20190297 Ver 2_Revised PCN Submitted_20190712

DWR
MOM— of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E -PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq. nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCN / 2OHelp % 2OFile % 202018-1-30. pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
f Yes r No
This is any publicly funded by rrunicipal,state a federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F_ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permits) do you wish to seek authorization?*
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
F- Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that
are not provided in the E -PCN can be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NN numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1d. Type (s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
[7 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
C Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
IF so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program
M Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
dickthe upload button a drag and drop files here to attach document
Barrington Subdivision Phase 1 DMS revised Acceptance.pdf
RLETYFEMJSTBEFTF
79.68KB

1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
r Yes r No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-PrograWAgency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Bob Zarzecki (S&EC, PA)
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
[phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?*
W Owner
r Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
264 Investments, LLC or assigns
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book 016478 Page 01190
2c. Responsible party:
(for Corporations)
Michael E. Jordan
2d. Address*
Street Address
933 Old Knight Road
Address Line 2
State / province / R�gion
City
State / Rovince / F2gion
Knightdale
NC
F stal / Zip Code
Country
27545-9065
USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Bob Zarzecki
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC)
4c. Address*
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2
Suite 104
City
State / province / R�gion
Raleigh
NC
Fbstal / Zip (ode
Country
27615
USA

4d. Telephone Number:* 4e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Reese provide the Agent Authorization Letter if you are sulxrdting this docunent.
Barrington_S&EC Agent Authorization.pdf 425.67KB
FLETYFE VUST BE RF
Fc—.Project Information and Prior Project History
2b. Property size:
(tax FIN or parcel Q
(in acres)
1. Project Information
210
1a. Name of project:*
Barrington Subdivision
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Barrington Subdivision
State / Province / Region
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:*
NC
Zebulon, NC
Country
2. Project Identification
kf)
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
(tax FIN or parcel Q
(in acres)
2716005664,2706819852,2705899809
210
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Old Bunn Road
Address Line 2
Criy
State / Province / Region
Zebulon
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27597
USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on howthe location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude: * Longitude:*
35.8373 -78.2905
ex: 34.208504 -77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Beaverdam Creek (Stream Index No. 27-86-2-3)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030202030101vvvvv
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions on the site consist of agricultural fields and forested land. A pond fed perennial stream flows offsite, back onsite, and into Beaverdam Creek, which flows along the
northeast property boundary. Headwater wetlands occur with ponds throughout the property, and bottomland forest wetlands are adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. Land use in the vicinity
of the project primarily consists of agricultural and forested land, with some commercial businesses, and a convergence of two U.S. highways.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW -0000-00000).
The DWR issued approval to use GC4139 and a Neuse Buffer Authorization Certificate on April 16, 2019 (DWR#19-0297.V1).
The USACE issued an Incomplete Application notice on April 3, 2019 (SAW -2018-00421).
The applicant responded to this notice in an email on May 10, 2019 and later met with Mr. James Lastinger of the USAGE on May 16, 2019. Since then the applicant has revised plans,
completed preliminary plans for the remaining phases of the development, and submitted these plans to the USACE and DWR for cursory review in emails dated June 12 & 17, 2019.
Guidance was provided from the USAGE & DWR to resubmit these new plans, and the DWR would provide an updated approval letter that will replace the one issued on April 16, 2019.
Project History Upload
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
19-0297 401 and Buffer Approval - Barrington.pdf
5.5MB
Barrington–USACE Incomplete Application _4-3-19.pdf
179.51 KB
RESPONSE TO USAGE 5-10-2019.pdf
5.52MB
Barrington Emails with USACE & DWR.pdf
108.06KB
File type must be FDF
4d. Attach an 81/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach decurrent
Barrington_USGS.pdf 849.91 KB
File type rust be pdf
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button a drag and drop files here to attach decurrent
Barrington_Soil Survey.pdf 2.03MB
File type rust be pdf
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
19.46
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(inte—ttent and perennial)
2,804
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To construct a residential subdivision.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project includes the construction of the entirety of the residential development as depicted on the attached plans. Please note that plans have been modified from the
"Illustrative Land Plan" master plan previously provided. These modifications were made to minimize and avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, ponds and Neuse Buffers.
The 1 st phase will still include the main entrance into the development, round about, single family lots, townhome lots, and stormwater management ponds. The final buildout of future
phases may not be exactly as depicted on the plans as these will be developed based on market demands (e.g., some phases shown as townhomes may change to single family if the
market is greater for single family). However, the proposed impacts to WoTUS and buffers should not change. Of course, any proposed changes to the impact areas will be provided to
the USACE and DWR for concurrence. Typical heavy equipment used for the construction of residential subdivisions will be used such as excavators and bull dozers.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
2019-06-27 Combined Wetland Impact Maps.pdf 4.29MB
File type crust be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments
Sb. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r: Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
Exarple: SAW -2017-99999
SAW -2018-00421
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): James Lastinger / Steven Ball
Agency/Consultant Company: USACE/S&EC
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR.
Site verification was completed by James Lastinger of the USACE, and a PJD was issued on June 26, 2018 (SAW -2018-00421).
Neuse River buffer determination was completed by Rick Trone of NCDWR on January 12, 2018 (RRO#17-440).
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload

Click the upload button a drag and drop files here to attach document
Barrington_PJD.pdf 7.77MB
Barrington_DWR Buffer Determination.pdf 857.04KB
rile type mut be PY
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity? This
includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
The entirety of the project is depicted on the attached plans.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands 7 Streams -tributaries W Buffers
W Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.290
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
2a1 Reason*(?)
2b. Impact type * M
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1 (lots)
Subdivision Lot(s)
P
Headwater Forest
W15
Yes
Both
0.213
(acres)
1 (road)
Road
P
Headwater Forest
W15
Yes
Both
0.037
(acres)
2
Storm Pipe
P
Headwater Forest
W14
Yes
Both
0.004
(acres)
Subdivision Lot(s)
P
Headwater Forest
W13
Yes
Both
0.023
(acres)
Storm Pipe
P
Headwater Forest
W13
Yes
Both
0.005
(acres)
Sanitary Sewer Xing
P
Headwater Forest
W11
Yes
Both
0.012
(acres)
5
Sanitary Sewer Xing
T
Headwater Forest
W11
Yes
Both
0.023
(acres)
6
Sanitary Sewer Xing
P
Headwater Forest
W7
Yes
Both
0.010
(acres)
6
Sanitary Sewer Xing
T
Headwater Forest
W7
Yes
Both
0.019
(acres)
7
Sanitary Sewer Xing
P
Headwater Forest
�W4
Yes
Both
0.011
(acres)
7
Sanitary Sewer Xing
T
Headwater Forest
W4
Yes
Both
0.026
(acres)
8
Road
P
Headwater Forest
W16 (G)
Yes
Both
0.013
(acres)
9
Road
P
Headwater Forest
W16
Yes
Both
0.039
(acres)
11
Sanitary Sewer Xing
P
Headwater Forest
W16
Yes
Both
0.014
(acres)
11
Sanitary Sewer Xing
T
Headwater Forest
W16
Yes
Both
0.030
(acres)
12
Saniatry Sewer Xing
P
Headwater Forest
W16
Yes
Both
0.096
(acres)
12
Sanitary Sewer Xing
T
Headwater Forest
W16
Yes
Both
0.192
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.290
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact

0.477
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.767
2h. Comments:
Of the 0.477 acres of permanent wetland impact, only 0.329 acres would result in permanent "loss" of wetlands. The remaining will are listed a
permanent wetland impact as they would convert a forested wetland to a herbaceous wetland within the permanently maintained easements.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S" will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
12
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
24
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
36
3j. Comments:
The City of Raleigh is requireing a 12 LF riprap section to provide safe access across the stream for maintenance purposes. The riprap will be placed
will not a#end above the epsting streambed elevation and will provide aquatic life passage and therefore should be considered a permanent impact,
but not a loss of waters. The remaing 24 LF of temporary impact will be restored to the original contours.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water
impacts below.
3a. Reason for impact"(?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(Pond 3) UT to Beaverdam Creek
Fill
Pond
0.01
(acres)
(?)
Jurisdiction*
P
length*
S1
pact 7 - Sanitary Sewer X
Impact
Temporary
Other
((Stam A) UT to Beaverdam
Perennial
Both
4Aver�e
2(i
(acres)
10
Road
P
Creek
Fill
Pond
(feet)
ear fee )
g2
Impact 7 - Sanitary Sewer X-
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
(Stream A) Ur to Beaverdam
Perennial
Both
ing
Creek
J��Bnear
feet)
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
12
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
24
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
36
3j. Comments:
The City of Raleigh is requireing a 12 LF riprap section to provide safe access across the stream for maintenance purposes. The riprap will be placed
will not a#end above the epsting streambed elevation and will provide aquatic life passage and therefore should be considered a permanent impact,
but not a loss of waters. The remaing 24 LF of temporary impact will be restored to the original contours.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water
impacts below.
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.08
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.08
4h. Comments:
1 (road) impact area was rounded up from 0.009 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.01 acres.
2 impact was rounded up from 0.005 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.01 acres.
3 impact was rounded up from 0.058 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.06 acres.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below.
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?*
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type * (?)
4c. Name of waterbody (?)
4d. Activity type *
4e. Waterbody type *
4f. Impact
area
1 (road)
Road
P
(Pond 3) UT to Beaverdam Creek
Fill
Pond
0.01
(acres)
Storm Pipe
P
(Pond 4) UT to Beaverdam Creek
Fill
Pond
0.01
(acres)
10
Road
P
(Pond 5) UT to Beaverdam Creek
Fill
Pond
0.06
(acres)
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.08
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.08
4h. Comments:
1 (road) impact area was rounded up from 0.009 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.01 acres.
2 impact was rounded up from 0.005 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.01 acres.
3 impact was rounded up from 0.058 acres (as labeled on the permit drawings) to 0.06 acres.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below.
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?*

Check all that apply.
P Neuse
F Catawba
F Goose Creek
F_ Other
F Tar -Pamlico
F Randleman
F Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type*(?) 6c. Per or Temp*(?) 6d. Stream name* 6e. Buffer mitigation required?* 6f. Zone 1 impact* 6g. Zone 2 impact*
Impact 7 -Sanitary Sewer )Fing
P
(Stream A) Ur to Beat:::1E
Creek
0.00
2,260
(square feet)
2,310
(square feet)
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Note the larger area of Zone 2 is the result of a tie in sewer line within Zone 2 only which was lumped into this impact. Impacts are listed as permanent
as the easement Will be maintained as required by the City of Raleigh (provider of sewer services to the Town of Zebulon).
Supporting Documentation - i.e. Impact Maps, Plan Sheet, etc.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
2019-06-27 Combined Wetland Impact Maps.pdf 4.29MB
File mist be FDF
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The developmer hired S&EC, PA to complete and verify all jurisdictional WOTUS and riparian buffers on the property. Site plans were development
which mapmized the protection of these areas in open space ("OS" on the attached plans). Plans for the entire development were further refined to
minimize and avoid impacts. This development is now only requesting 0.329 acres of wetland loss of the total approbmately 19+ acres of wetlands.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
A sediment and erosion control / land disturbance permit will be obtained for the development to include measures such as silt fencing and
sedimentcontrol basins to protect WOTUS during construction. A stormwater management plan will be approved for the development to protect
WOTUS postconstruction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
F- DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
F Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts:
0.00
0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts:
2,260.00
2,310.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts:
2,260.00
2,310.00
6i. Comments:
Note the larger area of Zone 2 is the result of a tie in sewer line within Zone 2 only which was lumped into this impact. Impacts are listed as permanent
as the easement Will be maintained as required by the City of Raleigh (provider of sewer services to the Town of Zebulon).
Supporting Documentation - i.e. Impact Maps, Plan Sheet, etc.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
2019-06-27 Combined Wetland Impact Maps.pdf 4.29MB
File mist be FDF
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The developmer hired S&EC, PA to complete and verify all jurisdictional WOTUS and riparian buffers on the property. Site plans were development
which mapmized the protection of these areas in open space ("OS" on the attached plans). Plans for the entire development were further refined to
minimize and avoid impacts. This development is now only requesting 0.329 acres of wetland loss of the total approbmately 19+ acres of wetlands.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
A sediment and erosion control / land disturbance permit will be obtained for the development to include measures such as silt fencing and
sedimentcontrol basins to protect WOTUS during construction. A stormwater management plan will be approved for the development to protect
WOTUS postconstruction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
F- DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
F Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.

4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
O.897
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
Mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio of all 0.329 acres permanent wetland loss and a 1:1 ratio for all 0.239 acres permanent wetland conversion from
forested to herbaceous within the maintained sewer easements.
There are no private mitigation banks that have wetland mitigation available in 03020203.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes
r No
1b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection
program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation shall be
provided.
What type of SCM are you providing?
F Level Spreader
F_ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
V Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
F_ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
(check all that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diffuse Flow Documentation
Click the upload button a drag and drop files here to attach document
File type nust be FDF
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
r Yes r No
To lookup low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state Stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
Hnt: projects that have vested rights, exeVions, a grandfathering from state a locally inplerrented stormwater programs a projects that satisfy state or locally-irrplerrented stormwater prograns though use of coarrunity in -lieu prograns should answer no
to this question.
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply):*
V Local Government r State
If you have a local govemrrent approval please include the SlvPon their overall impact rrap.
Local Government Stormwater Programs*
V Phase II W NSW
F USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.*
Zebulon
Comments:
The overall impervious coverage for the first phase of development is 39%. Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) #1.1 (wet pond), #2.1 (wet pond), #3.1 (wet pond), &#4.1 (wet pond)
Wil all be constructed as part of this first phase of the deverlopment. Similiar devices will be reviewed and approved for future phases, but plans have not yet been finalized. However,
areas have been set aside for SCMs.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*

r' Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
C Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
C Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a residential subdivision. Projects such as this are not typically considered to result in additional development or cumulative impacts to
WOTUS or water quality. Any potential additional development resulting from this development woudl be local and subject to similiar Federal, State
and Local regulations (e.g. wetland protection, Neuse riparian buffers, and stormwater management).
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater from the site will be discharged to the newly constructed City of Raleigh sewer lines along Beaverdam Creek and the City's sanitary sewer
collection system and wastewater treatement plant. The City of Raleigh, Town of Zebulon and DWR will ensure that adequate capacity ebsts.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
C Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
C Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
C Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
r Yes C No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
C Yes r No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw4eg.usace.amTy.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
r Yes r No
C Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
NHP Data Efgilorer & FWS websites
Consultation Documentation Upload
Qickthe upload button cr drag and drop files here to attach document
File type rrust be FDF
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH Mapper website - The project is located in the piedmont of NC far from any EFH areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpovmb/

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic
Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service was referenced on January 4, 2019. No historic listings, study list entries, or
determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. The "Bennett Bunn Plantation" (HPO Site ID WA0190), listed on the National
Register of Historic Places, exists adjacent to the eastern boundary of this project. No direct impact to the plantation property is proposed or
anticipated. The plantation house is located on the far eastern side of historic property, approximately 0.25 miles from this project. The owners,
Thomas and Jill Hendrickson, were involved during the rezoning process of this property to a Special Use District (SUD) by the Town of Zebulon. The
deverloper agreed to preserving additional open space ("OS") buffers along the property line to help screen this development from the plantation
property. These can be seen on the attached "Illustrative Land Plan" master plan. As such, the applicant believes that adequate measures have been
taken to preserve the historic integrity of the plantation.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File must be FEF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The NC Floodplain Mapping Program's NC Flood Risk Information System. FEMA floodplain exists along Beaverdam Creek and the northern property
boundary, but no impacts to the floodplain area are proposed.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Click the u*W button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
File nust be FDF or INR
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Bob Zarzecki
Signature
Date
7/12/2019

BARRINGTON SUBDIVISION
WETLAND IMPACT MAPPINGFOR A SINGLE FAMILYSUBDIVISION
ZEBULON, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATISTICS
PROPERTY DEVELOPER
264 INVESTMENTS, LLC
JW
8398 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 201, RALEIGH, NG 27615
PROJECT ADDRESS
1745 OLD BUNN ROAD, ZEBULON, NG
WAKE COUNTY PIN(5)
2716-00-5664
3
2705-89-9809
JW
2706-81-9852
EXISTING ZONING
R-13 SUE)
WATERSHED
WITHIN MOCCASIN GREEK WATERSHED
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY PRIEST, GRAVEN ff ASSOCIATES,
INC.
2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY THI5 OFFICE AND WAKE
COUNTY GIS DATA. EXISTING STREETS AND BUILDING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY BY PRIEST, GRAVEN $ ASSOCIATES, INC. AND DIGITIZED FROM AERIAL PHOTOS.
3. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TOWN OF ZEBULON, CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NGDOT, AND NGDENR
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4. FEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONES ARE LOCATED ON THI5 PROPERTY PER FEMA FLOOD
PANEL 3720-1851-00K/J.
5. THI5 SITE 15 LOCATED WITHIN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN.
COVER
SHEET IOP II
F \LHIO falJKlS\]015-[YA. W HYKHt - IMA'.T BASE.—. Jun 21. .19 - .. M , — 1 51fl81
F- VICINITY MAP N.T.S.
CONSULTANT:
PRIEST,CRAVEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNERS / LANDSCAPE DESIGNERS / SURVEYORS / ENGINEERS
3803 - B COMPUTER DRIVE, SUITE 104, RALEIGH, N.C. 27609
PHONE 919 / 781-0300 FAX 919 / 782-1288
EMAIL [e-mail] FIRM#: C-0488
VERTIGAL DATUM - NAWW
HORIZONTAL DATUM - NAP83
IMPACT TABLE
IMPACT IMPACT TYPE PURPOSE
NUMBER LOCATION
I
SHEET 3 OF II
JW
SUBDIVISION LOT/ ROAD
2
-SHEET 3 OF II
JW
STORM PIPE
3
-SHEET 3 OF II
JW
5UBDIVI5ON LOT
4
-SHEET 4 OF II
JW
STORM PIPE
5
-SHEET 4 OF II
JW
SANITARY SEWER GROSSING
6
-SHEET 4 OF II
JN
SANITARY SEWER GROSSING
7
SHEET 5 OF II
GH
SANITARY 5EWER GRO551N6
8
SHEET q OF II
JW
ROAD
9
SHEET 9 OF II
JW
ROAD
10
SHEET 9 OF II
JW
ROAD
II
SHEET 10 OF II
JW
SANITARY SEWER GROSSING
12
SHEET 10 OF 11
JW
SANITARY SEWER GROSSING
GH = CHANNEL, JW = JURI5DIGTIONAL WETLAND, ON = OPEN WATER, NI3 = NEU5E BUFFER,
ZI = ZONE I, 72 = ZONE 2
SHEET INDEX
I OF II
COVER SHEET
2 OF II
400' SCALE OVERALL 51TE LAYOUT WITH IMPACTS
3 OF II
50' 51 -ALE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPAGT5 I, 2, 4 3 MAP
4 OF II
50' 5GALE IMPACTS 4, 5, 4 6 MAP
5 OF 11
50' 5GALE IMPACT 7 MAP
b OF II
IMPACTS 2 4 4 STORM GRO551N6 EXHIBIT
7 OF 11
IMPACTS 5 4 6 SEWER GROSSING EXHIBIT
8 OF 11
IMPAGT 7 5ENER GRO551N6 EXHIBIT
9 OF II
50' 51 -ALE 8, 9, 4 10 MAP
10 OF 11
50' 5GALE 11 4 12 MAP
II OF II
IMPACT CHART
DEVELOPER AND APPL I CANT: Know what's below.
Jul
264 DEVELOPMENT, LLC Call before you dig
933 OLD KNIGHT ROAD, KNIGHTDALE, NORTH CAROLINA 27545
[e-mail]
REVISIONS:
APRIL 30, 201q IMPACT I
JLW 27, 201q REVISIONS IMPACT SPREADSHEET
ORIGINAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2018

1 ��� � �V U / � \ _ � /// �/ l � � �--�//rte � ^ r,;r��,,r, � � \ \�� O �,�) ,� � i / • • � �,- 11 ( / // � \ ._
�� ✓ n�� - _ - // J F �� �� �`� /� Y ��\� \\\ \� INTH
P ASES OF ��� \ \\ �r \\\\�<< �� �� l \\ / n . / 1� i \ ��) .>�\C`
�z ~
UTU12E `Y
/��{��\°' �, _� }��
Y �/%/� � / // / / : r; r; 4'r: : r� r: �: � r - 2 /�(�`r,� ' � r' � ° � \ 5 OF
/ 1; •,' r, �t;�r'r'r' PH rr fI �l% /-✓''/,� �i
,r,r : ( (i—
(!('—
/��;DEVEL ENT
L r r; r, , r; r; r; ✓ \ \ �
H
�^ / � / ) // ,f J- r'f � i>1 '� � r, r r � / � � i %✓ f� � I � a } N ®\�11`� �\ r l j pt r\' , \ � �\ ,� 1\��\\\���\-.�� � (� � � ( \ f ~ O
\ \ SGM #2.
}\\\�\
\�\
\\ (({
(
/1'K' W PO ) _ — J 3 ? ij� \��L \tip ✓ llff II 1111111 \� f' ? S 1�0 \\�\\��\\�� J 4 r�r 1 \\ Q
11.
\
1
Oi((� , ' / - i ; s _ 77 �\\�.� �� PAG 7
\ \ t ✓ l / /i! 1 1 \ li ,I ` �e r Z \ \ 0� — - ';\ \�\\\ 1 \ \\
ST PHASE OF �` _ \ ��-�\\ C\�<�\
DEVELOPMENT
Ac -
`tel ACT/
�����(rrlllr//�� ='=_'s'��`�'i r ( II � r .�i -- \\ `, j �( ?/�,) l�'Y;�;,�'',,r °`��, � ��\ Z>L� ��/ J✓��\\\� � o �
If sr II
PHI it i++ I l i 11
1 CC r, r
z41
o
I _ l I 171 r�- — '- �,-- �� � / � � :� \ //) i S I I 1 � ,� a o �-�' °'-•) 41 )r \\\\ � s �-. �-+
\ ` r ` �•. ` \ � (,s r ,.r ` � % � � (�/' 1� � / r, r:'r' •: r; r r: \ .o �/ 41 � `� `\ ? � w a`
(WE7 \\OND) ; r ;/�}I\111)111 f W
If �-// (�)`�11 t111<
\\� r��j � fF,-t's 11) 10
if �i �?✓ l (1 (/ �� / ! .� ��� i^ u✓�l�l/�/�//f%�����' 'z a
�/ � S � �\ � ��` � � 1( L� % v�% W d
) (�;\ ��\ W
V ¢$
800 400 200 O 400 SOO �=
OVERALL LAYOUT z o
N
��
5HEET 2 OF I I A m
6RAPH I G SCALE: 1 = 400 a

I MPAGT5 I, 21 5
SHEET 5 OF II
0.005 JAL
71
WETLAND/ �
JWIP
\ 0.025 A
J
>O 50 25 0 50 100
6RRPHIG SGALE: I"=50

I
i
/101T I I
�( Jdq
I I
EXST.—
WETLANDS
HP
/ / \ 10.012 AGI JWIT — — —
/ 0.023 AG
/ EXST. / \
WETLANDS
IMPA CT5 41 51 6
SHEET 4 OF II
\ \
limp
1 \ \ < .� / / / / opl� A —
E7 5T.
( WiTLANbof T-
11
LEGEND
= CHANNEL IMPAGT5
®= ZONE I IMPAGT5
= ZONE 2 IMPAGT5
® = JW IMPAGT5
100 50 25 O 50 100
GRAPHIC, SCALE: I"=50

0.0 G
24 LP
\ IGIP
1 0.001 A
\ - 12 LF
l,� r 2
Lt= Ir
IMPACT 7
SHEET 5 0F II
1\
L
L�
� ED
!JJ
<
4
v
Q � LU
o
u w
W U
z�€
�W
wou
U
OW�
LEGEND
c/1
= CHANNEL I MPAGT5
� Wa
LL
= ZONE 1 IMPAGT5
®
s
= ZONE 2 IMPACTS
a-
W W
® = JW I MPAGT5
> �
aLi
)O 50 25 O 50 100
U " s
n U �
wW
6RAPHIG SCALE: 1"=50
�m
a a
t, `
..,
MOM � = pA� ib
L
L�
� ED
!JJ
<
4
v
Q � LU
o
u w
W U
z�€
�W
wou
U
OW�
LEGEND
c/1
= CHANNEL I MPAGT5
� Wa
LL
= ZONE 1 IMPAGT5
®
s
= ZONE 2 IMPACTS
a-
W W
® = JW I MPAGT5
> �
aLi
)O 50 25 O 50 100
U " s
n U �
wW
6RAPHIG SCALE: 1"=50
�m
a a

O
244.0
RGP cc
00
GI 302
GP CA
\
L.F. 42"
0.50%
+
Z
g
0
�
o
a
o
g
Z
W
u
m
STA 6+05.
TOP 310.0
8
0
INV IN
INV IN
304.52 (31
)
INV IN
INV OUT
302.26 (30)
304.32 30
—HE --LAND
IMP
GT
�
z
O
�>'
m0
4 W Z
QQH
4
m
�
CTA5+71.87
GI 301
/
INV IN 3
310.05
302
INVOUT30
TLAND—
I AGT
\
o
LU
�
a
o
244.0
RGp
L.F. 42"
0.50910
+50 C +O +50
33.11 L.F. 4 "
I MPAGT #2
STORM GROSS I NCS PROFILE
U " $
Z
w o i
�, W d
—'
U �w
z
o a
a 4
Qo
4+50
I MPAGT
GROSS I NCS
#4
PROFILE
+
STA 3+27.g
TOP 306.g
INV IN f02.bO (30')
STORM
do
da
90 W zW
az
SEWER OR0551 NO EXHIBIT
SHEET 6 OF a
60 30 15 O 30 60
6RAPHIG SGALE: I =30
U! 3
w o
U

Z
H
l�gl
O
O
~
v
z
w
m
o
�
Z
L
�
N
@ 0.6
mQ
W
. 12"
4�z
1q2.
31.13 L.F. 8"
QQ O
a
1T M
TROD
z
G S.3.
10"
z
O
� Z Z
z z z_
z
4
lD
RV
>L
0
O
O
u
MER
LO
U
U
N
Q
v W u
O ,
w
V1 e
w �
o
w
aa
a
`../ v w
0 z
2+50
3+00
3+50 4+00 4+50
5+00
5+50
6+00
6+50
2p
A a
a 4
I MPAGT
#-7
ao
do
¢ a
5ENER GRO551 NC -7 PROF I LE9
w
a�
az
100
50 25
O 50 100
d�
8
a 3
5EVER OR0551 NO EXHIBIT
0 o
5HEET 8 OF I
w
U
6RAPHIG SGALE: I =50
@ 0.6
. 12"
1q2.
F RGEM IN
G5
1T M
TROD
z
i
z
10"
z
O
� Z Z
z z z_
z

4 \
JWIP/
O.Of3 AG I
EXST. / J
WEDS /C I
� 1
I MPA CT5 8, q, 10, 11
SHEET q 01= II
- NORTH
—
—
\ \ r/ ._ J�� / fig/ ^ / �/�\\✓
EX5T 1
/
SdPEN �
n / OAD �' l
OWIP
0.058 AG
LEGEND
� = CHANNEL IMPAGT5
® = ZONE I IMPAGT5
= ZONE 2 IMPAGT5
® = JW IMPAGT5
®=ON IMPAGT5
100 50 25 O 50 100
ORAPHIC, SCALE: I"=50
�Q�
t
i
/ �
1
EXST.
I�
—
WETLAND5 /
\
it
�>
�- -
-
OA l
/ E IE
I�, I�
I� IE I� /
I� I�
IE
I�
JWIP
r
O.0,3q AG
I MPA CT5 8, q, 10, 11
SHEET q 01= II
- NORTH
—
—
\ \ r/ ._ J�� / fig/ ^ / �/�\\✓
EX5T 1
/
SdPEN �
n / OAD �' l
OWIP
0.058 AG
LEGEND
� = CHANNEL IMPAGT5
® = ZONE I IMPAGT5
= ZONE 2 IMPAGT5
® = JW IMPAGT5
®=ON IMPAGT5
100 50 25 O 50 100
ORAPHIC, SCALE: I"=50
�Q�

CNORTH
IMPACTS II, 12
SHEET 10 0F I I
N
/ I r
ILS
/ IL- E- E
I-
/ / / ► r r r
E- ly\
V/I Ir I Ir I Ir I Ir
r YF
k- E- E— E -
/J it r it r it r\ it r
irk -� -,E
JITE / rz
it I 11 I- it I it I-
r / r Ia2rAG� t r r I r r
� J
7 �
I E
I-
/(
i
I-
//
EDCST. , _ _
WETLANDS /Ir I j I Ir
100 50 25 0 50 100
GRAPHIC, SCALE: I"=50
101

M PACTS
1
3
JURISDICT.
JURISDICT.
JURISDICT.
JURISDICT.
IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT
*RIP RAP
IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT
*RIP RAP
SUBDIVISION LOT
NEW
3
WETLAND
WETLAND
OPEN
OPEN
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
BUFFER
BUFFER
BUFFER
ROAD
2
SHEET
0.004
ROAD
11
STORM PIPE
IMPACT
3
IMPACT
IMPACT
WATER
WATER
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
REASON FOR IMPACT
4
NO.
0.005
SANITARY SEWER X -I NG
TOTALS
1 0.1621 0.2221
STORM PIPE
NO.
4
PERM.
TEMP.
IMPACT
IMPACT
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
ZONE 1(SF)
ZONE 2 (SF)
TOTAL (SF)
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
6
4
(AC)
(AC)
PERM. (AC)
TEMP. (AC)
(AC)
(AC)
(AC)
(LF)
(LF)
(LF)
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
1
3
0.213
0.013
0.009
SUBDIVISION LOT
1
3
0.037
0.005
ROAD
ROAD
2
3
0.004
ROAD
11
STORM PIPE
3
3
0.023
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
12
10
SUBDIVISION LOT
4
3
0.005
SANITARY SEWER X -I NG
TOTALS
1 0.1621 0.2221
STORM PIPE
5
4
0.012
0.023
-1
-
-1
-
*RIP RAP TO BE SUPPRESSED AT TOP OF STREAM BED ELEVATION
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
6
4
0.010
0.019
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
7
4
0.011
0.026
0.002
0.001
24
12
2,260
2,310
4,570
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
TOTALS
0.315
0.068
0.005
0.009
-
0.002
0.001
-
24
12
2,260,
2,310,
4,570,
*RIP RAP TO BE SUPPRESSED AT TOP OF STREAM BED ELEVATION
Estimated Future Impacts
8
9
0.013
ROAD
9
9
0.039
ROAD
10
9
0.058
ROAD
11
9
0.014 0.030
SAN ITARY SEWER X -I NG
12
10
0.096 0.192
SANITARY SEWER X -I NG
TOTALS
1 0.1621 0.2221
0.058111
-
-1
-
-1
-
*RIP RAP TO BE SUPPRESSED AT TOP OF STREAM BED ELEVATION
Estimated Project Totals
TOTALS 1 1 0.4771 0.2901 0.0631 0.00911 0.0021 0.00111 241 12.0001 2,260 1 2,310 1 4,570
IMPACT CHART
SHEET II OF II