20191110 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190820

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191110
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Asheville Regional Office - [phone] Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Hominy Creek Stabilization
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Andrew Bick
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
a n d r evv@ h e a d Ovate rs-e n g. co m
Date Submitted
8/20/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Hominy Creek
Basin
French Broad
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.563178
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Buncombe
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-82.608798
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable ureters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
13 - Bank Stabilization
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r• Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Center for Spiritual Living, Inc.
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2144/0479 (tracts 1 and 2)
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
2 Science of Mind Way
Address Line 2
City
State/ Rovince / Fbgion
Asheville
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28806
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
r- Yes r No
r- Yes r No

1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Asheville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
962769957700000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2 Science of Mind Way
Address Line 2
City
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28806
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Hominy Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
French Broad
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
060101050503
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
6.6
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is located near the outskirts of a highly developed residential neighborhood. Hominy Creek flows along the eastern property boundary and is suffering from bank erosion that
appears to be due in part to the effects of a remnant dam foundation that are directing flowtoward the left bank. The subject property is used as a church and includes two buildings, a
paved parking lot and a grass overflow parking area.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes G No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
CSL TOPO MAP.pdf
813.2KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
CSL SOILS MAP.pdf 399.5KB
4f. list the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
970
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to stabilize the and protect the eroding stream bank.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The stabilization practices include stone toe reinforcement to protect the lower bank, boulder vanes to direct flow energy away from the eroding bank, and reinforced soil lifts ("geolifts")
with dormant cuttings of native riparian species on the upper bank. The cuttings in the soil lifts will quickly establish a stabilizing root mass while also providing shade to the stream. The
wooden foundation remains of a dam that was removed decades ago will remain in place, with the upstream of the two vanes butting against the downstream side of the structure.
Equipment will include track -mounted excavators, dump trucks and hand tools.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Hominy Stabilization Plans CSL 081919.pdf 15.45MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
Hominy Creek is jurisdictional. Hydric soils may be present but no wetlands were identified.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved F Not Verified r Unknown r WA

Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Wetland Determination Data Form CSL.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes 6 No
1.89MB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed I m pacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands R Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r- Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Stabilisation Permanent Bank Stabilisation Hominy Creek Perennial Corps 70 450
Average (feet) (linear feet)
gy Construction Access Temporary Bank Stabilisation Hominy
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
450
31
Creek
Perennial
Corps
70
Average (feet)
320
(linear feet)
. Total temporary stream impacts:
320
. Total stream and ditch impacts:
770
3j. Comments
31
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation --
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed stabilization measures are based on a natural channel design approach and avoid hard armoring the bank. Much of the work can be
performed from the top of bank, but some equipment access to the stream will be required. Coir fiber matting will be used to stabilize disturbed bank
soils.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
All construction equipment and materials (stone, seed and coir matting) will be mobilized to the site before work begins. Equipment will be maintained
to be free of leaks and fueling will be performed well away from the stream. The base flow is too large to use apump-around flow diversion, but work
Wil
be staged during times of lowflow in order to minimize downstream turbidity impacts. Work will be staged such that no more stream bank and bed
is disturbed than can be fully stabilized by the end of that work day.
2. Compensatory
Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
l' Yes F No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The work being proposed will improve and protect aquatic resources.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent toprotected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Site is not located in a buffer protection area.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
Work will not result in an increase in impervious surface.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is focused on stabiliang the eroding bank and protecting emsting upland areas.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

USFWS website was the primary source. Endangered species likely exist in this part of Buncombe County, but the work will be confined to a narrow
corridor along Hominy Creek that was cleared and developed many years ago . The likelihood of habitat disruption is very low.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA fisheries website.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO web site. Site BN5915 (the bridge on South Bear Creek Road) is located at the downstream end of the project reach but wil not be affected
by the proposed work.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A floodplain development permitting effort through Buncombe County is underway concurrently.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FRIS website.
Miscellaneous
Comments
The signature page from a hard copy PCN, signed by the owner, is attached.
A check for the review fee is forthcoming under separate cover.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
signed pcn.pdf
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
788.88KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the INC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Andrew Bick
Signature
Oleate r ffl-6
Date
8/20/2019

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
rX1 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes © No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website was the primary source. Endangered species likely exist in this part of Buncombe County, but the work will be confined to a narrow
corridor along Hominy Creek that was cleared and developed many years ago . The likelihood of habitat disruption is very low.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA fisheries website.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO web site. Site BN5915 (the bridge on South Bear Creek Road) is located at the downstream end of the project reach but will not be
affected by the proposed work.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A floodplain development permit is being pursued concurrently with this application. The project has been designed to avoid adverse flooding impacts.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC FRIS website.
�.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
rX1 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes © No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website was the primary source. Endangered species likely exist in this part of Buncombe County, but the work will be confined to a narrow
corridor along Hominy Creek that was cleared and developed many years ago . The likelihood of habitat disruption is very low.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA fisheries website.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO web site. Site BN5915 (the bridge on South Bear Creek Road) is located at the downstream end of the project reach but will not be
affected by the proposed work.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A floodplain development permit is being pursued concurrently with this application. The project has been designed to avoid adverse flooding impacts.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC FRIS website.
�.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Soil Map—Buncombe County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/19/2019
Page 1 of 339365803936630393668039367303936780393683039368803936580393663039366803936730393678039368303936880353940353990354040354090354140354190354240354290354340354390
353940 353990 354040 354090 354140 354190 354240 354290 354340 354390
35° 33' 53'' N 82° 36' 42'' W35° 33' 53'' N82° 36' 23'' W35° 33' 43'' N
82° 36' 42'' W35° 33' 43'' N
82° 36' 23'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 30 60 120 180
Meters
Map Scale: 1:2,230 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

SITE
PROJECT SITE
SHEETINDEX
HOMINY CREEK BANK STABILIZATION
CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL LIVING
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
1: TITLE
2: NOTES AND SYMBOLS
3: PLAN
4: CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN/ IMPACTS MAP
5-7: DETAILS
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
J
PREPARED FOR:
Center for
rctua�Lcvin�
AsAevclle
n
n
Q
w
~a �
oz
�
o
Lv
�cy
U
V)
w
0
�I
0
w U E �
of f 0061-
W 0 cU
Q z C 70,
L
W L
O W m J
Z �co
LLJ
2 w m
U
z
0
z
Q J
W D z
W
N W
-j
co O
Y O= Q
Z W
Q�
00 z
LLJU
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
TITLE
SHEET 1 OF 7
Oma/ cOo\'
(,%-�
z'= Q _
�
N
N ,
!
0
w U E �
of f 0061-
W 0 cU
Q z C 70,
L
W L
O W m J
Z �co
LLJ
2 w m
U
z
0
z
Q J
W D z
W
N W
-j
co O
Y O= Q
Z W
Q�
00 z
LLJU
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
TITLE
SHEET 1 OF 7

n
n
Q
NOTES:
LEGEND
EXISTING
Li
o
z
CONTOUR (1')
FLOODPLAIN GRADING
PARCELS
SILT FENCE
O
1. NO IN -STREAM WORK SHALL BEGIN UNTIL ALL MATERIAL NEEDED FOR IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND BANK STABLIZATION
11+00
TREE
STREAM CENTERLINE
— — — —
ARE BROUGHT TO THE SITE.
GEOLIFTS
OVERHEAD ELEC & POWER POLE
�oW--O—oW
BOULDER VANE
w
2. WORK SHALL BE STAGED SUCH THAT NO MORE CREEK BANK IS DISTURBED THAN CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF
BOULDER STEP
v
THAT WORK DAY.
w
C)
3. IN -STREAM WORK SHALL BE STAGED AT TIMES OF LOW FLOW. STONE USED FOR IN -STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE
USED TO FORM TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS TO DIVERT FLOW AROUND WORK AREAS.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO BE FREE OF LEAKS.
..........
5. FUELING SHALL BE PERFORMED INA CONTAINED AREAAT LEAST 200 FEET FROM FLOWING WATER.
6. TREES AND LOGS REMOVED DURING GRADING SHALL BE SALVAGED FOR ON-SITE USE AS IN THE PROJECT UNLESS
DIRECTED OTHERWISE. LOGS AND CLEARING DEBRIS NOT USEFUL TO THE PROJECT SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF-SITE.
7. LIVE STAKES AND BRUSH MATERIALS USED IN GEOLIFTS SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING THE DORMANT SEASON, TYPICALLY
=
DECEMBER THROUGH APRIL.
0
0
C/) 0�
Lu 0
Qz°' z
� EE
W L U_
W
L Z m J
(/)
W -0 J
2 w m
U
Z
Z
Q J
Z J
W D Z
IN Lu
00 Z
H 0 Lu
Y OLL
Q
Z ry
Lu
Q I_
m Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
NOTES AND
SYMBOLS
SHEET 2 OF 7
LEGEND
EXISTING
PROPOSED
CONTOUR (1')
FLOODPLAIN GRADING
PARCELS
SILT FENCE
_SF —SF —SF —
11+00
TREE
STREAM CENTERLINE
— — — —
SANITARY SEWER & MH
GEOLIFTS
OVERHEAD ELEC & POWER POLE
�oW--O—oW
BOULDER VANE
BOULDER STEP
STONE TOE
0
0
C/) 0�
Lu 0
Qz°' z
� EE
W L U_
W
L Z m J
(/)
W -0 J
2 w m
U
Z
Z
Q J
Z J
W D Z
IN Lu
00 Z
H 0 Lu
Y OLL
Q
Z ry
Lu
Q I_
m Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
NOTES AND
SYMBOLS
SHEET 2 OF 7

�
is; t� C/�
\\ . . .. 0
WIDEN DRIVEWAY >
TO TWO LANES, LLJ
u
• `�`r DESIGN BY OTHERS cn
W
0
LLJ
INS
BOULDER VANE; := STEP -POOL OUTLET ��. ----►may"�..._�
r TIE TO REMAINS OF_f.\ `''J{ : "�,
�...• EXCAVATE FLOODPLAIN
..�� _ 0' -
BENCH
DAM FOUNDATION - / , 1-2' DEEP ! '� %;��" �r i _ ;�
\ • i 19
�, z =
�1 ,� / EXTEND 6" PVC TO ► ►' U = v N =�?`:
STEP -POOL OUTLET
\ ���� -�._ rr�r�i._..� BOULDER VANE o
E S
W - Cj
(D .
W
ui
w � m
, U
z
-_
� J
�{ Q Y Q U
F_ W p Z
N �-�, Lu
Maw. Lu z
0 I
Q
_ = w
r z
Lu
U
li 60' 120' 18 DATE: AUGUST 2019
4 . SCALE: AS SHOWN
PLAN
SHEET 3 OF 7

Y
i+
INSTALL STONE TOE FROM TOP
OF BANK (230 LF; IMPACT S1)
GEOLIFTS, OUTLET
STEPS AND VANE
(160 LF; IMPACT S1)
APPROXIMATE EQUIPMENTACCESS
ROUTE (200 LF; IMPACT S2)
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
APPROXIMATE EQUIPMENTACCESS
ROUTE; 120 LF (IMPACT S2)
STAGING AREA;
INSTALL SILT FENCE ON CREEK
SIDE OF STOCKPILES
BOULDER VANE
(60 LF; IMPACT S1)
NO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO RIGHT BANK
60' 120'
mai
180'
Q
W
Q
0 z
0
o (n
w
v
w
0
=w N o c i
(.?...
0
0
E Lo
0v
W (� U
QL z °' z
W L U
W
c)
W -0 J
2 w m
U
Z
(D
Z
Q J
Z J
°wDz
N_ W
00Z %

6" DIVERSION BE
SOIL LIFTS REINFORCED WITH
ROLANKA BIO -D BLOCK 12-300 OR 12" COIR
LOG WITH COIR MATTING ATTACHED.
12" x1"x1" WOOD STAKE
AT 3'0.C. IN DIAMOND PATTERN ♦`
EXISTING GROUND
COMPACTED ON-SITE SOIL
SAND/CLAY MIX WITH 5% ORGANICS ♦♦
BIAXIAL GEOGRID EVERY 3rd LIFT
REMOVE SLUMPED SOIL
LOGS, ROOTWADS,
BRUSH MIXED WITH
CLASS 1 RIPRAP
SHRUB CUTTINGS OF SILKY DOGWOOD,
SILKY WILLOW, NINEBARKAND ELDERBERRY
2 10' +/-
1
— — — 1' MIN.
BASE FLOW 0
f
8' +/-
1 GEOLIFTS
5 1"=5'
NOTES:
1. SOILAVAILABLE FOR GEOLIFTS GENERATED FROM
FLOODPLAIN BENCH EXCAVATION AND DRIVEWAY WIDENING.
2. SHRUB CUTTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING DORMANT
SEASON, GENERALLY NOVEMBER TO APRIL.
n
n
Q
w
Q �
o z
0
o (n
� W
u �
U
cn
w
0
0
0
0v
Lu 0
Qz°' z
L
W L U_
W
Z 0 J
Lu -0 J
2 w Sul m
U
z
CD
z
Q J
z J
W D z
N_ 0� Lu
J U J_
00z %

a
V LL I V V I L L.
FOOTER BOULDER
PROFILE A -A'
is
BOULDERS SHALL BE HARD,
DURABLE ROCK WITH MINIMUM
DIMENSIONS OF 5'X3'X2'. FLAT,
STACKABLE BOULDERS ARE
PREFERRED.
SECOND LAYER OF FOOTERS MAY
BE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE DESIGN
DIMENSIONS, DEPENDING ON THE
SIZE OF THE BOULDERS AND
DEPTH OF FLOW.
FILL WITH 50-50 MIX OF
S BAND CLASS 1 RIPRAP
EADER BOULDER
HEADER BOULDER
NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC -
IACKFILL W/ CLASS B
\ND CLASS 1 RIPRAP
VARI
1 BOULDER VANE
6 NTS
CREATE POOL U/S OF STE
FILTER FABRIC
UPSTREAM OF HEADERS
'MIN.
2' MIN.
RIVERD
FOOTER BOULDER
SECTION B -B'
ROOT WADS AND BRUSH SEE N
ANCHORED INTO CLASS 1 STONE - i
3'
r3'� STONE TOE WITH BRUSH
6 NTS
TUCK E.C. MATTING
BEHIND STONE
4' MIN.
2' MIN.
SECTION
HEADER BOULDER
5' MAX.
12" THICK LAYER
CLASS B RIPRAP
FOOTER BOULDER
FLOW� TOE OF BANK (TYP)
I TOP OF BANK (TYP)
MEDIAN AXIS COBBLE
]INKING BETWEEN BOULDERS
HEADER BOULDER
IIN. 2' MEDIAN AXIS
OOTER BOULDER
PLAN
(RIPRAP NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
2 BOULDER STEPO
6 NTS
NOTE
1. WHERE DIRECTED BY ENGINEER,
SLOPE LOWER BANK, SEED,
MULCH, MAT AND LIVE STAKE.
n
n
Q
(n U
W (�
Q z_
ui
w
Q w
Q z
Lu
= w
0
E Loo
0 v
�U
C5
T
� U_
� J
U)
-0m
J
coo w
a) m
� U
z
U
Z
Q J
Z J
F Lu W Z
N_ 0� Lu
J C) J_
00 Z_
ry LuO
CO
O�Q
Z Lu
Q I---
00
00 Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DETAILS
SHEET 6 OF 7
cf)
(n U
W (�
Q z_
ui
w
Q w
Q z
Lu
= w
0
E Loo
0 v
�U
C5
T
� U_
� J
U)
-0m
J
coo w
a) m
� U
z
U
Z
Q J
Z J
F Lu W Z
N_ 0� Lu
J C) J_
00 Z_
ry LuO
CO
O�Q
Z Lu
Q I---
00
00 Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DETAILS
SHEET 6 OF 7

NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON STREAM
STEEL T -POST SIDE OF ALL STOCKPILES.
FILTER FABRIC 2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED UPON
WITH WIRE BACKING COMPLETION OF EARTHWORK.
COMPACTED�OBACKFIFF �SIDE K
L l � STEELnT-POST
4"
8I I24' MI IN. 18" MIN.
L FILTER FABRIC WITH
SECTION PROFILE WIRE BACKING
SILT FENCE
7 NTS
Permanent Seed Mix ` - 30 Ib/acre
Mulching: wheat or oat straw mulch applied at 1 bale/1,000 square feet
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percentage
Deer Tongue
Panicum clandestinum
20
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
20
Virginia Wildrye
Elymus virginicus
20
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
20
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
20
USE TURF TYPE TALL FESCUE BLEND TO SEED DISTURBED
AREAS IN LAWNS BEYOND STREAM GRADING LIMITS.
Temporary Seed Mix
Application Dates
Common Name
Scientific Name
Rate (Ib/acre)
Applied
Rate (Ib/acre) Applied
CO
z-= Q _
Separately
w/ Permanent Mix
August 15 to May 1
Rye Grain
Secale cereale
120
60
May 1 to August 15
Pearl Millet
Pennisetum
40
20
glaucum
2 SEED MIXES
7
a
a
a
w
a �
o Z
O
TOP OF BANK (WHERE APPLICABLE) zo
MATTING PLACED FLUSH WITH BANK SURFACE, LAPW
V MIN. OVER DOWN STREAM / DOWN SLOPE SEAMS
/ 12" WOOD STAKE PLACED IN w
T O.C. DIAMOND PATTERN Q m
[-LIVE STAKE, 3' O.C.
REMOVE ALL DEBRIS;\�/�\j ''\\jam'
SCARIFY SURFACE, PLACE \;�\j STREAM BED
TOPSOILAND SEED/MULCH
BEFORE PLACING MATTING
SECTION
NOTES:
1. MATTING SHALL BE COIR FIBER, 780 G/M2 WITH NOMINAL
0.50 INCH OPENING SIZE.
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DORMANT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION. SPECIES SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST 3 OF
THE FOLLOWING: SILKY DOGWOOD, SILKY WILLOW,
NINEBARK, ELDERBERRY.
Form
0.4" --/
WOOD STAKE
TOP CUT AT 150
AFTER INSTALL
BUDS POINTED
UPWARD, MIN. 3 BUDS
ABOVE AND BELOW
GRADE AFTER INSTALL
24" MIN.
1/2" TO 2"
�-BASE CUT
AT 45°
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING/LIVE STAKES
NTS
0
U E �
m
0,7
LU (� 0) U
Q E 0 Z
L
W (,j
O W m J
Z �U)
2 w (a m
U
Z
0
Z
Q J
O W L-) Z
W
N W
m Z U) >
Q W _
O
Y 02 Q
Z W
Q F--
00
m Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DETAILS
SHEET 7 OF 7
Oma/
CO
z-= Q _
N
0
U E �
m
0,7
LU (� 0) U
Q E 0 Z
L
W (,j
O W m J
Z �U)
2 w (a m
U
Z
0
Z
Q J
O W L-) Z
W
N W
m Z U) >
Q W _
O
Y 02 Q
Z W
Q F--
00
m Z
W
U
DATE: AUGUST 2019
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DETAILS
SHEET 7 OF 7

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes ❑ No=
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
2
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes ❑ No=
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to
or
Sampling Point:
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0