Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0022805_Staff Report_20190703 State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
July 1,2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00022805
Attn: Poonam Giri Facility name: 215 Constitution Ct SfR
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 06/24/2019 and 06/28/2019
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: n/a and their contact information: (_) ext.
e. Driving directions: Were tweaked on RIMS
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
11. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils,depth to water table, etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5
6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or El No
If yes,attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,-explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
III.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ®Yes or❑ No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 360 gpm
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function,maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions(e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc)maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary,new development, etc.)? ®Yes or❑No
If yes, please explain: See comment 1
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable?® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0022805 Page 2 of 5
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , „ O ,
It
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O ,
11
O , „ O ,
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Pemrittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have'all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliancelenforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No ❑N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:Not likely
17. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0022805 Page 3 of 5
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ® Yes or❑ No
If yes,please explain: See comment 1
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
Permit recission See comment 1
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
Xssue
❑Deny Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional superviso :
Date:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 W00022805 Page 4 of 5
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1- The house is under construction and about 80%complete,per owner.The wastewater system, including the septic
tank, has not yet been installed.As confirmed by the county,the owner has received permission for a county
permitted low profile chamber system,which requires a minimum soil depth of 20 inches to the confining layer
and is considerably cheaper with a much smaller field footprint.The soil depth was confirmed by our soil
scientist, Gary Kreiser, on a site visit on 6/28/2019.Therefore,the state permit can be rescinded,upon
confirmation by the owner.
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0022805 Page 5 of 5
W00022805
y `
^�S�'
�_- ! � .t? i� ti >F '4 r• a �`A �q.l'�+ s,. ram•.:i°"ii' %` .. + f 4 �� ,,.
5. . 'x
v d
51,
231
`�i+.�"+iy
-`;[VO
�+ p
ul
*"5' '• P; � z a^♦ � �` � �h„r`� ,{�� -t } ����Pr a t" � tit rYs, ., � '"ti hai.♦
.,� �,• r"e ,>, d�x��'�yy,,��� Y `� N ( yh �. { "'gym t''i n'$� t "*..� - ,
`'l.x " �'+ °�'fiY+.^+`k` >*f �+ F !f y,� x �"jx �,i.q 1't^ .� �- `ram=���n �•;•l+S,�.F
�,'y*7#�f 4 K �i -t � �.�" �-"�f N'.,t,1 w^..e '. 1215<j��� ��'4"a 4"�' +:� y •^� "�.��� -
W`} ._Mt `n+' v4'p • R.C `,+iM,t'� J �a yy
�: §• ' r >`�y+x5rr.+ 1 k; " w c & � { 80910 ,y.d '� : `�
'g. !; �W
s�jt i' ,yi .�PF �ty'+ qy fy
tex.*h � s<� ft��q �' �` 4 r7x£;� �� 3' xt � $
y�
v
�` 'S �+a` -'mot'`'' , "*S +- 7F` r
-+ w„r .*}' 'r"Y?' a, w'YN`•,.x# �S�'ye'x +x f M1 W „�.+a•.lF' •,,
34ay`� 'l`'1lY 4'�J$ Yxftu p �h Ate„ 1 E- f 4 # Fh a` P} .. ♦ J �A
" 3 '�5a '`S,x§ & ,{"{ 'a'} r, ,r „4r�4' ✓ :+..g�"fvl';'' -,,,` ", .yJ .' y+*, .+�.x,L t�R '•'ti h 'p 809+06eg
.
� 1
}� =*y"u "{5e,w� + "`.r G a.' `kty `
+Zfti 4 i }�x'4 ii i
�a "nh #+q^, •" +`*`�.1+R' Lp, f ni' '4
f y,
i q s'i1 $e ki A• 4x t,+ $^�'i''',4'r'< ° , xm..: C`c. ,•. ¢r+,. 't *t •-
r +
80905 ` iA ,#3 "i^5 <
`c°t� n „4r•e' x++'��ry� i*,. 1 ,,syn. T v r 4Y �. w�^ C7
' '��' ,-., r y.1g a•;.
tiP;"
-.��a .x, :w•n .*a"t-.+x,,: `: ,k`�'•l. a ,.. . .P ,C .,.r'.,, f c$,. . _-r... +,^^+.��`'.... , e.t '. =.r.. 7 15 ,x
h3r. Service Layer Credits: Chatham County,
e w emRw, Chatham County Tax Department
�� - ❑ Afprow. 10+ I`AeS
x'+a9P!
hie ar� Whlre.,Qv,� M'µ aoiq / m1
cue —`��Fi,µ l.yl7,i4,,pak� 0 0,0125 0.025
N
apex
a i CNATHAMCOUNIY
NORTH CAR01.1AA
Date: 7/1/2019
Time: 10:10:27AM