20190898 Ver 1_401 Application_20190702

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
2018°8s
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2019- Begin Date (Date Received): June 18, 2019
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Actio 1 ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: River Walk Subdivision
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial �C
a\\C�
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and B3e : `J\
� !a�
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct Phase 3 of River Walk Subdivision. Phase 3 includes the construction of 28 town
home units, associated access roads, landscaped areas and stormwater devices.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: River Walk 54, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Michael Brame/Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: Unknown
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
36.054710 0/-79.369659 0
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 8893099403
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Alamance
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Graham
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Haw River
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03030002
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FEI Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
River Walk Subdivision Phase 3
2b. County:
Alamance
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Graham
2d. Subdivision name:
River Walk
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
River Walk 54, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3602-0213
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3705-A West Market Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27403
3f. Telephone no.:
336-292-4200/336-669-4760
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Michael T. Brame
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kemersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4620
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8893099403
Latitude: 36.0547100 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
79.369659°
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
10.68 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Haw River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land. A high-tension powerline and associated easement cross the site.
Residential and commercial development is located within the vicinity of the site.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.032 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=290 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct Phase 3 of River Walk Subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Phase 3 includes the construction of 28 town home units, associated access roads, landscaped areas and stormwater
devices. In order to provide access to the southern portion of the sub -division, it will be necessary to install a stream
crossing. In order to connect to an existing sewer line, it is necessary to cross a small wetland pocket. To facilitate the
construction of the access road and development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders,
haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame/David Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is phase 3 of the River Walk subdivision. Other phases of the subdivision have been constructed. Impacts to
streamstwetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ®T
Sewer Line
Emergent
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.005
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.005
2h. Comments: In order to connect to an existing sewer line and manhole, it is necessary to temporarily impact a 0.005 acre
emergent wetland. Following installation, the area of temporary impact will be restored to similair pre -construction conditions.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Culvert/Rip-
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
5
73/23/5
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
E] PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
73/23/5
31. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact 73 linear feet of stream from culvert fill and 23 linear
feet of stream associated with rip -rap that is to be keyed in. Additionally, 5 linear feet of stream channel will be temporarily
impacted associated with a coffer dam/pump around. Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction
conditions.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Pi
Stormwater
0.25
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
0.10
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
6.17
5k. Method of construction:
It is a biocell that will be constructed in uplands that will discharge into the
floodplain.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
61 ❑P❑T
El Yes
® No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The applicant is seeking buffer authorization for the project from the local DWR delegated municipality.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed residential sub -division to avoid other impact to streams and wetlands, specifically
associated with lot/pad fill and a bio -retention cell. The applicant has further demonstrated avoidance and minimization of
stream impacts by proposing to construct culvert head/end walls. The applicant has designed the stream crossing in a
relatively straight portion of the stream that does not contain adjacent wetlands. The remaining 189 linear feet of stream and
0.027 acres of wetlands are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. A temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient of the
proposed culvert. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate stream bank
protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be immediately removed
from the stream bank crossing area. The rip rap is being keyed in to further minimize the impacts to the stream. Upon
completion of the culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted through the
culvert. Following construction, disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live
staked. Upon installation of the sewer line, the emeregent wetland will be restored to grade and seeded.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
Comments: No concentrated flow discharge points are proposed into the buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
27.15%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater retention bio -cell has been designed to treat stormwater from the site.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Graham
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the proposed subdivision will be discharged into existing sanitary sewer lines located immediately east
of the project area. A small wetland will be temporarily impacted by the proposed line that is identified in Section C.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the USFWS Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened species inhabit
Alamance County, NC. The Cape Fear Shiner is listed as a federally protected endangered species. The stream on the
site is small and does not contain fish habitat. Fish will not be directly impacted by the proposed project. A pump around
will be used during the culvert installation to avoid sedimentation down stream. Additionally, stormwater will be treated
from impervious surfaces prior to being discharged to down-gradient waterbodies that contain fish habitat. Based on our
observations, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down-gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The map does not identify eligible for listing properties at the site or on nearby properties. A copy of the map is included
as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? 3710889300K (Drawing 4)
Michael T. Brame, PWS
agnaly 9gned by Michael8rame
Michael Brame En.cmmchtaeloeuame,o Plot
6.28.19
email=mbrameepilotenvim.com, SUS
Date: 2019.0628 09:53:03 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposal far Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal 4457.1
June 12, 2019
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address:
Owner Information:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
h , ` V 2)
12
4 � � Y - -
t e
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
���
P, A tJ F
Print Name
Capacity: i Owner Authorized Agent
-/ 2 /
Date
Signature
5

1/28/2019 ConnectGIS Feature Report
G = ALAMANCE AlamanceCounty
�ONNECTIS
COUNTY Printed January 28, 2019
WIS nc.;T See Below for Disclaimer
:STH CA=4
$ EiR R Y
Darcels 10
P
p,5 +
r
� ?adress
'
''
=F::•.I-I �, to
1720n
...: ELON
■ S185Gf�rILlE
- -.
C) Prerrm-nary AOCrcw
rn
7 52 rd
reeL
r
�f
■ aS o<E
■ S>.tEPSr_�l. IEEE
Poeta
-.
r2N-'9
�.
Pr•tate Roes
1737
1748
17850 1760.
U
GRAHAM
https://alamanr-ecounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile. ashx?i=_agr,_map77fO3e6ceed34a8491 ebe8c9e8743f7ax. htm&t=printid 1/2
Darcels 10
Crtws
'
■ A�,StsaPKF
"� EUFC=s1G'�fi
1720n
...: ELON
■ S185Gf�rILlE
e
, of AMfft
■ SPEEN LEVEL
■ WE SANE
■ aS o<E
■ S>.tEPSr_�l. IEEE
1` A"ITSE—
-Fatly Irdustral Deyploornert
' APPLIED FOP PEPMI-
PEPk.� arva��EO
�.3,•rGa�s
.rt
MaJor Roads
-all otrrer , mics
990
— H'triHPn
199$
out5tdo (Ourlres
■ iiS�ti CCvntr
1999
■ cpm ca,, -,r
�urlort/CtsurS.
Orarpe Ccurd,
gra.
^? Plrior' lt: J^tt
- P{tt;t rrgrarr CP++rKp
arebm NIGS La# 'COB
�n
Dam or Weir
uttemrttert
1:1$1 Feet
-' tit,*maoeSrwrelrr! Permmrt•
https://alamanr-ecounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile. ashx?i=_agr,_map77fO3e6ceed34a8491 ebe8c9e8743f7ax. htm&t=printid 1/2

1/28/2019 ConnectGIS Feature Report
RSINFO GPIN# (State ID). Parcel ID
465189.229661295 8893099403 152047
Old Tax ID CalcAcres Owner Name
6-30-35 10.68 RIVER WALK 54 LLC
2nd Ownr Name Parcel Ownr Addrs OwnCi
3705 WEST MARKET ST STE A GREENSBORO
Own OwnZip DdAcres
NC 27403 0
ad -Pg Dd Bk Parcel Site Address
0491 3602 RIVERWALK DR
Lot# Pit Pg Pit Bk
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 0213 076
Assessed Value Parcel Ownr 2nd Addrs Yr Bit
210012 0
OBJECTID 1
50928
elcome to the Alamance County GIS Site. THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT. Alamance County shall assume no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the
nformation provided regardless of how caused; or any decisions made or actions taken or not taken by user in reliance upon any information or data furnished
ereunder. The user knowingly waives any and all claims for damages against any and all of the entities comprising the ALAMANCE COUNTY GIS SYSTEM that may arise
Yom the mapping data. The well & septic layer is a representation of well and septic data collected or plotted by the Alamance County Health Department. It is accurate
thin the limits of their equipment and training. GPS data collection began in 2013, it is not a complete representation of all parcels within the county that have wells
nd septic systems. This dataset is updated periodically as new data becomes available. **IMPORTANT NOTE: This web map is intended to provide general informatio
s to the individual school attendance zones. The completeness or accuracy of the mapping is not guaranteed nor should the user assume the results as a guarantee o
udent placement at any school. Addresses that are on or near an attendance line should be confirmed by the Alamance -Burlington School District Transportation
e artment 336-570-6541!*
https://aiamancecounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map77fO3e6ceed34a849l ebe8c9e8743f7ax.htm&t=printid 2/2

1/28/2019 ConnectGIS Feature Report
�CONNECTGIS ..e. ' ALAMANCE
W t B 141.:`5T114G MON,COUNTY
NA
PRAHA
...er
R•U 152046 N.
j
`tt
T,. 1520 t3
t �;4
152(42
7 HAL
o�
1 : 292 Feet
AlamanceCounty
Printed January 28, 2019
See Below for Disclaimer
5'reers
r oa,01
Prelim mer, 9 "ds
Prr,ate Roads
Parcels IC
a
Cines
. aLAtAAtJCE
5URLI'Si. 70N
ELCNI
GI95CNa,. —f
;r AHAM
GPEM LEVEL
■
HAW F.1%EF
MEQ"rE
■ OSSIPEE
. WEPSCI'A ILLS
�eao irdusmal Development,!
APPLIED FOR FERMI'
PEF.I.In APPROVED
uNDEP CONSTRu ON
i=ailrt7ad5
t
Malo, Roads
'ar, Wrier ,-aloes
HWY INh
Outside Coums
Cass.«II Co�rx f
r
�' Ct�them CO{irYtj
turd Co .,rd,
Duanpe COury
Pers�n CGurt)
Fa�Cc'vh.e:�r
i DCk.ngrYln �Dlir'J'j
Fr PI rc- %4GS Llr* iC08
so..
It4rology
Derr or Weu
Imerm+ttent
Manmade Shw&irr Prrmanmt
https://alamancecounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map999el 99cca8840abb63202553cd2227dx. htm&t=printid 1/2

1/28/2019 ConnectGIS Feature Report
RSINFO GPIN# (State ID). Parcel ID
403557.176182426 8893192352 172077
Old Tax ID CalcAcres Owner Name
6-30-94 9.26 CITY OF GRAHAM
2nd Ownr Name Parcel Ownr Addrs OwnCity
PO DRAWER 357 GRAHAM
Own t OwnZip DdAcres
NC 27253-0357 8.94
Rd Pg Dd Bk Parcel Site Address
0802 3331 RIVERWALK DR
Lot# Pit Pg Pit Bk
0213 076
Assessed Value Parcel Ownr 2nd Addrs Yr Bit
13410 0
OBJECTID 1
54185
Welcome to the Alamance County GIS Site. THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT. Alamance County shall assume no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the
information provided regardless of how caused; or any decisions made or actions taken or not taken by user in reliance upon any information or data furnished
hereunder. The user knowingly waives any and all claims for damages against any and all of the entities comprising the ALAMANCE COUNTY GIS SYSTEM that may arise
from the mapping data. The well & septic layer is a representation of well and septic data collected or plotted by the Alamance County Health Department. It is accurate
thin the limits of their equipment and training. GPS data collection began in 2013, it is not a complete representation of all parcels within the county that have wells
and septic systems. This dataset is updated periodically as new data becomes available. **IMPORTANT NOTE: This web map is intended to provide general informatio
s to the individual school attendance zones. The completeness or accuracy of the mapping is not guaranteed nor should the user assume the results as a guarantee o
student placement at any school. Addresses that are on or near an attendance line should be confirmed by the Alamance -Burlington School District Transportation
Department 336-570-6S41.**
https://alamancecounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map999el99cca884Oabb63202553cd2227dx.htm&t=pdntid 2/2

' Ri
X11
3 A �� \ v y Avv �V A_ _• s �� - _ — / \� wo
z'55
�A56
6 ZZ
kb
� � I i/i --, � v v V A 1 � 1 A � � I � A\ / 1ECJ � v v v v — , •�
o
�v � - • / � v � � � � \��. \ \ \ \ � I �I
LL
-
7rb2 5F YMANDS
TO R F AIN
� I I
b j p
10
bp
i1RISDIGTIONAL
qb LF PERMANENT
a
DISURBANCE
503 Q 5Q'�TREAM
S� ti) -2.q
w
IMPAGU
ijm5DICTIONAL STREAM
13 LF ULVERT INPA6T5 (PERMANT)
23 LF RIP RAP IMPAGT5 iPERMANT)
5 LF GOfffR DAM IMPAGT5 (iEWOARY)
ail
I I 11 11
BWREngineers
- Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A,
621 E.F. Cams, SWn 100, G—A—, NC 27301.2711
PO B. 21882 Grembme, NC 274201862
K— 33627W,1 Fu: 336275.3719
W6 w.x.bmme-.ade.cam
m
zor� 2 zor� 1 z 1 2
5U DATA
umi
TOTAL AREA:
IObbt AC5.
\ 51TE
5TREAM WER — TYPICAL 5WTION
zONIN6:
C-R
NOT TO SCALE
DEED REFERENCE:
OB 3602, P6 491
4
ZONE I MU5T REMAIN NATURAL AND UNDI5TUREED.
PIN ID
8893098403
ZONE 2 MAY BE DISTURBED BUT M)5T BE REVE6ETATED.
OLD TAX MAP REFERENCE:
6-30-35
49
ALL BUFFER 014- lON5 ARE FROM 5TREAM BANK, TOP
PRa'O-qD U5E:
28 UNIT HJLTI FAMILY
VIGINITY MAP
OF SwPEl OR EDGE OF C 16M NETLANDS *10 EVER
TOW440M B
N. T. S.
PRODU a A 6REATER BUFFER).
IMPAGU
ijm5DICTIONAL STREAM
13 LF ULVERT INPA6T5 (PERMANT)
23 LF RIP RAP IMPAGT5 iPERMANT)
5 LF GOfffR DAM IMPAGT5 (iEWOARY)
ail
I I 11 11
BWREngineers
- Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A,
621 E.F. Cams, SWn 100, G—A—, NC 27301.2711
PO B. 21882 Grembme, NC 274201862
K— 33627W,1 Fu: 336275.3719
W6 w.x.bmme-.ade.cam
m
umi
v
W
=
4
cn
>
A
LU
uc
o
..
oCL..
o
LL. <
o
W
<
=V
Q3:
<
oc
NVOKU
mmmwwnvsr,
W,2"
212-1704
VRAM Or,
VA115 b -Z- ,
'wymb IMPACT5
EXHIBIT
5TREAM, EtUFFER5
E YETLAND5
OIG1�16'JfJYB M1 �
n�ineria
WI

605TRUGTION 5EQUEN6E
I, NO CONSTRUCTION TO W61N UNTIL ALL NEC�� SITE DEVEDPMENT
PERMITS ARE OBTAINED ANWIDIN6 A 6RADIN6 PERMIT FROM NG0I=0).
2. FOLLOW THE APPROVED EROSION CONTOL PLAN AND SEaJEJGE IN ORDER
TO CLEAR AND 6RADE THE SITE.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISRRB4IGE WITHIN THE IMPACT AREA.
4. ENSURE THAT A COFFER DAM AND PUMP AROUND 15 INSTALLED TO DIRECT
RUN-OFF DRAINA6E FROM THE hETLAND5 THROUGH THE SITE.
5. COFFER DAM AND PUMP AROUND M1J5T BE LET IN PLACE UNTIL NEW 48' RCP
STORM SEER PIPES ARE INSTALLED. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET W-4.
6. GRADE SITE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED
48' RCP STORM SE1H2 UNDER PROP05M ROAD.
1. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW THE DETAILS OF THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN TO EN5IJRE THAT NO OFF-51TE SEDIMENTATION OCCURS DURIN6 C 6TRUGTIOK
8. SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED IN A TIMELY MANNER A5 PER THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE
NCDENR STANDARDS AND REC"TION5.
RIP RSP
23'LX21'
2' DEPTH
GI.A56 '1'
T 3 � ir—_�� I
56ALE I"= 40' HORIZONTAL
I" = 4' VERTICAL
NARRATIVE
42' STORM SEWER PIPES TO BE CONSTRUCTED FIRST AS PER THE
CONSTRUCTION 5EWCE ON THIS PLAN AND/0R A5 PER ANY WEE2,ENTLY
APPROVED 6RADIN6/EROSION CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF THIS PLAN
15 TO PROVIDE ADMATE CONSTRUCTION NOTE5 AND DETAILS SUCH THAT
THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EA5TIN6 DRAINAGE THAT RUNS FROM
NORTH TO SOUTH ALONG TILE STREAM TO CONTINUE TO FLOW THROUGH THE
51TE UNTIL THE NEW STORM SEVER 15 IN-PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL.
Engineers
lWk Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A.
621 Fgew Cam, SWL 100, G,m ,NC 77401-2711
PO Bm 21882 irtxm.6rRo, NC 27!20.1892
Pf— 3362750/71 Fox: 13&275 3 719
esus
t'A
�
Uj
0
W u =
'n
_
===
QC o cccc
Q J t
<
x
Lu
x
Uj
p<
d
wVqmx%Ur'
stns "m misaw sr
SIB69 ao, sc rhos
f" M2 -M
M"x, "m
dub e+2ot,
IMPACTS
EXHIBIT
STREAM, BIAS
t NETLANDS
ONN�N �U1t8 M1�0'
PWI'i@t110. 2 �
l

EX
241" DEPTH OF GLA% "Ie
RIP RAP TO 13E EMBEDDED INTO
THE EXI5TINO 5TREAM BED
FILTER FABRIC
EX. 501L
GLA55 "B" RIP
TO GREEK I' DEPTH
b" RIP RAP
3' OUTLET AT OUTLET
yjj OUTLET
�* Ln U
PUMP GLASS "B" RIP
DISGHARGE TO GREEK I' DEPTH
TOP VIEW 51DE VIEW
STILLING BASIN-
N.T.S.
TOP VIEW
GENERAL NOTES:
SAND BA6
GOFFER DAM
SILT FENCE
INTIAL 6RA
CULVERT
ROCK FILTER OUTLET
RIP RAP STABILIZATION
1L-�I x&r*:Vroyl .
TOP OF
I/ -TOE SLOPE
SILT FENCE
• � I 0 STILLING N
USE SILT SACK
ON D15GHAR6E
A A5 BEST POSSIBLE INSTALL CULVERT DURIN6 A DRY CONDITION.
B. INSTALL 51LT-FENCE ON BOTH 510B OF THE CULVERT DURIN6 CLEARING AND
61UBBIN6. G. INSTALL ROCK FILTER DOWN STREAM OF CULVERT.
G. INSTALL SANDBA65 UPSTREAM OF DAM AND PUMP WATER TO STILLIN6 BAIN5 AS
REQUIRED.
D. LAY CULVERT. REMOVE SANDBA65 AND DIVERT FLOW TO CULVERT. COVER AS
REWRED. INSTALL SILT FENCE AT TOE OF SLOPE SEED 9NOLDER5 AS COVER 15
BROUGHT TO FINAL 6RADE.
E. INSTALL FLAIRED END SECTION.
CULVERT IN5TALATION
N.T.S.
— — - CD TOP OF GREEK BANK
5AN BAG — — - GREEK BOTTOM
COFFER DAM
FRONT VIEW
I. SAND BAG DAM HEIGHT 5' MAX. OR TO TOP OF BANK.
2. INSPECT FENGE5 NJEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. REPAIRS 544ALL BE
MADE IMMEDIATELY.
5AND BAG COFFER DAN
N.T.S.
Engineers
BWA-- Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A.
621 C—, imz 100, c-1—, Nc 2701.2711
PO Ess 21881 G—lb m, NC 21420.1882
Pb— 136.275 D471 F. 3%2763719
Web: —.6— —d:.—
S"
m
ui
MVIFA lK 54 UL
1106 POT MAIM sr.
W, 2"
av
242-TO04
mw VA 1W
mb 69-20"
Fevism
SW,b
DETAILS
FU NDApwFeffVff#V4Lyj2E9m2LNV
ms
"OMNI
W3

GONSTRUGTION 5EQUENGE
I. NO CONSTRUCTION TO BE61N UNTIL ALL NECESSARY SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMITS ARE OBTAINED (INCL)DING A 6RADIN6 PERMIT FROM NCDEQ).
2. FOLLOW THE APPROVED EROSION CONTOL PLAN AND SEQUENCE IN ORDER
TO CLEAR AND GRADE THE SITE.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANGE WITHIN THE IMPACT AREA.
4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER LINE AND RESTORE TO EXISTING GRADE.
SEEIN6 AND STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY.
5. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW THE DETAILS OF THE APPROVED ER05ION CONTROL
PLAN TO EN51JIRE THAT NO OFF-51TE SEDIMENTATION OGGIIR5 DURIN6 CONSTRUCTION.
6. SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED IN A TIM LY MANNER AS PER THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE APPROVED ERO51ON CONTROL PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE
NCDENR STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS.
T
i
4G5
485
480
415
410
55_EX24,SA \
�—pNNIAL STREAM '
G
3015
NARRATIVE
42' STORM SEWER PIPES TD BE GONSTRUCTED FIRST AS PER TIE
omTRUGTIoN 5EQUENCE ON THIS PLAN AND/OR A5 PER ANY 51185Eli BTL
APPROVED 6RADING/ERO51ON CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF THIS PLAN
15 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS SUCH THAT
THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EASTIN6 DRAINA6E THAT RUNS FROM
NORTH TO 5" ALONG THE STREAM TO CONTINUE TO FLOW THROUGH THE
SITE UNTIL THE NEW STORM SEWER 15 IN-PLACE AND RINCnONAL.
EX. MH
�4„
N.
\ � 5
q12-.` Fx�4—=MGlN
212 SP\QF *-TLW
_TO BE D STI��W
\ \. 471 \
Cl)
PR(ZP'MH
•201 401:• •
IN =401
REngineers
BWA - Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A.
s2 i � cam., Su1� loo. cam, Nc z;wi.zn 1
POB. 21642 (i, v , NC 27120.1882
P6— im m 0171 r— 3i627s nib
SAS
.a
kn
W
O
2
O
r+yrswx K u2c
5u mir lI im 9r,
614911158M X 2140
2104104
am fff. Km
LME b]F]OM
R'a!l171tl,
'e1 mm IMPACTS
EXHIBIT
5TREAM, aFFERS
I NETLAND5
92
CRAIMSwa N40
Wil mw ft
W4
Is
�a
�Q
EX G�RAA DE
coo N
tt
�
2.
I Als
o?
z
CA
EX
4' SAN.
FVFQ
ALE IN
40' HORI
ZTAL
z�
I"
4' VERTI
AL
T
i
4G5
485
480
415
410
55_EX24,SA \
�—pNNIAL STREAM '
G
3015
NARRATIVE
42' STORM SEWER PIPES TD BE GONSTRUCTED FIRST AS PER TIE
omTRUGTIoN 5EQUENCE ON THIS PLAN AND/OR A5 PER ANY 51185Eli BTL
APPROVED 6RADING/ERO51ON CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF THIS PLAN
15 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS SUCH THAT
THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EASTIN6 DRAINA6E THAT RUNS FROM
NORTH TO 5" ALONG THE STREAM TO CONTINUE TO FLOW THROUGH THE
SITE UNTIL THE NEW STORM SEWER 15 IN-PLACE AND RINCnONAL.
EX. MH
�4„
N.
\ � 5
q12-.` Fx�4—=MGlN
212 SP\QF *-TLW
_TO BE D STI��W
\ \. 471 \
Cl)
PR(ZP'MH
•201 401:• •
IN =401
REngineers
BWA - Planners
Surveyors
Borum, Wade and Associates, P.A.
s2 i � cam., Su1� loo. cam, Nc z;wi.zn 1
POB. 21642 (i, v , NC 27120.1882
P6— im m 0171 r— 3i627s nib
SAS
.a
kn
W
O
2
O
r+yrswx K u2c
5u mir lI im 9r,
614911158M X 2140
2104104
am fff. Km
LME b]F]OM
R'a!l171tl,
'e1 mm IMPACTS
EXHIBIT
5TREAM, aFFERS
I NETLAND5
92
CRAIMSwa N40
Wil mw ft
W4

•
- �-
dq, IF
44 N
In
y -_ _ •'Ii+ a .5 _ Y.
.NT
N.
'ems\ . 1• i f'' .
1 1 g ' o T i11
1 •r • �
try,° .( � �`��� t* `� •_,
.�.. � - �� • j �-� it � f�� • ��� , .
y
�� • .. • - � r�J - -• is , . - � - ..�"°4.- � fes` a +~� - �
� y
-
rte• �i• _ ,
LEGEND
-�"" Site Boundary
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map Riverwalk - Phase II
Burlington and Mebane, NC i { Approximate 10.68 -Acre Tract
Quadrangles �f1' Graham, Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1'=2,000' PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL. INC Pilot Project 4457

MLA
1 74
441 :: ...,
44.
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Web Soil Map
Drawing 2
Riverwalk -Phase II
USDA Web Soil Survey
Approximate 10.68 -Acre Tract
of Alamance County, NC
°°'' �
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1„ =200
PILOT INVIR0NMENTAL.INC
Pilot Project 4457

Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Alamance County, NC
Published 1960, Sheet 19
Not to Scale
PILOT
P I L O T E N V I R O N M E N T A L. 1 N C
Published Soil Map
Riverwalk - Phase II
Approximate 10.68 -Acre Tract
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4457

P I LOT ENVIRON M ENTAL . INC
LEGEND
P. Site Boundary
'" Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
. Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
Other
NWI Map
Riverwalk - Phase II
Approximate 10.68 -Acre Tract
Graham, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4457

A
SA
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Wetland
Perennial Stream
000..0 Ditch (Non -Aquatic)
SA 1-5 ma Number THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NO BEEN
VERIFIED BY THE US EE AND/OR THE NEDEQ DWR THIS EXHIBE INCLUDES eP LOCATIONS OF
DP10 Data Point DELINEATED FTURES.
464"L4,
.:
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
\ ~ J Riverwalk -Phase H
AeH»|mag r Rola E m . � �� � » � 2 \
©\®< ^ Approximate 10.68 -Acre Tract
and @|o GPS Data » � `- A pp
Scale: 1 2Oƒ . P|L13�� G R ham,Alamance Eounty, NC
Date: E 1ƒ 19 r.,, ..e.0.M.f4,.r a. < Pilot Project 4457

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Riverwalk Drive City/County: Graham/Alamance Sampling Date: 1.29.19
Applicant/Owner. Riverwalk 54, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.053529 Long: -79.367796 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam (ChA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
—True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (133)
X Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Ostrya virginiana
10 No
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
tanus occidentalis
30 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30 Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 70 x2= 140
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 Yes
FACW
FAC species 5 x3= 15
2.
FACU species 20 x4= 80
3.
UPL species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 95 (A) 235 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.47
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Lolium perenne
5 Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9.
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
10 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116.4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-18 2.5Y 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_
Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Thick
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Sandy
Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
—Stripped
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Riverwalk Drive City/County: Graham/Alamance Sampling Date: 1.29.19
Applicant/Owner. Riverwalk 54, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Side Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Let: 36.053626 Long: -79.367908 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewada loam (ChA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (B3) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Drift
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
1. Platanus occidentalis
15
2. Acer rubrum
15
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
15
4.
FAC
5.
3 (A)
6.
FACU
7.
35
Sampling Point: DP -2
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
45
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
50% of total cover:
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (A)
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
35
x4=
1.
Species Across All Strata:
8 (B)
5
Yes
Percent of Dominant Species
2.
Crataegus mollis
230 (B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
37.5% (A/B)
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
45
=Total Cover
0
FACW species
50% of total cover:
23
30
20% of total cover:
9
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACU species
35
x4=
1.
Juniperus vi►giniana
0
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Crataegus mollis
230 (B)
5
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Allium canadense
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Otis rotundlfolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
3
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
15
x 2 =
30
FAC species
20
x3=
60
FACU species
35
x4=
140
UPL species
0
X5=
0
Column Totals:
70
(A)
230 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.29
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116.4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Thick
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Version 2.0

NCSHPO Map