20181228 Ver 1_PCN Submittal_20190717

ID#* 20181228 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review 07/18/2019
Completed Date
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/17/201, -
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * r Yes r
Type of Mitigation Project:*
PF Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Project Information
Existing 20181228 Existing 1
(DWR) (nunbersonly ...nodash) Version: (nunbersonly)
ID#:*
Project Type: F DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Mockingbird Site Mitigation Project
County: Davie
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Mockingbird PCN.pdf
4.13MB
Mockingbird401 COffice.pdf
44.57KB
Mockingbird401 FeeMemo.pdf
42.94KB
Mockingbird401 Winston.pdf
39.36KB
Mocking bird_100021 _MP_2018. pdf
93.41 MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the corplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:*

Signature:*

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 11, 2019
Lon Snider, Water Resources — Water Quality Assistant Regional Supervisor
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Re: Permit Application — Mockingbird Site Mitigation Project, Davie County (DMS Full
Delivery Project)
Dear Mr. Snider:
Attached for your review is 404/401 permit application package for the subject project. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this plan (919-707-8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package
Final Mitigation Plan
Cc: Karen Higgins
Sincerely
Lin Xu
,,��D`
EQ��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 276999652
919.707.8976

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Debby Davis
Lin Xu Lx
Payment of Permit Fee
401 Permit Application
June 11, 2019
The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is implementing a mitigation project for
Mockingbird Site Mitigation Project in Davie County (DMS IMS # 100021). The activities
associated with this restoration project involve stream restoration related temporary
stream and wetland impact. To conduct these activities, the DMS must submit a Pre -
construction Notification (PCN) Form to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) for
review and approval. The DWR assesses a fee of $570.00 for this review.
Please transfer $570.00 from DMS Fund # 2984, Account # 535120 to DWR as
payment for this review. If you have any questions concerning this matter I can be
reached at 919-707-8319. Thanks for your assistance.
cc: Karen Higgins, DWR
D,E
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street ( 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
0,0
w
KAw M
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 11, 2019
Karen Higgins, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
Re: Permit Application- Mockingbird Site Mitigation Project, Davie County (DMS Full
Delivery Project)
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Attached for your review is 404/401 permit application package for the subject project. Another
copy has been sent to the Winston-Salem Regional Office for review. A memo for the permit
application fee is also included in the package. All electronic files have been uploaded to NC
DWR's file system. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this plan (919-
707-8319).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely
Lin Xu
Attachment: 404/401 Permit Application Package
Final Mitigation Plan
Permit Application Fee Memo
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

4C1 n Office Use Only:
EM
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1 A January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1 Pra.�a
Ilia
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit
❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number-
umber1c.
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval Is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
❑ Yes ® No
or tn4leu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
❑Yes No
below.
1 h. Is the protect located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Mockingbird
2b. County:
Davie County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Bermuda Run
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3e. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See Supplemental
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Permittee, DMS
4b. Name:
Lin Xu
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
NC Division of Mitigation Services
4d. Street address:
217 W Jones Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, INC 27603
4f. Telephone no.:
919-707-8319
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Co -Applicant
5a. Name:
Cara Conder
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
RES
5c. Street address:
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27605
5e. Telephone no.:
919-209-1052
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): see supplemental
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 36.038433 Longitude: -80.51641
1c. Property size: 49.33 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Hauser Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C and WS -IV
2c. River basin: Yadkin River Basin - 03040101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See the Supplemental Information and the existing conditions maps (Figure 1: Project Service Area and Vicinity Map, Figure 2: Existing Conditions,
Figure 3: NWI, Figure 4: NRCS Soils Map, Figure 5: USGS Map, and Figure 6: FEMA Map).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.63
3c. List the total estimated linear fleet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 8,812
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See Supplemental
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Supplemental
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall riot phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
_
Preliminary ❑ Final
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): RES - Jeremy Schmid
Agency/Consultant Company: RES
Other
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was sent to the USACE on October 27, 2017 and a final PJD was received on March 26, 2018.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ©No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
© Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWO (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Stream Restoration
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
No
Corps
0.06
W2 T
Stream Restoration
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
No
Corps
0.26
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
We -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.32
2h. Comments:
Wetland impacts associated with restoration efforts occurring adjacent to the existing wetlands will be minimized by the restoration plan. Creating a
new stream channel and enhancing existing channels will only impact wetlands slightly and will provide an overall increase in wetland function with the
addition of native trees and shrubs along the stream banks.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e. 3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
Choose one
See Supplemental
S2
Choose one
-
-
S3
Choose one
-
-
S4
Choose one
-
85
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
4,891
3i. Comments:
See Supplemental
Page 4of1O
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary T
01 Choose one Choose
02 Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
Pond ID number Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then yqu MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
6c.
Reason for impact
fid.
Stream name
6e. 6f.
Buffer Zone 1
mitigation impact
required? (square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See supplemental
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See supplemental
2. Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes © No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c, Comments:
4. Corn lets if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Strearn mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
...al....A ro im f.A. i acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitlgation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page t3 of 1 u
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
T—
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in4ieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes © No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow pian included? If no, explain why.
No Increase In impervious surface.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No Increase In impervious surface.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Pian with proof of approval been
attached?
[]Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
ORW
HSession Law 2006-246
[]Other
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
®Yes
❑ No
use of public (federaltstate) land?
1b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Oyes
©No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500). Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
[]Yes
®No
2c. If you answered 'fres" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Dyes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
© Yes
❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes
❑ No
Impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPAC and Natural Heritage Program Database
B. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Ba. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
© No
Bb. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAH Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes
Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS Database and confirmation from coordination with SHPO.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes
❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
See supplemental information.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Firm Panel 3710584200L eff. 5/18/2009
Lin Xu
ApplicanVAgent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only If an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
i
Cara Conder
_
Date
Co -Applicant's Printed Name
Co -Applicant's Signature
Page 10 of 10

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
PCN Supplemental Information
Mockingbird Mitigation Site
Nationwide Permit 27
Pre -Construction Notification
Name and address of the Applicant:
NC Division of Mitigation Services
c/o Lin Xu
217 W Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
8�
Resource Environmental Solutions
c/o Cara Conder
302 Jefferson Street. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
A. Application Information
3. Owner information
(3a) Name(s)
Teresa S.
The Wilson W. and
The Sparks
Michael A. Miller
on Recorded
Phifer
Katherine S. Sparks
Family Trust,
and Nancy S.
Deed
Living Trust, Dated
Dated July 26,
Miller
December 03, 2015
2005
(3B) Deed
0193/0025,
0200/0442
0623/893
01035/0245
Book and
0173/0157
0623/896
01035/0246
Page No.
0130/0265
(3d) Street
203 Windsor
150 Herons Lane
900 Spillman
903 Spillman
Address
Greene Drive
Road
Road
(3e) City,
Monroe, NC
Advance, NC 27006
Mocksville NC
Mocksville NC
State, Zip
28110
L 27028
27028
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel 1D)
5852594790, 5853514536, 5853416631, 5853164843, 5853173894, 5853153934, 5853144949
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of
the proiect at the time of this application:
The Mockingbird Mitigation Site is a stream mitigation project located within a primarily rural
watershed in Davie County, North Carolina. The Site is located within the Yadkin River Basin
(HUC 03040101) and in the Turner and Hauser Creeks Watershed (03040101160010), a
Targeted Local Watershed (TLW). The Turner and Hauser Creeks Watershed encompasses 21
square miles of watershed area. Within the 1,540 -acres (2.41 square miles) drainage area of the
project, the primary land use within the drainage area consists of approximately 70 percent forest,
42 percent agricultural land, nine percent residential and two percent impervious surfaces.
Currently the Project area has an absence of riparian buffers, bank erosion, sediment deposition,
channel incision, cattle access the streams, and the historic land use has led to channelization.
The Project area is comprised of two sections (north and south) involving Hauser Creek and nine
unnamed tributaries, totaling 8,812 existing LF, which eventually drain into the Yadkin River. The
southern easement area is separated from the northern area by over 4,500 feet of Hauser Creek.
Over 2,500 feet of this easement break is the Scout Mitigation Bank, which connects to the
upstream end of the northern Mockingbird easement area. The downstream end of the Project
connects to the DMS Hauser Creek Mitigation Site. All easements combined total approximately
50 acres and 14,605 LF of stream that will be protected in perpetuity. Approximately 10,407 LF
of Hauser Creek is protected by these three projects combined, which accounts for about 60% of
Hauser Creek.
There are eight easement breaks on the Project along reaches HC1, HC2-B, HC2-C/D, NM2, and
above reaches HC2-A, NM3, NM4, and TP2. The Project is split into 13 reaches based on
proposed treatment type. !
Reach HC1 (Hauser Creek)

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
Reach HC1, along Hauser Creek proper, is a sand/gravel channel with a moderate sediment load
that flows in a northerly direction. The reach is contiguous to the DMS Hauser Creek Project that
begins just downstream of Spillman Road. This incised channel has been historically
straightened, has a slope of less than one percent, and flows through a broad alluvial valley. The
buffers are impacted with active pastures within the eastern riparian areas and agricultural fields
to the west.
Reach NMI
Reach NM1 is a headwater system that flows in a westerly direction into the upper third of Reach
HC1. The majority of the riparian buffer is forested; however, while the reach is stable, the
downstream section is oversized and has been historically ditched.
Reach NM2
Reach NM2 is an incised gravel and cobble bed stream that flows northeast through an
agricultural crossing before meeting at a confluence with HC1. There is a low to moderate
sediment load and a channel slope of less than one percent. The valley transitions from a width
of approximately 50 feet just upstream of the project boundary to a broader alluvial valley that ties
into the western floodplain of HC1.
Reach NM3
Reach NM3 is an incised sand/gravel bed stream with a relatively low sediment load and a
channel slope of one percent to two percent. The channel is relatively stable and has historically
been channelized and ditched. The channel flows in an easterly direction through an active
agricultural field down to Reach HC1.
Reach NM4
Reach NM4 is a headwater system that flows in an easterly direction into the downstream end of
Reach HC1. The downstream section of the channel has been historically ditched and is
oversized. The buffers are comprised of pasture grasses with some woody vegetation along the
banks at the confluence with HC1.
Reach NM5
Reach NM5 is a headwater system that flows in a westerly direction into the downstream end of
Reach HC1. The channel has been historically ditched and no longer has proper bedform or
structure. The buffers are compromised by livestock access and vegetation is sparse. Moving
upstream from the confluence, the channel becomes decreasingly defined until is it lost altogether
towards the edge of the pasture and upland tree line.
Reach JS1
Reach JS1 is an incised sand/gravel/cobble bed stream with a moderate sediment load and a
channel slope of less than one percent. The channel exhibits irregular banks and moderate
erosion as the reach is actively impacted by cattle. The channel flows to the west, through a
pasture with no riparian buffer, down to the confluence with the DMS Hauser Creek Project.
Reach HC2 (Hauser Creek)
Reach HC2-A at the upstream end is a slightly oversized and stable, cobble bed stream that flows
in a northerly direction. The bed profile appears stable and is controlled by root grade controls,
boulder outcrops and cobble riffles. The channel appears to be managing its low sediment load
and the banks exhibit little to no erosion. The riparian buffer is fully intact along the right bank;

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
while widths vary from 15 to 30 feet along the left. An active cattle pasture is adjacent to the
channel along the west side, and cattle have access to the channel throughout the reach. Further
down the reach after the proposed easement break, it is gravel/cobble stream. The channel is
slightly incised in some areas and exhibits irregular banks due to cattle access and hoof shear.
The riparian buffer is in fair condition with much of the buffer being intact and wooded; however,
there are areas of invasive species (privet). Jurisdictional wetlands are in the floodplain of this
reach; WC is approximately 0.13 acres in size (upstream end and right bank), WE is
approximately 0.36 acres in size with 0.26 acres in the proposed easement (downstream and
right bank), WF is approximately 0.05 acres in size (downstream and left bank), and WG is
approximately 0.23 acres in size (downstream and right bank).
Reach HC2-B is a sand/gravel/cobble stream that flows in a northerly direction between Reaches
HC2-A and HC2-C. The channel is incised, has irregular banks due to cattle access and exhibits
little bedform diversity. Livestock have direct access to the channel, and the resulting hoof shear
has severely degraded the channel banks. The riparian buffer is in poor condition being comprised
of an active pasture with some mature trees located along the top of banks. Jurisdictional wetlands
are located in the floodplain on the right bank; WH is approximately 0.75 acres in size with 0.59
acres being in the proposed easement.
Reach HC2-C is a sand/gravel/cobble stream that flows in a northerly direction between Reaches
HC2-B and HC2-D. The channel is incised, has irregular banks due to cattle access and exhibits
little bedform diversity. Livestock have direct access to the channel, and the resulting hoof shear
has severely degraded the channel banks. The riparian buffer is in poor condition being comprised
of an active pasture with some mature trees located along the top of banks.
Reach HC2-D is a slightly incised, gravel/cobble bed stream that flows in a northerly direction.
The bed profile appears stable and is controlled by cobble riffles. The channel appears to be
managing its moderate sediment load and the banks are generally stable with some areas of
localized erosion and cut banks along some meander bends. The riparian buffer is in good
condition and comprised of mature forest with few invasive species present.
Reach TP1
Reach TP1 is a slightly oversized gravel/cobble bed stream with a low sediment load and channel
slopes ranging from one to three percent. The channel appears to be managing its low sediment
load and the banks exhibit little to no erosion. The riparian buffer is fully intact throughout and
comprised of hardwoods and little understory. Cattle have direct access to the channel and buffers
throughout the reach.
Reach TP2
Reach TP2 is a channelized ditch that flows to the west into the upstream end of Reach HC2-B.
The channel is oversized, and incision increases as the channel approaches the confluence with
reach HC2-B. The riparian buffer is in poor condition and is primarily comprised of pasture
grasses. Livestock have direct access to the channel and associated buffers. Jurisdictional
wetlands are in the floodplain of the left bank; WB is approximately 0.08 acres in size.
Reach TP3
Reach TP3, a historically ditched channel, flows southwest through an active pasture and into the
downstream end of Reach HC2-C. Channel incision increases as the channel approaches the
confluence with reach HC2-C. The channel exhibits localized areas of minor erosion and the

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
streambed is comprised of gravel and sand. The riparian buffer is in poor condition due to cattle
access and is a mix of pasture grasses and some hardwoods, and shrubby vegetation along the
top of banks. The reach originates in Wetland WA (0.83 acres with 0.26 acres in easement), which
extends beyond the easement boundary and is also heavily impacted by cattle access.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The objective for this restoration project is to restore and design natural waterways with the
appropriate cross-sectional dimension and slope that will provide function and meet the
appropriate success criteria for the existing streams. Accomplishing this objective entails the
restoration of natural stream characteristics, such as stable cross sections, planform, and in -
stream habitat. The floodplain areas will be hydrologically reconnected to the channel to provide
natural exchange and storage during flooding events. The design will be based on reference
conditions, USACE guidance, and criteria that are developed during this project to achieve
success. Additional project objectives, such as restoring the riparian buffer with native vegetation,
ensuring hydraulic stability, and treating invasive species.
3e. Describe the overall proiect in detail, includincr the type of equipment to be used:
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project will be accomplished through
analyses of geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applies
a combination of analytical and reference reach based design methods that meet objectives
commensurate with both ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment activities
may range from minor bank grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic
geometry. For reaches requiring full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied and
verified through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach is to
design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat improvements and ties into the
existing landscape.
The Project will include Priority I Restoration, Priority II Restoration, Enhancement Levels I and
11, and Preservation. Stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single -thread meandering
channel, with parameters based on data taken from reference sites, published empirical
relationships, regional curves developed from existing project streams, and NC Regional Curves.
Analytical design techniques were also a crucial element of the project and were used to
determine the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole.
The Project design approach began with a thorough study of existing conditions, including the on-
site streams, valleys, and watershed. Design parameters, including active channel, habitat and
floodplain features were developed from analyses performed on the reference site data. Analytical
design techniques were used to determine the design discharge and to verify the design as a
whole.
Engineering analysis were performed using various hydrologic and hydraulic models to verify the
reference reach based design. A combination of methods were used to estimate bankfull flows,
and flows corresponding to other significant storm events. A HEC -RAS model was used to
simulate water surface elevations of flows generated by the hydrologic analysis. The development
of the HEC model is an important component to the design; therefore, model input parameters
are field verified when possible. Through this hydrologic analysis, the design discharge (typically
referenced as bankfull or dominant discharge) was determined. The subsequent design was

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
based on this calculated discharge. As part of the design process, a qualitative analysis of
sediment supply was performed by characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of
windshield surveys, existing land use data, and historical aerial photography, followed up by
ground truthing, was analyzed to assess existing and past watershed conditions and to determine
if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment supply. Design parameters
developed through the analyses of reference reach data, watershed characterizations, and
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling were confirmed using the Stable Channel Design function
and/or the Sediment Transport Analysis components within HEC -RAS in conjunction with shear
stress and velocity analyses.
Geomorphic and habitat studies were performed concurrently with the engineering analyses.
While stream design was verified by simulations of hydrology and fluvial processes, analogs of
desirable habitat features were derived from reference sites and integrated into the project design.
Both in -stream and riparian habitat features were designed. In -stream structures will be used
throughout the project to act as grade control and for bank stabilization by dissipating and
redirecting the stream's energy. Bank stability may further be enhanced through the installation
of brush mattresses, live stakes and cuttings bundles.
Sections of abandoned stream channel will be backfilled with material excavated from onsite to
the elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel, installing channel plugs where
necessary. Due to the Priority II approach on some reaches, excess cut material is expected.
RES has performed a preliminary quantity estimate and has developed an onsite disposal plan
that will satisfy landowner requirements. The floodplain will be planted with native species creating
a vegetated buffer, which will provide numerous water quality and ecological benefits. Stream
banks will be stabilized using a combination of grading, erosion control matting, bare -root
plantings, native material revetment techniques (i.e., bioengineering), structure placement, and
sod transplants where possible. The stream and adjacent riparian areas will be protected by a
minimum 50 -foot conservation easement which will be fenced to exclude livestock as needed. In
conjunction with the stream restoration, adjacent wetland hydrology will be enhanced through
raising the channel bed. No wetland mitigation credits will be generated from the enhancement of
these wetland areas; however, the enhancement and protection of these currently degraded
wetlands will store excess water during flood events, prevent erosion of stream banks, and reduce
in -stream sedimentation and nutrients.
The Project has been broken into the following design reaches:
Reach HC1 — Reach HC1 begins at the upstream end of the northern portion of the project and
at the downstream limits of the proposed Scout Mitigation Bank. A 40 -foot easement break is
proposed between the two projects that will coincide with a culvert crossing and include 24 LF of
48 -inch double barrel RCP. The reach totals 2,083 LF of Priority I Restoration to address historic
channelization and livestock impacts. Priority I Restoration provides higher functional uplift and
less risk of failure when connected to the restoration on upstream Reach HC3. The left bank is
crop land while the right bank is active pasture, contributing to significant disturbance on both
banks. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural valley with
appropriate dimensions and pattern, adding channel plugs where necessary and backfilling the
abandoned channel. Backfilling the abandoned stream channel presents an opportunity to create
wetlands in the ephemeral pool areas. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, rock
cross vanes, and rock/wood constructed riffles will be installed for channel stability and to improve
habitat. A minimum 50 -foot buffer is proposed along each side of the channel. Buffer activities will

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and
sediment loads to the channel.
Reach NM1 — Historically channelized reach NM1 begins at the ephemeral/intermittent break on
the right bank near the top of HC1 and flows west to a confluence with HC1. Active pasture
surrounds this reach. The reach totals 229 linear feet of Enhancement II, and enhancement
activities will include buffer plantings and the treatment of invasive species. This reach treatment
ends at the farm path.
Reach NM2 — Reach NM2 begins on the west side of Reach HC1 and flows east to the confluence
with HC1 near it's midpoint. The reach totals 637 linear feet of Priority I Restoration and 731
Priority II Restoration. Due to elevation and slope constraints, Priority II Restoration will be utilized
at the top of the reach, blending into Priority I as it nears the HC1 floodplain. Active crop land
surrounds this reach as well as limited cattle exposure. A 40 -foot easement break is proposed for
a culvert crossing where an existing 72 -inch CMP will be removed and replaced with 24 LF of a
double barrel 48 -inch RCP. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within
the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern, adding channel plugs where
necessary and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush
toes, log cross vanes, and rock/wood constructed riffles will be installed for channel stability and
to improve habitat. A minimum 50 -foot buffer will be maintained along on each side of the channel.
Buffer activities will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent fields, thereby
reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach NM3 — Reach NM3 begins at a culvert on the west side of Reach HC1, near the
downstream end of the Project, and flows east to a confluence with HC1. The reach totals 280 LF
of Priority I Restoration to address historic channelization and excess deposition due to
agricultural practices. The incised reach is surrounded by active fields of row crops and lacks a
protective buffer. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel with appropriate
dimensions and pattern, adding channel plugs where necessary and backfilling the abandoned
channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, rock cross vanes, and constructed
riffles will be installed for channel stability and to improve habitat. A minimum of 50 feet of buffer
on each side of the channel is proposed. Buffer activities will improve riparian areas that will filter
runoff from adjacent fields, reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach NM4 — NM4 is a headwater reach that forms from the hills on the east side of HC1 near
the downstream portion of the Project. Active pasture surrounds this reach. This reach totals 253
LF of Enhancement II. Treatment includes removing an existing crossing at a 15 -inch RCP,
establishing a minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer, and instream structures such as rock cross vane
and log sills to provide channel stability.
Reach NM5 — NM5 is a headwater reach that forms within the eastern floodplain of Reach HC1,
just upstream of Reach NM4, and flows west to a confluence with HC1. Realignment of Reach
HC1 will displace the majority of NM5 due to plugging this channel at its confluence with the
existing HC1 and filling in that abandoned channel. A small portion of intermittent channel will be
protected within the easement, but will receive no credit. Active pasture surrounds this reach.
Reach JS1 — Reach JS1 begins in an active pasture, north of Spillman Road, and flows east into
the existing DMS Hauser Creek Mitigation Site that exists downstream from the Project. This
incised reach totals 523 LF of Priority I Restoration to address historic channelization, livestock
impacts and erosion. Restoration activities will include removing an existing ford, constructing a

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
new channel within the natural valley, backfilling the abandoned channel, and reconnecting to the
floodplain for frequent inundation. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, log cross
vanes, rock cross vanes, and constructed riffles will be installed for channel stability and to
improve habitat. A minimum of 50 feet of buffer on each side of the channel is proposed. Buffer
activities will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing
nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. The channel will tie back into the existing location in
order to connect to the 72 -inch CMP under the landowner's gravel driveway.
Reach HC2-A — Reach HC2-A begins at the upstream end of the Project (the southern portion of
the project), and flows north to Reach HC2-B. The reach totals 2,018 linear feet of Enhancement
II. Agricultural fields and bottomland hardwood forests are located adjacent to the reach.
Enhancement activities will include the re-establishment of a riparian buffer along the channel
(buffers will extend a minimum of 50 feet from the top of each bank) and invasive species
treatment as needed. Buffer improvements will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby
reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Additional habitat improvements will be
gained through livestock exclusion. A 31 -foot easement break is proposed to maintain an existing
ford crossing within the bottom third of this reach.
Reach HC2-113 — Reach HC2-B begins immediately downstream of Reach HC2-A and flows north
to Reach HC2-C. The reach totals 595 LF of Priority I Restoration to address historic
channelization and cattle exposure. The incised reach is surround by active pasture and the
downstream portion is surrounded by disturbed bottomland hardwood forests and riparian
wetlands. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural valley
with appropriate dimensions and pattern, adding channel plugs where necessary and backfilling
the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, cross vanes, rock A -
vanes, and constructed riffles will be installed for channel stability and to improve habitat. A
minimum of 50 feet of buffer on each side of the channel is proposed. Buffer activities will improve
riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment
loads to the channel. Reach TP3 ties into HC2-B prior to a proposed 35 -foot easement break and
ford crossing, before transitioning into Reach HC2-C. Also, the reach will be built through part of
a jurisdictional wetland that is currently on the right bank floodplain and degraded from cattle
access and pasture -use. While this project is not claiming any wetland credit, the raised channel
bed should enhance the wetlands' hydrology by reconnecting the floodplain wetlands to the
stream. Also, backfilling the abandoned stream channel presents an opportunity to create
additional wetlands in the ephemeral pool areas. A gauge will be installed on the right floodplain
to monitor the wetland hydrology and will be reported in the yearly monitoring reports.
Reach HC2-C — This incised, degraded reach begins at the downstream end of HC2-B and flows
north from a ford crossing to the upstream end of HC2-D. Although cattle have been historically
excluded from this reach, upstream pasture activity and travel across the existing ford have
resulted in bed and bank erosion and sedimentation. The reach totals 155 LF of Enhancement I,
and enhancement activities will include laying back and/or benching the left bank and installing
coir matting and live stakes to provide channel stabilization. Bottomland hardwoods are located
adjacent to the reach.
Reach HC2-D — Reach begins immediately downstream of Reach HC2-C and flows north to the
downstream boundary of the southern portion of the easement. The reach totals 407 linear feet
of preservation with minimum 50 -foot buffers. Bottomland hardwoods surround this reach.

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
Reach TPI — Reach TP1 begins on the east side of Reach HC2-A in headwater Piedmont forest,
and flows west to a confluence with Reach HC1-A. Lightly disturbed forest surrounds this
reach. The reach totals 146 LF of Enhancement II, where cattle exclusion and supplemental
planting of the riparian buffer is proposed. This reach treatment ends at the fence line.
Reach TP2 - This channelized reach begins on the east side of Reach HC2-A, just downstream
of the confluence of TP1 with HC2-A, and flows southwest to a confluence with Hauser Creek.
The reach totals 471 LF of Enhancement II. The reach is surrounded by active pasture and a
small wetland occurs near the stream origin. Enhancement activities include reestablishing the
riparian buffer with native vegetation and cattle exclusion. A sediment trap will be installed
upstream of ephemeral/intermittent stream break to provide sediment and nutrient control from
upland agricultural practices.
Reach TP3 — This mildly incised, historically channelized reach begins to the east of Reach HC2-
B and flows southwest to a confluence with HC2-B upstream of a proposed easement break. The
reach totals 470 linear feet of Enhancement Il. The reach is surrounding by active pasture and
forms out of a headwater wetland. A sediment trap (made from woody debris and livestakes) is
proposed at the upper end of the reach to provide sediment and nutrient control from upland
agricultural practices.

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Stream
3b. Type of Impact
3c.
3d. Perennial
3e.
3f.
3g.
Impact
Stream
(PER) of
Type of
Average
Impact
Number
Name
Intermittent
Jurisdict
stream
length
Permanent
(INT)
width
(linear
(P) of
ion
(feet)
feet)
Temporary
S1
Perm
Stream
JS1
Per
Corps
4.7
465
relocation/restoration
S2
Perm
Stream
NM4
Int
Corps
4.8
60
relocation/restoration
S3
Temp
Pipe removal
NM4
Int
Corps
4.8
10
S4
Perm
Stream
NM3
Per
Corps
6.7
197
relocation/restoration
S5
Perm
Stream
NM5
Int
Corps
12.6
73
relocation/restoration
S6
Perm
Stream
HC1
Per
Corps
22.0
2,135
relocation/restoration
S7
Perm
Stream
NM2
Per
Corps
10.0
1,243
relocation/restoration
+24ftonRCP
S8
Temp
Pipe installation
NM2
Per
Corps
10.0
20
S9
Temp
HC2-C
Per
Corps
17.0
35
Ford Crossing
S10
Perm
Stream
HC2-13
Per
Corps
10.0
568
relocation/restoration
S11
Perm
Stream
TP3
Int
Corps
3.0
50
re location/restoration
S12
Perm
Ford Crossing
HC2-A
Per
Corps
11.7
35
3h. Total Stream and tributary impacts
4,891
X. Comments
Impacts due to the relocation of the stream to natural valley will provide a net gain in ecological
function to the stream and wetland system. Active pasture is located adjacent to these reaches.
Restoration is proposed along these reaches to address channel degradation and bank erosion
caused by cattle access. For stream relocation and impacts: Stream Impact 1, the existing length
of JS1 is 465 linear feet (LF), and the new length will be 523 LF; Stream Impact 2 and 3, the
existing stream length is 286 LF and the new length will be 253 LF due to the main stem being
restored closer to the tie in of NM4; Stream Impact 4, the existing stream length of NM3 is 197,
the new length will be 280 LF. Stream Impact 5, majority of Reach NM5 will be displaced through
the realignment of the main stem, HC1. Stream Impact 6, the existing length of HC1 is 2,135 LF

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
and the new proposed length will be 2,083 LF. Stream Impact 7 and 8, the existing length of NM2
is 1,219 LF and the proposed length is 1,368 LF, the impacts will include the addition of a pipe
crossing. Stream Impact of S10, the existing length of HC2-13 is 565 LF and the proposed length
is 595 LF. Stream Impact S11, the existing length of TP3 is 525 and the proposed length 470 LF
due to tie-in with restoration on HC2-B. Impacts that are due to the installation of ford crossings
include S9 and S12.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
deshaninn project:
Due to the nature of this project, complete avoidance is not possible. Both stream and wetland
impacts were considered when designing the Mockingbird Mitigation project. This project should
uplift the ecological quality of streams and wetlands on site. The existing project channel length
is 8,812 LF. The proposed project will result in 8,998 LF of stream (see table below).
1b. SAecificaliv describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts
through construction techniques:
Impacts are minimized using a staged construction approach. Where possible the channel will be
constructed prior to turning stream flow into a segment. This approach allows minimization of the
impact of each stage during the project construction. Additionally, all work in wetlands and
streams will be conducted during dry conditions and/or with mats to protect soil structure. Efforts
will be made to preserve individual high value trees located within the stream restoration area.
F. Supplementary Information
8b. If yes, explain how pro[ect meets FEMA requirements
The Project includes a mapped FEMA 100 -year floodplain (1 % annual chance of flooding) present
on seven of the proposed reaches (HC1, JS1, NM1, NM2, NM3, NM4, & NM5) (Figure 7). The
Stream Mitigation
Proposed Reach
Mitigation Type
Existing Length (LF)
Proposed Length (LF)
HC2-A
Enhancement II
2,018
2,018
HC2-B
Restoration
568
595
HC2-C
Enhancement 1
155
155
HC2-D
Preservation
408
407
HC1
Restoration
2,135
2,083
TP1
Enhancement II
157
146
TP2
Enhancement II
450
471
TP3
Enhancement II
525
470
NM1
Enhancement II
229
229
NM2
Restoration
1219
1368
NM3
Restoration
197
280
NM4
Enhancement II
286
253
JS1
Restoration
465
523
TOTALS
8,812
8,998
1b. SAecificaliv describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts
through construction techniques:
Impacts are minimized using a staged construction approach. Where possible the channel will be
constructed prior to turning stream flow into a segment. This approach allows minimization of the
impact of each stage during the project construction. Additionally, all work in wetlands and
streams will be conducted during dry conditions and/or with mats to protect soil structure. Efforts
will be made to preserve individual high value trees located within the stream restoration area.
F. Supplementary Information
8b. If yes, explain how pro[ect meets FEMA requirements
The Project includes a mapped FEMA 100 -year floodplain (1 % annual chance of flooding) present
on seven of the proposed reaches (HC1, JS1, NM1, NM2, NM3, NM4, & NM5) (Figure 7). The

PCN Supplemental Information -Mockingbird Mitigation Project
design and permitting of the mitigation work will include coordination with the Davie County
Floodplain Administrator and permitting a FEMA No -Rise Certification or CLOMR/LOMR.
Hydraulic modeling will be required to determine that restoration activities will have no effect on
100 -year flood elevations downstream. No hydrologic trespass will be permitted to adjacent
properties upstream or downstream of the Project.

Targeted Local Watershed
Turner & Hauser Creek
03040101160010
M '
S
k�.
g4'
5
a
E'
c
J
Pin"01- Rd
River Basin Restoration Priority ,
Yadkin River Headwaters a
03040101 Rhys
S
Yaddnville a
c�
LaM avill e
Legend
A
a�
0
iriPlr+' Tei
a
3
a Myers Rd
µs ttd
gar
21
clamm"s Proposed Easement
Scout Easement
a Catbird Easement
z - Hauser Creek Easement
Rain6.4 BillsWy
p
Mockingbird ocksville HUC - 03040101 o
g Mitigation Site e�
TLW - 03040101160010
i
"
Figure 1 -Vicinity Map
Date: 71/901078
w e Drawn by: MDE
a Mockingbird Mitigation Site 9 Checked By: CSC
rom s
0 1,000 2,000
Daive County, North Carolina 1inch -2,000feet
g

1 —*.r3
ri t w
��� � Y •Ry � ��J �r� flf�� ��� 1 �'. _ r r moo,._.. �5 ' � ..
'
'1 ` e1 - - ■ - t`a�w yup 4'+ �` � �
y
r•
Y b
e
'?y
Via
�s �•. .. �. L.knlrlrq��p � �/ff� � ` •�' I l 1 � 4•
• I f
: ;moi j\" • {ti ) k :'^,+ p a�'ien
Lec
t Proposed Easement
a
Drainage Areas (1,540 ac.) f.
s �
N Dew: 11/9/2018
a Figure 2 - USGS Map
W E (Farmington 1967) Diumnby: Ewr
Mockingbird Mitigation Site
res9
€ 0 1,000 2,000
(Siiiiiia Davie County, North Carolina 1Inch =2,000 feet
gI F

r1

1
1'
�.w
T f -
P
m �
sr -
.+Fad. `�Ya}.: ,,y, � �,r�, fir, d.r s�^� •
MRA.;
A
AK x{
A
1p• �r
is
d
a
Lemenr i I �•..
Proposed Easement
iw.
Existing
Streams
Hauser Creek
e.IL
� • I�r }w 1 „Y cam+
7 Wetlands yw ` ��.
Parcels

r
M:
F, c
VV A,VVH 00
#
c.
A.
' Ow
Vy F !!t
! � �� r
•- A.
YX
H
r e •>r V
,' 1
Sa`n,1
MAL -it
1 y�V f lei;
Lecien* k f, r r
Proposed Easement (Inset B) '' 3 `1 '7 `wl S
V
Existing Streams .� � s-'r", ,• �`•�i ,,�rs��.� uy.��-� . �, ,'
Hauser Creek
n to
Wetlands
Parcels
i
N
Date: 111912018
Figure 3c -Existing Conditions Map (South)
eY s Drawn by: MDE
S Mockingbird Mitigation Sitc res
0 200 400
Tsiiiiiia Davie County, North Carolina 1 inch = 400 tact

`� a r �r'<tx a •,• �
IL
-10
4,• � r�lk i ' f � �_
} + PUF3Hh ,
PUBHh
PUBHh
1. F'UBHh? `l
r� 1 r.•,Tf � _
r +x
R Al PUBIlit
Legen
QProposed Easement A • *'
NWI WetlandsIV 7- _
N
Figure 4 - NWI Map Date: 11/9/2018
w e Drawn by: EWT res
Mockingbird Mitigation Sit -
o 1,00(
Davie County, North Carolina I1 inch = 1,000 feet

GaD ,
or, B�t �1
4f+ -�
,��.. C' ErsE ' ChA
W
- C Gnp �
G RC
GnG2
N, lop—
G.1rlfi 2
SIP MSC
GnB 2 GnB2
En Go
M
SeB MrBt
E n G` \ i
lGnB
2
EnB Ch -
h;
EnB
E n B
ur
EnC
E
GnB2 t .� EnB
Le-gen �� A r A '•li + E5 C
Proposed Easement
N -
Figure 5 - Soils Map Date: 11/92018
w e Drawn by MDE
Mockingbird Mitigation Site
res9
0 500 1,000
Davie County, North Carolina 1 Inch = 1,000 feet

Aquatic Resources Table - Revised Post Survev
Site
Reach/Wetland ID
Latitude
Longitude
Length (LF)
/Area (ac)
Type
Mockingbird
WA
-80.504691
36.026870
0.26
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WB
-80.503075
36.023060
0.08
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WC
-80.503590
36.020154
0.13
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WE
-80.504582
36.024412
0.28
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WF
-80.504827
36.024210
0.05
Wetiand Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WG
-80.504506
36.023900
0.23
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
WH
-80.505161
36.025417
0.59
Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
HCI
-80.516843
36.036092
2135
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
HC2-A
-80.503956
36.021119
2018
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
HC2-B
-80.504621
36.023879
568
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
HC2-C
-80.505265
36.025208
155
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
HC2-D
-80.506699
36.025872
408
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
JS1
-80.517472
36.039677
465
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
NM1
-80.516771
36.034585
229
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
NM2
-80.518932
36.035076
889
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
NM3
-80.516842
36.037264
330
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
NM4
-80.515787
36.037801
286
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
NM5
-80.516801
36.037645
75
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
TPI
-80.5030541
36.021662 1
157
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
TP2
-80.503143
36.023014
450
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Mockingbird
TP3
-80.5051921
36.026046 1
525
1 Non -Wetland Waters of the US

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505 County: Davie U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Farmington
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: North Carolina Department of Environmental Ouality, Division of Mitigation Services
Harry Tsomides
Address: 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: 828-545-7057
E-mail: harry.tsomides ncdenr. ov
Size (acres) 37.0 Nearest Town Mocksville
Nearest Waterway Yadkin River River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040101 Coordinates Latitude: 36.0261
Longitude: -80.5050
Location description: The review areas are located on the west side of S illman Road. PINS: 5853144949 05853153934
5843932576 5853416631, 5852594790, 5853601920, 58535114536, 5853164843, and 5853173894. Reference review area
description in Jurisdictional Determination Request Package entitled "Potential Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Mad' and Printed Date of 2/28/2018.
Indicate Which of the Followine Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 2/28/2018. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters
including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
El We recommend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. If you
wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is
no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440 or
b roan. roden-reynolds(W7usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 03/26/2018.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not annlicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Corps Regulatory Official: �°.°<°,.•�<�,�o.°r��--�,.<°�o�<e�,.,����.��3�s,.
Date of JD: 03/26/2018 Expiration Date of JD: Not apnlicable

SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://cozpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Resource Environmental Solutions
Jeremy Schmid
Address:
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605,
Telephone Number:
919-926-1473
E-mail:
ischmidQ). res.us

CAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: North Carolina Department of
File Number: SAW -2017-01469 and
Date: 03/26/2018
Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services,
SAW -2017-01505
Harry Tsomides
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
P R r.T ,TMTN � R Y .I 1 JR T -1 ' ONAL DF--" —T ATION E
SEC I ION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or htt1,://www.usace.arrn,,.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReL-Lilator-\ ProgCaivandPermits.asax
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
CESAD-PDO
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investiations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/26/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Mitigation Services, Harry Tsomides, 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102, Asheville, NC 28801
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Scout and Mockingbird Sites,
SAW -2017-01469 and SAW -2017-01505
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review areas are located on the west
side of Spillman Road. PINS: 5853144949, 05853153934, 5843932576, 5853416631, 5852594790, 5853601920,
58535114536, 5853164843, and 5853173894. Reference review area description in Jurisdictional Determination
Request Package entitled "Potential Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S. Map" and Printed Date of 2/28/2018.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Davie City: Mocksville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.0261 Longitude: -80.5050
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Yadkin River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 10/03/17 and 02/15/18

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
degrees)
degrees)
review area (acreage
. wetland vsnon-
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
applicable
wetland waters)
10/404)
Scout Site (SAW -2017-01469)
Wetland
WD
36.0028026
-80.5144835
0.75 acres
Wetland
404
Stream
HC3
36.030105
-80.516072
2,428 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream
JD1
36.030583
-80.517263
238 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream
JD2
36.029308
-80.515734
77 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Mockingbird Site (SAW -2017-01505)
Wetland
WA
36.026870
-80.504691
0.83 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WB
36.023060
-80.503075
0.08 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WC
36.020154
-80.503590
0.13 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WE
36.024412
-80.504582
0.36 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WF
36.024210
-80.504827
0.05 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WG
36.023900
-80.504506
0.23 acres
Wetland
404
Wetland
WH
36.025417
-80.505161
0.75 acres
Wetland
404
Stream
HC1
36.036092
-80.516843
1,960 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream
HC2-A
36.021119
-80.503956
855 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream
HC2-13
36.023879
-80.504621
937 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream
HC2-C
36.025208
-80.505265
426 linear feet
Non -wetland
404

Stream
36.025872
-80.506699
455 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
HC2-D
Stream
36.039677
-80.517472
505 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
JS1
Stream
36.034585
-80.516771
378 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
NM1
Stream
36.035076
-80.518932
1,148 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
NM2
Stream
36.037264
-80.516842
202 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
NM3
Stream
36.037801
-80.515787
310 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
NM4
Stream
36.037645
-80.516801
101 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
NM5
Stream
36.021662
-80.503054
380 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
TP1
Stream
36.023014
-80.503143
438 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
TP2
Stream
36.026046
-80.505192
489 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
TP3
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual

permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Vicinity Map Dated 10/26/2017
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS Map, 1:24,000 Farmington
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Soils Map, Davie County Dated 10/26/2017
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: National Wetlands Inventory Map, USFWS NWI Mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Potential Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S. Map Dated
02/28/2018
or []Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corns and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
RO D E N Digitally signed by RODEN
REYN OLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.K DN!?Kl,o =USA,c =RODE nt,ou=DoD,
ou=PKl,ou=USA,cn=RODEN
ae °.326"558 0.1263385574
ENNETH.1263385574D0180142046
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
03/26/2018
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to fmalizing an
action.

ssI.,
4' %"Cf '.
�y }ems. ,•
--
'1�104 AL
�
t �
/ 17
{r
�—_
Northern
Section
jL+,
Southern
j Section �-
MrANIF
F
µ Potential Wetland or Non-Watland Waters of the U.S. Map - Northam Section
\l,: o tw eoo
Mockingbird and Scout Mitigation Sites
Davie County, North Carolina
Wetland Data Points
Upland Data Points
CEasement - Mockingbird
Easement - Scout
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
D.r: vzarzo,e
�.�6re
cn.daa w: �a

-,,mw� --ffigp- _
Legend
Wetland Data Points
Upland Data Points
Easement -Mockingbird
- Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
' Potential Wetland Waters of the US
FFit'
Northern
Section F1
n +v
,. Southern
Section
F•
Potential Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S. Map -Southern Section
¢ Mockingbird and Scout Mitigation Sites
Feat
Davie County, North Carolina
1%,
! MOOr
... • t�
J
ar: zrstveote
t>,evn M: ou
-
6re
GlwcluA M: c00000a