20180180 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190814

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20180180
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office - [phone] Mac Haupt:eads\dmhaupt
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Hollowell Mitigation Project
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Cara Conder
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
Gara@w,aterlandsolutions.com
Date Submitted
8/14/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Neuse River
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
Class C, WS -N
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.35814
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wayne
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.11642
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable venters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
27 - Restoration
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r• Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r- Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Connie H. Feige
2b. Deed book and page no.:
03133/486
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
16110 Turnbury Oak Drive
Address Line 2
City
Odessa
Postal / Zip Code
33556
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Debra H. Grantham
2b. Deed book and page no.:
03133/477
State / Rovince / Fbjion
FL
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
r- Yes r No
r- Yes r No

2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
3222 Stevens Mill Road
Address Line 2
City
Goldsboro
Fbstal / Zip Cade
27350
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Timothy J. Robbins
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2666/817
2c. Responsible party
2d. Address
Street Address
2386 Stevens Mill Road
Address Line 2
Cfty
Goldsboro
Postal / Zip Code
27350
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
John L. Tart II and Larue R. Tart
2b. Deed book and page no.:
03363/0205
2c. Responsible party
2d. Address
Street Address
585 King Road
Address Line 2
City
Goldsboro
Postal / Zip (ode
27350
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Cara Conder
3b. Business Name:
Water & Land Solutions
3c.Address
State / Frovince / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
State / R'wince / fegbn
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
State / Frwince / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:

Street Address
7721 Six Forks Road
Address Line 2
Suite 130
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Goldsboro
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2568057761,2568356824,2568560252,2568
223903
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Stevens Mill Road
Address Line 2
CKY
Goldsboro
Postal / Zip Code
27350
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Neuse River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Class C, WS -l\/
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011705
4. Project Description and History
State / Ftovince / Iegbn
NC
Country
US
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
72
State / Fnovince / Iagion
NC
Country
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
A majority of the epsting stream reaches have been degraded significantly as a result of historic and current agricultural and silvicultural practices, including row -crops, piping or
culverting of the stream, and/or channelization. Portions of the project stream reaches are unstable, with documented active headcut migration and associated localized channel
widening and down -cutting. See Mitigation Plan section 3 for more detail.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes F No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Map 2_Topo.pdf 1.34MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Map 3_Soils.pdf 1.03MB
Map 3_NRCS Soils.pdf 767.5KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
10.52
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property

10,441
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project. The primary purpose of the proposed project is to improve ecologic functions to impaired stream and wetland systems that discharge directly into
the Neuse River within the Neuse River Basin. See attached Mitigation Plan section 1 for specific goals and objectives intended to improve aquatic resource functions.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project will provide stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, preservation, and permanent protection of 8 stream reaches totaling approximately 8,979 linear feet, and 4
wetland areas totaling approximately 10.52 acres. The proposed stream and wetland mitigation activities will be conducted along four wetland areas and two unnamed tributaries to the
Neuse River. Activities will consist of filling the impaired/channelized portions of existing stream and restoring a natural floodplain connection and wetland hydrology. Work will be
conducted using track hoes (excavators), dump trucks/track dumps, tractors with disk harrow or rippers, and other equipment typically used in restoration projects for channel
construction, minor floodplain/wetland grading, ditch filling and in -stream structure installation. See Mitigation Plan Section 6 for proposed restoration practices and design approaches
as well as common construction elements.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
AppA_11X17_Hollowell_Final Design Plans 081419.pdf 25.35MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No C Unknown
Comments:
PJD package resubmitted 4/25/19
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW -2017-00159
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): George K. Lankford
Agency/Consultant Company: George K. Lankford, LLC
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Stream ID Forms.pdf 2.99MB
Wetland Data Forms Combined.pdf 2MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
FD. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
rr71 Wetlands 9 Streams -tributaries 9 Buffers
❑ Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.617
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.617
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?)
area*
W1
Excavation
P
Headwater Forest
W7
Yes
Corps
0.067
(acres)
W2
Excavation
P
Headwater Forest
W2
Yes
Corps
0.410
(acres)
W3
Fv avationP
Headwater Forest
W3
Yes
Corps
0.140
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.617
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.617

2h. Comments:
The proposed stream restoration practices will provide a more natural hydrology and flow regime. The riparian buffer area will be planted with native
species woody vegetation that is more tolerant of wetter conditions. The design approach will also improve existing areas of adjacent fringe, toe of
slope or marginally functioning wetlands through higher water table conditions (elevated stream profiles) and a more frequent out of bank flooding.
3. Stream Impacts
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
6,297 50
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
2422
3j. Comments:
Average stream widths are represented at the existing channel top of banks and not OHWM or bankfull
elevations since those features were difficult to consistently identify in the field.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
(peck all that apply.
W Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
❑ Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Stream and wetland restoration T unnamed tributary No 0 0
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 0.00 0.00
61. Comments:
Stream and wetland restoration are exempt from the Neuse buffer rules per 15A NCAC 02B.0233
Supporting Documentation
Map 5_Wetland Impacts.pdf 1.11MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type
3c. Type of impact`
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
UT1-R1
Intermittent
Cors
P
6
2,151
Aver�e(feet)
(linear feet)
32
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
UT1-R2
Perennial
Corps
1,777
Aver�7e (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
UT2-R1 lower
(lower)
Intermittent
Cors
P
4
874
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S4
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
U172 -R2
Perennial
Corps7
828
Average (feet)
(ir>�feet)
SS
Pipe Removal/Restoration
Temporary
Other
UT2-R3
Perennial
Corps
7
50
Average (feet)
(ir>�rfeet)
S6
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Ui2A ::Ifft:]
Cors
p
T;;;t;;J
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
6,297 50
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
2422
3j. Comments:
Average stream widths are represented at the existing channel top of banks and not OHWM or bankfull
elevations since those features were difficult to consistently identify in the field.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
(peck all that apply.
W Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
❑ Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Stream and wetland restoration T unnamed tributary No 0 0
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 0.00 0.00
61. Comments:
Stream and wetland restoration are exempt from the Neuse buffer rules per 15A NCAC 02B.0233
Supporting Documentation
Map 5_Wetland Impacts.pdf 1.11MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Proposed stream and wetland impacts and mitigation approaches are necessary to restore 6,571 LF, enhance 1,923 LF of stream, and preserve 485
LF of jurisdictional streams that flow directly to the Neuse River system.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures will be implemented during the construction phase per the NCDEMLR - Land Quality S&EC Planning and
Design Manual and approved permit conditions. The stream restoration work will involve filling the old degraded channel and constructing stable
design channels. The contractor will work outside the degraded stream banks and only enter the channel from specific locations designated on the
plans to minimize buffer disturbances. A pump-around/dewatering operation will be utilized to minimize sediment entering downstream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Stream and wetland restoration project.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
F- Level Spreader
F Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWf)
F- Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
,* Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flowthrough the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r' No
Comments:
Project site meets the criteria for Low Density development and will not increase overall percent imperviousness. Site plan is well below the threshold for impervious surface area.
Stormwater/diffuse flows will be transported via stable vegetated channels and across restored stream channels and natural floodplain topography.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Stream and wetland restoration project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*

C Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
C Yes C No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C Yes C No
Sf. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
C Yes C No
Sg. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C Yes C No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
C Yes C No
r Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
C Yes C No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS and NC Natural Heritage Program Database. Contacted/public notice during prospectus stage of project regarding protected species. Four
(4) species are listed as Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) for Wayne County, North Carolina, Redcockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Dwarf
wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Tar River spinymussel (Parvaspina steinstansana), and the Yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolata). Project
implementation is not anticipated to have any negative impact on these species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
C Yes C No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCWRC Natural Heritage and USFWS websites. The proposed action is not likely to significantly/negatively impact aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
resources.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C Yes C No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC Office of Archives and History website and NRIS database was searched. The project area and property do not contain nor are adjacent to any
properties listed by the National Register of Historic Places or NC State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO).
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
R Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Neuse River is a FEMA -regulated waterway and lower UT1 and UT2 are located within a FEMA Zone 'AE'. The topography of the site supports a
design without creating the potential for hydrologic trespass or impacting BFE's. The applicant has coordinated with the local floodplain administrator
to determine if any additional information is required such as a'No-Rise Certification.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
North Carolina Floodmaps / Floodplain Mapping Information System and FIRM Panel 2548, 2568.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Attached are the project location and existing hydrology maps, agent authorization forms, final mitigation plan, and WLS's response letter to the draft mitigation plan comments.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.

Map 1_Project Location. pdf
Map 4_Ewsting Hydro.pdf
Authorization Forms_All.pdf
Hollowell—MP—FINAL—IRT Response Letter.pdf
Hollowell—MP _FINAL _Aug20l 9. pdf
Signature
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
881.01KB
1.1MB
783.22KB
173.24KB
71.06MB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Emily Dunnigan
Signature
C�1!aII0-----
Date
8/14/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION,
LOT N0. PLAN N0. PARCEL ID: zs&% ()S22
STREETADDRESS: StEvzaS mR\
PropertyOwner: C(,nn
Property Owner:
4
WATER $ LAND
SOLUTIONS
11030 Raven Ridge Rd
Suite 119
Raleigh, NC 27614
watedandsolutions.com
919-614-5111
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize Adam McIntyre CEO of Water & Land Solutions LLC
to review my property and to act on my behalf to take all actions necessary for the
processing, issuance and acceptance of necessary permits and/or certifications and any and
all standard and special conditions attached. This authorization allows the individual to
represent on my behalf to the necessary Government agency personnel for the proposed
property.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
i Co11O Tus,gjCx to 00iL Or,d2 OJss- FL X35 (o
Telephone: 03' S Z-215 io
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate
to the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Autborized Slgoature V
Date: -Z�— `'] - 21- v 1 %

4
VdATER & LANE'
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM S O L U I IONS
I in30 Raven Ridge Rd
Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27614
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: watedandsolutbns-coin
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 919 614-5111
STREET ADDRESS: 7=,52 Sk qvp 1S MM RK
PropertyOwner: Ok.. 3ra (,,(C, tA"C, �
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize Adam McIntyre CEO of Water & Land Solutions LLC
to review my property and to act on my behalf to take all actions necessary for the
processing, issuance and acceptance of necessary permits and/or certifications and any and
all standard and special conditions attached. This authorization allows the individual to
represent on my behalf to the necessary Government agency personnel for the proposed
property.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate
to the best of our knowledge.
Au�thorJhz.ed�Signature ,T��.✓ AuZt zedT atu��--
Date: 1 L- I Z Date: 2-/,-- [.7

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DEEDBOOK: 01065　PAGE: O840 PARCEL ID: _2568560252
STREET ADDRESS: 2342 Stevens Mill∴Rd, Goldsboro, NC 27530
ゐ
1 1030 Raven Ridge Rd
Suite l19
Raieigh, NC 27614
Wate巾andsoIutions.com
919-614-51 11
Please Print:
Property Owner:エ圭皿Othv丁Robbins
Property Owner:
The undersigned′ registered property owners ofthe above noted property, do hereby
authorize
-岬」 Of 」岬______
〔Contractor / Agent〕　　　　　　(Name of consulting firm〕
to review my property and to act on my behalfto take all actions necessary for the
PrOCeSSing′ issuance and acceptance ofnecessary permits and/or ce舶cations and any and
all standard and special conditions attached・ This authorization a]lows the individual to
represent on my behalfto the necessary Government agency persomel for the proposed
PrOPerty:
Property Owner’s Address (if different than property above) :
2386 Stevens Mill Rd, Goldsboro, NC 27530
Telephone : 」雄」_____-___葛_臆し
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is tru。 and a。。urat。
to the best of our knowledge・
Authorized Signature
Date: //葛/二/乙一書臆　　　　臆臆_　　Date:
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community±0 0.5 1Miles
FIGURE1HollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
Project LocationMap
^_
^_
Johnston County
Wayne County
Goldsboro
Smithfield
Legend
^_Proje ct L ocatio n
HUC-1 2HUC-8 (Upper Neuse)Wayne CountyNC Cities
Wayne Co. Hydrograph yNC Coun tiesConservation Easement
0 3.5 7Miles050100Miles
Project is located in HUC-8: 03020201Upper Neuse Subbasin
Location: 35.354143°-78.115899°
Location: 35.354771°-78.128593°
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Legend
Conservation EasementCatchment Area : 42 acresCatchment Area : 29 acres
Catchment Area : 69 acresCatchment Area : 512 acresCatchment Area : 184 acres
Catchment Area : 260 acresCatchment Area : 306 acres
±
FIGUREHollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
USGS TopographicMap 2
0 0.2 0.40.1 Miles
We
NoB
Po
Bb
Lv
AyACh
Ch
KaA
NoC
w
Ke
Tr
Ke
CrC2
Ke
WaB
To
NoC
Kn
To
Na
Ra
Bb
KaD
NoB
WaB
Ex
WaD
Le
Ke
CrC2
NoB
Jo
Po
RuB
Dr
Kn
WhA
w
NoC
Jo
WaC
WhA
Kn
Rm NoC
NoB
NoA
WaC
CrC2 NoB RuB
Jo
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community±
FIGUREHollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
NRCS SoilsMap 3
0 550 1,100275Feet
Lege nd
Conservation EasementExisting Stream
FlowlinesSoil Map Units (NR CS Data from Web Soil Survey)
Aya: Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopesBb: Bibb sandy loamCh: Chew acla loam
CrC2: C raven sandy loam, 6-10% slopes, erodedDr: Dragston loamy sand
Ex: Exum very fine sandy loamJo: Johns sandy loam
KaA: Kalmia loamy sand, 0-2% slopesKaD: Kalmia loamy sand,10-15% slopes
Ke: Kenansville loamy sandKn: Kinston loam
Ke: Leaf loamLn: Leon sandLv: Lumbee sandy loam
Na: Nahunta very find sandy loamNoB: N orfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
NoC: Norfolk loamy sand, 6-10% slopesPo: Pantego loam
Ra: Rains sandy loamRuA: R uston loamy sand, 0-2% slopes
RuB: R uston loamy sand, 2-6% slopesTo: Torhunta loam
Tr: Troup sandWaB: Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopesWaC: Wagram loamy sand, 6-10% slopes
WaD : Wagram loamy sand, 10-15% slopesWe: Weston loamy sand
WhA: Whickham loamy sand, 0-2% slopesw: Water
UT2-R1 (up per)
UT2A
UT2-R2
UT2B
UT2-R3
UT1-R1
UT1-R2
UT2-R1 (lower)
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID , IGN, and the GIS User Community
0 500 1,0 00Fee t
FIGUREHollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
NRCS SoilsMap 3
Legend
Conservation E asement
UT1-R2
UT1-R1
UT2-R1
UT2A
UT2-R2
UT2B
UT2-R3
1974 Soil Sur vey of Wayne County, NC - Map 18 & 24
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community±
FIGUREHollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
Existing HydrologyMap 4
0 500 1,000250Feet
Lege nd
Conservation EasementExisting Stream
Existing Wetlands (unverified)
UT2-R1 (up per)
UT2A
UT2-R2
UT2B
UT2-R3
UT1-R1
UT1-R2
UT2-R1 (lower)
W1
W2
W5
W4
W3
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community±
FIGUREHollowellMitigation Project
NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
Wetland ImpactsMap 5
0 510 1,020255Feet
Lege nd
Conservation Easement
Proposed Stream: Top of BankUnverified WetlandsWetland Impacts (0.62 Acres)Stream Impact (50 ft)
UT2-R1 (up per)
UT2A
UT2-R2
UT2B
UT2-R3
UT1-R1
UT1-R2
UT2-R1 (lower)
Wetland W1Not Impacte d
Wetland W2 (Impact W3)0.14 Acres Impacted
Wetland W5 (Impact W2)0.41 Acres Impacted
Wetland W4Not Impacte d
Wetland W3 (Impact W1)0.067 Acres Impacted
Stream Impact S5Pipe Removal
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11
Project/Site: 64al
atitude: 35'° l /5,76 Un1
Evaluator: t
County: WLongitude:-78°77Z/9��
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank
Total Points:
Stream DetSpvAPAUQa4jrcle one)
Other 6kQJ%%pq
Stream is at least intermittent Zo
if;t 19 or perennial if t30* I�
Ephemer Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name: 64tOSFo
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = Q 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
er =
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
CNo
= 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= S. 0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(-Op 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 a
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Rioloav (Subtotal= 4(-O 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
er =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: GV C'4
9T -C E 96e
4C-
;
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: q111 //--�
Project(Site: i/41j, IN/
Latitude:35OV /`f 63)AI
Evaluator: L
County: u14W4Longitude:'
79 ° p31
Total Points:
Stream Detemninatlon
[7�n/YX-
Other
Stream is at least intermittent D C
ifs 19 or erennial if z 30' �/
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1°Continuity of channel bedandbank
0
1
2
1.5
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
24. Amphibians M
5. Active/relict Floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Cl
2
er =
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see digcussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 71.0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 1
2 $
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
(D 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0Yes
=
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 57.C2 )
U
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 32
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians M
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
er =
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11:2
Project/Site:OLL �Vpo
Latitude:S 7,11 y
Evaluator: K,
County: k//We
Longitude: -760 7 � 63
Total Points:
Stream Dete ircle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent -7 0 0
if t 19 orperennial if 2 30' Z
Ephemeral ntsrmittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
W
A. Geomorphology ( (Subtotal= [/-,>)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
S g
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8.. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HVdrologV (Subtotal =5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0.5 1
C. Biologv (Subtotal= 2.O )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �%/ (7 /� /
ProjecNSite: W64el/ L172 _
Latitude: J Z/ %D ,6S
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: 76#o/
•�%
Total Points:
Stream De circle one)
Other 6 4,S6)Q.0
Stream is at least intermittent '/ `
if a lg or erennial it2 30' r0 J
Ephemer ntermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( (Subtotal= •5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Yes = 3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
K0=0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9, 0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
23
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 di
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = O
M
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Cher =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:y /(I '
Project/Site: moll /% N'
Latitude: ,5 bor7�Sy U
Evaluator: K
County: W/ftC
Longitude: -78
Total Points:
Stream Determination(cir
Other 04D5 13,)R4
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or erennial if z 3n* 0'
Ephemeral Intermitte erennla
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology(gy (Subtotal=/* • `J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
01
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
r2)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = ',
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
Cl -,2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
25. Algae
CYes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.51
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
tI

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ham%
Date: 41I / /I
ProjectlSite:90/40W VZ
Latitude: '35".7-1,30..50"w
Evaluator: K ��
County:WA vm�
Longitude: -7906 `y/ lD((
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 111/ 7 C
I ✓✓
Stream Determination (ci a
Ephemeral lntermitten Perenni
Other ��y,n�e�,�.��
e.g. Quad Nam��e:��
i(t 19 or erennial if z 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 7- Y 'J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
11 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
es = 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1
es = 3
C. Biolo (Subtotal= 10.15
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22, Fish
0
0.5
CO15
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.51.5
1
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
= 0.7
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7 r� /"7
Project/Site: l /
Latitude: 7J5'�rA/ f/N
Evaluator: K L/ Gw
County:
Longitude: -w6 r
Total Points:
Stream Deter (circle one)
Other GDG 5AV)2jy
Stream is at least intermittent r5
if 219 orperennial if 2:30*
Ephemer Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 10.0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
.2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
i3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
13
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1,3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
'13
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
X13
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
i3
9. Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.Hvdrologv (Subtotal=g-Q_)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
i3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
13
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
es = 3
0.5
C. Biologv (Subtotal = q,C> )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
X10
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
13
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
13
22. Fish
0.5
1
J.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Cher =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
I
Sketch:
h/

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: C3/ A7
Project/Site:/b/� I ,`6
Latitude: 3,54z//7/ 2$/ice
Evaluator:
County: 1j*K
Longitude: '%b -6-Y
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c"
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 3.0
if t 19 or erennial if t 30'
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
e.g. quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 176 • d
A -b -s -e -n -t
-F Weak
Moderate
St' ng
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
'3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
'.3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
i3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict Floodplain
0
1
2
',3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
'3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
C2�2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.Hvdroloav (Subtotal ='1O-0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
'3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
'3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.51
2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes =.32
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= K.O )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
10
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
o
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
eAb
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 ther = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: