790001_Inspection_20181121

Division of Water Resource-
Facility Number - C ] ''Division of Soil and Water( .servafion 43 0
0"Other Agency 11
Type of Visit: 1P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: t . Arrival Time: ! Q Departure Time: [' County:Vp(,�. 1�q�tUV'V\Region: SK-1)
Farm Name: �j(, le) rooks `�, i()G tLay '\ Owner Email: r(AVQS ((Tt\����j1 OG Y to Vt( . VS
Owner Name: Da\/1(W f V�! a I �,, p ( p p lye,
Phone:
Mailing Address: �� d( (?'rnA I0 /1 4 IGI �ISVL lye, r} f Q 4-7
Physical Address:.f�(k/ tj(A( I RA . < f U�co t S On 0 C�'6
Facility Contact: s trail PCh VtS�rCAl/V Title: Phone: yr y
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �(� I ( yy aY-A
� -�1� no,yfrS d Pcl
Certified Operator: \� Certification Number: p V1lA n F \7 P(I I
� *'A NO-S Qj toy
Back-up Operator: VfA/2 v� Certification cation Number: QWA oQ(a,Y
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: j
v\ly ,b c tz SVt((C lod. 1+m dw i6X
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 1100 \-b\ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca'acit Pot). Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets I jBeefBroodCow
Turkeys
'.Other Turkey PouIts
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facility Numberr - / Date of Inspection: ( /-+.
Waste Collection&Treatment ! ( yam,
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? 7❑�Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: % l �ulA
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? X Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [A. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IN
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
I
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 0 l'i;1V m d i 1�I ih �i i ✓U
f13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes r7l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application M `—
Weekly Freeboard [�Waste Analysis Soil Analysis �3-ransfcrs Weather Code
Rainfall ] [`Stocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections ®/
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections [ dge Sury Sluey LN
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 7� 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - _ Date of Inspection: f-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apt .tion equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes T\71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 'M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes tA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comrn'ents(aefer, p gne�tign# I3x�t1'din'aYSr,altswef and/or any,adftiottI6otrinegd�tlans 4i dny ether co�uiefi5°pff ,#r w k?
} } t i414 1 1 hYvxtiY 1 1W Yf }4M X t
1Tse di awmgs of fac�hty fo bettei ez [�}Misr gtlop@(q, addifronals'a es a nec x „ „>
. . . „: . . . .
D-V CAA t1 6)1 �too\
�J a- I, �n �Jrlc.r5 `�(�,
1`C �1cc� ,m" t Onn:+ iin� Ai ;`hks '? 0_ClVvdI
�• i1�wb� anrA(� d S 1Ni;-,dow _ }(`� QUt '�tiV �{
. A-y y gas � CcdrcLe S�', 7 �C�
5 \If(A
99= (_acSy
Ca�ibl�U �cn� due- a i,1 Nip
AV' AiCcc-t U�S
G« 3 4 I�111 vG� e �rt�1�5n 5C\ 9�a
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q , { Phone: '
Reviewer/Inspector Signa Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015