980023_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190723

Faci t h'y
ivision of Water Resources
0 Division of Sail and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 1pfornpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: KRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: wl, j �
.XJl/RcgiJ
Farm Name: � q,,_.- CM Owner Email:
Owner Name: —51 Phone:
ry
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
e- 47 r✓
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
I
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Nan -Layer
Pullets
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DaiEZ Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 4] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Nate I of 3
114/2015 Corrtinned

I I
IFacility Number: -Date of Ins ection:
FFF
Waste Collection & T t
—a ment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ Yes
Structure 6
Identifier:
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Spillway?:
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps p Lease Agreements
❑Other:_
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Observed Freeboard (in): L
OKMEp-
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ SoiI Analysis
❑ Waste T
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ MonthIy and V Rainfall Inspect
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ
tal threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesNo [:]NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yesfdge
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, et
❑ PAN [:]PAN > 10% or I0 Ibs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/S into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Aved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps p Lease Agreements
❑Other:_
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ SoiI Analysis
❑ Waste T
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ MonthIy and V Rainfall Inspect
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
Page 2 of 3
No ❑ NA FINE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA FINE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
]No ❑NA ❑NE
tsfers ❑ Weather Code
is ❑ Sludge Survey
]No ❑NA ❑NE
] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - bate oT Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
Other Issues
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andior document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer.1nspector fail to discuss review! inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: CL Phone: qj q q ,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:pa Date: -?Jr-Q-1
Page 3 of 3 /412015

Strother Swine 98-23
7/18/2019 Receiving
SSA SSB
8/9/2019
6/10/2019 4.04 4.37
4/11/2019
4/16/2019
2/15/2019 3.42 3.32
12/17/2018
12/16/2018
10/17/2018 1.46 1.54
8/18/2018
8/1/2018 Unit 1 0.43
7/20/2018 Unit 1 0.54 0.54 Sludge 1.42 Sludge1.33