20171295 Ver 1_JD_update_20190725

Strickland, Bev
From: Jeremy Schmid <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Steve Kichefski; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Haupt, Mac; Davis, Erin B;
Kim Browning; Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US)
Cc: Bradley Breslow
Subject: [External] Scout Site (SAW -2017-01469)
Attachments: Scout_J D_u pdate.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
0
I visited the Scout site last week and looked at a few areas that were discussed on the IRT site visit that may need to be
revisited. Attached are data forms and updated mapping. Please review and let us know if you have any additional
comments.
Potential streams (CH3 and CH4):
Both streams show up on the Davie County Soil series maps while only CH3 shows up on the USGS Farmington quad
map. Both streams were dry at the time of evaluation, but Brad mentioned that they were flowing during the site visit.
This did not affect the outcome of the stream calls when completing a DWR stream form. CH3 appeared to flow parallel
to the property boundary until its confluence with Hauser Creek but actually cuts in to the easement for the last 60 feet
or so. I completed a DWR stream form and was able to score it as an intermittent reach. CH4 (labeled "Ditch") was
ditched through the field once exiting the woods and then makes a hard turn at the fence line before entering the
easement. I was unable to reach an intermittent score based on a lack of points in the hydrology and geomorphology
sections. Please find stream forms and updated stream lengths in the table attached.
Potential wetland area to east of Hauser Creek:
According to older aerials, the area appears to have been mowed last between May 2015 and February 2017. Early
successional tree and herbaceous species were present such as sweetgum, tulip poplar, blackberry, goldenrod and
pokeweed. There was also a mix of some wetland species such as button bush, black willow, and common rush.
Although there were wetland species present, they were rarely dominant and only making up 5-15% of any stratum.
Soils were bright reddish brown (10YR 4/4 ) in the top 10 inches and really didn't show any signs of hydric inclusions
until well below 12 inches. There were some areas that did show depletion but they started too deep (^'14 in) in order to
meet the F3 Depleted Matrix indicator. The assessed area does not appear to be jurisdictional, but we do believe there
is potential for a small area of wetland restoration with the Priority 1 stream restoration. However, because the area is
relatively small (0.5 acre), and the depth to hydric soil is greater than 12 inches from the surface, we believe the
potential for wetland restoration is limited. For those reasons, we are not having a Licensed Soil Scientist investigate the
site and RES is not proposing wetland credit on the site.
Thanks,
Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Senior Ecologist

RES I res.us
Mobile: [phone]

Aquatic Resource Table (SAW -2017-01469)
Site
Reach/
Wetland ID
Latitude
Longitude
Length (LF)
/Area ac
Type
Scout
WD
-80.514835
36.028026
0.75 ac
Wetland Waters of the US
Scout
HC3
-80.516072
36.030105
2,484
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Scout
CH1
-80.517263
36.030583
249
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Scout
I CH2
1 -80.515734 1
36.029308
1 68
1 Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Scout
I CH3"
1 -80.514051 1
36.027800
1 127
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
* Added to the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination on July 18, 2019

CH3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7-18-1 Q
Project/Site: Scout
Latitude: 36,0278
Evaluator: Schmid
County: Davie
Longitude: -80.5137
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 22
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
.5
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 11.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
.1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = fk
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: channel dry
in woods and farm field
Sketch:

CH4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7-18-1 g
Project/Site: Scout
Latitude: 36.03204
Evaluator: Schmid
County: Davie
Longitude: -80.5165
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 15.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if > 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 8.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = fk
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: channel dry
in woods and farm field
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Scout City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 18 -Jul -19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): J. Schmid Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.03216 Long.: -80.51695
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Datum:
Yes * No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ NO O
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aoDly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ NO 0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No O
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ NO
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
C . �-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Rubus argutus
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4. Robinia pseudoacacia
5. Cephalanthus occidentalis
6. $ymp10Co5 tinctoria
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Juncus effusus
2. Solidacio altissima
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Phytolacca americana
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: DPI
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
o
❑
o.o°r°
Total Number of Dominant
0
-
❑
0.0%
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
081- species 5 x 1= 5
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
0
El
0.0%
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 90 x 4 = 360
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 135 (A) 470 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.481
0
❑
0.0°r°
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is > SO%
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
L] Morphological ical Ada tations 1 (Provide supporting
10❑
18.2%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
20d❑
36.4%
FAC
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10d❑
18.2%
FACU
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
❑
9.1%
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
5 ❑ 9.1% OBL
5
❑
9.1%
FAC
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
55
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
15
18.8%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (I m) tall.
40❑
50.0%
FACU
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
20d❑
25.0%
FACU
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
❑
6.3%
FACU
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
0
Ll
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°r°
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (I to 6 m) in height.
80
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (I
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes NO 0
0
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
1
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Locz
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/4 100
Clay Loam
8-12 10YR 4/3 90
7.5YR 5/6 10
Clay Loam 2% iron -manganese masses
12-18+ 10YR 4/2 85
10YR 4/6 15
Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
F1Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[71 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MCRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (SS) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
mushydrophytic
hydrology
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Scout City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 18 -Jul -19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): J. Schmid Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.03235 Long.: -80.5171
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Datum:
Yes * No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ NO O
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aoDly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ NO 0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No O
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ NO
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
C . �-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Rubus argutus
2. Salix nigra
3. Symplocos tinctoria
4. Cephalanthus occidentalis
5. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Solidago altissima
2. Juncus effusus
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Phytolacca americana
5. Dichanthelium clandestinum
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: DP.2
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
o
❑
o.o°r°
Total Number of Dominant
0
-
❑
0.0%
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
081- species 10 x 1 = 10
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
0
El
0.0%
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 80 x 4 = 320
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 125 (A) 425 (e)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.400
0
❑
0.0°r°
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is > SO%
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
L] Morphological ical Ada tations 1 (Provide supporting
15
d❑
37.5%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
❑
12.5%
OBL
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
5
❑
12.5%
FAC
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
❑
12.5%
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
10 d❑ 25.0% FACU
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
40
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
40❑
47.1%
FACU
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
10
❑
11.8%
FACW
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
10
❑
11.8%
FACU
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
❑
5.9%
FACU
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
20
d❑
23.5%
FAC
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°r°
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
85
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes NO 0
0
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/4
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol(Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (SS) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Scout City/County: Davie Sampling Date: 18 -Jul -19
Applicant/Owner: RES State: NC Sampling Point: DP -3
Investigator(s): J. Schmid Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.03278 Long.: -80.5171
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Datum:
Yes * No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ NO O
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired; check all that aoDly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ NO 0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No O
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ NO
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No ❑'
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
C . �-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Cephalanthus occidentalis
2. Salix nigra
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Rubus argutus
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Juncus effusus
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Solidago altissima
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: DP.3
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
o
❑
o.o°r°
Total Number of Dominant
0
-
❑
0.0%
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
081- species 10 x 1 = 10
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
0
El
0.0%
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 120 (A) 400 (e)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.333
0
❑
0.0°r°
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is > SO%
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
L] Morphological ical Ada tations 1 (Provide supporting
5
❑
12.5%
OBL
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
❑
12.5%
OBL
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10d❑
25.0%
FAC
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
20❑
50.0%
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
40
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
10
12.5%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
10
❑
12.5%
FACU
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
40
d❑
50.0%
FACU
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
d❑
25.0%
FAC
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
0
Ll
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°r°
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (f to 6 m) in height.
80
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (f
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes NO 0
0
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: DP -3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/4
8-16 2.5YR 5/4 60 10YR 5/8 40 Sandy Clay Loam 2% iron manganese masses
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
F1Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
[71 Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MCRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (SS) (LRR N, ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrology
mushydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0