20191008 Ver 1_401 Application_20190726

oCCRg C�
JUL262019:�
01 & SuFFFR
July 26, 2019 0 8
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn Mr. Andrew Williams
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attm Ms. Karen Higgins
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Hillcrest Subdivision (Formerly O'Neal Property)
Request for NWP 29 & GC 4139 and Tar -Pamlico Buffer Authorization
Sage Project # 2018.53
On behalf of Ms. Mary O'Neal (applicant and owner) please find attached a complete application
and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that the impacts
associated with the activities described herein may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29
and General Certification (GC) 4139. A Tar -Pamlico Buffer Authorization is also requested.
Project Summary and Purpose
The proposed project includes the construction of a residential subdivision with associated roads
and utilities which will connect to existing adjacent infrastructure in the area. The +/- 73.94 -acre
project is located approximately 700 feet east of the Cedar Creek Road and Hill Road intersection
in Franklinton, Franklin County, NC. Franklin County lists the eastern parcel PIN as 1863-64-
8819. The approximate center of the property is located at Latitude: 36.0425510 N; Longitude:
78.4358580 W. The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and
associated utilities to meet the demand for housing in this part of Franklin County, NC.
Project Detail
The overall project consists of a single-family residential subdivision with 195 -detached residential
lots. Access to the subdivision will be off of Cedar Creek Road with several cul-de-sacs branching
from the main subdivision road. Two Stormwater Control Devices (SCM)'s will be located in the
western portion of the site. Proposed impacts from road construction, culverting, and lot fill will
result in temporary and permanent impacts to streams, wetlands, and buffers. Utilities for the
proposed project will connect to existing utility lines adjacent to the proposed project boundaries.
Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc.)
will be utilized.

No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur within 1 mile of the site
according to the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Database (September 2018). See attached
July 25, 2019 letter from NHP. The dwarf wedgemussel is known to exist within Cedar Creek
which the site drains to. The stream being impacted is intermittent and does not contain suitable
habitat within the impact area.
.. j 1
No historic structures or districts are located on the Site.
Project History
Portions of the site have been forested or in agriculture since sometime prior to the earliest
reviewed orthophotography (1994). It is likely that in the past it was utilized for agricultural
purposes. Sage staff completed a wetland and stream evaluation and delineation in 2018. A
jurisdictional field determination was held on November 30, 2018 with Mr. Andrew Williams
(Corps) and Mr. David Gainey of Sage Ecological. A buffer verification was held with Mr. Ray
Milosh of NCDWR and Mr. David Gainey of Sage Ecological on October 16, 2018.
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed roads were aligned to cross the drainage at a perpendicular angle so as to minimize
impacts to streams to the maximum extent practicable. Lots were positioned so as to avoid lot fill
in streams. Approximately 70 linear tributary feet (Tributary C and D) were avoided due to design
considerations. Open space was provided around drainages containing jurisdictional streams and
buffers. Wing walls were designed at the road crossing to reduce impacts to the stream and
associated riparian buffers. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor
and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional
protection from runoff.
Project Impacts
The project will incur both permanent and temporary impacts to streams and riparian buffers as
well as permanent impacts to a linear wetland. Stream impacts will result from dewatering, road
construction, and culverting activities. Proposed permanent intermittent stream impacts total 131
Linear Feet (LF) as a result of culverting. Proposed temporary intermittent stream impacts total
26 LF as a result of dewatering activities associated with the road construction. Impacts resulting
from road fill will permanently impact 0.002 acres of a linear riparian wetland.
The Project is located within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Permanent buffer impacts proposed
for the project include 4,786 Square Feet (ft2) in Zone 1 and 4,883 ft2 in Zone 2 resulting from the
road construction. The road construction will also require temporary impacts of 1,392 ft2 in Zone
1 and 1,613 ft2 in Zone 2. Zone 2 impacts resulting from a sewer line installation will total 509 ft2.
Grading and revegetation associated with lot construction will total 1,539 ft2 in Zone 2. Overall
riparian buffer impacts total 6,178 ft2 in Zone 1, and 8,035 in Zone 2.
Mitigation
Permanent stream impacts are less than 150 LF, and wetland impacts are significantly less than
0.10 -acre, therefore, no mitigation is proposed. Proposed impacts to the riparian buffer are
considered "Allowable" in the Table of Uses, therefore, no buffer mitigation is proposed.

If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 -Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
PJ D
NCNHP Report
Impact Maps
Check for $570.00 for 4017processing application fee (NCDWR only)

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW -2016-
01126
DWQ project no.
A.
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
1f.
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Hillcrest Subdivision (formerly O'Neal Property)
2b.
County:
Franklin County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Youngsville
2d.
Subdivision name:
Hillcrest Subdivision
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NIA
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mary O'Neal
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
MB 1; PG 140
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Wayne Choplin
3d.
Street address:
12225 O'Neal Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-426-1795
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
Agent © Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Mr. Sean Clark
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3707 Swift Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.:
919-559-1537
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
;cark ,sagpernEan�cat corn
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1863-64.-88:1;9
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.042258°N Longitude: 78.436307°W
1 c. Property size:
+/- 73.94 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to .proposed project:
UT to Cedar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar River Basin (HUC 03020101)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application. Portions of the site have previously been forested or in agriculture since sometime prior to the earliest
reviewed orthophotography (1994). It is likely that in the past it was utilized for agricultural purposes.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.002 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: +/-1,360 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and associated utilities to meet the demand
for housing in this area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including, the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of a single-family residential subdivision with 195 -detached residential lots with access off of
Cedar Creek Road and several stormwater outfalls. The proposed subdivision will contain several cul-de-sacs located
off of the main road. To treat stormwater, two Stormwater Control Devices (SCM)'s will be located in the eastern portion
of the site. Proposed impacts from road construction and associated culverting will result in temporary and permanent
impacts to streams, wetlands, and buffers. Utilities for the proposed project will connect to existing utility lines adjacent
to the proposed project boundaries. Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull-
dozers, etc.) will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: A field determination was held on November
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
30, 2018 with Mr. Andrew Williams (Corps) and Mr.
David Gainey of Sage Ecological.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company.
Sage Ecological Services, Inc,.
Name (if known): David Gainey and Sean Clark
Other;
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A buffer verification was held with Mr. Ray Milosh of NCDWR and Mr. David Gainey of Sage Ecological on October 16,
2018.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑(es ® No ❑ Unknown
this. project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. 'Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):,
® Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries' ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
. Corps (404, 10) or
Area of
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
impact
Temporary (T)
(acres)
1-P
Fill
Riparian
Yes
404 `
0.002
-
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g Total wetland impacts
0.002
2h. Comments: Impacts do not exceed 0.10 acres.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number
(PER) or
width
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(feet)
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
feet)
1-P
Road fill/Culvert
UTCreekto Cedar
INT
both
2-4'
131
1-T
Dewatering
UT to Cedar
Creek
INT
both
5-8'
26
3.h. Total stream and tributary impacts
157
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number _
waterbody, .
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
(acres)
Temporary T
01 Choose one
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: There are no open waters with proposed impacts within the project boundaries.
Page 4 of 10

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed", then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or
(acres)
number
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ® Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer mitigation required?
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
name
1-P
Sewer
UT to
Cedar
No
0
509
(sewer)
easement
Creek
1-P
Road
UT to
(Road)
construction
Cedar
No
4,786
4,374
Creek
1-T
Road
UT to
(Road)
construction
Cedar
No
1,392
1,613
Creek
Lot Fill l
UT
(Lot Fill/Grading)
Grading
C dar No
0
1,539
Creek
6h. Total buffer impacts
6,178
8,035
6i. Comments: Proposed buffer impacts are considered "allowable" in the table of uses.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Proposed roads
were aligned so as to avoid impacts to streams to the maximum extent practicable. Lots were positioned so as to avoid lot
fill in streams and wetlands. Retaining walls will be constructed to avoid lot fill impacts to the riparian buffers. Wing walls
will also be used to reduce the stream and riparian buffer impacts associated with the road crossing. Approximately 70 LF
of tributaries:(Trilautary C anctTributa y D:).were-avoided:due.tadesign. considerations..Open- space. was. provided.'around.'
'drainages containing jurisdictional streams and buffers. Cul-de-sacs were proposed to avoid the stream' crossing of the
road however the crossing was required to maintain compliance with interconnectivity requirements.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing and temporary basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the streams and
wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑' Mitigation bank
EDPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
cool
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 6 of 10

5a: If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba) .
Zone 2
1.5
.6f. -Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The diffuse flow plan is part of the Stormwater Management Plan being
❑ Yes ® No
..,,.reviewed
by the Franklin County,
2.
Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30.2%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project requires a Stormwater
-Management Plan that will'be reviewed -by-the:Franiclin'.Co6nty.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The site plan calls for two BMPs located in the eastern portion of the site.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Franklin County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Franklinton
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all .that apply):
. ❑.` Session, Law, 2006-246
® Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No.
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ _No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an experiditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
,(North- Carolina) -Environmental -Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA,final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):' .
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in .
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,". provide a short narrative description.
The development -of this site will not increase or decrease the likelihood of future development in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the.ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will tie into existing utilities adjacent to the site.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would_ impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Database was queried and a report dated September 5, 2018 and updated July 25, 2019 was
received from NCNHP which identified no recorded federally listed species on the project site or within a 1 -mile radius.
The dwarf wedgemussel is known to exist within Cedar Creek which the site drains to. The stream being impacted is
intermittent and does not contain suitable habitat within the impact area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your. site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in a part of Franklin County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would
support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7.. � Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes No
status (e.g.- National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. ' What data sources didyou use to -determine whether your.site would. impact historic.. or.archeolagicai,.resoui�-es? I
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ *A physical records check at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State
Archeology was not performed. Based on the HPOWEB review, no recorded historic structures or districts are located on the
project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
®Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No portion of the built upon area is proposed in the flood zone.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Map Service Center
(https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search) FEMA DFIRM Panel # 3720186400K, effective April 16, 2013
Sean Clark
'
07/26/201'9_
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
`
Applicant/Agents Si nature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

'EE s,
SAGE
AGENT AUTIIORIZATIO` FORM
All Blanks
/t�o�, BeFilledin By the Current Landowner or Legal Re
Name: � r / /7 I� �/ d /l ,1�-A
Address: 1 2 2 2 J U �' 19 W014
Phone: I� '!a "
Email: W `` /� a-- �- �1 d 6 ^�
Project Name/Description: O'Neal Pronert-. -
Sage Project # 2018.53
Date: _Z47/ 07 ! B
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1990
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the undersigned, the owner or a duty authorized representative of record of the property properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and"or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. 1 also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental infimnation in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
:Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange eeti
prior to visiting the site.
BY: -- ---Z -- - -- BY: - ...
Print Name of landowner or Signature of Lando%► ncr or
Legal Representative legal Representative

Legend
N
Project Study Area
7-
Map Location
USGS Topographic Map Figure 1
RSON WARREN Hillcreast Subdivision
VANCE HAL (formerly O'Neal Property)
GRANVILLE Sage Project #2018.53
FRANKLIN
URHAM Franklinton Quadrangle lip
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
NASH August 28, 2018 ( Office: 919-335-6757
AM WAKE
Cell: 919-559-1537
0 900 1801 ft

ee _
1F ! _ 1 �� - Li ■i
16
L all
IL wo
r
tt� =A t
Vies
rim
•rCC
of .
i v
Legend
Project Study Area
Map Location
NRCS Soil Survey Map Figure 2
RSON VANCE WAS HAL Hillcreast Subdivision
GRANVILLE (formerly O'Neal Property)
Sage Project #2018.53
FRANKLIN
URHAM Franklin County Sheet 9
+
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
NASH august 2s, 2018 Office: 919-335-6757
HAM WAKE I Cell: 919-559-1537
0 500 1000 ft �

(kWh" 11 21118
l2t )l t 't ►r )1'1 is
\11( HALL ti. k1.0A\
1.IMM C t i PIMP'
Subject: Buffer 1)eternlination Letter
NIiItIM I S - ,r.7
rmkhn C't)u=
Determination Type:
Buffer Intermittent per. nr, rt!
Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
gj Tar -Pamlico 1, 15A NCAC 2B .0259) tom- Intefirnittentf Perennial Determination (where local buffer
ordinances apply)
Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) 1
(governmental and or interjurisdictional
projects)
I'rujr: t Aante: C)'\Tal Slit-
\rids-cs. I oiatiort: (t Cellar ( rcck RcaJ. ) unn_N\ ills
Strranil.l: [: I i) (e�l:u' Crt:l.
Determination Date: October 16, 2018 Staff: Rai Milosh
S(reanlE/Ull' Not Subject Suhjcct Start a Stopvl soil Su]-%V� t SGS Iopo
Strca,n A l _ \ I ia_ "S V, I
Str.:uu li !'
�hlalmt4m: 'l ltc su'canl(:) lisl;.l aht)�c ha, hmn I��,' ad tol O nwo latent puhli.11L'd NRC•S 5„il Sun
lilt Ill, �l rV�:Vnt lop; +'. th' t�St t� t+ :r: i} p w 1tt 1:1 I I! 1 i ,) 5 i, l'
! . I .•_r.li ti tu. , :.1 :^ i ._-�. ,,:.il:. a� .1rt;int 1 lu1 i•. i!n•i hrt. "'e. t u
I di :tcrnlirl l t^, 11,)( h.:tl ik•a'i in! ,I i iut-:u . r i,
`trC,1111, Iltai hx.S� .11 !1 til:." PINTO!., M h11U:11!1`. ii 1:,
at lt:ast .1:1 Illlirlitillt-?ll lli Uii. l li r ' nm--, It i'. -.1 . ?: 1.:: ] :': 1, '1'1 li?'t'. Il•) lit t >17i :' ill'. , ;} r1;. m, lr-.
(CI�Yt-lli c.l ab"NV coll,id,iilt )til � i,' 1!!t- :."' Arllll
This on-site determination shalt expire list• Q )cars frons the date of this letter. I.ando)%lrers or affected
parties that dispute it determination made Ig the DNVR nm) rctlucst it determination h) the Director. %n
appeal regncst must he made tiithin silt) (60) d:ns of date of this !Tarin .\ ivginAl for it determination h) On-
Director
eDirector shall he referred to the iihmor in v. Titin;. If sr,rrlirr. ria VS f'ustrrl.4rrTic t: (.;,f) h"arrlt
/)If'/? 401 & Ruf fi•r ('rtir: 101' alai/ Svl•ric e Centr`r: tlrrlri,�lt..\C' 2"fiil9-]hl'. if Scvrdin", rill
do /h c t;t' s< r girt II T.S. / Illli•t'l7 111 ,131 D11 It 401 .': Ru flev A-viniitut;; I 'nit; 512 N. Sali.hul.r
Stivel: ffidvi,h..\C 2"6114.

'his determination is linal and hindinu UUWSY as detailed alm%e unless an appeal is requested WON siv�
I h0) days.
This project may require a Section MAI 401 Permit for be proposed acti% ity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the t S Army torp of EnWnecis (Raleigh Itegtilatory Field Office) at (914))-554-4884.
lf\ou h.i%c que,tions rc.,mi-diw.2 IIIiN fi,cc to k:,jjta,:j Ra: Mdoh at O)II)i -4 1 -4-240.
Sup, :r,, i!-oi-. WaKr OualitA- Regional ()pciwion�
cc: RRO DWR Idle Cops

O'Neal Site
Franklin County, NC-DWR Project # 18-367
Stream C
Stream
E/I/PX
Not Subject
Subject
Start(-&
Stops,
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
Stream A
I
X
Flag "SA01
X
Stream B*
P
X
X
Stream C*
P
X
X
X
* Streams B and C do not appear to be within 50 ft of the property
Locations are approx-
`
Legend: imate and are provided
project boundary�M. � for reference onlyI
A�

O'Neal Site
Franklin County, NC-DWR Project # 18-367
Stream B
A
Stream A
TV tM
Stream C
Ali
m�
Stream
E/l/PX
Not Subject
Subject
Started
Stop i
Soil
USGS
Stream A
I
X
Hag "SAO]
start'
X
Stream B*
P
X
X
Stream C*
P
X
X
X
* Streams B and C do not appear to be within 50 ft of the property
ATF "
�r i Locations are approx-
legend:!'' imate and are provided
j"\ n
for reference only
-Project boundary

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2018-02079 County: Franklin County U.S.G.S. Quad: Franklinton
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Sage Ecological Services Inc
David Gainey
Address: 3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Telephone Number: 919-771-9136
Size (acres)
74 (approximate)
Nearest Town Youngsville
Nearest Waterway
Brandy Creek
River Basin
Pamlico
USGS HUC
03020101
Coordinates
Latitude: 36.042457
Longitude: -78.436298
Location description:
The 74 acre (approximate) site is located immediately
northeast of theintersection of Cedar
Creek Road and Hill Road in Younesville. Franklin County,
North Carolina
(See may attached to PJD form).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination maybe used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW -2018-02079
—The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
.[phone] or Andrew.E.Williams2(R,usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: NIA. An Approved JD has not been completed.
D. Remarks: USACE site visit conducted on 30 November 2018
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative'appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: '
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OMI 5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by- Not Applicable.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.SmDigitally signed 6y WIWAMSANDREW.E7244561655
,,SDN: US, o=US. Govemen4 ou=DoD, ou=PIQ,
• b_.ou=USA, cn=WIWAMSANDREW.E7244561655
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2018.1130135133-05'00'
Date: November 30, 2018

SAW -2018-02079
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
littp:';corpsmapu.usacc.arm�.lriilicm apex''?p=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished (via email):
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Stephanie Goss
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628

The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
http;//www.fws.ciov/oftices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode =37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at _ _ or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
■ M■•
t r Governor
= NC DEPARTMENT OF
*1111111
�wft� niA,ri_ipAi A nen ri n ri i�A.i bccni 3grcc
l
r, Secretary
■
Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-9795
July 25, 2019
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Hillcrest Subdivision (formerly O'Neal Property); 2018.53
Dear Sean Qw-k.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
http;//www.fws.ciov/oftices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode =37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at _ _ or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program

No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at : ii Jlc.nhsiv_,-atures Data query generated on July 25, 2019; source: NCNHP, 02 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Hillcrest Subdivision (formerly O'Neal Property)
Project No. 2018.53
July 25, 2019
NCNHDE-9795
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element
Accuracy Federal
State Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status Rank
Rank
Date Rank
Animal
32239 Waterbird Colony --- 2010-04-19 C
5 -Very ---
--- GNR
S3
Assemblage
Low
Dragonfly or
33749 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004 -Pre H?
5 -Very ---
Significantly G3G4
S2?
Damselfly
georgiana
Low
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at : ii Jlc.nhsiv_,-atures Data query generated on July 25, 2019; source: NCNHP, 02 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-9795: Hillcrest Subdivision (formerly O'Neal Property)
July 25, 2019 1:24,015
Project Boundary o 02 0.4 oI mi
Buffered Project Boundary 0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garman, Intennep, increment P Corp., GESCO. USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Ge*&a , IGN, Kaoaster NL, Oronanm Survey. Esn Jgwn,
htETl. Exl Cnina (Hoop Konpl. (c) OpenSUeetMap wrWbuMn. and LMGIS
User Come 4
Page 3 of 3

I HEADWALL/WINGWALL
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
2,093 LF
318 SF /
. + + + + + +..
+ ♦ + + + +
/ + 4 + 4 +
/PROPOSED B X +++++++++++!++
++i+`+++++ +
+ a
CULVERT ` ` `
+ + +
+ +
TEMPORARY +`+`+`
ZONE 1 � / `+`+'
695 SF
EXISTING
CREEK
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
TEMPORARY 4,786 SF
ZONE 2 ' +
327 SF +`+`
+ + +
4 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 ♦ + ♦ � 4
PROPOSED 20' WIDE I
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
PERMANENT ZONE 2
177 SF /
+` + TEMPORARY ZONE 2 + ` +
+ • + 505 SF \ +
+`+ TEMPORARY ZONE 1 \
-4,+ 24 SF
PERMANENT STREAM \ a
IMPACT - 11 LF PERMANENT ZONE 2
WETLAND SEWER EASEMENT
IMPACT - 98 SF IMPACT - 509 SF
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT - 120 LF
TEMPORARY ZONt 1---
i� 673 SF \
/ TEMPORA.RY ZONE 2 - 463 SF \
HEADWALLANINGWALL
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
2,104 SF
IMPACT MAP EXHIBIT
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY TAR/PAM BUFFER IMPACT (ROAD)
ZONE 1 - 1,392 SF - (0.032 AC)
ZONE 2 - 1,613 SF - (0.037AC)
PERMANENT IMPACTS:
PERMANENT TAR/PAM BUFFER IMPACT (SEWER EASEMENT)
ZONE 2 - 509 SF - (0.012 AC)
PERMANENT TAR/PAM BUFFER IMPACT (ROAD)
ZONE 1 - 4,786 SF - (0.110 AC)
ZONE 2 - 4,374 SF (0.100 AC)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT (ROAD)
ZONE 2 - 98 SF - (0.002 AC)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (ROAD) - 131 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (ROAD) - 26 LF
SUBDIVISION
FRANKLIN COUNTY, NC
IMPACT MAP EXHIBIT - 1
THE SPAULDING GROUP. PA
1bmm4r^te=e
PREPARED FOR:
IREENPOINTE, LLC
'201 CREEDMOOR RD., STE 1
ALEIGH, NC 27613
DATE : 06-05-2019
S&N FIRM CERT. #: C-1875
PROJECT ENGINEER:
TOM SPAULDING, PE
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
IRIS MITCHELL
PROJECT SURVEYOR:
0 20 40
SCALE: 1"=40'
SEAL:
CARp�''%
S
191

I
PROPOSED RETAINING -
WALL
PROPOSED LOT LINE .
TEMPORARY ZONE 2
1,072 SF
IMPACT MAP EXHIBIT
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY TAR/PAM BUFFER IMPACT (LOT FILL)
ZONE 2 - 1,539 SF - (0.035 AC)
IMIERM SUBDIVISION
FRANKLIN COUNTY, NC
IMPACT MAP EXHIBIT - 2
THE SPAULDING GROUP. PA
."
MUA=AwWft
++++++++ + 467 SF
PROPOSED LOT LINE
PREPARED FOR:
GREENPOINTE, LLC
7201 CREEDMOOR RD., STE 1
RALEIGH, NC 27613
DATE : 06-05-2019
S&N FIRM CERT. #: C-1875
PROJECT ENGINEER:
TOM SPAULDING, PE
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
IRIS MITCHELL
PROJECT SURVEYOR:
0 20 40
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SEAL:
CARO
���� • FSS'
QQ�
S
=SIS � •�_
J

u =
FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS
TMS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF:
Spaulding & Norris, PA
and is mt w be mp hd dor -picd N W. or N pert without
permission from SpeWding k Noffm PA Tltis drawing u ml
m h uxd on any od- poiect and u m be aWmed b
Spoldirg & Norris, PA, upon mquesc
Aml
I
I �
_
s Rill
1111
j
�
Z
I �
O
I
/
> x
�w
/
3 Q
m � �
D
C/) U
CL
f
F
W z J
J_
I Ba
'>1
GRAPHIC SCALE
�(w
DRAWING
SHEET
INDEX
sae)
`' , f t I—a . 10o tt
PROJECT NUMBER
1860-17