20171294 Ver 1_Technical Site Review_20190625

Page 1
Site Information
Date: * 6/25/2019
Project Name:* Twiman
Prepared By:* Erin Davis
Type of Site:* Bank Stream and Wetland Site
Meeting Type:* Technical Site Review
Sponsor/Provider: *
Bank Stream and Wetland Site
USACE AID:
County: *
Yadkin
NCDWR ID:
20171294
HUC and Basin:*
Yadkin Pee Dee - 03040101
Weather:
Coordinates:
Attendees
Degrees North
RES - Brad Breslow, Brian, Casey, Matt
USACE- Todd Tugwell, Steve K., Brian R.
DWR - Mac Haupt, Erin Davis
Project Review Checklist
(provide additional detail in notes section on next page)
NCDWR Version
Degrees West

General Site Issues/Concerns:
Stream Issues/Concerns
Wetland Issues/Concerns:
Vegetation Composition or
Density
Planted Stem Vigor (due to
soil, browsing)
Invasive/Exotic Species
Beaver/Feral Hogs
(management plan)
Soil (manipulation,
compaction, fertility)
Livestock Present/Evidence
of Livestock Access
Crossings or Utility Lines
BMPs or Alternate
Approaches
Fencing Issues or Fencing
Needed
Ponds Within Project Area
Incised/Entrenched
Headcuts Present/Forming
Stream Structures
Failing/Piping
Excess
Sediment/Aggradation
Cross -Sections
Missing/Indicate Problems
Bank Instability/Failure
Bench Rills/Erosion
(constructed bench or P2
valley)
Excess Sinuosity (lack of
flow)
Braided/Anabranch Channel
Evidence of Excessive
Hydrology
Evidence of Insufficient
Hydrology
Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil
Series
Surface Roughness or
Bedding
Channel
Relocation/Riparian
Connectivity
Hydroperiod Length or
Start/Stop Date
Inappropriate Credit Ratio
Proposed
JD Needed to Confirm
Approach
Continuity/Fragmentation
Easement Issues (existing
farm, CE, NRCS funding)
Easement Encroachments
(livestock, clearing)
Easement Marking/Signage
Insufficient Project Size
Adjacent Property Owner
T&E Species
Section 106 (historic
listing/tribal issues)
Insufficient Stream Drainage
Area
Insufficient Hydrology (if
raising channel bed)
Vegetation in Channel
(stream vs wetland)
Flow Obstructions
(undersized pipes, fords)
Substrate Concerns
(embeddedness, particle
size)
Live Stakes Absent/Failing
Evidence of Water Quality
Issues
In -stream Habitat
Weak/Missing
Stream Buffer Width
Inadequate
Missing Gauge Data
(preconstruction or
monitoring)
Gauge Location/Placement
Gauge Maintenance
Drainage Ditches/Swales
Present
Field Tiles/Subsurface
Drainage
Continued Ag Use Adjacent
to Wetland

Page 2 - -
Notes and Sketches, etc
TC2-A walked initially lots of bedrock, appears stable, invasives buffer; discussion on E1 qualifiers- % reach fxn uplift &
actual site work (adding up treatment reach vs lumping credit totals); top of reach - stable, good bedform, shaded,
slightly incised;
TC3-B pond sediment blend into banks and cap; possibly bring in material for channel;
TC1-A highly incised, lateral movement;
Invasives- Multiflora, privet
TC5-A & B - DOT bridge to be replaced; "fiord" to be removed; generally good canopy, weak understory/groundcover;
evidence of cattle in buffer, not so much in the stream; 5B fencing & some buffer planting; something between 3:1 &
5:1 - question since TCSA is 7.5:1;
TC613 restoration- risky, possibility of losing flow, — P 1.5 approach, monitor
Wrap-up - TC3A ratio ok; office review of ratio for TC2A & TCSB; any changes document in final addendum
Credit Release/Site Closeout Information
(For monitoring or closeout review only)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Stream Credits
Warm Cool Cold
Requested
Approved*
Wetland Credits
Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
Requested
Approved*
"The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager.
Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout
Signature*
Date 6/25/2019