20190872 Ver 1_Stream Buffer Determination Request Form_20190702

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers -
Wlmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Re.ug latoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1190 B's Barbeque Road
City, state: Greenville, North Carolina
County: Pitt
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 10084
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jonathan Dale Grubb
Mailing Address: 9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
Telephone Number: 919.414.0214
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓Ir I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Emily Harrington
Mailing Address: 322 WHICHARDS LANE
CHOCOWINITY NC 27817
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Please See Attached Agent Authorization Form
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Pir Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area — 127 acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.617977
-77.427848
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
P ro gram/Juri sdi ction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
O Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑' Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ugulatorregdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.arLny.mil/Missions/Re ug latoKy-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 6/11/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: ECS, Jonathan Dale Grubb, 9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Project Harrington,
ECS: 49:9063-B
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1190 B's Barbeque Road,
Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
E. (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Pitt City: Greenville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.617977 Longitude: -77.427848
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18
Name of nearest waterbody: Tar Pamlico River
F. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s): April 3-4
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
may be„ subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
See Attached Excel
Table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ECS Figures 1-6
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:_
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 2
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 4
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 5
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 6
or ®Other (Name & Date): ECS Photolog_
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
DATE
ma
-"' W. -M
6/11/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Site Number Latitude Longitude Acreage/ Linear Feet Type of Resource Section 404 or 10/404
W1
35.6221
-77.4198
2.31 Acres
Wetland
404
W2
35.6223
-77.4219
2.5 Acres
Wetland
404
W3
35.6183
-77.4279
.04 Acres
Wetland
404
W4
35.6176
-77.4324
6.9 Acres
Wetland
404
W5
35.6154
-77.4291
0.30 Acres
Wetland
404
S1
35.6214
-77.4212
46 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S2
35.6221
-77.4273
2,609 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S3
35.6208
-77.4225
625 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S4
35.6205
-77.4236
280 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S5
35.6206
-77.4282
866 Linar Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S6
35.6200
-77.4273
108 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S7
35.6200
-77.4287
104 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S8
35.6199
-77.4296
636 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S9
35.6203
-77.4300
302 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S10
35.6206
-77.4309
174 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S11
35.6188
-77.4327
1,854 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S12
35.6181
-77.4311
62 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S13
35.6168
-77.4341
107 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S14
35.6166
-77.4314
201 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
S15
35.6146
-77.4302
11 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
T1
35.6176
-77.4275
1,397 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404
T2
35.6149
-77.4286
1,428 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
404

ECS SOUTHEAST,
LLP Seting the Standard for Service
toommmrz—A. Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental - Facilities
Agent Authorization
Property/Site:
Address of Site:
Parcel Identification Number (PIN):
Owner Information:
Name:
Address.
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
S
V
711
E-mail Address: �p ( O t l- Ceryl,
Property Owner Certification:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the propertylproperties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal/State jurisdiction under
Section 444 and 409 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899. l also authorize ECS to act in my behalf in the processing of this request and to furnish
supplemental information in support of this request, including streamJwetland matters in
coordination with the USACE and the NCDWR field verification and permit application:
.n I I
Property Owner Signature:
Date:
ECS Capitol Services. PLLC • ECS Florida LLC , ECS M d-Atianiic LLC - ECS blAvest. LLC - ECS Southeast, LLP -ECS -texas LLP
wwwecstirmited com

Legend
Project Study Area
H Arthur
yr
�6-
�s
I r rrn ood
rsodl Q �
C o un try Club `-
*0
'fa 'A
�3
°t s•
r
I
3`
John P East-Fwy,
N �
Client:
3j LeoTerra Development
Inc.
Fp .
•rte
Project:
S teq r� s erg #�
4y
r3
Q,
a
�y o
;4M`o4sf+'
0
S
Gr4�� yrr'.81vd
Pin GenrTb HARRINGTON
Awport SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
s oa r, l GREENVILLE
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
V%
f Title:
i
s ►� SITE
r
/} t+1° 511, LOCATION MAP
Greenville
1 in = 1 mile
y �o° Ca'ollna� i PITT COUNTY
Umver3tly fi
3�
may`
Drawn By:
Checked By:
JDG
WBF
Approved By:
Date:
a
WBF
04/01/2019
ECS Project No.
49:9063-A
Ra
�
FIGURE 1

Legend -
Project Study Area f✓,� � „ � ,` � � ,�
r NTERCK N 57 Q Client:
LeoTerra Development
Inc.
Project:
HARRINGTON
f SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
01"ri GREENVILLE
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
ti
{► Title: U$G$
TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP
op
r
9` * DATED: 1986
'►
ye+ Greenville, NC
1 .. - ■'
PROJECT STUDY AREA
i
syr
V\ r •
see a
_— 0 � s Drawn By: Checked By:
` JDG WBF
Gryi ` Approved By: Date:
WBF 04/01/2019
�* ■ ECS Project No.
49:9063-A
FIGURE 2

Legend
Project Study Area.
rr
''fir .1 f3
.%U
P
Nw-T 4�= � N
/ • Client:
7An
LeoTerra Development
Inc.
—+ —� Project:
CrH
was /I ave
Gr8
* rr
- F .
ILI
1
■
HARRINGTON
SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
GREENVILLE
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
USDA-NRCS
SOIL SURVEY MAP
DATED: 1996
PITT COUNTY
SHEETS 33, 34, 40, & 41
Aycock Fine Sandy Loam
Bibb Complex
Craven Fine Sandy Loam
Exum Fine Sandy Loam
Lynchburg Fine Sandy
Loam
Norfolk Sandy Loam
Wagram Loamy Sand
JDG I WBF
Approved By: Date:
WBF 06/14/2019
ECS Project No.
49:9063-A
FIGURE 3

Legend
Project Study Area
Flood Hazard Line
- <all other values>
Wetlands
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Pond
F7 Lake
H U8_03020101 _Watershed
s
5
a
rl BC
r{ S Demos Rd
17rA��94
9°r�ra
SBC _—/ RW PFCN
A]
Client:
LeoTerra Development
¢ Inc.
Ms�nd+ Project:
PUBHx HARRINGTON
PUBHx
SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
GREENVILLE
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
dv w's
0
USFWS
essaya National Wetlands
Inventory Map
PEM1Ax 8 Digit HUC (03020103)
PROJECT STUDY AREA
1A
P M1
6
a
� Sia silerarhdd 4i .,, r. :.,-r •.;._�,,,
MacGregor Downs ftC S'
E tiiac Gregor covens Rd Drawn By: Checked By:
m� c P JDG WBF
Approved By: Date:
Lcr :a
�Or
e,
n
PF04Bd
PF04Ad
WBF 04/01/2019
ECS Project No.
€ 49:9063-A
z
kaekR++ii
0 500 1,000 2,000 FIGURE 4
Feet

Legend
Project Study Area
FLD-ZONE
A
AE
X
Flood Hazard Area
PU 4W
ttf
v A
37147C
37147C
6r.
PANEL: 3714724000K
.0,S PITT COUNTY
PROJECT STUDY AREA
ON
N
�W c -7T
W
37147C 37147C
Drawn By:
Checked By:
V
T -L
JDG
WBF
Client:
Approved By:
Date:
WBF
04/01/2019
LeoTerra Development
No.
Inc.
49:9063-A
37147C
0 500
Project:
FIGURE 5
HARRINGTON
Feet
SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
GREENVILLE
-A
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
FEMA-NFHL
FLOOD ZONE MAP
PANEL: 3714724000K
.0,S PITT COUNTY
PROJECT STUDY AREA
ON
�W c -7T
Drawn By:
Checked By:
V
T -L
JDG
WBF
Approved By:
Date:
WBF
04/01/2019
ECS Project
No.
49:9063-A
0 500
1,000 2,000
FIGURE 5
Feet

S11
S13
Legend
Project Study Area
Ditches
Tributaries
Streams
® Wetlands
Wetland Area 2
S15
Trib 1
Trib 2
0 200 400 1100
Feet
N
S2
Wetland Area 1 Client:
LeoTerra Development
S1 Inc.
Project:
S3
- HARRINGTON
SITE
B'S BARBEQUE ROAD
GREENVILLE
PITT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
.� Title:
Wetlands and Waters
*+- of the US Map
■
Drawn By: Checked By:
JDG WBF
Approved By: Date:
WBF 04/11/2019
ECS Project No.
49:9063-A
FIGURE 6

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Harrington City/County: Greenville/ Pitt Sampling Date: 4/3-4/2019
Applicant/Owner: LeoTerra Development Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: W2
Investigator(s): Grubb Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35.617977 Long: -77.427848 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: AyB, Ly, CrB, CrC, WaB, WaC, Bb, CrB2, NrB NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Wetland 2
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus alba
10
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Ilex opaca
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
5.
Fagus grandifolia
15
Yes
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 36.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: 105 (A) 375 (B)
4.
Fagus grandifolia
10
Yes
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.57
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
35
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Polystichum acrostichoides
5
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Smilax auriculata
15
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-15 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) —Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy
Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) —Depleted
Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1538)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Harrington City/County: Greenville/ Pitt Sampling Date: 4/3-4/2019
Applicant/Owner: LeoTerra Development Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: W2
Investigator(s): Grubb Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35.621560 Long: -77.425630 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: AyB, Ly, CrB, CrC, WaB, WaC, Bb, CrB2, NrB NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland 2
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (B2) X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20
=Total Cover
OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: 85 (A) 220 (B)
4.
Ligustrum sinense
5
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.59
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
30
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Juncus effusus
15
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 5 No FACW
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 5/8 15 C M Loamy/Clayey
8-20 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1538)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

Harrington
1190 B's Barbeque Road
Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-9063-A
Photo 1: Photo of S3 and part of W1 in the northeastern portion of the property.
4
Photo 2: View of W2 inundation along the northern portion of the property.
ECS Southeast, LLP Page 1

Harrington
1190 B's Barbeque Road
Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-9063-A
Photo 3: Typical view of wetland W5 along the western boundary of the property.
Photo 4 View of Tributary In the middle of the Property
ECS Southeast, LLP Page 2

Harrington
1190 B's Barbeque Road
Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-9063-A
Photo 5: View of wetland W4 along the northern boundary of the property.
F =i
r9
Photo 6: View of the Harris Mill Run along the northern end of the property.
ECS Southeast, LLP Page 3

Harrington
1190 B's Barbeque Road
Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-9063-A
Photo 7: View of Wetland 3 in the center of the property
Photo 8: View of S4 in the north eastern section of the property
ECS Southeast, LLP Page 4

10084
1190 B S BARBEQUE RD
KARANGELEN, ANNE HIHARRINGTON, WILLIAM F JRIKING, SUSAN CAROL HIWEEKS, SUSAN HIHARRINGTON, EMILY LU
HERRINGIJENKINS, EVA HARRINGTON AKA EVA HARRINGTON JENKINS VAN CAMPIHARRINGTON, MICHAEL LIHARRINGTON,
VANCE S JRISULLIVAN, JAMES G UWO VANCE S HARRING
322 WHICHARD LANE CHOCOWINITY NC 27817
No Photo \taIIabIE
Total Market Value
$2,259,132
KEY INFORMATION
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Property Use
AGH
Lot Number
Land Value
$2,191,672
Zoning
R6
Land Class
AGH
Building Value
$0
Land Size
126.72
Legal Description
VANCE S HARRINGTON ETALS
Miso Imprwemems Value
$67,460
Township
FALKLAND
Fire District
RED OK FIRE SRV DIST
Use Value Deferred
$2,095,626
Neighborhood
0004069
Planning Jurisdiction
I GV
Total Market Value
$2,259,132
Total Tauable Value
$163,506
BUILDING DETAILS

n Residential Building (1)
Card #
Style
Living Area
External Wall
Internal Wait (1)
Internal Wall (2)
Heat
A/C
Bedrooms
Full Baths
Half Baths
Fireplace
Garage
Carport
Grade
Foundation
Stories
Year Built
Effective Year Built
0
No Photo Available
SALES HISTORY
SALE PRICE
DEED/DOCUMENT DATE
003556,00560
SALE TYPE QUALIFIED
Disclaimer
Pitt County Assessor's Office makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data herein, Its use or interpretation.
Data last updated: 03/12/2019

.=
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder
Governor Director
Natural Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
DWQ Use Only: Project # 19-0872
Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination
Required Information
1. Owner Information (corporation/individual who is legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
1 a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Emily Harrington
1 b. Responsible Party (for LLC)
LeoTerra Development Inc. (Kye Bunker)
1c. Mailing Address
322 Whichards Lane
1d. Telephone Number
(910)-251-4629 (Agent)
1e. Email Address
emily.b.thompsonngusace.army.mil
(Agent)
2. Location of Project Site - please include the county, nearest named town and highway number:
400 Industrial Boulevard, Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
3. Has anyone from DWQ visited the site?
Y / N
Staff Name
5d. River Basin
Date of Visit?
5e. Provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
Proposed development.
Additional Requested Information
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name, Company
Jonathan Grubb, Engineering Consulting Services
4b. Mailing address
9001 Glenwood Avenue Raleigh, NC 27617
4c. Telephone no.
919.861.9859
4d. Email address
JGrubb(a)ecslimited.com
5. Project and Site Information
5a. Name of project
Harrington
5b. County
Pitt
5c. Nearest Named Stream
Harris Mill Run
5d. River Basin
Tar -Pamlico
5e. Provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
Proposed development.
Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo and/or NRCS Soil Survey.
If you are unable to locate either of these maps, please contact the Regional Office for assistance.
DWQ Use Only: Is this stream call for the purpose of: buffer mitigation nutrient offset credit
Please return form to: Anthony Scarbraugh
943 Washington Square Mall Note: Submittals on Friday after 12:00 pm
Washington, NC 27889 will be stamped as received on the
Fax: [phone] next business day.
Email: anthony.scarbraugh(a)ncdenr.gov
Please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at [phone] if you have any questions.

WE
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 13 Polq
ProjecVSite: P[Ajf lA 3fvn
Latitude: 35,6/45
Evaluator: 3. 4,4
County: Pl -
Longitude: - 7 j , yt 7 S'
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral ermi Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 orperennial if >_ 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
a
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
Q1
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
V1
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
ID1
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
Sketch: Scwa 0.Mgk;eoa
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc ssions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 0?
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
7- 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es =
1
C. Biolociv (Subtotal= l9 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
C77
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
UO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 er =
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Scwa 0.Mgk;eoa
5Ma �� S�'tcah

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
J1
Date: V-3
Project/Site: A
Latitude: 15.G�qq
Evaluator: J �cc>56
County:
Longitude: -i1��28L
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 11
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
if 2:19 orperennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks CIV1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Q7
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(j)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
arnnciai aitcnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal= 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
(P
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
21. Aquatic Mollusks CIV1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
Q)
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
25. Algae
e
G. blolow (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks CIV1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Cher = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
�rN Wt'�fora
6�} n.�-
�� �. s �o..,
�►�n��.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: '-1 /4 1 20Iq
Project/Slte: ' � i i �
Latitude: 35. G Z 11
Evaluator: Gc'bb
County: p, }t
Longitude: . "1?.y3ps-
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittentEphemeral
ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or erennial if >_ 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i L. � )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Q3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1 1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
10
1.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
m
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = /9"5- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
©
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 19 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0' 1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 =
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes. -
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
610
Date: 9 Al / Z011
Project/Site: %�f�in �
Latitude: 3S. IVzaq
Evaluator: , Bubb
County: P�
Longitude: - -7 7 , q31 ti
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination circle one)
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
Other
if 2:19 orperennial if >- 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Q
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
0
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
'I
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
10
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
�No_=>
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 . !�' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 &-51) 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
-
G. Bioloav (Subtotal = /,., 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed Q
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5 1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 er =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
�o
S
we+6A

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
s,Z
Date: LA/14/ Z0I0,
ProjectlSite:
Latitude: 3S.(�201
Evaluator:
County: vt h
Longitude:
Total Points: Igor Iq
Steam is at least intermittent (�
Stream Det circle one)
Other
Y�
if _ 19 or erennial if>_ 30' 1S1'
Ephemeral rmitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= j )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
Q
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
11
V
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
Sketch:
�..V•►li�'� �f/ty �
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
arllilgal mtcnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1.5
G. t31010gv (Subtotal = &or 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed M
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
�..V•►li�'� �f/ty �
p�S.Sop�t�fS
�2J�'v"'^''

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Sly
Date: w zolq
Project/Site: t�„�}�
Latitude: 3S. 1y18�1
Evaluator: J C-Ifu
County: A � -
Longitude: -- -j-7.4316
0
1
14. Leaf litter
Total Points:
Stream DeterTinaLwilcircle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or erennial if >_ 30'
Ephemeral ntermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
es =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
m
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 J
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
{
arrnnciai oncnes are nor raiea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = -I. S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
Q
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 011,
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
(PP. 5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
V. t$IOIOQV (Subtotal = /y )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 ther =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: c •43 0('
a4kp ,I pod
{