20090963 Ver 1_Application_20090903

,a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
August 31, 2009
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Mr. Steve Lund
NCDOT Coordinator
SF10 o NZSU
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
®90963
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for the proposed intersection realignment of SR 2804
(Reedy Creek Road) and SR 2805 (Harrisburg Road) in Mecklenburg County,
State Project No. 9.8109822; Division 10; TIP No. U-4401, $240.00 Debit
Work Order WBS Element 36771.1.2.
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to realign the
intersection of SR 2804 (Reedy Creek Road) and SR 2805 (Harrisburg Road). There will be
67 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 12 linear feet of temporary stream impacts on
this project.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Jurisdictional
Determination (JD), permit drawings, stormwater management plan, design plans and
Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) for the above-referenced project. The State
Minimum Criteria (SMC) was completed in October 2004 and was distributed shortly
thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
This project calls for a letting date of March 20, 2012 and a review date of January 31, 2012,
however the Let date may advance as additional funding becomes available.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] ATLANTIc AVENUE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONFIENTAL ANALYSIS SUITE 116
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOTORG RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
7
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please e-mail Erin Cheely at [e-mail].
Sincerely
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
W/attachment:
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
W/o attachment (see website for attachments):
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Barry Moose, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Larry Thompson, DEO
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Michele James, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
O W 1 AA T?F \Y \ 1 O G
=a y
O ? Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. , Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ®No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Intersection realignment of SR 2804 (Reedy Creek Rd.) and SR 2805 (Harrisburg Rd.)
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: U-4401
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if .
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
2
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.25489 Longitude: - 80.65428
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 140 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to

proposed project: McKee Creek HUC 03040105
( )
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land use in the vicinity is approximately 90% heavily developed or disturbed land (primarily impervious surfaces with
maintained roadsides and residential areas) and 10% forest land (mixed hardwood and mixed pine-hardwood forest).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
185 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed realignment is needed to reduce the potential for accidents between the 1-485 Interchange ramps and the
current intersection of SR 2804 with SR 2805
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves realigning the intersection of SR 2804 (Reedy Creek Rd.) and SR 2805 (Harrisburg Rd.) further
away from the existing 1-485 interchange. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be
used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Preliminary JD issued 1/31105, expired 1/31/07
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what ty pe
®Preliminary El
Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services,
Name (if known): Steven Lund Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
January 31, 2005
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for [] Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
Site 1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments: No wetlands within project area
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ - non-404, (feet)
other)
Site l ®P ? T Culvert UT to McKee ? PER ® Corps 2
5 67
Extension Creek ® INT ? DWQ .
Site 1 ? P ®T Culvert UT to McKee ? PER ® Corps 2
5 12
Extension Creek ® INT ? DWQ .
Site 2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 67 Perm.
12 Temp.
3i. Comments: The intermittent stream's jurisdictional status begins at the southern end of the permanent impacts depicted on
Permit Sheet 5 of 7. The stream is ephemeral upstream of that location. The 12 linear feet of temporary impacts are due to
temporary distubance associated with the extension of the existing culvert and channel outlet protection
na.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts
L 0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments: No open water within project area
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
7
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to UT to McKee Creek could not be avoided as Reedy Creek Road needed to be realigned to the north of the
existing road to be further away from the 1-485 interchange. In addition, realignment of the road to the north minimized
impacts to residential homes. The outlet of the proposed culvert extension end will align closely with the natural stream
bed. The UT flows into McKee Creek about 1,500 linear stream feet downstream of the project area. McKee Creek is on
the 2006 303d list for impaired biological integrity due to fecal coliform (standard violation) and sedimentation (historic
listing decision). The portions of the project that drain into McKee Creek will be subject to Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds. Grassed swales will be used along the former location of Y3A (Reedy Creek Road) to aid in pollutant
removal through vegetative filtration and infiltration.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT's Best Management Practices will be followed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
? Yes ®No
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for If no, explain: No mitigation is proposed as there are minimal
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? permanent stream impacts (67 linear feet) and there are no
HOW, ORW or other protected waters in the project area.
Impacts for this project will not cause an adverse effect or
si nificant loss of waters of the United States.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWO ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
? P
t t
i
li
f
project? aymen
o
n-
eu
ee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes,
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream tempgrature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWO only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
(check all that apply): ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
10
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ® Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The new intersection will realign an existing portion Reedy Creek Road and the project area is already fairly heavily
developed with residential areas.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
11
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
®Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
(Checked the USFWS Website)
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ® Asheville
(Checked the USFWS Website)
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDOT field surveys for Michaux's sumac, smooth coneflower and Schweinitz's sunflower were most recently conducted
on September 17, 2008. Suitable habitat exists for these species within the project area, but no individuals of any of
these speces were found ("No Effect"). No habitat exists for the bald eagle or Carolina heelsplitter within the project
area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ?Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps

Dr. Gregory J. Thome, Ph D (?, i -
Az 4 8 - KJ ' (J9'
N
' ,
Applicant/Agent
s Printed
ame
ppli UAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
12
r11
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS `
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200530446 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: H risbur
gr-`
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA r

Property Owner/Agent : Gregory I. Thorpe, Director
Address: Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NTh f R't
s.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Telephone No.: 919-733-3141
Property description:
Size (acres) 0.5 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway McKee Creek River Basin Rocky
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates N 35.256417 W 80.655183
Location description Realignment of SR 2804 (Reedy Creek Road) and SR 2805 (Harrisburg Road), TIP U-4401.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
X Based on preliminary information, there may be surface waters on the above described property. We strongly suggest you
have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final,
a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of theClean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
RECEIVED
1 FEB 4 2005
Page 1 of 2
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PDEA-OFFICE OF NATURAL ENVIF
Action ID:
200530446
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steven Lund at 828-271-7980.
Basis For Determination:
Remarks: Consultant's report of June 11, 2004 identifies S1, an unnamed, intermittent tributary to McKee Creek in the project
area. '
Corps Regulatory Official: Steven W. Lund
Date Januarv 31, 2005
Expiration Date January 31, 2007
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial): /S i J
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form.
• A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form.
• If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form.
Copy Furnished: Ms. Gail Tyner, Environmental Services, Inc., 524 New Hope Road, Raleigh, NC
27610
Page 2 of 2
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
6 JAY V. BONAKDAR 10724 OLD WAYSIDE RD
CHARLOTTE,NC 28277
'remit Drawing
shut-3 ofd
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PROJECT-3677411 (U-4401)
SR 2804 (REEDY CREEK RD.)
.od SR 2805 (HARRISBURG RD.)
INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT
OF

0

Z
[ N
f N
6 N O
a ¢ Z a

F
- Z = O

W v E H O U
40 0
Z z m n
0

n 3
w
a
u
Z
F
w
w
z
N

IL

f
C
-Permit Drawing
;
Sheet K of a
_
m E
m?
O d N
?
(U 0 v
Z
O? N N
C C (J O
( n .N ? a E ? N N

m v ? v
? C C U C
?
r
E
wU
a
?
w
U N
n? ?
LL E m y 0 0
o
0

Y

a ? N
`o
? E 0)
?
o
0
N w -
a
F
U
Q ? N
a
a =
=
m-w
r U
_
W N ? C

Z U - >
Jr

~
W N
O a
?
i A =
N
N
t0 ?
U ?
>
W
W N
O. ? c
E -'? ?
F IL UI
C N
v = a
m _ m m
E LL
?
v 3
a
v n
? F a
h
v ? U
2 v
FD
N
N U)
m
J
m

O
m
O C O
? O

h LL ?
m
N
N
J
N

"•' d J
F
mz o
r
ro.
beb,„
Permit Drawing
Sheet. S of
PLAN VIEW
ENLARGEMENT, SITE
50' 0' 50'
GRAPHIC SCALE
¶ NCDOT
JL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PROJECT. $6774.11 (U-1401)
SR 2801 (REEDY CREEK RD.)
.od SR 2805 (HARRISBURG RD.)
INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
SHEET OF
05/26/
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
U-4401, WBS No.: 367741.1 Date:07/07/09
Mecklenburg County
Hydraulics Project Manager: Andrew Nottingham, PE
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves realignment of SR 2804 (Reedy Creek Road) & SR 2805
(Harrisburg Road). The project's purpose is to realign the existing intersection away
from the new I-485 interchange, which will reduce the accident potential conflict with the
interchange and the intersection. Curb and gutter is used along the relocated portion of
Reedy Creek Road that is currently a curb and gutter roadway. The remainder of the
project is a shoulder section with grass slopes and ditches.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION AND IMPACTS
The project is located in the Yadkin River Basin. A small jurisdictional stream is the
only impacted feature in this realignment. The stream drains to McKee Creek, which is
classified as class C and is on the 2006 303d list for impaired biological integrity due to
sedimentation. Stream impacts are due to the realignment of the intersection and will
consist of removing a portion of the existing pipe and installing a 36" CSP on new
location.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures will be used on the project to reduce
storm water impacts to the receiving streams due to erosion and runoff. Grassed swales
were used along -Y3A- to aid in pollutant removal through vegetative filtration and
infiltration. Drainage systems were designed to outlet away from surface waters to allow
time for infiltration in ditches or natural areas. Rip rap is used in ditches and at pipe
outlets where warranted to prevent erosion and sedimentation.
Grass swale locations:
• -Y3A- Station 8+50 to -Y3A- Station 13+26 Rt. (length = 416 feet.)
CONTRACT. TIP PROJECT: U-4401
Q o Z
O Q
0 u u 'M
'?Sy! N ** Im
? IGU - A
tadl d+? ?n
_
Q O n
w
I?p .. \
to of
_ P
N
O
u N
u
y
Z
A
'a Ssm -
u??
\
-' -
n o o CO`m ro mg a GD ?-n

{ to) z
I
Ij s?+
o 4 Q to I?
C ? O
ootl
r
? - Q
Zvi
11
n gg b
tt A
mmn w
> x 4
w
"3 I rn
I?@ W

to "?
tl 0 tl
° O V
tl tl tl tl
< N
D '
G
g
•^d
^1

0 3 M-

- "
m N
m A. v
J
IA
S

CQOtJ
NNIN
a
=m3
8
0 m o
OAmT?
-
?
S O 0 ?a O v Z 0/ W^ r Y? I. N fNil `

N
; X
aR ?
iR c c
m n

O

N

Q
?.

?
.W..

N

l
I+ Q
I O L
F r.
/ L1Pn3 ; ?4
W

? r\ \
C r`Y
C)
p?C
1m
N
I - -

0
a a =co-
N ?
~?

z
? g
f b
y ? tt1
0 o ,
:

ri

N

N

e

C? ep I

YJ
6 N Goo

O •li
-- -

z h-?

Laa
z
TO 1-465

Z? r
? C)
N a
,V h I ;
9n I N D
{??\b b
ohm
? ?
° y
Sa Lv
^u
m OT
?a 3
2f
A9IIHGAr TRN<64.
N YJ NYI-
_ A
?
? ? ??
[r O 7
? a
ry '-9
f,V,
yl C
p

0 `ob 1,J? .I n
4 2 , ?i n 0
? ?
O
? ? NAII 83/95 (? ? ,'Z

m m
i

?
e
IIa ?

? w h wF ??i.
spy uN 6
(?
H C a
a
.:t3
C9 ?
? n
a

Q
0
?
O
?
A
v d

e`o

? d
s Y

b
xx F
S
?m
7

{
.
y r gg
F
6v g
S 9

R/W REV. - PARCEL 7 - REDUCE POE TO AVOID SIGN - MW4 - 5130108

co' 0
1
k
4

fT"

N H t
0 ffigH I Lu3eo
ffi3H
-CD
RZ
r rn rrl
Ll
rL
om
,.WS
10
0

11

WS
I

-2.

lit

A

?
.?G
t

lit

i?S

SEE SHEEr NO. 4
J-:c ix
tl
J.,
ta
+
bb
Z5400 ;o
tl
;p
it
rL
jj to Ito
4
+
?1 c c r
rL
n
si
zo; I
4 Q U
Nk
;qp,

Z

A
P -4- so.'"
4
-
+
rn

I
R/W REV. - PARCEL 7 - REDUCE POE TO AVOID SIGN - YWL - 5130108
\ \ ? T y
5 \ 8 \ \
\
4 \\\ \ ?3
5
E j ?'' ?\ \\l 'sy(x
OS I
CD --I
51 I-? 111 rY ??i?
? ? 9'1 Hl II4y C: ltt

i

N Ls? v
LS
?3ieds"
i3
? ` I a3Hda9
? ? Ki y?ll
? dv/A3NLa3w
x.ccnsx
1'9.1
n s:mim ,_
s mm S 2 s? ?F
gOp I?.u g? '.,? \
o X11.11 y?n ?? ?
an _
mm gg $2
x c? EGG
n
'10 s
21
u.LOS \
€ \
T •

T V Vl? I
\\\ gem I
/
/
/ _-
a
-L- STA22+OOlm W-11

II
Iq /
? F}/
/
/

't tp
cr
\\ \? \\\\ /'
? y
b
?\ \ ?? \ \ n44o(4?(n,
Ln
i\ \ \\ \ m?Et1?`7w
'
\ \\? aco
??/ 1// g2yO
_ III- __ ? x0 ?nA-IrODa
\\\??/ -__ ? nun"4 na I
- 1 \ \\ \ r _ - v, Y,?1 ??y W
l I ¢It
1 \ I // / i %? 8////l:?/ 10
i/i i_i l I
rrl
•\ ??, %ll III / 1 I ??' a ?;g ?? ?
l/ / // 'rte go",O r .
II II
J
d
\

CONTRACT:
U
Q 1
1

?
? 9
O u
N 1
1
O
T
m 9
=
O
? O p 4 N i

4 C?
a C
N

? p
u o

0
y p 0 W UI N i N

S
O `"
D G?
Fi 3

f
o
9 y
T y
iO
a u
N N

N
z
x
H
ill g ? ? t
a `
PO
{
??gg
N ? ? ?' CI 21
.m
-` a O
a
p x' '=f a
nm $
•I m sy
in
z
Q
N
O
p
m Z O
C m
0
N Z
0
r_ -o
N 0
S
m m
O ? Z
j N
>?
;F
0 m C
p m Z
29
50
O
O C
Z
Aa ??
?-- TO 1-485 _ dr , I
N4?RISEY/Mi `.
(1 - _ r
I '1 ? I
I ?' I
I ' ' I

a
z
0
ti
m
Y
ag
Sy
TIP PROJECT: U-4401
N
t2i
O
yJ ?-
y ? ? •N?
? C
b
NAD 83/95 Ln 2i
? R
N
o ?
o "
m
S
t _
a

i?
F
C:
gyg
eo a
a
I?
a a
I Z
0 o HINGE POIM
,. .
.? .
r
?.
I

i
• ? R