HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0029601_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190802DocuSign Envelope ID: AAA24F36-D143-4C2D-A607-BE354C3D9B26
ROY COOPED
66crryc+r
K41C fAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
arwtor
Scott H Brown
Carolina Investments Inc
444 Harris Creek Rd
Jacksonville, NC 28540
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Qual"
August 08, 2019
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Southwest Plantation WWTF
Non -discharge Permit No. WQ0029601
Onslow County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Southwest Plantation
WWTF on August 2, 2019. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in
compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in Non -discharge Permit No. WQ0029601. The
findings and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection
report entitled "Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Dean Hunkele with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7215 or via email at
dean. hunkele@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
I ONE �Aarrr O�.
7F141E73B6F3456...
Tom Tharrington, Asst. Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENT
Cc: Upload to Laserfiche
NorthCaroLnaDepartmentoftnvironmeatailQaadrty I DWsionofWater Resoirroes
r, Wilmington Reg •3i.a-Off ra 1 127 CArd'inslDrive!Extension I WINmington, North Caro --ra2$405
_:r'•• " a"• 910-796-7215
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0029601 Effective: 08/01/17 Expiration: 07/31/22 Owner: Carolina Investments Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Southwest Plantation WWTF
County: Onslow 245 SW Plantation Dr
Region: Wilmington
Jacksonville NC 28540
Contact Person: Scott H Brown Title: Phone: 910-340-1086
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SI, WW2,
Primary ORC: Charles John Scozzari
Secondary ORC(s):
Regina Welty
Maxwell M Carroll
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Certification: 11190
1001732
1004834
Scott H Brown
Sonny Scozzari
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Entry Time: 09:20AM
Primary Inspector: Dean Hunkele DocuSigned by:
Secondary Inspector(s):
E1 D9294C4D3746E...
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Reclaimed Water
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Phone: 910-451-7190
910-330-6471
910-451-7190
910-340-1086
910-455-7094
Exit Time: 11:OOAM
Phone: 910-796-7215
8/8/2019
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Treatment
Use Records
Treatment Filters Record Keeping
Treatment Sludge Storage/Treatment Treatment Clarifiers
Treatment Flow Measurement Treatment Return pumps
Standby Power
(See attachment summary)
Miscellaneous Questions
Treatment Barscreen
Treatment Activated Sludge
Treatment Disinfection
End Use -Reuse
Page 1 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
No issues detected with facility or records.
Page 2 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Yes No NA NE
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
❑
Single Family Drip
❑
Lagoon Spray, LR
❑
Single Family Spray, LR
❑
Recycle/Reuse
❑
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
❑
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
❑
Infiltration System
❑
Reuse (Quality)
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: A temporary turbidity meter was being used as old meter failed. Will be replacing with a better
unit. Need to ensure that the meter can collect & store data for periodic download (ideally at
least weekly) or have a chart to record the data. Facility is monitored by telemetry; it was noted
that EQ etc. only have visual alarms with no audible.
Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
❑
❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly?
❑
❑ ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
❑
❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow?
❑
❑ ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records Yes No NA NE
Is water use metered? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
❑
❑ ❑
Page 3 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Calibrated 5-29-2019 and has a chart. Can use a datalogger if chart should fail in the future, but
download data at least weekly.
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is generator operable? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does generator have adequate fuel? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Tested under load each Monday
Treatment Barscreen Yes No NA NE
Is it free of excessive debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screenings in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the bars spaced properly? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The sewer collection system is a pressure sewer system using individual grinder pump stations,
thus the facility really should have been designed with an automatic fine mesh screen to collect
the small fines and grit it receives. The current 1-inch manual screen collects very little, thus
these fine materials are depositing in the EQ and aeration basins.
Treatment Activated Sludge
Yes No NA NE
Is the aeration mechanism operable?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the aeration basin thoroughly mixed?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the aeration equipment easily accessed?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is Dissolved Oxygen adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
Are Settleometer results acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is activated sludge an acceptable color?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Clarifiers
Yes No NA NE
Are the weirs level?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are the weirs free of solids and algae?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scum removal system operational?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scum removal system accessible?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket at an acceptable level?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the effluent from the clarifier free of excessive solids?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Return pumps Yes No NA NE
Are they in place? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are they operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment:
Treatment Filters Yes No NA NE
Is the filter media present? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the filter media the correct size and type? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the air scour operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scouring acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the clear well free of excessive solids? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mud well free of excessive solids and filter media? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does backwashing frequency appear adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Filters are upflow throuqh a fine plastic screen that contains no other media.
Treatment Sludge Storage/Treatment Yes No NA NE
Is the aeration operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the aeration pattern even? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If required, are Sanitary "Ts" present in tankage? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Disinfection
Yes No NA NE
Is the system working?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there adequate detention time (-30 minutes)?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the system properly maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the chlorinator accessible?
❑
❑ ❑
If tablets, are tablets present?
❑
❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑ ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
❑
❑ ❑
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
# Is it a dual feed system?
❑
❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Page 5 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is a copy of current permit available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
NDAR?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are application rates adhered to?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are annual soil reports available?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
# Are PAN records required?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
If so, has it been applied?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are operational logs present?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab sheets available for review?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
❑
❑ ❑
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Thermometer in sampler was reading too low, thus it should be checked.
If refridgerated unit
fails, then could consider using a portable unit that uses ice since only sample 1 x/month even if
Phase 2 expansion is implemented according to the permit.
End Use -Reuse
Yes No NA NE
Is the acreage in the permit being utilized?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the acreage specified in the permit correspond to the measured acreage at the site?
❑
❑ ❑
Are all essential units provided in duplicate?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is an automatically activated standby power source available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the equalization capacity adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is aerated flow equalization present?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the turbidity meter been calibrated in the last 12 months?
❑
❑ ❑
Does the turbidity meter have recording capabilities?
❑
❑ ❑
Page 6 of 7
Permit: WQ0029601 Owner - Facility: Carolina Investments Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is all flow diverted at the appropriate times?
❑
❑ ❑
Is all upset wastewater diverted from reuse storage unit?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is all upset wastewater treated, retreated, or disposed of acceptably?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is upset wastewater treated prior to discharge to irrigation storage?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is public access restricted from irrigation area during active site use?
❑
❑ ❑
If golf course, is a sign posted in plain sight on the club house?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the cover crop acceptable?
❑
❑ ❑
Are buffers adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of ponding/runoff?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the acreage in the permit being utilized?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment acceptable?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the application area free of limiting slopes?
❑
❑ ❑
How close is the closest water supply well?
❑
❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within the CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Is municipal water available in the area?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells required?
❑
❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RIB and CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Comment: A temDorary turbiditv meter was beina used as old meter failed. Will be reDlacina with a better
unit. Need to ensure that the meter can collect & store data for periodic download (ideally at
least weekly) or have a chart to record the data. The highest turbidity level for the day is what
should be reported on the monthly report and record the level at the time that fecal coliform is
sampled for possible correlation to a bad result. 5-Day upset pond had plenty of storage; ORC
had been running collected rainwater thru plant, but that volume can be dumped onto ground if it
hasn't ever been used for poor effluent.
Page 7 of 7