19940950 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19941012

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A, Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A, I I FA
[D FE F1
November 28, 1994
Cumberland County
DEM Project # 94950
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Cumberland County
Post Office Drawer
Fayetteville, N.C. 28302
Dear Sirs:
You have our approval to place fill material in 2.90 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose
of road crossing at Cumberland Industrial Center, as you described in your application dated
28 September 1994. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by
General Water Quality Certification Numbers 2732 and 2671. These certifications allow you to use
Nationwide Permit Numbers 14 and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Stormwater management shall be done on lots south of Tom Starling Road by sheetflowing stonnwater
into wetlands remaining on these lots. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 30 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
P
L 7r. es
ton Howard, Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DENT Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
94950.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

?!y y/
44
E ,fief
ve
?? cr
G ?, p? v u?O k'ldf t d?
Go??e?? ors Co?,o?;Rk?
To Ll ??
Date Time

WHILE YOUMERE
M
of
? AM
? PM
Phone (
Area Code Number Extension
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message
Operator
ng AMPAD REORDER
EFFI C IE NC Y® 823-000
To /? -- - -
O AM
Date Time o? PM
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
Phone 6-90 U
Area Code Number Extension
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETU NED YOUR CALL
Message RQ-kW ?d II 3/3 7,0
i
121 -t rl, I-",- W-1
he Opt h - 01^t e Jij V,stj iN inc,c
A?g AMP!'
' REORDER
EFFICI NCYO 023-000
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, AT.X?FJ
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Water Quality 'A -4
Ja mes B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 11, 1997
Cumberland County
DWQ Project # 94950
Cumberland County Industrial Center
P. O. Drawer 1829
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Re: Compliance Inspection
Dear Sirs
On November 28, 1994 you were issued General Water Quality Certification Nos.
2671 and 2732 authorizing 2.9 acres of wetland impacts for road crossings and lot fill
needed to develop the Cumberland County Industrial Center located off Tom Starling Road
south of Fayetteville. This certification was issued only for the impacts shown in your
original application. The certification carried the additional condition that stormwater from
the lots south of Tom Starling Road shall be directed to sheetflow across the remaining
wetlands on those lots.
As part of an ongoing compliance monitoring and enforcement program for 401
Water Quality Certifications, Ken Averitte from the Division's Fayetteville Regional Office
and myself made a compliance inspection of the Cumberland County Industrial Center on
January 16, 1997. From our inspection it appears that your project is not entirely in
compliance with the conditions of the certification. We found that a number of the lots had
been developed, but much of Technology Drive and Production Drive had not been
completed. The problems we found include the following:
1. The plat submitted with the application (dated June 1994) is not accurate with
what has been constructed. Only one cul de sac has been constructed on the north side of
Tom Starling Road and it is located across from Corporation Drive.
2. Along this cul de sac on the east side is a roadside ditch which cuts through the
headwater forest wetland just north of the Cutter Hammer facility. The ditch probably
serves to carry water from the stormwater pond but is also serving to drain the wetland.
3. There is a perennial stream running along the north side of Tom Starling Road
from Lot 42 through Lot 40 that is not shown on the plat. Will additional road crossings be
needed for access to these lots?
4. Although it is stated in your original application that the plat represents the
USACOE approved wetland delineation, I question the straight line wetland boundaries
shown on Lot 29, the Purdue Foods lot, and the Swift lot.
In order to bring your project into compliance with the 401 Water Quality
Certification, please provide this office with an updated plat showing the existing structures
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% port consumer paper
and wetland impacts, and accurately showing all streams and wetland boundaries on the
property. You will alsopeed to pipe or fill the roadside ditch through the wetlands near Lot
37 or apply for those additional impacts. Please identify any additional impacts, such as
road crossings, that may be needed for future development. It should also be noted that
additional impacts above the 2.9 acres originally authorized may require mitigation under
the current rules.
Your cooperation in complying with the conditions of your 401 Water Quality
Certification is appreciated. Should you have any questions concerning this matter please
feel free to contact me at [phone] or Ken Averitte at [phone].
Sincerely, A?
Peter B. Colwell
Environmental Specialist
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
Scott McLendon, USACOE Wilmington Field Office
John Dorney, DWQ Central Office
Kevin Martin, Soil and Environmental Consultants
File
cumindctr.94950
MEMO
Date: February 25, 1997
To: Peter B. Colwell, DWQ
From: Kevin Martin
FEB 2 71997,
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
..,n4
Re: Your 2/11/97 Letter Regarding Cumberland County Industrial
Center (DWQ Project # 94950)
I have reviewed your letter for my client and have the following responses
(numbering corresponds to those in your letter):
1. S&EC submitted revisions to NW14 and NW26 permits to the Corps and
your office consistent with the existing road alignment in June 1996 (copes
attached). Your office approved the change on 6/11/96 and the Corps
approved it on 8/12/96 (copies attached).
2. I would like to discuss this with you further by phone or at your office. I
do not understand exactly where you are talking about. Do you mean at
the end of Distribution Drive under the CP&L R/ W (which is east) or on
the north side of Distribution Drive? The ditch under the CP&L R/W has
been in existence since the mid-80's and was present when we began our
work.
3. Again, I am not quite sure where you mean and would like to discuss this
with you.
4. Enclosed is a copy of the Corps signed delineation for the project The
straight lines on Lot 29 and the Swift lot are associated with older ditches
where water table monitoring justified the approved delineation. The
Perdue Foods and Sonfast, Inc. lots were not included in our delineation
because they were not owned by our client when we did our work. We do
not know the extent of wetlands (if any) on those tracts.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
A copy of the current site plan showing wetland locations is enclosed.
As for the ditch near Lot 37, I again need you to explain exactly were you mean.
After you and I discuss my questions, I will coordinate additional responses
with my client. I may need to perform a site visit myself. I will await your call
before preparing any additional responses to your letter. I hope the enclosed
information will clarify the situation and answer most of your questions.
cc: (w/o enclosures)
Bob Stanger
Danny Fore
KCM/mag
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A • Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 11, 1996
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental Consultants
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Martin:
Re: Revised site plan
Cumberland County Industrial Park
DEM #94950
COE #199100764 and 199103404
Cumberland County
In accordance with you 30 May 1996 letter, the 401 Water Quality Certification for
this project is hereby modified to reflect the new lot configuration. All other conditions of
our Certification are still applicable.
Please call Mr. John Domey of my staff at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
. - '?
Pston H ard, Jr., P
cc: Fayetteville DEM. Regional Office
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Matt Flint, Wilmington Field Office Corps of Engineers
John Dorney
Central Files

L.! r - ------ - r
i
Division of Environmental Management - Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 - Telephone [phone] - FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
August 12, 1996
Action ID No. 19950011, Modification of Nationwide Permit Authorization,
Cumberland County Industrial Park
Mr. Kevin C. Martin, President
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Dear Sir:
Please reference the Department of the Army permit issued automatically
upon expiration of the 30 day nationwide permit notification period, on
November 11, 1994; and your written request for permit modification received
May 31, 1996. You have requested permit modification to allow extension of
Corporation Drive across wetlands, rather than construct the previously
planned crossing at a location "downstream" of the Corporation Drive
extension. The modified design will impact 0.15 acre of wetlands.
The Nationwide Permit 14 verification is hereby modified to include the
work shown on the enclosed plan. This letter provides written confirmation of
the verbal modification verification I conveyed to you by telephone on June 7,
1996.
Our files indicate that you did not receive a letter of verification for
this nationwide permit. For the record, the Corps has authorized 1.74 acres
of wetland fill for commercial development lots and road crossings, pursuant
to Nationwide Permit 26; and 1.07 acres of wetland fill (including a reduced
acreage for your modification) for wetland road crossings, pursuant to
Nationwide Permit 14. The total area of wetland impact authorized in the
Cumberland County Industrial Park is 2.81 acres.
Provided that the design of your work in wetlands does not change from
the plans submitted with your 1994 application and 1996 modification request
and that the (enclosed) nationwide permit conditions are met, your
authorization shall be extended until the nationwide permit is modified,
reissued, or revoked. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be
modified, reissued, or revoked prior to 21 January 1997. It is incumbent upon
you to remain informed of changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a
public notice announcing the changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you
commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the
nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve months from the
date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the
present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
-2-
Mr. Jeff Richter, of the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office staff has
assumed responsibility for our regulatory program in Cumberland County.
Please direct inquiries regarding this correspondence to his attention by
writing to the above address, or by telephoning [phone].
Sincerely,
a Fli
eg aw t tist
Enclosures
!roo"
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
NCDEH & NR - DEM
Attn: Mr. John Dornev
4401 Reedv Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Messrs. Dornev and Flint:
US Army Corps of Engineers - Regulatory
Attn: Mr. Matt Flint
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
The purpose of this letter is to request a revision to the current DEM 401 Water
Quality Certification and Corps Nationwide Permits for the project known as the
Cumberland County Industrial Park (DEM project #94950 and previous Corps
Action IDs 199100764 and 199103404). Total proposed wetland impacts are
equal to or less than the amount originally permitted.
The client desires this change because of changes in lot configuration. As
always, industrial parks are designed based on initial best guesses of what a
buyer may want and are later revised based on "reality".
Our client needs to begin construction ASAP and I hope, as in the past, we can
receive verbal authorization to proceed quickly (i.e. the 30 day process period is
usually not required).
Please call if you have questions or require further information to process this
request.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin
President
KCM/tnag
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping; and Phvsical Analvsis ¦ Wetlands Mapping; and Mitigation ¦ Fnviron mental Audit
On-Site `^'- ate Treatment Svstems. Evaluation and D(eSWn

I?

/ . 0
c
MN
GN
- I 1'11'
107 MILS 21 MILS
4 GRID AND 1916 MAGNETIC NORTH
ECL NAMN AT CENTER OF SST
HOPE MILLS, N. C-
NWl4 SAINT PAUIS 15' QUADRANGLE
34078?+8-TF-024
1986
DMA Sm N NW-SFJM VW2
SCALE 1:24 000
N. C. 1
•
QUADRANGLE LOCATION

I .5 0
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 400D 5000 6000 1000 8000 9000 10 000
FEET
1 5 0 KILOMETERS I 2
1000 0 METERS 1000 2000
CONTOUR INTERVALS FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
THIS MAP COMPILES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS'
FOR SALE BY U.:. LOLOGICAL SURvF_Y, DENVER. COLORADO 80225. OR RESTON. VIRGINIA 22092
A IOl. .; I)1(5CRIRING TOPOk.-WHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLL O. -t-QUEST
w O F'
m104
o e
Coe
lk?
fop
ell
1 ' O? u S
\\ / :au
\ J
M •W
M ?p Q u 1
\ `--•-` ? ? • . \ ? b q q ? , . ;?. ,t 0 yr\
'r0 r •' \ •C \
1 A .
r. ? h„ •'r O? 1? 1 ? r M
Q
o 01-OV 5! e° v
OOjf /? ` ?•'
1 Val
Ilk
\\ ? n 'rte ?f ?d ?. ` •",r•.'a?,?. < /Z,?Q. Q°4 ?. , 2I < yJ ????i ?,1? Ooh' 36.09
00.
-20
JIB

5? *w
o
-? 0
.

a
3 :9 6 0' AC ROAD $5
M
s \
4
2
f
0

!F

z
y
z
O
to
2
0

0
U
I
U
O
U

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
401 COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FORM
DWQ Investigator: e v1 A v'ee'r 1-16, 'le
lI DW # l G
Date : j 1 97 Time: r D Regional Office: County:
Project Name: CG/ `v1 f?? ?" ICf !/jam( 710CJ4?15" fb^ la"?G?
Permittee: (4 ?y t' c /a ?rJ Cd fit Pt
Location of Project:
6f
?- Y Sr , Al ?v7? yS
Type of Development Authorized: /1 0 L• Z-0 SS %k r 7 Cv k-17"'1 e /i1 l 6
Type of Permit / Waters Quality Certification: 73?/ 7 r-7?
Type of Impact: W'-eV0 l15 -(of/- P-eae) C VW5 S1
Wetland Type and DWQ Rating: Gvlr Po c- / a- 3 of 3
Nearest Stream: T fc? ?O? k ?'sl? Cr° Basin/Sub.:

Distance of Wetland Impact from Nearest Surface Water: J j44e ,.,,•i ?i I SOY /
Specific 401 Conditions:
5feef(?abv 5forxt ?L??f« o GI?U la i ?d we1?aac
Is project in compliance with all conditions: (P / (P? ma5 -1.
g /
Comments / Description: J C veV'u I ttlldC t, ?.(oi u-c b v e 4, vfe ve.
5 ?Uw t'? t• bl ? I? I , ?Lc, ?1??0???' lr o' ?' ??`r;G????lr'o ?t ??l ??' Lt ?t v-e. ??y? ??.?t'i-, C%r1i???????
TOtJ ? l,Us cleared, 01,11j ()Grc- Tvu(,?,; (7-
b?T+wee??
a too -i Yo ad ? I vuc 5 7 > ) ? ?- /-1-7 11,1-4/kl ,'c?? P60
?? owrxr`v, ?,? ?'as {
-tv'ea vo a le v, o 'T r,,,
{- rl NO
J i5 vr< ?? r ?S?"???
Is there a violation of the 401 Certification authorization ? ! eS
If so complete the enforcement section on the back of this form and forward copy to
the Central / Regional Office.

4;6 6--6, t - f 6
Signature: Date: X1 l //
DWQ 12/96
ENFORCEMENT
1. Is there a previous history of 404 / 401 activity on the property?
If so, give any details:
Nature of Violation (fill, excavation, etc.):
V.,? '-1f'qka ( Itid(u tic 5 Acres:
Wetland Rating (if possible):

d11t4jw r.1 P(Jr ? «lr.ia
Significant uses impacted: ,rya 4-w' . 4'0 1, ( of, P
Were downstream uses impacted? Vo
Coul& the impacts have been avoided or significantly minimized? '-e a
Could the activity have been authorized?
Is restoration or mitigation appropriate for the unavoidable impacts?
'-'de
?0 G,
PC
Staff Recommendations for Future Action: I q pi 7 C ! v? ??'
fp'
?l9R,
. - ll?ctlv'

WhAnINQ §TnVF --On'
' ;' h m 1' _!'f^M N"J. P q K A N 1J . „t P 1+F; A ;

A p„_ 111, mf MY: Jlvil", `{ 1w
.. i?ti
{ ;c •. f

z , 9 A-C,
--i?51 -- -:5 - K"?? >>

T Gh 61J

»,+.,E T_ I. I. + I ,. W._. m,-r ,Inn r! . .

qq //
G

vw-
?U
C-) )Cvy
,1
f, o d
Project name1 CD `?''? far., Nearest roan Q"I
County Wetland ¦*? acres Wedand width feet
Name of evaluator, ,Date X/- Or'
•
0 Hydrologically connected
Hydrologically Isolated
jwa i 'flooded orconve
ring Or fiber str?rms
sorially flooded or fir
ermittantly flooded or t,
•
•
wetland to stream ratio ? 7 to 3 ? surface water
! no elwertce of floodlrsg os surface water'
Wetland type (select one) O Other
r1 Swamp forest O Shoreline •
Q Bottomland hardwood forest O Brackish marsh •
? Carolina bay O Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin O Bog/Fen •
O Pine savannah O Ephemeral wetland
°"at fiat •
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
•••••••••••••••••••• ••••sum••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Water storage' •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 4.00 =
Pollutant removal ..... - •
Sensitive watershed
score.
Travel corridor v x 150 = >WWeiland
Special ecological attnbes r % •
ut
Wildlife habitat = x 150 = - `.; g"<' L •
•
t
Aquatic life value •
RecreationtEducation f y •
0
Economic value .25 = •
49
•
•
•
•
•
•
p? VJ ?c?,?:?? ?,1 Nearest road
Wetland ¦rm acm Wetland width feet
Este //-Z- L2e'"
? ariSdurKl
•?,
'
?? 'OP P09
:?.?_ cry ptrav
on inter itt
.? evi?thtnintez
-other ,

O Hydrologically connected
• .• •
opeat
J predomir?antiy mfr?erai non-sandy
'
K i~
D predominantly sandy Tood
and wetness
i
a
sem
permane
t
Iy to pernlanently ,.
' flooded or inundated
Hydraulic pastors regularly floods or conveys stormwater
freshxater. brackish during orafberstonms
steep topography seasonally flooded or inundated
D ditched or channelized $ ntermittardly flooded or temporary
wetland to stream ratio z 1 to 3 surface water
no t ideme of f7ODdin& Or Surface water
••••••••i??••••••••?•••••••i•••?•••••••??'??_••••• ••- ••••••
Wetland type (select one) O Other
r1 Swamp forest
Q Bottoml
d h
d
d f O Shoreline
?
?° •
an
ar
woo
orest Brackish marsh N
• O Carolina bay
Cl Pocosin ? Freshwater marsh Rg .
O Bog/Fen O •
• O Pine savannah O Ephemeral wetland
• O Wet flat •
The rating system cannot be appli ed to salt marshes. ;
•.••.••••••..•.•••••••.••sure••••••••••:••••••••••.••••.••.
Water storage A •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00
Pollutant removal __,??? •

Sensitive watershed
Travel corridor _L- 1 150 a Wetland score.
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat x 1S0 =
Aquatic life value _e?_ •

Recreation/Education e7t? •

Economic value L x 0.25 =
•
49
wIffiln I mite :I::: W un?
natural vegetatkm .....
if
5L
15 55
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
44 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
:1,,
September 28, 1.994
NRCD -DEM
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dear Messrs. McLendon and Dorney:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
OCT - 194 E
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 14 and 26, a~ nc a-"
Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project to be known as
Cumberland Industrial Center. The project is located near Fayetteville, NC
(Cumberland County) at the NE, SE and SW quadrants of the intersection of SR
2220 (Tom Stalling Rd) and I-95 as shown on the enclosed plans and Hope Mills,
N.C. USGS Topo Quad vicinity map.
The Corps approved wetland delineation is shown on the attached map. The
delineations of impact areas have been approved by Mr. Scott McLendon of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Fill in the wetlands will be required to construct roads and utilize a lot.
It will be necessary to fill 2.91 acres (see map) of jurisdictional wetlands above
headwaters for placement of some of the proposed roadways and a lot utilizing
Nationwide Permits 14 and 26. A total of 1.16 acres (see map) will be impacted
for road crossings under Nationwide Permit 14. Road crossings are
perpendicular to wetland alignments, in order to minimize impacts. Impacts to
lot 42 total 0.35 acres under Nationwide Permit 26. Additional acreage (1.39
acres) requested for under Nationwide Permit 26 is derived from road crossings
that do not qualify for Nationwide Permit 14. Please note that the wetland area
on lot 42 is of low quality and is an old agricultural field. The wetland was
created by grading operations on the site.
To expedite the permitting process and to make "life easier" on everyone
involved, the following individuals/ agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire application package: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
National Marine Fisheries, N.C. Cultural Resources, Ken Averette (DEM) and
David Franklin (Wilmington Corps).
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Please call if you have questions or require further information. If you intend to
perform a site visit please call and we will arrange for someone to accompany
you.
Sincerely,
?? C I
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (with enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
USF&WS
N.C. Cultural Resources
Ken Averette, DEM Fayetteville Regional Office
National Marine Fisheries Service
KCM/cah
NOTE:
An endangered species survey was performed on the site. No threatened or
endangered species were found in the survey. A copy of the study has been
appended to this permit application sent to USFWS.
DEM ID: ACTION ID: _
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft
26 & 14
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MF.. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone (919) 733,08?
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Cumberland County
2. Owners Address: P.O. Drawer 1829, Fayetteville, NC 28302
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): [phone] (Work): same
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil and Environmental Consultants
244 W. Millbrook Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone]
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County:
Cumberland
Nearest Town or City: Fayetteville
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NE, SE and SW quadrants of
intersection of SR 2220 (Tom Starling Rd) and I-95
(See attached plans)
6. Name of Closest Stream/ River. Rockfish Creek
7. River Basin C a 1D e Fear
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS 11?
YES ( ) NO (X)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain
10. Estimated total number of acres of wafters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Unknown, approximate total shown on attached plans
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. ixtt di wetlands, acted by the proposed project:
Filled: 1-74 1.1614
Drained:
Flooded: O
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 1.74 1.16
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2" X 11" drawings only):
Majnrity of impacts are due to road construction One small
araa fnr 1nt fill iG in_lud-d
13. Purpose of proposed work Allow development of industrial park.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts.
See attached letter from S&EC
15. You re required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (X) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? YES ( x) NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? T n rls i a 1 park or rural undeveloped
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? 11% i n i c i P;; 1
G ?8(q4
kkJ
Signatu Date
OwncrS U

J??1
.-b

- X,

t
MN
GN
W- I 1'11'
107 MILS 21 MILS
I GRID AND 1916 14AGNEITC NORTH
CLINATNN4 AT CENTER OF SHEET
HOPE MILLS, N. C.
NW/4 SAINT PAULS 15' QUADRANGLE
U07MS.TF-M
1986
DMA SM N NW-SERffS V842
SCALE 1:24 000

N. C.-)
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
.5 0 1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 30M 4000 5000 6000 1000 8000 9000 10 000
FEET
1 .5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 0 METERS 10,00 2000
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
THIS MAP COMPLIES WrrH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SUnvEY, DENVER, COLORADO 80225. OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS A%,....ABLF ON RFnllFCT
DATA PDOINI' .? ""
EC ROUMMOMM t NwMT=aafon 5.? ` 1125COdaftm
AI A Environmental Consui?ants ??-? R '•? ?s
TINE: DATE: qCOUNTY! c " 1L r a ?? (919) X30-911
NEAREST WN: o dP- A ? WATERWAY: ap? e
QUAD: t?ate- M LOCATION:
PRUPKRT4 OW P4 (NAHE ADDRESS) r PARTY DOING WORK:(NANE/ADORESS)
u an ?+r?
Q Z 30
PIIt)NF: (?)? O PHONE:
OTHER ENDIVEDUALS PRESENT:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE Y VEGETATIVE UNITS
--------------------------------- -----
Do noun wwkt nmsr W ao d* ms exbt at the plant commundy?
Yes . No _ (U rw, 0492M on bads)
Has the veg soils, WWW hydrology been Wgri ficandy dsturbed?
YN _- No (I YM. explein on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF IMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES---X COVER--INDICATOR
s `?'
1
gn
e
?
(
O ` GROUND COVER: SPECIES-X COVER-INDICATOR
Q
.
u
r
q
n Facr c v?T, 1 r•ac\a fo ty..aQ ZV L11?
2.
3 2. Lyoh,a L.uat
lo
c w
IFcL
. 3. .
4. 4.
.
S. s
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 6.
1. ttc
V
-
\
N 7.
.?
? ,
.??. •?? ?? k s
2. 1 w 8.
3. Ykr-x Gl4bra %O ?- W W090V VINES
4. CIcNiVm $ecuti?loro, ?0 ?c- 1. ??ax LQuciu??cc C l?

Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACK and/or FAC too
Is the hydrophytb vagstadon kMtaion met? Yes _V", No
Radonsie:

$OI S ` L
Serissiphase: r - Subgroup.2
lathe soil on the hydria soils iist? Yes ./ No Undetermined
b the soil a Histosoi? Yes No Histic spipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: MlaOW? Yes No :tEGisyed? Yw _ No ?-
NW* Apr 1..C 71 , mottle Colors:
Other hydric sob Wcato :
Is the hydrfc sod a tarbn met? Yes No
Rationale:
-as o v.o w kA) a t 1" o -p- 0. 1,x
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the sod saturated? Yes ,Z No
Depth to fraiw4tendhV water in pWsod probe hole:
Het other field evidence of surface Inundation or sod ssaustion. A
Is the wetland hydrobgy criterion met? Yee _V No
Ratbnaim:
JURISDICTIONETERMM
AMON AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wsdand? Yes
Rationale for jurbdWtbnai decision: C' _ a
C V oArn tom:
???OTIiREO!?!tll?IA7'1t- 1111?D. _
oil A Environmental Consultants
NEAREST
QUAD:
OTHER LNDIV

dr&
1126C8ftt tM
Rttleiph; NC 276
TIME: r ' OATI::. (919) 7 g11:
_ /--/, COUNTY: vvl ?r a r?
P_ M N'
WATERWAY! ..v....•. d n a c
LOCATIONS
OARESS) PARTY WING WORKS (NAME ADDRESS)
L .
amung I
r \ ,- 13 0 ,
PHONE:
L4 PRESENT:
T-
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE VECSTATIVK UNITS
------------------------
Oo notm)d environmentej s sxkt at ow plant ocnnnuMy'r - - - - -
Yq V No (8 q. 6xPWn on back)
Has the veep sole, and/or hydrology been slpnilicantV d o bed?
Yq - r4a -16 _ (8 YW NKPIWn on bads)
VECRTATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREESS SPISCIE ---X COVER--INDICATOR ?GROUND COVER: SPECIES-X COVER-INDICATOR
• .?.?.5 a \cts tip ?cVL +• ??«z'?? a «?ra
2. 343 'vcx c_
3. 2.
4. 3.
4
. '
S
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS= S.
1..?,AeccV,i XCt&%J\S 3 cu 7.
6•
e
2. Ll 8.
3. WOODY VINES:
4.
S 1.
PWORM of dominant apedas that an DBL. FACW, and/or RAC
N the hydrophytic vegstWan criterion met? Yq No
RedonaM:
Serlea/phaae: 801L8 A V1 , C v\1 Q e
io the soil on the hydro sous list? Yee No ?UndeteMkW \ o
Is the soli a Hlatosot? Yes__ No ?C Histic epipeclon prmwO Yq _ No `
Is the soil: No y/ Gloyed? Yes No
Matrix Color- Mottle Colors:
Other hydria sob Indicators:
b the hydrlo sag criterion met? Yq No ?
Radonale: C 1'\...v t. LA_
_
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground sudaw inures Yee No ?8wfaw water depth:
Is the sob saturated? Yes No ? t
Depth to free-standing wow In pdsoli probe halo: AAo c e_
Uzi other Reid evidence at surface Inundatlon or sag satrrratimL
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes - No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
t Rationale plant community d d Yee No f
atbnaie for Jurisdictional ttonal dodsla slon: (?
R ? CA
- \ ,J ?l
YATA ? - M 1!9!n 10?01
F. ROUTINeoNSITIrr v ?At1oy1 Noma ? -V . e ft ft t
oil ° & Environmental Consultants b
l on Rae h; 27a:
Al "e-Itff-
TUNE : s DATE: 1/?/L COUM: (919) T9o-911
Ntr:AREST Tcloe? :O ?A ?1/??\ ? WATERWAY:
QUAD: Ao ( LOCATION:
PROPERTY OW •(NAME. ADDRESS) PARTY. DOING WORK: (NAME ADDRESS)
vr. \Qr?
e '
Z 3 03 ,
sai"
PlIONE: PHONE:
OTIIEK LNDIVEDUAL,R Pitmqvwr. -- ?-
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE VEGETATIVE UNITS
------------------------
Do normid environmental aondwons =dat at the plant commun$y't - - - - -
Yes No __ (11 no, sl;dWn on bad:) - -
Has the vegetation sos
Ye_No2: (a Mdor hdologybeen spntim*ddubd
expbh an badt) .
VECRTATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-UONINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES---Z COVER--INDICATOR GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
%AO '?;aC, 707 Yv` uAtv""- " 1S ?vzcxc_ kk
2. P?..?s Qa`uS'}c?s
3. t 0 c_ 2. t_Q. o t1.7 1-- ux ?? o<<u wi 10 `'mac v?
4. 3'
4.
5. 5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 6.
1.. TAex 9 lam- Sac w 7.
2. ftcen46a_ 10 -IF,t- w 8.
3. t<7sS a s7 k v-` \,eL lS ?i WOODY VINES :
4. Qvef tv g Nn.g ro. 1 O
1.
5. Qveccus Iaev\s 10 t-acUl 2.
Pen01 rt of dominant speda that are 08L. FACW, and/or PAC
Is the hydrophytta vegetation oriterion met? Yes _% No
Ra lonale:
SOILS
Seriss/phose: A. c+,r,\ 3*4roup:2 \k-E G' 1 S`mrn*
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No .--- Undowmin•d
Is the soil a Hislosol? Ya No Histic ep don pesent? Yes No
b the soil: Mottled? Yes No Glsyed? Ya _ No ?-
Maft color.
Other hydria sob Indlcaton. hohP ° calm
b the hydro soil criterion met? Yes No ?
MmAnnols.
0 WE 11°"m "rumwgy crftarion met? Yes No ?C
Ratbnate: Se S' A +C,
JURISDIC770MAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No L----?
C a
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: S?n A a
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No f Swteoe water depth:
Is the soil saturated? yea
No ? t
Depth to fra-standing water in pidsoii probe hole: 10 d r? ??a r Z • S
Lld Other field evidence Of surface inundation or soil saturation,

X 0
46 Soil & Environmental Consultants Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
September 28, 1994
NRCD -DEM US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon
PO Box 29535 P.O. Box 1890
Raleigh, NC 27626 Wilmington, NC 28402
Dear Messrs. McLendon and Dorney:
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 14 and 26, and a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project to be known as
Cumberland Industrial Center. The project is located near Fayetteville, NC
(Cumberland County) at the NE, SE and SW quadrants of the intersection of SR
2220 (Tom Stalling Rd) and I-95 as shown on the enclosed plans and Hope Mills,
N.C. USGS Topo Quad vicinity map.
The Corps approved wetland delineation is shown on the attached map. The
delineations of impact areas have been approved by Mr. Scott McLendon of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Fill in the wetlands will be required to construct roads and utilize a lot.
It will be necessary to fill 2.91 acres (see map) of jurisdictional wetlands above
headwaters for placement of some of the proposed roadways and a lot utilizing
Nationwide Permits 14 and 26. A total of 1.16 acres (see map) will be impacted
for road crossings under Nationwide Permit 14. Road crossings are
perpendicular to wetland alignments, in order to minimize impacts. Impacts to
lot 42 total 0.35 acres under Nationwide Permit 26. Additional acreage (1.39
acres) requested for under Nationwide Permit 26 is derived from road crossings
that do not qualify for Nationwide Permit 14. Please note that the wetland area
on lot 42 is of low quality and is an old agricultural field. The wetland was
created by grading operations on the site.
To expedite the permitting process and to make "life easier" on everyone
involved, the following individuals/ agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire application package: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
National Marine Fisheries, N.C. Cultural Resources, Ken Averette (DEM) and
David Franklin (Wilmington Corps).
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mit;-ation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
Please call if you have questions or require further information. If you intend to
perform a site visit please call and we will arrange for someone to accompany
you.
Sincerely, C
-
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (with enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
USF&WS
N.C. Cultural Resources
Ken Averette, DEM Fayetteville Regional Office
National Marine Fisheries Service
KCM/cah
NOTE:
An endangered species survey was performed on the site. No threatened or
endangered species were found in the survey. A copy of the study has been
appended to this permit application sent to USFWS.
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide permit #): 26 & 14
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATM: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 276264535
ATTN: MF:. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone (919) 733,5083
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Cumberland County
2. Owners Address: P.O. Drawer 1829, Fayetteville, NC 28302
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): [phone] (Work):
same
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil and Environmental Consultants
244 W. Millbrook Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone]
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County:
Cumberland
Nearest Town or City: Fayetteville
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): N Er SE and SW quadrants of
intersection of SR 2220 (Tom Starling Rd) and I-95
(See attached plans)
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Rockfish Creek
7. River Basin: Cape Fear
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS II?
YES ( ) NO (x)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Unknown, approximate total shown on attached plans
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. i c**d wetlands, ?%pagted by the proposed project:
Filled: 1-74 1.16
4
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 1.74 1.16
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2" X 11" drawings only):
Majnrity of impacts are due to road construction One small
a raa far 1 of- Fi 1 1 is i n 1 uded
13. Purpose of proposed work Allow development of industrial park.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts.
See attached letter from S&EC
15. You re required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (X) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? YES ( x) NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? Ind u s. r i a 1 nark or rural undeveloped
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Mu n i r i lea 1
G??(q4
S%gnatu Date
Oc,?nc.15

_ •.? mow- ?

MN
GN
107 MILS I 1'11'
21 MILS
GRID AND 1986 MAGNETIC NORTH
=4ATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
HOPE MILLS, N. C.
NW/4 SAM PAIRS 16' QUADRANGIE
3407$-1'18-TF-M
1986
DIVA 5253 N NW-SMM VIN2
SCALE 1:24 000

N. C. )
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
'5 0 1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5.000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10 000
FEET
1 •5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 0 METERS 1000 20'00
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
THIS MAP COMPILES WITH NATIONAL MAP "^rIJRACY STANDARDS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER, COLOt%ADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS A1,.. ABLE ON RFOITFCT
DATA i0?1' -ft"
EC ROUIIN?ONBtTSDRTiiA111M 71FiOD , S \ ` 1125Ceclada t 1
ail & Environmental Consultants RaleiA-NC276(
1 (91 S) 790.9117
TIME: DATE: COUNTY:??? ?r -
NEAREST WN: _?ko tip ?l\\ WATERWAY: ....K••• cN?bA-,c fW?41 On
QUAD: 1'?coe? iUl LOCATION:
pRUPF:RTY OW (NAME. ADDRESS) r PARTY DOING WORK:(MANE/ADDRESS)
rn `ah ?+M
v
PlltfNF-: (WIM-7 -1 p Pll N
OTHER LNDIVLDUALS PRESENT:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE VEGETATIVE UNITS
Do nwmjd condhions exist at the plant community?
- - -
- -
Yes No _ (I no. explain on bads)
Has the vegetation sobs, and/or hydrology been signifkatmtly &turbed?
I
N
\
Yes -,
o ,.,
. (
I yon. expisin on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR
1. .1 `rizec?q (n0 `F GROUND COVER: SPECIES-X COVER-INDICATOR
f
`
c?Cr
20 cvjs., .1?^ac\0-
v.YZ, o k. l 0
2
o
L
6
L Ft, L1tD

3 u r-\.c
0
h%aL
y t
lo
LL
ac
. 3.
4. 4.
S• S.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
fiat 6.
.
1. LtV , flwt O
V
\ 7.
2. M-3vv
1%-
.??1?14,a S ?ucw 8.
3. Y \eX G in bra \0 Wc- W Woulm- VINES :

4. Cyc \\\a ccM, ?1crq k c ? c, w rrc \1
1.. Y-- \ a 7 Iauc.T\cc
"AC l.v
5. 2. ?h.Y. Q?,,,c
percent of dominant spoon that are OBI, FACK and/or FAC t o O
M the hydnophytia vgwatbn criterion met? Yes _- No
Rationale: -
Serfedphase• ?O?nv?aor? SOILS Subgroup.2 }'1neCW-\? (•tw.w\?c ?u?-al?cPP?
lathe Sagan the hydric soils list? Yes ./ No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoso(? Yee No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
b the soil: Mcttbd? Yes No Gleyed? Yes NO T-
Matrix Cobra . r Mottle Colors:
Other hydro soil Indicators:
Is the hydria sob motion met? Yes No
Rationale:
AaSo?\ ?b ?Jk) m to A,7 (%f&
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes _-,Z No
Depth to free-standing WOW In pWsod probe hole:
List other field evidence of surfaw Inundation or soil sawratim
b the wetland hydrOkW criterion met? Yes V No
Rallwals:
JURISDICTIONETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yee \ , na,\
Rationale for jurbdkxionai decision: _ y '1-u +

1125CGftftM.
oii & Environmental Consultants RalelM, NC 276
(919) 794.911
TUM: r' DATE:. j -q Comm V. a r?
NEAREST WN: ?ko op WATERWAY: ?..•?ed c??„i ae, tic
QUAD: o M LOCATION:
PROPERTY OW Rf(NAHE/ADDRESS) r PARTY DOING WORKs(NAHE/ADDRESS)
M. (w ur,
e \ Z 130
PHONE: (COR 1) t' - O PHONE:
OTHER LNDIVLUUAL4 PRESENT: -- IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE V VEGETATIVE UNITS

-------------
Do normfi smihmmww condition adsd at the
l
n
j - - -
- - - - -
p
ant commu
4
Yee V_ NO _. (If no. upWn on bode)
Has the vegetation' sails, and/or hydrology been Wonfficw tly digumbed?
Yee _ No 2: (a YW explain on bade)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR

aN'ksocts yo G?k GROUND COVER: SPECIES-X COVER-INDICATOR
v\.s+t a A-t u? -4 3(3 "iF

2. cx L
2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
S.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 5.
6

1.. ??ecc?s \ae??S 30c,u .
7.
2. ?wnr??s «.qc.\n.? ?c c? 1Op,c (? 8.
3.
4. WOODY VINES:
1.
S.
Percent of dominant species that are 08L. FACK and/or FAC Z O
Is the hrdrophtrtic vegetation criterion met? Yes
Rationale: No

l SOILS
SerieNphase: ? A y\ r, f C V \\1 up:2 P rn \ C `?-
ls the soil on the hydria soils list? you No f' Undetermined u
la the NW a Hletosoi? Ya No f H" ?Yea No
colo r. `10" a)Y,@ - _ No -- wed? Y« _ No yG
tic
Other hydroo sob irk; Mottle Colors:
Is the hydro sob criterion met? Yes No
Radonale: paS o hu? ???b 11 lA)r,4e r
HYDROLODY
le the ground aufaoe inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the sod saturated? Yes _- No f
Depth to ine4tandirrg wafer in pit//soil probe hole: M o c e A--\w r Li
Uzi other field evidence of surface inundation or son saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology crfhrion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDIC ONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
lathe plant community a wetland? Yea No '_? t (?` 1
Rationale for Jurisdictional decision: _ ?? ?\ V AQ ?-?N o ?u

C L YArA aver. 01 -? -V-w---NB
ROUTINEO"T D>lE mom""m WQHO0 Wwhjf5t
oil & Environmental Consultants Ra?J+-NCo7E
NEAREST
QUAD:_
U
PHONE : (m)
OTHER EHOIV

s ' DATE:/_q / COUNTY: ?t- j (919) 790-911;
-L VA
=WATERWAY.*r
ac c
,TION
r PARTY DOING tdORK:(NAME/ADDRESS)
It 0%0" -
jamurbTur,
? O v / i
L14 PRESENT: L
IS PRUPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE VEGETATIVE UNITS
Don environmental oordtlons aft at the On Comm - - - - -
Ye
Has s V No __ (a no, sXpWn on bads) Unity?
- - -
?
y" the vpeO ] (S Y'441- upla an book) signilicantly
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-UOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES I SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
I. P?r,.s ?aao?4 %IkO *?;aL I. \S
3. 10 ?C_ u- Z• Le.?? 7 vx??o?luw? t0 ?+c ?l
4.
4.
5. 5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 6.
1..?ex s io ra 3 0ac W 7.
2. Lyc\Ax? Pacem??oc? %0 W 8.
3. r ?S-ca sylvu??ai l5 ?i WOODY VINES:
4. 4ue?c,?s T%\3 rc. 1 O
1.
5. ?v ccc.?s 11WA,5 tO t-ac Ul 2.
PWcent of dominant spedss that are OHL. FACW, and/or FAC 9) s
the
na?le v0gl tion criterion met? Yes -L No
18
Reflo
n(? SOILS
SerIas/phaac YoL?o?u 2 ;(v VC 01
b the coil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _ Undetermined `? a m ?
Is the soil a Ms:osoi7 Yes No =Hbtic epq»don present? Yes No
is the soil: Molded? Ya No Weyed? Yes No Matrix
hydro sod Indicmonz; µ v\d_ v\A- Monts Colors: t o X ?/ z
Is the hydric sod Criterion met? Ya No ?
Rationale:
?i
wwwr -M ri 11%
HYDROLD(ly
Is the ground surface lnwxkb ? Yes No ?Surfaoe water depth:
Is the sod saturated? Ya No ? t
Depth to fre"anding water in pit/boll probe hole: o s2 -?'ka r, Z. S
List other field evidenos of surface inundation or sod satauatlon.
Is the wetland hydrology cfsrion met? yes_ No _.L?
Ratlonais: S e Sao ?/oTri
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No a.? c
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
x
a
a
c4
H
aq
z
O
U
A
a
c4
w
H
W
H
V