20021159 Ver 2_More Info Received_20070223

YV~1 L TUN ~1V'
INF.ERIN
2/13/07
Ed Beck
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
2 0 0 7 0 3 3 7
~R ~
~~ ~~.~~
~~~B ? ~ 20th"l
~~3Eii1 - k'~fAl Y~4i fi..k `u `:=`._E I i
1~f~/1r1~' `sp`a ~'riC~~'",~tk~ :`.~i ~fi.gtal.i°t
Dear Mr. Beck
The following is a full response to your letter dated January 12, 2007 with a plan map
attached:
1. See attached plan map.
2. Due to the complicated nature of the plan, there were miscommunications between the
contractor, the surveyor and the developer. The silt fencing was supposed to be the
boundary of the wetland preservation line and from what I gather is the silt fencing did not
agree with the plan exactly. I was not involved at this point during the project so I just am
explaining what I was able to research. There were quite a few approved modifications to
the plan so there were opportunities for confusion. The reason for the timing of the
response is that I have been communicating verbally with Noelle Lutheran, Joanne
Steenhuis, and Thomas Farrell and made it known that I wasn't clear on everything that I
needed to complete the response to the violation. In order to respond thoroughly, I
needed to understand everything that was required of the response. The meeting on
January 9, 2007 was very helpful in clarifying everything that I had a question about.
That meeting took more than a month just to schedule due to holidays and conflicting
schedules.
3. a) See attached plan map.
b) and c) After the meeting on 1/9/07, mitigation was proposed by DWQ and USACE as
an option and Ron Bryant has agreed to this. See attached plan map.
4. See attached plan map.
Proposal for Oceanaire 404 Permit/401 Water Quality Certification Compliance
Outline:
Tel: [phone] PO Box 895, Burgaw, North Carolina, 28425 Fax: [phone]

WAL TON EN GINI~~JRIN
A. The original approved plan depicts silt fencing around a 10 feet area of each house within
the wetland preservation area but does not account for these areas in the "Area of
Wetlands to be Filled" table or the actual permit. The modified plan will reflect the
changes that were discussed at our meeting on January 9`h. The silt fencing is actually
located around the perimeters of the house footprints. The modified plan calls for the silt
fencing to be moved five feet from the "footprints" and these areas around the perimeters
will be figured in the total wetlands to be filled. In other words, there will be a five feet
buffer around each house within the conservation easement that will be impacted.
B. The area between lot #'s 22 and 23 will be preserved. Areas already impacted are to be
figured in with total for wetlands to be filled are located at lot #'s 24, 25, 26, 29, and 30.
These areas do not include the five feet buffers discussed in item #1.
C. Some utilities, principally sewer and power, are located in the wetlands. In order to
include these impacts in "the wetlands to be filled," the modified plan calls for the 45 feet
right-of--way for Oceanaire Lane to be widened by ten feet on each side beginning past lot
#'s7and31.
D. The difference in the planned area for the pump station and the actual area of the pump
station was figured and included in the total impact.
The total amount of additional "wetlands to be filled" equals 0.325 acres. The total "wetlands
to be filled" would equal 0.636. The client will apply for In-lieu fee mitigation from NCEEP
for the additional filled wetlands. The wetlands in the Conservation Easement that were
disturbed shall be restored as described in the original restoration plan submitted in September
of 2006.
5. A rain gauge was placed on site in mid-December and readings have been kept since.
This was not discussed at the meeting on January 9~' and I forgot to call it to the attention
to the representatives at the meeting. A copy of the records through the month of January
are included.
6. See item number 5.
7. A copy of the after-the-fact PCN is enclosed.
8. The plat will be recorded as soon as all permits are obtained.
Tel: [phone] PO Box 895, Burgaw, North Caroli*~a, 28425 Fax: [phone]

YTIALTON ENGINFERIN
9, Schedule:
Februaryl9 -Violation response submittal
February 19- Submit 404/401 permit/certification modification
February 26-CAMA restoration completed
February, March ?- Silt Fencing completed according to planJpermit(if
approved/issued)
Sincerely,
~t~~ ~ ~
r
Adrian Moon
Tel: 91G-259-G80~ PO Box 895, Burgaw, I3orth Carolina, 28415 Fax: 9iu-2~9-I77y

i
~~ -_~
~..,-~ I
STOR141WATER INSPECTIONS FOR GENERAL PERMIT NCGO10000 -LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES '~
PROJECT:__ G~C.c~Gc ~-ict ~ l-~
MONITORING FOR THE WEEK BEGINNING:
RAINFALL;
Date
Of
Rain Amount
(inches) Initials
~ :;

By this signature, I certify (in accordance with Part II
Section B, 10 of the NCGO10000 permit) that this report is
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permitee or Designee)
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION~CONTROL FACILITIES INSPECTED: (At least once [twice, if on 303(d) listed stream for construction related parameters*]
er seven calendar da ~s And within 24 hours of a rainfall of 0.5 inches er 24 hours
Facility Date of Operating Describe corrective actions taken (may need to attach additional information}
Identification tnspection Properly _ r
OBSERVATIONS OF RUNOFF AT STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFACES: (At least once [twice, if on 303(d) listed stream for construction related parameters *]
er seven calendar da s And within 24 hours of a rainfall of 0.5 inches per 24 hours)
Stormwa er v
1 Date Clarit Fl
t

Discharge
Ouifail
Identificati
on • oa
tng
solids Suspended
5olidg ON sheen Otht:r obvious
indicators of
stormwater
pollution
(list 8c describe) Visible
sedlmenf
leaving
the site?
{y/N} ~ if yes, describe actions taken to
prevent fuiure releases
(may nced to attach additional
information} Describe mcasures Eaken to clean up
sediment outside of the disturbed
limits
(may need to attach additional
i
f
n
ormation}

Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very cloudy
Floating Solids: Choosy the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 the surface is covered in floating solids
Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy
Oil Sheen: Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Y or N
* 303(d) listed streams for construction related parameters - Tl~e latest approved list may be obtained from the Division of Water Quality, or from the following website location:
ltttp://h2o. enr.state.~~c.us/se%onstri~ction303d

STORiV1„f:~TER INSPECTIONS 1~t~R GENET-tr~L PERMIT NCGOl0UC0 -LAND BISTt?II.I3ING !~-CTi~' iTIL~
PROJECT:
I~~IUNI`f'CRING FOR Ti-iE ti~EEK FEGiNNING:
as erosion and seditnentatior. control facilities and sturnt~i~ater discharge outfalls must be inspected at least once (t+~'ice, 'sf on 303(d) listed stream for construction
related parametersF) per• seven calendar days and +vithin 24 hours of a rainfall of 0.5 inches per 2~ hours. Permittee must keep a record of inspections.
R ~+ frr~Ti A T T .~ ~;^„fle must be maintained on site
Date
Of !
Rain r mount
(inches) Narne
'~ i _
Ja: 5 (~ B
1
~ ~
1
Kvi ~ ~ li
~ ~~~, ~o- 2I S ~
~ i
13y this signature; I certify (in accordance ,with Part II
Section I3, IU of the NCGtIIUOi)0 permit) that this report is
accurate and complete to the best of mp knowledge:
(Signature of Perrni[tee or Designee)
EROSION A~iD.SELgII~'iENTATION CONTROL F.ACILITII;S INSPECTr~D: Identification of all facilities may require additiona[ pages.
hacility Date :;i Time of Nanre of Operating Describe corrective actions taken (ma need to attach eddnianr; ,nforrnaiion;
fdentification inspection inspection I inspector Properly
fall measures) (Ym) •
~ e v ~ ! 5~~ ~r Fr ( ~a v F _ -~---
;JBSERVATIOatiS O: RUNOp'F :~T STORMI~'ATER DISCIIARGE OUTF,~.LLS; Take immediate corrective action to cont•roi the discharge of sediments outside the
disturbed limits of the site. iliay require additional pages.
:itnrmwater hate of 'Time of Name of
Discharge inspection I inspection inspector
i~utfall

Identification ~

~ Clarity

1-IO) Floating
solids

(1-IO) Suspended
Solids

(I-lU) Oil
sheen

(YJN) Other obvious
indicators of

stormwaler
pol]utiu^
(list & describe) Visible
sediment

leaving
the site?
(YJN) If yes, describe actions i T)escrtbe measures [at:en w
taken to prevent future clean up sediment outside of

releases the disturbed linuts I
(may need to attach (mate Hel=d Ic ~uach add:uunai
additional information) ~ li'.jOrrn3ti~:~;~)
. i
` i ~
I -

~ _
.
~
-
I
i I _
':u-,ty: Chc~ase the number whtch best describes the eiarit~~ of the dtscharge where l rs cleat and 10 ,s very cloudy
F•. :ttn~~ ~ohds: Choose the »u,_:her which best describes the Itmount of llcating solids in the dischar~~e where l i no soh~ls and 10 the surface is covered ,n `lot:hn~ s<,I,d~
~~~. •nded Solids: Choose the number which bes[ describes the amount of suspended solids in the discltarce when ~~ 1 ,s no solids and 10 is extremei ;~ muddy
~ I-fas a land disturbing construction been completed`' (Y/1`d) Has the final permanent ground cover E~een completed ~ established`.' (~'%"Y)
~~13tc =tee! sueams for cor.arucuon related parameters -The latest approved lift may be e,btained from the D,vis,on o[ \'+'ater C)ual;tv, or from the fr,ll,;~=.~in~ •,+ebs,:e iocat;on
--tr~~ !/h: :r srcue.nc.i,s.'s:~`co,tstn,cri,:ut303d
G~1ooU~