20190940 Ver 1_401 Application_20190716

W ATF9OG
20190940
PAIDOffice Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
�.� ,
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 & 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
For the record only for DWQ 401
For the record only for Corps Permit.-
ermit:because
becausewritten approval is not required?
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
❑ Yes
® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
❑ Yes
® No
below.
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Lumpkin Project
2b.
County:
Ashe
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Lansing
2d.
Subdivision name:
Mountain Associates Property Subdivision
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
N/A
project no:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Owner Information
3a. Name RecorciedI eed
Ellen G. Lumpkin and husband John G. Lumpkin
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 490, page 1099
3c. Rasponsib(e f.ty,(or C t,O if
oocable)
Ellen G. Lumpkin and husband John G. Lumpkin
3d. Street address;
611 ',Silas Creek Road
3e. City, state, zip.
Lansing NC 28643
3f..Te1ephona no.
321-436-8530
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. 'mii aftac)d�4
[e-mail]
4. Applicant JIM66"," fferei
t from owner)
4a. Applipant,f;A
ent D dther,;specify..
4b. Name.
Glen Sullivan
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Foggy Mountain Nursery
4d: Street address:
2251 Ed Little Road
4e. City;, stete, zlj
Creston NC 28615
4f. T61666"ir a no
336-384-5323
4g. Fax no.:
336-384-3764
4h. Email address.
foggymtn @skybest.com
5. Agetm(ifapplicable)t
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
18294020 011
1 b. Site coordinates, (in decimal degrees):
Latitude Longitude:
(36.4855) (-81.4375)
1c. Property size:
2.781 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
North Fork New River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;ORW
2c. River basin: map is available at
New
hftp:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is located along the North Fork of the New River east of Lansing, NC. Landcover in the area consists of
mixed hardwood conifer, managed herbaceous cover, and mixed upland hardwoods. The property is used as a
permanent dwelling for landowners and their family. Surrounding land use is primarily rural residential with some
agricultural use. River banks at the property are moderately to severely eroded due to the lack of vegetative buffer along
stream.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 none
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
173 If of the North Fork New River,
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To repair and stabilize eroding banks by re-establishing proper bank profiles through bank reshaping and with 1 in -stream
structure and to improve water quality. To improve habitat for aquatic fauna and to improve the overall condition of the
riparian areas at the site.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Eroding banks will be reshaped to approximately 2:1, or flatter and planted with native vegetation. One (1) rock vane will
be constructed to divert the thalwag back to the center of the stream. During construction a track hoe will do the work
from the bank, although the track hoe may have to access the stream to construct the end of the rock vanes. After
construction the bank will be seeded with native grass seed and sloped bank will be covered with erosion control matting
and anchored with live stakes and landscape staples. Flat areas will be seeded and mulched with straw. All areas will be
planted with live stakes (Silky Willow, Salix Sericea) (Silky Dogwood, Cornus amomum) (Elderberry, Sambucus
canadensis) along with native rhododendron mtn laurel and riverbirch
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictionalareas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands 0 Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Open Waters ❑ PondConstruction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland ;impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a
2b3
2c
2d`,
2e.
2f;
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps'- 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Totalwetland impacts
0
2h. Comments: There are no wetlands in the impacted area.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites; impacted.
3a'.
3b;
3c.
3d
3e.
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Stabilization
North Fork New
River
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
108
163
S2 ®P ❑ T
Rock Vane
North Fork New
River
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
108
10
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h, Total stream and tributary impacts
173
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11

4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
0
4g. Comments:
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f: Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse E] Tar -Pamlico EJ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ PEI T
EJ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la, Specifically descnbe measures taken to, avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.:
This project will stabilize 173 If of eroding stream bank, reduce stream bank erosion, reduce in -stream sediment loads
and improve in -stream aquatic habitats. Stream aesthetics will be improved with the establishment of a well vegetated
and functioning riparian zone.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction; techniques.
During construction, equipment will only access the stream when absolutely necessary. For this project, it is anticipated
that most of the track hoe work can be accomplished from the top of the bank. However, equipment may need access the
stream during the construction when no other construction alternative exists. Soil disturbance will be limited to what can
seeded and stabilized in one day. Banks will be seeded, and coir matting will be placed and anchored with wooden
stakes. Flat areas will be seeded and covered with straw.
2. CompensatoryMitigation` for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
El Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
El Yes No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): There are no
violations. The permit is due to an extreme flood event, that destroyed a campground road.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
EJ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife Service website:http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh—coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places athttp://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/nrlist.htm
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will thisproject occur in:a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Yes' ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project will not impede flood waters.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http:// msc.fema.gov/portal/search#searchresultsanchor
Glen Sullivan
--
July 12th, 2019,
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11

designa,,c� Gk%n Sullivan of Foggy Mountain
Nursery to act as my duly authorized agent concerning all US Army Corps of
Engineers and NC DENR permitting regarding the stream tank restoration project
on my property in County, NC.
A -
Name
5-1 45 rl�
Address
L)
Phone number
Piix nurn
—7'1_Ae 4r /-:4 A) t i5; o iP eg- J — ZTq-4 d hS , &O -In
E-mail address
M
Dme

'N"
1. 4.IWC! —04 sc
A—S 1-2010�9 841 AQ p@4�jqnd p,, op� Pddow '4p
oom I 3Vos
­A
77
�\A
T -JI
—A,
7"o
;
Ali
j
i A
7,
A
-'N IM,
V. 411-
.0. 8 t N 10W
"dl
o
7
14
:t4 72,-
da,
4�
41
AN,
V
-ly
tl
Oil
1 o
0
rm—
N"4
4111
r
1-11.,11a.W s..As 31nNIW 5't ABAHAS IVOID01030
M 3"sv-vj4j1odvo llwoN S0183INI 3HI JO IN3Kl8Vd30
BiONvdavno NOSS3zlJ3r GAIVIS 031INn

LEGEND:
Bank reslopmg
Rock Vane
SUMMARY TABLE
ACTIVITY REACH
Reach Length 173 Feet
No. Instream Structures 1
Length (in ft) Impacted 10
by Instream Structures
Sloping ('n ft) of Slreambank ^173
Plangfpg (in ft) W Live Stake 173
. Riparian Buffer Planting (Acres). 0.10
Area Disturbed During
(:mMn,ctinn (A-1 0.10
SITE PLAN
Lumpkin Project
Foggy Mountain Nursery
2251 ED UTTLE ROAD CRESTON NC 28615 Tel: [phone]
60 0 60 120 180
GRAPHIC SCALE — FEET
—�—ApproXimate
Prop lin,
House
�X)m p
rOPertY Line
VICINITY MAP
y�
Y � 1669 M

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Lumpkin Project City/County: Lansing/Aske Sampling Date: 7/11/19
Applicant/Owner: Foggy Mountain Nursery State: NC Sampling Point: S1
Investigator(s): Tom Davis Section, Township, Range: Walnut Hill Township
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flood Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat; 36.4855 Long: -81.4375 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Colvard Fine Sandy Loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No=
Remarks:
Sample was taken in a mowed yard that was recently flooded by the North Fork of the New River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑✓ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Q, No= Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
n ILL
Saturation Present? Yes Q No' ' Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30X30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1, Salix babylonica 5erg FAMP
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1.0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1.
2.
3.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15x15
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5X5
1, Festuca
10
2. Phalaris arundinacea
10
3, Vernonia fasciculata
5
4, Poa pratensis
5
5, Dactylis glomerata
5
6. Phleum pratense
2
7. Plantago major
2
a_ Glechoma hederacea
5
50% of total cover: 22
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
numbers here or on a separate
yes FACU
no FACW
no FAC
nn FAr l I
Sampling Point: S1
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.5 (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 -0
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
FACW species
15
x 2 =
30
FAC species
5
x 3 =
15
FACU species
29
x 4 =
116
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
49
(A)
161 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
no r-mk-u
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
no FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
no FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
no FACU
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
144 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes n No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-12 10YR 2/4 100
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
H5Histosol
ric Soil Indicators:
(Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: S1
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Se no redox indicators present
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
L] Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Z @IdweS

Sample 1

FIGURE 5. Typical bank reshaping and revegetation plan.
Cross-section view before work (existing condition)
Pasture grasses, little valve for bank
l stabilization or stream shading.
Vertical bank showing area to be
,`�=.ft '�.............................................,... A/ reshaped.
14,
�e
.t u
t .
Cross-section view after work
Rooted trees, 2' to 6' tall.
Herbaceous vegetation.
Live stakes 18" to 24" in length. I
Erosion control blanket 4
' - 8 ft wide, anchored with
wooden stakes/live stakes.
� 111I1I
Water level
r a a 5 a
a

FIGURE 6. Typical rock vane structure showing plan and cross-section views. Photograph
shows a rock vane constructed in the South Fork New River at the Wagoner Road Access, New
River State Park.
PLAN VIEW
le
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
Footer rocks
Top rocks
Bankfull bench
W

Station 1+75 - 0+00

Station 1+00 - 0+00

Station 1+00 - 1+73

fb:
h y
` � r
\�1r
` 1