20191104 Ver 1_JD_PCN final_20190816

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder F-1 Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Tattersall Storm Drainage Improvement Project (SDIP)
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional F-1 Government Fv-1 Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) intends to improve storm drainage infrastructure to reduce
roadway and structure flooding.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: CSWS; POC: Isaac Hinson
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: HDR; POC: Kelly Thames
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
bounded by Merrywood Rd. and Seth Thomas Rd. to the north, Park Rd. to the east, Quail Hill Rd.
to the south, and Wittstock Dr. to the west in Charlotte, North Carolina (-80.860471 °, 35.126351 °).
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 17330162, 17330163, 17330141, 17330143, 17330151, 17325120,
17325121, 17325406, 17325407 (See Figure 3 and Appendix B)
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A21b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Little Sugar Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 030501 03
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 F✓ Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
eStandard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑✓ Regional General Permit # 163
F✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

hdrinc.com 440 S Church Street, Suites 900 & 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202-2075
[phone]

August 15, 2019

Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801

Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Verification Request, Pre-Construction
Notification Pursuant to Regional General Permit No. 163,
and Water Quality General Certification No. 4147

Tattersall Storm Drainage Improvement Project (SDIP)
Charlotte, North Carolina

Dear Ms. Amschler:
The Tattersall Storm Drainage Improvement Project (SDIP) is roughly bounded by Merrywood
Road and Seth Thomas Road to the north, Park Road to the east, Quail Hill Road to the south, and
Wittstock Drive to the west. The SDIP project encompasses 62 acres within an approximately 130-acre
drainage area; however, the areas of impact to potentially jurisdictional features include three smaller
locations within the greater project area, comprising one acre (Figures 1 – 3; Appendix A). The project will
improve outdated storm drainage infrastructure including culvert replacements and pipe system
upgrades; incorporate channel improvements; and will reduce roadway and structure flooding.
Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) is requesting authorization under Regional General Permit
Number (RGP) 163 and Water Quality General Certification (GC) 4147, for activities associated with the
Tattersall SDIP.
Applicant Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services, POC: Isaac Hinson
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: [phone]
Project Location: Hopecrest Drive and Merrywood Road
Tax Parcel IDs: 17330162, 17330163, 17330141, 17330143, 17330151, 17325120, 17325121,
17325406, 17325407
Waterway: UTs to Little Sugar Creek
Basin: Catawba (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg County
Center Decimal Degree Coordinates of Project Area: 35.126351°, -80.860471°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, NC (1981) and Weddington, NC (1989)
Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 2

Desktop Review
A number of resources were reviewed including U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangles
(Figure 2; Appendix A), aerial imagery (Figure 3; Appendix A), Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) Soils Survey (Figure 4; Appendix A), and the USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI), and Federal Emergency
Management Act (FEMA) floodplains (Figure 5; Appendix A).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service
(USDA-NRCS) Soils Survey of Mecklenburg County (Figure 4; Appendix A), on-site soils within the
impacts areas consist of four soil map units. There are no soils listed as hydric within these areas. Lastly,
a FEMA floodplain is located within the impact area associated with Plan Sheet 5 within the site (FEMA
FIRM Panel 3710454000K, eff. date 02/19/2014) (Figure 5; Appendix A).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On April 18, 2018, Helen Simonson, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) reviewed the three areas of
impact (1 acre) for potentially jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Jurisdictional stream channels were
classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
guidance. Streams were also assessed using the North Carolina Stream Assessment Methodology
(NCSAM).
The results of this field investigation indicate that there are two jurisdictional stream channels; one that
crosses through the impacts areas associated with Plan Sheets 4 and 8 and one that crosses through the
impact area associated with Plan Sheet 5 (Figure 6; Appendix A). There are no wetlands within the
impact areas of the proposed project.
Stream A was determined to be an intermittent stream and received a Low NCSAM rating. Stream B was
determined to be a perennial stream and received a Medium NCSAM rating. NCDWR Stream
Identification Forms, NCSAM Rating Forms, and representative photographs for both Stream A and
Stream B are attached (Appendix C).
Table 1 (below) summarizes the potentially jurisdictional waters of the US located within the three areas
of impact.
Table 1. Summary of on-site potentially jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Feature Name Coordinates
(decimal degrees)
Type of
Aquatic
Resource
Cowardin
Classification
Estimated Amount of Aquatic
Resource in Review Area
Non-Wetland Waters of the U.S. – Tributaries
Stream A 35.124465
-80.858969
non section 10,
non-wetland R4SB3
Length: 160 feet
Width: 4 feet
Area: 0.01 ac.
Stream B 35.127791
-80.860669
non section 10,
non-wetland R5UB1
Length:193 feet
Width: 5 feet
Area: 0.02 ac.
Total Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.: Length: 353 linear feet
Area: 0.03 ac.

Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 3

Project Description
The Tattersall SDIP consists of a combination of closed pipe and open channel storm drainage
improvements designed to alleviate flooding within the project area. These improvements include the
replacement of two culverts, the installation of rip rap aprons (Plan Sheets 4, 5, and 8; Appendix D).
Stream grading, including the creation of bank full benches will also be performed to aid in flood
attenuation. Regraded stream banks will be stabilized with coconut fiber matting, native riparian seeding,
and live staking.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The need for this project was identified through a project ranking process that involves analysis of
customer drainage requests, including complaints of house (finished floor) flooding and road flooding.
Previous maintenance work has been done within this project area to help alleviate flooding of some of
the more problem prone areas.

This purpose of this project is to improve the storm drainage infrastructure to reduce roadway and
structure flooding within the project area.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters. A pump around will be utilized to ensure that all work is conducted in the dry. The project will
comply with all Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) requirements and RGP Special and
General Conditions.
No impacts to wetlands will occur. Impacts to streams have been reduced through an iterative design
process, as described in the alternatives analysis below.
Alternatives Analysis
No Build Alternative
A no-build alternative was considered, but was deemed impracticable. The no-build alternative would not
meet the project goals of alleviating flooding to structures and roadways within the project area and was
therefore removed from further consideration.
Preferred Alternative
The preferred design for the project was developed through an iterative process that is discussed in detail
below.
Initially, the Tattersall SDIP proposed improvements included 3,200 linear feet (lf) of closed system
improvements and 3,700 linear feet of open system improvements. The closed and open system
improvements were proposed to address roadway flooding, structure flooding, and to address channel
erosion throughout the project area.
At the start of the design phase in 2014, the project team re-assessed the proposed 3,700 of proposed
open system improvements. After the analysis, the project team decided to remove channel work
upstream and downstream of the Hopecrest Drive culvert (with the exception of stabilization at the
headwall and outfall of the culvert replacement at Hopecrest in order to achieve a stable transition). It was
also decided to remove channel work along Tattersall Creek (with the exception of the completion of a
Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 4

stable transition at the proposed outfall at 2407 Tattersall Drive, as well as stabilization along 2415 and
2419 Tattersall Drive, 2435 Twilight Road and 3500 and 3505 Gatewood Oaks Drive). The previously
proposed improvements along channel sections to address minor erosion issues in the project area would
result in the loss of many large mature trees and would significantly alter the properties and canopy within
the neighborhood; therefore these channel improvements were eliminated from further consideration.
These previously proposed efforts to address minor channel erosion would result in significant impacts to
property owners and the environment that would outweigh the benefits of addressing minor bank erosion.
It was also observed that some of the erosion along the creek banks was a result of sheet flow from
private run off and would not qualify for service to be performed with the project.
In 2016, there was another analysis to determine the impacts from the benefit/cost of the proposed
channel improvements with the Tattersall project. This resulted in another decrease in the length of
closed system being improved by approximately 200 linear feet of pipe and a decrease in the length of
open channel being improved by approximately 25 linear feet.
Some of the proposed work in 2016 was deemed to be proposed ONLY with private property buy-in with
donated easements. During the real estate phase for the project, several residents decided that they did
not want the City to construct improvements on their properties. Therefore, in 2018 additional work was
removed which included removing another 118 feet of pipe, and additional headwalls and channel
grading near Twilight Road. In late 2018, the design team also removed additional channel grading and
other channel work to try to minimize the amount of channel disturbances to the bare minimum needed
for the flood control capacity needs and the stream velocity concerns to minimize future erosion.
The project team also added upstream boulder sill/riffle sections to the Merrywood and Hopecrest culvert
replacement efforts to attempt to alleviate the concerns for the existing perched pipe conditions.
Additionally, upstream of both culvert locations, mature trees provide grade control, which will be
removed during construction. During an on-site meeting with the Division of Water Resources (DWR) and
CSWS, it was requested by DWR that the existing channel bed grades be maintained as the removal of
the existing grade control would result in channel headcutting upstream of the system. Therefore, the
boulder sill/riffles upstream of the culverts are intended to mimic baseflow for aquatic life and to focus
water into the center of the downstream rip rap aprons, resulting in aquatic life passage while also
assisting in the retention of existing stream channel banks and grade control. All final hard stabilization
and rip rap aprons proposed in the channels for the Tattersall SDIP are required for flood control capacity
and the required minimal management of erosive velocities in the channels. All of the proposed hard
structure material is required to construct stable outfalls and transitions at new proposed culvert/pipe
locations. There are no further channel impact reductions that can be performed.
The final improvements for the Tattersall SDIP now only include 2,673 linear feet of closed system
improvements, and 320 linear feet of open system improvements.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under RGP No. 163, unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional streams are limited to 20 linear feet (lf) of
permanent (non-loss) impacts, 136 lf of permanent (loss) impacts, and 130 lf of temporary impacts (PCN;
Appendix D). Project impacts are illustrated on Plan Sheets 4, 5, and 8 (Appendix D). In order to minimize
grading and additional impacts to jurisdictional streams it was not possible to bury the new culverts per
the requirements of RGP 163 (Special Condition H), and will require pre-construction notification for this
project; however, the proposed sills upstream of the culverts will provide for the passage of aquatic life
while also maintaining existing channel grades.
Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 5

Plan Sheet 4
The existing 80-foot long 48” x 72” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) at Hopecrest Drive will be replaced with
an 86-foot long 7’x5’ reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC), resulting in 6 linear feet of permanent
impacts to Stream A (Impact #1, Plan Sheet 4; Appendix D). The culvert includes sills (benches) that run
the length of the culvert to maintain low-flow channel dimensions (Plan Sheet D5; Appendix D).
Rip rap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the new culvert resulting in an additional 60
feet of permanent stream impact (Impact #2). The proposed rip rap aprons are necessary to dissipate
flows exiting the culvert, protect the culvert from scour, provide grade control, and are required by the City
of Charlotte design standards. Regrading of the stream channel upstream of Hopecrest Drive will result in
approximately 40 linear feet of temporary stream impacts (Impact #3) and construction disturbance will
result in approximately 20 linear feet of temporary impacts (Impact #4). The existing channel upstream of
the Hopecrest Drive culvert is stable with natural root grade controls and a mature wooded buffer
(Appendix C; Photograph 2). Immediately downstream of the culvert, there is an existing 4-foot nick point,
followed by a plunge pool and sanitary sewer crossing (Appendix C; Photographs 3 and 4). In an effort to
avoid and minimize impacts, CSWS is proposing to not bury this culvert, as it would require grading the
up and downstream channel for several hundred feet, installing multiple in-stream grade control
structures, and impacting the riparian buffer. In addition, there is an underlying sanitary sewer line that
precludes burying the culvert.
Plan Sheet 5
CSWS also proposes to replace the existing 97 linear foot, 60” CMP culvert at Merrywood Road with a 97
linear foot, 10’ x 5’ RCBC (Plan Sheet 5; Appendix D). This existing culvert will be replaced foot for foot
and will not result in any additional impacts. The culvert includes sills (benches) that run the length of the
culvert to maintain low-flow channel dimensions (Plan Sheet D5; Appendix D).
Rip rap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the culvert replacement, resulting in 70 feet
of permanent impact to Stream B (Impact #5). Regrading of the stream channel downstream of
Merrywood Road will result in approximately 50 linear feet of temporary stream impacts (Impact #6) and
construction disturbance will result in approximately 20 linear feet of temporary impacts (Impact #7). The
Merrywood Road culvert is in a similar condition as the Hopecrest Drive culvert. Both culverts are serving
as streambed grade controls, as evidenced by the downstream channel incision and upstream channel
stability. The existing channel upstream of the Merrywood Road culvert is stable with natural instream
grade controls and a wooded buffer (Appendix C; Photograph 9). Immediately downstream of the culvert,
there is an existing 3-foot nick point, followed by a plunge pool, and a bedrock outcrop (Appendix C;
Photographs 10 and 11). In an effort to avoid and minimize impacts, CSWS is proposing to not bury this
culvert, as it would require more than 100 feet of upstream and downstream channel grading. This would
necessitate excess impacts to the nearby residences, destruction of the wooded buffer, blasting of
bedrock, and potential destabilization of the upstream channel.
Plan Sheet 8
Plan Sheet 8 proposes a rip rap apron energy dissipater at the end of a proposed storm water pipe
(Impact #8; Appendix D). The rip rap apron is proposed to be installed at and along the banks of Stream
A. In essence, the rip rap apron will serve as hard bank stabilization for Stream A and will result in 20
linear feet of permanent (non-loss) impacts.
Table 2 (next page), summarizes the unavoidable impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 6

Table 2. Summary of Impacts to On-Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Feature
Intermittent/
Perennial
Plan
Sheet
Impact
Number Impact Type
Temporary /
Permanent
Impact
Impact
Length (lf)
Stream A Intermittent/
Seasonal RPW Sheet 4
1 Culvert Extension Permanent 6 lf
2 Rip Rap Apron Permanent 60 lf
3 Grading Temporary 40 lf
4 Construction Disturbance Temporary 20 lf
Stream B Perennial RPW Sheet 5
5 Rip Rap Apron Permanent 70 lf
6 Grading Temporary 50 lf
7 Construction Disturbance Temporary 20 lf
Stream A Intermittent/
Seasonal RPW Sheet 8 8 Hard Bank Stabilization Permanent
(non-loss) 20 lf
Proposed Temporary Stream Impacts: 130 lf
Proposed Permanent (Non-Loss) Stream Impacts: 20 lf
Proposed Permanent (Loss) Stream Impacts: 136 lf
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
The National Park Service National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) GIS Public Dataset and the NC
Historic Preservation Office (NCHPO) HPOWEB GIS Web Service1 were reviewed (Agency
Correspondence, attached). These sources revealed there are no known cultural resources, historic
structures, or historic districts located within the project area. Archaeological data were not included as
part of the NCHPO GIS services and were not assessed as part of this review.
Protected Species
HDR obtained and reviewed a list of federally protected species for Mecklenburg County from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) website
(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html), which was last updated on June 27,
2018 (Agency Correspondence, attached). Table 3 (next page) lists the six federally protected species
identified by the USFWS for Mecklenburg County.

1 http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed July 23, 2019
Charlotte Storm Water Services i Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre -Construction Notification
Table 3: Federally Protected Species Identified in Mecklenburg County
Vertebrates
Northern long-eared bat
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's sunflower
Smooth coneflower
Michaux's sumac
Invertebrates
Carolina heelsplitter
Rusty patched bumblebee
Myotis septentrionalis
Helianthus schweinitzii
Echinacea laevigata
Rhus michauxii
Lasigmona decorata
Bombus affinis
T Probable/Potential
E Current
E Current
E Current
E Current
E Historic
T = Threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range."
E = Endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Current = The species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic = The species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Probable/Potential = The species is considered likely to occur in this county based on proximity of known records (in adjacent
counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
HDR also queried the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer database for
protected species Element Occurrence distribution and proximity to the Project Site (Project Report
[NCNHDE-9805], attached). The query revealed that no known occurrences of federally protected
species or critical habitat have been documented within a one -mile radius of the Project Area.
The project site does not exhibit suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, Michaux's sumac, smooth
coneflower, or Schweinitz's sunflower. It was also determined that potential summer roosting habitat for
the NLEB is present in forested areas of the site. Therefore, the project was also reviewed in accordance
with the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species
(SLOPES) between the USACE, Wilmington District, and the Asheville and Raleigh U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Offices. It was determined that the project is located is more than 0.25 miles away from
HUCs with documented hibernacula and activities in the project limits do not require prohibited incidental
take; as such, this project meets the criteria for the 4(d) rule and any associated take is
exempted/excepted. As established in the NLEB SLOPES, this project does not require prohibited
intentional take of the NLEB and it meets the criteria for the 4(d) rule.
The proposed Project is not anticipated to have an effect on any federally protected species.
CSWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification with attachments in accordance with RGP 163, and
GC 4147. Should you have any questions or require additional information following your review of the
enclosed materials, please contact me at [phone] or ihinsonaci.charlotte. nc.us.
Sincerely,
mann..-- w
Isaac Hinson, PWS
401/404 Permitting Supervisor
Charlotte Storm Water Services
Page 17
Kelly aures, PWS
Environmental Project Manager
HDR

Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification

Page | 8

Appendices: Appendix A
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Quadrangles
Figure 3. Aerial Imagery and Mecklenburg County Parcels
Figure 4. USDA-NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 5. NWI, NHD, and FEMA Floodplains
Figure 6. Potentially Jurisdictional Waters of the US
Appendix B
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Landowner Information
Appendix C
Representative Site Photographs
Stream Data Forms
Appendix D
Plan Sheets (Proposed Impacts)
Pre-Construction Notification
Appendix E
Agency Correspondence

Appendix A
Figures

PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\01_PROJVIC.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 1
PROJECT VICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1Miles O
LEGEND
SDIP Project Area (62 ac.)
Mecklenburg County,North Carolina
DATA SOURCE: Esri, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
1 in = 1 miles
SDIP Project Area
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\02_TOPO.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 2
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
SDIP Project Area (62 ac.)
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
USGS Quadrangle
DATA SOURCE: USGS Topo Quadrangles:Charlotte East, NC (1981)Weddington, NC (1981)Charlotte West, NC (1981)Fort Mill, SC (1981)
Charlotte East, NC (1981)
Weddington, NC (1989)
0 1,000Feet O1 in = 1,000 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
SDIP Project Area
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 4
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 5
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 8
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\03_AERIALPARCELS_V2.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 3
AERIAL IMAGERY AND MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARCELS(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
SDIP Project Area (62 ac.)
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Mecklenburg County Parcels
DATA SOURCE: Mecklenburg County Tax Parcelshttp://www.bing.com/maps
0 200Feet O1 in = 200 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
Map ID*Parcel Number
1 17330162
2 17330163
3 17330141
4 17330143
5 17330151
6 17325120
7 17325121
8 17325406
9 17325407
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Note: See Appendix B forproperty owner information
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 4
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 5
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 8
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\04_SOILS.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/14/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 4
NRCS SOILS SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
SDIP Project Area (62 ac.)
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Soil Map Units
DATA SOURCE: NRCS Soils Survey of Mecklenburg County, NChttp://www.bing.com/maps
0 200Feet O1 in = 200 feet
On-Site Soils:No hydric soils located within the impact areasEnB - Enon Sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesMeB - Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesPaE - Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesWkE - Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 4
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 5
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 8
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\05_NHDNWIFEMA.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/14/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 5
NHD, NWI, AND FEMA FLOODPLAINS(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
USGS NationalHydrography Dataset
USFWS NationalWetland Inventory
FEMA Flood Zone
100-Year Flood Zone
500-Year Flood Zone
DATA SOURCE: USFWS National Wetland Inventory(http://www.fws.gov.wetlands [2019]; USGS NationalHydrography Dataset(http://www.nhd.usgs.gov/ [2019]); FEMA MapService Center, National Flood Hazard Layer(http://msc.fema.gov/portal [2019]);http://www.bing.com/maps
FIRM Panel 3710454000K (eff. 02/19/2014)
0 200Feet O1 in = 200 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 4
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 5
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 8
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\06_WOUS.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 6
POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Jurisdictional Streams
Culvert
DATA SOURCE: http://www.bing.com/maps
0 200Feet O1 in = 200 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 5
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 4
Impact AreaPlan Sheet 8
Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream A (132 lf)
See Figure 6A
Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream A (28 lf)
See Figure 6B
Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream B (193 lf)
See Figure 6C
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\06A_WOUS.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 6A
POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Jurisdictional Streams
Culvert!!!(Photographs
DATA SOURCE: http://www.bing.com/maps
0 50Feet O1 in = 50 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
1
Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream A (132 lf) NCSAM Score: Low
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\06B_WOUS.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 6B
POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Jurisdictional Streams
Culvert!!!(Photographs
DATA SOURCE: http://www.bing.com/maps
0 25Feet O1 in = 25 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream A (28 lf) NCSAM Score: Low
Right Top of Bank ofStream A is outside of the impact area.
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3389_CITYOFCHARLOTTE\10180349_TATTERSALLSDIP\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\JD\06C_WOUS.MXDUSER: KTHAMES - DATE: 8/7/2019
TATTERSALL SDIP
FIGURE 6C
POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US(CLIENT LOGO)
LEGEND
Impact Areas (1 ac.)
Jurisdictional Streams
Culvert!!!(Photographs
DATA SOURCE: http://www.bing.com/maps
0 50Feet O1 in = 50 feet
Name: Tattersall SDIPApplicant: CSWSLocation: Hopecrest Dr and Merrywood Rdin Charlotte, NCMecklenburg County PID #: See Figure 3Date: 7/24/2019SDIP Project Area: 62 acresImpact Areas: 1 acreCenter Coordinates: -80.860471°, 35.126351°
1Potential Non-WetlandWater of the USStream B (193 lf) NCSAM Score: Medium

Appendix B
Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form
Jurisdictional Determination
Request
Landowner Information

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 8/7/2019

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:

Isaac Hinson
Charlotte Storm Water Services
600 E. Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
[e-mail]
704-336-4495

C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington Regulatory District – Charlotte Office

D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg County City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.126351° Long.: -80.860471
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Sugar Creek (Catawba Basin, HUC# 03050103)
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): April 18, 2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.

Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
“may be” subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Stream A 35.124465 -80.858969
Length: 160 feet
Width: 4 feet
Area: 0.01 ac.
non-wetland waters Section 404, non-section 10
Stream B 35.127791 -80.860669
Length: 193 feet
Width: 5 feet
Area: 0.02 ac.
non-wetland waters Section 404, non-section 10

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.

2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
Z Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1":24,000' Charlotte East, NC (1981) &
Weddington, NC (1989)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soils Survey of Mecklenburg Co. (2018)
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI (2019)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710454000K (eff. date 02/19/2014)
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): National Geographic Society, i -cubed (Bing coni) (2013)
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site photographs, dated April 2018
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to fuializing
an action.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
13
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.anny.miliMissions/Re u�ryPermitPro rg am.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: East W. T. Harris Blvd Charlotte, NC 28202
City, State: Charlotte, North Carolina
County: Mecklenburg County
Directions: From uptown Charlotte, take 1-277 East to US 74E. Take Exit 246 to Albemarle Road. Continue on
Albemarle Rd for 2.8 miles, then right onto East W.T. Harris Blvd. Site is 0.4 miles on the left
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 17330162, 17330163, 17330141, 17330143, 17330151,
17325120,17325121,17325406,17325407
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services; POC: Isaac Hinson
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC, 28201
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address 1: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑✓ Other, please explain.
CSWS will conduct work in city utility easements for which the applicant is listed as
the POC for this project.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Charlotte Storm Water Services; POC: Isaac Hinson
Mailing Address: 600 E. Forth street
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28202
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address 3: [e-mail]
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
t If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION TYPE
Select One:
13A, /1 '�
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
F] I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑v Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area
acres
I v I I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
Project Coordinates: 35.126351 °
Latitude -80.860471 °
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑v Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
F✓ USGS Topographic Map
✓❑ Soil Survey Map
❑v Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
❑ Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/r)ublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.0
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x 17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIPPJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification Appendix B: Landowner and Parcel Information Page 1 Table 1. Landowner and Parcel Information - * Map ID numbers correspond with Figure 3 in Attachment A Map ID* Parcel Number Deed Book / Page Owner Name Site and Mailing Address 1 17330162 28912 / 886 RONNIE S TALENT 2425 HOPECREST DRIVE, CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 2 17330163 30523 / 194 ELEY R & MATTHEW FESTGER 7342 QUAIL HILL RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 3 17330141 04773 / 412 PAUL DAVID SMITH & TAFFNEY JOSIF 7400 QUAIL HILL RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 4 17330143 31266 / 888 DAVID L & KATHARINE MORRIS JR 2410 HOPECREST DR CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 5 17330151 07218 / 479 DAVID R PATRICK 2300 HOPECREST DR CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 6 17325120 30302 / 086 NEIL G & SUSAN D BUSHONG 2522 MERRYWOOD RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 7 17325121 30426 / 445 YUJI & ELIZABETH IWAKURA 2510 MERRYWOOD RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 8 17325406 05491 / 266 DONALD A & TRUDY M YOUNG 2501 MERRYWOOD RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210 9 17325407 31108 / 716 LILLIAN R & RICHARD J GERARDI 2521 MERRYWOOD RD CHARLOTTE, NC, 28210

Appendix C
Representative
Photographs & Stream
Data Forms

Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification
Appendix C: Representative Site Photographs Page 1
Stream A – Figure 6A (Appendix A) and Planset Sheet 4 (Appendix D)

Photograph 1 – Stream A, Facing Inlet Photograph 2 – Stream A, Facing Upstream

Photograph 3 – Stream A, Facing Outlet Photograph 4 – Stream A, Facing Downstream
Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification
Appendix C: Representative Site Photographs Page 2
Stream A – Figure 6B (Appendix A) and Planset Sheet 8 (Appendix D)

Photograph 5 – Stream A at proposed rip rap
apron location
.
Photograph 6 – Stream A, Facing Upstream

Photograph 7 – Stream A, Facing Downstream
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 04/18/2018 Project/Site: 7342 Hopecrest Dr Latitude: 35.1244
Evaluator: HMS County: Mecklenburg Longitude: -80.8591
Total Points: 25.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
CLT East- Lower Catawba 03
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )

a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

W EATHER CONDITIONS DAY OF SAMPLE: Sunny/ Unnamed Tib of Little Sugar/ RAIN?: Rain in last 24 hours -
No

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on th e same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): 7342 Hopecrest Dr 2. Date of evaluation: 4/18/2018
3. Applicant/owner name: CSWS 4. Assessor name/organization: HMS
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Little Sugar Creek 7. River basin: Catawba
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.1244/-80.8591
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 15 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting i n accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:
Purpose of project is flooding.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name 7342 Hopecrest Dr Date of Assessment 4/18/2018
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization HMS

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology

LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow

MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow

LOW LOW

(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW

(4) Microtopography NA NA
(3) Stream Stability

MEDIUM MEDIUM

(4) Channel Stability HIGH HIGH

(4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow

MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation

LOW LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow

MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Substrate

LOW LOW
(3) Stream Stability

HIGH HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream-side Habitat

MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Stream-side Habitat

MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat

NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction

NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat

NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone

NA NA
Overall LOW

Charlotte Storm Water Services | Tattersall SDIP
PJD Request & Pre-Construction Notification
Appendix C: Representative Site Photographs Page 3
Stream B – Figure 6C (Appendix A) and Planset Sheet 5 (Appendix D)

Photograph 8 – Stream B, Facing Inlet Photograph 9 – Stream B, Facing Upstream

Photograph 10 – Stream B, Facing Outlet Photograph 11 – Stream B, Facing Downstream

Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 04/18/2018 Project/Site: 2501 Merrywood Rd Latitude: 35.1277
Evaluator: HMS County: Mecklenburg Longitude: -80.8604
Total Points: 35.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other CLT East
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.5 )

a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11.5 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

WEATHER CONDITIONS DAY OF SAMPLE; Unnamed Tributary of Little Sugar Creek, Sunny. No rain last 24
hours.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on th e same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): 2501 Merrywood Rd 2. Date of evaluation: 4/18/2018
3. Applicant/owner name: CSWS 4. Assessor name/organization: HMS
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Little Sugar Creek 7. River basin: Catawba
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.1277/ -80.8604
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 250
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting i n accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name 2501 Merrywood Rd Date of Assessment 4/18/2018
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization HMS

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology

MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow

MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow

MEDIUM

(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM

(4) Microtopography LOW
(3) Stream Stability

HIGH

(4) Channel Stability HIGH

(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow

MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation

MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat

HIGH
(3) Baseflow

MEDIUM
(3) Substrate

HIGH
(3) Stream Stability

HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat

HIGH
(2) Stream-side Habitat

MEDIUM
(3) Stream-side Habitat

MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat

NA
(3) Flow Restriction

NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat

NA
(2) Intertidal Zone

NA
Overall MEDIUM

Appendix D
Plan Sheets & Pre-
Construction Notification

INDEX OF SHEETS
CoverSheet..............................................................
GeneralNotes...........................................................
Storm Drainage Schedule .........................................
Plan & Profile............................................................
Structural Details .....................................................
Details........................................................................
Traffic Control Plans ...............................................
PlantingPlans...........................................................
ErosionControl........................................................
Utility Plans & Details .............................................
Charlotte Water Utility Sheets ...............................
1
2
3
4-21
S1 -S8
DI -D5
TCPI-TCP13
P1
ECl-ECll
UT1-UT5
Ul - U5
TOTAL SHEETS 69
STO P
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
'NORTHCAROLINA ONE CALL"
AT 1A 32-4949 FOR
ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING ANY
EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO
BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
STOP
SURVEY PREPARED BY:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE SURVEY -MAPPING -GIS FROM
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR
THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES
ESTABLISHED BY: NCGS MONUMENT OR CONTROL POINT
WITH NAD 83(2011) STATE PLANE COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 507,760.62 FASTING: 1,450,375.91 ELEVATION NAVD:
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS
PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.999846446
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 LSUG-7 ELEV. 564.03
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL
DISTANCES. DATE RANGE OF SURVEY: 12/12/2013
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Dewberry®
N.C. REGISTRATION # F-0929
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
9300 HARRIS CORNERS PARKWAY
SUITE 220
CHARLOTTE, NC 282693797
PHONE: [phone]
January 28, 2015 FAX: [phone]
•
CHARLOTTE..
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Construction Plans of Proposed
Tattersall Storm Drainage Improvement Project
Project No.: 671-14-135
Project Features:
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
VICINITY MAP CHANNEL BANK ENHANCEMENT & STABILIZATION
NOT TO SCALE SANITARY SEWER LINE RELOCATIONS
WATER LINE RELOCATIONS
RIPARIAN PLANTINGS
CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND ASPHALT
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
SHEET INDEX MAPS
nrn'r—Qr nT�
GRAPHIC SCALES
Charkde•ISeck4nhhlp 20 40 60
STORM Plan View .................
zo 40 60
WATERHorz. Profile ............
Services 4 R 12
Vert. Profile .............
2018 NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 20 40 60
Cross Section ...........
PE SEAL
cPgN
CARO��'.:
�QQ9FE35Iq,, ('y9 �__
S L 9
27 28
NIJ ,Q�l`(
Record Drawings
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Contract Administration
Storm Water Construction
Landscape Management
Utility Coordinator
CDOT - Design
CDOT - Implementation
CLTWater
Storm Water Project Manager
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Existing Property Line ..................................
Maintained as R/W Line ............................... —,A
Existing Structures ........................................
Fence............................................................... X
Overhead Utility Easement ........................... GUE OUE
Temporary Construction Easement ............ e
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Easement ............ — SSE SSE —
Existing Sanitary Sewer Easement .............. —SSE SSE—
Proposed Storm Drainage Easement ............ — SDE SDE—
Existing Storm Drainage Easement ............. SDE— SDE
Other Existing Easement .............................. E
Existing Gas Line ........................................... c c
Existing Water Line ....................................... w w
Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ Ss SS
Existing Underground Telecommunications UT
Existing Underground Electric ..................... UE
Existing Storm Drainage ...............................
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................
Proposed Water Line ...................................... w w —
Proposed Sanitary Sewer ...............................—. SS SS.
ExistingTree.......................................................... .................
Existing Water Meter.............................................................................
Existing Water Valve............................................................................. oa
Proposed Water Valve............................................................................ H
ExistingGas Valve................................................................................. oa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole........................................................
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole ...................................................... Os
Existing Storm Drain Manhole............................................................ 0°
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole.......................................................... •
Existing Telephone Manhole................................................................ O
Existing Electric Manhole..................................................................... Q
Existing Catch Basin............................................................................. ff�]
Proposed Catch Basin...........................................................................
Proposed Yard Inlet.............................................................................. X
Existing Yard Inlet................................................................................ a
ExistingLight Pole................................................................................. #
ProposedLight Pole...............................................................................
Existing Utility Pole................................................................................ Ya
ExistingGuy Wire............................................................................
Proposed Utility Pole.............................................................................. )&
IronPin.................................................................................................... 0
ExistingFire Hydrant.............................................................................
Proposed Fire Hydrant..........................................................................
Proposed Double Catch Basin..........................................................
IM
ExistingDrop Inlet................................................................................. 0
Proposed Drop Inlet................................................................................
MU
ProposedPlug........................................................................................
Tree Protection.............................................................................. ��
Orange Const. Fence................................................................... —0-9—
SiltFence.....................................................................................
Grading Limits...........................................................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk, Headwall... 0
Proposed Asphalt Pavement Mill / Repave ................................ 0
Proposed Gabion Wall ..................................................................
Proposed Gravel Access drive ......................................................
Existing Riprap............................................................................
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch..............................................................
Channel Grading Area.............................................................. 0
Construction Access......................................................................
Proposed Trench / Full Depth Asphalt Replacement ...............
SelectBackfdl...............................................................................
Removal.......................................................................................
Existing Contour......................................................... — — — —6M -
Proposed Contour......................................................... 55s
Existing Tree Cover............................................................ rrvrvwrv,
Inlet Protection..............................................................................
Proposed Fence .................................................. X
Controlled Backfill ...................................................................... SA o
ExistingGround........................................................................... Wyk
ExistingStorm Flow Arrow...........................................................�,..y
DrainageDirection....................................................................
AIIIIIIIIIIII
ProposedRetaining Wall ..............................................................
1% Annual Chance Floodplain Limits............
Proposed Guardrail................................................................... .
0
1�
l..dltlllLO1 1 L' .
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
APPROVED
Bid Set No.
CITY ENGINEER DATE
P:\50062142\CAD\Civa\Submitral\1.0 Cover,heetdwg
6/28/201911:49 AM

635 Z
630
625
620
615
610
605
�� N
HOPECREST DRIVE STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
635 H o
aQ
TEMPORARY TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION STORM DRAINAGE _R_CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT MINIMUM WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLAN)
EASEMENT
N
CHANNEL UNDISTURBED
U pj
U
V V
W-2215
VARIES (AREA TO (AREA In
J p
J
J J
-
aw
Qj
Qj
w
QH Q O
_
10 rO
______ _______ r� II� ILII
MATCHH GRADEIII
5z O�
RU
JZV >Z N
OQ
/
GAS LINE YO BE
KF co+�w
¢N
dN d U
>jR
aw `N
aw
aw <@ a
15' moo zj
= o^
POOL
EE
CLEAR ZONE PROPOSED n inN
1. NO TREES TO BE PLANTED IN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SELECT
2. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
GRADE 1..<o xw
LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL -03
MATERIAL
_
_ I n in
AND FLARED END SECTION
s
MATERIAL COVER
15'
WITHSELECT
RIFFLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
AND
AND RIPRAP
AND FLARED END SECTION
CLEAR ZONE
;� \
REMOVE EXIS NG HEADWALL
INSTALL MANHOLE OVER ESTING IPE.
\
FIELD VERIFY INVERTS OF EXISTING.-�
PIPE. SEE SHEET z0 FOR PR FILE
Stream A - Impact #2
J NO
WORK PROPOSED WITHIN \ 351f permanent impact
(rip rap apron)
BANKFULL CHANNEL. \�
APPROXIMATE
\IIT -REMOVE EXISTING HE� DWALL
EXISTING TOP 4 BANK (RIGHT)
/
LOCATION OF EX.
^
AND PROP. 6' WL
SEE SHEET IJT1
_
\ �- EXISTING NEL
CENTERLINE (THALWEG
EXISTING TOP OF BANK (LEFT)
PROPOSED
-
RIPRAP PROPOSED ROUIDFR
----
3.00X (SEE RIFFLE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)ar
'
OF
PROP
_
/ PR POSED
EXIS INC GRADE
- IPRAP
r
_ _ — _ —
PRO OSED GRADE
— ExisnNe a" vcP _ — -
- — PROPOSED IFFLE
_ —
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
-�
PR OSED FOOTING
AP ROXIMATE LOC TION
FILL EXISTING VOID
PROPOS SILL (TYR)
-XISTING 80 LF OF 48" x 72" MP 0 0.779
NTH SELECT MATERIAL.
(SEE DETAIL SHEET D5)
C VER WITH GEO XILE
PROPOSED FOOTING
'
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
aQ
TEMPORARY TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION STORM DRAINAGE _R_CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT MINIMUM WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLAN)
EASEMENT
630 DISTANCE TIE -INTO TIEINTODISTANCE
CHANNEL UNDISTURBED
VARIES EXISTING BANKFULL EXISTING
DISTANCE 5' BENCH 5' BENCH
GRADE GRADE
_S
DISTANCE
t CHANNEL ~tip
DISTANCE VARIES (ARBA Aly~ (VARIES) �R(ARBA A) (VARIES)
VARH?S
VARIES (AREA TO (AREA In
CHANNEL SECTION #2
---1ff-
III
PROPOSED PROPOSED
ss J ss
- - - L
II III � GRADE GRADE
_ - - _ TT
I „ ��I II
625
Y BENCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL
�I F 111 20% 1 1F=ITLTF
MATCH GRADE
______ _______ r� II� ILII
MATCHH GRADEIII
`.\\
620
615
SELOCETDIZEANDINST'TT11 T1
PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.
SEE TABLE I, THIS SHEET FOR MATTING SELECTION.
�
1'x2'.2' BOULDER 2
(APPROX.)—
• III - - - II
II II I EXISTING SOIL I r 5,1 EXI6TING 601E IP
SE ,FE TILIZP AND INSTALL MATTING
_
- - - - - - - - - I I- -
.IIIILI I-ILI IIIILI 111111 ILI III _II
"'""�`I�111JII�•�' I EXISTING BANKFULL
PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.
6EE TAHLU I, THIS SHEOT FOR MATTING 6i[. TION.
CHANNEL UNDISTURBED
LEGEND*
(—
\
CHANNEL GRADING 0
CHANNEL SECTION #2
ez
ss J ss
NOT TO SCALE
RE. 2e9i2 PC. 665
LOT 17 BLOCK C MAP 19-418'
STORM DRAINAGE SDE
Y BENCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL
605
EASEMENT LINE
BACKFILL MATERIAL
`.\\
SIGNIFICANT SPACES, FILL
VOIDS WITH STONE
CHANNEL GRADING GL
= 4'
/
GAS LINE YO BE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LIMITS
- F! LOW
NOT TO SCALE
CATCH BASIN
'SEE COVER SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL LEGEND ITEMS
—ELEV.= 613.58
ExISHNc GRADE
NCDOT x840.01 {
POOL
NOTES:
_
1. NO TREES TO BE PLANTED IN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
-_
2. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
—
MATCH EXISTING GRADE
LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL -03
Or : Net[
SEE PLAN AND PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
FILL EXISTING VOID WITH
AND FLARED END SECTION
s
MATERIAL COVER
REMOVE 15 LF OF 15" RCP
WITHSELECT
RIFFLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
AND
AND RIPRAP
AND FLARED END SECTION
610
) ��
ADJUST EX. MANHOLE R M TO
ELEV. 613.4 (APPROX.)
/
ELEV.= 612.4 (APPROX.),
(—
\
RIPRAP APRON ----
7 //
_
ez
ss J ss
CONSTRUCTED
RE. 2e9i2 PC. 665
LOT 17 BLOCK C MAP 19-418'
BOULDERGAPPED BUILDNOT BE
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY- -
605
HAVE ANY
BACKFILL MATERIAL
`.\\
SIGNIFICANT SPACES, FILL
VOIDS WITH STONE
TYPE II FABRIC
m - � \
/
GAS LINE YO BE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)
Or Nett
NOT TO SCALE
117+50 118+00 110+50 119WD 119+50 120+00
Table 1: Channel Gradin and Turf Reinforcement Summa Table
ADJUST EX. MANHOLE R M TO
WITH 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
623.50. CONTRACTOR TO'
PROTECT DURING CONSTRUCTION^
0
RONNIE TALENT,?,,
ENT �p
\
END STATION
7 //
_
ez
ss J ss
1301 71 / REPLACE EXISTING LINE
RE. 2e9i2 PC. 665
LOT 17 BLOCK C MAP 19-418'
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY- -
(SEE SHEET UT1 FOR
- aa2e-NOrECRE$T DR
117+93
`.\\
sy.F ADDITIONAL INFORMATION)'
/ 1` S 4,.K PO
m - � \
/
GAS LINE YO BE
REPLACE EXISTING
RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)
Or Nett
MAI -J9 C EARNHARDT
CATCH BASIN
/
I If temporary impact / 17330143
DB: �z 2v� 32a -
NCDOT x840.01 {
I 1 V l
INSTALL TRANSITION TO
2'-6" CURB AND GUTTERS
r the culvert replacement) 0 HDPECREST DR
\ \
A \
v
V / -
1�
PER CLDS (j10.19 (TYR)
j
SEE SHEET/1 FOR PROFILE -
\
Or : Net[
Table 1: Channel Gradin and Turf Reinforcement Summa Table
REPLACE 2'-0" VALLEY GUTTER,
WITH 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
(SEE DETAIL SHEET D1)
MATTING SELECTION
CLDS #10.17,W
END STATION
REMOVE, PROTECT, AND RESE
AREA A
MAILBOXES AS NECESSARY
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION (TYR)
F
REPLETE 18 S OF
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY- -
100% Biodegradable
CLDS y10.25A
117+93
#2
Coir Fiber 400
SEE SHEET 21 FO -
R PROFILE
m - � \
/
GAS LINE YO BE
RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)
Or Nett
MAI -J9 C EARNHARDT
ream A - Impact #4 / /& KAREN P EARNHARDT
I If temporary impact / 17330143
DB: �z 2v� 32a -
A D
..o
onstruction disturbance oT 1(3:1)7 BLOGK c MAP 19-n1B
'-
r the culvert replacement) 0 HDPECREST DR
Straw/Coconut Matting wrth
SEE SHEET/1 FOR PROFILE -
Or : Net[
_ _
REMOVE 24 LF OF 15" RCP
y
AND FLARED END SECTION
s
REMOVE 15 LF OF 15" RCP
AND FLARED END SECTION
- -� RIPRAP APRON'
(SEE SHEET EC2)
INSTALL MANHOLE OVER ESTING IPE.
FIELD VERIFY INVERTS OF EXISTING.-�
PIPE. SEE SHEET z0 FOR PR FILE
Stream A - Impact #2
J NO
WORK PROPOSED WITHIN \ 351f permanent impact
(rip rap apron)
BANKFULL CHANNEL. \�
7E _ SEE
SHEET 2 NOTE 19 FOR
BANKFULL IQEFINITION -- --
Table 1: Channel Gradin and Turf Reinforcement Summa Table
TRIBUTARY #1
MATTING SELECTION
MATTING SELECTION
START STATION
END STATION
CROSS SECTION
AREA A
AREA B
100% Biodegradable
117+30
117+93
#2
Coir Fiber 400
Straw/Coconut Matting with
Or Nett
100% Biodegradable
118+78
119+50
42
Coir Fiber 400
Straw/Coconut Matting wrth
Or : Net[
Z
C
EXISTING CHANNEL
CENTERLINE (THALWEG)
P,>t LI TRAKIMOWICZ
DO NOT DAMAGE PRIVATE STORM SYSTEM �/ & JENNIFER � TRAKIMOMCZ
THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION Da: liosa bac: mt
LOT 8 �N A. DF LOT RTES
2560 ROBIN HILL DR�
CUT END OF EXISTING 4 - -
%� / CPP TO EXTEND 6" BEYOND' ---
/ PROPOSED GRADE (TYR)
�� :INSTALL SEEDING, MATTING, ANS
ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION MEASURES; _
Stream A-Impact#3 _PER TABLE 1 AND SHEET Pi
40 If temporary impact GRADE CHANNEL BENCHIN
. (grading) TO DRAIN TO STREAM (TYP)
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
'(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
RIPRAP APRON
(SEE SHEET EC2)
Stream A Impact #2 SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT v /
(SEE SHEET I FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION)
t A 251f permanent impact ' /I S
(rip rap apron) REPLACE 81 LF OF 48" x 72" CMP AND TWO
HEADWALLS WITH 86 LF OF Tx5' RCBC AND { \
� TWO HEADWALLS
T /
REPLACE ASPHALT FULL
DEPTH (TYR) (SEE DETAIL
SHEET D1)
-MILL AND REPAVE ASPHALT ON HOPECREST DR (SEE /
PAVING NOTE THIS SHEET AND DETAIL SHEET D1)
S -\ / REMOVE LIGHT DURING CONSTRUCTION, REPLACE ONCE /
oR� STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE (BY OTHERS) (TYR)
5
�
Stream A - Impact #1 S �,� Y /MATTHEW MAISE
1 & DAWN MAISE
6 1f permanent impact ° / 17330163
CUtverl extension �" �+T O / DB. 29131 PG: 659
( ) \/ LOT 15 BC MAP 19-418 -`
Z"0 / 7342 QUAIL HILL RD
I a _
J2 _ INSTAL A� STAKING BETWEEN S
P 19-41 L / A 6 / REPLACE 22 SY OF J
L ED 117+30 TO 117+93 AND 118+78 TO a \� / {� CONCRETE DRIVEWAY /I
119+50 AS SHOWN ON SHEET P1� �� \
1 ,.. r CLDS #10.25A
1. STA. 117+30 TO 117+93 AND 118+78 TO 119+50 CHANNEL
IMPROVEMENTS PER OR SS SECTION ON THIS SHEET.
2. CONTRACTOR WALL NOT STORE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WITHIN THE
FLOODPLAIN.
UTILITY NOTE:
THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT IS THE
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY TO VERIFY BOTH HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT
NO ONE -CALL AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. EXISTING
UTILITIES SHOULD BE EITHER RELOCATED PER PLANS OR PROTECTED
IN-PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE SEE THE UTILITY SECTION OF
THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND/OR
CLARIFICATION.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE CONDUITS FOR
DUKE, SPECTRUM AND AT&T (PAID FOR UNDER SPECIAL PROVISIONS).
PRIVATE UTILITY NOTE:
PRIVATE UTILITIES TO SUPPORT THEIR OWN AND COORDINATE SCHEDULING
DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE CONFLICT EXISTS, PRIVATE UTILITY TO
RELOCATE
SANITARY SEWER & WATER LINE LATERAL NOTE:
LIMITED SANITARY SEWER LATERALS HAVE BEEN LOCATED AND SHOWN ON
THE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY M LOCATE
ALL SERVICE LATERALS (WATER AND SEWER) THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY
THEIR ACTIVITIES. ALL SERVICE LATERALS IMPACTED BY THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT.
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON SHEETS
TCPI-TCP13
PAVING NOTE:
A) MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH TO REMOVE ASPHALT OVERLAY
TO DEPTH OF EXISTING GUTTER PAN (DEPTH VARIES 1"-3"). MILL AND
REMOVE ASPHALT FROM GUTTER PAN SURFACE. ADJUST EXISTING
MANHOLE RIMS WITHIN PAVING LIMITS TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE.
B) MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH OF AREA SHOWN ON PLANS
DITAN
ADIONAL 1.5' AND RE -PAVE PER DETAIL SHEET D1.
C) MATCH EXISTING PAVING AND PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION AT
PAVING LIMITS.
SCALE: HORZ. V'= 20'
VERT. 1" = 4'
® Y
w LL z o
tlI z aBkg-
O u F¢z�
c
2 A'wua
H �
� c
2 W
A dE-
Z 9
O
C�
O
W U W
Q
=0P15sS 4y�7ryy'= F Q z iLl w C/i
""BR7AIN J.OEy`"�Iq n � O \O
P:\500621/21CA0\CMMubmiR,M-5 Eli, &Pmfik(Ch1a I).dwg
7/19/2019 12:37 PM

EXI
MERRYWOOD ROAD STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS H o A H
n
600
I
TRIBUTARY #2
MATTING SELECTION
MATTING SELECTION
START STATION
600
CROSS SECTION
W-35 m n
AREA B
100% Biodegradable
200+50
201+79
42
r
Straw/Coconut Matting
�
with Or anis NIium
a7 M W
2
IOWI Biodegradable
Z
N
W-�2N
42
Coir Fiber 400
Straw/Cowmt Matting
� Li Q d VH
595
� t;
Z
Z O Z
n=
595
0-00V
F
F
••N
ai v,Zz
Uw
VZ>K
0 ZAPPROXIMATE
-�
0 0 In �nw
w
¢
a
¢
a n
LOCATION OF EX. 0 3�
590
~ ^ ^ f m
2
O
AND PROP. 6" WL
590
SEE SHEET UT1 RD xN
¢N
�N
3 oow
a w
a w
RADE
PROVID SAFETY RAIL
PROPOSED
LDS STD. #50. 4A & 50.048
G
585
10' CL AR ZONE♦
585
10' CLEA_ ZONE
EXI TING CHANNEL CENTERLINE
SELECT
_
_
w
tAELIY
RAIL
& 50.04B
REM. EXISTING HEA WALL
y
58U
580
EXI TING 97 LF OF
-
ROPOSED BOLL R
_
°
-
-----
SEE RIFFLE DETAI THIS SHEET
/
EXISTING TOP F BANK (RIGHT)
__ _ _---�'-- -- - - -
_zz-
--
_
RIPRAP APRON/
-
_ __ --
PROPOSED 2,65%
-
APPROXIM TE LOCATION
STING
TOP OF BANK LEFT)
_
F EX. 8" SS
PR RIFFLE
PROPOSED _46Oposm
B
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
570
GROUT IN PLACE
578
0.
PROPOSED FOOTING
APPROXIM TE LOCATION
PROPOSED E ILL (TYP)
APPROXIMATE L CATION
SEE DETAIL SHEET D5
OF
PROP. 8" S
565
565
. (APPROXI ATE LOCATION
CONSTRUCTION STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONS'IRUCIION I
EAHEMENT
ETES (ANE PLAN) ggrygNT •
DISTANC .nLIN.CO Tr r0 DISTANCE
RIES
]�TSTINI 5'BENCH BANKFCLC 5'BENCH T EO
DISTANCE— CHANNEL DISTANCE
nisi a (VARIHS)~�<"A)yl� (VARIES)-c^RFA U,ARws) VARIES
''-TI
VARIES (AREA B) (AREA.)
-IT1-
- -1]-1� PROPOSE. PROPOSEDfinry
p'i-i-i Tall -Il -lid GRADE cRA.e --I mnTrin
ESI T -II -I I- II i--1,
I� �_-I -11=IF IZE Arv.unvsrAL
T _Ex srlrvc 105 C3?--II-I
-- — _— - o T -i -i rT �T MATcncwwE
SEED, I
ruTCHCIRADIe' lil fill l 2.0/ 46°/ 1 Ili ii-u-�' ® 9
--�-Ilii _ sxlsnrvc sal. _� ERrnu LMATTIN
�s nMANIIPACTURER SPEEITE2 oNS.O L w
S®TAB PER MANUPACTURHR 8PHC4TCA'rIDES IILr l- =1, � SEE
sTABLE I, THI65F1EeT POR MATTIN06ECECTION.
iU'.eTPORMATrwcseLEcriory l '111 LLii !i lima o z q
CHnn'NNILLNu DISruaDED 4)
cg
U an0 "C
- C �
2
HAEL SECTION 2 LEGEND � D, my�aLL
C NN S C ON # to B
NOT TO SCALE
5' BENCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL CHANNEL BENCH/ W
CHANNEL GRADING 2 W
STORM DRAINAGE SDE— Z E-
4 EASEMENT LINE 3
2' 3' FLOW CHANNEL GRADING GL d
1'z2'z2' BOULDER LIMITS p
(APPROX.) 1' *SEE COVER SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL LEGEND ITEMS
PFILIELEV.= 5]5.1]
_ POOL
ELEV. 574.8 (APPROX.) _ S\ _ELEV.= 573.8 (APPBOX.)`EXISTING GRADE
RIPRAP APRONMATCH EXISTING GRADEFILL E%(STING VOID WITHLE SELECT MATERIAL. COVER
BOULDER SHOULD NOT BE WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
GAPPED OR HAVE ANY BACKFILL MATERIAL AND RIPRAP
SIGNIFICANT SPACES, FILL
VOIDS WITH STONE TYPE II FABRIC
it
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
g 9 Y
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. NO TREES TO BE PLANTED IN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
2. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL - 03
SEE PLAN AND PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Table 1: Channel Grading and Turf Reinforcement SuMMIEI Table
TRIBUTARY #2
MATTING SELECTION
MATTING SELECTION
START STATION
END STATION
CROSS SECTION
AREA A
AREA B
100% Biodegradable
200+50
201+79
42
Cort Fiber 400
Straw/Coconut Matting
with Or anis NIium
IOWI Biodegradable
202+77
203+40
42
Coir Fiber 400
Straw/Cowmt Matting
with Organic Netting
sm 14%
INSTALL LIVE STAKING BETWEEN STA. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION LINE SEE SHEET 19
(SEE ATTACHED CLTWATER PLANS) 1. STA. 200+50 TO 201+79 AND 202+77 TO 203+40 CHANNEL AlMATCH
200+50 TO 201+79 AND 202+77 / `` Q -i / \ • s-./ - 1-- 2 ,/ / / IMPROVEMENTS PER CROSS SECTION ON THIS SHEET.
NO WORK PROPOSED WITHIN z3I ASS SHOWN ON SHEET P7 I a / INSTALL TRANSITION/ y \I I v 1 L \ REPLACE ASPHALT FULL :%__/ urLvPUT ///~
/TO 0 +40 1 / urLv PUT PTH (TYP) (SEE DETAIL �, 2. CONTRACTOR WILL NOT STORE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WITHIN THE
BANKFULL CHANNEL. g" 1 I L zowcoFFEe TaAvls TO 2'-6" CURB ANDS / ! // - DE aoHN cosTELLo III
- d FLOODPLAIN.
SEE SHEET 2 NOTE 19 FOR n3zs4o] ( ) + �/ SHEET D7) -
/ PROPOSED HEADWALL"' ! \ GUTTER PER CLDS / ��. ��, x NATAUE cosTE o hccr - seawcc u
+ 2521 MERRYWOOD RD ? ' 1]325120 �\ / - _ A{ UTILITY NOTE:
BANKFULL DEFINITIO '-
CONNECT EXISTING 15 RCP TO V
DB: 036fi0 PG: 946 1 DB: 2]]42 PG: 3 2
Q A STRUCTURAL
L PLANS FOR LOT 2 BLOCK 21 MAP to 529 #10.19 TYF ` 1 ! "',•" MILL AND REPAVE ASPHALT ON }
1 TURA
LOT 12 BLOCK 23 MAP i'4-529
�, ° INFORMATION \ \ MERRYWOOD RD (SEE PAVING NOTE zszz MERRYwooD RD's THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT IS THE
` REPLACE 45 LF OF 3' D --- - �� THIS SHEET AND DETAIL SHEET D7) i' _ - CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY BOTH HORIZONTAL AND
v SEE STRUC \ ` - 0 - VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT
>< " EXISTING CHAN�EL CENTERLINE w \, SPLIT RAIL FENCE o /8 t% T� _n" b Q NO ONE -CALL AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. EXISTING
(THALWEG) `REPLACE X97 LF OF 60" CMP �°^ ! 0 �PROPOSEO WATERLINE / ' -, / '<M e+ 1 \ soEr UTILITIES SHOULD BE EITHER RELOCATED PER PLANS OR PROTECTED
Stream B - Impact #6 ° RELOCATION (SEE SHEET UTI) i e " / IN-PLACE DURING S SHEET
FOR ADDITIONAL
SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION OF
WITH 97 LF 10'X5' RCBC, " n -- --� )� \ j THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR INSTRU TIONS AND/OR
SO if temporary impact >., -- o`` h� ` -REMOVE EXISTING GRADE CHANNEL BENCHING TO -'' �r 6`3e CLARIFICATION.
-
- (grading) GAS LINE TO BE / 5oE
j zoo+oo \ ,o - HEADWALL DRAIN TO STREAM (TYP) / Lh 5 pP sTHE
RELOCATED (BY OTHERS) a �_ J 5�E_C - - _ - - / DUKE, SPECTRUM AND AT&T (PAID FOR (UNDER SPECIAL PROVISIONS).
R
T-
100 YEAR �IKI)ODPLAIN E �°\� S _t v- " -.Ho _ _ / _ D , - - PRIVATE UTILITY NOTE: w'
aaP a s
-
SS t. 5g5
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE � � 8 F
/ PRIVATE URDTIES TO SUPPORT THEIR OWN AND COORDINATE SCHEDULING
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET) - DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE CONFLICT EXISTS, PRIVATE UTILITY TO
,L
RELOCATE.
9 -
e c°° m. tot+ z _ •..
/ I -� \ ^, e' / � - - - - - - E � E � SANITARY SEWER &WATER LINE LATERAL NOTE: E-
J ii
Stream. Impact #7 � -
°J3 ° / 3� E =s _ LIMITED SANITARY SEWER LATERALS HAVE BEEN LOCATED AND SHOWN E i -
ry-.
\ _ � h ,'' 20 If temporary impact THE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE
`S,y� - '1- (construction d15t., bw fOr o ALL SERVICE LATERALS (WATER AND SEWER) THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY 1 0
0+
the culvert replacement _ TV THEIR ACTIVITIES. ALL SERVICE LATERALS IMPACTED BY THE CONTRACTOR )
REPLACE 56 LF OF..-� , " _ + °--� - - -'"-' ' ��� _ J � `r. - - °o � E � _ SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. a r
°s^ 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE gof\ - 202+o 1015, uq - _ o L =' / TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE: = Oy c
(COORDINATE WITH HOMEOWNER `^' " �'
AND CIN INSPECTOR); - t - a 6 - - -
s '4_. i 75 a H 3525 - E TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON SHEETS
SEE SHEET EC3 FOR - : , ' - � - �, .�_ _ � � - � \J � s TCP1-TCP13
RIPRAP_ APRON INFORMATION Bio - I '.y - _ s* cgs°" 55
a
" ! E a� -L' PAvrnc Nom:
5. n .. - .. - - s` "w.- 55E 55 e' vcP J SS
Q REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL.0� f —¢- NE,"v i J
Drr. MALL PUT FOPh s - _--_ )
- ° "w Sg 55 _ ' _ < A MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH TO REMOVE ASPHALT OVERLAY
t]3zs4o6 ' T J " --- -SSE_ eb. w \"v tel= / -- TO DEPTH OF E%(STING GUTTER PAN (DEPTH VARIES 1' 3"). MILL AND
DB: 5491 PG: 266 6, EPLA EREPLACE 167 LF15"
115' RCP ) V� f --55f'' - - - _ REMOVE ASPHALT FROM GUTTER PAN SURFACE. ADJUST EXISTING fy
DONALD A YOUNG � 4^ S _
/� & TRDDV M YOUNG �4'.. -
L- / REPLACE 2'-0" VALLEY GUTTER / '�� MANHOLE RIMS 1WTHIN PAVING LIMITS TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE. F Zi
' 7 GAS LINE TO BE \ /� O
LOT 3 BLOCK 21 MAP 14-529 WITH 2'-6 CURB AND GUTTER B) MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH OF AREA SHOWN ON PLANS AN
2501 MERRYWOOD RD . ,� RELOCATED (BY OTHERS) z e / a +
�E _ - -O SEEDING, MATTING, AND /- ADDITIONAL 7.5' AND RE -PAVE PER DETAIL SHEET Di. `Wy w M
FS REPLACE EXISTING CATCH BASIN WITH CLDS #10.17A D .NAL STABILIZATION MEASURES 5 c EXISTING PAVING AND PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION AT /•
SEE DETAIL SHEET D1
\ /' / / I TA ) MATCH E IS j� rJ w O O
/ Q�`' - T _ 1 AND SHEET P_7UNITS.C �/
• - ER BLE PAVING ill N
DOUBLE CATCH BASIN CLDS jj20.03 �
' - �` c, REPLACE EXISTING CATCH BASIN' _ _ - F 0
/ REPLACE 27 LF 15" P �c - 26 WITH DOUBLE CATCH BASIN -' 1a 20 40 60 rn F E A 0
S /"�- _ J,( Stream. Impact#5 �( pf, U
�� ATI S / 'A CLDS #20.03 � � -� q0 If permanent Impact OR z A" � �
// s P s` _ _ � i ORMATION=-_ C '�" w ti A G
Stream B -Impact #5 S ETU // �� / ali / /; '� _ _ (rip rap apron) 11 _ r C
7 30 If permanent impact // /� / / n, _ __
SCALE: HORZ. 1"=20'
rl - Z� W S" a Z }
(rip rap apron) iy! / /i' / I I I� /_ , _ _ _ �AN� VERT. 1 — 4 y�
S"EE SHEET 21 FOR STORM 0.
RAINAGE PROFILE �� ��
/'v' //r�LLPa� / M v'
/KEPLACE 14 SY OF a F,HAHN s s RT/ V :'o��E srgy�T49 A" V1
/ CONCRETE DRIVEWAY CLDS Q' la
8/ 17325121
/••,,,. �I #10.27A De: 194e2 Pc: z] _ =
/ LO 13 BLOCK 23 MAP 14-529
2510 MERRYWOOD RD
RE PLA E EXISTING CATCH BASIN /� ti� .� 2
.� WITH DOUBLE CATCH BASIN /
#20.03
2���. Ql
PAS00621421CA0^\'CbdPSubmNml\0-5 Plan & Profile (Ch ... LI)Awg
7/19/2019 12:38 PM

610
605
600
595
590
585
580
575
HOPECREST DRIVE STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS H o 0
610
Table
1:Channel G III and Turf Reinforcement Sumatury
Table
K
'TEMPORARY
COEASEMENLT
EASEMENT STORM WIDTRALH
VAPMS(SEEPL
EASEMENT MWIMUM WIDTH VARI83 (SHB PLAN)
i
•
I
MATTING SELECTION
AREA B
DISTANC DISTANCE
2. CHANNEL BENCH WIDTHS TRANSITION BETWEEN
CROSS-SECTIONS.
SEL CT
605
VARIES VARIES
BL
H-361
CHANNEL~.{�I
105+13
106+14 1 Coir Fiber 400
— _ EA AJ
(VARIES)
CCXFSISITTEINRGLINCHANNEL
G
MATER AL
-P-s.
_ - _Q cPR1u=De(
I I I
K
Organic Netting
EASEMENT
4. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
-DIN-;a^'N\•_/
ET
XISTWGSOIL
u_l
g6001��f w^
MATCH GRADE 2�
--
i¢a
m
580 LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL -02
I
388D, PERTIZEAND WSTALLMATIONL
LLp'
H,
rc
CO a1R
EXISTING
m
-
Z ¢ K g
SEE PLAN AND PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
�
Q L iNown
595
EXIBANKFULL
CHANNELEL UNDISTURBED
a
F C � s 7o
K
g
m F
GRADE-
?
m
w
SCALE
NOT TW
10' TIE W ON ONE SIDE OF CHANNEL (2:1 MAX SLOPE)
Q U
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
zp
o
i
CURB/GUTTER/SIDEWALK/
r
m
n+° zZw
DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT**
_
= o: .,.'Q ��APPROXI ATE LOCATION—
OCATION
575
s
g
OF EX. 2" WL
OF
CHANNEL BENCH/
UI ­
CHANNEL GRADING
_
REMOVE
EXISTING
n
C!
*SEE COVER SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL LEGEND ITEMS
MH -3621
g.%
CATCH
BASIN
• mom
a
O
„RCP
m
�g
o+v
oM1•a 3 LF OF 15" RC
P
0.16
o
a p
�+
z�
m "e
N jGp
�x1�j
a-
N
?ter
p H o
o
N nzz
mz3p
2230
zo
I w p
T�
m
F
H!2!2Z
p
r-
CB -2231
p0
CO. R---
EXISTING
"o - vo Oo
CB -223
/
® MAN
LE
J
ww
_
W-3816 H -36th
O
5Z 0
LP
F -x%
p X
V'
ad aln '
avFi
2
/ O�
0
�F � �F
z
< T
xv
O Z 3 nO.Z
GRADE
mop",,
��e PRO OSED 53 LF 0
SNO
•
15" RCP 0 1.00% APPROXIMATE LOCATION
PROPOSED
FF EX. 8" SS
RIPRAP
610
Table
1:Channel G III and Turf Reinforcement Sumatury
Table
K
'TEMPORARY
COEASEMENLT
EASEMENT STORM WIDTRALH
VAPMS(SEEPL
EASEMENT MWIMUM WIDTH VARI83 (SHB PLAN)
i
•
I
MATTING SELECTION
AREA B
DISTANC DISTANCE
2. CHANNEL BENCH WIDTHS TRANSITION BETWEEN
CROSS-SECTIONS.
LEGEND*
605
VARIES VARIES
BL
DISTANCE DISTANCE RA
VARIES VARIES
CHANNEL~.{�I
105+13
106+14 1 Coir Fiber 400
— _ EA AJ
(VARIES)
CCXFSISITTEINRGLINCHANNEL
G
k
-P-s.
_ - _Q cPR1u=De(
I I I
K
Organic Netting
EASEMENT
4. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
-DIN-;a^'N\•_/
ET
XISTWGSOIL
u_l
g6001��f w^
MATCH GRADE 2�
--
i¢a
m
580 LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL -02
I
388D, PERTIZEAND WSTALLMATIONL
LLp'
H,
rc
PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.
SEE TABLE 1, THIS SHEET FOR MATTWG SELECTION.
m
m
-
Z ¢ K g
SEE PLAN AND PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
�
Q L iNown
595
EXIBANKFULL
CHANNELEL UNDISTURBED
a
F C � s 7o
K
g
CHANNEL�SECTION #1
?
m
w
SCALE
NOT TW
10' TIE W ON ONE SIDE OF CHANNEL (2:1 MAX SLOPE)
Q U
590
Table
1:Channel G III and Turf Reinforcement Sumatury
Table
K
p
START STATION
END STATION CROSS SECTION MATTING SELECTION
# AREA A
MATTING SELECTION
AREA B
2. CHANNEL BENCH WIDTHS TRANSITION BETWEEN
CROSS-SECTIONS.
LEGEND*
100% Biodegradable
105+13
106+14 1 Coir Fiber 400
Straw /Coconut Matting with
p
G
k
k
K
Organic Netting
EASEMENT
4. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
585
NOTES:
1. ALL CHANNEL SECTIONS LOOKING UPSTREAME
z
K
2. CHANNEL BENCH WIDTHS TRANSITION BETWEEN
CROSS-SECTIONS.
LEGEND*
3. NO TREES TO BE PLANTED IN SANITARY SEWER
p
G
k
k
K
EASEMENT
4. ALL PERMANENT SEEDING WITHIN CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
580 LIMITS TO BE RIPARIAN MIXTURE PER SPL -02
rc
m
m
SEE PLAN AND PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
o
a
K
K
g
FULL DEPTH
m
w
ASPHALT REPLACEMENT**
o
i
CURB/GUTTER/SIDEWALK/
r
m
m
DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT**
575
s
g
3
CHANNEL BENCH/
CHANNEL GRADING
*SEE COVER SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL LEGEND ITEMS
**SEE OVERALL PAVING SHEET D1 FOR ASPHALT/CURB/
e00w0 800 0 80Nw0 WHEI0 em+00 8M+50 803+(10 8 N+5o GUTTER REPLACEMENT QUANTITIES �i ft 57
I I � I I � A" 1/1l�'Ulll
© -
'i� STORAGE
CONTRACTOR
TTO BE PERFORZE MED DIS OUTSIDE GRADING NO OR I J I I I 1 ®I �,.. \' I I I I I I 1 / ®1 � / 1 I II UTILITY NOTE:,
/
1 IwoINSTALL 26 LF OF ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING ! 8 .' { Y ! \ { \ 1 THE UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT IS THE
I L ) { I { CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY BOTH HORIZONTAL AND
ALONG EDGE OF PROPOSED TCE (SEE DETAIL SHEET D4) / / I I _ \ I VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT
/ / / I " )` \/ 1 I NC ONE -CALL AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. EXISTING
ADDITIONAL EST STABILIZATION MEASURES PER'/ I `�- f 1\ I I I I / / l L I UTIUTIES SHOULD BE EITHER RELOCATED PER PLANS OR PROTECTED
- -- / IN-PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE SEE THE UTILITY SECTION OF
Si ry CHANNEL SECTION �j1 0_ N THIS SHEET II THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND/Oft
<' INSTALL LIVE STAKING BETWEEN STA - - I- I % CLARIFICATION.
�,
105+13 TO 106+14 AS SHOWN ON \ THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE CONDUITS FOR
<'\s^'`'\\ 1 esE by wr'seiea SHEET SIANITARY SEWER RELOCATION VALLEYEGUTTER2 SEE MADJUST OR ETERS SERVICES A ORES STING WA R / DUKE. SPECTRUM AND AThT (PAID FOR UNDER SPECIAL PROVISIONS).
roP E� sa as o.. " \ RONALD L HARNACH
\ \Am ( & NANCY J HARNACH / AS NECESSARY PRIVATE UTILITY NOTE:
I} 1111 (SEE SHEET U4 FOR ADDITIONAL /" - �, DETAIL SHEET D1) \ n330uz TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
11v I I { 1 I \ I INFORMATION) / / / J" / �: CLDS t10.178,C' / Oe: 3733 Pc: PRIVATE UTILITIES TO SUPPORT THEIR OWN AND COORDINATE SCHEDULING
I* 'I 10 IN AREA OUTSIDE OF CHANNEL I / / DB: m21e Pc: ass / \ L\T. 2� BLOCK c MA\ 19,413 AND GUTTER PER CLDS DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE CONFLICT EXISTS, PRIVATE UTILITY TO
1 I \\ \t ,r SECTION, INSTALL 100% 6' CURB
pp bV RIPRAP APRON. SEE SHEET EC5 / I / DAwD R PATRICK - INSTALL TRANSITION T ( ) RELOCATE.
/'P PL�I R.b ` I iJ330151 / / / 230] HOPECRBAP DR D 2-
BIODEGRADABLE STRAW/COCONUT I / LOT 28 BLOCK C MAP 19-418h 'RIS \ \ \ ` EMOVE,ESkAS &,' AND
JOSEPH E. FREEMAN JR. / / _ SANITARY SEWER &WATER LINE LATERAL NOTE:
2300 HOPECREST OR / (� co"c. \ \ \ _ \ COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION TO z 1 aPECREST DR y-- / ' m
I\ MATTING WITH ORGANIC NETTING 9 TYP NECESSARY TO ETc DBv CKCPG 556MAPJ9-418 / / LIMITED SANITARY SEWER LATERALS HAVE BEEN LOCATED AND SHOWN ON
( )5 H THE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY TO LOCATE o
{�� \l \ / ALL SERVICE LATERALS (WATER AND SEWER) THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY L ¢ o
I I REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL / / / \ Y \ 1 I \ �/ra — I THEIR ACTIVITIES. ALL SERVICE LATERALS IMPACTED BY THE CONTRACTOR
T \ \I 14 1 \ I I 1 \ v SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. x
\ �\ b \ I I 1 1 AND 30 LF OF 15" RCP /® /�// / `\\ \ `V z \\ I REPLACE 44 SY OF � _ � //I � -
REPLACE 10 SY OF 7 I I TE DRIVEWAY _' - , \ / I� . TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE: i d
GILDS DRIVEWAY
\\ � CONCREU.27A TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON SHEETS �
1s•rlNv"-ss as - CLDS 1 --- 1
\s \ \
I � "�' v � �• . 1 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY v '* t I I � _
pMa g ei # „., \ I I /y,\ \ I >` - / I ® TCPI-TCP13
1 { \ ✓ ' \ I v ss, ,a ccC?'O GAS LINE PAVING NOTE: 'm m
ou*sDE� RELOCATED BY OTHERS / \ 1_�� �� V o
\ \ / A) MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH TO REMOVE ASPHALT OVERLAY I6
OOx E SOi+O SDEq SDE _ b' ` I 'N I \ \ TO DEPTH OF EXISTING GUTTER PAN DEPTH VARIES 1' 3' MILL AND
NO WORK PROPOSEDWITHIN oo _ _ - _ --—'�\_o+o / �� _ % ( ) o
BANKFULL CHANNEL. H-361 -223Y / �\ 03+18 '� \ REMOVE ASPHALT FROM GUTTER PAN SURFACE. ADJUST EXISTING
15 RCP MH -3617 \ R F �� �/ I -\, \ MANHOLE RIMS WITHIN PAVING LIMITS TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE
SEE SHEET 2 NOTE 19 FOR ts' RCP MH-3s2i r �* I Pz D ! I \
BANKFULL DEFINITION - - Gps GOS a� - A �- E s r s0s A �,
3D 0175 BOIS " < 3 1 wR�v a auev fur R_ -R ,� 7I \ B) MILL EXISTING STREET ENTIRE WIDTH OF AREA SHOWN ON PLANS AN
30 / SS e I /' \ ADDITIONAL 1.S AND RE -PAVE PER DETAIL SHEET D1.
361 G 16' RCP _ -'— SS 1 -jam--- 55 / `� = / II C) MATCH EXISTING PAVING AND PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION AT
311�� l { PAVING LIM3�1ITS.
\ 31, ,nrra.. ,n Iss - s. \ I \ ss j ;'
EXISTING CHA L CENTERLINE \ ~ � UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TO BE DE -ENERGIZED PL4uaoTY L" � � \ " —� �
(THALWEG) "�' - PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (BY OTHERS) )� - o50 rR� W U W 000
v - ""'�v v s EXISTING CHANNEL CENTER LINE (THALWEG) lye �'���✓� �`�-,- A sN 1D u2 w REEL ASPHALT FULL ® l �IDq'j.� 20 40 60 r�/� C F A
rw eL ms.. \\�/` �����-�'.
s V'DEPTH (TYP) (SEE DETAIL-� c" a" [�
- REPLACE 77 SY OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY MICHAEL c PIscITEw\ \0`4 ��� v v SHEET D7) _ 0R18J I, g� V A 0. Z wM
Stream A - Impact #8 ° x CLDS jJ10.Al F1
27A. GRADES OF DRIVEWAY & KRISTEN E PIsaTELu A \ w v v --:.,j / A ®
20 If hard bank Stabilization Of °o SHALL MATCH EXISTING TO MAINTAIN \ n33o16o A V AA \ - - -- - �a .� _� / 9 ®J� SCALE: HORZ. 1"=201
W Z 0
\ \ DB: 18937 PG: 288 _
permanent (non -loss) impacts / DRAINAGE AWAY FROM FROM PROPERTY :I,� \ LOT 29 BLOCK c MAP 19 -ala \/ �®- _ I / \ �,, VERT. 111 = 41 A.
(SEE REAL ESTATE SPECIAL PROVISIONS) A 2304 HOPECREST DR V ��.MILL AND REPAVE ASPHALT ON "-/ ' �� v D W (,7 W 0
\ s" CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY PARKING a HOPECREST DR (SEE PAVING NOTE / �owc / SAe- kF'I' 4 0000
w\ PAD FOR HOMEOWNER USE DURING CONSTRUCTIONWI, �� - \� THIS SHEET AND DETAIL SHEET D7)
4 PAD TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TH GRASS\ I �7 (�y
AFTER CONSTRUCTION (SEE \� -�. ��y ®1 _ clnosE S2o� y ; �i Z
`r .. SEED AND STRAW _ - �/ L I & s�l ELexs YETI tsss/gy L
\ v A A A V v1 44ee REAL ESTATE SPECIAL PROVISIONS) - . _-- v � o�c ,, �' _ _- 173301488— �t
<- -@ �'`� Da 39B-31,,PG 811 V = v
i ,jam s ,9_- _-- I vJ ouNCAN o FLORA 7v wT- CK c MaP 19 -ata _
-ADO NOT DAMAGE EXISTING MAILBOX. IF MAILGOX - A & LAUREL E FLORA I v ,--z3�o i PFCRESP,DR T
-v CANNOT BE PROTECTED, REPLACE WITH "MOSS- - - - - v \ ® DB: 11911 PG: 899 / e
(SEE REAL ESTATE SPECIAL PROVISIONS v w ®aal'" 0 310 HOPECREST Da18 / 0' "Ic '^ \ / 1 Tco;� s �'�•�B I 1
\ _
\\\ I \ CREEK" MAILBOX BY CAROLINA MAILBOXES, INC.--
V v v v_
\. )-_�� \ _olwALL A,s vs-
P:00062142\CAMClvll\Submittal\69 PI....d Profk.dwg
6/28/201911:55 AM

REBAR DOWELS TO BE
IMBEDDED INTO RCBC,
SIZED AND SPACED PER
MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATION
\ \ EXTERNAL JOINT WRAP
\I
11
I
I �
I
I
I
/
/ I
I
I I
I �1
/ I
RCBC
SIZE
DIMENSION
q r B
10' X 5'
2.0' 4.0'
7' X 5'
1.5' 2.75'
PVC, ALUMINUM, OR GALVANIZED STEEL
EDGING W/ METAL PIN
4" SILL
1/16" MIN — 3/16" MAX. SAND FILLED JOINTS — ASTM C33
8" MIN. EXISTING BRICK PAVERS TO BE RESET
1" TO 1 1/2" SAND BEDDING COURSE— ASTM C33
MIN. AGGREGATE BASE 957.
COMPACTION
KSUBGRADE 95% COMPACTED
SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
BRICK PAVER INSTALLATION DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2" MIN
WRAP ��
PROP
RCBC
FIGURE 1
NOTES:
i. SEAL THE EXTERNAL JOINT WITH AN OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP CONFORMING TO
ASTM C877 STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERNAL SEALING BANDS FOR
CONCRETE PIPE, MANHOLES, AND PRECAST BOX SECTIONS THAT IS AT LEAST
12 INCHES WIDE AND COVERS THE JOINT ON BOTH THE SIDES AND THE TOP
OF THE CULVERT, BEND, AND/OR TRANSITION SECTIONS. USE CONWRAP
CS -212 FROM CONCRETE SEALANTS, INC., EZWRAPFROM PRESS—SEAL
GASKET CORPORATION, SEAL WRAP FROM MAR—MAC MANUFACTURING CO., INC.,
CADILLOC EXTERNAL PIPE JOINT FROM CADILLOC, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL
FOR THE OUTSIDE SEALER WRAP.
3®1
F
W
A
20 Q�fE55iO,y9( y% R�Ayi
S =
27 20
' gGiNE�' 1
��pLA'N�uO), Il`t N A Cr �O
7.0
P:\50062142\CAD\C"\.S96mita11D2-D5 De le.dwg
711912019 12:00 PM

Page 1 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form

A. Applicant Information
1. Processing

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:

☒ Section 404 Permit ☐ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 163
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ☒ Yes ☐ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):

☒ 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular ☐ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit

☐ 401 Water Quality Certification – Express ☐ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
☐ Yes ☒ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:

☐ Yes ☒ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.

☐ Yes ☒ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.

☐ Yes ☒ ☐ No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Tattersall Storm Drainage Improvement Project
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Please see Figure 3 (Appendix A) and landowner information table in Appendix B. All
proposed work will be conducted within city utility easements.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):

3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:

Page 2 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ☐ Agent ☒ Other, specify: Charlotte Storm Water Services
4b. Name: Isaac Hinson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
CSWS
4d. Street address: 404 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Kelly Thames
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
HDR
5c. Street address: 440 S. Church Street, Suite 900
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.: 704-338-6710
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]

Page 3 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 17330162, 17330163, 17330141, 17330143, 17330151, 17325120,
17325121, 17325406, 17325407
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.126351° Longitude: 80.860471°
1c. Property size: 1 acre for three impact areas
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Little Sugar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Catawba (HUC 03050103)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of a combination of a closed pipe and open channel storm drainage system. The surrounding area consists of single-
family residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 353 lf
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This purpose of this project is to improve the storm drainage infrastructure to reduce roadway and structure flooding.

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See cover letter for additional project description. A track hoe and other typical construction equipment will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?

☐ Preliminary ☐ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Helen Simonson
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: Applicant - CSWS
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?

☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ☐ Yes ☒ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary

1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):

☐ Wetlands ☒ Streams – tributaries ☐ Buffers ☐ Open Waters ☐ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f. Area
of
impact
(acres)
W1 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No -
W2 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No -
W3 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No -
W4 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No
Yes/No
-
W5 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No -
W6 - Choose One Choose One Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
Impact # 1 P Culvert extension Stream A INT Corps 4 6
Impact # 2 P Rip rap aprons Stream A INT Corps 4 60
Impact # 3 T Grading Stream A INT Corps 4 40
Impact # 4 T Construction Disturbance Stream A INT Corps 4 20
Impact # 5 P Rip rap aprons Stream B PER Corps 5 70
Impact # 6 T Grading Stream B PER Corps 5 50
Impact # 7 T Construction Disturbance Stream B PER Corps 5 20
Impact # 8 P Hard Bank Stabilization Stream A INT Corps 4 20
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 286
3i. Comments: Approximately 20 lf of permanent (non-loss) stream impacts, 136 lf of permanent (loss) stream impacts, and 130 lf of
temporary stream impacts are proposed.
Page 5 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.

Type of impact
4d.

Waterbody
type
4e.

Area of impact (acres)
O1 - Choose One Choose
O2 - Choose One Choose
O3 - Choose One Choose
O4 - Choose One Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose One
P2 Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.

6a. Project is in which protected basin?

☐ Neuse ☐ Tar-Pamlico ☐ Catawba ☐ Randleman ☐ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.

No Build Alternative
A no-build alternative was considered, but was deemed impracticable. The no-build alternative would not meet the project goals of alleviating
flooding to structures and roadways within the project area and was therefore removed from further consideration.
Preferred Alternative
The preferred design for the project was developed through an iterative process that is discussed in detail below.
Initially, the Tattersall SDIP proposed improvements included 3,200 linear feet (lf) of closed system improvements and 3,700 linear feet of open
system improvements. The closed and open system improvements were proposed to address roadway flooding, structure flooding, and to address
channel erosion throughout the project area.
At the start of the design phase in 2014, the project team re-assessed the proposed 3,700 of proposed open system improvements. After the
analysis, the project team decided to remove channel work upstream and downstream of the Hopecrest Drive culvert (with the exception of
stabilization at the headwall and outfall of the culvert replacement at Hopecrest in order to achieve a stable transition). It was also decided to
remove channel work along Tattersall Creek (with the exception of the completion of a stable transition at the proposed outfall at 2407 Tattersall
Drive, as well as stabilization along 2415 and 2419 Tattersall Drive, 2435 Twilight Road and 3500 and 3505 Gatewood Oaks Drive). The previously
proposed improvements along channel sections to address minor erosion issues in the project area would result in the loss of many large mature
trees and would significantly alter the properties and canopy within the neighborhood; therefore these channel improvements were eliminated
from further consideration. These previously proposed efforts to address minor channel erosion would result in significant impacts to property
owners and the environment that would outweigh the benefits of addressing minor bank erosion. It was also observed that some of the erosion
along the creek banks was a result of sheet flow from private run off and would not qualify for service to be performed with the project.
In 2016, there was another analysis to determine the impacts from the benefit/cost of the proposed channel improvements with the Tattersall
project. This resulted in another decrease in the length of closed system being improved by approximately 200 linear feet of pipe and a decrease in
the length of open channel being improved by approximately 25 linear feet.
Some of the proposed work in 2016 was deemed to be proposed ONLY with private property buy-in with donated easements. During the real
estate phase for the project, several residents decided that they did not want the City to construct improvements on their properties. Therefore, in
2018 additional work was removed which included removing another 118 feet of pipe, and additional headwalls and channel grading near Twilight
Road. In late 2018, the design team also removed additional channel grading and other channel work to try to minimize the amount of channel
disturbances to the bare minimum needed for the flood control capacity needs and the stream velocity concerns to minimize future erosion.
The project team also added upstream boulder sill/riffle sections to the Merrywood and Hopecrest culvert replacement efforts to attempt to
alleviate the concerns for the existing perched pipe conditions. Additionally, upstream of both culvert locations, mature trees provide grade
control, which will be removed during construction. During an on-site meeting with the Division of Water Resources (DWR) and CSWS, it was
requested by DWR that the existing channel bed grades be maintained as the removal of the existing grade control would result in channel
headcutting upstream of the system. Therefore, the boulder sill/riffles upstream of the culverts are intended to mimic baseflow for aquatic life and
to focus water into the center of the downstream rip rap aprons, resulting in aquatic life passage while also assisting in the retention of existing
stream channel banks and grade control. All final hard stabilization and rip rap aprons proposed in the channels for the Tattersall SDIP are required
for flood control capacity and the required minimal management of erosive velocities in the channels. All of the proposed hard structure material is
required to construct stable outfalls and transitions at new proposed culvert/pipe locations. There are no further channel impact reductions that
can be performed.
The final improvements for the Tattersall SDIP now only include 2,673 linear feet of closed system improvements, and 320 linear feet of open
system improvements.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.

Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment and erosion control
measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. A pump around will be utilized to ensure that all work is conducted in the
dry. The project will comply with all Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) requirements and RGP Special and General Conditions.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

☐ Yes ☒ No
Page 7 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):

☐ DWQ ☐ Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?

☐ Mitigation bank

☐ Payment to in-lieu fee program

☐ Permittee Responsible Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank

3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)

Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One

Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:

3c. Comments:

4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ☐ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ

6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?

☐ Yes ☒ No

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)

Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)

Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)

Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:

6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:

Page 9 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?

☐ Yes ☒ No

1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

☐ Yes ☐ No

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%

2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?

☐ Yes ☒ No

2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project will disturb less than 1 acre and since the project is storm drainage infrastructure project, it will not result in an
increase in impervious surface.

2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?

3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? City of Charlotte

3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):

☒ Phase II
☐ NSW
☐ USMP
☐ Water Supply Watershed
☐ Other:

3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?

☐ Yes ☒ No

4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):

☐ Coastal counties
☐ HQW
☐ ORW
☐ Session Law 2006-246
☐ Other:

4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?

☐ Yes ☐ No

5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?

☐ Yes ☐ No

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?

☐ Yes ☐ No
Page 10 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)

1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?

☒ Yes ☐ No

1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?

☐ Yes ☒ No

1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)

Comments:

☐ Yes ☐ No

2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?

☐ Yes ☒ No

2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?

☐ Yes ☒ No

2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)

3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?

☐ Yes ☒ No

3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)

4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑' Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑Yes ®No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
HDR queried the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer database for protected species Element
Occurrence distribution and proximity to the Project Site (Project Report [NCNHDE-9805], attached). The query revealed that no
known occurrences of federally protected species or critical habitat have been documented within a one -mile radius of the
Project Area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ®', No
F
I
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/application/efhmapper/index.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
0 Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Park Service National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) GIS Public Dataset and the NC Historic Preservation
Office (NCHPO) HPOWEB GIS Web Service' were reviewed. These sources revealed there are no known cultural resources,
historic structures, or historic districts located within the project area. Archaeological data were not included as part of the
NCHPO GIS services and were not assessed as part of this review.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
®Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A small portion of the 100 -year floodplain of Little Sugar Creek extends into Impact Area Sheet 5. Applicable floodplain
development permits will be obtained if determined necessary by the Floodplain Administrator of Mecklenburg County.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Panel 3710454000K
Isaac Hinson`
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's
signature is valid only if an authorization letter
from the applicant is provided.)
I http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed July 23, 2019
Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Appendix E
Agency Correspondence

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
ME NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
women NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 son Walter Clark, director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-9805
July 26, 2019
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE. Tattersal SDIP
Dear Jessica Tisdale.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butlerWncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JON E5 STREET. RALEIGH. NC 77603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 77699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Tattersal SDIP
July 26, 2019
NCNHDE-9805
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Nameommon Name Last � Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
C
M Date Rank
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5 -Very --- Endangered G3 S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/helr). Data query generated on July 26, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-9805: Tattersal SDIP
tcl dire =
F arr9R
ce ds
-.
-. -ct
Qk—�.�
4 r e
P
�+°� S Prr.^r.,, _
_ - '6y1
,�'�
-wry
Ch-tn
1
U�
ti
r
cFw� QalncKQ o
_
-
.hro as
Starmou ,I
Spring Valley
Wamaro or
yf� ynry
° P
a P'
L.irkf;elA"
t 'p 'R
$bfrrpunt
v
fi0r"p oak Rd k01rz pr tl !)r
]19 ft
Cwchin Dr �'
; O'
J=
South OaXe
kaa
Re_K 0
�
rfo
SuIK'rK
�
-
D Adan
-
Cenbr
0m0
SGnndL i
,
E ArNwuOd Rd
utnt Mill lirl
sw"'b ox Dr _
8u�nl Mlllq 6 L
s K00 Pl P
Cte rcer Dr
�I�
°odslream
Dr �
Ra ���C
vy,
�F g
cnamw:vo
PI �3
0
b
sown
swa I
o` °
yrei
s 2 �¢
si
o-
.#� i� o
>, Beverly cotiuwn
ave
—d a<`
3
o
�P Woods Ao o *
°�"b
N
u
a
KrrN
m�-t
d ,fa
f
k'vo
v, �i Oro
d
S
4,'2
rCr tlSl
1
µay
CI
c
i°r
41 '11%
I T
a'
= Redo Goma
HollowOuail
u
s h o Vic
o-,6a'r
ki•,erbcra
°70. o� rWaaoda
Nrrrstlak 1,
o
Rorxwb9e
r Itd
P
NU
3t,
ur
ar'Vrhror',ye
Sharon Wood, @`
He hr
Rd
MaVwrxl(Ir:
n�
�v U
t
h R
ITr.
S 'hoetl r 3
n
RggeMoOk�v
_
`Ro Hramv.Yc6"
fi _ Fbrrls
i.
J
�
�
E
rOtl
�
In
SFerb°urrc p,
syn
a y
Sr
c
9'
�,
WeekdaylelP
n
a
U
-
_ zi
°'Hc
h�•Y
_
� O
¢ lJ ti
o
Ha Rog pyo
V
a =
Uak��ye 01ly+ton
Ra
1 �flart°r <tr Ifo
C -
'
GaroYna Mrr.C.,
.atloly Lr'
lltNri
rP'k,0 91j'.s
Snlwnl
�2
Sfutlrngm^v` c
/;n
oaf
stewnR d \h'
�w 4q OuailComers
w
� o
o
my
Sharonbrook
hnaao
N
�rnitnl;e
se ner Id ;, N
3
°hlnlAy
�hraf Dr
South
McMuri an Crcc1
July 26, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:24,551
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmia, Intermap, increment P Carp GEBCC,, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esn China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community