20190871 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190627

-4� WithersRavenel
1/ Our People. Your Success.
June 26, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Town of Knightdale Environmental Park - NWP 3 & 18 PCN Submittal
Knightdale, Wake County
WR Project #02180515.02
Dear Ms. Dailey and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the Town of Knightdale, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use
NWP 3 for 0.973 acres of temporary open water impacts and 34 If of permanent stream impacts
for pond maintenance and NWP 18 for 0.019 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 33 If of
permanent stream impacts for construction of a plunge pool below the culvert in N. Smithfield
Road. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above referenced impacts, as
well as a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for 5,755 sf of permanent riparian buffer
impacts and 6,559 sf of temporary riparian buffer impacts.
The proposed project is located within the ±7.94 acre Town of Knightdale Environmental Park
(PIN: 1754188334), which is located west of the intersection of N. Smithfield Rd and Edenburghs
Keep Dr in Knightdale, Wake County.
The project is located in the Neuse River basin (HUC: 03020201) and the site drains to Beaverdam
Creek (Stream Index: 27-29; Water Classification: C;NSW).
Proposed Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat
within the onsite perennial stream and onsite pond, and ultimately Beaverdam Creek, by reducing
the amount of sediment being transported into the onsite stream and pond. Additionally, the
project will improve water quality and enhance the aquatic habitat within the pond. Furthermore,
the proposed dredging will increase the storage capacity of the pond, thereby helping to alleviate
flooding issues upstream caused by the current shallow water depths due to sediment deposition.
This will be accomplished by removing the accumulated sediment to increase water depths and
create areas of various depths in order to establish aquatic habitat zones of varying depths in order
to provide habitat for the many stages of the life cycle of the aquatic fauna that inhabits the lake.
The onsite perennial stream (UT to Beaverdam Creek) originates as a culvert discharging runoff
from Hwy 64, and receives urban runoff from the surrounding commercial and residential
development. During a storm event, the stream experiences flash flooding, causing significant
erosion of the stream banks upstream of the project. This causes extreme silt and sediment
219 Station Road, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Town of Knightdale Environmental Park - Knightdale, Wake Co. %0 Withers Rave n e l
Jnr Pcnolc Ycur Success.
loading, which ultimately suspends out within the perennial stream and pond as flow velocity
decreases in the headwaters of the pond. The sediment deposition within the onsite pond has
resulted in a loss of approximately 0.4 acres of open water surface area in the head of the pond
since 1988, reducing the pond size from ±1.5 acres in 1988 to ±1.1 acres currently. The ±0.43
acres of previous open water that has silted in has converted to forested wetlands, which will not
be disturbed during dredging of the pond. The sediment deposition within the pond has reduced
the average water depth to only ±4.0 feet at the dam to only a few inches near the observation
deck. The historic depths ranged from ±8 ft near the dam to 1-3 ft near the observation deck.
The shallow water depth has created poor water quality, higher water temperatures in the summer
due to solar heating and low dissolved oxygen levels, resulting in algal blooms.
The proposed project will aid in alleviating the sediment transport into the onsite stream and pond
by constructing a plunge pool downstream of the existing culvert beneath N. Smithfield Rd.
Sediment deposition is so bad following a storm event that the culvert becomes blocked, causing
flooding in the neighborhoods upstream. The Town has to use an excavator to remove enough
sediment below the culvert to restore flow and allow flooding to subside. The proposed plunge
pool will reduce flow velocity to allow sediment to suspend out prior to entering the pond, and
will provide a means for removal of accumulated sediment. The plunge pool has been designed to
have a concrete lined bottom, which will make removal of accumulated sediment easier. Access
for construction of the plunge pool and regular maintenance/sediment removal will occur from an
existing maintenance road off of N. Smithfield Rd.
The proposed lake dredging will restore the pond to historic water depths. During the onsite pre -
application meeting on 5/13/19, Samantha Dailey with the USACE determined that dredging of
the pond would be allowed up to the existing woody vegetation line, as depicted in the attached
Impact Maps. The water level of the pond will be pumped down and temporary coffer dams will
be installed upstream of the pond and flow will be pumped around the pond and downstream of
the dam to create a dry pond bed. Excavators will be used to remove accumulated sediment and
restore historic water depths. During sediment removal, double handling of spoil will be minimized
to the greatest extent possible. All spoil will be loaded in dump trucks and hauled to an offsite
upland disposal area. Construction access for the sediment removal within the pond and hauling
of spoil will occur within an existing sewer easement running south from the pond to the existing
access road for the pump station which will provide access to N. Smithfield Rd.
After the sediment removal is complete, the existing outlet structure will be replaced. As part of
the replacement of the outlet structure, approximately 34 If of stream channel will be lined with
rip -rap to create a dissipater.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
Proiect History
Samantha Dailey with the USACE conducted an onsite pre -application meeting on 5/13/19 to
review the project area and discuss the proposed activities.
Page 2 of 4

Town of Knightdale Environmental Park - Knightdale, Wake Co. %0 Withers Rave n e l
n,�r Pcoolc Your s.,«ess.
WithersRavenel conducted a delineation of the onsite wetlands and streams in May 2019. We
are not requesting issuance of a Jurisdictional Determination in conjunction with issuance of the
requested NWPs.
The features depicted on the USGS and Wake County Soil Survey were present in the field.
Therefore, subjectivity to Neuse River Riparian Buffers is conceded, and a formal Buffer
Determination from NCDWR was not requested.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of:
Impacts for Pond Maintenance (NWP 3)
• 0.973 acres of temporary open water impacts (Impact 4)
• 34 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact 3) (rip -rap dissipater below new outfall)
• 4,946 sf of permanent riparian buffer impacts for replacement of pond outfall structure
(Impact 8)
• 6,268 sf of temporary riparian buffer impacts (Impacts 7 & 9) (for construction access)
The construction access will occur from an existing maintenance road within the buffers which has
a vegetative cover of mowed grass. Once construction is complete, the vegetation within the
temporary buffer impact area will be restored by planting grass seed to restore the existing
vegetative cover.
Impacts for Plunge Pool Construction (NWP 18)
• 0.019 acres (828 sf) of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 1)
• 33 If (438 A of permanent stream impacts (Impact 2)
• Please note that total permanent wetland/stream impacts for construction of plunge pool are
less than 0.10 acres, making it eligible for authorization under a NWP 18.
• 809 sf of permanent riparian buffer impacts (Impact 5) (for construction of plunge pool)
• 318 sf of temporary riparian buffer impacts (Impact 6) (for construction access)
The construction access for the pond dredging will occur within an existing cleared, maintained
sewer easement, which has a vegetative cover of mowed grass. Once construction is complete,
the vegetation within the temporary buffer impact area will be restored by planting grass seed to
restore the existing vegetative cover.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Due to the nature of the project, impacts could not be avoided. Impacts have been minimized to
only those necessary to for construction of the plunge pool and sediment removal within the pond
to improve water quality and aquatic habitat within the project area.
Page 3 of 4

Town of Knightdale Environmental Park - Knightdale, Wake Co. %/ Withers Rave n e l
n,�r Pcoolc Your s.,«ess.
Impacts have also been minimized by designing the project to access the project areas via existing
roads, trails and uplands. Additionally, sediment removal within the lake will occur "in the dry" to
prevent the escape of sediment and turbid water into downstream waters.
Mitigation
The proposed permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, and permanent wetland impacts are
less than 0.10 acres. Therefore mitigation is not proposed.
The current request is for 0.019 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 74 If of permanent stream
impacts, 0.973 acres of temporary open water impacts, 5,755 sf of permanent riparian buffer
impacts and 6,559 sf of temporary riparian buffer impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for
details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenet
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Historic Aerial Photos
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• Impact Exhibits
Page 4 of 4

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20190871
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Town of Knightdale Environmental Park
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Dustin Tripp - Assistant Town Manager
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
6/27/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Beaverdam Creek (Stream Index: 27-29)
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.804815
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.487341
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable venters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
NWP 03 - Maintenance; NWP 18 - Minor Disharges
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
03 - Maintenance
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Town of Knightdale
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 006026; Page: 00684
2c. Responsible party:
Dustin Tripp — Assistant Town Manager
2d. Address
Street Address
950 Steeple Square Ct.
Address Line 2
City
Knightdale
Postal / Zip Code
27545
State / Rmnoe / Fiejion
NC
Country
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
r Yes r No
rYes rNo

1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Knightdale
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
PIN: 1754188334
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Located west of intersection of N. Smithfield Rd and Edenburghs Keep Dr
Address Line 2
City
Knightdale
Postal / Zip Cade
27545
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Beaverdam Creek (Stream Index: 27-29)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010705
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
±7.94 acres
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located within the Town of Knightdale Environmental Park, which contains a pond, undeveloped vvodlands, greenway trails and various shelters. The land use in the
vicinity of the project consists of a mixture of residential, commercial and government land uses.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes r^ No F Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Location.pdf
USGS.pdf
835.57KB
131.9KB
4e. Attach an 81/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey.pdf 328.83KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetlands -±0.76 acres; Pond -±1.1 acres
49. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
±1,000 If
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat within the onsite perennial stream and onsite pond, and ultimately Beaverdam Creek, by
reducing the amount of sediment being transported into the onsite stream and pond. Additionally, the project will improve water quality and enhance the aquatic habitat within the pond.
Furthermore, the proposed dredging will increase the storage capacity of the pond, thereby helping to alleviate flooding issues upstream caused by the current shallowwater depths
due to sediment deposition. This wrill be accomplished by removing the accumulated sediment to increase water depths and create areas of various depths in order to establish aquatic
habitat zones of varying depths in order to provide habitat for the many stages of the life cycle of the aquatic fauna that inhabits the lake.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*

The onsite perennial stream (UT to Beaverdam Creek) originates as a culvert discharging runoff from Hwy 64, and receives urban runoff from the surrounding commercial and
residential development. During a storm event, the stream experiences flash flooding, causing significant erosion of the stream banks upstream of the project. This causes extreme silt
and sediment loading, which ultimately suspends out within the perennial stream and pond as flow velocity decreases in the headwaters of the pond. The sediment deposition within the
onsite pond has resulted in a loss of approximately 0.4 acres of open water surface area in the head of the pond since 1988, reducing the pond size from ±1.5 acres in 1988 to ±1.1
acres currently. The ±0.43 acres of previous open water that has silted in has converted to forested wetlands, which will not be disturbed during dredging of the pond. The sediment
deposition within the pond has reduced the average water depth to only ±4.0 feet at the dam to only a few inches near the observation deck. The historic depths ranged from ±8 ft near
the dam to 1-3 ft near the observation deck. The shallow water depth has created poor water quality, higher water temperatures in the summer due to solar heating and low dissolved
oxygen levels, resulting in algal blooms.
The proposed project will aid in alleviating the sediment transport into the onsite stream and pond by constructing a plunge pool downstream of the existing culvert beneath N. Smithfield
Rd. Sediment deposition is so bad following a storm event that the culvert becomes blocked, causing flooding in the neighborhoods upstream. The Town has to use an excavator to
remove enough sediment below the culvert to restore flow and allow flooding to subside. The proposed plunge pool will reduce flow velocity to allow sediment to suspend out prior to
entering the pond, and will provide a means for removal of accumulated sediment. The plunge pool has been designed to have a concrete lined bottom, which will make removal of
accumulated sediment easier. Access for construction of the plunge pool and regular maintenance/sediment removal will occur from an existing maintenance road off of N. Smithfield
Rd.
The proposed lake dredging will restore the pond to historic water depths. During the onsite pre -application meeting on 5/13/19, Samantha Dailey with the USACE determined that
dredging of the pond would be allowed up to the existing woody vegetation line, as depicted in the attached Impact Maps. The water level of the pond will be pumped down and
temporary coffer dams will be installed upstream of the pond and flow will be pumped around the pond and downstream of the dam to create a dry pond bed. Excavators will be used to
remove accumulated sediment and restore historic water depths. During sediment removal, double handling of spoil will be minimized to the greatest extent possible. All spoil will be
loaded in dump trucks and hauled to an offsite upland disposal area. Construction access for the sediment removal within the pond and hauling of spoil will occur within an existing
sewer easement running south from the pond to the existing access road for the pump station which will provide access to N. Smithfield Rd.
After the sediment removal is complete, the existing outlet structure will be replaced. As part of the replacement of the outlet structure, approximately 34 If of stream channel will be lined
with rip -rap to create a dissipater.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
Cr10.^..
Comments:
WithersRavenel conducted a delineation of the project in May 2019. The limits of the onsite
wetlands, stream and jurisdictional pond are depicted in the impact exhibits. Please note that we are
not requesting issuance of a formal Jurisdictional Determination in conjunction with issuance of the
requested NWPs.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
C Preliminary C Approved r Not Verified r" Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Other:
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Delineation Exhibit.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
245.13KB
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
V Wetlands ® Streams -tributaries W Buffers
V Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?)2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested *f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
t�]
Construction of Plun e P Headwater Forest Wetland A Yes Both 0.019
Pool g (acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.019
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.019
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
67
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
67
3j. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
a. Site # 4a1. Impact Reason 4b. Impact type 4c. Name of waterbody 4d. Activity type 4e. Wate rbody type 4f. Impact are:
npact 4 11 Pond Dredging T N/A Dredging Pond 0.97 - 11
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.97
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.97
4h. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
beck all that apply.
V Neuse
E Catawba
E Goose Creek
E Other
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00
E Tar-Pamlioo
E Randleman
E Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type;W3f.
Type of
3g. S. width*]
3h. Impact
F
809
0
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
g1
Construction of plunge pool
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Impact 2 - Stream 1 - UT to
Perennial
Both
10
33
Impact 7 - Allowable
Beaverdam Creek
Pond 1 & Stream 2 - llT to
�N.
Average (feet)
(Inear feet)
FReplacement
of Pond Outlet
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Impact 3 - Stream 1 - UT to
Perennial
Both
10
34
No
Structure
299
Beaverdam Creek
Creek
Average (feet)
(I earfe�)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
67
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
67
3j. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
a. Site # 4a1. Impact Reason 4b. Impact type 4c. Name of waterbody 4d. Activity type 4e. Wate rbody type 4f. Impact are:
npact 4 11 Pond Dredging T N/A Dredging Pond 0.97 - 11
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.97
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.97
4h. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
beck all that apply.
V Neuse
E Catawba
E Goose Creek
E Other
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00
E Tar-Pamlioo
E Randleman
E Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact 5 - Allowable
P
Stream 1 - LIT to Beaverdam
No
809
0
Creek
Impact 6 - Exempt
T
Stream 1 - LIT to Beaverdam
No
318
0
Creek
Impact 7 - Allowable
T
Pond 1 & Stream 2 - llT to
�N.
658
452
Beaverdam Creek
Impact 8 - Exempt
P
Stream 1 - UT to Beaverdam
No
4,647
299
Creek
Impact 9 -Allowable
T
Stream 1 - LIT to Beaverdam
3,166
1,992
Creek
�N.
______]
6h. Total buffer impacts:
.................................._ ._.......................
Zone 1
Total Temporary impacts: 4,142.00
Zone 2
2.444.00

Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 5,456.00 299.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 9,598.00 2,743.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
Knightdale Environmental Park - Impact Maps.pdf 1.94MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be
minimized.
Due to the nature of the project, impacts could not be avoided. Impacts have been minimized to only those necessary to for construction of the plunge
pool and sediment removal within the pond to improve water quality and aquatic habitat within the project area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts have also been minimized by designing the project to access the project areas via existing roads, trails and uplands. Additionally, sediment
removal within the lake will occur "in the dry" to prevent the escape of sediment and turbid water into downstream waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes 6 No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acres and permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If. Additionally, all proposed buffer impacts are either exempt or
allowable, and therefore buffer mitigation is not required.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
6 Yes f No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
F- Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
P Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flowthrough the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Storrawater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
f Yes F No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
F Yes r No
Comments:
The proposed project will not result in impervious surface that requires stormwater management.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
F Yes r" No

1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
The project does not meet requirements warranting NEPA/SEPA review.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of improvements to the water quality within the UT to Beaverdam Creek and the onsite pond by reducing sedimentation,
and will not be a catalyst for future development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes R No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home, as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent
occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see
attached NCNHP project review letter.
Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for bald eagle, red -cockaded woodpecker or Michauxs sumac.
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin, and therefore is not located within the known range of the Cape Fear Shiner. Additionally, the project
is not located within the known range of the Tar River spinymussel and yellow lance.
The project site is within the known range of the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe and dwarf wedgemussel. The onsite
perennial stream is an urban stream, fed primarily by runoff from Hwy 64 and surrounding commercial and residential development. As a result of the
urban runoff, the stream is subject to flash flooding, which causes high silt and sediment loading and deposition due to the erosion of the banks. The
onsite perennial stream does not have the excellent water quality and high oxygen levels necessary to be considered potential habitat for these
species. Additionally, the onsite perennial stream is located upstream of five separate dammed impoundments upstream of the Neuse River, including
Nueseoco Lake and Beaverdam Lake, which would prevent migration of these species to sustain viable populations. Therefore, the onsite perennial
stream was not considered potential habitat for the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe and dwarf wedgemussel.
Therefore, the proposed project will have No Effect on federally listed species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Project Review Letter_ 2019-06-25.pdf 224.08KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No

6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.nrdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to determine if there were any
known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The database review did not identify any known resources within or
in the vicinity of the proposed project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r: Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The proposed project consists of construction of subsurface plunge pool and sediment removal within the onsite pond, and will not result in above
grade fills that will affect the floodplain. Therefore, the proposed project will result in a No Rise.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Aerial.pdf
Parcel -Owner Info.pdf
PCN Cover Letter_Final_2019-06-26.pdf
Signature
rJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
260.33KB
181.57KB
150.66KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
Date
6/27/2019

■■ VlWithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner, Town of Knightdale {Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, focal municipalities, etc.) for: a] review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams,
riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b] preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
permit applications/requests for projects associated with the Kni�htdaleEnvlronmental
Park PIN: 17541883341 located west of the intersection of Smithfield Rd and Edenbur hs
Keeo Dr in Kni htdale Wake County,
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date: G�12101
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Client:
WithersRavenel Inc. ,n �C` . law jar
(Name - Pri t] {Title]
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 (Signature)
Tel. [phone]
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone: i 2-V7 " 2Z
M1 `
Email: �feW—.,l �r
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.33401 f: 919.467.60081 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh l Wilmington

PIN: 1754188334
PIN Ext: 000
Real Estate ID: 0200875
Map Name: 1754 05
Owner: KNIGHTDALE TOWN OF
Mail Address 1: PO BOX 640
Mail Address 2: KNIGHTDALE NC 27545-0640
Mail Address 3:
Deed Book: 006026
Deed Page: 00684
Deed Acres: 7.94
Deed Date: 2/28/1994
Building Value: $0
Land Value: $260,200
Total Value: $260,200
Biling Class: Exempt
Description: BOUNDARY TOWN OF
KNIGHTDALE BMFOR
Heated Area:
Site Address: 0 N SMITHFIELD RD
Street Name: N SMITHFIELD RD
City: KNIGHTDALE
Planning Jursidiction: KN
Township: St. Matthew's
Year Built:
Sale Price: $0
Sale Date:
Use Type:
Design Style:
Land Class: EXEMPT
0 105 210 420 ft
1 inch = 200 feet
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use, or its interpretation.

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 inch= 100 ft
5 1 7
LMIH
NIGHTDALE ENVIRONMENTAL PARK AERIAL (2017) WithersRavenel
DALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors
,r
S
Q
`
p �
r
.�I
5 1 7
LMIH
NIGHTDALE ENVIRONMENTAL PARK AERIAL (2017) WithersRavenel
DALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
;bn
n
Fel
ApB�
b
KNIGHTDALE ENVIRONMENTAL PARK
r
�n7
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 51
VaB
r4'r I
:40-0 N4 a
Lockhiil
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

i"
GRAPHIC SCALE -
0 100 200
r
1 inch = 200 ft.
x
a23 xiE
21
3
i
S
x
i
s`
i
e
e
1
d
KNIGHTDALE ENVIRONMENTAL PARK USGS QUAD (2013) - KNIGHTDALE WithersRavenel
m 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
KNIGHTDALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft f�------/�
I
geaue daz
ki
F44IR FARMSLN
4 5
AR -RV BY OR,�
i e �_.., GES
Pebhlebrook .,
L.1
-
a ple-wood
� OR
OR is --. � -- _ _ 64
Bus
fOHTpALI BLVD, 64/ e
%?WHITE DR 3 LA6E
o ,
e �Lic,
LE
Zso aEo°gay., C a- xr-ri 091
N
� a
Fx
I.YNNV✓O�(?D RD11GHTiJt3L'L� L.- 2Zti�'•.— ' �S .. ;. � �„� 4¢ . I .: £; f r,: _ Imo% r
KNIGHTDALE ENVIRONMENTAL PARK USGS QUAD (2013) -KNIGHTDALE �0- WithersRavenel
KNIGHTDALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

WF
I"
SITE
Kl'9htdale
0
u
w -fig'
VICINITY MAP - N.T.S.
I
I
I WETLANDS BOUNDARY
EXISTING POND
NORMAL POOL
1\ �
/ + CEMETERY
i I I
PUMP STATIO ,
I
I
I
TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE
TOWN HALL
.Ab—NEPW 'ILL
-�
'� '� CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
I
II I 19 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlok
\1
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
1 inch= 200 Ft.
Vo.-tevision Date I By 1111n—i—r Scale l"50'III
1 V V
1 11/ ltherSRavenet
WR
Drawn By °ate 5/23/19 Town of Knightdale: Environmental Park OVERALL EXHIBIT MAP 14/ Eng,neers I Planners I Surveyors
Chedcad By ]ob No. 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
WR 180515.02 Cary Wake North Carolina t: 919.469.3340 I license #:C-08321www.withersraveneLc—

OPEN WATER IMPACTS
IMPACT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
4
--
0.973 ACRES (42,370 SF)
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
1
0.019 ACRES (828 SF)
--
\ \ RIPRAP
NOT
SHOWN
DISSIPATOR POOL APRON CHANNEL
AP's-"@.i�a;ai�4="�` - _ 10hs or 3Wo 5hs or Wo
-2.1 TOP OF RIPRAP
EDGE OF 2:1 7
WATER �-------
\ \ �Y 2:1 Y TW
HORIZONTAL
\ AF'Rt:IN
CULVERT s FLOOR
/ / _ 3 (50 oI 2 d max 2(50 or 1.5( max
11
STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
2
33 LF (438 SF)
--
3
33 LF (898 SF)
--
/� , ( ENERGY DISSIPATOR -PLUNGE POOL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
50' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER (ZONE 2) / \
— -)A, EXISTING WETLAND — \ _ _ ^ ` ` \ e 30' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER (ZONE 1)
BOUNDARY IMPACT#4
TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT I r
0.973 ACRES (42,370 SF) IMPACT #2 p / /•.• /
------% _ 1 — PERMANENTSTREAM IMPACT
33LF(438SF) \x\
/—
�. IMPACT #1
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT / CONSTRUCTION —
/ ENTRANCE \
,.L� � �� � � � � � � � �� � � \ 0.019 ACRES (828 SF) � i n \
TREES N6' TALL ` \ 1 / r l I • �I I
1IL _ 1
o CULVERT CROSSING
RISER OUTLET STRUCTURE 1 I
'
\ r - '���� r / I I W VE� TATION / _ I PLUNGE POOL
✓/ \� oI 1 \ ,� r r/r r r r � ,�_.� r r — � I ` / t –_ —' �-- �`'j I / � '�'I\\``1
II ---4'
o
o
'i EXISTING NORMAL POOL
GREENWAY TRAIL\J
IMPACT#3 / �� CULVERT / / / _j
— \ / PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ( �x r / - — �� / — I /
�I 33 LF (898 SF) /� n / / / JI — — \ I PROPERTY BOUNDARY
--1 GRAPHIC SCALE
ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR / / / / 20' CONSTRUCTION _ / 50 0 25 50 100 )
1 REPLACEMENT OUTLET STRUCTURE / /�j1 / / ENTRANCE I j
i /// / 1 i lii ���� l ` / J
I / 1 inch = 50 ft.
No, Revision Date Bv 111F)_i_, Scale
15° IllWETLAND AND STREAM �0 Wit ersRavene sneet�o_
Drawn By °ate Town of Knightdale: Environmental Park I/ Engineers�Planners�Surve ors 2
WR 6/6/19 y
Ched<ed By yob No. IMPACT MAP 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
WR 18°515.°2 Cary Wale North Carolina t: 919.469.33401 license #: C-0832 Iwww.withersraveneLcom

BUFFER IMPACTS
PERMANENTIMPACTS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
IMPACT
ZONE1
ZONE2
ZONE1
ZONE2
5
0.019 ACRES (809 SF)
--
--
--
6
--
--
0.007 ACRES (318 SF)
--
7
--
--
0.052 ACRES (2,248 SF)
0.077 ACRES (3,371 SF)
8
0.107 ACRES (4,647 SF)
0.007 ACRES (299 SF)
--
--
9
--
--
0.073 ACRES (3,166 SF)
0.046 ACRES (1,992 SF)
TOTAL
0.126 ACRES (5,456 SF)
0.007 ACRES (299 SF)
0.132 ACRES (5,732 SF)
0.123 ACRES (5,363 SF)
50' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER (ZONE 2) / a
30' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER (ZONE 1)
/ EXISTING WETLAND � � \ \ e �--, /
BOUNDARY
IMPACT6
I I TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACT
/ — 1 / — `��\v \ \ r I I CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOR PLUNGE POOL
r
/I �j 1 _ \ / \ \ —J `� `2 �� ZONE 1 - 318 SF
J(CONSTRUCTION —
7 � \ I'ENTRANCE
/�
/ _
I I \ \1 � / — TREELINE
/ i \ IMPACTS — / 1\ 1� 1r \ 1 l l �\ l \ \ / / \ / TREES >6'TALL
TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACT \ /
OUTLET STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT \ 1 — — 1 \ / \ / ' I d _ \
\ ZONE 1 - 3,166 SF \ 1 1 RISER OUTLET STRUCTURE \ / / — / J I I o II o 1 C P ,L CULVERT CROSSING 1
\ ZONE 2 -1,992 SF I— �� > �\ \ \ / — / / _ J / I l W� VEGETATION _ J /PLUNGE POOL / /
1 IMPACT 8
\ PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACT \ / I / / ^ J r r ~ \ J / J — ��� / /� / IMPACT 5 (1 \
� OUTLET STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT � � � \ � f � � — / o s � � � ,LS�� / PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1 -4,647 SF v1i� V / PLUNGE POOL J
ZONE2-299 SF ` _ 1 `_ _ — �' �Sy ` -- / / ZONE1-809 SF /
EXISTING NORMAL POOL
1� GREENWAY TRAIL
\ i \
\=---
/ / �� � � � \\ / N �5 CULVERT `/I
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
' 20' CONSTRUCTION
/
) ENERGY DISSIPATORFOR % � / J/ ENTRANCE
— I / REPLACEMENT OUTLET STRUCTURE
y I li /--� (I I // I ( IMPACT 7
TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACT
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOR DREDGING &
OUTLET
STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT
2,248
/`
'ONE 2-3,371 SFS
go14-1
III f III �
o�66 l�
I I I/
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
iiiiiiiimiiiiiiii
Lz
1 inch = 60 ft.
Revision [)ate BV 1111in-i—, seae \/ WithersRavenel
1„ sG neer No
D=awn By WR Date�61611�1 Town of Knightdale: Environmental Park BUFFER IMPACT MAP I/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
Checked By ]ob N 115 MI
Drive I Cary, NC 27511
WR 5.02 Cary Wake North Carolina t:919.469.334011 icense#:C-08321w—withersravenel.com

GRAPHIC SCALE }_ z
-
„}..
Now
PROJECT AREA LIMITS���* - �+
PROPERTY BOUNDARY WETLAND A �+
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF THE USiv STREAM 1
k POTENTIAL NON—WETLAND
WATERS OF THE US
STREAM 1 w w w w w
POTENTIAL NON—WETLAND POND 1 w w
WATERS OF THE US POTENTIAL NON—WETLAND
WATERS OF THE US w �'
IS
AL
STREAM 3 * t
POTENTIAL NON—WETLAND STREAM 2
WATERS OF THE US`
or
F ZPOTENTIAL NON—WETLAND •
WATERS OF THE US

a ■■N Roy Cooper. Governor
00 i NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
notan NATUPAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
E sow Walter Clark, Director, Land and Mater Stewardship
NCNHDE-9390
June 25, 2019
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE. Knightdale Environmental Park, 02180515.02
Dear Troy Beasley.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1:1 W. JONES STREET, PALE01_ P<_ 27603 - 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 276"
OFC !J19 747.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Knightdale Environmental Park
Project No. 02180515.02
June 25, 2019
NCNHDE-9390
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name 11011FIr Owner Type
Wake County Open Space Wake County. multiple local government Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/hely). Data query generated on June 25, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Knightdale Environmental Park
Project No. 02180515.02
June 25, 2019
NCNHDE-9390
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date ` Rank 0 M i
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -Pre H? 5 -Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Type M
Wake County Open Space Wake County. multiple local government Local Government
Wake County Open Space Wake County Local Government
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement Triangle Land Conservancy Private
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/helr). Data query generated on June 25, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

8
NCNHDE-9390: Knightdale Environmental Park
TJ
J_
L—:
E S
June 25, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
EJ Managed Area (MAREA)
if p
Foul WL i.
–1 ------------------
V,Ipg k D,
o LA
.7
F
Knight Ju+srm S•
Page 4 of 4
,t4
Ln
-carrOIRAwe ------
L
Rd
Nt
2'.
%14
O
if p
Foul WL i.
–1 ------------------
V,Ipg k D,
o LA
.7
F
Knight Ju+srm S•
Page 4 of 4
,t4
1:21,504
D 0.175 0,35 0.7 Mi
0275 055 1-1 km
Sources: ESA. HrRE, CWrnin. Intennnap, inu nt P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO NPS, NRCM, IG N Kad-t.r NL, 0,dna.m Survey, Earl .japan.
MLT;. Ewi China (Heng KQrbg)- [Q� OperOAreeWap uqnWit�
nwto, and the GIS
UMF Community
-carrOIRAwe ------
Rd
Nt
2'.
%14
1:21,504
D 0.175 0,35 0.7 Mi
0275 055 1-1 km
Sources: ESA. HrRE, CWrnin. Intennnap, inu nt P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO NPS, NRCM, IG N Kad-t.r NL, 0,dna.m Survey, Earl .japan.
MLT;. Ewi China (Heng KQrbg)- [Q� OperOAreeWap uqnWit�
nwto, and the GIS
UMF Community