19930997 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19930313

?l
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
Enviromnental Consultants
Robert N. Needham [phone] Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
13 November 1996
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
U.S. -Army Corps of Engineers
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6846
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
N?.v 51996
-iwC.C
ENVtFt??``1Eh r P? ` `'`
Enclosed you will find a copy of the 1996 vegetation monitoring report for the Crooked Creek
Golf Course enhancement site, Wake County, North Carolina.
If you have any questions for need additional information, please call. We look forward to
hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
/--, ?- ?' k
Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.
enclosures
cc: John Dorney, Division of Water Quality, w/enc
Tony Withers, Crooked Creek Partners, w/enc
VEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE
MITIGATION SITE
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
November 1996
Prepared by
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
3717 Old Fairground Road
Angier, North Carolina 27501
BACKGROUND
Crooked Creek Partners, Inc. were issued a Department of the Army permit (Action I.D. #
199400727) on 25 April 1994 to impact wetlands associated with the construction of the Crooked
Creek Golf Course. One of the conditions of the permit required enhancement of a 4.43 acre
wetland area located on-site. This proposed enhancement required the planting of six hardwood
tree species. The six species chosen for planting were: cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var.
pogodifolia), willow oak (Q. phellos), water oak (Q. nigra), overcup oak (Q. lyrata), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica). Needham, Jernigan, & Associates,
Inc. (NJ&A) were contracted to conduct the planting and monitoring of this enhancement site.
Even though the site did not specifically meet the success criteria (as specified in the permit
conditions) for 1995, no remedial actions were required by the Corps (Corps letter dated 13
February 1996). This report presents the findings of the second year of monitoring.
METHODOLOGY
No manipulation or management of the site has taken place since the original planting. Herbicide
treatments were not implemented based on their limited effect and the Corps' recommendation.
The only disturbance that has occurred on-site is flooding associated with overflow from Middle
Creek. The flooding deposits sediment and debris over some of the site and erodes the soil
surface in areas of high flow.
Monitoring was conducted in mid-October using a stratified random sample of the rows to ensure
coverage of the entire site. Approximately 10% of the total number of trees planted were
sampled.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The original planted tree density was 469 trees/acre (2080 total trees planted/ 4.43 acres). Based
on the planted tree density, the percent survival required to satisfy the success criterion of 320
trees/acre would be 68% (320/469). The overall survival of the six trees species planted was 67%
(Table 1).
Most of the trees that survived from the first growing season appear to have survived a second
growing season (Table 2). It was noted during this sampling that some trees which were counted
as dead last year were alive this year. This can be explained in one of two ways. Either the tree
was not found last year because of the dense weed growth or the seedling resprouted from the
roots. This resprouting phenomenon has been observed at other plantings, especially with oaks.
Most of the trees are now 2-4 feet tall (Figures 1 and 2). Trees in the pooled areas (Figure 3)
with dense soft rush (Juncus effusus) are smaller probably due to stress and competition.
Table 1. Summary of vegetation sampling data for Crooked Creek Golf Course Wetland
Enhancement Site, Wake County - 1996.
Species # Live # Dead Total # % Survival
Cherrybark Oak 28 7 35 80%
Willow Oak 28 4 32 88%
Water Oak 13 17 30 43%
Overcup Oak 26 8 34 76%
Green Ash 34 13 47 72%
Blackgum 2 15 17 12%
TOTALS 131 64 195 67%
Table 2. Comparison of 1995 and 1996 survival by species.*
Species % Survival 1995 % Survival 1996
Cherrybark Oak 74 80
Willow Oak 93 88
Water Oak 50 43
Overcup Oak 71 76
Green Ash 57 72
Blackgum 18 12
OVERALL 64 67
* Increases in survivorship without replanting can be attributed to resprouting from roots and/or
the tree was not found last year due to dense weed cover.
Herbaceous weeds are still very dense and overtop the tree seedlings (Figures 1,2,3, and 4). The
survivorship of the tree seedlings does not appear to be affected by this competition but growth
rates may be affected. Blackberry (Rubus sp.), beggar's ticks (Bidens sp.), and goldenrod
(Solidago sp.) dominate large portions of the enhancement area and reach heights of 5 to 6 feet
tall (Figure 4). Tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum) binds the above species together to form a
dense cover. Softstem rush (Juncus effusus) and some sedges (Carex sp. and Cyperus sp.)
occupy the wetter portions of the site (Figure 3). The dense herbaceous cover may account for
some sampling error (i.e. seedlings which cannot be found are considered dead).
Figure 1. Green ash seedling with a 4-foot bush axe beside it.
Figure 2. Overcup oak with an 18 inch wire flag beside it.
.b
herbaceous cover.
Figure 3. One of the several pooled areas dominated by soft rush and sedges.
Figure 4. Red maple, sweetgum, and tulip poplar volunteers. Note the dense
Volunteer tree species have sprouted from root stock and seeds throughout the site. River birch
(Betula nigra), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and
red maple (Acer rubrum) are scattered throughout the site and have already achieved heights from
6-10 feet tall (Figure 4).
NJ&A feel that the area in question has been enhanced and is progressing toward a forested
wetland. The overall survivorship is higher this year than last (Table 2) and the survivors are
growing well in spite of the competition from other invading species. Since no remediation was
required last year, NJ&A recommend no remediation prior to next year's monitoring.
VEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE
MITIGATION SITE
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
November 1996
Prepared by
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
3717 Old Fairground Road
Angier, North Carolina 27501
BACKGROUND
Crooked Creek Partners, Inc. were issued a Department of the Army permit (Action I.D. #
199400727) on 25 April 1994 to impact wetlands associated with the construction of the Crooked
Creek Golf Course. One of the conditions of the permit required enhancement of a 4.43 acre
wetland area located on-site. This proposed enhancement required the planting of six hardwood
tree species. The six species chosen for planting were: cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var.
pogodifolia), willow oak (Q. phellos), water oak (Q. nigra), overcup oak (Q. lyrata), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica). Needham, Jernigan, & Associates,
Inc. (NJ&A) were contracted to conduct the planting and monitoring of this enhancement site.
Even though the site did not specifically meet the success criteria (as specified in the permit
conditions) for 1995, no remedial actions were required by the Corps (Corps letter dated 13
February 1996). This report presents the findings of the second year of monitoring.
METHODOLOGY
No manipulation or management of the site has taken place since the original planting. Herbicide
treatments were not implemented based on their limited effect and the Corps' recommendation.
The only disturbance that has occurred on-site is flooding associated with overflow from Middle
Creek. The flooding deposits sediment and debris over some of the site and erodes the soil
surface in areas of high flow.
Monitoring was conducted in mid-October using a stratified random sample of the rows to ensure
coverage of the entire site. Approximately 10% of the total number of trees planted were
sampled.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The original planted tree density was 469 trees/acre (2080 total trees planted/ 4.43 acres). Based
on the planted tree density, the percent survival required to satisfy the success criterion of 320
trees/acre would be 68% (320/469). The overall survival of the six trees species planted was 67%
(Table 1).
Most of the trees that survived from the first growing season appear to have survived a second
growing season (Table 2). It was noted during this sampling that some trees which were counted
as dead last year were alive this year. This can be explained in one of two ways. Either the tree
was not found last year because of the dense weed growth or the seedling resprouted from the
roots. This resprouting phenomenon has been observed at other plantings, especially with oaks.
Most of the trees are now 2-4 feet tall (Figures 1 and 2). Trees in the pooled areas (Figure 3)
with dense soft rush (Juncus effusus) are smaller probably due to stress and competition.
Table 1. Summary of vegetation sampling data for Crooked Creek Golf Course Wetland
Enhancement Site, Wake County - 1996.
Species # Live # Dead Total # % Survival
Cherrybark Oak 28 7 35 80%
Willow Oak 28 4 32 88%
Water Oak 13 17 30 43%
Overcup Oak 26 8 34 76%
Green Ash 34 13 47 72%
Blackgum 2 15 17 12%
TOTALS 131 64 195 67%
Table 2. Comparison of 1995 and 1996 survival by species.*
Species % Survival 1995 % Survival 1996
Cherrybark Oak 74 80
Willow Oak 93 88
Water Oak 50 43
Overcup Oak 71 76
Green Ash 57 72
Blackgum 18 12
OVERALL 64 67
* Increases in survivorship without replanting can be attributed to resprouting from roots and/or
the tree was not found last year due to dense weed cover.
Herbaceous weeds are still very dense and overtop the tree seedlings (Figures 1,2,3, and 4). The
survivorship of the tree seedlings does not appear to be affected by this competition but growth
rates may be affected. Blackberry (Rubus sp.), beggar's ticks (Bidens sp.), and goldenrod
(Solidago sp.) dominate large portions of the enhancement area and reach heights of 5 to 6 feet
tall (Figure 4). Tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum) binds the above species together to form a
dense cover. Softstem rush (Juncus effusus) and some sedges (Carex sp. and Cyperus sp.)
occupy the wetter portions of the site (Figure 3). The dense herbaceous cover may account for
some sampling error (i.e. seedlings which cannot be found are considered dead).
Figure 1. Green ash seedling with a 4-foot bush axe beside it.
Figure 2. Overcup oak with an 18 inch wire flag beside it.
6
herbaceous cover.
Figure 3. One of the several pooled areas dominated by soft rush and sedges.
Figure 4. Red maple, sweetgum, and tulip poplar volunteers. Note the dense
Volunteer tree species have sprouted from root stock and seeds throughout the site. River birch
(Betula nigra), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and
red maple (Ater rubrum) are scattered throughout the site and have already achieved heights from
6-10 feet tall (Figure 4).
NJ&A feel that the area in question has been enhanced and is progressing toward a forested
wetland. The overall survivorship is higher this year than last (Table 2) and the survivors are
growing well in spite of the competition from other invading species. Since no remediation was
required last year, NJ&A recommend no remediation prior to next year's monitoring.
VEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE
MITIGATION SITE
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
November 1996
Prepared by
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
3717 Old Fairground Road
Angier, North Carolina 27501
BACKGROUND
Crooked Creek Partners, Inc. were issued a Department of the Army permit (Action I.D. #
199400727) on 25 April 1994 to impact wetlands associated with the construction of the Crooked
Creek Golf Course. One of the conditions of the permit required enhancement of a 4.43 acre
wetland area located on-site. This proposed enhancement required the planting of six hardwood
tree species. The six species chosen for planting were: cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var.
pogodifolia), willow oak (Q. phellos), water oak (Q. nigra), overcup oak (Q. lyrata), green ash
(Fraxinus penn.sylvanica), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica). Needham, Jernigan, & Associates,
Inc. (NJ&A) were contracted to conduct the planting and monitoring of this enhancement site.
Even though the site did not specifically meet the success criteria (as specified in the permit
conditions) for 1995, no remedial actions were required by the Corps (Corps letter dated 13
February 1996). This report presents the findings of the second year of monitoring.
METHODOLOGY
No manipulation or management of the site has taken place since the original planting. Herbicide
treatments were not implemented based on their limited effect and the Corps' recommendation.
The only disturbance that has occurred on-site is flooding associated with overflow from Middle
Creek. The flooding deposits sediment and debris over some of the site and erodes the soil
surface in areas of high flow.
Monitoring was conducted in mid-October using a stratified random sample of the rows to ensure
coverage of the entire site. Approximately 10% of the total number of trees planted were
sampled.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The original planted tree density was 469 trees/acre (2080 total trees planted/ 4.43 acres). Based
on the planted tree density, the percent survival required to satisfy the success criterion of 320
trees/acre would be 68% (320/469). The overall survival of the six trees species planted was 67%
(Table 1).
Most of the trees that survived from the first growing season appear to have survived a second
growing season (Table 2). It was noted during this sampling that some trees which were counted
as dead last year were alive this year. This can be explained in one of two ways. Either the tree
was not found last year because of the dense weed growth or the seedling resprouted from the
roots. This resprouting phenomenon has been observed at other plantings, especially with oaks.
Most of the trees are now 2-4 feet tall (Figures 1 and 2). Trees in the pooled areas (Figure 3)
with dense soft rush (Juncus effuses) are smaller probably due to stress and competition.
Table 1. Summary of vegetation sampling data for Crooked Creek Golf Course Wetland
Enhancement Site, Wake County - 1996.
Species # Live # Dead Total # % Survival
Cherrybark Oak 28 7 35 80%
Willow Oak 28 4 32 88%
Water Oak 13 17 30 43%
Overcup Oak 26 8 34 76%
Green Ash 34 13 47 72%
Blackgum 2 15 17 12%
TOTALS 131 64 195 67%
Table 2. Comparison of 1995 and 1996 survival by species.*
Species % Survival 1995 % Survival 1996
Cherrybark Oak 74 80
Willow Oak 93 88
Water Oak 50 43
Overcup Oak 71 76
Green Ash 57 72
Blackgum 18 12
... 64 67
* Increases in survivorship without replanting can be attributed to resprouting from roots and/or
the tree was not found last year due to dense weed cover.
Herbaceous weeds are still very dense and overtop the tree seedlings (Figures 1,2,3, and 4). The
survivorship of the tree seedlings does not appear to be affected by this competition but growth
rates may be affected. Blackberry (Rubes sp.), beggar's ticks (Bidens sp.), and goldenrod
(Solidago sp.) dominate large portions of the enhancement area and reach heights of 5 to 6 feet
tall (Figure 4). Tearthumb (Polygonuni sagittatum) binds the above species together to form a
dense cover. Softstem rush (Jttrtcus effuvts) and some sedges (Carex sp. and Cyperus sp.)
occupy the wetter portions of the site (Figure 3). The dense herbaceous cover may account for
some sampling error (i.e. seedlings which cannot be found are considered dead).
Figure 1. Green ash seedling with a 4-foot bush axe beside it.
Figure 2. Overcup oak with an 18 inch wire flag beside it.

herbaceous cover.
Figure 3. One of the several pooled areas dominated by soft rush and sedges.
Figure 4. Red maple, sweetgum, and tulip poplar volunteers. Note the dense
Volunteer tree species have sprouted from root stock and seeds throughout the site. River birch
(BetzIila nigra), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and
red maple (Acer rubrum) are scattered throughout the site and have already achieved heights from
6-10 feet tall (Figure 4).
NJ&A feel that the area in question has been enhanced and is progressing toward a forested
wetland. The overall survivorship is higher this year than last (Table 2) and the survivors are
growing well in spite of the competition from other invading species. Since no remediation was
required last year, NJ&A recommend no remediation prior to next year's monitoring.
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
Enviromnental Consultants
Robert N. Needham [phone] Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
29 February 1996
Mr. John Dorney
Wetlands Group
Division of Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
RE: Crooked Creek Golf Course Mitigation Site - Vegetation Monitoring Report
Dear Mr. Dorney:
C'
cFs
We apologize for excluding you in the distribution of the monitoring report for the Crooked
Creek site. Based on the information we received, it was our understanding that the only
regulatory agency requiring a copy of report was the Corps of Engineers. We have since been
informed that your office should also be copied with each of the monitoring reports.
Enclosed is a copy of the 1995 Vegetation Monitoring Report. If you have any questions, please
call.
Sincerely,
l
Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.

VEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
CROOKED CREEK GOLF COURSE
MITIGATION SITE
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
October 1995
Prepared by
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
3717 Old Fairground Road
Angier, North Carolina 27501
BACKGROUND
Crooked Creek Partners, Inc. were issued a Department of the Army permit (Action I.D. 9
199400727) on 25 April 1994 to impact wetlands associated with the construction of the Crooked
Creek Golf Course. One of the conditions of the permit required enhancement of a 4.43 acre
wetland area located on-site. This proposed enhancement required the planting of six hardwood
tree species. The six species chosen for planting were: cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var.
pogodifolia), willow oak (Q. phellos), water oak (Q. nigra), overcup oak (Q. lyrata), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and blackgum (Nyssa syNatica). Needham, Jernigan, & Associates,
Inc. (NJ&A) were contracted to conduct the planting and monitoring of this enhancement site.
METHODOLOGY
The enhancement area was mowed prior to planting to reduce initial weed competition. No soil
disturbance activities had occurred on the site, other than those associated with overflow flooding
from the adjacent creek.
Bare-root seedlings of the six hardwood species listed above were planted during the period of 20
February and 9 March 1995. NJ&A had to contact three different sources to obtain the six
species planted. The overcup oak seedlings were obtained from the North Carolina Division of
Forest Resources. The willow and cherrybark oak seedlings were obtained from Weyerhauser.
The other three species (water oak, blackgum, and green ash) were obtained from Warren County
Nursery in Tennessee.
The planting scheme consisted of rows with approximate 10 foot centers but was not random
(i.e. the species with the greatest tolerance for wetness were planted in the wetter portions of the
site). Each tree location was marked with a color-coded wire flag to aid in identification and
monitoring. Each tree seedling was fertilized with a forest starter tablet (22-8-2). A pre-
emergent herbicide was sprayed around each seedling in late March to further reduce weed
competition until the seedlings could become established.
Monitoring was conducted in mid-October using a stratified random sample of the rows to ensure
coverage of the entire site. Approximately 10% of the total number of trees planted were
sampled.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The planted tree density was actually 469 trees/acre (2080 total trees planted/ 4.43 acres) rather
than 435 trees/acre (based on 10 foot centers). Based on the planted tree density, the percent
survival required to satisfy the success criterion of 320 trees/acre would be 68% (320/469). The
overall survival of the six trees species planted was 64% (Table 1).
Mortality was not uniform over all six species. Blackgum appears to be an unsuitable candidate
for this site. It seems more than coincidental that the three species with the lowest survivorships
all came from the same source (Warren County Nursery, TN). Some mortality can be attributed
to the damage done by flooding from the creek (drift material covering the seedlings, flood waters
washing out some seedlings, etc.).
None of the seedlings were more than 18 inches tall when planted. Some of the overcup oak and
willow oak are now nearly 3 feet. The other species planted also showed height increases but not
as dramatic.
Table 1. Summary of vegetation sampling data for Crooked Creek Golf Course Wetland
Enhancement Site, Wake County - 1995.
Species # Live # Dead Total # % Survival
Cherrybark Oak 25 9 34 74%
Willow Oak 29 2 31 93%
Water Oak 15 15 30 50%
Overcup Oak 24 10 34 71%
Green Ash 25 19 44 57%
Blackgum 3 14 17 18%
TOTALS 121 69 190 64%
By the end of the growing season herbaceous weeds had overtopped the tree seedlings.
Blackberry (Rubus sp.), beggar's ticks (Bidens sp.), and goldenrod (Solidago sp.) dominate large
portions of the enhancement area and reach heights of 5 to 6 feet tall. Tearthumb (Polygorrum
sagittatum) binds the above species together to form a dense cover. Softstem rush (Juncos
effusits) and some sedges (Carex sp. and Cyperus sp.) occupy the wetter portions of the site.
Herbaceous cover was so dense that it was difficult to find the planted seedlings during
monitoring.
Volunteer tree species have sprouted back from the mowing. River birch (Betula nigra), tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifua), and red maple (Acer
rubrum) are scattered throughout the site and have already achieved heights over 5 feet.
NJ&A feel that the area in question has been enhanced even though the success criterion of 68%
survival was not quite met (actual survival = 64%). We recommend that weed control be the
point of focus for the 1995 growing season. A combination of a pre-emergent treatment with
GOAL in mid- to late March, a post-emergent treatment with VANTAGE in mid-July, and
mechanical control with weed eaters and/or small rotary cutters if necessary. If the weeds can be
controlled for another year, the tree seedlings will have a better chance of survival and rapid
growth. The area does not appear to be lacking for nutrients based on growth rates of the weeds
and tree seedlings. Therefore, no additional fertilization seems necessary.
? RECEIVED
U- FEB 2 71996
February 13, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Regulatory Branch
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199400727
Mr. Tony Withers
C.C. Partners, Incorporated
1149 Executive Circle
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Dear Mr. Withers:
Reference the April 25, 1992 Department of the Army permit,
subsequently modified, authorizing C.C. Partners, Inc. to discharge
dredged and fill material in jurisdictional waters of the United
States, including wetlands, located adjacent to Middle Creek, to
facilitate construction of the Crooked Creek golf course and
residential development, near Macks Village, in Wake County, North
Carolina. Reference also the October 1995 Annual Monitoring Report
submitted by Dr. Leon Jernigan for the required wetlands mitigation
site for the subject project, and the November 29, 1995 inspection
of the mitigation site by Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of the Raleigh Field
Office regulatory staff.
As Mr. Alsmeyer discussed with Dr. Jernigan by telephone on
December 20, 1995, the mitigation site does not specifically meet
the criteria for success as specified in the permit conditions,
i.e., 320 trees per acre surviving, based upon the referenced
mitigation report and site inspection. However, since a) there is
moderately good overall density of survivors, b) there are questions
about the initial vitality of the three lowest survivors, and c) the
surviving trees exhibited good growth and vitality, the Corps does
not see the need to take substantive actions to remediate the
mitigation plantings. Although we believe that replanting is not
necessary at this time, monitoring over the next two growing seasons
will have to document that the survival of plantings remains
approximately at the current densities in order for the plantings to
continue to be considered successful. If unacceptable mortality of
the surviving seedlings occurs, remediation will be necessary.
In regards to your desire to minimize vegetative competition on
the site, please note that we do not recommend or require weed
control because of its limited benefits. However, we will not
oppose your decision to pursue that option to potentially increase
tree survival.

-2-
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Alsmeyer,
telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
S. Kenneth Jolly
Manager, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Appian Consulting Engineers
Attn: Mr J Michael Stocks
Po Box 7966
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804-0966
Dr. Leon Jernigan
Needham, Jernigan & Associates, Inc.
3717 Old Fairgrounds Road
Angier, North Carolina 27501
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Mgmt.
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
y` 1
II RECEIVED
FEB 2 81995
ON161RNTni.s _
24919g5- appian
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA
• CIVIL, MUNICIPAL&STRUCfURAI ENGINEERS'
BOBBY L. JOYNER, P.E.
J. MICHAEL STOCKS, P.E.
? oriY ?
?,? SkeU1?
oV have aY Qves?4'o,?s .
hmv- x
. ??c 1?15n1eYer

i

' V Y \.
Needham, Jernigan, & Asso ' s, Inc.
Environmental Consultants
Robert N. Needham [phone] , Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
22 February 1995
Mr. J. Michael Stocks, P.E.
Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A.
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
RE: Crooked Creek Mitigation Site
Dear Mr. Stocks:
As of 21 February 1995, four of the six hardwood tree species have been planted (z 1400 trees).
The other two tree species should arrive the week of 27 February and will be planted as soon as
possible after their arrival. Each of the six species has been marked with a color-coded wire flag.
It is important that these flags remain in place until monitoring is complete in late September or
early October (refer to client's responsibilities associated with vandalism in revised proposal dated
30 January 1995)..
It was our understanding that additional clearing (i. e. removal of the pines on site) would take
place before the planting. Since the majority of the site is now planted, care should be taken
cutting the pines and other trees that are bent over but not uprooted. The cut trees can be left
between rows if the major limbs are removed and piled alongside the trunks.
Weed control is also the client's responsibility. The herbaceous vegetation on the site appears to
be well established. The grasses, rushes, and sedges on site will be intense competition for the
tree seedlings and need to be controlled until the trees can become established. The
recommended procedure for weed control in hardwood plantings is an early season application
with Oust or Goal. Application should take place before the first leaves appear (i.e. before the
end of March). A 4-foot wide band should be sprayed over the tops of the tree rows. There are
53 tree rows which vary in length from 200 feet to 450 feet. If the pre-emergent treatment is
unsuccessful, mechanical clearing with weed eaters and/or small rotary cutters may be required.
Also, a post-emergent application of Vantage in mid-August may help. All three of the
herbicides mentioned above are approved for use in wetlands. These recommendations for weed
control are based on information obtained from the NCSU Forestry Extension.
If you have any questions concerning these matters, please contact us immediately.
Sincerely,
Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.
Innnr
000IN
A??iAn
Transmission via Fax CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
CIVIL, MUNICIPAL & STRUCTURAL ENGIN
INEERS
BOBBY L. JOYNER, P.E.
Date: January 4, 1995 J. MICHAEL STOCKS, P.E.
To: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer COE [phone]
Mr. John Dorney WQ [phone] D J? ?{
Mr. Ron Ferrell WQ [phone]
Mr. Owen Anderson WRC [phone] JAN 00 1995
Mr. David Dell FWS (919) 8564556
Mr. Tony Withers, P.E. CC [phone] 5. I
Mr. Leon Jernigan, PhD NJA [phone] ?A?tl? (?¢?BRI '?
PLANNING N'? 6???CH
From: J. Michael Stocks, P.E.
Re: Crooked Creek Golf Course and Residential Development
Owned by C. C. Partners, Inc.
DEM #94997, COE #199400727
Dear Sirs:
Per approved permit conditions the following is notification that C.C. Partners plans to begin wetland mitigation
planting for the above reference project on January 9, 1995. Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. and Withers &
Ravenel Engineering & Surveying, Inc. will oversee the planting operations headed by Leon Jernigan, Ph.D., of
Needham, Jernigan & Associates, Inc., Wetland Regulatory Specialist and Environmental Consultants. Plants for
the mitigation planting will be supplied by Gilmore Plant and Bulb Company, Inc.; out of Julian, North Carolina.
As of January 4, 1995:
• The COE and WQ have been notified that species planting will be grouped together for the highest chances of
survival rate, instead of the sequence planting as approved, i.e. the trees requiring the highest need for water
will be planted in the wettest areas.
• Leon Jernigan is in the process of discussing weed control with Mr. Doug Frederick, NCSU School of
Forestry, to determine the best means of weed control across the +/- 4 Acre site. It appears that weeds will
only be controlled in an area of 2' to 3' radius around the species planted. This will encourage wildlife to
forage in the undisturbed vegetated areas, i.e. keep the deer from wanting to eat the planted species.
• All mitigation planting is scheduled to be completed by March 31, 1995.
Should you have any questions please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely, Mike 9 A
JMS/94007F03.doc
841 South Wesleyan Blvd.
Rocky Mount, NC 27803
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jan. -1 11:4b UUUU HPPIHtJ W WL11HLi EHU PH TEL 1-yl -y'' -''biiJ
Transmission via Fax
P. 1
TITT
jinun
CONSULTING ENCJNCERS, PA
CIVIl,MI1NI0WAt LS141000QAt rNUNtttS
iloliBV L 7OYNER. PE
1. MlCfiA[L sIOC?,.S, PL.
Date: January 4. 1995
To. Mr. Eric Alsineyer COE [phone]
Mr. John Dorney WQ [phone]
Ron Ferrell
?Mr WQ [phone]
.
Mr. Owen Anderson WRC (919) S28-9839
Mr. David Dell FWS [phone]
Mr. Tony Withers, Y.E. CC [phone]
Mr. L con Jernigan, Yhl) N.IA [phone]
From: J. Michael Stocks, P.E.
Re: Crooked Creek Golf Course and Residential Development
Owned by C. C. Partners, Inc.
DEM #94997, COE #199400727
Dcar Sirs:
Per approved permit conditions the following is notification that C.C Partners plans to begin wetland nutlgation
planting for tilt: above reference; project oil January 9, 1995. Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. and Withers &
R.wenel Engineering & Surveying, file. will U.'crsee the planting operations headed by Leon Jernlpsn, Ph.D. of
Ni;Wham, Jernigan & Associates, Inc, Wetland Regulatory Specialist zind.Envlroiuuenlal Consultants. Plants for
the mitigation planting will be suppbcd by Gilmore Plant and Bulb Company, inc.; out of Julian, North Carolina.
As of January 4, 19957
The COE and WQ have been notified that spec:ics planting will be grouped together for the highest chances of
survival rate, instead of the sequence planting as approved, i.e. tilt trees requiring the highest need for water
will be planted in the wettest areas.
Leon Jernigan is in the proecss of discussing weed control with Mr. Doug Frederick, ; a1J School o
Forestry, to determine the best nicans of weed control across the +/- 4 Acre site. It appears
only be controlled in an area of 2' to 3' radius around the species planted. This will encourage wildlife to
forage in the undisturbed vcgetatW areas, i.e. keep the deer from wanting to eat the planted spe:ics
All mitigation planting is scheduled to be completed by March 31, 1995.
Should you have ally questions please contact me at [phone]
Sincerely, Mike 90105
J M 5/940071.0]. dc
1741 Spurh Vwcsleydn Blvd.
R,wky Mount, NC 27803
P.O Box 7966
RixLy Mount. NC 27ti(14
nww)w (`i14i 472.7703
fa (914)972-M38
Regulatory Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
September 23, 1994
Action ID. 199400727
Mr. Tony Withers
C.C. Partners, Inc.
1149 Executive Circle
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Dear Mr. Withers:

Reference the Department of the Army permit issued on
April 25, 1994, subsequently modified on June 22, 1994, for the
discharge of dredged and fill material in waters of the United
States, including wetlands, adjacent to Middle Creek, to
facilitate construction of th rooked Creek golf course and
residential development, near Macks Village, Wake County, North
Carolina. Reference also the letter dated August 8, 1994, from
J. Michael Stocks of Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A.,
requesting further modification of the permit to allow additional
change in the layout of several golf fairways, which would result
in a 0.52 acre decrease in wetland impact, and to allow a
modified mitigation plan which would eliminate wetland creation,
modify the proposed enhancement of field wetlands, and increase
the total conservation area. These modifications became
necessary when it was determined that several areas that had been
identified on project plans as pasture, within the impact and
mitigation areas actually, contain mature trees.
Based on the reduction of wetland impacts associated with
the proposed modification of the golf course layout, and our
determination that the proposed modified mitigation plan will
adequately compensate for the unavoidable wetland impacts, we
have determined that public review of the proposed modification
is not required. Therefore, the permit is hereby modified to
include the work and modified mitigation plan as shown on the
enclosed modified drawings, revised August 3, 1994. Special
Conditions a. and a9. are modified as follows:
a. The compensatory wetland mitigation plan shown on
the "WETLANDS MITIGATION MAP", dated 2-3-94, and last
revised on 8-3-94, and described in the "WETLAND
J. r
-2-
MITIGATION NOTES" of the same dates, will be implemented in
its entirety....
9. The 41.50 acre area shown as "CONSERVATION
EASEMENT" on the "WETLANDS MITIGATION MAP" will be
maintained in its natural state. The remaining.
compensatory mitigation areas will also be naintained
in their natural state upon meeting the success
criteria. Filling, excavation, grading, drainage,
thinning, clear cutting or select cutting of
vegetation, or any other environment-altering
activities are not permitted in these areas (infrequent
mowing is permitted in the 1.04 acre area designated
"FIELD WETLAND - CUT SEMI-ANNUAL"). The permittee
shall ensure that this condition will run with the
land, and shall be binding on any subsequent property
owner. Such steps shall include, but shall not be
limited to, clearly depicting the mitigation areas on
the subdivision plat for Crooked Creek as conservation
area, to be maintained in their natural state in
perpetuity, and by recording this permit with
conditions with the Register of Deeds of Wake County,
North Carolina, so that they appear in the chain of
title of the property.
It is understood that all remaining conditions of the
original permit remain applicable and that the expiration date is
unchanged.
Sincerely,
James H. Bradley
Construction-Operation
Division
Enclosure

-3-
Copies Furnished with enclosure:
,lf . John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Mgmt.
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box.27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
6
Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A
Attn: J. Michael Stocks
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, NCB 27804

LEGEND AM9&& r IN ACRES
OTHM WATERS OF U.8. TO 86 Fa l M) 0.34 Am
MELD WETLAND TO 8E FLLMO 228 Am
WOOOMD WETLAI fD TO BE CUT AND FLL-=X>. L32 AG.

MUST240 WATERS + WETLANDS 44.3 t At--
OAXF CART C OOeSt4G C.17 Aa
® FAFIWAY
D OMEN OR TM AREA

WEnAND TO BE FL LED
WOODED WETLANDS FiL.LED 1.32 A'
MELD WETLANDS FILLED 2.28 AC.
0=F CART CROSMNG a17 Am
OTHER WATERS 4.34 Am
4.11 Am
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
WETLANDS IMPACTED
JE
nnT 1!CTl1 11An x111 T 1111 T Af•I Cl ABU
• PROKSEO 10' EA'WAKT FOR ABOVE GRGVNO
6' WATV"E. A 10' a1WE M£ANOERING
® UrUTY EASEMENT WILL BE FIELD LOCATED
® TO AY010 LARGE TREE REMOVAL U 10' MO
THERE IS AN EXISTING FORCE MAIN LARGER
LOCATED IN A IV MEANOERINO EAST -1
ACCESS TO COLE
MAINTENANCE AREA :f! ; g , ?.•.
,tom ?i i ?iii::- i1:`•>i
pp //
ACCO3 TO
w+¦td.?s ee •' ':::? ?. Tom..-"•:
AIRA 27 wDt [? ii :Ei:t;F: i PRO.
- {"'?• ,N EAST INTAKE
••?Ji w Eii 2:E ,_? • ---'? /ii S7SA:>;117AE
'-?"........?....?...?_..?
C WATER
l
IA/
,• , • iiFEi:i
3
:Yl
r 1• • ?I•• I
.y
?. .
-•
«"
\
? 7
rte.-?-_•?-••'?'_

0i i

14

SCALE

0 300 600 750 goo Mo 1200
ads

rTT1nl1TT. T, rn>r err /ArTTtlhT Tn- t44ann7?.7) 1""""

O y i':;ia 3
O
O
© . S O E
Ql
0
® © o
® ® o
_CM,*O ?-

r4,? T
(D ®t,o 0 4 ® 0 ?z..
0
1
IMPA C TE:D]
Karr COCWXYAT04 tAMMINt
? eooom
wiu

3 g
2

SECTION 0
EAU,
1--vi' nos.
NOT TO r-vx VIM
asnas
n p
SEVION \@D
SCAtll,
•4T Td Sr.. r VCR.
$D-29 PLANTING
BARE-ROOTED SF>* MN S
iOt :a fact Y7•eA "
M.AHMI
'a4s4f CAM
st moms, MClurm. it It Is
rtl ZMY 'a MVC 1014- 1490 MILKS Tae .arC
n" It vCM OC ran fir VAT" MM RG 1)O Ic
'VOM it ;y r-rnr?Ki tp !M Acs verrnt M N:xAOt.
AMAaal M" It tt"ItAt, IC r%MK 'rYN,:
n':SI
f. la ?VpT.'YAtMa'. svrMn MCKAate VIM woos f"T AM Linn
a tT a x " 7t, A M"Ks, CaL. OW rKCrM lAwnol
CAM CF SEEDUM
YiRiie
a?w? 4eA Mail M r771 NII7r iMR :rill
Nit; IM M Or=& 10 Wit UM =01442 a TOA
leers CNORs to fit Ns, .0 sue !CCr •ass•?rOa:e
tCCLIM IN A carlAlbox rA0113, VnIA VC7 i@s tot rnus VIM tom
KAM VATS 00Y0t CLAY-TWAtO =XJWt VRP VET NeX OLT,
enter }M At MOK He YQ lmfr nine Tw Pell W TovAM
Me" ba." Mq R/CC -DO boats TvVMe Pbvrte r%ftoo
KM FUNNe to k? tamttcT ftinq 11m,1 s0i Ar'7ptttM
u• txw rairnoi. spin acsi arts a .pens
AM
I'Mi t VA4 ft= rqL d i.Atr ? ttor rUM64
NLL st
rwave AML Or &MIAr fT+,Iere MccW" n iJOnIT d
Tor d coats vrM Ian. vtr" tM rtti, rscs.tw
^ ?r t? T
°? rorAIT
oe M A Hie, L
oar V1010 n®t ains?. liff' ~wOi
KWH rl ?MTMCV[?.,,1
,.r ,p Iv1 x00 sad. • Yin
1 was m THAT l1 a t!Y '.
iRtlAt aT P" e= essfl N104
mw vmC Or M OrDUe. reaLT,
WEILaNO MITIGAMN NOTES
L AN eke wetlands were 11*9"d by Sol and EnvYonmMntd -
Consultants and liold located and mwped by tNthers and
1
boundary on
RarvvW, !no. The US= opp= ?trtsdt 1
Ootober 8, 1993, Mr. Eric Alomyte.
2. No filling or grading is to be performed In ornas dtsigncted
as 404 ).wfsdlctkxtd wetlands except .Hero area has been
approved and permitted by the USCOE and NrAE7tl, Water

3. Quality.
All work within Wetland area <nd/or rikeyol,or Oreq will be
'
- Wetmds
completed in accordance with Wan sheet n-imber 59,
'
Mitlgotlon Pion
.
'
A, eeate4 to
All surfooe runoff from r.",4sien Is to be 9
golf "Wet irt'-augn ponds, An ponds will be do"od
such that outlet points win! direct now to (a) existing
bottomiand hardwood wetlands (b) existing field wetlands
! that heel bean planted In bottorniond hardwoais or (c)
exutMg bottornland hardwood wetlands that hcr" been cut and
Al nano'( will be
r
se
o
tl
i
d
k
an
s g
n we
sp
os
s.
plant
o
U
th
d
l
am
#
•
en
directed thoua mcermodt wetlon4 or enhance
M1
C
k
land'

5. dde
ree
,
prior to entering
a natural wet
Planting tcre-rooted tree Seedlings: Trott- to be Wonted os
bore-rootta seedlings shouW be handed only while dormant Do
not plant V" b toil grasses or legumes which wit ovenhode the
now seedrngs. Wnxe poeaDle 141, mV1th around
seedlings, mulct will help seedlings to compete successfully
With herbaceous plants. For highest chamcs of apseles
IIWAi ol. ss"in9s should be Piontod in Jorworv and/or Feb vary
'
i. al be planted
AN CreOtad'pnd/or erthnneM planted xeas w
wlth *lx (61: dltt`orent species of trees (16.75 of each )
with trees at 10' f2• centers A tctd of 435 'lees/ acre
will be Planted Assuming o survi at rate 0.75x peer throe
(3) years, net yield .guols 325 Messlove greater than the
minimum of 320 Lees/acre. Any ssvtvd rote loss than 320
trees/acre ell result in the area beieng reolonted and/or
regraded and reWented.
7. Planting guidelines, survfval, and monitoring to conform to
Corps of Engines - Wlmirigtoo District - Compensatory
Hardwood Mitigation Ouldeilnes (12/8/93).
6. Mitigation Area::
a) Ponds: Wf course Irlgotiun ponds and Storm Water
Management Focllt!es, depth . 2'-6' deep. Area not
.punted M mtttgvtlon area. Total pond arse + 0.92 As,.
credit gl'-M w 0 Ac.
b) flooded WetletWa: Wetland butferf orcTnd Irrigation
ponds, depth + 0' to : deep. Area counted in
mitlgo tlon area as created wotlcm4 Set. Told flooded
wetland created w 1.16 Ac, Credft ghnn a 0.39 As, .
c) Enhoneed Wetlands: Area will be pi0nted In hardwood
trees or grosses. Area oountea h mittgatlon area is
enhanced Wetlands . k 1. Total w4wneed wetlands
. 4.43 As,. Credit ghen 1.11 As,
d) Omitted
e) Preservation Area. Arta currently ciass!fled as 65X
eland and 35% )irisdbtiond wetlands. This ores will
be paced M a comstmatton oosernent Area counted In
MIND am ono os pre.erA;0*r. 10:1. Total area of
conserwtton 41.50 Ac, credit gi+on 4.15 Ac-
f) Restored Wetlands: Area currently dassired as uWads
that were waters of the United Sates prior to POT114ted
dam surety frnpro•.wrment This area will be .Harsh nand
arias pond siewlbn is restored. Area counted In mitigation
eras, as restored wetlands, 2.1. Total rptored wwtlonas
. 0.64 Ac creaR Oom 0.32 Ae.
S. Tress to be pionted 'eciuaed any conbinatlon of at least 6
trees listed below. No one species shill be more tllon 20%
of total.
Chorryboex 3dt (Outreus oogo6(dla ALL) (1}
• Ash, Green (Froxinus Pemnsyly lca)
• Oak, Swornp Chestnut (0uereus uichOVO) (1}
• Oak. Water (Ourcu tliIra)
• Oak. WRtcw luerws Rialtos
• Gum. 81ock y Nye" Sy(votled
Mvoso Aquatloo) (1)
Water
Cum
® .
u
Overdfp Ook (i)uereus tyroto)
• common PeraNtimon (Otaspros Ylrglnl*mo t_) (?)
Trees availability confirmed from Worm '`Qvnty Nwsary,
Richard at [phone], awlaWt unless noted (1).
10. Crosses to be planted indud? any oombinat,on of at least 3
specks listed. No one species shot be more than 505 of
total.
• Spike Rush (Elaochar(s)
• Wet Pankvrn
• Common Reed (Ph Itee Catmunis Trim.)
• Hdlfox Moldencone (Panicum hem!tomon Shultes)
• P.edtop (Agroetb oba i.)
• Reed Comorygass (Phdorfs avndsrocea Q
010"f Wintercresper (Euonyfnus fortunes veto)
Wad Grass
Grassy Yegetotien selection x11 be made depending upon
availability of spears at the Orne of planting.
11. All created and enhanced wetland ono x'l1 be deed restricted 1t
C'Mr marked as 'Wetland Monitoring Area-Plea.. Stayxrt' in
do effort to prevent ?+v.-hart ow negt to Wont aeed"s.
12. An annual monttoring repent ell be autwnttted to the Corps
of Engineers In October of each year until vegetath*
success criteria Is met C.C. Par7tare representative to
coordinated with local COE offkw
13. C.C. Partners will secure o performance bond or sufficient
letter of credit to enure comp6anae with approved
mitigation requirements,
14. Dart Root tree seed". to be mininwrn t year old, 12 to 18
inctlte high. 1/4' or greater dtometw• root color. 4 or more
lateral roots and healthy. -
i5. Annual Maintenance of eo.sr34 Rough areas will be performed
In late fall -orAy. Do not mainton in early Spring or Summer.
15. Prior to planting bore root oseaLlin C.C. Partners wall contact
the Corps of Engineers and/, watt, Ouaflty Section
to notify each ogerney krvalved In the review pact » to see it
they are interested let portlc"ttng Im the Planting process.
..,-..,?,smr, i.r+rrnr.- /snmrnAr rn . i nnAn/t+•rn'^y 1
-^--- --""-- ft to"-
---- --- -.- ^ . ^, - . nn. ,..,. - ,. n n R n T U,,,' AA., n wn.i
LEGEND AMOUK IN ACMES

50ST1NG WATERS + WETLlISIDS 44.$ 3 A<
OF POND AAAE AA eO?ORATION ATN2 1EASTSIDE 0.64 Aa

00141SERYATON EASSAENT (28.40 Ac. 0F LAND
AND 18.10 Ai QFl` WETLANDS (PPFF-MWA-110N ATT IO -1)
J

4250 Aa
POND 0.92 A0.
INUNDATED WETLANDS V TO X
(CAL•ATION AT 3 - 1) t10 Ao.
EasTING F4121-0 D8 PLANTED K*PC CO ( CEUENT AT 4 4A3 Aa
MILD WETLAND - CUT 8EIMI-'ANNUAL iU4 Ac
IDD FAIRWAY
' ' t C3PMSJ OFt TEE APEA
R
A APPROVED ADJ. PROAOSED ADJ.
ACTION T MITIGATION MIT. MITIGATION WT.
I AMOUNT AMT. AMOUNT AMT.
n
• Restoration .......................... _.....................................................
• Creation - Upland to Wetlands ................................................
• Creation - Area around Ponds .............. i............................. .... 3:1'
• EN,oncw.t - FWd Wetland to Hardwoods - On-Site ...... 41
• Enhoncsmsnt - Fleld Wetland to Crosses .............................. 4.1
• Enhancement - Field Wetland to Hardwoods - Ott-Site ...... 4:1
• Conservation - Upland and Wtlond ........................................ 10:1
• Ponds ................ ....................................... .............................. _. -0-
Upland Planted in Hardwoods ................................................... 10:1
• Fwd Wetland - Cut Semi-Annual, Jut. not Ailed ................. -0-
TATAI K1I71GATION .... ............................................. ..........
• Red - Decrease in approved amount
• Blue - Increose to approved amount
• Block - Equal to the approved amount =
0"EERING' &: SURVEYING
iwemu" stet Cw. H& =11 (ele? Ml 34io
F
;,Repo= l0' EASEULW FOR ABOvE GROUND } -
E' WATERLINE. A 10' MADE WEANCUIIHO !
UTILITY r.,,m SVT M.L 9E nmo LOCATED
® TO AVC(O LARGE TRIM ROACIVAL 19 10'. AND
THERE IS AN -ASP..Nd -ORCE MA)N VslC£R
LOCATED IN A 15' MEANDER!NG EAST
ACCESS TO COLE MAINTENANCE AREA-?

a 1 k T}3MI x
PRO.
INTAKE

r
...-ti..??,,` .?+. .r- ..+ • rte- e

a.
r
s =

t
I

J

_ ,Q, _
SCALE.
0. 300 600 5C 900 1050 1200
rRnnu-wn rRFFK (ArTmiv 11)- IP.1940o727)

r.
1
/ ®r
E' \ {' Q
© Q Q \ O \ \\
qD T,/
\® ® -( _ \-----s- - _
sy .-J\
(1) T

7olc
W MAP
lap
WETLAND MITIGATION NOTES
t.
2
3.
4.
I r-
i
® 6.
3.
In site watipndt were gagged by Soil and Environmental
C• nsuitants and geld 19cote4 and mapped by Withers and
Rovenok Inc The USCOE approved )wlsd.Ctiafd bo rwlary on
October a. '.993, Mr. Eric Alemyer.
No filing ar grading it to be perfumed in areas designated
as 404 )+rlsdktlond wetlands except where area has boat
=Ion and permitted by the U300E and NCDOA. Water
Qualty.
All xark xlthkt wetland area and/or mitigation crew rill be
completed in accordance with plan sheet number 59, -W4ttmds
Mitigat;m Pion ^.
All surface rllnaff from subdfvteian is to be drected to
of course irrigator pones. All ponds will be designed
such that outlet points will direct 60w to (o) existing
bottomiand hardwood wetlands (b) existing field wetlands
that have been planted In battemhand hardwoods or (c) >
existing bottomo fond hardwood -*UwWt that It" been cut and
planted In wetlad species graws. AN nmoff will be
directed though o manmade wetfond or anhanced wotiond, then
a nature wetland =made entering Middle Creak
Planting barn-rooted tree sesdings: Treat :o be planted as
bore-rooted seedlings should be handed only while dormanC Oe
not plant trees In tap grasses or legumes which will 00"30 ads, the
now seedlings. More possible &do mulch around
scrod kw^ mulch will help seedlings to compete successfully
with herbacaove plants. For highest dw4s, of specks
survive, ssedlh^-;,?.t should be planted In Jwwwy and/or February
All created bra /or enhanced planted areas will be planted
with six (6) different spades of trees (16.78 of each )
with tress at 10' 32' centers. A. told of 4445 trestj Cara
will be Aunt" Assuming a surAvel rate of 75% over three
(3) years, not yield equals 326 trees/acre greater than the
rninfmum of 320 :rears/acre. Any surAyd rote less than 320
trees/acre will result M the area being replanted and/or
regraded and replotted.
Pionting guidelines, suMval, and monitoring to conform to
'CQtps of En dwood Mit kin tion Gluldellnos (12/8/93}. _ Compensatory
Aim"tion Areas: _
a) Management FaocRlties, qo depth Ter 6• deep. Area Wotv
not
counted M miUgotlan enc. Total pond area - 0.92 Ac.,
eraJlt given - 0 Ac.
b) flooded Wetlands: Wetland buffers around irrigation
ponds, depth • 0' to T deep. Area counted in
mitigation area as west ed watiand. 3:1. Told hooded
wetland created w 1.16 Ac, Crsdit ghwt w 0.39 Ac .
c) Enhanced Wollonds: Area will be planted In hardwood
trees. Ana counted in mitswI m area as.
ontwlosel wetlands . 4:1. Tote enhanced wetlatndt
. 4.43 Ac. Credit given . 1.11 As.
d) Omitted
e) FrssarWtfon Area Area currently classified as 63%
upland and 35% jurtsdct?smd wetlands. This area .ii
be placed In o conservation easement. Area counted in
mitigation area as preservation. 10:1• Total Ono of
conservation • 41.50 Ae- credit given 403 Aar
t) Restored Wetlands: Area currently claosifted as uplanes
that were waters of the United States prior to permitted
dam sofstr brhpravwnent: This, am will be. marW land
once pond eMvoHotr fit rettand. Ana aaunW In mt,kpt;an
area at restored wettands, 2:t. Total restored wetlands
. 0.64 Ac. credit given 0.32 At.
Trees to be planted Indudel any combination of at least 6
trees listed below. No one species shall ba more than 201-
of total.
Ash, Deaf (roxN Plimsy4vatical) UL) (7)
Oak Swomp Chestnut (Ouerws Michw.il) (4}
Oak rioter ((Qusrcw N1gro)
Oak. Wpbw (C( 4t+erat Phe
Cum, Block Mysse S)svot"
Wm. Water K Aquatka) (4).
0 wcup Oat (Querous L rota)
• Common Psrshnrnw (D1oV" Vleginicra L) (?)
'revs awicb!Rt?r confirmed from Waren County Nursery.
Richard of (61a) 668 0941. available unless noted (7Z
10. Crassex to be planted include any combination of at least 3
species Itatsd. Yo one species sharp be more than 50% of
total.
• Spike Rush (Eta Ktnars)
Wet Panicum
tae Cormnunle Trio.)
Gammon Reed (tam hsmltomon Shutters)
Rolioatop Metden ab Q
Road (Agroatia
Reed Conaygroes (Ishdarls arundtnaceo L)
• Bigkof Wintorweeper (Euanymus forttxhN.vegota)
• Wool Cross
Grassyy vegetation selection will be mode depending upon
cvaiiobitty of species of the time Of pt Ung.
11. AS created and enhanced wetland area will be deed restricted A
clearly marked as 'Watiand UwAoring Ano•-Plewe Stayoue kh
on effort to prevent hut n* do rage to plant o"dings.
An annual monfteeing report will be submitted to the Caps
of Engineers In October of aoeh Year until vegitotive
sucau o,itwia is mat. C.C. partners representative to
coordinated with local COE allies.
13. C.C. Partner will sewn a perfarr^anu bond or sufficient
letter of credit to ensure co npltanee with opprovsd
mit!gotloa raqulreawts.
14, Bare Root tree seedsnge to be mtnI mum t It or old, 12 to 18
inches high. 1/4' or rotor dfameter root caper. 4 or more
lateral roots and hod
15. Annual Maintenance of cooune Rough ands will be pertartnaI
r tale fail only. Oo not maintcln In early Sprl" or Summer.
16. Prior to plea bore root Im"ding CA Partners wart contoct
the of EnptnWe ad/, Water Oudity Section
to not! exalt agency involved In the review process to see if
they are Interested In partle{potirng In the, planting proesss.
. _..-- - ?' _ _ . .. ?.... ..? ...v .....v .-. oerPw leers sww "?
"'MI r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 15, 1994
Mr. Michael Stocks
Appian Consulting Engineers
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804-0966
Dear Mr. Stocks:
AITM.?FA
ED F= F1
RE: Approval of revision of mitigation plan
Wake County
DEM # 93997, COE # 199400727
DEM staff have reviewed your revised plans for mitigation at
Crooked Creek golf course dated 8 August 1994. These plans and
schedules are acceptable to DEM and are hereby approved as a
modification to Water Quality Certification Number 2879.
Please call Mr. John Dorney of my staff at 919-733-1786 if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,.
93997.rev
f- re'
Howcyrja, Jr. P . E .
cc: Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files

P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
APPIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
CIVIL AND MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
POST OFFICE BOX 7966
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA 27804-0966
BOBBY L. JOYNER, P.E.
August 8, 1994
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
RE: Crooked Creek - Mitigation
COE Action ID #199400727
DEM Action ID #93997
Wake County, NC
Dear Eric:
S IJ
t
- 9 ILA,
i
S ti i.
841 S. WESLEYAN BLVD.
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX r (1319) 972-7638
As you are know we have been working on a revised impact and mitigation plan for Crooked
Creek. The attached plan outlines the proposed changes. It is our belief that this plan is
better than the original plan, due to the fact that we were able to use off-site areas to mitigate
and not just the areas on-site. The recently acquired land adjacent to our project, along the
northern side of Middle Creek, allowed us to utilize land that was not considered in the original
approved permit. Below are tables that compare the approved impact and mitigation plans to
the modified impact and mitigation plans.
APPROVED PROPOSED
ACTION IMPACT IMPACT
AMOUNT AMOUNT
• Cut but not Filled 0.23 0.00
• Channel Filled 0.34 0.34
• Field to be Filled 2.20 2.28
• Woods to be Filled 1.61 1.32
• Golf Cart Crossings 0.25 0.17
TOTAL IMPACT
4.63
4.11
¦ Red - Decrease in approved amount
¦ Blue - Increase in approved amount:
¦ Black - Equal to the approved amount

August 8, 1994
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
2
R
A APPROVED ADJ. PROPOSED ADJ.
ACTION T MITIGATION MIT. MITIGATION MIT.
AMOUNT AMT. AMOUNT AMT.
O

• Restoration 2:1 0.64 0.32 0.64 0.32
• Creation - Upland to Wetlands 3:1 0.46 0.15 0.00 0.00
• Creation - Area around Ponds 3:1 1.10 0.37 1.16 0.39
• Enhancement - Field wetland to Hardwoods - On-Site 4:1 4.24 1.06 0.00 0.00
• Enhancement - Field Wetland to Grasses 4:1 2.07 0.52 0.00 0.00
• Enhancement - Field Wetland to Hardwoods - Off-Site 4:1 0.00 0.00 3.93 0.98
• Conservation - Upland and Wetland 10:1 37.60 3.76 41.50 4.15
• Ponds -0- 1.17 0.00 0.92 0.00
• Upland Planted in Hardwoods 10:1 1.84 0.18 0.00 0.00
• Field Wetland - Cut Semi-Annual, but not filled -0- 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00

TOTAL MITIGATION 49.12 6.36 49.19 5.84
¦ Red - Decrease in approved amount
¦ Blue - Increase in approved amount:
¦ Black - Equal to the approved amount
This revision has a net decrease in impact of 0.52 acre, a percent decrease of 11.2% and a
net decrease in adjusted mitigation area of 0.52 acre, a percent decrease of 8.2%. It is our
option that this layout is a preferred alternative and it should receive a favorable review. We
do not believe Water Quality will be negatively impacted due to the modification, in-fact, if
examined this alternative may of been preferred over the approved plan. It is designed to
leave the questionable field areas in their natural state in a conservation easement, such that
the vegetation volunteering can continue to grow in an undisturbed state and designed to
locate the proposed enhancement area in one general location to avoid several small patches
of enhanced areas. The relocation of the enhanced area, out of the golf course area, will
increase the survival chances of the trees planted due to the fact that future golfers will not be
disturbing the area while playing. Having one large enhanced area will also help simplify the
monitoring process for the annual report to be submitted.
August 8, 1994
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
3
All areas of mitigation will be implemented no later than March 31, 1995 as outlined in the
original approved permit. Several venders for acquiring the trees have been contacted and
each inform us that the trees should by ordered around mid October to early November in
order to have sufficient time to acquire and plant the trees by the March 31, 1995 deadline.
Venders contacted were Tommy Massey and C.B. Daughtridge, both of whom deal with
Warren County Nursery out of Tennessee.
We are requesting that the currently approved wetland permit, Action ID #199400727 and
DEM Water Quality Certification, Action ID #93997 be modified to reflect the revised impact
and mitigation plan. Once again we believe that the modification does not adversely impact
the aquatic ecosystem or have significant adverse environmental consequences, therefore we
request a favorable consideration to the proposed revised impact and mitigation plan.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Should your require any additional
information please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
J. Michael Stocks, P.E.
cc: Mr. Ron Ferrell
Mr. Tony Withers, P.E.
file
attachments
JMSMW7C07.d.
a
LEGEND AMOUNT IN ACRES
EXISTING WATERS + WETLANDS 44z* Ac.
RESTORATION OF WETLANDS ALONG EASTSIDE
OF FOND AREA (RESTORATION AT 2, 1 ) 0.e4 Ac.
CON1SERNATION EASEMENT (26A0 Ac. OF UPLAND
AND 15.10 Aa OF WETLANDS (PRESERVATION AT 10 11) 4L50 Ac.
Ftj POND 0.92 Aa
7 94LMATED V&-T .ANDS a TO 2'
(CREATION AT 3 - 1) 116 Ac.
EXISTING FELD WETLANDS TO BE PLANTED
W WETLAND GRASSES (ENHANCEMENT AT 4 1 ) 3S3 Aa
. FELD WETLAND - CUT SEM-ANINUAL 104 Ac.
[D] FAIRWAY
14-01 GREEN OR TEE AREA
R
A APPROVED ADJ. PROPOSED ADJ.
ACTION T MITIGATION MIT. MITIGATION MIT.
I AMOUNT AMT. AMOUNT AMT.
0
e Restoration .................................................. ......................... :... .. 2:1 0.64 0.32 0.64 0.32
e Creation - Upland to Wetlands .............................................. .. 3:1 0.46 0.15 0.00 0.00
e Creation - Area around Ponds ............................................. ... 3:1 1.10 0.37 1.16 0139
e Enhancement - Feld Wetland to Hardwoods - On-Site .... .. 4:1 4.24 1.06 0100 0.00
e Enhancement - Fleld Wetland to Grosses ............................ .. 4:1 2.07 0.52 0.00 0.00
e Enhancement - Feld Wetland to Hardwoods - Off-Site .... .. 4:1 0.00 0.00 3.93 0.98
e Conservation - Upland and Wetland ..................................... ... 10:1 37.60 3.76 41.50 4.15
e Ponds ....................................................................................... .. -0- 1.17 0.00 0.92 0.00
e Upland Planted in Hardwoods ................................................. .. 10:1 1.84 0.18 0.00 0.00
e Feld Wetland - Cut Semi-Annuol, but not filled ............... ... -0- 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00
TOTAL MITIGATION ................................................. ................. .. 49.12 6.36 49.19 5.84
e Red - Decrease in approved amount
e Blue - Increase in approved amount
e Black - Equal to the approved amount
Z91 IF, 1.1" o?Qga
aa1f?YIraIKp! 3011KTRVIAL
yalOEOa
Y? 11LV1c K >7i?
eye sans
Withers & Ravenel, Inc,
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1140 0MCUTIYE CIRCLE. CNRY, N.C. 27511 [phone]
Revisions
No. Descri ban Date WETLANDS MITIGATION MAP
Y 1-1- JIS
4 TON NOM- A NA1F115 -
YVACT MD YTWTW M -

2
14 /
THERE IS AN EXISTING FORCE MAIN
LOCATED IN A 15' MEANDERING EAST
ACCESS TO GOLF .;j
MAINTENANCE AREA
A ,'? uA917FNAN(E
Access To ! A FA
PROPOSED 10' EASEMENT FOR ABOVE GROUND
6" WATERLINE A 10' MADE MEANDERING
UTILITY EASEMENT WALL BE FIELD LOCATED
TO AVOID LARGE TREE REMOVAL, le 10" AND
PRO.
INTAKE
STRUCTURE

A Ie,
0
A
/?" - •-\ -v 17
%
j?
1 • ?• 0
SCALE
0 300 600 750 900 1050 1200
Driq:r soul. sns.e Na
r.xn
CROOKED CREEK (ACTION ID: 199400727) or- ?2 3 9t 59a
Ch k d By JoD Ne.
920.39

1
I ° a
O ® i - DRIVING RANGE -
0 0 0 © 0 (9) CD ooOO©oool... Zln ??°

J1,

DO NOT Osw" KOH CONSERVAIIO! EASFIAENT
-010
1.

2
.

?
?
8 8
a ?8
4.
1
r
LI B
SECTION AQ 5.
SCALE.
1.200• HOR. -
.T TO SCALE VER.
NOT Y OS AND WRIER REILAND FILL AREA BEGIN CONSERVATION © 6.
EASENCINT
Tote CREATION AREA
?a Y BE
?s
S 6 ? ? ? 8G. ? 8 Sa Sa 8e §
SECTION ©(
SCALE-
1•.20a HOR.
NOT TO SCALE VER.
SD-29 PLANTING
BARE-ROOTED SEEDLINGS
Hm TD scALE SO-rN
CARE OF BEEDLMCiB
UNTIL PLANTID
SEEDLINGS SIRILD DE PLANTED DINEDIAIELT, 7 IT IS
NECESVin' TO STORE M-SS?ACtED SEEDLINGS rat HERE
THAN 2 VCCK% ONE PINT DF VATER PER PKG. SHIXILD DE
ADDED. 7 CLAY-TREATIo% W NOT ADD VATER TO PACKAGE.
'AaRx NWST DE SEPARATED To PHDVE E vENTDATTIN
TO PREVCNr TOG•. SEPARATE PACKAGES VIm1 v1® STRIPS MID STORE
=
MITT OF 111E
I A "DIED, COR (NOT rRE EZM LOCATION.
. rCT•yyrARRRE ?0FFpr?S?EAEr?rOTr.L?ffiM "
vet, PLANT KEPT NOISE ONTLL TREES
ME ]N PO cROl m SEEP iN rauR

AND S a
HAND EXPOSED TO THE AIR M KEEP HOPACED
SEEADI/ O A CAR PACKED WITH VET
ET M-nSS OR, ml THICK
MUDDY _UM. . CGvVR OVER CLAY-TREATED SEF:DLDFG.t VIT X VET Rv xi VET UILAR -1
aLY.
HAND PLANTM
pi6 m& Am
INSERT DAR AT RCN- DAR AND
ANGLE SXDVN AND PLACE SEEMING
PUSH FOKVARD TO AT COD ECT
WRIOIT POSmEN. DEPTH
1
'?6 INSERT DAR TVO PILL MR TOWARD
DKAIES TOWARD PLANTER rDea.
PLANTER FROM SILL AT DOTTOH
SEEDLING. Or RWTS.

16 A
PUSS MR FORVARD FILL IN LAST
FTFRRO Nfi ANT AT SH RIG

TO. W RDOTS. WITH HEEL r1SG SOIL TEST PLANTING
ASEEIXING ROUND GW PULL
NTLT ON
WITH FEET. SEEDLING.
E DONT EXPOS[

r0 AIR
R.
„ ... . '• ? ?r
RIpR"' ? VRQG FaoztN OGOISIe PLART

S .
AT AN AHfiE. ... ..
Ricer" '? vROxG

•.. -'

. .•
'
' NaT REND
ROOFS W TINT
'.' .;.• iNEY GROW

':•• ALVA L PLAfIT M
SOIL - EVE

LFi1VES:; i
LCaSE `
M DCDIKIS .

'
RICH
. uPVARDi OuT
WTOG Di TIE fDN1M0. PACK SOB F.

TIGHTLY.
, VROG
WETLAND MITIGATION NOTES
All site wetlands were flagged by Sol and Environmental
Consultants and field located and mopped by Withers and
Ravenel, Inc. The USCOE approved jurisdictianai boundary on
October 8, 1993, Mr. Eric Alsmyer.
No filling or grading is to be performed in areas designated
as 404 jurisdictional wetlands except where area has been
approved and permitted by the USCOE and NCDEM, Water
Quality.
All work within wetland area and/or mitigation area will be
completed in occordance with plan sheet number 59, 'Wetlands
Mitigation Pion
All surface runoff from subdivision is to be directed to
golf course irrigation ponds. All ponds will be designed
such that outlet points will direct flow to (a) existing
bottomland hardwood wetlands (b) existing field wetlands
that have been planted in bottomland hardwoods or (c)
existing bottomlond hardwood wetlands that have been cut and
planted in wetland species grasses. All runoff will be
directed though a monads wetland or enhanced wetlond, then
a natural wetland prior to entering Middle Creek.
Planting bore-rooted tree seedlings: Trees to be planted as
bare-rooted seedlings should be handled only while dormont. Do
not plant trees in tall grasses or legumes which will overshode the
new seedlings. Where possible circle mulch around
seedlings, mulch will help seedlings to compete successfully
with herbaceous plants. For highest chance of species
survival, seedlinggs should be planted in ,bnuary and/or February
All created and/or enhanced planted areas will be planted
with six (6) different species of trees (16.7% of each )
with trees at 10' t2' centers. A total of 435 tress/ ace
will be planted. Assuming a survival rate of 75% over three
(3) years, net yield equals 326 trees/acre greater than the
minimum of 320 trees/ace Any survival rate less than 320
trees/acre will result in the area being replanted and/or
regraded and replanted.
Planting guidelines, survival, and monitoring to conform to
Corps of Engineers - Wllmingtan District - Compensatory
Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines (12/8/93).
Mitigation Areas:
a) Ponds: Golf course irrigation ponds and Storm Water
Management Focilities, depth - 2'-6' deep. Area not
counted in mitigation area. Total pond area - 0.92 Ac.,
credit given - 0 Ac.
b) Flooded Wetlands: Wetland buffers around irrigation
ponds, depth - 0' to 2' deep. Area counted In
mitigation area as created wetlond, 3:1. Total flooded
wetlond created - 1.16 Ac, Credit given - 0.39 Ac .
C) Enhanced Wetlands: Area will be planted in hardwood
trees or grasses. Area counted in mitigation area as
enhanced wetlands , 4:1. Total enhanced wetlands
- 3.93 Ac., credit given - 0.98 Ac.
d) Omitted
e) Preservation Area: Area currently clossified as 657
upland and 35% Jurisdictional wetlands. This area will
be placed in a conservation easement. Area counted in
mitigation area as preservation, 10:1. Total area of
conservation - 41.50 Ac., credit given 4.15 Ac.
t) Restored Wetlands: Area currently classified as uplands
that were waters of the United States prior to permitted
dam safety improvement This area will be marsh land
once pond elevation is restored. Area counted in mtigotion
area as restored wetlands, 2:1. Total restored wetlands
- 0.64 Ac. credit given 0.32 Ac.
Trees to be planted included any combination of at least 6
trees listed below. No one species shall be more than 20%
of total.
• Cherrybork Oak (Oueroua Pagodifolio ELL) (?)
• Ash. Green (Froxinus Pennsylvanico)
• Oak, Swamp Chestnut (Quercus Michauxii) (?)
• Oak, Water ((Quercus Nigro)
• Oak, Willow ((( Quercua Phellos)
• Gum. Black Nyssa Sylvetico
• Gum• Water Nysm Aquatico) (?)
• Overcup Oak (Queroue Lyrata)
• Common Persimmon (Diospyros Virginiona L) (?)
Trees ovalability confirmed from Warren County Nursery,
Richard at [phone], available unless noted (?).
10. Grosses to be planted include any combination of at least 3
species listed. No one species shall be more than 50% of
total.
• Spike Rush (Eleocharis)
• Wet Ponicum
• Common Reed (Phrogmites Communis Trin.)
• Halifax Moidencone (Panicum hemitomon Shultes)
• Redtop (Agrostis olbo L)
• Reed Conorygraas (Pholaris arundinacea L)
• Bigleof Winterceeper (Euonymus fortunel vegota)
• Wool Grass
Grassy vegetation selection will be made depending upon
availability of species at the time of planting.
11. All created and enhanced wetland area will be deed restricted &
clearly marked as "Wetland Monitoring Area-Please Stayout• in
an effort to prevent human damage to plant seedlings.
12. An annual monitoring report will be submitted to the Corps
of Engineers in October of each year untl vegetative
success criteria is met. C.C. Partners representative to
coordinated with loco[ COE office.
13. C.C. Partners will secure a performance bond or sufficient
letter of credit to ensure compliance with approved
mitigation requirements.
14. Bare Root tree seedlings to be minimum 1 year old, 12 to 18
Inches high, 1/4• or greater diameter root collar, 4 or more
Inches roots and healthy.
15. Annual Maintenance of course Rough areas will be performed
in late fall only. Do not maintain in eariy Spring or Summer.
16. Prior to planting bare root seedling C.C. Partners will contact
the Corps of Engineers and/or NCDEM, Water Quality Section
to notify each agency involved in the review process to see if
they are Interested in participating in the planting process.
7
CROOKED CREEK (ACTION ID: 199400727)
I D.- ,w SeP4 SNAYt NR.
Y-300'
By
Dgly ?. HR.
°?' 60a
2-3-34
C?Rtlwe
92039

Revisions
Withers ER Ravenel, Inc. N?. Description Date I By
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS IMPACTED
a
1149 EXECUTK Mom CARE. KC. 27311 (919) X69-SSW ? nM 2 Na-?E¢1I. } - .K
IWACf wm urnwna e.a-a .Ks
:ED
CROOKED CREEK (ACTION ID: 199400727)
D-10- s"" Snwt ra.
P.IDS
Dm- By
ooe. 5 9
1-3-94
CMe4M B/ Job W.
94039
PROPOSED 10' EASEMENT FOR ABOVE GROUND
® 6' WATERLINE A 10' WIDE MEANDERING
0 UTILITY EASEMENT WLL BE FlELD LOCATED
TO AVOID LARGE TREE REMOVAL, le 10' AND
n?cwc ie eu cnerun rnwrc unw .......-..
- DRINNG RANGE -
® 0
I I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0t
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N1•
o
O O Ole 0 0 0 0 ••• 1
O O O 0 0 0 0 0- - I :n
0 0© 0 0 0 0 0 •••
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •••
O •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •••
C ENERAL NOTIE:e
L MNTDa MUCIA rO! i awFE a SPEC
A, PATTOOT 10 M NATER OF SPECIES.
®L NEANKR PAT SEERLDCS ON Lr' A CENTERS.
3 PLANTCA M CNATR LDCATOT OF SPECD:S
FLAMED FM FUTUK NOINTO0I6
/. TKFEAT PLNRD6 SCRENCE L EMIRS
PLN M MCA IN TTLLY FLAWM
TYPICAL WrIGATION
PLANING PATTERN (6 SPECIES)
- - NOT M SCALE
L1°, ppOG,1° m SCALE
COWLT" D
aa. Nwvr . ?PA
oTUNaF
ra TYt TMI
0 300 600 750 900 1050 1200
®X ki
)O
Q -41
fl
Withers & Ravenel, Inc. NRoeV1S1Of1S Description I Dote
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING h JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS IMPACTED
1140 DMMgW MOLE. CARY• N.C. 27511 (019) 460-WW Jill xoR .. w
V?CT ANR rnGaoN 8- JE
BEAN OXB ADDN EAYNart WETLAND MITIGATION NOTES
00 NOT pSNRB NOCafD
1. All site wetlands were flagged by Sol and Environmental
Consultants and field located and mapped by Withers and
Rovenel, Inc. The USCOE approved jurisdictional boundary on
r October 8, 1993. Mr. Eric Alsmyer.
2. No filling or grading is to be performed in areas designated
Q ,°ypr yr °?R:pr 9 as 404 jurisdictional wetlands except where area has been
Sg H S S approved and permitted by the USCOE and NCDEM, Water
x S 555 S S y? Quality.
3. All work within wetland area and/or mitigation area will be
8 „4 y _$ :$ completed in accordance with plan sheet number 59, *Wetlands
S S WS "S y Mitigation Plan'.
4. All surface runoff from subdivision is to be directed to
golf course irrigation ponds. All ponds wni be designed
such that outlet points will dlreat flow to (a) existing
bottomland hardwood wetlands (b) existing field wetlands
that have been planted in bottomland hardwoods or (a)
existing bottomland hardwood wetlands that have been cut and
planted in wetland species grasses. , All runoff will be
L _F directed though a manmade wetland or enhanced wetland, then
a natural wetland prior to entering Middle Creek.
SECTION @ 5. Planting bare-rooted tree seedlings: Trees to be planted as
SCALES bore-rooted seedlings should be handled only while dormant. Do
1••200 N.R. not plant trees in tall grasses or legumes which will overshode the
NOT TO SCALE VER new seedlings. Where poseble circle mulch around
seedlings, mulch will help seedlings to compete successfully
with herbaceous plants. For highest chance of species
sLTAMS 'RAT survival, seedlinggs aM1ould be planted idn .bnuary and/or Felxuory
AND A n1. ARFA eEGxVATOM ®6. All created and/or enhonaed planted ress wll be planted NOT oroisDrre aIEATIDN AREA r EAm?aa r with- six (6) different species of trees (16.7% of each )
W with trees at 10' t2' Centers- A total of 435 trees/ acre
cull be planted. Assuming a survival rate of 75% over three
p (3) years, net yield equals 326 trees/acre greater than the
3 err tlr Sipg minimum of 320 trees/.cre. Any survival rote less than 320
8 S« trees/acre will reault in the area being replanted and/or
9 $ $ S G 4 regraded and replanted.
F?44 $4 7. Planting guidelines, survival, and monitoring to conform to
S. iT SS S l
$B SS S8 Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines es 7(12/8/93).- Compensatory
® S. Mitigation Areas:
a) Ponds: Golf course Irigotion ponds and Storm Water
Management Faclities• depth - 2'-6• deep. Area not
counted in mitiggation area. Total pond ore. - 0.92 Ac.,
Credit given - 0 Ac.
b) Flooded Wetlands: Wetland buffe around irrigation
ponds, depth - 0' to 2' deep. Area counted in
mitigation area as created wetland, 3:1. Total flooded
wetland created - 1.16 Ac, Credit given - 0.39 Ac .
c) Enhanced Wetlands: Area will be planted in hardwood
SECTION © trees or grosses. Area Counted in mitigation area as
enhanced wetlands , 4:1. Total enhanced wetlands
SCALE - 3.93 Ac., credit given - 0.98 Ac.
t•°700 HOR. d) Omitted
NOT TO SCALE vER, e) Preservation Area: Area currently classified as 65%
upland and 35% jurisdictional wetlands. This area win
be placed in a conservation easement. Area counted In
mitigation area as preservation, 10:1. Total area of
.. conservation - 41.50 Ac., credit given 4.15 Ac.
SD-29 PLANTING f) Restored Wetlands: Area wrently classified as uplands
that were waters of the United States prior to permitted
BARE-ROOTED SEEDLINGS dam safety improvement This area will be marsh land
NUT T. SCALE 5-3-94 once pond elevation is restored. Area counted in mitigation
area as restored wetlands, 2:1. Total restored wetlands
CARE OF 9EEC7LWCi9 - 0.64 Ac. Credit given 0.32 Ac.
UNTA_ PLANTED 9. Trees to be planted included any combination of at least 6
SE MINIS SHOULD DE PLARED OPEDNTELY, a IT IS trees listed below. No one species shall be more than 20%
NECESSARY TO STORE NOSS-PACKED SEEDLa1GS M 1KNE of total.
THAN a WCOM ONE PM OF VATER PER PM SHOULD It
ADDER IF CLAY-TREATM Da NOT ADD VATER To PACNAfi.
PACKAGES MUST K SEPARATED TO PROVIDE VENTILATION • Cherrybork Oak (Quercus Pagodifallo ELL) (.)
TO PREVENT WATING'. SEPARATE PACVADES Vml VOID STRRS AND STORE • Ash, Green (FfaxnUS PMnsylvOnlCa)
our OF mt vwD IN A suDEa Nxn Oar rncEZNNCT LrcwnaA Oak, Swomp Chestnut (Quercus Michouxii) (?)
CARE CP BEEDLN09 Oak, Water laso erws N graQUIR d PLANTING Oak, Willow erwa Aellos)
Gmysaa Sylvatica
ARE IN T aoX W br oRY EyENmLS? w ?s GumAquatica) (?)
NAND EXPOSED TO TINE AIR AND Suit NECP NOSS-PA D ® Overcup Oak (Querns Lyrato)
SECO3NG IN A CONTAINED PACIiD v[TN VET NOSS OR rw.ED VnH THIEVE Common Persimmon (Diospyros Vlfginlono L) (?)
NJDDY VAFOL COVER CLAY-TREATED SEEP-MS VITH VEr BIEaAP OI_Y.
HAND PLANTNO Trees availability confirmed from Warren Cwnty Nursery,
i Richard at [phone], awlable unless noted (?).
10. Grasses to be planted Include any combination of at least 3
species listed. No one speei shall be more than 50% of
total.
INSERT BAR AT REMOVE DAR AND Raw BAR Iva PULL so raVARD • Spike Rush (Eleochods)
ANGLE SH11" AND PLACE SEETtING INCHES 7OVmD PLANTER rON" Wet POnicum
MH F01h ARD TO AT CORRECT PLANTER FR SOIL AT 110770`4
LPRTOr POSITIO. DEPT. SEECLONe EP Pains. Common Reed (Phraggmmites Communis Trin.)
• Halifax Maidencone'(Panicum hemitomon Shultes)
• Redtop (Agroatis albo L)
• Reed Conarygross (Pholaris arundinoceo L)
t6 ?fi • Blgleof Wlntercreeper (Euonymus fortunes vegata)
• Wool Grass
PUSH DAR FORVARD FILL IN LAST riRm sax. TEST PLANTING Grassy vegetation selection rin be made depending upon PuLLING
ra?e,ING PLANTER SOR. AT $T sn°m SEEK" up Y a availobility of species at the time of planting.
TOP of ROins. vmN NFb rtN It". srEUaxa 11. All created and enhanced wetland area will be deed restricted k
clearly marked as •WeUend Monitoring Area-Please Stayout• in
mr E an effort to prevent humor damage to plant seedlings.
RaDTS To Am ADt xwlT 12. An annual monitoring report will be submitted to the Corps
SEE0.W0
l:. IIIDIRFA@E "LrwcNAlAr,Li of Engineers in October of each year until vegetative
PLANT
RIdT NRb1G FROZEN CADUNa RIOR vRQ1G success criteria is met. C.C. Partners representative to
coordinated with local COE office.
13. C.C. Partners will secure a performance bond or sufficient
r.vArs PUNT m
m Nor DEND mD. _ NEVE letter of Credit to ensure compliance with approved
T - ROOTS TM"T LWSE LCAVEi:; mitigation requirements.
THEY DSDOOUT DR DEBRIS 14. Bare Root tree seedlings to be minimum 1 year old, 12 to 18
JL1 L-
won, vRaw rc THE axoum. P may, RIa1T , vRmO Inches high, 1/4• or greater diameter root Collar, 4 or more
lateral roots and healthy.
15. Annual Maintenance of course Rough areas will be performed
in late fall only. Do not maintain In early Spring or Summer.
16. Prior to planting bore root seedling C.C. Partners will contact
the Corps of Engineers and/or NCDEM, Water Duality Section
to notify each agency involved in the review process to see if
they are interested in participating in the planting process.
Oasgnr Stub SNwr No.
1'•30a
'D CROOKED CREEK (ACTION ID: 199400727) °°° "4.3.94 60
a.d-I By
JoD No.
94039
*0
41
y
STATE
r:
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Director
February 10, 1988
Mr. Art Wylie
Borum & Associates, Inc.
P. O. Box 14215
Greensboro, NC 27415-4215
Subject: Proposed Fill in
Headwaters or Isolated
Wetlands
Green Ford, Inc.
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Wylie:
Upon review of your request for Water Quality
Certification to place fill material in an unnamed tributary
to South Buffalo Creek, we have determined that the proposed
fill can be covered by General Water Quality Certification
No. 2176 issued November 4, 1987. A copy of the General
Certification is attached. This Certification may be used
in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers'
Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact Bill Mills at
919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
William C. Mills
For R. Paul Wilms
RPW/dkb
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 276117687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Y
t
t
BORUM & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
405-D PARKWAY
GREENSBORO, N. C. 27401
MAILING ADDRESS:
P. O. BOX 14215
GREENSBORO. N. C. 27415-4215
November 2, 1987
N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources
& Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Attn: Mr. Bill Mills
Dear Bill:
TELEPHONE [phone]
272-3115
AREA CODE 919
R'Ec?
rI V,
YUV ° `? jg87
11PEkA to ""s E s,FCr1QN
As per our conversation of this date, regarding the Green Ford project in
Greensboro, I am writing to ask that this project be covered under a General
Water Certification.
I am enclosing one (1) copy each of the following for your information:
1. Copy of Application
2. Vicinity Map
3. Property Map
4. Typical Fill Section
5. Corps-of Engineers Information Sheet
Please continue with your review of this project, and if you have any
questions, or require additional information, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
BORUM & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Art Wyli
SAW/cc
Encls.
APPLICATION
FOR
PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
Department of Administration State of North Carolina Department of the Army
(GS 146.12) Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(GS 113-229,143-215.3(a)(1), 143-215.3(c), 113A-118 (33 CFR 209.320-329)
RECESVE®
Please type or print and fill in all blanks. If information is not applicable, so indicate by placing N/A in blank.
NuV0 3 1987
1. Applicant Information WATER QUALITY SECTION
A. Name Green Ford, Inc. OPERATIONS BRANCH
Last First Middle
B. Address 3800 West Wendover -Avenue
Street, P. 0. Box or Route
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 [phone]
City or Town State Zip Code Phone
If. Location of Proposed Project:
A. County Guilford
B. 1. City, town, community or landmark Greensboro
2. Is proposed work within city limits? Yes X No
C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or nearest- named body of water to project Unnamed
tributary to South Buffalo Creek
Description of Project
A. 1. Maintenance of existing project 2. New work Culvert
B. Purpose of excavation or fill
I. Access channel N/A length width depth
2. Boat basin N/A length width depth
3. Fill area N/A length oo`6?- width'f depth 5
4. Other N/A length width depth
C. I. Bulkhead length NIA Average distance waterward of MHW (shoreline)
2. Fype of bulkhead construction (material)
D. Excavated material (total for project)
1. Cubic yards 500 2. Type of material Structural fill
E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (see also VI. A)
1. Cubic yards 10,000 2. Type of material Structural fill
IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment: '
A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes No X
B. Does the disposal area include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes No X
C. Disposal Area
1. Location On site
2. Do you claim title to disposal area? Yes
D. Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in N/A
E. How will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled? Sediment pond and stone dam
1'. 'I ype of equipment to be used Backhoe, bulldozer, pan
G. Will marshland be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? If yes, explain No
i F-81
r
V. Intended Use of Project Area (Describe)
A. 1. Private
2. Commercial
3. Housing Development or Industrial
4. Other
B. I. Lot size(s) 7.50 Ac.
2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water
3. Soil type and texture
4. Type of building facilities or structures N/A
5. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing Public sewer Planned
B. Describe
6. 'Land Classification'(circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITY RURAL
CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis)
VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality:
A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes No X
B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the
area following project completion? Yes-No X
2. Type of discharge
3. Location of discharge
VI I. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A
VIII. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for
work in project area, if applicable: N/A
IX. Length of time required to complete project: 120 days
X. In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided:
A. Attach a.copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant
claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property,
then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written
permission-from the owner to carry out the project on his land.
B. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8% X 11 "'white paper (sec instruction booklet for
details). Note: Original drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted.
C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or
certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113-229 (d))Enter date served
D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's.
Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below.
XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies
with the State of North Carolina's approved coastal management program. and will be conducted in a
manner consistent with such program.
X11. Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli-
cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel-
opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing.
DATE 8-71-87
Boeuro 4'Associ,4r A
405-o PAZ11Ay pphcant s Signature
f°o. $ox ?4z?5
O & F-6 2 ?a CEE?t/SBOeo N.C.
Rev. 10/78 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS
z?S
?T tt3j / sro ??
1 ILE:
(0 4Ei.
FENTNfS? ??
RID 1 ?----1373, 1 --..? -
N?
?d
1 a
NJ T
CAR GIE
PLAcE
O'S
R7 ? ? 1370 ?
JL / S
I
?N-J g .un a g i I `? I546 n _- ???? 1348 4
/? E A`tP c
c. /nl y t _'G____ ?p ug; 80%WOOD L p 1
_.?>__Jp r-?I / / -•J `";t, qp FRANCES KING`.
!L Ji ??- ••_ 4?, qo `fir
1
.
14CNTLIEU AV,??ly T r yl ?'
(a 1369 ROA m
0 21gq
Pa HOq .???y a3A''D5i T.^Y. a
?q'Oi ?`S'7• f ° K
y q N oa LAUSANNE w
O
p( C ??? O 00
q SNEAMAN T.
Pp
? 9 ? o!RY? ?A •? m m
/ ?,?ON A R y_ ? © p%f R
w A -
_ A y CANNON RD'
A
y P
_ ? z `d• d -'- oc' ?JL_9PiRING _ + _._ _ -___-_.
° 1 pf ° off' z
0 ----9R.
` ? m ?° . b0 If']?j tI,I ° r?• i i_-__---i 1 Sp L'/ S?__=.'_"._- _l r..7y < ? wE3TlaN_
i
Cc I ,? z I a? i 1 m VAR IILL??LL.CC3i11JJ p r
d ^_ '• L_-_ , 1 ..! ? a / ®OXYGE ' ' £ ? ? -1?"??_.??? o ?. -r ? % '?J?-.; - ,.
/?__i.` _ _ __J +I a ?_ f@•_ Q8 _?17 -1 9RA0&1RY s z ``_w.?.._.
t` NORWALK <ST, a O GV N D ?/~ wpRe L
1: c$ ? (I??? VER r o
I3ARTON ,l ' c a 1 J MO TPELIER
I I 1 s tAMN/1 ST. v Ri
? ___ / '1MdYi rS MEA Vf N
?if II I? .ttt ARTON 1 '3Ad 1• d o y w 1 n
J 1 (s g VAL p1 ! ON1U `' c91"Z 1 OA a ?vm?i a P M
II `I I m psrp t, ! / ? a (? ? ? a ? ! I??s-????M?f
?I ? E N ? / ? oa a ? s `y ! MORAN DR. t S \--•1('" /
UU _? RD. \UI n . ?I I
` o '. • ? ? ;d0 ? 33 b W °i A"O!1• n 9e 9n p'N Ztot '?. ° _ DRI4E a° I,
t ?\? 1 WK'S 31YDNrlmns OR. S r 9 w -_ M Ury p !
RA?_ ?u( PINEIANO y J WRC E a SVSE-,? e?y NQ ? w. ry._ CI p gJVE
NG SO
'?<` ?? o r a0 ' :? C RIGA co cr N ?._-•-
I f N> 9, zg POMONA OR ? •NO NOLNOtl15 ? o CT L/ c * . `_ 4LIrM n
ME 1'I F.. 4F n < i -i WES '? A _' ? t0-• ?.? r(•? 1`'ryOT ? ??? ? r
II I t 3' FIR P AC a i .? 50' TAE .aY-1 Y a_ z ?. ?4 gUS D lfn ;
Z i 'S3yJ r i RUCKER 3 PEE I -?.• • u ecc( r Oq iig ry f "? A? 3S `w-'•t
'\ CRA A ADDIN•
\/ ? `- '? ROOK ? I q ?
w '? --- -- - ???a. I-h? ME ETC -r- _ .-•a, --- - i---?-3
ArKINS
•1 bA?fd? IZ•? ?J 3. ??o ? t ( ? '`VEN I 097 c?`'m ' -? f yS'lR' ,?•% : o ' '? '-- •
R ' 'KERRIi I I ' -II 4 a oo H 2D EST\1 f i- 1=--' ?'? LO ?i'--• '-__?
^+?+ y C - -+ ?1a - DP ' ti? UGREFp?••-_ I __ __- _ ?W s?•J p ' m ____-_''
VVV „. I a O ? ? 0 4?y ROOMAN
SNY DRIVF' r+ yNn99 ' ?RRI of d 0 /
0 R It i NA SON >• //1 1,? ,? OE y0?
w d ??. I -. q< c f ySd o ao
STOKES z HaO4 ,r r° fXi a AY i
_ ?C O
06
a y Sry ti? ` COAPMA C? 00 ?Ih I
a a /\ •Oj , --' GAY 1111?'? fgq? m ddYy ?`? ?_
? t J ? "? .5? I? TER. I 1 ? c po+[ poo H?((kQ
c' i I ? .. ?? Op0 O
CT.
f ;I it N ROAD "1. 4UDUgp O
4? NOLOEN A OA• GREENWOOD [
Z xpplr1 ; N9 p s v NOME r 9 KNOLLWOOD o a ; AOAD F
{/YI \! C , "?r^`!. I m fki.
r 9 0 add z? < DQ f''?TOOtER
F m -
WEDGEDALE rn?
LAI ST
t?D 1 c m c p S
tr q N r s ? ? y?
? ` U LLQ 4 ?bBM A HD F
`' ? ? I I w '____ I u ? +•! _?.. ' r ? ..i•. gEVER P ? ? i^ -J ._
K at ? ? 1 < ? Ol•w m ? N {
O o t, 1 '` Otl? Z
o l $'? WE57 8,
s Ae?
'? w Y, ?? 11 E TDALE '.. o ..A AVONOALE
a GVOU LONGVIEW S _/y0 ••.?y' Sr , C
O D r I
i ~HOWARD ??' f < F ;
(? .t yS?'7I'Jr^Yt E_? STREET a O p0 AVENUE y ^?
IRF ?
RD i 1r1*ti D O nRID(;E ?
STLEt
_ o (tn NORT T l
y?ll? c n S R ET \ fH CE oa a
r` r `'0 \??1 di > m O;vALLEV HER C E. o YD?m 1
tl • ???f / ?TTS 'x'1%K',/I SCOTT ?_ AVENUE
? 'S'/, ?^?. cr a v Z ?o:' x Oqp c A n O/?'n
fl'?AI BITTY- m_o SOUTH [L'4 °? AV I? NORTH Epgy 1^`? • , ??/•/^
,?aQ `-? O
11Y-ENGI.E W000 t?_-T?•?i ,•• L<Z Ial 1TRIDC.E WAY
• --?N•E . ?Lf9 IMILTON II ??I> • I???\'-•Ir! 11
r
1 certify 4hat on the date of this drawing, I sur- This property is not located in
veyed the property shown an this plat; that the a special flood hazard area as
property lines and location of all structures are determined by the Department of
accurately shown hereon; that no structure lo- Housing and Urban Development.
cated on this property encroaches on any adjo•
cent street or property; and that no structure an
adjacent property encroaches on the premises
surveyed.
i
WALL

d'
4
bc
MO.eEHEAO ?OWNSH/P
?ui?Fo ep coUiv7Y. AlOW7Ti-/
I `
1 O
.LL
V
x+.37$ i O 1
V
i
MARVIN L. BORUM AND ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
405-D PARKWAY GREENSBORO, N.C.
PHONES: 275-0471 • 272-3115
'h P
2
Scale 1" = loot:.. Date..45:4rr:e7 ...................
Lot No .................................... Block..............
Of .......................................... Sec...............
Plat Book ............................ Page..................
? ? I
if
I certify tiet on the dab of this drawing, I sur• This property it not located in
#eyed the property shown on this plot; that the a special flood hazard area as
property lines and location of all structures are determined by the Department of
accurately shown hereon; that no structure lo. Housing and Urban Development.
cated on this property encroaches on any adia-
cent street or property; and that no structure on
adjacent property encroaches on the premises
surveyed.
3Z.3
8Z8,O
8i-7 4
6X157- G.FOUrI/!» /Cu00
TYPICAL F-/LL 5ECT/OA.1
P.eOPE.eTY /[ OJF
C? FORD
MoeEHE.9o 'ToL?.vsN/P
COC11VTy IVO,eTN CAeOUNA S
H:i'=4O•
%TCH SZ¢,O /
FLGL'?!J/.J.4Y 8ZZ.0

vv ?- r
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
SAW26-87- ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
PRE-DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION FORM FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT 26
NOTES: If Item A.7. (below) is 10 acres or more or if any of the conditions
listed in Section B. (below) are not met, the applicant must submit an
individual permit application. Please contact the District for forms and
information.
Applicant is required to obtain a Section 401 Water quality Certification from
the State of North Carolina for NWP 26 to be valid. This certification
should be furnished with this pre-discharge notification.
PLEASE PRINT
A.
1. NAME: Dean Green
Green Ford, Inc.
2. ADDRESS: 3800 W Wendover Avenue
Greensboro, N.C. 27407
3. PHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK: COUNTY: Guilford
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE STREAM NAMES, ROAD NUMBERS, ETC.): 230' west
of terminus of Tri-City Boulevard approximately 900' north of intersection
of Tri-city Boulevard and West Wendover Avenue
5. DESCRIPTION OR. PROPOSED WORK: Install 2-90" C.M.P., headwall,
endwall and fill as required in unnamed tributary of South Buffalo
Creek
6. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: To allow access from Tri-City Boulevard
to owners' property west of creek. Property to be use as automobile
storage facility
7. APPROXIMATE SIZE OF WATERS AND WETLANDS WHICH WILL BE LOST OR
SUBSTANTIALLY ADVERSELY MODIFIED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED WORK (EXPRESS
IN TENTHS OF ACRES): 1.5 acres
8. INFORMATION THAT THE APPLICANT BELIEVES IS APPROPRIATE:
7
-40 f ?

9. DO YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF ENDANGERED SPECIES ON OR
NEAR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA? YES [ ) NO [XI
IF YES, INDICATE WHAT SPECIES.
10. DO YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES WHICH ARE LISTED OR
DETERMINED ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES THAT OCCUR IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT? YES [ ] NO [X]
11. WILL THE ACTIVITY INTERFERE WITH NAVIGATION? YES [ ] NO [X]
B. CONDITIONS. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET FOR THE NATIONWIDE
PERMITS TO BE VALID (33 CFR 330.5-.6):
MET NOT MET
1. DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL WILL NOT [X] [
OCCUR IN THE PROXIMITY OF A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
INTAKE.
2. DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL WILL NOT [X) [ )
OCCUR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED SHELLFISH PRODUCTION
UNLESS THE DISCHARGE IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO AN AUTHORIZED
SHELLFISH HARVESTING ACTIVITY.
3. THE ACTIVITY SHALL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DISRUPT THE [X) [ )
MOVEMENT OF THOSE SPECIES OF AQUATIC LIFE INDIGENOUS TO
THE WATERBODY (UNLESS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE FILL IS
TO.IMPOUND WATER).
4. DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST [X] [ )
OF SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE FROM TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN TOXIC
AMOUNTS.
5. ANY STRUCTURE OR FILL AUTHORIZED SHALL BE PROPERLY [X] [
MAINTAINED.
6. THE ACTIVITY WILL NOT OCCUR IN A COMPONENT OF THE [X] [ J
NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM; NOR IN A RIVER
CURRENTLY DESIGNATED BY CONGRESS AS A "STUDY RIVER" FOR
POSSIBLE INCLUSION.
7. THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF THE ACTIVITY WILL [X] [ ]
NOT IMPAIR RESERVED TRIBAL RIGHTS.
? F
C. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. THE FOLLOWING MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SMALL BE
FOLLOWED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE
PRACTICES MAY BE CAUSE FOR REQUIRING AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT. APPLICANT
SHOULD PROVIDE EXPLANATION FOR MANAGEMENT PRACTICES NOT MET.
1. DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS MET NOT MET
OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE AVOIDED OR MINIMIZED fX] [ ,
THROUGH THE USE OF OTHER PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVES.
2. DISCHARGES IN SPAWNING AREAS DURING SPAWNING [X) I
SEASONS SHALL BE AVOIDED.
3. DISCHARGES SHALL NOT RESTRICT OR IMPEDE THE (XI
MOVEMENT OF AQUATIC SPECIES INDIGENOUS TO THE WATERS OR
THE PASSAGE OF NORMAL OR EXPECTED HIGH FLOWS OR CAUSE
THE RELOCATION OF THE WATER (UNLESS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE
OF THE FILL IS TO IMPOUND WATERS).
4. IF THE DISCHARGE CREATES AN IMPOUNDMENT OF WATER,
ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE AQUATIC SYSTEM CAUSED BY THE [X] I ]
ACCELERATED PASSAGE OF WATER AND/OR THE RESTRICTION OF
ITS FLOW SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
5. DISCHARGE IN WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (X]
6. HEAVY EQUIPMENT WORKING IN WETLANDS SHALL BE PLACED [X) [ I
ON MATS.
7. DISCHARGES IKTO BREEEDING AREAS FOR MIGRATORY [X) I J
WATERFOWL SHALL BE AVOIDED.
8. ALL TEMPORARY FILLS SHALL BE REMOVED IN THEIR [X) I
ENTIRETY.
APPLICANT'S E DATE