19930410 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19930517

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, VA
Health and Natural Resources 4 0 o
Division of Environmental Management .N
James B. Hunt; Jr., Governor °
Jonathan .B.. Howes, Secretary
? ? ?---'
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 1, 1993
Cities Development Co. of
Raleigh Inc. ,
P.O. Box 1607
Wilson, N C. 27894
Dear Sirs:
Subject: Proposed fill in Wetlands or Waters
Residential development Taminary Farm
Wake County
DEM Project # 93410
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification to place fill material in
2.22 acres of wetlands or waters which are tributary to Williams Creek for residential
development and stormwater ponds located between SR 1435 & SR 1010 in WakeCounty, as
described in your submittal dated 11 May 1993, we have determined that the proposed fill
can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2671 issued January 21, 1992. A
Copy of the General Certification is attached. This Certification may be used in qualifying for
coverage under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit Nos. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
A. /reston Howard, Jr. PIE.
93410.Itr?
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martine, Soil and Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501k recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

TE i0 S'oil & Envir 9k c- Inc.
r .
,'"3818 Bland 'Road ¦ Raleigh, r rolina 27609 9) 7 9117 ¦ : Fax [phone]
WETLANDS GROUP
WATER UAIITY SECTION
May 11, 1993
NRCD-DEM. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr., John Dorney Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
PO Box 29,535 6512 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 2762b Raleigh, NC 27615-6846
Dear Messrs. Alsmeyer and Dorney:
The purpose of this letter is to request a Nationwide Permit and ,a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project to be
known as Taminary Farm. The project is located near Apex, NC
(Wake County) and is bordered, to the south by S.R. 1010,as shown
on the enclosed.plans and vicinity maps.
The Corps approved detailed wetland delineation'is shown on the
attached map. These delineations,-have been approved; by Mr. Eric
Alsmeyer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Fill in the wetlands will be re_ to construct roadways and a'.
residential development.
It will be necessary to fil 2.05 ac s (see map.) of
jurisdictional waters above headwat s for placement of the
proposed facilities utilizin N onwide 26.
In addition to 3 ,natural wetlands, two old farm ponds currently
exist on-site. We propose to fill.-one of the ponds, the-smallest
wetland area., and portions of the remaining pond and' wet1ands, .for
a total of 2=.05.acres of fill in Waters of the U".S. However, the
three wetland' areas impacted by partial fill will be'reworked,
creating two new ponds and adding .44 acres of waters to the site.
.17 acres; of wetland will be flooded. The, -Ponds will be'us'ed to
retain and treat_stormwater, which will help protect water, quality
in the watershed.
Based on conversations with DEM and the Corps staff, under current
"policy" non-vegetated area of Waters of the U.S. to be'"inundated
by creation of lakes or other impoundments are not considered to
be adversely impacted,' except for the dam area. Since the old
farm pond to be reworked meets the criteria for exclusion, the
area that is"to remain flooded has not been. included as a negative
impact. Areas to be filled are included as negative impacts.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environment Ial Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
j¢5 R
2 e
Pon
his An" To
J
j
IVAN
f
}
U
j
ASK
- t
i
A WHOM
5
L
lot
v
'
A
w
C
J
y,
MAW
MOW. n
t >
W CEO
F
SAW
Hit
V "YAW
:j
�
i
y
�
' Y
�.

- 1
i
y
E _ F
e
}
i
1
1.
1
t ?
f'
i
t -Ass
- 1
i
y
E _ F
e
}
i
1
1.
1
t ?

:..........:::: }. }:, •• :•:.:::w.v.v..v::::.v::.:. :.:.:..+:.x,:4?v:.::::.. }.::}•}'•'i'::s}x:.:•EV;}}:b4n?5'v«fid}^a}:•:?SL•`+J}
................. .............:.... :.................... }:::.vn :v :•.+•v:.:..w:.vv}.....:.v. w:.•: v. w::: x+: ••.::•. vv.
...++ .wv.Jn4wvw}:.viM•.vnwW:::::iii: - v.4:\.v..v:ti•}:•:i•}::•}:i?i?:•}Y v::.v :::::::: ....:: v}}:::: .x ,m}3.M.»+}:..;..}v}v..:v::}}v,.:.}.vLx:}};
.. / . ? iis::iii3i2?i<c.:+:}iw`:2+4?':Y:x:'?'isti:'c::};i:'cii?;Yv:;:;i:;:.v:nw.v..2v:'w..:vxx....v:.w.;:•:•::,:,:ixi;;:.:c+:::..•;.-,::;:::i+},G':,.i;•,?'ttk'a"ot"acakru'.4d'aaS.'?•'`.?.o'"`'ke?a7?»'?"...'?iwty
1
U.S.G.S. or NWI map_
NWI wetland type
k X
?10rr
? Coastal Plain! Sandhills Piedmont ? Mountain
Nearest stream name _1p?,` I' c v? S y-e c
River Basin and sub-bas::. g"is"_
Stream index number Classification
Wetland area acres Wetland width 20 feet

u Hydrologically connected ? Hydrologicaliv isolated
Endangered, threatened, rare s-Decies
Source (NHP, USFWS, other)
Adjacent special natural areas
Nearest road C- - ?? ? ?,
Wetland type (select one) '
• ? Swamp forest ? Shoreline
a Bottomland hardwood forest ? Stream channel
• ? Carol ina bay ? Salt marsh
? Pocosin ? Brackish marsh
? Pine savannah ? Freshwater marsh •
• ? Wet f lat ? Bog/Fen
? Perched ? Vernal pool
• Water storage 4 •
Bank/ShoreI ine stabi I ization It
• PoI Iutant removal ..... -?-.-
x 5.00

, .. ,.:.:,,.., .. ,...:.... . •

Sens it ive watershed
•
3 Wetland score
• Dispersal corridor
: :.:.::.:::

0
75 •
x
.

ecological attributes
Special
Wildlife habitat
' Aquatic I ife value
;:
>> x 1.00 = <><<:
.><>

Recreation/Education .
Economic value 3

><>>> -
x 0. ''
..5

.... ........................................... ...............
v `40
J L
.,
1
IL •? 37
14
'?J? \ .9? II 4.90 // .? - - • • ? _
$ch • ?
5 5
v68? : °II ? ? O T ? 1 \
? ? ' 1435
Q • boo ? . u
(\? ch • 1306 'I li,
EDO
• 1157 • ,•:\•? '' :_?/ /11 /,?
v •? • A r T 4 9 a ?'•'
llo?
'I _lA tt ?: I II t 0? 11
O / ?l
11\ ? in l v /,?/
( V? Ir u
er--•
S.C
a ? of ®? ?? ? I
R 'o. I ' Ir?
SOIL I ENVIRON CONSULTS
PAYROLL SYSTEM PIGS 3
PAYROLL REGISTER
1/03/93
tit GRAND TOTALS ttt
'OTAL CHECKS (NET):
---EIRNINGS-- ---------- DEDUCTIONS---------- ---- TOTALS -----
81.27 RIG 88.00 FIC 6.73 INS 0.00 EARN 88.00
OT 0.00 FED 0.00 Mil 0.00 DEDU 6.73
ON 0.00 STI 0.00 MI2 0.00
COM 0.00 CIT 0.00
MIS 0.00
SCALE 1:24 000
1 Z 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
APEX, N. C.
V I C I N I T I MAP 35078-F7-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
1974
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DEM ID: ?Sq/o ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 2 6 ,
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRC
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATIN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
MAY/ T 1993
V?D
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Cities Development Company of Raleigh, ,Inc_.
2. Owners Address: PO Box 1607, Wilson, NC 2 7 8 9 4
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work):
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil & Environmental Consultants
3818 Bland Rd, Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Wake
Nearest Town or City: Apex
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located. on east side of Apex,
between S.R. 1435 and S.R. 1010.
(See Attached Vicinity Map)
6. Name of Closest Stream/River.Unnamed tributaries to Williams Creek
7. River Basin: N z,) s v-
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS H? YES [ ] NO Jc3
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [g]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
Approximately 3 acres
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 2.05
Drained:
Flooded: .17
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 2.2 2
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): n n e c) 1 d f a m D o n d a n d
hart of another will be filled (1.88 ac) One small wetland will•be
filled (.02 ac). Two other wetlands will be partially filled (.15 ac)
an f loone ac to create 2-K-177- pors
13. Purpose of_ proposedwork.- .
To-build roadways, stormwater retention ponds,
and 'create residential housing.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Project has been aligned to minimize impacts to
wetlands. Fill is required in order to utilize uplands.
15. You are required to contact the U.S: Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [x ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES R)1 NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property? R P a J, 8 P n t i a 1 a n r9 u n 8 A r e l n u e d r» r a t
F. H applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? 'M u n i c i p l e sewage
@mnpk Signature Date
Agent's
T ?1 or- p S?1 r 2. I G DATA FORM
r ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOW
?Pekry 1 f'fi
COORDINATOR: TIME: DATE: 3L/]_Q_/!n3 COUNTY: W A
NEAREST TOWN: ?pQWATERWAY:
QUAD: -T LOCATION: ?/Q /D c7 n` i ' 0441 1"=t' to -
PROPERTY OW14ER:(NAME/ADDRL'SS) PARTY DOING WORK:(NAME/ADDRESS)
oAn
?PYclryl,.
Fmvi ran=R,"
-
? . r_:? T., c ?,.?, ?.7 < -- soil
16 Q `7
W/L50^1 , /v C,_ 3. - \Tr 7lAna
PHONE:(_)___ - - PHONE:(
OTHER INDIVIDUALS PRESENT:
!'(c IS PROPERTY UNIFORM % OR SEPARATE DISCRETE VEGETATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
1 Y Yes No X (N no, explain on back) ?A- - "C- Qo. •C caw.-
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _X (If yes, explain on back)
--------------- -----------------------------------
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES ---% COVEk--INDICATOR GROUND COVER: SPECIES-Y. COVER-INDICATOR
1. L?r;o dtr dww +t P;Pvr,-- 10% FAC. I. ,4?di?s•w ??a?? IS?% FACvJ
2- lL; V\ ckxw-k.r rl- y&-Uflvw. 10'(. PAC- 2.
3. GAC 3.
4. 4.
nf? # 5. 5.
t` SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 6.
I. Ac-.. ^b....ti lo•?s FAr- 7.
2. PAC 8•
3. U WOODY VINES:
4. 1. LoN; ?? JaPo..rkti S?% FAc-
5. PAC
Ce
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC loot
Is the hydrophyt' vegetation criterion met? Yes No?,.?
Rationale' fl'&'0. AIL31 is ?IQL ? wwLFFG
SOILS,
Series/phase: ? e-4,4 //,( e, e. Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils fist? Yes ,4r No Undetermined
is the soil a Histosol? Yes No 1_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No ac1--Gieyed? Yes--,-e- No
Matrix Color:-:Z-.d 6, &- ' <- Mottle tors: I „ y?? 41/,v
other hydric soil indicators: ' ? ``
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: _ /,-,- y h. s f rr'a? t 1( f •. r- : S? /3
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X_ Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ? No ,v
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ?"
List other field avid nce of surface inundation or soil saturation.
? n e -F G A4 n n P /J a r ?.'? ?/ 1? C_ Ldd S
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale:
P.-?r? ?cf e-7( wed rti
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes .e No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: s1• i t ?A (7e- ^ P -?'
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES N0__K_ AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404 NONE_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEADWATERS_ ISOLATED ADJACENT NWP U
DETERMINED BY:
aa-M . DATA PUMM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION MEfHOOt
COORDINATOR: TIME: _ DATE: _L/ jA / q3 COUNTY: (n1•?cc,
P`r`y
Nw?
C 14
NEAREST TOWN: WATERWAY.
QUAD: LOCATION:-
PROPf•:RTY OWNFR. (NAME ADDRESS) PARTY DOING WORK: (NAME/ADDRESS )
C?I?PS QI'Y'•lN?abv?7 CuM?i????1
Soil and Environmental Consultants
d - b)e" 3818 Bland Road
'
?i LJU N NG Ram, rTC 27609
g12) 7 A 0 _91 1 7_
PHONE: PHONE:
OTHER INDIVIDUALS PRESENT:
IS PROPE11TY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE _..- VEGE'T'ATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _X (B yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
' S• SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
rRLL •
1. iv.os "faL&O- IT-(. FAC. 1. 11ivoN o?v.wd;w.s $-•%
2. r?oO?t`Aalb"?- 'Ivt; 10°(e FAC_ 2.
3. L. ?ui alAwb? S'f?,n.c? wk. s•!e FAc 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS: 6.
1. L;?oolc?arrow-?,1;r .? s°(. FA(-
s.
2.
3. WOODY VINES:
4. 1. SW..; )w>< S/. 5-7.
5. _ 2. LpN%, tu°- `,o f0-,c,_
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 740X/e
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? t? es X_ No
SOILS
Sedes/phase: C? e x'6440 e s Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No THistic epipedon present? Yes Nowt
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. Lai- 1s '' io 14A Mottle colors: /n 4 6i? 2 - y2 y?? .
Other hydric soil indicators: . "o
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No 4--
?? e P o /, ds ?/
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No = y 4e
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: Av' -yam r " ' A a 7 r^ ? rc?
-FAG ?l

FAc
Z'!. FRC
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: y/V! It&e'*- e- Oi fPIr*A nD? /nPe
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO AUTHORITY: 10 404 10/404 NONE_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEAD TERS ISOLATED ADJACENT NWP #
DETERMINED BY:

MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES:
Reviewer: 1,
TO: John Dorney WO Supv.:
Planning Branch DATE: 5 4-1 _
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
**EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) ***
PERMIT YR: 93 PERMIT NO: 0000410 COUNTY: WAKE
APPLICANT NAME: CITIES DEVELOP. CO. OF RAL. - TAMINARY
PROJECT TYPE: SUBDIVISION FILL PERMIT-TYPE: NW26
COE_#: DOT_#:
RCD_FROM _CDA: APP DATE _FRM_CDA: 05/17/93
REG_OFFICE: RRO RIVER AND_SUB_BASIN_#:/ol,T /,
STREAi1'I_CLASS : ws STR__INDEX_NO: 27- -Z
WL__IMPACT? : Y?N WL_TYPE :Q?
WL_REQUESTED: Z. 2-2al-Stm WL_ACR_EST? : Y/
WLSCORE (#) : 1-7f 00 WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: ?N
HYDRO_CNECT?:CJ N MITIGATION?:CVN
MITIGATION_TYPE: MITIGATION-SIZE: G vvazw
C-a4v1y-
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?:ry/N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One) : ISSUE I TTE/CO D DENY
COMMENTS: e as
cc: Regional Office
Central Files
MAY 2 61993 1 D?

Wetland type (select one)
• ? Swamp forest ? Shorel ine .
lA Bottoml and hardwood forest ? Stream channel ;
• ? Carol ina bay ? Salt marsh
? Pocosin ? Brackish marsh ;
? Pine savannah ? Freshwater marsh •
• ? Wet f tat ? Bog/Fen
? Perched ? Vernal pool
'
• Water storage -
' Bank/Shorel ine stabi I ization
• Po l l utant removal •
• ::<>?>° x 5.00 = ` .??.:>>':><'<.»?? •

' Sensitive watershed S
Weiland score `
•
Dispersal corridor -.3 ---- '
.::.....:::::.:.....
..........

Special ecological attribute
Wildlife habitat
' Aquatic I ife value ,----.:-- `
x 1.00

Recreation/Education 3 •
• Economic value