WQ0022810_Staff Report_20190729

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
July 29,2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00022810
Attn: Poonam Giri Facility name: 166 Democracy PI
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 07/08/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Schneier
C. Inspection report attached? ❑Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: n/a and their contact information: (_) ext.
e. Driving directions: Are correct in BIMS
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
H. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils,depth to water table, etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
--4._,Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells,etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No El N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR04-14 Pagel of5

6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
M.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑Yes ❑No M N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Roughly: Septic tank, dual Advantex filters,recirc tank and pump,UV,dosing
tank and pump, audio/visual alarms,rain sensor, 0.38 ac drip field
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 600 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e.,equipment condition, function,maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc)maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or M No
If yes,please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑ No M N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or M No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No M N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0022810 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please complete the following ex and table if necessary).
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , II O , 11
O , „ O ,
11
O I „ O 1
11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes;please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliancelenforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No0N/A
If yes,please explain:
1. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: At the NE corner,the property includes a portion of a pond on 8 lots,but
the closest portion of the spray field is shown on the construction diagrams as about 400 feet away.
2. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 W00022810 Page 3 of 5

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
n/a
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparers
Signature of regional supervisor—
Date:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 W00022810 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1- The lot is undeveloped and the system has not yet been built.
2- The facility location was taken from the design diagram and should be updated whenever the house is built.
3- The field location was taken from the design diagram and should be updated whenever the field is built.
a
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 W00022810 Page 5 of 5

OR APPLY 6000 LB/ACRE,GROUND 1-67 1-69 [� TOTAL 1100 \ • i : •j•Y i 'i
1TS-j0-10 FFRTU2ER. �_� 1-67 '�fj 2-61 ���:•�`•:'�\ C / i..
-72 4=70 1 64 I 2T'6T 1_70 ZONE 4 ,\\ \••\ `\`` V.
ALENT COVER OF AN°MER"SUITABLE 2]6 260 265' i. ,2 261 \ \ �`` �`` ` , •\ \-.V.
IG NIIH F�HALT, jV''NC OR;NETTING. 4-70 4-70PTOTAL
70 y4-7OE14-70 II \ `` \ ' \•\ i
ON STE TOTAL 1 y 2so zaoao 1 / . \ O 1 /
it i
NHL IS FULLY ADEQUATE MAYBE MOWED I I II I \ I �'!iii
IEGESSARY. RFSEE°•''ERTUZE''AND 20NE 2 1400
1-78 '1
1-BO 2-91 gg
1-so 1-91 1-66 3- TOTAL OF FOUR (4) ZONES a 5466 FT OF DRIPPER LINE /• , , I !f
1=86 1=66 2-82 1_ _ TOTN. DOSING AREA - 16.398 aq.ft.326 367 338 J0 MIN. DOSING AREA REQUIRED o 16,078 sq.fL R
AREA DEUNEATED BY SOIL SCIENTIST � 24.940 s .ft. 1
:H SEPTC SYSTEM IN THE ROSENONT COMNUNTIY. ONE WILL CONTROL
D5PEft5PL TOTAL 1334 i ( SURPLY RETURN UNE SIZES :,.
I Zone 1 Zone 2 2ana 3 Zone 4 !f \ ',s / i 1
WE x 15' HIGH AND SHALL BE NEMA 4X, UL RATED ENCLOSURE THE If I SUPPLY f-1/2' 1-1/2' 1-1/2' 1-1/2'
!OM THE SYSTEM DIS�IryBUTOR.
(� RETURN 1-1/2" 1-1/2' 1-1/2' 1-1/2. ,j i f
ICIAN AS CLOSE TO THE TANKS AS POSSIBLE. IN THE APPROXIMATE AREA '� 2 f �
24' FROM FINISH GALOT 61
I . i i , / -� I I f RECOMMENDED DRII
/,
E INIERNQ PANEL Cc'NRECTIONS OF THE PUMP'AND CONTROL CORCS:' i i ' /.i" r �f '/ / i i j� `_- /-- ---- J
HEMAMC IDpf P IyG ALL TERMINAL CONNECTIONS. THE SYSTEM 1 ' 1 . ,``=,_,, 44 (LI, / „ ``. ` f' OBLTHY� - : ♦ •� SCALE 1'-5
THE APPROPR3TE IDENTIFICATION AND SECURE IN THE ACCESS i i \ I L p°f r i - 1w^ ` ' ; ---
r it Il.r\ i l..ir ��—_ c -, ,\`..\\ A, SETBOCK UNa
EdGATED CNCPIR OF 20 Mn. 230 VOLTS. SINGLE PHASE 1 i - r y �`l ;�( li'1 'i K'-��'-_`��` \.`�`�`\\` I i i � �\ - ` .•._ I '"�'�'
�rtT OF 15 AMPS, 115 WLT$, SUPPLIED FOR THE T \
i i I `� I,��: !f=Z.",'{�///' D,FIELD L\ �I �� J,\\`I``` `i\ i i i 1I\ i� ` '9 `i ♦.
QNE i :�ttOM THE DWELLING FOR THE WEB BASED ,! \ 1b ` 1�\\\ ^`'
EXTFN3ON FROM ANY LINE THAT IS USED IN E a ' \ ' I ,}/
l -vsr , 'ur�yt 6 t':.`* I 1:'.:.II ♦ '` , , ♦i, TJI 1
fVICUIT OF 20 AMPS. z30-vDL'rs r " �. 1T ,; .: _ _ n.
15 \ \\\ li��l }' 111 1 '''/i `'` ' .i i i"i _— \•ary,p�'`.'\
GRCUR OF 28 AMPS r2a5p"oc Ppl'!ED'„TOR'INE<UY
S.' s'r .t-•[ .0 .`.•. , 1 N, 11
t °L '� "6; ._ / I \ \1 I i`�\ 1-�1 i I _ i'l l /r i ', \'«/ \ I i N %i r /
9%+'. t bfC.r^z r N' lu l it l I 1 '\ ` i i lr^:OISfALLED BY THE ELECTRICPN AS A CONNECTION r , 1 i 1 i I li ♦ :' r 1 , ( .�\, 'C' \ `'♦\
POINTS OUT IN THE TANK.AREA_ q7E'I It I 1, .�. ��`•`�` �. ,.,; `♦.. 1 ' � i I APPROXIM CATION``` `` ♦^
i 1 ' - � `♦`II ` PUNT dI •-_NOOSE UJ ` .&T SEAL EMBEDDED IN ORDER TO PREVENT -_- _^ 1 Sir 'i - AN0.51ZE'••'. `III ` `�_q`
NOT USE PERMANENT SILICONE OR ETIPPNDABfE V ' f 1 I ' 1 1 i i rri I ' i' i �� \ `,'if �` \STG. f0[(K i i
f I I i� r1 / 1 K / TES\ \ "�` EITHER 30' OR 50' LEADS. THIS W!LL HELPI- RETL \ G --
IBLE' IF A SPLICE MUST BE USED, R MUST BE _ Q r I J ' r / r,,, ,, i;rr IAZ`RN♦ `,),t FCI AP
�o ,I"r` / / 7 ; (1 . !_ s \ "::1g� OL AN MYANTIE, TPRL�pIAnTecR2u ro ELEVAn\
P i1 `... I ' i I , 1 I i I I UNES `♦ , ,1\I %�r 1` I r /i .NINIw TAt4L 7A6 0`^� _\
AUTO DIALER TO VERICOM SYSTEM. \`` �f`;yJ I ;/ --' I 1 i _ L , $ITC , M\(1A(YVtlli �``L}EGO�IyyO,,N;.,2)�``
`♦`l\\\`.♦`\ ral 11 ��\'l— �``-`♦\l
11^>,•. - ' \, l l p/ i ( `✓-�_ - ''r i `` ` \ `'`♦J1NR , I: t .i 1 - `♦\�♦\\\ \`♦�♦ ♦ .
N.THE BEST f� f IJ : II`I,\ 1 ♦ \,.___✓/ ♦ \\♦` I I 1 r f i' `,\`.` , \ ` ♦`,`,
a `1 \\`\\I` " : \,�-. r / \ `d♦\ IT• ill 1 , ! ``.1 , \,` ♦ ♦ \ `
�INAL DESIGN
�X's
NOT RELEASED FOR COM
I IA"5f v. :� �hI ' \';` Y" /�\.�(,V" •'�`�•_ W^" , ; 111 HERiTAGE POINTE - LOT No. 6
SURI�AC-"WASTEWATER DISPERSAL
FOR 5-BED(200M 600 gpd DWELLING
CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
4 PLAN VI
IM �D�da81(� "elih pia9rpM
1 .