The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20171295 Ver 1_Field Meeting Notes_20190626Mitigation Site Meeting Notes Date: June 26, 2019 Project Name: Scout Prepared By: Erin Davis, NCDWR Type of Site: Bank Stream Site Meeting Type: Technical Site Review Sponsor/Provider: RES USACE AID: County: Davie *Denotes County w/ 30 -foot Buffer NCDWR ID: 20171295 HUC and Basin: Yadkin - 03040101 Weather: Coordinates: ON °W Attendees: RES - Brad, Brian, Casey, Matt USACE - Todd, Steve, Brian DWR - Mac, Erin Project Review Checklist - (provide additional detail in notes section on next page) General Site Issues/Concerns: ❑ Vegetation Composition or Density ❑ Inappropriate Credit Ratio Proposed ❑ Planted Stem Vigor (due to soil, browsing) ❑ JD Needed to Confirm Approach ❑ Invasive/Exotic Species ❑ Continuity/Fragmentation ❑ Beaver/Feral Hogs (management plan) ❑ Easement Issues (existing farm, CE, NRCS funding) ❑ Soil (manipulation, compaction, fertility) ❑ Easement Encroachments (livestock, clearing) ❑ Livestock Present/Evidence of Livestock Access ❑ Easement Marking/Signage ❑ Crossings or Utility Lines ❑ Insufficient Project Size ❑ BMPs or Alternate Approaches ❑ Adjacent Property Owner ❑ Fencing Issues or Fencing Needed ❑ T&E Species ❑ Ponds Within Project Area ❑ Section 106 (historic listing/tribal issues) Stream Issues/Concerns: ❑ Incised/Entrenched ❑ Insufficient Stream Drainage Area ❑ Headcuts Present/Forming ❑ Insufficient Hydrology (if raising channel bed) ❑ Stream Structures Failing/Piping ❑ Vegetation in Channel (stream vs wetland) ❑ Excess Sediment/Aggradation ❑ Flow Obstructions (undersized pipes, fords) ❑ Cross -Sections Missing/Indicate Problems ❑ Substrate Concerns (embeddedness, particle size) ❑ Bank Instability/Failure ❑ Live Stakes Absent/Failing ❑ Bench Rills/Erosion (constructed bench or P2 valley) ❑ Evidence of Water Quality Issues ❑ Excess Sinuosity (lack of flow) ❑ In -stream Habitat Weak/Missing ❑ Braided/Anabranch Channel ❑ Stream Buffer Width Inadequate Wetland Issues/Concerns: ❑ Evidence of Excessive Hydrology ❑ Missing Gauge Data (preconstruction or monitoring) ❑ Evidence of Insufficient Hydrology ❑ Gauge Location/Placement ❑ Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil Series ❑ Gauge Maintenance ❑ Surface Roughness or Bedding ❑ Drainage Ditches/Swales Present ❑ Channel Relocation/Riparian Connectivity ❑ Field Tiles/Subsurface Drainage ❑ Hydroperiod Length or Start/Stop Date ❑ Continued Ag Use Adjacent to Wetland Page 1 of 2 Date: June 26, 2019 Project Name: Scout Notes, Sketch, Action Items, etc.: HO start at top - priority 1 R; small trib right side not on concept plan - check JD, will need to stabilize confluence with main channel & show on design plans; highly incised main channel; no buffer on right side (now to bank edge); move permanent deer stand; another trib coming in from right at end of field (goes up to road & small culvert) - change design from plug to stabilize confluence; bottom easement area appears wet (likely additional wetland resource - review JD & possibly delineate); if wetland add monitoring gauge & possibly add wetland credit to project; at bottom ties into mockingbird site; Invasives- privet, honeysuckle, multiflora; Wrap-up - updates needed to PCN & final plan - not anticipated to alter regulatory timeline; need to evaluate/delineate lower wet area by LSS (JD can be incorporated into other submitted) Credit Release/Site Closeout Information (for monitoring or closeout reviews only) Stream Credits Wetland Credits Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal Requested Approved* Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout Review Extended Monitoring Required Project Manager Signature Date *The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager. Page 2 of 2 Form Updated 03/20/2019