The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0010689_Staff Report_20190626State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Regional Staff Report FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 1 of 4 June 26, 2019 To: DWR Water Quality Permitting Section Central Office Application No.: WQ0010689 Attn: Troy Doby Regional Login No.: From: Bev Price Asheville Regional Office I. GENERAL SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? Yes or No a. Date of site visit: CEI - June 22, 2018 b. Site visit conducted by: Bev Price c. Inspection report attached? Yes or No CEI is available on Laserfiche d. Person contacted: and their contact information: Corey Carpentier, 828.756.6636 e. Driving directions: Take Hwy. 221 North out of Marion to NCSR 1560 (located behind Baxter – North Cove). The facility is on the left. II. PROPOSED FACILITIES FOR NEW AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS 1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit) 2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? Yes or No If no, explain: 3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? Yes No N/A If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B) DocuSign Envelope ID: 4D55EBA2-77E6-483B-AF98-27CC88A8EA54 FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 2 of 4 III. EXISTING FACILITIES FOR MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS 1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? Yes No N/A ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #: 2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? Yes or No If no, please explain: 3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? Yes or No N/A as the application fields are not permitted. If no, please explain: 4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? Yes or No If yes, please explain: 5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? Yes or No If no, please explain: 6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? Yes or No If no, please explain: 7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? Yes or No If no, please explain: The current permit references a Class B residual – page 1 of the permit. 10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? Yes No N/A If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary): Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ 12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g., NDMR, NDAR, GW)? Yes or No Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: 2019 Annual Report : Corrosivity Method 9045 D was used. Based on the % Moisture (>20%), the method used to determine Corrosivity should be 9040 C. 13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? Yes or No If yes, please explain: 14. Check all that apply: No compliance issues Current enforcement action(s) Currently under JOC Notice(s) of violation Currently under SOC Currently under moratorium Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) 15. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: DocuSign Envelope ID: 4D55EBA2-77E6-483B-AF98-27CC88A8EA54 FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 3 of 4 16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? Yes No N/A If yes, please explain: IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? Yes or No If yes, please explain: 2. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Item Reason 3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: Condition Reason 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued: Condition Reason 5. Recommendation: Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office Issue upon receipt of needed additional information Issue Deny (Please state reasons: ) 6. Signature of report preparer: Signature of APS regional supervisor: Date: DocuSign Envelope ID: 4D55EBA2-77E6-483B-AF98-27CC88A8EA54 6/26/2019 FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 4 of 4 V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS Hazardous Waste Determination: Page 2 Indicates analysis date of 3.14.19 for Corrosivity, Ignitability, Reactivity – There were no results for Ignitability or Reactivity. Both parameters were analyzed in 2018. The incorrect Method (9045 D) was used for Corrosivity. The permit cover letter should include language clarifying which Method(s) should be used for Hazardous Waste Determination. Setback References: The permit lists two different setbacks to surface waters: Page 3: 50 ft. and Page 5: 25 ft. 15A NCAC 02B .0505 – This reference generally refers to NPDES facilities – possibly use the generic 2T reference .0108. The SOP footnote on Attachment A should be reviewed by the permittee and updated if needed. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4D55EBA2-77E6-483B-AF98-27CC88A8EA54 Certificate Of Completion Envelope Id: 4D55EBA277E6483BAF9827CC88A8EA54 Status: Completed Subject: Please DocuSign: 20190626_WQ0010689_STFRPT.docx Source Envelope: Document Pages: 4 Signatures: 2 Envelope Originator: Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Beverly Price AutoNav: Enabled EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) 217 W. Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27699 Bev.Price@ncdenr.gov IP Address: 149.168.204.10 Record Tracking Status: Original 6/26/2019 1:16:10 PM Holder: Beverly Price Bev.Price@ncdenr.gov Location: DocuSign Signer Events Signature Timestamp Beverly Price bev.price@ncdenr.gov North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10 Sent: 6/26/2019 1:17:13 PM Viewed: 6/26/2019 1:17:19 PM Signed: 6/26/2019 1:17:31 PM Freeform Signing Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign G. Landon Davidson landon.davidson@ncdenr.gov Asheville Regional Office, Regional Supervisor DEQ, Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Regional Operatoins Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Uploaded Signature Image Using IP Address: 97.82.231.89 Signed using mobile Sent: 6/26/2019 1:17:32 PM Viewed: 6/26/2019 1:31:22 PM Signed: 6/26/2019 3:44:24 PM Freeform Signing Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp Witness Events Signature Timestamp Notary Events Signature Timestamp Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 6/26/2019 1:17:32 PM Certified Delivered Security Checked 6/26/2019 1:31:22 PM Signing Complete Security Checked 6/26/2019 3:44:24 PM Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Completed Security Checked 6/26/2019 3:44:24 PM Payment Events Status Timestamps