20060080 Ver 1_Email_20060117

Hudson and Ferguson, Greenville NC
Subject: Hudson and Ferguson, Greenville NC
From: "Jamie Midgette" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:40:43 -0500
To: "Ian McMillan" <[e-mail]>
Mr. McMillan,
We spoke two weeks ago concerning a request to discharge stormwater into a buffered stream without
meeting the diffuse flow requirement. This was the continuation of a discussion I had been having with Ms. Karoly,
but the plan submittal was lost. Last week I resent the calculations and plans for the jobs and wanted to check on
their status. Please let me know how the review is progressing.
Thank you,
Jamie Midgette, El
Malpass & Associates
Greenville, North Carolina
C?? av?e?
(4A?Ll

a?--

?Sm> P? eRt?, J11 z5f
1 of 1 1/31/2006 1:38 PM
>>Boyd Devane wrote:
>>>Jamie, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. It is not
>>>something that the folks in my individual office deal with but I'm
>>>tr.ansferr_ing your question to Cyndi_ Ka.roly and Cynthia Van Der Wiele.
>>>I think they deal with these issues.
>>>Jamie Midgette wrote:
>>>>Mr. Boyd;
>>>> A site with an adequately designed stormwater peak flow
>>>>mitigation and nutrient removal system (`Par/Pam rules) is trying to
>>>>release water into a buffered stream. However, the site is not
>>>>adjacent to the stream and is looking to pipe the flow into the
>>>>stream. Will DWQ accept a diffuser at the end of the pipe other than
>>>>a level spreader. If the TSS and nutrients are controlled as well as
>>>>the peak flow would an energy dissipater be acceptable in lieu of a
>>>>level spreader?
>>>>Jamie Midgette, El
>>>>Malpass & Associates
>>>>Greenville, North Carolina
2