20160980 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report FINAL_20190708

ID#* 20160980
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
07/08/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/8/2019
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
W Stream W Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Brad Breslow
Project Information
Existing 20160980
(DWR) (nunbersonly ...nodash)
ID#:*
Project Type: (- DMS f• Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Meadow Spring
County: Johnston
Document Information
(- Yes (--
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurrbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Meadow Spring Baseline Monitoring Report
23.34M6
FINAL.pdf
Rease upload only one RDF of the corrplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

MEADOW SPRING MITIGATION SITE
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SA W-2016-01989
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
Provided by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC,
An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1056
July 2019

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary.....................................................................................................................................
2
1.1 Project Location and Description..............................................................................................
2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives....................................................................................................
3
1.3 Project Success Criteria.............................................................................................................
3
StreamSuccess Criteria...................................................................................................................
4
WetlandSuccess Criteria.................................................................................................................
4
VegetationSuccess Criteria.............................................................................................................
4
1.4 Project Components..................................................................................................................
5
1.5 Design/Approach.......................................................................................................................6
Stream..............................................................................................................................................
6
Wetland............................................................................................................................................
7
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions......................................................................................
8
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO).................................................................................
8
Vegetation........................................................................................................................................
8
StreamGeomorphology...................................................................................................................
8
StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................
8
WetlandHydrology..........................................................................................................................
9
2.0 Methods..................................................................................................................................................
9
3.0 References.............................................................................................................................................
10
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorpholo2v Data
Baseline Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Table 10. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: As -Built Plan Sheets
Meadow Spring As -Built Survey
Meadow Spring As -Built Redlines
Meadow Spring 1 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Meadow Spring Mitigation Site (the "Site") is located within a watershed dominated by agricultural
land use in Johnston County, North Carolina, approximately three miles north of Smithfield. The project
streams and wetlands were significantly impacted by channelization, impoundment, and cattle access. The
project involves the restoration and protection of streams in the Neuse River watershed and the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of adjacent riparian wetlands. The purpose of this mitigation site is to
restore, enhance and preserve a stream/wetland complex located within the Neuse River Basin.
The Site lies within USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (RUC) 03020201100050. The 2010 Neuse River Basin
Plan (RBRP) identified the Neuse River watershed (RUC 03020201100050) as a Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW), a watershed that exhibits both the need and opportunity for wetland, stream, and riparian buffer
restoration.
The total easement area is 60.93 acres. The wooded areas along the easement corridor designated for
restoration activities are classified as mixed hardwoods. Invasive species were present throughout the
wooded areas. Restored channels were both laterally and vertically unstable, impacted by cattle, have
disturbed riparian buffers, and did not fully support aquatic life. Previous stream conditions along the
restoration reaches exhibited habitat degradation because of impacts from livestock and impoundment to
promote agricultural activities.
The Meadow Spring Site includes Priority I/II restoration, Enhancement Levels III and III, Preservation
and wetland re -habilitation, re-establishment, enhancement and preservation. Priority I restoration reaches
incorporate the construction of a single -thread meandering channel, with parameters based on data taken
from the reference site described above, published empirical relationships, NC Coastal Plain Regional
Curves, and hydrologic and hydraulic analyses.
The Site includes wetland re -habilitation, re-establishment, enhancement, and preservation. Wetland re-
establishment occur adjacent to Priority I stream restoration reaches. The restoration approach was to
reconnect the floodplain wetlands to the stream, fill existing ditches, rough the floodplain surface, and plant
native tree and shrub species commonly found in small stream swamp ecosystems. The wetland
enhancement treatment includes livestock exclusion, improving hydrology via pond removal and ditch
plugging, and planting native tree and shrub species.
The Site will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the Site will be conducted at a
minimum of twice per year throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until
performance standards are met. These site inspections will identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. The measure of stream restoration success will be documented by bankfull flows and
no change in stream channel classification. Sand bed channels are dynamic and minor adjustments to
dimension and profile are expected. The measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of
at least 210 seven-year old planted trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of year seven
of the monitoring period.
Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF). The NCWHF will be responsible for periodic inspection
of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed restriction
document(s) are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions will be
negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Meadow Spring 2 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) identified several restoration needs for the
entire Neuse River Basin, as well as for I UC 03020201, specifically. The Site is in HUC 03020201100050
(Neuse River), a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) that exhibits both the need and opportunity for wetland,
stream, and riparian buffer restoration. The watershed includes 52 square miles of area, with 31 percent of
the 106 stream miles lacking wooded buffers. Thirty-seven percent of the watershed is used for agricultural
purposes with 13 animal operations occurring in the watershed. Impervious surface near the town of
Smithfield is increasing and set to surpass the critical seven percent benchmark (NCDMS 2010).
The Site was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and
hydrology within the Neuse River Basin. This project is intended to provide Stream Mitigation Units to be
applied as compensatory mitigation for unavoidable authorized impacts to waters of the US under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and support the overall goal of "no net loss" of aquatic
resources in the United States. The Site is located within the downstream end of I UC 03020201 and
includes an unnamed tributary that directly discharges into the Neuse River. Many of the project design
goals and objectives, including restoration of riparian buffers to filter runoff from agricultural operations
and improve terrestrial habitat, and construction of in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity, will
address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major watershed
stressors in the 2010 Neuse RBRP.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Design and construct stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile based
on reference reach conditions.
• Exclude livestock permanently from streams and their associated buffers as well as surrounding
wetlands.
• Reduce bank height ratios to less than 1.2 and increase entrenchment ratio to greater than 2.2 in
accordance to the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update
Guidance.
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least fifty feet on both sides of the channel along the project
reaches with an appropriate riparian plant community.
• Re-establish, rehabilitate, and enhance riparian wetlands by raising stream bed elevations, plugging
surface ditches, and planting native wetland plant species in order to maintain appropriate soil series
saturation/hydroperiod thresholds during the growing season.
• Preserve and enhance of hydrology in existing riparian wetland seeps.
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Site.
• Remove invasive species from the riparian buffer and wetland areas to support the colonization and
survival of native riparian buffer species.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot data
will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream and wetland hydrology data and visual monitoring
will be reported annually.
Meadow Spring 3 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

Stream Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross-sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should
not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.
Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A
series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Wetland Success Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) has a current WETS table for Johnston County upon
which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data station
was determined to be the WETS station for Smithfield, NC. The growing season for Johnston County is
233 days long, extending from March 18 to November 6, and is based on a daily minimum temperature
greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years.
Based upon field observation across the site, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation to actual
site conditions in areas of the site. Mitigation guidance for soils in the Coastal Plain suggests a hydroperiod
for the Bibb soil of 12-16 percent of the growing season. The hydrology success criterion for the Site is to
restore the water table so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 12
percent of the growing season (approximately 27 days) at each groundwater gauge location. Based on the
extensive management history of the Site and soil compaction, RES expects a slighty reduced hydroperiod
in the monitoring years 1 and 2.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site follow
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of
two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring shall occur annually between July 15 and leaf drop.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the site are the survival of at least 320 planted three-year
old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees that are at least 7 feet tall at the end of Year
5, and the final vegetative success criteria is 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the
end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are to be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly
monitoring reports, but do not count towards the success criteria of total planted stems.
Meadow Spring 4 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

1.4 Project Components
The project area is comprised of an easement area along an unnamed tributary to the Neuse River. The
easement is separated by an existing power easement and three agricultural crossings. The project is divided
into northern and southern portions by the existing power easement. The northern portion of the project
includes Reaches S1, S2, S5, S6A and S6B. The southern portion of the project includes Reaches S7, S9,
S11, S12 and S13. The stream and wetland mitigation components are summarized below.
Mitigation Plan Stream Credits
*The non-standard buffer width adjustment was only performed for reaches S7, S9, S12, S13
Mitigation Plan Wetland Credits
Wetland Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
Wetland
Mitigation Type
Total Acres
Reach
Mitigation Type
Stationing
Existing
Length
(LF)
Design
Length
(LF)
Mitigation
Ratio
Base
SMUs
S1
Enhancement II
3+50
to
6+00
250
250
2.5:1
100
S2
Enhancement I
6+00
to
11+00
500
500
1.5:1
333
S5
P1 / P2 Restoration
0+76
to
3+07
215
231
1:1
231
S6A
P1 Restoration
11+00
to
24+50
1,220
1,350
1:1
1,350
S6B
P1 Restoration
24+50
to
36+26
1,150
1,176
1:1
1,176
S6B
Enhancement I
36+26
to
37+93
165
167
1.5:1
111
S7
Enhancement I
38+80
to
48+70
1,035
990
1.5:1
660
S7
Enhancement I
49+40
to
53+80
452
440
1.5:1
293
S9
Enhancement III
53+80
to
60+55
665
675
7.5:1
90
S11
P1 Restoration
60+55
to
71+00
906
1,045
1:1
1,045
S12
Preservation
71+00
to
74+80
380
380
10:1
38
S13
Preservation
9+69
to
14+23
454
454
10:1
45
Total
1
7,392
1 7,658
5,473
Non -Standard Buffer Width Adjustment*
50
Grand Total Adjusted SMUs
5,523
*The non-standard buffer width adjustment was only performed for reaches S7, S9, S12, S13
Mitigation Plan Wetland Credits
Meadow Spring 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019
Wetland Mitigation
Wetland
Mitigation Type
Total Acres
Mitigation Ratio
WMUs
WB
Rehabilitation
0.95
1.5:1
0.63
WD
Preservation
0.03
No Credit
No Credit
WE
Preservation
0.09
No Credit
No Credit
WF -A
Preservation
2.00
No Credit
No Credit
WF -B
Enhancement
2.02
3:1
0.67
WG -A
Enhancement
3.68
3:1
1.23
WG -B
Enhancement
18.03
5:1
3.61
WH
Re-establishment
6.84
1:1
6.84
WI
Re-establishment
2.87
2:1
1.44
Total
36.51
14.41
Meadow Spring 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

1.5 Design/Approach
Stream
The Meadow Spring Site includes Priority I/Priority II Restoration, Enhancement Level I, Enhancement
Level II, Enhancement Level III. Priority I Restoration reaches incorporate the design of a single -thread
meandering channel, with parameters based on data taken from the reference site described above,
published empirical relationships, NC Coastal Plain Regional Curves, and hydrologic and hydraulic
analyses. As a result of the restoration of planform and dimension, frequent overbank flows and a restored
riparian buffer will provide the appropriate hydrology and sediment transport throughout this coastal plain
watershed. All non -vegetated areas within the easement were planted with native vegetation and any areas
of invasive species were removed and/or treated.
• Reach S1 (STA 03+50 to STA 06+00) — Reach beginning at northwestern limits of the project
flowing southeast to Reach S2 totaling 250 linear feet of Enhancement Level IL Row crops and
active pasture were located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement involved revegetating the buffer
with native vegetation.
• Reach S2 (STA 06+00 to STA 11+00) — Reach begins at the downstream end of Reach S1 and
flows southeast through what was active pasture to Reach S6A. Reach S2 totals 500 linear feet of
Enhancement Level L Active pasture and row crops used to surround this reach. Enhancement
involved revegetating the buffer and stream stabilization of localized erosion with the installation
of log cross vanes and sills.
• Reach S5 (STA 00+76 to STA 03+07) — Reach begins north of Reach S6A and flows south through
active pasture to a confluence with Reach S6A totaling 231 linear feet of Priority I and II
Restoration. Active pasture and maintained lawn used to surround this reach. Restoration included
meandering the channel within the valley, backfilling the old stream, reconnecting to its floodplain,
and restoring hydrology to drained wetlands.
• Reach S6A (STA 11+00 to STA 24+50) — Reach begins at the downstream end of Reach S2 and
flows east through what was active pasture, flows adjacent to a farm pond and ends at a confluence
with Reach S5. Reach S6A totals 1,350 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Restoration included
meandering channel though the natural valley, backfilling the old channel, reconnecting to its
floodplain, removing the old dam, and restoring hydrology to drained wetlands.
• Reach S6B — Section 1 (STA 24+50 to STA 36+26) — Reach begins at the confluence of Reach
S5 and S6A flowing east to the second section of Reach S613. Reach S613 -Section 1 totals 1,176
linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Restoration included meandering the channel within the valley,
backfilling the old stream, reconnecting to its floodplain, and restoring hydrology to drained
wetlands.
• Reach S6B — Section 2 (STA 36+26 to STA 37+93) — Reach begins at the downstream end of
Reach 613 -Section 1 and flows east to the Duke Energy right-of-way. Reach S613 -Section 2 totals
167 linear feet of Enhancement Level L Enhancement included stabilization of localized erosion
by installing log sills, increasing radius of curvature, regrading point bars, removal of invasive
vegetation, and revegetating the buffer.
• Reach S7 (STA 38+80 to STA 53+80) — Reach beginning downstream of the Duke Energy right-
of-way and flows south to Reach S9 totaling 1,430 linear feet of Enhancement Level L A 70 -linear
foot easement break is located in this reach to accommodate a proposed farm crossing. Hardwood
forests and active pasture are located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement included stabilization of
localized erosion by installing log vanes, log sills, brush toes, and regrading point bars. As well as
removing dense areas of invasive vegetation and supplementing planting in its place.
Meadow Spring 6 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

• Reach S9 (STA 53+80 to STA 60+55) — Reach beginning at the downstream end of Reach S7 and
flowing south to Reach SI I totaling 675 linear feet of Enhancement Level III. Hardwood forests
and active hog lagoons are located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement included invasive treatment
and supplemental planting.
• Reach S11 (STA 60+55 to STA 71+00) — Reach beginning at the downstream end of Reach S9
and flows southeast to Reach S12 totaling 1,045 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Hardwood
forests and grassed fields were located adjacent to the reach. Restoration included meandering the
channel within the valley, backfilling the old channel, reconnecting to its floodplain, and improving
hydrology to drained wetlands.
• Reach S12 (STA 71+00 to STA 74+80) — Reach beginning at the downstream end of Reach S11
and flows southeast toward the Neuse River floodway totaling 380 linear feet of Preservation.
Hardwood forests are located adjacent to the reach. Preservation included invasive treatment and
buffer/stream protection.
• Reach S13 (STA 9+69 to STA 14+23) - Reach beginning downstream of the large wetland slough
along the Neuse River floodplain totaling 454 linear feet of Preservation. Preservation included
invasive treatment and buffer/stream protection.
Wetland
The Meadow Spring Site offers a total ecosystem restoration opportunity. As such, the wetland restoration
and enhancement are closely tied to the stream restoration. The Site provides 14.41 WMUs through a
combination of wetland re-establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement.
Because of the sites observed soil characteristics and landscape position, a combination of wetland re-
establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement was incorporated. In wetlands WH, the non jurisdictional
area, hydrologic restoration, at a credit ratio of 1:1, was accomplished by plugging the existing incised
channel to restrict drainage and allowing a natural hydroperiod to return. In addition, re -constructing a
stream channel at a higher bed elevation in the natural valley, backfilling to create shallow depressions
within the old channel, and the removal of spoil from pond excavation along the floodplains aids in the
restoration of a natural floodplain surface relative to the surrounding landscape. Due to compaction and
long-term agricultural use, a shallow ripping of the surface along the contour to a depth of eight to ten
inches creates adequate porosity for infiltration and storage, provides microtopographic relief, and should
improve vegetative survival and growth.
As part of the wetland re-establishment in wetland WI, at a credit ratio of 2:1, the pond was removed. The
construction of a farm pond has altered surface drainage and placed spoil across the floodplain. The stream
was reconnected to the floodplain and in addition to out of bank events the large perennial spring serves as
a source for hydrology for the re-established wetlands. Retention and storage within the floodplain has
returned to a natural state having an increased hydroperiod.
In wetland WF -B, a credit ratio of 3:1 was implemented for wetland enhancement. This wetland has been
impacted by channel incision and active management for agriculture in the past. The wetland mitigation
treatment consisted of reconnecting the stream to the floodplain and replanting disturbed areas. These
activities result in a much healthier, better functioning wetland.
In wetland WG, the large disturbed Neuse River floodplain area, a credit ratio of 3:1 was implemented for
wetland enhancement in the areas that are planted (WG -A) and an enhancement credit ratio of 5:1 in the
areas not planted (WG -B). This wetland has been actively managed for agriculture and waterfowl through
drainage manipulations and tree clearing. The wetland mitigation treatment was primarily re -planting the
disturbed areas, plugging the main ditch, and removing existing berms within the wetland. These activities
result in a large floodplain slough with a diversity of microhabitats.
Meadow Spring 7 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

1.6 Construction and As Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in June 2019. The Meadow Spring Mitigation Site was
built to design plans and guidelines. A redline version of the as -built survey is included with the sealed plat
in Appendix E. Project credits are based on design centerline, but as -built stream lengths are shown on
Table 1.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO)
The Meadow Spring Baseline Monitoring activities were performed in June 2019. All Baseline Monitoring
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland
interim success criteria.
Vegetation
Monitoring of the 18 permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots was completed during
early June 2019. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot
locations are in Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success
criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 405 to 1,578 planted stems per
acre with a mean of 971 planted stems per acre across the permanent plots. A total of 19 species were
documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to
establish in upcoming years. Data from the three random vegetation plots showed 1,012 stems/acre in
Random Plot 1, 971 stems/acre in Random Plot 2, and 971 stems/acre in Random Plot 3. The average height
in the random vegetation plots was 1.8 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MYO was collected during June 2019. Summary tables and cross section plots are
in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the design. The as -built
conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all restoration/enhancement reaches.
All reaches were designed as sand bed channels and remain classified as sand bed channels post -
construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
Stream Hydrology
Two stage recorders were installed in June 2019 to document bankfull events. One stage recorder on Reach
S6B and one stage recorder on Reach 511. Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year
1 Report in this section and in the appendices. Recorder locations can be found on Figure 2 .
Meadow Spring 8 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

Wetland Hydrology
Eleven groundwater wells were installed in June 2019, including one reference well, to monitoring
wetland hydrology. Groundwater well locations can be found on Figure 2 and the data will be included
subsequent monitoring reports.
2.0 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS -312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data were collected at 24 cross-sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®,
and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorders include an automatic pressure
transducer set in PVC piping in the channel. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder
location was recorded to be able to document presence of water in the channel and out of bank events.
Visual observations (i.e. wrack or debris lines) will also be used to document out of bank events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 18 permanent monitoring plots and three random monitoring plots.
Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2
(Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year. The random plots are to be collected in locations where there are no permanent
vegetation plots. Random plots will most likely be collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects
with variable dimensions. Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and the transects
will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Wetland hydrology is monitored to document success in wetland restoration and enhancement areas where
hydrology was affected. This is accomplished with 11 automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in
groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. Ten have been installed within the wetland
crediting area and one within reference wetland areas. One automatic pressure transducer is installed above
ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are
calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory guidance. Visual
observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also recorded during quarterly site
visits.
Meadow Spring 9 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

3.0 References
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). "Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
2010." (Amended 2018).
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions (2018). Meadow Spring Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Final
Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P.. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic
and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble.
ERDC/EL TR -10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
USACE, 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Meadow Spring 10 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site July 2019

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Meadow Spring - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Existing
Mitigation
Restoration
3802.0
Re-establishment
8.28
Footage
Plan
0.63
Enhancement
Mitigation
As -Built
Enhancement 1
1398.0
or
Footage or
Mitigation
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Project Segment
Acreage
Acreage
Category
Level
Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Acreage
Comments
5473.4 0
50
5523.0
14.41
S1
250
250
Warm
Enhancement II
N/A
2.50000
100.0
250
Native Planting
S2
500
500
Warm
Enhancement I
NA
1.50000
333.3
500
Structure Installation, Native Planting
S5
215
231
Warm
Restoration
1 & 2
1.00000
231.0
231
Full Channel Restoration, Native Planting
S6A
1,220
1,350
Warm
Restoration
1
1.00000
1350.0
1350
Full Channel Restoration, Native Planting
S613-1
1,150
1,176
Warm
Restoration
1
1.00000
1176.0
1176
Full Channel Restoration, Native Planting
S613-2
165
167
Warm
Enhancement I
NA
1.50000
111.3
167
Structure Installation, Point Bar Grading, Inaysive Removal, Native Planting
S7
S7
1,035
452
990
440
Warm
Warm
Enhancement I
Enhancement I
NA
NA
1.50000
1.50000
660.0
293.3
1430
Structure Installation, Point Bar Grading, Inaysive Removal, Native Planting
Structure Installation, Point Bar Grading, Inaysive Removal, Native Planting
S9
665
675
Warm
Enhancement III
N/A
7.50000
90.0
675
Invasive Removal, Supplemental Planting
S11
906
1,045
Warm
Restoration
1
1.00000
1045.0
1045
Full Channel Restoration, Native Planting
S12
380
380
Warm
Preservation
N/A
10.00000
38.0
380
Invasive Removal
S13
454
454
Warm
Preservation
N/A
10
45.4
454
Invasive Removal
WB
N/A
0.95
RR
Rehabilitation
NA
1.5
0.63
0.95
Plugging Ditches, Native Planting
WD
N/A
0.03
RR
Preservation
N/A
No Credit
No Credit
0.03
Permanent Conservation Easement
WE
N/A
0.09
RR
Preservation
N/A
No Credit
No Credit
0.09
Permanent Conservation Easement
WF -A
N/A
2
RR
Preservation
N/A
No Credit
No Credit
2
Permanent Conservation Easement
WF -B
N/A
2.02
RR
Enhancement
N/A
3
0.67
2.02
Floodplain Reconnection, Native Planting
WG -A
N/A
3.68
RR
Enhancement
N/A
3
1.23
3.68
Plugging Ditches, Removing Berms, Native Planting
WG -13
N/A
18.03
RR
Enhancement
N/A
53.61
18.03
Plugging Ditches, Removing Berms
WH
N/A
6.84
RR
Re-establishment
N/A
1
6.84
6.84
Plugging Old Channel, Floodplain Reconnection, Ripping, Native Planting
WI
N/A
2.87
RR
Re-establishment
N/A
2
1.44
2.85
Pond Removal, Floodplain Reconnection, Native Planting
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Warm Cool Cold
Riparian Wetland Non -Rip Coastal
Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration
3802.0
Re-establishment
8.28
Rehabilitation
0.63
Enhancement
5.51
Enhancement 1
1398.0
Enhancement 11
100.0
Enhancement 111
90.0
Creation
Preservation
83.4
Total
NSBW Adjustment 1
Total Adjusted SMUs 1
5473.4 0
50
5523.0
14.41

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Meadow Spring Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 4
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 4 weeks
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Sep -18
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Mar -19
Stream Construction
NA
Jun -19
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1 &2
NA
Jun -19
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May -19
Jun -19
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Meadow Spring Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc. / 720 Corporate Center Dr., Raleigh,
NC 27607
Primary project design POC
David Perry
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC / 453 Silk Hope Liberty Rd, Siler City,
NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
[phone]
Survey Contractor
Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC
28501
Survey contractor POC
James Watson, PLS
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
Contractor point of contact
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen [phone]
Monitoring Performers
RES / 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605
Stream Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Meadow Spring
County
Johnston
Project Area (acres)
60.9
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35.5437 N Longitude:
-78.3303 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
22.8
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201100050
DWR Sub-basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
379 ac (0.592 sqmi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Forest (45%) Agriculture (37%)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
S1 S2 S5 S6A
S613•1 S613•2 SI
S9
S11
S12 S13
Length of reach (linear feet)
250 500 231 1,350
1,116 165 1,430
615
1,045
38 45
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined) - -- -
-- - --
-
--
- -
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)
36ac, 46ac, 36ac, 91ac,
0.06s mi 0.01s mi 0.06s mi 0.15s mi
q q q q
Mac, Mac, 218ac,
0.21s mi 0.21s mi 0.43s mi
q q q
331ac,
0.53s mi
q
319ac,
0.59s mi
q
410ac, 31ac,
0.64s mi 0.05s mi
q q
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
I I P P
P P P
P
P
P P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Stream Classification (existing)
F5 C5 F4 F4
R-E4 R-E4 E4
E5
E5
F5 F5
Stream Classification (proposed)
- E5 E4/5 E4/5
E4/5 E4/5 --
-
E5
- -
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
FEMA classification
-_ I _- i _- -_
-- -- -- --
_- I -_ I _-
-- -- AE
i -_ I
AE
_- I
AE
-_ I -_
AE I AE
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2016-
01989
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 16-
0980
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Appendix B
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Appendix B
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

le
Z -a
Al oo°
pryer Ot
a°
¢ S Leo
�}ephenaon Ilr
Bookermobife Or
Dalry RdC"
Shady Lane t*
m A
w liarrley 6r n
a S4nrjas4, a �� Cr
rl stO 3 S
v 7 o q4.1
u>13erQVa x'
[ascii S[ L
t7 v
P2ees[ V
i
Whilldy Dr
0
S itick[and Dr West=a6Npf)r
Sri" St amlt field
rF
Sr
Fi�.r
1;
rr�''io::iinlr+�►�►,���til
s
�L
N
w E
1,000 2,000
turnzp
e Rd
Legend
Conservation Easement
I
I
1
H�
ka
F�
O�
Buefalo Rd
m �'a
ry
�r�A m, p` �� LaUrgt Or
En
- 800l, rr Harry Rrt
It, t 4 a
Soaker Dairy R'-
SmAnlwld Rxaiea� y�0�
E�� r Aran x � .-
r
�a
Parkway Or 'Tt� BOO
liolla RA Dr VII
904
4 Bayhill 01
I Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS;.Inte'rmap, INCREMpENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),,Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Date: 7/3/2019
Figure 1 -Site Location Map
Drawn by: B rLms Meadow Spring Mitigation Site
Checked by:: BPB
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 2.000 feet 0

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

".5
XI tU
S1 5 , I_.�
-AILS5 ,
��\ - �P "fie, xy i 1 0' v •
wk� WH
�i.
��. � �,. l.•� � �/(�„per !” 6 .
i (D��`\,
wi O
H.
-_-.
iS2sw
S6B
ter:. S6A
WB
sT�
WF -A
WG -A
fires
N
W E
S
0 200 400
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Overview
MYO 2019
Meadow Spring
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/2/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat:35.381042 Long: -78.420862
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Design Centerline
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Enhancement III
Preservation
XS Meadow
'lugged Ditch
o ' Meadow
o .andom VP MYO Meadow
o As -Built Top of Bank
As -Built Wetland
o Rehabilitation (1.5:1)
® Re-establishment (1:1)
o Re-establishment (2:1)
o Enhancement (3:1)
o Enhancement (5:1)
Preservation (No Credit)
O Stage Recorder
® Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Pn Target Community
U Present Marginal Absent
U
Q AbsentNo Fill
fn
G1
.N
Present
>
C

D
S1
2
moi- ti'
40
fires
N
w
e
S
0 100 200
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
1
MYO 2019
Meadow Spring
Mitigation Site
Johnston County, NC
Date: 7/2/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Lat:35.381042 Long: -78.420862
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Design Centerline
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
a
— Enhancement III
Preservation
Cross Section
Plugged Ditch
o Vegeation Plot
F
•' o Random Vegetation Plot
o As -Built Top of Bank
As -Built Wetland
o Rehabilitation (1.5:1)
® Re-establishment (1:1)
4
o Re-establishment (2:1)
o Enhancement (3:1)
o Enhancement (5:1)
Preservation (No Credit)
O Stage Recorder
• Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
w Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
fn
W
Present
1$ U)

12.
15
S6B
w
Q
I
x
REF1
7�
0
WIN
S11
/0�*/ fires
S
0 100 200
Feet
1 Figure 2
1 Current Conditions
1
1 2
1 MYO 2019
1
' Meadow Spring
1 Mitigation Site
1 `I�
1 IJohnston County, NC
1 -
1 Date: 7/2/2019 Drawn by: RTM
1
dGW9
Lat: 35.381042 Long: -78.420862
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
1 _ . Design Centerline
1 — Restoration
15 Enhancement I
1 Enhancement 11
1 — Enhancement III
1 Preservation
1 ` Cross Section
— Plugged Ditch
o Vegeation Plot
o Random Vegetation Plot
r o As -Built Top of Bank
•, As -Built Wetland
o Rehabilitation (1.5:1)
® Re-establishment (1:1)
o Re-establishment (2:1)
S o Enhancement (3:1)
o Enhancement (5:1)
Preservation (No Credit)
O Stage Recorder
• Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
w Present Marginal Absent
U
Q Absent No Fill
fn
G1
N
Present
M
I A S

A a
.h,
,1 -
^ ,�•_, ko',du i.'_i� . �''• ,,ate �.`
�`. k• t � Yom• .� ^� ,y
�y��t
` � rt uY' , x , \fir+. ' .L • -�pyr� 3'
a '" ;. r
I:AIIRJ I •=�� � � �� ��` y„�4 `• �4 � � Z #' �� .� ? y—�`f it .� �t i- �-
{a v "1 � �, ; �M -i - �� �= � ,per `F'.• 3 � W At. •
' �� .�� � � ` � • � sty � ,«� tsdt�
- � i, "�' � t ,� 3 �:r Six• �i�n � T
Iry
Y �7
ter-
_ _- —_ _ _ il` ✓ .. � ? .., .. K✓.. � C�(.,QG�P" � - e o o�j(� ��i�17�G11 �i °�f�l)��

Meadow Spring MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 11
Vegetation Plot 8
ix
P
�Ta
i
yy.
Vegetation Plot 10
Vegetation Plot 12

Vegetation Plot 13
Vegetation Plot 15
Vegetation Plot 17
Vegetation Plot 14
Vegetation Plot 16
Vegetation Plot 18

Random Plot 1
Random Plot 3
Random Plot 2

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
3,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2,700
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,300
Baldcypress
Taxodium distichum
21000
Green Ash
Praxinus pennsylvanica
2,000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
2,000
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2,000
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
2,000
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa bi ora
2,000
Water Tupelo
Nyssa aquatica
1,700
Yellow Poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
1,600
Crab Apple
Malus angustifolia
800
S Dogwood
Cornus amomum
800
Flowering Dogwood
Cornus florida
800
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
700
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
600
American Plum
Prunus americana
500
American Hazelnut
Corylus americana
400
River Birch
Betula nigra
400
Elderberry
Sambucus nigra
100
Total
28,900

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Plante d
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Ave rage
Stem
Height (ft)
1
1255
0
1255
Yes
1.8
2
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.6
3
769
0
769
Yes
1.6
4
769
0
769
Yes
1.8
5
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.8
6
1295
0
1295
Yes
1.5
7
1578
0
1578
Yes
1.8
8
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.6
9
1416
0
1416
Yes
1.8
10
931
0
931
Yes
1.9
11
1416
0
1416
Yes
1.6
12
931
0
931
Yes
1.8
13
971
0
971
Yes
1.8
14
769
0
769
Yes
2.0
15
486
0
486
Yes
2.1
16
405
0
405
Yes
1.8
17
728
0
728
Yes
2.0
18
607
0
607
Yes
1.9
Project Avg
971
0
971
1 Yes
1 1.8

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Meadow Spring
Current Plot Data (MYO2019)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
06122019-01-0001
Common Name Species Type PnoLSP-all T
06122019-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
MYO(2019)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch Tree
8
8
8
1
1
1
2
2
2
13
13
13
5
5
5
7
7
7
4
4
4
52
52
52
Cephalanthusoccidentali common buttonbus Shrub
common buttonbus Shrub
1
1
1
7
7
7
2
2
2
4
4
4
14
14
14
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood Shrub
silky dogwood Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
9
9
9
12
12
12
Cornusflorida
flowering dogwood Tree
flowering dogwood Tree
2
2
2
1
3
3
3
Corylus americana
American hazelnut Shrub
American hazelnut Shrub
I
1 1
11
11
3
3
3
4
4
4
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon Tree
11
1
1
11
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash Tree
green ash Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
6
6
6
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
11
8
8
8
34
34
34
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree Tree
4
4
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
10
10
10
Malusangustifolia
southern crabapple Tree
southern crabapple Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa aquatica
watertupelo Tree
water tupelo Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo Tree
swamp tupelo Tree
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
11
1
3
3
3
1
1
7
7
7
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum Tree
blackgum Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
14
14
14
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
3
3
1
1
1
2
7
7
11
11
11
3
3
3
2
2
2
72
72
72
Prunus americana
American plum Tree
American plum Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus
oak Tree
4
4
4
17
17
17
6
6
6
3
3
3
4
4
4
10
10
10
7
7
7
10
10
10
14
14
14
111
111
111
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak Tree
overcup oak Tree
3
3
3
8
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
21
21
21
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
4
4
41
11
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
Quercus nigra
1wateroak Tree
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
Iwillowoak ITree
41
4
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
17
17
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress ITree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
�2525
8
4
4
4
35
35
35
35
Stem count
size (ares)
Species count
size (ACRES)P1255F1:25851
Stems per ACRE1255
31
31
1
0.02
31
8
27
6
1093
27
1
0.02
6
1093
27
6
1093
19
9
769
19
1
0.02
9
769
19
9
769
19
11
6
769
19
0.02
6
769
19
6
769
26
10
1052
26
1
0.02
10
1052
26
10
1052
32
7
1295
32
1
0.02
7
1295
32
7
1295
39
11
1578
39
1
0.02
11
1578
39
11
15781
6
10121
1
0.02
6
10121
25
6
10121
35
7
14161
35
1
0.02
7
14161
35
7
14161
432
20
9711
432
18
0.44
20
q711
432
20
971
Meadow Spring
Current Plot Data (MYO2019)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
06122019-01-0010
Common Name Species Type PnoLSP-all T
06122019-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
06122019-01-0018
PnoLS P -all T
MYO(2019)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch Tree
31
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
13
13
13
9
9
9
52
52
52
Cephalanthusoccidentali
common buttonbus Shrub
2
2
2
4
4
4
14
14
14
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
12
12
12
Cornusflorida
flowering dogwood Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Corylus americana
American hazelnut Shrub
4
4
4
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon Tree
1
1
11
1 1
1
1
71
71
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
11
1
1
11
1
2
2
2
34
34
34
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree Tree
2
2
2
10
10
10
Malusangustifolia
southern crabapple Tree
2
2
2
Nyssa aquatica
water tupelo Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum Tree
1
1
1
1
14
14
14
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
41
4
4
10
10
10
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
7
7
7
2
2
2
5
5
5
8
8
81
72
72
72
Prunus americana
American plum Tree
1
1
1
Quercus
oak Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
11
11
11
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
111
111
111
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak Tree
8
8
8
21
21
21
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
1
1
11
21
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
Quercus nigra
wateroak Tree
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
1willowoak Tree
1
1
11
1
17
1717
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
8
8
8
3
3
3E4332
5
35
35
Stem cont
u
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count10
StemsperACRE
23
931
23
1
0.02
101
931
23
101
931
35
121
1416
35
1
0.02
121
1416
35
121
1416
23
1
61
931
23
1
0.02
61
931
23
61
931
24
1
51
971
24
1
0.02
51
971
24
1
51
971
19
51
769
19
1
0.02
51
769
19
1
51
769
12
41
486
12
1
0.02
41
486
12
41
486
10
31
405
10
1
0.02
31
405
10
1
3
405
18
41
728
18
1
0.02
4
728
18
1
4
728
15
4
6071
15
1
0.02
4
6071
15
4
6071
20
9711
432
18
0.44
20
9711
432
20
971

Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 1
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
53
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
56
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
54
5
Betula nigra
56
6
Quercus sp.
66
7
Quercus sp.
78
8
Quercus sp.
51
9
Quercus sp.
50
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
11
Nyssa sylvatica
64
12
Nyssa sylvatica
63
13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
54
14
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
60
15
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
56
16
Quercus sp.
58
17
Betula nigra
70
18
Taxodium distichum
53
19
Quercus sp.
53
20
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30
21
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
60
22
Quercus sp.
53
23
Quercus sp.
56
24
Quercus sp.
55
25
Quercus sp.
65
Ste ms /Acre
1012
Average Height (cm)
57
Average Height (ft)
19
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 2
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Quercus sp.
55
2
Quercus sp.
50
3
Quercus lyrata
59
4
Quercus sp.
62
5
Quercus sp.
79
6
Nyssa biflora
50
7
Quercus sp.
47
8
Taxodium distichum
68
9
Nyssa biflora
50
10
Nyssa biflora
48
11
Betula nigra
44
12
Betula nigra
51
13
Betula nigra
50
14
Taxodium distichum
60
15
Nyssa biflora
51
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
51
18
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
19
Taxodium distichum
42
20
Taxodium distichum
57
21
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
55
22
Quercus sp.
40
23
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
49
24
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
Stems/Acre
971
Average Height (cm)
53
Average Height (ft)
1.7
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2
Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Random Plot 3
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Betula nigra
65
2
Quercus sp.
50
3
Quercus sp.
50
4
Quercus sp.
40
5
Quercus phellos
40
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
7
Quercus sp.
30
8
Quercus sp.
70
9
Taxodium distichum
45
10
Betula nigra
40
11
Taxodium distichum
70
12
Taxodium distichum
85
13
Taxodium distichum
40
14
Betula nigra
45
15
Nyssa sylvatica
40
16
Nyssa sylvatica
50
17
Quercus sp.
40
18
Quercus lyrata
60
19
Taxodium distichum
60
20
Taxodium distichum
70
21
Nyssa sylvatica
50
22
Quercus nigra
80
23
Nyssa sylvatica
50
24
Taxodium distichum
70
Stems/Acre
971
Average Height (cm)
54
Average Height (ft)
1.8
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
166
Meadow Spring - Reach S2 - Cross Section 1 - Riffle - Enhancement 1
165
164
°
163
LU
162
161
— — — —
— —
— —
— —
—
— — —
—
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— — — —
— —
— —
160
0 3 6 9 12 15
MYO-2019
18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
— — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
161.35
Bankfull Width ft
5.2
Floodprone Width ft
11.2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.0
Low Bank Height ft
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
3.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
2.6

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring - Reach S2 - Cross Section 2 - Riffle - Enhancement 1
161
Cross Section 2
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
156.99
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>31.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
1.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
4.0
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
10.1
160
>5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
159
c
°
158
a�
LU 157
156
155
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
156.99
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>31.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
1.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
4.0
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 3 - Riffle
157
Cross Section 3
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
152.52
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
5.5
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
40.3
156
>6.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
155
154
c
0
153
Ji
152
151
150
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
152.52
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
5.5
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
40.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
156
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 4 - Pool
155
154
c
°
153
a�
LU152
— —
— —
—
— —
—
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
151
150
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4
Basedontixedbaselinecross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 152.23
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
BanIkfullMaxDepth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankrull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft2 )
6.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
Bankrull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 5 - Riffle
153
152
Based on fixed baseline crof sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
149.54
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
BanldullMaxDepth (ft)
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
4.3
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
151
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>7.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
c
150
LU 149
148
147
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5
Based on fixed baseline crof sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
149.54
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
BanldullMaxDepth (ft)
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
4.3
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>7.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
153
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 6 - Pool
152
�a A�
y.kdl
Upstream
Downstream
153
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 6 - Pool
152
151
c
°
150
LU
149
148
147
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6
Basedon fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
149.62
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
6.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
NA

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 7 - Riffle
150
Cross Section 7
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
146.13
Bankfull Width ft
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
62
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.7
149
>5.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
148
c
° 147
a�
LU 146
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
145
144
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 7
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
146.13
Bankfull Width ft
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
62
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

�,ggs i 'LN
Upstream
Downstream
150
Meadow Spring - Reach S6A - Cross Section 8- Pool
149
148
c
°
147
a�
w
146
145
— -
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— -
—
144
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
• FloodproneArea
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
145.92
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
BanldullMaxDepth (ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
4.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
Bankfull Entrenchment ]Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring - Reach S613 - Cross Section 9 - Riffle
146
Cross Section 9
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
141.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
145
>5.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
144
c
° 143
a�
LU 142
— -
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— -
—
141
140
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 9
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
141.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
6.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
145
Meadow Spring - Reach S613 - Cross Section 10 - Pool
144
143
c
°
142
w
141
140
139
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
— Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10
Based on fixed baseline cros s sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 141.57
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
6.0
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio I
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio I
NA

Upstream
Downstream
142
Meadow Spring - Reach S613 - Cross Section 11 - Pool
141
,N
140
F ti "v
c
° 139
Downstream
142
Meadow Spring - Reach S613 - Cross Section 11 - Pool
141
140
c
° 139
>
a)
LU 138
137
136
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 11
Basedon fixed baseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MYS MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.01
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
7.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
Meadow Spring- Reach S613 - Cross Section 12 - Riffle
142
Cross Section 12
Based on fixed baseline cr s sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.07
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
6.6
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
13.3
141
>5.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
140
c
° 139
a�
LU138
— —
— —
— —
—
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
137
136
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12
Based on fixed baseline cr s sectional area
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
138.07
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
6.6
Bankfull W idth/Depth Ratio
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
139
Meadow Spring - Reach S613 - Cross Section 13 - Pool
138
137
c
°
136
a�
LU
135
000,
134
133
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 13
Bas ed on fixed bas eline cros s s ectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
136.00
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Right Bank
139
Meadow Spring - Reach S6B - Cross Section 14 - Riffle
138
137
c
°
136
a�
LU
135
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
134
133
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 14
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 135.88
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
BanldullMaxDepth (ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
7.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
129
Meadow Spring - Reach S7 - Cross Section 15 - Riffle - Enhancement 1
128
127
c
° 126
w 125
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
124
123
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 15
Basedon fixedbaseline cross sectional area
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
125.52
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
BankrullCross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.6

Upstream
Downstream
126
Meadow Spring - Reach S7 - Cross Section 16 - Riffle - Enhancement 1
125
124
123
c
0
> 122
wa�
121
— —
— —
— —
—
— — — —
— —
—
— —
—
— — — — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
120
119
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 16
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevatio
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
121.88
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>39.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
10.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio I
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.3

Upstream
120
Meadow Spring- Reach S11 - Cross Section 17 - Riffle
119
118
c
°
117
w
116
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
115
114
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 17
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevatio
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
116.34
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
5.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
119
Meadow Spring - Reach S11 - Cross Section 18 - Pool
118
117
c
° 116
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
—
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
a�
LU 115
114
113
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 18
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevatio
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
116.29
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
12.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
117
Meadow Spring- Reach S11 - Cross Section 19 - Riffle
116
115
c
° 114
Ji 113
112
111
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 19
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
113.46
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
9.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
116
Meadow Spring - Reach S11 - Cross Section 20 - Pool
115
114
c
° 113
a�
LU 112
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
111
110
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Roodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 20
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
112.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
6.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
116
Meadow Spring - Reach S11 - Cross Section 21 - Pool
115
114
h
�p
.s
Upstream
Downstream
116
Meadow Spring - Reach S11 - Cross Section 21 - Pool
115
114
113
c
0
112
—
w
111
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— — —
— —
—
110
109
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Roodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 21
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
111.69
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Upstream
Downstream
116
Meadow Spring - Reach S11 - Cross Section 22 - Riffle
115
114
113
c
0
112
111
110
109
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Roodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 22
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
111.53
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
7.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
148
Meadow Spring - Reach S5 - Cross Section 23 - Riffle
147
146
c
° 145
a�
LU 144
143
— —
— —
— —
—
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
—
142
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 23
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
143.29
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>38.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
0.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
22
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>7.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
147
Meadow Spring - Reach S5 - Cross Section 24 - Pool
146
145
c
° 144
a�
Ji143
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
142
141
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Distance (ft)
MYO-2019 — — —Approx. Bankfull
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Roodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 24
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
143.16
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>48.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 )
3.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
NA

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site - Reach S5 (XS23)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max SD n Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- ---
---
--- 4.6
---
--- 1 ---
--- 9.9 --- ---
--- ---
4.8
---
---
---
5.3
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
--- 6.0
---
--- 1 ---
--- 50.0 --- ---
--- ---
>11
---
---
>38.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- --
--- 0.4
---
--- 1 ---
--- 1.1 --- ---
--- ---
0.5
---
---
0.4
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
--- 0.7
---
--- 1 ---
--- 1.7 --- ---
--- ---
0.8
---
---
---
0.9
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft --- I --- I ---
---
1.8
1
1
11.2
2.6
---
---
2.2
Width/Depth Ratio
11.6
1
8.7
9.0
---
---
---
12.6
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1
>2.2
>2.2
---
---
>7.3
Bank Height Rati
3.4
1
1.3
1.0
1.0
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
2
---
9
--- --- 4
--- --- 19.9 ---
--- 2
---
10
4.3
6.7
5.7
10.4
2.3
8
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
--- ---
---
0.0001
0.02096 0.0236
0.0484 0.01561
8
Pool Length (ft)
3
--- ---
28
--- --- 6.9
--- --- 21.6 ---
--- 3
---
10
2.8
10.3
11.3
13.5
3.5
9
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
--- --
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
15
--- ---
53
--- --- 40.3
--- --- 109.8 ---
--- 20
---
53
12.9
28.2
30.0
37.6
7.4
8
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- 41.2
--- --- 43.5 ---
--- 16
---
28
16
---
---
28
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- 13.11
--- --- 24.6 ---
---
--
14
9
---
---
14
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- 1.2
--- --- 2.3 ---
--- 1.9
---
2.9
1.9
---
2.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
--- ---
---
--- --- 49.5
--- --- 64.9 ---
--- 21
--
40
21
---
---
40
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
--- ---
---
--- --- 3.8
4 ---
--- 3.3
---
5.8
3.3
---
---
5.8
---
---
I ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
F4
E5
E4/5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- ---
Valley length (ft)
185
285
185
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
215
375
231
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.16
1.32
1.25
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.013
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.013
0.0025
0.002
---
3 Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank 21---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site - Reach S6A (XS3,5,7)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- ---
8.6
--- --- 9.4
--- 2 --- --- 9.9 --- ---
--- ---
7.0
---
7.0
7.9
7.5
9.3
1.2
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
13.0
--- --- 14.0
--- 2 --- --- 50.0 --- ---
--- ---
>15
---
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
0.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- ---
0.6
--- --- 0.8
--- 2 --- --- 1.1 --- ---
--- ---
0.8
---
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.1
3
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
--- --- 2.2
--- 2 --- --- 1.7 --- ---
--- ---
1.1
---
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
0.1
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1 -- -- --
11.2
1 11.8
2 11.2
5.3
---
4.3
15.3
15.5
6.2
1.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2
8.7
2 8.7
9.3
11.5
21.8
13.7
40.3
16.0
3
Ratio
EntrenEHeh
>2.2
>2.2
2 >2.2
>2.2
5.4
6.4
6.7
7.1
0.9
3
'Bank Rat'
1.2
1.3
2 1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
--- ---
--- --- 4 --- --- 19.9 ---
--- 3
---
14
2.9
10.4
8.4
24.0
5.6
30
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- --- --- --- --- --- ---
--- ---
---
---
0.0001
0.01094 0.0004
0.0829 0.01991
30
Pool Length (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- --- 6.9 --- --- 21.6 ---
--- 5
---
15
1.9
11.4
10.6
32.4
7.6
37
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- --- --- --- -- --- ---
--- ---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- --- 40.3 --- --- 109.8 ---
--- 28
---
78
12.8
36.8
37.3
116.4
17.5
36
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
16
--- --- 74
--- --- 41.2 --- --- 43.5 ---
--- 23
---
40
23
---
---
40
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11
--- --- 35
--- --- 13.11 --- --- 24.6 ---
--- 14
---
19
14
---
---
19
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1
--- --- 4
--- 1.2 --- --- 2.3 ---
--- 2
---
2.7
2
---
---
2.7
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
65
--- --- 130
--- --- 49.5 --- --- 64.9 ---
--- 35
---
78
35
---
---
78
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
2
--- --- 8
--- --- 3.8 --- --- 4 ---
--- 3.3
---
5.7
3.3
---
---
5.7
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
F4
E5
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- ---
Valley length (ft)
1041
285
416
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1220
375
490
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.17
1.32
1.18
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0039
0.0025
0.0035
---
3 Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site - Reach S6B (XS9,12,14)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- ---
7.2
--- --- 9.1
--- 2
--- --- 9.9 --- ---
--- ---
8.4
---
9.0
9.4
9.4
9.9
0.5
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
11.0
--- --- 15.0
--- 2
--- --- 50.0 --- ---
--- ---
>18
---
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
0.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- ---
0.7
--- --- 0.9
--- 2
--- --- 1.1 --- ---
--- ---
0.9
---
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
3
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.1
--- --- 1.1
--- 2
--- --- 1.7 --- ---
--- ---
1.4
---
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
0.1
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1 -- -- ---
6.3
1 6.8 1
1 2
11.2 1 --- I ---
7.8
---
6.4
16.8
16.6
7.5
0.6
3
Width/Depth Ratio
8.1
12.2
2
8.7
9.0
12.8
13.1
13.1
13.3
0.3
3
Ratio
EntrenEHeh
1.1
2.0
2
>2.2
>2.2
5.1
5.3
5.3
5.5
0.2
3
'Bank Rat'
1.9
3.1
2
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
2
11
--- ---
4 --- --- 19.9 ---
--- 3
---
17
3.8
12.6
13.1
26.5
6.2
27
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
--- ---
--- ---
--- --- --- --- ---
--- ---
---
---
0.0001
0.00791
0.0050
0.0318 0.00959
27
Pool Length (ft)
4
--- --- 30
--- ---
6.9 --- --- 21.6 ---
--- 6
---
18
2.3
10.3
8.6
26.3
6.2
29
Pool Max depth (ft)
--- ---
--- ---
--- --- --- -- ---
--- ---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
10
--- --- 48
--- ---
40.3 --- --- 109.8 ---
--- 34
---
93
10.2
38.6
41.7
72.6
16.0
28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
22
--- --- 48
--- ---
41.2 --- --- 43.5 ---
--- 22
--
37
22
---
---
37
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
--- --- 26
--- ---
13.11 --- --- 24.6 ---
--- 16
---
23
16
---
---
23
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1
--- --- 3
---
1.2 --- --- 2.3 ---
--- 1.9
---
2.7
1.9
---
---
2.7
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
32
--- --- 90
--- ---
49.5 --- --- 64.9 ---
---42
--
81
42
---
---
81
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
3
--- --- 6
--- ---
3.8 --- --- 4 ---
--- 2.6
---
4.4
2.6
---
---
4.4
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
F4-E4
E4/5
E4/5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- ---
--
Valley length (ft)
1147
285
1147
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1315
375
1340
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
1.32
1.17
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0057
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.006
0.0025
0.003
---
3 Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site - Reach S11 (XS17,19,22)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- ---
5.9
--- --- 10.0
--- 2
--- --- 9.9 --- ---
--- ---
9.6
---
8.8
9.4
9.6
9.8
0.5
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
--- --- >30
--- 2
--- --- 50.0 --- ---
--- ---
>21
---
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
0.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- ---
1.1
--- --- 1.6
--- 2
--- --- 1.1 --- ---
--- ---
1.1
---
0.7
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.2
3
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
--- --- 2.6
--- 2
--- --- 1.7 --- ---
--- ---
1.6
---
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.7
0.2
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1 -- -- ---
6.3
1 15.8 1
2
11.2
10.2
---
5.8
17.5
17.1
9.6
1.9
3
Width/Depth Ratio
6.4
9.2
2
8.7
9.0
9.6
12.1
13.2
13.4
2.1
3
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
2
>2.2
>2.2
5.1
5.3
5.2
5.6
0.3
3
'Bank Height Rati1
1.0
1 --- I --- 1 1.1 1
--- 1 2 1
--- I --- 1 1.3 1 --- I --- I
--- I ---
1 1.0 1
---
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
0.0
3
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
5
--- --- 23
--- ---
4 --- --- 19.9 ---
--- 4
---
19
3.6
14.7
15.1
28.7
7.5
21
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- --- --- --- ---
---
---
0.0001
0.00728 0.0001
0.0958 0.02084
21
Pool Length (ft)
5
--- --- 28
--- ---
6.9 --- --- 21.6 ---
--- 7
---
21
1.5
13.8
11.9
32.1
8.9
23
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
--- --- -- --- ---
--- ---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
21
--- --- 113
--- ---
40.3 --- --- 109.8 ---
--- 39
---
106
8.4
44.5
39.6
153.9
30.6
22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
41.2 --- --- 43.5 ---
--- 15
---
56
15
---
---
56
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
13.11 --- --- 24.6 ---
--- 17
---
23
17
---
---
23
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
1.2 --- --- 2.3 ---
--- 1.8
---
2.4
1.8
---
2.4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
49.5 --- --- 64.9 ---
--- 43
---
82
43
---
---
82
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
--- --- ---
--- ---
3.8 --- --- 4 ---
--- 1.6
---
5.8
1.6
---
---
5.8
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5
E5
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- ---
--
Valley length (ft)
844
285
844
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
898
375
1036
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.32
1.23
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0041
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0041
0.0025
0.003
---
3 Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 - The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 - Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Meadow Spring
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) usec
161.4
157.0
152.5
152.2
149.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.2
6.4
7.5
7.6
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft
11.2
>31.9
>50
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.7
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft
2.7
1.1
1.3
1.7
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ff
3.2
4.0
5.5
6.5
4.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Rati
8.4
10.1
40.3
8.8
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
2.2
>5.0
>6.7
NA
>7.1
Bankfull Bank Height Rati
2.6
1.0
1.0
NA
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) usec
149.6
146.1
145.9
141.9
141.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
9.3
8.3
9.0
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
6.6
6.2
4.2
6.4
6.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic
10.3
13.7
16.5
12.8
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic
NA
>5.4
NA
>5.5
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratic
NA
1.0
NA
1.0
NA
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
Cross Section 14 (Riffle)
Cross Section 15 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) usec
138.0
138.1
136.0
135.9
125.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
9.4
10.2
9.9
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft
>50
>50
>50
>50
40.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.9
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.7
1.3
2.2
1.4
1.4
Low Bank Height (ft]
1.7
1.3
2.2
1.4
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
7.9
6.6
10.7
7.5
10.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic
10.0
13.3
9.7
13.1
11.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
NA
>5.3
NA
>5.1
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratic
NA
1.0
NA
1.0
1.6
Cross Section 16 (Riffle)
Cross Section 17 (Riffle)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Riffle)
Cross Section 20 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
121.9
116.3
116.3
113.5
112.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
9.5
9.6
6.9
Floodprone Width (ft
>39.7
>50
>50
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
1.1
0.7
1.3
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.6
1.3
2.8
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft
2.2
1.3
2.8
1.7
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
10.2
5.8
12.7
9.6
6.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Rati
8.5
13.2
7.1
9.6
8.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
14.3
>5.6
NA
>5.2
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratic
1.3
1.0
NA
1.0NA
Based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
Bankfull Max Depth ft
Low Bank Height ft
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft
Bankfull Wdth/De th Rati
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
Bankfull Bank Height Rati
Base
111.7
10.0
>50
1.0
2.1 1
2.1
9.9
10.1
NA
NA
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
1
MY+
Base
111.5
9.8
>50
0.7
1.5
1.5
7.1
13.4
>5.1
1.0
Cross Section 22 (Riffle)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
143.3
5.3
>38.3
0.4
1 0.9
0.9
2.2
12.6
>7.3
1.0
Cross Section 23 (Riffle)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
143.2
5.8
>48.4
0.6
1.3
1.3
3.6
9.4
NA
NA
Cross Section 24 (Pool)
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10.
Meadow
Stream Reach Data Summary
.. .
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Bankfull •
®®®®®®Floodprone
������������������������������
Width (ft)
MMMMMM
Mean Depth (ft)
MMMMMM
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
HeightBankfull
Bank -..®®M®®®MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Pool
m
mmm
m MMM M MM
MM M M
M M MMMM M M M MMMM M M MM MM M
Pool Max .-.
®®®®®®
MMM M MM
MM M M
M M MMMM M M M MMMM M M MM MM M
Channel:-
m®®M®®
MMM M MM
MM M M
M M MMMM M M M MMMM M M MM MM M
-.. -
0®®m®®
MMM M MM
MM M M
M M MMMM M M M MMMM M M MM MM M
•
M®®M®®
MMM M MM
MM M M
M M MMMM M M M MMMM M M MM MM M
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel2 Habitat Metric
Biological . Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10.
Meadow
Stream Reach Data Summary
.. .A
and Substrate - Riffle only
WidthDimension
Bankfull
Floodprone Width (ft)
Mean Depth (ft)
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
BankHeight
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Maxdepth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radiusof Curvature (ft)
widthBankfull
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg-.
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel2 Habitat Metric
Biological . Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Meadow .. .
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
BankHeight
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length'®�
m
Maxdepth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radiusof Curvature (ft)
widthPool
®®®®®
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg-.
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel2 Habitat Metric
Biological . Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10. Stream Reach Data Summary
Meadow ..
and Substrate - Riffle only
WidthDimension
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
'Bank -full Max Depth
Low Bank Height
Bank -full Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment
'Bank Height Ratis
Shallow Length
ShallowSlope
Pool Length
Pool Maxclepth
Pool Spacing
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
of Curvature (ft)
widthRadius
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
AdditionalMeander
Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length
(ft)
WaterSinuosity
- Slope
Channel ..-
iii 11111
2% of Reach with Eroding Bankn
ChannelI?
Habitat -
Biological Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
As -Built Plan Sheets

CA
� pfaRgSSiIT lk
sl
S4 s
- =4 SEAL a
e
v S L471i1f��Al
'ryllglllw���
sir •o.
1 OF 14
G[,1r
A
W
H
N
2
0
Z
�
PR
°
a
I a
Z
.jM Z
0
B
' W
do
v Z
Z
Z
�c 0
cc
0
CC
L
70
(a
Z
Z
W
R:
X
W
0
0
0a
�
cc
a
=1
W
0
H
W
�cc
MATRIX
BAST, PLLC
908 N. QUEEN SF, SLATE A
KINSTON, NC 25501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM CIC. f P-0221
ntrixeesl.net
EMAIL: SLOULLT-M
JRW er
MEA[))WuEanow sPRIrre

I I
11 EAryWNCfMENT N �
1°E10ir auy sr (SrA 3+50 TO 6400)
srArs.s4
I I �rrw'reer r. sr[r+e4ar
II` as arJo. fc cr1
v9 TZ AL !ff I s+v+ns 0et �+ �ssouu+rtir+a^
I iTv tract+ sr re 2. rc 147
I sA6.w
I I�
REACH S2
EAUt4ACEAIENT I
(STA 6+00 TO 11+00)
Ratio
Acres
WB
I I
1.5:1
k
WO
PRESERVATION
IDA
0,03
WE
PRESERVATION
I L
0.09
i
1I I
51A 11.00
-
_ - I -w► -1 i
-- —
� I I i 5lvrnaar f992 w+fa wanrEteslm� - -
�i
ENHANCEMENT
3:1
2.01
I I
ENHANCEMENT
3:1
m
aur w. sro'+mesr e '
--
-
I I
1�1
V I
I
1 I
k`I
EIII
18.01
WH
Wetland Ip
Mftation Type
Ratio
Acres
WB
REHABILITATION
1.5:1
0.95
WO
PRESERVATION
IDA
0,03
WE
PRESERVATION
10:1
0.09
WF -A
PRESERVATION
10:1
2.00
AF -B
ENHANCEMENT
3:1
2.01
WG -A
ENHANCEMENT
3:1
3.68
WG•B
ENHANCEMENT -LOW
3:1
18.01
WH
RE-ESTABLISHMENT
1:1
6.8d
WI
RE-ESTASLISHMENI-LOW
2:1
2.85
—
2
■
�
TOTAL
ACREAGE
3G50
REACH
MITIGATION TYPE
AS -BUILT LENGTH
IN EASEMENT
ST
ENHANCEMENT If
250
52
ENHANCEMENT I
SDO
S6A
PI RESTORATION
1350
S66
F-1 RESTORATION
1 176
S68
ENHANCEMENT!
167
S7
ENHANCEMENT I
1430
59
ENHANCEMENT III
675
511
P1 RESTORATION
1045
512
PRESERVA77ON
380
S 13
PRESERVA77ON
454
S5
Pi P2 PRESERVATION
231
TOFAL 1
7658
[TV PL.L}r SW
SA12..5p
REACH S&A
PI RMORAT10N
(Sip 11+00 TO 24+50)
REACH S5
P 1/P2 RES70RA r*N
(STA 0+76 TO 3+07)
� mr r9vs rover .vcreu aannosnlr
# og arx ac 2vv
- - _ REACH S68
PI RESrORAT1ON
�( (STA 24+SO m 36+26) I
7
REACH S69
— -- --- _ -_ -_ = - ENFGWCEMENT 1
I (STA 36+26 TO 37+93)
Sit .P4dr 1997 URIm --*05W `• - - - __� -.
oe r fir, rc5r
M2. M 16] pErpl so
ST ']6.% - SiEFh."i,515V 19➢7 4Aw1w A-WPVMW
on Irs1Cx Me9e r sx . 3'
A. I
' 7 READY S7
I,pENHANCEMENT I
(STA 38+80 TO 48+70)
resat HW ��tm9Pa�dF�s*w
-1
sra+¢nsar rrw r.nm vwrnnrs.�
_ A.O xrxx s7
afarr Arxrr sn
YYF A I
xoavc +asa.. ramr or .,pwcrcw ccv,wrr. �. L
A9 2e9s, PC ]35 I
ae ex +c au _
1
REACH $7
EMHANCEAdEN7 1
(STA 49+40 TO 53+80) 19fi7 i,ra+to awn.fSsw
a9 r2Pe 131
P6 2,, /C fi7
REACH S9
ENI6WCEuE0vr Al
(STA 53+80 TO 60+55)
REACH 512
PRESERVAMR W
(STA 71+00 r0 74+.80)
ac ow. 112
$M.N n
oa' uLrs,''acL r
ve ar, rc 92
=»rXN 1997 �PARfAUWW -
00 17 AC +Sr II'a A
'A
s jA ❑ A A ' ��
4 ❑ ❑ R
' ❑ a ❑ A�
t 7 A
r/ A was a
3 ❑ a a A 6
❑pa a e
Xeanea A 4 A
aAA
n d A A a 6❑ A �
aAa Aa❑n6 ❑ ��'
neaaAAAA❑
eAae❑❑app A�� a � ]
A A A A A e a A A p a A 4$
/A A A P n a❑ e e a
AL.
'aa❑aaaae❑aeee aA
n A a a a a g a W• B a s
r a A A A L1`[ _ ?+ a
A�rAR
❑AAA VT
'aeaeea P
REACH Sit 4AA AAAA;
4 a A e e q
Pt RE57DRAWN A
A A A A AAAAA
(57A 60+55 TO 71+00) dA a a a A A 4 A n.
�aaAAa annoA
a a e A 6 A ❑ A A e a a
4 A A a a A a 6 a 4 4 A
.f AAAAAA n 6 e A A A A
n e A A A A A A A n e 6 6 A.
n a A❑ A a a A❑ a a A A A%
6 A A n e e 6 A A A A❑ A e
i A a A a A A A A A A A 6
A6 A A a A A &&& a A A
9 A A p
4 a4YYC3$ a ❑ A ±
� � Aaaa .r ❑
aaaa n
eee aWGA
e e e A -r
q AAA
4 n A,
A A A q
A A A ,
Le Aa
� aEc11v �Ipf 5f]• A q afi
sas.� a ❑iter
V/ /
r
BEACH S13
PRESERVA170N
(STA 9#69 TO t4+23)
aro o loo 200 aoo
( 1x tact !
s —h . 8O0 It
�rpr,OFgSSIpy�Y :`
'
{4 SEAL
S L�]1P S
$2
sr sa+s5
2aF14
�hrL�g
tifpr94LW 199) NNrEe naAlnfR9�
-`_
�t7PC 16111
' •r
_•_---
W
`
EIm RpO�r 511
af6av xrncx srs
YAV•71/W
REACH 512
PRESERVAMR W
(STA 71+00 r0 74+.80)
ac ow. 112
$M.N n
oa' uLrs,''acL r
ve ar, rc 92
=»rXN 1997 �PARfAUWW -
00 17 AC +Sr II'a A
'A
s jA ❑ A A ' ��
4 ❑ ❑ R
' ❑ a ❑ A�
t 7 A
r/ A was a
3 ❑ a a A 6
❑pa a e
Xeanea A 4 A
aAA
n d A A a 6❑ A �
aAa Aa❑n6 ❑ ��'
neaaAAAA❑
eAae❑❑app A�� a � ]
A A A A A e a A A p a A 4$
/A A A P n a❑ e e a
AL.
'aa❑aaaae❑aeee aA
n A a a a a g a W• B a s
r a A A A L1`[ _ ?+ a
A�rAR
❑AAA VT
'aeaeea P
REACH Sit 4AA AAAA;
4 a A e e q
Pt RE57DRAWN A
A A A A AAAAA
(57A 60+55 TO 71+00) dA a a a A A 4 A n.
�aaAAa annoA
a a e A 6 A ❑ A A e a a
4 A A a a A a 6 a 4 4 A
.f AAAAAA n 6 e A A A A
n e A A A A A A A n e 6 6 A.
n a A❑ A a a A❑ a a A A A%
6 A A n e e 6 A A A A❑ A e
i A a A a A A A A A A A 6
A6 A A a A A &&& a A A
9 A A p
4 a4YYC3$ a ❑ A ±
� � Aaaa .r ❑
aaaa n
eee aWGA
e e e A -r
q AAA
4 n A,
A A A q
A A A ,
Le Aa
� aEc11v �Ipf 5f]• A q afi
sas.� a ❑iter
V/ /
r
BEACH S13
PRESERVA170N
(STA 9#69 TO t4+23)
aro o loo 200 aoo
( 1x tact !
s —h . 8O0 It
�rpr,OFgSSIpy�Y :`
'
{4 SEAL
S L�]1P S
$2
2aF14
�hrL�g
Owl
W
V7�
—
2
■
�
Z
w
W
au
19 W
U)
H
~
J ia Z
'm
0
ul
0y
W
4 49
aw
Z
Z
Z
Wa
0
cc
a
H
Z
W
_
W
0
0
u
a
W
W
'S
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
908 N, QUEEN ST., SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX.. [phone]
FIRM UC. ,®
P--022 i
EMAIL: surveyor0mo[rixen5l. net
JFiW er
fi/20/2019 1"L= 20Q'
fAGACT ,�
201fi0051
MErAr.E
LIEADAOOW SPRINGS AS eUILT.OWG

I i
I�I
I I
1 I
� � I
REACH Si
Eho'NnICE4fENT A 1 sµ+
'r S, (STA 3+SO TO 6+00)
c
b LN1IRn a SmRCgGw
1i9 icvz, HC .1f3
a9 1r5a rs 8Y.1
w -r srp+e�5p. 1ay7 ur2o rvurmclesw ra ]a su MIs
M sr ��-yy ve a. +c Iv7
REACH S7
+m
4 ENHANCEUENT 1
(STA 6+00 TO )1+00)
DOAr�u
AMW
Mw
III sra .w 1057 l ww Awlnncs++�
m 1732, rs 151
�I 'I' P92. ✓C 161
I i
1 I
V 1
I I
IIy
I I
I�I
4
�P
■I
4 V. 9irPlpgpe
G7 HTS,
BASELINE MONITORING CROSS SECTION CONTROL
OESCRIFiION
NORTHING
FASTING
ELEVATION
X501LP
655,662.0418'
2,195,4375962'
164,13'
XSOIRP
655,640.9513'
2,195,392A755'
163.30'
X502LP
655,493.7104'
2,195,602.8716'
159.W
X502RP
655,455-7160'
2,195,570.4985'
158-14'
XS03LP
655A26.2745'
2,195,854.9820'
152.0'
XS03RP
655,.362-0820'
2,195,831.7957'
153-37'
X504LP
655,425A346'
2,195,8573330'
152AY
X504RP
655,380.8683
2,195,836-3440'
153.25'
XSWOGLP
655,487.6258'
2,196,030.9481'
149.78'
XS059P
655,437.6413'
2,196,935-8466'
149.56'
X506RP
655,450.8531'
21196,064.381T
150.00'
XS07)08RP
855,572.5888'
2,196,403.7881'
146,86'
X507LP
655,5733880'
2,196,353.9538'
146.45'
XWSLP
111'
2,196,365.7207'
14634'
X50911OLP
655,641.5649'
2,196,769.8662'
142.34'
XS09RP
655,627.5543'
2,196,722.3365'
142.29'
XSIORP
655,597.9561'
2,196,746.7722'
141.99'
X511)12RP
655,520.3396'
2,197,107.3370'
138,29'
XS11RP
655,500.0502'
2,197,061.9195'
138,69'
X512RP
555,485.2829,
2,197,072.1625'
138.38'
X513114RP
655,348.9780'
2,197,272.5321'
136.23'
X51Xp
655,387.1938'
2,197,304.5307'
135,94'
X514LP
555,356.3196'
2,197,321.0374'
135.87'
XS15Lp
654,718.8796'
2,197,779.2843'
126.85'
X515RP
654,729.1282'
2,157,730.3418'
126,83'
X516LP
654,25&4246'
2,197,709.9181'
12355'
X516RP
654,275.7651'
2,197,663.2494'
122,84'
X527/18RP
653,527,0615'
2,197,820)0366'
116.56'
X517LP
653,572.9155'
2,197,801.4985'
117.02'
X518LP
653,573.3719'
2,197,836-9519'
116,61,
X51II
653,417.3603'
2,398,134.5730'
113.57
X519RP
653372.0145'
2,198,1144605'
113.33'
XS20LP
653,378-3904'
2,198,161.7038'
113-76'
X520RP
653,362.6540'
2,198,114.2910'
113.36'
XS21LP
853,091-3300'
2,198,292.0625'
112.54'
XS21RP
653.091.8656'
2,198,242.3928'
111.81'
=2LP
653,0605176'
2,196,282-1551'
_ 111.81'
X522RP
653,086.4137'
2,19$239.7961'
111.72'
X523LP
655,7334892'
2,196,653-8186'
144.55'
X523RP
655,716,1222'
2,196,606.9767'
144.10'
X524LP
655,738.0969'
2,196,6520554'
144.52'
X524RP
655,695.8932'
2,196,625.1810'
143.59'
REACH $5
Pl/P2 RESTORATi(NM
(STA 0+76 TO 3+07)
Imam,
ri u , = AWAOI r� 7. rc x9a
c'
pyp REACH 568
us�t •_-- Pf RESTQRATION
(STA 24+50 TO 36+26) 1
3RPl4]6aV l091 NCTIA A1RTM9N5lMo
REACH SSA y9 !#7. Pc rsI
PI RESTORATION
STi43
(STA 11+00 TO 24+50)
EN1i4WEWNT 1
(STA 36+28 M 37+93)
6iO�/O'l9LW 190] lYfID AlelN019M _
oe 1730. rc 131
REACH S7
ENhANCEMENT 1
(STA 38+60 TO 48+70)
�--_ ,� I➢➢S rAPcr rNvrfP
9e len. x z9s
_
1erM-x sr
MAL �
-
-
srA4a.4o
= L4ris
_
�
srasawxw Tsar ulm� aa4naesvr
•"-
•"S -I
091, 6G Isf
PITz. a sr
-'-
oncr1 97
p REACH 57
-•-
eepx +erAcar
ENHAWE1fENT !
S
(STA 49+40 TO 53+80)
;^.. jj
W
v
I
•
z
-
... . REACH 59
0
•--
,,
F
A (STA 53+80 in 60+55)
d
--�
■
I;.'.; •.; x..16
v++6.c uc¢c+1r rwu cr ,ovxsnw axrm; ac
N
'' f `;
D
a
U)
1
W
> W
PIIb AWUI
5
z
'
emu Rptl1 SISl
SrAd0a3S
�
1p i5-
J d
coWin
.
_
sr1
Z
z
Lu
d'
cc
r<s
L
MCI' So
A.M.ve
Apo, S12
SM7,. v
z
REACH 812
PRESERVAPOA'
W
($TA 71+00 rO 74480)
W
n4> 1xn1c11 s1z
srw.r4aeo
wa7a x i4s
se 4r,msz
Slf'Fh0i6Qv 1997 —" lttRin!%Lp A a _
f!H 1]37, iC 151 _
Per X.Po 167
g A n A
I❑ a
Aa ❑ ❑
a
3n ❑ a
AA n A
e.n n n
G n ❑ a a,6
❑ A A I A
❑ ❑ a ❑ A ❑
rn e A a a e A A n
sarsnmsav v9] ❑ 1xa7m nwnaxaw a e n
ae 1 a a d❑ A ea
2, ov &
va z a 1e'7 ❑❑ a a❑ a n r� ,
A m r_ ❑ ❑
/ n n n n
4 nn e 4
[REACH Sit AAA a a
PI RESTORAYl0N �7 ❑ a n a a a❑ ;N
a A❑ a ❑❑ n❑ a
(STA 80+55 TO 71+00)
4e. .. A441% . 'C
❑❑❑❑ aAAa 5
a a ❑ a :.. ..AAAA A
❑ 4 A A n a e A a
AAA,. nnna a a /
�9 ❑ee: ❑eAeneaa ❑'
a.nr: � ❑� •. as
' ❑r
i�'4 ❑,G❑ 9 �,
❑ n
. Sn�ya e9
a a
SM 1M+73 a 6"
'—REACH S13
/ PRESERvATIOry
(STA 9+69 TO 14+23)
2w 0 1N m
IN i`SSS' J
f I inch - 200 fl
rr.. �a111�CAIR Ip�f
}oi o is lYa4,�a
auww rw
MAL �
-
SS3qt
= L4ris
3 OF 14
(v l l4
mi
W
v
I
z
0
F
z
d
■
aj
N
D
a
U)
W
> W
a
z
W
�
J d
coWin
C�
Q�
F
Z
z
Lu
d'
cc
L
CIA
U)
z
w
W
x
W
0
0
C3
0
=2
a
�
W
0
U
W
cc
S1x
MATRIX
EAST, RTC
9O6 N. QUEEN ST, SUITE
KINSTON, NC 26501
A
TEL; 252-527-2500
FAX, • 252-522-4747
RRM LIC.
JAI P-0221
EWE: surveyor®matrixeast.net
JRW 6r
6/20/2019 1' -- 200'
I+r0.[C1 ,q
20160051
re --
a --
MEA00WSPRINGS AS 9111LT.OWC

REACH S! J
- EVh4W£MENT n
(STA 3+50 TO 6+00)
I1=1I REACH �2
`
- — -EWAUl MENTI —
(STA 6+00 TO r,+W)_ • - �,
sr� \ \ 1 -~ - — f-�', ,o•a6 - i-1 1 El I ice. .5: REACH
P? ,eESTow4TroN .
(5 TA 71+00 TO24+%
"� 1114 I I. -- � - I -=� I �-1 + 1=�L� �_�• IJ-� 14=1! I---1 l� E 11= -I I % 4�
IA II !=III
1
II-I=_Il l I
I
-1 FON= El l i-III-ir l_ Ell - I1
-_ 110 11--11 i-1 11 -1 11-1 I H 1-1 -- 11 F�I
_1 I -I i 1�
~I I -I 11 I 1=11 ^ I --1 I I -I 11=I I I=
I�_1=!
I1=1�1-1II=is1-111= 11=1111 -III- 1=
_ IiITi I\r r.Zal r6r
------------------
T65
ICA~ W.
d
S4
- i4 se,u r
&rs5
1 .
4OFtq
�f�lt9
v
�
J
�
r80
I,
ili
~
160
Z
0
..
-
Or
■
C3
Tri
0
rcc
T55
r50
0
T'�
W IY
I
145
145
cn
n u
.JIL
ad
z
C)
m z
WIII
�
C�
�L
8
D g
N
�op511;iiIIP rllyr
fR p t
ICA~ W.
d
S4
- i4 se,u r
4OFtq
�f�lt9
v
J
�
W
ili
~
Z
0
..
Z
■
C3
0
■
H
0
W IY
>o
Q
Z
.JIL
ad
z
C)
m z
WIII
�
C�
�L
Z
Z
Z
a�
NN�c
a�
z
I
W
o
o
0
in
�
a
W
0
W
glTi
Eosi
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST, SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28507
TEL [phone]
FAX, 252-522-4747
r f LIC.
4 P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor®malrUeos[-ne[
w er
JRW
xxc
6�20�2019 S" 30'
20160051
dlk .N
MEADOW SPRINGS AS R111LT.DWG

-_ . --____ - _ -
11�1�1��=I 1� _ ._�-- -
'�E`-I f 11 f i 1=I I=11 E E--1 E 1-
-I I II1 !—
I I- I � Irli`r : I' I=1�1 I 1—III-I I1 I I 1
! l lel I I lei Fl=T -11�=111
�1 yT
IICIi=11-
E ,y , I I� --�I I 1=1 I 1=�- -s-
s.�
f I M1 i -,;,ILL- I lzlTl-I-T-I f
—A —T
-III-1 f I -III-! I I�I 11=11 I-_=�_I
_ —1'' _ -_=-- s
I= I =E I €- 1-11 E -I 11-1 fel 1= i 1-1 - I-11 I=iTE-JJ=i
i�l f1=111 --I
ISI I1 I l=111-,, I ��� I��_! I-1 =E I- . r I 1=11�1 € I I I I -I 11 1
--I I_:
i -I 11 I E 1=1 f 1-E -1 I - --1 -I
�� _•� :111: -111-III--III-lII=1,;= _ III�� II 'I�!=111.=-��� II Iii -I TIII=III-lli====_-_____.�____= �
=LF
� _ � -- � I i 1=, � +-1 � I-''-11- �-h`=i 11=T_1.-1 I •=! = I-I'�i"" i I I III -I I 1=1 i 11=1 I _ _-= = _ - - - - - -_-_ _- _-_ _--
--,�'-1,111=III--
���I�r�-.:LI 1=1 f 1=11 --I 1 I -III -1 I
- Il��-I
- - --- -------4444-_ --------=-=-------
IEMLI ITwI I k 111=III _ = - =
111-VIII=111-IIIEl1 - H1=111=L— z; l== II 1=1114=11�=1�:�1 h�—I=_----=----
—�_ 11—III= =III—I 1—I j I-. _ Pi PEsr�rrov --7. - _ _______ _ _ _ _ ==r= _ _=_
111— ' . 111=i1E 1x11- 1 E 1—E 11—I (s�F r r+00 TO 24$ +50, I' 1— 111-1= --- _ _ - - -
--=1 f l I=] f l=f -I�l_____ _ ___ _ _ _ __
� T�i--1 [��'� -f N ;�, i-11.1=1 E 1=1 I Iii I•I--��Ti I i=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 [ 13'1 I� �1 I
=F1 -M=1 1 -1 -
!-1II=1TT'f•--E 1 E_= 111=t-N�-I�-x.11=E I �. I -I 1 I� 1 I -I i 1=E i�1 I - 11= -�-= _-==_=_= _= __=_-= -
N
rsG I
I
155 755
-
- I _
.aarr ar ppw p W. OF mv-/..
r50 )5p
ws-erur rrov.nrc — —
7R5 1<5
r iwlu
140 _ _ 1 _ I 140
sows
7 • . ao•
a
,LR�fX Sf�Yl .
....I11i11711q//
CR
gp<pl
pxxre: n
�2: DF6831pY
_ la SEAL
;�
r1
CC
Y5
rJy"IfifRlll�l
ya7 xo
sort:
car=-� 1q
J
W
�
H
Z
Z
..
Z
g
Q
r
�
W
J
m a
W
a�
Z
Z
Z
'4=
anauL
0�
cc
a
-
a
Z
�
Z
W
_
W
a
cc
a
=1
W
0
y
W
cc
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
Bos N. QUEEN ST, SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FWAd LIC.
4 P-0221
EMAIL: surveyprgmatrixecst.net
JRW �
6/2L1/�019 j" 30'
20r8905�
dCAD nw[
,.IEAQQW SPRINGS AS HUILT.QWG

as,xav ��
REACH $68
_ P1 RESTORATON --
�� - (STA 24+50 TO 36+26)
b
155
150
145
140
ISS
Q R R 8 8 8 155
150
145
140
x35
i
narrmxw scrr
�tanpv xv[
x c jVL Cr�r�ru+ny��//
YE; BOj
�=p�rcRSSlp��� �
GB
S
c ja 4"L ?
��r Lynx�f
e z
6 OF I;
r-�*ai t9
J
W
H
N
z�
Z
0
Z
ID
'J
0
Ic
a
z
N6
Q
z
o
'dW
ma
�
44 z
i
z
z
�m
o
0
L
U)
2
z
°C
W
0
0
Li
D
"7
cc
a
2
W
0
(hW
cc
F.a.[
MATRIX
EAST,
_PLLC
806 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE A
KINSTON NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC- # P-0221
EMAIL: sur eyar0ma[rixeasf.Ae!
J9iW
6/20/2019 1 nI-- 30•
riro,Fcr �a.
201600,51
a,...a —
IAEACOW SPRINGS AS BUILT.OWG

rn
150
t4s
140
135
130
a rn
� / f
-
� ' r'r � s�w�vrscw rva� i.rna nwn�eyw
REACH S63
_= _
----- _ - _ � {stn ?R+5f1 i0 36+26} — -
-_-__ - -----=_ _- - _
________ ___'__ _ -_ - _--=- - -_- --__=__== r_=� --
-- -�- - _ - — -- -- =_==f ----------
- -
--- ------ -
-- - __ ______ _ __ _ _====_ - � - -- ---- _ __-_-
r - -- _::_____
-----_--_ __ _-_�__-�___ =- _-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ - --------- _
m --------- _-�_-_---_-
_ _ _ _
------ ____-_----____________ __�'� _____
_______ _ ____ ____ _ _-_ �____ :a7'-=------------------ -- -- --_ -- - --- - -__-
- "" ----- I"-= = _- _ __ _ _ _ _ -------------------- _- ---------- _ _ _ _ _ = = = = = - -----------_-_-= _ _ _-------- -_ ----------
---
---
__________________:___:_____::-------------_---_ -__----------
----------------------
---------------
--
---------------- -
-- - - - - - - - - - --- ==f===-_-----------
--------------------_-- - _ _�___=_-----=- _____ _ _ __=-_-____=:-----:-:- ---____-__-_____
-------
----------------------____ _ -- ti•_ti lJg-�--------------------------------
------- r
- --_- -=----__•______
== =_ =_ � _____-----------------===--=-=__--__--_-_-_:_-__=__=_ _----------
-------
-----------
�
S
w
w
X150
145
rap
135
f30
u
`�qs�N ARpfir�
yg�oQ sssrokiY
a
S7
sF nL r:
v {{ L�712 = _-
7 OF 14
�w I Iq
J
W
.,
H
H
Z
0
rJ
c
a
7 +
;N
J
a
s
z
W
td
W
Z
01
wo
W
0
yd
4101
2.
z
Z
Z
Wy
M WCC
o
0
H W
CC
L
U
U)
z
a
W
�
W
W
0
0
0
O
MD
�
a
�
W
W
cc
�g
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SCUTE
KINSTON, NC 28501
A
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]
PRM LIC. f P-0221
EMAIL: surveyargmalrixeast.rret
JRw
6/20/2019 1' .
39'
rRo Tc
20169051
L�WG l
]AEADOW—SPRINGS AS 8U1LT.DWG

725
. - - - -_-- '-__•_--__-_=-��_ ru:------_- uw REACH S7
ENHANCEMENT
-... _ _ _ __ ___ •_ _ __ ; _ _ _ r - — _ - ,7 (STA 36+80 TO 48+70)
REACH Ews
eNwwceMENT + -___ I p ,,,---
-_[STA J6+26 rO J7+9J)- = i,
10
"] __-- -=-=r==--__-___ _ _______''�`_•=-- �� +w -•prat � � tt
-------------
-----------------------
------------
- -_ _ ------
____ =-_-___ _ _-
.. _... REACH S6B_
PI RESTOR7Y7ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
_ _x; r; _ ..-_.__ wl-_ _ _ .-
(STA 24:50 70 36+26)'-= _ " . _ _ _ _ ....Z.
-------------
MENEM 0 MEMEMMUM sommom
al ■mmommom SOMEONE
..........................................
.�i .■■■■■■■■■ . .............................
��.= .a��.■�:3 E.■■■■■■■■■MEMO
u,■� ' �� �•��■■■■■■■■■■■■ MEMO
■■■■■■■ loom ��■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■►�si
MENNEN Ion
;AU,
120
n
8
Naazavnv. ay.
3' 6'
iva+Ov. SPv.F
;pOp8881py Y =-
1
S8
i 6EAL _
k4 L�r,Y
ryffrrllly gllw`FL�dp
8 OF ..:
Cs Ets � I q
W
�
Z
■
~
LU
J
16
5a
m�
W
dZ
a
uj
oc r-
cc
y(A°
C
a
m
toZ
2
W
_
W
W
o
M2
a
�
W
0
W
cc
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUIlL
KINSTON, NC 28507
A
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC. IF P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor®matrixeas[.net
6/20/2019 1'
3p'
eRGIC� NG
20160Q5]
CMxy(
MEADOW SPRINGS AS BUILT,OWG

n+o ax orry
r.ro
125
126
8
d
8
0
Y+�suN��dtzt�
�m7i�r��wr�
0
�h-•f r9
cwr uec
1
e I
J
r.ro
125
126
8
d
8
0
Y+�suN��dtzt�
�m7i�r��wr�
0
�h-•f r9
cwr uec
e I
J
Nod-
M»rr� scar
W
x'= r°Sg88rGyir �
fo- ss
Sri
Y+�suN��dtzt�
�m7i�r��wr�
oiarw
90F1:
�h-•f r9
J
W
N
H
2
0
-
Z
.
�
Z
J
0
a
c�
>+
—
Z
H
W
J
z
L6
'd
in cc
W
a�
�=Z
Z
Z
ul Qa
o0
cc
L
_I+
H
Vi
V
9
Z
a
°C
Z
W
Lu
0
LJ0
cc
a
W
0
W
W
cc
lsix
tia
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST.. SUITE A
KINSTON, NC .28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]
FIRM LIC.
if P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor&melrixe°st.net
JRw rr.
6/20/2014 1" '1-30'
2016 rn
2G160051
uewaw sR>zrNcs as auILr.owc

r,zs�
r30
G q
w 4
1C lA Al lei
E551py�T
?p��.SE
we ria
r/�.
� �
_
N
y■��l■■■■MEMO
�q�lkllWl�l���
ME
■■■■■■■■■■■NEEM■i
OMEN
SEEN
so
.
C■■■■■■■■■■■��■■��ra�._
........■■..
■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■.....■■.....■■■�'■■�
ME= ©
.
.■■■
r
■
^ !Jt■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
■■■■■■■t■■■■t■■■■.■■I
....MEMO■'■■■...
J
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■::■■■:■�■■■iiC:'■ii:
135
■::■■■ii■■■■■.■■■
■■■I
1C lA Al lei
E551py�T
?p��.SE
we ria
r/�.
� �
_
N
�I
�q�lkllWl�l���
v[e1 n.
10 OF f4
o
+
D
G
J
=I
135
W
r.ro
N
Z
175
0
120
Z
�
J
�
rls
x
a
w
�
Lu N
Mla
a
Z
J 116
Q
Z
0
ngo�u� scvr
+•_ry
Lu
44 z
Z
Z
Z
ISFfCY. met
Q
1C lA Al lei
E551py�T
?p��.SE
we ria
r/�.
� �
_
N
�I
�q�lkllWl�l���
v[e1 n.
10 OF f4
J
=I
W
(0
N
Z
0
Z
J
�
Z
a
Lu N
�
Lu N
Mla
a
Z
J 116
Q
Z
0
Lu
44 z
Z
Z
Z
uj
CC
Q
~�
mad
h,
U)
z
m
Q
Z
W
_
W
0
0
0
in
MD
cca
0
W
0
N
W
cc
F..3 � 1
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST. SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC.
# P-022 i
EMAIL: surveypr*metrixenst.net
piw
201 6T •0.
?�160QrJl
IAEA>?MEAD NA
OW SPRINGS AS BNLT.pWG

F25
rr.1
115
Ila
rv5
ue E ZS 15 6
N
R
pN
C
120
115
s¢ y
– rc sEw� r. –
110
J7
o
ao
11 OF i<
�*zcwne scar
4 st y
,awx-.u. stir
w
``� S H ��•". Aro%�yy
s¢ y
– rc sEw� r. –
C J7
J7
11 OF i<
4 st y
—
W
N
F
2
H
D
Z
Ci
p
Z
�
�
�
H
R
N
Q
{
a
C�
z
cc
W
mL
wz
W
a
aJ
Z
Z
Z
L
Q
cc
0
H H
N
Z
=
a
2
W
_
W
0
0
ci
a
cc
<
W
H
W
cc
1::.t
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
gas N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
KINSTON, NC 28501
A
TEL [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC. # P-0221
EMAIL: survey"mctrxeast.net
.RW
6%20/2015 Im .
30'
r n
2001516 0051
MEAD Mme[
YEa00w SPRINGS AS BUILT.OWG

a
f25
12D
!i5
I o
705
1
P} RESTL7RAilON' t�� ,_-
.. f5 FA 60+5S 10 77*LV) '� '^-�.�L ' _ ;•" ,• ,I i�.`
�� - 5 � . WF$ • r .
b' .
�M1M1
4 4 R gIM
120
zxy
710
x cn
xaaawrr, scu.[
o r
>lxnae scree
� u��V51VlAillllylll!!
,� 4N GRRp l/ji
w^"^r +o
S12
5� L4712
? Z
"'17felRilIwP P s�
12 0F,4
W
H
N
Z
H
0
�
2
■
�
_
0
■
Z
'+
2
c�
F J
AIL
Z
0
too
0.
LLI
zto
Z
Z
p
p
N r5C
L
v
>
Z
a
Z
W0
0
0
a
M)
�
a
W
0
H
W
cc
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
905 N. OOEEN ST., SUITE A
KINSTON. NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC. j P-0721
EMAIL: sur yor®molrrxsast.net
,Rw
6%20/2019
w,aiccr xa
2 01 5 01751
pa"wC
lAEA90W SPRINGS AS 6111LT.QWG

REACH Sf.3
I � „ wvESER1.ArIov
' (SrA 9+89 r0 14+23)
�s'. '.,4;,,;,•, ,•.,. ,,;,, . ; � fir/
REACH S12PRESERVAMN
�q �•, ROACH S 7 f _ ,� ��•. � — •, � . - „q5
Pi
7-
rQR "ON xs-1a� _ ' •`' �
• (SrA &P+.55 TP 71+60J .•� '•,!, --' / E} i
��I�/.`•1'•; �/�'.' ,,�.�:� iii I-•:�` ',;f. - � . >'
� � v
g $ 720
11P
Ila
tas
POO
90 60
i
luruarrx sone
f•.m•
wxrfae saes
r• . s
�1l ��ZH1CAyR'p�Iq��
�=O r�F�E831py�y �
7•
�4
oR.r.G ra
S13
se►,t r � __
�y�
13 O�fa
MITA f9
J
W
coi
I
z
0
z
.
Q
0
C4
J
$
a
LU
0
'
Ic J_
j
�
Z
Ja
Z
0
CL
mz
W
Z
Z
Z
L
W r
0
0
oc
a
z
a I
W
W
0
0
0
0
cc
14
=1
W
0!�
Yr
W
cc
Eusl
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
406 N. QUEEN ST, SUITE
KRVSTOA1, NC 28501
A
TEC: 252-522--2500
FAX; 252-522•-4747
FIRM 1JC.
j P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor®me[rixeosl.net
.I Wer
8/20/2019 30'
mntcr no
201B005i
MCAD wx[
ftEAOQW SPRINGS AS Bl11LT.OWG

6
ti
155
150
145
740
135
_----------
WH
_-wx
ry x5-09 g RCACN see' - - - - - -
•r I Pf RESMRATON
w1sa, pm KN v urlm ,aaenoes/,N, I 7 {SrA 24+50 70 36+26J
oa rerr, >'c asv 1
rQ1m cRosSNc
-
__ -__ . _ _ _
------------
RE4CH $5
+TS+SQ
ti
PI P2 Rt5rORAT7DN •" "' _-_-_ -_ _ _-. as-�.av REAC1+ S6AP? PCSTORATfON
-� STA 0+76 TO 3+67 {STA 1 7+00 TO 24H50)
------------
--------------
8
a
f
v a
155
150
T45
14{1
135
�,1PL5441c11�lIy1jN
t : ry R�2llr4
- _¢ °
R.I �'
snEr 1
44 OF 14
3'jh., IW Lp„
�.�
J
W
2
W
4
Z
10
'
�
a
c�
�i +
J
� 16
and
�cd
aZ
Z
Z
Z
Win°
°C0
CL
U)
Ld a
?
Z
W
=
W0
0
0
o
M)
W
�
0
U)
W
cc
r• ,,{4r
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN S7.. SURE A
1f1NSTON, NC 28501
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
F7RM LIC.
# P-0227
EMAIL;
surveyorVmetrlkee0.net
AW �r
6/20/2019
2D 0051
MEADO 5W PR4NCS AS BUILT -SWC

- MEADOW SPRING ASBUILT REDLINES
kadeig� _ SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA
-
NEUSE RIVER BASIN: HUC 03020201
JULY 2019
S"th k
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
eFi�eie ; 302 JEFFERSON ST, SUITE 110
sP Goldsbor RALEIGH, NC 27605
❑u PROJECT LOCATION
# ---- .. I - . ----.Arm±nc-
NTS
SITE MAP
NTS
Sheet 1-15t Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
--
COVER
51
REACH 51
52
REACH 52
53
REACH 52 * 56
54
REACH 56
55
REACH 56
56
REACH 56
57
REACH 56
58
REACH 56
59
REACH 56 * 57
510
REACH 57
51 1
REACH 57
512
REACH 57
513
REACH 59
514
REACH 59 * 51 1
515
REACH 51 1
51 6
REACH 51 1 * 51 2
517
REACH 5 12
518
REACH 55
519
REACH 513
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27805
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax [phone]
—.re.—
SEAL
w
a m
0
o ,
0
U
0
u,
o
W
0
W
o
W
of
W
W o
� lL
Q LL
PROJECT NUMBER:----
PROJECT MANAGER:
#####
DESIGNED:
#####
DRAWN:
#####
CHECKED:
#####
SHEET NUMBER:

LCE LCE
REACH S1
/ ENHANCEMENTII
/ (STA 03+50 TO 06+00)
/ O
- -
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
1 /
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
1p
W
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
\' i X90
ot-7
175—_—T��—
J
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
J �
a
EXISTING WETLAND
z
--�__
�.
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— — — — BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
\
w
m Z
fn
LCE LCE
REACH S1
/ ENHANCEMENTII
/ (STA 03+50 TO 06+00)
/ O
- -
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
o
W
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
---� —170.
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
U
� 3�7
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
o
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
J �
a
EXISTING WETLAND
z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— — — — BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
----X
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
a
PROPOSED FILL AREA
o
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
LU
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
J �
a
LOG GRADE CONTROL
z
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
� Q
W
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
N
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAzn
DRAWING NUMBER:
S1IL
� o
O
J n
a
z
O
w
O [[
O �
w LL W
O W W
y
co)
U
a
o
cn z
LU
z 0
o
J �
a
z
LU U
a
� Q
W
N
J_ �
a'
U
a
o
cn z
LU
z 0
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J_ �
a'
O z
¢ 2
� 0
w
m Z
fn
w
o
¢ o
Z Z
W
� L w
� 0
�
¢ y O
d
Z
O
¢ � >
O
F O
�
�
0 �
w
cc) LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Z oOm
O
IX
¢ate

NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
/ LC EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —50 - — -
( LCE , / E /
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR - - - - - - - - - -
i I\ / �yE / PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
- _ ) LCE \V PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
x 170 X,X—X� \ �� VP -2 \b / '� ' EXISTING WETLAND
/� EXISTING TOP OF BANK ----TB
'—
XIX—X \ \�� EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK - BE
/ --_ REACH S2 —y��X X—X—X=X—X—X—.X PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
REACH S1 l ENHANCEMENT I CHANNEL ENHANCEMENT II (STA 06+00 TO 11+00) d''t'i _ _ /
(STA 03+50 TO 06+00) 163 EXISTING FENCELINE — — — — x
EXISTING TREELIKE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK _---------_
rlml= LIMITS OF PROPOSED
1L �--_ ---- -������VAV� - _ _ W CONSERVATION EASEMENT
_\� I —��-�_ co PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
r ` \
PROPOSED FILL AREA
xs-area ���-%��-��-�•%�00
6g1619 \\�_ \� - �� DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
VP -1 \ \k \ \ I BRUSH TOE
331 \ X/�/J� `� DOUBLE LOG DROP
331 -----_ -
f
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAco
DRAWING NUMBER:
S2
w
a
0 0
cn z
a
i
z
0
w
o
¢
O �
LL
zp
w
W
p Z
W i
Y O
v� ¢
N
� ¢
¢ oW
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
zp
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J �
a'
O z
¢ 2
Z
(N
w w
j�
zz
a
w
o w
�
d
cq
Z
O
F O �
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ N
3
WOZJ
a
�
zoom
O
a
¢ate

V /
/ + 0
vG
El
LCE,
X— //�'�
XXX�XX—X--_/��//
2--
9 —— —161-- _REACH S2.753
VCA / ENHANCEMENTI
OPV x 160 a L (STA 06+00 TO 11+00) / —77 T�_
ul
--.153
XS-O,44RRP 1
\ / 111 —81------ i
REACH SEA ti
P1 RESTORATION
\ V cq� V,41/��� — �� ��> �\ v (STA 11+00 TO 24+50)
301
� —WL
\ x 301/
1\\ - /
S2=5a'
S6A=z0'
52=1.8' 52=09'
S6A=22' S6A=13'
BANKFULL STAGE
52=09'
S6A =1 1'
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
52=54'
S6A=] 0'
52=1.8 52=18' 52=1.8'
'A A=�,' S,A=I 6' AIA =I I'
BANKFULL STAGE
3
S6A6A=1 3'
52=02'
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION S6A=03
STRAIGHT REACH
FA 4
- 7n
m
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
S2- 4
S6A=z0'
w
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN ,AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
0 0
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR — — —
— — — — — — —
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
o z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— — — — BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
z
CHANNEL
�
EXISTING FENCELINE
----X
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
a
PROPOSED FILL AREA
0 0
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
O �
w
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
W
LOG GRADE CONTROL
o z
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
v�
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
N
z
BRUSH BED SILL
�
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCA
DRAWING NUMBER:
S3
IL
a O1
a
0 0
Wz
a
z
O
w
O �
w
Zo
w
W
o z
w >
Y O
a
v�
N
z
F_U
J
�
U
a
o
Wz
Zo
0
J �
w a
z�
N
z
F_U
J
�
0cr
� O
U
z w
m z
U' z
Z
=
U
�
$ F w
U
w
O
F O
�
°
0 �
O w
U LL
2 W p
2
Z
w
F-
W
(0
Z
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

NOTES:
T 0, 1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
22' 13' 2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
BANKFULL STAGE ENDOFEACH GALLO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
CL AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
].0 6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
22' 2.6' 22' SECTIONS.
BANKFULL STAGE ]. IN- STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PRO JECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
13
' CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES FOR BREACH.
1. INSTALL ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON ESC SH EETS.
/ I 1 03 2. UTILIZE A PUMP OR SIPHON TO COMPLETELY DRAIN THE EXISTING POND. DO NOT DRAIN
`C I I 1 CL THE POND BY BREACHING THE DAM. DO NOT ALLOWDEWATERING RATE TO LOWER LAKE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION MORE THAN 1 FOOT PER DAV.
STRAIGHT REACH 3. BEGIN PROPOSED DAM REMOVAL. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM FREEBOARD OF 3.0 FEET UNTIL
POND IS COMPLETELY DRAINED. NO GRADING MAY OCCUR UNTIL DRAINING IS COMPLETE.
i�// ' �� r5 ���.n� "�i"�--? / �•419� �� `� n\\\� \\ I 4. MAINTAIN EXISTING FLOW PATTERN AROUND THE POND UNTIL POND BED GRADING AND
/� "sem_ j y` _ QRF�pM,s9p• �\ �� I / \��� \ Q ^� T 0 STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE.
54 / Esq er V1 a vIA /
42' 12 S. COMPLETE PROPOSED GRADING AND ROUTE MAIN CHANNEL THROUGH THE STABILIZED
153— /�'�\\ \�1 I I / L\\ \`\ ,\iP ND
CONDITION TOM. ALL CHNNEL GRADING SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN ADEWATERED
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAor co o
DRAWING NUMBER:
S4
IL
a O1
a
LEGEND
� o
F N
cn z
O
J n
a
LU -::i
AS -BUILT INSTREAM STRUCTURE
[[
O �
LL
Z
w
W
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION 0
W W
O
y �
6
� Q
N
ABU ILT CHANNEL LIMITS
O z
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —
—50 — —
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
zz
a
w
o w
��
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
0'
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
D
F O
o
O
0 �
EXISTING WETLAND
o �
U LL
� W 2
a� O
Z
w
�
¢
N
BANKFULL STAGE
(0
Z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
TB
3
WOZJ
a
�
Z pOfD
O
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— — — — BE
¢ate
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
16
EXISTING
X
L
EXISTING LIFELINE
EXISTING LIFELINE
PROP OSED TOP OF BANK -----------
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
CONS ER ATION PRSNEASEMOSEo
LIMITSENT
LCE
SECTION
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J -HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAor co o
DRAWING NUMBER:
S4
IL
a O1
a
� o
F N
cn z
O
J n
a
LU -::i
Z
O
U
O
[[
O �
LL
Z
w
W
z
W W
O
y �
6
� Q
N
J �
U
a
o
cn z
LU -::i
Z
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J �
O z
z
�
wow ¢W
U ¢
zz
a
w
o w
��
�
d
Z
O
D
F O
o
O
0 �
o �
U LL
� W 2
a� O
Z
w
�
¢
N
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Z pOfD
O
IX
¢ate

1 0'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
I
1 1'
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
1 0'
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
1
LEGEND
U
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
o
STRAIGHT REACH
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
W J
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION •
�
zp
FC
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
z
42 12
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50— — —
BANKFULL STAGE
¢ WQ
�
WQ O
W
O ¢ 2
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
w
co z
c')w
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
zz
a
w
o w
Z)
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EL
c
Z
16
EXISTING WETLAND
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
EXI STING TOP OF BANK
----TB
¢
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
BE
WOZJ
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
�
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
CHANNEL
¢ate
EXISTING FENCELINE
X
1 0'
EXISTING TREELIKE
.
z
z
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK – —
— — — — — — — — –
BANKFULL STAGE
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
16
LPROPOSED
FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
41GL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
V
SECTION
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAzn
DRAWING NUMBER:
S5IL
a O1
� o
F N
a
O W
U
O [[
O �
w W W
O � W
y (n
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
zp
J or
w a
z
U
W
W
N
¢ WQ
�
WQ O
W
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
zp
J or
w a
z
U
�
N
J F_z
a'
O ¢ 2
w
co z
c')w
zz
a
w
o w
Z)
EL
c
Z
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
2 W 2
Z
w
¢
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
zoom
O
a
¢ate

jIl
1 REACH SS
\ P1/P2 RESTORATION
(STA 00+76 TO 03+07)
XS -24L\
t
REACH SIB
a P1 RESTORATION
(STA 24+60 TO 36+26)
n
142
L
��F
XS-09110LP 10
N
\ Z U1
- J
2 /
/
REMOVE EXISTING
BERM
S6A=z0'
S6B=84'
S6A=22' S6A=13'
S6B =2.8' S6B=14'
BANKFULL STAGE
S6A=1 1'
S6B=1 4'
_/
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
S6A=70'
SSE =84'
S6A=22' S6A=2.6' S6A=22'
S6B=2.8' SSE =2.8SSB =2.8'
r BANKFULL STAGE r
SIA- 1 3'
S,B=1 6'
S6A=03'
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION SB 04
STRAIGHT REACH
�
IA_7o
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
S6A= 7 0�
SSB=84'
S6A =1 6'
ssB=zo'
L
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWASTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN ,AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
REACH S6A
�
P1 RESTORATION
(STA 11+00 TO 24+60)
—60 — — —
4 `
J
REMOVE EXISTING
BERM
REACH SIB
a P1 RESTORATION
(STA 24+60 TO 36+26)
n
142
L
��F
XS-09110LP 10
N
\ Z U1
- J
2 /
/
REMOVE EXISTING
BERM
S6A=z0'
S6B=84'
S6A=22' S6A=13'
S6B =2.8' S6B=14'
BANKFULL STAGE
S6A=1 1'
S6B=1 4'
_/
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
S6A=70'
SSE =84'
S6A=22' S6A=2.6' S6A=22'
S6B=2.8' SSE =2.8SSB =2.8'
r BANKFULL STAGE r
SIA- 1 3'
S,B=1 6'
S6A=03'
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION SB 04
STRAIGHT REACH
�
IA_7o
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
S6A= 7 0�
SSB=84'
S6A =1 6'
ssB=zo'
L
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWASTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN ,AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
� o
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—60 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
o �
LL
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— — — — BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
X
EXISTING TREELIKE
w
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
�
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
zz
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
o w
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
EL
cq
Z
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
O
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
pO
� �
LOG TOE PROTECTION
ow
U LL
LOG SILL
w
LOG GRADE CONTROL
F-
W
LOG VANE
\ to I �
¢ to
LOG THOOK
3
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
a
BRUSH BED SILL
Zoom
O
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCA
HALF SCALEco
DRAWING NUMBER:
S6
IL
a O1
a
� o
W Z
O
o_
z
O
(U/1
o �
LL
Zo
w
W
W W
O
y �
� Q
N
J �
�
U
a
o
W Z
Zo
0
J �
a
LU U
z
�
N
J �
�
� z
s
w
z
�
w
j�
zz
a
w
o w
�
EL
cq
Z
O
F O
�
pO
� �
ow
U LL
2 W 2
Z
w
F-
W
(0
Z
\ to I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
IX
¢ate

84
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 4'
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
a 4'
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
1 LEGEND
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
STRAIGHT REACH AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION •
a'
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
1 4 EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —$0 — — —
BANKFULL STAGE EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
20 EXISTING WETLAND
EXI STING TOP OFBA NK ----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE X
84
EXISTING TREELIKE .
14
sv
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK - — — — — — — — — — -
BANKFULL STAGE LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
2 0L_ \ V '
PROPOSED FILL AREA
I
CL DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS 41
SECTION
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCA. = HALF SCALE
DRAWING NUMBER:
IL
a O1
a
� o
F N
cn z
a
LU J
O
w
O
[[
O
W
Z p
w
W
z
W W
'
O
y
6
L W
W
N
J F_
a'
DRAWING NUMBER:
U
a
o
cn z
I
LU J
Z p
o
J cr
a
z
LU U
cr
N
J F_
a'
O z
¢ 2
w
co z
w
j�
Zz
a
LU
o w
cr p
crN
a
d
cn
Z
O
¢ >
F O
pO
0 cn
ow -
LU 2
w
U LL
a�O
Z
F
N
F-
WZ
0
—66 1
Q to
3
W°Z
a
Z coo
O OM2
a
DRAWING NUMBER:

84
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 4'
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
a 4'
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAco cr In
DRAWING NUMBER:
S8
1
LEGEND
a
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
cn z
a
STRAIGHT REACH
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
[[
O �
W
Z
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION •
W
84
W W
O
W
N
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
W O
O z
¢ 2
1 4
w
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—$0 — — —
w
j�
zz
BANKFULL STAGE
o w
�
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
d
cq
Z
O
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
2w 2
ic 20
Z
w
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
20
EXISTING WETLAND
EXI STING TOP OF BANK
----TB
�
zoom
O
IX
¢ate
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
X
84
EXISTING TREELIKE
.
14
sv
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK - —
— — — — — — — — -
BANKFULL STAGE
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
2 0'
LPROPOSED
FILL AREA
GL
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
41
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAco cr In
DRAWING NUMBER:
S8
IL
a O1
a
� o
F N
cn z
a
W J
O
U
O
[[
O �
W
Z
w
W
z
W W
O
W
N
¢ W
W O
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
Z
o
J �
a
z
W U
�
N
J �
a'
O z
¢ 2
w
z
CT:
w
j�
zz
a
w
o w
�
d
cq
Z
O
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
2w 2
ic 20
Z
w
¢
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
Z.
a
�
zoom
O
IX
¢ate

TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
STRAIGHT REACH
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —$0 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE X
EXISTING TREELIKE .
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE V
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULLSCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2"= FULL SCALE
1.HALF SCAUE
zn
DRAWING NUMBER:
S9IL
a O1
� o
O
J n
a
O
U
O [[
O �
LL W
O
(n
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
zp
J or
w a
z
W
y
W
� W
W
N
z
W
W O
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
zp
J or
w a
z
U
�
N
z
J For _n
�
� O
U
z w
[0 z
U' z
Z
=
U
�
$ F w
U
w
O
F O
�
°
0 �
O w
U LL
� W 2
ap
Z
w
F
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
zoom
O
a
¢ate

NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
V \
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
v 0 \
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
/ A�A100yp ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
GRADE &MAT /\
CHANNEL BANKS I EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —50 — —
(MAX SLOPE 2:1) i� I EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR ----------
b
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
-� -131--_, 00
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
_ -130 �OYF2/ / / %� EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK ----TB
REACH S7 EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK ----BB
_ _I�p-r�_-__- ENHANCEMENT
129 /�� O \ �( (STA 38+80 TO 48+70 &
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
STA 49+40 TO 53+80)
CHANNEL
GRADE POINT BAR EXISTING ---
- x
(MAX SLOPE 3EXISTING FENceuNE
EXISTING TREELIKE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
\ GRADE POINT BAR
(MAX SLOPE 3:1)LIMITS OF
�
GRADE POINT BAR CONSERVATION EASEMENTD
(MAX SLOPE 3:1).- p
k PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
LU
Z rn / \ W
XS-15LP g J PROPOSED FILL AREA
�Oo vv a� A I t�j
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
30-1
\ GRADE POINT BAR
S-15RP DOUBLE LOG DROP
3�1 ,�O ^► (MAX SLOPE' i� � _j�.��/ �s - �
J OLS �V, �1�� \ \ l
LOG TOE PROTECTION
\,(00♦l
v LOG SILL
/ LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
\ IV �!y LOG .CROOK
/ ♦ � .
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAo
DRAWING NUMBER:
S10
IL
a
� o
F �
W
O
a
J
z
0
w
o
¢
O �
LL
Zp
o
W
p Z
W i
Y O
v� ¢
N
J �
�
U
a
o
W
�
J
Zp
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J �
�
� z
I
m
z
�
wow ¢W
U ¢
zz
a
w
o w
��
�
0_
cq
Z
O
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
� W 2
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
-66 I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

r1l
A-----100YR' �Ipp
P
LCE LCE
LCE GRADE POINT (MAX SLOPE 3AR
'---" LCE �
1W=113.5 _
�9T �- $
nil
so
X/O
(
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
� o
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
PROPOSED RIFFLE
/ GRADE CONTROL
GRADE POINT BAR
(MAX SLOPE 3:1)
r
/ PROPOSED RIFFLE
_ 125 wv=JrgADE CONTJC �
_ 36
'i RC
lNv.=11a1P PO3�o LF OF
AIA=114.11
,j''- "P lN✓.=113.53' r/
_ — 12, _ \,
REACH S7 INV.=113.55'
/ 1W=114.11"�
r
ENHANCEMENTI m
(STA 38+80 TO 48+70 & m
STA 49+40 TO 53+80)
!-1W=114.11"
LC
3oi 301
OO"
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
� o
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
O �
w
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
�
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
X
EXISTING TREELIKE
w
PROPO SEDTOP O FBANK-----------
�
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
zz
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
UE
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
0_
Z
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
O
¢ � >
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
0
0 �
LOG TOE PROTECTION
O w-
U LL
LOG SILL
w
LOG GRADE CONTROL
F
W
LOG VANE
� Uj I �
¢ to
LOG THOOK
3
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
a
BRUSH BED SILL
Zoom
O
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCACE
DRAWING NUMBER:
S11
IL
a O1
a
� o
(n Z
O
J n
a
LU
z
O
w
O �
w
Zco 0
w
W
�
w W
O
y �
6
� w
w
N
J �
a'
U
a
o
(n Z
�
LU
Zco 0
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J �
a'
O z
¢ 2
w
z
�
w
j�
zz
a
w
o w
�
0_
Z
O
¢ � >
O
F O
�
0
0 �
O w-
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
w Qz�
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
331 301 331 EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
125-
0 GRADE POINT BAR _ EmsTIKC TOP OF BANK
+ ----TB
2� 349 (MAX SLOPE 3:1) REACH S7
+ 123.49' EX ISTING BOTTOM OF BANK ----BB
v1 ENHANCEMENT GRADE POINT BAR
Ltl —.. — 12a — _ _ (STA 38+80 TO 48+70 & � i M PROPOSED CENTERLINE of
STA 49+40 TO 53+80) (MAX SLOPE 3:1) 4.bd i _
'unJ'' _ CHANNEL
2 �l xs-Z_� ---
EXISTING FENceuNE — x
GRADE POINT BAR S } aK i i S� 2 EXISTING TREELIKE
w i
�1 O �.
(MAX SLOPE 3:1) F-
<<
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK-----------
'���;
CONSERVATION OF EDD
EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
_—_ --- �122�
DIFFUSE FLowsTRucruRE
— 123 —
BRUSH TOE
1 4 ,^. GRADE POINT BAR
' \ (MAX SLOPE 3:1)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
--- ice
LCE LCE
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
� LOG VANE �
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SGAUEco
DRAWING NUMBER:
S12IL
a O1
� o
F �
O
a
Z
O
w
i o ¢
O �
w LL W
,oZW-
U
a
o
W
�
J
Z
o
J �
a
>
Y O
v� ¢
N
J �
�
U
a
o
W
�
J
Z
o
J �
a
LU U
z
�
N
J �
�
� z
I
W
z
�
W
j�
Zz
a
w
o w
�
0_
cq
Z
O
F O
�
pO
� �
ow
U LL
� W 2
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAo
DRAWING NUMBER:
S13
IL
a O1
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
� o
F N
Wz
'/�1
30-1
301
O
a
i
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTINGCONTOUR MAJOR —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR --------
¢
O �
W
—50— — —
--
33l
W_
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
W i
30l
� ¢
W ¢
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
W
� ¢
W O
¢ W
'a
m
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
z
�
REACH S9
zz
a
w
o w
��
----TB
ENHANCEMENTIII \�---.tty �� ,
(STA 53+80 TO 60+55)' i �n1r`�' —
Il
�
Z
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE of
CHANNEL
----BB
'
F O
�
pO
� �
ow
U LL
2 W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
--121------- _ q ,'
(7
Z
� y I �
¢ to
EXISTING FE FELINE
---— X
a
�
Zoom
O
a
EXISTING TREELIKE
¢ate
ZPROPOSED
TOP OF BANK �����������
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
a
��
�i
41
' �/ a
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
\
`� '51 4 0' i ,
i
PROPOSED FILL AREA
/ 'A-- \�
\\ ' i i
i (,
}'�4 4 4 4�
4
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
1 \ 1
ill
I \ i , ,
i
BRUSH TOE
q
DOUBLE LOG DROP
'
, , , ,
LOG TOE PROTECTION
' ' , �E'
L
�,
LOG SILL
z" �+ E
�\i,
' LCE ,
`�
,
LOG GRADE CONTROL
i
/ ,
LCE I
,
'
LOG VANE
, , /�6jM ,
,
Loc
'
/ ,
.CROOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAo
DRAWING NUMBER:
S13
IL
a O1
� o
F N
Wz
O
a
i
z
O
w
o
¢
O �
W
Z
w
W_
p Z
W i
y O
� ¢
W ¢
N
W
� ¢
W O
¢ W
U
o
Wz
-::i
Z
o
J �
a
z
W U
�
N
J �
�
O z
¢ x
m
z
�
wow ¢w
U ¢
zz
a
w
o w
��
�
Il
�
Z
O
F O
�
pO
� �
ow
U LL
2 W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F
W
(7
Z
� y I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

SCE
CE
9 6'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 6'
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
11
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
STRAIGHT REACH
9 6'
18' 16
BANKFULL STAGE
2 2'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
9 6'
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION
o
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
�
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
��--124-\
\REACH S9
EXISTING WETLAND
ENHANCEMENT III
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
(STA 53+80 TO 60+55) ,
SCE
CE
9 6'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 6'
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
11
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
STRAIGHT REACH
9 6'
18' 16
BANKFULL STAGE
2 2'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
9 6'
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
ASBUILT CROSS SECTION
o
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
�
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
J �
w a
EXISTING WETLAND
z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
z
CHANNEL
r
EXISTING FENCELINE
X
EXISTING TREELIKE
�.
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
a7
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
U
o
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
=
PROPOSED FILL AREA
cr O
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
o
BRUSH TOE
or
DOUBLE LOG DROP
Z
LOG TOE PROTECTION
F O
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
0 �
LOG VANE
w o
U LL
LOG THOOK
w
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
F-
W
BRUSH BED SILL
� Uj I �
¢ to
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAIn
DRAWING NUMBER:
S14IL
a O1
� o
a
O
w
O �
w LL W
y � W
U
a
o
(n Z
�
W J
�
Z
o
J �
w a
z
U
6
Q
N
z
J �
or
r
U
a
o
(n Z
�
W J
�
Z
o
J �
w a
z
U
�
N
z
J �
or
r
O
R.
� O
�
w
co Z
a7
w
�
U
o
O Z
=
� w
cr O
o
or
Z
F O
pO
9
0 �
w o
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
Zoom
O
IX
a
¢ate

9 6'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 6'
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
11
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
0 4'
LEGEND
z 3�1 TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
STRAIGHT REACH AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
3� AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
9 6'
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
1 6 EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR — —50 - — -
REACH S11
P1 RESTORATION - /�G_ _ BANKFULL STAGE EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
(STA 60+55 TO 71+00) WLU FILL EXISTING CHANNEL _ PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
WLB- PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
• J r Ngo '-�\----------- ----- 22'
EXISTING WETLAND
• /♦ r �'�'d.� -\ _�,L�� `-=` --------- i --- TINGSTINGTOP OF BANK ----TB
• / - � � EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK - BE
•/ / ��_� �� -- 115 •� _ -- `--- CL
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
• / • _ _ --- ,� --'
CHANNEL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
EXISTING FEKceuKE x
96
•%a_� _r • \ •-- /� EXISTING TREELIKE
/� • \�i • r ` Xs -SLP PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
\ 8 r
• • //J� !`l�`� ~_BANKFULL STAGE CONSERVATION EASEMENT"
6 • • /� lM o - �-' . , PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
• iL _ _ �y XS-19RP-
/�✓fr PROPOSED FILL AREA
ORP
Z • • �/ / --- _- A `m\ \V ` A w GL DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE41
\` TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
o \ FILL EXISTING CHANNEL r \\� V)
'1 \ �\\ = SECTION
BRUSH TOE
/[/ // / /� / X121' vv � �� V A AV Avv �v�v • �
DOUBLE LOG DROP
ca—LOG
f�,�
-Z.➢'- "G_.1' LOG TOE PROTECTION
6 q
LOG SILL
\
124 � `\ / ` b \ \ \ ` \ LOG GRADE CONTROL
/ / \
Loc VANE �
LOG .CROOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCA
DRAWING NUMBER:
S15
IL
a O1
� o
F N
W Z
a
i
Z
O
wO
o
LL �
Z0
w
W
p Z
W i
Y O
v�
N
or
U
o
W Z
Z0
o
J or
w
U
z
�
N
or
0.
s
� O
T
w
m z
U
w
Z Z
Z)
W
o w
L
cr
d
c/)
Z
O
F O �
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ N
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

9 6'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
1 6'
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
11
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
--3u
LEGEND
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
/'v,/•e STRAIGHT REACH
//• (��'---- _ � �� • �� V
AS -BUILT CROSS secnoN • �
+ \
+\ • \ • ��), +\ \ 9.6 AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
/ /) \ + + • + \ \ 5.8 16_ EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
/+ / • • • + i @� BANKFULL STAGE
— / ; . • . + J\ + \ \ PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
f / • + + \ \ \ PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
• + \ `
• + (r \. • \ z@� 22 EXISTING WETLAND
REMOVE EXISTING
_ _ _ _ _ _
+ + \ + 172 PIPE AND•DISPOSE �\ ExISTING TOP OF BANK ----TB
• • \ + + I + OP OFFSITE. l\
+ + \ I • �\ + \ \ EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK ----BB
+ + + �V A • y• I VP -11 PRO POSED CENTERLINE OF
Q O'q • XS_27�p- — �� ` + \ \ CHANNEL
8 "� TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
4 i„
.¢� A EXISTING FENceuNE x
\, •\\ �_ .6 sa
96 EXISTING TREELIKE
XS_22� 1
+
/ \� • PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
LIMITS OF PRO
BANKFULL STAGE POSED
+ • / \ \� / C'
+ / • /� - _ - + _®+ / + t�'� / / / ��/� CONSERVATION EASEMENTLCE
. C
\` + REACH S l + XS -2.. _ - L + + / /� ,, ``,x PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
+ P1 RESTORATPN + I + XS-22RP 22
• + + STA 6055TO71+00) 1A I • _ _ + / /ij/ /� PROPOSED FILL AREA
(L DIFFusEFLowsTRucruRE41
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
11111 I III SECTION
FILL EXISTINGC ANNEL . / ^ REACH S12 / / , / I 1 1 1 \\11�\\\ BRUSH TOE
/ PRESERVATION
�OTA 71+00TO74+80)
DOUBLE Loc DROP
-
// // / \`t \ �I'1I11� LOGTOEPROTECTION
\
Loc SILL
LCELOG GRADE CONTROL
' LCE LCE LCE LOG VANE
LOG .CROOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAco
DRAWING NUMBER:
S16
R'j
IL
� o
W Z
O
a
z
O
w
o
¢
O �
LL
Zoor0
w
W
p Z
W i
Y O
v� ¢
N
z
J
NF_
R'j
U
o
W Z
Zoor0
J
w a
z
U
�
N
z
J
NF_
0or
� O
U
w
m z
w
r
cn
¢¢
U ¢o
Z �
1:�
F w
� O
o
EL U
z
w
CCU
� o
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ N
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

1
SvLf^\
/ r
r
\ STA 7ci
\ \ \
/
■
X05
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
� o
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
O �
LL
i
I
//
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
p Z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
� o
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
O �
LL
I
//
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
p Z
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOVNMSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANYWAY EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL ON DWG D8) ON
A MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
a
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
� o
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
O �
LL
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
W
EXISTING WETLAND
p Z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
N
CHANNEL
EXISTING FE FELINE
X
EXISTING TREELIKE
.
PROPOSEDTOP OF BANK -----------
(�
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
Z �
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
- w
F
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
�
PROPOSED FILL AREA
ap
cq U
Z
DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
~� o
¢ � >
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
pO
0 �
LOG TOE PROTECTION
ow
U LL
LOG SILL
w
LOG GRADE CONTROL
F
W
LOG VANE
\ N I �
¢ N
LOG THOOK
3
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
a
BRUSH BED SILL
zoom
O
FLOODPLAIN SILL
®�
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" =FULL SE
HALF SCACALUE
DRAWING NUMBER:
S17
IL
a O1
a
� o
cn z
a
W J
Z
O
w
O �
LL
Z
w
W
p Z
W i
y O
6
� Q
N
J_ �
a'
U
a
o
cn z
W J
�
Z
o
J �
a
LU U
z
�
N
J_ �
a'
O z
¢ 2
� p
a
w
m z
(�
w
¢
Z �
W
- w
F
cr
�
ap
cq U
Z
~� o
¢ � >
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
U LL
� W 2
amp
Z
w
¢
F
W
(0
Z
\ N I �
¢ N
3
WOZJ
a
�
zoom
O
IX
¢ate

4 a'
}r BANKFULL STAGE
08
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
4 a'
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAV BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL DWG D8) ON A
MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
REACH S6B LEGEND
P1 RESTORATION / _ _ _ tt TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
/
(STA za+so rG 36+26)STRAIGHT REACH
I iAS-BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
���� �� / X41 AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
29' 08EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR —50 — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR —
—
BANKFULL STAGE
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50
b J//
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
q
PROPOSED FORD / / I EXISTING WETLAND
� / /� // 1 y /
��
/ REACHSS EXISTING TOP OF BANK ----TB
v/9 P1/ P2 RESTORATION5I I ss I �// l / EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK ----BB
/ (STA 00+76 TO 03+07)...hhh
\ //� / / — ✓ / PROPOSED CENTERLINE
OF
EL
N
0+00 i^ a°/� //i �/ TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
EXISTING FENCELINE X
4.8 EXISTING TREELIKE .
_ / $ — 08
PROPoseoroP of BANK za
3 00 -----------
> � s �//� � qA �I l�
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
BANKFULL STACE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
} \ ✓ a\� / 4Y / ,y�� ep O \ �\ PROPOSED FILL AREA
LL DIFFUSE FLOWSTRUCTURE
\\
FILL CHANNEL T's `/�` �� SECTION TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
}
v �V BRUSH TOE
CC
( DOUBLE LOG DROP
\r\` vP-e
Loc TOE PROTECTIOK
ACH S6A LOG SILL
PE RESTORATION
V (STA 11+00 TO 24+50) Loc GRADE coKTROL
Loc VANE �
I
LOG LHOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL ®�
FULLSCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCAIn w
DRAWING NUMBER:
S18
ui
a
� o
W Z
O
a
i
z
O
w
o
¢
o �
LL
Z 0
w
W
p Z
W i
Y O
a
v� ¢
0C
N
J �
or
U
o
W Z
Z 0
o
J �
a
z
LU U
�
N
J �
or
� z
�z
�
ww
j�
zz
a
w
o w
�
cr
In
0_
cq
Z
O
F O
�
pO
0 �
ow
o-,
� W 2
Z
w
¢
F-
W
(0
Z
� Uj I �
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Zoom
O
a
¢ate

+ • ' A �� • /' \\� 119 \\_ I
• \` //��/' , 301
' - / /• Q 111 \ ^, // // /� // \\ I /
A< <
• .� ,. n / , ` / .� ,mss /
73
REACH S13V�T,fi
• • / I \ PRESERVATION y, i _
14+23)
(STA 916 'fO
�
_ � J
/7
i%/ I
lo, 65
A
4
T,
/1l��%q�rll�wg_
wvv
IN
v A `�ign61 V J v V All v �/ / 0 Atev v----
�- A\l\
z/�'`'//
� Vl\--Z4+80.
_ be
�/� ssi4 nkti T,se
/
56
T,
590
g
�T,\�\—l/ %' T'.flfi .S „'1a5`�\—_118--J\\\\\�✓\``\\\ \\\ T m `—T,5�/s65
rises REACH S12
PRESERVATIONT\
(STA 71+00 TO 74+80) r� AV�AAA Q� �� VAAA\o
/49
rn
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
02
I
I
I
I
m
~ I
I
I
/
/
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL DWG D8) ON A
MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
\ U
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
I I
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR — — —
— — — — — — —
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
✓' I
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
• I '
'
Y
a
frJ
J
/
I j
z
FLOODPLAIN SILL
4
T,
/1l��%q�rll�wg_
wvv
IN
v A `�ign61 V J v V All v �/ / 0 Atev v----
�- A\l\
z/�'`'//
� Vl\--Z4+80.
_ be
�/� ssi4 nkti T,se
/
56
T,
590
g
�T,\�\—l/ %' T'.flfi .S „'1a5`�\—_118--J\\\\\�✓\``\\\ \\\ T m `—T,5�/s65
rises REACH S12
PRESERVATIONT\
(STA 71+00 TO 74+80) r� AV�AAA Q� �� VAAA\o
/49
rn
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
02
I
I
I
I
m
~ I
I
I
/
/
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE STORED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILEAREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALLNOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO REMAIN.
5. UN LESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE CONSTRUCTED WOODY RIFFLE (SEE DETAIL DWG D8) ON A
MINIMUM OF 30% OF PROPOSED RIFFLE SECTIONS.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION
o
F
ASBUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 — — —
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR — — —
— — — — — — —
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
r1
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
LOG SILL
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK ----TB
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — BE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL —
EXISTING FENCELINE X
EXISTING TREELIKE
lamtaommoaaan®
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CON SERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
o
F
DIFFUSE FL OW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
W J
z
0
w
O
DOUBLE LOG DROP
J Q
LOG TOE PROTECTION
w
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
W i
v�
LOG VANE
Y
a
LOG THOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
z
FLOODPLAIN SILL
FULL SCALE: 1-30
0 30 60
2" = FULLSCALE
HALF SCA0 coUj zo
DRAWING NUMBER:
S19
w
�
o
F
(n Z
o�
a
W J
z
0
w
O
[[
O �
LL
J Q
w
W_
p Z
O
W i
v�
Y
a
m
N
z
�
(n Z
W J
�
J Q
O
a
W
� =
N
z
z
m Z
w W
(n
Z
U
�
FO
O
wazW
�=
�
F­�
W
c7
Z
¢ to
3
WOZJ
a
�
Z co
O
a
¢ate