20150525 Ver 1_Emails_20090318

Dorney, John
From: Rob Moul [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:48 PM
To: John Dorney
Cc: John Williams
Subject: RE: OLF questions
John: Yes, I believe that an onsite visit would be best so everyone will be using the same
sheet of music. I want to make sure these sites will work for you and then we can discuss the
monitoring adjustments that give you enough ground water information. John Williams and I
will be the contact persons on our staff. Once you choose a date for the visit I will make
sure we read the automatic data loggers and graph the well data prior to your visit. The
current rainfall bar graphs that correspond to the spikes and draw down rates will be
displayed on the well graphs.
During the last three weeks we have experienced some good rainfall events during cold weather
that should help establish the estimated seasonally high ground water table when compared to
onsite soil profile information and historical normal rainfall totals. Our schedules are
pretty flexible the next few weeks so if you name a date we will be there.
Thanks! Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:19 PM
To: Rob Moul
Cc: Brent Manning; Jon Risgaard; Joanne Steenhuis
Subject: Re: OLF questions
thanks. I'd be glad to talk about the wetland augmentation projects.
Would a site visit be the best way to start?
Rob Moul wrote:
> John: Brent received permission last week from the Navy to send them
out
> to the Corps and your office. I'm out of town but I will ask Brent via
> this email to forward you a copy on Wednesday. The Preliminary maps
will
> be in a scoping summary report which includes the Virginia tracts as
> well.
> When you have some time I would like to discuss the two existing waste
> water projects that would be good candidates for wetland augmentation.
> Both have isolated and damaged headwater pine flat (not Pocosin)
wetland
> types and are owned by public entities (Brunswick County and Surf
City).
> They both have given us approval to install the monitoring wells (our
> cost) during this late winter and early spring in order to get the
> hydro-period and unsaturated soil depth and duration during the early
> growing season. The Brunswick site has its delineation completed and
it
> has existing tertiary treated effluent with drip piping already
1
running
> past the potential candidate wetlands. Don Safrit worked on this
design.
> The Surf City site has been delineated and its design is still in the
> planning stages.
> Best Regards!
> Rob Moul
> Land Management Group
> 910-471-0501
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:51 AM
> To: Rob Moul; Kyle Barnes
> Subject: OLF questions
> I need a copy of the preliminary wetland maps that you boys were
playing
> with in OLF-land. Can someone please send me a scanned version?
thankx
John Dorney
Wetland Program Development Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
(o) 919-733-9646
/E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties./
z
Dorney, John
From: Jon Risgaard [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:54 PM
To: John Dorney
Subject: Re: OLF questions
I'd like to go on any sites visits. Especially if you can guarantee good weather.
John Dorney wrote:
> thanks. I'd be glad to talk about the wetland augmentation projects.
> Would a site visit be the best way to start?
> Rob Moul wrote:
>> John: Brent received permission last week from the Navy to send them
>> out to the Corps and your office. I'm out of town but I will ask
>> Brent via this email to forward you a copy on Wednesday. The
>> Preliminary maps will be in a scoping summary report which includes
>> the Virginia tracts as well.
>> When you have some time I would like to discuss the two existing
>> waste water projects that would be good candidates for wetland augmentation.
>> Both have isolated and damaged headwater pine flat (not Pocosin)
>> wetland types and are owned by public entities (Brunswick County and Surf City).
>> They both have given us approval to install the monitoring wells (our
>> cost) during this late winter and early spring in order to get the
>> hydro-period and unsaturated soil depth and duration during the early
>> growing season. The Brunswick site has its delineation completed and
>> it has existing tertiary treated effluent with drip piping already
>> running past the potential candidate wetlands. Don Safrit worked on this design.
>> The Surf City site has been delineated and its design is still in the
>> planning stages.
>> Best Regards!
>> Rob Moul
>> Land Management Group
>> 910-471-0501
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Monday, March
>> 16, 2009 11:51 AM
>> To: Rob Moul; Kyle Barnes
>> Subject: OLF questions
>> I need a copy of the preliminary wetland maps that you boys were
>> playing
>> with in OLF-land. Can someone please send me a scanned version?
>> thankx
Jon Risgaard - Supervisor, Land Application Unit Aquifer Protection Section - Land
Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-715-6167
919-715-6048 FAX
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
DISCLAIMER: Per Executive Order No. 150, all a-mails sent to and from this account are
subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2