20190949 Ver 1_401 Application_20190718

%0 WithersRavenel
RioOur People. Your Success
115Macl<enan Drive
Cary, North Carolina 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008
TO: Nit- n.„ .-+%A/,+o,- o— ..... .o _ nnl %A/ -+i- 4� 1 i.,;+
512 N. Salisbury Street; 91h Floor
Raleigh, NC27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑x Attached
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
Letter of Transmittal
FBoggl
07/1701902180885.00
Ms. Karen Higgins
ess Residence - NWP 29
Chapel Hill, Orange County
❑ Under Separate Cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Change Order ❑ Diskette
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Other
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑ Other
❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAD UP
REMARKS:
COPY TO: File SIGNED: Lyle Phillips
If enclosures ore not os noted, kindly notify us of once.

%0 WithersRavenel
/ Our People Your Succe«
07/17/2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Boggess Residence
Chapel Hill, Orange County, NC
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
WR Project #02180885.00
Dear Ms. Dailey and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Dr. John Boggess, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 29
for 74 If of permanent stream impacts for construction of a shared driveway to access two
proposed residential dwellings. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above
referenced impacts. Impacts to Jordan Lake Riparian Buffers will be permitted through Orange
County as the delegated municipality.
The project is ±20.06 acres in size and comprised of 2 parcels (PIN# 9861349206 & 9861339810)
located west of Union Grove Church Road Between Coyote Lane and Arthur Minnis Road in
Chapel Hill, Orange County (Latitude: 35.986837°N; Longitude: -79.122129°W). The project is
located in the Cape Fear River basin and onsite waters drain to Long Branch. The Water Quality
Classification for Long Branch is WS -V; NSW and the Stream Index Number is: 16-41-1-2. The
hydrologic cataloging unit for the site is 03030002.
Proposed Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 12 ft wide shared driveway to facilitate
construction of two residential dwellings within the buildable area of the parcels.
The overall proposed project consists of the construction of two dwellings and driveways.
Standard commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the
proposed project.
Proiect History
Wesley Poole of Orange County issued a Buffer Determination for the project area on
05/31/2019. A copy of the Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an appendix.
15 MacKenan Di,vt. i - iry. NC 2751
t: 919.469.33+u i f: 519.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com i
Asheville -ter., aIp;ok I+-

Boggess Residence - NWP 29 PCN 4% WithersRavenel
Onsite wetlands were delineated by WithersRavenel on 05/21/2019. A preliminary JD request
and all supporting information has been included in support of our delineation, and WR is not
requesting issuance of the JD in conjunction with the issuance of the NWP 29.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of:
• 74 If of permanent stream impacts
Proposed impacts have been limited to only those necessary to cross the stream which bisect the
property in order to access developable uplands in the eastern portion of the project. The
construction of the 12ft shared driveway will result in 39 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact
#1A) for installation of twin 48" culverts. Installation of the rip -rap dissipaters above and below
the culvert will result in 35 If of permanent stream impacts (Impacts #113 & #1C). The twin culverts
will be buried 12" below the stream bed, with the eastern culvert carrying baseflow and the
western culvert being grouted to only carry flood flow.
The rip -rap dissipaters are required to reduce flow velocity and prevent erosion of the stream and
undercutting of the culvert and headwalls. A plunge pool will be constructed on the downstream
end of the culverts (Impact #1C). The rip -rap will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the
top of the rip -rap matches the pre -construction contours of the natural stream bed, allowing for
the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of this section of stream channel. The
rip -rap apron on the upstream end of the culvert is necessary to divert flow into the eastern culvert
and armor the area above the headwall to prevent scour and undercutting (Impact # 1B). The rip -
rap will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the rip -rip is at the surface of the
channel, allowing water to flow over the rip -rap to maintain aquatic life passage.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimize.
Due to the access Union Grove Church Road and the location of Stream 1 which bisects the
project, impacts to Stream 1 is required to access adjacent uplands and therefore impacts could
not be avoided entirely. To minimize impacts the driveway has been designed to cross Stream 1
at a perpendicular angle and backslopes have been designed at 3:1 slopes to transition road fill to
natural grade. The 12 ft driveway has been designed as a shared driveway with a single stream
crossing, rather than having separate driveway crossings for each parcel/dwelling, thereby
minimized stream impacts to the greatest extent possible. Additionally, the project avoids
impacting wetlands entirely (see Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit).
Additionally, the rip -rap dissipators will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the
rip -rap matches the pre -construction contours of the natural stream bed, allowing for the passage
of aquatic life and prevent a functional loss.
Page 2 of 3

Boggess Residence - NWP 29 PCN 4 0 Withers Rave n e l
Construction techniques used to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts include the installation
of erosion and sedimentation control devised prior to construction. Additionally, access to impact
areas will be from uplands.
Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 74 If of permanent stream impacts, of which 39 If will result in
functional loss as depicted in the table below.
The proposed permanent stream impacts (with functional loss) are less than 150 If; therefore,
mitigation is not proposed.
The current request is for 74 If of permanent stream impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for
details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WithersRaveneI
Lyle Phillips
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Info
• Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quadrangle Exhibits
• Orange County Soil Survey Exhibit
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
• Orange County Buffer Determination Letter
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• Impact Exhibits
Page 3 of 3
Stream Impact Mitigation Table
Impact #
Reason for Impact Functional Loss
No Functional Loss
1A
Road Crossing 39 If
1B
Rip -Rap Dissipater
13 If
1C
Rip -Rap Dissipater
22 If
Total 39 If
35 If
The proposed permanent stream impacts (with functional loss) are less than 150 If; therefore,
mitigation is not proposed.
The current request is for 74 If of permanent stream impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for
details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WithersRaveneI
Lyle Phillips
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Info
• Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quadrangle Exhibits
• Orange County Soil Survey Exhibit
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
• Orange County Buffer Determination Letter
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• Impact Exhibits
Page 3 of 3

%0 Wi the rsRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success
PCN FORM

W A rFR ,G
7
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑Yes
®No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Boggess Residence
2b.
County:
Orange County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Chapel Hill
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John and Kim Boggess
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
6571 and 457— PIN#9861349206
6511 and 146 — PIN#9861339810
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
308 A McGregor Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
3f.
Telephone no.:
919.360.8372
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Lyle Phillips
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
WithersRavenel
5c. Street address:
115 MacKenan Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27511
5e. Telephone no.:
919.535.5165
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
IphillipsU)withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
PIN#9861349206
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN#9861339810
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.986837 Longitude: -79.122129
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
t 20.06 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Long Branch
proposed project:
Stream Index— 16-41-1-2
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V; NSW
Cape Fear River Basin
2c. River basin:
HUC: 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing conditions on the site consist of undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity of the project
consists primarily of undeveloped woodlands and sparse residential land use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
t 0.98 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
t 2219 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 12 ft wide shared driveway to facilitate construction of two residential
dwellings within the buildable area of the two parcels.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall proposed project consists of the construction of two dwellings and driveways. Standard commercial construction
equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed project. Standard commercial construction equipment and
techniques will be used to construct the proposed project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Onsite wetlands were delineated by
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
WithersRavenel on 05/21/2019. A preliminary JD request and
all supporting information has been included in support of
our delineation, and WR is not requesting issuance of the JD
in conjunction with the issuance of the NWP 29.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary 1:1 Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): L. Phillips & A. Ricci
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Wesley Poole of Orange County issued a Buffer Determination for the project area on 05/31/2019. A copy of the Buffer
Determination Letter has been provided as an appendix.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact #1
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
El No
[I DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #1A
(Sterm
Road Crossing
LIT to Long
❑ PER
® Corps
3
39
T
(Functional Loss)
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Impact #1 B
(Sterm
Rip-Rap Dissipator
LIT to Long
❑ PER
® Corps
3
13
T
(No Functional Loss)
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Impact #1 C
(Stream 1)
Rip-Rap Dissipator
LIT to Long
EJ PER
® Corps
3
22
®P El T
(No Functional Loss)
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Total Permanent Impacts (with Functional Loss)
39
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
74
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse [:1 Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑PFIT
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts will be permitted through Orange County as the delegated municipality.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimize.
Due to the access Union Grove Church Road and the location of Stream 1 which bisects the project, impacts to Stream 1 is
required to access adjacent uplands and therefore impacts could not be avoided entirely. To minimize impacts the driveway
has been designed to cross Stream 1 at a perpendicular angle and backslopes have been designed at 3:1 slopes to transition
road fill to natural grade. The 12 ft driveway has been designed as a shared driveway with a single stream crossing, rather
than having separate driveway crossings for each parcel/dwelling, thereby minimized stream impacts to the greatest extent
possible. Additionally, the project avoids impacting wetlands entirely (see Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit).
Additionally, the rip -rap dissipators will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the rip -rap matches the pre -
construction contours of the natural stream bed, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and prevent a functional loss.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques used to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts include the installation of erosion and sedimentation
control devised prior to construction. Additionally, access to impact areas will be from uplands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project consists of two residential dwelling with 2.2%
❑ Yes ® No
imperviousness and therefore does not require a diffuse flow plan. Diffuse flow
requirements will be reviewed and approved by Orange County.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2.2%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The proposed project overall
imperviousness is less than 15% and therefore no runoff peak attenuation controls or
land dedication is required.
Stormwater requirements will be reviewed and approved by Orange County as the certified
local government.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Orange County
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of two single family dwellings on t 20 acres. Future development resulting from the
proposed project which could impact nearby downstream water quality is not anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the proposed project will be treated via a conventional individual on-site subsurface septic
system.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
EJ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at httr)://www.ncnhi).orq/web/nhp/home, as well as
NCNHP GIS data to identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project.
The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species
or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter.
Furthermore, site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any federally protected species known to occur in
Orange County.
The project site is not located within the known range of the cape fear shiner, dwarf wedgemussel, Carolina madtom
(proposed for listing) and Neuse River waterdog (proposed for listing). Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat
for bald eagle, Michaux's sumac or smooth coneflower.
Stream 1 is a small intermittent stream and was not considered suitable habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe (proposed for
listing).
Based on the lack of suitable habitat and lack of nearby records, WR concludes that the project will have "no effect" on
federally protected species or their critical habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Orange County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Page I l of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Lyle Phillips — WithersRavenel — —
Authorized Agent 07/17/2019
Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1/ VVithersRavene I
1/ Ox P( ,lj, Yo,� Sj'
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

NO WithersRavenel
14/ Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner John & Kim Boggess (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel.
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the t 10.05 acre tract/Orange Co. PIN:
9861349206 & t 10.02 acres tract/Orange Co. PIN: 9861339810/Located west of Union
Grove Church Rd between Coyote Ln and Arthur Minnis Rd.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel. Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: J — /
Signatu
( e - ri t) (' tle)
(Sig ure)
Mailing Addre�sss
�:/qA 011 N i --, 975-,X/
City State Zip
Phone: 919 '546 - 93'7
Email: ATP/LZ <?, In6- C—ov✓�
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.33401 f: 919.467.60081 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

10WithersRavene[
Our Peaplc Your Succc-:'
PARCEL/OWNER INFO

This map contains parcels prepared for the inventory of real property within Orange County, and is compiled from
recorded deed, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforementioned
public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The
county and its mapping companies assume no legal responsibility fort he information on this map.
PIN:
9861349206
SIZE:
10.05 A
OWNER 1:
BOGGESS JOHN F
DEED REF:
6571/457
OWNER 2:
BOGGESS KIM A
RATECODE:
10
DDRESS 1:
2712 CREEKRUN CT
DATE SOLD:
1/30/2019
DDRESS 2:
BLDG SQFT:
0
CITY:
CHAPEL HILL
YEAR BUILT:
",TATE, ZIP:
NC 27514
EGAL DESC:
A913 UNION GROVE UMC P87/20
BUILDING COUNT:
LAND VALUE:
BLDG VALUE:
USE VALUE:
TOTAL VALUE:
July 9, 2019
$163,100
$0
$0
$163,100
1:4,800
0 0.04 0.08
0.16 mi

This mapcontains parcels prepared for the inventory of real property within Ora ngeCounty, and is compiled from
recorded deed, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforementioned
public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The
county and its mapping companies assume no legal responsibility fort he information on this map.
PIN:
9861339810
SIZE:
10.01 A
OWNER 1:
BOGGESS JOHN F
DEED REF:
6511/146
OWNER 2:
BOGGESS KIM A
RATECODE:
10
DDRESS 1:
2712 CREEK RUN CT
DATE SOLD:
8/20/2018
DDRESS 2:
BLDG SQFT:
0
CITY:
CHAPEL HILL
YEAR BUILT:
'TATE, ZIP:
NC 27514
EGAL DESC:
A9A UNION GROVE UMC P87/20
BUILDING COUNT:
LAND VALUE:
BLDG VALUE:
USE VALUE:
TOTAL VALUE:
July 9, 2019
$162,400
$0
$0
$162,400
1:4,800
0 0.04 0.08 0.16 mi

%0 WithersRavenel
NioOw Pc�oplc. Your Succu',.
WETLAND/BUFFER
DELINEATION EXHIBIT

1%WithersRavene[
Our Peouic. Your Sj(u ss-
USGS QUADRANGLE EXHIBITS

GRAPHIC SCALE ^
0 1000 2000
7�J) ' 1 3 �� \ - Jam_/i �..LAND•gD f \ moo_, / t3_/ \ `I i..,
1 inch = 2000 ft. �_/ e� �— --\ 1 �._ �✓ 1 I �'
- % , �� .{-�1 � 1 �i-✓ 1 i J//� "fir /, 1 {�/ 50WO�
�,
)\ .. ✓` �%,� , _ j— �,� ``l.J }fir /L f:�..�1�� ___r ,l �_ � {/ �=� _� \\�'�. � ��1 ; \�� / ,
Rfl
-,11
\J i .I, OAK LEAF DR 1 1 \(�-' , f i` '�' '_tel �
j�, t � �.. l r `�\ - -•\� , � / /� ' ^�,� ! i� -,/ .` ..,�_-}� 1. -'1
\�� cArEs:NaKoarHILL �f PROJ� ARBA.
�`�_�.c��`'ti l��r��/ \ % 1 _ `_ J1 1 !` / -/'
IN-
� ,/ ` �� (iJ (yam �-�/�Ci1�'- /f m �- - -•.1 ! /f
/ r .,�- ! /�\� � rte- att/`-, _, cek
NN
mites, tees
lr'acwt( / - �� L �/� l _ W,
Meadow
r J y ( r �� >I _ ! '00
g �r .ri '`�J�� Flats
E r � �� • ` \ � . t `f 1 / i� r.� S 1 a J�J� if 50� '! `ti1r -... � ' _,
3 . r,�\ Vi � I , \\ i \\ ;, `1��� j l�t� S/ / I v 11/ � l�:\ %!•r 9i\�;\� ` \_` ,� �`+r• y� �y' / C� `��.'_'_
��� : ��„L• ,\�}.
tl !�% r `� J � i"� � . I � _ ��•�� r li� f 7 ! � IBJ � � � I �_'�.' � ..' yF (J .
✓ 1 { _ �t
%z
BOGGESS RESIDENCE
ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2013) - CHAPEL HILL
140 WithersRavenel
00 Lngineers I Planners I Surveyors

%0WithersRavenel
00 Our PeoPlc. Your Success.
ORANGE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT

;0 WithersRavenel
Our Prup'c. Yo,ir 5�� cc
PRELIMINARY )URSIDCTIONAL
DETERMINATION REQUEST

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Located east of Union Grove Church Road and north of Coyote Lane
City, State:
Chapel Hill, NC
County: Orange County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9861349206 & 9861339810
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Lyle Phillips - WithersRavenel
Mailing Address: 115 MacKenan Drive
Cary NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-353-0219
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
FInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: John & Kim Boggess
Mailing Address: 308A McGregor Drive
Chapel Hill NC
Telephone Number: 919-360-8372
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
' Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION'.'
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Lyle Phillips - WithersRavenel
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
07/16/2019
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rocess.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/ JSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓0 Size of Property or Review Area +20.06 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
W11
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude
35.986837°N
Longitude: -79.122129°W
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://NNNN A.saA.usace.army.niil/Missions/Re ug l_ atory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
aAerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
F7 Soil Survey Map
F] Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
F] Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
RNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' ww,w.saw,.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form tillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lyle Phillips - WitehrsRavenel; 115 MacKenan Drive
Cary NC 27511
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Located east of Union Grove Church
Road and north of Coyote Lane
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Orange City: Chapel Hill
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.986837°N Long.: -79.122129°W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Long Branch 16-41-1-2
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
Wetland A
35.987353 ON
-79.120938 °W
0.52 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.987444 ON
-79.122213 °W
0.06 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
35.987483 ON
-79.123043 °W
0.07 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland D
35.987755 ON
-79.122946 °W
0.14 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
35.986705 ON
-79.123143 °W
0.06 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland F
35.985954 ON
-79.122878 °W
0.02 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland G
35.985640 ON
-79.122220 °W
0.09 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland H
35.985389 ON
-79.121153 °W
0.03 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Stream 1
35.987948 ON
-79.123215 °W
1618 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream 2
35.985294°N
-79.121059 °W
309 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream 3
35.986021 ON
-79.122861 °W
72 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

0
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
L.Phillips
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: SE Durham Quad (2013) — 1:24K
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Orange Co Soil Survey Sheet 22
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Aerial (2017) — NConemaps
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
Ly/ — —
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Lyle Phillips - WithersRavenel
Authorized Agent - 07/16/2019
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) '
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

%0 WithersRavenel
�� ii PCCu�IP. Your Si �r Ct��.4
Boggess Residence
WR Proiect No. 02180885.00
Jurisdictional Determination Request Information
Applicant - John & Kim Boggess
308A McGregor Drive
Chapel Hill NC 27514
Property Owner -
Physical Address -
Written Authorization:
Nearest Municipality -
County -
PIN -
Drainage Basin -
HUC Code:
Receiving Waters -
Stream Index:
Classification:
Decidegrees -
USGS Quad Map -
Soils Map -
Total Area -
Same as Applicant
Located east of Union Grove Church Road and north of Coyote Lane
See attached Agent Authorization form
Chapel Hill
Orange County
Orange Co PIN: 9861349206
Orange Co PIN: 9861339810
Cape Fear River Basin
03030002
Long Branch
16-41-1-2
WS -V; NSW
35.986837°N; -79.122129°W
Chapel Hill Quadrangle
Orange County Soil Survey - Sheet 22
±20.06 acres
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
169.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License Nc. C `!< '-:
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

This map contains parcels prepared for the inventory of real property within Orange County, and is compiled from
recorded deed, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforementioned
public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The
county and its mapping companies assume no legal responsibility fort he information on this map.
PIN:
9861349206
SIZE:
10.05 A
OWNER 1:
BOGGESS JOHN F
DEED REF:
6571/457
OWNER 2:
BOGGESS KIM A
RATECODE:
10
DDRESS 1:
2712 CREEKRUN CT
DATE SOLD:
1/30/2019
DDRESS 2:
BLDG SQFT:
0
CITY:
CHAPEL HILL
YEAR BUILT:
TATE, ZIP:
NC 27514
_EGAL DESC:
A96 UNION GROVE UMC P87/20
BUILDING COUNT:
LAND VALUE:
BLDG -VALUE
USE VALUE:
TOTAL VALUE
July 9, 2019
$163,100
$0
$0
$163,100
1:4,800
0 0.04 0.08
0.16 mi

This map contains parcels prepared for the inventory of real property within Orange County, and is compiled from
recorded deed, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforementioned
public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The
county and its mapping companies assume no legal responsibility forthe information on this map.
PIN:
9861339810
SIZE:
10.01 A
OWNER 1:
BOGGESS JOHN F
DEED REF:
6511/146
OWNER 2:
BOGGESS KIM A
RATECODE:
10
DDRESS 1:
2712 CREEK RUN CT
DATE SOLD:
8/20/2018
,DDRESS 2:
BLDG SQFT:
0
CITY:
CHAPEL HILL
YEAR BUILT:
,TATE, ZIP:
NC 27514
_EGAL DESC: A9A UNION GROVE UMC P87/20
BUILDING COUNT:
LAND VALUE:
BLDG VALUE:
USE VALUE:
TOTAL VALUE:
July 9, 2019
$162,400
$0
$0
$162,400
1:4,800
0 0.04 0.08
0.16 mi

•/ WithersRavenel
N/ Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner John & Kim Boggess (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel,
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the t 10.05 acre tract/Orange Co. PIN:
9861349206 &:t 10.02 acres tract/Orange Co. PIN: 9861339810/1-ocated west of Union
Grove Church Rd between Coyote Ln and Arthur Minnis Rd.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel. Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: �—;- I /
Signatu
( e - ri t) tle)
(Sig ure)
Mailing Addre�sss
�/006*41e
City State Zip
Phone: 9/9 364 - 93
Email: fi DP (91VC-
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary. NC 2751 f.
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919 467.6008 1 www.withersravenef.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Surface Water Identification Request
Erosion Control Division
Orange County Planning & Inspection Department
131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 200
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Tract Information:
Date Requested:
Requested by:
❑ Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Staff
Parcel Identification Number: 9861349206 & 9861339810 Acreage: 10.05 & 10.01
Property Owner(s): John & Kim Boggess Watershed: Jordan Lake
Location/Physical Address.. West of Union Grove Church Rd between Coyote Ln and Arthur Minnis Rd.
Number of Features to be Evaluated: 2
Owner/Agent Information:
Name: Lyle Phillips - WithersRavenel (Authorized Agent) Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Mailing Address: 115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Authorization:
I, ,print „a,,1ei " ,") , �1'e As owner of the property described above, or as a legally
authorized representative of the owner, do hereby convey permission to Orange County Planning and
Inspections Staff to enter the property at their convenience to conduct a surface water identification (SWID)
necessary to determine whether or not water features on my property are subject to the stream buffer
regulations described in Section 6.13 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. This SWID may
be necessary to facilitate the approval of my proposed subdivision, or to determine whether or not the property
may support o mprovement. This SWID will be public record, and may be requested in the future for
review b artie in ted in the property.
�/. ;�-3
gnatu of Owner Date
Signature of Representative Date
Fee Information (staff use only):
Fee Amount: Date Paid:
Receipt No:

bNOTES:100 200
,,a• • •
WETLAND D� �'�" ' • • • • - • • •
• R ��� i _ POTENTIAL WETLAND • • • •
WATERS OF US M
200 ft,
1} ,fir •��►�+s�l�+.� r ' �A `� e�
�` s s� ��, � \ �� �►�� �� ♦ r +fir,
I r
�-
i+►t46 WETLAND B ti� =,..,w
;:�POTENTIAL WETLAND .t Nr `
� WATERS OF US
STREAM 1.:— ! � r+�y +�` • +
•'� �t POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND y AM*_WATERS OF US •
ND F " m -
' TLAND
A►r ��
L)$
4• i +*JWNTIAL NON WETLANDIf *Fw ,
WATERS OF US L
�• I� `3d� r ~► M e
r.
WETLAND G
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF US
L' _ j
STREAM 2
POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND -
WATERS OF US
STREAM 1
'POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND
WATERS OF US
s
WETj
POTENTIAL
WATERS
REVI

LE
GRAPHIC
000SCAz oo
on -
BOR
1 inch = 2000 ft.
Itu -1
RD
--
us1AI C
SRD
�f
i1 )/
1-.\ - 1 � moi_ ~) ;�{, \` �I � / / / j 'OAK LEAF OR
59D J
EATESNICKORYHIIILN`=- ?.titi REVIEW AREA
(/�a� \'� `\_- ! �✓
s `, 1 �,� •'�� / �� ��_ � /` ``�i11 ,,, _ - i �X,-+r-
5TURER�
--
^Maes - _Hues
Air ir�ort'
g' � _.i:( It �\/I10-- i�r-�Ir' r�f��—r' /\�� �i�/�`�`-� %� !I ,� � •� f—/\J � i � `i
�MeZow- t
Z.
dam) ^ (J 1 L --M� � ` � `L ; 1 / �
\ Y \ V
IA
.LUCY,,[ij
A,/
�0 WithersRavenet
BOGGESS RESIDENCE USGS QUAD (2013) - CHAPEL HILL 1� E g--, I Planners l S,—eV1
—

f
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 loo 200
1 inch — 200 ft.
REVIEW AREA
t
E
d
E
BOGGESS RESIDENCE USGS QUAD (2013) - CHAPEL HILL 10 WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
CHAPEL HILL ORANGE COUN1) NORTH CAROLIN4

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Boggess Residence City/County: Chapel Hill/Orange County Sampling Date: 5/21/2019
Applicant/Owner: John & Kim Boggess State: NC Sampling Point: DPA
Investigator(s): L. Phillips & A. Ricci - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.98729514 Long: -79.120826726 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GeB - Georgiaville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This sampling point was located within Wetland A at Flag F-4 near the lat/long specified above. This sampling form also applies to Wetlands B, C, D,
E, F, G & H as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus laurifolia 20 Yes FACW
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex spp 20 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
4
FAC
Sampling Point: DP -1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 185 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.47
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 1 Present? Yes X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
No
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LOC2 Texture
Remarks
0-14 10YR 2/2 90
7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (All 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present at this sampling point
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335.15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Boggess Residence City/County: Chapel Hill/Orange County Sampling Date: 5/21/2019
Applicant/Owner: John & Kim Boggess State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): L.Phillips & A. Ricci - WithersRavenel Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.98729514 Long: -79.120826726 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GeB - Georgiaville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This sampling point was located within uplands adjacent to Wetland A at Flag F-4 near the lat/long specified above. This sampling form also applies
to uplands adjacent to Wetlands B, C, D, E, F, G & H as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (614)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (63) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (65)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus alba 10 Yes FACU
2. Pinus taeda 25 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Carya glabra
10 Yes
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes
3. Juniperus virginiana
5 Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present at this sampling point.
FACU
FAC
FACU
4
Sampling Point: DP -2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 55 (A) 190 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.45
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1.
FACW species x 2 =
2.
FAC species x 3 =
3.
FACU species x 4 =
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
—Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 61164 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
tion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

10 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
ORANGE COUNTY BUFFER DETERMINATION
LETTER
SWI D19-0011

Pagel of 3
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Engineering / Erosion
Control / Stormwater �- 131 W. Margaret Lane
Suite 201
[phone] ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
[phone] (FAX) NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
www.orangecountync.gov
May 31, 2019
Lyle Phillips
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Re: Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Surface Water Identification
Jordan Lake Unprotected Watershed
PIN: 9861349206&9861339810
Dear Mr. Phillips:
This letter serves as confirmation of an on-site surface water identification made by Orange
County Erosion Control Division staff for the referenced parcels. Orange County enforces a
stream buffer along streams and water features in the County per the Orange County
Unified Development Ordinance (see Section 6.13 Stream Buffers).
According to current Orange County GIS imagery of the parcels in question, there were
two water features to be evaluated; however, three features were discovered. The field
visit verified two of those water features to be subject to buffer regulations and one that
was not. The ones found subject will require an undisturbed buffer along both sides, as
calculated per the referenced Ordinance regulations. These undisturbed buffer areas
shall be measured from the top of the stream bank, outer edge of wet, marshy areas, or
outer edge of the floodplain where applicable. In the instance where a water feature has
braided stream segments with channels running parallel to one another, the buffer shall
be measured from the outermost bank on either side. See below for examples of how
the buffer is to be measured in varying situations:
SA5_Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control Div\Stream Calls\2019\Cape
Fear\05312019.PIN9861349206&9861339810.Boggess.doc

Page 2 of 3
Buffer Width 1
� 1
�� Buffer Width ��
1 1
OR
�Et
of
r
a► ^
OR
1 B,xtrer width 1
1 1
lain
of stream bank
S: Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control Div\Stream Calls\2019\Cape
Fear\05312019.PIN9861349206&9861339810.Boggess.doc

Page 3 of 3
The following is a description of how the buffers affect the property:
Feature A, a previously mapped stream segment, is only subject to buffer regulations
downstream of the ephemeral / intermittent stream channel transition point flagged in
the field for reference. The required stream buffer for this feature would either be a
65' or 80' undisturbed buffer along both sides depending on the slope value, as
calculated per the referenced Ordinance regulations. This feature will be updated on
the Orange County GIS stream layer.
2. Feature B, a previously mapped stream segment, did not score high enough to be an
intermittent stream channel and therefore is not subject to buffer regulations. This
feature will be removed from the Orange County GIS stream layer.
3. Feature C, a previously unmapped stream segment, scored high enough to be an
intermittent stream channel and therefore is subject to buffer regulations. The
required stream buffer for this feature will be a 50' undisturbed buffer along both
sides, as calculated per the referenced Ordinance regulations. This feature's
beginning point has been flagged in the field for reference and the feature will be
added to the Orange County GIS stream layer.
If you have questions about this determination, please contact me at [phone].
However, if you have further questions about the application of the Unified Development
Ordinance to this parcel, how to calculate the buffer lengths, or possible restoration
requirements, please contact Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor at 919-245-
2597.
Sincerely,
G4 *
Wesley Poole
Erosion Control & Stormwater Officer II
Attachments: Aerial Photograph / Map
cc: File
SA5_Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control and Water Quality\Erosion Control Div\Stream Calls\2019\Cape
Fear\05312019.PIN9861349206&9861339810.Boggess.doc

70
h
y
e 1W
1 .x 'tit �j% l�•' !.
Y' 'L. Mr � .fit , � f. �,.- • J
_ �`.`'*a,r , . • Ls iris`- ` � 1.%• "r `"
_'� � 'ir'yk }•`�� �ti. . _ 1. `�l ,•. � . z� - +fin r
i /� • '."d��r_ ' . �''�' r�,.,�.« ' � • s''i ` 'fit
S / yam. <Ji•Y' ♦ i _ .y�� ;� � r 'I i
vk
ilk
r* Illy
`, ♦y • z
Feature C
1•€
•i• • 1• �r�' 0
. �.Data shown on this map is obtained from Orange
G' S and is for reference only
rbact locations and boundaries should be field verified
f, w

Planning and Inspections Department
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
[phone]
[phone] (FAX)
www.orangecountync.gov
31LLING CONTACT
NITHERSRAVENEL INC
'15 Mackenan Dr
'ary, Nc 27511
Reference Number
SWID19-0011
A_ALL_OC_ALL_ReceiptData 2019.5
'.eport created 5/21/2019 11:13.31AM
Fee Name / Notes
EC Determinations/Site Fee
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Transaction Type
Fee Payment
131 W. Margaret Lane
Suite 201
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Payment Payment Method
Date
05/21/2019 1 Check #4188
SUB TOTAL
TOTAL
Amount Paid
$200.00
$200.00
$200.00

;O WithersRavenel
Our proplc. Your S (u ss.
NCN H P PROJECT REVIEW LETTER

a ■o■ ....,� ---p...., vn.•..,.
■■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
mites NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Susi Hamilton. Secretary
N Now Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-9612
July 10, 2019
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Boggess Residence; 02180885.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.but IerCci)ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
CNI[i
rAV

atural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Collective Rating
eadow Flats
RI (Exceptional)
C4 (Moderate)
Boggess Residence
R4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
anaged Areas Documented Within a One -mile
Radius of the Project Area
Area Name
�" ' " §
Project No. 02180885.00
riangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
uke Forest
Duke University
Private
riangle Land Conservancy Preserve
July 10, 2019
Private
eadow Flats Registered Heritage Area
Duke University
Private
ald Mountain Registered Heritage Area
Duke University
Private
NCNHDE-9612
lement Occurrences
Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Eixonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name Last'' Element
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
roup
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date Rank
utterfly
34564
Erynnis martialis
Mottled Duskywing 1952-07-01 H
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G3
S2
Low
Rare
rustacean
33072
Cambarus davidi
Carolina Ladle Crayfish 1992-10-16 E
3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G3
S3
Rare
ragonfly or
33764
Somatochlora
Coppery Emerald 2004 -Pre H?
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
amselfly
georgiana
Low
Rare
atural
16373
Dry Oak --Hickory
--- 2010 C
3 -Medium ---
---
G4G5
S4
ommunity
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
atural
17405
Piedmont Monadnock
--- 2016-12-03 A
3 -Medium ---
---
G3G4
S3
ommunity
Forest (Typic Subtype)
atural
19012
Upland Depression
--- 2006 A
3 -Medium ---
---
G2G3
S2S3
ommunity
Swamp Forest
ascular Plant
25159
Cornus racemosa
Gray Dogwood 2001-11-02 E
3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G5
S1
Rare
Peripheral
atural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Page 2 of 4
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
eadow Flats
RI (Exceptional)
C4 (Moderate)
ald Mountain
R4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
anaged Areas Documented Within a One -mile
Radius of the Project Area
Area Name
�" ' " §
Owner Type
riangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
uke Forest
Duke University
Private
riangle Land Conservancy Preserve
Triangle Land Conservancy
Private
eadow Flats Registered Heritage Area
Duke University
Private
ald Mountain Registered Heritage Area
Duke University
Private
Page 2 of 4

=finitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on July 10, 2019; source: NCNHP, 02 Apr 2019.
ease resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-9612: Boggess Residence
July 10, 2019
DProject Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:22,245
0 0.175 0.35 07 mi
�5 'r
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Soraus. Em. HERE, Go~. Imemop, mcwmrd P Corp., GEBCO USGS,
FAO. NPS. NRCAN, GeoSs", IGN, KOI NL, Ordnenoe Survey. Esn J"W.
=w Ew Ctw (Hong Korq), (c) OpenStreeI conrbulms. ar the GIS
user Con.nuruy
s
%•�'%%:
�•• � :.:.'::
.iii
July 10, 2019
DProject Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:22,245
0 0.175 0.35 07 mi
�5 'r
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Soraus. Em. HERE, Go~. Imemop, mcwmrd P Corp., GEBCO USGS,
FAO. NPS. NRCAN, GeoSs", IGN, KOI NL, Ordnenoe Survey. Esn J"W.
=w Ew Ctw (Hong Korq), (c) OpenStreeI conrbulms. ar the GIS
user Con.nuruy

4% WithersRavenel
Our PeoPle. Your Success.
IMPACT EXHIBITS

=L,
IE
A
Permanent/No
Permanent
Functional Loss
(Rip -Rap
Dissipators)
tream Stream
(LF) I (SQ FT)
13 107
22 158
35 265
1
1
1
1
1
.....
...........
PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING
JOHN F & KIM A BOGGESS
\ \ \ \ \ ;,` ,1 • ' , \ A98 UNION GROVE 9.59 ACRES
CHURCH ROAD
PIN 9861349206
LOT LINE
r / LOT LINE
t
JOHN Ff& KIM A BOGGESS
\ \ \ \ A9A UNION GROVE CHURCH ROAD _
9.74 ACRES
PIN 9861339810
PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING
SHEET 1-2
WIDE PAVED
- - RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY
GRAPHIC SCALE
too o so too 200
1 inch= 100 Ft.
AnCK17IAI nDIX/C►A1Av III r.�i�r, 1 1 CITr r,l AI o III _1/_ WIfF1PfCRaVPr1PI
/
\\ \ \� \� �'�
\
STREAM IMPACT#1 A'
I
, •,•
(DRIVEWAY IMPACT)
\
I
Z'
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 39 LIF
\,
I,
SEE SHEET 1-2
STREAM IMPACT #113
STREAM IMPACT #1 C
(RIPRAP IMPACT)
(RIPRAP IMPACT)
I
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 13 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 22 LF
SEE SHEET 1-2
SEE SHEET 1-2
AnCK17IAI nDIX/C►A1Av III r.�i�r, 1 1 CITr r,l AI o III _1/_ WIfF1PfCRaVPr1PI

\ IMPACT LEGEND:
\ C' iso\ PERMANENT STREAM AREA:
�0.12' WIDE
�F'9y �\ \ �G�cc^ \ REST ENTIALAVED DRIVEWAY PERMANENT STREAM:
1,p ` -NO PERMANENT LOSS
^F� 9\
�'y \ STREAM IMPACT #1A PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT MATTING
\ PERMANENT \ TO ARMOR SLOPES
/ 39 LF (338 SQ. FT.) STANDARD NCDOT
PRECAST ENDWALL INSTALL
(15" - 48" PIPE) NATURAL FC AN CHLUSH ANNEL
A A
/0S STREAM IMPACT #1 B
c�Fp PERMANENT \
�L T 13 LF (107 SQ. FT.)— _ _ _ PIPE OUTLET
RIPRAP DISSIPATER
NO PERMANENT SQUARE PREFORMED
FUNCTIONAL LOSS SCOUR HOLE
(RIP RAP NOT SHOWN
STREAM 1 FOR CLARITY)
SCOUR HOLE - PLAN VIEW
NTS
k"
C` WETLAN G ,
Q� STANDARD NCDOT
PRECAST ENDWALL
(15" - 48" PIPE)
EXISTING STREAM BED
IMPACT AREA #1 CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
TO TRANSITION TO
PIPE OUTLET NATURAL CHANNEL
12'
12"
EXISTING NCDOT FINISHED
TOP OF RIPRAP TO
GRADE CONCRETE GRADE BE PLACED FLUSH
RIP RAP O 2:1 WITH STREAM BED
536.74 ENDWALL CONTOUR
SCOUR HOLE - SECTION A -A
NTS
Z 532.3 48" RCP 48" RCP
EXST. C HANNEI. CULVERT CULVERT
}.
_ 531.3 INV. 1: ' •' •�'• .:�
DUAL 48" RCP AQUATIC PASSAGE
DOWNSTREAM CROSS-SECTION
(NTS) GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 Ft.
lr)r:KITIAI nDIX/CIA//�V I cTnr!AKA 1nAnA!"T AnrA u- I _\/_Wif prcRavPnal ��-