20191044 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190802

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191044
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Washington Regional Office - [phone] Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Martin Marietta Fountain Quarry
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Thomas Brown
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
Thomas. [e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/2/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Kitten Creek
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.6742
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pitt
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-77.6189
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable ureters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
14 - Linear transportation
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Martin Marietta Materials
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Larry Roberts
2d. Address
Street Address
2700 Wycliff Rd
Address Line 2
Suite 104
qty
State / Province / R icn
Raleigh
NC
Postai / Zip Cade
Country
27607
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
Larry. [e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
r Yes r No
rYes rNo
tni

1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Fountain, NC
2. Project Identification 1
2a. Property Identification Number:
4700813898,4700911263
2c. Project Address
Street Address
5368 Allen Gay Rd
Address Line 2
City
Fountain
pWal / Zip Code
27829
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Kitten Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201030203
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
103
State / Ftwince / Pagzm
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project area is located adjacent to an existing Rock Quarry. The Current land use is agricultural.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Topo Map.pdf 1.23MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Map.pdf 484.73KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.88
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1000
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The proposed road crossing will be used to transport overburden material from the current quarry site to a proposed storage area located across Allen Gay Rd. This section of Allen
Gay Rd has been closed and is controlled by Martin Marietta. The stream parallels Allen Gay Rd, as shown on the attached maps. No other impacts are proposed for this project at this
time. The overburden will be placed on high ground with proper erosion control as required by NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Normal grading equipment such as excavators and loaders will be used to install the culvert. As shown on the attached detail, the culvert will be 5ft and will be buried 1 foot below the
channel bottom.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
Determination has been reviewed by Corps in the field
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:

5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Thomas Brown
Agency/Consultant Company: Martin Marietta
Other:
5dl. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes F No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands R Streams -tributaries V Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Road crossingPermanent Culvert UT to Kitten Creek Perennial Both 10 100
Average (feet) (lir�earfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
6c. Per or Temp
0
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
100
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
No
100
200
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
F Neuse
P Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba
r Randleman
F Goose Creek
r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Road Crossing
P 11
UT to Kitten Creek
No
300
200
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 300.00
200.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 300.00
200.00

6i. Comments:
Minimal buffer exists in this area of the stream. The stream is located between a road and farm field.
Supporting Documentation
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed crossing is located in an area where the stream has already been channelized. The crossing will be installed perpendicular to the
stream in order to minimize impacts. All wetlands are being avoided.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be used during construction. All exposed soil will be stabilized quickly. To the extent possible,
work will be preformed during times of low flow. Except for the immediate area of the crossing a 50ft buffer will be maintained on the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The crossing is less than 150ft and is located in a section of stream that has been previously impacted by channeliration for agricultural purposes.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
[ Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
r[ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
[ Local Government W State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II
[ HWQ or ORW
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
F- Coastal Counties
W Other NPDES General Permit
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
f Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
O Yes r- No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r- Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r- Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Field Observations and Conversations vnth Corps of Engineers and DWR
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r' Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Field Observations and Conversations with Corps of Engineers and DWR
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r^ Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Field Observations and Conversations with Corps of Engineers and DWR
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes f. No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Local FEMA mapping

Miscellaneous
Comments
The project was discussed in the field with Raleigh Bland and Emily Thompson of the Corps of Engineers, and Chris Pullinger of NC DWR.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Martin Marietta, Fountain Quarry, JD Maps and Data.pdf
19.8.1.Fountain. Proposed.Stream.Crossing.Cross.Section. pdf
Signature
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
1.27MB
135.04KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Thomas Brown
Signature
1ZaW Pua
Date
8/2/2019
v

1'Ø5'QUARRY:DWN BY:DATE:DWG.JOB. NO.SHEET NO.SCALE:CK. BY:DESIGN FIRM:FILE NAME:52104376108911BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BY:BYREVISIONDATENO:©BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED.20191NTSPNPAUG 2019PNPPROPOSED STREAM CROSSING401/404 PERMIT APPLICATIONFOUNTAIN1FOUNTAIN.PROP.CROSSINGNOTES:1.ENSURE MINIMUM PIPE COVERMEETS MANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONS2.STREAM CHANNEL SHAPE FORILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 1 of 33950100395030039505003950700395090039511003951300395010039503003950500395070039509003951100262200262400262600262800263000263200263400263600263800264000
262200 262400 262600 262800 263000 263200 263400 263600 263800 264000
35° 40' 37'' N 77° 37' 42'' W35° 40' 37'' N77° 36' 24'' W35° 39' 56'' N
77° 37' 42'' W35° 39' 56'' N
77° 36' 24'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 400 800 1600 2400
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:9,040 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Pitt County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2015—Feb
25, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes,
Southern Coastal Plain
22.4 20.2%
OcB Ocilla loamy fine sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
2.4 2.2%
Pg Pantego loam 0.7 0.6%
RaA Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
61.9 55.9%
Ud Udorthents 23.4 21.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 110.8 100.0%
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 3 of 3
Op
e
n
Wa
t
e
r
Dit
c
hRoadDitchStream
Wetland A1.36 acres
Wetland B0.52 Acre
ExistingBermExisting Berm
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic NamesInformation System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National StructuresDataset, and National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line; HERE Road Data
Legend
Wetland
Project_area
¯
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
Fountan QuarryApproximate Wetland MapFor planning purposes only
Op
e
n
Wa
t
e
r
Dit
c
hRoadDitchStream
Wetland A1.36 acres
Wetland B0.52 Acre
ExistingBermProposed Haul Truck Crossing
100ft Wide
Existing Berm
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Legend
Wetland
Project_area
¯
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
Fountan QuarryApproximate Wetland MapFor planning purposes only
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, EsriChina (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community
Legend
Project_area¯4,100 0 4,1002,050 Feet
Fountan QuarryVicinity MapFor planning purposes only
Op
e
n
Wa
t
e
r
Dit
c
hRoadDitchStream
Wetland A1.36 acres
Wetland B0.52 Acre
ExistingBermExisting Berm
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, Geographic NamesInformation System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National StructuresDataset, and National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line; HERE Road Data
Legend
Wetland
Project_area
¯
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
Fountan QuarryApproximate Wetland MapFor planning purposes only
Op
e
n
Wa
t
e
r
Dit
c
hRoadDitchStream
Wetland A1.36 acres
Wetland B0.52 Acre
ExistingBermExisting Berm
Legend
Wetland
Project_area
ned03m35077f5.tif
Value High : 40
Low : 15
¯
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
Fountan QuarryApproximate Wetland MapFor planning purposes only
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 1 of 33950100395030039505003950700395090039511003951300395010039503003950500395070039509003951100262200262400262600262800263000263200263400263600263800264000
262200 262400 262600 262800 263000 263200 263400 263600 263800 264000
35° 40' 37'' N 77° 37' 42'' W35° 40' 37'' N77° 36' 24'' W35° 39' 56'' N
77° 37' 42'' W35° 39' 56'' N
77° 36' 24'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 400 800 1600 2400
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:9,040 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Pitt County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 23, 2015—Feb
25, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes,
Southern Coastal Plain
22.4 20.2%
OcB Ocilla loamy fine sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
2.4 2.2%
Pg Pantego loam 0.7 0.6%
RaA Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
61.9 55.9%
Ud Udorthents 23.4 21.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 110.8 100.0%
Soil Map—Pitt County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/6/2019
Page 3 of 3
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Fountain Quarry Pitt County, NC 4/23/2019
Martin Marietta NC Wetland
Thomas Brown
Flat Concave 0-2
133A 35.67135 -77.6169
Rains
X
X
X
X X
X
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
X
X
X X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Quercus marilandica
Pinus taeda
Liquidambar styraciflua 40
10
10
60
YFAC
UPL
FAC
3
3
100
30 12
Persea borbonia
Clethra alnifolia
50
10
10
70
Y FACW
FACW
FAC
Cyrilla racemiflora
35 14
Smilax Rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
Y
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-6
6-18
18-24
10YR 2/1
10YR 3/1
10YR 6/1
100
60
100
10RY 5/1 40 D M
SL
SL
SCL
✔
X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Fountain Quarry Pitt County, NC 4/23/2019
Martin Marietta NC Upland
Thomas Brown
Flat None 0-2
133A 35.67135 -77.6169
Rains
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Quercus marilandica
Pinus taeda
Acer Rubrum 10
25
70
105
Y
Y
Y
FAC
UPL
FAC
5
8
62
52.5 21
Persea borbonia
Ilex opaca
10
10
10
30
Y
Y
Y
FACW
FACW
FACU
Vaccinium corymbosum
✔
15 6
5YFACUPteridium aquilinum
Smilax Rotundifolia 10 Y FAC
X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-10
10-18
10YR 3/2
10YR 4/4
100
100
SL
SL
X