cr - 30 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches
to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
27

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:H
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nres.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_052290.pdf
29

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
34°59'32.53"N
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
FEMA
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A. V. A99
SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE. AO, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
4,6:qw Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
ITHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. Zone x
FLOOD HAZARD �® Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone 0
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone 0
GENERAL ---- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES I i i I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
117.5 Water Surface Elevation
— — Coastal Transect
.µ 513 -,. Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
-- --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Digital Data Available N
NO Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS Unmapped
0 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 4/11/2019 at 12:31:43 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
34°59'37.55"N
, — I .U,000
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
FEMA Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A. V. A99
SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE. AO, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
q,L,qv Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
ITHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. Zone x
FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone 0
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone 0
GENERAL ---- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES I i i I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
117.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- — — Coastal Transect
—5+5— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
-- --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Digital Data Available N
NO Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS Unmapped
0 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 4/11/2019 at 12:36:27 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
PUBHIi
f � sl � `v4 j •� /�� I Mervin. a.•-. �. 1 ,
rol�i t
lit0.7 km
I — +I,qa �/ " tj► °.� .. riiy _. 1 � � �:e ''�. f: ,1. I t y ,

APPENDIX C
NCDOT Rainfall Intensity

12/11/2018 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
' Location name: Waxhaw, North Carolina, USA* '
Latitude: 34.9888°, Longitude:-80.77360
Elevation: 650.88 ft**
source: ESRI Maps m y�
** source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, I Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
Duration F�����
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
5.00 5.90 6.85 7.56 8.35 8.90 9.41 9.86 10.4 10.8
5-min
(4.61-5.44) fl (5.44-6.43) 1 (6.30-7.46) 1 (6.92-8.20) 11 (7.62-9.05) 1 (8.09-9.65) 1 (8.51-10.2) 1 (8.87-10.7) 1 (9.25-11.3) 1 (9.50-11.7)
10-min 4.00 4.72 5.49 6.04 6.65 7.09 7.48 7.82 8.21 8.47
(3.68-4.34) (4.34-5.14) 1 (5.04-5.98) 1 (5.54-6.56) 1 (6.07-7.21) 1 (6.44-7.69) 1 (6.76-8.10) (7.03-8.48) 1 (7.32-8.92) 11 (7.49-9.21)
3.33 3.96 4.63 5.10 5.62 5.98 6.30 6.58 6.89 7.08
15-min
(3.07-3.62) (3.64-4.31) 1 (4.25-5.04) 1 (4.67-5.53) 1 (5.13-6.10) (5.44-6.48) 1 (5.70-6.82) (5.91-7.13) 1 (6.14-7.48) (6.26-7.71)
2.28 2.73 3.29 3.69 4.17 F 4.82 5.12 5.48 5.73
30-min
(2.10-2.48) 11 (2.52-2.98) 1 (3.02-3.58) 1 (3.38-4.01) 1 (3.80-4.51) (4.09-4.88) (4.36-5.23) 1 (4.60-5.55) 1 (4.89-5.96) 1 (5.07-6.24)
60-min 1.42 1.72 2.11 2.40 2.77 3.05 3.32 3.59 3.93 4.19
(1.31-1.55) 1 (1.58-1.87) 1 (1.94-2.30) 1 (2.20-2.61) 1 (2.53-3.01) 1 (2.77-3.31) (3.00-3.60) (3.23-3.89) (3.51-4.27) 11 (3.70-4.56)
0.824 0.996 1.23 1.42 1.65 1.83 2.01 2.19 2.43 2.61
2-hr
(0.754-0.901) (0.912-1.09) 1 (1.13-1.35) 1 (1.29-1.55) 1 (1.50-1.80) 1 (1.66-2.00) (1.81-2.19) (1.96-2.39) (2.15-2.65) (2.29-2.85)
0.583 0.703 0.876 1.01 1.19 1.34 1.49 F 1.64 F 1.85 2.01
3-hr
(0.533-0.641) ( 0.643-0.774) ( 0.800-0.963) (0.920-1.11) 1 (1.08-1.31) (1.21-1.46) (1.33-1.62) 1 (1.45-1.79) 1 (1.62-2.02) 1 (1.74-2.20)
0.351 0.423 0.528 0.611 0.724 0.814 0.907 1.00 1.14 1.24
6-hr
(0.322-0.386) (0.388-0.465) (0.483-0.579) ( 0.558-0.669) ( 0.656-0.789) (0.734-0.887) (0.811-0.987) (0.889-1.09) (0.993-1.24) ( 1.07-1.35)
0.206 0.249 0.312 0.363 0.433 0.490 0.550 F 0.612 F 0.700 0.772
12-hr
(0.190-0.226) (0.229-0.274) (0.286-0.342) (0.331-0.397) (0.392-0.473) (0.441-0.534) (0.489-0.598) (0.539-0.665) (0.607-0.761) (0.660-0.839)
0122 0.148 0.185 0.215 0.257 0.290 0.325 F 0.361 F 0.412 0.452
24-hr
(0.113-0.132) (0.137-0.160) (0.171-0.201) (0.199-0.233) (0.236-0.278) (0.266-0.314) (0.297-0.352) (0.328-0.391) (0.372-0.446) (0.407-0.491)
2-day 0.072 0.087 0.108 0.125 0.149 0.168 F 0.187 F 0.207 0.236 0.258
F(0-
(0.067-0.078) (0.080-0.094) (0.100-0.117) (0.116-0.136) (0.137-0.161) (154-0.182 0.171-0.203) (0.189-0.225) ( 0.213-0.257) (0.232-0.282)
0.051 0.061 0.076 0.088 0.104 1 F-0.117 0.130 0.144 0.164 F 0.179
3-day
(0.047-0.055) (0.057-0.066) (0.070-0.082) (0.081-0.095) (0.096-0.112) (0.107-0.126) (0.119-0.141) (0.132-0.156) (0.148-0.178) (0.162-0.195)
0.040 0.048 0.060 0.069 0.081 0.091 0.102 0.113 0.128 0.140
4-day
(0.038-0.044) ( 0.045-0.052) ( 0.056-0.065) ( 0.064-0.074) ( 0.075-0.088) (0.084-0.099) (0.093-0.110) (0.103-0.122) ( 0.116-0.139) (0.127-0.152)
0.027 0.032 0.039 0.044 0.052 0.058 0.065 0.071 0.081 0.088
7-day
(0.025-0.029) (0.030-0.034) (0.036-0.042) (0.041-0.048) (0.048-0.056) (0.054-0.063) (0.060-0.069) (0.066-0.077) (0.074-0.087) ( 0.080-0.095)
F 0.025 0.031 0.035 0.040 0.045 0.049 0.054 0.060 0.065
F0.021
10-day
(0.020-0.023) (0.024-0.027) (0.029-0.033) (0.032-0.037) (0.038-0.043) (0.041-0.048) (0.046-0.053) (0.050-0.058) (0.055-0.064) (0.059-0.070)
0.014 0.017 0.020 0.022 0.026 0.028 0.031 0.033 0.037 0.040
20-day
(0.013-0.015) (0.016-0.018) (0.019-0.021) (0.021-0.024) (0.024-0.027) (0.026-0.030) (0.029-0.033) (0.031-0.036) (0.034-0.040) (0.037-0.043)
0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.025 0.028 0.029
30-day
(0.011-0.012) (0.013-0.015) (0.015-0.017) (0.017-0.019) (0.019-0.021) (0.020-0.023) (0.022-0.025) (0.024-0.027) (0.026-0.030) (0.027-0.032)
0.010 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.023
45-day
(0.009-0.010) (0.011-0.012) (0.012-0.014) (0.014-0.015) (0.015-0.017) (0.016-0.018) (0.018-0.020) (0.019-0.021) (0.020-0.023) (0.021-0.024)
6�-dy60.009 0.010 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019
(0.008-0.009) (0.010-0.011) (0.011-0.012) (0.012-0.013) (0.013-0.015) (0.014-0.016) (0.015-0.017) (0.016-0.018) (0.017-0.019) (0.018-0.020)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=34.9888&Ion=-80.7736&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 1/4

12/11 /2018
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
100.000
PDS-based intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves
Latitude: 34.98931, Longitude:-00.7735D
... . .._ _ _ .. _ .._ .
0.001
C
C
C
C
C
L L
L
},
}, },
}y },
},
},
71 }.
L L
L L
L
rp
rq r4
M r4
r4
rp
r9 r4
O
O
O
N A4b
H
A 4
V
� O
O
O
U' O
i
r I
m
[a
ry
rn
v n
Duration
100.000
t
10.000
C
ZI
1.000
C
C
0.100
a 0.010
0 001 i I I I I I I I I i
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
Average recurrence interval (years)
NDAAAtlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Created {GMT}: Tue Dec 11 22-11.32 2018
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
— 1
2
— 1Q
25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
— "in —
2-day
— 1D-min —
3-day
I5-min —
4-day
— 30-min —
7-day
— 60-min —
10-eay
— 2-nr —
20-day
— 3-hr —
30-day
— 6-hr —
45-day
— 12-hr —
6o-day
— 24-hr
https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=34.9888&Ion=-80.7736&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 2/4

12/11 /2018
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
i1
3km
2mi
Large scale terrain
Ci
III -son [Ity�. '� 0
t_h Winston -Sal enl
• • Du1'llam
Greensboro R
Asheville NORTH C A R 0 L I N A
�fhar Otte Fayetteville,
Greenville'
a
SOUTH CAROLINA
-,
100km Colun-bia
60mi
t
Large scale map
s A Winstan-SalGni Greensboro
Ddrhi
" F
North
Carolina
mbia
100km r-,
hmina �{
--
Large scale aerial
N )
n
Y
https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=34.9888&Ion=-80.7736&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 3/4

12/11 /2018
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https:Hhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=34.9888&Ion=-80.7736&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 4/4

APPENDIX D
Existing Drainage Map

A
M awl
�t 0: 224 CFS
a a R
•L-.al'>• r- - �1' . I/ .? A r' .'-t __. �
w EP-0609
P 1
NEW TOWN RD
0%1 (EX)
ow
AREA- IJ65 AC
T - C.- 0.398
0. 2.88 CFS 0903 (EX)
AREA; 0267AC
i� ,. C� 0.655 EP-0601
f - TC: /0 MINS
�` • _ .. 0.-1.09 CFS
CB-0609 (EX)'`,. _ AREA; Iw353 AC
r TC /0 M/NS"p.� . -
+, �►', y ! _ a.- 728 CFS
IF
Luj• .-f
Lu
k
r' f
1 r
s • '.
Ki'm e )))Horn
NC License #F-0102
421 FAYETTEVILLE S-F, STE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE [phone] ©2018
-,
v
,'
EP-0602
EP-0701
EP-0605
EP-Q6p3
£P-000G
CB —060�
AREA- 0.:
C: 0.676
TC:10 MI
0.-1.65 0
0403 (EX)
AREA 1.324 AC
C: 0.410
TC:10 MINS
EP-0404 0.-3.37 CFS
EXISTING DRAINAGE
t ,
V d 1
O � F
CO
/00/ (EX)
AREA; IW656 AC o 1. A
TC.- 22.56 MINS '
0. 2.41 CFS
1203 (EX)
AREA.• 0.752 AC
1002 (EX) C. 0.330
AREA OB34 X 1003 (EX) TC,: 21.57 MISS
C.Ow357 AREA OJ95 AC 0.-2r56 CFS
TC:15.09 MINS C. 0.419 s z
P
0.1.547 CFS TO /0 MINS - •° • �`
0.- 0.506 CFS 1102 (EX)
EP-1003 AREA- 49B8/ AC 1201(EX)
AREA. 0215 AC
l/a/ (EX) C.- 0.400 � C.-0.483
AREA: 2.143 AC T C. 2126 M/NS TO 10 MINS
EP-1002 C. 0w383 0.92rU9 CFS
a. 0.64 CFS
TO /0 MINS EP-1203
0: 4M CFS
.— EP_1102 NEW TOWN
EP-1001
EP-1101
EP-1201 irr
EP-1202ir
r
t 1202 (EX)
0
AREA 1.910 AC T
2 C: 0.401
TC.- 1624 MINS _- a
n- 7 00K /%c c
DATE: 04-15-2019
17
0
4#
J �
150, 300' 450'
GRAPHIC SCALE
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

APPENDIX E
Existing Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)

Kimley>>)Horn
Project Information
Project Name: Marvin Gardens
KHA Project #: 017437002
Designed by: ALM
Checked by:
Revised by:
Link Analysis
Existing Conditions
Date: 4/15/2019 PROVIDENCE ROAD & NEW
Date:
Date: TOWN ROAD INTERSECTION
Link - ID
Link - Library Item
Unk- Upstream
Node
Link -
Downstream
Node
Link - Material
Link -Actual
Length
Link - Slope
Link - Discharge
Link - Capacity
Link - Invert
Upstream
Link - Invert
Downstream
Link -Actual
Velocity
Downstream
EX 0404
15in RC Pipe
EX 0403
EX 0401
Concrete
105.29
3.63
3.37
13.33
662.43
658.61
9.03
EX 0601
18in RC Pipe
EX 0601
EX 0602
Concrete
77.30
2.32
9.51
17.32
654.23
652.37
9.72
EX 0602
18in RC Pipe
EX 0602
EX 0603
Concrete
92.16
3.64
11.10
21.72
652.12
648.69
11.95
EX 0603
24in RC Pipe
EX 0603
EX 0608
Concrete
136.66
4.55
12.71
52.29
648.47
642.18
13.51
EX 0605
24in RC Pipe
EX 0605
EX 0605-0UT
Concrete
64.63
9.37
1.46
75.02
636.76
630.61
9.38
EX 0606
18in RC Pipe
EX 0606
EX 0607
Concrete
97.10
1.59
3.00
14.33
645.60
644.06
6.39
EX 0609
18in RC Pipe
EX 0609
EX 0601
Concrete
11.83
3.30
7.28
20.69
655.82
655.33
8.33
EX 0701
30in RC Pipe
EX 0701
EX 0701-OUT
Concrete
69.02
0.81
13.64
40.03
632.10
631.54
7.20
EX 0901
18in RC Pipe
EX 0901
EX 0902
Concrete
72.28
4.48
2.88
24.10
667.48
664.23
9.08
EX 0903
18in RC Pipe
EX 0903
EX 0903-OUT
Concrete
53.01
1.23
1.09
12.63
660.85
660.20
4.35
EX 1001
12in RC Pipe
EX 1001
EX 1001-OUT
Concrete
51.33
2.59
3.00
6.21
646.65
645.32
7.67
EX 1002
12in RC Pipe
EX 1002
EX 1002-OUT
Concrete
22.04
3.04
3.00
6.73
640.05
639.38
7.50
EX 1003
24in RC Pipe
EX 1003
EX 1003-OUT
Concrete
40.68
6.83
0.51
64.07
633.89
631.11
6.06
EX 1101
18in RC Pipe
EX 1101
EX 1101-OUT
Concrete
39.14
8.18
4.00
32.54
624.73
621.53
11.72
EX 1102
48in RC Pipe
EX 1102
EX 1103
Concrete
37.92
2.48
92.09
245.01
605.40
604.46
13.28
EX 1201
12in RC Pipe
EX 1201
EX 1201-0UT
Concrete
40.02
5.72
0.64
9.23
628.85
626.56
6.73
EX 1202
18in RC Pipe
EX 1202
EX 1202-0UT
Concrete
104.22
4.48
3.89
24.09
620.13
615.46
9.97
EX 1203
15in RC Pipe
EX 1203
EX 1203-OUT
Concrete
35.89
2.65
1 1.14
11.39
619.59
618.64
5.83
Notes:
GEOPAK Link output
GEOPAK inputs from NCDOT Instruction Manual for GEOPAK Drainage

Node Analysis
Kim ey)))Horn Existing Conditions
Project Information
Project Name: Martin Gardens
KHA Project #: 017437002
Designed by: ALM Date: 4/1512019 PROVIDENCE ROAD & NEW TOWN
Checked by: Date:
Revised by: Date: ROAD INTERSECTION
Node - ID
Node - Library Item
Name
Area- Composite C
value
Area -Composite
Area
Node - Tc Used
Node -Station
Node -Elevation
Node -Depth
Node - Junction
Loss
EX 0401
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
12+40.61
658.61
0.00
0.52
EX 0403
Pipe Stub out
0.41
1.32
10.00
13+46.73
662.43
0.00
0.31
EX 0601
Existing CB
0.58
0.62
10.02
19+71.07
657.68
3.45
0.51
EX 0602
Existing CB
0.68
0.39
10.16
20+48.63
655.27
3.15
0.56
EX 0603
EXIST DI
0.49
0.55
10.28
20+81.80
651.79
3.32
0.30
EX 0605
EXIST DI
0.51
0.49
12.00
24+80.39
640.51
3.75
0.15
EX 0606
Pipe Stub Out
0.38
3.52
0.00
22+36.85
645.60
0.00
0.25
EX 0607
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
22+32.26
644.06
0.00
0.52
EX 0608
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
22+62.68
642.18
0.00
0.52
EX 0609
Existing CB
0.87
1.35
10.00
19+70.63
659.41
3.59
0.48
EX 0701
Pipe Stub Out
0.36
8.71
23.84
26+62.54
632.10
0.00
0.49
EX 0901
Pipe Stub Out
0.40
1.17
10.00
16+81.67
667.48
0.00
0.24
EX 0902
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
17+54.59
664.23
0.00
0.52
EX 0903
Pipe Stub Out
0.66
0.27
10.00
17+99.76
660.85
0.00
0.14
EX 1001
Pipe Stub Out
0.32
1.66
0.00
25+60.08
646.65
0.00
0.36
EX 1002
Pipe Stub Out
0.36
0.83
0.00
27+44.34
640.05
0.00
0.36
EX 1003
Pipe Stub Out
0.42
0.20
10.00
28+55.28
636.09
2.20
0.08
EX 1101
Pipe Stub Out
0.38
2.14
18.43
30+07.03
624.73
0.00
0.30
EX 1102
Pipe Stub Out
0.40
49.88
21.26
33+74.42
605.40
0.00
1.37
EX 1103
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
33+76.49
604.74
0.00
0.54
EX 1201
Pipe Stub Out
0.48
0.22
10.00
40+18.78
628.85
0.00
0.12
EX 1202
Pipe Flared End
0.40
1.91
16.24
38+22.83
620.13
0.00
0.30
EX 1203
Pipe Stub Out
0.33
0.75
21.57
37+56.36
619.59
0.00
0.15
EX 0605-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
24+85.16
630.61
0.00
0.48
EX 0701-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
26+53.78
631.54
0.00
0.08
EX 0903-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
18+01.56
660.20
0.00
0.15
EX 1001-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
26+11.39
645.32
0.00
0.05
EX 1002-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
27+66.37
639.38
0.00
0.05
EX 1003-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
28+95.96
631.11
0.00
0.03
EX 1101-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
30+46.17
621.53
0.00
0.03
EX 1201-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
39+78.76
626.56
0.00
0.02
EX 1202-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
37+18.63
615.46
0.00
0.05
EX 1203-OUT
Outlet Node (Misc)
n/a
n/a
0.00
37+20.50
618.64
0.00
0.03
Notes:
GEOPAK Node output
GEOPAK inputs from NCDOT Instruction Manual for GEOPAK Drainage

APPENDIX F
Proposed Drainage Map

IPA
CB -0604
s
AREA OD54 AC
-
TC- l0 MINS
0- 029 CFS
CB-0603 (EX)
AREA OJ81 AC
C. 0 300
TC- 10 MINS
0- 034 CFS NP-U602
CB-0602 -
AREA 0.393 AC
C- 0.676
CB -0907
T C- l0 MINS
AREA OD54 AC
0-1.65 CFS
C- OB64
TC- l0 MINS
0- 029 CFS
CB -0903
AREA: 0r045AC
C- OB94
TC- l0 MISS
0- 025 CFS CB -0902
AREA, OD55 AC
C- OB72
T C- l0 MINS
0- 030 CFS
'r
CB -0901
_ AREA- OD81 AC
" C. 0.868
TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.44 CFS 090/ (EX)
j AREA:IJ65 AC
C• 0.396
IJ
TC- 10 MINS
y 0- 2.88 CFS
{_..-
, CB -0904
r CB -0%5
AREA OD49AC AREA.- 0.104 AC
CC.-0.898 C.-0.884
T
C- 0 MINS TC- l0 MINS
0- 028 CFS 0- 0.57 CFS
0903 (EX) -GCB-060/ (EX)
AREA: 0r047AC AREA- OJ32 AC
C- 0 300 C- 0 769
TC- l0 MINS TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.09 CFS 0- 0.63 CFS
NEW TOWN RD
CB-0612
AREA 0218 X
C. OB80
TC- l0 MINS
0- IJ9 CFS
CB -061I
AREA- OD37 AC
C- OB62
TC- l0 MINS
0- 020 CFS
NP-0901
EP-0901-
/CB -0609 (EX) -'
AREA. II,353 AC EP-0601
C- 0.868 EP-0602
TC- l0 MINS
0- 728 CFS
CB -0602 (EX)
AREA- 0.393 AC
C- 0.676
TC- l0 MINS
0-1r65 CFS
•_ _•t
CB-0703
AREA OM5 AC
0704 C: 0.7%
AREA- 8.567AC TC- l0 MINS
C- 0.363 0- 0.47 CFS
TC- 2JB40 MINS NP-0704
0-13.65 CFS
NP-0614
CB -0614
AREA- 0215 AC
C- OB53
TC- l0 MINS
0-10 CFS
EP-0605 2
CB-0613
AREA 0280 AC
C. 0.876
TC- l0 MINS
0-1r52 CFS
CB-0605 (EX)
AREA; 0274 AC
C. 0.300
TC-12 MINS
0- 0.48 CFS
AREA: OJ51 AC
G 087/
TCr l0 MINS
oloxo,i 0- OBI CFS
CB-0404
AREA- 0224 AC °
C- OB67 w
TC- l0 MINS z
0-1.20 CFS w
CB -0402
AREA- 0260 AC
C- 0.879
TC- l0 MINS
0-1.42 CFS
NP-0405
�- EP-0404
CB -0601-
AREA- 0J14 AC
C- OB66
TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.61 CFS
NP-0703
/ NP-1 05
NP-10a3 -
Lt-- tip-090
CB-06%
AREA,• 0r480
C- 0.599
TC- l0 MINS
0-1r78 CFS
NP-0&76
CB-0605
AREA 0.313 AC
C- 0.461
TC- l0 MINS
0- OB9 CFS
NP-0603
CB-0603
AREA; OJ85 AC
C- 0.775
TC- l0 MINS
0- OB9 CFS
CB-0702
AREA 0r069 AC
C- 0.851
TC- l0 MINS A 1/05 -
0- 0.37 CFS AREA; 48.698 AC
C- 0.394
TC- 2126 MINSy„
40 NP-a7a2 0- 88.48 CFS
CB -0609
r
pw AREA- OMI AC
o C.-OB86
1z T C- l0 MINS o
0- 0.34 CFS �CO
CB-0607 s
AREA OD64 AC y ��
C- OB79 T
TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.35 CFS 02 Y .
IUP-06"
CB-0608 CB-1005
AREA; 0.043 AC AREA OD76
C- 0.864 C- OB58
TC- l0 MINS TC- l0 MINS
0- 0229 CFS 0- 0.40 CFS
CB -1001 CB -1102
AREA- 0.063 AC AREA; OJ83 AC
C- OB55 C- OB55
TC- l0 MINS TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.33 CFS 0- 0.97 CFS NP-1/05
CB-I104
CB -1003 AREA- OJ24 AC
AREA- OJ25 AC C- 0r858
C- OB51 TC- l0 MINS
TC- l0 MINS 0- 0.66 CFS
0- 0.66 CFS i
NP-1102
tip -lot&
NP:i007
CB -1004
AREA; 0.170 AC
C- 0.553
TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.58 CFS
- CB -1002
AREA OJ34 AC
C- 0.734
TC- l0 MINS
0- bi,2 CFS
NP-10a2
CB-0610
AREA; 0r55/ AC
C- 0.660
TC- l0 MINS
,. 0- 225 CFS
NP-1102
NP-Ifl4 �
CB-lll4..r
AREA OJ20 AC
C- 0.82674
.
TIC: l0 MINS . eA
0- 0.61 CFS'
0
sh z
CB-1201 -
AREA 0.850
C- 0.392
TC- 22.720 MINS
Riq ti.
01.49 CFS -
NP-1202:
CB -1202
AREA OD99 AC
C- 0.300 * J'
TC: l0 MINS f
o- 018 cF • �"
NP-1203
, In
CB -1203
AREA- 0.778 AC
C- 0.455
TC- 21.570 MINS
0-1.63 CFS
NP-1205
NP-12006'a
NEW TOWN RD
-� 1201(EX)
=CB-'1113
EP-1201 AREA; Or2/5 AC
C.- 0.447
AREA OD45 AC NP-1207 � � TC- 10 MINS
C- OB18 (P 0- 0,60 CFS
- NP-IIOI
TC- l0 MINS
0- 023 CFS _.
OZ
CB-1106
AREA- 0.140 AC < s
C- 0.832 ;,� �2 CB -1206
r l l AREA• 0.025
C-0 MNS AC ..
rc
0- 0r72 CFS _ r C- OB82
ti
TC- l0 MINS
CB-1107 0- 0.14 CFS
AREA OJ30 AC
C- 0.872 CB-1205
T C- l0 MINS AREA; 0.129 AC
0- 0.70 CFS C- 0.300
TC- l0 MINS
NP-1107 0- 024 CFS
CB -ll0/
AREA: 2.495 AC
C- 0.397
TC-14.43 MINS
0- 5.75 CFS
- CB -1007
AREA- 0.172 AC
C- 0.498
T C-15.090 MINS
0- 0.45 CFS
CB -1006
AREA- 0.332 AC
C- 0.490
TC- 15.18 MINS
0- OB4 CFS
CB-1103
AREA- 0232 AC
C- 0.482
TC- l0 MINS
0- 0.69 CFS
STONEHAVEN DR
CB -1204
AREA-1.744 AC
C- 0.391 jam-
TC- 21260 MINS
0- 3J5 CFS
■ NC License #F-0102
421 FAYETTEVILLE S-F, STE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
Kim e >>> PHONE [phone] ©2019
PROPOSED DRAINAGE
DATE: 04-15-2019
0 150, 300' 450'
GRAPHIC SCALE
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

APPENDIX G
Proposed Drainage Modeling (Link, Node, and Spread analysis)

Kimley>,))Horn
Link Analysis
Proposed Conditions
Project Infornnation
Project Name: Marvin Gardens
KHAProject #: 017437002
Designed by: ALM
Checked by:
Revised by:
Date: 4/15/2019 PROVIDENCE ROAD & NEW TOWN
Date:
Date: ROAD INTERSECTION
Notes:
GEO PAK Link output
G EO PAK inputs from NCDOT I nstructlon Manua l for GEOPAKDrainage

Kimley)))Horn
NodeAnalysis
:�sm
Ir.p dC dki.-
Prywt—
rgeetrvame: Navin Games
.A
--d ALM
o.m 41M9 PROVIDENCE ROAD & NEW
-15etl
TOWN ROAD INTERSECTION

Kimley>>Morn
Project Name: Marvin Gardens
KHA Project #: 017437002
Designed by: ALM Date: 4/12/2019
Checked by: Date:
Revised by: Date:
Revised by: Date:
Spread Analysis
Proposed Conditions
10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY = 4.00 IN/HR (ALLOWABLE SPREAD = 8 FEET, INLETS IN GORE AREAS HAVE LARGER ALLOWABLE SPREAD)
LOCATION
DRAINAGE
RUNOFF
SURFACE"Q"
SLOPE
INLET
BYPASS
STREET
STA
TYPE
AREA
COEFF.
SUB.
TOTAL
LONG.
CROSS
"Q"CAP.
SPREAD
DEPTH
Qb
TO
INLET #
A (acres)
C
Qs (cfs)
Qr (cfs)
SL (Wit)
S. (Wft)
Q_ (cfs)
T (ft)
D (ft)
(cis)
INLET#
0402
-L- Providence Road
11+31.93
ON -GRADE
0.260
0.879
0.913
1.181
0.0335
0.031
0.685
4.302
0.133
0.495
--
0404
-L- Providence Road
13+95.67
ON -GRADE
0.224
0.867
0.776
0.776
0.0277
0.027
0.509
4.181
0.112
0.267
0402
0501
-L- Providence Road
19+05.24
ON -GRADE
0.151
0.871
0.525
0.525
0.0372
0.027
0.356
3.425
0.091
0.169
0601
0601
-L- Providence Road
20+42.93
ON -GRADE
0.114
0.868
0.394
0.563
0.0422
0.022
0.372
3.910
0.084
0.191
0603
0602
-Y1-New Town Road
20+35.60
ON -GRADE
0.196
0.867
0.681
0.742
0.0309
0.045
0.477
2.895
0.131
0.266
0604
-Y1- New Town Road
21+86.46
ON -GRADE
0.185
0.775
0.573
0.764
0.0317
0.026
0.494
4.081
0.108
0.270
0605
0604
-L- Providence Road
21+75.21
ON -GRADE
0.054
0.869
0.188
0.454
0.0426
0.008
0.301
6.598
0.054
0.153
0612
0605
-Y1- New Town Road
22+36.31
SAG
0.313
0.461
0.577
1.265
--
0.035
1.265
3.531
0.122
0.000
--
0606
-Y1- New Town Road
22+67.80
ON -GRADE
0.480
0.414
0.795
1.093
0.0099
0.015
0.675
8.201
0.125
0.418
0605
0607
-Y1- New Town Road
22+33.27
ON -GRADE
0.064
0.879
0.226
0.239
0.0149
0.033
0.194
2.671
0.087
0.045
0609
0608
-Y1- New Town Road
23+16.73
ON -GRADE
0.043
0.864
0.148
0.148
0.0023
0.037
0.135
2.930
0.108
0.013
0607
0609
-L- Providence Road
22+47.57
ON -GRADE
0.061
0.886
0.217
0.262
0.0270
0.004
0.184
9.953
0.035
0.078
0611
0610
-Y1- New Town Road
23+70.63
ON -GRADE
0.551
0.660
1.452
1.452
0.0012
0.036
1.154
7.905
0.285
0.299
0606
0611
-L- Providence Road
22+93.58
ON -GRADE
0.037
0.862
0.126
0.204
0.0424
0.004
0.151
8.179
0.029
0.052
0614
0612
-L- Providence Road
23+36.63
ON -GRADE
0.218
0.880
0.767
0.767
0.0313
0.012
0.469
6.814
0.080
0.298
0613
0613
-L- Providence Road
24+80.86
SAG
0.280
0.876
0.981
1.365
--
0.032
1.365
4.005
0.128
0.000
--
0614
-L- Providence Road
24+84.05
SAG
0.215
0.853
0.733
0.849
--
0.032
0.849
2.965
0.093
0.000
--
0702
-L- Providence Road
26+55.66
ON -GRADE
0.069
0.851
0.236
0.236
0.0373
0.039
0.172
2.006
0.078
0.064
0614
0703
-L- Providence Road
26+60.50
ON -GRADE
0.095
0.790
0.301
0.301
0.0409
0.034
0.214
2.333
0.080
0.087
0613
0901
-Y1- New Town Road
15+77.11
ON -GRADE
0.081
0.868
0.281
0.281
0.0114
0.028
0.230
3.306
0.091
0.051
0902
0902
-Y1- New Town Road
16+63.69
ON -GRADE
0.055
0.872
0.191
0.242
0.0251
0.018
0.191
3.584
0.063
0.052
0903
0903
-Y1- New Town Road
17+31.33
ON -GRADE
0.045
0.894
0.162
0.214
0.0520
0.013
0.161
3.681
0.046
0.052
0907
0904
-Y1- New Town Road
17+41.36
ON -GRADE
0.049
0.898
0.178
0.178
0.0250
0.015
0.144
3.517
0.053
0.033
0905
0905
-Y1- New Town Road
18+00.18
ON -GRADE
0.104
0.884
0.369
0.403
0.0426
0.023
0.281
3.275
0.077
0.122
--
0907
-Y1- New Town Road
18+01.58
ON -GRADE
0.054
0.864
0.187
0.239
0.0531
0.012
0.178
3.906
0.047
0.062
0602
1001
-Y1- New Town Road
24+20.88
ON -GRADE
0.063
0.855
0.214
0.214
0.0085
0.037
0.182
2.649
0.097
0.033
1003
1002
-Y1-New Town Road
25+10.75
ON -GRADE
0.134
0.734
0.394
0.394
0.0433
0.015
0.277
4.296
0.064
0.118
1004
1003
-Y1- New Town Road
26+43.19
ON -GRADE
0.125
0.851
0.425
0.458
0.0320
0.059
0.305
2.041
0.120
0.153
1005
1004
-Y1-New Town Road
26+43.19
ON -GRADE
0.170
0.553
0.375
0.493
0.0390
0.021
0.337
3.902
0.080
0.156
1006
-Y1-New Town Road
27+60.82
ON -GRADE
0.076
0.858
0.260
0.413
0.0393
0.049
0.274
2.106
0.104
0.139
1102
1006
-Y1-New Town Road
27+60.82
ON -GRADE
0.332
0.490
0.651
0.807
0.0424
0.009
0.464
7.676
0.070
0.342
1007
1007
-Y1- New Town Road
28+54.20
ON -GRADE
0.172
0.498
0.343
0.686
0.0585
0.015
0.414
5.059
0.074
0.272
1101
1101
-Y1-New Town Road
30+60.83
ON -GRADE
2.495
0.406
4.048
4.320
0.0523
0.022
1.340
7.886
0.177
2.980
1103
1102
-Y1-New Town Road
30+60.83
ON -GRADE
0.183
0.855
0.626
0.765
0.0684
0.025
0.433
3.640
0.092
0.332
1104
1103
-Y1-New Town Road
32+47.46
ON -GRADE
0.232
0.482
0.447
3.428
0.0174
0.027
1.565
7.890
0.214
1.862
1107
1104
-Y1-New Town Road
32+47.46
ON -GRADE
0.124
0.858
0.425
0.757
0.0294
0.009
0.451
8.140
0.072
0.306
1106
1106
-Y1- New Town Road
33+74.46
SAG
0.140
0.832
0.466
0.772
--
0.041
0.772
2.127
0.088
0.000
--
1107
-Y1- New Town Road
33+76.89
SAG
0.130
0.872
0.452
2.315
--
0.031
2.315
5.941
0.182
0.000
--
1113
-Y1- New Town Road
34+70.85
ON -GRADE
0.045
0.818
0.146
1.214
0.0219
0.037
0.752
4.222
0.156
0.461
--
1114
-Y1- New Town Road
35+05.15
ON -GRADE
0.120
0.826
0.396
2.345
0.0185
0.052
1.277
4.518
0.234
1.067
1113
1201
-Y1- New Town Road
36+09.05
ON -GRADE
0.850
0.392
1.333
3.403
0.0234
0.024
1.455
7.989
0.193
1.948
1114
1203
-Y1- New Town Road
37+19.12
ON -GRADE
0.778
0.455
1.416
3.304
0.0440
0.041
1.234
5.056
0.207
2.070
1201
1204
-Y1- New Town Road
38+32.81
ON -GRADE
1.744
0.391
2.730
2.746
0.0814
0.033
0.858
4.816
0.158
1.888
1203
1206
-Yl- New Town Road
1 38+77.46
ON -GRADE
1 0.025
1 0.882
1 0.088
1 0.088
1 0.0429
1 0.017
1 0.072
1 2.284
1 0.038
1 0.016
1 1204