20170921 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_20190802

ID#* 20170921
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
08/02/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/2/2019
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
W Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Lindsay Crocker
Project Information
Existing 20170921
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: F DMS f Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Major Hill
County: Alamance
Document Information
(- Yes 0 -
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurnbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: MajorHill_100015_MYO_2019.pdf 15.53MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:

FINAL
AS-BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MY0)

MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina

DMS Project ID No. 100015
Full Delivery Contract No. 7193
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01472
DWR No. 17-0921
RFP No. 16-006990

Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002

Data Collection: September 2018 – January 2019
Submission: March 2019

Prepared for:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

March 18, 2019
Ms. Lindsay Crocker
NC DEQ – Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1652

Subject: Major Hill Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site: As-built Comment Responses
DMS Contract #: 7193; DMS Project ID: 100015; RFP # 16-006990

Electronic Deliverables:
• All GIS files should be projected in NAD 83 State Plane coordinate system. For this project, some
of the shapes are in GCS and some are in the required
NAD_1983_StatePlane_North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet. Make sure these are all in correct
projections and resubmit. All shapefile projections were updated to the correct coordinate
system.
• Need jurisdictional wetland area and planting area shapes added to submittal. Assets should
match what is in the As-built report and be broken out by reach and wetland area. These were
added to the digital submittal and the assets match Table 1 in the as-built report.
• Need CVS database file CVS database was included in the digital submittal.
• Wetland asset shapefile: there are significantly more enhancement shapes than there were on
the JD, which does not make sense. Many of these shapes are very small. Can you explain what
is going on with these small pieces? The wetland assets were divided by the as-built stream
channel, creating several small polygons on either side of the stream. Is this shape the same one
used for the Mitigation Plan? Yes, this is the same shapefile from the Mitigation Plan, but it has
been divided by the as-built stream channel. The areas on the attribute table need to match the
areas on the asset table. You can either break out the areas to add to the asset table, or you can
merge the polygons by asset type to create a multi-part polygon that matches the attribute
table. The total areas match the areas on the asset table. The wetlands were merged to show
one multi-part polygon for enhancement and one for restoration.

Asset updates:
• The assets on the MY0 report do not match what is in the Mitigation Plan. This is fine if it
accurately reflects what is on the ground, but it is not explained in the report. Add a detailed
description of how and why the assets changed in memorandum format for submission to the
IRT with the AB report to change the credits. Please see the attached letter to RS (from Axiom)
that provides a description for the asset updates. The letter has been included in the document
as Appendix I.
• Page 2, assets: Add a column on Table 1 that includes ‘Mitigation Plan footage/acreage.” IRT will
want to see this. Also, it appears that most of the changes occurred in the Enhancement II
sections of the assets, which should have remained constant from MP-AB and these differences
are significant. How and why did these changes occur? An additional column has been added to
Table 1 and is titled Mitigation Plan Footage/Acreage. A description of the credit discrepancies
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492
has been provided (see the attached letter) and the letter has been included as Appendix I to the
document.
• Wetland Asset shapefiles: the enhancement assets don’t match what is in the 404 permit as
existing wetlands. Where are the enhancement assets from? Wetland enhancement assets
were based on correspondence with David Bailey (USACE) after a mistake was discovered in the
final PJD tear sheet (see attached email). The final existing wetlands were 0.52 acres, and with
the as-built channel dissecting some of those, the final wetland enhancement acreage is 0.44
acres.

As-Built Report:
• Suggest reviewing the guidance for this contract on As-Built reports. We have reviewed the
guidance.
• Add DWR number on cover page. This was added.
• It would make much more sense to move section 1.2 in front of section 1.3 and 1.4 for context.
Section 1.2 was moved to the end and became Section 1.4.
This section (1.3 and 1.4) should also contain information on actual as-built information.
Currently, there is no discussion of as-built conditions, deviations from mitigation plan, fence
installation, construction timelines, planting dates, densities, or locations. Please update report
to read like an As-Built. Provide description of pond removal, methodology, and any issues. The
following was added to the document. “Additional activities that occurred at the Site included
the following.
• Installation of a marsh treatment area to treat drainage prior to entering UT1.
• Fencing the entire conservation easement by leaving some pre-existing fencing,
removing fencing, and installing additional fencing.
• Planting 8.11 acres of the Site with 8600 stems (planted species and densities by zone
are included in Table 5 [Appendix C]).
• Removing a small, abandoned farm pond by 1) notching the dam to dewater; 2) removal
of the dam to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain; 3) excavating sediment that was
unsuitable for channel bank construction; 4) backfilling areas of sediment removed with
soil suitable for channel construction (as necessary); 5) excavation of the design channel,
6) stabilization of the channel with coir matting, seed, and mulch; and 7) installation of
structures.

Deviations from the construction plans included not constructing 2 log cross-vanes, constructing
15 structures at the bottom of riffles that were shown at the top of riffle on construction plans,
and not constructing the Terracell drop structure; the restoration channel was tied into existing
bedrock (Appendix G). No other deviations of significance occurred between construction plans
and the as-built condition. In addition, no issues have arisen since construction occurred.”
• Move Table 1 up before discussion of success criteria (this table should follow goals and
objectives). Also, Table 1 is the same as the Table on Page 9, with one additional column. Merge
these tables and just provide one time in the report. Text was moved after Table 1. In addition,
Section 2.4 was removed and the last column of the table was added to Table 1.
• Section 2.1 remove everything after the table. There is no need to mention pre-construction
data if it was already provided in the Mitigation Plan. All text after the Stream Monitoring
Summary Table was removed and the following note was added to the table “Preconstruction
data for water quality was included in the Detailed Mitigation Plan and for benthic
macroinvertebrates is included in Appendix F.”
• Section 2.1, this first paragraph is pasted from the Mitigation Plan on what RS is going to do.
Because this is an As-Built, it should say what you did, not what you are planning to do. Update
to reflect as-built. This was adjusted.
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492
• Section 2.3, same comment as 2.1. Include planting area, densities and timeline. The following
sentence was added to the beginning of this section “Planting occurred in December 2018-
January 2019 within 8.11 acres of the Site and included 8600 stems (planted species and
densities by zone are included in Table 5 [Appendix C]).” And this sentence was added at the end
“). Baseline measurement also included two random sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter).
Measurements of all 10 plots resulted in an average of 716 planted stems/acre excluding live
stakes (Tables 6-8, Appendix C).”
• Table 8, these numbers don’t match Table 6. Table 8 should also include T-1 and T-2 in the
averages. Table 8 originally pertained to riparian buffer totals which exclude shrubs. Since this
information is included in App H, this Table was replaced with a summary of planted stems in the
8 fixed and 2 random plots.
• Table 2, the RFP issue date is 9/16/2016. Add 404 permit date to table (6/28/2018, see excel
table guidance). This was adjusted/added.
• Figure 2, CCPV, Please increase text on legend so it is more legible. Show location of fences on
CCPV. Font size in the legend was increased, and fences were added to the CCPV.
• Table 4, Appendices the stream lengths don’t match asset pre-condition lengths. These were
adjusted to match Table 1.
• Morphology Table. 10c shows that some of the cross sections don’t match the design. For
instance, Riffle 5 is much wider and has a larger cross-sectional area than proposed. Also, xs-10
is much wider and shallower than designed. These are the types of deviations that should be
explained in the As-Built report, and designers need to explain why / how the size of the channel
is so different than design which came from regional curve and reference analysis. This is true
for x-sections 1, 2, 4, 5, and 10. Also, is there a reason you labeled the cross-sections
backwards? Site construction was completed on September 19th. The Site experienced multiple
bankfull events from Hurricane Florence from 9/15 to 9/18. Cross sections were performed just
after Florence on 9/19-9/20. While the Site made it through this storm with multiple bankfulls,
with minimal damage, there were likely some changes in the post construction cross sectional
areas. In addition, the use of sod mats and natural riffle bed material may cause channel
dimension variations that are compounded with the small size of the constructed channel. Based
on field reviews of the Site, these variations appear to be within an acceptable tolerance for
channel stability.

As-Built Drawings:
• Sheet 5A and 5B appear to be conservation easement plat. This is not required for As-Built,
please remove. The conservation plat has been removed from the plans.
• Sheet 5A (3 of 20), this should show the different planting areas on the map as differentiated in
the Mitigation Plan (ex: Pied/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest type should be one area on the map)
along with the planting species table. Also, it appears that RS planted the entire easement, but
over half of the easement has existing trees. Update with actual ground-truthed planted area,
by planting area type. (Something like Table 2 from page 264 of the Mitigation Plan should be
included in the As-Built, along with map). A planting plan, with different planting areas
differentiated on the map has been provided.
• Sheet 5A (4-7 or 20) are not necessary. Information from these pages has been transferred into
the Construction Drawings, as discussed in the field. These pages have been removed from the
document.
• Your drawings should show the drawings from the Mitigation Plan and red lines where anything
deviated from those construction drawings. It should contain at minimum topography, location
of structures, stationing. Refer to guidance on As-built drawings. As built profiles should show
design elevation lines, with As-Built as a red line (where elevation deviates). Construction
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492
Drawings have been updated as discussed in field review and meetings. Red-line alterations
have been added to the documents with appropriate notes.
• Sheet 8-10 of 20 (profiles). These elevations should be overlain on the design sheets (6A-6G). As
discussed in the field, profiles are not being added as overlays on this project’s as-built. For the
purpose of this as built construction plan, the structure elevations (pre and post) have been
added as a table to ensure the design channel elevations have been met. Profiles will be
provided independently as baseline data for future overlays, as required by the DMS/IRT.
• Profiles: there shouldn’t be survey measurements on profile drawings, the graphs as a stand-
alone are fine, that other information should go in your geomorphology excel files. The as-built
profiles should overlay the design profile. Please see the note above.
• Stationing: why does UT-1 only go out to ~1,675 and UT-2 only go to 28’? Shouldn’t you be
showing the distances as stationing as in the design? As discussed in the field, stationing on the
profile and stationing of the alignment are independent. The alignment is based on the
centerline along the plan view, while the profile is based on field measurements and will
inherently be different. The profile is not expected to match the alignment which is used for
crediting purposes.
• There were some structures that were not constructed, but there is no explanation as to why or
how the grade was maintained. Please provide text explanation. A note has been added to the
construction drawings to indicate that the structures were removed due to contact with bedrock.

Riparian Buffer As-Built supplement:
• Add DWR number This was added.
• Read through summary and update for As-Built. There are sections that say ‘will be’ or have
strange verb tenses like ‘was not be.’ This was adjusted.
• Table 5 does not match Table 6 for your vegetation counts. Table 5 summarizes riparian buffer
success criteria, which only includes planted hardwood trees and excludes shrubs, pines, vines, or
unknown species in CVS. Table 6 includes all planted stems. Both tables are exported from CVS.
• As-Built report maps. All riparian buffer measurement should be measured in square foot (to
the whole square foot) and reported in square foot on the maps. Update Asset maps and As-
Built maps with the numbers in square feet and ensure they match the asset table. All reporting
of riparian buffer assets was updated to square feet.
• Provide a planting map and show by planting zone and acreage (same as wetland and stream
report). A planting map (Figure B) was created with planting zones and acreages.
• Asset Table: Each Reach ID should be a separate unit (instead of being all labeled as ‘Major Hill’).
The areas should match the shapefiles and shapefile should identify each reach ID in the
attribute table. Each reach was given a separate ID in the table and shapefile attribute table.
• Credits changed from Mitigation Plan to As-Built. Please provide explanation for this change in
the document. The final surveyed easement was slightly different resulting in a few changes to
assets.

FINAL
AS-BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MY0)

MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina

DMS Project ID No. 100015
Full Delivery Contract No. 7193
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01472
DWR No. 17-0921
RFP No. 16-006990

Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002

Data Collection: September 2018 – January 2019
Submission: March 2019

Prepared for:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

Prepared by:

And

Restoration Systems, LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Worth Creech Contact: Grant Lewis
919-755-9490 (phone) 919-215-1693 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Table of Contents page i
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 2
1.1 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................ 2
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 4
1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE .............................................................................. 4
1.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA ................................................................................................................ 5
1.4.1 Stream Success Criteria.............................................................................................. 5
1.4.2 Wetland Success Criteria ........................................................................................... 5
1.4.3 Vegetation Success Criteria ....................................................................................... 6
2.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 STREAM MONITORING ........................................................................................................... 6
2.2 WETLAND MONITORING ........................................................................................................ 7
2.3 VEGETATION ......................................................................................................................... 7
3.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 9

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table9
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Table 7. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 8. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 9A-9B. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 10A-10D. Monitoring Data (Dimensional Morphology Summary & Stream
Reach Data Summary)
Appendix E. Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
Appendix F. Preconstruction Benthic Data
Preconstruction Benthic Results
Habitat Assessment Dataforms
Appendix G. As-built Plan Sheets
Appendix H. Riparian Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report
Appendix I. Credit Discrepancy Letter
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 2
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Site).
1.1 Project Goals & Objectives
Project goals are based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report
(NCEEP 2009) and on-site data collection of channel morphology and function observed during
field investigations. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03030002050050. The RBRP report documents benthic ratings vary between “Fair” and “Good-
Fair” possibly due to cattle, dairy, and poultry operations. The project is not located in a Regional
or Local Watershed Planning Area; however, RBRP goals are addressed by project activities as
follows with Site specific information following the RBRP goals in parenthesis.

1. Reduce and control sediment inputs (reduction of 10.0 tons/year after mitigation is
complete);
2. Reduce and manage nutrient inputs (livestock removal from streams, elimination of
fertilizer application, and marsh treatment areas may result in a direct reduction of 852.4
pounds of nitrogen and 70.6 pounds of phosphorus per year);
3. Protect and augment designated natural heritage areas.

Site specific mitigation goals and objectives were developed through the use of North Carolina
Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM) analyses of existing and reference stream systems at the Site (NC SFAT 2015 and NC
WFAT 2010) (see Table 1).
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 3
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 1. Stream/Wetland Targeted Functions, Goals, and Objectives
Targeted Functions Goals Objectives Compatibility of Success Criteria
(1) HYDROLOGY
(2) Flood Flow (Floodplain Access) • Attenuate flood flow across the Site.
• Minimize downstream flooding to the
maximum extent possible.
• Connect streams to functioning wetland
systems.
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and restore jurisdictional wetlands
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Remove livestock
• Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase soil surface roughness
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• Document four overbank events in separate monitoring years
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Conservation Easement recorded
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
• Increase stream stability within the Site
so that channels are neither aggrading nor
degrading.
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile
• Remove livestock
• Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel
substrate
• Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
• BHR not to exceed 1.2
• ER of 1.4 or greater
• < 10% change in BHR and ER in any given year
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(1) WATER QUALITY
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
• Remove direct nutrient and pollutant
inputs from the Site and reduce
contributions to downstream waters.
• Remove livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
• Install marsh treatment areas
• Plant woody riparian buffer
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
• Livestock excluded from the easement
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(1) HABITAT
(2) In-stream Habitat
• Improve instream and stream-side
habitat.
• Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and plant woody riparian buffer
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
• Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel substrate
• Visual documentation of stable channels and in-stream structures.
• Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Conservation Easement recorded
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-Stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
Wetland Landscape Patch Structure
Wetland Vegetation Composition
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 4
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
1.2 Project Background
The Major Hill Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the “Site”)
encompasses 16.7 acres along warm water, unnamed tributaries to Pine Hill Branch. The Site is
located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of Snow Camp and 6 miles north of Silk Hope in
southern Alamance County near the Chatham County line (Figure 1, Appendix A).

Prior to construction, Site land use consisted of disturbed forest and agricultural land used for
livestock grazing and hay production. Livestock had unrestricted access to Site streams, which
had been relocated to the floodplain edge, ditched, impounded, trampled by livestock, eroded
vertically and laterally, and received extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from stream banks
and adjacent pastures. Approximately 60 percent of the stream channel had been degraded
contributing to sediment export from the Site resulting from mechanical processes such as
livestock hoof shear. In addition, streamside wetlands were cleared and drained by channel
downcutting and land uses. Preconstruction Site conditions resulted in degraded water quality, a
loss of aquatic habitat, reduced nutrient and sediment retention, and unstable channel
characteristics (loss of horizontal flow vectors that maintain pools and an increase in erosive forces
to channel bed and banks). Site restoration activities restored riffle-pool morphology aiding in
energy dissipation, increased aquatic habitat, stabilized channel banks, and will greatly reduce
sediment loss from channel banks.
1.3 Project Components and Structure
Site restoration activities generated 3058 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 0.76 Wetland
Mitigation Units (WMUs) as the result of the following.

• 1738 linear feet of Priority I stream restoration
• 3299 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level II)
• 0.54 acre of riparian wetland restoration
• 0.44 acre of riparian wetland enhancement

Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Installation of a marsh treatment area to treat drainage prior to entering UT1.
• Fencing the entire conservation easement by leaving some pre-existing fencing, removing
fencing, and installing additional fencing.
• Planting 8.11 acres of the Site with 8600 stems (planted species and densities by zone are
included in Table 5 [Appendix C]).
• Removing a small, abandoned farm pond by 1) notching the dam to dewater; 2) removal
of the dam to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain; 3) excavating sediment that was
unsuitable for channel bank construction; 4) backfilling areas of sediment removed with
soil suitable for channel construction (as necessary); 5) excavation of the design channel,
6) stabilization of the channel with coir matting, seed, and mulch; and 7) installation of
structures.

Deviations from the construction plans included not constructing 2 log cross-vanes, constructing
15 structures at the bottom of riffles that were shown at the top of riffle on construction plans, and
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 5
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
not constructing the Terracell drop structure; the restoration channel was tied into existing bedrock
(Appendix G). No other deviations of significance occurred between construction plans and the
as-built condition. In addition, no issues have arisen since construction occurred.

Site design was completed in February 2018. Construction started on July 25, 2018 and ended
within a final walkthrough on September 6, 2018. The Site was planted in December 2018-January
2019. Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and
background information are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
1.4 Success Criteria
Project success criteria have been established per the October 24, 2016 NC Interagency Review
Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
1.4.1 Stream Success Criteria
From a mitigation perspective, several of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally
elevated by restoration activities without direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be
considered successful upon achieving vegetation success criteria. The following summarizes
stream success criteria.

• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days.
• Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section.
• Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be no less than 1.4 at any measured riffle cross-section.
• BHR and ER at any measure riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10%
from baseline condition during any given monitoring period.
• The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met
through four separate bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring
years 1-7.
1.4.2 Wetland Success Criteria
The following summarizes wetland success criteria.

• Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum,
10 percent of the growing season, during average climatic conditions

According to the Soil Survey of Alamance County, the growing season for Alamance County is
from April 17 – October 22 (USDA 1960). However, the start date for the growing season is not
typical for the Piedmont region; therefore, for purposes of this project gauge hydrologic success
will be determined using data from March 1 - October 22 to more accurately represent the period
of biological activity. Based on growing season information outlined in the Interim Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region (USACE 2010), this will be confirmed annually by soil temperatures exceeding
41 degrees Fahrenheit at 12 inches depth and/or bud burst.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 6
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for 10 percent of the monitored
period (March 1-October 22), during average climatic conditions. During years with atypical
climatic conditions, groundwater gauges in reference wetlands may be used for comparison to the
Site; however, reference gauge data will not be tied to success criteria. These areas are expected
to support hydrophytic vegetation. If wetland parameters are marginal as indicated by vegetation
and/or hydrology monitoring, a jurisdictional determination will be performed. The jurisdictional
determination will not supersede monitoring data, or overturn a failure in meeting success criteria;
however, this information may be used by the IRT, at the discretion of the IRT, to make a final
determination on Site wetland re-establishment success.
1.4.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
The following summarizes vegetation success criteria.

• Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at
year 3; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved
planting list for the site; natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the
IRT on a case-by-case basis.
• Any single species can only account for 50% of the required stems within any vegetation
plot.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016 NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update. Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports
of the data collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than
December 31 of each monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized
in the following table.

Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Streams
Wetlands
Vegetation
Macroinvertebrates
Water Quality
Visual Assessment
Report Submittal
2.1 Stream Monitoring
Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross-sections and substrate on riffles and
pools (Figure 2, Appendix B). Data presented in graphic and tabular format include 1) cross-
sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, and 5) width-to-depth ratio.
Longitudinal profiles were monitored for as-built; however, profiles will not be measured routinely
unless monitoring demonstrates channel bank or bed instability, in which case, longitudinal
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 7
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
profiles may be required by the USACE along reaches of concern to track changes and demonstrate
stability.

Stream Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent
Stream Profile Full longitudinal survey As-built (unless otherwise
required)
All restored stream
channels
Stream Dimension Cross-sections Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 10 cross-sections
Channel Stability
Visual Assessments Yearly All restored stream
channels
Bank Pins Yearly
Only if instability is
documented during
monitoring
Additional Cross-sections Yearly
Only if instability is
documented during
monitoring
Stream Hydrology
Continuous monitoring
water level gauges and/or
trail camera
Continuous recording
through monitoring period
Two gauges on UT1
(upstream and
downstream) and one
trail camera on UT1
(downstream)
Water Quality* Water samples Yearly Two locations
Macroinvertebrates* Qual 4 sampling Years 3, 5, and 7 Two locations
*Preconstruction data for water quality was included in the Detailed Mitigation Plan and for benthic macroinvertabrates is included
in Appendix F.
2.2 Wetland Monitoring
Six groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within the drained pond area and the remaining
wetland restoration areas to take measurements after hydrological modifications were performed
at the Site (Figure 2, Appendix B). A detailed soil profile was described adjacent to each installed
groundwater gauge (Appendix E). Hydrological sampling will continue throughout the entire year
at intervals necessary to satisfy jurisdictional hydrology success criteria. In addition, an on-site
rain gauge will document rainfall data for comparison of groundwater conditions with extended
drought conditions and a trail camera was installed to confirm overbank flooding events. Growing
season soil temperatures will also be documented using a continuously logging soil temperature
probe, this data will be provided with wetland hydrology data.

Wetland Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected
Wetland
Restoration
Groundwater
gauges
As-built, Years 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
6 gauges spread
throughout
restored
wetlands
Soil temperature at the
beginning of each monitoring
period, groundwater and rain
data for each monitoring period
2.3 Vegetation
Planting occurred in December 2018-January 2019 within 8.11 acres of the Site and included 8600
stems (planted species and densities by zone are included in Table 5 [Appendix C]). After planting
was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods and to determine
initial species composition and density.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 8
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
During quantitative vegetation sampling, 8 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter) were installed
within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Baseline measurement also included two random sample plots (10-
meter by 10-meter). Measurements of all 10 plots resulted in an average of 716 planted stems/acre
excluding livestakes (Tables 6-8, Appendix C).

Vegetation Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected
Vegetation
establishment and
vigor
Permanent
vegetation plots
0.0247 acre (100
square meters) in
size
As-built, Years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7
8 plots spread
across the Site
Species, height,
location, planted vs.
volunteer, and age
Annual random
vegetation plots,
0.0247 acre (100
square meters) in
size
As-built, Years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7
2 plots randomly
selected each year Species and height

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 9
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
3.0 REFERENCES

Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan. Available: https:// https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-plans/cape-fear-2005 [December 8,
2016]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures
for Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online).
Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Environmental%20Sciences/BAU/NCDWR
Macroinvertebrate-SOP-February%202016_final.pdf

North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2009. Small Streams Biocriteria
Development. Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=2d54ad23-0345-4d6e-82fd-
04005f48eaa7&groupId=38364

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available :
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329

North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.

North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 10
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified
Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest
Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Publ.167.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [August 2016].

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Alamance County, North
Carolina. Soil Conservation Service.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 1
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 2
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Major Hill Restoration Site
Reach
ID
Stream
Stationing/
Wetland Type
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan
Footage/
Acreage
Constructed
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits Comment
UT 1 00+00 to 16+99 1829 1699 1699 Restoration 1699 1:1 1699
UT 1 16+99 to 27+96 1097 1060 1097* EII 1097 2.5:1 439
UT 2 00+00 to 01+68 168 168 168 EII 168 2.5:1 67
UT 2 01+68 to 02+07 39 43 39* Restoration 39 1:1 39
UT 3 00+00 to 22+98 2298 2197 2298* EII 2298-80-144-
40=2034 2.5:1 814
80 lf and 40 lf of UT3 are
not credit generating due
to crossings and drainage
easement. 144 lf are not
credit generating due to
lack of control of south
bank and drainage
easement.
Wetlands Riparian
Riverine -- 0.54 0.54 Restoration 0.54 1:1 0.54 Wetland Restoration
Wetlands Riparian
Riverine 0.52 0.44 0.44 Enhancement 0.44 2:1 0.22 Wetland Enhancement
*See attached letter (Appendix I) for explanation of credit discrepancies.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) page 3
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 1 continued. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Major Hill Restoration Site

Length & Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage)
Restoration 1738 0.54
Enhancement (Level II) 3299* --
Enhancement -- 0.44**
* An additional 264 linear feet of stream enhancement (level II) is proposed outside of the easement (at road crossings), or the sponsor controls only one bank of the
stream, and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit calculations.
**Approximately 0.08 acre of existing, degraded wetland will not be enhanced as the result of the design channel crossing the wetland area.

Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 3058
Riparian Riverine Wetland 0.76

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Major Hill Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Technical Proposal Issue Date (RFP No. 16-006990) September 16, 2016 September 16, 2016
Institution Date (NCDMS Contract No. 7193) -- May 22, 2017
Mitigation Plan -- February 2018
404 Permit Date -- June 28, 2018
Construction Plans -- July 2018
Site Construction -- July 25-September 6, 2018
Planting -- December 2018-January 2019

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Major Hill Restoration Site
Full Delivery Provider Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Worth Creech
919-755-9490
Designer & Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis
919-215-1693

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Major Hill Restoration Site
Project Information
Project Name Major Hill Restoration Site
Project County Alamance County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres) 16.7
Project Coordinates (latitude & latitude) 35.873206, -79.360906
Planted Area (acres) 8.11
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Project River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14-digit) 03030002050050
NCDWR Sub-basin for Project 03-06-04
Project Drainage Area (acres) 17 to 445
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious <2%
CGIA Land Use Classification Managed Herbaceous Cover & Mixed Upland Hardwoods

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Major Hill Restoration Site (continued)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT 1 UT 2 UT 3
Length of reach (linear feet) 2926 207 2298
Valley Classification & Confinement Alluvial, moderately confined to confined
Drainage Area (acres) 71.7 17.2 444.7
NCDWR Stream ID Score 20.25 – 33.5 -- --
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Intermittent/Perennial Intermittent Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-V, NSW
Existing Morphological Description (Rosgen 1996) Cg5 C4/5 C3
Proposed Stream Classification (Rosgen 1996) C/E 4 C4/5 C3
Existing Evolutionary Stage (Simon and Hupp 1986) III/IV III I
Underlying Mapped Soils Efland silt loam, Georgeville silt loam, Herndon silt loam,
Orange silt loam, Worsham sandy loam, Local Alluvial Land
Drainage Class Well-drained, well-drained, well-drained, poorly drained, well-
drained, poorly drained, respectively
Hydric Soil Status Nonhydric, nonhydric, nonhydric, nonhydric, hydric, hydric,
respectively
Slope 0.0241 0.0256 0.0130
FEMA Classification NA
Native Vegetation Community Piedmont Alluvial Forest/Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Site) 45% forest, 35% agricultural land, 20% low density
residential/impervious surface
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Cedarock Reference
Channel)
65% forest, 30% agricultural land, <5% low density
residential/impervious surface
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation <5%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetlands
Wetland acreage 0.54 acre drained or impounded & 0.44 acre degraded
Wetland Type Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series Worsham and Local Alluvial Land
Drainage Class Poorly drained
Hydric Soil Status Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater, stream overbank
Hydrologic Impairment Incised streams, compacted soils, livestock
Native Vegetation Community Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
% Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation <5%
Restoration Method Hydrologic, vegetative
Enhancement Method Vegetative

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, U. S. Geological Survey - National Geospatial Program. Data Refreshed October,
2017.
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
NOV 2017
1:20,000
17-009
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
Alamance County, NC
MAJOR HILLSTREAM ANDWETLANDMITIGATION SITE
PROJECTLOCATION
1
³
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i-cubed
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i-cubed, U. S. Geological Survey -
National Geospatial Program. Data
Refreshed October, 2017.
Directions to the Site from Raleigh:- Take US-64 West out of Raleigh and travel 25 miles,- Take exit 381 and turn right onto NC-87 N,- After 5 miles, take a left onto Castle Rock Farm Road,- After 5.8 miles, Castle Rock Farm Road becomes Old Switchboard Road,- Continue for 2.1 miles, turn right onto Lindley Mill Road,- After 0.5 mile, turn left onto Major Hill Road,- Site can be accessed from Burnett Church Road which is on the left after 1 mile.- Site Latitude, Longitude 35.873206, -79.360906 (NAD83/WGS84)
USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Saxapahaw, Silk Hope, Snow Camp, and Crutchfield Crossroads, NC Quads)
Snow Camp
¬«87
LindleyMillRoadBet
hel
Sout
hForkRoadE G reensboroChap elHi l l R o a d
SnowCampRoadB
eth
el
S
o
uthForkRoad
Ma jo r H ill R o a d
Ol
d
S
wit
c
h
b
oard
R
o
a
d
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
!(
XW
^_
!(
!(
#0
#0
XS-7P
XS-1
R
XS-2RXS-3PXS-8R
XS-6PXS-4RXS-9P
XS-5RXS-10RT-1T-22
1
2
4
6
5
7
8
1
3
12
3
5
6
4/4a
NCCGIA
­
0 140 280 420 56070Feet
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Alamance County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
FIGUREDwn. By:
Date:
Project:
KRJ
Feb 2019
17-009
2
Legend
Easement
Stream Channel
^_Trail Camera
#0 Benthic/Water Quality Stations
!(Groundwater Gauges
!(Stream Gauges
XW Rain Gauge/Soil Probe
!(Marsh Treatment Areas
^_Plot Origins
CVS Plots
Temporary Vegetation Plots (2m x 50m)
Structures
Cross-sections
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Enhancement
Newly-Installed Fencing
Previously Existing Fencing that Remains Post-Construction
Fencing Removed During Construction UT-1UT-2UT-1U T -3
U
T-3

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Major Hill Asbuilt Vegetation Plots
Photos Taken January 8, 2019

Plot-1 Plot-2
Plot-3 Plot-4
Plot-5 Plot-6
Plot-7 Plot-8

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix C
Vegetation Data

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Major Hill Restoration Site
Species
Piedmont/Low
Mountain
Alluvial Forest
Dry-Mesic
Oak/Hickory
Forest
Marsh
Treatment
Wetland
Streamside
Assemblage Total
Acres 1.1 5.5 0.01 1.5 8.11
Alnus serrulata 5 20 25
Asimina triloba 200 200
Betula nigra 100 200 300
Carpinus caroliniana 600 600
Cephalanthus
occidentalis 5 20 25
Cercis canadensis 500 500
Cornus amomum 95 5 800 900
Diospyros virginiana 450 450
Fraxinus americana 100 100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 150 750 900
Liriodendron tulipifera 75 75
Nyssa sylvatia 600 600
Platanus occidentalis 120 780 900
Quercus nigra 110 790 500 1,400
Quercus phellos 100 700 400 1,200
Salix nigra* 400* 400
Sambucus canadensis 11 14 25
TOTALS 750 3,740 26 4,084 8,600
Stems/Acre 682 680 2600 2722 1060
*Live stakes of Salix nigra were planted; all other planted species were planted as bare root plants.
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 17.009. Project Name: Major Hill
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Asimina triloba pawpaw Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 9
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 14 14 14
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5
Fraxinus ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus americana white ash Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 10 10 10
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 7 7 7
Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 23 23 23
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 18 18 18
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 6
11 11 11 13 13 13 15 15 15 21 21 21 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 21 21 21 129 129 129
5 5 5 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 10 10 10 16 16 16
445.2 445.2 445.2 526.1 526.1 526.1 607 607 607 849.8 849.8 849.8 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 849.8 849.8 849.8 652.6 652.6 652.6
Color for Density PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%P-all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
0.02
1
0.02
8
0.200.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
17.009-01-0007 17.009-01-0008
Annual Means
MY0 (2019)
Stem count
size (ares)1 1
Current Plot Data (MY0 2019)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
17.009-01-0001 17.009-01-0002 17.009-01-0003 17.009-01-0004 17.009-01-0005 17.009-01-0006

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Major Hill Restoration Site
Species
50m x 2m Temporary Plot (Bearing)
T-1 (179⁰) T-2 (347⁰)
Asimina triloba 1
Betula nigra 2 3
Carpinus caroliniana 3
Cercis canadensis 7
Diospyros virginiana 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2
Nyssa sylvatia 3 2
Platanus occidentalis 1
Quercus nigra 11 7
Quercus phellos 1 3
Total Stems 27 21
Total Stems/Acre 1093 850

Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Major Hill Restoration Site
Plot # Planted
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria Met?
1 445 Yes
2 526 Yes
3 607 Yes
4 850 Yes
5 648 Yes
6 648 Yes
7 648 Yes
8 850 Yes
T-1 1093 Yes
T-2 850 Yes
Average Planted
Stems/Acre 716 Yes

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

Tables 9A-9B. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 10A-10D. Monitoring Data (Dimensional Morphology Summary & Stream Reach Data
Summary)

Parameter Gauge
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft)3.8 5.6 6.4 8.0 9.6 12.1 5.6 6.4 6.0 6.0 10.9 11.8 3
Floodprone Width (ft)11.0 27.0 48.0 15 75 140 20 60 40 23 40 40 3
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 3
BF Max Depth (ft)0.7 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.7 2.0 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.6 2.6 2.6 8.0 11.4 14.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.5 7.1 3
Width/Depth Ratio 5.4 13.4 27.0 8.0 9.6 15.1 12.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 19.6 33.9 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 5.8 12.6 1.9 7.1 13.0 3.6 9.3 6.6 3.4 3.7 3.8 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.3 3
Riffle length (ft)5 16 47 3
Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.0100 0.0207 0.0576 0.0268 0.0401 0.0357 0.0000 0.0252 0.0539 3
Pool length (ft)4.0 13.0 28.0 3
Pool Max depth (ft)1.5 2.3 2.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.5 3
Pool spacing (ft)22.0 40.8 81.0 18.0 48.0 24.0 18.0 24.0 48.0 3
Channel Beltwidth (ft)17 26.3 38 18 36 24 18 24 36
Radius of Curvature (ft)9 23.6 113 12 60 18 12 18 60
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)0.8 2.4 10.3 2 10 3 2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)10 65.7 116 36 72 51 36 51 72
Meander Width ratio 1.5 2.7 4.7 3 6 4 3 4 6
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1.07 1.2 - 1.46 1.08 1.08
0.0225 0.0053 - 0.0258 0.0223 0.0195
9.5 28.8 - 60.6 9.5 9.5
Monitoring Baseline (UT 1 Upstream)
Additional Reach Parameters
Cg 5 Eb 5 E/C 4 E/C-type
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
Profile
Pattern
Table 9a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1 Upstream)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition (UT 1
Upstream)Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT 1
Upstream)
Parameter Gauge
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft)4.9 6.7 8.7 8.0 9.6 12.1 6.8 7.8 7.3 8.6 10.3 11.8 3
Floodprone Width (ft)9.0 14.0 21.0 15 75 140 25 75 50 22 40 40 3
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.4 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 3
BF Max Depth (ft)0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.7 2.0 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.2 3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.8 3.8 3.8 8.0 11.4 14.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.5 5.8 7.5 3
Width/Depth Ratio 6.1 13.1 21.8 8.0 9.6 15.1 12.0 16.0 14.0 18.0 18.0 21.0 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 2.2 4.3 1.9 7.1 13.0 3.7 9.6 6.9 2.6 3.4 3.9 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.6 2.2 2.8 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
Riffle length (ft)5 16 47 1
Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.0100 0.0207 0.0576 0.0000 0.0297 0.0264 0.0000 0.0252 0.0539 1
Pool length (ft)4.0 13.0 28.0 1
Pool Max depth (ft)1.5 2.3 2.7 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1
Pool spacing (ft)22.0 40.8 81.0 21.9 58.4 29.2 18.0 24.0 48.0 1
Channel Beltwidth (ft)17 26.3 38 21.9 43.8 29.2 22 29 44
Radius of Curvature (ft)9 23.6 113 14.6 72.9 21.9 14 22 73
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)0.8 2.4 10.3 2 10 3 2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)10 65.7 116 43.8 87.5 62 44 62 88
Meander Width ratio 1.5 2.7 4.7 3 6 4 3 4 6
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Table 9b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1 Downstream)
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition (UT 1
Downstream)Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT 1
Downstream)Monitoring Baseline (UT 1 Downstream)
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
Cg 5 Eb 5 E/C 4 E/C-type
14.2 28.8 - 60.6 14.2 14.2
1.26 1.2 - 1.46 1.12 1.12
0.0147 0.0053 - 0.0258 0.0165 0.0195
Dimension MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width (ft)11.8 8.6 13.0 10.3
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)40.0 22.0 NA 40.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6
BF Max Depth (ft)1.2 0.7 1.7 0.9
Low Bank Height 1.2 0.7 1.7 0.9
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)7.5 3.5 8.4 5.8
Width/Depth Ratio 18.6 21.1 NA 18.3
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 2.6 NA 3.9
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)25.4 25.4 6.0 25.4
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Only
Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft)8.6 10.3 11.8 3
Floodprone Width (ft)22 40 40 3
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.4 0.6 0.6 3
BF Max Depth (ft)0.7 0.9 1.2 3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.5 5.8 7.5 3
Width/Depth Ratio 18.0 18.0 21.0 3
Entrenchment Ratio 2.6 3.4 3.9 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
Riffle length (ft)5 16 47 1
Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.0000 0.0252 0.0539 1
Pool length (ft)4.0 13.0 28.0 1
Pool Max depth (ft)1.7 1.7 1.7 1
Pool spacing (ft)18.0 24.0 48.0 1
Channel Beltwidth (ft)22 29 44
Radius of Curvature (ft)14 22 73
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)44 62 88
Meander Width ratio 3 4 6
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
E/C type
1.12
0.0195
Baseline (UT 1 Downstream)MY-1 (UT 1 Downstream)
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
MY-5 (UT 1 Downstream)
Table 10b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
MY-7 (UT 1 Downstream)
Riffle
MY-2 (UT 1 Downstream)MY-3 (UT 1 Downstream)
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
Parameter
Table 10a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Cross Section 1 (UT 1 Downstream)Cross Section 2 (UT 1 Downstream)Cross Section 4 (UT 1 Downstream)
Riffle Riffle
Cross Section 3 (UT 1 Downstream)
Pool
Dimension MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width (ft)11.8 8.9 7.4 6.0
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)40.0 NA NA 23.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.6 1.0 1.6 0.5
BF Max Depth (ft)1.1 2.0 2.5 0.8
Low Bank Height 1.1 2.0 2.5 0.8
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)7.1 9.1 11.7 3.0
Width/Depth Ratio 19.6 NA NA 12.0
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 NA NA 3.8
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)25.4 6.0 6.0 25.4
Dimension MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width (ft)7.0 10.9
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)NA 40.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.3
BF Max Depth (ft)1.3 0.7
Low Bank Height 1.3 0.7
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)4.9 3.5
Width/Depth Ratio NA 33.9
Entrenchment Ratio NA 3.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)6.0 25.4
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Only
Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft)6.0 10.9 11.8 3
Floodprone Width (ft)23 40 40 3
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.3 0.5 0.6 3
BF Max Depth (ft)0.7 0.8 1.1 3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.0 3.5 7.1 3
Width/Depth Ratio 12.0 19.6 33.9 3
Entrenchment Ratio 3.4 3.7 3.8 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.3 3
Riffle length (ft)5 16 47 3
Riffle slope (ft/ft)0.0000 0.0252 0.0539 3
Pool length (ft)4.0 13.0 28.0 3
Pool Max depth (ft)1.3 2.0 2.5 3
Pool spacing (ft)18.0 24.0 48.0 3
Channel Beltwidth (ft)18 24 36
Radius of Curvature (ft)12 18 60
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)36 51 72
Meander Width ratio 3 4 6
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Table 10c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
Parameter
Cross Section 5 (UT 1 Upstream)Cross Section 6 (UT 1 Upstream)Cross Section 7 (UT 1 Upstream)Cross Section 8 (UT 1 Upstream)
Riffle Pool Pool Riffle
Table 10d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Parameter
Cross Section 9 (UT 1 Upstream)Cross Section 10 (UT 1 Upstream)
Major Hill Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 100015
Baseline (UT 1 Upstream)MY-1 (UT 1 Upstream)MY-2 (UT 1 Upstream)MY-3 (UT 1 Upstream)MY-5 (UT 1 Upstream)MY-7 (UT 1 Upstream)
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
E/C type
1.08
0.0195
Pool Riffle

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix E
Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-1 35.874565, -79.359097
Investigator:Axiom Inc
Color %Color %
0-4 10yr 4/3 80 10yr 4/6 20 Silty Clay
4-10 10yr 4/2 90 10yr 4/4 10 Clay
10-24 10yr 4/1 95 10yr 4/6 5 Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: Gauge located near old
channel, area has been
disturbed during construction.
Soil profile has been disturbed.
SOIL BORING LOG
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-2 35.874562, -79.359275
Investigator:Axiom Inc
Color %Color %
0-6 10yr 5/3 70 10yr 5/6 30 Silty Clay
6-8 10yr 5/2 60 10yr 6/6 20 Silty Clay
8-16 10yr 5/2 60 10yr 6/4 5 Silty Clay
16-24 10yr 5/2 85 10yr 6/4 10 Silty Clay some gravel included
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: Soil saturated at ~8"
SOIL BORING LOG
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-3 35.875063, -79.359124
Investigator:Axiom Inc
Color %Color %
0-3 10yr 5/1 70 10yr 5/6 30 Silty Clay
3-8 10yr 5/2 100 Silty Clay
8-14 10yr 5/3 100 5 Silty Clay
14-20 10yr 4/3 95 10yr 6/4 5 Silty Clay/rocky
20+----Rocky
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: Saturated ~10"; Soil
disturbed during construction
SOIL BORING LOG
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-4/4a 35.876569, -79.3560568
Investigator:Axiom
Color %Color %
0-2 10yr 6/2 60 10yr 6/6 40 Silty Clay
2-6 10yr 6/2 95 10yr 6/6 5 Silty Clay
6-14 10yr 6/1 90 10yr 6/3 10 Silty Clay
12-20 6/5GY 80 10yr 5/6 20 Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: In old pond bed, bench
excavated here. Some Fe- at
surface. Saturated at 6"
SOIL BORING LOG
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-5 35.877017, -79.360568
Investigator:Axiom Inc
Color %Color %
0-4 6/5gy 100 Silty Clay
4-12 7.5yr 7/1 60 7.5yr 6/6 40 Silty Clay
12-20 7.5yr 8/2 65 7.5yr 7/6 35 Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: In old pond bed, soil
significantly disturbed during
construction activities
SOIL BORING LOG
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Project/Site:Major Hill
County, State:Alamance, North Carolina
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:GW-6 35.877175, -79.360758
Investigator:Axiom
Color %Color %
0-3 10yr 4/4 70 10yr 4/6 30 Silty Clay
3-8 7.5yr 5/1 100 Silty Clay
8-20 6/5GY 80 10yr 4/6 20 Silty Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number:1233
Signature:
Name/Print:W. Grant Lewis
Matrix Mottling
Depth (inches)Texture
Notes: In old pond bed, soil
significantly disturbed during
construction activities
SOIL BORING LOG

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix F
Preconstruction Benthic Data

Preconstruction Benthic Results
Habitat Assessment Dataforms

AXIOM, MAJOR HILL, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES COLLECTED 4/16/2018.
PAI ID NO 51232 51233
STATION MH-1 MH-2
DATE 4/16/2018 4/16/2018
SPECIES T.V.F.F.G.
PLATYHELMINTHES 2
ANNELIDA
Clitellata
Oligochaeta CG
Tubificida
Enchytraeidae CG 1
Naididae
Naidinae CG
Dero sp.9.8 CG 7
Nais sp.8.7 CG 1
Slavina appendiculata 8.4 CG 1 1
Tubificinae w.h.c.CG 1
Tubificinae w.o.h.c.CG 2
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Copepoda
Cyclopoida
Cyclopidae
Acanthocyclops sp.2
Macrocyclops albidus 5
Isopoda
Asellidae SH
Caecidotea sp.8.4 CG 16 2
Amphipoda CG
Crangonyctidae
Crangonyx sp.7.2 CG 13 3
Insecta
Ephemeroptera
Baetidae CG
Baetis flavistriga 6.8 CG 1
Heptageniidae SC
Maccaffertium modestum 5.7 SC 2
Odonata
Coenagrionidae P
Ischnura sp.9.5 1 10
Libellulidae P
Libellula sp.9.4 P 1
Plathemis lydia 9.8 1
Plecoptera
Nemouridae SH
Amphinemura sp.3.8 SH 1
PAI, Inc.Page 1 of 2 Axiom Major Hill 4 18cl.xlsx
AXIOM, MAJOR HILL, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES COLLECTED 4/16/2018.
PAI ID NO 51232 51233
STATION MH-1 MH-2
DATE 4/16/2018 4/16/2018
SPECIES T.V.F.F.G.
Perlidae P
Perlesta sp.2.9 P 1
Hemiptera
Belostomatidae
Belostoma sp.9.5 P 1
Trichoptera
Hydropsychidae FC
Diplectrona modesta 2.3 FC 4
Philopotamidae FC
Chimarra aterrima 3.3 FC 1
Coleoptera
Elmidae CG
Optioservus sp.2.1 SC 1
Hydrophilidae P
Enochrus sp.8.5 CG 1
Scirtidae SC
Scirtes sp.1 15
Diptera
Chironomidae
Chironomus sp.9.3 CG 19 14
Conchapelopia sp.8.4 P 2
Cricotopus sp.CG 1
Cryptochironomus sp.6.4 P 1
Micropsectra sp.2.4 CG 1
Microtendipes pedellus gp.3.9 CG 1
Parametriocnemus sp.3.9 CG 7
Polypedilum sp.SH 1
Polypedilum flavum 5.7 SH 1
Procladius sp.8.8 P 1 2
Psectrocladius sp.SH 2
Zavrelimyia sp.8.6 P 4 8
Culicidae FC
Anopheles sp.8.6 FC 2
Culex sp.FC 1
Simuliidae FC
Simulium sp.4.9 FC 3
TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS 84 86
TOTAL NO. OF TAXA 22 25
EPT INDEX 5 1
BIOTIC INDEX-ASSIGNED VALUES 7.22 8.50
PAI, Inc.Page 2 of 2 Axiom Major Hill 4 18cl.xlsx
3/06 Revision b
Habitat Assessment Feld Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ ITOTAL SCURE k
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 204 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent
average stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the fern,
select the description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two
descriptions, select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream_ Lh -1 4. P.r{ 0:11 $r. Location/road: Bart* Ct­a lid Name !County .0" le,
Dateq14T CC# 7-:� jcP001 Basin G. t 6e Subbasin Q% - OL- oa{
Observer(s) KO Type of Study: Cl Fish Menthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude Longitude ' *I• V'g?'_Ecoregion: ❑ MT XP ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature I'll . I "C DO — mg/! Conductivity (torr.) JW,7 pS/cm pH _�_- 11
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: 1p %Forest %Residential 10 %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industriial */*Other - Describe:
Watershed land use : )&Forest 16Agriculture ❑Urban 04Anirrial operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream i. p Channel (at top of bank) 1, S Stream Depth: (m) Avg__12,Z, Max O f-
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on). (m) U.
Bank Angle: _:�S ° or ❑ NA (Vertical is 900, horizontal is 0°. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid -channel. < 900
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
J4 Deeply incised -steep, straight banks %Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphytonwth ❑ Heavy Filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge $sewage smell
Marinade Stabilization: ri ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Serm/levee
Flow conditions : ❑High $Normal []Low
Turbidity: ❑Clear Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? )4 YES ❑NO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................
B. Water fills >75% of available channel. or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ ❑
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed ............................................. ❑
D. Root mats out of water ............................... ................................................................... ................ . ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools.......... ........................................... ❑
Weather Conditions: I L4bJ
Photos: ❑N MY (ldDigital 1335mm
Remarks: S}rff � it r,eo-VI ,,. r 'atiI VN f .'fF4L e .
fed -C." kpArrA0.1, q, 'l ti. , Anj J,,-
42
rr
42

t'I (05)
L Cbmwel Modification Score
A. channel natural, frequent bends........................................................................................................ 5
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ...................................................... 4
C. some channelization present...................................................................................................... IT
.
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted...............................................................
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ..................................................... 0
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging=no large woody debris in stream 08anks of uniform shapetheight
Remarks Subtotal 3
11. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If>70% of the
reach is rocks. I type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Marie as Ifc Cgmmon, or Abundant.
Rocks Macrophytes C Sticks and lea"eks _L Snags and logs G Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
Score
>70%
40-70%
20-40%
<20%
3. embeddedness 40-80%.....................................••...................................•........--------...............
Score
Score
SCQM
Score
4 or 5 types present .................
20
16
12
8
3 types present .........................
I9
15
11
7
2 types present .........................
I8
14
2. embeddedness>50%..................................... ...................... ....................................... ..-
b
1 type present ...........................
17
13
3
5
No types present .......................
0
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay ..................... ............ ............................................. .....--...........
XNo woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal
Subtotal /0
11L Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at
riffle for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line' or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 20-40%......................................................................... --•-...........................
12
3. embeddedness 40-80%.....................................••...................................•........--------...............
8
4. embeddedness X80% .......................... ...................... ............................................. ...............
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness 40%...........................................................................................................
14
2. embeddedness 2040% ......................................................• ---.........
11
3. embeddedness 40-80% . ......... ................................ .................................................. ............
6
4, embeddedness X80%............................................................................................................
2
G substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness <50%..........................................................................................................
8
2. embeddedness>50%..................................... ...................... ....................................... ..-
4
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock................................................................................................--
3
2. substrate nearly all sand ............... ........................................................................ .................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus....................................................................................................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay ..................... ............ ............................................. .....--...........
Remarks
Subtotal
W. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present -swrc
1, Pools Frequent (>30% of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes........................•-.................................----------..........-----•----..................... 10
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) ........................................................ 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes....................•-----...-•---.............------.•......................-•----••---...................... 6
b. pools about the some size _........................ ...._............. - ................. -
B. Pools absent .......................... . .
Subtotal Lf
13 Pool bottom boulder -cobble hard 13 Bottom sandy -sink as you walk Silt bottom El Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total
43

-i:�, (t;s)
V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Rife is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and tin, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width ofstream.... I6 �2
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length Is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles absent..... .................................................................................................•---..... 0
Channel Slope: PiTypical for area ❑Steep --fast flow OLow=like a coastal stream Subtotal
Vi. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.. 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
I, diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ..................................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs. vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3, sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3
4, mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow
5, little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ...................................... 0
Total
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Score
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent .....................................................
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .................................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun 1n all but a few areas ....................................................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading......................................................................................................... 0
Subtotal -7
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition_ A
break in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as
paths down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides. etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: ❑ Trees ❑ Shrubs'Grasses ❑ Weeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters.....................................................................................
5
5
2. width 12-18 meters...................................................................................
4
4
3. width 6-12 meters.....................................................•----...............------......
3
3
4. width < 6 meters.....................................................................................
2
2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width> l8 meters.........................................................................
4
Q
b. width 12-18 meters.........................•...........................................
.3
3
c. width 6-12 meters...................................•-----............................
2
2
d. width ¢ 6 meters.........................................................................
1
1
2. breaks common
a- width > 18 meters.....................................................-.................
3
3
b. width 12-18 meters......................................................................
2
2
c. width 6-12 meters .................................. .....................--.............
I
d. width r 6 meters.....................................................................
0
4
Remarks
Total g
Page Total
76
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream.
TOTAL SCORE_ y y
44

Diagram to determine bank angle'
9o°
Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
� J
45°
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
45
This side is 450 bank angle.

3/06 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ IrOTAL SCORE
Directions for use- The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent
average stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form,
select the description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two
descriptions, select an intermediate score. A final habitat ware is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream JT- I h 9,,- 10 &, Locationlroad: ;5 n. 44 Oo.,J- oad Name )County ,w... e
Date Leif CC# iC"1
arA
Basinr Subbasin
Observers) ► T r L Type of Study: ❑ Fish 0enthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude 3S. P170 Longitude - 71• 3S Pbt LI Ecoregion: ❑ MT �(P ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature I4.6 °C DO — mg/I Conductivity (con-.)1SY.1 µS/cm pH G.qy
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: 49' %f=orest %Residential s °/QActive Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %lndustriai %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use: WForest Agriculture ❑Urban A Animal operations upstream
Width; (meters) Stream 1.5 Channel (at top of bank) ? Stream Depth: (m) AvgMax
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest pan of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m)
Bank Angle: 10 0 ' or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90°, horizontal is 0°. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid -channel. < 90°
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
ElDeeply incised -steep, straight banks (]Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton rowth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge 13 Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization: »]V ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-eontrol structure ❑Berm/levee
Flow conditions : ❑High ONormal ❑Low
Turbidity: ❑Clear 4 Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? ❑ YES l;iD Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of bath lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................ Jff
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or 45% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ ❑
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed ............................................. 13
D. Root mats out of water................................................................................................................ ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools... .................................................. ❑
Weather Conditions:
Photos: AN ❑Y ❑ Digital ❑35mm
Remarks;-- ,(w,l .cd6li�rl�ck. tis.
D+ ! C
42

L Channel Modiffeation 59ore
A. channel natural, frequent bends .................................... .......... ..............................--••---•----- .......
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ......................................................
C. some channelization present .................................... ........... ............... -•................ ....... ....................... 3
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted............................................................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ..................................................... 0
i] Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging=no large woody debris in stream ❑Banks of uniform shapelheight
Remarks Subtotal 44
M tmtream Habitat; Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. 1f X70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare. Common. or Abundant.
Rocks Macrophytes G Sticks and leafpacks Snags and logs Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONUATION OR COYER
X70% 40-70% 20-40% <20%
Sore 5 re Scott: Score
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 qo 12 8
3 types present ......................... 19 15 11 7
2 types present...... ................... 18 14 10 6
1 type present........... ................ 17 13 9 5
No types present- ....... __ ........... 0
O No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal 14
Ill. Bottom Substrate (silt sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, buk only look at
riffle for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness 40% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 20-40%..............................................•..........................................................
12
3. embeddedness 40-8O% ....................... .................................................. ..........................
8
4. embeddedness X80%.......................................................................... ....
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddednessG20%............................... ,................................--•---.........................----•---.....
14
2. embeddedness 20-40%., ................... ....................................
11
3. embeddedness 40-80%,.... ....................................
6
4. embeddedness>80%................ ........ ....... ............... ...... .......................................................
2
C. substrate mostly gravel
Lembeddedness<50%................................ ........................... ........................... ...............
8
2. embeddedness >50%............................................................................................................
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock.......................................................... ------...............•-•---............
3
2- substrate nearly all sand ................. ...................------..............................................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus......................................•-•---•...........................••---......................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay ......................................... ....... ............................... I.--.... .........
1
Remarks
Subtotal iz
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water"., small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 200m area surveyed) _
a. variety of pool sizes ................................... ............. ............................................................... 10
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in)............................................................ 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ..................................... .......................................................................... 6
b. pools about the same size............................................................. ......................................... 4
B. Pools absent........................................-•------...................... 0
Subtotal 10
Pool bottom boulder-cobblc=hard'p Bottom sandy -sink as you walk Cl Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total�Z
43

(PS)
V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -cart be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 11 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles a nt................................................................................................................... 0
Channel Slope: Typical for area ❑Steep --fast flow ❑Low=like a coastal stream Subtotal
Vt. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Scare
A. Banks stable �
I . little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for crosion.O7 C9
B. Erosion areas present
1 _ diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ..................................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... S 5
3, sparse mixed vegetations plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grosses, few if any trees and shrubs. high erosion and .failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
S. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ........................................... 0 0
Total
Remarks
Vhf. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent.................. ................................... hl
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .................................. 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ..............
ENo canopy and no shading ............. .................................. ................. .............. I.............................. 0
Subtotal (d
VUL Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A
break in the riparian none is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as
paths down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lit. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: pQ Trees ❑ Shrubs ❑ Grasses ❑ Weeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
. width > I8 meters..............................................-----..................................
2. width 12-18 meters .................... ..............................................................
3. width 6-12 meters....................................................--------------...................
3
3
4. width c 6 meters.. ................................................ ...................................
2
2
H. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters.......................................................... ..............
4
4
b. width 12-18 meters.......................................................................
3
3
c. width 6-12 meters..........................•--.........................................
2
2
d. width <6 meters--.......................................................................
1
I
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters.......................................................................
3
3
b. width 12-18 meters..... . ................................................................
2
2
c. width 6-12 meters.......................................................................
1
I
d. width r 6 meters.................................................................•.......
0
D
Remarks
ry
Total b
Page Total
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream.
TOTAL SCORE—
ME

Supplement far Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine batik angle:
90° 45°
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
135°
fivical Strcam Cross-section
L.Oreme High Maier T
Norma I Flu-
wti.� I
Upper Baoi.
LStreafn Mridd This side is 451 bank angle -
:1r. s.►. �'.�_ .tet
45

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix G
As-built Plan Sheets

0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
PROJECT ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/990
00
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_01.dgnjharveyCONTRACT:Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Prepared in the Office of:
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
Not to Scale
VICINITY MAP
50
50
10
50
50
10
100
100
25
25
5 5
Raleigh, NC 27603
218 Snow Ave
Axiom Environmental
GRANT LEWIS
PROJECT DESIGNER
WORTH CREECH
Raleigh, NC 27604
Suite 211
1101 Haynes St.
Restoration Systems
SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Designed By:
SITE
NONRIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)STREAM (linear footage)RESTORATION LEVEL
RESTORATION
ENHANCEMENT
TOTALS
MITIGATION UNITS
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
UT3
UT1
JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E.
UT2
PSH 04
DATE:
TOTAL STREAM LENGTH= 5301 LF
STA 0+00
START -UT1-
STA 27+96
END -UT1-
STA 0+00
START -UT3-
STA 0+00
START -UT2-MAJOR HILL SITEMAJOR HILL SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3.5 ACRES
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION: Whitehead Dr.SR 2453Burnett Church RdSR 2349UT1
STA 2+07
END -UT2-
STA 22+98
END -UT3-

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT1= 2796 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT3= 2298 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT2= 207 LF Justice TrlSelby DrPointer Dr
-
-
-
- NONRIPARIAN WMUs
3563
3058 SMUs
MAJOR HILL SITE
AS-BUILT PLANS
LONGITUDE -79.360906 (WGS84)
LATITUDE 35.873206
RFP# 16-006990
NC DMS CONTRACT# 7193
01-BC & 01-BD
SPO FILE NUMBERS 01-BA, 01-BB,
DMS PROJECT ID NO. 10015
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
PSH 05
PSH 06
PSH 07 PSH 08
PSH 09 PSH 10PSH 1112PSH
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
assumed elevations.
coordinates are based on NC Grid 'NAO '83(2011) and all elevations are
2015; that the survey was completed on December 5, 2018; and all
the Class B standard, and that the original data was obtained in December,
survey to the accuracy of Class B and vertical accuracy when applicable to
was performed to meet the requirements for a topographic/planimetric
to meet Federal Geographic Data Committee Standards; that this survey
that this As-built survey was performed at the 95 percent confidence level
and responsible charge from an actual survey made under my supervision;
, certify that this project was completed under my directJohn A. RudolphI,
I certify that this plat does not meet G.S. 47-30 as amended.
exception to the definition of subdivision.
recombination of existing parcels, a court-ordered survey, or other
I certify that the survey is of another category (as-built survey), such as the
or any other features above, or below ground other than those shown.
wetlands, hazardous material sites, underground or aboveground utilities
Surveyor's disclaimer: No attempt was made to locate any cemeteries ,
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION(S)
MARCH 11, 2019
1738 0.54
0.44
0.76 RIPARIAN WMUs
0.985301Talt
o
n
Tr
Rd
Alson
White RdBurnettChurch Rd
Whitehead Dr.
1003
2350
2348
2349
1003
2453
Chapel
Burnetts
2351
2351
2351
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
3/14/2019
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_01A.dgnjharveyALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
Existing Metal Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Guardrail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
h
Existing Control of Access
C
F
Existing Easement Line
HYDROLOGY:
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
;zvW
K
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
Proposed Cable Guiderail
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Paved Ditch Gutter
UTILITIES:
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
P
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Existing Telephone Pole
R
}Tp
Q
H-Frame Pole O O
POWER:
TELEPHONE:
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
4
I
H
a
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter n
c
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
d
o
A/G Water
Above Ground Gas Line
A/G Gas
Above Ground Water Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/G Sanitary Sewer
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole O
F
S
3
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
?
CONC
CONC WW vvDrainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Storm Sewer
Storm Sewer Manhole m
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Monument
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
g
F
123
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Area Outline
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Church
School
Dam
Sign
Small Mine
Well
V
M
WW
S
x
Foundation
S
Building
y
y
VEGETATION:
Single Tree X
Y
Vineyard
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard
FLOW
*S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
WLB
EIP BECM
CONC HW
CB
Cemetery
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
Parcel / Sequence Number
E
AATUR
End of Information E.O.I.
Abandoned According to Utility Records
WLB
EAB
EPB
R
W
R
W
R
W
C
A
E
TDE
PDE
PUE
S
P
P
W
W
G
G
SS
FSS
FSS
?UTL
Jurisdictional Stream JS
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
BZ 1
BZ 2
Wetland
TUE
DUE
AUE
CRProposed Curb Ramp
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
Geoenvironmental Boring
C
A
HPBExisting Historic Property Boundary
U/G Power Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
P
U/G Water Line LOS B (S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS C (S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS D (S.U.E*)
W
U/G Gas Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
G
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
FSS
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
Note: Not to Scale
UST
Primary Horiz Control Point
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
Vertical Benchmark
New Right of Way Line
Concrete or Granite R/W Marker
New Right of Way Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
New Control of Access Line with
New Control of Access
New Temporary Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
New Permanent Utility Easement
New Temporary Utility Easement
New Aerial Utility Easement
Computed Property Corner
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap
#
XS-10R
#
Stream Gauge
AS-BUILT:
Groundwater Gauge
CVS Plots
Cross Section
Origin Point on CVS Plots
1
New Conservation Easement
Adjusted Stream Structure
Not Constructed
Benthic & Water Quality Station
SYMBOLOGY 01A
Riffle Rip Rap
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PC Sta. 0+00.00PT Sta. 0+02.12PC Sta. 0+14.49PT Sta. 0+18.14PC Sta. 0+32.22PT Sta. 0+43.39PC Sta. 0+54.76PT Sta. 0+65.85PC Sta. 0+75.01PT Sta. 0+85.97PC Sta. 0+97.63PT Sta. 1+05.96PC Sta. 1+18.42PT Sta. 1+22.76PC Sta. 1+36.38PT Sta. 1+43.14PC Sta. 1+54.31PT Sta. 1+62.95PC Sta. 1+75.67PT Sta. 1+82.16PC Sta. 1+94.05PT Sta. 2+00.09PC Sta. 2+13.94PT Sta. 2+17.87PC Sta. 2+31.47PT Sta. 2+41.19PC Sta. 2+52.18PT Sta. 2+66.48PC Sta. 2+82.50PT Sta. 2+90.75PC Sta. 3+04.47PT Sta. 3+12.06PC Sta. 3+24.52PT Sta. 3+35.17PC Sta. 3+47.77PT Sta. 3+55.06PC Sta. 3+75.27PT Sta. 3+81.89PC Sta. 3+95.86PT Sta. 4+08.45PC Sta. 4+23.69PT Sta. 4+34.14PC Sta. 4+46.70PT Sta. 4+57.22PC Sta. 4+69.53PT Sta. 4+75.54PC Sta. 4+87.80PT Sta. 4+93.76PC Sta. 5+04.82PT Sta. 5+12.47PC Sta. 5+24.39PT Sta. 5+32.98PC Sta. 5+43.85PT St
a.

5+47.63PC Sta. 5+57.89PT Sta. 5+63.87PC St
a. 5+75.50PT St
a. 5+84.88PC Sta. 5+96.97PT Sta. 6+00.06PC St
a. 6+10.95PT St
a. 6+15.13PC Sta. 6+26.53PT Sta. 6+39.61PC St
a.

6+53.97PT St
a.

6+69.08DATE:
PI Sta 0+01.06
D
L = 2.12'
T = 1.06'
R = 17.00'
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
C-12
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
C-18
C-19
C-20
C-21
C-22
C-23
C-24
C-25
C-26
C-27
C-28
C-29
PI Sta 0+16.33
D
L = 3.65'
T = 1.84'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 0+38.01
D
L = 11.17'
T = 5.80'
R = 17.00'
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
C-12
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
C-18 C-19
C-20
C-21
C-22
C-23
C-24
C-25
C-26
C-27
C-28
C-29
C-30
C-31
C-32
C-33
C-30
C-31
C-32
C-33
C-34
C-35
PT Sta. 6+91.26PC Sta. 6+81.66PC Sta. 7+04.05PT Sta.

7+13.27-CURVE DATA- UT 1
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03.dgnjharveyPI Sta 0+60.74
D
L = 11.08'
T = 5.97'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 0+80.79
D
L = 10.96'
T = 5.78'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 1+01.92
D
L = 8.33'
T = 4.29'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 1+20.60
D
L = 4.34'
T = 2.19'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 1+39.83
D
L = 6.76'
T = 3.45'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 1+58.83
D
L = 8.64'
T = 4.52'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 1+78.97
D
L = 6.48'
T = 3.30'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 1+97.12
D
L = 6.05'
T = 3.07'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 2+15.92
D
L = 3.93'
T = 1.98'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 2+36.54
D
L = 9.72'
T = 5.06'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 2+60.03
D
L = 14.30'
T = 7.85'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 2+86.79
D
L = 8.25'
T = 4.30'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 3+08.40
D
L = 7.60'
T = 3.93'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 3+30.22
D
L = 10.66'
T = 5.71'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 3+51.50
D
L = 7.28'
T = 3.73'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 3+78.67
D
L = 6.61'
T = 3.39'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 4+02.62
D
L = 12.59'
T = 6.76'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 4+29.17
D
L = 10.45'
T = 5.48'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 4+52.32
D
L = 10.52'
T = 5.63'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 4+72.60
D
L = 6.01'
T = 3.07'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 4+90.84
D
L = 5.96'
T = 3.04'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+08.78
D
L = 7.65'
T = 3.96'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+28.88
D
L = 8.60'
T = 4.49'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+45.75
D
L = 3.78'
T = 1.91'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+60.95
D
L = 5.99'
T = 3.06'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+98.53
D
L = 3.09'
T = 1.55'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 5+60.95
D
L = 5.99'
T = 3.06'
R = 12.00'
C-34
C-35
PI Sta 6+13.06
D
L = 4.18'
T = 2.11'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 6+33.59
D
L = 13.08'
T = 7.06'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 6+62.36
D
L = 15.12'
T = 8.39'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 6+86.73
D
L = 9.60'
T = 5.07'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 7+08.83
D
L = 9.22'
T = 4.78'
R = 14.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 1
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3A
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03A.dgnjharveyC-36C-36
C-37
PC Sta. 7+22.26PT Sta. 7+24.80PC Sta. 7+43.30PT Sta. 7+58.59PC Sta. 7+71.88PT Sta. 7+77.34PC Sta. 7+89.54PT Sta. 8+02.22PC Sta. 8+13.54PT Sta. 8+25.41PC Sta. 8+33.98PT Sta. 8+40.22PC Sta. 8+53.03PT Sta. 8+61.97PC Sta. 8+71.14PT Sta. 8+79.97PC Sta. 8+89.51PT Sta. 8+94.61PC Sta. 9+05.32PT Sta. 9+09.99PC Sta. 9+20.76PT Sta. 9+32.29PC Sta. 9+48.43PT Sta. 9+70.15PC Sta. 9+92.83PT Sta. 10+13.26PC Sta. 10+27.04PT Sta. 10+33.65PC Sta. 10+50.24PT Sta. 10+63.19PC Sta. 10+75.76PT Sta. 10+83.23PC Sta. 10+97.05PT Sta. 11+09.80PC Sta. 11+25.70PT Sta. 11+35.30PC Sta. 11+49.43PT Sta. 11+62.05PC Sta. 11+80.19PT Sta. 11+95.13PC Sta. 12+08.55PT Sta. 12+17.08PC Sta. 12+35.14PT Sta. 12+47.28PC Sta. 12+59.40PT Sta. 12+65.34PC Sta. 12+79.21PT Sta. 12+97.29PC Sta. 13+20.30PT Sta. 13+39.15PC Sta. 13+53.88PT Sta. 13+60.04PC Sta. 13+81.68PT Sta. 14+04.49PC Sta. 14+21.31PT Sta. 14+27.16PC Sta. 14+44.96PT Sta. 14+57.59PC Sta. 14+74.13PT Sta. 14+85.85PC Sta. 15+04.59PT Sta. 15+13.94PC Sta. 15+31.58PT Sta. 15+54.56PC Sta. 15+82.51PT Sta. 15+86.66PC Sta. 15+98.39PT Sta. 16+00.71PC Sta. 16+14.03PT Sta. 16+17.44C-37
C-38
C-39
C-40
C-41
C-42
C-43
C-44
C-45
C-46
C-47
C-48
C-49
C-50
C-51
C-52
C-53
C-54
C-55
C-56
C-57
C-58
C-59
C-60
C-61
C-62
C-63
C-64
C-65
C-66
C-67
C-68
C-69
C-70
C-38
C-39 C-40C-41
C-42
C-43 C-44C-45C-46
C-47
C-48
C-49
C-50
C-51
C-52
C-53
C-54
C-55
C-56
C-57
C-58
C-59
C-60
C-61
C-62
C-63
C-64
C-65
C-66
C-67
C-69
C-68
C-70
PI Sta 7+23.53
D
L = 2.55'
T = 1.28'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 7+51.51
D
L = 15.29'
T = 8.20'
R = 17.00'
PI Sta 7+74.65
D
L = 5.45'
T = 2.76'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 7+96.54
D
L = 12.68'
T = 7.01'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 8+20.01
D
L = 11.87'
T = 6.47'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 8+37.17
D
L = 6.25'
T = 3.20'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 8+57.66
D
L = 8.93'
T = 4.63'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 8+75.77
D
L = 8.84'
T = 4.63'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 8+92.09
D
L = 5.10'
T = 2.58'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 9+07.68
D
L = 4.67'
T = 2.37'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 9+26.88
D
L = 11.53'
T = 6.12'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 9+62.16
D
L = 21.73'
T = 13.74'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 10+05.35
D
L = 20.43'
T = 12.52'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 10+30.40
D
L = 6.61'
T = 3.37'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 10+57.42
D
L = 12.95'
T = 7.19'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 10+79.62
D
L = 7.47'
T = 3.86'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 11+03.90
D
L = 12.74'
T = 6.85'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 11+30.78
D
L = 9.61'
T = 5.08'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 11+56.21
D
L = 12.62'
T = 6.77'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 11+88.46
D
L = 14.94'
T = 8.27'
R = 14.00'
PI Sta 12+12.93
D
L = 8.53'
T = 4.38'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 12+62.41
D
L = 5.94'
T = 3.01'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 12+89.53
D
L = 18.08'
T = 10.32'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 13+30.69
D
L = 18.85'
T = 10.39'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 13+57.00
D
L = 6.16'
T = 3.13'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 14+24.26
D
L = 5.85'
T = 2.95'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 14+51.68
D
L = 12.63'
T = 6.72'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 14+80.21
D
L = 11.71'
T = 6.07'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 15+84.60
D
L = 4.15'
T = 2.09'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 15+99.55
D
L = 2.31'
T = 1.16'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 16+15.74
D
L = 3.40'
T = 1.71'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 12+41.56
D
L = 12.13'
T = 6.42'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 13+94.90
D
L = 22.82'
T = 13.23'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 15+09.37
D
L = 9.34'
T = 4.78'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 15+44.93
D
L = 22.98'
T = 13.35'
R = 18.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 1
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3B
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03B.dgnjharveyDocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 1
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3C
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03C.dgnjharveyC-71
C-71
PC Sta. 16+34.29PT Sta. 16+41.78PC Sta. 16+60.87PT Sta. 16+68.20PC Sta. 16+91.69PT Sta. 17+02.65PC Sta. 17+08.84PT Sta. 17+18.16PC Sta. 17+31.28PT Sta. 17+36.13PC Sta. 17+50.71PT Sta. 17+54.30PC Sta. 17+93.30PT Sta. 18+00.20PC Sta. 18+21.87PT Sta. 18+28.25PC St
a. 18+46.91PT St
a. 18+53.61PC St
a. 18+68.89PT St
a. 18+77.80PC Sta. 18+86.27PT Sta. 19+00.36PC St
a. 19+12.07PT St
a. 19+26.23PC Sta. 19+32.66PT Sta. 19+38.02PC Sta. 19+69.81PT Sta. 19+82.77PC Sta. 19+90.67PT Sta. 20+10.39PC Sta. 20+27.07PT Sta. 20+41.57PC Sta. 20+45.46PT Sta. 20+58.41PC Sta. 20+77.07PT Sta. 20+92.39PC Sta. 21+11.58PT Sta. 21+20.16PC Sta. 21+53.39PT Sta. 21+61.96PC Sta. 22+06.21PT Sta. 22+11.13PC Sta. 22+18.36PT Sta. 22+25.26PC Sta. 22+49.13PT Sta. 22+66.39PC Sta. 22+97.72PT Sta. 23+07.21PC Sta. 23+30.14PT Sta. 23+37.95PC Sta. 23+74.18PT Sta. 23+95.20PC Sta. 24+16.74PT Sta. 24+24.03PC Sta. 24+60.56PT Sta. 24+67.54PC Sta. 25+01.74PT Sta. 25+09.79PC Sta. 25+18.33PT Sta. 25+20.78PC Sta. 25+35.58PT Sta. 25+43.28PC Sta. 25+56.71PT Sta. 25+59.54PC Sta. 25+79.71PT Sta. 25+94.30PC Sta. 26+19.61PT Sta. 26+27.95PC Sta. 26+54.82PT Sta. 27+44.65POT Sta. 27+95.71C-72
C-73
C-74
C-75
C-76
C-77
C-78
C-79
C-80
C-81
C-82
C-83
C-84
C-85
C-86
C-87
C-88
C-89
C-90
C-91
C-92
C-93
C-94
C-95
C-96
C-97
C-98
C-99
C-100
C-101
C-102
C-103
C-72
C-73
C-74
C-75
C-76 C-77
C-78
C-79
C-80
C-81
C-82
C-83 C-84
C-85
C-86
C-87
C-88
C-89
C-90
C-91 C-92
C-93
C-94
C-95
C-96
C-97 C-98
C-99
C-100
C-101
C-102
C-103
C-104
C-105
C-104
C-105
PI Sta 16+38.07
D
L = 7.49'
T = 3.78'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 16+64.57
D
L = 7.33'
T = 3.70'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 16+97.42
D
L = 10.96'
T = 5.74'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 17+13.80
D
L = 9.32'
T = 4.96'
R = 11.00'
PI Sta 17+33.73
D
L = 4.85'
T = 2.45'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 17+52.51
D
L = 3.59'
T = 1.80'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 17+96.81
D
L = 6.90'
T = 3.51'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 18+25.11
D
L = 6.38'
T = 3.24'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 18+50.32
D
L = 6.69'
T = 3.40'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 18+73.48
D
L = 8.90'
T = 4.59'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 18+94.03
D
L = 14.10'
T = 7.77'
R = 13.50'
PI Sta 19+20.32
D
L = 14.15'
T = 8.25'
R = 11.00'
PI Sta 19+35.39
D
L = 5.35'
T = 2.73'
R = 11.00'
PI Sta 19+76.72
D
L = 12.96'
T = 6.91'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 20+02.76
D
L = 19.73'
T = 12.10'
R = 13.50'
PI Sta 20+34.94
D
L = 14.50'
T = 7.87'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 20+52.80
D
L = 12.94'
T = 7.34'
R = 11.00'
PI Sta 20+85.47
D
L = 15.32'
T = 8.40'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 21+15.99
D
L = 8.57'
T = 4.41'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 21+57.80
D
L = 8.56'
T = 4.40'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 22+08.69
D
L = 4.92'
T = 2.48'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 22+21.87
D
L = 6.90'
T = 3.51'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 22+58.85
D
L = 17.26'
T = 9.73'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 23+02.63
D
L = 9.49'
T = 4.91'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 23+34.14
D
L = 7.81'
T = 4.00'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 23+85.57
D
L = 21.01'
T = 11.39'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 24+20.42
D
L = 7.29'
T = 3.68'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 24+64.08
D
L = 6.98'
T = 3.52'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 25+05.87
D
L = 8.05'
T = 4.13'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 25+19.56
D
L = 2.46'
T = 1.23'
R = 11.00'
PI Sta 25+39.56
D
L = 7.70'
T = 3.99'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 25+58.13
D
L = 2.84'
T = 1.42'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 26+23.89
D
L = 8.34'
T = 4.28'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 27+16.61
D
L = 89.84'
T = 61.79'
R = 51.00'
PI Sta 25+87.64
D
L = 14.60'
T = 7.93'
R = 15.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 1
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3D
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03D.dgnjharveyDocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 2
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3E
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03E.dgnjharveyC-1
C-2
POT Sta. 0+00.00PC Sta. 0+08.87PT Sta. 0+14.24PC Sta. 0+27.52PT Sta. 0+41.76PC Sta. 0+51.84PT Sta. 0+55.25PC Sta. 0+63.15PT Sta. 0+80.66PC St
a. 0+89.26PT St
a. 1+02.13PC St
a. 1+12.12PT St
a. 1+25.70PC Sta. 1+33.53PT Sta. 1+35.40PC St
a. 1+52.67PT St
a.
1
+5
7.
7
2PC Sta. 1+67.22PT Sta. 1+76.65P
C
St
a.
1
+
8
5.
6
6
P
T
Sta. 1
+
8
9.13PC Sta. 2+00.48PT Sta. 2+07.19C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
PI Sta 0+11.66
D
L = 5.37'
T = 2.79'
R = 8.00'
PI Sta 0+35.61
D
L = 14.25'
T = 8.10'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 0+53.58
D
L = 3.41'
T = 1.73'
R = 8.00'
PI Sta 0+78.66
D
L = 17.51'
T = 15.51'
R = 8.00'
PI Sta 0+96.12
D
L = 12.87'
T = 6.86'
R = 15.00'
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
PI Sta 1+19.74
D
L = 13.57'
T = 7.62'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 1+34.47
D
L = 1.87'
T = 0.94'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 1+55.23
D
L = 5.04'
T = 2.56'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 1+72.20
D
L = 9.44'
T = 4.98'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 1+87.41
D
L = 3.47'
T = 1.75'
R = 12.00'
PI Sta 2+03.89
D
L = 6.71'
T = 3.41'
R = 15.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 3
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3F
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03F.dgnjharveyC-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
POT Sta. 0+00.00PC Sta. 0+02.77PT Sta. 0+13.01PC Sta. 0+51.87PT Sta. 0+60.57PC Sta. 0+77.35PT Sta. 0+87.32PC Sta. 1+00.82PT Sta. 1+12.64PC St
a.

1+35.69PT St
a.

1+58.01PC Sta. 1+66.12PT Sta. 1+76.54PC Sta. 2+13.67PT Sta. 2+23.93PC Sta. 2+53.29PT Sta. 2+63.61PC Sta. 3+02.25PT Sta. 3+27.21PC Sta. 3+42.12PT Sta. 3+57.90PC Sta. 3+72.43PT Sta. 3+78.42PC Sta. 3+90.42PT Sta. 4+04.65PT Sta. 4+28.78
PC St
a.

4+55.29PT St
a
. 4+69.50PC Sta. 4+87.09
PT Sta. 5+08.21
PC St a . 5+42.48PC Sta. 6+23.53PT Sta. 6+41.03P
C
Sta. 6
+
7
5.9
3
P
T
Sta. 7
+
1
0.0
9PC Sta. 7+68.20PT Sta. 7+88.10PT Sta. 5+46.83
PC Sta. 4+15.19
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
C-9
C-10
C-11
C-12
C-
1
3 C-14
C-
1
5
C-16
C-17
C-18
C-19
PI Sta 0+08.07
D
L = 10.24'
T = 5.30'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 0+56.33
D
L = 8.70'
T = 4.46'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 0+82.50
D
L = 9.97'
T = 5.15'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 1+07.02
D
L = 11.83'
T = 6.20'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 1+49.10
D
L = 22.33'
T = 13.41'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 1+71.52
D
L = 10.41'
T = 5.40'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 2+18.99
D
L = 10.26'
T = 5.31'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 2+58.64
D
L = 10.31'
T = 5.34'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 3+18.08
D
L = 24.97'
T = 15.84'
R = 16.00'
PI Sta 3+54.21
D
L = 15.78'
T = 12.09'
R = 8.00'
PI Sta 3+75.57
D
L = 5.99'
T = 3.14'
R = 8.00'
C-12
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
C-18
C-19
PI Sta 4+00.29
D
L = 14.23'
T = 9.87'
R = 8.00'
PI Sta 4+22.26
D
L = 13.59'
T = 7.07'
R = 20.00'
PI Sta 4+62.79
D
L = 14.20'
T = 7.49'
R = 18.00'
PI Sta 4+98.75
D
L = 21.12'
T = 11.67'
R = 20.00'
PI Sta 5+44.66
D
L = 4.35'
T = 2.18'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 6+32.77
D
L = 17.50'
T = 9.24'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 6+93.56
D
L = 34.15'
T = 17.63'
R = 56.00'
PI Sta 7+78.25
D
L = 19.90'
T = 10.06'
R = 56.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 3
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3G
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03G.dgnjharveyC-20
C-21
C-25
C-26
C-27
C-28
C-30
C-31
PC Sta. 8+79.44PT Sta. 8+87.00PC Sta. 9+42.96PT Sta. 9+76.89PC Sta. 10+31.72PT Sta. 10+45.33P
C
Sta. 10
+
6
4.5
6
P
T
Sta. 10
+
9
5.8
1PC Sta. 11+19.84PT Sta. 11+53.59PC Sta. 11+90.00PT Sta. 12+08.97PC Sta.

12+41.02PT Sta. 12+88.57PC Sta. 13+13.33PT Sta. 13+30.85PC Sta. 13+54.17PT Sta. 13+76.97PC Sta. 13+94.24PT Sta. 14+30.52PC St
a. 14+92.33PT St
a. 15+08.14PC Sta. 15+48.88PT Sta. 15+65.84C-22
C-23
C-24
C-20
C-21
C-22
C-23
C-24
C-25
C-26
C-27
C-28
C-29
C-29
C-30
C-31
PI Sta 8+83.23
D
L = 7.55'
T = 3.78'
R = 56.00'
PI Sta 9+64.34
D
L = 33.93'
T = 21.38'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 10+38.75
D
L = 13.61'
T = 7.03'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 10+83.48
D
L = 31.25'
T = 18.92'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 11+37.25
D
L = 33.75'
T = 17.40'
R = 56.00'
PI Sta 11+99.84
D
L = 18.97'
T = 9.84'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 12+72.08
D
L = 47.54'
T = 31.06'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 13+22.37
D
L = 17.52'
T = 9.04'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 13+66.71
D
L = 22.79'
T = 12.54'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 14+18.03
D
L = 36.28'
T = 23.79'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 15+00.44
D
L = 15.81'
T = 8.11'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 15+57.43
D
L = 16.96'
T = 8.55'
R = 56.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SHEET NUMBER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DATE:
-CURVE DATA- UT 3
ALAMANCE
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
PROJECT NAME:MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SHEET NAME
COUNTY:DATE:2018
3H
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_03H.dgnjharveyC-32
C-33
C-37
C-38
C-39
C-40
C-34
C-35
C-36 C-41
PC Sta. 16+29.25PT Sta. 16+71.33PC Sta. 17+13.99PT Sta. 17+27.32PC Sta. 17+63.04PT Sta. 17+85.51PC Sta. 18+09.48PT Sta. 18+39.08PC Sta. 18+56.05PT Sta. 19+09.55P
C
Sta. 1
9
+
3
8.2
8
P
T
Sta. 19
+
4
7.9
0PC Sta. 20+59.86PT Sta. 20+74.88P
C
Sta. 2
0
+
97.3
5
P
T
Sta. 21+
15.00PC Sta. 21+50.83PT Sta. 21+62.46P
C St
a.
2
2
+1
8.
8
3PT St
a. 22+63.11POT Sta. 22+98.38
C-32
C-33 C-34
C-35
C-36
C-37
C-38
C-39 C-40
C-41
PI Sta 16+51.34
D
L = 42.07'
T = 22.08'
R = 56.00'
PI Sta 17+20.77
D
L = 13.33'
T = 6.79'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 17+74.43
D
L = 22.46'
T = 11.39'
R = 56.00'
PI Sta 18+27.01
D
L = 29.61'
T = 17.53'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 18+94.32
D
L = 53.50'
T = 38.28'
R = 29.00'
PI Sta 19+43.17
D
L = 9.62'
T = 4.89'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 20+67.68
D
L = 15.02'
T = 7.82'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 21+06.68
D
L = 17.65'
T = 9.33'
R = 22.00'
PI Sta 21+56.96
D
L = 11.63'
T = 6.12'
R = 15.00'
PI Sta 22+53.57
D
L = 44.28'
T = 34.74'
R = 22.00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
00 +50 AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
4
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
550
545
540
535
530
[phone]+50 +50 +50 +50
540
545
535
530
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_04.dgnjharveyAT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
THALWEG
PROP
06+50
550

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE STA 6+50 -UT1-
UT 1
SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE STA 6+50 -UT1-REMOVE STRUCTURE
REMOVE PIPE
ELEV= 546.29
STA 0+00
BEGIN RESTORATION
-UT 1-
AS-BUILT STRUCTURES
GROUP, P.A. ON 9-19-2018.
DATA PROVIDED BY K2 DESIGN
ELEVATIONS BASED ON SURVEY
STRUCTURE LOCATION AND
AT THE TAIL OF RIFFLE/ HEAD OF POOL.
THESE STRUCTURES WERE FIELD ADJUSTED AND CONSTRUCTED
SHOWED SEVERAL STRUCTURES AT THE HEAD OF A RIFFLE.
CONSTRUCTION PLANS DATED 07-23-2018 INCORRECTLY 532533534534535535536537538539539539540540540
540
540540540541541541
541541542542542
542
542542
543543543543
543543543544544544544
544
544544
544544544
545545545545545545 545
545
545
545
545
545545
546546546546
546
546547547547547
547
547
548548548
548 548549549549
549 549549549549550550550550550
550 550
550 550
550
550
550551551551
551
551
5
5
2
552
552 552552552553553553
553
553 553554554554554
554
554
554555555555555
555
555
555
555
556556556
556
5
5
6
557557557
558558
558
559559
560560560560
561
562
562563
563564564
5645645
6
4
564564565 565
565
565565566567567568
568S
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
TINNIN, ANDREW M
DEED PG 0756
DEED BK 2514
TINNIN, ANDREW M
DEED PG 0756
DEED BK 2514
12" PVC OUTLET
12" HDPE
EIP 0+00 -UT1-1+00 -UT1-2+00 -UT1-3+00 -UT1-4+00 -UT1-5+00 -UT1-6+00 -UT1-ELEV=546.29
STA 0+00 -UT1-
RESTORATION
-UT1- BEGIN
STRUCTURE
REMOVE DRAINAGE
REMOVE PIPE
678XS-9PXS-10R654DUE TO BEDROCK CONTACT
NOT CONSTRUCTED
LOG CROSS VANE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET
4MATCHLINE STA
6
+5
0
-UT1-
SEE SHEET 613+00 -UT1-MATCHLINE STA
AS-BUILT STRUCTURES 5
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_05.dgnjharvey13+50
540
535
530
525
520SEE SHEET 6MATCHLINE STA 13+00 -UT 1-[phone]+50 +50 +50 +50
530
535
525
520
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
THALWEG
PROP
12+50
540
UT 1
SEE SHEET 4MATCHLINE STA 6+50 -UT 1-525
520
UT 2
00 +50 01 02+50 +25
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
THALWEG
PROP
ELEV= 520.43
STA 2+07 -UT2-
-UT2- END RESTORATION
ELEV= 522.86
STA 0+00 -UT2-
ENHANCEMENT II
-UT2- BEGIN
ELEV= 520.43
STA 12+08 -UT1-
STA 2+07 -UT2-
-UT2- END RESTORATION
ELEV= 520.72
STA 1+68 -UT2-
BEGIN RESTORATION
-UT2- END ENHANCEMENT II
GROUP, P.A. ON 9-19-2018.
DATA PROVIDED BY K2 DESIGN
ELEVATIONS BASED ON SURVEY
STRUCTURE LOCATION AND
TAIL OF RIFFLE/ HEAD OF POOL.
FIELD ADJUSTED AND CONSTRUCTED AT THE
THE HEAD OF A RIFFLE. THESE STRUCTURES WERE
INCORRECTLY SHOWED SEVERAL STRUCTURES AT
CONSTRUCTION PLANS DATED 07-23-2018
517
517
518519520
520521
521521
522522
522522
523 523523
524 524524524
524
524524
525525
525
5255255255255
2
5
525525525
526
526526526
5
2
6
526
526527527527
527527527527
527
528
528528
5285285
2
8
528
528528 528 529
529529529529 5295
3
0
530
530
530
530530530530530530531
531
531531531 532532532
532532532
532
532
533
533
533
533533534534
534534534
535535535535
535 535536536
536537537537
538538
539
539540540
540
541543544
546
TINNIN, ANDREW M
DEED PG 0756
DEED BK 2514
ISS CAP 3
EIP
ISS CAP 26+00 -UT1-7+00 -UT1-8+00 -UT1-9+00 -UT1-10+00 -UT1-11+00 -UT1-12+00 -UT1-0+00 -UT2-1+00 -UT2-2+00 -UT2-
ELEV= 520.72
STA 1+68 -UT2-
BEGIN RESTORATION
-UT2- END ENHANCEMENT II
ELEV= 520.33
STA 12+08 -UT1-
STA 2+07 -UT2-
-UT2- END RESTORATION
ELEV= 522.86
STA 0+00 -UT2-
ENHANCEMENT II
-UT2- BEGIN
REMOVE PI
PE3
4
5 XS-3PXS-4RXS-5RXS-6PXS-8R
XS-7PDocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET 513+00 -UT1-
MATCHLINE STA
SEE SHEET 7MATCHLI
NE STA 19+50
-UT1-
AS-BUILT STRUCTURES 6
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_06.dgnjharvey19 +50
520
515
510
505
500SEE SHEET 7MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT 1-[phone]+50 +50 +50 +50
510
515
505
500
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
THALWEG
PROP
18+50
520
UT 1
SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE STA 13+00 -UT 1-ELEV= 511.16
STA 16+99 -UT1-
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II
-UT1- END RESTORATION
GROUP, P.A. ON 9-19-2018.
DATA PROVIDED BY K2 DESIGN
ELEVATIONS BASED ON SURVEY
STRUCTURE LOCATION AND
CONSTRUCTED AT THE TAIL OF RIFFLE/ HEAD OF POOL.
THESE STRUCTURES WERE FIELD ADJUSTED AND
SHOWED SEVERAL STRUCTURES AT THE HEAD OF A RIFFLE.
CONSTRUCTION PLANS DATED 07-23-2018 INCORRECTLY
505
506 507507508509
5 10
510510510511
511512
512513
513513513514
514514514
514514515515
515
515515
515515515515515515516
516
516
516516516516516516517
517517517517
517517517517518518518518
518518518519
519
519
519519519520
520
52052
0520520520
520520520520520521
521521
521521521522
522
522
522522522522523523523523
523
523 5235235245245245
2
4
524
524
525525525525525
525525
525 525525526526526526526
527527
5
2
7
527528528528528 5295
2
9529
529530530530530530530
530
531531
531
531531532
533
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
ENTERPRISES, LLC
WILLIARD
DEED PG 0270
DEED BK 3143
14+00 -UT1-15+00 -UT1-16+00 -UT1-17+00 -UT1-18+00 -UT1-19+00 -UT1-20+00 -UT1-ELEV= 511.16
STA 16+99 -UT1-
BEGIN ENCHANCEMENT II
-UT1- END RESTORATION12XS-1RXS-2R3211DUE TO BEDROCK CONTACT
NOT CONSTRUCTED
DROP STRUCTURE
DUE TO BEDROCK CONTACT
NOT CONSTRUCTED
LOG CROSS VANE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET 6MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT1-S E E S HE E T 8
26+00 -UT 1-MAT C HL INE S T AAS-BUILT STRUCTURES 7
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_07.dgnjharvey25 +50
505
500
495
490
485SEE SHEET 8MATCHLINE STA 26+00 -UT 1-[phone]+50 +50 +50 +50
495
500
490
485
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
24+50
505
UT 1
SEE SHEET 6MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT 1-484484
484484485
486486
486486487487487487488
488488488488488489
489489490490
490490490490490491
491491491491491491492492
492492492
492
493
493
493493 494494
494494495
495495
495
495495495495495496
496
496
4964964
9
7497
497
497497497497497498
498
498498498498498499
499
499499499499500500
500
500500
500
500500500500500500501
501
501501501501501501502502502
502
502
5
0
2
503
503503
503503504504
504
504504504504504505
505505
505
505
505
505505505505505506
506
506506506506507
507
507
507
507507507507508508508508 5085085085085085
0
9
509
509509509509510510510
510
510
510510510510510511
511511511511511511512
512
512512512513
513
513513514
514
514514515515
515515515515515515516516
516516516517
517517517518
518518518519
5195195195195 2 0
520520
5205205205205
21
5215215215225
2
2
5225225225235235
2
3
523
524524524524524525525525525525
525
525525526526527528529ENTERPRISES, LLC
WILLIARD
DEED PG 0270
DEED BK 3143
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
D
EED PG 0896D
EED BK 2789AN
D CA
RO
L LLAM
M, JA
M
ES D20+00 -UT1-21+00 -UT1-22+00 -UT1-23+00 -UT1-24+00 -UT1-25+00 -UT1-2DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET 726+00 -UT1-MATCHLINE STAAS-BUILT STRUCTURES 8
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_08.dgnjharvey22 +50
495
490
485
480
475
[phone]+50 +50
485
490
480
475
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
495
UT 1
SEE SHEET 7MATCHLINE STA 26+00 -UT 1-495
490
485
480
475
UT 3
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
ELEV= 478.78
STA 27+35 -UT1-
STA 22+98 -UT3-
-UT3- END ENHANCEMENT II
ELEV= 478.20
STA 27+96 -UT1-
END ENHANCEMENT II
-UT1-SEE SHEET 12MATCHLINE STA 21+50 -UT 3-ELEV= 478.78
STA 27+35 -UT1-
STA 22+98 -UT3-
-UT3- END ENHANCEMENT II
+50
SEE SHEET 12
MATCHLINE STA 21+50 -UT3-
477
477478
4
7
8
478478479 479479480480
480480480480480480480480480 480480481481481481
4
8
1 481481481482482482482
482482482482482482483483483483
483
4834834 8 4
484
484484484484484484484485485485485485485 485485
485485485485486
486486486486487
487
4874874874874884884884884 8 9
489489490490
490490490490491
4914914914 92
492492492493
493494
494494495495
495495496
496497
4974
9
84
9
8 4984984 9 9
499500500
5005005
0
1
501501502502502503505505 507507508508508ENTERPRISES, LLC
WILLIARD
DEED PG 0270
DEED BK 3143
DEED PG 749
DEED BK 690
AND MARY A
NOBLIT, GEORGE W
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0920
DEED BK 3150
AND MARY E
RICE, JOSEPH M
EIP
EIP
EIP
EX ROCK EX ROCK
27+00 -UT1--UT3-22+00STA 27+35 -UT1-
STA 22+98 -UT3-
END ENHANCEMENT II
-UT3-
STA 27+96 -UT1-
-UT1- END ENHANCEMENT II
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET
1
0MATCHLINE STA
6
+5
0
-UT3
-
AS-BUILT STRUCTURES 9
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_09.dgnjharvey03 +50
515
510
505
500
495
[phone]+50 +50
505
510
500
495
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
515
UT 3
06 +50+5005+50 SEE SHEET 10MATCHLINE STA 6+50 -UT3-STA 0+00
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II
-UT3-499500
500501
501501501501
501501501501501502502502
502502502502502502 502502503503
503503503503503503503503504504504504
504 504504504504504504504504504505505505505505505
505505505505505505505505505505505505505505505505505505506506
506506506506506506506
506506506 506506506506506506506 506506506506506507
507
507507507507507 5075075075075075075075075075 0 8 508508508508508
508508
508508508508508508508508509
509
509
509509 509509509509509509509509509509509509509509509510510510510510510510510
510
5
10 510
510
510510
510510510510510 510510510510511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511511512
512
512
512512
512512512512512512512512512512513513513513513
513513513513513513513513513514
514
514
514514514514514514 515
515
515
515
515
515515515515515515515515515515516516
516516516517517517517517517517517518
5185185185185185195195195205205205215215
2
1
521522522522523523523524525526526528DEED PG 0105
DEED BK 3158
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
EASEMENT
EX 20' ACCESS
EASEMENT
EX 20' DRAINAGE
CAVINESS, ROBERT W
DEED PG 0716
DEED BK 3572
AND WELDON L
JENKINS, BETHANY L 0+00 -UT3-1+00 -UT3-2+00 -UT3-3+00 -UT3-4+00 -UT3-
5+00 -UT3-6+00 -UT3-STA 0+00 -UT3-
ENHANCEMENT II
-UT3- BEGIN
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJSEE SHEET 1113+00 -UT3-MATCHLINE STASEE SHEET 9MATCHLINE STA 6+50 -UT3-AS-BUILT STRUCTURES 10
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_10.dgnjharvey09 +50
510
505
500
495
490
[phone]+50 +50
500
505
495
490
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
510
UT 3
12 +50+5011+50 SEE SHEET 11MATCHLINE STA 13+00 -UT3-SEE SHEET 9MATCHLINE STA 13+00 -UT 3-495495495
495
495
495 496496496496
496
496
497
497497497497 497
497
497
497497
497497
497
497
497
498
498
498 498498498
498
498
498
498498498
498
498
498
498498498498
499
499
4
9
9
499499499499499
499499499499
499
499
499
499499
499
499 499
499
499
499499
499
499
499
499
499499
499
499
499
499
499
499 499
499
499499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499
499499
499
499
499
499
499499
500
500
500
500500500
500500
5
0
0
5
0
0
500500500500500500500500
500
500
500
500
500500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
501
501
501501
501501501501501
501
501
501
5
0
1
501
501
501
501501
501
501
501
501501
501
501
501
501
501
501501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
502
5025025025025
0
2
502502
502
503
503503503503503503503
504
504
504
504504504504
504
504
504
504
504
504 504
505
505505505505
505
505505505505505505505
505 505
505
506
506
5
0
6
506506506506507
507
507
507507507507
507
507
508508508508508
508 508
508508508
508
508
508
509
509
509
509509509509509
509
510510510510510510510
510
510
510
510510
511
511
5
11
511511511511512512
512512512512
513
513513513513513513
513
514
514514514514514515
515515515515515515515515
515
515
515515
515516
516516516516
516
516
516
517517517517517
517
517517
518518518519519519
519
519520520521521
522523524525525526CAVINESS, ROBERT W
DEED PG 0716
DEED BK 3572
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
EASEMENT
EX 20' DRAINAGE
EIP
7+00 -UT3-8+00 -UT3-9+00 -U T3-10+00 -UT3-11+00 -UT3-12+00 -UT3-DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
S
E
E
S
HE
E
T
12MATCHLINE
S
T
A
19
+
5
0 -UT
3-
S EE S HEET 10
13 +0 0 -UT3 -MATCHLIN E S TAAS-BUILT STRUCTURES 11
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_11.dgnjharvey16 +50
500
495
490
485
480
[phone]+50 +50
490
495
485
480
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
500
UT 3
19 +50+5018+50 SEE SHEET 12MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT3-SEE SHEET 10MATCHLINE STA 13+00 -UT 3-BURY 1.0'
2@60" CMP
PERMANENT CROSSING 485485485485
485 486486486486486
486 487487
487487
487
487
487
488488
488488488
488
488
488488488
489489
489
489489489489 489
489
489
489
489
490
490
490
490490490490490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
491491
491491491491
491
491491491491491
491
492
492
492492492492
492
492
492
493
493
493
493493493493
493
493493493
493
493
494494
494
494494494494494
494
494
495
495495
495
4 9 5
4
9
5495
495495495495495495495
495
495
495
495
496496
496496
496496496497497
497
497497497497
497
497
497
497
498
4
9
8498
498498498498498
498498
499
499
499
499499499499499
499
499
500
500500500
500
500
500500500500500500500500 501501
501
501501501501
502
502
502
502502502502503503
503
503503503503
503
503
503
504504
504
504
504504504504505
505
505
505505505
505505505505505505505505505
505
506506
506
506506506506
507
507
507
507
507507507507
508508 508
508
508
508
508
508
508508508
508 508508
508
508
508
508 5095095
0
9
509509509509509509509
510510510510
510510510 510510510
510510
510
510
510
511
511511512
512512512
512
512
513
513513513 513513513513
514
514514514
515
515515515516
516
516
517
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
AND MARY E
RICE, JOSEPH M
DEED PG 0920
DEED BK 3150
14+00 -UT3-15+00 -UT3-16+00 -UT3-17+00 -UT3-18+00 -UT3-19+00 -UT3-DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
AIN
HT
OR LR
O
CA
ROFESSION
26971
GE
NREINE
SEALPNAL
NOTLAD .G
AUHS
OJ
SEE SHEET 11MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT3-SEE SHEET 8MATCHLINE STA 21+50 -UT3-AS-BUILT STRUCTURES 12
ALAMANCE
SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAME
PROJECT NAME:
COUNTY:DATE:2018
DATE:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
TEL [phone]
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
MAJOR HILL STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
3/14/2019Major Hill_Hyd_AB_PSH_12.dgnjharvey20 +50
495
490
485
480
475
+50 21
485
490
480
475
AT PROP THALWEG
EXST GROUND
495
UT 3
+50 SEE SHEET 8MATCHLINE STA 21+50 -UT3-SEE SHEET 11MATCHLINE STA 19+50 -UT 3-481481482482483
483484
484485485485
485 485486
486486486486487
487487487488
488489
489490
490
490490491
491492
492
492492493493493494
495
495
495495496
496497497498
498498499
499499499500
500
500500500501
501502
502503
503504504504505
505505505506507
507507508509511DEED PG 0920DEED BK 3150AND MARY E
RICE, JOSEPH M
DEED PG 0920
DEED BK 3150
AND CAROL L
LAMM, JAMES D
DEED PG 0896
DEED BK 2789
20+00 -UT3-21+00 -UT3--
U
T
3-
22
+
00
DocuSign Envelope ID: 57AB4840-5904-4DBD-B50F-B29DC0807CF3
3/14/2019
PLANTING SCHEDULE
ALL PLANTS WERE PLANTED
BY 12/31/18
Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Major Hill Restoration Site
Species
Piedmont/Low
Mountain
Alluvial Forest
Dry-Mesic
Oak/Hickory
Forest
Marsh
Treatment
Wetland
sseemblambla a
Assemblage
Ass
Total
Alnus serrulate
5
20
25
Asimina triloba
200
200
Betula nigra
100
200
300
Carpinus carohniana
600
600
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
5
20
25
Cercis conadensis
500
500
Cornus amomum
95
5
800
900
Diospyros virginiana
450
450
Fraxinus americana
100
100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
150
750
900
Linodendron tuhpifera
75
75
Nyssa sylvatic
600
600
Platanus occidentalis
120
780
900
Quercus nigra
110
790
500
1,400
Quercus phellos
100
700
400
1,200
Salix nigra*
400*
400
Sambucus canadensis
11
14
25
TOTALS
750
3,740
26
4,084
8,600
*Live stakes of Salts nigra were planted; all other planted species were planted as bare root plants.
(PLANTING SCHEDULE PROVIDED BY
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL)
/
�\OoNE s o0��'�
SEAL
L-4194
o
SURgi-_ oe;
�/'/ SHL EY RSO `�\\
AS -BUILT
PLANTING PLAN
0 150 300 600
I" = 300'
BUILT TOB - TOB
TION EASEMENT LINE
:ATMENT AREA
RY FOREST - 239,349 SQ. FT.
LOW MOUNTAIN
CREST - 46,501 SQ. FT.
�E
3E - 50,960 SQ. FT.

Project NameMajor Hill - As-built (2018) ProfileReachUT 1 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)FeatureProfileDate9/19/18CrewPerkinson, RadeckiStationBed ElevationWater ElevationStationBed ElevationWater ElevationStationBed ElevationWater ElevationStationBed ElevationWater Elevation0.0513.35513.5515.1514.20514.3229.5514.53514.5831.0513.82514.5633.8513.77514.5735.9514.21514.5641.6514.31514.6242.8514.20514.6049.7514.29514.6352.2514.47514.7461.1514.71514.8762.2514.27514.8765.2514.28514.8566.8514.57514.8280.5514.73515.0093.5514.87515.1596.9514.49515.17108.5513.95515.16115.7513.87515.18118.0514.92515.18134.6515.25515.44As-built136.4514.46515.440.0195139.4514.60515.4416143.9515.19515.550.0252163.6515.99516.1013164.5515.78516.11166.1515.35516.10169.3515.43516.10173.1516.08516.21187.3516.30516.63191.4515.63516.62199.6515.65516.63203.8515.68516.63207.3516.31516.63221.2516.71516.79241.4516.78517.10247.7515.86517.09255.0515.75517.09260.7515.95517.09269.4516.72517.09291.4517.18517.51293.7516.69517.53297.2516.52517.53299.4517.88517.95314.9517.78517.98318.1517.50517.99326.7517.40517.99332.6518.01518.16352.9518.43518.61358.7517.65518.63365.6517.54518.62377.1518.10518.60378.6519.04519.04392.4518.82519.11404.7518.96519.18410.5518.35519.21415.5518.48519.22419.3519.11519.31434.7519.67519.98439.3518.83519.96447.7518.63519.97448.8520.37520.37459.1520.32520.70462.1520.52520.82465.6519.72520.78473.2520.02520.75As neededAs neededAs neededAvg. Water Surface SlopeRiffle LengthAvg. Riffle SlopeAs neededPool Length2018As-built Survey5125145165185205225245265285305325340 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000Elevation (feet - arbitrary)Distance (feet)Major Hill, UT 1 (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)As-built Profile 2018"Bed As-built 9/19/18""Water Surface As-built 9/19/18"2
Project NameMajor Hill - As-built (2018) ProfileReachUT 1 (Sta 10+00 to 17+00)FeatureProfileDate9/19/18CrewPerkinson, RadeckiStation Bed ElevationWater ElevationStation Bed ElevationWater ElevationStation Bed ElevationWater ElevationStation Bed ElevationWater Elevation990.8531.12531.161005.5530.92531.401007.8530.39531.401013.6530.29531.391017.7531.59531.631030.3531.63532.061031.3531.20532.071036.7531.04532.051041.0531.72532.191053.8532.24532.591067.2532.69532.881069.1532.32532.881072.4531.87532.891075.4533.37533.391087.9533.38533.501089.1532.68533.491092.0532.71533.481094.4533.17533.511106.9533.73534.181108.5532.88534.171112.7533.08534.16As-built1115.2533.93534.160.01951126.5534.33534.56161137.9534.59534.790.02521139.5533.87534.84131142.9534.12534.841145.9534.61534.831157.0535.08535.271159.1534.43535.291165.2534.49535.291168.4535.17535.291178.9535.51535.651180.5535.00535.671183.2534.98535.671185.0535.48535.681197.3535.67536.021199.2535.22536.031202.2535.29536.031204.9535.96536.011216.2536.25536.401218.6535.84536.411225.2535.65536.401228.8536.32536.471238.5536.51536.821240.7535.96536.771245.5535.91536.801250.1536.71536.811265.9537.06537.451267.5536.66537.421273.9536.74537.421279.3537.22537.431299.8537.65537.831319.1537.97538.201321.2537.52538.311324.4537.63538.221327.5538.10538.271339.8538.48538.751341.9538.08538.741351.1538.20538.781353.8538.49538.801364.6538.69539.001366.6538.38539.011369.8538.28539.021373.4538.72539.011386.4539.22539.551387.9539.16539.562018As-built Survey As needed As needed As neededAs neededAvg. Water Surface SlopeRiffle LengthAvg. Riffle SlopePool Length5285305325345365385405425445465481000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700Elevation (feet - arbitrary)Distance (feet)Major Hill, UT 1 (Sta 10+00 to 17+00)As-built Profile 2018"Bed As-built 9/19/18""Water Surface As-built 9/19/18"3
MAJOR HILL - ASBUILT (2018) PROFILE STATIONS - UT1
9/19/18
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
0.0 513.35 513.55 297.2 516.52 517.53 582.1 522.18 522.62 863.6 527.60 527.84
15.1 514.20 514.32 299.4 517.88 517.95 594.2 522.70 522.96 868.6 527.00 527.83
29.5 514.53 514.58 314.9 517.78 517.98 597.3 522.13 522.99 872.5 526.81 527.86
31.0 513.82 514.56 318.1 517.50 517.99 604.0 522.19 522.98 874.7 526.95 527.84
33.8 513.77 514.57 326.7 517.40 517.99 607.8 522.85 523.18 878.9 527.65 527.94
35.9 514.21 514.56 332.6 518.01 518.16 625.6 523.30 523.64 886.9 528.03 528.20
41.6 514.31 514.62 352.9 518.43 518.61 628.8 522.80 523.63 890.4 527.45 528.18
42.8 514.20 514.60 358.7 517.65 518.63 635.8 522.81 523.63 892.8 527.22 528.17
49.7 514.29 514.63 365.6 517.54 518.62 639.1 523.36 523.68 895.8 528.08 528.18
52.2 514.47 514.74 377.1 518.10 518.60 648.4 523.54 523.91 910.7 528.17 528.55
61.1 514.71 514.87 378.6 519.04 519.04 655.8 522.93 523.88 916.7 527.43 528.52
62.2 514.27 514.87 392.4 518.82 519.11 662.0 522.55 523.92 925.0 527.35 528.56
65.2 514.28 514.85 404.7 518.96 519.18 667.4 522.71 523.91 926.9 528.97 529.01
66.8 514.57 514.82 410.5 518.35 519.21 671.0 524.10 524.13 939.9 528.81 529.09
80.5 514.73 515.00 415.5 518.48 519.22 691.1 524.57 524.67 941.7 528.22 529.10
93.5 514.87 515.15 419.3 519.11 519.31 698.8 523.58 524.64 945.7 527.91 529.10
96.9 514.49 515.17 434.7 519.67 519.98 707.5 523.47 524.66 947.1 529.53 529.59
108.5 513.95 515.16 439.3 518.83 519.96 712.2 524.28 524.92 957.8 529.52 529.82
115.7 513.87 515.18 447.7 518.63 519.97 729.9 524.92 524.99 959.6 529.21 529.83
118.0 514.92 515.18 448.8 520.37 520.37 732.0 524.31 525.02 965.8 529.22 529.87
134.6 515.25 515.44 459.1 520.32 520.70 738.2 524.22 525.02 967.5 530.27 530.29
136.4 514.46 515.44 462.1 520.52 520.82 743.2 524.09 525.00 977.5 530.01 530.39
139.4 514.60 515.44 465.6 519.72 520.78 746.0 525.32 525.34 981.5 529.41 530.42
143.9 515.19 515.55 473.2 520.02 520.75 763.3 525.26 525.49 989.8 529.24 530.40
163.6 515.99 516.10 477.0 520.69 520.84 769.9 525.67 525.83 990.8 531.12 531.16
164.5 515.78 516.11 491.2 520.98 521.30 771.3 525.08 525.87 1005.5 530.92 531.40
166.1 515.35 516.10 493.4 520.56 521.30 773.7 525.67 525.96 1007.8 530.39 531.40
169.3 515.43 516.10 499.8 520.69 521.34 785.6 526.11 526.31 1013.6 530.29 531.39
173.1 516.08 516.21 508.8 520.97 521.48 788.2 525.27 526.30 1017.7 531.59 531.63
187.3 516.30 516.63 510.0 521.78 521.82 793.6 525.40 526.30 1030.3 531.63 532.06
191.4 515.63 516.62 515.4 521.04 521.84 795.3 526.32 526.36 1031.3 531.20 532.07
199.6 515.65 516.63 522.5 520.91 521.84 802.9 526.17 526.39 1036.7 531.04 532.05
203.8 515.68 516.63 529.2 520.82 521.82 807.5 525.34 526.38 1041.0 531.72 532.19
207.3 516.31 516.63 532.2 521.61 521.95 813.3 526.61 526.62 1053.8 532.24 532.59
221.2 516.71 516.79 542.5 522.06 522.28 818.2 526.48 526.67 1067.2 532.69 532.88
241.4 516.78 517.10 547.8 521.51 522.30 820.4 525.81 526.69 1069.1 532.32 532.88
247.7 515.86 517.09 555.5 521.47 522.27 824.7 525.97 526.68 1072.4 531.87 532.89
255.0 515.75 517.09 560.8 521.55 522.29 830.7 527.15 527.19 1075.4 533.37 533.39
260.7 515.95 517.09 563.2 522.00 522.29 840.1 527.31 527.54 1087.9 533.38 533.50
269.4 516.72 517.09 571.5 522.14 522.45 842.6 526.36 527.56 1089.1 532.68 533.49
291.4 517.18 517.51 573.9 521.75 522.47 849.1 526.34 527.57 1092.0 532.71 533.48
293.7 516.69 517.53 580.6 521.96 522.46 854.6 527.46 527.60 1094.4 533.17 533.51
2018
As-built Survey
2018
As-built Survey
2018
As-built Survey
2018
As-built Survey
4
MAJOR HILL - ASBUILT (2018) PROFILE STATIONS - UT1
9/19/18
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1106.9 533.73 534.18 1364.6 538.69 539.00 1638.8 544.59 545.63
1108.5 532.88 534.17 1366.6 538.38 539.01 1643.4 544.71 545.65
1112.7 533.08 534.16 1369.8 538.28 539.02 1646.7 545.44 545.66
1115.2 533.93 534.16 1373.4 538.72 539.01 1673.7 546.13 546.54
1126.5 534.33 534.56 1386.4 539.22 539.55
1137.9 534.59 534.79 1387.9 539.16 539.56
1139.5 533.87 534.84 1393.2 539.05 539.57
1142.9 534.12 534.84 1396.1 539.24 539.60
1145.9 534.61 534.83 1410.1 539.72 539.96
1157.0 535.08 535.27 1411.6 539.38 539.98
1159.1 534.43 535.29 1417.2 539.50 540.00
1165.2 534.49 535.29 1420.7 539.83 540.01
1168.4 535.17 535.29 1439.6 540.39 540.64
1178.9 535.51 535.65 1442.1 539.82 540.63
1180.5 535.00 535.67 1446.0 539.54 540.65
1183.2 534.98 535.67 1452.9 540.00 540.64
1185.0 535.48 535.68 1460.8 540.38 540.64
1197.3 535.67 536.02 1473.7 541.00 541.47
1199.2 535.22 536.03 1483.5 541.44 541.81
1202.2 535.29 536.03 1486.5 540.97 541.83
1204.9 535.96 536.01 1490.3 541.07 541.83
1216.2 536.25 536.40 1493.9 541.69 541.96
1218.6 535.84 536.41 1504.4 541.99 542.20
1225.2 535.65 536.40 1512.7 542.26 542.43
1228.8 536.32 536.47 1514.9 541.84 542.42
1238.5 536.51 536.82 1519.5 541.70 542.42
1240.7 535.96 536.77 1522.8 542.19 542.44
1245.5 535.91 536.80 1544.5 542.79 542.86
1250.1 536.71 536.81 1569.7 543.26 543.45
1265.9 537.06 537.45 1574.3 542.77 543.47
1267.5 536.66 537.42 1580.5 542.47 543.46
1273.9 536.74 537.42 1581.3 543.85 543.89
1279.3 537.22 537.43 1594.0 543.75 544.31
1299.8 537.65 537.83 1596.5 543.58 544.28
1319.1 537.97 538.20 1604.2 543.32 544.26
1321.2 537.52 538.31 1605.2 544.78 544.80
1324.4 537.63 538.22 1609.6 544.44 544.79
1327.5 538.10 538.27 1612.6 544.01 544.79
1339.8 538.48 538.75 1615.2 544.01 544.77
1341.9 538.08 538.74 1617.5 544.63 545.00
1351.1 538.20 538.78 1624.5 545.12 545.31
1353.8 538.49 538.80 1635.8 545.16 545.68
2018
As-built Survey
2018
As-built Survey
2018
As-built Survey
5
Project NameMajor Hill - As-built (2018) ProfileReachUT 2FeatureProfileDate9/19/18CrewPerkinson, RadeckiStation Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation0.0520.8521.14.7519.8521.112.6520.0521.117.0520.7521.128.0520.9521.1As-built0.0011NANA17Avg. Water Surface SlopePool LengthRiffle LengthAvg. Riffle Slope2018As neededAs-built SurveyAs neededAs neededAs needed520520520520520521521521521051015202530Elevation (feet - arbitrary)Distance (feet)Major Hill, UT 2, As-built Profile 2018"Bed As-built 9/19/18""Water Surface As-built 9/19/18"6
Station Elevation0.0 516.88516.83.2 516.767.55.5 516.7911.87.7 516.83518.08.6 516.7640.09.4 516.451.29.9 516.301.210.5 516.000.611.3 515.6518.612.2 515.643.413.2 515.571.013.6 515.7414.0 515.79C/E14.6 515.8915.4 515.8216.6 516.1217.8 516.4419.1 516.5821.3 516.8523.0 516.9924.5 517.0526.0 517.3Stream TypeFlood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:Low Bank Height:SUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:FeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 1, Riffle5155165175185190102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 1, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/187
Station Elevation0.0 518.12517.22.1 517.863.54.2 517.588.66.1 517.44517.97.5 517.2522.08.9 517.120.79.9 516.880.710.4 516.750.411.1 516.7621.111.7 516.552.612.6 516.611.013.6 516.5414.5 516.65C/E15.5 516.8416.7 517.2017.9 517.3419.9 517.4322.1 517.6924.2 517.80SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 2, RiffleFeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5165175185190102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 2, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/188
Station Elevation0.0 520.9520.22.2 520.68.44.3 520.413.05.6 520.3NA6.8 519.8NA7.6 519.21.78.5 518.71.79.2 518.40.69.8 518.6NA10.2 518.6NA10.8 518.81.011.4 519.112.2 519.6C/E13.1 519.715.4 519.916.8 520.018.8 520.220.0 520.322.1 520.3Major HillCape Fear, 0303002UT 1, XS - 3, PoolSiteWatershed:XS IDFeatureBankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Date:Field Crew:PoolW / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:Bankfull Elevation:SUMMARY DATALow Bank Height:Stream TypeMean Depth at Bankfull:9/19/2018Perkinson, RadeckiBankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:5185195205215220 102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 3, PoolBankfullMY-00 9/19/189
Station Elevation0.0 520.94520.52.6 521.175.84.8 520.8910.36.3 520.35521.47.2 520.1740.07.9 520.140.98.4 519.670.99.5 519.690.610.1 519.7618.311.0 519.753.912.0 519.781.012.7 519.8613.5 519.78C/E14.5 520.0915.4 520.3916.2 520.5817.6 520.5718.9 520.6020.9 520.5422.2 520.66SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 4, RiffleFeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5195205215220102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 4, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/1810
Station Elevation0.0 525.23524.42.4 524.817.14.7 524.4711.85.8 524.41525.56.5 524.0440.07.4 523.731.18.0 523.411.18.7 523.320.69.7 523.3319.610.5 523.403.411.2 523.531.012.4 523.8013.1 523.74C/E14.1 523.9115.9 524.2318.1 524.4519.9 524.53SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 5, RiffleFeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5235245255260102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 5, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/1811
Station Elevation0.0 525.9524.81.7 525.69.13.4 525.58.94.6 525.4NA5.9 525.0NA6.8 524.72.07.6 524.22.08.1 522.91.09.2 522.8NA9.8 522.8NA10.5 522.81.011.2 523.111.6 523.8C/E12.6 523.913.6 524.415.1 524.616.8 525.018.7 525.021.6 524.9SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 6, PoolFeaturePoolDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5225235245255265270 102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 6, PoolBankfullMY-00 9/19/1812
Station Elevation0.0 529.8529.52.1 529.911.74.7 529.97.46.7 529.8NA8.3 529.0NA8.8 528.12.59.6 527.42.510.7 527.01.611.4 527.0NA12.2 527.0NA12.7 527.31.013.1 527.013.5 528.7C/E14.1 529.315.0 529.716.4 529.518.4 529.719.8 530.021.7 530.3SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 7, PoolFeaturePoolDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5265275285295305310 102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 7, PoolBankfullMY-00 9/19/1813
Station Elevation0.0 530.31529.62.4 530.173.05.3 529.876.07.7 529.59530.48.7 529.0623.09.4 529.240.89.8 528.860.810.6 528.810.511.2 528.9112.011.7 528.803.812.3 528.951.013.0 529.3813.7 529.61C/E15.3 530.1116.9 530.3118.6 530.3320.7 530.1322.2 530.30SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 8, RiffleFeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5285295305310102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 8, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/1814
Station Elevation0.0 539.4539.22.9 539.34.94.9 539.57.06.3 539.2NA7.6 538.8NA8.3 538.51.38.9 538.41.39.6 538.00.710.2 537.9NA10.7 538.0NA11.4 538.41.012.1 538.612.5 538.8C/E13.2 539.213.7 539.414.5 539.416.2 539.219.0 539.220.5 539.4SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 9, PoolFeaturePoolDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5375385395400 102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 9, PoolBankfullMY-00 9/19/1815
Station Elevation0.0 541.29541.02.4 541.203.56.2 541.1410.97.2 540.91541.78.0 540.6040.08.5 540.350.79.1 540.300.710.0 540.330.310.5 540.4633.911.3 540.503.712.0 540.551.012.7 540.6113.2 540.80C/E14.2 540.7615.7 540.7117.9 540.9619.1 541.0220.4 541.05SiteMajor HillWatershed:Cape Fear, 0303002XS IDUT 1, XS - 10, RiffleFeatureRiffleDate:9/19/2018Field Crew:Perkinson, RadeckiSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Stream TypeLow Bank Height:Flood Prone Width:Max Depth at Bankfull:Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio:5405415420102030Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Major Hill, UT 1, XS - 10, RiffleBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY-00 9/19/1816

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Appendix H.
Riparian Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report

RIPARIAN BUFFER ASBUILT BASELINE REPORT
MAJOR HILL MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina

DMS Project ID No. 100015
Full Delivery Contract No. 7193
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01472
DWR No. 17-0921
RFP No. 16-006990

Cape Fear River Basin – Haw River Arm
Cataloging Unit 03030002

Prepared for:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

March 2019

This project with conforms with theNorth Carolina consolidated buffer mitigation rule 15A NCAC 02B
.0295, effective November 1, 2015 and the Jordan Lake Buffer Protection Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0267 &
15A NCAC 02B .0268)
Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: Table of Contents page i
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table of Contents
1.0 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY .............................................................................. 2
2.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................... 3
3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, & PRESERVATION PLAN ........... 4
3.1 RIPARIAN AREA RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ................................................................... 3
3.2 RIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT VIA CATTLE EXCLUSION ACTIVITIES ...................... 5
3.3 RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................. 6
3.4 MARSH TREATMENT AREA ............................................................................................ 6
4.0 ANNUAL MONITORING .................................................................................................... 6
4.1 MONITORING ......................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .................................................................................................. 7
4.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... 7
4.4 MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................... 7
5.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 9
Tables
Table 1. Buffer Project Attributes .................................................................................................. 2
Table 2. Buffer Project Areas and Assets ...................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation ............................................................................. 5
Table 4. Riparian Buffer Monitoring ............................................................................................. 6
Table 5. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals ................................................................................... 7
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species ...................................................................................... 8
Attachments
Attachment 1
Figure A. Riparian Buffer Asset Map
Figure B. Riparian Buffer Planting Map
Attachment 2
Riparian Buffer Sealed Survey

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 2
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
1.0 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY
The Major Hill Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the “Site”)
encompasses 16.7 acres along warm water, unnamed tributaries to Pine Hill Branch. The Site is
located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of Snow Camp and 6 miles north of Silk Hope in
southern Alamance County near the Chatham County line. Project attributes are included in the
following table.

Table 1. Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name Major Hill
Hydrologic Unit Code 3030002050050
River Basin Cape Fear
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) 35.873206, -79.360906
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG) (2789, 896), (2514, 756), (3143, 270), (3150, 920)
Total Credits (BMU) 402,837
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer Restoration, Enhancement, & Preservation
Mitigation Plan Date Apr-18
Initial Planting Date Dec 2018-Jan 2019
Baseline Report Date Mar-19
MY1 Report Date
MY2 Report Date
MY3 Report Date
MY4 Report Date
MY5 Report Date

The Site drainage area is primarily composed of pasture, forest, agriculture land, and sparse
residential property. Impervious surfaces account for less than five percent of the upstream land
surface.

Prior to construction, Site land use consisted of pasture, hayfields, disturbed forest, and agricultural
land used for livestock grazing and hay production. Livestock had unrestricted access to Site
streams, and stream banks were eroded vertically and laterally and received extensive sediment
and nutrient inputs. Riparian zones in the upper reaches of UT 1 were primarily composed of
herbaceous vegetation that was sparse and disturbed due to livestock grazing, bush hogging, and
regular land-management activities. The downstream reaches of UT 1 and all of UT 3 were
primarily wooded with livestock disturbance to stream channels. UT 2 was the lone tributary not
subject to continuous, unrestricted livestock access. Riparian areas immediately adjacent to UT 2
were forested with a fence to protect this area from livestock access.

The riparian areas were restored in concurrence with the Major Hill Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site (NC DMS Project ID 10015, SAW-2017-01472) and involved restoring riparian
buffers adjacent to restored streams to help reduce non-point source contaminant discharges to
downstream waters in the Haw River sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. All riparian areas were
assessed by DWR (Katie Merritt and Sue Homewood) during an onsite visit February 20th, 2018
to determine viability for buffer mitigation.

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 3
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

The Site is protected with a permanent conservation easement. Riparian restoration, enhancement,
and preservation area widths adjacent to restored streams extend out to a maximum of 200 feet
from the top of stream banks with a minimum width of 50 from the top of banks. Riparian buffer
enhancement and preservation credits generated on this Site are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o). No riparian restoration areas that are less than 20 feet wide from Top of Banks are
used to generate riparian buffer credit.

Riparian buffer mitigation credit was not generated in areas that are generating wetland mitigation
credit.

2.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Credit determination for this Site follows the North Carolina consolidated buffer mitigation rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective November 1, 2015 (see Table 2 on the following page and Figure
A, Attachment 1).

3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, & PRESERVATION PLAN
This Site was also proposed as a stream and wetland mitigation project; therefore, restoration of
riparian areas was accomplished through the goals and methods outlined by the Major Hill Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Plan. All applicable federal, state, and local documentation, permits,
and/or authorizations were acquired as part of implementing the above-mentioned mitigation plan.

Primary goals focused on 1) improving water quality, 2) enhancing flood attenuation and
hydrology, 3) improving aquatic resources, and 4) restoring riparian habitat. Completed mitigation
provides floodplain connectivity, floodplain resistance, stream stability, sediment transport,
surface and subsurface storage and retention, in-stream habitat, riparian habitat and structure,
thermal regulation, floodplain biogeochemical processing, and pollutant filtration as well as
remove sources of pollutants. The riparian area will be restored through the revegetation of native
plant communities.
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
3.1.1 Site Preparation
Soil grading occurred during stream restoration activities. Topsoils were stockpiled during
construction activities and spread on the soil surface once critical subgrade was established. The
replaced topsoil will serve as a viable growing medium for community restoration to provide
nutrients and aid in the survival of planted species.

Farm Pond Removal
To complete the stream and wetland restoration activities and subsequent riparian buffer
restoration, the removal of a small farm pond, ~0.58 acres occurred. Stream, wetland and riparian
area restoration within the abandoned pond included 1) notching the dam to dewater; 2) removal
of the dam to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain; 3) excavating sediment that is unsuitable for
channel bank construction; 4) backfilling areas of sediment removed with soil suitable for channel
construction (as necessary); 5) excavation of the design channel, 6) stabilization of the channel
with coir matting, seed, and mulch; and 7) installation of structures.

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 4
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Table 2. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
RIPARIAN BUFFER (15A NCAC 02B.0295)
If Converted to
Nutrient Offset
Location Jurisdictional
Streams
Restoration
Type
Reach ID/
Component
Buffer
Width (ft)
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Initial
Credit
Ratio
(x:1)
% Full
Credit
Final
Credit
Ratio
(x:1)
Riparian
Buffer
Credits
(BMU)
Convertible
to Nutrient
Offset (Yes or
No)
Nutrient
Offset: N
(lbs)
Nutrient
Offset: P
(lbs)
Rural Subject &
Nonsubject Restoration 1 0-100 213,290 1 100% 1.00000 213,290.000 Yes 11129.775 716.842
Rural Subject &
Nonsubject Restoration 2 101-200 40,976 1 33% 3.03030 13,522.094 Yes 2138.186 137.715
Rural Subject Enhancement 3 0-100 341,433 2 100% 2.00000 170,716.500 No 0.000 0.000
SUBTOTALS 595,699 397,528.594 13,267.960 854.558

ELIGIBLE
PRESERVATION AREA 198,566

Location Jurisdictional
Streams
Restoration
Type
Reach ID/
Component
Buffer
Width (ft)
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Initial
Credit
Ratio
(x:1)
% Full
Credit
Final
Credit
Ratio
(x:1)
Riparian
Buffer
Credits
(BMU)

Rural Nonsubject Preservation 4 0-100 25,614 5 100% 5.00000 5,122.800
Rural Nonsubject Preservation 5 101-200 2,814 5 33% 15.15152 185.724
SUBTOTALS 28,428 5,308.524
TOTALS 624,127 402,837.117
*Area eligible for preservation may be no more than 25% of total area, where total area is back-calculated with the equation R+E/0.75. *Buffers must be at minimum 20' wide for riparian buffer credit, buffers must be 50' wide for nutrient offset credit *When preservation areas exceed the total eligible preservation area, select the areas with the best credit ratios as the creditable areas.

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 5
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
3.1.2 Planting
Bare-root seedlings within the Piedmont Alluvial and Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forests will be
planted at a density of approximately 680 stems per acre on 8-foot centers. Species in the stream-
side assemblage and Marsh Wetland Treatment Areas were planted at a density of approximately
2720 stems per acre on 4-foot centers. The following table summarizes planted bare root stems
within the Site.

Table 3. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species
Piedmont/Low
Mountain
Alluvial Forest
Dry-Mesic
Oak/Hickory
Forest
Marsh
Treatment
Wetland
Streamside
Assemblage Total
Alnus serrulata 5 20 25
Asimina triloba 200 200
Betula nigra 100 200 300
Carpinus caroliniana 600 600
Cephalanthus
occidentalis 5 20 25
Cercis canadensis 500 500
Cornus amomum 95 5 800 900
Diospyros virginiana 450 450
Fraxinus americana 100 100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 150 750 900
Liriodendron tulipifera 75 75
Nyssa sylvatia 600 600
Platanus occidentalis 120 780 900
Quercus nigra 110 790 500 1,400
Quercus phellos 100 700 400 1,200
Salix nigra* 400* 400
Sambucus canadensis 11 14 25
TOTALS 750 3,740 26 4,084 8,600
*Live stakes of Salix nigra were planted; all other planted species were planted as bare root plants.
3.2 Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Activities
Riparian buffer enhancement included permanently protecting existing riparian buffer from
livestock via exclusionary fencing, cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and any similar activities that
would affect the functionality of the riparian buffer. These areas are defined primarily as disturbed
mixed hardwoods. Buffer credits sought in the enhancement area are allowed under 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(6). The enhancement area extends a maximum of 200 feet from the top of the bank
with a minimum width of 20 from top of banks.

A small portion of UT-3 is generating riparian buffer enhancement credit from only one side of
the stream. Prior to construction, cattle had access to the entire area; however, the only access
point was from the pasture on the northern side of the stream, the Parcel owned by Mr. Lamm.

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 6
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Once fencing was installed to prevent cattle access from Mr. Lamm’s parcel to the stream, cattle
will no longer be able to access the south side of the stream. This action will result in compliance
with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6), which states that the permanent exclusion of grazing livestock
must be done such that the livestock are fenced out of the stream and its adjacent buffer. The
southern parcel, which is not apart of the conservation easement, is owned by the Caviness family
and is a single-family home. Cattle will not be grazing within their parcel post construction.
3.3 Riparian Buffer Preservation Activities
Riparian buffer preservation includes permanently protecting existing riparian buffers from
cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and any similar activities that would affect the functionality of
the riparian buffer. Areas specified for Preservation at the Site, in accordance with 15A NCAC
02B .0295, are defined primarily as mixed hardwoods, with the number of high-value species
above 200 per acre. They are areas where livestock were fenced out prior to construction with
little or no historical livestock access.
3.4 Marsh Treatment Area
A marsh treatment area was constructed to intercept surface waters draining through agricultural
areas before discharging into UT1. The marsh treatment area is excluded from credit calculations.

4.0 ANNUAL MONITORING
4.1 Monitoring
Eight vegetation monitoring plots (10-meter by 10-meter) were installed within the Site as per
guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008); this covers 3.4% of the area generating riparian buffer restoration credit. Vegetation
monitoring will occur annually in the fall (between September and November), prior to the loss of
leaves for a period of five monitoring years following planting. Parameters to be monitored
include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub
and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. In addition, inspections for beaver
and other potential nuisance species will occur throughout the course of the monitoring period.

The following table outlines riparian buffer monitoring for this project; monitoring parameter
descriptions follow.

Table 4. Riparian Buffer Monitoring
Required Parameter Quantity Frequency Notes
Yes Vegetation
Eight (8) plots
located across all
restored buffer
zones.
Annual
Vegetation will be monitored for five years or until
performance standards are met. Visual monitoring of the
site will be done all five years. Analysis of vegetation
will be recorded using level 2 CVS Monitoring protocol.
Yes Project
Boundary NA Annual Locations of fence damage, vegetation damage, boundary
encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 7
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
4.2 Performance Standards
Performance standards were established to verify that the vegetation component supports
community elements necessary for forest development and the maintenance of diffuse flow
through the riparian buffer in accordance with North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and
Maintenance of Riparian Buffers). Performance standards are dependent upon the density and
growth of at least four native hardwood tree species where no one species is greater than 50% of
the stems. After five years of monitoring, an average density of 260 woody stems per acre,
including planted shrubs (silky dogwood and blueberry), must be surviving, and diffuse flow
maintained. 15A NCAC 02b .0295 (2)(E) dictates that monitoring for planted stems would also
include the health of planted stems. Level 2 CVS monitoring protocol requires the vigor, a
determinant of health, of a monitored stem be recorded. If requested, RS will make available
during the monitoring years, planted stem health, e.g. vigor.
4.3 Results and Discussion
Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 617 planted hardwood
tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes, shrubs, pines, and vines) at asbuilt (MY0). In addition,
each individual plot met success criteria. The following Table 5 summarizes riparian buffer
success criteria and Table 6 summarizes all vegetation data by species, plot, and year. Vegetation
plot photographs are included in Appendix B of the Major Hill Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Site Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report.

Table 5. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Plot # Riparian Buffer
Stems1/Acre Success Criteria Met?
1 405 Yes
2 486 Yes
3 567 Yes
4 850 Yes
5 647 Yes
6 647 Yes
7 567 Yes
8 769 Yes
Total Riparian Buffer
Stems/Acre 617 Yes
1-Buffer Stems include native planted hardwood trees. Does not include shrubs, pines, or vines.

4.4 Maintenance and Management
No maintenance or management activities are currently planned for the coming year, and no
remedial action activities are necessary at this time.

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 17.009. Project Name: Major Hill
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Asimina triloba pawpaw Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 9
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 14 14 14
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5
Fraxinus ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus americana white ash Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 10 10 10
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 7 7 7
Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 23 23 23
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 18 18 18
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 6
11 11 11 13 13 13 15 15 15 21 21 21 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 21 21 21 129 129 129
5 5 5 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 10 10 10 16 16 16
445.2 445.2 445.2 526.1 526.1 526.1 607 607 607 849.8 849.8 849.8 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 849.8 849.8 849.8 652.6 652.6 652.6
Color for Density PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%P-all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
0.02
1
0.02
8
0.200.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
17.009-01-0007 17.009-01-0008
Annual Means
MY0 (2019)
Stem count
size (ares)1 1
Current Plot Data (MY0 2019)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
17.009-01-0001 17.009-01-0002 17.009-01-0003 17.009-01-0004 17.009-01-0005 17.009-01-0006

Buffer Asbuilt Baseline Report (Project No. 100015) Appendix H: page 9
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
5.0 REFERENCES

Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B
.0268, and 15A NCAC 02B .0295

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Raleigh, North Carolina.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

ATTACHMENT 1

Figure A. Riparian Buffer Asset Map
Figure B. Riparian Buffer Planting Map
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
2
4
6
5
7
8
1
3
NCCGIA
­
0 140 280 420 56070Feet
Riparian Buffer Asset Map
Major Hill Mitigation Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
FIGUREDwn. By:
Date:
Project:
CLF
Jan 2019
17-009
A
Legend
Easement
New Fencing Installed for Cattle Exclusion
Existing Fencing Left in Place for Cattle Exclusion
Fencing Removed/Reworked for Cattle Exclusion
Stream Asbuilt TOB-TOB
@ Marsh Treatment Area
^_Plot Origins
CVS Plots Meeting Success Criteria MY0
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Enhancement
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Type
TOB - 100 ft. Restoration (1:1) - 213,290 sq ft
101 ft. - 200 ft. Restoration (1:1 but 33% credit per Rule) - 40,976 sq ft
TOB - 100 ft. Enhancement (2:1 Cattle Ex. per Rule) - 341,433 sq ft
TOB - 100 ft. Preservation (Non-Subject Stream 5:1) - 25,614 sq ft
101 ft. - 200 ft. Preservation (Non-Subject Stream 5:1 and 33% Credit per Rule) - 2,814 sq ft
Non Credit Generating (Less than 20 ft.)
TOB to 50 feet
100 foot line
150 foot line
200 foot line UT-1UT-2UT-1U T -3
U
T-3
No credit is being
generated within the
Marsh Treatment Area.
This area is located
outside of the
easement and is
not generating credit.
NCCGIA
­
0 140 280 420 56070Feet
Riparian Buffer Planting Map
Major Hill Mitigation Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
FIGUREDwn. By:
Date:
Project:
KRJ
Feb 2019
17-009
B
Legend
Easement
Stream Asbuilt TOB-TOB
Stream Side Assemblage = 1.5 ac
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest = 1.1 ac
Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory Forest = 5.5 ac
Marsh Treatment Wetland = 0.01 ac
UT-1UT-2UT-1U T -3
U
T-3
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
ATTACHMENT 2
Riparian Buffer Sealed Survey
Table 2. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
RIPARIAN BUFFER (15A NCAC
2 101-200 40,976 1
3 0-100 341,433 2
SUBTOTAISI 595.699
ELIGIBLE
PRESERVATION AREA
Jurisdictional
Restoration
Location
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Streams
Type
Streams
Type
Rural Nonsubject
Subject &
Rural Nonsubject I
Rural
Credit
Restoration
to Nutrient
Nonsubject
Width (ft)
Area (sf)*
Subject &
Credit
Rural
Credits
Restoration
1893100.6160
Nonsubject
33%
Rural
I Subiect
I Enhancement
2 101-200 40,976 1
3 0-100 341,433 2
SUBTOTAISI 595.699
ELIGIBLE
PRESERVATION AREA
Jurisdictional
Restoration
Location
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Streams
Type
Convertible
Reach ID/
Rural Nonsubject
Preservation
Rural Nonsubject I
Preservation
Credit
Buffer
2 101-200 40,976 1
3 0-100 341,433 2
SUBTOTAISI 595.699
ELIGIBLE
PRESERVATION AREA
198,566
Reach ID/
Component
Initial
Creditable
Area (sf)*
FinalRiparian
0-100
Convertible
Reach ID/
Buffer
Creditable
Credit
% Full
Credit
Buffer
to Nutrient
Component
Width (ft)
Area (sf)*
Ratio
Credit
Ratio
Credits
Offset (Yes or
1893100.6160
5
33%
(x:1)
185.724
(x:1)
(BMU)
No)
1
0-100
213,290
1
100%
1.00000
213,290.000
Yes
2 101-200 40,976 1
3 0-100 341,433 2
SUBTOTAISI 595.699
ELIGIBLE
PRESERVATION AREA
198,566
Reach ID/
Component
Buffer
Width (ft)
Creditable
Area (sf)*
4
0-100
25,614
5
101-200
2,814
Credit
SUBTOTALS
28,428
773864.2494
TOTALS
624,127
33% 3.03030 13,522.094 Yes
100% 2.00000 170,716.500 No
397,528.594
Initial
WETLAND RESTORATION
Final
Riparian
1
Credit
%Full
Credit
Buffer
1893589.7412
Ratio
Credit
Ratio
Credits
773864.2494
(x:1)
5
(x:1)
(BMU)
6
5
100%
5.00000
5,122.800
1893100.6160
5
33%
15.15152
185.724
P
DRAWN BY: FGR
DATE: 03/15/19
SURVEYED BY: J.A.R.
5,308.524
SHEET 1 OF 6
402,837.117
*Area eligible for preservation may be no more than 25% of total area, where total area is back -calculated with the equation R+E/0.75.
*Buffers must be at minimum 20' wide for riparian buffer credit, buffers must be 50' wide for nutrient offset credit
*When preservation areas exceed the total eligible preservation area, select the areas with the best credit ratios as the creditable areas.
(PROVIDED BYAXIOM
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC) REVISIONS: (03/15/19)
1 -ALL BUFFER AREAS MEASURED IN SQ. FT.
2 - CONSERVATION PLAT REMOVED & PAGES RENUMBERED
3 - REVISED PLANTING AREAS
4 - REVISED TABLES
5 -ADDED NOTES WHERE NO CREDIT IS GENERATED
6 -ADDED DWR NUMBER
LEGEND:
STREAM ASBUILT TOB - TOB
. ORIGIN POINT ON CVS PLOTS
#❑ CVS PLOTS MEETING SUCCESS CRITERIA MYO
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE
CVS PLOTS COORDINATE
TABLE (COORDINATE AT THE PLOT
ORIGIN - )
WETLAND RESTORATION
_
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
1
MARSH TREATMENT AREA
1893626.6861
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE
CVS PLOTS COORDINATE
TABLE (COORDINATE AT THE PLOT
ORIGIN - )
CVS PLOT
NORTHING
EASTING
1
773384.9763
1893626.6861
2
773487.7063
1893589.7412
3
773727.6476
1893526.7350
4
773864.2494
1893433.7282
5
773898.3702
1893316.6978
6
774178.0237
1893229.9873
7
774280.3598
1893100.6160
8
774560.4220
1 1893143.3643
TOB - 100 FT RESTORATION (1:1) - 213,290 SQ. FT.
101 FT - 200 FT RESTORATION (1:1 BUT 33% CREDIT PER RULE) -40,976 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT ENHANCEMENT (2:1 CATTLE EX. PER RULE) - 341,433 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1) - 25,614 SQ. FT.
101 FT - 200 FT. PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1 AND 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 2,814 SQ. FT.
NON CREDIT GENERATING (LESS THAN 20 FT)
DISTANCES FROM TOB
If Converted to
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient
Offset: N
(Ibs)
Nutrient
Offset: P
(Ibs)
11129.775
716.842
2138.186
137.715
0.000
1 0.000
13,267.960
1 854.558
NOTE:
RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT AREAS WERE PROVIDED BY AXIOM
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
-�NCARO////
9 .
Q.SSS••. Z/
.'SOF
SEAL
L-4194
R�� `�\\
//101111110\\
AS -BUILT
CREDIT AREA PLAN
INDEX SHEET
0 250 500 1000
9"= 500'
0
C) �.
in CCU
r
W M C N
0 U
=O O Z � N N
O �` N
O O t/ C
� N
CC) ° of - E
0
UC SiC9rnY i
m
C co
N 1 O
cr
C>NM
2<L)
C3:z
W0
Eu>.2)N
.XON 6
QN�6
v
2
w
E
0
a
z
0
� w
Q NNN
w
» ,
W a �w
Vf N
W >-
im N
U
h
o
Z Z
9Om
0 O — 5;o o
QO U
Z
LLO WO^ o
W z H
WUOZ `°m
W C7 c
Q
3 o
D W F a G o
to 2 (_5
W 50OOU a
W
Jp UJ
z
W
U) Z;= W_J
�F
U�FONzo
Q
Z
�Wo�O
¢> d
01
, H
d
P
DRAWN BY: FGR
DATE: 03/15/19
SURVEYED BY: J.A.R.
DWG. NO. RSS771AB19
SHEET 1 OF 6

UT -1 BEGIN RESTORATION
SOFT FROM TOB STA 0+00 (UT -1)
LEGEND:
j SOFT FROM TOB
200FT FROM TOB
STREAM ASBUILT TOB -TOB
. ORIGIN POINT ON CVS PLOTS
FlCVS PLOTS MEETING SUCCESS CRITERIA MYO
8
4
o ��D►
oN 7
I C5
� M
U Q
Z Z
100FT FROM TOB
z 6
5
`'
50FT FROM TOB
50FT FROM TOB
WETLAND RESTORATION
_ WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
MARSH TREATMENTAREA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE
TOB - 100 FT. RESTORATION (1:1) - 213,290 SQ. FT.
101 FT - 200 FT RESTORATION (1:1 BUT 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 40,976 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT. ENHANCEMENT (2:1 CATTLE EX. PER RULE) - 341,433 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT. PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1) - 25,614 SQ. FT.
® 101 FT - 200 FT PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1 AND 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 2,814 SQ. FT.
NON CREDIT GENERATING (LESS THAN 20 FT.)
DISTANCES FROM TOB
UT -2 BEGIN
ENHANCEMENTII
STA 0+00 (UT -2)
�N CAVO
o�••FEssio'��'j,'':
SEAL =
'. L-4194
&HL EY
50FT FROM TOB
/-- 100FT FROM TOB
Jerry ryl� UT -2 END
1 ENHANCEMENTII
BEGIN RESTORATION
STA 1+68 (UT -2) AS -BUILT
UT -2 END RESTORATION CREDIT AREA PLAN
STA 2+07 (UT -2) SHEET 2 OF 6
STA 12+08 (UT -1)
0 50 100 200
1"= 100'

STREAM ASBUILT TOB - TOB
. ORIGIN POINT ON CVS PLOTS
❑# CVS PLOTS MEETING SUCCESS CRITERIA MYO
WETLAND RESTORATION
_ WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
MARSH TREATMENTAREA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
v
50FT FROM TOB
100FT FROM TOB
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE NO CREDIT IS BEING
GENERATED WITHIN
MARSH TREATMENT'
TOB - 100 FT. RESTORATION (1:1) - 213,290 SQ. FT AREA
_ 101 FT - 200 FT RESTORATION (1:1 BUT 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 40,976 SQ. FT.
_ TOB - 100 FT. ENHANCEMENT (2:1 CATTLE EX. PER RULE) - 341,433 SQ. FT.
_ TOB - 100 FT. PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1) - 25,614 SQ. FT.
_ 101 FT - 200 FT PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1 AND 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 2,814 SQ. FT.
NON CREDIT GENERATING (LESS THAN 20 FT.)
DISTANCES FROM TOB
50FT FROM TOB
100FT FROM TOB
UT -1 END RESTORATION
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II
STA 16+99 (UT -1)
50FT FROM TOB
AS -BUILT
CREDIT AREA PLAN
SHEET 3 OF 6
0 50 100
1"= 100'
200

LEGEND:
STREAM ASBUILT TOB - TOB
. ORIGIN POINT ON CVS PLOTS
❑# CVS PLOTS MEETING SUCCESS CRITERIA MYO
WETLAND RESTORATION
_ WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
MARSH TREATMENTAREA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE
TOB - 100 FT. RESTORATION (1:1) - 213,290 SQ. FT.
101 FT. - 200 FT. RESTORATION (1:1 BUT 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 40,976 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT. ENHANCEMENT (2:1 CATTLE EX. PER RULE) - 341,433 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT. PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1) - 25,614 SQ. FT.
101 FT. - 200 FT PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1 AND 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 2,814 SQ. FT.
NON CREDIT GENERATING (LESS THAN 20 FT.)
DISTANCES FROM TOB
50FT FROM TOB
18" CMP
PLAIN PIPE
EACH SIDE
(2) 60" CMP
\��\IIIIIII////
�N CA"�o /''
Off'.• ess/• . <%
i
Z . �0F oti
y.
SEAL
L-4194
�j, ' •. SURv .• ' p �.
PERMANENT CROSSING
16' TOP WIDTH (TYP.)
50FT FROM TOB
50FT FROM TOB
SOFT FROM TOB
SOFT FROM TOB
UT -3 END ENHANCEMENT II
STA 22+96 (UT -3)
STA 27+35 (UT -1)
UT -1 END ENHANCEMENT II
STA 27+96 (UT -1)
AS -BUILT
CREDIT AREA PLAN
SHEET 4 OF b
0 50 100
1"= 100'
200

UT -3 BEGIN 50FT FROM TOB
ENHANCEMENTII
STA 0+00 (UT -3)
5OFT FROM TOB
UT -3
50FT FROM TOB
THIS AREA IS LOCATED
OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENT
AND IS NOT GENERATING
CREDIT
LEGEND:
STREAM ASBUILT TOB - TOB
. ORIGIN POINT ON CVS PLOTS
❑# CVS PLOTS MEETING SUCCESS CRITERIA MYO
WETLAND RESTORATION
_ WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
MARSH TREATMENT AREA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION TYPE
TOB - 100 FT. RESTORATION (1:1) - 213,290 SQ. FT.
101 FT. - 200 FT. RESTORATION (1:1 BUT 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 40,976 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT ENHANCEMENT (2:1 CATTLE EX. PER RULE) - 341,433 SQ. FT.
TOB - 100 FT PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1) - 25,614 SQ. FT.
101 FT. - 200 FT. PRESERVATION (NON -SUBJECT STREAM 5:1 AND 33% CREDIT PER RULE) - 2,814 SQ. FT.
NON CREDIT GENERATING (LESS THAN 20 FT)
DISTANCES FROM TOB
5OFT FROM TOB
50FT FROM TOB
18" CMP
FLOOD PLAIN PIPE
1 EACH SIDE
(2) 60" CMP
PERMANENT CROSSING
16' TOP WIDTH (TYP.)
50FT FROM TOB
\ 111111111////
�N CARO
�\0�'
� .•Q -o by ."9
SEAL
L-4194
;tiff' .a S�Rv . ' 0
LEY
//////111111111`
50FT FROM TOB
V�I
AS -BUILT
CREDIT AREA PLAN
SHEET 5 OF b
0 50 100
1"= 100'
200

PLANTING SCHEDULE
ALL PLANTS WERE PLANTED
BY 12/31/18
Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Major Hill Restoration Site
Species
Piedmont/Low
Mountain
Alluvial Forest
Dry-Mesic
Oak/Hickory
Forest
Marsh
Treatment
Wetland
sseemblambla a
Assemblage
Ass
Total
Alnus serrulate
5
20
25
Asimina triloba
200
200
Betula nigra
100
200
300
Carpinus carohniana
600
600
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
5
20
25
Cercis conadensis
500
500
Cornus amomum
95
5
800
900
Diospyros virginiana
450
450
Fraxinus americana
100
100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
150
750
900
Linodendron tuhpifera
75
75
Nyssa sylvatic
600
600
Platanus occidentalis
120
780
900
Quercus nigra
110
790
500
1,400
Quercus phellos
100
700
400
1,200
Salix nigra*
400*
400
Sambucus canadensis
11
14
25
TOTALS
750
3,740
26
4,084
8,600
*Live stakes of Salts nigra were planted; all other planted species were planted as bare root plants.
(PLANTING SCHEDULE PROVIDED BY
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL)
/
�\OoNE s o0��'�
SEAL
L-4194
o
SURgi-_ oe;
�/'/ SHL EY RSO `�\\
SHEET 6 OF 6
AS -BUILT
PLANTING PLAN
0 150 300 600
I" = 300'
BUILT TOB - TOB
TION EASEMENT LINE
ATMENTAREA
RY FOREST - 239,349 SQ. FT.
LOW MOUNTAIN
CREST - 46,501 SQ. FT.
)E
GE - 50,960 SQ. FT.

Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100015) Appendices
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
Appendix I
Credit Discrepancy Letter
Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-215-1693

March 5, 2019

Mr. Worth Creech
Restoration Systems, L.L.C.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

RE: Major Hill Stream a nd Wetland Restoration Site - Asbuilt Discrepancies 17-009

Dear Worth:

During preparation of the As-built Construction Plans and Baseline Document for the Major Hill
Stream and Wetland Restoration Site it became apparent that a stationing discrepancy occurred
during detailed planning. Stationing discrepancies are listed in the following table and are depicted
on the following page.

  Detailed  Construction As‐built 
UT Plan  Plan Plan 
Numbe
r End Station End Station End Station 
UT 1 27+59 27+96 27+96 
UT 2 02+11 02+07 02+07 
UT 3 21+97 22+98 22+98 

Please note, Construction Plan and As-built stationing are consistent. The discrepancy between the
Detailed Restoration Plan and Construction Plans are not certain, but likely result from easement
boundary changes between Detailed Plan figure development and Construction Plan preparation,
GIS conversion errors, and/or typographical error. These problems are being resolve for future
submissions.

The final Asbuilt stationing matches the Construction Plans and depict what was
constructed/enhanced at the Site.

The original SMU total calculated for the Detailed Restoration Plan was 3006 SMUs. The Asbuilt
SMU total calculated for the Asbuilt Construction Plans and Baseline document is 3058 SMUs.
Major Hill-Asbuilt Discrepancies
March 5, 2019
Page 2 of 3
Detailed Plan – Figure 6 (Restoration Plan) Stationing

Construction Plan – Sheet 1 Stationing

Major Hill-Asbuilt Discrepancies
March 5, 2019
Page 3 of 3
Based on information provided above we request a credit alteration at the Site. The credit alteration
results from stationing discrepancies from the Detailed Restoration Plan and Construction Plans. The
alteration is in the amount of 52 SMUs and represents what was constructed/enhanced at the Site.

Yours truly,
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

W. Grant Lewis
President

Project No. 100015
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina

Restoration Systems, LLC
March 2019
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATION PLAN
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Major Hill Restoration Site
Reach
ID
Stream
Stationing/
Wetland Type
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan
Footage/
Acreage
Constructed
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits Comment
UT 1 00+00 to 16+99 1829 1699 1699 Restoration 1699 1:1 1699
UT 1 16+99 to 27+96 1097 1060 1097* EII 1097 2.5:1 439
UT 2 00+00 to 01+68 168 168 168 EII 168 2.5:1 67
UT 2 01+68 to 02+07 39 43 39* Restoration 39 1:1 39
UT 3 00+00 to 22+98 2298 2197 2298* EII 2298-80-144-
40=2034 2.5:1 814
80 lf and 40 lf of UT3 are
not credit generating due
to crossings and drainage
easement. 144 lf are not
credit generating due to
lack of control of south
bank and drainage
easement.
Wetlands Riparian
Riverine -- 0.54 0.54 Restoration 0.54 1:1 0.54 Wetland Restoration
Wetlands Riparian
Riverine 0.52 0.44 0.44 Enhancement 0.44 2:1 0.22 Wetland Enhancement
*UT1, UT2, and UT3 discrepancies between Mitigation Plan and As-built tables are the result of errors between detailed plan stationing and surveyed
construction plan stationing. They are specifically attributed to typographical error, GIS to CAD conversion error, and easement boundary changes
between detailed plan development and construction plans. Construction Plan information is consistent from Mitigation Plan to As-Built, and the As-
Built table reflects Construction Plan measurement accuratly.
Overall Assets Summary: Amended Mitigation Plan
Stream 3058 SMU
Riparian Riverine Wetland : 0.760 WMU