20171448 Ver 2_More Info Received_20190626

Homewood, Sue
From: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 11:17 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Homewood, Sue
Subject: [External] RE: SAW -2016 -02266 --Preserve at Stone Ridge / Gibsonville / Alamance
County (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: 6.26.19 -Corrected Stream Impact Section- Exhibit -Stoneridge Subdivision.pdf, Wetland
I mpact_20190626REV.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to report. spa [e-mail]<mailto:report. spa [e-mail]>
David & Sue,
Please find attached revised information. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:22 PM
To: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW -2016 -02266 --Preserve at Stone Ridge / Gibsonville / Alamance County (UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Hi Michael. I reviewed the above referenced PCN this afternoon. Everything looks fine for the most part, but there is a
discrepancy between the pipe length (89.60 If according to the profile drawing) and the proposed stream impacts on the
PCN (90 If of permanent loss from the culvert). Given the sinuosity of the stream in the proposed crossing location, a
culvert that is basically 90 feet long should result in greater stream impacts. Please double check these figures and
revise. Thanks.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
1

US Army Corps of Engineers
CE -SAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: David. [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message -----
From: RaleighNCREG
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: SAW -2016 -02266 --Preserve at Stone Ridge / Gibsonville / Alamance County
Importance: High
Good Morning,
On 31 May 2019, we received your Pre -Construction Notification (PCN). We have assigned the request the file number
SAW -2016-02266 and forwarded project to David Bailey for further processing.
Action ID#: SAW -2016-02266
Project/County Name: Stone Ridge / Gibsonville / Alamance County
Project Manager: David Bailey
Sincerely,
Joyce A. Thames
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Reg. Field Ofc.
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone] Ext 21
-----Original Message -----
From: Michael Brame [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:16 AM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Alamance County, Preserve at Stone Ridge PCN Application
Please confirm receipt. Hard copies are being sent to the NCDEQ-DWR.

Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com <Blockedhttp://www.pilotenviro.com/>
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

NOTE
1. WETLANDS AND STREAM VERIFIED BY PILOT
ENVIRONMENTAL INC. WITH USACE AND NCDEQ—DWR ON
�t \ TRACT #2 NOVEMBER 20, 2016. GREEN MOUNTIAN ENGINEERING,
�. ARLES E. NEILL, nl PLLC, FIELD LOCATED THE VERIFIED WETLAND AND
.• :;:: ''`�C : x� '� PROPERTY STREAM FLAGS PLACED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
�:;:; ;• �' 0 / '� ID #8846336637
a 5s3o_ F / i3. 3661, PG. 0249
t 2°.69°± 4 \ 1 ? I 18, PG. 36 2. THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE TOWN
OF GIBSONVILLE AS A LOW DENSITY STORMWATER
"°°°* IF PROJECT, WITH JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES.
. •'/ / 1 1 15.959' IF
4';± $F DEVELOPER:
SHUG
ART 9.0 ± IF 221 JONESTOWN R.
PRDSES, LLC..
„ l l 8 l y x 3y e WINSTON
6,450± SF —SALEM, NC 27104
Qy� J P a°' 9F \ �\ o ,�a CONTACT GREG GARRETT
2 0 �� /
�b `O .� '\a °Ry PH: 336.765.9661
.5.64± IF •.- � 16.9,4± IF AZ
/
23.766' IF
�.
{OLOMN;E�w�UB23.725±
_ � 50. PS• 23.; 25± IF
\ `
/ OI t 04 CS 2.575± .F Z © �� _. \ .G
_ 751_±.- __.± SF 7.926± `' 43.546' SF
�, \_ �
13.920± IF IJ,9Py\\
_ x
v ' 106 LF CULVERT IMPACT
a, a Y' I IF Timothy E. Campbell
a",n 18 LF RIP RAP IMPACT, TO BE Parcel # 8846431971
N_'> — D.B. 933, P 971 Q
KEYED INTO BED AND BANK. — —j 3 9• \ j i
6, ° 36 D.B. 2420, Pg. 342 1 ohn H,, P etiej I \�
a m _., -* s, ,.a+s± 3F P.B. 47, P 175 nd Cindy' ruett
TEMPORARY IMPACTS 9 Timothy E. Camp SII'
r 00 CD o P.B. 72, Pg. 24 / Parcel # 8846431971 Pa,lcel # 88 &4493, 7 '
w 29 LF COFFER DAM 31 __ - D.B. 933, Pg. 971,, D. . 4D0, P . 47X
a
= 0.015 AC WETLANDS IMPACT _ °'61t IF D.B. 2420, Pg. 342,y r� '
X�
w o P.B. 72, Pg. 24 \
° K.C. Properties 3z \ /
3 Parcel # 8846433053 (3�a
v D.B. 1092, Pg. 174¢ s.o96± IF 1 \- e' 0
w
Alamance County �s: s ° moo- ESR
T \
`NNIIl u nl mlpq/ ao o G.,� 3^K' _OS
C A a-
ICIIII�II+"\ p
J J XO'7/q�
-INTERMITTENT STREAM/ GREEN MOUNTAIN
ENGINEERING, PLLC
2 99 = WETLAND IMPACT MAP 7A WENDY CT
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
PRESERVE AT STONE RIDGE
Tel: [phone]
v0 CERTIFICATE N0. P-0826
SCALE: 1"=200' SUBDIVISION www.greenmountainengineers.com

NOTE INTERMITTENT STREAM/ WETLAND IMPACT MAF
1. WETLANDS AND STREAM VERIFIED BY PILOT PRESERVE AT STONE RIDGE
ENVIRONMENTAL INC. WITH USACE AND NCDEQ—DWR ON
NOVEMBER 20, 2016. GREEN MOUNTIAN ENGINEERING, SUBDIVISION
PLLC. FIELD LOCATED THE VERIFIED WETLAND AND
STREAM FLAGS PLACED BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
2. THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE TOWN
OF GIBSONVILLE AS A LOW DENSITY STORMWATER
PROJECT, WITH JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES.
EXISTINGoINTERMITTENT e / /
STRW INVERT: 929.99-
P INVERT: 929.39
y 1 HW -1---,'; 106 LF CULVERT IMPACT
X.CI-15
!y EX.CI-16 \ \
i
i
�t r 18 LF RIP RAP IMPACT, TO BE
KEYED INTO BED AND BANK. /
F /
'
Q / /
/
\ SWMH-10��`
/11 �$p
/ ISTING ITTEi /ry cl-1 B
STR I RT- 32.3
/ PIPE 9 7 /,- CI -24 /
/ HW -2 `v
c TEMPORARY IMPACT
29 LF STREAM COFFER DAM
0.015 AC WETLANDS IMPACT \„�o��j110°����fit,
SCALE: 1"=20' = S
DEVELOPER:
SHUGART ENTERPRISES. LLC
221 JONESTOVMI RD S''''ao,' IN �11v0 J .
f / WINSTON—SALEM. NC 27104 "'',, FA ""nnninmun" ,
CONTACT: GREG GARREIT H ``
I
XI PH: 336.765.9661
- w'-10 I
GREEN MOUNTAIN
ENGINEERING, RLLC
7A WENDY CT
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
Tet: 336.294.9394
CERTIFICATE NO. P-0826
www.greenmountainengineers.com

950
M
+H
O
Q]
.. n Z
940
WING—WALL
EXISTING INTERMITTENT
RCP C
O 2 63 /V
G— WALL
EXISTING INTERMITTENT
DATUM ELEV
926.00
Q0 co O
r7 N-) O
C6 co
O
0+00 0+50 cx) + O
co O
O
SCALE: 1M=4' V INTERMITTENT STREAM/
DEVELOPER: WETLAND IMPACT MAP
SHUGART ENTERPRISES, LLC
221 JONESTOWN RD. PRESERVE AT STONE RIDGE
WNSTON—SALEM. NC 27104
CONTACT. GREG GARRETT SUBDIVISION
PH: 336.765.9661
SCOUR
Es S/,
-
2 999
GREEN MOUNTAIN
ENGINEERING, PLLC
7A WENDY CT
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
Tel: [phone]
CERTIFICATE NO. P-0826
www.greenmountainengineers.com

TOP OF BANK
IMPOUNDED WATER STREAM BOTTOM
TO BE PUMPED
SANDBAG
COFFERDAM ANDBAGS
SECTION A -A VIEW
_TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK A -
FLOW
DIRECTION
EGITO-MOF BANK
TOP OF BANK
PUMP
36" RCP STORM SEWER
ROADWAY
INTAKE
dDBAGS
SANDBAG
COFFERDAM
36" RCP
STORM SEWER
SCALE: NTS
DEVELOPER:
SHUGART ENTERPRISES, LLC
221 JONESTOWN RD.
WINSTON—SALEM, NC 27104
CONTACT. GREG GARRETT
PH: 336.765.9661
r
GENERAL NOTES
1. PLACE SANDBAGS ON ALTERNATING HEADER COURSES
AND STRETCHER COURSES
2. SIZE PUMP ACCORDING TO FLOW
3. SIZE FILTER SOCK ACCORDING TO PUMP CAPACITY
4. AVOID WORK WITfDNN STREAM AREA DURING TMS OF
ANTICIPATED RAINFALL
PLAN VIEW
FILTER SOCK
innunq�"
BAR
= Q:
2 99
INJ
TEMPORARY SANDBAG STREAM GREEN MOUNTAIN
ENGINEERING, �LLC
DIVERSION DETAIL 7AWENDYCT
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
PRESERVE AT STONE RIDGE Tet: 336.294.9394
CERTIFICATE NO. P-0826
SUBDIVISIONwww.greenmountainengineers.com

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.01
Hardwoods
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ®T
Coffer Dam
Bottomland
Hardwoods
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.015
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.025
2h. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact less than 0.01 acres (191 SF) of wetlands associated
with fill for the road crossing. The cofferdam will temporarily impact 0.015 acres of wetlands. Following installation of the
culvert, the coffer dam will be removed and the wetland will be restored to the existing grade.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Culvert/Rip
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
5
106/18/29
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
106/18/29
3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact a cumulative total of 124 linear feet of intermittent
stream channel associated with road crossing fill, including the culvert and rip rap. Of the 124 linear feet of permanent impact,
rip rap will impact 18 linear feet of stream channel. The rip rap is proposed to be keyed in to the stream bed and banks. The
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed residential sub -division to avoid other impact to streams and wetlands, specifically
associated with lot/pad fill. The applicant has further demonstrated avoidance and minimization of stream and wetland
impacts by proposing to construct head and end walls.
The residences will utilize municipal sanitary sewer services and has been designed to avoid impact to jurisdictional features
associated with sewer line connection. The sanitary sewer services will connect to existing sewer lines that cross the site.
The applicant has designed the stream crossing to be buried 6 inches below the existing stream bed elevation to adequately
allow aquatic passage. The remaining approximate 0.175 acres of wetlands and 976 linear feet of stream channel are being
avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and best management practices will be used. A temporary coffer dam will be installed
upgradient of the proposed culvert. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate
stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be
immediately removed from the stream bank crossing area. Upon completion of the culvert installation, the temporary sand
bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert. Following construction, disturbed banks will be
restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version