20170995 Ver 1_Year 0 As-Built Review_20190624

Page 1
Site Information
Date: * 6/24/2019
Project Name:* Brushy Mountain
Prepared By:* Mac Haupt
Type of Site:* Bank Stream and Wetland Site
Meeting Type:* Year 0 As -Built Review
Sponsor/Provider: *
Bank Stream and Wetland Site
USACE AID:
County: *
Yadkin
NCDWR ID:
20170995
HUC and Basin:*
Yadkin Pee Dee - 03040101
Weather:
Coordinates:
Attendees
Degrees North
DWR - Mac Haupt, Erin Davis
Usace - Brian Roden -Reynolds, Todd
Tugwell, Steve
RS - Ryan Holz, Mathew Harrell
Axiom - Grant Lewis
Project Review Checklist
(provide additional detail in notes section on next page)
NCDWR Version
Degrees West

General Site Issues/Concerns:
Stream Issues/Concerns
Wetland Issues/Concerns:
Vegetation Composition or
Density
Planted Stem Vigor (due to
soil, browsing)
Invasive/Exotic Species
Beaver/Feral Hogs
(management plan)
Soil (manipulation,
compaction, fertility)
Livestock Present/Evidence
of Livestock Access
Crossings or Utility Lines
BMPs or Alternate
Approaches
Fencing Issues or Fencing
Needed
Ponds Within Project Area
Incised/Entrenched
Headcuts Present/Forming
Stream Structures
Failing/Piping
Excess
Sediment/Aggradation
Cross -Sections
Missing/Indicate Problems
Bank Instability/Failure
Bench Rills/Erosion
(constructed bench or P2
valley)
Excess Sinuosity (lack of
flow)
Braided/Anabranch Channel
Evidence of Excessive
Hydrology
Evidence of Insufficient
Hydrology
Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil
Series
Surface Roughness or
Bedding
Channel
Relocation/Riparian
Connectivity
Hydroperiod Length or
Start/Stop Date
Inappropriate Credit Ratio
Proposed
JD Needed to Confirm
Approach
Continuity/Fragmentation
Easement Issues (existing
farm, CE, NRCS funding)
Easement Encroachments
(livestock, clearing)
Easement Marking/Signage
Insufficient Project Size
Adjacent Property Owner
T&E Species
Section 106 (historic
listing/tribal issues)
Insufficient Stream Drainage
Area
Insufficient Hydrology (if
raising channel bed)
Vegetation in Channel
(stream vs wetland)
Flow Obstructions
(undersized pipes, fords)
Substrate Concerns
(embeddedness, particle
size)
Live Stakes Absent/Failing
Evidence of Water Quality
Issues
In -stream Habitat
Weak/Missing
Stream Buffer Width
Inadequate
Missing Gauge Data
(preconstruction or
monitoring)
Gauge Location/Placement
Gauge Maintenance
Drainage Ditches/Swales
Present
Field Tiles/Subsurface
Drainage
Continued Ag Use Adjacent
to Wetland

Page 2 - -
Notes and Sketches, etc
Completed in May - planted in phases
As -built redline done, copy to be resubmitted/uploaded
Since planting past March will be more scrutinized in MY 1-3
Terraces within easement removed, outside remain
Landowner tracks outside (appear as erosion)
Road and woods are signed - to be painted yellow
GWG installed with bentonite seal - target 12%
2 bankfull events already
1 rain gauge onsite
Prescribed burn & spray treatment of fescue
Lower valley very wet wetland (saturated & inundated areas); seeps present
Tera cell at project boundary- protection for headcuts into project; Mac - not needed given slope and bedform
Live stakes look good
UT 4 - significant rock not much gravel (onsite mined); likely fill in a bit with fines & leaf litter; question if aquatic
passage with standard yr flow (been wet yr); flow variability may rot log vanes; hobo flow gauge in pool but camera will
tell when flow over riffle stops to calibrate flow elevation; change wth E1 to keep cluster of trees (6)
No cattle - landowner leasing for hay; posts installed as visual and can be used to fence if livestock lease change
UT 3 - Spring located in preservation reach then turns ephemeral fairer
UT 3 - banks low vigor/ cover; Reseed and then lime treatment if still low cover establishment
Field full of lespedeza; tree of heaven border
Trib at road/easement border (leading to wetland area) determined not jurisdictional but strong flow present, RS lined
with rock and wattles, no credit being requested;
UT 1 A & B - treat privet and TOH; live stake banks in fall;
UT 1 - lots of stone; adjacent wetland super wet pockets (drainage tiles removed across site)
Wrap-up - heavy use of rock not matching design plan; dress bank where cut - sparse veg cover; invasives treatment
good - keep it up; add more live stakes 1 A & 1 B; as -built report figure 2 - label E & R; discussion on adding
preservation reaches upstream
Credit Release/Site Closeout Information
(For monitoring or closeout review only)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Stream Credits
Warm Cool Cold
Requested
Approved*
Wetland Credits
Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
Requested
Approved*
'The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager.
Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout

Signature*
Date 6/24/2019