850002_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181030

�uV\h �L
Division of Water,Resourc'-
P
Other Agency
Type of Visit: P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review (_-) Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (� Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: fp 3� Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1 _' County: S4 le-&—s Region:
Farm Name: a o,Lr-,e-5-L Fq,Owner Email:
Owner Name: &'V ��- rQ� Phone:
Mailing Address: 7-5�-� W V O( s i �QU-tjJQh'1 1� l i i �� 70.Z Z
Physical Address: l q p1 H' w y %C) t( y\j o � �, �1.�3� 1l'l l'� i N c- a 7 d 2— 2___
Facility Contact: A (Z— 13 caj Title: Phone: c2:7(
Onsite Representative: W Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: 366 /6 ' 3-5- t � Longitude: ..5" b l ' /s I/
/-� y � how , V-3Y -70
Design -Current Design Current Design Current'
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop „s
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
3
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes 0 No
Yes [:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment -
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No j2j'1*4A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No J�-NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a []Yes P]''No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ISpo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Fe, 5 C U
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
CS�KA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
,J�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
%
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. es record keeping need improvement? I
Yes
[:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application [—I `x' ''• , .,,ehdA:u ❑ Waste Anal sis Anal
❑-- to
.f:cs
❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [� Crop Yield ;�.-r.�nn' Zn T�•nt�t�eteerts Monthly and 1"
Rainfall Inspections
El chid,@ sopo y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
(�No
'❑
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
CO -NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: LD - 7 `" _ of
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste of tion equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [—]Yes J❑No aNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes [9'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes N5'1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes fid No ❑ NA ❑ NE
j6n 5o 1( +esks ; Noi-16-t , 4-b send , sec V
Ca l � b rah � � o� Scg l � � 5 Pr� �+' d c� � i P► a-O 1 � !'le-2�i v I s c
01 �a FaArm,5 uhae, re -ow a.>n� ut°�id�? t�1uS4-�.�dQ�� �rAw ul,@ due_ losk 1�
do o V1 -4r e6 Zvi Sect o q
�i
over 1P1ov5�.� -� tot- + ZAP i 5� 1 vv1,P.t 4
+&l i-e-
4
02` ,Sme, c�P�tcc }-louts oJlk-o t) oy n XW7 + /o'c uf"r zoV—o 60J
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
L3
Phone: -17 M _
Date: lb-30 2.01�
21412015