19930319 Ver 1_Complete File_19990517

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
July 7, 1993

Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199302529 and Nationwide Permit No. 12 (Utility Line Backfill
and Bedding) and 26 (Headwaters and Isolated Waters)
The New Fortis Corporation
2700 Wycliff Road, Suite 216
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Dear Sirs:
Reference your application of May 11, 1993, submitted on your behalf by
Soil and Environmental Consultants, for Department of the Army authorization
to discharge fill material impacting a total of 0.10 acre of waters of the
United States, and wetlands adjacent to the Neuse River and unnamed
tributaries, for backfill and bedding related to construction of a sewer line,
and minor fill for a roadway, for construction of the Waterford Landing
residential development, south of U.S. 64 and east of Rogers Lane, east of
Raleigh Wake C©tinty, North Carolina.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits.
Authorization was provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
for discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters
provided:
a. the discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters
of the United States;
b. the permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one acre in
accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in
special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include
a delineation of affected specific aquatic sites, including wetlands; and
c. the discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project.
Authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was also
provided for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility
lines, including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change-in
pre-construction contours.
Your work is authorized by these nationwide permits provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM). This nationwide permit does not
relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local
approval.
-2-
This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit
authorization. If during the 2 years, the nationwide permit authorization
expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that the activity
would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,
activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit will remain
authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of
the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,
suspend, or revoke the authorization.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, at telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Soil and Environmental Consultants
Attn.: Mr. Kevin Martin
3818 Bland Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Mike Coughlin
Environmental Engineer
Wake County Community
Development Services
Post Office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources XT. 0
Division of Environmental Management AW4V
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary
ID EH H N f?
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 1, 1993
The New Fortis Corp.
2700 Wycliff Road
Suite 216
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Dear Sirs:
Subject: Proposed fill in Wetlands or Waters
Sewer line and roadway crossing, Waterford Landing
Wake County
DEM Project # 93319
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification to place fill.material in
0.10 acres of wetlands or waters which are tributary to Neuse River for sewer line and
roadway crossing located near US 64 and SR 2517 in Wake County as described in your
submittal dated 11. May 1993, we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by
General Water Quality Certification Nos. 2664 & 2671 issued January 21, 1992. Copies of the
General Certifications are attached. These Certifications may be used in qualifying for
coverage under Corps of Engineers' General Permit Nos. 12 and 26.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
P Howard, Jr,/P,E.
93319.Itr
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

00,*-A a
Soil &z Envm* rumental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road ¦ Rai
U UJr5?p 19) 790-9117 ¦ Fax [phone]
7nn
- -WE U
U. S. Army. Corps of Engineers WATWEE ?o
onmental Management
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer "-"" --zre
6512 Fall's of the'Neuse Rd., Water Quality Planning
Suite, 105 Attn:, Mr. John Dorney
Raleigh, NC 27615 PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dear Messers. Alsmeyer and Dorney
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits (No.
26 and 12) and appropriate 401 Water Quality Certifications for
the placement of fill material on the project known as Water;ord
Landing, near Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Alsmeyer, (Corps)has alr ady
sited fYe site: "' 1?r."K`?1'eyer' did- not xamn" the small wetlan
area to be impacted by !the 'sewer line in?,the flaodplain of the
Neuse'''River but it was flagged and surveyed at-the-same time the
other areas were evaluated, but at that time no impacts to this'
area were foreseen. The attached,plans show the locations of
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. as approved by the Corps on the
property utilizing the 1987 manual, the proposed impact sites and,
the areas of `Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. to be impacted by
sewer lines and a road.
A considerable amount of thought and ground truthing has gone into
developing this layout and we feel impacts have been minimized as
much as possible. The impacts to wetlands are from sewerline
crossings, which will require impacts of .09 acres. The sewer
lines have been kept as close to the toe of slope as possible
without requiring excessively deep lines. The roadway which will
require .01 acres of fill, is perpendicular where-it crosses the
wetland, in order to minimize impacts while allowing access to the
entire tract.
Please call if you have questions or require further information.
We realize that our client is not 'required to notify you for fills
less than 1/3 acre above headwaters butwe have chosen to do so
for the record and as a professional courtesy.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation "¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design

Since we are on a tight construction time table anything you can
do to expedite the permit process will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
f ,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
Karl Schafer, (Raleigh DEM (regional office))
DEM ID: 3f) 9 ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 12
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIR(
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE S ???1 THE
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF TRW
PLEASE PRINT.
[MAY i 1 71993
1. Owners Name: The New Fortis Corporation
2. Owners Address: 270n ljyrl i ff Read, Suite 216, Ra 1 r-i gh , Nr 27607
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): 782-47An
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil & Environmental Consultants
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: wake
Nearest Town or City: Ra 1 Pi qb
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.);_gr
(Roaers Lane), and west of the Neuse River.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Neusp Ri v r
7. River Basin: Neuse
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS H? YES [ ] NO [x]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO )[x]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
Approximately 3 acres
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
NW26 NW12
Filled: .01 acres .09 acre s
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: .01 acres .09 acres
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): _ Fill of .10 acres of
wetlands is required for a sewerline ccnd roa6woukl.
13. Purpose of proposed work: Residential Development
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Wetland fill wilt allow uplands to be utilized.
See attached letter for minimization of wetland impacts.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [x]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. Not required
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO ' x]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. Not required
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Residential and undeveloped rural
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? , Municiple sewage
C ? ?-- (?-) 9 a
gen sSignature
Date
wj.-Y- DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
?-
COORDINATOR: TIME: _ _ DATE: L/ S /_U COUNTY:
NEAREST TOWN: WATERWAY: "JP .- P=J?r
QUAD: G,, ;V wCG+? S•Q• ZSt?I `E 11J??3t Q?uW --
PRUPI:KTY UWNE :(NAME/ADDRL•'SS) PARTY RUING WORK: (NAME/ADDRESS)
? CA
I.??w `?AC''r?S aw•eS _ 13 z
Pti(NE &ON T R ICO -140 - l( -
oTHEit INDIVIDUALS PRESENT:_ ,?
IS PItOPE1tPY UNIFORM OR EPARATL DISCRETE VEGETATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X _ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TREES: SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR
1 - W& PAC
2• pl c. nv<v5 cccic?ev.i?•1i5 20°(. F1AC-VJ
3. 1"lw ,no?ic, 1jiT?iv??'?.v?A 5°J6 FA kW
4. gevlo. ??`?"` 5G(o ?RcMI
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
1. Ui'?a„rvw,r?r? `r\esgv(?N,,rh (5?/0 -----
2. Mw?NOl?i.v:rgihcn??Sa/e FACMf
3. Z;?.??dar?bc:r s?i?,rACo?fuc? 5°lo FAC
4. F???S ??.w`sLi{rolic` S°(c, FJIc.
5.
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
1 A-, '3 5"01 (`AC,
•
2. /-y??QkkC\(& 1N2LA o
r4TTyrC vr- cYtL'X.?{2.MiWC? _
1$°G, Ac-
3.
.1ruci lO`(.
1,-JC Law.bo,r S4
FAC
4. Sv^,(o.ti,ro(v;fo1?'A- 10°(0 FAC.
5. 1?loadwr.rdkQ-v(Y?iN«h Sole OVl.
6. Sb.v {J YJS cecKVus S`f. Ot3L

8.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACK and/or FAC 100°(A
Is the hydroph is vegetation criterion m)e_t? J(es No
Rationale: iT T
I SOILS
Seriestphase: r [ 12 Subgroup:2 ?)f Pie- r1a V13 a ?(QU ?S
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon pros t? Yes _ No vl?
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _ No Gleyed? Yes No -Af Matrix Color: O `? ?' ;?( • • Mottle Colors: ?"Ze??0- 4;
-4-Q '`lam ^ 'i'?'
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ?_ No , , ??,p
Depth to free-standing water ln pd/soil probe hole:
List otfler fieldgy#dence of surffcce, inundator soil saturation.
- A& CCL d - W ? s - o
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes_ No
Rationale adne?.t?_ .??ia may) ?/rt? ' i??o-r6?a Q. n-?-? l?¢n ,
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIN
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes I/' No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
a
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO V-- AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404_ NONE_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEADWATERS- ISOLATED- ADJACENT- NWP //
DETERMINED BY:
TION AND RATIONALE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
0
COORDINATOR: TIME: DATE: COUNTY: \&to, c?
NEAREST TOWN: WATT ERWAY:
QUAD: LOCATION: ?g:P.c R _?? i't ar Ntv 2?y?r
PROPERTY O JF.R: (NAME/ADDRESS) PARTY DOING WORK: (NAME/ADDRESS )
e o ?,.e S la r+ `? r ter'
ins
PIIONE:(_)-- _ PHON
OTHER LNDIVLDUALS PRESE'NT:_?r
TS PRUPEItrY UNIFORM OR EPARATE DISCRETE ?( VEGETATIVE UNITS
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ?(_ No (B no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No V (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TREES: SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR
1 - a-li e* cas ?ACo4r, '35°f. Ft4L (A
2. QJ trCV3 P ktkko? t0 0(. FALVW
3. Aker rvt'un, (0°i. FA-
4.
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
I. Covv.,s VtorrAs- 30 °i, t=ACOL
2* -Ctk
5°(,
rf4 k
3- lQ?erL?S ?1?11a5 S`ib FACW
4.
5.
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
,
1. lpK(LGGI.Cwd?v01 f"t(LAK) 20014 PA(-
2, C fS s t-0.CjjC LA5 i5°/? FAQ
3. Lt%?tdezx k(r (C°io ---
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100°(-
is the hydrophytic v@getation griterion met? Yes No
Rationale' 110yJ.`u.o:n? crJ2CiCSad"ac -1 X47 k?4!M1%? h+ ??
SOILS ,
Seriestphass: I) ? - - Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _X_ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No - 5P- Gleyed? Yes A_ No
Matrix Color: p Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicato : s.*r "
Is the hydric soil crit n ion met? Yes No ?_ ?• J???
Rationale: ze ? J- 9 = s ?r-.??
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No -
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe he oie: ?R-(?
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil s uration
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X_
Rationale: -e-a .t.e-
JURISD18MONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: -
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO ? AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404_ NONE'
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEADWATERS ISOLATED- ADJACENT NWP it
DETERMINED BY:
No
3
PP DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD'
COORDINATOR: _ TIME: _ DATE: L?ct_/ 5 /97_ COUNTY: w&kt-
NEAREST TOWN WATERWAY: \I s? 2?yt r
LOCATION: 25t1 ?- IV¢v?e t??vrT' QUAD: Qe.Hln C:?St
PROPERTY 0 FR: (NAME/ADDRESS) PARTY DOING WORK:(NAME/ADDRESS)
I'D Vy
G. C h Sow r 1 r (ur ?s
PHONE: (_)-- PHON'. (rlq_)Jar, -_SJ(a
OTHER ENDIVLDUALS PRESENT: s-
O IS PROPElUfY UNIFORM OR RATE DISCRETE X VEGETATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _)?_ No (H no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _)( (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TREE IES—% COVER--INDICATOR
1. (Aus ? 50°(o FAC,
2. Lvrd4.tn`b,r st-Imcjl,:,, 15°to FA3.
4.
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
1. ?,??aewaroh ar e?r2vve. 15410
2• L;II,viGtGtWl?c?r s+J(T cJ(J-
3. (fit circus h(6? g-(-
4. ACU- (vbrv,%+ 5°i,,
5.
VT SPECIES)
COVER-INDICATOR
Pptvd
PAC..
FAr-
' _ ` SOILS I
Series/phase: d A) PLL Subgroup:2 y ?' t ? d cJ u / ?
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X_ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No ?_ Histic spipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No _ Gleyed? Yes No 3e
Matrix Color: -?.,?T-- ^ Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: A§
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINAI
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-%
1* QiCr cus ?, kos S"ta
C 2• NC_er rvbj vw. 5°j0
3. CSIpff_% r?dG`car`s 5?/a.
4.
5.
6.
FACU? 7.
f o`(. FAc 8.
FAG WOODY VINES.,
t= Ac. 1.
2.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC $0°(-
Is the hydroppytic vegetation criterion met?? Yes XNo
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No )( Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No __ c r
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other,fleld evidence of surface,inund4Ltion or soil sp ratpn. C) t,
Is the wetland hydrology criterion
Rationale:
ed?
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE
NO L/ AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404_ NO
HEADWATERS ISOLATED- ADJACENT- NWP #
DETERMINED BY:
No 4- `? n.. r.. v? (J
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD'
0
COORDINATOR: TIME: _ _ DATE: COUNTY: WvL-
NEAREST TOWN: Kopf` WATERWAY: At (Z.`.rcr
QUAD: LOCATION : J, ?,?tt?t S•?S 1') ?0- 111 cusp : +r -_-
PROPERTY 0 ER:(NAME/ADDRL•'SS) PARTY DUING WOKK:(NAME/ADDRESS)
eW Ho?eS ?? 'S rA
CL VAS d i1 l h . v h
PtiUNf PHUN . (411) ll qt)-- C(It _
oTHER INDIVIDUALS PRESENT:_?f, 1 smfii" CorY?
IS PROPEIUfY UNIFORM
OR SEPARAT DISCRETE _X VEGETATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes V No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _,X_ (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TRLES: SPECIES ---% COVER--INDICATOR
0
1. Pt?nvs •-tckt u, t=
2.3eAv4,,. %m 5r- 20 °/a 4=ACW
3. NAA-O,,nus o0Lc &-wA-81175 15-G FACvJ
4. Aces CvW-vn. 511n PAL
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
1. E, k(A 1 {a VX ,M i y, 0- 6001. FA(-
2. y?iC? r? ?c? db?: c l5 °lo PAC
3. C?np S,` c? c? i c a,w $ ° fo F Ac-
4. L ?u;alaw.b.,. S ??ki vtl s °(o FAC.
5.
6.
7.
8.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC j?() °G
Is the hydrophytjp vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 1IJJaw. u aunt o C i Q -&"D?ect ILI. • d ob. • h ev?virnti vu?
SOILS
Series/phase: f?^ ? p Subgroup:2 4y ]err ya yxe Ac
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ? No Undetermined ??? ?!
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No V_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No _
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators.
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes__X_, No ,
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
I.Lrtoicl ,-6m- S}ImCJkuo- to"i„ FAC
2. Accr f„ brw'*^ lo°lo PAC
3.
4.
5.
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X_ Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes _X No ?i
Depth to free-standing water in pVsoii probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology, criterion m,_.g? 3.? Ye No n
Rationale: ?•: 0 A,' 'aiVtA k4 ?e-?^-.?- y-N-dC ?ir?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404 NONE_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEADWATERS ISOLATED- ADJACENT- NWP #
DETERMINED BY: