U-5825_SEAFONSI_FINAL signed

U-5825 WBS 44396.1.1
Administrative Action
STIP Project U-5825
State Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Wake County, North Carolina
Widen SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) from Apex Peakway,
Town of Apex, to SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road),
Town of Cary.
PREPARED FOR
stir
N.C. Department of Transportation Division of Highways

DocuSign Envelope ID: D21A1 D9E-8983-4B53-81 B3-88COEE39FECB
STIP Project No. U-5825
Submitted pursuant to North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act
SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) Widening
From Apex Peakway to SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
WBS 44396.1.1
STIP Project No. U-5825
Administrative Action
State Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
June 2019
DOCUMENT PREPARED BY VHB ENGINEERING NC. P.C.
6/27/2019
Date
6/28/2019
Date
��cuSigned by: � � � �� � � L
C( 1A/�F.A '�"i 1/r/��1
Lauren Triebert, PE
Project Manager
VF�B �F3n rc ering NC, P.C.
�fi� �IIn,S
Tim Goins, PE
Project Engineer
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
6/27/2019
Date
6/27/2019
Date
La
occlu'Signed by::'I MII
Zahid Baloch, PE
Project Planning Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
DocuSigned by:
Joey Hopkins, PE
Division Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
Ten Ten Road Widening

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Widen SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) from SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
to Apex Peakway to Multi -lanes
The following special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
Division 5
• A pre -application meeting with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and NC
Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) will be scheduled prior to permit applications
being submitted.
• A detailed traffic maintenance plan will be prepared during final design.
• After project completion, the contract administrator for construction must submit the actual
amount of tree clearing reported in tenths of acres to the appropriate NCDOT website to
confirm compliance with the NLEB PBO.
• On May 21, 2019, the Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi) and Carolina madtom (Noturus
furiosus) were proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. The Neuse River
waterdog is proposed for listing as Threatened and the Carolina madtom is proposed for
listing as Endangered. The biological conclusion for these species is Unresolved. Surveys for
both species will be conducted (and any consultation required under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act) prior to the start of project construction.
Geotechnical Engineering Unit
• Field verification of known hazardous waste sites and identification of unknown sites will be
performed during final design and prior to right-of-way acquisition.

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table of Contents
Description of Proposed Action.............................................................................1
2 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action......................................................... 3
ProjectPurpose.....................................................................................................................................3
ProjectNeed.......................................................................................................................................... 3
TrafficOperations................................................................................................................................. 3
SecondaryBenefits..............................................................................................................................4
CrashData.............................................................................................................................................. 4
3 Existing Corridor Inventory.....................................................................................6
Right of Way and Access Control.................................................................................................. 6
Intersections........................................................................................................................................... 6
Existing Full Access Signalized Intersections....................................................6
Existing Full Access Unsignalized Intersections..............................................6
Structures................................................................................................................................................ 7
Utilities...................................................................................................................................................... 7
Multimodal Accommodations........................................................................................................8
TransitFacilities.....................................................................................................................................8
Other Transportation Projects in the Area................................................................................. 8
4 Alternative Development......................................................................................10
No -Action Alternative......................................................................................................................10
Conventional Widening Alternative............................................................................................10
Other Alternatives Considered......................................................................................................10
Superstreet Widening Alternative......................................................................10
Alternative Modes of Transportation................................................................11
Travel Demand Management (TDM) Alternative.........................................11
Transportation Systems Management (TSM)................................................11
Selection of Preferred Alternative................................................................................................12
5 Proposed Improvements for the Recommended Alternative ...........................13
Proposed Right of Way and Access Control...........................................................................13
Intersections.........................................................................................................................................13
Proposed Full Access Signalized Intersections..............................................13
Proposed Full Access Unsignalized Intersections.........................................13
Proposed Partial Access Unsignalized Intersections...................................14

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Structures..............................................................................................................................................14
TrafficOperations...............................................................................................................................14
EstimatedCosts...................................................................................................................................15
6 Environmental Effects............................................................................................16
NaturalEnvironment.........................................................................................................................16
Soils.................................................................................................................................16
Terrestrial Communities.........................................................................................16
ProtectedSpecies......................................................................................................18
WaterResources........................................................................................................22
Regulatory Considerations....................................................................................24
HumanEnvironment.........................................................................................................................25
Cultural Resources....................................................................................................25
CommunityImpacts.................................................................................................26
Land Use and Transportation Plans...................................................................29
Relocations..................................................................................................................30
AirQuality....................................................................................................................30
Noise..............................................................................................................................30
Hazardous Materials and Contaminated Properties............................................................34
FloodHazard Evaluation.................................................................................................................35
Visual and Aesthetic Resources....................................................................................................35
RequiredPermits................................................................................................................................35
Summary of Environmental Impacts..........................................................................................36
7 Public Involvement................................................................................................37
8 Basis for Finding of No Significant Impact.........................................................45
9 References...............................................................................................................46
Appendices
Appendix A: Figures
Appendix 13: Cultural Resources Correspondence
Appendix C: Preliminary Designs
Appendix D: Public Meeting Materials

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
List of Figures
Figure No. Description
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Study Area
Figure 3 Typical Sections
Figure 4 Area Projects
Figure 5 Terrestrial Communities
Figure 6 Jurisdictional Features
Figure 7 Demographic Study Area
Figure 8 Traffic Noise Analysis Reults
Figure 9 Geoenvironmental Features
List of Tables
Table No. Description Page
Table 1: SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) Corridor Crashes..........................................................................4
Table2: Crash Type Summary..............................................................................................................5
Table 3: Project Cost Estimates......................................................................................................................15
Table4: Soils in the Study Area......................................................................................................................17
Table 5: Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area.......................................................18
Table 6: ESA federally protected species listed for Wake County....................................................18
Table 7: Streams in the study area................................................................................................................23
Table 8: Surface waters in the study area...................................................................................................23
Table 9: Characteristics of jurisdictional streams in the study area.................................................24
Table 10: Characteristics of jurisdictional wetlands in the study area.............................................24
Table 11: Population Change, 2000 to 2010.............................................................................................27
Table 12: Traffic Noise Impacts*....................................................................................................................31
Table 13: Preliminary Noise Barrier Evaluation Results.........................................................................32
Table 14: Hazardous Material Sites..............................................................................................................34
Table 15: Summary of Environmental Effects...........................................................................................36

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
1
Description of Proposed Action
Ab
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division 5, proposes to widen SR 1010 (Ten
Ten Road) from SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road) in the Town of Cary to Apex Peakway in the Town of Apex,
in southwestern Wake County (Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map — in Appendix A). The proposed project is
included in the NCDOT 2018-2027 State Transportation Improvement Program (2018-2027 STIP) as
U-5825.
This environmental document has been prepared in accordance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA) and is intended for use by both decision makers and the public. It includes the
disclosure of relevant environmental information regarding the proposed project.
The length of this project is approximately 3.3 miles (Figure 2 Study Area Map — in Appendix A), extending
from Apex Peakway in Apex to Kildaire Farm Road in Cary. The proposed project improvements include
widening to a four lane, median divided, curb and gutter facility with 11-foot lanes, 5-foot bike lanes,
5-foot sidewalks and a 10-foot asphalt multiuse path (MUP) on the northern segment, spanning from
Apex Peakway to Penny Road. Both sides of the roadway will have sidewalks southeast of Penny Road.
This project also includes improving the interchange bridge over US Highway 1.
This project is funded by the State Highway Trust Fund. The 2018 estimated cost of STIP U-5825 is $87.1
million, which includes $36.7 million for right of way (ROW) acquisition, $4.6 million for utility relocation
and $45.7 million for construction.
The basic construction elements for the project include:
Adding eastbound and westbound through travel lanes along SR 1010;
Adding a median between eastbound and westbound lanes;
Description of Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Adding a multiuse path along the north side of the corridor between Apex Peakway and Penny
Road;
• Adding sidewalks along the entire south side of the corridor, and the north side from Penny
Road to Kildaire Farm Road, to accommodate pedestrians;
• Adding an exclusive bicycle lane in both directions to accommodate bicyclists; and
• Improve the interchange bridge over U.S. 1.
Existing SR 1010 is classified as a Minor Arterial. The existing right-of-way on SR 1010 ranges from 60 to
110 feet throughout the project corridor. Approximately 100 to 130 feet of right-of-way would be
required to accommodate the proposed improvements, so right-of-way acquisition is expected as part
of this project. Currently, access is not controlled along SR 1010. The bridge over U.S. Highway 1 is
structurally deficient and functionally obsolete, requiring replacement as part of the project. The
proposed project includes construction of a median between eastbound and westbound lanes. Four
different typical sections would be constructed throughout the corridor, as depicted in Figure 3 in
Appendix A. From Apex Peakway to U.S. 1, four through lanes will be constructed, two bicycle lanes, one
sidewalk and one multiuse path. The road will then widen to six lanes, continuing the two bicycle lanes,
one sidewalk and one multiuse path from U.S. 1 to Penny Road. The next typical section will consist of
five lanes (two westbound lanes, three eastbound lanes), two bicycle lanes and sidewalk on each side of
the corridor along Penny Road to Smith Road. Finally, the typical section would return to four through
lanes with bicycle lanes, however there would be sidewalk on each side, from Smith Road to Kildaire Farm
Road.
2 Description of Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
2
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
Project Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to improve traffic flow and reduce travel delay and congestion
along existing SR 1010 to improve traffic operations with a goal of Level of Service (LOS) D at signalized
intersections in the 2040 design year.
Project Need
The proposed project is needed due to transportation deficiencies resulting in existing delays and
congestion along SR 1010.' The 2016 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes for the
project corridor range between 19,200 to 30,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Most of SR 1010 currently
operates below LOS D during peak hours. In the absence of the proposed project, traffic volumes are
expected to increase, ranging from 22,200 to 39,800 vehicles per day. By the design year, 2040, traffic
volumes along the project corridor are estimated to range between 32,800 and 57,400 vpd with the
project constructed. LOS F will occur at most signalized and unsignalized intersections along the corridor,
resulting in significant delays and congestion for the users.
Traffic Operations
Existing condition (2016) results, detailed in the Traffic Capacity Memo (June 2017), indicate that all
intersections along the project corridor are operating at unacceptable levels of service (LOS) (i.e., below
LOS D), with one exception at Smith Road (signalized), which operates at LOS C for both peak periods.
The Design Year (2040) No -Action condition indicated that the AM and PM overall intersection delays
increase by approximately 10-40 seconds during both peaks, reducing operations at most intersection to
LOS F during both AM and PM peaks.
A highway facility is deficient when it is unable to safely and efficiently satisfy travel demand because of the amount of traffic using the
facility, the inadequate roadway width to carry the traffic, and/or safety concerns.
3 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Secondary Benefits
In addition to relieving congestion and improving traffic flow, the proposed project will also improve
safety along the corridor. With the implementation of a median, turning movements will be localized
which will reduce the potential for collisions of turning vehicles. Bicycle and pedestrian accommodations
are also included with this project. By providing an exclusive bicycle lane, bicyclists on the road will no
longer have to share main through lanes with moving vehicles. Additionally, the inclusion of a multiuse
path will allow recreational riders to be completely separated from vehicle traffic for much of the corridor.
The project will also create a continuous pedestrian link along the corridor, improving the incomplete
sidewalk network that exists today.
Crash Data
Crash data was provided by the NCDOT Traffic Safety Unit for the Ten Ten Road corridor from SR 1306
(Schieffelin Road/Apex Peakway) to SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road) for the five-year period from March 1,
2011 to February 29, 2016 (see Table 1 below). An analysis of the data is included in the Traffic Capacity
Memo (June 2017). There was a total of 351 crashes along the Ten Ten Road corridor during this period.
No fatalities occurred during the study period; however, three (3) pedestrian crashes were recorded along
this section of Ten Ten Road. As shown in Table 2, 50% of all crashes were rear end, slow or stop collisions,
which are typically associated with stop -and -go conditions along congested corridors.
Non -
Tab
le 1: SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) Corridor Crashes (March 2011-February 2016)
Rate Crashes Crashes per 00 IVIVIVI Statewide Rate' Critical Rate'
Total 351 243.04 324.59 349.60
Fatal 0 0.00 1.66 3.77
Fatallnjury 92 63.70 99.33 113.32
Night 71 49.16 74.81 87.00
Wet 44 30.47 60.4 71.38
z 2013-2015 statewide crash rate for urban 2-lane, continuous left turn lane for State Routes in North Carolina.
3 Based on the statewide crash rate (95% level of confidence).
4 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
z 2013-2015 statewide crash rate for urban 2-lane, continuous left turn lane for State Routes in North Carolina.
3 Based on the statewide crash rate (95% level of confidence).
4 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table 2 Crash Type Summary
Crash Type Crashes
Angle 43
%
12%
Backing Up 2
1%
Fixed Object 6
Left Turn, Different Roadway 24
2%
7%
Left Turn, Same Roadway 36
Other Collision with Vehicle 2
Ran off Road — Right 9
Rear End, Slow or Stop 176
Right Turn, Same Roadway 4
Sideswipe, Opposite Direction 6
Sideswipe, Same Direction 13
Pedestrian 3
Other 27
10%
1%
3%
50%
1%
2%
4%
1%
8%
5 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
3
Existing Corridor Inventory
Right of Way and Access Control
The existing right-of-way on SR 1010 ranges from 60 to 110 feet throughout the project corridor. There
is currently no defined control of access along the corridor. Generally, parcels along SR 1010 have a
single access driveway, but this varies. Proximate to the U.S. 1 interchange, there are minimal driveways,
but the access is not formally controlled by NCDOT.
Intersections
There is a mix of existing signalized and unsignalized intersections along the project corridor.
Existing Full Access Signalized Intersections
• Apex Peakway/ SR 1306 (Schieffelin Rd)
• U.S. 1 SB Ramps/Waterford Green Drive
• SR 1444 (Lufkin Road)/U.S. 1 NB Ramps
• SR 4070 (Reliance Avenue)
• SR 1303 (Smith Road)
• SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Existing Full Access Unsignalized Intersections
• Satinwood Drive
• Forest Grove Drive
• Old Grove Lane
• Myrtle Grove Lane
• Investment Boulevard
• Parkfield Drive
• SR 1306 (Schieffelin Road)
• Kiftsgate Lane
• Arbordale Court/MasTec Driveway
• Caterpillar Drive
6 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
• SR 1379 (Penny Road)
• SR 1304 (Jessie Drive)
• SR 4023 (Littleman Lane)
Structures
The U.S. 1 overpass bridge is the only major
structure within the project limits. Originally
constructed in 1959 as a steel multi -beam
structure, this bridge is currently
considered to be structurally deficient and
functionally obsolete per the most recent
NCDOT bridge inventory.
There are no hydrologic structures of 72"
diameter or greater located along the
corridor.
Existing U.S. 1 Overpass Bridge
Utilities
The following utilities were identified in the project study area:
• Duke Energy — Power Distribution and Transmission
• Town of Apex — Water & Sewer
• Town of Cary — Water & Sewer
• Colonial Pipeline — Petroleum Pipeline
• PSNC — Natural Gas
• AT&T — Fiber Optic and Copper Telecommunications
• Centurylink — Telecommunications
• MCNC — Telecommunications
• Charter/Spectrum — Telecommunications
• NCDOT — fiber optic / ITS
7 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Multimodal Accommodations
There are sections of existing sidewalk along Ten Ten Road in the project limits. These sections are
primarily located on the westbound side of the project corridor. A small section of sidewalk is located on
the eastbound side of the project corridor in front of Sheetz. There are no greenways or existing bike
lanes within the project limits; however, the corridor is part of NC Bike Route 5 (Cape Fear Run).
Transit Facilities
There are no transit routes that pass along the project corridor. The closest routes are Route 311 and 305
from GoTriangle, which have stops at Compare Foods on E. Williams Street, west of the project limits.
Other Transportation Projects in the Area
Ten projects programmed in the NCDOT 2018-2027 STIP are located within or near the project study
area, as well as four Town/locally funded projects. Below is a list of projects, along with their right-of-
way and construction year estimates. Figure 4 in Appendix A shows the location of these projects.
• U-5301 — Corridor upgrades and improvements to U.S. 64 from west of SR 1308 (Laura Duncan
Road) to U.S. 1 in Apex and Cary. (Right-of-Way/Utilities — FY 2020; Construction — FY 2022)
• U-5537 — Widen SR 1521 (Lake Pine Drive) to 3 lanes, north of MacGregor Pines Road to north
of Versailles Drive. Includes 10 ft multi -use path on east side and 5 ft sidewalk on west side.
(Construction — FY 2018)
• EB-5893 — Construct Swift Creek Greenway from SR 1521 (Lake Pine Drive) to Koka Booth
Amphitheater in Cary. (Right -of -Way — FY 2023; Construction — FY 2025)
• U-2901 B — Widen NC 55 (Williams Street), from US 1 to north of SR 1160 (Olive Chapel Road) in
Apex, convert existing multi -lanes to median divided section and widen remaining 2-lane
section to multi -lanes. (Right -of -Way and Utilities — FY 2019; Construction — FY 2021)
• U-5928 — Construct grade separated interchange for Apex Peakway at South Salem Street and
CSX Railroad from James Street to Towhee Drive. (Construction — FY 2018)
• U-5530 — Pedestrian improvements from James Street to North Salem Street in Apex. Part of
Capital Area MPO Bicycle, Pedestrian, Transit and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
• U-6066 — Add lanes to U.S. 1 from NC 55 in Apex to U.S. 64 in Cary. (Right-of-Way/Utilities — FY
2024; Construction — FY 2026)
8 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
• U-5981 — Interchange improvements to U.S. 1/NC 55 interchange in Apex. Improve interchange
and upgrade NC 55 northbound from SR 1444 (Lufkin Road) to U.S. 1. (Right-of-Way/Utilities —
FY 2024; Construction — FY 2026)
• EB-5895 — Construct a sidewalk on NC 55 (East Williams Street) from SR 1301 (Sunset Lake
Road) to NC 55 in Holly Springs. (Construction — FY 2019)
• R-2721 — Future route of NC 540 — New construction. (Right -of -Way, Utilities and Construction
set to begin in FY 2019)
• Jessie Drive Extension — Extension from Jessie Drive to East Williams Street (NC 55).
• Apex Peakway SE Connector — Connector of Apex Peakway SE from NC 55 to Center Street in
Apex.
• Kildaire Farm and SW Cary Parkway— Intersection improvements. (Construction to be
completed Summer 2019)
• Kildaire Farm and Advent Court — Intersection improvements. (Right -of -Way and Utilities — Fall
2018 to Summer 2019; Construction — Summer 2019)
9 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Alternative Development
No -Action Alternative
The No -Action Alternative serves as the baseline for comparing the potential impacts associated with the
proposed action. The No -Action Alternative would include routine maintenance and road repairs to SR
1010 (Ten Ten Road) and account for other projects listed in NCDOT's 2018-2027 STIP and shown in
Figure 4 in Appendix A. The No -Action Alternative would not reduce congestion and delay and would
not address the proposed project's purpose and need. A failing LOS would occur at the evaluated project
intersections, except Smith Road, under the No -Action Alternative.
Conventional Widening Alternative
The Conventional Widening Alternative takes into consideration the 2040 future year traffic conditions
and the conventional widening of Center Street/Ten-Ten Road (SR 1010) along with other conventional
intersection improvements that would take place along the length of the corridor. This design takes into
consideration the projected future year traffic volumes associated with a widened SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road).
Therefore, this alternative accounts for expected changes in travel patterns due to the added capacity
along Ten -Ten Road as well as other changes in the surrounding roadway network.
Other Alternatives Considered
Preliminary alternatives considered included a superstreet corridor, Alternative Modes of Transportation,
the Travel Demand Management Alternative (TDM), and the Transportation Systems Management (TSM)
Alternative. These preliminary alternatives, which are briefly discussed below, would not address the
proposed project's purpose and need and are therefore not carried forward in this document for detailed
review.
Superstreet Widening Alternative
The Superstreet Alternative takes into consideration the 2040 future year traffic conditions with the
addition of a superstreet system on Ten Ten Road between Apex Peakway/Schieffelin Road and Penny
Road, except at the U.S. 1 interchange area. Conventional widening would take place between Penny
10 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
Road and Kildaire Farm Road. At the U.S. 1 interchange intersection, movement conflicts would be
reduced, while improving traffic flow and simplifying signal operations at this location. The Superstreet
Alternative also includes other intersection improvements where necessary, such as signalization and
adding exclusive turn lanes. This alternative was designed based on the same traffic demand as the
Conventional Widening Alternative, except the traffic was rerouted via the superstreet configurations at
the affected intersections.
Based on the traffic capacity analysis results, there was no notable improvement in traffic operations
between the conventional widening and superstreet alternative. Additionally, there was notable public
opposition to the superstreet alternative. Because the impacts projected for the superstreet alternative
(traffic operations, cost, right-of-way impacts, environmental effects) were not notably lower than the
conventional widening alternative, it was eliminated from further evaluation.
Alternative Modes of Transportation
Mass transit (buses/trains) and bicycle/pedestrian accommodations are examples of alternative modes of
transportation that may help reduce highway congestion and delay. GoTriangle Bus Route 311 currently
stops near W. Williams Street and Hughes Street in Apex, which is northwest of the project area. Traffic
congestion along Ten Ten Road would not be alleviated by taking bus transportation because no direct
route through the project area is present. The proposed project includes construction of sidewalks and a
multiuse path to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians. Providing accommodations for
alternative modes of transportation alone would not address the purpose and need for the proposed
project, still resulting in a failing peak hour LOS in the design year. Thus, this option was removed from
further evaluation.
Travel Demand Management (TDM) Alternative
TDM measures, such as carpooling and alternative work schedules are potential ways to reduce
congestion and delay. However, these measures are not controlled by NCDOT, and would not alone
address the purpose and need for the proposed project.
Transportation Systems Management (TSM)
TSM improvements involve increasing the available capacity of a roadway within the existing right-of-
way without reconstruction or installation of additional lanes to the existing road. Physical TSM
11 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
improvements include striping, signalization, signing, and minor road realignments. Operational TSM
improvements include signal timing changes and speed restrictions. TSM improvements alone would not
address the purpose and need for the proposed project because a failing LOS would not be prevented
without adding more through capacity.
Selection of Preferred Alternative
As mentioned previously, both the conventional widening and superstreet widening alternatives would
meet the purpose and need for this project. The impacts projected for the Superstreet Alternative (traffic
operations, cost, right-of-way impacts, environmental effects) were not notably lower than the
conventional widening alternative; additionally, there was notable public opposition to the Superstreet
Alternative. As such, the Conventional Widening Alternative, was selected as the preferred alternative to
carry forward in project development, design and implementation.
12 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Proposed Improvements for the Recommended
Alternative
Proposed Right of Way and Access Control
Approximately 100 to 130 feet of total right-of-way would be required to accommodate the proposed
improvements, requiring an additional 40-70 feet of right-of-way along the corridor. The project proposes
partial control of access within the project limits.
Intersections
All intersections within the project limits will remain in place; no new intersections are proposed.
However, with the construction of a median, many side -street intersections will be limited to right-
in/right-out access or right-in/right-out/left-in access. Major cross streets will maintain full access.
Proposed Full Access Signalized Intersections
• Apex Peakway/ SR 1306 (Schieffelin Rd)
• U.S. 1 SB Ramps/Waterford Green Drive
• SR 1444 (Lufkin Road)/U.S. 1 NB Ramps
• SR 4070 (Reliance Avenue)
• SR 1379 (Penny Road, new signal)
• SR 1303 (Smith Road)
• SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Proposed Full Access Unsignalized Intersections
• Satinwood Drive
• Old Grove Lane
• Investment Boulevard
• Arbordale Court/MasTec Driveway
• SR 1304 (Jessie Drive)
13 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Proposed Partial Access Unsignalized Intersections
• Forest Grove Drive
• Myrtle Grove Lane
• Parkfield Drive
• SR 1306 (Schieffelin Road)
• Kiftsgate Lane
• SR 4023 (Littleman Lane)
Structures
The U.S. 1 overpass bridge will be replaced with a new, wider bridge to accommodate the roadway
widening, as part of project. The bridge is expected to be replaced in its current location, widening to the
south as needed. The replacement would be implemented through phased construction, maintaining at
least one lane of through travel in each direction during construction. When the new portion to the south
is built, traffic would be shifted to the new structure while the existing structure is replaced. The two
portions would be joined together and opened as a single, wider bridge to complete the replacement
process.
Traffic Operations
Based on the Traffic Capacity Memo (June 2017), the traffic operations within the Conventional Widening
Alternative offer notable improvement compared to the No -Action Alternative. In 2040 with the proposed
project, six of the seven signalized intersections are projected to operate at the goal level of LOS D or
better during both peak hours; the remaining signalized intersection, Center Street at Apex Peakway,
would operate at LOS D during the PM peak hour, but LOS E is projected during the AM peak. It is
common to see LOS E or LOS F at unsignalized side streets during peak hour analyses. Often, the volumes
on these approaches do not warrant signalization and would not benefit from additional lanes or
widening. Of the six unsignalized intersections on the study corridor, only one is expected to operate at
LOS D or better during both peak hours; all others would operate below LOS D during at least one peak
hour.
14 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
Estimated Costs
Cost estimates for the proposed action are presented in Table 3 below.
Table 3: Project Cost Estimates
Proposed Action' $36,737,000 $4,262,000 $45,700,000 $87,063,000
Based on preliminary cost estimates, dated December 2018.
1s Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Environmental Effects
Natural Environment
For NCDOT projects, evaluation of natural resources includes physical resources, soils, biotic resources,
water resources, wetlands, and federally protected species. This section provides a summary of the
Natural Resources Technical Report for this project, dated October 2016 and November 2018'. Field
investigations were conducted in the summer of 2016 and winter of 2018.5
The Web Soil Survey provided by the National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identifies thirty
soil types within the study area as shown in Table 4
Terrestrial Communities
Four terrestrial communities were identified in the study area: maintained/disturbed, pine forest,
hardwood forest and field. Coverage of terrestrial communities within the study area are represented in
Table 5 and Figure 5 in Appendix A.
4Two finalized NRTRs exist for the U-5825 project. The first NRTR was approved in 2016. The project study area was then expanded, and a
new NRTR template was used to evaluate the expanded project study area (finalized in October 2018).
s Additional field investigations were conducted on the expanded project study area, and to confirm previous natural resources findings.
16 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table 4: Soils in the Study Area
Soil Series
Appling gravellysandy loam, 2 to 6 % slopes
Mapping
Unit I[Fainage
A B
Class
Well drained
Hydric Status
Nonhydric
Appling gravellysandy loam, 2 to 6 % slopes, moderately eroded
A B2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling gravellysandy loam, 6 to 10 % slopes, moderately eroded
A C2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes
A B
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
ApB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
ApC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes,
ApD
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 % slopes, moderately eroded
AsB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Appling fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 % slopes, moderately eroded
AsC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
CeB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
CeC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
CgB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
CgC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Colfax sandy loam, 0 to 3% slopes
CnA
Somewhat
poorly drained
Nonhydric
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 % slopes, moderately eroded
EnB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Geor eville silt loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
GeB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Geor eville silt loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
GeC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Geor eville silt loam, 10 to 15% slopes, moderately eroded
GeD2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Granville sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
GrB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
HrB2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
HrC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Herndon silt loam, 10 to 15% slopes, moderately eroded
HrD2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes
MfB
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes
MfC
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
MfC2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes
M B
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
M B2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Ma odan gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes, moderately eroded
M C2
Well drained
Nonhydric
Udorthents loamy, 0 to 15% slopes
UdD
Well drained
Nonhydric
Worsham sandy loam, 0 to 3% slopes
WyA
Poorly drained
Hydric
17 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table 5: Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area
Community
Maintained/Disturbed *
Coverage (ac.)
188.71
Pine Forest
42.27
Hardwood Forest
28.94
Field
2.34
*includes roads and impervious surfaces
Protected Species
As of May 21, 2019 the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) lists eight federally protected species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for Wake County, as listed in Table 6. For each species, a
discussion of the presence or absence of habitat is included below along with the Biological Conclusion
rendered based on survey results in the study area.
Table 6: ESA federally protected species listed for Wake County
N
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Red -cockaded
0016. Status
Endangered
Present
Yes
Conclusion
No Effect
woodpecker
Cape Fear shiner
Endangered
No
No effect
Dwarf wedgemussel
Endangered
No
May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
Tar River spinymussel
Endangered
No
No Effect
Atlantic Pigtoe
Proposed Threatened
Possible
Unresolved
Yellow lance
Threatened
No
May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
Michaux's sumac
Endangered
Yes
No Effect
Neuse River waterdog
Proposed Threatened
Possible
Unresolved
Carolina madtom
Proposed Endangered
Possible
Unresolved
Red -cockaded woodpecker
USFWS optimal survey window: year-round; November to early March (optimal)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) inhabits mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine,
for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living
18 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to
provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 miles. Stands of
pine trees greater than 30 years old were found within the study area. Pine stands in the study area
ranged from 10 to 70 years old and were comprised of loblolly pine. These stands may provide potential
foraging and nesting habitat, therefore a half mile survey was conducted. Only a few stands within the
half mile survey area contained pine stands with trees 60 years old or greater. These areas were surveyed
on foot. Habitat assessment and surveys were conducted on May 25, June 1, 16, 17, 30, 2016 , January
11, 2018 by VHB environmental . No RCW cavity trees were found in the study area or within the half
mile study area. Pine stands in the study area and within half a mile do not provide optimal nesting habitat
as the stands are small and fragmented between development areas. A review of NHP records, updated
July 2018, indicates no known RCW occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. This project should
have no effect on this species.
Cape Fear Shiner
USFWS optimal survey window: April -June (tributaries); year-round (large rivers)
Biological Conclusion: No effect
A review of North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) records on or updated July 2018 indicates
no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Additionally, the project is located in the Neuse
River Basin which does not support populations of the Cape Fear shiner, which is restricted to the Cape Fear
River Basin.
Mussel Species (Dwarf wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel and Yellow lance)
USFWS optimal survey window: year-round; unknown for Yellow lance
Biological Conclusion:
• Dwarf wedgemussel: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
• Tar River spinymussel: No Effect
• Yellow lance: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
The USFWS has developed a PBO in conjunction with the FHWA, the USACE, the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC), and NCDOT for the Dwarf wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel and
Yellow lance in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the following activities in Divisions 1-8: bridge
replacements with bridges/repairs/rehabilitations; culvert replacements or extensions; and bridge to
19 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
culvert replacements. This project was reviewed using the USFWS IPaC website; it is concluded that the
project could impact the Dwarf wedgemussel and the Yellow lance. A review of NHP records on or
updated July 2018 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Michaux's sumac
USFWS optimal survey window: May -October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Michaux's sumac is endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont and grows in sandy or rocky,
open, upland woods on acidic or circumneutral, well -drained sands or sandy loam soils with low cation
exchange capacities. The species is also found on sandy or submesic loamy swales and depressions in
the fall line Sandhills region as well as in openings along the rim of Carolina bays; maintained railroad,
roadside, power line, and utility rights -of -way; areas where forest canopies have been opened up by
blowdowns and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots; abandoned building sites; under sparse or
pine/hardwood canopies; and in and along edges of other artificially maintained clearings undergoing
natural succession. In the central Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant
is shade intolerant and, therefore, grows best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, periodic
fire) maintains its open habitat. The majority of the study area is commercially and residentially developed
with regularly maintained and landscaped areas along with patches of forested areas. Suitable habitat is
present along the edges of some of the forested areas and portions of the roadside that are not
maintained regularly. These areas were surveyed on foot. No Michaux's sumac was found. Habitat
assessment and presence/absence surveys were conducted on May 25, and June 1, 16, 17, 2016 for the
original study area. Habitat assessments for the expanded portions of the study area were conducted on
January 10, 2018. Suitable habitat is present along the edges of some of the forested areas and portions
of the roadside that are not maintained regularly. A presence/absence survey was conducted on June 6-
7, 2018. No individuals were found. A review of NCNHP records, updated July 2018, indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
20 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Atlantic Pigtoe
USFWS optimal survey window: year round
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
This information will be provided by the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group (BSG).
Neuse River waterdog
USFWS optimal survey window: unknown
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
The Neuse River waterdog is an entirely aquatic salamander found within streams of the Tar -Pamlico and
Neuse River basins. It prefers streams greater the 15 meters in width with low to moderate gradients and
low current velocity. A review of the NCNHP records, updated July 2018, indicates no known occurrences
within 1.0 mile of the study area. If required, surveys will be completed by the NCDOT BSG.
Carolina madtom
USFWS optimal survey window: unknown
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
The Carolina madtom is a small catfish that grows to a maximum length of five inches. It occurs in riffles,
runs, and pools of medium to large streams and rivers, inhabiting freshwater systems with continuous,
year-round flow and moderate gradient. The Carolina madtom prefers gravel and cobble substrates that
have cover, e.g., rocks, bark, mussel shells, etc., for nest sites. A review of the NCNHP records, updated
July 2018, indicates no know occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. If required, surveys will be
completed by the NCDOT BSG.
Northern long-eared bat
The USFWS has developed a PBO in conjunction with the FHWA, the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern
long-eared bat (NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions
1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the
NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides incidental take coverage
for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all
21 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Wake County, where STIP U-5825 is
located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a final listing determination
through April 30, 2020. After project completion, the contract administrator for construction must submit
the actual amount of tree clearing reported in tenths of acres.
This information will be submitted at:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/construction/biosurveys/Lists/Northern%20Long%20Eared/20Bat/Allltems.aspx
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
The bald eagle is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and enforced by the USFWS.
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to large bodies of open water
for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study corridor, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0
mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on May 24, 2016 using color aerial photography.
An approximate 2-acre pond is located about 0.7 mile from the study corridor, providing a marginal
feeding source. Since there was possible foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project
study corridor and the area within 660 feet of the study corridor was conducted on July 1, 2016 within
the original study corridor and January 11, 2018 within the expanded study corridor. No nests were
found. The study corridor is highly developed with only fragmented patches of forests which does not
provide ideal habitat for bald eagles to nest. Only a few stands within the study corridor contain trees
large enough to support a nest. A review of the NCNHP records, updated July 2018, revealed no known
occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study corridor. Due to less than optimal nesting
habitat, marginal feeding sources, and no known occurrences, it has been determined that this project
will not affect this species.
Water Resources
Water resources in the study area are part of the Neuse River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Hydrologic Unit 03020201]. All jurisdictional features are illustrated in Figure 6 in Appendix A. Four
streams were identified in the study area, the streams and their physical properties are listed in Table 7.
22 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table 7: Streams in the study area
There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW) or water
supply watersheds (WS-1 or WS-11) within or within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. No waters in
the study area or within 1.0 mile of study area are listed on the North Carolina 2016 Final 303(d) list of
impaired waters. No Essential Fish Habitat occur within the project study area.
Five surface waters were identified in the study area, as shown in Table 8. The first pond (PA) is a BMP
located adjacent to a Sheetz gas station. The pond discharges via an outlet control structure and is
approximately 0.23 acres in size. The second pond (PB) is located within the Knight's Play Golf Course
(Figure 6 in Appendix A). Based on field work, this pond has no jurisdictional streams flowing into it. The
pond discharges via a pipe which leads to a low area ultimately leading to an ephemeral stream and
appears to be spring fed. Approximately 0.6 acre of the pond is located within the study area. The third
pond (PC) is a BMP located adjacent to a Walgreens. The pond is approximately 0.12 acre in size and
discharges by a culvert into wetlands outside of project area. The fourth pond (PD) is a BMP approximately
0.03 acre in size located near a shopping center. The pond discharges into a second BMP outside of the
project area. The fifth pond (PE) is approximately 0.05 acre and is located beside a residential area. The
pond discharges via a pipe to wetland WJ.
Table 8: Surface waters in the study area
Surface Water
Jurisdictional
D of Area
(ac) in
mpacte
Connection Study
Area
(ac)
*Based on preliminary designs of the proposed action +25ft.
23 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Regulatory Considerations
Four jurisdictional streams were identified in the study area Table 9. The location of these streams is
shown on Figure 6 in Appendix A. USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and NCDWR stream
identification forms are included a separate Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Package. All
jurisdictional streams in the study area have been designated as warm water streams for the purposes of
stream mitigation.
Table 9: Characteristics of jurisdictional streams in the study area
Study Area
Classif icatioll I
ICompensatoryl[iverffBars3[impacted
MitigationLengthin
Area*
SA
IL (ft.) ima
422
Intermittent
Required
Yes
Subject
177
SB
424
Perennial
Yes
Subject
9
Sc
174
Intermittent
Yes
Subject
85
SD
35
Intermittent
Yes
Subject
n/a
Total
271
*Based on preliminary designs of the proposed action +25ft.
Streamside riparian zones within the study area are protected under provisions of the Neuse River
Buffer Rules administered by NCDWR. Table 9 indicates which streams are subject to buffer rule
protection. Potential impacts to protected stream buffers will be determined once a final alignment and
design have been determined.
Ten jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the study area and are summarized in Table 10. The
location of these wetlands is shown on Figure 6 in Appendix A. All wetlands in the study area are
located within the Neuse River basin [USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201]. USACE wetland determination
forms and NCWAM forms for each site are included in a separate PJD Package. A total combined
impact of 1.80 acres is expected within the project construction extents plus 25 feet.
24 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Table 10: Characteristics of jurisdictional wetlands in the study area
Map ID
Irclassification
WC
Basin Wetland
Wetiand
Rating
11
..Impacted
Classificatiol
Non -riparian
Study Area
0.11
Area* (ac)
n/a
WD
Hardwood Flat
28
Non -riparian
0.08
0.08
WE
Headwater Forest
16
Riparian
0.17
0.06
WF
Seep
12
Non -riparian
0.07
n/a
WG
Hardwood Flat
21
Non -riparian
0.43
n/a
WH
Hardwood Flat
24
Non -riparian
0.10
n/a
WI
Hardwood Flat
21
Non -riparian
1.58
1.21
WJ
Hardwood Flat
21
Non -riparian
0.35
n/a
WK
Hardwood Flat
21
Non -riparian
0.95
0.45
WL
Headwater Forest
22
Riparian
0.01
n/a
Total
3.85
1.80
*Based on preliminary designs of the proposed action +25ft.
Human Environment
The following sections discuss potential impacts to cultural resources, community resources, and air
quality, as well as potential impacts from traffic noise.
Cultural Resources
Historical, architectural, archeological, and cultural resources encompass a range of sites, properties,
and physical resources relating to human activities, society, and cultural institutions. North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS) 121-12 establishes a procedure for the review of state undertakings that affect
historic properties. NCGS 121-12 states that the head of any state agency having direct or indirect
jurisdiction over a proposed state or state -assisted undertaking, or the head of any state department,
board, commission, or independent agency having authority to build, construct, operate, license,
authorize, assist, or approve any state or state -assisted undertaking, shall, prior to approval for the
undertaking, take into account the effect of the undertaking on any property listed in the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) pursuant to Public Law 89-665, 54 United States Code (U.S.C.) 300101
et seq. As the project is state -funded, GS 121-12(a) applies.
Archaeological Resources
Per the March 2018 No Archeological Survey Required Form, the entire project study area is located in
a highly urbanized location, containing many commercial and residential properties; therefore, the
archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) is unlikely to contain NRHP-eligible archaeological
25 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
resources. Section 106 area of the National Historic Preservation Act permit are unlikely to contain
significant, intact, and preserved archaeological deposits eligible for NRHP inclusion. A finding of "no
archaeological survey required" is considered appropriate and no further archaeological input/work is
necessary. The No Archaeological Survey Required Form (dated March 2018) is included in Appendix
B.
Historic Architectural Resources
Per February 2018 Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Historic Properties Present or Affected Form,
the project APE contains no significant resources; there are no properties listed on the NRHP within
the APE, and only one property identified as a study list resource. Although not eligible for the
National Register, four cemeteries are located in the project area and should be afforded best practice
protections during construction. A finding of "no historic properties present or affected" will satisfy
both Section 106 and GS 121-12(a) compliance requirements. The Historic Architecture and
Landscapes No Historic Properties Present or Affected Form (dated February 2018) for the project is
included in Appendix B.
Community Impacts
Both a Community Characteristics Report, completed in December 2016, and a Community Impact
Assessment, completed in February 2018, were used to identify notable community characteristics and
evaluate potential community impacts, including potential indirect and cumulative effects, for the
project.
The existing land use along the project corridor is a mix of residential, non-residential and undeveloped
land; however, most of the uses fronting the road are non-residential, including churches, commercial
establishments, manufacturing, and other industrial services. There are a number of side streets that
provide access to residential neighborhoods. The corridor serves a large volume of local traffic
generated by these land uses.
Future land uses that may access the Ten Ten Road corridor include a new multiuse development along
Jessie Drive, apartment home construction of The Meridian at Ten Ten and expansion of businesses
near the Lufkin Road area.
The existing zoning along the project corridor is a mixture of Planned Industrial, Planned Commercial,
Rural residential, Conditional Zoning, Conditional Use, Office and Institutional, Office, Research and
26 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Development, High Density Multi -Family Residential and High Density Single -Family Residential (Town
of Cary, 2017 and Town of Apex, 2018). At present, there are no plans to change or modify the general
zoning of the project corridor in either Cary or Apex.
Demographics
The Demographic Study Area, Figure 7 in Appendix A, represents all Census Block Groups that overlap
with the Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) for the project. It contains the population group for
the demographic data which are analyzed for a proposed project.
Census data indicates a notable presence of low-income populations meeting the criteria for
Environmental Justice (EJ) within the Demographic Study Area (DSA), but no minority or low-income
communities were observed along the project corridor within the DCIA during the field visit. Local
planners noted minority populations are frequently observed walking or bicycling along Ten Ten
Road, specifically over the U.S. 1 bridge and live in Center Heights neighborhood. Census Tract
534.18, Block Group 2 and Census Tract 534.20, Block Group 2 meet the threshold for EJ low-income
populations, as 18.9 percent and 20.7 percent of the total population (respectively) were classified as
near poor (Wake County is 8.1 percent). Within Census Tract 534.18, Block Group 2, 23.0 percent of
the total population have no vehicle available and 34.7 percent of the total population have only one
vehicle available. Potential low-income single-family homes were observed during the site visit, but no
impacts are expected.
Census data does not indicate a Limited English Proficiency (LEP) but does indicate Spanish and
Asian/Pacific language -speaking populations greater than 50 persons within the DSA. These groups
were provided translation services during the public involvement efforts for the propose action.
Population Growth
Between 2000 and 2010, Wake County's total population increased by 43.5 percent, at an annual
average rate of 3.7 percent. Table 11 presents the population change in Wake County and in North
Carolina from 2000 to 2010.
Table 11: Population Change, 2000 to 2010
Total Population (2000)
. Aggregate•unty
11,216
627,779
North Carolina
8,049,313
Total Population (2010)
21,194
900,993
9,535,483
Percent Change
89.0 %
43.5 %
18.5 %
Annualized Growth Rate
6.6 %
3.7 %
1.7
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 and Census 2000, Summary File 1 100% Data, Table P1 and P001 "Total Population."
27 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
Title VI and Environmental Justice
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, protects individuals from discrimination on the grounds of race,
age, color, religion, disability, sex, and national origin. Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low -Income Populations" provides that
each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and
addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority and low-income populations. Special populations may include the elderly,
children, the disabled, low-income areas. American Indians and other minority groups.
Executive Order 12898 requires that Environmental Justice principals be incorporated into all
transportation studies, programs, policies and activities. The three environmental principles area:
• To ensure the full and fair participation of all potentially affected communities in the
transportation decision -making process.
• To avoid, minimize or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority or low-income
populations.
• To fully evaluate the benefits and burdens of transportation programs, policies, and activities,
upon low-income and minority populations.
Notably adverse community impacts are anticipated with construction of this project but appear to
affect all populations equivalently; thus, impacts to minority and low-income populations do not
appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits and burdens resulting from the project are
anticipated to be equitably distributed throughout the community. No disparate impacts are
anticipated under Title VI and related statutes.
Indirect and Cumulative Effects
Overall, this project is not expected to have notable indirect land use effects in the Future Land Use
Study Area (FLUSA). Based on the Indirect Effects Screening Matrix, the need for a Land Use Scenario
Assessment (LUSA) is not likely.
28 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Qualitative analyses of the probable development patterns in the FLUSA, based on the information
and data available at the time of this report, suggest that development resulting from this project
would impact the watershed. The project will add impervious surfaces. The project falls within
designated watersheds but is not located in close proximity to the named streams. The potential for
the degradation of water quality also exists through erosion and stream sedimentation. Any direct
natural environmental impacts by proposed NCDOT projects would be addressed by avoidance,
minimization, and mitigation measures during the permitting processes. Current and future
developments would be required to follow local, state, and federal guidelines and permitting
regulations, as appropriate.
Land Use and Transportation Plans
The Apex Transportation Plan emphasizes Ten Ten Road to be a "gateway" to downtown Apex. Various
residential, non-residential and industrial plans have been approved as planned development that will
boarder the study corridor and be served by both Jessie Drive and Smith Road.
The Towns of Cary and Apex, as well as Wake County, have proposed plans of new greenways that will
cross or run adjacent to the project. Currently, no greenways exist within the DCIA, but the DCIA does
border an existing greenway (Symphony Lake Greenway) in the Town of Cary. Three greenways have
been proposed by the Town of Apex, which will be constructed directly within the DCIA. One will run
along the northern portion of Watersglen Drive; another just south of and parallel to U.S. 1, running
east; and one along Jessie Drive. In addition, the Town of Cary has proposed a greenway expansion
project that will reach portions of Ederlee Drive and Penny Road, connecting to the greenway that Apex
plans to build south of U.S. 1. All of these greenway projects are expected to run parallel to SR 1010 and
therefore will not cross or intersect the project corridor. As part of the The Apex Parks, Rec, Greenways
Master Plan and Comprehensive Bicycle Plan, the Town of Apex is also proposing a side path along
Lufkin Road which would then run along Ten Ten crossing at Reliance and continuing as a greenway
through the Meridian at Ten Ten development. Wake County has also proposed a new greenway near
Lufkin Road Middle School that would cross the project corridor. It is expected that the multiuse path
proposed along much of the corridor will tie into the existing greenway system to increase multimodal
connectivity in the area.
29 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Relocations
Based on final preliminary design for the Preferred Alternative, a total of thirteen (13) residential
relocations and ten (10) business relocations would be needed due to the required right-of-way for the
project. Any relocations will be handled through NCDOT's relocation assistance programs.
Air Quality
The project is in Wake County, which is within the Raleigh -Durham -Chapel Hill nonattainment area for
the prior 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as defined by the EPA. This area
was designated nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard effective June 15, 2004. However,
due to improved monitoring data, this area was redesignated maintenance on December 26, 2007. EPA
approved a SIP revision for the removal of Federal low-reid vapor pressure requirement effective on
February 3, 2014. The Raleigh -Durham -Chapel Hill area was attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
resulting in the 1997 ozone NAAQS being revoked on April 6, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. District v.
EPA ("South Coast II," 882 F.3d 1138) held that transportation conformity determinations must be made
in areas that were either nonattainment or maintenance for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and attainment for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS when the 1997 ozone NAAQS was revoked. Transportation conformity for plans
and TIPS for the 1997 Ozone NAAQS can be demonstrated without a regional emissions analysis
pursuant to 40 CFR 93.109(c). The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) conform to
the intent of the SIP. The USDOT made a conformity determination on the MTP on February 12, 2019
and the TIP on February 12, 2019. The current conformity determination is consistent with the final
conformity rule found in 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. There are no significant changes in the project's
design concept or scope, as used in the conformity analyses.
Noise
Introduction
In accordance with Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 772, Procedures for Abatement of
Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise (Title 23 CFR 772) and the North Carolina Department
of Transportation Traffic Noise Policy, each Type I highway project must be analyzed for predicted
traffic noise impacts. In general, Type I projects are proposed State or Federal highway projects that
construct a highway on new location, add new through lanes to an existing highway, substantially
30 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
change the horizontal or vertical alignment of an existing highway, add or relocate interchange ramps
or loops to complete an existing partial interchange, or involve new construction or substantial
alteration of transportation facilities such as weigh stations, rest stops, ride -share lots or toll plazas.
Traffic noise impacts are determined through implementing the current Traffic Noise Model (TNMS)
approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and following procedures detailed in Title
23 CFR 772, the NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy and the NCDOT Traffic Noise Manual. When traffic noise
impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures must be
considered for reducing or eliminating these impacts. Construction noise impacts may occur if noise -
sensitive receptors are in proximity to project construction activities. All reasonable efforts should be
made to minimize exposure of noise sensitive areas to construction noise impacts.
The source of this traffic noise information can be found in the STIP U-5825 Traffic Noise Report,
SR 7070 (Ten Ten Road) Widening, Wake County (VHB, June 2079).
Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours
The maximum number of receptors in each project alternative predicted to become impacted by
future traffic noise is shown in Table 12. The table includes those receptors expected to experience
traffic noise impacts by either approaching or exceeding the FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria or by a
substantial increase in exterior noise levels as defined in the NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy.
Table 12: Traffic Noise Impacts*
*Per TNM2.5 and in accordance with 23 CFR Part 772
The maximum extent of the 71- and 66- dB(A) noise level contours measured from the center line of
the Build alignment are 110 feet and 200 feet, respectively.
Traffic Noise Abatement Measures
Measures for reducing or eliminating the traffic noise impacts, including noise barriers, were
considered for all impacted receptors in each alternative. The primary noise abatement measures
evaluated for highway projects include highway alignment changes, traffic system management
measures, establishment of buffer zones, noise barriers and noise insulation (NAC D only). For each of
these measures, benefits versus allowable abatement quantity (reasonableness), engineering
31 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
feasibility, effectiveness and practicability and other factors were included in the noise abatement
considerations.
Substantially changing the highway alignment to minimize noise impacts is not considered to be a
viable option for this project due to engineering and/or environmental factors. Traffic system
management measures are not considered viable for noise abatement due to the negative impact
they would have on the capacity and level of service of the proposed roadway. Costs to acquire
buffer zones for impacted receptors will exceed the NCDOT base dollar value of $22,500 per
benefited receptor plus an incremental increase as defined in the NCDOT Traffic Noise Manual,
causing this abatement measure to be unreasonable.
Noise Barriers
Noise barriers include two basic types: earthen berms and noise walls. These structures act to diffract,
absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise. For this project, earthen berms are not found to be a viable
abatement measure because the additional right of way, materials and construction costs are
estimated to exceed the NCDOT maximum allowable base quantity of 4,200 cubic yards per benefited
receptor plus an incremental increase as defined in the NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy.
A noise barrier evaluation was conducted for this project utilizing the Traffic Noise Model (TNM 2.5)
software developed by the FHWA. Table 13 summarizes the results of the evaluation and Figure 8 in
Appendix A illustrates the noise analysis results and likely wall locations.
Summary
A traffic noise evaluation was performed that identified 8 noise barriers that preliminarily meet
feasibility and reasonableness criteria found in the NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy. A more detailed
analysis will be completed during project final design. Noise barriers preliminarily found to be feasible
and reasonable during the preliminary noise analysis may not be found to be feasible and reasonable
during the final design noise analysis due to changes in proposed project alignment and other design
considerations, surrounding land use development, or utility conflicts, among other factors.
Conversely, noise barriers that preliminarily were not considered feasible and reasonable may meet
the established criteria and be recommended for construction. This evaluation was conducted in
accordance with the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23 CFR Part 772.
32 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy, the Federal/State governments are not responsible for
providing noise abatement measures for new development for which building permits are issued after
the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of the proposed highway project will be
the approval date of the State Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
(SEA/FONSI). NCDOT strongly advocates the planning, design and construction of noise -compatible
development and encourages its practice among planners, building officials, developers and others.
Table 13: Preliminary Noise Barrier Evaluation Results
Northwest
bound side of
NSA 3
Ten Ten across
500/11
5,300
5
1,060 / 1,500
Yes
from Smith
Road
50
Yes
NSA 4-5 B: Arbordale Ct 1,360/15 20,440
409 / 1,500
to Kiftsgate Ln
C: Kiftsgate Ln
NSA 4-5
to End of
400/8
3,280
12
410 / 1,500
Yes
Pinnacle Plaza
Waterford
NSA 6
Green Dr at Ten
720/17
12,000
13
923 / 1,500
Yes
Ten Rd to US 1
11
No
NSA 8 Old Grove Ln to 360/11 3,840
349 / 1,500
Satinwood Dr
A: Harvest Creek
PI along Kildaire
NSA 11
Farm Rd to 600
600/20
12,000
27
444 / 1,500
Yes
Bldg of ARIUM
Apts.
B: Harvest Creek
PI along Kildaire
NSA 11
Farm Rd to 600
360/14
5,040
12
420 / 1,500
Yes
Bldg of ARIUM
Apts.
1,654 / 2,000
NSA 12
A: Jessie Dr to
960 /12
11,580
7
Yes
Littleman Ln
B: Littleman Ln
1,650 / 2,000
NSA 12
400/16
6,600
4
Yes
to Smith Rd
Average wall height. Actual wall height at any given location may be higher
or lower.
z The likelihood
for barrier construction
is preliminary and
subject to change,
pending completion
of final design and the public involvement
process.
3 Barrier is not feasible due to right of way constraints and
existing utilities.
33 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Hazardous Materials and Contaminated Properties
Based on information provided by the NCDOT Geotechnical Engineering Unit in a memo from August
31, 2016, there was an initial expectation of eleven (11) geoenvironmental concerns within the study
area. A Phase I field investigation was completed on March 14, 2018 which indicates a total of sixteen
(16) sites of concern identified within the proposed study area. Table 14 lists the type of each site,
property name, location, type of potential contamination and anticipated risk as taken from the Phase I
report. These locations are also shown in Figure 9 of Appendix A.
Table 14: Hazardous Material Sites
1
UST
Circle K
Quality Mart 44/Shell
3305 Kildaire Farm Rd
PCs
Low
2
UST
1003 Langston Pond Dr
3498 Kildaire Farm Rd
0 Ten Ten Rd
2503 Ten Ten Rd
5505 Caterpillar Dr
2232 Ten Ten Rd
2290 Ten Ten Rd
PCs
Low
3
UST
Vacant Lot/Former Gas Station
Vacant Gravel Lot
Vacant Store/Former Ten Ten
Penny Mart/ Shops @
Regency/ARZ Inc.
Tractor Tracks Inc.
Star Enterprise/Motiva
Enterprises LLC
PCs
Low
4
UST
PCs
Low
5
UST
PCs
Low
6
ARF
PCs
Low
7
UST
PCs
Med
8
DC
A Cleaner World
DCS
Low
9
ARF
Fast Lube Plus
2280 Ten Ten Rd
PCs
Low
10
UST
Circle K 2723633
Sheetz 540
Abby Rd Tavern & Grill
Dragonfly Pond Works
Center St Grocery
Breeze Thru # 30050/Peakway
One Stop
2105 Ten Ten Rd
4000 Lufkin Rd
1700 Center St
807 Center St
808 Center St
781 Center St
PCs
Low
11
UST
PCs
Low
12
UST
PCs
Low
13
UST
PCs
Low
14
UST
PCs
Low
15
UST
PCs
Low
16
UST
Former R&T Jones Oil Bulk
806 Center St
PCs
Low
6 UST = underground storage tank, DC = dry cleaners, ARF = auto repair facility
' PCS = petroleum contaminated soil, DCS = dry cleaning solvents
34 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Flood Hazard Evaluation
Wake County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). According to the FIS and
DFIRMs obtained from North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP), there are no FEMA
designated streams within the project limits.
Visual and Aesthetic Resources
Visual resources and aesthetic impacts are typically defined in terms of a project's physical
characteristics and potential visibility, along with the extent to which the project's existence would
change the perceived visual character or quality of the environment in which it would be located.
The project corridor is located within a highly developed area with primarily residential uses, including
townhomes and single-family homes. Non-residential community uses are also present and include
churches, various businesses, a private cemetery, and a golf course. The project corridor serves a large
volume of local traffic generated by these adjacent land uses. Accordingly, the project corridor is
considered to have low visual sensitivity.
To maintain the residential feel and aesthetics, a grassy median will be constructed as part of this
project. Sidewalks, as well as a multi -use path, will also be constructed to match the current landscape,
helping to maintain the existing level of visual appeal of the area.
Required Permits
Construction of the proposed Ten Ten Road widening project would result in construction activities
requiring environmental regulatory permits from state and federal agencies. A list of these permits,
organized by issuing agency, is provided below. NCDOT would obtain all necessary permits prior to
construction.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Any action that proposed to place fill into "Waters of the United States" falls under the jurisdiction of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCAE) in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
USC 1344). The Clean Water Act provides public notice and review of pending Section 404 permit
applications. Encroachments into jurisdictional areas subject to the Clean Water Act must be reviewed
and approved by the USCAE.
Based on the anticipated impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands as a result of this project, an
individual permit from USACE may be applicable; minimization and avoidance efforts should be
35 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
explored during final design to further reduce the projected impacts if possible. The USCAE holds the
final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction.
Summary of Environmental Impacts
Table 15: Summary of Environmental Effects
Environmental
Traffic Volumes (2040 AADT)
32,800 - 57,400 vpd
Residential Relocations
13
Business Relocations
10
Low-Income/Minority Populations
No Impacts Anticipated
Known Archaeological Sites
None
Known Historic Sites
None
Community Facilities Impacted
None
Section 6(f) Properties
None
Federally -Protected Species
None affected
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
271
Wetland Impacts (acres)
1.8
Noise Receptor Impacts
185 impacts/8 barriers "Likely"
Air Quality Impacts
None
Potential Geoenvironmental Concerns
16
Right-of-way Cost
$36.7 million
Utility Relocation Cost
$4.3 million
Construction Cost
$45.7 million
Total Cost
$86.7 million
36 Environmental Effects

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
7
Public Involvement
A Local Officials Meeting was held in February 2018. Two Public Meetings were held, in March and
October 2018 to gather public comments on the proposed project and answer questions. The March
2018 public meeting was preceded by an Affected Property Owner Meeting. NCDOT utilized the USPS
Every Door Direct Mailer (EDDM) postcards informing the public of the meetings. Public Meeting
information was also posted on the NCDOT Public Meetings webpage
(https://www.ncdot.gov/news/public-meetings/Pages/default.asl2x and hosted on a Publiclnput.com
webpage, as well as the planning websites for the Towns of Apex and Cary. A Public Meeting Notice
was also shared with local newspapers, radio stations, and TV stations.
The Local Officials Meeting, held in February 2018 at Apex Town Hall, introduced the project and
presented both the conventional and superstreet alternative to local officials. A total of twelve (12) local
officials attended the Local Officials Meeting. Justification for the purpose and need of the project was
also presented, including traffic volume comparisons of no -action and build alternatives and traffic
capacity analysis results indicating failing levels of service in the future year. The projected project
schedule was also presented.
The Affected Property Owner Meeting, held in March 2018 at the Summit Church, presented the
alternatives to the property owners whose structures on property were likely to be affected. The intent
of this meeting was to provide one-on-one discussions with those likely to be most greatly impacted by
the proposed action and to gain input on their concerns and opinions. Eight affected property owners
attended. The meeting was held as an open house format, where invited property owners could stop by
at any time to review materials and ask questions. Meeting maps were on display which showed the
preliminary design for both the conventional and superstreet alternatives. The handout provided
additional information about typical sections and conventional design vs superstreets. A display board
provided information about environmental features within the project study area.
The Public Meeting, held in March 2018 at the Summit Church in Apex, directly followed the Affected
Property Owner Meeting. Roughly 310 members of the public attended. This meeting was held in the
same open house format as the Affected Property Owner Meeting.
37 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
The second Public Meeting, held in October 2018 at the Summit Church in Apex, presented the
preferred alternative. Roughly 152 members of the public attended. This meeting was held as an open
house format, where members of the public could stop by at any time to review materials and ask
questions. Meeting maps of the final preliminary design for the preferred alternative, showing expected
limits of construction and right-of-way needs were set up as stations throughout the room. A handout
provided additional information about the final alternative typical sections, a rendering of the proposed
U.S. 1 Interchange and information about conventional widening. Display boards provided further
information, including: environmental features, nearby STIP projects with an associated handout which
identified each project and a rendering of the U.S. 1 Interchange improvements.
The following is a summary of comments and concerns expressed by local officials:
• What is the LOS for the design year as proposed? Did the traffic model include Apex Peakway
connectivity from NC 55 to Center Street, or Jessie Dr connectivity from NC 55 to Ten Ten Rd?
Response: For Apex Peakway, southbound dual lefts are being incorporated into the design and were
reflected in the subsequent public meeting materials. The traffic model included the Apex Peakway
connection to NC 55, which is currently in the feasibility study stage. Jessie Dr was not included in the
forecast due to its current state, therefore no LOS is available. The project team is aware of the
development at Jessie Dr and therefore included a median opening at this location in case future
signalization at this location is warranted.
• Concerns about trucks going past Penny Road to make a U-turn.
Response: At the time of comment, the team was in the process of evaluating the impact of adding
truck movements to the Penny Road signal or to a new signal at Arbordale Court, to understand if
signalization is feasible. After discussions with the business owners, the decision to signalize the U-turn
point past Penny Road to serve this truck traffic was determined to be sufficient.
• Anticipating right-in/right-out at Schieffelin Road will increase traffic using Investment Blvd,
expressed concern about the impact on Investment Blvd. Concern if businesses were contacted.
Response: Currently, 2000 VPD travel on Investment Blvd. 2200 VPD are projected to use this roadway,
therefore no impact is anticipated. Businesses were identified and contacted via Every Door Direct
Mailers (EDDM).
38 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Is the bicycle lane shown intended to be striped as a bicycle lane or wide shoulder?
Response: Exclusive, striped bicycle lanes (5) in both directions are included in the proposed action.
• Concern regarding the estimate of impacts (The Groves and Surrey Meadows), will these be
reduced as the design is refined?
Response: The project is in preliminary design phase with a 50-foot potential impact area from edge of
pavement which indicated structures that may be impacted. Minimization will take place as the design
moves forward. It is possible that there will be some structural impacts on one side of Center Street, in
the Groves vicinity.
• Concerns about pedestrian crossings since they are not shown at this stage in the design,
specifically, Parkfield Drive and Calvary Chapel Road.
Response: Pedestrian and bicyclist accommodations are planned for the length of the corridor.
Protected crossings, as needed, will be determined during the final design phase. However, it is unlikely
there would be a protected crossing between Parkfield Drive and Calvary Chapel Road, as there is no
signal proposed in that area.
• What is the sidewalk width for the bridge?
Response: Sidewalks along the bridge are 8.
• The Meridian at Ten Ten apartments are expected to be a right-in/right-out access. What
coordination with the Meridian has taken place? Has it been determined if this access will be
allowed?
Response: We have been in direct communication with the Meridian developer. Currently, NCDOT
intends to allow this right-in/right-out access to remain, with a review of the intersection safety taking
place after it is open and before U-5825 is constructed.
What are the major advantages of the Superstreet? Is it a much better LOS or significantly less
impact in terms of acquisitions?
Response: Based on the capacity analysis results, there is no notable operational advantage to the
Superstreet Alternative as compared to the Conventional Widening Alternative.
39 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Public comments for the first meeting were accepted in writing, mail, email or by the project website
through March 29, 2018. A total of 222 individuals reached out with comments and requested to be
added to the project mailing list. The project website also featured a poll of which alternative is
preferred. The results of this poll yielded: Traditional (Conventional) widening favored at 110 votes
(58%), followed by Superstreet at 75 votes (38%) and no preference at 8 votes (4%). Comment forms
were open-ended, allowing individuals to comment on any questions or concerns regarding the
proposed project. The following is a general summary of the public comments received:
Many comments gave suggestions related to potential alignment suggestions, some that were
specific to parcels/intersections, and some that were overarching throughout the corridor.
Response: Each specific alignment suggestion was considered during the design revisions. Ultimately,
the design of this corridor will be based on a balance of impacts among resources (natural and
community related), constructability, and cost implications.
The majority of comments that provided a preference between the two presented alternatives
(Conventional Widening and Superstreet) favored the Conventional Widening alternative, which
allows for full movement intersections at major cross streets that have median openings. Some
cross streets/driveways would be allowed left -in access, but no left -out would be permitted
under this alternative.
Response: After evaluating a number of parameters (capacity analysis results, potential right-of-way
impacts, and public input), NCDOT is eliminating the Superstreet Alternative from further
consideration for the U-5825 project. Future public meetings, the preliminary designs, and the
environmental review will focus only on the Traditional (Conventional) Widening Alternative.
• Some residents stated concern about the addition of a median changing traffic patterns which
may affect the following: school bus routes, EMS response times, left turns to access
neighborhoods, requiring U-turns for some existing left -turn movements, and access to U.S. 1.
Response: This project will include a center median along the corridor, which limits full movement
access at minor driveways and side streets. This design encourages safer movements by localizing the
conflict points along the corridor to expected, regular locations and provides separation between
opposing directions of travel. The project team coordinated with the local school systems and
emergency response personnel to ensure their needs are meet with the proposed project design. Where
40 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
deemed appropriate, a mountable median will be considered as part of the final design to assist
emergency response vehicles.
Comments received covered various safety concerns regarding the design of this project. These
concerns were: crash history along the corridor, bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and
safety, new traffic patterns and older population traveling along corridor, speed limit reduction,
and a U-turn signal.
Response: NCDOT strives to deliver safe, efficient projects that meet the transportation needs of a
project corridor with sensitivity to the surrounding environment. An evaluation of the five-year safety
data for this corridor (completed as part of the Traffic Capacity Analysis), indicates that this corridor
does not present crash rates higher than those on similar facilities statewide; however, the
predominant crash type that occurs is rear -end, collisions, which indicates a congested facility
operating at or over capacity during given parts of the day. The addition of a center median generally
improves the overall safety of a corridor that is not currently median divided.
• Those citizens likely to have direct property impacts from the project asked about the Right -of -
Way acquisition process, including who pays for the building/property should it need to be
taken for project construction.
Response: NCDOT Division 5 has a Right -of -Way (ROW) group that will facilitate the property
acquisition process once the Right of Way plans are completed.
• Concern about Apex losing its residential feel.
Response: Apex is a fast-growing municipality and the regional growth extends beyond this project's
limits. The Town implements local plans and ordinances to regulate growth and land uses. NCDOT is
committed to working with municipalities to help accommodate that growth through infrastructure
projects that remain sensitive in context to the communities in which they are built.
• Residents who live along the corridor have requested a sound barrier/sound wall and are
concerned that the proposed realignment of Ten Ten Road being closer to homes will increase
noise pollution.
Response: As part of the State Environmental Review Process, a traffic noise analysis will be completed,
modeling the impacts of the proposed project on existing homes and businesses. The results of that
41 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
technical analysis will be included in the environmental document and any impacts that warrant
mitigation will be evaluated for feasibility. Any mitigation efforts will be included in the final design
stage of the project process (anticipated in 2020).
• Why is 10 feet used for the width of a multi -use path?
Response: A 10 foot multiuse path is the standard width for such a facility, anything narrower does not
allow for proper passing of users and would be designed as a standard sidewalk (5 feet) instead.
People may throw stuff off the bridge onto U.S. 1, was this considered?
Response: Proper fencing along the bridge will be included in the design to deter this type of action.
Will the sidewalk over the bridge be sectioned off from traffic to separate pedestrians from
traffic?
Response: Currently, there is no physical barrier proposed between the sidewalk and travel lanes. The
sidewalk will be 8 feet in width along both sides of the bridge to provide added comfort for pedestrians
(standard sidewalk is 5 feet wide).
Is it safe for pedestrians to cross so many lanes on the road?
Response: Pedestrians will be encouraged to cross at signalized locations, which will provide
crosswalks and pedestrians signal timings as appropriate.
• Why was traffic projected to 2040? How were these traffic projections calculated?
Response: NCDOT prepares a traffic forecast report that projects traffic to a future design year, which
is currently 2040. We evaluate traffic this far in the future to ensure that the proposed U-5825 design
is sufficient to handle travel demands well into the future and is not a short-term solution. The traffic
forecast procedure is a standard practice used on most NCDOT projects.
• Trucks from Motiva will cause even more congestion, especially since they will have to make a
U-turn to go left. How will these trucks move with a proposed median?
Response: Currently, trucks and large vehicles from Motiva and other industries in that section of Ten
Ten Road make left -turns from their individual driveways, often stopping traffic in both directions to
do so. Under the proposed project, those trucks or large vehicles would all use a single, likely
42 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
signalized, U-turn pointjust beyond Penny Road. This would eliminate the potential conflicts of self -
regulated, left -turn movements as they happen today by forcing them to occur in a single, controlled
location. This location was placed to allow adequate length to account for the trucks needing to merge
left toward the median to enter the U-turn lane.
Tolls from NC 540 should be removed, traffic will go to NC 540 rather than Ten Ten Road. Also,
how does NC 540 influence the project?
Response: Removing tolls from NC 540 is not a feasible alternative to this project. The usage of NC
540, as well as other planned facilities in the region, are accounted for in the Traffic Forecast Report
previously mentioned and available on the project website.
Will there be a light at Penny Road to accommodate school buses and the large volume of
traffic that is seen on this road?
Response: Yes; the Town of Cary is currently in the process of installing a temporary signal at this
location. The U-5825 project would replace the temporary signal with a permanent one.
• Why does the work not extend to Holly Springs?
Response: NCDOT projects are funded and constructed in parts based on a prioritization process that
accounts for available money and statewide needs. U-5825 has been prioritized has scored high
enough to be funded. Extending the project to the east, beyond Kildaire Farm Road is a separate
project that is re-evaluated with each 2-year prioritization process.
• Impacts to wetlands, drainage/stormwater issues with the new design.
Response: As part of the environmental review process, we are evaluating impacts to a wide variety of
resources including wetlands and streams and will obtain proper permits and mitigate any impact as
applicable by state and federal regulations. Stormwater design is included during later stages of the
design process.
• Residents were concerned about a grassy center median/landscape appearance, to keep the
residential feel along Ten Ten Road.
43 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Response: Specific landscape treatments have not yet been specified; however, the intention is to have
a grassed/landscaped median in place as part of the effort to maintain sensitivity to the surrounding
community.
• Will the speed limit increase with additional lanes on the corridor? If they do, is this safe?
Response: The posted speed limits will not change as part of this project.
• Why does Sheetz need to be impacted?
Response: We are currently in close coordination with Sheetz representatives and the Town of Apex to
develop a design that minimizes impact to this property more than originally presented.
These specific comments were received from property/business owners along the project corridor. The
NCDOT project team and Town representatives are coordinating with these individuals to discuss
potential design modifications to minimize impacts to residences and businesses, especially at The
Groves and Sheetz location.
Public comments for the second meeting were accepted in writing, mail or email through November 20,
2018. A total of 2S individuals and businesses responded with comments following the second public
meeting. Comment forms were open-ended, allowing individuals to comment on any questions or
concerns regarding the proposed project. In general, the public was accepting of the preferred
alternative and appreciated the revised design. Most comments that were not of general support were
property specific questions and were responded to on an individual basis.
44 Public Involvement

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Basis for Finding of No Significant Impact
Based upon a study of the proposed project documented in this assessment and upon comments
received from federal, state, and local agencies, and the public, it is the finding of the NCDOT that this
project would not have a significant adverse impact upon the human or natural environment. The
proposed project is consistent with local plans and would not disrupt communities. Per this evaluation,
a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Therefore, no further environmental
analysis will be required.
45 Basis for Finding of No Significant Impact

STIP Project No. U-5825 Ten Ten Road Widening
References
Apex Parks, Recreation, Greenways and Open Space Master Plan, June 2013.
Apex Transportation Plan 2071 Update, Town of Apex, North Carolina.
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Volume 1 (Division 1-7) 2018-2027, NCDOT, August
2017.
U-5825 Air Quality Report, NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit — Traffic Noise and Air Quality Group,
December 2018.
U-5825 Traffic Noise Report, NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit —Traffic Noise and Air Quality Group,
June 2019.
NCDOT GeoEnvironmental Planning Report, March 2018.
U-5825 CIA Short Form, NCDOT Human Environment Unit — Community Studies, February 2018.
U-5825 Community Characteristics Report; NCDOT Human Environment Unit — Community Studies,
December 2016.
U-5825 Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Summary, NCDOT Human Environment Unit —
Community Studies, April 2018.
NCDOT Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Historic Properties Present or Affected Form, 2018.
NCDOT No Archaeological Survey Required Form, 2018.
U-5825 SR 7070 (Center Street/Ten-Ten Road) Widening Forecast, NCDOT TPD, August 2016.
Preliminary Hydraulics Study for Environmental Impact, NCDOT TIP No. U-5825 SR 7070 (Ten Ten Road)
Widening and Improvements; Sungate Design Group, P.A., 2016
Natural Resources Technical Report, Widening of Ten Ten Road (SR 1070) from Kildaire Farm Road (SR
7300) to Apex Peakway in the Towns of Cary and Apex, NCDOT EAU, October 2016.
Natural Resources Technical Report, Widening of Ten Ten Road (SR 7070) from Kildaire Farm Road (SR
7300) to Apex Peakway in the Towns of Cary and Apex, NCDOT EAU, November 2018.
46 References

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
U-5825 USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package; Prepared for North Carolina
Department of Transportation, May 2017.
U-5825 Traffic Capacity Analysis Memo; NCDOT, June 2017.
47 References

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Appendix A - Figures
Al Appendix

55
64
Apex
1
Project Corridor
Stream
Municipal Boundary
64
STIP No. U-5825�
0 0.25 0.5 1 Figure 1. Project Vicinity Ten Ten Road from Apex Peakway .�,
Miles Prepared by: VHB Date: December 2018 To Kildaire Farm Road a
N Wake County tea..

�_ TEN TEN ROAD (SR i0V)
WBL EBL
1", ]' S' 11' 1 11. 'T .1 1 11S I,, 1p'
TO, 4' xE �**]p'� 4' 5'
ll'V/ 1�'}I 6• OR G41
CmIww
�1TI115E
nam I°EwAix
ORIGINAL
GILOEIKI�
Apex Peakway to U.S. 1
TEN TEN HOAo ISt
°Ie;
'YhL !3L
dE I
A
I
U.S. 1 to Penny Road
CLTEN TEN ROAD (SR 1010J
W 6L EBL
I I
3a'
GROUNV
Sln=wni [ L
°R°u"° Penny Road to Smith Road
CLTEN TEN ROAD �SR 1010)
WBL EBL
1u 2 Y 10.
s 4' 4
K;RauNo
S DEw�LK TSIEIEW
_ I
GR Nu
Smith Road to Kildaire Farm Road
U-5825�
Figure 3. Typical Sections Ten Ten Road Improvements
Prepared by: VHB Date: December 2018 Wake Countyr
a

1 �+h•?-trig � _'.�.�.3 ,ice � �.+ � Y v `"J ',� k.C6
R L
r f +i,.• jam,
� _y!'[`�� :+`_ � �F _ �.'' 4�p•' � r 5..11;'t• -'7 �t '17` jC� ,..t ��' _
11 M4
;� off. .A ... �.:. .�,►. : 4 , � � � ., � �F r � �...' �.
,,��""���-�-��
. } !.y t � L` _ r •� .� • � � "/�^��n�Cfi G� , �"Grl'a!aa"""%%% a'.c■ +��
' �Y - . 4 l F -A Y, _ .fir•" _ r �if ' . ]l . .'
,. L'Y'MM
,y • -�.• �i .y l { �� 1s± .L. =.rl. L } 9 li •e:.
Rey � '�� � ! I C! jy®f �y•�`,J •+�" -'• �'4`i ^r1 �'r 'P
�� -�• �I,.
'�, i may$ Sti. Rti - -- ]�n I'. .. � i� �� • _
��� �, � �i � 4 ri' J r I! y� }+ ..� ••••••iiiiRR4444''"''""''' k
• • Vy i � ry �Y� r ! � _
_ _ rig �'�► _ w
r },
` •ILJ:r1? , �.1•:-.. �.. r•'s�l� ` I - yi•�". Y�J. _ 1 ..7 •' i, aj +•' 4 .
TM

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018
3-1 3-2-
3-3 Ca ry Vintage Gro
3-6 in
3-5 F
� {
Apex al
3-7 a)
3-8 3-9 a Sd0 I
aa) 's r ►
_ a Rainesview Ln
X
- Culvert St Center St ' Foresrov D�
1
t r Y }
96
I
t �
■ C M
* Old Grove Lr -
E Chatham StCO
IA t
O Study Area (262.2 Ac)
I _l Figure Index -
w ' t
Field now
;+►ti.
Hardwood Forest
Maintained/Disturbed`` . ■
Pine Forest -Sourae:;Esri, Digital Globe, Geo ye, Ea' hstar Geographics, CNES/ irb
~, IGN, and'"the GIS User Co �i Investment Blvd
0 75 S50e 30o Figure 5-1 U-5825 NV�10.00
e Ten Ten Road Improvements
Feet Terrestrial Communities Wake County �hb.
.. w

September 19, 2018
3-1 3-2 iw
E �
3_3 3-4 Ca ry ' #
3-5
Apex
3-6 sview Ln • ' _ � _ _ 4AIL
3-7
3-8 3-9
r #_JELM
r r R
4 1 ti.
* # I.' ItOtt �
I
I
L
C
en
� 1 F
-
I
A& 1
.FIGURE
O Study Area (262.2 Ac) ! I
I —1 Figure Index _ la
Instt Blvd I #
Fieldi�'
Hardwood Forest i �r
Maintained/Disturbed
4�
Pine Forest ��- i � , � Source.. Esri, D.igi�Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geograph cs, C E /Airb s P
IGN, and the.GlS, User Community
Scale Figure 5-2 U-5825
0 75 150 soo Ten Ten Road Improvements
e Terrestrial Communities v
Feet Wake County hb.
w

September 19, 2018

Apex
I
11 =
X,
a�
O Study Area (262.2 Ac)
I _I Figure Index
Field
Hardwood Forest - 5
Maintained/Disturbed ` k
Pine Forest ounce; Es
Scale Figure 5-4
0 75 150 300 e
Feet Terrestrial Communities
1
,,h
��euuiuuunnv�. a
U-5825
Ten Ten Road Improvements
Wake County
September 19, 2018
b,

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

Ca ry
Apex
�'4�d - A ii ,
'ljjj!R4W"4V-V4W1AV4V4VAV4WMj4
I t ";Jt
O Study Area (262.2 Ac)
I _I Figure Index
Field
Hardwood Forest
Maintained/Disturbed r .
Pine Forest 44
i
Scale
0 75 150 300
Feet
0-
V,
5 c5
5 0
ilk #i ;
Figure 5-7
Terrestrial Communities
e
71
U-5825
Ten Ten Road Improvements
Wake County
September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

%
.. "9r
1 F
I F
O Study Area (262.2 Ac)
Figure Index
September 19, 2018
lf—ft iice! i
C.
ikFh URE. -c9)
- - - - - - - -
Perennial - —
Intermittent NMI
Pond
Wetland
......... ......... qrGeographic
Scale Figure 6 U-5825 NNO00,0M,
top
0 500 1,000 2,000 Ten Ten Road Improvements 0
Feet Jurisdictional Features Index Map Wake County Vhb.

September 19, 2018
} I
.'j i
4-1
4_g 4-4 Ca ry I _ ---_---------------
4-5 ti. a+k Rrt Vintage Grove'n
Apex a-s
4-8 4-9 ♦' 4/ X
Q
4 � � �a Raiinesview Ln .�
i
� Center St .._ . , Forest Grove Dr
r 1 *vert St
# 10�CD
y% i
! * *
v
a •, eA A y i
}
U%
•+ bra '_ ��.. 4&
FIN or yl �
t+�'wa: i �' Old Grove L� `'
E Chatham
Iw
+r t I
Study Area (262.2 Ac)
Figure Index
Perennial Stream
~ wi r ri I
Intermittent Stream
- Pond
Wetland ' � i Sou e: Esn, DigitalGlob'e, Geo ye, arGhstar Geograp�hics, ONES/,Ai'rb is�;S, D '
+r SIGN, an the GIS User Co I InveJL
stment Blvd
75 S50e 30o Figure 6-1 U-5825 .� 0
Ten Ten Road Improvements �VI�p
Feet e Jurisdictional Resources Wake County yea„

September 19, 2018
4-1 4-2
4-g 4-4 Ca ry m } # J
4_5 ui
y �4 �
Apex - f -
4-6 esview Ln
4-7
U49
..'� ,
r � _
++ C J
CU
YL N
o TY i Cent
(D
dc, op
W I ••
jr Waterland Dr.
r
O Study Area (262.2 Ac)'
—� Figure Index
Perennial Stream Ivd
Intermittent Stream
- Pond
Wetland Source. Esri, DigitalG_obe, GedEye, Earthstar Geograph s, C E A rbus DS S
IGN, and theGlS User Community
75 Scale
30o Figure 6-2 U-5825 �.� 0
Ten Ten Road Improvements �VI�p
Feet e Jurisdictional Resources Wake County yea„

VIM"
4122 #r
4344 222
45
Ape ee
47
48 -9
- FIGURE3-2
� Ct � — — — — -- —--:----�--------------- �— — — §2 �
r
� / ,3 \� ` : ' • �- I
. '
,� � ■ �� � _ i
GeQ©/
#
September
dr
�
-
{.}
i % •
`2/
/
��
-
' {
� W§
-
� .� 44
\ ,
PA
0 Study Area (262.2A)
\
z
-- — -- -- — - --
Figure Index
Perennial Stream
. %_
[ 3i^-~
1mermILLem. Seam
Pond
&kmd , \� m_\k\ >Ams10 #, a&sr■mgr hI
m%ak me)S _-6 .
G S ScaleeFig ure 6-3 U-5825 �s�
TnTnRo dImpmv Improvements 7
Feet Jurisdictional Resources Wake County hb.
>,

r� _y
4-1 4-2 y' c
4_3 4-4 Cary I
4-5
Apex a-s
4-8 4-9
�I o
Waterton L.
I
_ I
I
I
I
T i
o � I
I
September 19, 2018
O t o
Study Area (262.2 Ac)409
�, m
Figure Index ? j N
_ Perennial Stream p
Intermittent Stream►
- Pond r '{
� {
Wetland At rce Esrl�iI, ©igitalGiobe, Geo�'e„ arthstar Geographies, C► E' r
}'} GNWa,d the'-GIS UsScaler Co
75 s50e 300 Figure 6-4 U-5825
Ten Ten Road Improvements Vhb.
Feet e Jurisdictional Resources Wake County
yea„

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

September 24, 2018
fircoo, fa
4-1 4-2 way a
4.3 4-4 Ca ry
4-5
Apex
4-8 4 9
r
E, L. W. -
0
•: o . E
Crave` �•i - -- � h. � �` � _ �'-�
-,
+ gS�onLPond Dr _
LV
40 1 f
. Kildaire
Farm Rd
on Meadow Ln -- x ` r w -it++ 4
jam
-q�. v PFPV t.
OStudy Area (262.2 Ac) `—_----------- ----------- -------- f - 1 r r,}`
Figure Index FIGURE 3-8 ' �~� r G st�a\\e� •` _
4k
Perennial Stream {;
N
Intermittent Stream ! .r I .
- PondrF - c
Wetland -. 4�~ Source,: E-sri,-DigitaiGiobe, GeoE,ye, Eartahsltar Geographies ,<CIES/Air S, USDA, USGS, AeroG
IGN, and the'•GIS User Commun}IT-
Scale Figure 6-9 U-5825 Ifto;;;'
0 75 150 300 Ten Ten Road Improvements rwM
Feet Jurisdictional Resources Wake County vhb�,a„

Census
Tract 534.18
64 - Block Group 1 1
55
64
Census
Tract 534.19
Block Group 1
Cary
Census
ATract 434_9,
Apex -Block Group 2
Census
Tract 534.18 1
BlockjGroup 2
1
534.20
Group 2
'ract4534.05
ock Group 2
Tract 534.05
Block Group 1
Census
Tract 534.05
Block Group 3
Censu:
Tract 530
Block Gro
Tract 534.21
® DCIA Block Group 1
`+ Demographic Study Area f
w Stream
Municipal BoundaryFIT
STIP No. U-5825�
0 0.25 0.5 1 Figure 7. Demographic Study Area Ten Ten Road from Apex Peakway
Miles Prepared by: VHB Date: December 2018 To Kildaire Farm Road s a
N Wake County a..+

.11
12-U1 vi. -
z—
SEE PAGE 9 OF 14 r t� _ r 0 75 150 300 450 600
1W or Feet
fOCC030-
Rexford Ln • air
•' �e "► O ■
6 o
�
CPIfb( 0 600C)O�g ohPublix Super Market
00
at Millpond Village
OO y ..
3 0 ' Wake Tech
��
2-15 and Retail Stores
O � O �' 2-17i
=000 2-12 �
r
rt 2-13
-�
4
_ O2.1
_ KildaireFaam , R0=
82_-09
10-50 04�10-43-10_41�
e Tre e Or
` f� I
y. 10-48 110=39 ._•—� a 2-06 2-10 "2-
- 10 46 - w • —10:33 _ , , — , �p,z c
10 44 ` 11
* 10 42 ;10-37 '. O _ �`��-
10-65 10-64'1 "10 �40 10-38.'s P ,, '_ j 4` • { 2-05
1 o-66 k. 10 62 10 60 '
i _® 2-03 - F°re
10 58 w 10=32 �'. 204 2-02' StFd O�
'+a 10-67 0-:3. 10 61 - Q 10-57 _ - t • .� �L 9e v,
_ O
r y 10-74 '10f 72 10 59 10-56� '� '� _ *oM..>�j Q1-31 2-01 r ape
101-68
10-55 : 1 I _ . ��ston Po�dO �
a f -
7�r p - �ebanks 10-54 . 10-35 _ _ _ • � �" .. - '�i _ '
c �° 10-69 10-53 - 10-34 - 1=12
1OF j
1-11 1-24
Onyx Creek Dr 1 35 Qa
U '1f. 1-33 f Mgr
- Q _ - � 1-10 1=23
_ Qa r • II I-pg - SEE PA:.kill Ct1052 _ c� -08 ``ntej-amSSt_O�'dR\s
j ^
_
�ecy P/
GE;8 OF 14 5,
Lily Creek D�NSA6�I 1o7 1r 31
129 NSA
.. j, Cary 00 1-06 i'-28 tO,,,�/�/ c t A �►� NSA`4
Ap X✓ e�.ryRd
- Q 1�05 0 1-17 " Y*
1 . o P -is
_ . -► 1 04 1.16 'ne Wa
�• 4 :L , r,' _� O - - -R NSA 1
5 tol _ _ . -�•1 a k ` �cdpNSA 1iP-�19 �ROSIWE D
L
`
N
V " + ` - - - iW ay r
Felspar ��
r - r. +Z We
y Ycu
P4�oP N017H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4%'hF o O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 1 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

' 1,3 57 O 0�1�3-31 13-06 3-55 13-0 13-05 3-54 Od
�' 0 75 150 300 450 600
13-30 �e7
0 13-19
13-55 0 13-43 0 13-04 e'y� �'. Feet
• Y 13-54 13-29
0 0 013-18 13-03 ti `o * on 1 a r0
13-42 3=49
!� ights Play O
Kn0 13-28 3-02 3-50
7 Golf Course 13-53 0 13-41 O 013--17 �, 3 01
�13-52 O 0 13-27 1 6 3-53
,temple Gate -1 CD•�
13-40 O 013-15 ,
13-510 0 µ,
13-26 4 3-51 '
013-25 4 0 Danbury
0 13-39
w �
13-38 122--33 ' .� 3-26
�
13� 50 ,, � �� • - �. t � - 3-3.1 3� � �
3.523
� �' 3-25 3-40 3=43 3-41 3-32 3,28 4s -05
3,04
106
�, 12-32 e� a, 3-45 3-24 3-39 3-38 3-34 3-33 \,/3-29
3-10w 00 3-09 -✓O ',
1031
� � .i , � ` 2 3-21 3-36 3-13 • ' , . - � � ,
_ '3 12=30 3-11 -'03
•"� :u`% f ,� 3-17 3-15 3-14 3-12 016
�` ♦..�: 12-36 ,. L^.r 3-20 3-99 3-18 3-16 CID
R '.y
r� !. 4# F N4- - 2
m� 12.28 ` Ten Ten Rd 16
� � Z - �, � - � 12 17� - _ ,��—.
a� 29 W1 �12 06 M_3.1 x#.'
12' 12-18—N 28 0.
iC� F
�` _t`± rrf• f 12-27 12-'07
03.3 t: �:�Je '` T'�n ,% t 12-20 Summercrest , w rci ,� ,,�Y O
�� �• �' r i' _ 12-26 - 12-08 a � �+• � r
12-02
12-21 ' N '
r -
� x
•� . '• . 22
�122
� � � �,x. f ,,� �•��. .ate ',� � ��-- ,�,., { .: 96 �a
o ` +` .,�' i _ 3 12-23 C0f r
s ��" , , ��► 12-24 ent+;SNt�' e\cy P
°.�•, r 12-14 12-1.1 `�� NSA,:,1LIL5i�,,�
► �.#.; 1 ■ - 12 9 Y ORcf) �v SA 6—
NSA 5.
_ _
)`'� � 1 . a r:�+ •.� �.' •' '+f. � � ' r � r 12-15 _ 12-10
:. r �Y ► 0 0 Ca ry
NSA 131 %
* .12-16 NSA 4\ •r t Stephenson d
RdApex,/a R
• i ' .A
C�
t -
pen
i P1 i • p P�ist�he W �� ---I
12713 12-12 ► m h_Ra NSA 1
NSA 11
1.n �.
g1ossom -4'
�P�each- 'a—
r icu
r •� a_ F
P4�oP N017H C4R Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers
Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition =- - Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4rhF 04 O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 2 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

.. - � • - ,,:. a �- _ .. .. ,;.
�► ; "S''w �� .•6-62 6-63 6-68 �` 0 75 150 300 450 600
Feet
•'` . 6-61 6-64
`k 6-58 6-57
C.' ..' 6-59 6; 56 • .
erton \-x'
�s
6 ,48
\a0� �%� •'- sdq�* • ' �atercloseC� 6=54 •i' � r -- .
�' �t� t •_$ • r � 7-12 7-13 7-15 7-16 ��. 6-47 F` � .. � �
�• k 7-18 7-14 6=46 6 50 6-51 ^ ..� • , .' , , ' �a� SEE PAGGE 1
y . 1
-
t.
G, 5-132
� orQ, �r • 7-17 7_09 r re '6-41 . t ! ' 6-2.1 6-37 en F'1 5-1*4"-5'_33
7-14.3 SEEPAGE1OF14 6-42O
7 7-01 O` 6-20 6=36 6-33 6-32 6,31 }+ ' 5-129
�
o� �7-20 7-02
� 7-06 C9 6 19 6-1 8 Waterford Green 6_29 �+� 5-128 O' 5-124
,�pG /� \ 7=05�7-03 a 6=27 '�
`\Set 7-35� 7=21 6-26 v 6-17 616 '6'14 6-13 6-42 �! ` ` Circle
• J 7-3 \ 7-22 7=04 �`� 6 25 0 6-08 2t , 6-1eCG� S_ Ten Ten Rd * _ �,■.�,
O 7-33\ O''7-23 2 6-09 6-07 V Wa 6-02 6-01 5-127 5-126 5-125 •,
O 7 24 p :M-2.3 6-05 6-04 f` �t�-� 1 O O O
O 7-25 �'
7=32 - 7-3 6-24 6-10 6-03t Sheetz
7-26 O ---
M-2:2 6-06 _ >
6_22 6-11 1 . :; - /�� 13-62 � � .may - -
1� 7-30 7-28. n1-27 _ w
J-36 - p0 -
• � --- O _ _ _ _ �z729 � 2.1� -W
,gip :�
ter_St '
= - 14=01-
in Rd
r �ufk'
-
14-02 ' ' Abbey Road
14.03 Calvary Chapel Taverns �� �`�'� Public Storage
q' Y p age
Cary N\aya
a
c E - - '' f- ► c�nte 'S�t�'. '� / �. oe�cy P/-
L
15i�� NSA 51
>4 : • COS. . ems` NN
SA 6
r
Cary
tqc NSA 3 N,A.
. rt .q
?,is'-
ne Wad ��h_R��NSA 1
lcu
Ten Ten Road Widening Project yh
P4�oP N017H C4R • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition =- - Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4rhF 04 O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 4 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

9
•' ' 0 75 150 300 450 600
i 00 �+ Feet
• �, l 4
r
S r� V
13-63
141
Goa
Lufkin Road
+ T.
,►► mac°' +i Middle School
4• •� y L� _ ` 40'
WaY �� ► s : { Y-
OF
ssic Rd Goodworth Dr
U �
� � . f f r • � � e�gr�a
0 \d Ra\
e�`cy P�
Ity
} s NSA,1NSA5,
N SA` 6
6 n
NSA�13,`, Cary
NSA-4\ d
�- S- _f i '` ��' Apex`.nryR
P�ist CD Pe
ice' - � . • 'ne W a �;��\ �---I,
NSA 11IsIt
L�
� N I
CU
j yy aF
t T
P4�oFNoxrH�gQ yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition =— — Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
o o • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
STIP U-5825 Page 5 of 14
Wake County, North Carolina O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW
"TpFTR�Nse JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

4� w 4* a •-� ' • �� f 0 75 150 300 450 600
1 0 Feet
� �- ark•. •'� .. c � � s p .� - � �
IN
o��rgham Wa NI�, s
I A� � i � ' `r a , ■ �-
6-12Ir
+*6-126 6-127
•; •, 6-123 6=125 6
o� Green reen
6-122 6"99 6-100 6-130
6-101 r i• r
Fordcrest Dr '
92
f . 5.' _ 6r116 6-117
J w LOs�6 115 en L`n
6=118
A' n 6-109 6-111- 6-108 6-88 r°_ 0\d
6-107 6-87 w+� Cent' �N �� �'�i• c P
6-106' i e�'St-- �s�; e� Y
Iw; 0 6-110 6-84 6-86 ``�` NSA' 15 ice, �F SNSN A�-
r 6-102 6-104 6-105 .. - V �`�NSA'6'y"
►* Q . C� A
t p°Stan 6=78 6-103 6-80 6�83 _ .� ,a��NS 3, Cary
'. . .� 6=74 6-81 r a NSA'4�
6_82 ,�- �� -'N Apex,/ ` e ��� ryRd
� �• �9t 6-73 i.. , ; r: . � t� Pen
<- Ga/y) Or 6'66 r, �s� ,, , ?is bt-he W
i� ey%y 6-75 6-65 6-71 S- c f m�'- NSSA I1
11
e NS u�u1`i1
IV,L
6-69
Ab eta t� O
�. r Wa—
F r•' t�oCa G` 6-64 _ i • a F
Y - ='� r �1 ate 6-60 6-61 Y ii
P4�oP N017H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition =- - Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4%'yF o�`P O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 6 of 14
"rGfTRANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

0 75 150 300 450 600
1 �. 1;y 'A�• "�. Samara St
Nk
Feet
181101CD
� r liyj � � � � • 9� ,r
A 9-83
�cr 9-884 Meadows.`
d 9-85
Old Ra\e�g� R .-.- f. � •9-89 9-87' \Hoppe � � 'Sarbouc � � O
\\
IL-
{9 81 sas a • �� w 4k .
-
9 78 0 SEEM r v
i O oNle .► : R
#SEE PAGE 14 OF 14. u, 8=92 8 87� Rai • ,t '1 . 848 - � • � -
8-91 8-88'
_ - 8-74 e=,8 e-a�
8-93 '.8=75 • e-as ti -
SAWCUT t-IV (87-52 vela
8-94 Cosa Or 8=89 8-79 8-76t C 8 56 s 54 8.538-100 8-51 Old 8-33 8-31 r
8-37 8-35'
' M�\\�1\\ 8-96 8-84 8-81 �oCes�859 8-55 64i 8-39 O 8=34 8-32
8-58 .' a 42 8-38 8-36
' : + 8-97 8-83 The Groves SEE PAGE 12 OF 14
8-98 n 8'85 J Townhomes 8-02 8-01 k
Grindstone Dr _ a • &86 CCDO CCCCD CC) Cp
' 15-53=- � Cuts
_ f
10-50W5_23 M 1 F1
15=01
9`1,7 g 14 15 52 ,iiC� ` 'A „nN ••�.,., 14-03 14-02
h �♦ . - r/ L
9_'01 r 9-10 �'
920 9-099-06 9-04 9-02 �O , _
Center St 9-21J= g,= . M Center Street
9-05 9:03 - \ Grocery
15-67 15=61 r. m F'
��� � f`00000
�m O R
04 15-63 icy P
M1•
•
NSA�15 i��.. sG NSA 5, °�
-. .
15-64 i i • ; ,�� SEE PAGE J13 OF 14 NNSA 60-
Culvert St Q CD
15-65 ,._ �`D A�1
4- .�NS 3; Cary
3 O 15-66 �r _ �r �� e� NSA 4\
A p x P ✓ ?e n r`1 Rd
' � '► � .- e
0 Z N 1
e
. _ _ i� • ' 15-58 15-57 ' ; ' P �ist�
` w _ 15-56 s��er�g �.• ne W �`RNSA 11
z\ram �CQ NSA 11'
r
5� NV
E'Chatham St ,a
Y cu
LL
P4�oP N017H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted But Benefited X Property Acquisition =— — Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted Not Benefited ®NSAs Revised U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4%r. o�`P O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 7 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

Ap \�r�a _� 11=243 0 30 60 120 180 240
11-240
d Rafe
-246 Feet
6S\cy P/r • 11-241 �. 11-245
11-238 11-242
NSA'15i��,� �F NSA 5. � .- = " `�+ 11-244 a,
R,i '�NSA`6� - 11-229 11-233 11-236
11-201
��NSA�13w \\%/ Car ! ` ' ; 111-2310 11-z3z 11-235
y gfton Meadow Ln 11 234 11-200 11-215
Ape7 I
NSA4\
x `henry Rd 1 , 11=237w11-199 11-216 - t
11-214
°ris; . CD 11-197 11-196 11-212�
\�'"-7 � � - ,+�.• � �-�.- _ 11-228 11-198 11-213
me W .=� 7<\I\ NSA I � .
r► �� 11-211 Q NSA ' r f �11:224 11-227
1111-195 11-194 11-209 �t���
r
�, � '-3 3 � 11-217 1v1sz 11-207
Y ° 11-2.18 11-221 • 11=190 11-202 11-204 1
11-189
`L r' - 11-2.19 11 222 �. 11-203 -e Jr Publix Super Market
11-248 11-188 11-187 11-249 f at Millpond Village
3 � 11-186
• 511
"`11-185 ax1,1-182
- O'•
yi 1 1' 18 Q 11-140 11-154 11-155
l 11-181 O
f s ' U
h . 4-1
1-175 11-141 011-139-1Z6 11"F78 11-1513 11-172 011-169 11-137
J 1-
11-124 11-177 O 11-138F0 0 11-13611-149 11-150
11-174 11-170 11-162
11-123a'1l1zs 11-112 11-171 0 11-1340 0 �j
O / 11-161 0 01-148 11-147 '
11-'12f n'-1os n-na 11-114 11-90 111167 11-166 O 11-135 33
�120 0 11-121 11-168 Q O 11-160 11-130 0 O /
'f - 4�` 11-132 Y -
* 11-119Q011-11s-11-110 11-1�1 11-89 1�1-88 11-1630 011-157 O O 011-145 11-146 ,'• -
11-1170. 11-106 11-87 11-73 11-164 0 O 11-158r 11�-131 11-128 O 0 011-144
11-116 �11=107 11'-'108 11-84 11-86 11-85 11-74 Q O 1 19A •11-127 11-142
1143
;I. 11-115117_1oa 11"83 11-70 11-165 11-159 11 429 fr a NSA 2
• _ - 11-104 11-1 �5 _ -� 11�8.1_ ,11_82 11-75 gist Valley .� �/// / �i •. - ..r..
11-247 0'
NSA11-67 11 �172 lot
11-68 11-11 11=10- 11-23 �►� �
11-78 0 11-79 O 11-64
h NSA 1 1 11-77 0 11 JP
O 11-69 11-24
A,>s 11-65 11 OS 11 11-19 11-20
1160 r / /
11-102 11 61 O 11-66 ' 11-09
gee 5 11-99 O 11=57 00 62 11-07 11-21
5�G 0 011-101 O 11-63 11-OS 11-04 11-16 11-17
�y s. 11 98 O 11 59 O 11-56
�., �' �'• � 11,-97 O A1195
� =91O 1-52011-49 11 39 11-42 11-45 11 48 11011-92O -53 O 11-38 011-41 O O 11-03 11-13 11-15 ��
Rf O Q O 11.50 0 011-44
11-93 11-96 11-54 •1 51 11-37 011-40 0 11-43 11-46
- - O 1 0 11 31 Cg
_ � r• 11 11 B 5 12 - 8 11 34
Kildair_O 11-29
Earm`Rd- 11 260 O Q 11 32 11-35
�•.. — _ 1
NSA 10
Kildare arm Rd
- NSA 1
r
f-
P4�oP N017H C4R • yh Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted but Benefited X Property Acquisition Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted but Not Benefited ®NSA Boundary U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4rhF 04 O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 9 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

Apes a f
� .�rQ- �� tit +++++ ++►+
d Rafe `
t�oY P/r
"\ �e
NS'
A�15NSA 5,
v NSX, 6y +�+
NSA) Cary
NSA'4�
Apex
Anse �
ine-W
h R
��d� NSA 1
m NSA
µ- -
u* is Ogg- �a' I .max
5-55 Manad�'iia •�
1 Y CU
U O!' l4iay
5-12r1p O 5-122
O
5-119 O 5-120
5-117 Q 5-118 d
7
' 0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
\ 5;43 � • s
545),0
5-123 , b 5-44 w '�
5-47 Q O 5=49 O 5 46 .�' °ory Or
rp0O 5-48
O 5-50
5-53" 5-52�A�R NSA 4 ►�
•.i
5-6,w460
564 0"-
2
_ O O 5-56
O 5-58 O
5-77 5-76 r 5 65 0 5 63 5 61 O 0 5-57.
O 59, � 5-15
5 5�74 =,. 5 ; 5-16. J
5-13
3 5-72 O 4 0 Ji
5-1090 r 5-84 NSA 5 bit 1 5-70 lb 11 5- .. 5`18
5-108 — 5-69 5-68 5-20
5-107 O O 5-106 k_'
5-83 5-82 5-67 �n 5-21 5-22
5-105Q 05-104 5-66 _ - Solandra
5-103 0 5-102
� � •_? -! m 5-42 5-4.1 5-23
5-101 5-25 f
O 5-100
5-79 5-40 5-39
5-28 5-26
t T 5-37 5-35 5-33 5-31 529 NW4-5B
4=67
5-78
r 5-99 5-38
r r * ~ r 5-98 : O O -
r 5-36 5 34 5=32
5-97 - - -
595-
�' a ~ ~ ~ 06 r 5-94 5-86 5 _ - T� Ten Rd
F'.. r �+`W� 5-93 5-88-
5-92 5- N.
O O O 5-87 _ - / cj r
Q,� r
' 5-9'1 -89 / NSA 13-
1 4 �#
•
Aft
It
Ten Ten Rd
y► V
P4�oP N017H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted but Benefited X Property Acquisitiofr— Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted but Not Benefited ®NSA Boundary U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4rhF 0Q`P O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 10 of 14
"I'OF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

r.
\ , : 7-66 -
1
7-68 6 7-67 -
\O
7-70 7-69
O 7-71
d.
4 yw� r
�53/ .�
T
NSA 7
Abe'` Q-a i .!O„ Water\and �r 7-42
d Ra\e��r 7-44 r
N7-43
0
1%_r
C YP
7`O
S5," NSA15-74
-5467-47�NSA60 7-48 •-
�� •a �
� - 7-50 `�
Cary 7-49
7-51
nI NSA•4� 7 L r`
\ w Rd y• �.. -52
■
Apex Peery
Ans` ine Wa
CD :R NSA
�duNSA11LM
�f
Impacted and Benefited
O Monitoring Site
Recommended Noise Barriers
N017H C4R
Ten Ten Road Widening Project
•
P4�oP
yh
Traffic Noise Report
O
Not Impacted but Benefited
X Property Acquisition
Not Recommended Noise Barriers
z STI P U-5825
•
Impacted but Not Benefited
®NSA Boundary
U-5825 Proposed EOP
�`P
'4rhF JOF�ANSe aWake County, North Carolina
"
O
Not Impacted Not Benefited
Parcel Boundary
U-5825 Proposed ROW
0
Non -Noise Sensitive Site
U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk
0 15 30 60 90 120
10 Feet
•
f
I
W •'
•1
FIGURE 8
TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
Page 11 of 14
JUNE 2019
mm

;. • = oN0 15 30 60 90 120
°� Feet
y �
Rainesview Ln y A.
Glo
►
00 ` 00 1 . � � N
ao ,
8-73 � !j ao �The Groves ` � �•
O 8-72 •� o -� Townhomes •.
Myrtle Grove n a 08 L
170 r Myrtle Grove Ln
O 8-69
r
O 8-68 : O rn
00
00 00 N N N CO N 1 O 0) tiIII O 00 ) ~O C.0 i 0 +O r O'
{ • 00 00 N CV N . N , N - co ap I pp 00 00 '1g100
O ' ' 00LO • •
N W8
C ; Cerite`r--Sty
�°y p� o a~' + -. �,-. • Sit a
O-St�'-
�/AVNSX,6'y � � ,..6 s r"
4.
�NSA) 3Cary
NSA'4
Apexine-W�Penry �a . ' '
ty ~
a� NSA 1
o R� P1 _
NS?�91p%� '.".' � . NSA 15 A �
/ a -�
LL Z ■
P4�oP N017H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Ten Ten Road Widening Project
Recommended Noise Barriers FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted but Benefited X Property Acquisition- Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report • Impacted but Not Benefited NSA Boundary U-5825 Proposed EOP ® TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825
'4rhF 0Q`P O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 12 of 14
"JOF,RANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

0 15 30 60 90 120
15=51
- •-: X Feet
IPA
. f •� . tea. } 15-44 ��
:15-43 15-49 x
VIP
5-42 / . .
' 115-45 15-47
15-41
15-40 15-29 15-28
f 15- 39 ►f X X X 5-27 �, -
sip r 15-26
15-38. •.J, .11 - X 4.
I , � 15-34 15- 33 �15-31 15-30, � y
n 15.0 Ti 4-4
15-37 15-36 15-35
X1 X
- � ` 15-22JL
• ' '� X /� Forest Grove Dr
,- . p 15-211 NSA 15 ■,�
p15-2 _ -L I F
VON p
• NSA 8
w r r rrrr r, r►
15-18 ' 15-17i 15-14 15-12 15-10 15-09 15-07 15-05 15-04 i�
�a 15-16 15-15 15-13 15T11 15-08 15-06
O\d Rafe /
O M-1.2 fJ
0 ,�
Cep/sboy P4r t.
'\s t —*�� ��
NSA 15 NSA 5,
SA` 6�y � � -
!��
NSA)13lK`p,�
Cary 15-02 c
v r
NSA'4
A
ex� ` ��. �a s- Q'
p �Penry � .
ine-Wa7�---� �_ �` t
71.
NSA 1 _ f -
o
\Q �NSA11
P4�oFNo17H C4R yh • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted but Benefited X Property Acquisition Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted but Not Benefited ®NSA Boundary U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4%'hF a�`P O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 13 of 14
"rGfTRANSe Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

Ape'` a r 0 15 30 60 90 120
`� d Ra\e■p�c r
r A. �\ ; 4 9-63 Feet
cy P� 9=64 9-545-65S5,
v NSA`6 3y'C" g-55 ?Xr'�/l
NSA13i`� Cary
'• ya
�fomy
NSQ $
9-67' 9-56
Apex,/
NSA•4, �a J 9-68
penny • 9-57 '
°ns;, 1 �,---i 9-69 9-59
ine Wad NSA 1 9=70 9-60 r
P7 ;:
�ayNSA11 — 9-71,
5�■ter �u `�� �� � 9-61 �C � a
NL I 9,72 9.45
9-62 '
,9-46
r � . 9-29
lr
Y LL y . • 9-47 4
m 9-48 9-30
w 9-49 9-32
9-51 NSA 9 �� P °• ��
' 6 * 9-34
' 9-52 9-35
9-53 9-36 <
0\ .
9-38
f Tunsta// 1- 9-39
lip
- { a
'941 y `, e� •
r
r 9 -
44
1 9-43
�•, _� : 9-22
% OOL
V9-23
9-2
9-25 • r ,
9-27 ' M
Gr\ndstone DC _ _ 9-28 9-26
w
OF NOA7H Cq • Impacted and Benefited O Monitoring Site Recommended Noise Barriers
yhP,� Rorq Ten Ten Road Widening Project FIGURE 8
O Not Impacted but Benefited X Property Acquisition Not Recommended Noise Barriers
Traffic Noise Report TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS MAP
z STIP U-5825 • Impacted but Not Benefited ®NSA Boundary U-5825 Proposed EOP
'4%r. a�`o O Not Impacted Not Benefited Parcel Boundary U-5825 Proposed ROW Page 14 of 14
"JOfTRANse Wake County, North Carolina JUNE 2019
0 Non -Noise Sensitive Site U-5825 Proposed Sidewalk

May 14, 2019
Cary , -
Apex'
, P�BrreeezrejThru # E
g005U�P P way g /• "
One•Sto Dragonfly
?. Pond Works6. lot
R&T Jones -- — "_ " / .. .. •. �•
Oil Bulk Center St: �.
.Grocery r; 41.
VNJ
. 41- -1 CC
'Ak
c •1r a � -
,14
�
�• ll � r .� � •{ � 44•"� it � k �4
Study Area
CD
Auto Repair Facility
I `
Dry Cleaners ' •�. ;' _ _ +..� 1'
Underground Storage Tank 9 1
�5 Sae 30o Figure 9-1 U-5825
Ten Ten Road ImprovementsVhb.
Feet Geoenvironmental Features Wake County
yea„

May 14, 2019

May 14, 2019
r�
a
Ca ry Abby Rd
Tavern . i
Apex &Grill
U � �
Ak
10
�r• i ='` " Sheetzr540
Study Area �" •'�
Auto Repair Facility
Dry Cleaners d; - Y,�� •
Underground Storage Tank
q�
s a
75 Scale
30o Figure 9-3 U-5825 •�.�+o
Ten Ten Road ImprovementsVhbp �
Feet Geoenvironmental Features Wake County
yea„

r
ti.
IM
I i'v
Al
.71
It Jf
Ae
-__yam � � �_ - ,. T�� .. •.f.--
FigureOf
Scale •U-5825
075 150 300
N ---- ------ - -- -Improvements�..

IL
it
Cary z
Apex
A
CirclIL
2723633
h�OS Nehz 540
-�O
lit as.
Lube
Plus A Cleaner
ANAL
World
jq�
OStudy Area
Auto Repair Facility
Dry Cleaners
Underground Storage Tank
Scale Figure 9-5 U-5825
0 75 150 300 Ten Ten Road Improvements
Feet 0 Geoenvi ron mental Features Wake County
May 14, 20'
JEEf 6terprh6e-/
Ent6i�WOises L
vl� Lea y�.a...��

May 1 n on -
Car y �4y • . f . r •~4'"
Apex '.�"
- - Vacant Store/Former Te_n
Ten Penny Mart/Shops
_ � - +- � - @Regency%ARZ}Inc. ••,
' .. Tractor
-�T
t
• -- r '• R�� '� � tit _ � -
Study Area �`," * 5 • , ��
Auto Repair Facility ':�• _
J • ' �:
Dry Cleaners . `4,
Underground Storage Tank w
825
75 Scale
300 Figure 9-6 U Improvements
•�.�+o
Ten Ten Roadd ImprovementsVhb.
Feet Geoenvironmental Features Wake County
yea„

May 14, 2019

7.1
_N.
a _
';
y.�,
• +e � r yr+
17
Study Area
Auto Repair Facility
Dry Cleaners
Underground Storage Tank
Scale
rl ' ~x 4 r•
✓ t I ^� w ,
Figure • •
25
150 300
N ---- ------ - -- -Improvements�..

May 14, 20'
MIS •`i r + '"
r ,
�''r •T• Q[131 :ail- „.-
?I,!4
Study -�• � � - .-ice"• � • i �� • _
Auto Repair Facility
j r
Underground0 Dry
ners
• • Storage Tank
ScaleFigure • •
• 75 150 300 Ten Ten Road Improvements
Feet Geoenviron

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Appendix 6 - Cultural Resources Correspondence
A10 Appendix

Project T lacking No.:
16-08-0006
o NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
top Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No
WBS No.
F.A. No:
U-5825
44526.1.1
Federal Permit Required?
County Wake
Document: State EA and FONSI
Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE
Project Description: The project involves the widening to multi -lanes of SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) from SR
1300 (Kildaire Farm Road) to the Apex Peakway in Wake County, North Carolina. This project also
includes improvements to the SR 1010 bridge over US 1. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects
(APE) encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing activity as depicted on the attached GIS
mapping. In particular, the USACE federal permit areas were the primary focus of the archaeological
review.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by
state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review" form, the project is state -
funded with federal permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply
and the United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) will serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction
design and other data was examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to
the ground surfaces embracing the project locale. The project study area measures 3.3 miles in length and 500ft in
width. Because the project is state -funded, the USACE federal permit areas were the primary focus of the
archaeological review.
Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology
(OSA). Several archaeological sites have been documented in the vicinity of the project study area, but no cultural
resources are contained within the currently defined APE or adjacent. Although this data raises the potential for
uncovering similar archaeological sites in the current APE, it is well documented that Wake County has a poor
history of containing intact, preserved, and meaningful archaeological site locations; particularly in the same
topographic and disturbed situation as the project study area. This is not to say that it is impossible for the
recovery of archaeological artifacts in the APE, but rather it is very unlikely to contain preserved archaeological
deposits eligible for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) inclusion.
Examination of NRHP, State Study Listed (SQ, Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site
(SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of
noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these mapped
resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing archaeological components are
situated within or proximal to the APE. In addition, historic maps of Wake County were appraised to identify
former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other confirmation of historic occupation in the
project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as well. In general, the cultural
background review established that no previously recorded archaeological sites or NRHP properties with potential
archaeological deposits are located within the APE. Based on cultural -historical factors, the APE is considered to
have a low potential for the documentation of significant archaeological resources.
"No ARC'HA).DLOGY SURVhT Rh,'Q1]11?hD" form for the Amended Mirror•Transportation Prajecis a-%owfifred in the 2015 hvgra mmaiic Agreement
i of 2

Projecl Tracking Na-,
1d-08-0006
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
past occupation at this location. Aerial and on -ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer/ARC-GIS) and the
Google Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of
disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites.
Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The entire project study area is highly urbanized, containing commercial and residential properties fronting SR
1010. Soil data and aerial imagery confirm the high levels of disturbance in the project study area. This project
originally received a "SURVEY REQUIRED" form based largely on the potential for the need to survey the entire
project study area. However, the site is now state -funded with only the federal permit areas subject to Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act. As such, the USACE federal permit areas are unlikely to contain
significant, intact, and preserved archaeological deposits eligible for N R H P inclusion. As currently proposed as a
state -funded project with federal permit interaction, no further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no
archaeological survey required" is considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO A RRCHAEOL0GY SURVEY 9W UIRED
NCDOT
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
No ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VAT RhCMIRKla "form for Fhe Amended Mirror 1 rarrsparlalran Projecis as Oiakfred fn the 2015 Programmatic Agreemeu+.
2 of 2

16-08-0006
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
r, NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
U-5825
County:
Wake
WBS No.:
44396.1.1
Document
Type.,
Fed. Aid No:
Funding: i
X State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permits :
X Yes ❑ No
Permit
Type s :
USACE - NWP
Project Description: Widen SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) from SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
to Apex Peakway (no off -site detour specified).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register -listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
❑ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
X There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
DESCRIPTIUNOFREVIEWACTIVITIES. RESULTS, ANDCUNCLUSIUNS: HPOWeb reviewed on 22
August 2016 and yielded one SL, 3 SS, and no NR, DE, SL, or LD properties in the Area of
Potential Effects (APE). The APE extends approximately 1000 feet from either end of the
proposed 3.3-mile project length (NW -SE), 2000 feet along US 1 to either side of its intersection
with SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) (SW -NE), and 500 feet to either side of the SR 1010 (Ten Ten
Road) and US 1 centerlines to encompass anticipated construction activities and possible
impacts. Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information revealed
a developed APE containing resources dating from the 1910s to the 2010s (viewed 22 August
2016). Approximately 40 resources — including both residential and commercial properties and
four cemeteries — pre -date 1970. Constructed in 1959, Bridge No. 163 is not eligible for the
National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Inventory as it is not representative of
any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type.
Given the presence of multiple resources of concern, as well as the limited design information
provided in the review request, a field investigation was indicated and a "survey required" form
issued on 26 August 2016. Shortly thereafter, NCDOT-Historic Architecture was instructed to
delay survey until permit locations and extents were determined. Jurisdictional information
became available in February 2018 (see attached maps). No significant resources are located
within any of the permit areas, nor are the previously recorded properties: the study -listed John
Hivoric• Archifeenore and Landscapes dscarpes NO NISTL7/?K' Ylt01'lift11h S YRli SEWT OR AFFIECTAD form for Minor Transporraiion Projects
avv Onedified in the 20071'1nglrr�nn�nair Agreenre�ua.
Page 1 of 2

H. Seagraves House (WA0676), House (WA0674), House (WA0882), and the Whops Community
(WA2249) (the latter is no longer extant). Thus, the project is in compliance with Section 106,
The project is also in compliance with GS 121-12(a), which applies to the entire APE, as no
National Register -listed properties are present.
While not eligible for the NR, four cemeteries are located in the project area and should be
afforded the usual protections during construction: 1) Cemetery at the corner of Summercrest
Drive and Ten Ten Road (PIN: 0751723921); 2) Cary C. Jones Memorial Park (including two
adjacent parcels) near Penny Road/Ten Ten Road intersection (PINS: 0751653483,
0751652466, and 0751653533); 3) Cemetery near Waterford Green Drive/Ten Ten Road
intersection (PINS: 0751194034, 0751194063, and 0751194055); and 4) Cemetery near Center
Shieffelin Road/Ten Ten Road intersection (PIN: 0742709862).
HPOWeb and Wake County GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information were
consulted again in February 2018 and confirmed that no changes had occurred since the
original review and that slight expansion of the study area (see attached map) did not add any
new resources of concern. The comprehensive architectural surveys of the county (1988-91 and
2005-6) and related publication, as well as later studies, recorded no properties in the APE
besides those noted above (Kelly Lally, The Historic Architecture of Wake County, North Carolina {Raleigh: Wake County
Government, 1994)}. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the presence and relative placement of
architectural and landscape resources in the APE and in the permit areas (viewed 22 August
2016 and 21 February 2018).
A finding of "no historic properties present or affected" will satisfy both Section 106 and
GS 121-12(a) compliance requirements.
Should funding, permitting, or any aspect of the project design change, please notify
NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessarv.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. []Photos Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Histori Architecture and Landscaves — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OF AFFECTED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
U-5825, Wake County
WBS No. 44396.1.1
Tracking No. 16-08-0006
Page 2 of 2
Date
Historic Arcluteciure and Lcaydscnprc NO HIS1MIC: PROPER'1'7hS Fld,'SENT OR AF1-F_('7h'D fojw farMinor rrunsportalwn Prajws
as Qualified to the 2007 Prograntuatie Agreemew,
Page 2 of 2

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Appendix C - Preliminary Plans
A13 Appendix

STIP Project No. U-5825
Ten Ten Road Widening
Appendix D - Public Involvement Materials
A16 Appendix

Public Meeting Noticc
The purpose of this meeting is to present the latest information and answer questions regarding the
proposed project. Comments may be submitted until March 15, 2018 by mail or email to the project
team listed in this handout.
Project Overview
NCDOT is proposing to widen Ten Ten Road from Apex Peakway to Kildaire Farm Road, through the
Towns of Apex and Cary in Wake County. Currently, Ten Ten Road is primarily a two-lane roadway
throughout the project corridor, with turn lanes at major intersections. To relieve congestion, NCDOT is
proposing to widen the road to a median -divided, four -lane roadway with curb -and -gutter. The roadway
would have a sidewalk on one side and a multi -use path on the other for much of the corridor length to
accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians in the area. The existing overpass of U.S. 1 will also be
replaced as part of this project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
1st Publi
Environmental Right of Way Estimated
Meeting
Document Authorization It Construction
SOng 2023*
U-5825*Dates
�
�
are subject to change
I Continual public involvement throughout project process.
Second Public Meeting anticipated to be held in Summer 2018.
At this stage, we are including the whole U-5825
project corridor for impact evaluations and
design efforts. The project, however, is planned
to be constructed in two parts, Section A and
Section B. The division of the Sections occurs at
the U.S. 1 interchange. Determination of when
each part is constructed will be based on
available funding. It is expected that the
interchange improvements will be included in
the first Section, A or B, that is constructed.
J
Connecting people, products, and places safely and efficiently with customer focus, accountability and environmental
sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality of North Carolina.

February 2018
STIP PROJECT NO. U-5825 (TEN TEN ROAD WIDENING)
For more project information, please visit our website.
https://ncdot.publicinput.com/tenten_apexcary
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS J
Currently, NCDOT is preparing the environmental document (State
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact [SEA/
FONSI]) in compliance with the North Carolina State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) as well as preliminary designs for this project.
Potential impacts to the natural and human environment will be
evaluated during the project development process and documented
in the SEA/FONSI.
Two alternatives are being studied to meet the project's purpose and
need. The primary difference in the alternatives is that one
alternative improves the intersections along the corridor through
conventional widening, while the other alternative includes a number
of superstreet intersections. Opportunities for public input on the
project will continue throughout the process and another Public
Meeting will be held to present the preferred alternative and solicit
additional public comments.
The area shown on the
maps as "Potential Impact
Area" is intended to show
the extents of possible im-
pact. This does not mean
that the project will affect
everything within the
shaded area. Rather, the
project team is focusing
on evaluating these areas
due to their proximity to
the roadway.

February 2018
STIP PROJECT NO. U-5825 ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1 - Traditional Widening
Left -Turn Movement
F
IL
Through Movement
Traditional widening includes improvements such as constructing turn lanes and adding an
additional through lane to increase capacity. Additional turn lanes allow vehicles to move out of
the stream of traffic to make their turns. No turning movements are rerouted, which enables
drivers to travel through the intersection in a traditional manner.
Alternative 2 - Superstreet
Left -Turn Movement
Through Movement
Superstreet intersection improvements direct side street traffic to make a right turn and then pro-
ceed to dedicated U-turn movements, to continue in the desired direction. Safety is improved
with this design by reducing conflict points seen at major cross streets. With this design, traffic
flow and capacity are increased.

February 2018
I- STIP PROJECT NO. U-5825 POTENTIAL TYPICAL SECTIONS
Alternative 1: Traditional Widening. 4-lane, median -divided roadway, with some 6-lane portions;
sidewalk and multi -use path from Apex Peakway to Penny Road to accommodate bicyclists and
pedestrians along Ten Ten Road.
Alternative 2: Synchronized Street. 4-lane, median -divided roadway, with some 6-lane portions;
with sidewalk and multi -use path from Apex Peakway to Penny Road to accommodate bicyclists
and pedestrians along Ten Ten Road.
TEN TEN ROAD (Sit 1010)
WIRL EBL
IA --A• # S' n' 1P 23• n' rr S• 11. 1q'
2 1Q 4` u 4MOUND
dtlGIF1AL
LnusE
ram mEwux
ORIGINAL
G Alternatives 1 and 2. Apex Peakway to U.S. 1
i�11-N UN Ro kr3 ISi nlr
WML LaL
-I
Alternatives 1 and 2. U.S. 1 to Penny Road
A multi -use path is physically separated from motor vehicular traffic
by a barrier, such as a grass strip, and provides recreation and
transportation opportunities for a variety of user groups including
pedestrians and bicyclists.
•-��l1 iii��
Alternative 1. Penny Road to Smith Road
R lel m: u)A9 pR loy
*1L fR
Alternative 2. Penny Road to Smith Road
CrTENTEN ROAD (SR 1010)
WBL EBL
- -0A' 5'
b. d..
BRIGIWLL
GROUND
SIDEWALK r IDEK'n1K
—
4XGIWLL �— -- � — — — — — —
GRWNo Alternatives 1 and 2. Smith Road to Kildaire Farm Road

p
�� •�-y
//�/aiiii�i�
-- ��- _�T � ,:�� �� �� -�� ;�;r
1
• . ` v � � �
� � �/v �� � � -;� -.,n �I •�
�e�`r �
;; �., �o `fir ��
/ � +r rr. ��
v
����j�/�71010�1/lai/
ice- �
,,: , �
Id�U_-_� � - J �✓/1/� e� - _ � ".
- -'___ � V i 1 Y
4
.
y
� �..�
� � ��,
I.
___ � �
Ill%/�"• \ \ %j/��/� l 4"
.a t� I Y �\ %, �\ 7, i�� : "� .\ � . �I
ti
�- �'� �_� � _ � �a�-C�� \
f
- \ t
• \� lam. II
• r
J I
• �\ � � • * * �
i
. \\\ ��. \\ R /�
G
g
,
:
,
e
_ y
l J.. y
�r6
f
r
r

n
2
SOUTH
CHASE
i
r
LEGEND !• `�
sRD
o raoro:eD aoADwA. .-
PUBLIC MEETING MAP ,m
PROJECT U-5825
WAKE COUNTY
APEX -TER TEN RD (SR 7010) 41 »>$I ITws x IT.as,
FROM APEX PEAKTO
RE) (
XILDAlRE FARM RE) (SR
]300) .oao
ALTERNATIVE 2- SUPERSTREET
ROLL 2 OF 2 _
KENSINGTON
AT REGENCY
DANBURY
°o�EoaE
PRELIMINARY PLANS ry/I2�ip////y/%'
n
T
raorozeD auseD
� meouu i wsauae
nTH
� raoreaTr axes �
® - eD HAT — AaeA
a°��D�Hcs "'°ACeO UMSTEAD } .
- weTaHD:
©a ,r ND,a sTaeAH.s ` T
u�.
® eeMeTea. ? i „ r► �, SUMMERCREST
if race Dr woa:x�r
� �,aDous wASTe s�Te
D,To�De
1IT1
=�D�u
o D
S,
S eu
11-
cTu esa�Ds
o � wA o ,a IT.
e o c
�;
vi roTeM�A<—ACT AaeA y race or woa:H�r
exirnrtc ai..T ov wAv rvnuaoous wasre sire
w+ IDanssl
ewmHc STeUeruae '
m re n r
^wu HATUK— AREA .w,r
r
'--1m- ACV,
-END TIP 5
-- Y\\\\ PROJECT U-5825
�_- i0 :� i -L- STA. 204+39
�• MEADOWS
6 AT KILDAIRE

Ten Ten Road (S.R. 1010) Improvements
STIP No. U-5825 (from Apex Peakway to Kildaire Farm Road)
Wake County
Public Comment Sheet
Please let us know of any comments or concerns you have on transportation
issues related to the proposed improvements along Ten Ten Road from Apex
Peakway in Apex to Kildaire Farm Road in Cary. You can mail/e-mail your
comments to the contacts listed below.
Name:
Add ress:
Email/Phone:
COMMENTS
If additional space is required, please attach additional sheets before mailing.
Comments may also be submitted directly to the individuals listed below via e-mail or telephone
Mr. Zahid Baloch
N.C. Department of Transportation
Division 5
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
[phone]
[e-mail]
Ms. Lauren Triebert
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
Venture 1
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
[phone]
[e-mail]

VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
Venture 1
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
Attn: Lauren Triebert
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
Venture 1
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
i

TITLE VI PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT FORM
Completing this form is completely voluntary. You are not required to provide the information requested
in order to participate in this meeting.
Meeting Type: Public Meeting Date: March 1, 2018
Location: The Summit Church, 3000 Lufkin Road, Apex, NC 27539
STIP No.: U-5825
Project Description: Ten Ten Road (SR 1010) Improvements (from Apex Peakway to Kildaire Farm Road)
In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related authorities, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) assures that no person(s) shall be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any of the Department's programs, policies,
or activities, based on their race, color, national origin, disability, age, income, or gender.
Completing this form helps meet our data collection and public involvement obligations under Title VI
and NEPA, and will improve how we serve the public. Please place the completed form in the designated
box on the sign -in table, hand it to an NCDOT official, or mail it to the PDEA-Human Environment Section,
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598.
All forms will remain on file at the NCDOT as part of the public record.
Zip Code:
Gender: ❑ Male ❑ Female
Age:
Street Name: (i.e. Main Street)
❑ Less than 18 ❑ 45-64
❑ 18-29 ❑ 65 and older
Total Household Income:
❑ Less than $12,000 ❑ $47,000 — $69,999
❑ 30-44
❑ $12,000 — $19,999 ❑ $70,000 — $93,999
❑ $20,000 — $30,999 ❑ $94,000 — $117,999
Have a Disability: ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ $31,000 — $46,999 ❑ $118,000 or greater
Race/Ethnicity:
National Origin: (if born outside the U.S.)
❑ White ❑ Asian
❑ Mexican
❑ Black/African American ❑ Hispanic/Latino
❑ Central American:
❑ American Indian/Alaskan Native
❑ South American:
❑ Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
❑ Puerto Rican ❑ Vietnamese
❑ Other (please specify):
❑ Chinese ❑ Korean
❑ Other (please specify):
How did you hear about this meeting? (newspaper advertisement, flyer, and/or mailing)
For more information regarding Title VI or this request, please contact the NCDOT Title VI Section at
[phone] or toll free at 1-800-508-1886, or by email at [e-mail].
Thank you for your participation!

Diane Wilson
NCDOT — PDEA
Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Attn: Diane Wilson
NCDOT - PDEA
Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598

PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
CITY, STATE
PERMIT NO. XXX
The N. C. Department of Transportation is holding a Public Meeting for
proposed improvements to Ten Ten Road from Kildaire Farm Road to
Apex Peakway in Wake County.
The purpose of the project is to improve capacity and decrease congestion along Ten Ten Road from
Kildaire Farm Road to Apex Peakway. The proposed design consists of a median -divided, four -lane
roadway with curb -and -gutter, and a multi -use path on one side and a sidewalk along the other for much
of the corridor.
As part of this project, NCDOT will hold a public
meeting:
Thursday, March 1, 2018
4-7 PM
The Summit Church
3000 Lufkin Rd
Apex, NC 27539
The purpose of this meeting is to
present the latest information and an-
swer questions regarding the proposed
project. You are invited to drop in any-
time between 4 PM and 7 PM to ask
questions, provide feedback, and talk
to project team representatives.
Connecting people, products and places safely and efficiently with customer focus,
accountability and environmental sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality of North Carolina.

Public Meeting
The purpose of this meeting is to present the latest information and answer questions regarding the
proposed project. Comments may be submitted until November 20, 2018 by mail or email to the
project team listed in this handout.
Proiect Overview
NCDOT is proposing to widen Ten Ten Road from Apex Peakway to Kildaire Farm Road, through the
Towns of Apex and Cary in Wake County. Currently, Ten Ten Road is primarily a two-lane roadway
throughout the project corridor, with turn lanes at major intersections. To relieve congestion, NCDOT is
proposing to widen the road to a median -divided, four -lane roadway with curb -and -gutter. The roadway
would have a sidewalk on one side and a multi -use path on the other for much of the corridor length to
accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians in the area. The existing overpass of U.S. 1 will also be
replaced as part of this project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
*Dates are subject to change
I Your input is important.
Public involvement has been continuous throughout the project process.
ILIA
After receiving public input, the 4 "
project team has selected
traditional widening option as the
preferred alternative to move r+
forward to final design and.
construction. A superstreet
alternative was also evaluated;
however, it is no longer being
considered for Implementation. Rendering of the proposed U.S. 1 interchange
i i
Connecting people, products, and places safely and efficiently with customer focus, accountability and environmental
sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality of North Carolina.

October 2018
STIP PROJECT N0. U-5825 (TEN TEN ROAD WIDENING)
For more project information, please visit our website.
https://ncdot.publicinput.com/tenten_apexcary
CPROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Currently, NCDOT is preparing the environmental document (State Environmental Assessment/
Finding of No Significant Impact [SEA/FONSI]) in compliance with the North Carolina State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and has completed preliminary designs for this project. Potential
impacts to the natural and human environment have been evaluated during the project development
process and are documented in the SEA/FONSI. At this time, the project is estimated to relocate
approximately 17 homes and six businesses.
At this stage, we are including the whole U-5825 project corridor for impact evaluations and design
efforts. The project, however, is planned to be constructed in two parts, Section A and Section B.
The division of the Sections occurs at the U.S. 1 interchange. Determination of when each part is
constructed will be based on available funding. It is expected that the interchange improvements will
be included in the first Section, A or B, that is constructed.

October 2018
I- STIP PROJECT NO. U-5825 TYPICAL SECTION
Traditional Widening. 4-lane, median -divided roadway, with some 6-lane portions; sidewalk and
multi -use path from Apex Peakway to Penny Road which will accommodate bicyclists and
pedestrians along Ten Ten Road.
:i}18
ORIGINAL
Gkoui,m
fL TEN TEN ROAD (511, WIG)
WBL EBL
1A' Y 7' 11• 11• 73' S' 7' 1p'
: 1. 1 1 ■ ■ 1 a 5 e•
0 M
muse
na*n IDEwAex
WBL
I
d c 030
SIOFWAV
ORIGINAL
GROUND
Apex Peakway to U.S. 1
r�TEN TEN ROAD IM 'DLL;
S I 1
6YhY�
A"W"
U.S. 1 to Penny Road
n
['LTEN TEN ROAD (SR 1010J
EBL
I 3a
A5'
t t fl3a ° owwwu
Geouno
SIDEWALK
_ I
Penny Road to Smith Road
ILTEN TEN ROAD (SR 1010)
WBL EBL
10' �• S' �J' I' 10'
5' A n d' S'
6° 010
°.
+� ORIGINAL
cRDUNo
SIDEWALK r51DEW K
GP GIn
cRouND
Smith Road to Kildaire Farm Road

October 2018
STIP PROJECT NO. U-5825 (TEN TEN ROAD WIDENING)
Traditional Widening
Left -Turn Movement
Through Movement
Traditional widening includes improvements such as constructing turn lanes and adding an
additional through lane to increase capacity. Additional turn lanes allow vehicles to move out of
the stream of traffic to make their turns. No turning movements are rerouted, which enables
drivers to make turns and travel through the intersection in a traditional manner.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMENTS
For more information about this project or to express any comments or concerns, contact
either of the project managers below.
Please refer to the project number U-5825.
All comments and questions will
be addressed as soon as possible.
Mr. Zahid Baloch
Ms. Lauren Triebert
N.C. Department of Transportation
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
Division 5
Venture 1
1548 Mail Service Center
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27699
Raleigh, NC 27606
[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
THANK YOU!
Thank you for visiting the Public Meeting for STIP No. U-5825.
Your feedback is important — please complete and return the attached comment form by
November 20, 2018.

TITLE A PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT FORM
Completing this form is completely voluntary. You are not required to provide the information requested in order to participate
in this meeting.
Meeting Type: Date:
Location:
TIP No.:
Project Description:
In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related authorities, the N.C. Department of Transportation assures
that no person(s) shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any of the
Department's programs, policies, or activities, based on their race, color, national origin, disability, age, income, or gender.
Completing this form helps meet our data collection and public involvement obligations under Title VI and NEPA, and
will improve how we serve the public. Please place the completed form in the designated box on the sign -in table, hand it to
an NCDOT official or mail it to the Environmental Analysis Unit, 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598.
All forms will remain on file at the NCDOT as part of the public record.
Zip Code:
Gender: ❑ Male ❑ Female
Age:
Street Name:
(i.e. Main Street)
❑ Less than 18 ❑ 45-64
Total Household Income:
❑ 18-29 ❑ 65 and older
❑ Less than $12,000 ❑ $47,000 — $69,999
❑ 30-44
❑ $12,000 — $19,999 ❑ $70,000 — $93,999
❑ $20,000 — $30,999 ❑ $94,000 — $117,999
Have a Disability: ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ $31,000 — $46,999 ❑ $118,000 or greater
Race/Ethnicity:
National Origin: (if born outside the U.S.)
❑ White
❑ Mexican
❑ Black/African American
❑ Central American:
❑ Asian
❑ South American:
❑ American Indian/Alaskan Native
❑ European:
❑ Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
❑ Chinese
❑ Hispanic/Latino
❑ Vietnamese
❑ Other (please specify):
❑ Korean
❑ Other (please specify):
How did you hear about this meeting? (newspaper advertisement, flyer, and/or mailing)
For more information regarding Title VI or this request, please contact the NCDOT Title VI Nondiscrimination Program at
[phone] or toll free at 1-800-522-0453, or by email at titleVl ncdot.gov. Thank you for your participation!

NCDOT - Environmental Analysis Unit
Attn: Diane Wilson
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598

SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) Improvements
STIP No. U-5825 (from Apex Peakawy to MIdaire Farm Road)
Wake County
Public Comment Sheet
Please let us know of any comments or concerns you have on transportation
issues related to the proposed improvements along SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road)
from Apex Peakway in Apex to SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road) in Cary. You can
mail/e-mail your comments to the contacts listed below.
Name:
Add ress:
Email/Phone:
COMMENTS
If additional space is required, please continue on the back of this comment sheet.
Comments may be submitted directly to the individuals listed below via e-mail or telephone
Mr. Zahid Baloch
N.C. Department of Transportation
Division 5
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
[phone]
[e-mail]
Ms. Lauren Triebert
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
Venture 1
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
[phone]
[e-mail]

9091Z ON `46191eN
005 9}inS `eAp(3 sndweo uiew 0-P6
� 9anjueA
'O'd `ON 6uia99ui6u3 8HA
:p9geial u9ine-I :u:}y

PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
CITY, STATE
PERMIT NO. XXX
The N. C. Department of Transportation is holding a second
Public Meeting for proposed improvements to Ten Ten Road from
Kildaire Farm Road to Apex Peakway in Wake County.
The purpose of this meeting is to present updated potential impact information and answer
questions regarding the proposed project. The final alignment choice, Conventional Widening,
will be presented. You are invited to drop in anytime between 4 and 7 p.m. to ask questions,
provide feedback on the final alternative, and talk to project team representatives.
As part of this project, NCDOT will hold a
second public meeting:
Tuesday, October 23, 2018
4-7 p.m.
The Summit Church
3000 Lufkin Rd
Apex, NC 27539
The purpose of the project is to improve
capacity and decrease congestion along Ten
Ten Road from Kildaire Farm Road to Apex
Peakway.
Please visit the project website to view
updated information as it becomes available.
https://ncdot.pubIicinput.com/tenten_apexcary
Connecting people, products and places safely and efficiently with customer focus,
accountability and environmental sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality of North Carolina.