20061199 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090701

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s): r 't l
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review:', Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies-Prr=sent: -ntYj (€ -`l r?\r?Y 1c?'? Q t? ?k?r??S1 ?1v? r.?a
Weather Conditions (today & recent): ? 1c \ l (?'S) + ??_?z?; „? a ?,w. ?1C- _? K Zsr?
Directions to Site: Immediately to the south of NC Hwy 561, south of Tillery.
I. urrice Keview Ition:
Project Number: 20061199
Project Name: Cono ite
County(ies): Halifax
Basin & subbasin: Roanoke 03010107
Nearest Stream: Looking Glass Run
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status:
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 148 acres
Stream: 5050 linear feet
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
Associated impacts (if known):
Proiect History
Event Event Date
Site Visit - Streams 3/19/2008
Site Visit - Wetlands 3/19/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 5/27/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 2/12/2009

"Add significant project-related events: reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
uunng office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Mitigation Component
Monitoring Success Success
Year (report) (field) Resolved
20061199-1 69 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration 3
20061199-2 8 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Enhancement 3
20061199-3 71 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Preservation 3
20061199-4 5050 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 3
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 69 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration Component ID: 20061199-1
Description: Plugged ditches and planted
Location within project: See map
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated or saturated >5% of growing season Inundated
7 Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success f Drift lines
Observational fielddata agrees? No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? No
es Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive wa er, etc.):
chi S4_ V C S.'% Sk aQ
i

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 spa in yr 3, 260 spa in yr 5 Species Story TPA/% cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes, No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): 'MFes ?aAuj
r'?-??Qr?` do+n? + More XroUg - mcq%l+ reitkRa 04fqft& -ko
reAec? letcL G00tii?:00%i - wo?4-c%n for CO-Ve-
/.
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 6
a
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: I NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful p ially succes I unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
tell ?.
i d 0e_%y 4- JM0 4?v- eq\:?ro- 0-'-n
-t cues" - ?Vd(\- JL66 - -? z - kA\, -fie S
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 8 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Enhancement Component ID: 20061199-2
Description: Planting
Location within project: See map
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 spa in yr 3, 260 spa in yr 5 Species Story TPA/'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? a No
based on community composition? a No
based on TPA and/or % cover? No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
6 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 3 of 6

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: su cess ul partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:

Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 4 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 71 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Preservation Component ID: 20061199-3
Description:
Location within project: See map
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
I

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPAI'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 5 of 6
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
i
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: su c ful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
lOd ??
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow- p a tions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 6 of 6