20070314 Ver 1_Application_20070223

a
d~.a STA7E'.~
~°M
ti
~_ "gun
°p pun vC~•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 21, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
070314
Subject: Proposed safety realignment and improvements to NC 56 and NC 96
interchange in Granville County. North Carolina Moving Ahead Project
MA05021R. WBS Element No. 37667
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to conduct
improvements at the NC 56 and NC 96 intersection in Granville County. The existing
facility is not aligned and is the site of numerous accidents.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The project crosses an intermittent stream, an unnamed tributary to Beaverdam Creek,
[NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 27-12-(0.4), Best Usage Classification WS-IV NSW; HUC
03020201] (Figure 1), in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structure that conveys the
creek is a 24 inch concrete pipe (with headwalls at the inlet and outlet) that is 57 feet long
(see attached photograph). The NCDOT proposes to remove the existing headwalls and
extend the structure 20 liner feet at the inlet and 36 linear feet at the outlet. Rip rap will
be placed eight linear feet upstream of the proposed inlet of the structure and eight linear
feet downstream of the structure to provide streambank stability.
During the construction of the project, the NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the
work zone for approximately 2 weeks. This will involve the temporary placement of
sandbags at the construction limits. To maintain water flow during construction, water
upstream of the construction will be temporarily pumped out by a hose and conveyed
downstream of the construction activity where it will be allowed to filter through
vegetation before flowing into the stream. The effluent from the work area may be
pumped into a prefabricated silt bag allowing water to slowly filter out of the bag in a
dispersed matter and the sediment to be captured in the bag. Once the stream has been
dewatered, the pipe will be extended. The materials used for dewatering will be
removed after construction.
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

2
Permanent stream impacts at the site include 56 linear feet fill in surface waters
associated with the extension of the structure and 16 linear feet of rip rap placed along the
streambank for stabilization upstream and downstream of the structure. Temporary
concurrent stream impacts will include the dewatering of 721inear feet of stream.
Riparian Buffer
Construction at this site involves a road crossing of a .stream that is subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream is depicted on the most recent version of
the Wilton (USGS 1977) topographic quadrangle (Figure 1) as well as the Soil Survey of
Granville County (USDA-SCS, 1997) (Figure 2). Construction impacts at this site total
4,156 square feet in Zone 1 and 2,157 square feet in Zone 2 (totaling 72 linear feet of
riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at this site, this
crossing is ALLOWABLE. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed as
required within the permitted buffer footprint.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at the
jurisdictional site. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best.
Management Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced
during project construction.
Compensatory Miti ation: All compensatory mitigation requirements will be left to the
discretion of the regulatory review agencies.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of February 19, 2007, the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Harperella
(Ptilimnium nodosum) and smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) are federally
protected species in Granville County. No populations of smooth coneflower were
observed during the site visit in September 2006. Suitable habitat for the bald eagle,
dwarf wedgemussel and Harperella is not present at the site. A review of the Natural
Heritage Program database revealed no occurrences of protected species within the
project area. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat observed during the site visit
and the NHP database review, biological conclusions of No Effect have been rendered for
each species.

3
Summary
Permanent stream impacts at the site include 56 linear feet fill in surface waters
associated with the extension of the structure and 16 linear feet of rip rap placed along the
streambank for stabilization upstream and downstream of the structure. Temporary
concurrent stream impacts will include the dewatering of 72 linear feet of stream.
Construction impacts to the riparian buffer at this site total 4,156 square feet in Zone 1
and 2,157 square feet in Zone 2 (totaling 721inear feet of riparian buffer impacts).
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 14, NWP 33, and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) No. 3404, WQC No. 3366 and riparian buffer authorization for
above-described activities. Apre-construction notification is attached with this request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Chris
Murray at [phone].
Si erely,
~.
~~ J. W. owman, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Mr. Rob Ridings, NCDENR-DWQ
Mr. Donald Pearson, NCDOT
Mr. Mike Kneis, NCDOT

... - s'4
;~
.~,
4 ,,.
"~ _ l_t'.~..
~• ~ ~
~ N ~
:tits l~ii~ ~•., '-
View of stream below structure.
Photo 1.

_ ._
.. 1~; ,~,
` 4
_~ N,
~ ~-

r ~
.
~ ,
•.~ ~ ~ ~.

~ r' €\
,. ;^ /
_
.
~_ _ ~_ - 6 r .
~, i t
~ ,
,_.R~Aka~ Ch

..
,
~ ~,
- _
,
.~
-,
_ _ _ _
,

`
- _
~, ,.-
t
n ~
~.
tJU .
~+ soy ,
~ ,

.,
"aa
r `
,~
r
.
~ FG ~ ~ ~ ...-

. ...
.,
,. .
- ~, ' ~
--
_ - ~

.

_

1

~ '

~.. F
ry~
~ 1

;r
~ ,
`~ ~ ~ ~ ,.
Site 1
~ ? '
~ ~ ~
-~, : ..
.

„
••
.,
,, ,
"~
., ~
..

i

~

,

. ~
..
....
' ~'

>
,~ ~
~ ~
~+'t)#:t7ft

'

_
~ $ ~ -
? . ,r
._, ~ _
.«c
.. .,
., ~

,
.
. ;
,
it

~ r
_ _
~
~,
c5
iT~ f

1~.

=
~. ;, , ~__
_.
~

t
f
.,
,:=
' ~
__.
.
.. <
~
~ G7..
..
'~~

~~ Proposed improvements to NC 56 and NC 96 i nterchange \:';~
.~~ - Granville County \~~

s
a v~
~~ Wilton USGS topographic map (1977)
~
~`
m~
~
"
' North Carolina Moving Ahead Project No. MA0 5021R ~, '-
~ ~
., Figure 1 1'=24,000'

_.i

_ :.._1

~ is
'
.j ' .~
. ~
~~

xa53 ,,~
,_
_ , ~;~
b ~ r
`
f ~ ~
~ l
,
- ,~ . ~ .
~ - 7 .- r
ti.,, ~ ,

~~
f
_

' it 7 ~'
-
~._ .. ;.
`, t
' .~ ~.
ti

. .. ...,
t
r~ Cem - `
~
~ . r
~ ~ ~!• ~
~ ~~
~~ i ~ ~~ Brxgsfield Ch
~
c5d~ '~ J 3 i
.,

Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc

;Jd
N
.s compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
:ice, and cooperating agencies. Base maps are
ed by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological
ial photography. Coordinate grid ticks and Land
~. are approximately positioned.
~F:.~_. .
r 1 PaE
Cab
.Y
(Joins sheet 16)
~C2 ~:
~-~- _ .
~\
rCae
.'
Proposed improvements to NC 56 and NC 96 interchange
Granville County
NCMA Project No. MA05021 R
Franklin Co. Soil Survey
Figure 2 1:24,000

~ -7-
W
Q
~_
m
J
U
~~i ~
i W
~1
W ~~
e
~ ~ ~ '~
y
I ~I
W ~ N Cp ~ -
~ I I W Cll.
= Q ~ W
' J I ~ C~ ,c.$C
N O
X V
2

. o ~
Z
G
~
I
~U C
I ~ I `l.
~ ~ ~ A ~,~
~~ I,
~~~
~ I
8Z 2 I a
I C
~ ~
I
wl I ~
I
W I

Q ~
~ (n V-

~ Z
~ p N
~ F-
m `~ ~-
~~
~ to cn
1 U
W W
/,/% I
J
~~~
i ~ W
w
I I
I~ - ~
~ r
I W \
I \
I
I
~, Ja
~ J
~ W
ZI ~
~I
N
X
~ W
OI

i
I ~
p o

a, ~
I c
o `
3
I
W
I c
1
.Q
~ ~ ~
C
p ,N
3 >c

0 1
3
0 ~
i co o,
a
L ~

C pU
~
O 4
~ O
Q ~
4, ~ O
O
L L
~
~
a j Q

N
-~

Z Z
rn ~
~ o,
o ~
~ c
~ ~
~ ~ N
4)
O
o ~ ~
C
0
o L ~ .~
~ ~ ~ ~'i
II
C''

Office Use Only: Form version March os
j USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 7 0 3 1 4
(If any particular item is not applicable to tuts project, please enter °NOt Hppucaote or tviH .~
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:NWP 14 and 33
2. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
3. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
4. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5 J. W. Bowman, P.E.
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St. Durham. NC 27704
Telephone Number: X919) 560-6851 Fax Number:~919) 560-3371
E-mail Address: wbowman(a~dot state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Fax Number:
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 1 of 8

include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or .other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed safet~gnment and improvements to NC 56 and NC 96
interchange in Granville County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Granville Nearest Town: Franklinton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Franklinton,
travel west on NC 56 to project site.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.1419723 °N 78.5785606 °W
6. Property size (acres): Pro-ject is approximately 4.2 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT Beaverdam Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is surrounded by wooded land, houses and
development.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
NCDOT will extend the existing structure and dace rip rap for streambank stabilization.
Equipment may include excavator backhoe bulldozer grader and crane.
11. Explain the purpose. of the proposed work: Proposed safetyrealignment and improvements
to NC 56 and NC 96.
IV. Prior Project History
Page 2 of 8

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The NCDOT will extend the
existing structure at the inlet and outlet. Rip rap will also be placed along the streambank for
stabilit .
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, .grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
N/A
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 1V/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
Page 3 of 8

construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial Average Stream Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact or Width Before Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Intermittent Im act (linear feet) (acres)

Site 1 UT Beaverdam
Ck pipe extension Intermittent
2 feet 56 feet <0.01
. ac
Site 1 UT Beaverdam
Ck Rip rap for stabilization Intermittent
2 feet 16 feet <0.01
. ac
Site 1 UT B Ck erdam Temporary dewatering Intermittent
2 feet 72 feet <0.01
(concurrent) ac
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 72 feet <0.01
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred in , floodin , draina e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): <0.01
Wetland Impact (acres): NONE
Open Water Impact (acres): NONE
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) <0.01
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 72 feet
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Page 4 of 8

Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. All wetlands and surface
waters not affected by construction will be protected from unnecessary encroachment during
construction. Strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of wetlands
and surface waters will be enforced during construction. Only the smallest amount of fill
necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the United States.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
Page 5 of 8

of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Compensatory mitigation will be provided if requested b ty he re ug 1~~ eg ncies.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, -does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Page 6 of 8

2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 4,156 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 2,157 1.5 N/A
Total 6,313 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payr.
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the pfoperty. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Existing impervious surface: 1.7 acres and
nronosed impervious surface: 1.9 acres. Runoff from the roadway wll_continue to traverse over
rassed shoulders.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate wastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
ent into the
as identified
Page 7 of 8

If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
No additional development will result from this action
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Specyes, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-_ - -- G?! Z~ly~
,ppli ant/Agent's ature ~ /Date/
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8