19930950 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19931112

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
December 20, 1993
C
0 1993
WETLANDS GROUP
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Action ID No. 199400522 and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
Mr. Joseph C. Poole
Route 4, Box 231-A
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Dear Mr. Poole:
Reference your application dated November 3, 1993, in which you requested
authorization pursuant to Nationwide Permit #26 to place fill material in
approximately 2.5 acres of wetlands adjacent to several unnamed tributaries to
Puppy Creek in conjunction with development of a golf course. It is our
understanding that no fill material will be placed in wetlands adjacent to
Puppy Creek.
The property is located south of SR 1409, near Raeford, Hoke County,
North Carolina. According to information provided to Mr. McLendon during your
November 30, 1993 meeting, The majority of the impacts to wetlands associated
with this project are from the excavation of several small ponds.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM). You should contact Mr. John
Dorney, telephone [phone], regarding this water quality certification.
This nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain
other required State or local approval.
This verification will be valid for two years from the date of this
letter unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked.
Also, this verification will remain valid for the two years if, during that
period, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification
or the activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide
permit authorization. If during the two years, the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that
the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the
nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under
construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the
nationwide permit will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration,
modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised
on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authorization.

-2-
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Scott McLendon, Wilmington
Area Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mrf John Dorney
ater Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. Connie Miller
Land Quality Section
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary
H N FF?-
Q EE
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E„ Director
December 15, 1993
Joseph C. Poole
Carolina Turf Farms
P.O. Box 850
Raeford, N.C. 28376
Dear Mr. Poole:
Subject: Proposed fill in Wetlands or Waters
Golf course development
Hoke County
DEM Project # 93950
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 2.41 acres of wetlands or waters which are
tributary to Puppy Creek for golf course development located at SR
1412 and SR 1409 in Hoke County as described in your submittal dated 3
November 1993, we have determined that the proposed fill can be
covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2671. A copy of
the General Certification is attached. This Certification may be used
in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit
No. 26. The applicant is reminded that if residential development
occurs which will impact wetlands, then separate 401 Certification
would be required.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right
to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in
the form of.a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
1786.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-
Sincerely,
4P eston Howard, Jr. P.E.
93950.1tr
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES:
Reviewer: 6-
TO: John Dorney WQ Supv.: cX.Q•.
Planning Branch DATE
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) ***
PERMIT YR: 93 PERMIT NO: 0000950 COUNTY: HOKE
APPLICANT NAME: JOSEPH C. POOLE
PROJECT-TYPE: GOLF COURSE PERMIT-TYPE: NW26
COE__# : DOT.-#:
RCD_FROM_CDA: APP DATE_FRM_CDA: 11/09/93
REG-OFFICE: FRO RIVER--AND-SUB-BASIN-#: o-.3
STREAM-CLASS: G STR_INDEX_NO: /S
WL_IMPACT? : O?N WL_TYPE: O T4 L? ?-
WL_REQUESTED: 7,4-( WL_ACR_EST?: Y60
WL_SCORE(#): WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?:?N d
w
HYDRO_CNECT?: &N
?
MITIGATION?: YI!P

MITIGATION-TYPE:
,104- --?
C=Y
MITIGATION-SIZE:

IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y6
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY
4-
c-
L G11 Vt li1 1' 1.1 C:iJ
A ? i TE ??uzv`'?? `

SEED.... ?a ina
SOD --...
SPR;GS "rF , Tur arms
P.O. BOX 850 • RAEF.ORD, NC 28376 • PHONE: [phone]
November 3, 1993
Mr. Scott McLendon, Biologist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
RE: NWP-26 Notification, Joseph C. Poole
Dear Mr. McLendon:
Enclosed please find the following:
1. Notification Form (1 copy) - covering the proposed Golf
Course Development on property owned by Joseph C. Poole
2. Vicinity Map
3. Copy of Wetland Survey of the property
4. Copy of Storm Water Discharge Permit for Development
5. Concept Plan Indicating Area of Impacted Wetlands
6. Description of Impacted Areas and Size
We hope that the information provided will be sufficient for
your review and issuance of approval under the NWP program to
construct the facilities as shown.
We understand that the wetland boundaries indicated on the
attached Concept Plan are not located by a Meets and Bounds
Survey. However, in establishing the centerline of all the
Golf Course holes, and surveying them in the field from a
grid layout of the Concept'Plan, flagging of the wetland
boundaries was noted, and fit the actual field layout very
closely. The wetlands on the property as a whole are very
easily followed by distinct topographic changes. The entire
layout was designed around the 65+ acres of wetland on the
property as much as possible. The only areas we are impacting
are the ones essential for transportation around the facility.
A
Mr. Scott McLendon
Page 2
November 3, 1993
In addition, we understand that if the permit is approved,
utmost care should be taken during construction to limit the
affected areas.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. We look
forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
a4seph C. Poole
enclosures
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #):
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY.
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AGEMENT--
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO , OE, .,%$, [j 1f1 15'
AND NATURAL RESOURCES 'z
P.O. Box 29535 '
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 NUV - 9
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO AMOMI -. -?
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: _ Joseph C. Poole
2. Owners Address: Route 4, Box 231-A, Raeford, NC 28376
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): 919 - 8 7 5 - 5 2 5 6 (Work): 919-875-6141
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Hoke
Nearest Town or City: Raeford, NC
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Intersection of S R 1412 & S R 14 09
6. Name of Closest Strearn/River: Puppy Creek
7. River Basin: Cape Fear
8. Is this project located in a watershed classed as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ J NO [x]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [X]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site: 12
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: .44
Drained: 0
Flooded: 1.97
Excavated: 0
Total Impacted: 2 .41
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
Construction of golf course and residential subdivision.
13. Purpose of proposed work: Construct golf course
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Cart path crossings, one street crossing f
clA'- up 13? hand in fairways
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES[ ] NO[
]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [X ] NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the n acement of the _
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. .
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Agriculture
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Sept i c Tanks
1 C? ?11? -3- 3
O n is ignature Date
MCKIETHAN gttg
POND ?k.
AIIITARY- _._._, -- - RESERVATION i
Pi F - I
..(
ti
s-
URCI fS
'DA'D
CE
)RTH C
PREPARI
VICINITY MAP
N.T.s.

I-x"
Post Office Box 33604
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
WETLAND CONSULTANTS
Mr. Joe Poole
Carolina Turf Farm
P.O. Box 850
Raeford, NC 28376
Dear Joe:
December 12,1990
The ground survey of the Poole property east of Raeford and south of Fort Bragg, in
Hoke County, NC has been completed. In addition, a cursory windshield survey of
habitat adjacent to the Poole property was conducted within 1/2 mile.
Survey Period/Area Covered:
During 11/4/90-11/25/90, P.C. Campbell and P.D. Doerr spent 4 days (8 inan days)
conducting straight line, parallel transects at 100m intervals back and forth across the
J.H. Poole property located at the intersection of Parker Church Road and North Parker
Church Road in Hoke County, east of Raeford, NC.
The surveys were designed to assure a high probability of detecting endangered ver-
tebrate wildlife species which could be expected to occur in the relict longleaf pine
habitat that characterizes the proppert The endangered pine/wiregrass ecosystem in-
clude the red-cockaded woodppecker Federal), the pine woods sparrow (State), and the
northern pine snake (State). We were also alert to the presence of similarly protected
pplant species which might occur, such as Michaux's sumac and rough-leaved
Ioosestrife, although the timing of the survey was such that these plants were unlikelyy
to be detected. We also note that pine woods sparrows would also have a low probabil-
ity of detection at this time of year.
We made a concerted effort to ensure that our transects would provide intensive
coverage of the entire property. We walked in tandem, at 50m intervals, in easy view
of one another, to ensure that all potential habitat received careful scrutinyy. We util-
ized compass azimuths to establish each line transect and covered all of tI1e property
systematically. We were especially cognizant of relict old growth and mature second
growth trees (and flat-topped trees) that are so often used by red-cockaded woodpeck-
ers (RCW's) and habitats which characterize the original flora of the longleaf ecosys-
tem. Specifically, we needed to determine the presence and extent of mature longleaf
pine on the property, and establish if there was any evidence of current, recent, or his-
torical occupation of the property by RCW's.
Results:
We found no evidence that RCW'S have occupied the area in the recent past. Further-
more, we found no evidence that RCW'S had ever occurred on the property, even
though the area has all the characteristics of once having supported suitable habitat.
Coast Office 275 Redfox Trail Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Phone [phone]
Mr. Joe Poole
Page 2
December 12,1990
We found numerous old growth relict longleaf pines, many with the twisted, bent
character of flattops so often used by the birds. While we expected to find evidence
that some of these had at least received historic use by RCW's, that did not happen.
The property supports an excellent example of the native longleaf pine ecosystem
which has been a owed to deteriorate for several decades. There is a matrix of old
growth and mature second growth pines which 40-50 years ago was the dominant fea-
ture of the property and likely thousands of adjacent acres. Then, it appears the area
was logged of many of the best timber trees, some of which may have included RCW
cavity trees. Then the property was apparently protected from the normally frequent
occurrence of owing season fire. Protection from fire subsequently allowed the
development of the veryy dense hardwood understory which occurs in the forested area
west of Puppy Creek. Of interest is the fact that wiregrass (the dominant ground cover
species of the native longleaf pine savannas) still occurs in remnant patches throughout
the property. Wiregrass is generally shaded out as the hardwood understory and
midstory develops when fire is retarded in the fire dependent longleaf forest.
To the east of Puppy Creek, the same remnant mature pine matrix exists, but the
hardwoods have encroached to the extent that they are the canopy dominants.
Wiregrass is encountered infrequently there, although it still occurs.
Overall this forest has, in the absence of fire, experienced successional changes which
make the area unsuitable for red-cockaded woodpeckers. RCW's simply do not
tolerate dense understory and midstory conditions of the sort that occur everywhere on
the Poole property. Similarly, the lack of fire and the concomitant loss of the luxurious
wiregrass growth which characterizes such sites combined to make the area unsuitable
for the pine woods sparrow, as well as the RCW. The sparrow requires dense stands of
the clumped wiregrass in which to place it's nest, as well as the open savanna which
characterizes the typical natural stand of longleaf pine.
Our cursory windshield survey of the wooded tracts near the Poole property was con-
ducted to assess the possibility that RCW colony sites might occur within 1/2 mile.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requires an assessment of foraging habitat
availability within 1/2 mile of RCW colony sites. Further, any habitat modifications
that would reduce foraging habitat below an established standard of 8,490 square feet
of basal area, with 6,3500 pine stems 10 inches in diameter or larger are prohibited. As
there are no known colony sites within 1/2 mile of the Poole 'proper fy, this requirement
does not apply. We point out, however, there is a population for RCW's on and ad-
jacent to Fort Bragg, a scant 1.5 miles distant.
Sincerely,
Triangle Wetland Consultants
Doug J. Frederick, Ph.D. Russ Lea, Ph.D.
Post Office Box 33604
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
WETLAND CONSULTANTS
November 6, 1990
Mr. Joe Poole
Carolina Turf Farms
P.O. Box 850
Raeford, NC 28376
Dear Joe,
Attached is our wetland report plus a map outlining the
wetland areas. The line was done in several segments and we have
identified and numbered each line. Also attached are the wetland
field sheets we completed which typify the wetland and upland
habitats.
The lines drawn in green on the map are our estimate of the
line location in the field. These areas were extremely thick and
it was sometimes difficult to know exact locations. Also, the
contour lines on the map you gave us with the property boundaries
drawn in were not very accurate, especially in the upper reaches
of the tributaries.
We suggest you look over this information and then call us
when you want the Corps to come to the field and approve our
flagged lines. We can make the arrangements for the field visit
or you can. Following approval of the line, we then suggest you
have the line surveyed. Then you can be very specific about your
development planning.
Dr. Phil Doerr should have the wildlife survey work done in
the next two weeks so we are about on schedule.
Based on our in depth survey of this property, you have some
very attractive land with considerable potential. The wetlands,
although widespread make up a relatively small percentage of the
total land area and may be a definite amenity to your overall
development plan.
Coast Office 275 Redfox Trail Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Phone [phone]

Please let us know if you have any questions or if we can
help you further.
sincerely,
Triangle Wetland Consultants, Inc.
Doug Frederick, Ph.D Russ Lea, Ph.D
cc: J. Poteat
- 2 -
Post Office Box 33604
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
WETLAND CONSULTANTS
Jurisdictional Wetland Survey
of
Carolina Turf Farms Property
Hoke County, North Carolina
Proposed For:
Mr. Joe Poole
Carolina Turf Farms
P.O. Box 850
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Prepared By
Triangle Wetland Consultants, Inc.
P.O. box 33604
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
November 6, 1990
Coast Office 273 Redfox Trail Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Phone [phone]
Between September and November, 1990 'Triangle Wetland
Consultants (TWC) conducted a wetland delineation on property
owned by Carolina Turf Farms located along Puppy Creek near
Raeford in Hoke County, North Carolina.
This report summarizes the wetland delineation of this
property with additional comments on the topography and habitat.
The opinions and conclusions reached in this report with
accompanying maps are based on data and information assembled by
TWC and we reserve the right to modify or update this report
based on new information, input from Carolina Turf Farms, or
outside parties. The wetland lines drawn on the accompanying map
are estimates of the line location and do not refelct a surveyed
line which may change the location. We recommend the lines be
surveyed to insure exact location.
The wetland areas on this property consisted of the main
floodplain of Puppy Creek plus the small to medium headwater
stream areas which are tributaries to Puppy Creek. There were
also several isolated wetland areas located within some tributary
drainageways.
The area surveyed is in the Piedmont Province and is a
highly dissected landscape with very well defined drainageways.
Runoff from uplands is quite rapid and there is considerable
erosion potential. Most of the streams are small, shallow and
often intermittent. Some stream channels disappear completely
and give rise to isolated wetlands in shallow swales.
very well-defined broad uplands give way to densely
vegetated forested wetlands along the stream channels. The
wetlands were typically narrow but extremely dense and in some
cases nearly impenetrable. only limited timber cutting has
occurred on this tract and much of the timber is mature with a
moderate understory.
The predominant wetland soil in the area is Johnston Loam
which is a poorly drained soil found on nearly level sites along
major drainageways. These soils are frequently flooded and the
seasonal high water level is at or near the surface for much of
the year. Other soils frequently found adjacent to the
drainageways and floodplains were Blaney Loamy Sand and Candor
Sand soils. These soils were on the toe slope areas and only
infrequently showed hydric parameters.
- 2 -
A simple wetland delineation approach was used in this
survey following the 3 parameter requirements specified in the
new Federal Manual for Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands in the
U.S., 1989. The wetland line is flagged using red and white
plastic flagging sequentially numbered and identified by a
separate letter for each line. Field Wetland Delineation Forms
were completed for several wetland line segments to characterize
representative upland and wetland areas adjacent to the lines
(all completed forms are attached). Sample plot locations are
numbered corresponding to numbered flags along each lettered
line.
Wetland Vegetation: Typical tree species found on the
wetland areas were: Liquidambar styraciflua - sweetgum (FAC),
Acer rubrum- red maple (FAC), N ssa sylvatica - black gum (FAC)
and Liriodendron tulipifera - yellow poplar (FAC). Typical
schrub species included: Ilex o aca - holly (FAC), Clethera
alnifolia - pepperbush (FACW), Leucothoe axilaris - fedderbush
(FACW), and Vaccinium corymbosum - highbush blueberry (FACW).
Most common ground cover species were: Arundinaria gigantea -
giant cane (FACW), Woodwardia aerolata - Virginia chain fern
(OBL), and Osmunda cinnamomi - cinnamon fern (FACW). Most common
woody vines were: Smilax rotundifolia - greenbriar (FAC), and
various species of wild grape - Vitus spp. (FAC).
Wetland Soils: Soils were sampled to an 18 inch depth.
Physical properties including texture, mottling, gleying,
incidence of streaking and concretions, organic matter
incorporation, presence of hydrogen sulfide plus other
characteristics were observed at various depth intervals.
Soil parameters were reliable indicators'of wetland
conditions on this property. The low chroma, mottled condition
of the Johnston Loams consistently distinguished hydric
conditions and helped establish the wetland boundary. Soils of
10 YR 3/2 were very common on the wetland side of the wetland
boundary while soils of 10 YR 4/2 to 6/2 with no hydric
parameters were common on the adjacent uplands.
Hydrology: Hydrological parameters recorded included: water
lines, scouring, debris dams, exposed roots, buttressing,
siltation, crayfish mounds, standing water, saturated soils plus
other characteristics.
The wetland boundaries for this tract were rather distinct
owing to the sharp topographical features, abrupt ecotones in
- 3 -
vegetation and soil changes. Typically the wetland plots had
several hydrological characteristics and the wetland line was
accurately established. However, confirmation was always made
using sample plots and by visual methods along the boundary using
the three parameters: vegetation, hydrology and soils.
Overall, this tract has a relatively small area of wetlands,
mostly confined to streamside areas. The broadest expanses of
wetlands were in the upper reaches of the tributary streams and
along the floodplain of Puppy Creek. Several of the tributary
streams had very low volume flows and even disappeared in places
resulting in some isolated wetland areas. Also, there were some
broad, uplifted wetlands with deep peat deposits which were
rather unique for the area. In all cases the wetlands were very
heavily vegetated and were functioning well to catch sediment
from the surrounding uplands. The wetlands also are very
effective in providing diversity and edge habitat between them
and the uplands and open fields.
- 4 -
LAND DETERMINATION FORM 9
Coordinator: Time: o 4 ci Date: 10 / 7 / 2O County: SIG
Nearest Town-,, n <. Y h t Waterway: _ --- ?> Or l.
Quad: Location: P'.&
Property ?3-
Owner:(Name/Address) Party Doing'Wrk:(Name/Address,)
1Z\A t V a Y, N (f.. Q \1 L C -k 6-(4 N C Z 76
Phone : wen 875 = G (t( Phone : (q, K) 702-7 3 ?q Z
Other In ividuals Present:
Is Property Uniform- Or Separate Discrete Vegetative Units
Vegetation: (In Order of Dominance,
Trees: Species ---% Cover--Indicator
1. S'` y ?-c. c, ?s ?v? c? 30 15A1 C c
2. f e? !n 0 F r1C.
3. L o F c
) a
4.
5.
Sa plin gs/Shrubs:
1 e • 99-
2:
Q
5?41- A?.
16-
?=?Ec_Lk-
3 . C CA. \ W 50t .75 FVWC cti
4 l- . as<<???n
s?/ 71i e vt-<--
.
5. R 11
Y •_ Ii v ?. t V I Y1 L.
Draw Line Above Non-dominant Species)
Ground Cover: Species ---% Cover--Indicator
1. Ve'c c? -> ?`?_ FvIC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Woody Vines:
1.
2. v?}? FAc
$ Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.) Other
Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Yes X,, No
56- Basis:
Typical: /"",(Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
Soil:
S ire es: On Hydric Soils List: Yes No k
Mottled: Yes No Matrix Color: 1C,Ll/z- Hydric Soils: Yes No -
Basis:
5
Hydrology:

Inu at : Yes No >C Depth Of Water:'
Saturated Soils: Yes No Depth To Saturation ater Table ---m--
Other Indicators : ?,, : C ?r '_XZZ _
Wetland Hydrology: Yes No Basis:
Atypical Situation: Yes No x. Normal Conditions: Yes No
Wetland Determination: Wetland: Non Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes No Aut ority: 10 404 10/404 None '
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater Isolated Adjacent NWP # _
Dete)mited
t
T
1--6T ?3y1 l
ERMINATION FORM Cw
Coordinator: Time: : a Q Date: 16/ ? /% County: M v
Nearest Town: ?P o. 1?1 C Waterway: _T-Ck
Quad.: Location:
Property Owner:(Name Address). Party Doing Wor :(Name/Address)
CM L?Nw sv<iEv- s DTI C? -t-w
6 ux P 'q 0 G (l5 X ?>"3 4 0
Phone: () S 0 `i Phone: () 7??-- 3-t c Z
Other Individuals Present:
r
Is Property Uniform Or Separate Discrete Vegetative Units
Vegetation: (Id Order of Dominance, Draw Line Above Non-dominant Species)
Trees:, Species--4 Cover--Indicator Ground Cover: Species ---% Cover--Indicator
1. K sY(V-N,'ch • G0 SAS FWC 1• 3? F* -4J
2.
3. ? oY' ,c c\ 3 o
1-. k..l.,
iSeva tv Zvi c
?? 2.
3
(
J Fa" c- . .
4. ?
-?-a e?C ?? .
,
' 1 U F 4 •
5. 5•
Sa plings/Shrubs: 6.
1. T , o ?.« y
r t-Ac 7•
2. %^ S v
C l FVtC-W 8.
r wbOs
?' C F
L Woody Vines:
•
4. ?lu L ?
? ? 1.
5. 2.. V .-F ti S A Z-,tF- F-
% Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.) 54`a0ther Indicators:
Hy ophytic Vegetation: Yeses No Basis:
Typical:*(Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
Soil:
Se Fill s: C>Ut,g On Hydric Soils List: Yes No
.:Mottled: Yes_ No Matrix Color: Hydric Soils: Yes
57No
_
Basis: r s c c_ d L v X,
Z_
L z FG?k S
H rol •
Inundated: Yes No D
pth
'
e
Of
Water : c v?
Saturated Soils: Yes >7 NO De th To Saturation/Water Table Z
`
Other
Indicators : u s o• 7 o GL L
Wetland Hydrology: Yes No Basis:
Atypical Situation: Yes No X Normal Conditions: Yes No
Wetland Determination: Wetland: Non Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes No Aut ority: 10
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater -.,/:S. Isolated 404 X 10/404 None
Adjacent NWP #
Determined By: )? " L
WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM
Coordinator: Time: : 6U Date: /U/ /ft? County:
Nearest Town: e,,..e Waterway: --"VYI/
C?
Quad: Location:
..??y Owner:(Name/Add
Party Doing Wor : (Name/Address)
? R L r? c - w c.._
U o -a 0 ? O x t, o
Phone: ( ) ?1 - Je N Phone: (q t 7Sz - j7 Z
Other Individual(?? Pr'ent:
Is Property Uniform X Or Separate Discrete Vegetative Units
Vegetation: (In Order of Dominance, Draw Line Above Non-dominant Species)
Trees Species-4 Cover--Indicator Ground Cover: Species ---% Cover--Indicator
1. P. ?,X,: j 2 8 S#Z' FVv?. 1. Y 0_,_ e . ?.. `•.?.., o V F .
2. Q < ccc?c\ l FI?0,--2. R- _ aKke
3. Fvo c- 3 r
.
4. Cw? S 10 PAC - 4. r
5 5
Saplings/Shrubs: 6.
1. ? a( u\ccl 3 ?' SIRG 7.
2 t'. F 8.
• C . S luv. Jc; Z gr- W q Woody Vines :
4. F+IC
5. 2. r4c
% Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.) 66 ether Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Yes No Basis:
Typical: N(Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
,Soil:
Series: <Z?N 5 On Hydric Soils List: Yes No
Mottled: Yes NoL<,Matrix Color: Hydric Soils: Yeslk? No Basis: c
H drol
Inundated: Yes No K Depth Of Water:
Saturated Soils: Yes No Depth To
Other Indicators: ,,,„
Atypical Situation: Yes No ,Normal Co ditions: Yes K ?No
Wetland Determination: WetTand: Non-Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes No Authority: 10 404 10/404 None
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater Isolated Adjacent NWP #
Determined By:
Q T ?
WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM
Coordinator: Time: 12- : Y Date:6 1d County: ?d }? L
Nearest Town: o.e Waterway: K.
Quad: Location: ( .-Z
Property,Owner:(Name Address) Party Doing Wor :(Name/Address)
?2 v J? z P Q "7 Q K 2 S-
Phone: ( 4k) - Phone: (L)7$ Z--__l 7q Z
Other Individuals 0resent:
Is Property Uniform_ Or Separate Discrete Vegetative Units
Vegetation: (In Order of Dominance, Draw Line Above Non-dominant Species)
Trees: Species--% Cover--Indicator Ground Cover: Species---g Cover--Indicator
-?y
2.1C?
3 F *c 1: C• . a k K t.<&at C-%.. / U ?/-G
,-
•
U
3. 1.. + -? ?. be ?-k Z C-) F& Pre
FA-r- 2 'a-e. rCd
3. GAL.
:
4. 4 \5 ti l u
5 FV+c(-k 4.
ih 2?c o I,o a act (,t ?. S ?-G,
G (,?}
. 5. .
Saplings/Shrubs: 6.
,
-jrttw. ?
3rN 8.
1. - s -? l r w? • ?r? M ti ?5
4: rL Woody Vines-
1. S . r-?"
f"F9G
5. V ,
Y eorcw
2. v i fK. s ??? -
% Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.)? Other Indicat rs:
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Yes No Basis:
Typical :(Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
Soil:
S ire es: On Hydric Soils List: Yes No
Mottled: Yes o Matrix Color: Hydric Soils: Yes -27NO
Basis : n - i_ /.... o . l e7 ,-
Z
eve- 4 ! ¢ > Cw M ?i`y?lh
lot... var.-s? ? .•?.. t e
Hydrology:
Inundated: Yes No Depth Of Water:
Saturated Soils: Yes No Depth To Satur tion/Water Table ---
Other Indicators: c uwY? a c? row
Wetland Hydrology: Yes No Basis: f
Atypical Situation: Yes No Normal Conditions: Yes No
Wetland Determination: WQtTand: Non-Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes No Authority : 0 404 X 10/404 None
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater Isolated Adjacent NWP #
Determined By: ?, \_ ?_.
WETLAND DETERMINATION FORM
Coordinator: Time: Date: D
Nearest Town: _ ?? FoRD 1`F C. Waterway.
Quad. Location: v
Property Owner:(Name/Address) Part?]
0 uy- 1"T b KY? - -a?0 - Zb3?0 RU
Phone r (42.) V5-:7 61 Phone :
Other Individuals Present:
G?
H
DCounty go k P
g Work:(Name/Addres
T W
31 - a t_j
1`EC'
-t) ?SZ- 3 W/ Z
Is Property Uniform_ Or Separate Discrete Vegetative Units
Vegetation: (In Order of Dominance, Draw Line Above Non-dominant Species)
Trees: Species---% Cover--Indicator . Ground Cover: Species--% Cover--Indicator
1. ??CC?n
? 3 v VAC 1.(k . f=vtcw
2. S,.?vw
.ct? 5 6 ?RL 2. W . UevcolKicc, , 5- ogl.
3. .. rw?r K w. 2 o F R L 3. O• G? 1n 1nc.., ?, ! G-l c
w
4. .
4.
_ 5. 5.
Saplings/Shrubs: . Vac ?ti.•k.?.? C0 0"'. , 15- F14c?
l w.?
1. C l e-vkV% CA ' %ct 2 J? ?IprC W 7 ,
2. e. eµ Yaks
?
d s.
? 3. eu?otiwc VfbcL Wood Vines:
4. 3 FHC
5. L5 FrKw 2.
% Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.) 5U /,, Other Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Yes No Basis:
Typical:`$, (Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
Soil:
Se it es: On Hydric Soils List: Yes ?< No
Mottled: Yes No 24 Matrix Color:
Basis: U 3 Hydric Soils: Yes X No
AV5< s..
O
xe41,K kL--. CO,, GYe
H drolo .
Inundated: Yes No Depth of Water:
Saturated Soils: Yes >( No Depth To Saturation/Water Table «
Other Indicators: S 6 n
e,4 Z v,-C w v i li t 4;-1
r s 1464 (? 0 5 S
Wetland Hydrology: Yes No Basis:
Atypical Situation: Yes No Normal Conditions: Yes X' No
Wetland Determination: Wetland: Non-Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes No Authority: 10 404 x 10/404 None
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater Isolated . Adjacent x NWP # ,
Determined By:
WETLAND DETERMI ?•N FORM
• r ? ? , C lh
Coordinator: _ Time: Date: tb / ? / Q o County: HO VC G-
Nearest Town: pC ?rj NC Waterway: -P
Quad:... Locaticq: PLOT
Property Owner:(Name/Address).. Party Doing Work; (Name/Address)..: ..W
tom' . dt: k.11f? 1.1 s •M .5 E 't• W C_
Pc) .CS 3Lo?t
C C. 2 Z (o h 4 C 'Z-'1 3
Phone: O 0"1 4 ty Phone: 1) 7Ez - ) Z
Other Individuals Present:
Is Property Uniform Or Separate Discrete, Vegetactive Units
Vegetation: (In Order of Dominance,-D3;,aw Lkne Above Non=dominant Species)
Trees: Spe`cie ---% Cover--Indicator.,GrouncTyCover: Species--- Cover--Indicator
s tfto 1, Q .SSa•ca???c. ?(? ? F61-CL:? '1, IP - ?.?a..•'t-?ti . .r?_, ?lA-?-lam!
2• '?h ?a FMK 2.
3 3:
4• 4
5. 5.
Saplings/Shrubs: 6.
1j„c T. e- C_ 7.
7. C. p6K-W 8•
3. Cp.Yyy? S ?- r#ct., Wood Vines:
4. Pcv?s.4...w? !5 F6rGt-C 1. S. ?? ?•?4•:?c?, t 5?c
5. 2. F+4C
g Of Dominant Species (OBL. - FAC.) 5u Other Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Yes No Basis:
TYPic, (Complete Below) Atypical: (Complete Back)
Soil:
S es: On Hydric Soils List: Yes No
Mottled: Y No Matrix Color:
Basis. MWI_ ? Hydric Soils: YesNo
d - l0 /v• K
S /_ G"( I u V I- Z
4, .
A
H drol.m: .
Inundated: Yes No
Saturated Soils: Yes
Other Indicators:
Depth Of Water:
_ No X, Depth To
ion/wa !Table
weLiana nyaroiogy: Yes No x Basis:.
Atypical Situation: Yes No - - NOr A .Co itions: Yes X No
Wetland Determination: Wetland: Non-Wetland:
Photos Taken: Yes s:... No'- Authority: 0 404 10/404 None
Jurisdiction: Above Headwater Isolated Adjace t NWP # ,
. ... Determined y,:
BY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCQ010000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGC1ntRa
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Joseph Coble Poole
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from land disturbing activities located at
Fairway Place Golf Course
Intersection of Johnson Mill Road and North Parker Church Road
Raeford
Hoke County
to receiving waters designated as Puppy Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III
and IV of General Permit No. NCG010000 as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective August 6, 1993.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 6, 1993.
Ceston Howar , J?, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. NCG010000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT
TO.DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by North
Carolina Environmental Management Commission and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act as amended,
All owners or operators Of stormwater point source discharges associated with
construction activities including clearing, grading and excavation activities
resulting in the disturbance of five or more acres of total land area are
hereby authorized to discharge stormwater to the surface waters of North
Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system conveying atormwater to the
surface waters. Facilities disturbing less than five acres may be covered by
this permit on a case-by-case basis if the discharges are a source of
significant pollutants.
The General Permit shall become effective on September 1, 1992.
The General Permit shall expire at midnight on August 31, 1997.
Signed this day July 31, 1992.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Acting Director
Division of Environmen nagement
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
i
1 ? ? I
x-v
,• ?, , \?
i
,-- DA i L y rF, T_ C c)urr,?-e
Description of Impacted Areas and Size
Area #1: Construct small dam and lake
Total area impacted ...................... 0.64 AC
Area #2: Construct small dam and lake
Total area impacted ...................... 0.45 AC
Area #3: Residential street crossing
40'
QL;
Total area impacted... . ...... .......... 0.09 AC
Area #4: Construct small dam and lake
Total area impacted ...................... 0.18 AC
Area #5: Construct cart crossing
/ ?c l
f 3?t _ / ??a`? RCP ? -
Total area impacted ...................... 0.03 AC
Area #6: Construct cart crossing
"Typical" H=41+
Total area impacted ...................... 0.03 AC
Area #7: Construct cart crossing
"Typical" H=7'
Total area impacted ...................... 0.04 AC
Area #8: Construct cart crossing
Residential street crossing
"Typical" H=3'
Total area impacted ...................... 0.08 AC
Area #9: Construct cart crossing
"Typical" H=4'
Total area impacted ...................... 0.03 AC

Description of Impacted Areas and Size (cont.)
Area #10: Construct cart crossing
"Typical" H=4'
Total area impacted ...................... 0.07 AC
Area #11: Construct cart crossing (2 each)
"Typical" H=4'+
Total area impacted....... ............... 0.07 AC
Area #12: Construct small dam and lake
Total area impacted ...................... 0.70 AC
Total Impacted Area 2.41 Acres
Note: 1. Areas where cart path crossings are constructed
will be cleaned and shaped for better down stream
channelgation by hand. Rip rap will be used in
some cases.
2. Equipment will not be used for clearing in these
areas.